UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:001 turns
Thank you very much.
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
And before we approve the agenda, I just wanted to say a few quick words of thank you and gratitude for last night. I'd like to thank everyone who showed up last night for this special meeting. Several people came up to me during or after the meeting were so pleased at the tone and behavior in the meeting It's been a group effort and a huge learning opportunity. So I want to thank my four council members, we've all worked long and hard on that issue and we've learned a lot.
I'd like to thank the staff for allowing the meeting to happen making everything so nice. And I'd like to thank Chief Newman. Thank you so much for riding this wave with us. You're amazing, so flexible thoughtful and present to our city attorney who's always there ready to advise And to our new city manager, it's no coincidence that things are running smoother since you started. And as a team we are constantly refining what we do so leadership truly is collaboration.
It's easy to criticize the council meetings for being toxic and use that excuse not to show up. We need people to show up, to listen and to model civility and respect. Last night for the most part was a great example of civil discourse on a very challenging topic. People really listened and there was very little attacking finger pointing or side comments that changed everything.
This is what we need here and everywhere. This is the daily practice of peace, so let's be a beacon of peace and focus on policy and not personality. This is the Ojai that we all want, and so let's be the change. Thank you for listening. Is there a motion to approve the agenda? No, you go ahead. I'm going
to approve
it. I'll second. All in favor?
Aye. Okay, wonderful and we have a brief introduction from our Assistant City Manager Carl Alameda. We're very excited to have a new management analyst named Will so thank you Will for being here.
Thank you Mayor. So i'm happy to introduce our new management analyst that recently started for us in the city manager's office Will Pettner So Will actually comes to us from north of the border. He worked in Canada for the Ontario Public Service Department for a few years, Prior to going back home to Canada for a short stint, he worked in a couple cities in California. So we are his third city agency.
He previously worked for the City of Pasadena as a management analyst in their public health department during the heighth of the COVID-19 pandemic where he led a team of over 50 disaster service workers setting up vaccination clinics throughout the City of Pasadena. Prior to that, he worked for the City of La Cuneta Flintridge and our Public Works Department Leading their budget development efforts, grants and also implemented a public asset inventory which was the first for the agency using their GIS system.
He is an alumni where he got his MPA from University of Southern California in his undergrad degree from the University of Mary North Dakota. where he also was a star baseball player and attended on a baseball scholarship. So we welcome Will to the team, and we're excited to work with him. He's going to be leading a lot of our budget development efforts and some special projects like the EFR grant for the encampment.
Wonderful thank you Carl, and welcome Will! What position did you play?
Nice.
Okay, all right well we will move on to presentation. We have a progress report on the formation and activity of the Mayor's Youth Council and I would just like to have a big thank you to co-chairs Chris Engel, Kathy Hodgkiss, and Peggy Grunert for coordinating. I'm really really grateful for you We're lucky to have you, thank you. And I'm also grateful to AirPizza owner Terry Karabatas for hosting us he opens AirPizza on his night off and makes everybody pizza which is really really generous and also to the students for showing up so thank you all for being here very excited and grateful for your attendance and we can't wait to hear what you have to say it's been super rewarding and you are truly inspiring So we have a presentation from three of the members of the Mayor's Youth Council, Alma, Scout and Avery.
Come on up and welcome!
Hello, I'm Scout Mortensen. I'm a junior at Ojai Valley School and I've been working with our Mayor's Youth Council periodically once a month. We've been brainstorming in small groups to find possible solutions for the issues that mean the most to us in our community. We have 27 people from each of six schools, Besant Hill, Nordoff, Ojai Valley School, Oak Grove, Thatcher and Villanova who come together in hopes of having our voices heard.
I personally am interested in homelessness because I grew up in Seattle so it's really difficult for me to go back to where I'm from and see that this issue has grown. It's becoming a concern now in our own community My small group has been coming up with solutions for this issue in Ojai, and you'll hear about that later. We're all very lucky for you guys to be here and be hearing us. And thank you so much. And this is Avery.
Hello City Council, my name is Avery and I am a day student at Thatcher. The Mayor Youth Council has been so much fun! I love spending time getting to know and connecting with the other like-minded high school students from around the Valley who are just as passionate about building sustainable and just communities as I am. Once every month we consider how as local high school students we can make our town and the world a better place. We have also been fortunate enough to learn from several incredible guest speakers at our meetings, including Council Member Rachel Lang, Jane Walter from the Help of Ojai, Jacob Shaw from PETA who I believe you'll be hearing from later this evening. Michelle Elston on greenhouse gas emissions, Abra Stewart from Climate Replacing Oil and Gas and Ray Powers of Ojai City of Peace.
We also routinely hear profound insights from Terry, the owner of Air Pizza who offers his words of wisdom in between rolling out each pizza dough for the group. Beyond the fantastic food and welcoming environment I am so grateful for this experience to learn from my peers and experts. I cannot wait for our next meeting and hearing more brilliant creative solutions to the problems that plague Ojai and our world.
And this is Alma. Okay.
Hello, my name is Amo Kibo and I'm a junior at the Thatcher School being a part of the Mayor's Youth Council has been a phenomenal experience so far as members connect with like minded high school students and shared different perspectives on how to impact our community and beyond positively. We have had the opportunity to meet and listen to great speakers like Andrew Jelani, an education advocate for refugees and immigrants. He highlighted the importance of connecting and unifying youth voices which aligns with the goal of the Mayor's Youth Council. My voice and opinions are heard and amplified. I can talk to the Ojai Council and advocate for positive change from the youth perspective.
I look forward to more incredible opportunities and insightful conversations. So, if you're a high school student interested in participating in change and working with our local government and peers to strengthen different movements please join the Ojai Youth Council. Additionally, I look forward to listening to some of our peers' speeches today in the general public section. Thank you.
Thank you so much Ama, Scout, and Avery. Beautiful. All right, we will move on to public communication. And so we'll begin with Barbie Kafka Kafka.
Okay, good evening. I'm Bobby Skafka and I hope you will all understand me when I speak. Don't raise your hand because I want to know that you understand me. Okay, I am here to talk about the unhoused and I think it's a very important thing to talk about this so if I can make some suggestions I think for our community it would be a brilliant idea to have a shower, washroom and dryer installed in these buildings as parking lots to provide the services needed for the unhoused.
There are people here who have problems working.
0:10 – 0:166 turns
There would be love within the community. The office room ought to be open on the weekend as a holiday. There is a woman who has health issues and she is willing to have a spare key to watch the coffee room over the weekend and the holidays. We would be able to have our own, you know, as people. This would be so helpful. It is necessary. I noticed that in one of the buildings here, there is a dining room and a kitchen.
We ought to use that room. There would be more space. It would help having the kitchen to make our meal. The food can't be put into the cabinets. Although I noticed, I just wanted to prove my name in the community. Outside there is a real problem with smoking close to the coffee room. It's really a lot of secondhand smoking so I was kind of concerned You need to do something, get rid of the secondhand smoking. It's too close to the coffee room door when it opens!
And I think it would be a good idea to move back past that beautiful patio and have lunch chairs for them to sit there so they can sit further away from the coffee room.
Microphone, please.
There's a button on the base that will turn on a light.
So, I think it would be a good idea that we do that. I hope that we can do this and the Council will compose that. But I pray that we can have women like Willie come about to spare a key so we can have the coffee room open on weekends and at the holidays It would be much better. It really helps. I think it's a good idea to have the coffee room open, so this is what I'm asking and I hope it will work out. Okay um I'm not finished there are more ideas that I want to help out But I would like, I'm happy for all of them to have some chairs and a lot more things to keep.
You know, like about deaf children and hearing children to learn sign. I will get into that later but today I just wanted to start out more at the under house and I think it's a good idea right here in the community to be more of a seed for this community which would help us to have proper relocated. I think it's a good idea Thank you, Barbie. Yes, yes, Barbie. Barbie.
Okay,
I just want to thank Barbie for your written comment. And I will ask the city clerk to be sure to forward it to Rick rain and to make it a public comment.
Thank you. Thank you, Barbie. Next we have Rachel Hunt and Ama Akibbo and I think it's Avery Lee.
0:16 – 0:216 turns
Hi, I'm Rachel hunt. And I'm here to basically just support the suggestions that Barbie made recently like on the for laundry, a lot of the members Can't access the program that's laundry love, which is a wonderful program. But it's hard like she says because of disabilities. It's not accessible to them so I've been coming here and picking up campers and laundry and taking it. And laundry love has been working with me but it's, it's becoming like even more burdensome. One option would be providing transportation on those days and working with laundry love to have like maybe like a van or something that helps transport them back otherwise I agree with her that it seems like there'd be enough space to put something like that here.
And also with regarding to the coffee room, having that open on the weekends because like most currently with the last storm I mean no one had a way to heat up their food. To just kind of get out of the rain for a little bit and something more comfortable like she said she mentioned the woman with health issues. She has volunteered to help hold the key. I know her, I would trust that she would be responsible to do that. She's been a longtime member of Ojai community and her children live in the town, but unfortunately can't have her live there, but it would really be a huge benefit to her. And then lastly like she mentioned the cigarette butts so you know No offense to cigarette smokers, everybody makes those choices but it shouldn't be affecting other people's health and also too just the overall morale.
It kind of sets a bad tone. And so we know we have the campers that smoke I've encouraged them to go off property, but it's kind of hard to encourage them when we have staff members smoking right there continually. Right in front of the elderly people. And so we have staff members involved in this project that are doing that maybe they could be encouraged, everybody could be encouraged to go off site to go smoke cigarettes.
So I think that's all for today and anything I can help with to meet their needs you can reach out to me or whatever however though because I love to support them, I consider them my friends and family.
Thank you, Rachel. All right next we have Ama then Avery and then Carlos.
Hello, I am a 16-year old and I worry about not having enough water. I grew up in Nigeria with these same concerns and never thought that these would be the same fears I'll have here. Climate change does not discriminate it affects us all rich poor brown white straight gay old and young my name is Amo Okibo and i'm a junior at the Thatcher School and I'm a part of the Mayor's Youth Council I want to inform this audience about California's rising drought and water scarcity concerns. Ojai might lose its essential resources if nothing drastic is done. Currently, 4 billion people, almost two-thirds of the world's population are affected by water scarcity daily. In these water deprived areas there is an increase in the destruction of wildlife, increased poverty, higher likelihood of diseases, economic decline, and many other atrocities that come from water scarcity.
Ojai has already experienced water scarcity as its residents had to live with a mandatory water conservation plan. But recently, Ojai has been blessed with so much rainfall some may argue that we are drowning from all the rainfall. Lake Casitas is now 72% full and Ojai has never looked greener or blossomed this well. So my speech today raises a cautionary alarm. While many countries bear the costs and pains of water scarcity, its effects may be worse in Ojai for several reasons. California serves its direct districts from groundwater. However, years of unregulated pumping means California's groundwater is running out. Additionally, California is highly farmable and surrounded by invasive species with low rainfall rates the state could become a dried up desert Ojai should take these unusual water abundance seriously.
The city should practically promote environmental sustainability, ensure economic stability and build a resilient community. The Ojai Council should seek to manage demand by advocating for effective household water usage. Ojai schools should continue to create programs that teach the students about the risks of water scarcity and the importance of saving water. For instance, a county could have a Save Water Week during which it will share a lot of information about water usage effectively in homes. These are all temporary solutions to reduce the demand for water.
Ojai is one of the most beautiful places on earth. We cannot afford to lose this beauty to draw on the possibility of water scarcity. We can start today to do something about it. Thank you.
Thank you. And just a reminder to everyone well we cannot discuss these, we can agendize these items for future and we really appreciate your comments so thank you know that. Okay next we have Avery then Carlos, and then Suki saying.
Hello, I came here to talk about the homeless issue as well like Barbie. But as I heard from the two speakers before me, I'm not nearly as well informed about this issue as they are. And I just know that in our Youth Council meetings we've been discussing this issue and possible solutions and I just come here to say that I think it should be a topic of discussion for the future so thank you very much.
Thank you Avery Next we have Carlos, then Suki and then Julie.
0:22 – 0:3115 turns
Good evening, my name is Carlos Ochoa. I'm in 11th grade. I attended Thatcher School and am a member of the Ojai Mary Youth Council. The problem I am addressing today is the current need for a formal right to housing policy to be developed by the city of Ojai. Currently there are around 30 homeless individuals living outside of City Hall who require and need guaranteed proper access to housing and funding But this is only a small fraction of citizens without housing security. There are more living in poverty throughout the city of Ojai. Homelessness is a problem that is faced all over the world.
Homeless citizens cannot afford housing, nor can they even find opportunities for employment because whenever they apply to jobs, they need to have a required quote-unquote home address in their application. I have witnessed a lot of homelessness before, being an individual who has grown and raised in the city of Chicago which has hundreds to thousands of homeless.
My goal is to improve the state of Ojai and deliver recommendations that can combat this issue. As a result there are multiple actions that could be taken to decrease homelessness My proposal for you is to explore many options, including construction of a new residential building. Not only to blend into the traditional or popular architectural styles of Ojai but also to mainly supply homeless people with shelter and care.
If this project ever becomes unpopular we could always plan to sell or repurpose the building and donate those funds toward the unhoused Please take time to consider this proposal. I also advocate for installing more tents, which whenever needed for the unhoused individuals who desperately need housing and warmth. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals ranks poverty at the top of their list. Assisting our own local unhoused population will get Ojai one step closer to achieving this objective. Thank you.
Thank you, Carlos. And we appreciate your applause if you could hold those though and just You have appreciation. Thank you. Suki, and then I think it's Jolie. Did I say that wrong? I'm sorry. And then Leanna.
Good evening, I am a boarding student at Besant Hill School and a member of the Mayor's Youth Council. I wanted to share my opinions and views on an issue here present in Ojai. I will be touching on the topic of glue traps today and my own opinions on why the council should consider banning the distribution and use of glue traps
I'm really sorry. That's an agenda that's on the agenda later this evening, and this is general public comment no no no worries. Do you want to make a general public comment or do you want to save it for later I know you have to get back per exam.
Um, I don't have any comments.
Okay sorry. Can
we make an
exception? No no i'm sorry uh okay but we'll talk about that next meeting and we'll fill
you in. And mayor she
of
course could, sorry to interrupt, she could submit some written comments which the council could read.
Yeah Suki you can always send us a letter so if you want to take your comment and send it in then we can all read it that would be really we would appreciate that thank you so much for being here um okay uh surely so I can't What's your, did I read it wrong? Okay. Thank you.
Hello my name is Juliana Dupree and I'm from Berlin Germany. I'm a sophomore at Doesn Hill School and I'm part of Mayor's Youth Council. Thank you for inviting us to speak on an issue of utmost importance the unaddressed threat of water scarcity in our beloved city Ojai. We are facing a future where water, our most precious resource could become a rare commodity. It's a future that seems unimaginable yet is a real possibility if we do not act now.
California is no stranger to a drought yet it is returning the feature of our climate Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego and San Francisco Bay Area already have a shortage in water so we can't afford for Ojai to be next. Ojai is a place in which people live in nature and on indigenous land all of the native plants and animals need to be in a good climate to live and succeed If our community goes through with water scarcity, it will threaten our ecosystem.
We must start taking steps towards sustainable water use. We can do this by implementing water conservation measures, investing in rainwater harvesting, green soil planting and promoting education about water scarcity. More specific So measures that we can take are installing gray water recycling systems in city buildings to reduce water extractions from Lake Tresidas.
On average, a greywater system can save about 2,600 gallons of water per year. This would be a step in the right direction and could inspire homeowners to do the same. Additionally, if not done so already, drip immigration systems can be installed on public lands. This would prevent much water loss by reducing evaporation and runoff. The installation of these systems is also very easy in making this realistic plan.
Every drop of water we save today is an investment in our future. Let's work together to ensure that the future generations of Ojai residents will have access to clean, safe and abundant water. Thank you for listening.
Thank you, Jolie. Next, we have Leanna McNally and then Alula Alderson and then Leon.
Hi, my name's Leanna McNeely and I live in the house adjacent to the city hall parking lot. First of all, I need to go off topic and just say these kids are amazing. I'm so impressed with them. I have a few comments regarding the encampment behind City Hall. In early December census and survey was taken of those in the encampment to determine the numbers and the most critical needs of the population. At that time there were 26 people camped behind City Hall And the campus was theoretically close to new campers with a sign posted to that effect. Shortly after the closure, several more homeless relocated to the City Hall encampment bringing the number to 32.
Early this month, the city erected eight wilderness tents with plans for four more as a temporary measure to shield the most vulnerable of the homeless. As soon as these tents were occupied, at least two more men previously residing in Rotary Park have joined the encampment over the weekend new campers surfaced at Clough Park. In January, the city applied for a grant to put 18 to 20 permanent tiny homes on the Kent Hall lot. The 10 to 20 people included in the census but not moved into the tiny homes will be housed at motels until they are able to make the move to more permanent housing. The grant proposes eight more people will require services before the end of the grant period. That number as of this week is already close to being met two years before the end of the grant period.
That plan has several other identifiable issues. It will cost the city by a conservative estimate over $27,000 a month for motels for the first 10 people served. It will cost the city an additional $22,000 per month conservatively for shelter for the already eight accounted for in the grant that is almost $50,000 dollars a month. The grant application states the city is working with the county for permanent placement.
I don't know that there is permanent placement in the City of Ojai, and the city hasn't shared where that magical placement will be. There are nights when there are people sleeping in cars, four or more cars on many nights. There's always at least one in the lot next to my home 10 feet from my house. Lower Libby lot has a handful of campers every single night. It's obvious that the need is much greater than the proposed solution. Chasing grant money is a recipe for creating a patchwork of inadequate solutions that will ultimately cost the city more in maintenance and be less effective And because the current plan does not address even today's needs, it will result in a growing encampment behind City Hall for the foreseeable future. I challenge the city to have a greater vision.
Adopt a more realistic plan for housing this vulnerable population, one that would shelter those currently in need of housing, one that could grow to meet the inevitable growing demand
0:31 – 0:365 turns
Thank you, Leanna. We've got to keep moving I'm sorry next we have a Lula and then Leon and then David Chapman.
Hello, my name is Alula Alderson and I'm a senior at Ojai Valley School. For the past few months, I have had the opportunity of being part of the Mayor's Youth Council. It has allowed me to learn about local government and the various ways I can contribute to effecting change in my community. Today I would like to talk to you about e-bike safety in the Ojai Valley. Several months ago, my best friend was riding her e-bike when she was hit by a car and broke her leg. Since the accident she has undergone three surgeries and is yet to fully recover. I have seen her endure intense physical pain but equally as agonizing emotional pain as dance is one of her greatest passions.
Countless teenagers in Ojai ride e-bikes to get around. It's easy, efficient and eco-friendly however when used unsafely I've seen firsthand the harm that can result. You don't need a license registration or insurance to ride an e-bike however there are certain rules to abide by. In California the operator of a class 3 bicycle which reaches 28 miles per hour must be at least 16 years old must wear a helmet and must not transport passengers I frequently see e-bike riders in Ojai disregarding these laws, and it concerns me greatly. I urge the City Council to consider ways e-bike safety might be improved in our valley.
The local police department could take a more active approach toward enforcing the aforementioned state laws. Alongside this, a fine could be introduced and signs posted throughout downtown Ojai. Another idea would be to host e-bike safety educational workshops. On behalf of Ojai's youth, I urge the council to address the pressing issue that is e-bike safety. Thank you for your time.
Thank you Alula. Next we have Leon then David Chapman and then Carol Wade.
Good evening City Council my name is Leon Naran. I didn't write anything down because I'm going to speak from the heart. I'm going to speak for the low income people, the real locals here at Ojai I was going to speak about the new bike path that's being built in Oak View. I know you guys probably don't have much control of that or maybe you do, I don't know but the local people, the people that live here and they're living paycheck-to-paycheck, people that can't find jobs here in Ojai because there are so little job opportunities here have to travel down to Ventura and spend gas money to go to work.
These people Work and keep working and living paycheck to paycheck. And having to go to bonds, having to go to other places just so they can shop when they can be perfectly fine shopping here. But you're supporting the Ojai Valley and tourists in the LA people that come here to have a fun weekend. So they could get drunk at and the old high pub. You are putting the interests of tourists 1st over the local people.
And I'll move on from that when these kids talk about the homelessness and. All that, I can bet you money that none of these kids actually talked to any of those people over there individually in a human to human level. Well, I have I have sat and drink and smoke with these people over at the arcade back before he banned them. And I just saw how they're living here.
Why are you giving these people houses and taxpayer money? These people put themselves in that situation. They, you are encouraging and enabling these individuals And to just keep doing drugs and all that, and drinking. I know one person here, two people here specifically that are alcoholics and they drink all the time and I've drank with them. And I have actually helped these people. I have invited one of them to my home, an individual who died last year named Jeff Gore who lived here in Ojai.
Who used to have a house here in Ojai, but then became homeless. He I invited over to my house and let him shower. I gave him food. I gave him shelter and I helped him. You don't save the world by helping a whole group of people and stupid shit or stupid ass up my back. You help the world by helping 1 man at a time and showing that man kindness or woman who And showing them kindness so then they know that there's not some, so much evil and disingenuousness in the world.
Show them that there is kindness in the world and they will hopefully show kindness back. This is disgusting. Your non-existent leadership. The men here not being men. Thank you.
Thank you Leon. Next we have David Chapman, then Carol Wade, and then Bill Hecht.
0:36 – 0:414 turns
David Chapman, tonight I want to talk to you some more about the homeless encampment here at City Hall. The lower areas of the encampment based on our observations are still a mess with bags of trash everywhere even though trash bins have been provided by the city. We have observed that the new wilderness tents have belongings stacked outside the tents even though the storage huts have been provided by the city As the previous speaker Leanna had noted, we see that the camp is expanding. We know two new occupants have arrived and possibly a third, the naked guy from the Clough Vista Park that was reported on next door.
Looking at the park this morning, that person has moved on and is likely to move down to the camp. These additions indicate that the city is not going to or has a capability to manage the number of occupants as even more move in. On the sanitation side, one of my neighbours found a dead rat outside their house the other day. The rat issue is still an issue for local residents in the surrounding neighbourhoods.
It is clear from those of us who have seen homeless encampments insidiously grow over time that developing a strategic approach needs to be developed by the city The homeless issue, as you all know is complex. Our city administration I think it's out of their depth on this issue due to the complexity and the fact that it is new to Ojai. And I fear that will, that the city will end up making a series of bad decisions repeating the errors that other well-intended cities have made. Thank you.
Thank you David. Next we have Carol Wade and then Bill Hacks.
Hello. Thank you very much for being here. I have a great deal of appreciation for all of you, it feels as though i've spent a lot of time here lately and I have watched you as you listen and contemplate and work through many different issues sometimes well sometimes not as well but you work hard as you try to do that and I really want to acknowledge that and appreciate that so I am coming specifically today to say thank you for this journey that we've been on concerning the ceasefire now resolution.
Over a period of, I think four months we worked on this or people came forward to talk about this from both sides and I want to acknowledge that it was not an easy time for any of us It was a journey, and with any journey we go up and down and up and down. It felt like there was a great deal of that from week to week and month to month but I want to say that it was also very inspiring to watch as very desperate opinions came and the that you listened Even though there was no way to find a middle ground necessarily, you listened and you listened well as more and more people came forth. And I know that that was not an easy thing to do. I appreciate that and I'm glad that it made me once again believe in democracy.
I mean, obviously I vote or maybe not so obviously but there are things that I've been doing for a long time as a citizen of the United States and certainly a citizen of Ojai. Sometimes it feels as though it's worthless to do those things but when we work on a grassroots level if not there where you know like it felt especially important to talk about an issue that is actually something that the whole world is facing because we're all impacted by the conflict and the horror that's happening in Palestine. And I think that over this course of time, the fact that we could bring it to home, bring the realization that this does impact us Was really meaningful for me, so I felt compelled to come this night to acknowledge you and to say thank you.
You have kind of a Solomon job and I'm not, I don't think that I could do it but I do so appreciate that you do thanks.
Thank you Carol next we have Bill Hack
0:41 – 0:465 turns
Hi, 40 years plus my wife and I started a practice in our with our young family. Something that we call thankfuls and we were still doing it today and a thankful is where we would often do it at dinnertime during dinner or the end of dinner And we'd ask everyone at the table to go around and share something that they were thankful for. And one of the beauties of this, you could be having a terrible day and life just sucks but when you stop and just think for a moment well what's something that... let me see if I can pull something out of my hat that i'm really thankful for And we would do it, we'd always find something and the sucky day would suddenly get better. It wasn't as bad.
So this is something I want to kind of suggest the City Council consider putting a ceremony like this into your practice It's a great way to bring people together and you share, sometimes you're sharing your challenges and then how you have found solutions. But it can be very simple things like we had one of our kids one time she just didn't feel like doing it that night and she said I'm thankful for the color red And, you know, it was as simple as that. So I'm here tonight like Carol to express my gratitude with the process that happened with the city council around the ceasefire.
The ceasefire group basically got what we wanted, and I'm very grateful for that. But I'm grateful for the process that something like this is very contentious and it's not easy to come to some kind of resolution. And I think that in a matter of four months, that's what happened. We came to kind of a consensus and a resolution. And I was also very impressed that the decision that was made last night did not feel like it was a political decision. It felt like it came from a place of conscience, that after the preponderance of the information I feel like the three of you that voted for it, you came to a point where I can accept this, right? I can vote for this in clear conscience and I'm very thankful that process took place Kind of what I'm expressing is back in the 70s during the peace movement, we had a saying called there is no way to peace.
Peace is the way and that's what I think happened here. Thank you very much for all you do.
Thank you Bill and we have one more Robert Lofman
Good evening, my name is Robert Loffman. I was born and raised here, all right? And I know this is a lot of everything that's going on is because of me. Let me tell you this, because I'm a smart man, I just put a paper there and I'm gonna put you on notice, okay? Because Senate Bill 1380 for the California says housing is a fundamental right for all of us Okay.
United States Code, Section 18 Title 18, Section 241 is a deprivation of rights under the color of law. Title 18, United States Code, Title 18 Section 242 is a conspiracy to deprive us of those rights. I'm telling you When I try to be mean, follow the law. We're human. We have the same rights as you do when you go to sleep at night and in your warm bed, you get to go to the bathroom, we have running water and electricity. We deserve those same rights.
It's in the law. Look it up. Thank you.
Thank you, Robert. Mr. Mr city clerk. Are there any comments online.
Yes Mayor we do have one raised hand on zoom. Brian Martinez Valdez Brian you have the opportunity to unmute and speak
0:46 – 0:5426 turns
Hi, I hope you all can hear me. Dear Council, my name is Marty Valdez and I'm a senior at the Thatcher School. I'm currently taking the Building Sustainables Community class along with Carlos and Avery and we believe this council should focus on the right to housing. Throughout humanity having a shelter has been a main priority for humans because it affects every aspect of our life. It affects our physical mental and emotional well-being As of currently, 2023 from what I've researched there are around 45 unhoused people in Ojai. That's almost as much people that are in this room or what I think are in this room right now.
Now, I want us to imagine those 45 people here today. What would we tell them? And how would we say we're helping them? What plans are in place? Now I can imagine we're feeling some sort of way whether somber from this information or empathetic or energetic and getting this work started I myself live in Los Angeles with a gigantic unhoused population and walk by many unhoused people every day.
Here in Ojai, we have the potential chance to be one of the first cities to eradicate this problem. And I propose that we do some research first whether it be from the government or ourselves as a class and which ways we could help. My class has already done a little of this and we hope to put this theory into practice From there we can start making moves to combat this problem. There are many solutions, too many in fact such as housing first rent caps and tiny homes just to name a few however as of now there have been none to very little widespread action the government has taken to address this epidemic right now is the time for that and we as a youth movement have so much power in helping our friends who are unused who are unhoused at this moment We have many solutions, but I think the first step would be doing something the government does and doesn't really do anymore.
And this means going to everyday people, to the masses, to the homeless population and talking to them and organizing with them. We cannot just be dealing with this problem without knowing their stories, hearing their opinions or input on what affects them directly. Once we do this, we can accurately find out how to fix this dire situation I think from here, another solution is going off of what Carlo said is setting up a governmental building with the right to housing and having an experiment with this project and having people live in it. I think we can show Ojai what we can do for the betterment of our community and be an example for the rest of California. Thank you so much.
Thank you, Marty. That's it? That's it Mayor. Okay thank you very much that concludes public comment we will move on to the consent calendar is there a motion to approve
I'll move to
approve it. Is this where I pull an item yeah thank you
so I would like to pull sorry
can we just give the kids a hand
yes thank you
thank you thank you so much for coming wonderful
I think it's item I, Council Member.
Yes, I think you are correct. I would like to pull Item I. Item I? Okay. Thank you. Anything else?
Is there a motion to approve everything other than I?
I'll do it. Everything but I. Second? I'll
second.
All in favor? Aye. Council Member Ruhl?
Thank you. So I have heard from a couple of constituents, and this makes perfect sense to me that we carve out something like we did for the rent stabilization. In other words, for people who live in their homes who would like to go away for a month or two and rent their home out either for whatever reason whether it's Traveling nurses or, you know, it's that is the only way they can afford to take a vacation. Whatever it is. In other words, if someone lives in their home owns their home, I think that we should carve out an exception for them around the rental minimum being three months. I mean, the situation would be I want to go away for a month or two and I would like to rent out my house so that I actually can do that And we did it for instabilization.
So I would like to propose that we also do it in this particular instance for owner occupied homes, you know who would like to go. We put in and Matt wrote up some language for me so I can read it and see if it is acceptable To the council, it seems to me that otherwise we're being prohibitive around allowing people the right to do what they would like to do with their property to no real benefit to this city.
So I will read it. And as mentioned, this is basically the same that we put in for the rent stabilization. So it would be added to section 4-2404. This prohibition does not...
Can we have a moment to find it?
What
did you say?
No, I'm reading it from something Matt sent me. Oh,
but
do you want us to...?
It's on page 5 of 7 of Attachment A, the ordinance
Thank
you,
Pat. Page 5 of 7 and at the top
yeah 424-2404. Okay thank you. And it would just simply carve out it would say the prohibition also does not apply to rentals of residential real property for at least one month occupied by the landlord or their spouse domestic partner children grandchildren parents Or grandparents for at least 6 months before a fixed term tenancy of at least 1 month. And for which the landlord or their spouse, domestic partner children, grandchildren parents, or grandparents have a good faith intent to reoccupy the unit after the conclusion of tendency as affirmed by the landlord in written affidavit submitted to the city.
And so Matt, if you would like to speak to that or if the council has any questions. It basically is this is the same idea for and I guess I am repeating myself for owner occupied homes people who'd like to go away for a month and rent out their home. I can't see why they should not be allowed to do that. Or I mean, you know it seems prohibitive to me. To say that they're not allowed to do that and I've heard from 3 constituents who, um, you know, they do that we're an older population.
You know, especially in my district, and the ability to have some flexibility in working with potentially your only or your major. That is the addition that I would like to make so I would now pass it to Matt, and any questions that the council may have for for him.
0:54 – 1:0011 turns
To allow rentals of at least a month so this would not allow the shorter, shorter rentals. It's rentals have released a month that would be by a property owner or related family member who would occupy the unit before and after it's in that window, a rental of at least a month but of any fixed length that wouldn't have to be the minimum three months. That they could then rent it for, and that would be exempt from the rest of short rental prohibition. Right now they can do that because the prohibition applies. It's a minimum 1 month rental.
So if you rented say for 2 months, that's okay as you know, the ordinance is revised would require a minimum 3 month rentals in the default case so somebody wanted to rent a place for 2 months. That would not be possible, but for this exemption being added to the situation at issue and the requirement for owner on for the landlord or their defined family members to have occupied the place. At least six months in advance.
should serve to block investors or people just buying it. Enforcement is always a challenge, of course but that's where the requirements for the affidavit is in place if a complaint is received or concerns are received with city and its enforcement process notices a problem we can go to the landlord and say all right where's your affidavit? Where's your proof? And then put them in the enforcement process if needed thank you.
Thank you Mr. City Attorney any questions or comments from council Yeah, I'm sorry. No comments. Mayor pro tem. I'm sorry you're gonna have to stay quiet. Thank you.
So mine is a comment and actually I also was going to pull by on another issue but we'll address this one first. My comment is that. Before I became interested in this issue, I thought that this could be a good idea too. But the more I talked with people about it, the more I was convinced that it created enforcement issues that would make it extremely difficult to enforce the core principle that we're trying solve.
And unfortunately, Ojai just really isn't very good at enforcing things and so to create windows of non-enforcement is a problem
Okay, any member to go through the mayor any other questions or concern.
Tell him that if he can do a public comment card.
That's already happened. So
yes, so you know,
I'm sorry sir if you continue to talk and we're gonna have to ask you to leave. This is not time for public comment. Thank you. You can come back to the next meeting and fill out a card again and speak, thank you.
Okay so I'm interested in considering this because here is the truth people are going to do it anyway but they're going to do it and people are...I don't want people to feel like they're how do I say this The whole short-term rental thing only became a problem when it became so commercialized. When I've had long leases, I've always been in the room, short term, long term, usually to friends. There were no issues, no problems.
There are people in Ojai who've been doing short-term, long-term rentals for the last 40 years. Neighbors don't notice it because it's not advertised on an Airbnb site. You're talking about doing something that's not going to be advertised. We could make it so that it's not advertised. That is not gonna be advertised, right? So that alone limits it. And most people that are gonna go on vacation, it's almost like you're getting a paid house sitter. The person that you're renting to is gonna take care of your plants, pick up your mail, take care of your dog. That's gonna go on whether we make it legal or not.
Am I missing the point or is this part of the picture?
Let's no crosstalk, please. Let's go through the mayor. Any other comments from Council Member Lange?
Yeah, so I really hear what you're saying and I hear that this is going to happen anyway. And I mean, I hear all of those things and It if we make, if we make it. If we express that there's any kind of leeway or there's any kind of opening or flexibility I think it's something and we know that there's not a lot of enforcement. I think it's, I think it could lead to a slippery slope And, and this is something that I had not considered so I would need to have some time to think about it. But I think the thing I'm concerned about is that that in communities where Where short-term rentals are something that is allowed, I just think it creates an opening that I don't know how we would enforce. And I also think that it would create a slippery slope.
1:00 – 1:1021 turns
It's my turn. I'm going to agree with Mayor Pro Tem
and
Council Member Lange, I think it is a slippery slope and I think we've had so many issues with enforcement in the past we are looking at better ways to enforce and that was what we talked about in the meeting and I just think it opens up a can of worms That's where I'm feeling we do have one public comment card that just came in, or to public council. Well we're supposed to take all the comments
back to discussion.
Yes. Okay, so let's go ahead and do Larry's.
Larry Steingold, citizen voter and short-term rental interested. The idea to prevent them is not difficult. The willpower to actually really prohibit them and the amount of money invested in the personnel takes the effort. In my past life, we used to have to game the real estates. The way to get things done you have to sort of game it because everything is a no so we're trying to get the yes. If you leave an escape valve so that there are a few exceptions You know, it's better to have somebody come into the city and say look I'm renting it to my uncle for a month.
Okay otherwise the penalty has to be exorbitant and make it exorbitant but you leave an exception where somebody is willing to come in for $10 and they go look I am renting it to my uncle fine. I'm a homeowner. But if you don't make the penalty high enough, everybody's going to try to beat the system. So you've got the 1,000, the 5,000 whatever, but you're going to leave an escape system. Somebody is going to be able to rent my house and want to go away for a month.
But how do you do it easily? That's the problem. It just takes will and the money and the enforcement in the organization in the process. Either you've got to prohibit it all the way and then let some air out So,
thank you Larry. Next we have Anita Cram.
Thank you. I think you're creating loopholes that people are gonna try to game the system no matter what, and the more opportunities you give them to do that, the more it will happen. So I would strongly stand in opposition to it because I think the problem has gotten so difficult. We've talked about homelessness tonight and many avenues, and this is a big part of it, that our homes have been commoditized You know, it's a situation where I've owned homes in other cities, other states. I never would have considered renting it out as a part to pay my mortgage and I think that with home ownership there comes responsibility to the neighborhood and the community and I don't think this is a good idea. Thank you.
Thank you, Anita. All right we will return to oh I'm sorry.
Mayor if i may let's extend the opportunity for public comment on this polled consent item 1i to our zoom participants thank you so much. Zoom participants we have a polled consent item 1i. We'll just give a brief moment for any of you to raise your hands and we do have one raised hand from Teal Rowe followed by Roseanne Bonavito. Teal Rowe you have the floor?
Thank you, Weston. I'm with Anita and I think that this is a really bad idea. Thank you.
Thank you too.
Next we have Roseanne. Roseanne, you have the opportunity to speak. Roseanne please unmute if you would like. We'll give you one more chance. And no action mayor will move on.
Thank you very much. All right, who would like to begin returning to discussion, I could return to discussion. Um,
I find it concerning that. We're assuming that it's a slippery slope, but in assuming that it's a slippery slope or could be a slippery slope or it might be a slippery slope where someone might game the system for taking away the right of a owner occupied property. To do what they will for a month or two with their property. Um, because we don't know how to enforce or because someone I mean really think about it.
Somebody wants to go away for a month and rent their home. For a month and we can talk about well, you know, they're really actually they really want to run it for 4 months or 5 months and, you know, it's really not there on call. But let's just say that some, first of all I find it disturbing that we assume that we take a position that the it is going to be gamed and it is going to be exploited. I don't believe that. The people that contacted me, that isn't the case.
They're elderly, they're close to retirement, they'd like to take a month vacation but they're not wealthy I mean, at what point do we stop with these prohibitions to allow people to do what works for them and their life. So the city council is going to say no you actually can't rent out your house for a month. Authoritarian at the best. I mean, if there's three votes against it, there's three votes against it but for goodness sakes when do we stop with taking away people's control of their property and the life that they would like to lead?
I don't see it. I really don't see it but that having been said you know it's a vote of the council
Council Member Francina.
Yes, I want to be clear on what we're talking about here. Our city attorney crafted wonderful language allowing a one month rental if you could prove it was your domicile and you were not on vacation for a month. So I'm still interested to see if we can craft language. And I don't even know why the city has to be involved. If I'm going to go visit my relatives in Holland for a month, and I have a friend who is someone that's maybe already living in Ojai and they've just lost their house, I can say to them without causing any problem nobody needs to know. I'll say okay, I'm gonna be gone for a month would you like to live in my house? You know, for a few hundred dollars while you're looking for another place. How can we possibly even consider making that illegal?
There's so many examples or vice versa. I've got relatives out of town friends all over the United States who'd love to come and live in Ojai for a month. Now the month is illegal but three months wouldn't be illegal. Is that correct? Yeah, it
would be minimum three months unless the exemption allowed down to one month in specified cases.
So, I mean, this town is already becoming a rich person's town. Very elitist, okay? You're making it... There are plenty of people who have two homes in Ojai. It's not an issue. They just leave it empty. That home doesn't do anybody any good, okay? The only good is that there's no suitcases in and out of the house and strangers living in the neighborhood. But it's still there. I know people in Ojai who have, you know, a couple of guest house on their property and they're staunch... They've moved out of town but they were adamant that we should not allow short-term rentals but they saw nothing wrong with using their second house on their property to store their furniture This is not a black and white issue to me. I think we need to think through the different scenarios, and maybe our city attorney can craft something.
It should not be illegal for you to invite a friend or relative or have a referral. We used to have yoga retreats here in Ojai. Remember the yoga crib? And with the music festival, you know people open up their homes all the time. You can't really call them strangers because they're kind of part of either the music festival community or yoga. But opening up your home You know, there are circumstances where it's not the same as putting your house on the market as a short-term rental. There is a big difference that I think we need to acknowledge. I don't know if I'm making myself clear but we can't have it so that only rich people can go out of town for a month and leave their house empty I don't want to live in a world, Ohio. Well, I'm going to stay here no matter what.
But it's a sad day if that happens in Ojai.
Mayor Pro Tem Whitman. Well
I haven't changed my position if that's what you're asking.
1:10 – 1:2125 turns
Yeah. Okay.
Would it be possible to table voting on this, to have some time to think about it? To talk to some people, look at the read the language so that I can actually think it through before making a decision.
Of course, the council need not act tonight. One option would be two sub options. One is approve the rest of the ordinance as it reads now and then come back with further discussion about adding in this new exemption Uh, but that would mean it for that window. If the exemption was not added than the language that's in place now, which will create the problem identified by Council rule would be. Come challenge option 2 is defer the entire entirety of it and consider it further. Um, and that way it wouldn't remain the current role that it's 1 month.
Is the minimum rental length until the council life and further 3 months? No, what Councilmember Lange was proposing is to defer second reading which would mean the existing language as one month would be going continuing. That's the sub options. So option one is adopt a three-month minimum stay and then consider the exemption. Option two is continue everything and that means the current law would stay which is the one month minimum
Okay, so my the reason I was going to pull it is in the same section and part of its just clarification. But then the new language in so this is page five of seven. This prohibition does not apply to one month rentals Created by operation of law under civil code, 1945. Am I correct on that? That means that it's a rental agreement or lease that started out as a 90 day agreement and then by operation of law has converted two months a month
Yeah, it has to start out as whatever the length of started out is because 1945 says any residential lease. Of a year or shorter that. Revolves at the end, it becomes automatically amongst monthly unless somebody either side gets termination notice
yeah so I want to make sure and I don't know if there's some language to add to clarify. That. It needs to start out as the. 90 day or more rental. And, and so maybe that's just you know and does not apply to a rental release agreement that has started as a 90 or more day rental but has been converted to a month-to-month by operation law And I'm fine with that language, but I'm not understanding the very last part that says nor to rentals of at least one month if the renter establishes domicile at their rented premises.
Can
you tell me where you are?
Yeah it's the last part
Through the mayor comment just because we're finished. I would agree with Anita cram, I think it is our responsibility to the neighborhood to to our neighbors to live in our homes and turning homes into commodities is we've seen how many problems that has created we've had so many years of enforcement issues And I think it is fair to assume that is going to be gained if you look at the history of Airbnb. In the last several years, and we've had so many issues with this so I'm really against making any kind of loophole or escape valve in this I'd like to pass as is so I think we should.
Your suggestion to move it forward and then we can look at options. Excuse
me, through the mayor? I would prefer and I think it's a better policy that you don't change something and then come back to revisit it It's not an efficient and it's not a good policy. A better policy is you look at everything before you change it. I mean, in the end, it probably isn't gonna make any difference. So we do that often, we do that here. We say well, we'll just change it and then we can come back and review it.
And it gets momentum of its own where it's not neutral any longer. It's now something that you have to actually You have to pull it back, you have to change it. I can't find the word that I'm looking for but it's a different action to negate something than it is to actually evaluate it and change it so I've seen this momentum happen in a number of cases in this council where we say okay let's just go ahead and do it But it's harder, it's much harder to revisit something. The other thing I will say and I appreciate Council Member Francina for saying this, it is an elitist policy because if you can go away and leave your house vacant then you can take that month vacation but if you can't, you can't take that month vacation So to me it is, so in my district it makes a difference.
In the abalada it may not make a difference. So two things that I am bringing forward one is that is it possible to craft this all the other goes to three months but this remains to be revisited? In other words, everything except for whatever 4-204. I think it warrants consideration. I think we should hear from our constituents. I think we should think more deeply about the things that we are not allowing to have happen if we can't rent a place for one or two months when it's an owner occupied and it won't go back. So I would like At the very least, we need to hear from the public about this at the very least.
Would you like to make a motion Council Member
Wu? Yeah I would make a motion that we pass the prohibition for three calendar months excluding owner-occupied properties where There is an affidavit or some sort of verification that the property is being rented. With the intent of the owner coming back rented for one or two, just just very similar to the rent stabilization I apologize that I don't exactly have the words for it.
But I think I'm clear in the meaning perhaps
it would be. I think it'd be accomplished with the intent you've stated is interest the ordinance as proposed with the addition of the language read before that would Exempt your rentals of at least a month in duration where the property's owner occupied. At least 6 months before and then with intent to return after that were accomplished by goal,
you could also put a minimum I mean. Yeah, I mean there's other ways that you could you could try to foolproof this. You know really tighten it up and make it um but but I think that this is this is fair and we either assume that you know our population of owner occupied homes are going to try to gain the system.
Is there a second for that motion?
I'll second
okay and I would like to make a substitute motion that we pass as is.
Um yeah but I'm still working on the language at The end.
I want to offer a friendly amendment.
Okay, well I was still, I was kind of asking Matt questions because I don't understand how the final clause in on page five of seven this is section four dash 24 point oh four, which says two rentals have at least one month if the renter establishes domicile At the rented premises, I don't understand how that doesn't create a situation where someone can come in for one month and say at the end of the one month well i was gonna do a dump make this my domicile but I decided not to so now I'm going away and you just created a one-month rental that we're otherwise prohibiting.
If someone were willing to do go through the hoops necessary to establish domicile that exemption, the loophole you're describing could exist. The city's ability to enforce it would be to test what were the initial domicile that the renter used. Domicile is established by a combination of intent and facts. Intent alone does not establish it, nor do facts alone. So they have to change their facts and their intent, meaning that they have to register to vote there, change at least some other documentation, driver's license, insurance documents.
This is rented, so there's no homeowners exemption but establish their other legal presence there. If somebody merely said oh I intend to make my domicile here but took no concrete action at the end of the month then the city could seek to enforce against them and most importantly the landowner because that intent wouldn't have been married with any action. Establishing domicile requires intent and facts
Okay, so let me just for clarification then the language is intended to say that that person for that rent that one month rental. It must establish it as a domicile as a condition of it being allowed as a one-month rental?
Yeah, so the idea was to exempt with this exemption is if someone rents a place for a month or longer. But establishes domicile then that's exempt from the minimum three month rental and it was a situation was discussed at the prior meeting regarding Someone who lose involuntarily or otherwise loses residence and is able to rent a place for a month but doesn't know how long it's going to take to find a new place That not being having to be a minimum three month rental, but let that be a one month rental. And then that's something different qualitatively than the classic Airbnb because they're willing to establish domicile at that rented location.
Okay, well we have emotion on the table is there a second excuse me. Let's wait one time. Is there a second for that motion.
1:22 – 1:3023 turns
Can I offer a friendly amendment to that? Of course. Okay, I would like to second the motion with the...I'd like to pass the ordinance as it is and have staff come back with new language for this so that we can bring it up for discussion for the short...for the exemption and also the language that Mayor Pro Tem Whitman's talking about
I'm not going to accept any carve outs. Is there, so that there's no
second motion? I'll second the motion but i think we need to include what the establishment of domicile means within Within the ordinance so that somebody who reads this and is looking at what they can do understands what they have to do.
Mayor, can I
ask? Just a second. So just one second. So we have a motion. We have a second. We will continue discussion then we'll vote. Yes.
The way you establish domiciles, you have no other house. I have lived this the young man that was in the audience last meeting who was very concerned about this because he's a renter if you are if you lose your house and you cannot find A long term rental that you can afford, and you want to stay in Ojai. You now have a choice between couch surfing, living in your car, all your stuff is in storage. My stuff has now been in storage almost over two years ever since I lost my place. And I, I am renting a room month to month.
And in someone's house, you know i've never intended to be there. I've been there now seven months eight months. I thought it was going to be you know a month or two and I cannot, When you look at this, you have to acknowledge that we're in a housing crisis. There are people who need a place to live for a month and if they don't find a place, more than likely their intention might be to stay a month but they could be there a year.
You know, I am serious about this. I mean, I think Rachel's original emotion or sort of a motion about 15 minutes ago to just put a pause on this and just come back to this next time because this is this section is a problem. It's a problem. OK,
final comments before the roll call? Yeah, I still
I'm still looking
for
Did you hear me?
Excuse me, let's no crosstalk. Let's Council Member Rula is next.
All other things being equal we have not asked the public. We have not gotten feedback. We don't know what the actual state of this situation is. We don't know. We haven't asked anyone so Once again, I don't feel comfortable being the authoritarian figure that says housing has to be this particular way when we know that there are a thousand permutations and needs around housing.
And this is minor, we're talking one month or three months. So it's not like it's the end of the world but no public input and we just deciding that this has economic repercussions for people whether they can go see their families, whether they can go see their parents there's all kinds of situations and all kinds of people Who need, thank you very much to rent their house if they're going to leave it for any length of time that is an economic fact and don't like it if you don't like it.
But these people need to be able to do that I have heard from them and I have no doubt. That if we were to put a pause. They would also be happy to communicate with my fellow council members about their situations and I think we give them the right to make that communication, Mr city manager.
Madam Mayor, I might suggest allowing a couple of things. One having the City Attorney answer an outstanding question that sits on the table regarding domicile and then secondly I might just suggest from the staff perspective you know we can continue this item that seems like there's a lot of discussion and I hate to have a lot of chum in the water if you will so we could all have time to formulate our thoughts and ask staff lots of questions and we could do some research and provide some analysis and we'd be more than happy
So, and through the mayor before we continue to answer the question posed by the Mayor Pro Tem. We could import a definition of domicile my recognition is not to do so because there's about three books of cases that define domicile the tap into the education of the education of the elections code section 349 and 2022 2035, and the cases behind them. So my recommendation on that front is just to leave it as domicile, so not import all of that case law into it.
Okay.
But we could write, we can draft one if the council wants us to.
But you know based upon the discussion that's gone on I think my concern is that if it's intended to address the person who lives in Ojai becomes unhoused and is now looking for that first place to stay and give them more flexibility We're not limiting this to that situation. This allows somebody and I know you say that nobody's, you know, that it's unlikely but potentially it's a loophole that allows somebody to come in from some other location and set up a one-month rental that we're trying to prohibit
The First Amendment's going to right to travel is going to block applying this only to people who live in Ojai, right now. So federal law is gonna block that we can look further and maybe that's another yet another reason continue it. We can look further at trying to identify the use case the goal is to protect but we cannot adopt one set of rules for Ojai residents and another set for non-Hawaiians I realize that would solve a lot of problems but the federal government prohibited that But we can certainly assess further ways to narrow the box, to match the box that's at issue.
Through the mayor. Yes, Councilmember I'd like to make a motion that we accept the recommendation of the city manager that this particular paragraph but also anything else that needs to be clarified. Go back to staff with clarifications which would also give Ojai residents, a chance to weigh in. So that is my emotion. Yes. Sorry,
I'm not sure i understand that motion okay and is it to cut apart the ordinance and only got part of it
or no no no continue the whole ordinance I mean I was specifying that that is probably the portion that will be most likely to be dissected but it is no way uh um to limit it to that section thank you okay and is there a second for that motion?
I'll second the motion that we accept the city manager's recommendation
Okay, roll call please.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion by Council Member Rule seconded by Council Member Francina to accept the recommendation of the City Manager to continue the item and
Show transcript
Roll-call vote 0–0 Moved by Leslie Rule · Seconded by Suza Francina motion that we accept the city manager's recommendation Okay, roll call please. Thank you Mayor. There was three motions on the table we're · 2 under review
Show transcript
1:30 – 1:303 turns
1:40 – 1:595 turns
All right,
if you could take your seats we are going to return. We will return with item number two discussion item number two general plan update including budgetary adjustments timeline adjustments and next steps and we have a presentation from our community development director thank you Lucas
Thank you Mayor. Good, good evening everybody my name is Lucas Cybert I am the Community Development Director for the city of Ojai. Might I just say that I am super excited to bring this item before City Council tonight very excited. I get to geek out tonight and really have an in depth discussion regarding planning regarding where the city is where it could potentially be in the future.
And in order for us to do that, there's a couple of items that we need to sort through. Before I go into that, I think we have a presentation so James if you could put that up it'd be great. It was three things that I want to just mention the beginning here which is kind of answering the question or begging to answer the question, which is why update the general plan you know this general plan itself has been and kind of commenced in 2019.
And there's been other a lot of different things that have pushed out what was supposed to be an 18-month review and consideration for the general plan out to where we're at today. You know, aside from the housing element which was recently adopted and certified by HCD, the general plan has not received an update in over 25 to 30 years depending on which element you're looking at. And then typical practice for a general plan is to have updates called facelifts if you will every 10 to 15 years So we're really kind of overdue to kind of have that deep depth and discussion. And certainly, we've had quite a bit of that up to this point.
Secondly, the recently certified housing element includes a program number two which specifically identifies the city will complete its general plan by 2025. So we have kind of a spearheaded mark in which to address this. Could that be addressed? Yes, but we've got it out there for HCD and certainly they're aware of it. The state's aware of it and certainly we as a community are aware because you've adopted it. We recognized it moving forward. And then lastly, and I would say this is probably likely the most critical piece, is the update would serve to continue to protect the character of the community through well-written and informed policies. Now those policies could also be in the form of goals as well And I would also extend in an additional piece of information for this body and for the community as a whole.
The general plan from a Community Development Department standpoint, I would say from a planning standpoint it is an important document. It is a document we use on a regular basis regarding Basically any of the projects or applications that come in, we turn to that general plan for those goals and policies that we currently have in place. And those goals and policies are what we use to say yes to certain aspects or no to certain aspects. So it's an important piece that we turn to on a regular basis so with that if you go to the next slide Back up one, thank you. So it's five actions that we're looking at tonight. Some are pretty light. Some have some pretty extensive discussion.
Extending the contract. Right now we have a contract with Ramey and Associates and that is a contract that expired in 2022. We're looking at extending that. It's really kind of on a month-to-month if you will contract at this point. Then we're also looking at budgetary adjustments. Remy and Associates has put together a budgetary adjustment to the tune of about $174,000. That's been identified and specified point by point within the staff report as well.
There's also the climate option to proceed, and staff has done some research. Costs and estimates are ranging from $20K to about $350K. That's $350,000. Climate options being either a climate action plan or climate element. The tourism management piece is also one that we reached out to consultants for and that ranges from 40k to 55k. And then the last one is, we're looking for direction on both land use preferred directions which were brought forward at the April 2023 Joint Meeting with Planning Commission.
Realized that was a while ago but we are here today to have some meaningful conversation regarding it. Next slide please. This council has probably seen this process, several times I know I've lived it over the last several years. But really what it, it leans into is the first piece is the listening and learning and that's really kind of the foundation for the community engagement between engagement is through the entire process here. In terms of what we're looking at in terms of a general plan update process. We then leaned into and move forward to the visioning, and it's really the vision and guiding principles that was vetted through not only the community through a visioning and guiding principles workshop but also through planning commission and through this city council as well through some fairly meaningful and in-depth conversations just on a four page document.
That's helped to kind of frame the way in which this general plan is being worked. Moving forward to the policy piece, which is really kind of the meat and potatoes is what I would call this. It's where we're at right now. We're currently working on those, working with the consultant on those in terms of bringing something to the community for a fairly in-depth discussion And then leaning into the policy and plan development, which is really the admin draft for the general plan. And then the last phase would be the adoption of that general plan and the environmental that will go along with that.
So next slide. So the first one, remember I was five. The first one is pretty straightforward. We're just looking to extend that contract. That contract expired in 2022. It allows for the service to continue. In addition to that we need to identify who the agent is that's authorizing signatures moving forward for those items that can be signed and don't necessarily need City Council's full blessing.
And then we're looking to extend that to 2025 to get us to the finish line for this. General plan update. Next slide please. The budgetary adjustments, I've highlighted a few of them kind of the high end pieces and grouped them all together. There's the contingency as a second admin draft, not something that's absolutely necessary but I think building that in as a possibility recognizing that there may be that necessity Not something that's absolutely necessary, but it's something to think about in terms of if there's additional revisions. Revisions that then warrant an administrative draft to come back. That's the tune of about $60,000.
Evacuation plan is really something that's required now as a part of new legislative law that wasn't in place in 2019 When this, when this contract was first adopted and seen by city council moving forward. And then there's other ongoing and anticipated work that's been kind of grouped together into the 86 K that you're seeing there. It's highlighted more in depth within the staff report itself.
Before we go on to the next slide, I think this is worth noting and it's something that we had conversations with Ramey and Associates on which is the consultant for this. Their 2019 hourly rates have not adjusted. They've adjusted them actually three times over from where we were at in 2019. They've given us that commitment in terms of moving forward they will remain at those hourly rate at that hourly rate way forward. It's about a 20-25% cost savings that we're receiving for that Next slide please.
Would you like to take questions or do you want to continue?
Sure, I would prefer to go through this and then have the questions. Let's do that. Okay thank you. And then, so moving into the climate option piece that was the second bullet. So there's staff reached out to three different consultants had some riveting conversations and they provided very preliminary estimates but estimates in which we could kind of gravitate towards to say okay so this is kind of what we're seeing in terms of a ballpark Um, it ranges from a draft climate action plan or cap with very minor public input. And then it goes on to kind of a robust action plan or element in those conversations that could be either or with fairly robust environmental and certainly quite a bit of public input And then, so the ranges within that are very bare bones is the $20,000 option with the draft climate action plan piece with a minor public input.
When I say minor public input, I'm talking there wouldn't be a public hearing in regards to it. It would simply be if you have questions, we email them and that would be basically the public input versus the robust action plan, climate action plan or element with environmental and then Quite a bit of public input, not only through the sequel process but also just through potential workshops and stuff. And things of that nature that tops out at about $350,000 with this one staff is is requesting Council to consider which aspect to pursue there's three different aspects, there's the climate action plan or climate element. Public input, independent or public input part of the general plan process. Environmental input are independent or environmental as a part of the general plan process so it's something to kind of chew the fat over as we have that discussion later on.
Next slide please. And so then we have the tourist management or tourism management policy and or element, where I mean associates provided a preliminary estimate for each of these tasks. I will admit I reached out to three different consultants, all of them called it an economic development element and I said that's not what this is. That's not what we're looking for.
If you're looking at something that fosters and absolutely tries to find a way to roll out the red carpet for every single business that's out there, that's not what this is about. This is about evaluating and addressing and analyzing the tourism component and trying to find that balance. With that, Ramey understands that. Certainly we had a fairly good conversation during the joint meeting.
They took all that information and put together a proposal and that tops out at about $55 to $60,000 with that. It could be the policy or the element. Rameys already identified that they can roll that into the process in terms of what we're looking at currently. Um, so with that staff is requesting council to consider this item as an estimate record with requests that were received during the joint meeting. In 2023 next slide please okay so the land use element direction.
During the joint meeting in April 2023, there were two pieces of land use direction that staff was looking for both Ramey as well as staff in terms of kind of buttoning up the elements that we were focused on. Land use was the big one that certainly had probably the most movement that we were seeing and certainly garnered some additional conversations that we've had offline.
And I would say just overall is these are changes, these are potential changes but we've also heard from the community that maybe these are something to consider. I'm not going to sit here and say that it's 80% of the community. That's not at all what's happening here. You'll see in the next slide please That it's not a 80-20 rule. It's more like a 60-70, I wouldn't even say 70%, more like 60-65% in terms of the community that said hey maybe we give this a shot.
The first one is the Bryant Street area and really what it's looking at is creating kind of a live work type of format. Not necessarily saying hey you can do All 100% residential everywhere you want. It's introducing an opportunity for artists or some sort of artwork exhibit that then also has somebody living on the second floor and a loft, it's that kind of concept.
Um, and not only that but the even the discussion when we had the workshops was it's not that it would be a permitted use instead. It's evaluating it from a conditional use or discretionary review process right so let's say it's kind of a Let's see what it looks like and see if it's something that fits within this Bryant Street. I mean, for anybody that doesn't know Bryant Street is the last remaining industrial site that we have in the city. I mean there's no qualms with that. It absolutely is and the question is what does it become or where does it remain? And that's kind of the conversations that we've had dating back to the workshop in 2022 leaning into where we're at tonight.
Next slide please. Housing overlay options. During the conversation in 2022, leaning into the joint meeting in 2023 and then tonight you're seeing three options. What this really is it's identifying that along Ojai Avenue outside of the downtown district There are commercial areas on the north and south sides, and those stretch east all the way to the eastern boundary all the way to the western boundary.
There are opportunities As it may be for residential to live and function within some of these commercial areas opportunities. Now when we reached out to the community as to whether or not this was an option as an overlay, an overlay that more than likely requires some sort of discretion could be folded into the code and addressed from that fashion I can't sit here and say that it was This 100% was on, everybody was on board. That's not the case. But there was enough meat on the bone to say hey this is potentially an option moving forward or it's not It's one of those where it's like, yes let's try it or no absolutely not. We're pretty we're pretty satisfied with the way in which the commercial corridor operates and functions moving forward completely fine.
The same thing is true just going back to this to the slide James don't go back to the other side for don't go back to the other side. Bryant Street is in the same faction. It's not like there is a profound number of community members that have spoken on this and said we absolutely see the vision of, you know live work working within well along Bryant Street but it's an option. It s an option that came out of the discussion and has come to a visual for discussion as well so next slide please Ah yes, next steps. Next slide please.
So in terms of, now granted I just identified kind of five items that staff is looking for direction on tonight. With those five items we get direction on those five items especially and profusely if we can get direction on the land use items those two items that I just mentioned at the very end book ended um that allows for a memo to be finalized that was a part of the joint meeting. We've already pretty much written The memo with the exception of the land use piece because we haven't gotten the official direction from Council.
With that, we are moving forward with a draft admin document. And we are awaiting some of the final pieces for the land use piece or the land use element mind you and that is really the two pieces that I brought forward just a moment ago. Council has questions I can certainly be available, but there is a lot of really good information here. And I don't want to, I think the other thing that I want to also identify is we've heard from the community over the last couple of years and certainly with various workshops so we've had public input sessions face-to-face with Just a host of thoughtful pieces of information and dialogue.
Dating back to 2000, actually literally our first meeting was the day in which the emergency was declared. We're in the council chambers and we had to get shooed out because Council came in and issued emergency. That if that doesn't even like give you an idea of how this general plan update process has gone, nothing does so with that I'm certainly available for questions.
1:59 – 2:0515 turns
Thank you very much Lucas any questions from Council?
I have a few but yes Mayor Pro Tem. So picking up on the last thing that you covered, is there a need as opposed to just the possible option? We have a need to create new housing overlay areas prior to our next housing element cycle. I mean, so in other words is this something that is the... I think you understand what I'm asking.
Absolutely and I know exactly what you're getting at. Very interesting when we were having these conversations, this was before any of the other projects came forward. This Council has seen projects come forward that were never realized or even brought forward in discussions so this was an idea as a solution that we're talking about the overlays along Ojai Avenue.
That was an idea that came forward as a solution to address some of these housing situations So there's pros and cons to it. Pro is, it provides an opportunity for additional housing and some creative solutions. Con is I think we've all kind of seen some of the state law that's been coming forward you put housing in and you identify the opportunity for housing and that becomes not a may but it becomes a shall.
Okay, I think that was going to be one of my questions and thank you for answering that. But if i understand correctly some of the consideration about the overlay is because there have been proposals about projects along OI Avenue and the overlay potentially opens the door where it wouldn't otherwise exist
There are some there are, there's I mean there are a couple of vacant lots especially on the east eastern end of Ojai where there's opportunities opportunities that you know an overlay like this would certainly benefit from. Okay, as far as I'm going to go
okay so um and i don't if we want to rotate through other people so that i'm not the one talking or if you want me just to finish take whatever you
want. Take turns will come back okay any other questions from Council Mayor. I mean, no councilmember Francine.
As it stands now, in order for the property like the crosses from next door to Seafresh on Bald Street and other property across from Westridge where Nick Oatway was proposing housing on top of the existing commercial. As it stands now what can be done with those properties?
Commercial not residential
Okay, unless they secured a discretionary general plan amendment and zone change which is possible if the council so chose.
Matt is correct, yes. Matt is correct. There would be some fairly extensive legislative actions that would have to take place. That's the easiest way to put that as it sits right now in terms of what we have as a part of our zoning code. It's just not something that's allowed currently. Not without the changes that Matt just recognized.
Okay, can I ask? Because I'm still at the same question. If we did adopt a housing overlay it doesn't mean we have to act on it. It just would make it easier like is there an obligation then and it would still go through a normal process nothing is a given
We have an example of where that just this happened along Bryant Street, where we saw that that exercise take place. And the process in which that went forward as an overlay.
In summary, big picture. Once the council chooses voluntarily to zone something for housing. If a housing project comes through that is at that density, or more if there's density bonus and there's affordable units involved. It becomes very difficult to deny the project, which means it does go through a simpler process that would be why If one wanted to facilitate housing on the areas at issue, doing an overlay facilitates the housing project because it becomes much more difficult to deny it on the back end.
If the council wanted to not facilitate it or to ensure a robust process then the council would choose not to create the overlay and instead the applicants could come in and do it as a one-off zone change which would go through the full process. Does that
clarify? Yes yes it's clear are we being asked to decide that now
2:05 – 2:1431 turns
There are the two land use items that still remain outstanding, and those are the two that bookended the asks for tonight.
And if I could add to that, if the council is not prepared to move either those forward or one of the other tonight. That's okay. It can always be done in the future but as noted earlier on the other item it can be done in the future does not mean and it's easy to do it in the future would have to be a process there's an opportunity to bake it into the general plan update that somewhat simpler.
If the Council were prepared to move that forward soon
I do have one more
question. Can we rotate and come back? If it's on the same topic.
Yeah, so this overlay would only apply to appropriate locations, right? It's not like an housing overlay you can't just build a second story on any...
Yeah sorry through the mirror yeah get into this the right way Yes, along Ojai Avenue. Yeah. Only those areas that have the commercial zoning designation or general commercial zoning designation.
And as a matter of fact- So that would be... Go ahead. We could define a box and limit it. So if the council wanted to only allow for example one or two stories or only one story we
could...
The council could define that box that would be allowed. The one most important point to be aware of though Once residential uses are allowed at a site, density bonus can go well above any height limit if the project has enough affordable units to qualify for state density bonus protections.
So
once you open the housing door be advised that the box can get bigger.
Through the Mayor, the example is a project that this body has seen recently.
Thank you all right um any other questions Council Member Ruhl?
Yeah so if I'm understanding basically we are We are being asked to decide if we want to make a zoning change to allow more resident housing, more residential building because right now the zone precludes that commercial precludes that. And this doesn't necessarily but but this does actually become something like a special overlay district because it opens up the States housing regulations, whether or not it's actually in the housing element as a special overlay. It is for all intents and purposes.
A special overlay, even though it's not in our housing element. So all of those same conditions apply to it. We're just, we just haven't pointed it out. Is that, is that correct? Do I understand that correctly
through the mayor? Yes.
Okay. Okay. So So basically the question before us is, are we going to do zoning changes to allow more housing? That really the question.
I to the mayor. The thing that I would preface this, the general plan, the general plan guides what the zoning is going to look like in terms of how that's going to read and then the amazing thing is as as this is evolving and developing there's certainly density pieces that can be applied, as well as other development standards that can be applied Through this, through the general plan.
So it. I don't want to say that the zoning then dictates it's really opposite the just this general plan in terms of what we're looking at here really dictates how that forms how that's how that's formed.
Okay, so I'm going to ask a follow up if I can. So it's not once we, if we were to change the zoning, it's not a free for all there are also additional conditions that we can put on all of that zoning that would be modified by a density bonus. If someone wanted to build affordable housing there. But if they build market rate there, then all of those conditions and the density bonuses that people get would not be applicable.
But where this lies is underneath the general plan. So but the general plan is aspirational, isn't it? I mean, it's not specific, is it?
It's, it's specific when it needs to be through the mirror sorry. It's specific what it needs to be.
It's specific. So basically that means that if we want it to be specific. We can make it specific through the marriage.
Okay, through the mayor if I could add a point there. If the general plan didn't in particular on housing. designates a particular area as housing is allowed or isn't allowed to use or conditionally allowed to use, state law makes that specific. No matter how aspirational we intended it, state law makes that piece specific.
Okay. As
to housing the rest of it is not housing is different.
Okay okay so this particular land use that we're discussing now if we were to rezone it then the specificity given to us by the State Applicable.
Correct, Mayor so if the council designates this area for a future as a general plan lineage designation that allows housing. We have to follow through with the rezoning behind is noted by Mr Siebert be more specific, but that housing would be become a viable use if they met the rest of the rules and answer the other point yes. If the project is 100% market rate, no affordable and there's no density bonus protections. However, the Housing Calamity Act still applies and what we can enforce is the objective development standards.
So if we define a box and we defined it objectively in compliance with case law, we could enforce that box but we wouldn't be able to enforce less than the box. And to finish the point We can't design the box in the future. In the old days, before the Housing Calibrity Act we could say we'll allow housing there and we'll define the rules later. Now we have to define the rules up front and then we can then enforce them so we'll have to be specific in those rules as to what we want to see and then they'll have to meet that.
Okay great thanks. Any other questions? Mayor Pro Tem.
Yeah, so if I understand what we've been talking about it occurs to me and maybe this is just from my perspective but that our greatest flexibility to approve or not approve a project on a project by creating an overlay and then if we decided though that we did want to add housing, we would then in the context of that project have the ability to say you know we really want this housing it's not allowed. We're going to change this zone now to include housing as part of our act in approving the development is that Is that accurate?
I mean, through the mirror. Generally speaking, yes. OK.
That's great. Any, any other Council Member Lange?
Yeah.
Thank you. So I'm going to pan back from land use for just a second because am I correct in understanding that we have several different items to look at? We have one do we go forward with the contract with Ramey extending the contract to 2025 and spend $174,000? Two how do we proceed? Staff needs direction for proceeding Forward with a climate action plan or climate element. 3 decisions on land use, as we're just discussed and the 4th 1 is the tourism management.
So I have some questions just about so thank you for clarifying my question is really. about Ramirez and them as a consultant. I understand that they have worked with larger cities, cities that don't have the unique climate as ours and the small town feel that their experience is more with large towns. And do we have any flexibility in looking at other consulting firms right now?
2:14 – 2:2313 turns
Does the flexibility exist through the mayor? Yes. Would I, from a staff standpoint, would I recommend pursuing that if we're willing to spend a considerable amount more than where we're at currently? That's the first piece. I think cost is probably the first and biggest piece. The second is although Ramey doesn't necessarily have the resume for the small towns, they certainly understand a lot of what Ojai is. They did their research before they came here and certainly won over I would say Council and probably the community at the time, although I will admit my first day here was the adoption of the agreement, the contract so it It's a bit of an interesting conversation.
And you're also looking at a time piece and I can tell that the city manager will speak, let me finish my point. Is it possible? Yes. Are there things that would happen to delay and increase costs significantly? And would we get a consultant out there That is like Ramy or that is, is willing and able. I just get the sense that we would be starting from the beginning to a certain degree because they would have to get familiar with the community as well. Ramy has has been here the entire time they've been here virtually they've been here physically right and I, I would also say that in those four almost five years now that I've been working with them.
They understand this community. They've heard from this community. And they certainly have kind of a pulse of what's going on. But I would also say that's a testament to how precise this community has been speaking about the issues or non-issues in terms of the preservation or non-preservation, depending on who you're talking to and what group you're talking to.
Additionally, they've taken points from staff as well in terms of direction and just basic information. So that's all I'm going to say. Thank you.
I just think, thank you to the mayor just wanted to add at the same skill set that applies to putting together an excellent general plan for a large city applies to putting one together for smaller city. It's akin to selecting a city attorney. You know, you could select the city attorney has only worked in large cities and he would be able to work in a small city and vice versa. It's this it's the same skill set, and they take direction these consultants from from the staff and from the council and from the community that's how these things are shaped even if somebody is only. Worked in small towns. That doesn't mean that they necessarily understand Ojai. I was in two small towns before I came here and I wouldn't tell anybody that I know Ojai inside and out, I don't.
Thank you
Any other questions before
we ask a follow up question. So, thank you for for respond for responding. So I have a two part follow up one is. If, you know I'm aware of the cost of continuing this contract and obviously thinking about ways to reduce the cost. Are there ways to sort of divide up the remaining elements Sort of like an a la carte to work with instead of extending the contract with Ramey, to maybe see if there is another maybe community member of the community or another consultant that could take part of it. What would you think about dividing this up in an a la carte fashion?
I so here's, here's my thought with with that and I probably have a question for you. And that is this when you say all a cart. Are you talking about the right there's five elements that we're talking about here but also talking about two elements or policies that were brought forward during the joint meeting. One is the climate action plan or element, and then the second is the tourist element or plan or policy for that matter.
Are we talking about the five plus the two? Or are we talking about just the two what's the what's the a la carte just as curiosity?
If I may, so you've spelled it out really clearly that for those two elements that we would be looking at opening it up to other consultants. So I'm really talking about finishing the general plan. And, and so the land use any any elements that would still be remaining for the general plan. You know instead of extending the contract for that hundred and 74,000 Would it be possible to to delegate that in some other kind of way.
You know the, the interest through the mirror. The interesting thing about that point is this Ramey has the ability to bring on other sub consultants right now we're using Rincon for any environmental are using a terrorist for the transportation and we just finished up using Veronica Tam and associates for the housing. Um, all three of those are well versed in a lot of these different aspects.
Could we bring on another sub to work on one specific piece or two specific pieces in terms of carving it out? I don't think that's out of the realm of possibility. I don t think that would necessarily hurt the timeline from that faction as well.
So,
I do question the cost though because I would have to work with the consultant to see what sort of cost and estimates that would come out of that. Because when I was reaching out to consultants initially just getting the general estimates That was them independent of anything that was happening, but also kind of giving me that commitment. Yeah we can try to work with that timeline unless you don't want us to kind of scenario. So it just kind of there's some flexibility here in terms of how that works so just recognize that thank
you. When you say considerable amount more Lucas you just throw out a ballpark figure
Yeah, the 350 was a bit of a shocker when I when I was hearing that. I'm sorry, you're the man through the mirror. There was the $350,000 that I heard from one of the consultants for them to do a robust public outreach and then also doing the environmental independent. That would be considerable. I mean we're talking almost half really half of what the original budget of 719,000 was in beginning so That, that to me is a bit of an eye opener because we're talking about one piece when we've broken it up into five as a part of that focused on update.
Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem.
Yeah I've got a couple of questions that are on this same topic that Councilmember Lange started with. One of my questions is do we have the ability to adopt elements In a piecemeal or serial fashion. In other words, can we say let's tackle the land use element and go after that and do what we need to do? And then submit for approval and then go back And say, okay now we're doing safety or environmental justice and and you know and then submit those as they're done or do we have to do it in mass as you know the quote unquote general plan.
2:23 – 2:3115 turns
So, through the mirror there. The reality in terms of how that operates is each time that you address one of the elements you also open the door for two things one is consistency with the policies and then also consistency from an environmental standpoint. Each time you open up the environmental piece, it then creates... There's a baseline for cost for that.
And you group them together and that reduces the cost. You do them individually and the
cost goes up. Right. So we have to maintain internal consistency. If I'm understanding what you're saying, if we don't do it together With the potential to go back and have internal inconsistency and then, and then have you know. Have a kind of what, if you give a moose a muffin effect.
So let me give you an example through the mirror, through the mirror, the housing element as it was adopted by this body and then certified through HCD that still has to go through the environmental review process to ensure consistency along the lines of the rest of the elements.
Okay. And then go ahead.
Can you pull up the slide that has the cost for the climate, the tourism management?
Yeah. I think it's
all those costs.
Yeah. I think that was the second or third slide.
It was pretty early because that's when I asked if we should ask questions now. Okay, so let me try to remember when we had the meeting with James. Remember that? And we had three new council members and I remember that night because I'd already been through all of this process And I've always regretted that I voted to continue with all of this item. Because it seems like we could have ended, there was some completion at that meeting or what? Before we started adding things where were we at that night? Do you remember? Do you know what I'm talking about?
Through the Mayor are you talking about the joint meeting in April 2023?
You know-
The Planning Commission?
I don't know that it was that meeting Yeah, it was that meeting because I remember now we were all sitting at a table looking. Yeah, it was that meeting yes and I also started when I came home I hadn't I remembered that we had this like a stack of paperwork like you wouldn't believe you know like all the plans and stuff and just the thought that we were going to go through this again and produce all these paper all this paper and all that it hit me that I had gone astray that night That I wasn't, in my opinion, in retrospect thinking as clearly as it was getting whatever. But so when I look at things like climate option to proceed, part of me thinks why don't we just take that money and put it into direct action here in Ojai? What could they possibly tell us that we don't already know because most climate things are lifestyle related You know, I mean like and maybe what is it that we have in mind?
Like do we want to just you know put in the general plan. What is it that has never been clear to me what when we asked for these additional things what it was that we were asking so before I could vote for that money I would need Clarity on, you know it sounds like a good idea. But what is it exactly that we are anticipating that these consultants could possibly tell us that we don't already know? And then tourism management I mean I feel like we could sort that out.
No frankly that's how I feel. So why don't we just keep that money? Maybe raise the salary of those of us sitting here. And then, you know, we've lived here. We know what's going on.
Great questions and I think good insight in terms of what had happened in April and really if I can just go back to the wayback train. In April it was really a culmination of a workshop that had taken place in August Of 2022 that then led us to the next step, which was that joint meeting. And in that joint meeting there was definitely a lot of really important pieces and two of them are what are being discussed tonight out of that meeting I thought there was actually really two good pieces that came out of it one was a recognition that along Montgomery.
North of Ojai, that C1 zone or general commercial zone as a general plan piece. This body recognized that was the inappropriate zone because it was inhibiting and creating issues significant issues for some in an area that you know the uses on the ground were completely inconsistent with that. That was a great step forward. We've been working internally on addressing that. The second piece was then something along Fulton Street, which was the east side of Fulton, which was the M1 zone or manufacturing zone and addressing that as the land uses on the ground are completely inconsistent with what's what the zoning and even the general plan identify. So those are two really good pieces that we've been working on internally.
The land use pieces in terms of the discussion, it is and remains a very divided discussion. I'll have a conversation with someone and they'll have a certain opinion about it. And I'll have a conversation the next day, and it will be completely opposite. Right? So it's very divided when I say that it's 60%, 55%. It's very true. It's divided in terms of both of those pieces. Now, I think both of those came out of trying to find solutions for housing in Ojai.
I think that hearing from the community and our workshops, and you know during the surveys. I think everybody was looking for solutions. What's the solution moving forward? What's been kind of interesting is the wait-and-see has actually produced housing results that we're seeing on the ground right now. Some would say, I'm not sure that that's necessary anymore. Others would say it's still needed remains to be
seen so sure if i could just sorry councilmember i think i can answer the remaining part of your question you were kind of asking a why question through the mayor i believe sort of the general plan is basically kind of like our city constitution of sorts and not having an element or a policy Is also a statement and an indicator of a priority or lack thereof. So I think that's why to the why question you want to have these baked into that, or at least, you know, a component of it because it speaks to who you are and who you want to be. And lastly, we're required to make findings that are consistent with the general plan. And that's why it needs to be current and update and evolve. And that's why you can't just go back to your old plan because your old plan is from...
Think about how different the world was even just five years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago. That's why we need to do this type of action. It's important. It reflects who we want to be
2:31 – 2:376 turns
Can the council members that because we added the addition that night of a climate element, and the tourism management is that right but that was added that night. I still would like clarity. What is it that we're asking for? Tourism management and the circulation element, the traffic... The main problem with tourism isn't so much the tourists, it's their cars.
We kind of know there's things that we can do about that but what is it that you had in mind When you asked for those two additions, what is it that you thought the consultants would tell us that we don't already know? Is my question.
Through the mayor, I first want to just address the Climate Action Plan piece. You know when I reached out to these consultants, I asked point blank, I said what would you bring to the table? And they said hey we can bring a climate action plan that will circumvent CEQA and I said I don't think that's what this community wants Instead, what I would like for you to do is to come back with something that provides appropriate measurements does something to reduce greenhouse gases something along those lines. I think that's something that's very palatable for this community.
not circumventing CEQA. So don't think that we're even on board with something like that. So from a climate action plan standpoint, I think that's what you're seeing. That's what you would see. That's the return in terms of reduction and greenhouse gases. Now that's a big statement. Reduction and greenhouse gases basically means how do you reduce the emissions that are coming in and going out?
If I could through the mayor add a little more on this one The climate action plans range and the attachment be page one has a nice little layout that Mr super prepared or somebody. Sets of requirements that should be imposed on all or most, or development project as applicable sort of in the lower end to on the higher end of $350,000 and change. An element that would include a detailed scientific assessment of all greenhouse gases that are emitted in the city where they're emitted from how they're emitted in what quantities going back a certain amount of time It's a PhD scientist level analysis of what we have in the city. Now, that's the inventory and then a quantified metric developed plan for reducing all of those emissions to the extent feasible or achievable within X timeframe.
And set in as requirements with quantification. So instead of, the first one is a set of requirements, a set of measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to improve the climate situation. That's your sort of lower scale climate action plan. Your higher scale climate action plan takes that has a precise scientific numeric inventory and quantified measures and quantifies in fact typically the way these are done They will quantify the city's goal is by 2040, 2050 we're going to cut emissions by half, by a third numbers to be determined. And then it quantifies and does the math typically to show that if we implement these requirements on existing development and our projected new development, we will achieve that 2050 reduction of 30% by 2050 whatever the numbers are.
That's the higher scale 350,000 and change type climate action plan. That's what we would be buying if the council so chose to buy that. And that's where you get the differences between those significant 20,000 to 300,000 price ranges.
Can I ask a follow-up question? 50% of the greenhouse gases is trapped, okay. That has to do with jobs and housing but we have now we know what we have now which is a situation there's plenty of people working in Ojai that can't afford to live here right and other people their jobs are far away so you're talking about you can quantify and have statistics but this involves life willingness to do lifestyle changes You know, I don't know.
I mean, people aren't even willing to walk and ride their bikes to school. So I don't know about in... I just don't know about investing in that. Just
a reminder we're still on questions. We're not on discussion. Council Member Lange has a question then Mayor Pro Tempore.
Well, thank you. I was just going to say that I was the one who proposed that to Council Member Francina, I was the one who proposed the Climate Action Plan. And my reasoning was because We might have future councils who aren't climate oriented. And this would, like our city manager said, this would be a constitution saying these are the goals that we have.
And I had a question about the climate and so I think... So I just wanted to clarify that point for you too and respond to your question. And then also, I'm aware that there are Climate action that there are, I actually campaigned on looking at other cities' climate action plans and seeing that there are some really good templates out there. Is there a way to reduce that cost by taking this in-house? Working with our climate emergency mobilization or climate action committee, is it possible for us to create something that works for us, that can save and eliminate that budget item.
2:37 – 2:435 turns
Through the mayor. So if you're asking whether or not it could be done in-house with the current staff through community development, I would say no. And the reason why I would say no is that while I may have a lot of experience and exposure, I can't say the same thing for every single staff member and the expertise that would be needed for this then technicalities that would be needed for this are beyond the scope of what staff would have readily available Are we able to review, analyze and address those through a consultant who has those pieces? Yes. Are there community members out there that we've heard from and that have come forward as experts?
I think we've heard from them, correct? Could they sit at the table? That would be up to this body. Um, for sure. And I think that's something that's worth having discussion on as well. But in terms of staff absorbing it from a cost standpoint, I think we would be chasing her tail at some point. The technicalities that go into something like this are beyond the scope of what staff could do. Not to say that there's any...I have an amazing staff but there's limitations and I'm recognizing that so
Through the mayor, Mayor Pro Tem was first and then you can go up to that.
So this goes to the cost issues and I attended that August 22 workshop and there may have been Twice as many people attending as are attending here tonight. So I was not impressed that we were getting a sample of Ojai and then we also had, maybe that was in the earlier days of Zoom and there were folks who wanted to participate on Zoom and they couldn't because they had technical difficulties so Can we as a way of saving costs as opposed to employing Ramey to, you know, redo workshops or survey the community that sounded like that was kind of a big cost item if we wanted Survey added in can, can we have a workshop on a specific issue that we think is going to be important to the general plan but we want to hear what the public is going to say on that issue or at least invite them.
And you know, is that part of the general. Is that something we can do within the general plan process.
Through the mayor, yes. I think it would behoove this body to identify what piece is going to be the focus and then building around that piece. Would it be something that Ramey would run? That is really up to this body. The contract is something this body agrees upon. If you want to carve that out and have that additional input and then a summary be generated just internally by staff That's definitely something that I could see my staff definitely handling. The technical pieces that we were talking about earlier, that goes beyond the scope. Right
and then this is kind of a follow-up question but one of the things that struck me at that joint meeting that we had is I had spent time with our What's our current general plan and then, you know, kind of looked at the. The proposed draft. General plan actually I'm not even sure if that's what we received but it all seemed kind of. Foreign in the context of the general plan document that I read that I thought was a really good expression of.
Uh, low high values. It had like five pages of uh goals that I think anybody would read them and say yeah that that sounds like Ojai and then it had 30 or 40 pages of implementation so um our If the draft we get from Ramirez And I'm not even sure where we are in terms of administrative draft. But if it seems like it's devoid of things that we think are important, in terms of policies and implementation of policies, do we have the opportunity to say, hey, we need to add this in? And what's the process for doing that?
2:43 – 2:485 turns
Through the mayor, so the process exists as we speak right now. If there is an additional policy that is being drawn from the community that hasn't been spoken or identified through one of the workshops, or one of the visioning pieces It is absolutely now is the time in which that could be discussed and further analyzed or added. In terms of where this general plan update process is at currently, I mean you saw the five points but just realistically We are currently working on the land use element. That element is waiting patiently for decisions on these two items.
Once those are decided, there will be a draft ready for public review. and consideration. The same thing is true with the safety element, the safety element is close but there are policies that are currently being worked through based on what we've heard from the community over the last four years and that's true for sprinkling environmental justice throughout the rest of the elements addressing the circulation and then obviously making sure everything's married together with the housing
Yeah, so I see us and Lucas through there. You're great. But everything you've said yeah we can do anything. But actually, I don't think we can. Um, I think that there is a best practice to getting a general plan done. And I think as we are teasing apart everything we're getting further and further away from the best practice. Is there my question? My question yes, there is a question here. My question is to both Lucas and to the city manager. Do you have an idea of what a best practice is and do you feel confident in being able to forward or project, cause momentum for that best practice to work for us? That is my question to you.
Through the mayor I'll start if I could and then I'll have Ben jump in as city manager Best practice would be getting this to the finish line. Best practice would be taking the contract that we currently have and moving forward with those general plan update items, those five elements Best practice would be saying yes or no to the Climate Action Plan, or the climate action element.
The best practice would be saying yes or no to the tourism element or policy in terms of moving forward. Breaking apart some of these pieces while it's absolutely within the realm of possibility in terms of what we can do and what staff can do in terms of working with a consultant Is it going to add time, is it going to add cost. Is it going to confuse the issues to a certain degree.
Maybe the third piece isn't maybe the first two in terms of cost I mean the cost is hard that. Coming back and identifying that they're moving in this direction. I can just tell you, Ramey is immediately going to say well we've got to do another cost analysis for that and they're probably gonna come back with more it's gonna be more right from hearing from some council members that I'm not sure that we even need to do this piece Not required.
There are elements that we have through state law that are required. Some of these are not the two that were discussed and identified during the April 2023 joint meeting or not required their elected
Through the mayor, I just would like to add. So you have a subject matter expert here at your disposal. His name is Lucas. Of course. Let me walk through. So he is your professional urban planner and this is something that he went to school for something that he has worked in other jurisdictions and he's gained over time. And so what What we always try to do as your professional staff is, we always try to bring you the best practice in the form of the recommendation. And so our recommendations come to you as this is what we would suggest as the best practice. You're the policy makers. You don't have to take our recommendation, of course. But we're always giving you what we think is the best option. This is what we would recommend but you don't have to do it.
All right, how about we move on to public comment. First we have Bill Miley just have one card.
2:48 – 2:547 turns
Express the button on the microphone, please.
Oh, sorry. Okay. I especially want to support the tourism management man. But first I want to quickly read from our general plan land use item 17, which you can find on page 24. Recognize and support visitor-serving uses as an integral part of community life, and ensure that visitors serving uses and activities are designed and managed in such a manner that they are secondary to Ojai's small town character and identity as the desirable place to live. I would suggest that they are majority now They've taken over the town. So that land use policy is not being worked on now.
Although several pages used in draft documents under tourism management exempt tourism and hospitality, this is a tourism management proposal. I support your proposal only if it includes tourism and hospitality Exempting tourism leaves a big void and should be made a priority. Since tourism is the central part of our city economy, and by the way it brings about eight million dollars in which is 57 percent of our budget, it would seem best to approve it but only if it includes a priority for tourism and hospitality.
Here's some questions Why do tourists come here? What did they do when they get here? What are they missing? Are restaurants a big part? Well, what would tourists like that doesn't exist? How can we promote our tourism without having them buy our houses? Do we need an arts center? What if a major restaurant closes? These are things that we should be doing and asking.
And it's a major, if we don't take control and work on our tourist management issues this community is going to continue to lose. We're going to be dominated more and more by tourism which we need So I request your council include economic development options in your general plan update with a focus on tourism. And please again remember, it generates eight million dollars?
Thank you Bill. Next we have Anita Cram then Starchild and then Larry Steingold
So the tourism part is what I'm questioning too. I'm really vague, I didn't kind of get any idea of what that means and so I think the community needs to understand what that is. I agree with Bill that it's really taking over and it definitely needs to fall below the needs of the community members. So I have no clue what that means in the plan thank you.
Thank You Anita next we have Starchild then Larry Steingold
Hello, good evening. I'd like to speak in favor of more housing. You know hi, I moved here five months ago with my daughter. And we moved to Ojai, because it's a great community. She gets to go to wonderful school. We go to the farmers market twice a week. We play in the playground in Libbey Park and it's not like Ventura. There is no drug paraphernalia. It's safe for her and we want to be able to stay And one thing that's going to happen is we're going to need a better house. We got one that was available, a month-to-month lease. We don't have a washing machine. We've only got one bedroom for the both of us and there's not really backyard where she can play without running into the street so I'm running after her quite a bit. And in order to have a, for us to get a house or apartment or whatever it is.
There's going to have to be more well housing that we can afford and I'm lucky enough to have good enough job. I can almost afford a house but not quite. And I think if more housing were built, then there might be something for me to buy. And I looked a little bit, doing my research. It seems that not many new single-family houses have been built in this city in the last couple decades and when I hear about this housing overlay it makes me think about one term I saw in the general plan which was impediments to housing And I think if the city council can work to restrict those are to eliminate those impediments as much as possible, and it would be a great benefit not only to me but too many other families in Ojai. So, thank you.
Thank you star child next year Larry Stangle.
2:54 – 3:0017 turns
Good evening. I agree with Bill, it's not so much tourism development, it should be its tourism management. So we need to figure out how to manage our tourists and the numbers coming in and the money they generate. Which ones are required which ones aren't required? Can somebody tell me that?
You mean elements Larry? Yeah please.
Through the Mayor, I can respond to that. Land use housing circulation conservation open space noise safety and then the new one which is environmental justice.
So of the five that we're paying for now what you want to pay for?
So the ones that were that we're paying for now is land use housing circulation safety
so which ones aren't required?
We have Uh, we have a rec recreational element, which
is the ones we're looking to pay for
the 1 that we're talking about right now.
Yes, that is not required.
So tourism is 1 that's not required. Okay? And the 2nd, 1 is Kappa climate action plan as
well. Okay. We've got enough people in climate and I think we should be able to put that together for a lot less between the Climate Action Committee and all the experts we've been bringing here. For the last seven years that I've been here, we should be able to do it. The tourism management thing we need and that's just keep it simple. I mean even the expansion of the VMU what if we did that for the whole up and down? Now you've got the housing element, you've got the land element, you've got the building element and business and it's all done and everything is an exception anyway so you have control And if you want other business, you just had to get rid of some of the CUPs on the general businesses.
But keep it simple. I mean we need the climate for that's going forward for the next 20-30 years. Tourism? Who knows but that's an easy one this is not that difficult. We shouldn't have to be spending 350 grand. Thank you.
Thank You Larry. Mr. City Clerk any comments online?
Yes, Mayor. We're going to move on to public comment for our zoom participants on item two general plan update with a few raised hands we'll start with Renee followed by Teal row. Renee you have the
floor. Good evening City Council. You know, we get into a situation where we have the local residents living in our climate with limited resources and we have the tourists who can come into our town who add to our climate challenges without any constraints on those tourists. And from my point of view, we've got to find a middle ground so that the locals feel like our existing resources are being protected and that the tourists are being asked to pay their fair share.
And so I do feel that tourism management has a climate element to it And I'm wondering if we could have the tourism management part, have a climate element to it. So we can talk about ways to educate those people coming into our community about the environmental impact they're having on our town and ways that they can mitigate it, ways that their inn can mitigate those changes. We talked about in the past having bicycles and people who are staying at inns and doing different events having shuttles rather than having to take their car everywhere or having bicycles to transportation up to the top of shelf road for a walk without everybody driving their car up there.
To me, there is a way to do the climate and the tourism and have an environmental impact together. And I'm not sure if that's something that's possible. I'm not sure how to talk about that other than what I'm doing right now. But I know that there is a way to do it And I've been in countries and traveled in countries where they've created climate mitigation and educational opportunities. Every time you go to turn on the water, there's something that says, reduce and reuse and recycle. And we don't wash your sheets every day.
And they have educational places where people can go to see, and use, and be trained on environmental educational opportunities. So those are the climate elements that I was hoping we could adopt. Thank you very much. Thank
you, Renee.
Next we have Teal Rowe. Teal, you have the floor.
3:00 – 3:0813 turns
I'm with Anita and Bill and Larry on the tourism thing, and I'm wondering curious about the sequel laws do they not cover the climate. And I'm very concerned about the overlay. I'm wondering when I hear said, you may becomes you shall when we at this point have the housing element okayed by is it HUD? So that's very concerning to me. The other thing is the Bryant Street, like there's 50 there and there are 64 peppered elsewhere so without the overlay didn't 510 Ojai Ave just get okayed for how many units? And isn't that a commercial spot there or manufacturing or something else? So It seems to me, and I don't really know exactly but it seems to me like the zone is being changed regardless of the overlay anyway. And I don' think that's a really good idea especially for the Bryant Street area.
One more thing, I implore the wording to not use artist influenced Because so many things are using artists for Ojai as an excuse to develop or get what they want. And I think it's a complete insult to artists. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Teal. No more raised hands, ma'am.
All right. We'll move on to discussion. Who would like to begin?
I want to ask a question. Did my colleagues, understand what he'll just said about using artists as an. What would it. I didn't understand what she said did you could do the American. Well
we're in discussion right now so
yeah i don't know that others. I mean we're talking about the need. Part of the reason for having a housing overlay allowing housing on Bryant Street was, you know, to provide housing for our artists. I don't anyway. Okay. Who would like to begin discussion
all jump at once.
I end up talking first, like perpetually because no one else jumps up. So I was waiting to see if somebody would but all
we appreciate your enthusiasm. No,
I'll jump in. I do. I think that we do need both the climate Action plan and we do need the tourism land components to our general plan. That's items four and five, and just for clarification Bill Miley actually kind of pointed out Land use goal 17 on page 24 of our current general plan basically says that visitor uses and activities should be designed and managed in a manner that they are secondary Um, to a small town character and identity. As a desirable place to live, but that we depend on.
Tourism and so, you know, we need to figure out how to achieve those 2 things together. I think Mr Miley is correct that. It was nice to get that goal into our general plan, but it has not been implemented. And the way to look at ways to implement it is to develop a general plan component. And I'll also refer back to Mr. Harvey who said that having elements allows you to say this is important to us here's how we're addressing So I support both the climate action plan.
And on that, you know regard that you know reducing greenhouse gases and ways to achieve that are are important and So, I want
to interrupt. I'm sorry to interrupt we do have another raised hand on zoom. Okay, that we didn't know about.
Yes, thank you Mayor want to ensure all public comment is heard. We do have another race and it did come up right after we ended Kathy lattice you have the floor.
Yes, thank you. My hand was raised for several minutes so I'm not sure what happened but anyway. I'm Kathy Laudis and I'm a resident of Ojai. I would like to remind everyone that general plans are a powerful planning land use tool when they include a comprehensive set of policies that express the community's long-term vision and today we've had no draft policies Compiled, presented or reviewed and here we are coming to a close with this project. I've looked at the graphic at the bottom of page five on the staff report. The notation is alarming that we are here at step three policy options and this step involves the most challenging labor intensive work most legally important part of the general plan Why were we not discussing policies months ago or at least important issues or defining what the issues are?
So I do have two things to say about issues and policies in the town. One, we had a community vision and opportunities workshop back in 2020 early in the process that included participation by around 300 people. The most important issues identified were High quality of life, small town character open space engaged community environmental sustainability. I read that as climate change historical character of the downtown arts and culture unique residential neighborhoods but again we've had no discussion about these issues and the policies that we need to address them Number two, here's an example of existing policy from the land use element that's under the topic of preserving Ojai small town character. It's Policy LU1. Emphasize retention of Ojai's natural environment setting Small town character and scenic features as a priority over expansion of urban areas.
Policy LU2, preserve Ojai small town character along with the desirable features of individual neighborhoods and this is followed by 14 policy statements that further explain what that means So why have we not talked about the policies we already have in our award winning general plan, which is pretty darn good by the way and asked where do we need improvement or updating or are they fine as is.
We have seriously missed the boat to see the big picture. We have not had any discussion about the larger opportunities of the issues of the day, instead we were quickly directed toward discussing three focus issues of proposed development change that weren't really supported in any meaningful way by the Community Vision and Opportunity Survey. And why would we focus on three areas prior to an in-depth broad policy discussion of important issues first?
3:08 – 3:144 turns
No more race hands me. Thank you for that.
Okay, thank you. All right. Thank you, Mayor pro tem.
I think what the last speaker raised is also really high on my priorities list, is that we end up with an end product. The update of the general plan could be the most important thing that any of us do during our term of office and I want Our general plan to reflect as much as what I've read in our past plan. As we can do without offending HCD and what we have to achieve through our housing element, because we have to harmonize Those things, but everything that we can retain in terms of talking about what Ojai is and how to sustain and protect and move forward.
It's really important to me I have had extensive Conversations with Mr. Harvey and to a lesser degree Lucas, and I am being assured That although kind of Ramey hasn't really, you know shown us yet that they are prepared to show us that they understand where we've come from. And where we want to go. And that they will work with us on putting these things that we believe are required as part of our, our vision.
Based upon the representations of Lucas and Ben, I mean, I'm going to support going forward with Ramirez. It sounds like Approving the contract is going to be a little bit of an moving target because we're still. Defining what's going to go into a finished product, but. I approve of going forward as we've been requested with Ramirez based upon the recommendations of Mr. Harvey and Mr. Seifert, and I guess the last part that we need to cover in terms of the recommendations and the ask for action, I am not prepared to support The overlay ideas.
I think the best way to approach those issues is on my understanding is that we don't need those in order to stay compliant with the housing element and so that We retain the greatest flexibility for a project that comes to us by not having these overlays, that the state will jump on top of our overlays and take away our local control. And so I think my You'll hear me say this a lot, but I think local control is really important.
And and I want to protect it our local control to the greatest extent possible. I do have one other request. And that is that we Engage Sonny Soltani for the limited purpose Of reviewing when we have a. General plan, you know what? All right, we have our particular land use element formulated. Because she is playing a role with us in. Advising us on our rights vis-a-vis potential housing litigation and housing projects.
I think it's important for her to be part of the process in terms of where are we potentially creating places where it's going to be harder to defend local control and those types of issues. So, I'd like to see us allocate as part of this or at least actually so I'll make a motion Let me find the staff report so I
can.
3:14 – 3:2510 turns
Okay, so I am going to make a motion that we do authorize the city manager to enter into contract extension with Ramey as indicated in the staff report. I am going to approve the, what? Motion to approve That we include and create both a climate action plan and a tourism management plan. And that we not adopt the general plan amendments related to overlays and that we direct staff to approach I would like to ask. Ms.
Sultani. With a. To provide us with a proposed budget for assisting us in overseeing those issues that relate to potential future housing litigation.
Is there a second for that motion?
So, I agree with most of this. I just want to talk about the elephant in the room which is that 82% of the people who work who live in Ojai do not work in Ojai and 83% of the people who work in Ojai Do not live in Ojai, so when we and we have to ask ourselves why that is. And until we solve the housing problem. Until we have housing for people who work here to live here and until we have.
some sort of economic development for people who work outside of Ojai, we're going to have the same emissions that we have now. And it is long been known and this is I don't have an answer for this but I also don't want it to be covert in the conversation. We have to talk about climate as it relates How and what we want the population? We have Starchild there who talked about housing.
When we say no housing, we say no to Starchild. That's what we do. It is an elephant in the room that we never talk about. We have to figure that out. Once again, the numbers don't lie. And when those numbers equate to 50% of the greenhouse gases that we have in Ojai are the result of emissions and you have those numbers There's no way to not talk about housing.
We can say we wanna maintain local control, we don't want an overlay district but 20 years tells us what that means. It means that planning commissions and city councils do not approve housing. We know what has happened in Ojai That is why local control was taken away. I am not against local control, but that is why it was taken away because of those kinds of conditions and the...
And it's not to say that people don't have a right to have their small town stay as it is, but I don't want this to be covert. I want that elephant in the room to be out there and I wanna talk about it. If we wanna say no more housing unless Then let's say it, just say it. If we want 82% of the people that live in Ojai to work outside of Ojai because there's no housing or the other way around, let's just say it. We have to talk about it.
I
can't take longer.
Let the euphemisms run wild here. So that having been said, I would certainly support the authorizing of Ramirez. I would certainly support a climate action plan. I would certainly support a tourism management although we used to call it growth management. I don't know how that term changed but okay i'm fine with that Um, and we haven't talked about, you know, Bryant street which I think we need to talk about.
And I would not support. I think we need more discussion on the overlay district. I just really do, we need to speak honestly about the repercussions of not building any more housing or of the repercussions of making everything go through planning and trying to get people on planning who believe what we believe you know That's, that's pretty clear to me. So I would not support the land use motion. I think it needs more discussion. I want more honesty, just say what you mean and mean what you say, you know?
So that's my, and if we let's just talk about it honestly. So that is my discussion on the matter.
Council Member Lange?
Yeah so I also wanted to just follow up and say that thank you first of all thank you so much to our Community Development Director and to our City Manager to all of our staff who have worked so hard on this And I also have come away from our conversations with the understanding that we can direct Ramirez. That if we start back from, to your point, if we start back from ground zero and we look for another consultant that it would add time, it would add expense and we still have the ability to direct the process I want to speak about the land use in any overlay in particular.
And, and one of one of the considerations that I had, you know, coming into this process was, you know, do we, we is it something that isn't. Is it a good idea to have an economic development element, to address some of the concerns that Councilmember rule brought up and also taken. If you want to talk about the elephant in the room, it is that we don't have jobs here.
And so if we look at re taking away our rezoning are. Our light industrial Bryant circle area and we talk about replacing commercial properties with housing, then we are really limiting our ability to get high paying jobs into this town. And that's something that we talked about in our joint meeting. And that's something that I am gonna stand by because I feel like it's part of a bigger plan. So we can look at housing, we've approved four housing projects since we've been here. We have met our RHNA numbers. I mean, we have moved forward with housing but I think we really need to think about when we're approaching this general plan, we really need to think about there are so many considerations In addition to housing, where are the people we house going to work?
Where are our kids gonna go play and how do we go for recreation? We're still looking at if we build houses. We're still looking at people driving back and forth to Ventura or to Oxnard or to other places so where they can find jobs. So I think that what I heard Lucas say is that if we do the zoning overlay That it takes the might, we might be able to have houses to we shall have houses. And so it gives, it takes away some of our ability to make some of those long-term decisions about what we want our community to look like and what kind of amenities we wanna have for the people who live here and what kind of jobs we wanna have. So I feel really strongly about moving forward With the land use decisions to really limit that and hold that back.
I also do think, um, I also do want to move forward with the climate action plan. I don't think we need to spend the $350,000. I think there are some templates for that and yeah, I'd like to see what we can do you know, to conserve resources in that area.
Council Member Francina? So what page were, weren't there three choices? What page were they on for the climate There were three, right? We were supposed to choose one of the three.
Through the mayor that's attachment B page one and goes on to page two.
Do we have a moment to look?
3:25 – 3:3112 turns
I'm not finding it. B okay thank you.
Are you recommending
option
A?
I am recommending option A, yes. Okay. Which is just for go ahead. Go ahead. Yes.
Through the mayor, could I just clarify that? Option A through this climate action component is really sprinkling those policies throughout. That's where you're seeing a smaller, that's why the dollar amount is much smaller. The midpoint is really where you're seeing that climate action plan come to life as a separate component and that kind of sounded like what you were speaking to.
That's correct thank you for clarifying.
So let me just, I'm gonna invite. Council Member Lang to amend my motion so that it selects Climate Action B, but that we look at ways to reduce the costs through the borrowing of other people's successful climate action plans.
Yes,
yes. Council Member Francina, do you want to continue?
You know, my way of thinking. Number one, no tourist brings the car into town and if they do bring it down is their overnight guests. They don't park it. They don't get in it again. The locals have stickers that would you know there are so many. There are cities who've done these things You know, just that's how you manage tourists. There are ways to you know we've had discussions about this. So I just, you know if the climate plan is going to mean I'd like what an appreciated what you said that it's a constant like a constitution in case people in the future don't care how high buildings are and they don't care about these things I hope it never happens.
You know, I also brought up the points that Councilwoman rule product, but not as in depth, you know because we know what the problems are. The lack of housing and, you know, everything is connected you know that everything is connected. I'm just not, you know to me, I'd rather spend, I still would rather. I like A and I like spending the money on, you know I'd rather we could spend the money on...I guess there's not much you can buy anymore with that money it's not that much.
No it's not that much. It used to be that you could buy a giant parking lot where the tourists could park their cars before they come to Olape but now Okay, we'll do it. So that much in the scheme of things.
Thank you and I would really like to thank our Community Development Director Lucas for your patience, your endurance. Hang in there all the work that you've done on this year, and I'd also like to thank Rami and associates. You're listening. We got our housing element approved, which was huge and early. And we should definitely celebrate that. It seems like there are a lot of elephants in this room.
They're protected here in Ojai so that makes sense right? I think the huge element in the room is that land use is irreversible. I think we all just need to soak that in once you've developed a piece of land, that's it and we have a certain bio-regional caring capacity here in Ojai and we have wildlife coming from this side going to that side and going back So I think we all need to keep that in mind. We are a small rural town, that's why people moved here. We are not a city and I often if you're old enough to remember Mr. Rogers his little magical town where there was actually a trolley and if you can picture that there were buildings in it picture that and just picture putting another toy and another toy and another toy house and another toy house and some apartment buildings And all of a sudden it's filled up and that is not a small town anymore.
And yes, I think we definitely need housing for extremely low, acutely low income households. Those are very low rent. It's not low income, extremely low and acutely low. So I would say we have more of agreed issue That, for example comes up when we talk about Airbnbs people want to make as much money as they can. And that destroys our community so and I agree with Councilmember Lang we really have to protect our last industrial zone which is Bryant Street so back to Mr Rogers if you fill that in it is done there's nowhere to go and three point square 3.4.
No, 4.3 square miles so I think we should move forward and I appreciate all the input from my council members we have a motion on the table we have a second with some oh okay are there any more public comments?
3:31 – 3:3617 turns
We do have a raised hand right now but that'll be up to council direction to open up public comment again
Okay, wait just are we okay Councilor taking that one more comment I think it'd be. Okay no all right never mind okay yeah
almost everybody in the audience i'm in favor of allowing somebody to make a three-minute comment
okay all in favor
Yep. Okay,
right. I'm going to know but only because you know principle policy and otherwise we didn't really take about we just did consensus.
We have heard that there's been some issue with people getting through tonight so we have all in favor with three votes
yes
yes go ahead. Mr. City Clerk, we have one more comment?
Yes, we do. Thank you Mayor. So we will open up our public comment period again for our Zoom participants right now. We have Stephen Kolame with a raised hand. Stephen Kolame, you may unmute and speak.
I want to apologize. I did have my hand up, I think there was some freezing of the Internet here and I'll be careful here because I'm not quite as sanguine as the direction that the Council has been heading on this I think we have to not forget the context under which the current draft general plan and its elements occurred smack in the middle of the COVID shutdown, which Lucas has pointed out.
But despite that, we can celebrate the fact that we have an HCD approved housing element. That is really a big deal but if we go back to the very first public visioning session in 2020 Where there was meaningful input from a reasonable cross section of Ojai residents on what they wanted to protect, preserve and enhance. We were not looking at something that's heading in that direction and I'll go a little bit off script because I did review the existing land use element, the one that prevails until we come up with an update.
And there are some extremely Impressive policies and programs in that. And why it is that we didn't take the elements that we had, which were award winning elements and say let's see what we need to do to advance those to promote those. I mean, we're looking in the four step process at a pair of of policies, which are really more development oriented policies.
They're ways of giving an option to developers to increase a profit and that's not what a general plan is supposed to be. It's supposed to be a vision for what Ojai wants to be and look like in the year 2045. A lot of the people engaged in this process aren't going to be around in 2045, it's going to be our young families that will be there and I have not seen that visionary orientation. This is more like a current planning exercise to put this in planning parlance than an advanced planning input, so I hope you'll step back if i'm not impressed with what Ramey has done and their production. So if you're going to redirect them, I really hope that you will take a firm hand on the reins It is at least as good as the elements that we have in the current prize winning general plan.
Thank you.
Thank you, Steve. All right. Could I make a little council
member? Council Member Lange, did you say that you wanted option B because I'm looking...I think we should do option C because it's not that much more and we need to do option A and B The climate adaption should be sprinkled throughout. Don't you think we might as well? It's not that much more. On page attachment B, page one. Only 20,000 more or maybe only 10,000.
Please quiet. Thank you.
The way I understand be, and in my conversations
with Ramey is that it would also include the sprinkling of
those climate action Policies throughout the rest of the elements. The only way that works and functions, and it was what I was talking about early on is each of these elements will be tested against each other to ensure that there's a flow and a consistency And they all have kind of some harmony and that's through the environmental process If there's inconsistencies with what we're looking at within those elements, those have to be balanced as a part of that process. So having A and B and then showing that as option C, B is doing that regardless.
3:37 – 3:4329 turns
Council Member
Langdon, thoughts? I think there was a C because it was looking at going above and beyond what you would typically see just with those policies being sprinkled throughout. Kind of like what's being done for the environmental justice element Since it's not a standalone, all those policies are being interacted. And that's really the only thing that was going to be happening with option A. When you add option B they're looking at... They're showing that it's its own climate action plan or climate action element but the only way you can do that if it's an element is also having those policies interwoven.
So through the mayor You go with B and we'll have that conversation. If it's different than what I'm saying here, obviously we will come back.
Okay. All right, can I make a quick friendly amendment? Because I do not want to vote yes on the land use. I was wondering if we could separate out the motion such that includes the hiring of Rami, the climate action and the tourism management The land use, once again I will say you know I support an artist workspace we never discussed that on Bryant. You know, we could hope for manufacturing. Have we looked in the last 15 years how much manufacturing has come to this town? We have priced out our artists. We no longer have any Boho artists, Bohemian artists. We now have only people who can afford to live here. So anyway I'm not comfortable voting yes on the land use but I am comfortable voting yes on the others so if we could separate those and have two different motions I would much appreciate it.
Mayor Pro Tem, what's your motion?
I defer to the city manager on whether separating. I've tried to separate it out votes before. No you can't do that from a functional
standpoint. You can vote yes and I just want the opportunity to vote no on it.
I'm going to defer to the City Attorney this is his wheelhouse
Yeah, so Rosenberg's contemplates a motion to divide the question which is the maker of the motion. The second motion won't voluntarily split the motion. A motion to divide the question is an order that takes a second and once approved splits the motion into pieces And then you vote on the actual motion. I realize that's a little bit cumbersome,
I strongly disagree with Council respectfully disagree with council member rules suggestion i think we need to keep it in there and it is the most important part of our general plan this is more important than anything So, that's just one second. So one second. It is your motion. Mayor pro tem to confirm
yeah I'm not, I wasn't gonna amend based upon, I guess I'll take her comment as a motion and I don't want to amend my motion to include that. Okay,
so I will make it a substitute motion. I'm not...I'm just asking for the opportunity to vote no on the land use. You all will vote yes or you'll vote...I mean it will pass So I'm not asking for anything but the right to vote no on one portion of it. It doesn't separate it, it doesn't make it anything different other than it's a separation of vote. Now, I don't see what the problem is I truly don't. I mean, it's not doing anything other than giving us two votes. It doesn't separate it in reality.
But once again, do you want to go ahead and make a motion? Sure, I will make like me two motions to separate motions one motion is that we approve the contract for Ramirez that we approve Client at the climate action plan, the cap and that we approve. The tourism management component. The 2nd motion would be that we. Well, someone else can make the 2nd, but I'm not going to make a motion and we don't approve it that land use. I just want the opportunity to vote now.
That's all is there a 2nd for that motion?
Well, I'm going to make a separate related substitute motion that we
know that so that motion dies without a second. Okay, continue
my motion would be to take each item separately just as it's stated here first emotion to authorize the city manager. Second, you know,
is there a second for that motion also? Why not? I'll second that.
That separates
Okay. Well, then we have
yeah procedurally that amounts to motion by the question into the pieces of state and staff report. It would be in order to vote.
Okay, I'm
there I have one question for city attorney does it in, in, in practical terms make any difference to how we move forward.
No, staff will move forward with the whatever direction comes out of the motions that we'll move forward. We're not going to work on something in the gap between...
Right so in other words whether there's four separate motions this is my question whether there's four separate motions or there's one motion that includes all four components it is for all intents and purposes the same? Is that correct as far as it is as far as staff is concerned?
Yeah the direction that would provide a staff is the same
Okay okay
we
have
a
motion and a second career of the roll call please Weston.
Roll-call vote 0–0 Moved by Leslie Rule motion and a second career of the roll call · 2 under review
Show transcript
3:43 – 3:4830 turns
to split other way around the other way pardon motion council member Francina second council member rule to split Mayor Pro Tem's original motion which is in four parts into separate votes
If I may, I believe the motion is just simply to follow the recommendation outlined in the agenda report and to take the components as listed without the obvious open the matter for public comment.
Okay, question about my motion please. I, um, my question is to Councilmember rule does that accomplish what you wanted to do
it absolutely does, I just want the opportunity to vote separately on the land use issue because I feel like it hasn't been properly vetted and discussed, and I'm not
right roll call
please listen Councilmember
Are we voting now on item two?
Roll-call vote 2–2 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Okay, now we will make through the mayor. Now we make a motion for each separate entity is that correct? Thank you. I will make a motion. I'll make a motion that we approve the contract with Ramirez and instruct staff to move forward with that.
I'll second.
Okay roll call please Weston.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move forward with that. I'll second. Okay roll call
Show transcript
but it also includes what my colleague said about Sunny right?
That was not in the motion. No that would be a separate motion.
Okay I'm sorry okay but yes okay got it okay now a motion for
item three I'll make a motion that we move forward with option B for the climate action plan, with direction to staff to return with options for reducing the cost.
Is there a second? I'll second. Roll call please, Weston?
Yes motion understood. Mayor Pro Tem Whitman?
Just clarification so we're talking about item four on the recommendations is that correct? Yeah yes.
We skipped one but that's okay. That's okay.
We can go back to it. There doesn't have to be another one.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion understood. Mayor Pro Tem Whitman? Just clarification so we're talking about item four on the recommendations is that correct? Yeah y
Show transcript
All right, I'll make a motion that we approve recommendation well that we approve item five moving forward with a tourism management element.
I'll second it. Okay roll call please Weston
Yes. That's member role. Yes. Yes, that's my parents. Yes. Yes
yes
I'll make a motion that we have the, that we direct staff to consult with. Attorney Sultani and obtain a proposal for providing us with legal assistance in reviewing our general plan or those matters that impact her role in assisting us with our housing issues.
I'll second it. Okay,
roll call please Weston.
May i ask a question of the motion maker that would include uh a discussion about the housing overlay?
Um, that's not what I'm. That's not the motion that I'm making so But if that issue comes up again in the general plan, I would expect me as we're going through if that issue comes up then I would expect her to talk to us about that. Yes. Okay,
thank you. I need clarification on the motion. I don't understand
it
3:48 – 3:5435 turns
Okay, the motion is that we solicit a proposal from Attorney Sultani to provide consultation to us during the general plan process for those issues which relate to her role in providing us with assistance on housing issues.
Okay thank you. All right roll call please Weston?
Council Member Francina
You know, I find myself still wondering because I don't know the cost and how that works. Is there some way to climb?
Yeah, I'm asking them to obtain a proposal
that
would come back to us for us to consider and vote on.
OK,
just as I don' I don''t know what.
Yeah,
I don ''t know what to ask for in terms of an amount of money. So
through the mayor by May Part of that would depend on what level of involvement you would want from Ms. Soltani. Is it several consultation sessions with the council at a high-level, big picture level? Or is it asking Ms. Soltani and her team to review and redline the document word for word? Those two have very different budgets. It's
not what
I would expect the proposal could return with some range of options.
That's exactly right and I'll just say, I meant to say this earlier. It...I expect your firm to do the red line part of that to the extent that's required. My proposal is that Ms. Soltani is going to give us more of the $30,000 foot view but where she identifies areas that require attention that we potentially she comes to meet with us on one of those or
yeah okay um yes i'm sorry i have a clarifying question are we talking about the whole uh general plan that we're approving now the components each of those components that she that she look at are we talking about the whole general plan Oh, yeah. So I'm unclear on that because she is a housing expert. She's also city attorney, but we have no way of knowing if she can actually look at a climate action plan so.
I'm confused as to what we're going to what we are actually asking of her. What is the scope and what is.
Address the climate action plan, unless there's some component in it that bears upon the services that she provides her. I don't anticipate That would happen and I would expect that the vast majority of Of what she would be giving us advice on would be the land use element Land use components
I would just as a clarifying question, then I would be more. I would make that more specific. It was very, very general for me. I don't so as a friend is as I would like more clarity and more specificity in what we're actually asking her to come back with as a proposal unless you just want to throw it out too. Seems very
well, we have emotion. We have a second. So let's have the roll call please Western Okay. Yes,
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1
Show transcript
All right well that completes
our- I would like to make a motion that we do not have the land use overlay. We haven't voted on that yet
No, we haven't. Okay.
All right.
Hold on. Do we have a second for that motion?
So let me
just one second. We have a motion. Is there a second for that motion? I'll second.
Okay. I want to discussion on it in that or I want clarification Um, if we if we don't vote on that item it's not approved for being put into the general plan. It can come back at some later time but at this point in time by not voting we're not directing Lucas to move forward am I correct on that? Can you repeat the motion that was made
To deny any forward motion on the housing overlay.
I'll second that motion. That staff would cease all work on the proposed housing overlay.
Exactly.
Roll call,
please Weston. Would you repeat what you just said Mr. City Attorney?
It would be a motion to cease all work on the proposed housing overlay in the downtown, at the Ojai Avenue area. So it would be to direct staff to stop all work on the housing overlay. If that motion carries, staff would cease all work on that. The council could always pick it up at some point in the future but no more work will be done on that at this time if that motion carried.
Okay and if we vote yes, not only approve staff Continue to work on it we're approving
the opposite, the opposite. Yes is yes stop. Okay. If you wanted to have staff keep working on the housing overlay you'd vote no on that motion.
3:54 – 4:0042 turns
A yes also means if they keep working that we've approved it.
No, a yes is we stop.
The two states of the world in the motion would be stop all work on housing overlays no more work on it. That's if the motion carries. The other alternative would be if the motion does not carry then staff would continue on it per council's prior direction Unless the council made other action.
Okay,
all right would not yet be approved and nothing's approved in final tonight.
That's
an opportunity to stop work but not to finish work. Yes,
yes means stop. Roll call please Weston.
Yes mayor the clerks he is clear on the motion mayor sticks.
Yes.
Remember like,
yes.
Remember rule.
No.
Remember France
know
your pro tem Whitman.
All right, well that concludes our discussion of the no. Madam Mayor
we would still need direction on the budget amendments to do all of the above. I don't think we have a precise dollar figure. The dollar figure in the staff report presumed portions of what has been directed with the additions and subtractions. I don't know if we have an estimate else it'd be direct stat approved the budget amendments as necessary
Through the mayor, the budget estimates are right around $174,000. That's what's in as a part of the attachments to this report. So yeah that amount is correct.
Inclusive of option B for climate action plan and inclusive of...
Climate action plan has been identified as option B which has a range in it.
But does $174,000 include the climate action plan? No,
that's separate.
Do we know that total number yet or no?
for the climate action plan? I
think it was just approved. Do we know that number?
Oh, the total number? Yes. I mean, that's just combining the highest dollar figure with everything else but just to be clear there for the Climate Action Plan it was having a conversation with Ramey and Associates and looking at how that cost could potentially be reduced and bringing that back. That's the motion that I remember hearing correct? For the climate action?
That was, and then we divided it all up. So that was my motion and we divided it up- And
the division that I made was Mayor Pro Tem's motion so yes. Okay.
So it's a yes to that piece? Yes. So the budget amount that I think the city attorney is speaking to is the housekeeping amount of 174,000 You've identified the budget piece in terms of moving forward with the contract. Yes, with Ramey and that contract then separates it out into a dollar amount that's 174. That 174 includes and in my presentation I identified three different pieces that it included one of those was the Sorry, I'm drawing a blank onto one of the more important pieces which is now required by state law.
Evacuation piece, the policy for that. So all of those are inclusive of that 174 as well and identified within the fiscal piece of this staff report.
Sorry Mr. Siebert, one quick question the City Attorney and I were just of the understanding that perhaps if we're adding in all the options the B for the Climate Action Plan, Tourism Management etc., we'll probably that with the 174 we're probably looking at a number that's closer potentially but not necessarily as high as $450,000 Combining those pieces, I see. So as a whole... With the instruction from the council to come back in an effort to try to reduce the amount especially for the climate action portion of it that was the direction. Potentially could be as high as 450 but does not necessarily have to be in fact the direction is not to hit that number and then come back in lower
Okay, so we need a motion for that. Would someone like to make a motion to pay? Can we get a
motion on the table first? I'll make a motion to approve moving forward with extending the contract for $174,857.
Okay. And in the additional funding that's combined not to exceed, we already have that.
Is there a second for that motion? So wait, we need a second. Is there a second?
I'm going to propose an amendment. Okay. So I think my emotion would be that we Approve that city going forward with the staff going forward with the With the budgets that have been identified for Recommendation four and five, so climate and tourism with the instruction that they are to seek every economy in trying to reduce those amounts.
Do you accept that? I accept that yes.
Okay,
so
do you want a second that? Yes, I'll second that okay all right roll call please Weston
Can we repeat the motion again please. Sorry,
Roll-call vote 0–0 · 2 under review
Show transcript
4:00 – 4:1620 turns
to approve the budget amendments as recommended by staff and staff recommendations four and five, and to include the additional city council direction not to exceed $450,000.
And,
and to do and to direct staff to seek every
yes.
Economically, as a mayor we also would need the budget member for item three that one didn't get approved before.
Okay, do you want to
add that
three on this ever with 175,000 and change or 74,000
that was my original motion was to approve that he s
Yeah, understood.
Okay. All right, roll call please Western
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion was to approve that he s Yeah, understood. Okay. All right, roll call
Show transcript
Okay motion passes all right we have now completed our discussion of the general plan.
Through the mayor thank you.
Thank you thank you all and let's take a very brief break and we will come back with our final item thank Hey, please let's go. Okay we are back. Oh, still waiting. We're not okay.
We will move on to item number three, Introduction of Ordinance to Prohibit the Use and Sale of Glue Traps within the City of Ojai. We have a staff report Mr. Management Analyst. Thank you.
Good evening Honorable City Council I'm Brian Popovich Management Analyst for the City Manager's Office and i'm here tonight to present the item to introduce an ordinance prohibiting the sale and use of glue traps in the city of Ojai As you guys know, Ojai does have a big history of supporting items that promote animal welfare. Including the recent passing of an ordinance adding to the right... Adding the right to bodily libeley for elephants. The item in question tonight is glue traps.
Glue traps are also known as the sticky board or glue board which is basically composed of a layer of cardboard or some other sort of hard material with a non-drying adhesive attached to it The goal of glue traps is to entrap rodents because they cross the board, which will trap their feet or other bodily parts. The trouble is once an animal's attached or stuck to the trap, the trapped animal typically dies from starvation dehydration or suffocation, which causes unnecessary suffering and an inhumane death for the trapped animal.
Furthermore, the CDC also warns against the use of glue traps due to the trapped animals producing urine and feces. Which is potentially introducing harmful human health impacts to it. Another unintended consequence of these blue traps they often capture animals that they're not intended to trap such as birds other larger animals. And that being said, there are more humane alternatives to glue traps that do currently exist. The most common alternative, the alternatives are snap traps, live traps or electric traps.
Snap traps and electric traps have a higher chance of killing the rodents instantly thus reducing their suffering and live traps are intended to actually capture and release the animal safely without them being stuck to the glue traps which causes harms to the animals At the time of writing this report, if the council did decide to pass this ordinance we would become the second city to prohibit the use of blue traps. The only other city being West Hollywood at this time.
To reiterate, the ordinance as proposed would prohibit the sale and use of glue traps within the City. And if adopted, the ordinance shall become effective 1 year after the date of its passage which will grant retailers and licensed exterminators an amortization period to come into compliance with the ordinance. Furthermore regarding fiscal impact, drafting a staff report in the ordinance are included in the city's annual budget And enforcement of this ordinance is anticipated to have a negligible impact on code compliances resources.
That being said, I'm happy to answer any questions and I'd also like to introduce Jacob Shaw who is the PETA Special Projects Manager who would like to give just a brief presentation on the subject matter as well.
Okay, any questions before Jacob speaks?
I have a question but I could save it to... Microphone please. I have a question about the one year phasing out, but I'd like to have Jacob do his presentation because that might be a discussion. Yes, thank you.
Come on up, Jacob. Thank you so much for being here and driving all the way from L.A., and waiting.
Of course. So I'll try to be brief here. I know it's been a long night, Exciting stuff. So, good evening everyone my name is Jacob Shaw and I'm here on behalf of people for the ethical treatment of animals. And before I get into anything I just want to start off by thanking Mayor Sticks and the City Council as well as city staff for taking on this issue it's really so wonderful and just to expand a bit on what Brian laid out I'm going to talk a little bit about more about what glue traps are and how they work. And I apologize in advance because some of these details are a little bit graphic, but I think it's important to consider them when considering what this ordinance would actually accomplish and the type of animal suffering that would be avoided if the ordinance was adopted.
So glue traps are small boards that are coated with a sticky adhesive, and they're designed to catch any small animal who wanders across the trap surface. They are responsible for more suffering than any other commercially available wildlife control product And because they're indiscriminate, they pose a threat to every amazing animal who lives in and around it.
countless small animals every single year. And to give some sense of the scope of this issue, the Wild One database which collects and verifies patient admission information from wildlife care facilities around the country reports that 180 species of wildlife including dozens of species of birds, bats, chipmunks, lizards, opossums, mice, rabbits, salamanders, snakes, turtles and even flying squirrels have been caught in glue traps and were brought to animal hospitals in need of life-saving care.
But what is so horrible about glee traps is that the vast majority of animals who are caught in these traps are never even taken to an animal hospital or wildlife rehabilitator. They are left to suffer excruciatingly painful deaths. So after their paws, their tails, their beaks or their snouts get stuck in these traps they get stuck to the glue. The animals suffer for days in some instances and they die slowly and painfully from starvation dehydration asphyxiation and blood loss Their eyes and their mouths can become glued shut.
And as they struggle to escape from the traps, the glue tears off chunks of their fur, their feathers or their skin and recognizing that they will die if they cannot find a way to free themselves. Some animals will even chew off their own limbs. So, when people just leave glue traps out and you know they sort of put them somewhere out of sight out of mind the animal dies this horrible long drawn-out deaths. But what happens in other instances is people wake up in the middle of the night or they get up from the dinner table because they hear something moving something crying out And when people are confronted with an animal caught to the glue that's crying in agony and thrashing in pain, they panic. And there are some people who will call emergency response hotlines but there are other people who have reported drowning trapped animals or bludgeoning them to death.
And that's just because of the way these traps are designed it leaves people who are completely unprepared and unqualified to deal with this situation and obviously an enormous amount of cruelty results. So, the good news is that the ordinance before you tonight will establish that no animal regardless of their species should ever be forced to endure the kind of suffering that glue traps inflict.
By banning the use and sale of these traps, the council will measurably reduce animal suffering and will help spare the lives of countless gentle animals in Nevada. So thank you so much for your consideration for everything you've already done for animals. And this ordinance is just really amazing showing that a little kindness really can go a long way. So thank you.
4:16 – 4:2213 turns
Thank you
so much, Jacob.
Yes? Jacob, may I ask you a question? You know, I'm aware that if you go online there's all these, you know, just those gruesome descriptions and they also try to tell people how to remove the animal without killing it and I don't know if you want to say a word about that.
Yeah of course! So The best and most important thing to do is to just act quickly. So if you can call a wildlife rehabilitator, there's an application called Animal Health Now that you can enter the species, your zip code, and it will show you wildlife rehabilitators in your area and the species that they take in. Unfortunately... I mean, if you have a bird in a glue trap or Uh, snake in a glue trap some larger.
Excuse me more charismatic animal you know, you may have better luck finding rehabilitator if it's a mouse or a rat and the glue trap. It's harder to have rehabilitators take them in and in those instances. We suggest people take a few drops of baby oil and try to put it on in between the animal's body and the trap, obviously taking precautions to try to not get bit if that's possible given the situation. And then slide a piece of paper between the free limbs of the animal and the adhesive So that they don't get stuck anymore. If you want more information on that as well, I'm happy to sort of put together a more detailed explanation of that with some of the people on our side who are a little bit more experienced with the first-hand animal rescue work.
Yeah, I just wanted the public to be aware that that information exists. And you've said you said it very well think thank you. Thank you so
much.
Yeah.
Jacob. Can you we spoke about this can you clarify though for the public why blue traps are separate from poison at this point, you know why they're not in the same ordinance.
To as far as I understand it, I don't know there is another city in the US that has banned the use of all rodenticide so far. I think part of the reason has to do with the fact that There are certain applications of rodenticide that I don't know that there are quite as many alternatives spelled out as there are in the case of blue traps. I think if the council wanted to consider a ban on rodenticides at a future date, that's absolutely something that PETA and animal advocates around Ojai would be happy to support but i think This ordinance is just coming at a time where there's. A huge amount of momentum to ban glue traps because there's just an overwhelming consensus that they're cool, they're ineffective and you know, they've been banned in a number of countries like England, Iceland, Ireland, New Zealand, Wales I think this is all spelled out on the staff report but.
That there's a federal bill now that was introduced to the House of Representatives in January that would ban glue traps nationwide. So I think the real momentum behind this ordinance and the focus on glue traps is a reflection of the fact that on this issue in particular, there's just a growing amount of awareness and momentum behind a ban. Does that address what you're asking? Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank you so much, Jacob. We'll move on to public comment first we have Rick Sudis then Anita Cram, Suttas and then Starchild.
I wandered a lot of new people. I've been here since before. I grew up here. I own air control company since 68. I went over the city Ojai two years ago and sealed it up for rodents. I own a company called right away dot com It won't kill anything. But I've been in a lot of addicts, people throw those glue traps out and it's a bad way to go. I stepped on one time and I couldn't get it off my shoe.
Had a hell of a time with it. What happens, people now take these glue traps and put them on their cars because the rodents are hitting the cars. So the other little animals come they get in it and it's a mess. And it's the same thing that picture I showed you right there with that bait station. I just talked to a guy who lived on Del Norte Sunday he's got a BMW that they chewed up and right next to his BMW is that bait station And all those things do is bring the rats to the property.
And these guys that are got this racket going, charge you a hundred a month to come out and till those bait stations up and all they're doing is killing rats and wildlife and little mountain lions that we're paying two million a year to protect so need to get rid of all of them. On the way to the trap, the rat stopped and chewed up water you're protecting. A rat can smell another rat's hormones 10 miles away so if you leave something in your car then you smell it and here they come and all the wiring in cars now is biodegradable made out of soy.
So this is a big giant problem and I ship right away all over the world But this business and this poison's got to stop. I went to a guy's house about five years ago, and he's throwing decon around the yard, and he's got turquoise rat droppings all over the yard. Not telling him. So that's what you're sitting on. You're talking about climate change. That's the climate change you better worry about because it goes right up the ladder.
And I've been in a lot of addicts here that are loaded with decon, they're biohazards and the rat crap is about that deep. One rat can drop 20 000 pellets a year. Yep I see it all the time so i'm just telling you he's right absolutely correct and I talk to people over all over the U.S or they take If you got a glue trap, you gotta bring the animal to it. So the first thing you do is put some grain on it or a piece of peanut butter then here they come and they're suffering and then the next thing comes to eat that, they get in it.
4:22 – 4:2825 turns
Thank you so much Rick. I actually have a
question.
Hey Rick we have a question for you if you don't mind.
First, I'm glad you got out of that glue trap. But my question is what is Radaway? It's a spray. So it's a smell deterrent for... Yep.
Okay. I make 11 different fragrances. It won't kill anybody, it won't hurt anybody. If you go on the website to go to the video, they'll see me doing a taste test in 2007. I'm
going to buy some tonight!
And it works for deterring... That's what it
is, a
deterrent. It deters rats from doing that chewing activity
on cars? In fact, you can't buy mace in New York City. So I sent a lot of this to New York City. I just sent 100 orders here. in the last three weeks.
So
I'll tell people New York, if you order two then I give them some hot capsicum makes right away hot and spicy. So you take about a four ounce spray bottle and fill that up with hot right away when you're walking around in New York or somebody gives you a hard time bingo right between the eyes. And that'll stop it like a clock. You cannot buy mace in New York state.
Oh, you have a lot of information. Thank you so much. I know. No, that's great.
You could have
made to try
to keep everything environmentally safe. If right away was poisonous, I'd already be dead.
Well,
every day.
Thank you so much. OK, thank you. Next week, Anita Cram and Starchild.
That's right, you're a Ojai sports kid. That's Joe Miley, he's my son!
It's good enough for him, it's good enough for us.
Thank
you.
Okay so I support the banning of glue traps in Ojai and most important reason is that they do result in a cruel and prolonged death of rodents other small mammals birds reptiles and we are a community of conscientious people this aligns with our values it should be a no-brainer for us But I'd also like to say that in addition, glue traps and other traps by the way capture primarily young rodents. And maybe you've heard the phrase breeds like rats and mice so they're really not doing the job and you're doing a big job trying to manage traps So I think you'd do a lot better if you sealed the entry points, caulk screen.
I had a neighbor one time that paid a pest company a lot to come out close the garage door no lights on see where the light shined in a little corner of the garage door and put steel wool up I mean, that's something anybody can do. And you know the cars are a big problem right now. I like the old herbal tradition well essential oils are one, you know mixed with water spray plenty of websites will tell you how but i also like the old herbal tradition of strewing Where they actually threw herbs across the floor to prevent disease prevention.
And with all this rain my lavender, you know rosemary, oregano are doing really good so I just gave them a trim and just threw it around places where i didn't want rodents to come in You know, the last option that people are doing with their cars is they leave the hoods open because the rodents won't come in. Some people are doing it all day long I think just at night is enough probably but also if you can move your car. Securing your garage if you park in a garage is really important but if you have to leave it parked out and you're in a place where you're getting a lot of rodent traffic move it someplace else Also, if it's in an open shed which is or an open garage which is part of the problem and someone you know has stuff piled in the corners and they're coming in.
If you provide runways for them which then they sent with their urine and their feces and then it becomes a place they go but they want little hidden spots like wood is piled here so you have to eliminate all of those too And in the long run, it's probably a lot less work to do the you know excluding them getting rid of the incentives blocking the holes than trying to manage traps even if they're snap traps or have a hearts. It's all gonna You know just it's better to use exclusion techniques and sense that they don't like so anyway. It''s a great thing to ban them. Thank you.
Thank you need a star child
4:28 – 4:339 turns
Hi, I first encountered glue traps when I was maybe 19 years old. I was working at a summer camp in Minnesota where I'm from and saw an animal while it's a mouse in the glue trap with a lot of stool after it. And I thought that that's pretty inhumane. One thing I worry about this resolution is that people will try and find alternative traps so they might use poisons which of course can accumulate in the mouse and then be eaten by predators and bioaccumulate there Harming wildlife, it can also harm small children who might eat the poison.
Those snap traps can snap on children's fingers I worry a lot about that and i've also seen mice you know walking around with a snap trap on its tail so that that can't be that humane those live traps I guess it all depends on what you do with the live mouse that you caught I imagine If people really sit in the wild. That's one thing that I think that people might like drown it or something else so i just kind of wonder is bad as blue traps are if we're just pushing people to options that are worse, so, so
thank you start up any comments online, Mr city clerk
know raised hands on zoom Mayor.
Okay, well let's go ahead and move on to discussion. And I'll just put a motion on the table to introduce an ordinance prohibiting the use and sale of glue traps within the city of Ojai.
I'll second it. Okay, discussion? Yes my question is, I'm assuming this one at the very on page three you'll see that if adopted It states that the ordinance shall become effective one year from the date of its passage, which will grant retailers of glue traps and licensed exterminators that use glue traps in their profession an amortization period to come into compliance with the ordinance. And my question for the city attorney is Do we have to do that? Is there some way I would, I mean I would like to ban these immediately and just buy up the stock.
You know can we ban what can we do about this part?
So we do not have to set the amortization period as a year. The default is always the 30 days after adoption, that's just the standard for an ordinance. You could pick somewhere in the middle on the ammortization component of rather than buying up the stock, buying and destroying it any licensed exterminator or retailers who have stock Could sell that exterminator could use it somewhere else. It's not a line and the retailers if they're in Ojai, and they have alternative.
They own more than 1 store they can sell the other store and thus monetize it to no need for the city to buy it doesn't become a stranded asset. If there's a retailer who only exist in Ojai and it does become a stranded asset, then they could reasonably return it to their supplier. So we may be able to set it shorter than one year effective date. I believe that was drawn from West Hollywood which set it at a year as the only other model.
Perhaps the compromise would be a three or six month amortization period.
Legally we can do 30 days?
Yeah, the minimum is 30 days
Let's do 30 days, because this has gone on too long. And I understand the concerns of Starchild what a wonderful name that is. I have, I didn't realize that when I moved to Taormina that it's right next to the field house Constant stream of mice. First thing I did was, I ripped up the carpet at my own expense to put it in a wooden you know renting a room so it wasn't you know that much a thousand and something and then I had to put...I didn't want them living under my bed so I got rid of the gap, put my double mattress on the floor And there's been and I've got two dogs okay but with those things and, and all food is sealed or not in my room. So the mice are in the rest of the house, you know that, and we were very excited when live traps that worked.
Oh my god, 15 mice it was just like every morning and I'm not going to tell you what we did with them but they're still living there they either got eaten by owls or other you know we didn't kill them. Would you like to offer a friendly amendment? The friendly amendment is 30 days after the ordinance this goes into effect. Any other comments before roll call?
4:33 – 4:3819 turns
Yeah, I'll comment. I mean West Hollywood is pretty progressive aggressive you know so they're providing a year I presume is so that someone can sell their stock like So we should give some, I'm gonna approve of this measure but I think that we should give them at least 90 days the opportunity to sell off and potentially dispose of their stock.
No. Okay, I am crystal clear. I have studied this issue for so long. I've heard about hummingbirds getting stuck it is so unbelievably cruel and barbaric that there's just no reason to continue selling them and if there is a problem with some individual store owner has a complaint let's you know they can come in and we'll deal with it
I agree with Council Member Francina, just it's gone on too long. They need to go today tonight so and I also want to thank Jacob Shaw from PETA for all your hard work and it's been just such a joy and a pleasure coordinating with you so thank you and thank you so much Brian for all the work that you do
I'll just make one other comment in that when this issue first came up and I just heard ban glue traps, I was not very enthusiastic about this. But as potentially overreaching and beyond the things that we should be doing for the community but as I've received information about what these traps do I've changed my mind completely. I mean, I am especially disturbed by the number of birds that are killed by glue traps so it did kind of flip me around on this issue
Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem. Yeah, it's the suffering needs to stop so on that note roll call please.
Yes, ma'am. Motion mayor sticks second council member link to introduce the ordinance as recommended with the revision to have the ordinance take effect 30 days after passage which will be brought back in the second reading to counsel. Mayor pro tem women. Yes. Yes, yes. All
right motion passes wonderful Thank you so much. Thank you Jacob.
Okay,
well we are moving to the closed session no okay uh we have an announcement from the city attorney. I mean a city manager or the city attorney, I will say
on the call session item given the hour staff recommends we continue that to another day items four and five.
OK, all right. We will move on to council member reports anybody I would just like to thank the we had a great and what is the word? event at the jail. Recognition, thank you of Harry Hunt Sr., it was really lovely he was our last constable and the family was there big thank you to the commissioners Walker, McHatton, Visacea, Sims and Chair Akins for organizing that and also to the Ojai Valley Museum for hosting the reception it was really a beautiful event anybody else?
No city managers report. Okay, and future agenda items we are as far as I know we're going to wait for our goal setting session to add things right
just real quick i'd just point to the working agenda document that we send out please take a look at that we have a list of items waiting offshore and if you want to add something to it please send me an email individually and let me know thank you
Okay, well thank you all for a productive and compassionate
meeting. I will meet with you every Monday discuss future things but i wanted to address what the woman she's just left or the deaf woman barbie can we um there are some things that she stated it seems like staff could do without
Just, just quick clarification anytime there's something that we should you see us furiously riding over here. That's what we're doing.
Okay, like the snow smoking
already been smoking in City Hall campus staff will assess.
Okay.
All right. Thank you. Good. Okay. Alright thank you so much. We're adjourned.