UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:01 – 0:0616 turns
Roll call — called by Weston Montgomery · 1 under review
Show transcript
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
commission reports and commission reports.
We have Christine Steiner
from the Arts Commission. Thank you, Commissioner Steiner.
Thank you. I'm delighted to be here. So Mayor, City Council members, Arts Commission liaison Whitman and city staff it's lovely to see you. We are continuing to carry out our five-year plan as Chair Smitty West has so enthusiastically described to you in the past. And he sends his apologies for not being here. And I'm going to speak with you about three matters.
The first is grants, the second is music and the third is public art. So on grants, the application period closed September 30th. I think you were advised of that last session.
Can we
have
quiet please? Thank you.
There were 21 grants that were received, which is terrific. The Ad Hoc Committee has been convened and we look forward to its recommendations and for the Arts Commission to make an independent review of all grants and then to make our recommendation to you. The criteria for assessment was discussed in our September Arts Commission meeting. These are artistic merit, project feasibility, impact, qualifications, alignment with grant goals, organizational capacity that is the ability to execute the project based on past performance Sustainability and diversity and inclusion. And I should note that the scoring rubric, which was also discussed at the meeting weights more heavily artistic merit than other categories within the criteria.
At our October meeting, which is next Thursday, October 18th at 6 o'clock in City Hall chambers. Our grantees will present and while this presentation is not obligatory it is highly encouraged and also encouraged is for the applicants to bring their supporters, uh, to the meeting in order to show interest. And last year was quite a buzz as our then arts liaison Lang knows from-from that meeting and we look forward to the same.
Next, I have no questions. Next, I'd like to talk about music. So one aspect that the Arts Commission has introduced is community presentations. So we've instituted a practice at the beginning of our meetings to invite art community arts groups to present their programs who they are what they do.
I'm sorry there's this huge light shining in my eye
Well, it's probably the divine.
But I can't see anything and I'm going to have to turn around. If you don't believe me sit here.
You could see it on your face.
Oh it's the sun. It's the sun?
It's a sunsetting? Oh I thought it was some light!
That's very mystical, I'm sorry. That's very exciting. I don't want that to be coming out of my time, by the way. Okay. So I'm going to take it from the top if I may. We now include community presentations as a part of the Arts Commission. It's at the top of the hour for us and community arts groups or organizations present their programs. Who they are, what they do.
It gives an opportunity to meet the creators for them to meet the Arts Commission and understand who we are in who the city is. And it gives the public the opportunity to see the good work they do. It's quite successful and quite rewarding. So last meeting, the September meeting we were blindsided and bewildered by a last-minute instruction that the presenter which was the Dance Ojai group would not have its original music which was a part of its video muted.
That is it could not be included as a part of the video presentation This was not a copyright issue. This was, this was not subject to written instruction or anything we could understand as I said we were bewildered and blindsided so for the creative community it chills participation it stifles creativity and we look forward to understanding what this policy is about so it can be explained to the public And so that we will not be embarrassed in our community presentations and the community can fully express their creativity.
And then for the 3rd matter, finally it is a public art assessment as you know from your budget discussions. The Arts Commission undertook the first ever professional conservation assessment of the city's public art collections. And that assessment was completed, and we look forward to presenting it to you at our joint meeting with you whenever that is scheduled.
And that's it for my presentation.
Thank you very much Christine.
0:07 – 0:1319 turns
There's a policy about muting music. Does that impact you this Thursday night?
Well, it will likely impact us at our next meeting yes and it impacted us certainly at the September meeting we were told at the last minute by our staff liaison in an email to the Dance Ojai group that they were not allowed to have their music presented. The person immediately responded to say, this is my creative music so there's no copyright issue here and I know a bit about copyright and it was clear to me that there wasn't a copyright issue. Equally our chair Smitty West is a music Creator and he knew that for this group, it was not an issue. And so it caused a degree of consternation and distress we simply stopped with the video and said we would seek guidance and that guidance hasn't been forthcoming and we would like to understand.
A, is it a policy? And B, what the basis of the policy is. C, are there any exceptions and if so how are those applied? And D, we'd like to be able to alert the community so they will understand and we will understand as well.
Just really briefly, I had the same issue when I did a presentation. The music was not played and it really is from what I understood, I can say that it was copyright free music but until there's something official, it still puts the city at risk. That's what I understood and I had the same experience like why can't you play the music? It's copyright free, I can show you that so I think it's just a matter of reviewing and making sure that any copyright issues are dealt with beforehand.
I mean, that's really what it was. It was that it comes at the very last minute to the people who were projecting it and they don't know that is copyright free or protected or they don't have a way to validate copyright. So that's what we have to work on is making sure that there's a lead time to actually confirm, you know. I mean they didn't take my word for it, you know?
I
think
your... Well, I mean, I don't know what
your... It was fine! I mean, I understood. Yeah, I don't
know what your music is and whether there would be sub-licenses like master license or synchronization licenses or whatever it might be but I agree with you there ought to be more lead time to let the city understand But I would back up and say we should really have a policy so we understand. So lead time, I agree. And then it may be appropriate to have some sort of indemnification or some such whatever. Agreed. But lack of understanding and lack of writing only causes confusion and distress.
Yeah,
if I could jump in. Thank you Commissioner Steiner and Mayor and Council and to the community and our commission liaisons and commissioners present. We have a long-standing policy that requires 24 or 48 hours notice in advance and is designed to protect the city from a very real consequence we've experienced which is videos that YouTube thinks is copyrighted or are copyrighted pulling down so they have pulled down our meeting videos from YouTube which is our present online meeting video storage site We are putting in place several things to solve this. One is a written policy, it's forthcoming that will be very clear on these issues. That's forthcoming we'll circulate it once it's issued by the city manager under his authority and second we are in the process of looking at some software solutions to have something other than YouTube host our videos which would solve that concern of YouTube deciding on their own with not much appeal process to pull things down so two steps both in process stay tuned thank you
Marvelous that's that's news to all of us and it's and it's music to our ears literally
Thank you. Thank you Good one
Councilmember Lang, yeah, thank you. Well first of all, I just want to thank you for all that you and the other commissioners are doing I'm really looking forward to the next meeting and Because last year and I encourage everybody to go and watch it. If you want to fall even more in love with this community, go and watch the arts grant presentations. And on that note, I just really also wanted to apologize for for past miscommunications and past misunderstandings that surrounded the granting process. And I look forward to writing some of those things this time, and working in collaboration with the commission.
Thank you. We expect a much smoother grants process this year, and we look forward to it.
Thank you, Commissioner Steiner. Much appreciated.
Thank you. All
right. With that, we will move on to public communications and just a reminder these are items not on the agenda so we cannot discuss them. We can agendize them for the future. So let's begin with Christy Rivera. Then we have Starchild and then Andy Gilman.
So good evening, Mayor, Council, staff and community. I'm here tonight, Christy Rivera. I am the Public Information Officer and Events Coordinator for the City of Ojai. And I'm here to present our 2024 Ojai Day poster winner and the original artwork. So this is the artist winner, Dominic Breaux and his painting which is Soule Park Rockets.
Oh,
I love it! And there's the poster on the...
0:13 – 0:188 turns
Oh yes Well, I've always been in love with this structure. And when I moved to Ojai, I'd been schlepping this canvas around and wasn't sure what to paint on it. And the vertical format really lent itself. So they came about. And I always thought this would be a great poster for Ojai Day, this refreshing change from the arches and the topotopos and the matilahapapi And it's sort of an unsung hero.
Everyone's nostalgic that sees it, and it just reels them back. And I think it might be one of the last ones standing, so Soule Park Rocket deserves to be immortalized. And I'm totally honored to have been chosen to represent, so super grateful, thank you.
Thank you so much, Dominique. It's beautiful. And
we'll also have posters in the back for anybody attending that would like an OHEDI poster.
Oh fantastic. Got it nice. It's official! I spent a lot of time playing Power Rangers in that thing with my kids. Really fun. So thank you. Immortalized forever. Okay, next we have Star Child then Andy Gilman and then Ron Solarsano.
Good afternoon. Several times before I've come to you during public comments to talk about affordable housing and I realized that I haven't had a chance to talk about the environment. And so I want to talk to you about how affordable housing could help the environment here in Ojai and throughout the world. There are a couple reasons that I can think of One is that in California, we have stringent environmental regulations for building housing that reduce the carbon footprint.
And if also we have mild weather, I can think back to when I grew up in Minnesota how much carbon we must've used just to try and keep the temperature in a reasonable range. And so when we build more housing here in Ojai, and we allow people to stay here. I think about Nora Harold who's somebody who came to speak and said that she had to move to Chicago because she couldn't afford housing in the region.
I think about how much more carbon it's going to take to keep her warm than if she would have been able to stay here. in our valley. The other thing that can happen is when we allow more density, we can allow some of the old housing that doesn't have insulation to be demolished and the new housing that replaces it can reduce our carbon footprint even more. Another reason, entirely different is that if we could ever have people who live in Ojai or sorry people who work in Ojai be able to live in Ojai they wouldn't have to drive so far. Wouldn't have to use so much gas to be able to get here to work every day. If we had more density and people could live maybe closer to downtown they wouldn't have to drive downtown try and fight for parking they could live and play in the same place And the third reason that I think we should have more density in housing here in Ojai is that per household, it would use there would be less landscaping and there would be less demand on our water resources as a result.
And for all those reasons, I'd like you to think about more or think about less housing regulation and building more housing, especially affordable housing, as a way to positively impact our environment. Thank you.
Thank you, Starchild. Next we have Andy Gilman then Ron Solarsano and then Payman Rapeljmay.
Good evening Council and staff. I just want to register again what I said last time at the meeting which is that I hope at some point you will adopt a process where if you have items on the agenda that continue to postpone or that there is a pressing need for example And ethics guidelines and a budget review committee. That other items that come in that do not have a pressing need like a timeline such as the animal ordinances that we're seeing on the agenda tonight. Those get moved after the pressing things. I that's continues to be an issue that you have interests that get in the way of the things that most of the community thinks are not the central business of the government where these other things are so I hope that you will adopt that going forward thank you.
Thank you, Andy. And just a note to the public, we are having a special meeting on Monday to talk about code of ethics in the budget. Next, we have Ron Solarsano and then Payment.
0:18 – 0:258 turns
All righty, thank you members of council. My name is Ron Solorzano I am the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley Uh, I come here often talking about some of the things we have going on at the library and actually one of our groups That meets there the ukulele club Asked that I share with uh you all some information about that group The volunteer who leads it her name is Debbie gave me the following to read to you all so here we go The Ojai Library's ukulele group started in 2018 and has between 15 and 20 consistent members who currently meet from 10 a.m to noon on Mondays at the Ojai Library.
Each member brings tunes to the group and plays music from the 1920s to the present. Most are retired from all walks of life, but some younger members have joined and love the camaraderie. The youngest member is a college student who brings refreshing jokes to the group every Monday morning The group has become very popular in Ojai and has marched and played in the Ojai's July 4th parade. They've played for crowds at Ojai Day, for the Holiday Home Tour at the Continuing Care Center at the Ojai Hospital, for the Artists-in-Residence Bravo Program in Ojia Elementary Schools, and they've opened for the Ojia Film Society Summer Film Series at Libby Bowl recently during the screening of Back to the Future.
The group loves playing music together and sharing their voices and harmonies. Look forward to a great time when you hear this talented, fun-loving music group." So to me personally when the volunteer who runs this group came to me initially all those years ago it just it sounded like such a great thing such a community driven thing and I'm so glad that we were able to say yes and that they've been successful for so long. So just wanted to share a nice little success story for some of what we have going on there at the library I also really quickly wanted to once again plug something that I believe I mentioned last time which is the upcoming Ventura County Celebration of Books, which is going to be happening at the California State University Channel Islands campus on Saturday October 12th.
So this Saturday. It's going to be from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., and it's going to include exhibitors from the literary community in the county, it's going to include food trucks, the first 150 servings of which will be free. It's gonna have children's activities including our mobile library and story time And then at 11 a.m., there's going to be a panel on the state of homelessness in Ventura County, moderated by KCAL News anchor Amy Johnson.
Then at 2 p.m. is gonna be our featured keynote with Dr. Jim O'Connell who is the subject of the book Rough Sleepers which is this year's community read. So we hope you're able to join us on Saturday October 12th and if you have any questions or need more information come see us at the library thank you so much
Thank you, Ron. We much appreciate it. Yep.
Question? Could you repeat the title of this year's book?
Yes. The title for this year's book is Rough Sleepers. Rough Sleeper. Yeah. Sorry we got a little mic issue and the author is Tracy Kidder. And yet to clarify that the gentleman who's speaking as Dr. Jim O'Connell he is the subject of the book. And yeah hopefully we'll see you there. Thank
you. Thank you Ron. Much appreciated. Next we have Payment. Will you tell me how to pronounce your last name?
My name is Peyman and my last name is Rokhpeymai.
Thank you. No, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Actually, I received one citation for $70,000. I have one property in Ojai for three units and I got 70,000 citations and my request is to have an administrative hearing because I passed that 30 days. I calculated 30 days after Because originally it was $100,000 and they changed it to $70,000. And I calculate that one after I received the second one or waived that citation because I haven't received any warning or anything until I got one letter from collection company because the letter which was sent to me was certified and I wasn't in place to sign and get that one and all those letters Retained to the city, but I received $100,000 from like a collection company. And I find out the problem which because I rent the property in an Airbnb because I didn't know the rules of 30 days.
The minutes I find out I stop all of them. I send all this information to the city and talk with the Lucas back and forth many times But right now, I don't have that option to do the administrative hearing to explain all the detail what exactly happened. I upload all the document even back and forth with the city to their City Council website and I try to come talk in person to see how can I solve this issue?
I already stopped everything, but I cannot pay like a $70,000. And I really didn't know. I understand I have to know as a person who wants to live here all the rules. But I was thinking Airbnb is a website. They they know how to do that like any kind of the website because each city has their own rule and regulation. And i just got that property. I got that property with Loan, and after that I did the construction with like a hard money. And it's really hard for me to even pay or think about that.
And I really wants to have administrative hearing or waive this amount because I didn't receive any letter and I didn't know. And the minutes I find out I went to the city many times until today.
0:25 – 0:3114 turns
All right, thank you Payment. We can't comment on this because it's not on the agenda? Mr. City Attorney?
Yes that's correct the Council can't comment on the matter it's not on their agenda tonight I believe staff has been in contact with you and certainly will reach out again regarding the options to pay the fines as imposed as part of the city's enforcement of our short-term rental violation ordinance Can
I just talk in nine seconds?
Sure.
And I just got my certificate of occupancy and a lot of people here they knew my phone number and email, and I didn't get any e-mail or...
Okay. All right. Thank you, Payment. Thank you very much. Any comments online, Bridgette?
Yes, Mayor. Karina W. and Katrina Reich-Schmidt. Karina, if you're ready?
Hi good evening thank you can you hear me yes okay great a couple of things one completely random I just want to put a plug in to the City Council to the city staff Please somehow can we get a splash pad for the Libbey Park playground? I don't know why we don't have one, but we sure could use one. The kids could use one and just want to put that in somebody's ear so that might happen down the line.
Secondly, I want to draw everyone's attention to the Ojai Studio Artist Tours that are happening this weekend. It's three days and there are 60 open art studios Of members of the Ojai studio artists, and it is a high point of the Southern California arts calendar. And this tour attracts lots of collectors and designers and. Other curious creatives, and I just want to make sure everybody knows about it and to go to their website. Ojai studio artist dot org and buy their tickets and participate in this incredible art.
event in our community. Thank you.
Thank you Karina.
Katrina if you're ready.
Hi there. My name's Katrina Schmidt, and I'm with the Ojai Valley Tennis Club. And we are running a tournament on October 19th and 20th. And that just happens to be Ojai Day. We know that, and we've warned all our applicants that the road will be closed. They have to take the back way. But today we learned that the pickleball community, I think it's Tim Crouch is putting up a fuss because he planned to put an exhibition during Ojai Day on the tennis courts.
Well, that's very upsetting because we are running this tournament. It's a United States Tennis Association sanctioned event. We secured the courts properly in the proper channels way back in August and actually before that And we have our schedule of matches set for Libbey Park, OVAC and Weill, and Nordoff High School. And we just learned today that Tim Kraut is taking two of our courts for pickleball.
The staff there may not know that the Ojai Valley Tennis Club has a city council resolution that says that the tennis club has priority for its events And specifically, there's signs on the tennis courts that say there shall be no pickleball on the tennis court. So why are we in the last hour of our registration closes next week being told that we can't have two of our eight Tennis courts for tennis. We're a tennis organization running a tennis tournament for tennis players, and we are being told at the last hour that we cannot have two of our courts. It's really, really unacceptable. And I hope to get some City Council support for the tennis community who is going through the proper channels To get our courts and to run our tournament, and just use our tennis courts for tennis.
Very upsetting so anyway if any of the city council members can help us out with getting the courts that we reserved way back in August and even before that talking to the city rec department. That would be really helpful because we need those courts. Thank you. We reserve them and they're already spoken for, so please help.
Thank you. Thank you Katrina. Mr. City Manager?
So we're aware of the situation. Mr. Crout for the last four years has had a pickleball demonstration at the courts and signed up to do it again this year he signed up some time ago. We transitioned over to a new reservation system, a new electronic reservation system and unfortunately it didn't catch that two of the courts were occupied for Ojai Day So we're in a situation where we have to compromise. I don't really see a whole lot of options. Both parties you know have gone through the appropriate channels and it's it's you know it's the way it is this year unless one wants to move somewhere else and both want to remain where they are.
And so again it won't happen going forward will be able to modify the software so that we don't have that gap but that's a casualty of that this year and we do apologize.
Thank you, Mr. City Manager. All right we have one more public comment. Leah Heshey is that? Sorry, hi.
0:31 – 0:3820 turns
Okay. So I read your smooshy dog face reading.
No, no. This is general public comment.
But I wanted to suggest something instead of that and so
I was
told that might be.
Could you wait until item number three? Sure. Thank you very much. Yeah, we'll get you in there. Thank you. All right. That's it Bridget
Yes, mayor. There's no more.
Okay. Thank you very much Alright,
we will move on to item number two ratify point Oh, thank you very much moving right along. Okay is there a motion to approve the consent calendar? I'll move to approve then a second
On favor
Aye. Okay, all right wonderful we will now
move on to item number two ratify appointment to one vacant seat and three reappointments to new terms on the Planning Commission meeting in November or two actually. We have a staff report?
Briefly Madam Mayor, so on this one we had the agenda still lists four vacancies of course as the commission to the council is aware at the prior meeting we the council appointed new Planning Commissioner Robert Graham so that seat is solved There are three remaining open seats or seats to be reappointed or appointed as applicable at the end of a term. The committees, we went through the new committee process as the council is familiar with and the outcome is to recommend reappointment of Commissioner Bennett and Jamie Bennett and Commissioner John Trent and then for Commissioner Steve Quillacy There the committee had recommended his reappointment as well. On that front, as was discussed somewhat last time and in detail now staff recommends not reappointing Mr.
Quillacy and instead going back through the process to consider alternative options Given two incompatible offices issues, one is the conflict between Mr. Quillacy's role as a planning commissioner and his elected role as this Ojai Valley Sanitation District board director. And second, the incompatible office issue regarding his expected swearing into the city clerk's office assuming the election goes the way we expect because he's the only one on the ballot and then takes the oath if offered the seat and planning commissioner that conflict as well given those two conflicts, one present, one expected to occur Staff recommends not reappointing Mr. Quillacy, it is of course the council's choice. The last closing the triangle as to Mr. Quillacy three offices the last leg is not a problem City Clerk and Sanitary Board Director our conclusion is summarized in the staff report is that that's not an incompatible office I'm happy to answer any questions on that quick report thank you
Any questions from Council? I
have several questions. I think this is going to be a very interesting discussion So, I'd like to start by looking at the ordinance that I think that this council adopted June 11 2024 and throughout the ordinance in at least four places there is Language that says, for example on page one and then you know go down to number one. It says. As determined by the city clerk, that text appears four or five times throughout the ordinance.
And then my question is why doesn't it's if you're going to keep that language? I'd like to see that language removed. But I also don't understand why it doesn't say deputy city clerk, because in truth and reality, it's the deputy city clerk Not that that is under the city manager and it's not the elected City Clerk. My experience in my 12 years on the council only time I really see the elected City Clerk is when she swears me in other than that, I rarely see her. So in order to have a discussion about whether or not there is a conflict of interest, we need to distinguish between Deputy City Clerk which would usually be Wesson and is it still Cynthia Burrell?
Presently yes.
Yes okay.
So having to clarify that, the code is written to reflect the elected position. The city clerk, Ms. Burrell, the present city clerk and several past clerks have chosen to delegate most of their roles to the employee deputy city clerk. There is no requirement that they choose to make that delegation. The next clerk could choose to run that nomination calculation, nomination order selection themselves and retain it at the elected level. The council could amend the ordinance to have instead of the city clerk it be the deputy city clerk or presently chief deputy city clerk Or another employee or city manager. The council could amend the ordinance to remove that conflict on that front if the council so chose, that's not on tonight's agenda. That would be a future agenda item.
To reamend the planning commission ordinance further and then the 2nd thing I would note as was discussed in the staff report. We identify a second potential conflict that I want the council to be aware of. One is the city clerk's role in the planning commission appointment process, which that amendment would erase. Second is a significant potential for a clash of duties and loyalties because the city clerk has a significant role in the City Council's election process and that is this the elected city clerk position as long as there is an elected city clerk.
Mindful of course the delegation often occurs to the deputy city clerk
So my memory might be fuzzy, but I know that I approved this ordinance and at the time that language looked innocent. It didn't think it would be an issue. But I don't remember any of us, was there a discussion? Or why was that language, that text inserted?
As I recall, it wasn't a lengthy discussion. But the council's focus on having the clerk determine the order of rotation was to take it out of the council so it's not the council deciding among themselves and not have it be someone who reports to the council. So have it be not the manager but of course that's a choice. It could be the manager, it could be take it from the elected clerk and shift it to the chief deputy clerk or shift it to the manager or put it back to the council.
Any of those are valid options as the ordinance may be amended as the council may choose.
0:38 – 0:4518 turns
Well, I can wait. We can do a round and then I may have other questions or somebody else might ask the question.
That was just it was just a clarifying question to summarize that basically if we were to change this ordinance from city clerk to deputy chief city clerk, it would eliminate both of those conflicts. Is that correct?
No, only one of the two as I see it wouldn't eliminate the second conflict that we identified, which is the elected city clerks role in the City Council's election process And there are duties that the elected city clerk has in the election process that are not, the council doesn't have the power to delegate those in full. The clerk has the power to delegate them if the clerk so chooses but the council can't force the clerk to delegate them.
And what would those be?
Those duties include processing application processing candidates statements processing applications interfacing with the candidates as they seek reelection or appointment is applicable. Swearing them in and other associate and campaign finance statement filings.
Okay, so I would just mention that all of those are done by the Deputy Chief City Clerk and was done by his predecessor before that. The city clerk, I think as Council Member Francina indicated, I remember doing all of that and it was never done with the city clerk. It was always done with... She wasn't the deputy city clerk but none of those have been done by the city clerk to date So you're saying that those could be, the city council could not delegate that to the chief deputy city clerk. Only the city clerk could delegate that?
Right. The clerk has often chosen to delegate their elections duties to the staff, to the deputy or chief deputy city clerk but that's the clerks choice to delegate it's not a choice as I see it the council can make for the clerk.
Okay thank you
Yeah,
I mean just for clarification I Don't think it's correct that Weston has done Excuse me. Our deputy city clerk has done everything independently Because I've had personal experience with him telling me that he needs to review with the city clerk before He signs off or makes a final determination something
right and we often see that in the more For want of a better word, complicated aspects of the clerk's elections role. We are mindful of a number of past experiences where the clerk had a choice to process or not process an initiative or referendum as elected clerk. The staff deputy city clerk or clerk or chief deputy would take in the paperwork but then consult with the elected clerk as the elected clerk made the decision to process or not process something which impacted in some past cases The city council's policy goals, one way or the other by processing or not processing depending on the city elected city clerk choices as to how they saw.
The elections laws regarding initiatives and referenda being complied with or not which actually is a further. So the elections process isn't just the city council elections process, it's also the city elections process where we've seen in the past policy conflict between the elected city clerk and majority of the elected City Council on initiative and referenda which creates that possibility of a conflict of offices or conflict of duties and clash of loyalties because an elected city clerk would have Potentially competing roles do they do what their voters as elected clerk want and very strictly enforce? Initiatives in the referendum and elections law or do they do what their overlords is the further appointing authority. Sorry retract appointing authority as Council but in the end it's a council is appointing the Planning Commission Do they do what their appointing authority wants as planning commissioner are they unduly influenced in the role of City Clerk by their thought or concern for their role as planning commissioner underneath the city council.
That's the concern that we identify, thank you.
All right questions Council?
Yeah so you've explained uh the reason you put this text in here so what when it comes down in another hour or so when it comes time to make motions what is the result of removing removing that oh did I say something really crazy? I foresee this is a complex and very interesting situation. So what are the consequences if that text was removed?
So the text regarding in the Planning Commission Ordinance regarding the City Clerk's role in the Planning Commission nomination process, if that text was erased and replaced with something else, that doesn't erase the conflicts I just mentioned regarding the elections process. That continues to be a concern
No, but it's when it was. But are you saying that it's still there? It's still illegal. There's nothing we can't counsel if they so choose could remove that text. Not
tonight, but yeah the council can amend the Planning Commission ordinance at will to change the planning commission nomination process Absolutely with the right agenda items three
votes Like in the past if there is a conflict of interest a conflict like say that mr. Quill sees on the Planning Commission Usually There's the option to recuse yourself. And I know that Mr. Quillacy, I'm used to calling him Chair Quillacy because he's been the chair for so long. He is meticulous about obeying the law and recusing himself. So that's not an option to remove that conflict of interest.
Not for an incompatible offices situation. Recusal typically works in a political reform act where we have a single commissioner or council member has a financial conflict in a decision, they can recuse and the decision can still go forward subject to a whole bunch of exceptions that were the training the other day but for an incompatible office situation the problem is inherent in holding the two offices so recusal is not a solution
0:45 – 0:5625 turns
I have a similar line of questions about the sanitary district board. What would the conflict of interest between those two offices be?
So on that one, there is an attorney general opinion on point that concluded and I'll quote. There are myriad possibilities for influence in exchange between a planning commission and a local district that lies within the Planning Commission's territory where the district owns property runs facilities in the city as a consumer of the city services as district so there's that loyalty clash between your obligations to the district Managing it and running its services trying to reduce costs increase service levels And how that may conflict with your role as a planning commissioner trying to implement the city council and Planning Commission's general plan of policies so that conflict The Attorney General found directly on point in the cases in citation And I'll note on that one, as some may raise the question.
There is a special statute that exempted city council and sanitary board district director positions but that special statute does not apply to planning commissioner as was discussed in that AG opinion which sort of further affirms that there is a conflict because otherwise they wouldn't have had to adopt a special statute but notably the legislature's Special statute only exempts City Council and Sanitation Board Director, not Planning Commissioner and Sanitation Board Director. Thank you.
Any other questions?
That doesn't make any sense to me at all! You know that it would exempt City Council but not
I mean, to an extent there's a policy argument that the legislature should have extended the exemption down. But they did not do so and yeah, I never looked at Sacramento for logic.
So this case here that's from 2012 back when Kamala Harris was right? Yeah, right. That's why her name looks so familiar.
One of
her prior offices was in Costa Mesa. And it seems like the conclusion on the front page is kind of vague It says whether the offices of director, you know I don't wanna read that weather. Anyway accordingly the application for leave to sue is granted. I mean what does that all mean? Whether it doesn't seem like it's just what's the word decisive. It just seems like it's still up in the air.
Now I would not characterize it that way. So in the Coro-Ronto process, which is the process by which a public official is removed from office, it has two steps. The first step is the Attorney General issues an opinion finding that there is an incompatible office situation in this context and that justice requires the matter go forward and then issues the opinion, which is the first step to filing the lawsuit. Then someone goes and files the lawsuit So the Attorney General's opinion is definitive. The AG opinion does not remove the person from office, that takes a court. But on the law, the AG is definitive unless the court overrules it later on the law on those issues.
And the next question you'll ask is, well could a different Attorney General rule differently? Theoretically yes. We see other contexts where courts will overturn federal precedent and so that's possible but we have no law relevant law has changed since 2012 so we're not anticipating that the Attorney General would rule differently if they were presented the question again
My final question is the council has the sole discretion to remove any planning commissioner at any time without any cause. And likewise, does City Council if they decide after digesting all of this and mulling it over To, to not remove the Planning Commissioner at least not at this time. To see you know that's is that still a legal option? I mean we're not are you...
Yeah the council can do as the council may wish and i want to clarify one point it's not removal it's whether to reappoint or not reappoint Commissioner Quillesey's and along with the other commissioners, their terms have expired. They continue in their role because the ordinance provides that everyone continues until a successor is appointed and sworn in but it's not about removal. I realize the net effect is the same but I wanted to be clear.
Because the newly done ordinance from June and before has a process for removal that was discussed at length previously and that process doesn't apply because it's not removal its reappointment or not reappointments And the council can do as the council may wish, obviously. The council can make an appointment and then it would be up to anybody who may have concerns to begin the core onto process if they so chose.
OK, thank you. That's nice and clear.
Any
final questions?
I do. Yeah, this is once again a clarifying question. So when you go to the AG, the first thing you get is an approval to sue. And then does the AG issue a preliminary decision on whether or not your suit will win? I mean, the you get the approval to sue. But does the AG also weigh in on whether or not they feel you get the question?
Yes. It's the same document. So all of the attorney general's opinions that we've been citing, those are the documents which the attorney general gives you permission to sue or not and weighs in on whether they think the case is an incompatible office or not. So it's one document that gives both
Okay, so if the AG did not believe that it was incompatible they would not give permission to sue? Is that correct? Correct. So they do weigh in but it's not a final judgment. They say we are allowing you to sue because we believe that fundamentally you have a good case. So go for it is that what
I'm hearing? And the AG opinion process looks at two questions One is, is there an incompatible office in the AG's assessment? And two, is it in the interest of justice for the case to go forward. Right. Typically if they find that there is an incompatible offices situation, they will find it in the interest of justice to go forward but I note that there are two questions the AG has to answer. The second thing on note is this I think inherent in your question Can you ask the AG for an opinion separate from the Colorado process, separate because the Colorado process you asked the Attorney General for an opinion. And you have to state is part of it typically it's we believe someone holding off some properly. So if you want to just ask the question as opposed to ask.
There is a process by which an attorney general opinion request can be filed. That process requires state constitutional officers, state elected officials and certain local officials that do not include anyone in this room have the power to ask the Attorney General for an advisory opinion on any matter of law. If a city wants to do that typically the city goes to the assembly member or the state senator they have the power to ask the AG and then the AG would do what they will.
Okay, and I have one final question. And it was an important one so let me, I have to channel it. It was an important question. Okay I'm gonna, oh this was it. So under city clerk every city has different responsibilities for their city clerk. I mean we have for all intents and purposes a ceremonial city clerk who most of the day-to-day and the elections operations have all been handled by a staff member Right, so in other words what I'm saying is when you do a request to the AG and my Latin is bad which is why I'm not saying the words pro-oriento. That's fine. Even though I took Latin in high school.
Are you delineating the different responsibilities that the city clerk has? In other words, you could say city clerk but the responsibilities of different city clerks are different therefore when you're actually getting an opinion of what is incompatible, are you looking at the actual jobs that they do or responsibilities that they have, or are you just looking at the title that they carry and assuming a whole bunch of stuff underneath? So that's my other question. Does the AG look at specific things that this city clerk does versus what Oxnard City Clerk might do, or are they looking at only the title city clerk? Right, so that's my question to you.
So if the city were to direct us to file a request of the Attorney General, we would explain the statutory role the clerk, the elected city clerk has and the on-the-ground role our elected and deputy city clerks have typically placed. Mindful that there's a difference. You're right. Lots of elected city clerks run some all or none of the parts of their job in that varies heavily by city and by culture and by community. So if we were to do a request of attorney general, if directed by the council, we would absolutely Lay out our all of our facts the past AG opinions look at the facts in those particular places.
Okay, great Thank you. So it that's my questions. Thank you very much and so one final question the council could Basically reconfigure The ordinances to accurately reflect what the city clerk has done Um, like for instance this ordinance that says the city clerk does this but in fact the deputy city clerk does this. So if we were to change an ordinance here to accurately represent who does what then when you if we were to do a quo warranto then It would be best to align our ordinances with what we're actually saying is being done. In other words, if you look at the ordinance as a city clerk does this? Well, the city clerk doesn't do that. So it would be smarter for us to get our ducks in a row and change an ordinance to accurately reflect what is done by the city clerk versus what is done by the deputy city clerk.
Right. That would be a pathway if we wanted to Clarify the planning planning commission appointment process. We could reflect that it's the deputy city clerk. Yeah, deputy
I'm just wondering you know if the steps were to be taken in which which order they would be taken and Would it be wise for us to? Be consistent in what we say The deputy city clerk does what we say the city clerk does if we were indeed to move forward in any way
Thank you. The other thing I'll add on that point is the AG's analysis may It would turn on the text of our ordinance so we could pause it depending on the order of operations and direction from council. We could pause it if the ordinance is this, if it says that where's the answer? They often avoid giving what they call advisory opinions where the facts are uncertain but we'd sort through that if there was direction to ask the AG.
Thank you.
0:56 – 1:0212 turns
Mayor Pro Tem.
Yeah so just for clarification it's not the Attorney General that issues a writ of quo warranto, it's a judge.
Right so the Attorney General issues the opinion that allows this lawsuit seeking the writ of quo warranto to go forward. The writ itself is what removes somebody from office and when
they write their permission to pursue the quo warranto they're actually you know not just telling the person they can go forward but they're telling the judge who's going to rule on it what they believe The law to be and how it applies to those set of facts.
Yes, and that's why the opinions the authority to go file a lawsuit is paired with a lengthy opinion explaining why the agency sees the matter. And I'll note as was also I think put in staff report typically when the core onto opinion is issued most most we did print every word page three middle of the page Typically once an opinion is issued by the Attorney General that allows a suit to go forward, people will resign from one or the other to keep whichever office they'd rather have. And that's why there's not as much Court of Appeal case law on these issues because once the Attorney General has opined, people tend to go with that.
But as our law reads currently in terms of what the clerk's Legal authority is it would be consistent with this decision by the or the opinion by the AG that there is a incompatible office problem between a Sanitation district member or board member and a Planning Commission member Yes. Thanks.
Another question? Yeah, just clarifying but we would in anything that we presented to the AG specify what the actual duties that was my question to you with the actual duties are versus what the ordinance says because I think as Councilmember Francina pointed out You know, city clerk here is encompassing everything that the city clerk does or doesn't do as well as what the deputy city clerk does. So yeah,
if we were to bring an opinion forward, we would give the attorney general the full picture.
Thank you. That's I just wanted to clarify that, that we would
We will move on to public comments then. First we have Steve Quillesee then Brian Aikens and then Christine Steiner you want to comment? Okay no. And then Andy Gilman.
Good evening. I've been honored to serve on the Ojai Planning Commission for eight years, providing a service to the community based on following the law and on personal honesty and integrity. I agree it's your sole discretion to remove any commissioner anytime for any reason. It would be a shame to see my service end based on the insinuations in this staff report.
One, that I might in the past have done anything illegal or unethical by serving as a planning commissioner and a sanitary district board member. Two, that the new city clerk presumably me will have some improper influence over Planning Commission appointments. I find these personally insulting. One, I spoke with the City Attorney six years ago about the Sanitary District before I filed for election.
He noted the Attorney General opinion—opinion not law—that is cited in the staff report Saying it allowed for litigating the question of a conflict. But he said to me and I quote directly, go ahead and run see if anyone cares. No one has cared but suddenly my dual service seems to be a sin. Two, I spoke with the city attorney this August before filing for clerk.
We disagree on the specifics of his advice. But he did not mention selecting the rotating council member for a nomination, and until tonight has said nothing about a conflict with council elections. I asked the Sanitary District General Counsel for a second opinion and he told me there was no real conflict. Now six or seven months ago, we began interviewing applicants for a planning commission vacancy which we're all familiar with.
Assuming the process for selecting that rotating council member that would nominate was the same as before and that the city clerk had no role in it. The mayor, Member Rule and I did at least six interviews this way Unknown to us at the time, City Ordinance 946 changed that technically giving the city clerk a minor role. This alleged conflict is something created recently by this council and could easily be undone.
To date, the clerk has had no role in any of these appointments. If the city clerk had attempted to inject herself into the process we would have had some very unhappy council members. I commend your appointment.
Thank you, Steve. Next we have Brian Akins then Andy Gilman then Jeffrey Starkweather. Thank you.
1:02 – 1:108 turns
Thank you. I commend your appointment of Bobby Graham. I favor the reappointment of both John Trent and Jamie Bennett. They are honorable, diligent and reasoned in their consideration of cases. They're a credit to the Commission. Last, I commend your Assistant City Attorney Taylor Anderson. She is unafraid to say to Planning Commissioners you shouldn't say that or you shouldn't discuss that keeping us legal and ethical
Thank You Steve next we have Brian Aikens then Andy Gilman then Jeffrey Starkweather
Hello, Chair. I am Brian Akins. I am here as a chair of a commission, not a specific commission just as the chair of a commission. I've been on that commission for 10 years. I have been the chair for the last six years I understand exactly what it takes in order to be a chair, to keep your commission focused, to keep your commission staffed, to moving forward. All through those six years, I've worked closely with Chair Quillacy, he's still the chair on questions that I had or even parts where I had to be talked down off the roof. He's been helpful for me When my son grew up, as soon as he could play I entered him into Little League.
I shortly thereafter go figure became the president of the Little League because I wanted the best program to happen. I told the people there we were playing by the rule book not by the good old boys that tends to happen And went forward with that. So as president, oftentimes I would have parents that would come up to me and say, hey can't you just make an exception to the rules? And I always had a rule book in my back pocket. I also umpired Little League for 20 plus years for two generations.
And I knew what they might be able to do but I thought they should learn so I gave them the rule book. I said go look at this and come back to me next week and let's talk And they came back to me and they had some questions and suggestions. And so we found a way in the rules to make things go forward, make the experience happy, enjoyable. In this document that I've been going through over the last days, I see a lot of stop signs. I see a lot of impediments.
Not a lot of, well this is how we can make it work. All of us are reading through this. We've done the things I asked the parents. I would like to see some of the things that has been talked about today on the positive end finding a way to go forward some of the suggestions from the workers. I truly appreciate having Steve as a co-chair, being able to work with him, being able to ask questions, being able to find paths on going forward and would truly miss him in not having him.
As I attend planning commission meetings often just like it did last week anything that has anything to do with historic. So I have a lot of experience going to planning commissions In my closing minutes, I would just like to remind you that the Ojai Day is coming up on the 19th and at 11 o'clock and 2 o'clock in the afternoon We will have the Ventura County Ghost Hunter with us. And he's bringing his divining rods so come see us
Thank You Brian next we have Andy Gilman then Jeffrey Starkweather then Larry Steingold
It seems to me we try very hard to be polite and sometimes it's better just to be frank, and I think it's this. This body has spent hours trying to reconfigure the Planning Commission to get commissioners on that match your values. And we keep being thwarted by it, you try to circumvent the normal way and then it comes back to this and it seems to me the value or the concern is not exposure here, it's the opportunity to try to get Steve not on the commission again so that you can appoint somebody that's more aligned with your values. So what I would suggest That you take the time, make a motion to figure out how Steve could be re-appointed. That could happen on the next time and let's not pretend that it means something different than that.
Thanks. Thank You Andy. Next Jeffrey Starkweather then Larry Steingold then Bill Miley
I want to thank Andy for his statement, because I don't have to say it. Because that's exactly what I would've started with. Um, I think we're starting with a gigantic misunderstanding of what planning commissioners legally are responsible to do. Mr. Whitman's statement, what he wanted to influence the planning commissioner would be illegal! Planning commissioners have a duty to follow the code and when they have applicants they look at the facts and they follow the code.
Now, theoretically I say theoretically because I was on there for a year. The Planning Commission could make land use recommendations to you. We never got a chance to do that. In fact we made a commitment as a city in our housing element To do that with the promise, which we still have. We've had it for a couple cycles that we were going to review our land use regulations to eliminate barriers to affordable housing and we have a ton of them.
We never even got the chance to discuss that. So this whole thing, that somehow we can get planners on there that carry out some kind of philosophical or ideological views of city commissioners I think is just wrong. That's not what we do up there and I know Mr. Quellesea was one of the best people at making sure we stuck to the code. I as someone who had done land use law made sure of that and all of us were very careful to follow it Now, sometimes we did discuss ideas about how.
We could change things, but that came after we made our ruling following the law. So this notion that the election might be swayed by the clerk planning commission's concern regarding staying with the city council's favor in the planning commission. Jesus, if that's what we're doing on our planning commission, we are going in the wrong direction here folks. Planning Commission should be treating everybody the same Following our code. It's your job to create the code not the planning commission They have to follow it So let's just stop this is just a gigantic it's been an embarrassment to this city We started in March in 2022 and Mr. Whitman first brought this up we've gone through so much Of course, I went through the middle of it obviously but that's irrelevant Uh, we have spent all this time All this effort, our attorney's time.
And I would say if we have a conflict it's between the attorney and the city council and the deputy city clerk because I've dealt with a city clerk in election years probably as much as anybody. The deputy city clerk doesn't go to the clerk to get advice he goes to the city attorney And we had that mess with the valet parking, where a city clerk ruled against it. And somehow we...
Thank you Jeffrey. Next we have Larry Steingold then Bill Miley.
1:10 – 1:155 turns
Hi, Larry Steingold. I support the renominate reappointment of Jamie Bennett and Commissioner Trent. I also go to planning meetings, unlike most of the other people who have wanted to be on the Planning Committee for the last two or three years, all too wanted City Council. If you're going to want to participate, show up. Steve Quillacy shows up along with everybody else. You're being a little disingenuous. If you don't want the man, appoint him and then fire him.
Doesn't that make it easier? Then we don't have to go through all this because you can fire us at appointment anytime correct? Anytime for any reason is that correct Mr Attorney? That's what I've been told, and that's what we've heard. So just reappoint the man. We don't have to go through this. And then you fire him. And then he'll be city clerk, and then he won't have any conflict. He can run the clerk's office the way he wants to.
Would you rather have that? Because now he's going to be the city clerk. And you already said there's all sorts of potential conflicts and things that he can do. He could put a stick in the spokes of elections, of anything. Right? Because he can or we can ask the district clerk to do it whatever the case may be. He's now the city clerk wouldn't you want him on the planning commissioner because now he's under the microscope and you can watch and if he steps out a line you can get rid of him for any reason whatsoever But if you don't like them, just say, hey, we don't want you. We want to put somebody on our own there which is obvious, which is OK. That's your right. You're the power. You have the elected. You're the overlords, whatever.
OK? But seriously, just have the testicular fortitude to say, hey we don't want them. And that's it. Call it a day. But you don't have to go through this Just change the rules, make it so that there aren't any conflicts. That's what you're talking about. Remove the possible conflicts then there aren't any but then you watch him and you go is there a conflict? No fine is there another conflict maybe then you get rid of him.
That's all there is keep it simple not going through this or every time for the past.
Thank You Larry next we have Bill Miley
Hello. As I said last meeting, I support the reappointment of Commissioners Bennett and Trent. The email to your council written by Commissioner John Trent clearly shows credibility of the current board members. I am displeased about the apparent conflict of Chair Quillacy, his City Clerk candidacy and current elected board member of the Olive Valley Sanitary Board.
He has certainly made the Planning Commission run well. Now with the new information and this council's current meeting website, reading what was there. I have several new things to say. Apparently there is an ambiguity in the messages written in verbal from our city attorney about legal conflict, no conflict between Planning Commissioner and elected City Clerk.
That's interesting. And then there's the OI Senator District, District Attorney who said there's no conflict. It seems the city attorney's interpretation all lead to Chair Quillacy being excluded and no recommendations to make this appointment possible. Well that's all new from my point of view. I believe a mountain is being made out of a mole hill Since this is all new to the public, and I assume all new to the council members.
and very conflicting, and needs verifying. I would hope your council will vote to refer this agenda to the newly elected City Council Board appointed in December. And in ending, I understand Chair Quillency hopes to be reappointed. He has lots of support in his community. Please support the community.
Thank you Bill. Any comments online Bridget?
Yes, ma'am. We have one comment Renee. Go ahead Renee.
1:15 – 1:209 turns
Hello can you hear me? Yes OK I'm here thank you very much. What a. What a difficult situation you're in. I agree that Commissioner Quilici has done a great job on the Planning Commission. I think he's worked very hard for our city and represented our city well in many different areas, and I'm glad to see that he is going to be elected as our City Clerk And at this point, I think it would be in the best interest to work with Mr. Quilici to find a reasonable way out of this.
I understand questions to the Attorney General are not that difficult to get, and this might be something good to do. I would also like to say that I think our deputy clerk is also a very responsible person who has stepped up to do a lot of work in the last couple years and is quite capable of taking responsibilities that the clerk might ask the deputy clerk to do if there was ever any conflict So, I would expect that this could be worked out reasonably among reasonable people with no ill intent on anybody's part.
And I hope you can figure out what to do tonight because it is kind of a difficult situation. Good luck but I do want to commend the Mr. Chair Quillacy for his work in representing our city and working hard to get through this. Thank you.
We do have two more raise hands, Mayor. We have Teal and then Steven Colomi. Go ahead, Teal.
Thank you. Thank you very much. To me listening to this and thinking about it, it comes down to the ethics of the situation. And I think that it's really important to have the trust of the people because semantics and changing things around from the ordinance that you all put together 953 which also It also says that two members need to have distinct training in planning, which I don't think that they do.
And it doesn't appear when I watch the meetings and I also watch all the Planning Commission meetings, there's a lot of bobbing heads and there's a couple people that ask questions. One of the people that asks the most important questions, I think is Trent, John Trent So I think that it's a really good crop rotation to have healthy soil, healthy planning. And thank you for your wonderful service to the community and it's time to fertilize. Thank you.
Thank you, Teal.
Stephen, go ahead.
This issue actually is fairly simple. It's about whether we follow our city's rules, policies and ordinances consistent with state law or whether we wing it with each decision. The Planning Commission is a critical component of city government second only in importance to the City Council. Expertise, training and experience are required to fully understand building and development plans including the reading and understanding of site plans, knowledge of scale and potential impacts on project neighbors, grading and other technical issues.
And don't forget that the Planning Commission also serves as our design review board to evaluate commercial, industrial and certain residential developments. The best design review decisions are reached when there is design expertise present on the Planning Commission. In the past, our Planning Commission had members who were licensed building or landscape architects, electricians, professional engineers and experienced city planners.
The current composition of our Planning Commission, despite Commissioner Trent's letter is essentially a lay commission without members who have distinctly separate training and experience in the planning world. It is unfortunate that the city has not yet made a robust effort to identify and recruit individuals who have this distinctly separate training and experience to fill the two required seats that must, by ordinance, have those professional credentials. Thank you.
Thank you Steve.
Mayor there's no more raised hands. Okay
we have Starchild
1:21 – 1:3628 turns
Thank you. I put my card in a little bit later, I didn't know that I was going to speak. I thought I'd put everything that I needed to say in the written comments. But there are a few things I just wanted to say. I've only been here in Ojai year and so I didn't see a lot of maybe the political strife that people have talked to before. I actually don't believe the majority of City Council is being political in this decision.
I think the majority of City Council is trying to do the right thing by the city, to follow the law and not get us any legal trouble. One thing that I noticed is Mr. Summers recommendation it's new, right? Six years ago we didn't get it. We didn't get it two years ago It's new. And like any opinion, it's not the judge's final opinion. There could be some debate. There could be some room for interpretation.
When I looked at what the Attorney General might do if they got an application to file a writ of quo warranto—I hope I said that right—there's a lot of discretion the Attorney General has. They can look and see that in our small town, Steve Quillacy wears three hats because two of those hats nobody else would do if Steve wouldn't. How can we be held to the same rules as a big town like San Francisco or Contra Costa? We'd have to house that in the best interest to have those two seats unfilled or those two positions unfilled Also, Steve could recuse himself on day one. He could just write an order to Weston to take over any of the potential conflicts and that seems like it would moot the issue. And one thing I read is that the Attorney General isn't interested in litigating moot issues or allowing a petition for writ of pro warranto for moot issues.
So for all those reasons, it might be that Mr. Summers' prediction of what the Attorney General does doesn't come out to be true. So what I want to ask this Council to do is to direct Mr. Summers to file a petition for writ of quo warranto to the Attorney General. That would give Steve the opportunity to respond in writing More than three minutes and 20 seconds he could have counsel, he could write exactly what his position is. And then let's let the Attorney General speak for the Attorney General himself. What Steve said I it was kind of heartbreaking he's had years and years of service. And if we allow this opinion from Mr. Summers, which I know he made, he's trying to do the right thing, if we allow that to be the final opinion, the final say, what does that do to tarnish what Steve's worked for so hard?
I know Council Member Lange or Rachel, I think made the right opinion when you recommended Steve for reappointment And I think that directing Mr. Summers to file this writ is the right thing to do. Thanks.
Thank you, Starchild. That's it.
Yes
ma'am. Okay, thank you. Council Member Lange, do you want to begin?
Yes, thank you. I just want to thank you all for your sharing and thank you Star Child for acknowledging that and I really wanted to debunk this idea that there is some kind of agenda that we want to only appoint planning commissioners who ideologically agree with us I met with the nominating committee, including Mayor Stix and Vice Chair Trent. And we together collaborated to offer Mr. Quillacy, Chair Quillacy the reappointment.
And he has shown exemplary service. And he is a by-the-book planning commissioner who makes the, keeps the meetings running tightly and he goes above and beyond to read every little detail in every code and he has been incredible. And I don't foresee him having any kind of ethical breach. I think he holds himself to a really high standard, and you can see that every time you go to the planning meetings.
When I was talking with the members of the nominating committee, we decided that there were Things that we wanted to follow up on including looking at the code looking at you know what the ethical violations could be. And so we have together recommended that we put a that we that we put a pause on the reappointment and that we interview the other candidates and that we make a decision when we have more information Thank you.
So that is what we came to as, we have a new code now that says we have to come to a unanimous decision. And we've worked really hard. We've put a lot of effort into coming up with this unanimous decision but it's one that I think is a way forward that keeps us from opening ourselves. Yes, going to the AG or trying to go through that process is one thing. But I don't think we would be a wise body if we did anything that said let's go ahead and violate a law, let's go ahead and break a law and invite in legal issues. So before we move forward with doing that, we need to figure out what we can do that would allow us to make this decision without imposing, without inviting in legal issues.
And with that process, we also did keep open the possibility that he would be the best candidate. But we need more time to make that decision and Bill Miley's suggestion of waiting until the next council I think was good but I think that we can do this sooner than not.
Would you like to go ahead and put a motion on the table?
Yes, I would like to move to reappoint Commissioner Bennett and Commissioner Trent and to and to pause on the reappointment of chair policy
Okay, I will second that motion. But let's continue with discussion. Friendly amendment?
I
would really
like to separate the two. I would like to ratify the nomination of Jamie Bennett and Commissioner John Trent just as you stated but then look at our options for two separately.
Is there a second for that motion? I'll second it. Okay, let's go ahead and have a roll call for that motion. Are we ready for that Mayor Pro Tem? For that motion
as far as just organizing the
The motion would be to reappoint commissioners Trent and Bennett
Well, I have comments about that.
Okay. Well, we have emotion that motions on the table. It's been second Would you like to comment?
Yeah so Ojai has a problem with Enforcing rules or even acknowledging that the rules exist. And as much as I think that Mr Bennett is a fine commissioner and has added value he Does not meet the criteria for our planning commission and what we've set out as the criteria We're required to have at least two members of Um, chosen from persons having distinctly separate training and experience.
From fields of architect art building construction. Civil engineering land use planning land use law urban planning or landscape design and Mr Bennett does not fit those criteria in addition. Our ordinance says that a maximum, it says that it's preferred that all members of the commission have primary residence and be domiciled within the city. And a maximum of two members of the commission may have primary residence and be domiciled outside the cities, if determined necessary by the City Council to appoint commissioners with specialized expertise.
So there is no wild card in the planning commission where you get to appoint people outside of city residents, unless they meet a special criteria that's lacking on our ability to get that from the city itself. And so I do not believe that Mr. Bennett Meets those criteria and therefore I wouldn't support reappointing him. I would support reappointing Mr Trent, so I guess I'll make a third motion that we split it up even further vote separately on Trent versus Bennett and
Okay, so you made a motion to appoint Commissioner Trent. All right. I will second that motion Are we ready for a roll call on that
one? No, I would like to make some comments. The ordinance says specialized training. That is ambiguous. It does not say a professional. It does not say a licensed. It does not give any criteria for what specialized training is. As John Trent said, Jamie Bennett and I feel bad even having to defend this but Jamie Bennett has art and architecture experience Has anyone looked at his resume? Do you know that that's not true?
I'm thinking probably not. So, so that's the first question. You know, the second question is, is that we have gone all over this before. This is the same question has come back up, right? How many commissioners need to live in the city? What does all of this mean? Is this gonna come up every single time that we have a commissioner appointment? Jamie Bennett and so let's just start with the term specialized training doesn't say licensed Doesn't say professional, doesn't in any way give any criteria for what specialized training is. And as I contended at the last meeting, spending four years or eight years on the planning commission must count as specialized training. You have seen it all. You have given deep thought in ways that just training doesn't give you and you've had to be specific to Ojai.
All of that, to me, easily equals specialized training. I think that we need to revisit this. For instance, do we really need a planner? We have a whole planning department. How does that work? We need a planner? Really, I don't think so. I think we got plenty of planners. So maybe we need to look at this whole ordinance again and say you know what's really going on here?
We know and with all due deference to Councilmember Lange We know that Council Member Whitman was a strong supporter of Kathy Lattice, who was a planner. A retired planner by the way with no housing law experience whatsoever or keeping up with housing law as admitted in the interview by her. We know all of that and the community knows what this is about So I can say that it is terrible form, it is disrespectful to all of the commissioners and it's wrong. They have specialized training and before you say that any of these don't perhaps you need to have a conversation with them.
Jamie Bennett has deep history in art. He has deep history in architecture, do you know that to not be a fact? Have you spoken to him? I don't think so. So what I'm saying is it looks bad, it is bad and We talked about over and over about whether or not you needed to live in the city proper. And we came up with the decision that we came up to, and now we're calling this in question yet again.
So if you want to separate the two. That's fine, but not to reappoint Jamie Bennett is
Unethical.
It is unethical. It is just
bad form. Excuse me, let's I think... Let's stop the name calling and we do...
Nobody called names
by the way. We called about behavior.
You're interrupting me. We called on behavior. Behavior as in unethical. We did not say anyone was unethical. We said behavior was unethical.
I'm going to recommend that we have three motions. We have one motion on the table so let's deal with that one first and then we can go through the second one Would you repeat the motion, please?
Yeah. I believe the city attorney is going to repeat the motion.
OK, I'm happy to be the most. I also want to make sure Mayor Pro Tem Whittington doesn't lose his phone.
1:36 – 1:4420 turns
I hope that you stay.
I want to respond. OK. OK? Mayor Pro Tem. I have not engaged in any unethical behavior. I was not saying that. You did not say that. The angry council member at the end said that, that I engage in unethical behavior. First of all, I had nothing to do and was completely surprised when we received a memo from our city attorney saying that there was a problem with Mr. Quillacy having incompatible offices.
There, you know it's unethical to tell people that we've deviated from the process we agreed to when the process has always included a majority of the city council as being the final decider who we select for positions. And so Mr. Gilbin is completely wrong about that And it's a very political position to take in a situation where you say we shouldn't be political.
Is it unethical to have removed a planning commissioner who had served for four years, who had a master's in planning and she was not reinstituted for her second term You know, for what reason? Other than politics. Who was
that? I'm sorry, who was that?
Excuse me, can you run it through the chair please? Excuse me Mayor, I would like specificity.
I wasn't here
for
this. Kathy Lattis was a planning commissioner who served four terms and applied for a second term And she was not given a second term so that people on the council at the time could make their political appointments. So what's happening, you know I can call it a political appointment if you can call what we're doing here a political act when we're actually just taking advice from an attorney but there The for some reason, somebody has decided that Kathy Ladas who has a master's in planning and served as a planner.
For years. In. And Laguna Beach is not. That she shouldn't be appointed for mysterious reasons that have never been expressed. We have a big problem because we have rules and everything's a fight. And I think Mr. Starkweather is 100% responsible for that, organizing the fight. He came to us from North Carolina Where they said he has one playbook and that's to create Point of order council one at a time, please one at a time Can you finish mayor pro-tem? And then we'll continue.
Yeah I know I'm
I am thoroughly disgusted by how easy it is for people to accuse others of being biased And being prejudiced, and yet they can't look in the mirror and see what they're doing. So yeah I think this has been a really horrible chapter in the city's experience but I will remind people who you know who think there's no reason to have Provisions related to having two people on the council, on the planning commission.
That rule has been in place for about 50 years, as far as I know. That we have had people with specialized backgrounds because it assists the process to have people making decisions who actually have experience in the field they're making decisions about and I do not agree at all that Any of the current planning commissioners have any of those criteria?
Okay, um Councilmember Francina and just a reminder council we have a motion and a second on the table about reappointing Commissioner Trent
I just want to say for the record, I was not part of the majority. I was in favor of keeping Kathy Lattice on the planning commission. So don't look at me like that. Yeah, it's not... I recognize her qualities. You know what makes this whole thing even more interesting is that Stephen Colomay is the husband of Kathy Lattice and he's gone out of his way To point out the defect, the deficiencies in our current planning commission. And John Trent who I was on my appointment points out the background of all the commissioners and in his opinion, I'm just going to read the concluding paragraph of the two pages that he wrote why the current body is qualified and why he, John Trent feels they should all be reappointed. So he states based on the experience and background of our current commission Mr.
Columet is incorrect We currently have Planning Commission members who have quote relevant professional experience. Is my thing on? Yes, okay. Outlined in the ordinance with the appointment of Robert Graham we have four commissioners who have a primary residence in the city of Ojai And two, with relevant professional experience and training in the arts architecture land use planning and land use law. I'll pause there this public comment is on the city website for anyone who wants to read it in its entirety And I also want to remind this council that it's been a year that we've been grappling to fill a vacancy. This coming month, the Planning Commission is going to have to grapple with the homeless encampment, you know there that we need as many people on that on the planning commission as part of possible for that reason I feel that we should at least get to the point where we, I'm hoping we can get to the point where we do you know my motion that I made to ratify Jamie Bennett and Commissioner John Trent.
How about Council, let's go ahead and vote on the motion on the table and then we can continue. I'm going to call the question council yes?
I was gonna restate the motion
okay thank
you yeah So the motion on the table is by Mayor Pertin-Whitman, the second from Mayor Stix to appoint Commissioner Trent.
Okay roll call please.
Mayor Stix. I need a question so then we'll go to the next.
Then we'll take all the other motions thereafter. So there's three nominations on the table tonight nomination for Commissioner Trent or Commissioner Bennett and for Chair Quillacy. The motion is to just deal with Trent and then other there's other motions still on the table
So voting separately doesn't negate anything.
Correct, voting separately doesn't negate the others and as noted there was seems to be support for
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion is to just deal with Trent and then other there's other motions still on the table So voting separately doesn't negate anything. Corr · 1 under review
Show transcript
1:45 – 1:5738 turns
Okay, thank you. And we will go ahead and move back to discussion to the reappointment of Commissioner Bennett. Council Member Rule, do you want to make a comment? I do. And if anybody would like to put a motion on the table that'd be
great.
So you have the prior motion still on the table, which was by Councilmember Lange with a second by Mayor Sticks to appoint Commissioner Bennett and then pause Commissioner Quillesey's appointment.
That
motion is still on the table subject to other motions.
So we, we have the motion on the table to appoint Commissioner Bennett. Is that is that the next the next motion up?
Yes,
yes and two at the same time separate The motion is to appoint Bennett and pause Quillacy. A different motion could
be made to just appoint
Or we could or we could make a motion to appoint Bennett and to To postpone the final decision about the reappointment, but allow him to stay in office until we make that decision Okay Am I hearing that we want that to be two separate motions? Yes. Is that correct? Okay, then the motion would be to reappoint Commissioner Bennett.
Right and so just two things to say once again if you're looking at the ordinance it says specialized training Specialized training is not defined. If we want to say that we're not adhering to the ordinance, then we need to be a little bit more specific because it is within the realm of possibility and in my case it is within the realm if that four years sitting on a planning commission get specialized training outside and we don't know So that's the first thing, to say that we're not following our own ordinance is for someone basically defining what specialized training is. It's specialized training.
It's nothing else, so don't make it anything else. And I will remind my also angry council member on the other end that you said, I want my own guy on the planning commission and I quote, I want my own guy on the planning commission. That was the first thing you led with when this whole debacle started. So that is why people have that. That is why that is in people's heads because you said it
Yeah, but
yeah
we
let's excuse me. No no excuse me counsel Let's just take turns or did you finish councilmember rule? Yes, I am all right mayor pro tem.
Yeah, I Said that we should all be it each council member should you know select a Commissioner and that was voted down So that is not the rule here It's not anything that I expect I can do because we didn't vote to do it that way We now have a Convoluted process for selecting councilman Because that because planning commissioners because that was you know, my proposal was refused and the language is Distinctly separate training we should use the right language And I don't have any evidence in front of me that any of the planning commissioners have or that Jamie Bennett has distinctly separate training in any of those fields.
Excuse me. We're going to take turns, so I would like to just comment that I also supported each council member appointing a commissioner and was voted down on that just to avoid these issues. It was a much simpler system and I think Potentially in the future. Councils could look at that, see if there's an agreement. I want to thank Commissioner Bennett for his service and I really appreciate all those years on the Planning Commission. I do think it is important that we follow our own rules and I think I read this in the last meeting.
Distinctly separate training is the phrase that jumps out in the ordinance and I do think we need to follow that. And the fact that Commissioner Bennett doesn't live in the city limits, I think it's also an issue. I don't think though we as a council, as five people need to sit and argue this is a clear vote will just make a decision so we have a motion and we have a second To reappoint Commissioner Bennett, so I would like to call the question and You know, it's just a yes or no, right?
Okay roll call please
Roll-call vote 3–2 motion and we have a second To reappoint Commissioner Bennett, so I would like to call the question and You know, it's just a yes or no, rig
Show transcript
Thank you. All right, let's move on to the discussion of Chair Quillacy about reappointing. Who would like to begin conversation?
I'm sorry, did we not have a second motion from Francina? I can make
the motion to pause, to not move forward with reappointing and for the nominating committee to meet and interview potential candidates, and also to propose another nomination. A decision. I will second that.
I want to ask some questions. Sure. So what this means is that Commissioner Steve Quillesee will continue to serve on the Planning Commission. Is that correct?
Yes, and until a reappointment of appointment is made to that seat the present commissioner or chair will see continues in his role as a planning commissioner under the current ordinance.
Okay would this council consider a friendly amendment? We had discussed waiting 60 days and we're in about 75 days we're going to have a new council. Would Councilwoman Rachel Lang consider We can grapple with this, but that we have the next council look at all of this. I don't know quite how to say it at the moment because by the time you come back I mean, we have to go this means that we have to go through advertising again. Right. Is that what we're going to? Yeah,
I understand the motion would be to reapply re advertise the vacancy, take any nominations, have the nominating committee meet and not put the ordinance meet with whoever may apply, reinterview and then return with a new nomination.
OK, correct. How long do you foresee that usually do that for a month
The whole process probably 30 to 60 days depending on timing
I Think we should go forward now personally So perhaps We have a motion and we have a second. Any final comments before the roll call? I'm wondering if this should be
a friendly amendment or not. I think we need to move forward with a quo warrant request to the AG, because I see that we're going to be interviewing people but there's always going to be that question in the back of the mind. Well you know is this legal? Is this not legal and honestly I don't I don't think that with all due respect to our city attorney, that we can say that is a legal value. It's a legal interpretation but that's what it is and I would like the specifics of what we have to be part of this discussion. I also think that our ordinance is incorrect in how duties are allocated and I think we should fix that.
So, you know I think the nominating committee will go in saying well you know. You will not have clarity on the issue of whether or not there is a conflict. Therefore, I'm not comfortable with that level of ambiguity for the decision making and then it's going to come to us and we're going to have this same conversation again. So I'm feeling like just given the nature of the current council that we're going to need a professional Attorney general opinion, and I would like to move that forward because we are in no position To make this evaluation. We're in no position to evaluate the interpretation of the city attorney Just simply because we don't know enough it's a deep deep issue I mean the question of co-warranty is is incredibly complex and we are not able to deal with it So, I think that's our only way for clarity.
That's our only way for clarity and it's the only way that it actually gives Commissioner Quillacy a chance to respond. So, so I don't know if that's a friendly amendment or if that's a motion but I think that that's what we need to do before we do anything really. We need to clean up the ordinance And we need to send this to the AG with a quote warrant so that they can, he she whomever can make an evaluation and to me that's the only way forward. So I don't know if that's a friendly amendment? I don't know if that's emotion if it's emotion it's emotion.
So, I make that motion.
The answer to the question, is it a friendly amendment or is it a motion? Is if the maker of the motion accepts its, it's a friendly amendment. If they do not as just happened then it's emotion to be a substitute motion to refer all of the above to the Attorney General via asking for a Colorado
I'm going to make that
motion.
Okay, is there just one second? She
didn't get a chance to respond. Let Rachel
respond. No, I responded. That is not...I don't want that to be a part of my initial motion. Okay
so is there...just one second Mayor Pro Tem. Is there a second for that motion on the table?
I just want
to make clear that a Quill
Warren tow
1:57 – 2:0636 turns
Is asking the court to issue a writ removing somebody from their office. So are you, are the two of you actually wanting to pursue an order from a court removing Mr. Quillacy from an office? I don't see that as... If you want that then I don' think you should be making this motion.
Councilmember Rule, do you want to respond? That's
not what I understand it to be. I understand it to be the permission to do so is for the evaluation to do so is the first and then the permission to do so is the second
So it's a request to the attorney general asserting that there is a conflict or maybe a conflict. You can ask it and phrase it in the conditional, there may be a conflict asking the attorney general to grant permission to sue and then he either grants it or not. He or she is applicable, grants it or not. There is a second choice at which the council can choose not to file the lawsuit as obviously may or may not be the choice. It is a request for a writ to remove from office but the council can choose not to file the lawsuit which would be the process to get the writ It's a vehicle to get the opinion from the Attorney General, if that's the council's direction.
It's not an automatic filing of a removal. It's basically- It's a
request to remove, it's a request to remove for the Attorney General to evaluate the request to remove and then the lawsuit doesn't get filed until two things happen. One, the Attorney General grants permission and two, the council authorizes filing of the lawsuit.
Right so it's not automatic they would come back to the council who would then have to... So essentially what I am proposing is that we get the highest interpreter of law in the state to interpret for us, then it comes back to us to decide whether or not we move forward or anyone else decides to move forward. Although I'm not sure that if we apply that anyone can then.
Yeah, no, the person who applied if this council applied permission were granted to sue and the council chose not to sue Someone else would have to reapply for permission, although one would expect the AG wouldn't change their mind in a few minutes. Okay
so it's limited to the person who applies for this to be able to sue someone else once they knew the finding they could choose to do that if they so chose? So I don't see any other way forward than to have the highest legal interpreter, because he's not a judge. He's an interpreter. He interprets the law given interpretation. I don't see any other way forward.
Okay, let's make that
motion. Yeah, I made that motion and I'm gonna call the question Councilmember Lange you want to say
something? I just want to say one thing and I think if we take this out of the personal and Just look at it from a policy policy standpoint If we're going through this confusing, given this conversation legal process to clarify the conflict of interest. I just think this is just setting a precedent for any future Council member who has a political agenda, to be able to like to be.
It gives them a path forward to work the system. I think that in making this decision it's You know, the reason why we decided to hold on this was because the policies are in place. The conflict of interest, the ethics of that are in place for a reason and so I just wanted to say that this is not personal. This has nothing to do with ideological views or who someone is.
This really has to do with Adhering to a process that we all voted to adhere to but then also adhering to A policy that's been in place before. We were even here
Thank and I Agree with you councilmember Lang. I appreciate that comment. Yeah, we need to follow the rules So we have a motion on the table. We have a second let's go ahead and have the roll call I'm sorry quick wait up Council member Francina and then we're gonna call the question. Yep
What about my original question about cleaning up this ordinance?
Exactly. So I thought we'd answer that, but happy to go through that again. Is what Council
Member Ruhl is asking related to cleaning of the ordinance or can we We can agenda. OK we can we can agendize bringing back is obviously the existing ordinance has not solved our problem there's too many
The underlying problem of how the council appoints the Planning Commission. Yes, clearly the process doesn't work
over the use of the word of the language the text City Clerk because it doesn't say deputy city clerks There's all this stuff that's unclear so so as a separate You know I'm a little bit worried because we were making so many motions But that can be
agendized
for the future? The council could direct us to come back with more options on rewriting the Planning Commission ordinance again. We would look for a majority direction to do that
though.
But if I could just clarify that some of the conflict of interest concerns aren't specific to the ordinance, they are specific to the roles of each board position or each elected position and the planning commission? So even if we go back and change our own ordinance, there are still those larger questions that have to do with county and state policies. Correct?
Yes, so as I noted the larger there's several pieces of conflict that we've identified. One is the planning commission clerk or planning commission nomination process and the clerk's role in that. That's set by the ordinance that could be deleted at will by the council. So to clarifying this larger question regarding what does the phrase distinctly separate training and experience or specialized expertise mean That could all be solved by the council, but that does not solve the second piece of my assessment to the council, my opinion to the council regarding the second separate potential for clash of duties and loyalties between the clerk and the planning commissioner which is the inherent elections role the clerk has relative to the council.
And relative to the initiatives and referendums I noted, the basic elections roles.
So that's outside of our jurisdiction?
Right, simply amending the Planning Commission Ordinance doesn't fix those conflicts. I recognize that the motion by Councilman Rule to seek the answer from the Attorney General who is of course the definitive subject to a court and we would have no objection to that but we defer to the council.
Okay unless we basically remove every duty of the clerk and you know actually could eliminate the position?
That takes voter approval to eliminate the clerk position
Let's go ahead and
vote
on Councilmember Rolls motion and then we'll get back to Councilmember Lange. Could you repeat the motion?
So as I understood the motion, it is to direct the City Attorney's Office to file a co-oronto request regarding the removal of Commissioner Quillacy Framed as a Request for an attorney general provide opinion is he holding in a compatible office or not? To return to the council in public once the opinion is released but not authorizing filing of any lawsuit
Okay, that's correct roll call. Please my motion and I
just want to make one comment because I've read through it It's there's no ambiguity whatsoever in the opinion that Clerk position no not the clerk position. The sanitary district position and the Planning Commission position are incompatible. It does not matter what the individual facts are, there's law that says you do not consider how things go or done. You just look at the duties and roles of the office and if they're incompatible And we have a decision in front of us that they're incompatible.
Okay, roll call
please.
We really
need to call a question but I just have to point out that we also have a legal opinion of the sanitary departments. No, we don't. Council, we're calling the question.
Roll-call vote Failed 1–3 · 1 under review
Show transcript
2:06 – 2:219 turns
All right, we will return to Council Member Lange's motion. Could we repeat that motion just to make sure everybody is on the same page?
Yes. Please. Council Member Lange's motion is to return the nomination for the Quillacy seat to the nominating committee to return with a new nomination after a new application process.
Okay all right are we ready for roll call? Councilmember rule.
I'm sorry, I need you to repeat that again. I was engaged in secondary. Yeah exactly thank you
the motion is to return the Quillacy seat nomination to the nominating committee to return with a new nomination after completing a new application process and new interviews.
Is it too late to make a friendly amendment? I won't
okay let's have the roll call please
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion is to return the Quillacy seat nomination to the nominating committee to return with a new nomination after completing a new applicat · 1 under review
Show transcript
Okay let's take a short break and we will be back. If we could come back to our seats and
we'll move on to item number three, please. Okay, if everybody could come to quiet and we'll move on to discussion item number three. Confirmation of submitting a letter of opposition to the County of Ventura's Soule Park Master Plan. Can we come to quiet please? If you can find your seats that would be great. Which allows for the development of RV parking and camping in the county-owned Soule Park which is located within city limits.
Is there a staff report?
2:21 – 2:2818 turns
Yes, Madam Mayor there is and our Assistant City Manager Mr. Carl Alameda will be delivering the report with possibly some interjection from Mr. Seibert our Community Development Director who is on line. Mr. Alamedo?
Thank you. Yes, Madam Mayor and members of the Council so tonight before you is a letter of opposition to the County of Ventura Parks Department Sol Park Master Plan Soule Park, as you well know is fully located within the city limits of Ojai but is both owned and managed by the County of Ventura. And it was also the recent home of a highly successful project the city and the county did together to build the new Soule Park tennis courts.
Pickleball courts, I'm sorry. Pickleball courts which I've heard nothing but positive feedback about those courts so it was a great project to work together with the county for that outcome. The park well located within Ojai is 203 acres. It also has an 18-hole golf course, a dog park, playgrounds, structures, paddle tennis courts, picnic areas and again the recently completed pickleball courts. So the county's Parks Advisory Commission they've been engaging in a concept review that's been before the Parks Advisory Commission few times thus far And it's currently open and available online. And the county is accepting public comments on that plan.
The public comment period is open until this Friday, October 18th at 3 p.m.. My understanding is the county has received about 75 comments from the public on the plan itself. I don't have any gauge if those are supportive or in opposition of that's just a total number receipt. So the plan is presented Is. Going to be done over two phases if it's adopted and it provides for a couple of things one is the replanting of trees so they lost about 90 trees that had died I mean they're looking to replant about 213 trees over this project which the city is fully supportive of that component of project The other component is what is of concern that the letter points out, and that's the development of both an RV park and camping grounds in Soule Park.
The letter points out this use isn't compatible with the nature of the park so the two phases I mentioned, the first would build out half those spaces for 29 RV camping spaces and then the second phase would provide the balance of those 58 spaces with another 20. So from a use and operational standpoint, the concerns that are held are ones that are environmental. That we have the potential to see increased traffic and disruption in the park with the draw of 58 camping spaces.
It also will create noise and air pollution from RVs just by their nature Usually it's inherent that they have generators, air conditioning units and other equipment. That's not something that's existing in the park at this time We also worry potentially about overcrowding with this added use of 58 camping spaces There is the potential increased risk for fire unfortunately because camping is Something it's an overnight use where this is largely a daytime use Park So we do worry about that alterations to the landscape and the nature of the park itself, typically with RV park camping sites that are standalone. Most are standalone. They aren't combined recreational uses but you see things added in terms of amenities such as the need to build out roads Concrete pads extend utilities to the campsite and other amenities like showers, restrooms, and waste dumping stations.
Which isn't really compatible with active recreational use park type sole park. So these are some of the operational conflicts that we see and environmental conflicts that we see. Separate from those facts, it also isn't compatible with city zoning and that's something that Lucas is available to comment more on our Community Development Director. And he's available on Zoom.
If he has anything to add in, I can answer questions on operational parts and Lucas can give you an update on the zoning. He looks quite comfortable.
Can you hear me?
Yeah.
Through the mayor if I could. Yeah, the zoning itself is PL which is public quasi-public zoning. Sorry I'm relaxed. I'm enjoying myself listening to the council meeting tonight. From a use standpoint the use itself is not actually allowed as a camping campground use um it's not an allowed use within the PL. Camping is allowed within other zones. Lucas
you may not realize your camera's on by the way
okay oh Let me do this. I
think
it's important
to
understand that
from a youth
standpoint
within the PL zone, campgrounds are not allowed use.
They are
allowed in open space but they're not allowed to use within
the PL The zone in which we're talking about specifically. So, and PL just as a general understanding for PL it is a district applied to areas appropriate for public facilities, government offices and cultural facilities the maximum building intensity varies and shall be determined through development review process on a case by case basis The PL zone district is consistent with the public quasi-public land use designation of the general plan. So there's consistency with the general plan and the zoning, so we're good there. It's just a matter of this campground. The campground itself is not allowed to use period.
Thank you any questions from council? Questions? Council Member Ruhl
2:28 – 2:4531 turns
I do have a question. If it were you and you really wanted to do this, could you contort, twist, change or in any way argue that it is an allowed use? Could you stretch your brain to figure out and make an argument that it was an allowed use?
Within this zone, it's difficult And the reason why is because it's specifically identified within this specific zone for being for public facilities, for government offices and for cultural facilities. None of those fit within the framework of what we're talking about here. Are there uses that we have seen that are outside those boundaries? Yes, but they are so specific and so unique campgrounds I would assume for obvious reasons have been excluded from the PL zone.
Mainly, mainly because they are not necessarily for the public good but for the outside public good or for tourism purposes. Period.
OK, thank
you. Any other questions? Let's go ahead and move on to public comment first. We have William Wyrick and then Bill Miley.
Well, now that I'm retired elected official. It's nice to move beyond polite statements. No, they didn't just replace the trees. The county killed the trees. That's scientifically a fact. All right. So let's not mince words here. The county has not been a good steward of this property. They killed the trees. All right. Now they're replacing them. I think the last statement was very interesting.
There is LAFCO guidelines That are very specific that have not been mentioned that the county is supposed to be consistent with city planning guidelines, especially in the sphere of influence. And I don't see this mention and I think that would be a good thing to include in this letter. The other thing is I support Bill Miley's comments. regarding expanding beyond what the comments I just made about strengthening this letter by referring to the LAFCO guidelines and third, I would like to see Maybe not just saying we're opposed to this which I absolutely urge you to do is think as strongly as possible But also, you know the carrot in the stick This is a vacuum. They the county always wants money They want the parks to show a positive income.
That was one of the things that we were trying to do with the memorandum understanding that you guys chose to move away from, was to expand our park and recreation services by including an income positive for the county. So they're looking at another way to do positive income. I would submit to you that expanding parks and recreation services is a much better way of piggybacking some increase in revenue then leaving this vacuum that they're then thinking about, oh let's fill it with an RV park. So I would suggest that maybe you look at things like expansion of the bike path that I know Councilman Francina and I used to talk about there's a very good guideline for expanding the bike path through here. Expanding Park and Recreation Services we have no women's softball leagues why not?
We could So I just think that we don't look at just the, you know, not just no but hell no. I can talk like this now. But also here's a positive alternative that meets some of their monetary self-interest. So thank you.
Thank you Bill. Next we have Bill Miley.
Hello. First a little protocol comment. I assume the protocol for correspondence with other agencies is by the principal leader of the council, that's why the mayor authors the letter. However, it would seem to me more logical if the mayor submitted this draft as you're doing with a request to review as you're doing and then noting within the letter this approval process and also indicate that it was supported by the council members. Okay.
I suggest two additions. One, make a statement about the expelling of greenhouse gases from the RVs and the supportive vehicles which accompany them. Frequently, you can see this in the RV parks. There's a second vehicle that comes along too, not one. I gave you a chart that shows by Cruise America on the gas mileage these vehicles get. A big one gets 6 to 10 miles per gallon, okay? Greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas. Class B 18 and 22 greenhouse gas and then class C 10 to 15.
miles per gallon. You can probably smell it as they go along Ojai Avenue and those that don't have a second vehicle will come into Ojai with their RVs and take up spaces, so please consider the gas mileage issue. Now a better suggestion More folks recently are speaking out for the county leadership in a community poll. It's very much needed. There is a need for our council to collaborate with this county government in doing this. Most recently, Council Member Ruhl spoke about this valued recreation need.
Maybe we should form a valley-wide recreation district So please add these two suggestions. And there's a horse area out there, folks that was missed in the inventory. And I'll bet those horse people are not going to be very happy when the dust is created and the RV people say stop that. Stop that. It's wrecking our RV experience. Thanks.
Thank you, Bill. Any any comments online, Bridget for this item?
No Mayor, there is no comments online.
Okay we will return to discussion who would like to begin? And just a little history I have been contacted by many community members about this item so I went to staff and asked what could we do and so this is where we are anybody
yeah
yep Mayor Pro
Tem. So a few things that I guess we're looking at adopting this letter that's attached to our staff report and the, I think I would add to this and there's been a number of people have commented to me about this going back a couple years to when trees were actually killed Is that they are very upset. That the replacement of the trees is not going to have an impact on their life.
If the county plans to put little you know twigs that will eventually grow into mature trees and that because they. Are responsible We should be asking them to replace the trees with mature trees. I know that's exorbitantly expensive, but I think it's something that we can at least ask for and see if we can get some mature trees. I agree with Mr. Wyrick that in terms of the language first of all Support the idea that we do this as opposed to the mayor's Letter, but with her permission if if we're all in agreement to we say we are Writing to express opposition As opposed to concern. Yeah And let's see And then, so that would be at the beginning and then down when just before the bullet points.
I would say the city of Ojai objects to potential addition of 58 camping sites but I would start this out with one Of our list of objections, I would make objection number one That the project doesn't provide a public benefit to the Residents of the city and the greater value and then and and Thank You Lucas for articulating that and then I would also say that the I wrote this down somewhere.
So the addition of RV traffic would result in an increased burden on already overcrowded traffic conditions in the city of Elkhorn. And I would add the comments. Something along the lines, I haven't worked this out but the. Detrimental impact on air quality in the valley, not just from having the RVs running through town but also I've done some camping and yes. I don't use a generator but I get to listen to them when I go camping so I would add that.
Mayor Pro Tem, would you like to make a motion with those additions to the letter that Matt, our city attorney wrote down? Thank you very
much. Yeah I'd move that we make those additions and that we sign or as I don't want to assume that all five of us will sign, but I think that would be the best result. But however many sign so that they get the message that this is not just a mayor lark, it's a big city response.
And I will second that motion if
I could clarify one item on the sizing of the trees. They're replacing a far greater number than what was killed, I believe is around 90 that were lost and putting in 213. So we want to ask for
Hold on just one at a time mayor pro tem and then
yeah, so you know with my motion why don't we say something along the lines of and I'll take editing from anybody but That we that because there are You know so many residents who are gonna miss out on Having mature trees in the park, we would like the county to consider to replace as many of the trees with mature or semi-mature trees as is feasible.
And if I could
jump in ahead very briefly staff would also suggest in the motion including The reference to the guidelines for order development former councilmember Weirich is absolutely right That should be part of this for those not familiar with it some time ago in the 80s every city in the county and the county All agreed together to these partnership for some guidelines regarding development to be orderly and consistent with each other's policies where applicable, but that should be added as well. If the council so Jesus
OK, I would add that to my motion as
well. That's what I was going to say and put it is as close to the front as possible. Councilmember
Lange. I
just want to say my 57 year old son have pictures when those trees were little, those were really old trees. We will not be here when they mature. I mean maybe some of
us.
Do we know if those trees are going to be native trees or Fire like fire. Fire safe trees more.
My understanding was that they were looking to replant oaks.
OK. Good. Thank you. So I'm in agreement with all the other things including having us as a council sign it.
Okay, all right. Council Member Ruhl?
Yeah I'm also in agreement that we all sign it. I appreciate Mayor Pro Tem Whitman's encouragement that we be a little bit stronger in our opposition. Our constituents have certainly shown that they...I go to Seoul twice a day And number one, it's very difficult to find shade because there's only about five places now that have shade. Well, that's kind of an exaggeration there are places you know but they're there it's hard to find shade let's just put it that way.
So, and this can't be part of this letter. But I just do want to mention that we still don't know really what happened with those trees there's been no accountability as to what happened and it may be that the county doesn't know. It may be that the county doesn't want to share it maybe that it's still in process But I think that the citizens of Ojai need an explanation as to how this happened. It was it was a great, great loss for the city.
And finally, I just wanted to point out that the traffic coming off of 150 into Boardman, you know, if you take your life in your hands now because people speed up around that curve and you have to boot out, you know, Worm your way out to look left, look right and they're speeding up. But someone pointed out in the letter to the editor that Boardman is covered with low hanging branches of very old trees and these class, you know, the very long and high RVs will damage those.
You look up there, you know that's the case. And once again, that's not something that I think as a council we should be willing That's to me a very big deal. So I support it 100%. I support making it as strong as we can without being alienating, but our constituents and the citizens of Ojai and the Ojai Valley are very clear that this is not
2:45 – 2:5010 turns
what they want. Thank you council and I would also like to thank Mayor Pro Tem for those additions. Very helpful. Yeah, Council Member? Yeah, I
just want to quickly thank all the wonderful community members who wrote excellent letters they submitted them some of them came to us some of them I foresee will be Hopefully published in the Ojai Valley News and I especially want to thank Patricia Hartman who I think wrote the first couple of editorials they were excellent. That's all I want to say.
Okay roll call, please
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Motion passes
Thank you Okay,
we will move on to item number four introduce an ordinance adding a new article to the Ojai Municipal Code prohibiting the unethical breeding of companion animals We have
a brief staff report and I'm also joined by Assistant City Attorney Taylor Anderson who worked closely with folks on this one So it is an ordinance that would prohibit breeding dogs or cats with congenital anatomical features likely to cause suffering. Those include short snouts, abnormal breathing sounds, risky body shapes, difficulty in naturally mating and various other malformations as mentioned in the ordinance including unnatural postures and disorders.
Enforcement would be by peace officers and designated city officials. The violation is treated as infractions, subject also to administrative enforcement and injunctive relief as needed with that we are available for any questions. And I also understand represented from the organization that suggested this to the city is available as well.
Any questions from council? No. OK. All right. Let's go ahead and take public comment first. We have William Wyrick then Cynthia Wyrick then Leah Hecker
I'm going to be pretty short. My wife Cynthia is here, has a lot of education she's given me on this issue. You know, I think there's always a fundamental choice for government. Do you want to inform choice? Or do you want to tell people that they can take their choices away from you? It's a pretty sweeping companion breeds some of which on that list have Even by DNA analysis, been shown to be in existence for more than two millennia.
Yes indeed there are bad practices in terms of breeding but this is a sweeping eliminate the breed mentality. Companion animals are actually important to a lot of people And the logic of this, you know, we're government and we're going to tell you what to do mentality is also very sweeping in terms of here at this moment in time in a small city of 4.2 square miles saying well we know better than a cultural history going back millennia.
I know the dogs that we have, one of the things I like about them is that they're on this list but they are, have characteristics that are what they call throwback characteristics. And a lot of the breeding that was done in the beginning in the 17th and 18th century has put a lot of bad characteristics into many breeds not just companion breeds. Far better, I think, to find a way to more affirmatively have responsible breeding practices rather than to castigate and say this entire class of breed is bad. There's almost sort of an anti-domestication mentality here.
Our human culture is very intertwined with the domesticization of animals and, of course, plants. In terms of selection for certain characteristics and it can be done well, it can be done poorly. But this is basically an ideological these are bad breeds to have they shouldn't exist and that's pretty extreme. And one other comment I'll just make really quick about how well you know the experts show up and they know what to do. I saw this today.
A organization in the Appalachian saying, well we've seen FEMA once. They brought in a pallet of electric chainsaws to communities with no power. Yeah? They cut down greenhouse commissions but it was absolutely useless for people back in the area where no power they're trying to clear the roads.
Thank you Bill next we have Cynthia Weirich then Leah Hecker and then Bill Miley
2:50 – 2:566 turns
Well, I'm not. I'm displeased. Very displeased. This seems to be something between whoever wrote this ridiculous list up and the American Kennel Club or the English Kennel Club or the Canadian Kennel club in anyway trying to get trying to explain to you all that That dichotomy between mutts and purebred dogs, we've lived with it forever. I mean we've just lived with it forever. And yes people who have money are usually the ones that have a purebred dog. Okay. So what? You know, so what I've had, I've had rescues before didn't enjoy them as much as my pugs can tell you that I've never enjoyed anything as much as my pugs anyway, I'm just going to read. I'm going to read fast cause it's a lot.
Uh, the American kennel club clubs mission statement says that it will maintain a registry for purebred dogs to preserve integrity and ethical behavior. Members act as goodwill ambassadors for the pug breed by attempting to educate the public, interested parties and new owners whenever possible. I am a member of several pug groups. I answer questions online every day. People that have gotten a pug and didn't really know what they were getting in there like was that you know what they should be doing?
The whole breed has changed. There have been pug-like dogs known in China for since 400 BCE, that's a long time and it seems like if they were such a bad breed they just would have died out or they would have changed, they would have morphed into something else but anyway and a lot of things did happen in the 17th and 18th century. They tried to change the pugs that were brought in by the Dutch So, that's that.
Let me find my place. The Pug was a companion dog as it is a stable even-tempered dog at its even tempered breed known for its playfulness charm dignity loyalty and outgoing loving disposition They aren't diggers. They don't fetch dead birds, you know in the woods or in the water. A pug from the old English means someone tenderly loved. I have needed that in my life. I mean I had a broken back. I was in bed for years. My pug was beside me. I would have lost my mind. I mean that is my emotional support dog.
They were not bred to do work. They know two things, to eat and to be by your side. They do not kill.
Thank you, Cynthia. Next we have Leah Hecker then Bill Miley then Jacob Shaw.
So, hi. I commend you on wanting to do something for animals. However, seeing that Ojai is not the breeder capital of California, I find this law or ordinance to be kind of performative. So I wanted to come and give you an idea of something where you could do that would really help the animals of the valley. It would help the environment. Humans too, which is nice.
So why not do something like this? Why not follow the example of Portland, Oregon, Los Angeles, San Diego, Oakland and the entire state of Massachusetts and ban fireworks? Thousands of animals really suffer. I can show you my vet bills that I have every year, but not only the pets suffer the farm animals, the horses that are fleeing animals that can't deal with the noise. The wildlife suffers a 2023 study by Professor Bill Bateman.
He says the effects of fireworks were multifarious and profound. We were pretty much blown away by the extent of them. Fireworks are minor problem.
Yeah.
Fireworks are devastating for the environment. When fireworks explode, they rain down plastic gunpowder metals like lead, copper, cadmium, titanium and aluminum and toxic chemicals. These impact air quality, home and health waterways and soil. And they start fires. In 2022, 31,302 fires were started by fireworks and an estimated 109 million in direct property damage according to Michelle Steinberg from the National Fire Protection Association.
This is why Tahoe City, California dropped fireworks in favor of drones in 2022 following the Calder fire which devastated 22,000 acres. It's good for the environment, it's good for our animals. Our animals right here in the valley. It's good for our farm animals and the wildlife, for humans, and for safety measures against fire. So why not follow Taos City and ban fireworks? And replace them with drone shows which you could support financially.
Caddy Biggers of Tahoe says our lake, our surrounding mountains are wildlife. These are the reasons people live and visit here. So sustainability and stewardship are core values in Tahoe City. Shouldn't they be here too? Thank you.
Thank you, Leah. Next we have Bill Miley, then Jacob Shaw, then Dale Hanson.
2:56 – 3:0315 turns
Hello. Since we don't know, at least I don't know whether such breeding is happening in the city and we don't know if folks are buying such dogs and bringing them home here. Therefore, we just don't know. We should agree then that this is a principle statement based on a worldwide belief by some to change animal breeding and owning practices. And this statement, not a resolution but an ordinance is a principal statement from our 7500 residents to speak out and be known and acknowledge the likelihood there will be no active enforcement. Thanks.
Thank you, Bill. Next, we have Jacob Shaw, then Dale Hanson.
Mayor, Jacob would like to hand these out.
Hi, everyone. Is it cool if I just wait until those are handed out before I begin? Because those will be relevant to what I'm saying. Yes. Thank you so much. I'm ready whenever you all are. So, I just wanted to begin by addressing some- One
second
Jacob, can
we start it from the beginning? Three minutes, thank you. Okay perfect okay go ahead Jacob
So I just wanted to begin, first of all thank you so much for considering this ordinance and I wanted to start off by addressing some concerns that people have raised and some things that came up in the last meeting about whether this is a problem here. So as of today just a few miles from where we're gathered there are currently 10 French Bulldog puppies listed for sale and all of them have visibly identifiable extremely narrow nostrils and nasal cavities, and snouts pushed so far back in against their skulls that their side profiles are almost completely flat. Some of these photos are the handouts that I passed out to you and as everyone can see here you see this side profile of this dog is almost completely flat And what that means is that there is not enough room for their internal anatomy to fit.
Their soft palate extends backwards, it covers part of their windpipe and that's why you hear the signature snorting wheezing sounds from a lot of these flat-faced brachycephalic dogs. So for the rest of their lives, these puppies who are just a few months old right now will be trapped in deformed bodies. Unable to breathe properly, unable to thermoregulate, unable to run and jump and chase a ball and do all the things that make a dog's life joyful and fulfilling without gasping for air. And this companion animal protection ordinance will help make sure that no more dogs, no more cats will have to suffer in this way.
And as Dr. Milne spoke about in the last council meeting, this type of abusive breeding is just as tangible as physical abuse. The fact that we don't clock it that way when we look at these dogs doesn't mean that they don't experience it like that. So as long as there are people breeding dogs and cats in Ojai, which we know there are, this ordinance makes it illegal for them to breed animals with deformities that will cause them to suffer. So this is just common sense. A number of speakers mentioned how some of these breeds have long histories, and I would point anyone who's curious to look at older photos of these breeds where they had more normal anatomies. They had longer snouts and it was only through the pursuit of an extreme look that some people find cute that they've become so unhealthy.
And that's to say we don't know which breeds or which extreme looks will become popular in the next 5, 10 or 20 years. But this ordinance protects all dogs and cats in Ojai from being bred to become the next bulldog, from being bred into a genetic cold sack where they will spend their lives struggling and suffering. So anyone who has spent time with a dog or cat knows that it's not how they look that matters, it's who they are. So anyone who is really attached to a specific breed I would just ask if your dog had a longer snout, if they had a long tail instead of a corkscrew tail, would you love them any less? I think the answer is always no, of course not! I love my dog or my cat for who they are.
And for a moment just think about this from their perspective, that's to say the dog or cats' perspective. They don't care about breeds
Can you finish? Council, is that alright? Yeah.
How long? Go for
it.
I was just going to say that the dogs and cats themselves, they don't care about breed standards. They don't care about the way they look. They care about having a healthy and functional body as all of us do. So I just wanted to thank you so much for taking this step to protect animals. It's really not very often that we have the opportunity to measurably reduce the amount of suffering in the world but this is one of those opportunities. So thank you so much.
Thank you Jacob. Next we have Dale Hanson then Larry Steingold
Thank you for hearing me. First of all, I want to thank Leah for what she said about the fireworks. I totally agree with that and it's not only for companion animals is for the wild animals so but back to the point these breeds are bred for humans Not for the animal. It doesn't do the animal any good to have some kind of deformity that they can't breathe right, they can't run right or they can't do what any animal wants to do, have a normal life and I think that you know while people say well we're wasting our time doing things for animals Well, I think it's important that we make a comment. This is the city this is who we are and what we think as Leslie brought up the thing about the elephants that was important to me. I think that as Ojai we need to say what we think and how we feel.
And at this issue is something that anyone that has an animal knows it doesn't matter what the animal looks like they'll be loving to you no matter what they look like You know, they can be cute. They can be ugly or whatever, but they still are loving and those little pug bulldogs. They are cute, especially when they're babies. They are the cutest thing. They call them a chick magnet because people just go to them. But you know, we know that what it does to their lives. And I hope that you will pass this and I thank you for hearing us.
Thank you, Dale. Next, we have Larry Steingold
3:03 – 3:1015 turns
On PETA's website, it says animals are not ours to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment or abuse in any other way. And we don't have a pet. We did. We had a 15-year old Bichon. I had a Winamarana and I had a Dachshund but now we don t have an animal. And on Friday, November 29th, PETA is free the animals. So between this particular ordinance and the ordinance that you cannot buy a pet, a dog or a cat at an animal store, pet store anymore, and that you can only use animals from the shelter which is a good thing But now we're going to also make sure that they're neutered, which means they can't have. So at the end of the day are we going to and we cannot own an elephant? And I that's fine.
OK, and that's OK. You can have one.
That's not correct.
What is it? Can we have one
if you can provide sanctuary like conditions for the animal to live like they were born too? So
let's just be accurate. OK. I'll take it there but hold my time. Or not. I don't care. It doesn't matter. The point is, why don't we just go straight to the chase and have no animals owned in Ojai by 2030? No replacement animals. Nobody can own an animal. Free them all. If we're going to give the land and the air and dirt legal status, shouldn't we give animals legal status? Isn't that where it's all going?
At least here. If we're going to do it, let's do it. And let's have the conversation. Just put it on the table, resolved. Nobody gets to own an animal after 2030 and you can't replace an animal that's gone after 2026. Have the conversation because that's where it's all going. You specify elephant needs sanctuary, great. How about coyotes? Wolves? Bobcats? Donkeys, whatever they are. I've got a pig across the street. It's great.
It's wonderful. They were taking care of a llama during the Thompson fire down the street. Great! But nobody gets to own an animal. Take the leash off freedom. They say here Peter Friday free the animals on Friday Well, why not free them all the time? They want us to stop using camels in Egypt. Send a resolution there." That's what they're asking. Okay, let's go all the way. Ban the eating of meat. Ban the selling of meat in Ojai.
Just put it on the table so we can have the conversation so we can move onto fixing the roads. I mean this is not a big deal. Thank
you Larry. Next we have Casey Abbott
Good evening. My name is Casey Abbott, a former beekeeper and I'm a breeder of queens and a geneticist. Speaking as a breeder and geneticist, I would like this not to cover all animals because it's very important that we get to be able to breed those bees for the traits that we're looking for. Mostly I'm looking for traits that improve the lot of the bees. I can see that some of the complaints about our dog breeders who go for cuteness that does not benefit the dog, so if we do word anything in any kind of an ordinance and we do pass it please let's be specific about which animals and which types and which intentions and purposes that were trying to limit within city limits.
That's all I really ask is it reasonable work toward the benefits of the animal be protected as well as the unreasonable try to be Litigated out. Thank you.
Thank You Casey any comments online Bridget no mayor there are no raised hands online OK, we will move to discussion. Would anyone like to begin? And just for clarification, this is an ordinance just about companion animals
and specifically dogs and cats that you want to note Casey's concern is met. This has nothing to do with bees, dogs or cats.
OK. All right. Anyone like to begin?
I'd like to make a motion to adopt this ordinance.
Yes, I'll second it. OK. All right. Well, thank you very much. And I think I appreciate council looking at this and discussing it. And just to reiterate, it's not about eliminating any kind of breeds is about eliminating suffering as much as we can. So anything that we can do as a community to reduce suffering? I think that is our moral obligation to do that So let's go ahead and actually. Yeah, I got
it. Go ahead. Go ahead, Rachel. I just want to add one thing that this does not prohibit anybody from owning these animals. So if you love your pugs and you want a French bulldog, you can know no no one's going to stop you. But what it does prevent is the the breeding practices that are abusive. So I just wanted to clarify that.
And I just do want to add on a no marriage. I did meet a pug who was bred in town, in Daly Park and I talked to his owner and so it is happening. Go ahead Mayor Pro Tem.
Okay well as far as the examples that were brought to us, I did look at those to the extent I could I'm talking about the letter from PETA that listed. So, I mean two of the sites Or breeders could be verified not to be in the city. The other two, you couldn't tell one way or the other. I thought that the WIREX made some comments that were worthwhile but I don't know about pugs. I've never had one, never spent time with one.
My son has a beagle. And that's not a dog breed that I've ever had any interest in until he had to be. And I can't, I can't imagine my son ever having Dog that wasn't a beagle at this point because it is Such a fantastic dog But as I read this ordinance It's gonna. It's gonna prevent the It's gonna force them to try to find a beagle with long legs. I've never seen one So how, how is it not prohibiting the I mean every beagle I've seen has those short legs.
And I don't know I actually have never seen any suffering. That anything that I would understand to be suffering you know for that eagle. But it I know that this is going to be passed. I'm not going to support it. I don't think that this is what we should be spending our time on.
3:10 – 3:2019 turns
I'm looking at the section where they do talk about beagles and selectively bred to have short limbs. So we're just returning to the theme, this is about selective breeding that creates health issues. So we have a motion, we have a second. Let's go ahead and have the roll call unless somebody...
I just wanted to point out that there have been breeders in Ojai. I hear if you talk to, I talked to a woman who worked at the pet store and the breeder used to send the, I think they were pugs, they might've been Frenchies, used to send on Signal Street by the way very close to home Um, and would send them there. And it's well known within Ojai that there are breeders who are breeding these breeds. You know whether or not I mean I went on the website too when I was able to see in Ojai but you know often people will I did go to the sites that were sent to us and it did say Ojai. And I know that there are breeders in Ojai. And once again, to reiterate what Council Member Lang said, it's not about whether or not you can own these. It's about whether or not you can breed these and you breed them for basically Thank you very much.
Breeds that have difficult all kinds of anatomical. Physiological problems but I would hope that this ordinance provides education and the previous meeting with the slideshow education is an important component of this ordinance and hopefully whereas we cannot prevent you from buying them from owning them and loving them We hope that you will reconsider and adopt a cat or dog from the animal shelter, which is our next topic.
So I'm going to be looking forward to explaining why that should be considered. Plus, you can get these kind of dogs free at the animal shelter. You don't have to buy them and promote the continual breeding
And our job is to support the health and welfare of our community, and this really does. Because that includes every member of our community, two-leggeds and four-leggeds so let's go ahead and have the roll call please.
I just want to make a couple of comments Leah Hecker talked about fireworks and I think it's important for people to know in case they think that fireworks are okay, you know, they're not The issue would be whether we should be Permitting the fireworks display that's allowed on 4th of July. But all other fireworks are legal at this point And I don't think we would consider eliminating fireworks without the voters weighing in on that one. Yeah, for that display that we do on the 4th of July and I did want to point out that there is no other city in the country this is part of our report that has a similar Ordinance and so I would I'd like to see us avoid becoming a petri dish for you know Theories about Ethics in the rest
We have the roll call, please
Roll-call vote Passed 4–1
Show transcript
Motion passes.
Thank you. All right, we'll move on to our last item. Item number five introduce an ordinance amending the mandatory sterilization of dogs and cats article of the Ojai Municipal Code to eliminate certain exemptions. And we have a staff report.
Here's your city attorney. Yes thank you Mayor and Council. Brief staff report. The City's ordinance presently requires mandatory sterilization of dogs and cats with a number of exceptions. The proposed ordinance would eliminate several exceptions that except dogs registered with the American Kennel Club or the United Kennel Club, or that compete or are in training.
Dogs who are earning titles of agility, carting, herding, protection, rally, hunting, working, or other title from the American Kennel Club or the United Kennel Club, or if the owner of the dog is an American Kennel Club Breeder-of-Merit And last, if the cat is a breed recognized by the Cat Fanciers Association that has either been in a cat show or sporting competition in the last year or has earned a confirmation obedience agility rally sporting working or other title from the Cat Fancier's Association. So to recap, right now dogs and cats that meet those exemptions may be unaltered meaning not spayed and not neutered. This ordinance if introduced by the council would eliminate those exemptions requiring those cats and dogs to be spayed and neutered.
The other note on is of course there is the continuing exception for guide dogs, military law enforcement dogs, search and rescue dogs. And then if a dog's vet or owners of the dog's vet provides a letter certifying that their health would best be served by delaying or not sterilizing the animal And I know there's been some conversation about adjusting the timeline for large breed dogs and staff would have no objection to that. The present requirement is within six months of birth to spay, neuter and staff would have no objection to adding an adjustment for large breed dogs over 25 pounds to shift that out to 24 months has been was in some public comments. Thank you.
Thank you any questions from Council?
Yes. So on attachment A, page three of four the first paragraph I looked at this after we received a very important letter from Heidi Whitman and rightly pointing out there can be health issues serious health issues if you spay to especially the larger breeds too early so I'm in support of her concerns but does this paragraph Is this where the language needs to be broadened.
Right here the owner is because already there's an exception here.
Right, so the key here is Ms. Whitman has sought a further exception that for large breed dogs that it be shifted out to 24 months noting that not all owners of large breed dogs would have the resources to get a letter from their vet. That's the concern that the public comment has raised subject of course to council decision.
Okay, so this 24 months there was a big jump from six months to 24 months a lot of puppies can be born in that in that interim is can we find out what really is the right amount of time? Because we don't want to, I'm not a little, I didn't research 24 months seems that's two years.
So we pulled that number not out of our hat but from a couple of veterinarian analyses and studies that were done which we can circulate if they're not in the public comment Um, that looked at it across a number of breeds and recommended a medley of some breeds. 18 months, some 12, some 24. 24 seemed to be what would capture it but of course if the council wants to set it closer that's fine too perhaps 18.
And maybe a middle path and then a veterinary. Is it really expensive to get a note from a veterinarian? Is that really cost prohibitive?
Depends on how much your vet charges I suppose.
If i could just jump in, I think the other concern that we heard was just and I've experienced this as an Ojai resident sometimes it's hard to get into a vet unless you are already an existing customer if you're new to town it can be difficult that's part of the concern
I think we should be careful because we have millions of dogs being euthanized right now, right now.
Okay any other questions from Council? Let's go ahead and move on to public comment first we have Larry Steingold then we have Bill Miley and then Casey Abbott
3:20 – 3:256 turns
Thank you. I support the neutering of dogs and cats because it's a good thing. I know we had to wait about a year for our Bijan because the vet wanted to make sure that whatever sexual hormones, whatever could get going sort of didn't like kill him. Young. So I would suggest that you might want, I started to read something about University of California Davis that they had seen that young smaller dogs should also wait longer maybe eight months ten months you just don't want to cause more problems by turning them into eunuchs or what have you so i would just caution you on that and do some maybe some research on maybe lengthening it based on data and based on science and based on what, you know. Versus just I know that people have looked at studies and done homework, but maybe there's just make it so that it's kind of flexible.
So anyway, but neutering is not a good idea.
Thank you, Larry. Next, we have Bill Miley and then Casey Abbott.
I actually did not know we had this ordinance in our code. With the exclusions and exemptions taken out to be removed, eugenics comes to mind The four months seems arbitrarily uninformed, which I understand you're going to change. Even our county government makes licensing of cats optional and I gave you their website. And the reason we're doing this is because we have too many cats and dogs.
Why is that? We had, our family had one Ingus Cocker spaniel for 14 years. Maybe we need more shelters. Maybe we need more cat and dog owner education classes. Maybe we need more people to know about selective neutering in Spain. How many dogs and cats in Ojai are licensed? How many are not? The county does not require cats to be licensed, but we required them to be sterilized.
So DocuPet is the software the county uses and I referred...I gave you a copy of that to show altered Dog, PECOS, unaltered dog, senior altered dogs, voluntary cat licenses. In summary as I read this draft there is no exemption for breeders that's not good also making cats Mandatory for sterilization and not mandatory for licensing, that seems inconsistent.
Why is the city trying to sterilize all dogs and cats at four months? They don't even become eligible for babies until five months. There has to be a better way of influencing pet owners to help control the number of pets and their wanderings. Information and education is best. Also, maybe the licensing fees are too costly for some and we need a sliding scale.
And as one me gets older, the licensing fees become cheaper to more older people.
Thank you Bill. Next we have Casey Abbott.
Hello again. Just want to bring an experience I had recently up in the city of Paso Robles, they used a large masticator machine to destroy all the vegetation in the river there where many many people that were homeless were living. Created a huge rat problem for the rest of town. Great move guys! Well if you're gonna have a sudden rat explosion guess what are really nice to have our cats and dogs? They're both excellent rodent predators so Yeah, make your rule. Hope you have enough readers in the area. Good luck.
Thank you, Casey. Any comments online, Bridget? We have one more in the house. Kathleen Smith.
3:25 – 3:4023 turns
Good evening. I've been walking around trying to find where you guys were listening to on Zoom and I was going, oh my God, they're doing a vote. It was interesting for me to listen to some of the comments. I do not disagree with People that are opposed to exaggerations of breeds. The traits, the physical traits of breed. But... To have somebody talking about the length of leg for a beagle-
I'm sorry to interrupt Kathleen but that was item number four this is five strengthening our spay neuter ordinance we already voted on the companion animal breeding item
I'm getting okay. I am getting that Okay, well i'll go back to i'll go to the initial thing uh, the reason golden retrievers should not be neutered before 24 months which is recommended by uc davis Is that? They need the hormones and there are actually, they have proven that the incidence of cancer is increased at a younger age when a dog is spayed or neutered early.
And even earlier than before a year old. A reputable reader will recommend that a male does not get spayed or neutered before 24 months. And there is documentation of this, so there are We would like the females to not be spayed before a year old. We would like them to go through one season. There is a higher incidence of mammary cancer for a female golden retriever who's not spayed But every other cancer, there is a higher incidence when they are spayed.
So you guys are getting involved in something and I realize that the intentions are good. Everybody has good intentions but there is science To consider here. And I'm not sure that anybody is doing the research behind this that should be done. I'm going to go back to my original comment. We breed to a breed standard, the way a particular breed of dog looks is actually.
Thank you, Kathleen. Time's up. Thank you very much for your comment. We will move on to any comments online?
No Mayor there are no comments online.
Okay all right we'll move on to discussion who would like to begin?
I would like to read this. This, I don't know if the camera can zoom in. Can it? Do they do this? I don't know. Probably not.
You might just read it. OK,
well, I'm going to read it. Yeah. So first of all, I am the city liaison with Ventura County Animal Services. I make almost weekly trips to the Ventura County Humane Society in Ojai And I have one of my granddaughters. She spends at least an hour a day telling me how many thousands she goes all over the country and gives me the data on the number of animals in the shelter she knows which ones are getting adopted and all of this. And she did this on her own. She must have just absorbed it from me. I also moderate the Ojai Valley Animal Kingdom and others Facebook sites And if you just spend an hour there, you will begin to get a sense of what a state of emergency we are in.
I'm going to read you these seven facts about animal shelters and that I hope will give everyone pause. Seven million dogs and cats are euthanized every year because shelters are too full. Here in Ventura County, they're having to double up. There's like sometimes over 200 dogs. They're practically giving them away. They've waived all the fees. Homeless animals outnumber humans five to one. 90% of pets coming into shelters are not spayed or neutered Most strays are not kept indoors or provided with ID tags.
More than 25% of dogs are pure breeds. When Ventura County transitioned back in 2012, Dale Hanson and I went to county meetings and of course the breeders were opposed to the adoption of county spay and neutering laws. But you know almost any purebred people need to understand that if you do a little research, you will find not necessarily a county. Well probably a county shelter as well but there are groups of people who specialize they foster pure bred dogs They have 50 German shepherds, beautiful, beautiful German shepherd. Every kind of beautiful dog you can think of you can just simply by paying for the adoption fee. You don't have to pay seven or eight hundred dollars or more and here's the really sad part Only one out of 10 dogs born will ever find a forever home.
And, you know in along with educating people about the importance of spay and neuter we hope that people will start to think more deeply about adopting from a shelter because what I see every single day tracking these dogs is so incredibly heartbreaking You know, they're euthanizing little beautiful puppies. And it's our it's the weight of it you know as a community I know Ojai loves animals and an ordinance like this I believe is in keeping with you know it's an expression of our deep caring for the animal kingdom So I do want to address, okay here's my question. My question is by making these changes does that still come back for a second reading?
Yeah like all ordinances introduction tonight second reading next time.
Perhaps we have time to do a little more research on how to carefully...I'm in favor of the things that were changed but i would like to be extremely careful about how to word the part about you know the age And make sure and maybe you've already researched it and you're confident. But there's another opportunity to adjust that if we want to.
Right the council can adjust it in second reading depending on how far adjusted might
be introduction and doing others. In my thinking would just be the date, the amount of time. Yeah so right. You know and maybe there's some other language I'm going to go and talk to like you know some people who manage shelters how can we do this?
Would you like to go and make a motion. Yes
I'd like to make a motion that we introduce an ordinance amending Title 5 Chapter 4 Article 8 mandatory sterilization of dogs and cats of the Ojai Municipal Code to eliminate certain exemptions.
And that would be with the added exemption for large breed dogs
Yeah I'll have some language for that one after she's through with it.
Mayor
Pro Tem.
Yeah well I'm going to comment and then I'll ask for a modification.
Do I need a second?
I will second that.
OK so. I did quite a bit of research on this and so first of all, my wife and I owned a golden retriever And it experienced having tumors when it was about five years old. And the tumors were removed and then two years later. Excuse me. We took him in and his whole body was a tumor. And we were told by the vet then it was because he was neutered too early. And that's what the science is saying about large breed dogs, is that they develop cancer at an alarming rate if they're neutered too early in their life.
And, you know, they have They have gradations for depending on the breed where they recommend a year versus they recommend 24 months. But you know I talked to Matt about this and he thought it would be much simpler to just have a weight limit and I'm going to propose 40 pounds in that it'd be a twenty four So our current dog, when we got him, our first golden was a rescue dog.
But he wasn't purebred. But our second dog, we just got from a breeder a year and a half ago and our breeders said You know, do not neuter this dog for at least two years. That was a condition of buying the dog from her. And she also said don't neuter it if you don't have to. And I you know, I think there's one You know problem with this ordinance that that bothers me and that is that we're assuming That an Ojai resident is going to be irresponsible with their dog.
I Know cats are another issue but for dogs I I I can say that our last three dogs have never been out of my wife and I's sight. So this is like the last 15 years, and that's because the coyote issue. We're adamant not... we're very careful. We take our dog out on a leash. Our dogs never run free. You know, I. OK. I guess what I would say so you know we shouldn't just assume poor stewardship is going to happen and I do think that it's kind of ironic that we're talking two weeks ago or actually last weekend about rights of nature I mean, what dog would want to have its reproductive organs removed? And actually the other thing that I read was that you remove that dogs experience hip disorders as a result of being neutered too soon.
And virtually everything I read said that a female dog should go through at least one season, because for the same reason that there are hormones That a dog experiences, you know going into heat. That if they're never allowed to go into heat they won't experience and then they'll have no physical problems as a result of that so my long way of making an amendment Or proposing an amendment or addition is that we for dogs over 40 pounds, we require neutering after 24 months.
And that for female dogs that they be neutered after their first season.
3:40 – 3:4820 turns
Council Member Francina do you accept that?
No I don't accept it as an amendment. I wish I could believe me because I'm all about a health healthy dog
not mine apparently
no I do want to be careful how we do this but if I'll tell you it's better the
So I'll make an alternative motion. You have to
grasp that we are in a true, I can't, I cannot emphasize this enough. We are in an emergency and you know there's always pros and cons and everything has consequences. And I agree you're very responsible but unfortunately apparently or it's a fact that the majority of the population is not It's hard to work. I can't
find it. So I'm going to make an alternative motion that we add a provision that exempts dogs that are over 40 pounds, that they not be neutered, that they are not required to be neutered until 24 months and that for female dogs, they allow they are not neutered until they experience at least one season
Is there a second for that motion. I'll second that.
You know when this first came before the town council we had expert expert witnesses giving an entirely Characterizing this in a very different way. I do not have the background to pull that out of my head
We're gonna have another hearing where we can adjust dates. Yes, if
the
evidence supports
yeah. Yeah, okay so I am not comfortable. I mean, I recognize that it could be healthier for females to go one season but I also know the number of puppies in the pound that are going to be euthanized and that's It's a dilemma. We're in a dilemma
And I agree with Councilmember Francina. It is, it's hard. There are shades of gray and yet the overwhelming number of animals who are euthanized every year is I think the bottom line so I'm not comfortable with that. Limiting councilmember
if I may ask a question Wouldn't it be so we do have an exemption for any Dog whose health would be at risk By being spayed or neutered So what wouldn't that? That exemption Wouldn't large breeds or females after they're up to their first time in heat, wouldn't that go into the health? Could you make a
case if the veterinary made that case and yes, that would fall on that exemption.
Okay. Yeah, well we have a motion we have a second Councilmember rule
yeah so we have two motions right in two seconds just a couple of things that I want to point out I understand the Emergency that we are in. But I don't think that led you know, I'm kind of I don't think the legislating is going to do this. made for education, more shelters, more education, free spaying and neutering everywhere all the time. And I would go for an ordinance against backyard breeders. I would make it just like we made that guy pay $100,000 for putting something up on Airbnb. Make it $100,000 if you backyard breed without a permit and without going through some kind of training I think that's the real issue. Now, the idea of spaying and neutering, taking a species of animal and changing them biologically...
That is a huge, huge conceptual idea that we are going to change a species of animal and that's what will happen. And it is well known that female dogs should go through one heat or two heats. And we know that especially German shepherds, they know now if they're neutered too early their hips don't, just like your plates in your head have to come together. They need the hormones to bring their hip joints and their hip bones together. And just philosophically I'm not willing to be a human who says that we are gonna force spay and neuter on an entire breed I think we need to solve the problem of bad humans without deciding that it's the victim's fault and we're going to spay and neuter them.
And I understand we're balancing things, but philosophically, I can't go and vote for this kind of genetic sort fooling around with. I can't do that, as much as I understand the problem. I worked in shelters forever and in Massachusetts it's the same way. You actually by law have to have them spayed and neutered before you adopt out although you can give somebody like 30 days if they really need it But I never ever agreed with that, and I don't agree with it because then what happens is the only animals that you have are bred animals. And we know what bred animals are like. We know they are bred for features.
Whether or not you say they're bred for characteristics of, you know, what they used to do, they're not. They're bred for human consumption. And so we're left with the only animals that are being bred, or those that are being bred for human consumption. Because everybody else has been spayed and neutered if you were to take this out to its reasonable and logical conclusion.
It is about rights of nature and I'm just not going to do that. Secondarily here's a little bit of hope That's all we talk about at the dog park, and I go to the dog park all the time. So there is a wonderful lab who had a vasectomy. I'm But that's not the point. The point is perhaps we don't have to talk about sterilization like the doctor, the vet here everybody knows him he's the most prominent vet here. He had never done it but it made total sense to him and he gave this lab a vasectomy I was like, well that dog can't breed but yet it didn't have to be neutered. And so when it comes time for my pup, I'm going to see if she can have her tubes tied. That would solve the problem without pulling out all of her reproductive organs and going in there and messing around.
So I would suggest that we look at that alternative. Is that doable? Like this vet had never done it but he couldn't see why he couldn't. So he did! Local guy local vet everybody knows him. So that would be my suggestion And so the reason I hope that I made clear the reasons why I can't support this and I do think that there is an alternative which is tying the tubes and vasectomies
As far
as I know
3:48 – 3:5530 turns
As long as the animal can't have a dozen puppies, that counts as spay and neuter. You can do it- Right, the ordinance... ...as a vasectomy and tubes tied, that counts.
Yes, the ordinance states that sterilization means any medical procedure performed by a veterinarian on a dog or cat that prevents reproduction. However, if the vet does it, it's within the current ordinance. Certainly most common is spaying and neutering, but there are... I didn't know that mastectomy was an option, but there are apparently other choices.
So Council Member Rule I want to assure you that free spay neuter clinics mobile a spay and neuter education. You know all of this is part of the conversation it's we need all of it to stop this the insanity and the cruelty that we have now. It's just unbelievable. You can do your own research. You'll be appalled by what you find out.
We have a motion. Let's have the roll call for that motion. Do you mind repeating it?
Roll-call vote 0–0 motion. Let's have the roll call · 4 under review
Show transcript
to adopt the ordinance as proposed with an added 24 month exception for any dog expected to be over 40 pounds when fully grown and for female dogs after there to push it out to after their first season of heat otherwise to remove the breeder exemptions
Roll call, please.
Mayor Stick. You know it's this may all be fine but I'm not there's a difference in my thinking the 24 month exception The first season of heat when does that happen?
Eight months to a year It's I
think that's right That's my understanding as well not a vet but eight months to a year
So we. It just it seems like the original language for the veterinarian decides. The only reason I would vote for it is because or not vote for it, it's because I could change it at the second reading. Am I the first to go?
Go ahead. We haven't had that yet. We haven't had a vote yet. This is
common.
Roll-call vote Passed 3–2
Show transcript
Okay, motion passed? Motion passes. Okay thank you very much all right that's the end of the agenda items we will move on to council member reports anybody
Let me get my notes.
While you're away, Help of Ojai had their 50th year anniversary celebration at Camp Comfort. It was really a spectacular event. Lots of great participation and music and events. And so happy birthday to them. And thank thank you to all the great work that they've done in our valley.
I think we should give them a proclamation
Okay
And just
one more
shut up for
those
pickleball courts because they are spectacular so thank you again to
staff Miss Palmer Yes, miss Palmer Anybody else? Any reports?
Well, first I want to give a big shout out to Leslie and Rachel for the Rise of Nature presentation. I encourage everyone to watch the slideshow and the lecture online. It's really, really incredible even if we...I mean it just expands your thinking. It was one of the best most inspiring in my opinion very inspiring Presentation. So my other report is I go to the monthly Ventura County Transportation Commission meetings. Usually it's so late, I can never think of what I'm going to say but now it's only 5 to 10. So at the last meeting we heard from a...
her title is Principal Engineer for the 2028 Olympics And there are going to be millions and millions of people descending on Southern California. And she laid out, it's a four-year traffic plan in stages. And it was so phenomenal. That slideshow is also online and it includes, it has everything I ever wanted to see for Ojai but on a massive scale you know bike lanes every getting everybody in buses that run smoothly and frequently And priority for the million I think there's a million athletes. I mean it's the number of people is just mind well yeah 50,000 athletes but and anyway my assume when I heard after I listened to her and I listened and listened I thought to myself if they can do this in Los Angeles with millions and millions of visitors surely We can manage the traffic in our little town.
And I want to tell the El Roblar, the answer to your guests coming in if they have traffic congestion do not try sending them out to our residential streets. That's not the answer. So you know. I'll leave it at that.
Anyone else?
Nope.
No, I just want to say that I guess the city will be coming out with a URL for the Rights of Nature forum that we had. And I hope that any and all citizens interested in the question and interested in the ordinance take a look at that and certainly feel free to come with public. We are this is an educational event as well as a community response. We want to hear what people have to say so You have to watch it and then you have to come make public comment. So if that's your gig and you feel like you've got something to say, please take responsibility and do that and come say it.
OK,
city manager's report?
Three things briefly, I believe the URL for the recorded version of the meeting should be on the city website now. So everyone should be able to see that. Thank you councilmembers Lange and Rule. Secondly, I want to commend Miss Bridget Mara for doing a great job tonight filling in for Weston Montgomery.
3:55 – 3:565 turns
Thank you mayor. Thank you council members thank you Ben City Manager City Attorney flawless.
And then lastly, it is my duty to inform the council and the public that I did attend the ICMA conference in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The International City County Management Association from September 21st through the 25th. Learned a lot, networked a lot, had a good time. Thank you very much.
Thank you for attending. All right anybody else? Future agenda items?
We keep talking about the bike trail to Seoul Park and that could be a future agenda items probably for the next council, but let's Let's put that somewhere and I'll keep working on it. Even when I'm off council Sure
Okay. All right. Well, thank you fall for productive eating evening. It's not even 10 o'clock so we are adjourned Thank You