UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:003 turns
Mr. Summers, would you like to report out from our closed session?
Yes, thank you, Mr. Mayor. The Council met in closed session to consider item number one regarding public employee performance evaluation of the City Manager, provided direction to Staff, Council and the City Manager but took no reportable action. And the second item regarding public employee performance evaluation for the City Attorney and a continued discussion of performance evaluation of the City Manager will be set for a future meeting.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr Summers. So that will be the closing of our closed session And now we will convene in our open session for the evening. So, formulaic. Mr. Montgomery
Roll call — called by Kim Mang
Show transcript
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
Can I have an approval of the agenda?
I'll make a motion to approve the agenda.
Thank you. Second. Thank you, all those in favor? Aye. Thank you very much and now what I have next is a presentation from the Ventura County Farm Workers Housing Studies
Yay, hello. Good evening. If I could get the presentation up that would be great. Good evening my name is Lucas Seibert. I am the Community Development Director for the City of Ojai and the item we have before you tonight is an informational item a presentation kind of an update in terms of what's been going on this is the Ventura County Farm Workers Housing Study this is really kind of boiling down phases two and three a part of a five phase program next slide please Now, you might be wondering what the purpose of this is. And really it's to conduct a study obviously to identify need, develop solutions and then results seen as a roadmap for the county, countywide, as well as all cities in Ventura County.
Now, the last time this study was done in 2002 so it's certainly well in need and on top of that, it was a part of the housing element for Ventura County, Ventura County wide as a part of their programs in 2021. Next slide please. From a processing standpoint, as I said before this is part of a five phase program. The first phase was really kind of establishing the formation of an advisory council which consisted of 40 members. They spanned across both private and public enterprises.
And then what has been done? Well it's a multi-phase study. This is really results of phase two and three with countywide collaboration including stakeholder interviews Surveys, focus groups and then from that is derived the next steps. And that is really the phase four and five for talking about action plan five talking about the implementation. Next slide please Here you can see the funding sources. There's four included, but really kind of it's a broad stroke were mentioned as a part of one of the 10 cities that are identified there. I just want to note that our contribution was a part of a housing trust fund contribution in the 2021-2022 era at the tune of $50,000. Now obviously not all 50,000 was used as a part of this. It's really kind of a portion spread out equally amongst the different cities.
Next slide, please. So then okay so moving on here the stakeholder interviews next slide that was done in the winter of 2022-2023 It was conducted with 11 different interviews. The key issues identified were three in fold, housing shortage, affordability crisis and labor retention concerns. Obviously we all understand the housing shortage that's been happening throughout the county. It's no different spanning along the farmworker housing component and then the affordability crisis The shortage also equals low wages that then equate to a difficulty in terms of individuals finding affordable housing.
And then the labor retention is a result of the lack of housing and the affordability piece in terms of keeping people employed here locally. Next slide, please. The Agricultural Employer Survey, the results from that were derived through March through August of 2023. The employer survey results showed through the interviews and surveys of 40 agricultural employees or employers, which is a broader stroke. There was a high percentage of growing labor needs that is within the 94 percentile, a high percentage of insufficient farm worker housing as had mentioned before and broken down kind of a little bit further And then most frequently cited reason for not providing employee housing is not wanting to manage housing. That was through the survey itself.
Now, on the right-hand side you can see kind of the breakdown of the agriculture that exists throughout Ventura County, obviously citrus being the highest, avocado falling in second and then berries which is really raspberries, blueberries, strawberries. Next slide please. So, farm workers survey that took place this took place between April and October of 2023. Next slide please.
The Farmworker Survey result was derived throughout the county. 417 farmworkers were surveyed, a sole source of their income. Interesting to note that 97% of those workers see the agricultural business as their sole source of income versus it having—as those individuals having multiple jobs Their sole source is agriculture. Multiple households living within a house itself, a fairly high percentage of that in terms of what you're seeing here and then that is derived through a low-income derived median performance. In between you can see in the one two three four down 22 to 25K for a medium personal income, and then household income is a little bit higher up to almost $40,000. So the interesting piece of that takeaway is 48% of the medium household income is spent on housing which is significantly higher than what you typically see through...
I think we've seen this before in terms of the data through HCD They talk about 30%. This is more in the 48, almost 50%, so half of your income is being used for housing. Next slide please. So farm worker focus group meeting that was a single meeting that took place in October of 2023 as well. Next slide please. With that, there were 34 participants spanning five different languages. The most prominent language obviously being Spanish speaking. A third of those individuals that were participants were experiencing shared housing which is the percentage I had showed in the previous slides so there's a consistent piece that continues to happen with the shared housing. And then housing affordability, the main concern obviously being the housing affordability space that exists there.
Distance to schools, lack of awareness of available support services. Interesting little piece that was grabbed out of that was what makes a community sports faith-based organizations and then school accessible amenities? Which I thought was interesting considering what makes a community not Not parks or something along those lines, but in fact sports. But I think sports then probably translates to the park aspect to a certain degree.
Next slide please. So with that, with all these surveys focus groups that had taken place and the sole source meeting that had taken place there were areas of agreement. Next slide please. With that, you're seeing a housing crisis and H-2A workers or which is what's referred to as an increase of reliance on H- 2A workers due to domestic labor shortages. Before you sit and spin your wheels in terms of weight, H-2A workers are foreign nationals who temporarily work under a temporary visa program to fulfill temporary shortages of domestic labor force. In this case, ag. It's looking to fill that void through agriculture.
Housing conditions was also another area that was kind of an agreement, and there's a shortage of inadequate housing often due to affordability challenges. Now transportation and lack of knowledge rounds up kind of the agreement pieces. Next slide please. So next steps, as I had said before in the beginning here. This is a five phase approach multi-year started in 2021 looking to wrap up in 2025. Phase four is the action plan which is ongoing as we speak into the fall of this year anticipated could potentially be spread out even further. Phase five being the implementation into the fall of this year and then beyond.
If you're wanting more information, I am not the expert on this. I'm simply the sounding board. There are updates that are constantly being provided on the landing page for the farmworker housing study. You can see that. That's the first link. The second link is a link that I clicked on kind of out of curiosity. If you're interested in getting involved and being a part of this, you can enter your information and spit out the information concerns or information you're wanting, and they'll certainly reach out to you separately.
So with that, I think the last slide is some pictures. Last slide please? If you have any questions, I can certainly attempt to answer them. However, I think your best research is Ventura County's website. Thank
you. I have a quick question. The Cabrillo project, I have sort of a memory that was a farm worker housing
0:11 – 0:1812 turns
One piece of it is,
yes. It's 100% affordable. A portion of it is being allocated to farmworker housing. That's a part of their package for the grants that they're going for.
Is that part of the county program that you're describing?
So this is the study to help inform future projects countywide, including projects within our city. But we already have a housing element that dictates and provides programs for the future within our six cycle.
Other than the Cabrillo project? Are there any other farmworker projects
that are proposed within the City of Ojai? That would be the first that I'm aware of. Yes.
Just to offer, the museum had three wonderful talks not too long ago from labor suppliers, farmers all over the map like organic all the way to our commercial ones and it'd be interesting. I'm going to look at those links and see how much does Ojai map to the larger county but I think we're all very interested in this demographic and what we can do about that. Yeah, thanks. Absolutely. Anything else Mr. Whitman? No.
Okay. Thank you so much! Do we have any commissioners here for Commission Reports? Okay, then I will move on to Public Communications and I'm going to start with Chief Barry Parker.
Good evening, Council. It's a pleasure to be here in front of you this evening and it's an honor. This will be one of my last meetings due to a promotion which is a happy thing but I just want to take a moment to reflect on the past three years here public service and the importance of it in our roles that we play obviously Ojai is a very tight-knit community There's people behind me that I know them by their first names, and I think that is so important that we stay connected to the community. It is so important that we make good decisions whatever they are, we take our time there's not a rush on a lot of these things but more importantly is that we are a safety community and that we are preparing ourselves We all lived through the Thomas fire, and for some that weren't here it was tremendous.
And just last month in Los Angeles we saw the devastation so preparedness that's one thing one high note that I want to pass on to my counterpart his name is a division chief Nick Cleary I'm gonna have him step up and say a few words
Hey, good evening. Thank you guys for having me. I'm really looking forward to this. So Nick Clary, I've been with the fire district since 2002. I'll be stepping into this role effective on Sunday the 2nd. So right now battalion chief will be a division chief filling in between behind Chief Parker and I'm excited. I lived in Ohio at one time. I have family that lived in Ohio. I worked in Ohio as a fire captain so I'm looking forward to representing the fire chief in the city of Ojai and building new relationships with you guys. So thank you guys for having me.
Welcome!
Yeah, water down the wrong pipe. No big deal. Okay so Nancy Fritz, Renee Roth and Jeffrey Starkweather. Yes come up here thank you.
Hello so I'm here about Pedestrian crosswalk right here, it's very dangerous. I came up a couple of months and talked about it but now I need action because I worry about all the kids. I worry about me crossing it so when we start at Creekside Village there's cars coming this is all that's happening like all at once 315 330 on weekdays, and then during other times. But mainly when school gets out it's just a danger zone. So Creekside Village the cars are coming out there's vans plumbers people have a lot of maintenance here doctors office nurses are taking breaks walking around Shell Station has two driveways cars coming in and out both ways Motorcycles come out. Sometimes, there's 20 motorcycles at a time. The trolley car is stopping and pulling over.
People are getting on and off. Attitude Adjustment has the FedEx and UPS trucks coming in and stopping on the street side. Vaughan's has two entrances, cars coming both entrances. Vaughan's huge 18-wheelers pulling up at least four times a day to unload products. The neighborhood behind Vons, lots of kids, lots of e-bikes. In high school the kids are walking, e-bikes riding. Hospital emergencies, ambulance driving to the hospital and bright afternoon sun.
So put those all together it's just very dangerous. So, there's a school zone flashing light 20 feet in front of the crosswalk right here. But nobody seems to slow down for that and the kids on the e-bikes push the pedestrian button and just go they don't wait the 30 seconds to look both ways. And there's just too much activity going on at once and it's just too distracting people don't know what to do I don't know if you can put another light in.
You know, going to Ojai Avenue is so close to it. And so if not could we get the pedestrian lights like in Santa Barbara where you push a light and it's red and people are supposed to stop because the yellow one is not working? And then with the yellow school light coming up 20 yards ahead they're going which way do I stop or when do I stop? Let's see, and then the two pedestrians were killed on the farthest crosswalk.
That one? And I think they're spending right now like over $2 million to fix that and make the sidewalks bigger and stuff so... I came before you a couple of months ago but now we really have to take charge of this problem. And I know we can all complain about the kids in the e-market
0:18 – 0:2711 turns
We'll take this very seriously. Thank you, ma'am we have to have you end so we can get to the next comment but no would you are you willing to leave that oh thanks okay thanks thank you miss Fritz Renee Roth and then Jeffrey Starkweather
Good evening, Council. My name is Renee Roth and I remember being up at this podium here talking about this same intersection after one of my neighbors, Edith, was hidden at the second intersection on that sign in front of the Chase Bank She was in a walker, she was crossing the crosswalk. She got hit by a car who didn't see her coming because of the sunlight.
I've experienced the same glare and not seen people at those intersections as well. I live off that street. I'm on that street every day. I know exactly what she's talking about. It's very difficult. In fact there was a lawsuit that had to be settled as a result of that. I will say no more. I just want you to know this is really serious, and I know you all know this is important. And that's not why I came here.
Chief Parker, thank you very much for your service to our community. I want to acknowledge what you have done, and I appreciate your service. And I was here for the Thomas Fire, and will never forget it. And fortunately we did survive and we've learned a lot of lessons, and I'll talk about that later. The next thing I want to talk about is e-bikes. I wasn't here for the meeting where you passed the motorcycle comp.
And Trina, I would like to know and I would like the members of the council to know what is happening in Santa Barbara tonight. Santa Barbara is having a conversation. Oh great! Okay and Kim has printed it out. I sent it to Kim and Rachel because I know they voted no for the motorcycle cop. If I were here, I would have voted no for it because I think we need to do both motorcycle cop and education and definitions of what is reckless use of an e-bike. And that's what Santa Barbara is doing right now today. They had their meeting. I didn't attend but They are defining what is reckless use, what are motor vehicles, motorized e-bikes and all the motorized things you can use.
And they have an impoundment section where they can impound it but there's one concerning comment in their report which is, it says motorcycle or officers are not allowed to talk to minors one on one. I did not know that that was a limitation on what officers are able to do one-on-one with minors. There has to be somebody else there, how is that going to work? I think we're going to have some issues and I think it needs to be addressed. We need to do both motorcycle safety and education and look at what others say.
Thank you Ms. Roth. Jeffrey Starkweather
Good evening City Council, staff, Chief of Police, citizens. First of all I want to congratulate our mayor for a wonderful I went to town hall last night. And I've been recovering from an operation, so sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night. Last night I woke up at 4 o'clock in the morning and it took me about 45 minutes to go back to sleep, a couple of melatonins, but I started thinking about all the questions that grew out of that.
So I want to follow-up on that, but I learned something last night that the community should have known a year and two months ago, why we have permanent supportive housing rather than the model that Dignity Moves came here originally with which was transition housing. And I met them, went down and visited their transaction net, looked at it, and I was totally sold on that model. So I was frustrated.
They made it clear why because we have no permanent supportive housing in Ojai. And we are like the only place that got such a large amount of money, because we have to do permanent supportive housing. I think they confirmed everything I know about housing problems and the homeless. This is only gonna hit a portion of our housing homeless problem? We're not even addressing kids I asked Atticus sitting next to him, Atticus Reyes and he goes oh yeah we got a ton of kids that are living in cars and so forth. So I think this is a big issue we have to address.
So, I won't go into it because I've made spiels about affordable housing so many times before you're probably tired of them but I do have a couple of takeaways from this thing. We need a housing committee, task force, something that's gonna work on not just the homeless which it does need to but the larger issue and come up with strategies. One of the things that group could do or someone else needs to do is something we've committed on in our housing element which is to review and revise and reform our housing regulations, our suing court because we have plenty of bearers when I was on the Planning Commission I kept talking about this The third that Jane Walter said is besides additional housing, the only other thing we can really do to treat this problem in the long run is rent subsidy.
We have committed in our housing element to support Help for Ojai with rent subsidy and we've never done it. And the final thing which I'm got about six seconds to say is that I have a lot of questions. I'm going to send them to the whole panel. I would like the city, through the manager, to put some kind of portal on the website that would answer people's questions because I think when you start thinking about all you heard, these questions start arising.
So thank you.
Thank you very much Mr. Starkweather Do I have one more card over there? One more card, Mayor from Starchild. Mr. Starchild.
Thank you. If there's a theme for today's council meeting it's focus, focusing on our agenda and what's most important to the people of Ojai. One thing that I think is not important is strife, is conflict, lawfare It can detract from our city's ability to address the needs of the city and its residents. When is it that we will reschedule the closed session meeting to talk about the city entering the Byrne v. Rule lawsuit?
When is it that we'll talk about waiving privilege on some of those closed session meetings so that people can know the truth of what happened Also, I think that's very important is we need to reconsider the policy that's in effect now that two council members can call a special session. I think the effect of this policy is that many distracting items that don't have the council majority's support can be agendized and can distract our city further.
Thank
you. Mr. Montgomery, anybody online?
Mayor, we have no raised hands on Zoom, but let's do take a moment and speaking to our Zoom participants now is the time to raise your hand for general public comment on our agenda tonight. We'll give you a last call. Still no raised hands and mayor will move on.
Thank you, Mr. Montgomery. Moving on to the consent calendar. Is there anyone on the council that wants to remove anything from the consent calendar before we approve
I'll make a motion to approve the consent calendar. Thank
you. Second. Any discussion?
0:27 – 0:4222 turns
I'm going to approve the consent calendar, I would pull the warrants and discuss once again the legal fees but I do want to move forward with the agenda so I will not do that but I will point out to anyone who wants to look at it that it's worth looking at
Thank you, Ms. Rule.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move forward with the agenda so I will not do that but I will point out to anyone who wants to look at it that it's worth looking at Thank y
Show transcript
Motion passes.
Thank you and we'll move on to discussion item two City Council goals Great Mr. Harvey and I want to ask you Mr. Harvey what when's the right time in your presentation to accept public comments for this
Well, I would ask-I mean you are the presiding officer in your college. No, I understand but what for your flow? Let us know what you need here. Oh okay. So please as a council, I would like to make my presentation. I would like to take council questions about the agenda report and or the presentation, go to public comment and then come back for a council discussion if that's okay. Thank you.
Wonderful.
Okay, great so great. So thank you very much I'm impressed that we're already here at this item. That's awesome And the presentation is up soon Next slide please. We know why we're here for the City Council goals Okay gonna cover some items and a lot of this may seem obvious But I just want to make sure we're all understanding what we're doing and why we're doing and how we're going to do this tonight So the goals, what the heck are they? Well this is how we as a council and a municipal organization focus our efforts, our attention and our resources.
The goals that you establish are going to be in place so long as you sit together as a city council. So that means until November of 2026 okay and that's important keep that in mind these are not goals for Here forward eternal, these are your goals for while you are a council together. And that's important because this is how you set the direction which then translates or trickles down rather into your budget and into the things that we do. That's why they're important. With goals were able to facilitate results. That's how we do it. Everybody knows what we're doing and why and how we're going to get there.
These are your priorities, and I bring that up because You're going to only want to have a small number of priorities. This doesn't mean that we're not doing other day-to-day work, just because let's just play pretend. Let's say if you don't come up with a goal for recreation and I'm not saying that you're not going to but if you don't, it doesn't mean that we're not doing recreation or that we're getting rid of that department or that we don't care about that. No, it does not mean that at all. It just means that for this time period that we are working on these goals Maybe it's not in and amongst our highest priority, okay? It also doesn't mean that the day-to-day and the state mandates or the federal mandates are not being accomplished either.
So you're deciding what your top priorities are for that time period. With that in mind, it's really important that we develop what I'm calling SMART goals—goals that are strategic Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Some terms I'm going to use tonight. So, again, goals are going to be an area of focus and with the goals there are tactics that then roll up to the goal. So the goal is what we're doing and the tactics are how we're going to achieve that. How are you going to implement this goal of fire hardening or emergency preparedness or housing? Whatever it is.
OK. Moving on. Next slide. How is this going to work? So we're going to start the process tonight. We are not going to finish tonight, okay? Uh, we are going to- well, we... I'm asking you to indulge me. What I would like to do is I would like to go through each council member individually and have each member list what they would like to be, you know, the goals if they were king or queen And once we have that and the Chief Deputy City Clerk will be helping me here, we will then see where there are some concentric circles. And I fully anticipate that there will be overlap in your list. Why do I anticipate this?
I meet with you on a regular basis. I talk to you. I know the areas that are important to you and so it's no surprise—and we're going to get to the survey and the results—that some of the items that I put in the survey are things that I've heard you talk about Okay, so I'm expecting to come up with some overlap. Assuming we have that overlap and let's say it's four or five goals, that's okay. We don't need to have 10, you know, or some huge number. Let's say there's four or five.
What I would like to then do is to, you know, agree that okay this is our starting list. It doesn't mean it's our final list. Let's identify some tactics that go with each goal. Okay? Let's get those in place. Once we have that, I'm going to ask that you kick it back to staff. We take a look at the tactics and the goals. We offer some suggestions. Maybe we add some tactics. Maybe we remove some tactics because there's a problem or concern. And we bring it back to you to continue the discussion. That discussion would be at a near-term meeting probably sometime in March or April And at that meeting, I would want to finalize the list. Come up with a specific number of goals with tactics. I'm going to recommend somewhere between five and ten.
I've worked with cities that have had far more numbers and it's just not achievable. Once we have an adopted set of goals and tactics, from that we will develop a work plan. And this will be just exactly kind of what you think. It's going to have the goal, the tactic, some granularity as to what the status is. You know, what the estimated timeline is and who the department is that is in charge of realizing that goal. And we're going to bring this work plan and overall status to you back quarterly so that the Council and the community knows how we're doing. It's our scorecard. And no surprise at the end of our time together as a council and staff I want to get an A on the report card. Okay? I want us to move through and achieve the goals because that's how we deliver results Okay, next slide.
We put out a community survey. Admittedly, this was a non-scientific survey. Some people may have submitted entries more than once. All the survey was meant to do is to provide you with a snapshot of potential public input on this topic. It's not the be all end all. There could've been categories that we left out. There could've been things we missed but at least you have some type of idea as to how the community feels about Some of the goals that you might be considering tonight. And again, I base this list upon what I've heard you all individually talk about and also past council goals and things that I know are important to the community. Next slide.
So, and you're going to see this in the agenda report. The results of the survey show emergency preparedness number one, fire hardening number two, city infrastructure maintenance three, affordable workforce housing four, fiscal sustainability five, public safety six. Next slide. Climate and Environment 7, Homelessness 8, Economic Development 9, Recreation Classes and Programs 10, and rounding out the list, Technology and Innovation at 11. This is not exhaustive. If there's something that we didn't cover that you would like to have, great!
If this is too long, great! But this at least is a starting point so you know maybe this is where we can begin. Next slide? So again, going back to tonight. Thank you Mr. Montgomery he is going to be displaying his screen as we go through so that we see what your respective lists are I've asked him to highlight those that are across the board so that we can see where the concentric circles lie in the end goals and tactics work like everything else with the council it'd be great if things were unanimous But it may just be that three people think that's what we should be doing. That's how everything is that we do, so maybe we have some goals that are five people feel that way. Maybe there's some goals that are three people that feel that way.
I'm going to ask the Chief Deputy City Clerk to highlight those even if there's only three people that have agreed upon it because that's what we do as a council. And so again, once we get past what are the concentric circles and we move into the tactics. If three people want a tactic, we're going to move forward with it. If only two people want it, we're not going to move forward with it because just like everything else we do requires a vote of the majority.
Again, so I'm hoping that we come up tonight when we're finished with the preliminary list with the corresponding tactics and you direct me to bring it back to staff. We work on it and then we bring it back to you for further revision and adoption. And I think... Next slide please. Okay, I think let's go. Yeah, I think I've kind of covered this next slide please Now we're at the point when you can ask me some questions And if you don't want to do that, we can go to comment and then come back and get to work Thank you.
Yes. Well, I have a question is is that chief peak? A new graphic for us or have I just been missing it all this time
Okay, so yes and this kind of feeds into my evaluation a little bit. I'm trying out a new style guide and at a meeting in March I'm going to be bringing forward to you this proposed style guide. So this is our beta test of potentially what an informal logo may look like. This doesn't take the place of the seal But we're looking at some new branding and style. And I will also be meeting with you individually to discuss this, just since you brought it up. This also features colors from your seal. That's why we have teal and yellow and white.
Okay, cool. It's not a question, it's a hope for vision in the future and that would be that Our agenda is going forward once we have some things nailed down that we see sort of, oh what's the strategy? That's almost the first part and then here's the item that we're discussing that day. So I guess I imagine at some point we're not discussing anything that's not one of those big items unless there's a really good reason to. So,
one thing I've done in other cities and we could certainly do it here is within the agenda report template you have a goal alignment section and the agenda report correlates to one of the goals. However, I will point out that you end up with many that are just NA because some things are just operational or they're a requirement or sometimes something comes up and that's also a good thing because your goals and your tactics are living So sometimes you get halfway through your term and you're like, wow. How did we not have a goal of whatever it is? We need to adopt it. And that might mean dropping a goal or it might just mean tightening your belt and trying to get more accomplished. Those are both things that happen.
That's good. So I have a question in that. Are we only presenting like programmatic goals that we have or if If we'd just like some data on a topic, can that be – is that part of the table? Mayor
Stanton So tonight I'm going to ask you – okay. So I think I can answer the question. Tonight I'm just asking you for the big picture areas that you really want to focus on for your priorities. This does not prevent you as council members, as individual members from coming to me with questions where you need some information or some data. And it doesn't have to align with a goal when you make this request, because sometimes you're trying to understand an issue and you don't know if that should be a goal or not. You just need some more information. I try to – I don't think we have a policy on this, but I just want you all to know. I have kind of an informal thing which I call like the hour rule. So if you come to me – pardon the use of your last name.
If you come to me – it's true. If you come to me and you say, I need some information on this topic so I can make an informed decision. That's also part of my job and staff's job. So I think it doesn't prevent you from doing that. If something becomes kind of a woolly or bigger thing then I might say, you know what Councilmember? You might want to find a buddy and this should be a future agenda topic and we can see if there is a desire amongst the council to move forward.
So, does that answer the question? Okay. Thank you.
Any other questions?
Yes. I have a question. This is sort of a tactic and my question is this tactic could roll into any number of goals so let's just say broadband which might be a tactic. Well it certainly would help with emergency preparedness. It's certainly city infrastructure. You know, it could be fiscal sustainability
I'm
gonna
argue if I could
just step in because you and I have a
meeting at Simi Valley on Thursday this
week.
One of the topic areas of focus was technology and innovation, but to your point it is up to the council where you want that to live. I would certainly hope that we walk away either this meeting or the next meeting with something related to that because I see broadband as being hugely important and I see it as something that we can realize In the time period that you're together, it could be hugely beneficial to our community.
0:42 – 0:5112 turns
Yeah and so I guess my point is that while it would fit most reasonably under technology and innovation if that doesn't make it in the top five, I'm just pointing out that there are other ways to not necessarily squeeze it in but find an appropriate place for it to live due to its value and importance.
So if I could follow up with that, I know that I've had at least four of you probably five of you also talked to me about fireworks and drone shows. And it's a very similar thing right? You could put that under fire hardening. Right? I think I would hope for a tactic where we were that we leave this meeting or the next where we're pursuing you know whether we want to allow fireworks or not and a drone show And so I think that's a similar thing. That's because we're going to be, I suspect just from having discussions with you, that will be something that we'll be working on.
If I can follow up with what you brought up, Ms. Rule, I would suggest something like broadband would fit into many categories as you say and that to me is a great tactic because it checks many boxes so that would be high priority. Yeah? Okay. Super. Any other questions? Yes.
Yeah one other question is... So we know that some general plan and specific elements of it are coming up That shouldn't prevent us from saying this is on our priorities list, correct?
The general plan update is underway. You've already given direction on that, we're well into it and we are going to have elements coming back for your review. If you like, you could certainly make that a priority area but that kind of to me is a good example of stuff that we're already definitely immersed in and working on and following council direction currently. I don't feel that I need council prioritizing it to make it move forward because we have that pre-existing direction however this is okay this is a great example of what you're here for. You're a policy board, you're identifying what your main priorities are and if there are things about the general plan update that you would like to see or then it's entirely appropriate. This is very subjective based upon your role as a governing body member.
Thank you.
Anything else? Okay we'll move to public comments then I have Renee Roth, Bill Miley and then Chris Stanch
Thank you, sir. I don't like being first. I like being last.
Noted for next time!
Okay, I sent a letter to many of you and in that letter I talked about the use of Measure C funds and I realized that many of you may not have even been in office or paying attention to what Measure C was So I want to read what Measure C says. And it has to do with a 5% increase on the TOT tax, the transit occupancy tax and it allows that 5% of funds to be used for And I'm going to read specifically, to fund capital city improvement and maintenance projects including street paving and fire mitigation, code enforcement, and climate change mitigation.
Now, those can be big words and mean a lot of different things. As I've heard even Mr. Harvey say, mean different things to different people. So, I really think it's important when we're moving forward with spending Measure C funds that we try to identify What do those terms mean? My letter was focused on basically home-hardening and preparing our community to reduce our risk of a fire spreading in one area of town that will, unknownst to their neighbors, cause a fire in another and another and another.
That home-hardening concept is not defined in this, but it is covered under fire mitigation. And fire mitigation could include other things. So I want to make it really clear, I do believe Measure C funds should and could be used for that. And the point I wanted to make is, we've got the spending power to do it in Measure C. But unfortunately, I think the city has been overly focused on electrification and pushing electrification into the building code. which raises costs for housing and development. It's overregulating, as we've seen it's gone back and forth. The court has ruled you can't do this and you can't do that with no real measurable benefits. And I'd really like you to think about when you prioritize what is it that we're going to do and get some results?
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Ms Roth. Bill Miley, Chris Dantzsch and then Randy, is it Koger? Anyway. Thank you. Koger. Thanks.
Hello. To evaluate the choices, it's important to remember that in the chart that was presented, charts 60% of the survey respondents were either single home occupants or couples without kids Also, 47% are over the age of 65, including me. That's important and we're the young people. So I put down 18 goals. And I like the Tier 1 and Tier 2 ideas so I'm only going to read the Tier 1.
Facilitate at least 150 new affordable family rental and purchase units. Fire hardening of city properties. Consider the use of fire-resistant gel, barricade gel for immediate fire protection. The Palisades Shopping Center was saved by this application. Adopt residential ordinances to tax vacant homes or encourage their rentals. Provide new public parking facilities to reduce town vehicle travel for parking spots.
Use new technology to reduce short-term rentals. That's a two. Adopt the maximum 25 mile speed limit for city streets. Adopt a council policy to organize and use ad hoc type community groups for problem solving. Establish, publish and distribute an evacuation plan for the city and valley. Working with the county show choke points in the roadways. Identify the choke points and work on those to do preventive care to reduce their choke point or whatever.
And a drumroll. Prepare an annual report Each year, to the OI citizens on city accomplishments and how we maintain our city. An annual report to the public. Then I have two others. The OI art community is a major foundation of the culture in the Oia Valley. It should be boldly supported by our city. City Art Commission tries to do that this year at 30,000. Factually, that's an amount of two-tenths of one percent of the general fund.
I want to suggest the Council seriously consider tripling the amount next year to $90,000. And the last goal is consider placing a sales tax on the November ballot. Sales tax increase. We currently pay seven and a quarter. It's been around since 1991? Thank you, Mr. Miley. Chris Danch,
Randy, I'm just going to go with your first name here and then Larry Steingold.
0:51 – 0:574 turns
Good evening, I'm Christopher Dantzsch. I am the Executive Director of the Ojai Valley Fire Safety Council. I believe that a large majority of our citizens see wildfire risk as one of our most important concerns in the valley and many of those see wildfire as literally an existential threat to our valley. The Ojai Valley Fire Safety Council agrees with this assessment. Measure C which I was around for was passed in no small part on the promise that some of those funds would be used to improve safety from wildfire.
Wildfire hardening, as listed in the goals, is part of wildfire risk mitigation. I recommend you to say that if you adopt this as a goal, the priority should be termed wildfire safety and risk mitigation, as this encompasses a multitude of strategies and means to more holistically address this existential wildfire risk. I'm actually not exactly sure what is meant by fire hardening, but it does seem to be too narrow.
And while especially if it pertains just to structural hardening which is important, wildfire safety risk and mitigation covers much more including fuel reduction, vegetation management, watershed functions, resilient landscapes at all levels from the watershed down to the parcel level, home and other structural hardening, defensible space in HIZ, Home Existence Zone, firewise communities This is critical water infrastructure for first responders, and that's more than just the number and flow of hydrants. Evacuation in shelter-in-place options—we have an extensive evacuation assessment in place where we know what to do and what actually is not feasible to do. Community outreach of education on all aspects of wildfire safety and risk mitigation.
Business outreach and education, including the hospitality sector. Public emergency communications and messaging that was a mess during the Thomas fire. Building codes regulation ordinance need to be pay attention to over time. Responding to the insurance crisis which is complex nuanced and multifaceted Public health including mental health, protection of our AFN populations and other vulnerable members of our community. And community engagement which also builds social cohesion and capital that is one most if not the most important factor in disaster response and recovery and emergency operations as it pertains to coordination with CBOs and other private agencies.
When we do this, it includes emergency preparedness and climate adaptation. What you do for wildfire in a comprehensive way is going to apply to other disasters as well. And the framework and the infrastructure and the social cohesion created will be there for all those as well, though the details may differ. Now, this may seem all very daunting. Where you do vote, you have wisely adopted a community wildfire protection plan that contains pages of recommended actions that has been thoroughly vetted by a wide variety of participants and suggests that's where we start when you adopt this goal. Thank you.
Thank You Mr. Dance. Randy how do you pronounce your last name?
Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. As mentioned when I was called up, my name is Randy Coggin. While I'm not a resident of the City proper, residing up on Los Encinos Road in the High Valley, I do care very much about the City. It's all the City offers in the way of fine shops, dining, arts and culture in general that brought us back here this last year to retire.
I come before you to urge you to incorporate fire hardening as your top priority, not just for this coming year but in the coming years as well. I recommend this not only because it was pretty much tied with emergency preparedness in your community survey but because fire hardening and emergency preparedness are inextricably intertwined with each one supporting the other.
I wholeheartedly concur with Chris that the Council should consider restating priority as wildfire safety and risk mitigation, which is not only more holistic—and I won't go into the list that Chris gave you—but better captures those initiatives and actions that the Council should consider in ensuring the City's resilience to impacts from encroaching wildland fires.
I'm here tonight not only as the newest board member of the Ojai Valley Fire Safe Council, but as a seasoned fire service professional as well. Having spent over 25 years in the fire service, most of which is a chief officer including having been a former fire chief for Ventura County Fire Department. During my fire service career, I saw more than my share of the destructive power of wildland fires and how those fires not only impact unincorporated areas but how those fires spread in impacts surrounding cities as well.
The City of Ojai is no different. It is extensionally threatened and vulnerable, not so much from a major wildland fire starting within the city itself but because of what surrounds it. It would be nice if you could build an actual wildfire-resistant wall to prevent such a threat, but obviously you cannot. What you can do is take the necessary steps to mitigate this risk as much as possible.
The City took that first step by its adoption of the Community Wildfire Prevention Plan. You can now take that next step. By making fire hardening, a.k.a., wildfire safety and risk mitigation your top priority along with emergency preparedness these two together will allow you to build that wildfire resistant wall. Thanks for listening my remarks and for the opportunity to address you.
Thank You Mr. Coggin. Larry Stangold and Jeffrey Starkweather
0:57 – 1:044 turns
Larry Steingold, Ben thank you very much for that presentation. Maslow's hierarchy of needs they also work for jurisdictions basic needs housing roads food water sanitation security safety then we start getting down into all the other nice things But we're all here in Ojai and nowhere else. We have 16 million dollars. We're not Sacramento. We don't have billions. There's nobody sitting on the side writing checks or matching funds.
We only have so much money to spend, and roads fire-hardening without—I mean Palisades? It's gone. Altadena is gone. Paradise is gone in now decades. I don't want to be gone. I like it here. I want to stay here. I show up here for the same reason that you do because we like it here I wanted to remain Ojai. I liked what it was, but I didn't know what it was because I only can look in history books.
But I'd be fighting for what was here too. All right, we have things to do. I mean, do something. We've been talking about traffic now for eight years that I've been here and I don't see anything. We've been talking about street lights on OI Avenue and here, and there's nothing on the agenda about street lights. They talk about speed. There's nothing on the agenda about changing the speed limit. We have committees. We talk about it. We have commissions. We throw things up in the air, and if somebody catches it, great.
But we have to do things. I mean, action. Even if you're wrong, at least something is happening. You can undo it. I mean, you talk about goals. I sent you a list of 10. I mean speeding. Try something. We can't have a cop everywhere. You can put speed bumps on every street that people want them and then take them off if they don't want them but it'll slow traffic I mean, try stuff. You know, park and rec.
Has the casino showed up for a bus? I don't know. But that's something they can do. But I mean we have a Park and Rec Commission. There's only 8000 people in town. We can have one second to no one. I mean we just do it in the goals attainable achievable things that you can reach there's always the reach But let's stick with what we can do and get done and do them.
I mean, the word feckless dithering not you guys are new to two of you or no. But I mean the past, I mean pickleball should never have happened. I mean it was noisy they should never put it next to housing in the first place. I mean all it took was gee does it disturb people? Yes. Don't do it.
Thank you, Mr. Tangled. Jeffrey Starkweather.
Hey, I'm glad we're doing this exercise. Before I get started, of course, I've said this so many times, but I do think fire threat and housing are two most existential crises. I think we need to go a little bit slower in this process than what Ben suggested. I think you all should pick your goals And then have time to reflect and let citizens give input on tactics, because there's a lot of citizens.
Like Chris Danch, who may not know a lot more about the tactics than you might. And just to be sitting up here and figuring them out, I mean, I would have a hard time doing it, to be honest with you. If they gave me a couple of days, I could probably do it. But sitting here just... So I think we need to make that process and give citizens a chance to involve themselves. Another thing to think about is, to the extent that we can combine goals that are interactive All the better.
And the same thing, as Leslie said-sorry, Councilman Rule said, you know, tactics that can cut across. And I would say to Mr. Whitman's question about information, I think he's on to something because when it comes to housing If we created a housing task force, one of the biggest tactics we need to do is get a lot more information about how housing works in the city. So I think that is a legitimate tactic, obviously with climate change too.
So I would start with talking about combining goals. I think biohardening emergency preparedness are somewhat the same thing in a lot of ways, but they're also climate issues. I think I've sent some of you this article that was a result of scientists who looked at California federal lands or hemorrhaging carbon dioxide Wildfires are largely to blame. So wildfire suppression in Southern California is a climate tactic.
I also had something I've cited before, this is from research that showed it's no longer a matter of preventing wildfires but instead preventing points of ignition within communities by employing Home Harding Strategies, Proper Landscaping, Fire Resistant Siting and Enjoining Neighborhoods in Collective Efforts of Brush Claim. So I would say those two tactics include housing, and affordable housing or housing would also include homelessness because we know that's the cause of homelessness. And it's also a climate strategy to the extent we do infill housing and people don't have to commute here. We are cutting down on greenhouse gases. So I would look...
Thank you, Mr. Starkweather. And then Starchild.
1:04 – 1:1422 turns
The most pressing issue facing Ojai is affordable housing. We've done some things here in Ojai to make housing more affordable. The Cabin Village is an example of subsidizing housing, the Rent Stabilization Ordinance is one that helps keep people in their apartments or helps them find new housing if their housing is sold. The one thing that we haven't worked much on in Ojai yet, or hasn't come to fruition, is more housing supply.
Previously in Ojai our population was much larger. Previously in Ojai People could afford to live here with just one person working in the household. They could afford to work just one job, and they can spend time after work with their children, with their families, with their community. It's getting harder and harder to do that for young people. We spend, we're overburdened sometimes with our rent. Many spending more than 50% of their income on their rent. Many unable to buy a house and probably going to rent forever or move out.
Maybe some young people you know are considering whether they can live as adults in the city that they grew up in. We can change this in Ojai The solution is going to be to build more housing. I hear that there's not a ton of space, and I've got some ideas. One idea is to get rid of parking requirements. We have an absurdity here in the parking lot where people are housed where the car should be parked.
We could have more housing for people and less housing for cars. Another is to allow three-story buildings for residential housing. There are three story buildings throughout Ojai, I asked. Well there's at least one. And there can be more. When we make more housing, it brings down the price overall and more people will be able to live here spending less time on rent and more time, more money in their community. Thank you.
Thank you, Starchild. Mr. Montgomery, anybody online?
Mayor, we have no raised hands but let's make sure... We just had one raised hand now. Zoom participants, we are on item two, City Council goals. First, we'll have Stephen Colmay. And James Renger in the back, could you please give me permissions to invite our participants in? Standby council. There we go. Stephen, you have the floor.
Thank you. I applaud the Council's efforts at goal-setting and development of intermediate tactics to achieve underlying community priorities. But I do ask the Council members to please disregard the admittedly non-scientific community survey. While I am not a survey researcher, I worked on several projects with Mark Baldessari while we were both on the faculty at UC Irvine.
Mark became president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California. PPIC is the premier nonpartisan survey research organization in California, therefore I know that conducting a valid community survey is not an amateur undertaking. So what did you have presented before you as a survey? There were 159 responses in a community of 7500 individuals with about 5000 voters So this was a 3% self-selected sample of voters as respondents. And I do respect the integrity of our city manager in representing this is non-scientific, but no experienced survey researcher would hazard an interpretation of or reliance on these results.
Decision making still rests with you as the council and I encourage you to take these survey results with grains of salt and not waste time trying to interpret a meaningless survey. That, however, begs the larger question of how is it Council you can meaningfully engage public opinion and participation beyond the handful of council groupies that you hear from at nearly every meeting?
Let's be honest. This narrow faction does not represent our community nor does a poorly constructed and self-selected survey. I do wish you the best of luck tonight and encourage you all to use your gut instincts as leaders, and as our elected representatives, to set the highest priorities. Thank you.
Thank You Mr. Calame.
No more raised hands Mayor.
Thank You Mr Montgomery. Back to you Mr Harvey
If I may, Mayor and Council, just some clarification based on some of the items we heard during public comment. I'm going to argue that you are gonna have time to sort out tactics and you don't need to decide everything tonight. It's a preliminary list if this process takes two three or more meetings that's fine When we come away tonight with a starting list of goals with corresponding tactics, I would expect you to go to your constituents and ask for some fleshing out and some assistance.
Remember, your staff will also be doing the same. So when we come back together to revisit this topic I would expect that we'll be revising some of the things we came up with. That's the idea. It's a starting point tonight. We don't have to be wanting or asking you to complete. I'm just asking you to start so that's one thing. Secondly, I fully expect From talking to you individually and from what you hear from the community that some type of fire-related, I don't want to get into semantics to use the wrong words here.
Some type of emergency response related or one or multiple goals will come out of this. I would encourage you to avail yourselves of the expertise present in the room tonight. You have three or four chiefs here who, you know, some active, some retired, who could be very helpful to you and whom I have asked to be here to assist. So you don't have to come up with all the answers and you can certainly call on them to help you.
I think that's all that I have for clarification. Thank you.
Thank you. So, do we want to go now person by person?
That's what I'd like to do if that's okay with the Council. Okay so thank you. You can see we have a list by member and so Mayor may I start with you and if you need us to add beyond 10 of course that's fine and you also don't need to fill that up if you don't want to either.
Okay, sorry
not an
order of priority housing.
Oh wait, hang on a second Mr Montgomery?
Mayor if I may yes as part of the code of conduct We've been timing council members by five minutes should we do that tonight with our council goals?
It's up to the council.
I think that's fine.
I'll be done and I'll be done in way less than five Thank you for answering I can prioritize, sure. I was thinking that are we saying these 10? I thought we were looking for ones the priority would emerge to say all of us have picked one among our list. Am I hearing that right?
So yeah what I'd like to clarify is it matters less the priority right now. What we're trying to see is where you have overlap and again while I would love for all five of you to agree on one as long as there's three we're gonna consider that consensus yep that's what I heard
Mr. Montgomery, ready to go? Housing. Second, wildfire preparedness risk reduction or whatever that we land on. Growing culture for residents. Infrastructure.
Mayor, maybe a little more slowly.
Okay. Oh yeah. Growing culture for residents. I'm just trying to give the catchphrase. It would be like Parks and Rec, but Art Commission. I want Mr. Miley to think well of us that we grow the Arts Commission, whatever that means. And then infrastructure improvement? Safety parenthetically traffic things like that not disaster preparedness. Oh safety and then parenthetically something like traffic Diversifying the Economy, Climate Resilience, Environmental Stewardship, however we phrase that and then Fiscal Sustainability.
Thank you.
1:14 – 1:2017 turns
Okay, all right I see some overlaps this is we're doing good so far okay so my first one is and to use Mr. Dench's term wildfire safety risk and mitigation Then environmental preparedness, infrastructure. And within infrastructure, I'm specifically looking at ways that we can... So I have climate mitigation and resilience under a separate topic but I'm specifically for infrastructure look at what can we do now to prepare for a warming climate?
Planting trees, tree canopy things like that. Then communication Facilitate better communication with community through social media, through a coordinated communications plan. Fiscal sustainability – I'd like to include with that things like making sure that commercial properties' rents aren't going sky-high and businesses are having to close. Along with that, I would include broadband as a part of that too.
Looking at relationships with the chamber and economic development plan to diversify our economy, adding things in addition to tourism. And then also, I like the way that you phrased the growing culture for residents. We had a number of survey respondents say that they wanted to see more activities for youth. We had several people here and ones I've talked to too talking about how we need more arts funding. We're below Simi Valley.
And that's like literally what I heard. And Bill, I appreciate your comments to that effect too. And then finally housing specifically low income housing and perhaps looking at a community housing trust.
Mayor Pro Tem would you once Mr. Montgomery has finished typing would you please take a look at what he has prepared and offer edits? Thank you.
Well, I think the number two and number three are our I think infrastructure would be my number two. And environmental prep would go under actually no keep those separate. Yeah, but housing and community housing trust that might be a tactic underneath housing
And Mr. Montgomery, I think you could – don't even worry about where the concentric circles are yet. Let's just first focus on each member getting the list down, making sure it's what they want it to be and then we'll take a moment because some of the terms will be slightly different by member and we're going to want to make sure of that before we decide that that's concentric circle or not.
Mayor Pro Tem, I changed the terminology on number six to diversifying economy.
Excellent and number nine would be more of a tactic underneath number eight so you can delete number nine okay thank you
while you're there Mr. Montgomery I'm happy to change growing culture for residents to arts and culture and make that be the same because that's what I mean by it
And I also might suggest just not timing the member. I think it's distracting to watch, I don't think anybody is going to go over the five minute and if it seems somebody is, I might politely say please hurry up. It's just distracting to look at the list that way.
Great.
Ready for more?
So mine is, you can start with wildfire safety and risk mitigation. Public safety. Climate resiliency. Economic development.
Council Member
Rule, what
was your number three please?
That's a good question. That's why I was going so quickly. Oh okay, did I have, no I had climate resiliency Oh, economic development. Thank you. Good God I have and I have many words for all of this so oh yeah environmental stewardship and that may combine with something. I'll leave that to staff to find out fiscal sustainability Affordable housing for all, and that's important that we put for all there.
And I have to do this, arts, culture and critical thinking. Sorry but I got to do it. That's good for me right now, thank you.
Okay, mine number one.
Sorry Councilman Mang I want Councilman Rule just to take a look at what's up there before we go on just to make sure we got it as you're wanting yet to see it. Thank you
1:20 – 1:2625 turns
Okay, mine would be communication and relationships with community staff, council, emergency Wildfire safety and risk mitigation. Public safety, you know, traffic streets, crosswalks.
Slow
down
on that one.
Let's
get number three public safety is number two how you'd like it
written? Let me see the emergency welfare safety. Safety. Yeah, that's fine. Yeah. OK, let me see where my fiscal sustainability And arts, music, culture. And that I'm good with? Yeah okay. What is it like?
Yeah let's Council Member Mangles have you look at what we have just to make sure you think
that's what you said. Locations and relationships. Emergency wildfires safety risk management yes public safety yeah that'll be for
Great. Thank you.
All right, so I did have the fire risk as my top priority risk mitigation but I want to make sure that we do a deep dive into the evacuation or shelter in place issue that I think is causing a lot of concern for the community. I think our – so, I have priorities to manage our water future. Manage our growth future. Manage our traffic.
Water, growth, traffic
management? Yeah, and manage tourism protecting our small-town character.
Council Member, are those separate or one goal?
Well the managing tourism needs to incorporate the protection of small-town character.
Okay so would you say you mentioned water, you mentioned traffic, you mentioned growth, you mentioned tourism we have them all listed on one goal which seems a bit disparate.
Yeah I think they need to be separated
Okay, so let's let Mr. Montgomery catch up here and list them
separately. Just by explanation of the use of the term management is because I think we have to understand what our future is and take a deeper dive into data in science to understand how much growth can we absorb? No. How much, what is our water capacity except? I mean these ones a lot of them are interrelated. Okay did you get four of those manage things in there? All four. Okay good.
Climate sustainability and I'm fine with using whatever term has been used by other council people I'd like to see us invest in staff and invest with the idea that we're going to have more information from our staff to make our decisions. I think we need more information to make good decisions, so I'm interested in looking at how we can And that's not just for us, but it's for the public as well to understand reports. And one small point on that—you don't have to put this in—but I really want our reports to have a more thorough analysis of fiscal impacts because we very frequently get a report that says there are no fiscal impacts without really much analysis Okay, and then let's see.
A housing trust. And finally fiscal
sustainability.
On your number seven it says staff direction protocol but didn't you mean staff capacity? You want to increase somehow the capacity of what the staff can offer
It's potentially an investment in staff, both in terms of quality and number to be able to manage the amount of information it takes for us to manage the city or it takes for the City Manager. Does that make sense?
Yeah,
it does.
So let's let Councilman Whitman take a look at the list here.
1:26 – 1:3127 turns
I change that to Staff Capacity Protocol, subject to change now.
I think you could remove protocol. Right. Increase staff capacity. He's not miked so that's what he said. Thank you. Okay, great. So
awesome. Can I make one quick change? Of course. So for number two Weston, I'm gonna change the language of that to match others' climate resiliency. Thank you. Thanks
Mine as well. It's the same
thing. Did you get that on me? No, mine says climate sustainability say or climate resiliency.
Okay so we've got Whitman, Gilman, Lang wanting climate resiliency okay let's just let him catch up here mm-hmm
Pardon me. Is that in addition to Council Member Mang's? Would that be number six? I didn't
hear that. Sure, yeah you can do that fine. Thank you.
Okay so we're adding climate resiliency and Mang is number six. Are there other
changes for me? Yes, my number one housing. I'm thinking that all of the aspects of housing, including let's say developing a housing trust is a tactic for our housing question. So and I'm assuming that we're going to be focused on affordable. So I think I don't know, Mr. Whitman, if your housing trust is something specific from the rest of the housing question or if that's a tactic under housing.
I'm going to argue, if this is okay with the Council, that I think a broad goal of housing or affordable housing suffices and a trust or a development or legislative change would roll up as a tactic.
That's my thinking. So I'm happy to say that mine number one is affordable housing happily.
It's a policy decision you guys can decide to have it however you want.
Yeah. So my thought is that we've talked about a housing trust, but we don't have the mechanics yet. You know, it hasn't been kind of explained, fleshed out, discussed with the community about what we could potentially do. And so maybe that is a tactic. Yeah, I mean, I'm OK with that.
OK. Do other members want to change what's listed within their respective list before we move on to the next step?
I think I would like to add affordable housing to my list as well.
Number seven, Mang, affordable housing.
And just to be consistent you can take for all out of mine let's just make that inherent.
Councilmember Rule, remove for all. Got it. You got that okay great Any other changes we'd like to see?
Yeah, so change by number eight to say affordable housing slash housing trust.
OK. Let's give it a minute. OK, got it. Any other revisions at this point before we move on to the next step?
Yeah.
And actually, Mr. Montgomery, if you'll make it bigger font again or drop it down again so I have an idea for concentric circles. So just drop down the table, if you would? Thank you.
Okay, for number 10 on my list, infrastructure improvement.
Infrastructure improvement, 10 Whitman. Mm-hmm. Okay. Okay, very good. Any other changes? Okay I'm going to make a suggestion here and it doesn't have to be this way but i think one of the easiest things we could do is if we go by member look at each particular proposed goal and just see if there are three other people or excuse me two other people that have something that looks to be similar and then just pause there for a moment And once we make that determination, I'm just going to keep this view but bold it. And when it's bold that means at least three members think this is something that should be a goal. Is that acceptable to the council? Yes. All right so let's start with the mayor and affordable housing.
When I look across and this is why we all need to have eyes on this, I've seen at least three if not all that have that I'm going to say that there are some nuances in some of the titles, but they're largely affordable housing. Is that we think that's OK? OK, so Mr. Montgomery, let's bold that.
Mr. City Manager, should I bold across the five columns?
That'd be good. Yeah. So let's take a moment. I think that would be... Now we're getting fancy. It'll be green
1:31 – 1:3741 turns
shouldn't it?
Let's start with bold before we get too crazy here. Okay, so it looks like from a quick cursory review all five members want something related to affordable housing. Did any member not want that and am I misstating any proposed goals? Okay part two of the question for those members that might have a little bit of a different title can we simply go with affordable housing?
Yes. I'm seeing head nods
I think I would like to add trust to mine.
Would five members want trust on theirs or do three members want trust? For
me, trust is going to be there but it's a tactic among the other tactics so I'm not excluding that. I'm thinking it will be a tactic that we also have under the main
heading. That would be my assumption as well. I
am all for it.
Okay, so I'm going to just take a flyer here. Mr. Montgomery change affordable housing on all members to just simply read affordable housing. If it says slash housing trust we're going to go with the I promise that will be a tactic. So we've got five affordable housing. Congratulations, you have your first goal. Great. Let's move on because this will also be another easy one, I think. Wildlife prep, risk reduction, wildfire preparation.
I'm happy to change mine too. Wildfire safety and risk mitigation? No problem. That's what I mean.
OK, so I see a lot of overlap. I think every single member has that. Is that title acceptable to this council or would you like something different? I'm seeing three people nod their heads.
It's acceptable to me. Yeah, I'm good with that title.
All right,
so
let's give it a moment here. So
just under Mr. Whitman, just to say what you have parenthetically, I am thinking that will be part of what the tactic will be also. I mean, it's on my
agenda too. Yeah, that will be a tactic of many.
Okay.
Okay, great. Well, and that's great if they here in the audience if they're all bold, that's awesome. That's fantastic. That's what you want? Okay, so wildfire safety risk mitigation across the board. Great. Okay now one that might may or may not have universal but I don't know arts and culture funding
Now, can I let me just the reason why I labeled it just the larger is only this. You could say music is also one of the arts so you don't have to separate and but when I was thinking of culture, I'm also thinking of young families more recreation. So I was thinking of culture in that sense to include that. So somebody had something like Oh, we saw it in the survey rather. Recreation, I'm thinking that also falls under culture funding?
So however you guys want to phrase that, that's what I'm thinking and I think probably maybe all of us are thinking yes more arts, yes more things for young families to do whatever we want to phrase that.
I would say that I understand what you're saying, but when I think of culture, I don't think of recreation for families. I mean, I agree with the idea, but we might be able to find arts, culture and community
building
development.
Is there something wrong with just arts and culture? I don't see semantically that it represents the idea of community engagement with young
families or recreation, not that it couldn't. Here's what I'm asking this. If you just called it something like arts and culture or arts, culture and recreation, you're going to have tactics that are going to roll up to that that are gonna explain how you're going to in this case, engage young families to provide more opportunities or whatever it is.
I think adding recreation is absolutely fine.
Arts, culture and recreation. Yeah, cool. Great.
Arts culture and recreation. Okay, so now we've agreed on that let's take a quick spin through all the members here
Going now to Mayor Pro Tem Lang's number seven.
Yep, that works.
Okay. And
then Rule number eight.
Yeah, well...
Hold on, hold on, hold on. Don't say
it
too quick! Hold on, let's let Council Member Rule weigh in.
I'm trying to think if critical thinking can fall into arts culture or recreation. Oh, I see what you're saying. It's very important to me that we do some sort of that would get people thinking critically. I think of great lack right now.
If you if you do think of critical thinking in the sense of culture, like in literature, reading groups, philosophy?
I could. I definitely could. And so I'm I think I'm OK with that arts, culture and recreation that we can work on tactics that might or might not find a majority here.
Thank you. Excellent, we can work on that for sure. Okay so Mr. Montgomery Arts, Culture and Recreation.
The remaining would be Council Member Mang's number five here.
Okay so I'm seeing at least four with that? Correct. And I'm gonna say please bold that. Okay well I'll let you catch up and all the bold guys are gonna eventually come off on a separate list here in a second but we're probably gonna take a break to let Weston kind of do that so we don't yeah Okay, all right. So Mr. Montgomery just let us know when you're feeling ready.
Okay so now we're on infrastructure improvement and
1:37 – 1:4876 turns
So for me, just to say it's very much the nuts and bolts conversation. It's paving, it's the roadways, it's the waterways. And in my mind one of those tactics does overlap with some of what has been said when I see warming climate. One of the infrastructure improvements I would want to introduce that I think other people would too is do we look at those paving projects or canopy, anything of those things and say how do we reduce our carbon emission, make it more sustainable. So that would be one of the features of it but the infrastructure improvement I'm thinking what we all generally think of All the building stuff that happens in our town, that makes our roads okay and our waterways fine.
So my thought in adding that to my list is that I want to make – so I know we have a program for infrastructure improvement. I think it's always an open door to say, hey we need to work on this. But I want to make sure that it's in the priority category so that when we talk about budget where are we allocating money? We constantly keep in mind our infrastructure.
I have a more general question. Is there some sort of visual or diagramic way to show the sort of cross-cutting tactics or concepts, you know? That in other words how are we going to be able to...
When we get there
Yeah, I mean we think we'll be able to do that. I'm just curious if there's a way to say you know that this tactic belongs under climate resiliency and it also belongs under infrastructure improvement because it's solar panels or whatever it happens to be. Is there a way to visually represent that? Or are we planning to visually represent that?
We, I don't think we'll be able to visually represent that this evening. I
understand what you're saying. Not tonight, not this evening.
Heck
no.
Yes. No, I would like to get to where you're talking about.
Okay.
Um, I'll have an offline with you as to understanding the vision there.
Yeah, for sure.
So what I'm envisioning tonight is once we have all of our bold items new screen comes up, those are the starting point for the goals and we go one by one and try to come up with some tactics that go with it.
Yeah, I apologize if I stepped a couple of steps ahead.
No it's okay you're thinking about
the process. It's all good thank you.
Okay so where do we end? We're still on infrastructure improvement and we're trying to decide is there a better...I see a lot of infrastructure across the board at least three. Is there a better title that we like?
I think it's maintenance and improvement and Mayor Gilman to your point when I When I mentioned the warming climate, that's exactly what I was talking about. How can we do things better? So it is improvement but it's also let's make sure our streets stay paved and that Lindy's really taken care of.
So I might see that as tactics within infrastructure maintenance and improvement. You're explaining how you'd like those things to happen, if that's okay?
Yep, yep.
And I think it's a crossover to fiscal sustainability as
well.
Right.
Well, I see fiscal sustainability, if you don't mind me offering some input, as a separate goal.
Right, no I'm not. You're just saying they're related? I'm just saying that in order to assess fiscal sustainability we need to look at our infrastructure.
Yes okay sorry understood. Okay so are we okay with infrastructure maintenance and improvement as the general goal title for now and again you can change this later doesn't have to be this. So let's just let Mr. Montgomery go through each member and see
We have three, second being Mayor Pro Tem Lang and the third is Council Member Whitman here, number 10.
Okay, so I'm gonna say that's gonna be bold. Great, ready? Ready. Okay, so now we are on diversifying economy. Or safety traffic but... Oh, I'm sorry, I jumped right over there. Public safety is what I mean by
that. Sorry, public safety? Yeah, absolutely.
Okay.
So you don't have to parenthetically say traffic, I think public safety covers the bigger subject. The tactics would be things like speed limits etc.,
Got it.
I see a second there with Council Member Rules number two. So you can probably move my
traffic management to the public safety column?
Okay, great. And then Mang...
Yeah, I'll just reference really quickly. I think we need to do kind of a deep evaluation Managing the interface between pedestrians and vehicles from Ventura Street to Fox Street. And it's a traffic slowdown issue, and it's a safety issue that we have a constant kind of flow back and forth across the street.
So that's a terrific detailed. You don't need. No, it's great. It's great. That's going to be a long list of stuff. That's a very detailed tactic. And
I'm not proposing to add it. Yeah,
but that's a bit. But in all seriousness, that's that is the type of granularity that we are looking for so that we can then be successful. OK, so we see public safety.
I should have had that on mine and I wrote down on my list, but I didn't you're
entitled to
there. So I
want to
know that would make five. Great. Pardon? Go back
Hang on a second, let me catch up here. Okay now I jumped ahead we're on diversifying economy or something economic development just looking you know also I would add you know argue that tourism management also is kind of related to that too. I see at least three or four in that area what do we feel council about the title for this goal?
It's to me that what's interesting about diversifying, I think Ms. Lang said it more aptly which is diversifying away from tourism as the central or the main source that you think we're resilient now across some industries and that means lots of tactics do we How do we work with businesses, chamber? All that kind of stuff. So that's what diversifying the economy has meant to me for a long time.
Okay, so I see what you're saying and you're basically rolling in tourism management into that is what I'm hearing. Am I hearing that correctly?
I'll just explain on tourism management You know, my thought there is that one of the biggest complaints I hear is that I can't live in my town especially on weekends. And so I'm looking for strategies so that our residents feel more like this is their town. And that's my concept of tourism management so it isn't so much diversification Well, it might be just a much broader topic for me.
To me they're very close in this way but I knew what you meant and but it's slightly different but worth noting so the diversifying the economy gives if let's say there's more businesses that can employ more people here that live here okay so that's a traffic reduction people are living here and the energy we would put into it would not be more tourism because we've got plenty of that What you're saying, I think is when projects come up for us that are tourist-focused we're thinking of our larger plan about our residents and we're saying are we at capacity on tourism? But it seems to me we want to be saying that housing and jobs are a big part of what we mean by capacity and flourishing. So they're very close. I don't disagree with
that but I would also add then You know, my concept is that we even look at our existing relationship with tourism and recognizing that we are financially sustainable in large part because of tourism. But how do we make that kind of reality more palatable
for our community. So I'm gonna jump in when you get into the how now you're talking about a tactic
right fair enough
so let's come up with a goal title that reflects what we're trying to do
yeah well how about we just add tourism management as a slash line I mean, I think we're all sort of talking about the same thing.
Do I have? That's
fine.
OK, so it looks like I'm getting three people nodding their head with that changing into diversifying economy slash tourism management. Yes.
Yeah.
OK. So Mr. Montgomery, let's just make that update. Thank you council for working with me. OK. I see one under rule that you passed over economic development one at a time.
It's fine to change that. Thank you.
Yeah, thank you.
Council Member Whitman number
five. Okay.
So
there you go.
Okay, good. All right, great. Okay, now we're on to climate resiliency. I think?
We got five already.
Okay Do we have any changes there that we need to make?
No.
Okay great. That's an easy one. Thank you.
We have all five there.
So let's just let you go ahead and bold that
And you also have five fiscal sustainabilities.
Perfect, okay so let's just catch up on that and then we can see if we have any orphans that have...
So easy!
1:48 – 1:5240 turns
Then we can see if we have any orphans where there's three. This
will be taking out broadband title to make it uniform.
Okay Okay, so this becomes an eye chart and I'll ask anybody to help me. You can count to three on anything that's not bold. Please let me know. And remember you have to count to three.
Now, I want to say what I see in Ms. Lang's is communication plan and then I see under Mang, communication and relationships. I would happily add as my number nine something about communications, communications plan. I think that's worthy and a good thing to work on.
Okay. Do Lang and Mang have thoughts about that? Does that sound consistent with what you were envisioning?
Yes, definitely.
And so the title is Communication Plan or what do you want to call it?
Well, I think communication and relationships because the plan could be a tactic underneath that.
Communication and relationships is fine with me. Yeah.
I like communication relationships better because the plan is more of a how. So let's do it.
And then another question. So on Councilmember Whitman's number seven, it falls kind of into that.
It could be a tactic within there, I think or you could, you know...
Your seven is increased staff
capacity? It wasn't related to communications, but I mean it wasn't specific. Well,
I mean it actually is in the sense that every time we get a report it's a communication. I see what you mean.
I see it as a tactic.
Yeah
okay. Okay so now we have communications and relationships. I'll be
changing Mayor Pro Tem Lang. And the third is Council Member Mang.
Okay, well actually you can change my increased staff capacity as a tactic under that one. Great
okay other orphans that we have there where there's three? I don't see any anybody want to lobby somebody to make a change
You know, I think that for my number five environmental stewardship can actually go under climate resiliency as a tactic of some sort.
Thank you. Oh,
I already have climate resiliency up there. Yeah
okay that's great
yeah just
you can just
delete
mm-hmm okay great Okay, I don't see any other orphans.
Pardon me, I've missed a step. This number five for Councilmember Rule? You can just delete
it, yeah thank you.
Okay so now we're gonna go to Whitman and remove two and three because again... I'm
not asking you to remove them,
they're there. It's fine, okay fair enough let's not remove them because the next step...
Those may end up being
within
Please
don't
remove them. Okay,
so what I'd like to do now if council is okay with it is I'd like to give Mr. Montgomery about five minutes. I'd like for him to develop that just below this Mr. Montgomery, just I want a list of each of the goals and then I want five blank numbers below each one and we'll see if we can come up with five tactics for each of the proposed goals. Does that make sense? And so you're not going to see that table anymore all you're gonna see is this new list with the goals five numbers below it does that make sense got it okay and you might need to take do two columns so it fits makes sense?
So Mayor, I would suggest if you agree- Let's do it. Let's take a ten minute break. Okay great thank you.
2:05 – 2:1229 turns
Check, check, check. Okay everyone we're gonna start again thank you. We were just about to move into we've settled on these big items and we were going to get into what are some quick tactics and I know we reached out already to some people in the audience to maybe offer some guidance but we have a alternative proposal will consider Mr. Harvey
Yes, Mayor. During the break I heard from a couple members individually that there's a desire potentially to maybe spend some more thoughtful time on the tactics allow each council member to not only meet with me but also talk to their various constituents and more thoughtfully develop a list of tactics rather than having to splash down some things this evening which is completely fine and if it's the desire of the Council even though we probably have some people that are here in the audience might want Put forth a tactic or two tonight, maybe the council could direct me to meet individually with council members to talk about each of the areas and come up with some proposed tactics. And I could also meet with the subject matter experts that might be here or not here tonight and then come back with a draft list of five to ten tactics by each potential goal if that's the pleasure of the council.
That's one way to do it for sure.
Can I just ask real quick that graph that you just put together, Weston. Should we take a screenshot or when could we have that so we can
start? Mr. Montgomery would be able to email that out to you as early as this evening so that you could start noodling on that if you will.
It doesn't have to be this evening.
So just each member should know, I will be pressing each one of you to talk to me individually about this. I do want your direct feedback and I don't think that's a problem so but thank you.
Yeah, I would, I was gonna say what Ms. Rule said, I would love to meet with subject matter experts in more detail and then try to think very thoughtfully and especially probably find a lot of ways where there is overlap which would be really fantastic.
Thank you.
In a perfect world, I'd say great. We'll take this on a month from now on the 25th of March. Well, I'm not going to recommend the 25th of March because that is when the Cabin Village project is coming back before the City Council. That's not a good night to do this. So your question then remains, do you think that we can do this between now and the 11th of March or do we need to move this to the first meeting in April? And it's fine either way As far as like a fiscal planning perspective, because I didn't see any goals that you came up with that are completely out of left field. That are things that we're not already thinking about.
Go ahead
please.
I was just going to say I would be open to having a special meeting even next Tuesday or at another time to- I'd
like more time than that.
Possibly between the 11th and the 25th, possibly?
Yes. I don't mind a special meeting at all. I like the idea more than a week sounds good. And I would like to move it forward though only so that some tactics we probably would like to initiate right away, at least their start, their research. So not delaying that sounds like what the community is really asking us to do especially on some of the issues.
So I'm hearing sometime between the 11th and the 25th. Could we just settle on Mr. Montgomery, are you able to pull up a little calendar? Just really quick. I hate to do this everybody but I've had some trouble trying to schedule special meetings. You want to do the Tuesday that's in between?
Well the Tuesday that's the 18th and we have our Brown Act meeting that night.
Thank you for
pointing that out. Okay, so that's... You're concerned about the 11th because it's too soon? Or because we already have a full agenda? I'm
just wondering. The 11th is fine. Mr. Montgomery, am I able to put you on the spot and see what's on the working agenda? Can you access that from here?
Yes, I can. That would be much easier than a calendar.
Okay, then give us a moment here. A few seconds. Just want to refresh my memory as to what's on that agenda already. Pardon me. Oh, Mr. Almeida on the spot. Let's see here I have a hard copy which you don't have so Weston is going to pull that up. Okay. I have it also. Okay, I'm gonna make a suggestion. On the 11th already under the discussion section you have the mid-year budget update and the budget reserve policy Now you can keep it on that agenda if you want.
If you don't mind moving that to the first meeting in April, that might clear some room unless there's a desire to have the mid-year budget update on the 11th.
No, that doesn't in any way affect Mr. Alameda being able to move forward with his goal of anything creating the next year's budget. It doesn't
affect him and I'm fine with that. So I'm going to suggest that we okay so this is looking good for the 11th. Okay it's fine okay now We're prepared to deliver a 90-day pickleball update. That might bring a lot of folks out. I'm just going to suggest that maybe putting goals first on the discussion item, and then seeing where everything else falls out. This is a
decision— No, no, no. I definitely don't want to do what we said we were going to do for sure so I don't want to have that I wouldn't want to put that at the end. It seems to me what you could say is, the housing trust... I'm not trying to lose sight of that either but if we are going to say the housing trust is an aspect of what we're bringing forward, you could remove housing trusts there. I don't, I'm not trying to- I
see that as a tactic that likely has three supports for it so I think- Oh, me
too!
So I think that it's not gonna fall off. If you wanted to just say we don't need to have that on the working agenda, we know that that's gonna roll up to a goal? Council Member Whitman, are you okay with that or do you want to keep that on there as it is right now? Or do you want to think about that?
I guess my question would be then when will we have kind of a deep dive explanation
2:12 – 2:1828 turns
So this is then going to, it'll be delayed a little further because it's gonna be determined by the work plan and the effort involved. But it'll be on the work plan and will be detailed so you won't be losing sight of it. It just won't be happening as quick. The discussion will not be as quickly as it is now.
I'm okay with that. You know, I would also be okay with doing You know, the idea of doing a special meeting. I'll do either of those two.
But we have a conflict because of the Brown Act. We do. We have Brown Act training that day. Okay. So Mr. Montgomery, I'm hearing mid-year budget update and budget reserve policy can move to April somewhere? Okay.
Can I just say, Mr. Alameda, those are ones that you brought to us and we moved those both. Is that okay with you? It is? Yeah, okay.
We're gonna keep Pickleball and we're gonna just delete Housing Trust, not deleting it but just deleting it from this document.
Okay.
And instead on the 11th Mr. Montgomery we're going to put council goals and tactics continued which I already see you have on there great wonderful
that's I think this is worth a lot not waiting too long Great,
and then we could do our research. And then again Mr. Montgomery will email out to you all tomorrow morning what you agreed upon tonight and you can start fleshing out your tactics. I'm sorry to all the people that wanted to submit tactics this evening but we will be contacting you for assistance. Thank you. Yes
wonderful!
We got it. I don't think we need any more direction from Council. I appreciate the discussion very much. This is great
Okay, thank you everybody. All right so moving on we are on item discussion item number three two-member request resolution adopting a city council policy to consider local issues only shall I start that since I was one?
Sure, staff can provide a brief report. No you start and I'll follow up. So as noted this is a request from two council members Mary Gilman and Council Member Whitman it's for the council to consider adopting a resolution that would define the scope of its legislative and administrative actions focusing on local issues excluding national international and global issues that have no direct application in city operations or city residents The council can adopt the resolution as drafted. The council cannot adopt the resolution as drafted or may modify it as desired. Thank you. Thanks,
and I'm happy to hear from Councilmember Whitman as well just my I wanted to express the intention of this and why I'm interested in it is that over the past year and a half It's one of the central issues that I have heard at almost every meeting which was The desire to focus on things that are directly related to citizens of Ojai, and they meant that very plainly like roads and safety and fire. So it isn't that I'm troubled by something that's happening not here but very specifically driving on the road. And so I took that pretty seriously. And from my perspective, it seemed that some of the energy effort on things that were not directly related to things that happened in Ojai were very divisive in our community.
So that's why I'm interested in doing this in this way we can certainly talk about the details but that's the intention.
I support this as long as we have the ability to address a local issue that the federal government has decided to weigh in on, in some fashion. But it's not beyond our jurisdiction to address that issue. What's an
example?
Just a quick point of order. Are we having
discussion? No no I was trying to give my version of the staff report but I'll stop now
No, I mean you can continue. I'm just wondering where we are in the process.
That's what I was intending to do is to say what's the intention of it and then Mr. Whitman was offering his intention but happy to go to the next time. Yeah, I mean
I think it's in the...what I'm talking about is in the language. Okay
Okay, well
any questions? I'm happy to hear any clarification. No no no, I think I
clarified
it. I
was thinking the thing that becomes interesting that I think we'll hear from the public and maybe we could ask Mr. Summers as well is when we look at the language we might wonder what constitutes the right kind of thing for us to work on and what doesn't and when we say affect or directly affect what do we mean? It seems to me that's interesting so anyway any questions for Mr. Summers or Mr. Harvey before we go to public comment?
I have a quick question. Mr. Summers said national and international, does that exclude or include state? Does that become national? I mean are we not just curious like definitionally what that means?
So on the state component it's about issues that have direct effect on the boundaries of the city or residents in the city But there's the direct language in Section 2 that excludes national, international and global issues. So if there was a state issue that had no impact on the city, that would arguably also be excluded but the council could revise that language if desired. And that's also picked up in Section 4 is if there was a state issue that did impact the city then the council could consider it.
2:18 – 2:2412 turns
I did have a follow-up question, but I lost it. Can I
follow up on your question? Of course! When I see section 1 of page 3-4 and it says in its deliberations the City Council shall only consider policies resolutions ordinances and actions that directly impact the health safety and welfare of residents and visitors infrastructure economy and environment within the boundaries of the city of Ojai I'm taking that to mean, in a way that's our large demarcation about what we would take up and deliberate about. So it'd have to directly affect the people within the boundaries of the city limits in those ways.
Affect or effect?
I think the logical one would be affect with an A.
Okay, affect with an A. Would it affect them? Because the effect would be the consequence. Yeah we can get into language and things like that which I'm sure we will. No
let's do...
We will but after you know in discussion.
Okay are we ready for public comment? Okay Larry Steingold, Bill Miley and Renee Roth
Larry Steingold, good evening. We just spent maybe an hour on Ojai priorities. We've been spending a lifetime on Ojai priorities. There are four and a half square miles here. They're 8000 feet. The symbol is Ojai City of Ojai first last and always roads security sustainability fiscal park and rec culture all these wonderful things are all about the city of Ojai.
Not about Sacramento, not about Washington, not about Jerusalem or Cancun or Paris. It doesn't matter it's all about the city of Ojai. It's me walking outside my street and looking up at the stars at 10 o'clock at night and going what a great place to live It's walking down the street and just living here. It's all about Ojai, I'm interested in it. I live here on a day-to-day basis. Everybody lives here.
They don't live in Ventura. They want the roads paved. They want the sidewalks fixed. They want trees that blow up in the fire cut down. They want fire hardening. They want park and rec. They want affordable housing. Focus here. Anything that distracts you from your mission, go run for Congress. This is your mission here to keep Ojai the way we came here, you came here, you remain here for a reason.
If you wanted it to be somewhere else, you'd go. I don't want to change it to somewhere else. I mean, I'm as big and nimby as anybody But it's concentrate on Ojai. My taxes go to Ojai here, where money goes, it doesn't matter. But it's getting it done. It's just moving forward, less action. Action here, focus on Ojai. Ojai is your job. You're city councilors of Ojai, you're not state senators, you're not congresspeople, you are not whatever.
This is your chosen job and hopefully it's my job to help you stay focused on getting it done Okay, because better you than me. Because to me it looks too much like work. But seriously I mean it's all about Ojai. It's Ojai first last and I intend to be here forever as far as I'm concerned so I wanted to remain why we came here. So thank you.
Thank You Mr. Steingold. Bill Miley, Renee Roth and Starchild
Hello. I have several comments about the proposed ordinance. The past Israeli-Gaza issue comes quickly to mind. There are many new faces we saw then, and I haven't seen them now since. The issue the city government did not have any control over, didn't have any influence on or impact locally other than kind of separated us for awhile. Other than citizen attitude information and opinion, which got expressed.
If we'd had an ordinance like being proposed tonight it would have been kept to three minute public communications. So comments about the proposed draft? Section 1A, scope. Restricting it to the City of Ojai should be modified to add or the intermix of city and county responsibilities Traffic, water, earthquake, flooding, homeless. Section 1B, issues and public health, public welfare, pretty standard.
And please define the term Ojai community. It includes the Ojai Valley in my opinion. Section 2 and 3 are okay. Section 4, first section 4, define local community and visitors to the community. Who are they? It really includes entire Ojai Valley Section four, which was a typo. Again defines Hawaii community. I consider it the Hawaii Valley. We legislate within the city boundaries. We influence beyond and we listen to folks within and without our city boundaries.
And we consider the impact on the whole Ojai Valley. I support the proposal as I have modified it. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Miley. Renee Roth, Starchild and Jody Lewis.
2:24 – 2:293 turns
Good evening. While I while I appreciate the intent I'm really surprised that this is being brought as an issue before the Council with a draft of a resolution before it was even discussed by members of the Council. So that is the first mark of what was going on behind closed doors to make this into a resolution. And why did it get along this far between two members of the council?
That is very disturbing to me, period. And then my second question that I always go to is, do we have anything else that this could be added to instead of a separate resolution or a separate ordinance? I think we do. I think our protocols document should and could be modified to say we want to focus on local issues. I appreciate what you're trying to do. I also don't think the Gaza thing and other things that have come up are appropriate. I appreciate that, but I think there's other ways to handle it. I don't think we need another resolution to handle one more specific issue, but include it in the protocols document and get to that modification sooner rather than later. Thank you.
Oh, one last thing. Yeah. Is it going to be good for the residents of Ojai? Of a ember driven high fire knows no boundaries of where it's going to land and whose responsibility it is to take care of it. It's going to be all of our responsibilities to take care of it . Thank you.
Thank you, Miss Roth. Starchild, Jody Lewis and Elena Pascarella
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere, wrote Martin Luther King from his jail cell in Birmingham. Would the two Andes support a resolution to release Martin Luther King from jail? I opposed, and I oppose the ceasefire resolution. I condemn the terrorist organization Hamas. I believe there can be no peace as long as Hamas can harm Gazans or Israelis.
I condemn the language in the ceasefire language calling to release political prisoners in fair exchange for hostages and prisoners. I'm reminded of over a week ago when Kefir Bivas And his brother Ariel, bodies were released by Hamas. What fair exchange was there? They were released in exchange for convicted terrorists and their bodies were buried in the land of their ancestors eventually next to the body of their mother.
So why do I oppose this resolution today? Because it would leave unamendable the flawed ceasefire resolution. We can never ask for amendment, we can never ask for repeal of it. That's not what I want. I stand for peace, I hate war and I hate terrorism. I learned from the ceasefire supporters. I stand out there between Libby and Arcade on Fridays in the evening whenever I can.
I remember what happened to Hind Rajab who was killed, only a young child. And I agree with one thing that the ceasefire resolution says, that all human life is precious and Ojai's commitment as an international city of peace calls on elected officials to promote peace for all people. This proposal will not focus our energies if you don't want to talk about Gaza, international subjects.
Then just don't do it! But right now we're talking about it. If council wants to override the resolution they will. It will only take three votes. One, it's not up to you to decide what future councils can discuss that's up to the voters that's up the people This resolution is not prudence, it's apathy. It's cowardice masquerading as wisdom. This resolution does not save time.
It shirks the responsibility of this city council to stand for justice.
2:29 – 2:364 turns
Thank you, Starchild. Jody Lewis, Ellen Pascarella and Alan Greenberg
Hi, I'm Jodi Lewis. I don't know how we can parse what's local and what's global, and what's hyper-local community. And what's a larger community? I read a novel once where there was a little town in the middle of the woods, and they kind of built a bramble around themselves, and they opted out of World War One in Europe, right? No one ever found them. They had all they needed there. They never had to go outside. No one had to come in.
But that's not this. We are not that. This is not that time, and as much as our surfers might hate it, locals only is a fiction. There is no longer a local issue that's not global or global issue that's not local. Case in point the two most central city council goals agreed on tonight deal with the climate crisis and housing crisis. Global issues, local issues.
The issues of our time are the issues of our town Just as it's dawned on us that these issues are inextricably intersectional—climate crisis, racism, sexism, poverty, immigration, oppression, body sovereignty, homelessness, LGBTQ+, —it's time to get that the issues that affect our citizens have no borders. Case in point! Six young men last night, right across out of my living room window had a knockdown drag-out brawl outside the window at midnight. Yelling and threatening each other with every kind of horrifying hate speech I have ever heard.
Every one of the issues I just mentioned were screamed at each other including threatening to call ICE. All these issues are hyperlocal and are being literally fought out in the streets of our neighborhoods right now, in real time. Here's another one. Our town is largely funded by the billionaire Crown family, owners of the Ojai Valley Inn and founders of the largest stakeholders of the fifth-largest weapons manufacturer on the planet, General Dynamics. Any lands and all people being bombed into oblivion by this country in our proxies, the Crown family, general dynamics and our city budget is fattened off the abject suffering of millions. That is local.
Lastly we claim ourselves as an international city of peace. I mean, it's a global membership organization which states that its essential goal is quote to certify and recommend thousands of self-organized municipalities as cities of peace in order to put into motion a tipping force for global peace. That is our local responsibility as a member of this international body.
So let's be real. For a small local town, Ojai has a global reputation and ties. Clinton and Bezos have been here in this past year. We're home to global spiritual movements, global documentarians, international celebrities, global justice writers, neighbors from Palestine, neighbors from Israel, and the list goes on. Live here. The local is global, and the global is local.
Anything else?
Thank you, Ms. Lewis. Elena Pascarella and then Alan Greenberg
Good evening, Council. Thank you all for taking time for us and welcome to the new members and you Andy. Actually I remember seeing you write something about this before the election when you were elected and you thought about how the ceasefire issue And by the way, I'm here. Remember he said he didn't see any of us here but some of us are here from the Gaza ceasefire issue and you said that it was divisive and dividing our community.
And I feel that by not talking about things our community still remains divided And I'm appreciative of what Starchild said and quoted about how important it is for us to communicate with each other, and how he goes out there while still talking to each other. One of the things that concerns me right now which is a national issue is the issue of immigration, right?
and how people in our community are afraid, and just how Jodi spoke about ICE coming in. So if you make this an issue that we can't even talk about things and bring up our concerns to you because it's a national issue then I think it's going to stop us from protecting people in our community Just recently in Texas, a young girl, her name was Jocelyn Rojo Carranza. May she rest in peace. She was 11 years old and committed suicide because she was bullied about her parents' immigration status.
A few weeks ago, I stood out in the rain with about 70 students from Nordoff who were protesting the issue of ice in our community. And so, I don't want to be stopped from talking about this and bringing it to you. In fact, I would like our city to be a sanctuary city. And if you pass a resolution like this, then we're not going to be able to talk about that.
And I feel that it's important that we talk about this issue because the children and the parents in our community are suffering. They're the ones who rake our lawns, watch our children. They're keeping the tourism afloat by working for us. And I feel that this segment of our community isn't recognized and appreciated, and we need to be able to talk about it in these public spaces because our federal government is not acting in dignity with regards to immigrants. And I just want you to vote no for this resolution so that we can be able to talk about things and people in our community that we care about.
2:36 – 2:427 turns
Thank you very much, Alan Greenberg
I want to thank both Andes for bringing this up. And I completely disagree with the speaker who just was at this rostrum. If somebody in this town is afraid, they should not be afraid unless they're guilty of a felony, rape and murder or serious crime. Otherwise, I'm so tired of hearing Oh, everybody's going to be sent back. No, they're not. It's been made clear.
Clear as a bell that the people who are going to be sent back are the ones who are a threat to our safety. Period. And talking about a sanctuary city makes my blood boil. In this particular resolution it's actually too loose We shouldn't be talking about something that happened in Nebraska or in Wyoming. It doesn't mention anything about other states, they should be excluded.
Also should be excluded is any other issue There's an open gap there that says, well we could talk about anything if the council decides to do it. That opens up the whole can of worms. Either you're gonna take care of the people and this, and the infrastructure of this town or as Larry said, you belong in a different legislative body. You should only be concerned about what's going on right here I had no objection to the elephant thing, because it's about elephants here.
It's not about elephants in Ventura or some other place. The chaos that took place a year ago can only be described as embarrassing. And two of the people that ended up voting for that ridiculous resolution are now gone from the council, including the mayor who looked me right in the eye a week before and told me that resolution will never be passed. And then she was the vote to put it on the agenda and she was the clinching vote as well.
This is just chaos to bring in all this outside information So, I'm very much in favor of it and I think it needs to be tightened up so that all the council is doing is what's going on right here. I do think it should include, and I'm not sure if it does, I would say anything in the 930223 zip code because there are a lot of people living right across the border. If you take one step outside, you cannot eliminate them. You have to be concerned about their welfare as well. Thank you.
Thank you Mr. Greenberg.
Goodness the audacity of a resolution saying to stay on task. What's wrong with you people? I don't want to see this become a refuge city for people who cross the border illegally and punch me in the face and knock my front teeth out when they're drunk. I steal my jobs raking leaves for others and caring for the children. I've had a lifetime struggling against people who look the other way real hard, namely Republicans and Democrats But they needed one, is very interested in guys like me trying to work for a living.
But yeah we can just stick to what works locally if you have that as a resolution. You don't have to enact it and call it up every time but you may so I'd say go ahead and pass it. Have a good one.
Thank you Mr Abbott.
Mr Montgomery anything online? Mayor we have no raised hands but Zoom participants we are now on item number three on tonight's agenda and we do have one raised hand now from L Hecker El, you have the opportunity to
speak. Hi, this is Leah Hecker. I'm calling in to support this resolution and I have a completely different reason than everybody else who's talking here. I actually think that everybody who was talking proves why it's a wise thing to have It's not so much about relitigating Gaza or whatever, but what's happening currently in our politics is I think very divisive.
And I think it's going to get worse and not better. And I think for you to recognize and focus on this little piece of land here where we all live together that we all want to share in is wise And I think it's going to be hard enough. I see there are going to be more and more topics, that one side feels like this and the other side feels like that, and they will look to you to discuss it, and we all may be because it's mind-blowing.
However, to recognize holding us together focusing on us in pragmatic and touchable ways is very smart. So not to say, oh Gaza yes, Gaza no or whatever else there was but to give a very clear commitment to everybody in this town And to the things that we find important and space to discuss these things is smart in my eyes. Thank you.
2:42 – 2:517 turns
or our legal advisor. The way I read this ordinance does not prevent anyone from coming up to the podium during public comment and criticizing the president or anybody else, or asking us, the community, to think about a particular topic. This is simply focused to those issues that we will take up as a council.
Yes, as presently drafted this limits the Council's agenda it doesn't limit public comment.
Yeah, well Andy you and I have spoken about this many times and I am 100% against it. Um, I think that we have a mandate as represent- as representatives and as elected officials. We derive our authority from the people who elect us. And when my constituents ask me to address a certain item, I do not feel it is within my power to say to them, I'm sorry uh...I'm not going to address that.
That to me is the antithesis of what a A representative government is about. It is not up to me to determine what concerns of theirs are legitimate, especially when it's obvious that it is true and real to them. As far as what affects people, what are we talking about here? When people come up here crying Have they been affected or is that just, they haven't been affected? Are we only talking about if we affect their property? It only matters if we affect their streets and their cars and their houses. Doesn't matter if we affect their mental health. It doesn't matter.
So to me it's an absolutely artificial idea about affecting the population. The second point is that if the community wants to discuss it This is the public square. This is where we discuss it. Part of the problem with the Gaza situation is, is that we refused to take it up. We refused as a council and when we did we were unable to control the situation simply from ineptitude really you know so When you talk about time having been wasted, had we addressed it, it would have been dealt with way, way, way sooner. And by the way, Mayor Sticks was not the vote to put it on the agenda. There were only two votes taken to put it on the agenda. That was myself and Susie Francina. She did vote for it but she did not vote to pull it on the agenda.
We did not, excuse me it takes two and so I just have to say that was not the case. And when people come up here and say the wrong thing, I think we need to point it out and as you know, I am probably, you know, I mean no one can say that I stick up for the mayor generally. So, and I think that this language is going to lead to nothing but confusion. We're gonna be debating whether or not something affects the local population. We're gonna be in semantic debates. It's gonna end up wasting our time.
I just see this...I see this as an outgrowth of one specific This is an instance of what happened here, and it's reactive in my mind. It is a reaction to what happened on one particular topic. And to govern via reaction is just bad governance. At this point in time, we do not need to be tightening what is possible for the public to say and what they feel comfortable coming up and asking their elected representatives to consider. And as Starchild said, we are always free to say no. And do we have the right to legislate for future legislators?
To say, no you cannot address this topic For all of those reasons, all of those seem wrong to me. And so I'm a hard no on this. And finally with my last time, I also sort of repeat Ms. Ross' complaints. This is a full-blown resolution that this council was unaware was being drafted, I didn't know, showed up You know, how much time did we put into having it drafted? What if it doesn't pass? When we look at our legal bills there's got to be a better process by which we come up with these kinds of processes. We have a full-blown resolution here.
Now, maybe I missed the memo but I didn't know this was coming. I didn't know it was going to be full-blown. I wasn't prepared for it. I know that things happen and they go up on the, you know, coming soon to your local council member document because I can't think of what the real name is. Working agenda, thank you. It's not being flippant. I just really couldn't find the name for it.
So in that way, I feel like I have been disempowered. I feel like I've not been part of this conversation. I feel like I've been disrespected and I feel like it's cost us money to do so. And for those reasons... I'm upset with this. Thank you, Ms. Rule. Yes, Miss Lane?
Well, I will follow up with Councilmember Rule. Only I tend to not be as emphatic as she is but I totally agree with her. I thought a lot about this ordinance and you know, I think that one of the points that was raised tonight is that we've gotten to a place right now politically, globally where local issues are national issues International issues and vice versa.
Everything affects us on some level, and more than anything if a—this was already said—but if a group of constituents comes to me and they express a concern I want to be able to at least bring that up as a potential agenda item I am not in favor of division or divisive agenda topics, but I think that if we do pass this ordinance then we are limiting future councils from being able to address things that might be very important for them. And yes they can always change the ordinance Do away with it, but it just makes a statement that I think is limiting to the potential of future council.
And then one other thing too I'm going to add to that and that is that I do think things could have been handled better differently in the past And if we wanted to add, as Renee mentioned, add to the protocols that we prioritize, I'd be happy with adding to the protocols that we prioritize. issues that affect our local community, but I'm not comfortable with an ordinance that limits us or limits future councils in terms of what they can bring before.
Thank
you. Yes? So I want to correct what happened Because what the mayor brought up at an earlier meeting, I don't remember what it was. But it was in our normal progress of new business and the mayor said, I'd like to propose an ordinance which limits our work to local issues. And I supported that verbally. Everybody got to hear that. This is a first reading of an ordinance, so there's gonna be a second reading. So there's going to be...
It's a resolution, sorry I jumped in there. It's only a resolution? It's presently drafted, yes. Council can revise it into an ordinance but it's presently drafted as a resolution.
2:51 – 2:5714 turns
This isn't the first time that this idea has been floated at City Council, that we limit ourselves to these issues. James Vega talked to me about that when I first came on City Council two years ago. It was something that he supported. The way that I understood what we were going to approach is that we're not gonna, you know, make decisions as a city council that are gonna go out into the universe and be gone. For us to address it, the concept behind this is that whatever it is that we're addressing, it's gotta be focused on somebody in our boundaries And so, I mean, Starchild mentioned the plight of MLK.
I would be happy to have someone come up to the podium and talk about somebody like MLK and I would be happy to support You know his release from prison, but I don't think it's the role of our City Council to communicate about a criminal justice system. There's decision makers who make those decisions and we're not one of them and that's what I'm trying... That's why I would support this is because I think we should confine our issues to those areas of jurisdiction that we've been given under our system of government.
Someone else mentioned immigration? I don't think that...I wouldn't want, I would not object to someone coming in and talking to us about immigration. But I would want our involvement to be to look at what can we as a city legally do to potentially assist, make the plight of somebody who's facing immigration issues. But if we have no legal ability to impact that then I don't think we should be addressing it and I don't necessarily want to talk about, you know, theoretical issues. But, you know, Matt would...
Can you see that there would be maybe little chunks of the law where we could impact? I mean, I guess we could give direction to our police department As to how we want them to, you know, policy statements about how to address Immigration issues. Would
that be... Yeah, the council can adopt a... It's often time-framed as a sanctuary city resolution and a number of cities have done them including ones with contract sheriffs although it's somewhat more common with in-house police departments but it can provide direction subject to various limits on not... In summary, it's not doing any voluntary cooperation with the federal immigration system. That kind of certainly could be adopted as a policy statement by the council at future meetings.
Hold on, guys. Hold on. I believe that Sheriff Fryhoff actually said something to that effect countywide already. I think that was in the Star Prepress.
So you know, I would fully support the City Council addressing that issue if it was brought forward If we have the ability to impact how the issue played out, but if we don't have the ability to impact the decision makers on that then I don't think we should be doing it. Can I ask
a clarifying question? Sure,
yeah. Are you speaking if this is happening in our city or are you speaking if we could affect something that was happening in a wider range than our city and or our sphere of interest. I'm confused about that,
didn't get
it.
When I was talking about the example of immigration, you know, I would not object to our discussing potentially giving some policy direction to our law enforcement about our policy that we wanted them to follow in terms of how they were going to enforce the law.
No, I got that part but you had a statement after that that I didn't understand but that's fine it's okay. You were speaking more generally about if we could affect The law then it might be worth doing. I'm sorry, it doesn't really matter. I was just I couldn't follow
work on what we can legally affect. I think is what he was trying to say. So in other words, that would be like a policy statement to our police,
a policy statement to our police. OK,
I think so. But but in contrast, we can't go to. INS or ICE and say, you know, please do this that I mean, That's a subject matter for public comment and input to our federal legislators, and it's not something that we have the ability to control.
I would love to hear from Ms. Mang.
2:58 – 3:1229 turns
I agree with what Rachel and Leslie, I'm just concerned too you know with my constituents if they had issues or whatever not being able to address them because that's why I'm here because of them so if it's something where we lost it you know and a goal is communication in all of that.
So maybe if I can reply it seems to me that the The issue that I'm thinking about, and I have been thinking about this for a long time and I watched you guys go through it is that there were many things in our city that I would argue were neglected in favor of things that were not directly related to things that were here. For example, how long it took to approve a commissioner ratification system. It took so long to fill the commissions. And I thought, in my opinion, a valid criticism was Too much effort was spent on things that were not directly affecting what I think became an issue for us. So, I do agree with one thing that I heard in the public comments which is if I look at Section 1, for example A, that's on page 3.2 or 3.4 rather, I would want to think about when it says boundaries of the City of Ojai I do think we do have a sphere of influence that is just beyond our borders and they do look to us.
I would also see in Section 2, when we're talking about the notion of what effect is, I think it's clearly here if the City does not have jurisdiction to regulate the issue and its application to city operations or city residents. That's, I think it's trying to use a very narrow word of effect because all of us could be affected by a national policy that is upsetting. But I have to think for me What I was watching was we were missing important things happening in our city because we were working on other things that, I would argue when the argument gets made well what if someone's in jail do we want to work on this resolution to get them out of jail which we can't get them out of jail. We can make a resolution to make a public statement but we're not getting them out of jail but what's happening in the meantime is we have a divided public arguing about whether or not to work Thank you all for joining us.
That's OK. But then what's the danger of having this? And as you pointed out, any council can move forward and do something different. And then just to say we make ordinances not for ourselves. We make ordinances for some perpetuity that could always be changed. So to say we're hamstringing somebody I think is false. But we're always making, the regulations we do make are always thinking of the future. But again I would just say, I want to focus on what we can literally do.
I mean it manifests into things so that's my thinking on that.
I have one thing. So, I've been thinking about examples like what would this encompass and let's take war or some kind of global conflict you know if that war comes to the U.S. and hits L.A., L. A is a target we are so close to L. having an ordinance or having some, even just a letter to our representatives from the city. We would have to talk about that in a meeting.
And so there are, I think that having this ordinance would limit us from addressing some of those concerns that could potentially impact our community in a very real way. Or if, let's say right now many of us are on agency boards, federal funding is getting cut for things like buses. People are losing their jobs. There are very real things that are happening on a national level that are impacting us, and we don't know how they're going to impact us yet because bus lines might get cut. I mean these are things that we're talking about in our agencies and they're real.
Bus lines might get cut. We might not have the funding that's been promised to us through grants for attending to some of these things Having the ability to at least write a letter or send the mayor and the city manager and the attorney to D.C. to do some lobbying or some speaking with representatives, I think that's going to be more and more important. And so I'm looking at this not just in terms of what happened in the past but what could potentially happen in the future.
Can I ask you about your example? Yeah. So if the state from the federal government said buses are going to be cut and Ventura County is going to be affected, and you wanted to bring it to the council. And then we think about as a council what can we do? We can increase our trolley line. We can do these different various things or we can also work with our county. To me that completely works here. If you say we should spend money sending our attorney and city manager Washington, D.C., I would say that seems like not something that's a good—my own opinion—a good use of our money.
And I would say back that cities like Thousand Oaks are sending members to D. C. or sending members to Sacramento. I serve on a policy committee. I'm going and talking to members of other communities who are actually doing some active lobbying, and I'm not saying that that's what I want us to do, and I'm not advocating for it. But if we have an issue like SpaceX, for example, which does affect us, And we want to do anything to partner with others in the community, other cities in the community. Then we are going to need to look at policies that involve a bigger picture than just our streets and our trees, because SpaceX is affecting our trees and our houses and our streets.
That's a good example though it seems to me that the SpaceS is a great example because we are feeling the sonic booms.
Can I make a
comment? I'll come right to you. Oh go ahead.
Well, I was going to use another example. The Santa Susana toxic site that is 20 miles as the crow flies from us but not directly affecting us yet I went and spoke in front of the Ventura County supervisors speaking to the fact for Mostly as support for the children that are, you know, the result of cancer et cetera. But a very good point was made was that we're 20 miles. We're one good gust of wind from that being us. Do I now have to come to the council and get permission to do that? To represent the city? Okay, that's a good question. How much time are we gonna spend on that?
Also, I was lobbied by a lot of people local, my constituents to please go down there and make that statement. It was in fact at the farmer's market where I was stopped and asked to go make that statement. You know so it's those kinds of things. I think it's very very clear that there are no boundaries and borders any longer.
If this said county would that make you feel better?
Not really, because I think it's a principal thing. And so I'm just trying to bring home the fact that right now it doesn't say that but...
If it did? Because in Santa Susana site if they're asking we want all the cities and the county to speak on this subject, that's a direct effect. But if you said we're very concerned about what's happening in West Africa right now would you bring something to the council and we're going to spend time deliberating about what's happening in West Africa want to offer, let's get everything done on our checklist first. That's what
I would say. You could argue that and it would be up to the council to decide if they wanted to follow that. It's really the lack of choice. You want to make a point? That, you know, we shouldn't be involving ourselves in that and I want to make a point that we are. And I want to have that conversation. I don't want not to have that conversation and I want the council who are the elected representatives representing their people 25% of Ojai Right? We are the voice, as we've talked about. It's a representative government.
I don't want someone to say to my constituents, sorry, the council decided that I can't actually bring that up for discussion. I really wish they could. I know you do but it... To me, I don'y know how we get... But okay thank you. I know you hear that and once again What affects people is deep, and it's broad, and it's important. And it isn't about roads and all of this infrastructure stuff. And I've said that so I'm going to let that go.
I hear that. My response would be I'm trying to represent what I heard too. Of course we're all trying to do that. But I would also say we're not simply, we're not taking polls every time we vote. We're also working with our conscience of course and our data and it seems to me if someone came to me and said, I want you guys to curtail NASA funding because I think we're spending too much on space exploration, Let me get through our Ojai checklist first, is what I would say. And that's okay, we have a differing opinion about that and that's totally fine.
But that's not what we're talking about here. That isn't what happened. No, that isn't the result. Okay. That isn't how this ordinance came about when someone came to you about North Africa. It was local people saying, I want this issue to be dealt with.
Now, I'm sorry, but what people came to me to say-
Well, you weren't on the council
at the time. Oh no, I hear you. I'm saying what I heard over this past year and a half was Please, please, please do. In fact this is one of the strongest things that came forward for me so I knew it was something that I was going to bring forward was please change this and if it doesn't happen that's okay. It's totally fine but maybe what I would do is I want to suggest we could just keep talking all night and we don't have to persuade each other but let's take a comment or two.
I just want to make a couple of comments because Listening to Rachel having a concern about bus lines in Ventura County, and even if OHI hasn't been targeted yet I would still believe that we'd have the ability to take up the cut in funding that would potentially supplies our bus lines. You know, so I would see that as an issue of impacting our community. And then you raised another example – I'm drawing a blank – what was it? SpaceX. I mean, SpaceX, we're feeling that. There's no question in my mind. In fact, you know, I support this resolution.
That we do, you know, we figure out what we can do in response to SpaceX and we absolutely object to what's going on. And then as to Councilmember Rule wanting to be able to go talk to the County Board of Supervisors about a toxic spill. So first of all there is nothing that prevents one of us From going to any meeting, anywhere even in East Africa. But you know if we're gonna announce that I'm a city council member and you don't have the authority of the rest of the City Council to speak then you have to say I'm speaking As an individual, and you can absolutely do that. And I've seen examples of that right here in our community where someone will say, I'm on this board but I'm speaking as an individual. But if you wanted the endorsement of the City Council for that speech or presentation, I got to believe that if there's some serious toxic thing happening within 20 miles of us, that we're all going to think well maybe we don't have any evidence that it's here in our community right now but how far away from is it and how long is it going to be before it gets here?
And you know we can discuss that.
But if we have a resolution that says that we can't, then we need to deal with that. And that is what this resolution says.
Well I'm
happy
to extend the boundary if that makes it easier but you said it's principal not really boundary?
It's principal and maybe it's more. Maybe I'm on the Southern California Council of Governments, maybe it's Southern California But my main principle is I was duly elected to represent my constituents who knock on my door and tell me their concerns, or willingness to do. So that's the main point, the other points are just they're logistical problems their definitional problems and they exist and they will come up for conversation so but that's the main point
I had somebody approach me and they asked me, could I help make Ojai an anti-sanctuary city? And I said, I'm not willing to do that. So I feel comfortable saying that's something I can support.
Yeah, but if I feel like I should support it, but I can't. Well, that's
different.
That is different. And that is what I'm speaking
about. But it's not only your constituents say it, right? You're also using your conscience.
3:13 – 3:2048 turns
I'm not sure the relevance of that. You're
not only representing your
constituents? No, it's a balancing act, yes, of course it is. If someone comes up to me and my constituents want me to be racist or whatever, yeah, I can say that doesn't fit with my values. There might be somebody else but I'm talking about constituents who come up to me... That you agree with? Not even that I agree with, that I don't actively disagree with. That I believe it should be part of the public square's conversation.
That's
really
what it's about. I totally hear you and I would just maybe one last thing and then I'm happy to stop. The public square conversation is This is not the only public square. So there's many places people talk about many, many things. So my interest is as we talk about the things that we can influence but you already said it but let's not... We're not going to convince each
other. Can I just say one thing though? This is the only official public square where it is on record and that's very, very important that people can search on it. Public squares in other places are unofficial and there's no record of it and that's the difference for me
Just
on the last comment, I mean we will continue to receive comments from the public and all this would potentially do is if that comment Is not on a topic that we have any jurisdiction legally, then we wouldn't take it further and make it a discussion amongst the five of us on that issue because we just don't have any legal ability to impact that
issue.
That's what I understood the intent of
it. Do you have anything you want to add before we
vote? No thanks for that clarification.
People can talk about whatever they want.
No, we won't talk
about it. That's the point. Mr. Whitman is saying we wouldn't take it up if we couldn't affect
it. There
would have to be a threshold decision about whether we have any legal ability to impact
it.
That is not what we talk about all the time, whether or not we have a legal ability to affect
it. I guess what I'm saying is that I feel like we're at the stage now where we're trying to persuade each other but I would suggest let's call for a vote.
I'm going to make a motion that we, to Council Member Lang's point and also to Ms. Ross' point, that we make this something that goes into a protocols document as opposed to ordinance.
What would be the meaningful difference there Mr. Summers?
The meaningful difference is between resolution and ordinance because the resolution is adoptable by three votes, amendable at will on any agenda. An ordinance can only be adopted but for urgency ordinances with two votes at two meetings and a second vote in a regular meeting.
But she was saying
protocol versus... Protocols document. The protocols is adopted by resolution right now, so legally they're the same thing. Okay. The difference operationally is that we tend to amend the protocols less often and in the past when we've amended the protocols it's often brought up several other issues. So but legally because of protocols as adopted by resolution there's no legal difference between this rezo or any other rezo and the protocols.
So you're saying that it is easier to discuss something that is a resolution versus something that is in the protocols. Is that what you're saying? That the protocols is actually a more stringent
I heard you say it's the same thing. No, legally they're the same. The Protocols is adopted by resolution. Operationally we've made it more difficult to amend it because the Council has tended not to want to amend the Protocols but legally they're the same thing.
Right so but operationally it's more difficult is what you're saying? Protocols are more difficult than a resolution.
Correct because the Protocols has been treated as for lack of a better word an elevated resolution but legally they're the same just adopted by resolution.
So let me ask you something if I've heard you say that, you know, protocols can be overridden by three members of the Council in real time. Right? We've said that. You know, we can vote on it here and now and we can override the protocols document. Can you do that with a resolution or does that require a second reading? Yeah,
a resolution can be adjusted at will as long as it's on the agenda.
And it doesn't take 30 days to go into effect?
No, that's an ordinance.
Okay, still 100% against it.
Well and I if I was going to make a motion actually you may not agree with this but I do think that some of the comments did give me a pause and I was thinking about this section one that directly impact the health safety and welfare of residents and visitors the boundaries of the city of Ojai I did think that Mr. Miley's comment, which is one that I also had thought about the community of Ojai, it seems so I'm looking at now Section 1B, the City Council shall direct its policies towards matters etc., etc. and other concerns that are the concerns And directly impact the Ojai community. I personally would like to extend that to our sphere of influence.
Um, I think that answers some of those technical difficulties that people would have that someone lives right outside the city limits and it's still going to affect them more or less the same way. Now, I'm proposing that as an amendment that the Ojia community
Well, I think that's what why it says Ojai Community instead of City of Ojai. But I'm all in favor of being more clear.
Yes, but if Section A said and the environment within the Ojai community in Section A, if we replace that then it's consistent
Oh, okay. So you're saying within strike boundaries of the city of Ojai and replace it with the Ojai community or the Ojai sphere of influence? Yeah
And then where did you say you could put Ventura County, so it just gives us a little more?
Well I was simply trying to respond to Ms. Rule's point but if it said for example I'm looking at Section 1A and the environment within the Ojai community or the county of Ventura, I would be totally fine with that personally
Well, I would think that's better. It's a little
bit better. I'm fine with that. OK, well then that's what I would suggest then if I could. Then I would say is if I look at Section 1A, if the language read at the end of that sentence and the environment within the Ojai community and County of Ventura And then we don't have to nitpick every single piece, but you guys could then take that and follow suit. Would that be acceptable? Mr. Summers? Yeah.
OK.
That's the principle. Then I would suggest that. Can I? Yeah, let's
hear it. Can I make just a question? Yes. That might be a friendly amendment.
Yeah.
If in section one this says Council President
3:21 – 3:2730 turns
That would build my consensus. Okay, that would build my consensus.
So where is that going in? Section 1A, tell me if I get it wrong. In its deliberations the City Council shall prioritize policies resolutions ordinances and actions policies that directly impact the health safety welfare of residents and visitors infrastructure economy in the environment within the boundaries of the Ojai community and County of Ventura. I realize it got bigger and it got like a tiny bit squishier, but I can live with that.
No, they could do that. I
had constituents in the past when somebody got their permits to have an outdoor function at Libby Bowl and it was drums banging for the Gaza or something like that.
Well, we don't decide what goes in.
So yes, that's a separate contract for management. Well,
not only that, but there's OK. That's a totally separate matter because the individuals have a right to freedom of speech and unless there is going to be an imminent threat to public safety, we in general try to allow those types of things because we're supposed to do that. Yeah. And I totally separate from this. So
so that would be a question of us excluding anyone. And then we don' do that. That would be excluding someone who wasn't
But my point, I'm sorry to jump in here is that that is not.
No, I
get it. That's completely separate and distinct from this. There's no there's no bleed on this whatsoever. Yeah,
got it. So Mr. Montgomery, do you have it as I stated it? Do you need me to say it again?
Mayor the motion is clear for Section 1A. I would ask you what you had some changes to Section 1B.
Well, so I'm asking the principles of Section 1A that would carry out throughout the document which Mr. Summers will
handle. And changes throughout, shifting City of Ojai to Ventura County and shall only consider it to shall prioritize. Is
that okay? Yes. Well I have made the motion but I need a second.
I'll second it.
Oh great! Okay ready?
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion but I need a second. I'll second it. Oh great! Okay ready? Roll call.
Show transcript
Motion passes.
Good enough. Good enough is good enough. Thanks, guys. No, it's good.
We've talked and worked. That was good. Cool.
Legislative compromise in action.
All
right.
These next two I think are going to be fast.
We would love it if these were very fast. Let's burn through four and five. Okay, great. The Public Works Director is here. There's going to be a very, very brief staff report. Wonderful. Very, very brief questions. Very, very brief public comment. Yay!
Good evening all. So I have two ordinances to introduce—two ordinances today, not a resolution. Both of them are very routine. The first one is the introduction of a new ordinance, the second one is a revision to an old but I'll start with the first one and this is a very common and routine ordinance that many agencies have. And it is a moratorium on roadway pavement cuts. So what this really is, I will break it down and put in an essence, It is a moratorium on our newly paved streets So what we are trying to do is preserve the condition that since we are investing so much money and so many resources in paving our roads, that we are trying to preserve the new condition of them as long as possible.
So what this means is that if it's an asphalt project meaning new asphalt, we have a five year moratorium on pavement cuts in the street. And if it's a slurry seal, which is a seal, we have a three year moratorium. There are exceptions to this and we will be allowing the exceptions. It is up to my discretion to approve cuts and clearly emergencies planned work.
In the ordinance, it specifies exactly what those exceptions are. We don't intend on stopping agencies from doing the work they need to do. It's really to discourage pavement cuts if you will and if we do allow the exceptions Thank you very much. in infrastructure that this is something that needs to happen. Most agencies have it, we will keep a list up on our website of the streets and the year of the moratorium and they will come to us for an exception or come to us for an encroachment permit still In addition, we have implemented quarterly utility meetings with all of our local agencies including Southern California Edison. So Sanitary District, Water District, Ventura River and Casitas and everybody else who is excavating into our roadways.
So we are going to roll this out to them, and it's important that we get an ordinance like this adopted. We've got another paving project that is underway right now. We've got another one just back-to-back after that. So we've got the ATP project, we've got our paving project we've done last year. So, we don't have this ordinance on the books which surprised me when I came here because it's very usual, it's very common.
So, that's about as brief as I can be. That's
great. Let's do four and five separately. Oh of course! Yes, oh
naturally yes.
And any questions for Ms. Ballmer? Yeah.
So are we emulating some other jurisdictions so we're not like creating new grounds somebody else has done it
3:27 – 3:3330 turns
Every agency I've worked for has had a pavement moratorium. This city was unique. Ironically, we have kept a list of streets that have been recently paved and posted them on our website and told these utility companies that we had a moratorium but we don't so we need this to enforce it. So
there
it is.
And I'll add that this is drafted from a number of other jurisdictions. It's standard language. Very common. Anything
else? You know, I'm curious about the waiver program. But I kind of read into it that it's a... So we'll give somebody a waiver from the moratorium if they meet some criteria which is basically looks like they didn't You know, the fact that they didn't already do their curb cut is you know if it's their fault then they're not going to get a waiver. But if
So part of this is, no. It's basically, I mean if you go to page four of the ordinance it's very, very clear and it's endanger life property public health and safety interruption. If Casitas has a water main break that breaks we're going to allow them to go in and fix it. The other thing that we may see is we may see a catch up because what is happening, what has happened is a lot of the agencies, I know Casitas and I know Ojai Valley Sanitary District They, like us, put together their CIP which is a multi-year document. So we want to get this approved so they can start planning around these streets. We are coordinating these streets with them so if they have any infrastructure improvements, they can plan around our moratorium.
Let me let me jump in here. So the other thing that we're doing, which is going to it's a best practice everywhere else and Miss Palmer and I have talked about this. We didn't have this on the books, which is crazy with the other thing we're doing now is quarterly utility meetings so that we talk to everybody about their projects. And so we can all jump in the same trench together. However, I will tell you invariably what happens. You pave a street And there is a water break, or somebody has a service disruption where they increasingly utilities are underground and we have to dig them up. So it doesn't stop things entirely. It's going to still happen just makes it so it happens less
often. It makes it also a little bit more intentional for the agencies really. We put these streets out there. We have a map out there. These are the streets that we are paving and there will be a moratorium and they can plan their improvements accordingly.
It also allows us to push back on the utilities on the necessity for them to do the work. We really get to press them on like, okay, can you really... Do you have to do this right now? Can this wait? Et cetera, et cetera.
So if you're in that five-year period and there is a break so they've got to do the trench, that provision you mentioned where they've gotta pay from the center line so that we've gotta
Yes.
Cohesive pavement as that goes into effect?
Yes, we have our standard plates, standard requirements for trenching on streets that aren't under moratorium and then we've got this expanded requirement if they are trenching in streets that are under moratorium. Larger trenching smoother you know to the center line etc. Great.
Ms. Palmer, I just want you to know I have the road paving map on my phone so when people ask me when is this happening, I show them the map! Okay? All
right. I just printed that, laminated it and all of our Public Works crew has it now in their trucks. So it's all good.
Mr. Montgomery, I have no cards but is there anybody online?
Only two, so let's extend this we are taking public comment Zoom participants on item four I don't expect any raised hands, Mayor. And we'll move on.
Thank you. Any more discussion?
I'll make a motion. Please! I'd like to make a motion that we approve the proposed moratorium on roadway pavement cuts.
Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 motion that we approve the proposed moratorium on roadway pavement cuts. I second that. Roll call please. Roll call. · 1 under review
Show transcript
All right, maybe I can be more brief on this one. You were great. You are awesome. So so the second ordinance is an amendment to our an ordinance that the city council adopted in 2014. And this is this refers to the limits of the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act and what this means to us in public works and citywide Is we can contract without going out to bid under a certain threshold, 75,000. So the state controller's office has the opportunity every five years to increase these monetary limits. That's all this is, is they are increasing the limits. They have increased the limits as of January of this year so we are amending our code to stay in line with what the state allows us to do. That's what this is in a nutshell.
That seemed clear to me.
Okay,
any questions? Any public comment Mr. Montgomery
and just so we will not be coming back to council in five years when this increases because we have embedded that language in this ordinance to automatically do it
did you have any questions okay no mayor no raised hands wonderful
I'll make a motion
I'll
second okay
that we approve
yes that we approved the ordinance
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion I'll second okay that we approve yes that we approved the ordinance As proposed. Wonderful, okay. Roll call.
Show transcript
3:34 – 3:348 turns
Thank you Ms. Palmer. Second reading two weeks or first meeting in March effective 30 days after
I just have one quick question on number four that we just approved. Matt, I don't know if you're prepared by Tim? He's one of my
associates who specializes in public works issues. Okay perfect. So he wrote this draft for this city and a half dozen others.
Okay perfect thank you. Yeah second meeting
is to be on
consent. Thank
you
very much Any council member reports? I know just quick, quick man. Quick! Any council member report? Yes? No? City manager's report? None. And we are future agenda items we I'm assuming we will postpone there'll be tactics We're gonna come back and they'll be part of our strategy unless somebody wants to bring up something okay Then the meeting is adjourned
