Ojai City Council Regular Meeting

BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 March 25, 2025

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:002 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:04

Welcome here, everyone. OK, now this is going to be good. All right. Welcome to the regular Tuesday, March 25th meeting of the Ojai City Council. Roll call please. Mr.

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 38
Show transcript
Montgomery? Yes, Mayor. Mayor Gilman? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Lange? Here. Council Member Whitman? Here. Council Member Mang? Here and participating remotely council member Rule? Here
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.740:30

We heard you. Thank you.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:32

Mr. Montgomery, would you please lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.740:35

Absolutely Mayor. Welcome community! Please rise as you are able. Ready, begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed0:43

the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:57

Thank you.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:59

May I have an approval of the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:02

I'll move to approve the agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:05

All those in favor? Aye. Ms. Mang? Aye. Okay, and now presentation first. Outgoing Police Chief Trina Newman to be honored for her term of service and promotion to Commander of West County Patrol. You'll have to read this because I can't read that. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:37

Okay, it says Trina Newman, Ojai Chief of Police 2023-2025, in appreciation of unwavering service and dedication to the City of Ojai and its residents. Oh

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48

thank you so much. Wow we're so sad to lose you and everybody's so happy to get you in our county. What do we need to do? Pictures? What's happening

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.741:56

here? Well next we'll have our County Representative Sheriff Fryhoff would like to say a few words. Come on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:00

Rachel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:04

Well good evening Mayor, Council Members both present and remote. Obviously Trina continues a very good tradition that we have here in having the best of the best come serve the Ojai Valley. It's no mistake that she's now been promoted to Commander and she's going to take on a whole lot more responsibility in doing so. I know when I came up and visited her a couple months ago and I let her know that this was going to be happening and she had such a big smile on her face before I told her that she was getting promoted because it's such a wonderful place to work And I think in your career, certainly for me when I look back on my 35 years the three years that I spent in Ojai were just wonderful. The community here is nothing like anywhere else on the planet super engaged a lot of fun to work and it's the most beautiful city in the county.

It really is stunning. I loved being up here and I live on the east end of Simi so for me was an hour-and-a-half drive each way every day to commute here but I did it because I love it here And so I've now selected a couple people to interview for your chief job which your city manager has selected, which i will introduce here shortly. But a long line of people getting promoted obviously. I was the chief here in 2017-2020.

Jose Rivera was your chief from 2020-2023 when I promoted him to assistant sheriff and then now Trina's been promoted to commander and I want to thank her for all her efforts here in the Ojai community, what she has done here for you all. There were some pretty interesting times that were occurring here during a lot of protests and I think she handled it with such grace and professionalism that just made me very proud, certainly the Sheriff's Office very proud and was really excited to promote her to have this take on a little more responsibility, a lot more responsibility in this next role as a commander so thank you all very much and congratulations Trina.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:57

I might recommend we have a bunch of people in khaki and green here, and it would be really cool if we could get a big giant group shot.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:14

Tim, tell us how you used to be.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed4:45

I don't know.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed5:18

All right, now let's have Steve jump up front.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:46

All right, Mr. Chief is going to take a picture. Welcome! Thank you. And I'll say

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed6:01

a few words about him when you're ready. What's that? I'll say a few words about him.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.746:07

Right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed6:07

now. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed6:09

Please show us. Come on up here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed6:21

Well, good evening once again and it's my honor and privilege to introduce you to your new police chief, Steve Jenkins. You know one of the things we talk about with contract cities, Ojai being one of our five contracts that we have with the Sheriff's Office is the caliber of employee that you get in the level of experience that they bring when they come to Ojai. Should you have your own police department, they're very limited on the experience that they can build in a city that doesn't have all the resources the Sheriff's Office does so you get really the benefit of somebody with 20 Twenty-five years of experience. His last couple of assignments he was overseeing our Court Services Bureau, so catering to 40 something elected officials, all the judges there, all the staff there, a hundred plus employees.

A much larger operation as far as staffing level goes and not without its own issues. You like to call it what was it? The House of Conflict. So the House of Conflict As it is known, is where he's been for the last couple years as well. And so prior to that he was the investigative captain in Thousand Oaks running the entire investigations bureau and then he was watch commander before that and he's got a fairly lengthy resume that I'm sure he's happy to discuss at any time with all of you about what he's been able to accomplish in his 25 years with the organization.

I'm really proud for Steve to be your chief. He knows what this city means to me, he knows it's a very special place. I was a deputy here in the early 90s, came back as your chief in 2017 and I just love the Ojai Valley and I wouldn't give you anybody other than people that I really have the utmost admiration for to come and serve this community because I expect a lot out of them. I expect a lot about all my employees but a lot more out of those that are in Ojai.

Steve would you like to say a few words?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed8:05

First off, did everyone catch that? I have big shoes to fill. Sheriff, assistant sheriff and now commander but so I do want to say I'm so honored seriously Ojai is near and dear to my heart and I'll explain that at another meeting when I do a longer introduction but Just know that I know the values of Ojai. I'm going to build those relationships with the public. People are the most important part of our whole system, right? And so I'm a public servant. So to the community and I'm here to serve you, support you, protect you and all that.

But I do want to lastly say thank you to the Sheriff Thank you, City Manager. Great opportunity but also my lovely wife Marnie Jenkins is here I just want to thank her for being such a support without her I wouldn't be even close to where I'm at so that's it thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed9:02

Thank You Chief And we have one more presentation to Chief Parker, correct?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.749:11

Yes. We'll switch gears in our presentation now. We'll invite the mayor back up and we're lucky to have two chiefs outgoing. We will switch gears from Sheriff's Office to Fire Department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed9:27

To Barry Parker, Ventura County Fire Department Division Chief for the City of Ojai 2022-2025 in appreciation of unwavering service and dedication to the City of Ojai and its residents. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed9:50

Mayor, Council, community members, Dustin Gardner, your County Fire Chief. I just wanted to say thank you for acknowledging Barry and his service up here. Like the Sheriff said we only send our best and our brightest and our aspiring officers to cities like, you know, Ojai, Camarillo, Thousand Oaks, cities that they need somebody that engages with the community, somebody that understands the community and somebody that represents the City of Ojai like their city fire department and that's what Barry did.

I'm proud of him. I'm proud to announce that he's leaving here and we've promoted him to our executive staff as an assistant fire chief in charge of all of our support services, so our annex, our fleet, our IT, everything that surrounds all of our fire stations Barry now has. So we watched him up here and how he did with the City of Ojai, how he did with all of you and the leadership skills you helped him build, so Ojai thank you. The community members of Ojiai thank you.

It's been an honor to see this and have you recognize him I wish Nick could be here. I know he introduced himself, you said a couple meetings ago and just like Barry, Nick will fill big shoes. He's in the National Incident Command Team meeting right now so if you didn't know that, like Barry and Nick they're both on Type 1

0:10 – 0:177 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed10:59

Incident Management Teams, so the biggest disasters in the nation They're part of a small group of elite leaders that go and take care of those disasters. And we're lucky because we keep supporting them and bringing them up so that when we have disasters in Ventura County, which you all know we're no strangers to, we get to draw off all of their experience from going all around the nation. So Nick is out with his federal team right now, which as I'm sure you all know there's a lot of turmoil in the federal world right now, so as far as those are going, We're glad to have Nick there in his leadership and be up here with all of you, so thank you. Thank you for the acknowledgement.

I'm excited for Barry. I am glad to be stealing him from you and bringing him into our executive staff. Yeah, thrilled with the future. So thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed11:56

We're a little smaller

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed11:58

numbers in the sheriff's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed11:59

department. Sorry about that. Good-looking group is small.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed12:29

We'll have to photoshop

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed12:34

Leslie. Thank you. Do we have any Commission reports? No word. Okay, we'll go to Public Communications. I have a few cards here so far. These are for items not on the agenda for tonight. So let me start with Hope and then Bo Redd and then Dr. Tim Williamson. Hope. Thank you Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed14:07

Happy spring. Yes. I've lived in Ojai for like almost 12 years now and I'm about to leave, go off to the Midwest and go explore eco activism. And here's a prayer for Ojai because it needs it. So much grass, passing gas onward. Ritual at every breath. A lonesome sea of beauty pleading to death of another man's hypocrisy. Old rain borrowed by pain. Kim trails in the way.

Insane chimes of earthly rage turn the page. Replug the seeds of well-being. You can't eat money. You can't eat money. Learn from your nightmares, time cries at every door. I am a spore. Clothe me in a brighter sun, tell no one we are all one. Within our hearts and our dreams are trees living in an animate fever dream. Sorry this is hard. Save Pine Mountain please.

Cavities crave as a bird lays another egg driven in a human-made plague. Composting, I would like to promote composting in the Ojai Valley. I think that all the local restaurants should start saving up their food and giving them to local farmers because a lot of farmers need that food for their livestock, and it's all really good food. It's going to waste. It's producing methane emissions, which we know about.

As a city of peace, I think diving into our food waste is something to look into, as well as a space for artists to create together and be inspired. Does capitalism control climate change? We as people need to acknowledge environmental degradation, as well as economic inequality. Preserving our biosphere is the least concern amongst the explosive greed consumers weaving all human power against each other.

The living world is a natural domain of the most restless and paradoxical part of the human spirit. Biological Edie Wilson said, hence nature's incomprehensible. Note removing ourselves from 50% of the planet would save 85% of all earth species. Gaia is resilient but not infinitely so. Today's humanity being held by a strand of knowledge rooting towards animating ourselves at any given moment through nuclear chemical warfare and a genocide being...

Being broadcasted across our screens. If you've been living under a silicone rock, under a bridge and have not had the opportunity to observe human behavior look no further. The world

0:17 – 0:2614 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:14

Thank you, Hope. Thank you. Let's not clap though I know there's really great words coming. Bo Reed, Dr. Tim Williamson and then Matai Blacklock. Bo Red, thank you. Oh sorry I put an extra E in there my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed17:35

mistake. Well you know I've never addressed y'all so I thought I might. Jared Bo Red Bergman I wish I came a little more prepared, but next time. And I just wanted to come see what it's all about and how we throw down here. So a couple points I want to make. Not here to complain about anything. You know living is a hard thing to do. But what we need the most right now is community. There's no doubt about that. There's no doubt about the more localized it can be, the better it will be.

That is really hard to make a living as an artist out here and it's, as a blue collar worker as well. And you know I think there should be a lot more support for those things being in artistic communities. I was raised here my whole life and you know it was always hippies and rednecks and something in between. With all the money that's coming into Ojai, I don't see why it's not lifting us up as well instead of just pushing us out. Because we're all leaving and there's not a lot of places to go. There is, but we've got to go and that's unfortunate for some of the roots here who have held it down for a really long time in a lot of families.

Yeah, I'm here to throw down for my community as often as I can and I do as much as I can for the arts and supporting my friends who are artists and I spend my money locally. And yeah, I know that our homelessness is where we see it and I definitely am in favor of building cub homes for the homeless and that sustainable building. Also a community garden would be I think we could feed the people pretty easily, actually. Because I have a lot of friends who are farmers who are really down to sow seeds and tend to land.

And all that's needed is really the space to do that and the permission to do so. And I know so many plots of land in Ojai, whether it's right across from the park there when you're walking on the walkway or down across next to the Shell gas station or Miner's Oaks, the car wash. There's plenty of places to do something like that and to build little sustainable homes.

And I know the worries in it, what it could become, but I think you've got to start somewhere. Also food waste for sure. That stuff is insane and I know a lot of places like North Carolina that have places where you can buy food that's expired because it's not bad. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:36

I know, it's very exciting guys. Yes please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed20:39

If I could add one thing about the food waste so there was a Harrison sent an update just this week actually that they've been working toward We're working on it. Dr. Tim Williamson, Mattai Blacklock and then Dr. Sudip Rao.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed21:24

Hello

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:25

sir.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed21:26

Hello, I'm Dr. Tim Williamson. I'm here with my wife Marianne Williamson, family nurse practitioner. We've provided medical service in this community for almost 45 years. We were one of the first families to build in Persimmon Hill and have lived there for over 40 years. My talk is really more of a question than a talk. In all of Ventura County, Santa Barbara County, the building of a cabin community which I agree with Has it been in any of these locations near single-family

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:10

residences?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed22:10

I just want to caution you, that'll be our

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:11

item number two. Would you like to talk to that item in a moment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed22:15

Oh yes! I didn't realize that was the one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:16

That's what it is but I'll put you here and you'll kick it off. No thank you thanks for being flexible. Nope see you in a second Dr. Sudip Rao and then Renee Roth and then Liz Otterbein oh wait I forgot Mattai Blacklock sorry Mattai I believe it is. It is happening on the back side. Mayor, I believe he's holding our special meeting agenda. There are two agendas.

The special meeting is one in your hand probably. The next one is the one? You're for number two. Okay. Liz, okay gotcha and then now Sudip. All right.

CommentDrProposedself-stated23:01

Thank you Mayor Andy, Council Members Andrew Whitman, Council Member Kim Mang, Council Member Rachel Lang and also Council Member Leslie Rule. My name is Dr. Sudeep Modipalli Rao. I'm not a doctor of medicine. I am a doctor of engineering. I want to bring attention to both our city elected representatives as well as the city at large to wildfire Thank you all for joining us today.

Supervisor Matt LeVere initiated March 13th. That, of course, many of you are aware that Ojai is going to see a 64 percent increase in insurance costs. Sixty-four percent, I don't know if it's being covered very well and it's not been covered in the last two issues of the Ojai Valley News that came out after that meeting. Billions of dollars have been given out.

And the insurance companies are asking the Insurance Commissioner, Mr. Ricardo Lara, to approve even beyond the 20 percent that's been approved to go to 30 percent, et cetera. So and the justification is that their models are showing—by the way I'm not antagonistic about it. I just think there's a way to design good homes the way the homes that have survived So, we can learn a lot. Of course there's a lot of lessons we've already learned about home hardening but there are homes that are staying there standing so let's build houses that won't burn down. We do that for earthquake safety retrofitting. We should be able to build houses that don't burn like matchsticks and so those houses should have a very low risk profile and the models for insurance companies should reflect that and then offer credits so insurance costs should actually go down If the houses are built in a smart way.

So I'd like to request the city to help create a forum for us to discuss about it, maybe put an agenda, maybe invite the public to actually come in and participate. Are you okay with a 64% increase in your insurance costs? Yes we have a unique geography but I think it's worthwhile to at least talk about it As a society, do we just want to go by the risk models of one insurance company industry or can we do better? And so thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:52

I can respond to you to say on December 8th, the Fire Safe Council had a community workshop at the Ojai Retreat. That 64% number comes from that. That's the increase that has occurred in Ojai. Not that it's going to occur but has occurred. But there are two more panels in the works there so stay tuned. We're all wanting to learn more but maybe the city will do something as well. Thank you very much.

Renee Roth and then Starchild.

0:26 – 0:338 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed26:24

Good evening, everybody. That was a perfect introduction for what I would like to talk about. Good evening staff, council and the community. That was a perfect introduction for what I was going to talk about because as you know, I have talked a lot about fire safety and fire preparedness I understand that the new map that CAL FIRE has just put out has determined those areas within Ojai that are in the high and the very high fire hazard area of Ojai.

And I think that we've been down this road before with the Building Appeals Board, and it was shifted over to the Building Appeals Board to try to determine what the best boundaries are. Blah blah blah. Let's not go there. Let' s not do that. Why don't we just adopt what Ventura County Fire has determined to be our very high and high fire hazard area map? And let's start doing something about it.

I personally did register to have a home hardening assessment done on my house, and I live in a condo, and I live with other people in my village And I was shocked, I was really shocked about the vegetation. And I thought I knew a little bit about plants. I thought I knew what would grow in my area and what the right ones to put up against the wall and blah blah. I was totally shocked by what they said and what needed to be removed and what needed to be trimmed back There are ladders, fire ladders.

There are vegetation that can get underneath the eaves that needed to be trimmed back. There were trees that needed to be trimmed back five feet. I had no idea. And so I just want, I want everybody to really have that wake-up call. You know we got a little bit of rain that was really nice that you know what we have two inches of rain maybe this last cycle but i still think there's a lot of work to do and I really hope you take this new fire hazard map seriously grab it by storm. I know that was one of your priorities And I know Mr. Harvey is on it, and he's ready to present what your next level of activities or tasks or whatever you call them are underneath it. So anyway, I really appreciate you taking this on because I think it's so important and I have learned a lot.

And I don't—I know we have the Fire Safe Council. I do not think we should contract for the Fire Safe Council. I think we need to bring staff in to understand and develop programs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed29:26

Thanks, Ms. Roth. Starchild?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed29:34

Good evening. Today I want to talk about a subject that's been neglected for far too long, the casualty of the distractions that have consumed our city government. I refer to the community assistance program, the rental assistance program If you read just one page of the nearly thousand pages in your packet tonight, make it page 21 of the written public comments where I posted excerpts from the 2021 Ojai City Housing Element.

In these excerpts, the city promises to support financially the rental assistance program through the help of Ojai It tasks the office of the City Manager to see that this promise is fulfilled. It says that this will happen annually. It's a promise made and a promise broken because since at least 2021, the city has not paid a penny to help Alohai in support of the rental assistance program.

Preventing homelessness is a goal the city must see to fruition How many in the tent town would be housed if they had the funds in their hour of need to prevent them from losing their housing? It's time for this city to do more of the things it's promised to do. Millions for legal fees, but not a penny for the rental assistance program. There is no question that funds were authorized It says it in the housing element.

There's no question to whom they should be paid, it's the help of Ojai. There is no question who is responsible, it's the city manager. The only question I ask for the city manager tonight is WTF? Where's the funds?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed31:39

Thanks Starchild. Mr. Montgomery anything online?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7431:43

Thank you, Mayor. We'll switch over to our Zoom participants who are attending. Mayor, Council Member Rule is speaking now. Oh yes!

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8431:51

Yes sorry about that I'm not sure what the best way is to check in other than raise my hand and say hello so if anyone can offer any guidance to that I'm happy. I just wanted to say that The rental assistance to Help of Ojai comes up about twice a year, and we have not yet been able to implement it. So I'm hoping that we can either Take it out or preferably go ahead and support it. Like I said, this has come up probably four times in my tenure about how we don't actually do what we say we're gonna do on our housing element and I can talk about that on the warrants because we have an update on the housing element but I just wanted to chime in that maybe we should take this a little bit more seriously

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:52

Thank you, Ms. Rule.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7432:54

Mayor, we currently have no raised hands from our Zoom participants but I'd like to speak to our Zoom participants for a remote option. Now is the time to speak on general public comment if you'd like to raise your hand and use the raise hand function. We'll just give you one more minute before, one more moment before we move on.

0:33 – 0:3934 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:12

And let's move on. Thank you very much. We'll move onto the consent calendar. Are there any items that any council members would like to remove out of the consent calendar?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed33:21

Yes, I would like to pull item H.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:30

Very good. Anything

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8433:31

else? I would like to pull item B and also I'm going to pull item G which is review of the housing element.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:53

Shall we start with D? Or should we start with the motion to approve the ones that are, okay. So do I have a motion to accept A, B, C, E, F and I? Sorry Mayor, not B. Not B. Councilor Rule is pulling B and G. Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't hear the B.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed34:11

No problem.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:12

My mistake.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed34:13

So I'll move to approve A,C,D,E,F and I.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed34:24

Thank you. And Mayor, with Council Member Rule remote under the Brown Act will require roll call votes for all votes. Great.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8434:34

Very good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:35

And just did you say you're pulling D or was it B?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8434:39

It was B as in boy

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:40

and not D at all. D is fine. OK, thank you very much. Great. Mr. Montgomery, roll call please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Yes, Mayor. Council Member Rule. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Councilmember Mang? Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lange? Yes
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7434:59

Motion passed. Wonderful

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:01

and let's start with B, Ms. Rule

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8435:04

Yes, so in looking at the warrants I noticed that there is nothing for legal bills from either Myers-Knave or from Matt's firm. For...I think we're still looking at December, January and February for Myers-Knave that haven't been submitted and for Matt's firm January, February and March And in the previous three months, October, November and December they were all paid within a month. So given that our budget is looking for legal fees over $1 million right now I'm hoping that we can stay a little bit more current so we can understand really where we are with the fees. I don't know why there's a delay in them showing up But I think we should make an effort to make them as current and as possible so that we can track what our actual costs are.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:08

Let's move on then to item G, the housing element Ms. Rule?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed36:12

Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:13

Mayor it may be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed36:13

wise to approve each of these polled items.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:15

Okay thank you all right so let's start with B. Mr. Montgomery

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7436:20

I had a I'd like to hear motion and a second please. Oh yes. I move to approve

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:26

Item B.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7436:28

Second. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:29

You.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move to approve Item B. Second. Thank You. Roll Call
Show transcript
Roll Call Mayor Pro Tem Lang. Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Mang? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes, Mayor Gilman? Yes
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7436:40

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:43

and then Ms. Rule moving on to G

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8436:45

Yes, so once again I think review of the city's housing element is fascinating and I want to thank Lucas for putting this forward. I just wanted to mention that you know it may not just be a consent item or perhaps it goes into our goals but certainly fitting into this review would be the comments by Starchild about rental assistance that has been in our housing element So, if we were doing a review we could actually say here that we have provided no rental assistance even though we have said so in our housing element. And I just wanted to sort of make that connection with this progress report, which by the way I love. I love to read these numbers so thank you very much but that's all.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed37:39

Mr. Rule if i might point out in the goal setting that we're having under the affordable housing piece one of the tactics there is annual financial contribution to help with Ojai rental assistance etc. We took help of Ojai out but the items there so yes we're publicly saying we're curious and going to work on it

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8437:57

Yeah, I understand that. I was yeah, I voted for that for sure. I just wanted to make sure that we do indeed and that we are consistent really with our housing element and reviewing our housing element. That's all but thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed38:12

No great

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8838:13

okay. I have a yes quick question on that item so for Lucas I I'm not familiar with the format of this report, but I assume that it complies with what HCD requires that we do on an annual report basis?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed38:32

Yes.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role38:34

So the interesting thing about this report is it bases itself on this spreadsheet. I do not get to go in and change the formatting of that spreadsheet, it is set in stone by HCD, Housing and Community Development Department. So what I get to do is plug in those numbers for the entire year. And what it really boils down to is those projects that have come in for review, those that have gone through plan check, and those that have gotten certificates of occupancy. And those are the different buckets that we get to plug into. And then also, in addition to that, we provide updates to our different programs. One of the 19 programs that we've got going on with our housing element for the sixth cycle.

0:39 – 0:5127 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed39:19

I have one question in regards to what's considered very low, low the different types of housing. Is it possible to put what the percentage is with a dollar amount so down the road if we're looking we can go back and say oh in 2025 it was this?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role39:37

I could. The only concern there is from year to year, that's a sliding scale. It just depends on what the average cost is per house. That then tends to be the sliding scale because it's based on a percentage of that market rate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed39:55

Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role40:11

It's easy enough to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:13

Thank you, thank you. That's a good question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed40:14

Yes? Actually I'm glad that Councilmember Rule pulled this because I just wanted to point out how many low-income very very low moderate we have a lot of truly affordable houses On this list, housing projects on this list, 31 very low income deed restricted. One low income deed restricted, 26 moderate income deed restricted and only one above moderate income housing project.

I think that says a lot about our priorities and our values in this community, and I'm really happy to see this much being moved forward to help the people who need it the most.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:05

Thank you, Ms. Lang. Mr. Seibert, I have a technical question. When does a structure or building—when does it get counted in the re-entitled numbers? Is it when it's been permitted and approved or when it's moved in or what's—when does that get counted? When it's been finaled. That's when we get

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role41:21

to truly count it. Okay. So, the foreshadowing here is this body has—this council has approved several projects from an approval standpoint. Now we're working into the plan check phases once permits are issued then we work towards the final. Once final comes forward then we get to count them but it's interesting because you end up seeing them kind of progress from phase to phase and HCD is watching, so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:51

Just for clarification, final does not mean move-in ready or does that? That means move in ready. Okay, thank you. Perfect. Sorry I'm using

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role41:58

some of the technical

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed41:58

pieces. No no no! That's why I keep asking you technical questions. Thank you very much sir. Any other comments? I have two public comments here. Bill Miley and then Starchild on item G. Mr. Miley? Do you still want to do it? Starchild, go first. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed42:26

I wish that the housing in this report existed instead of just being planned. One thing I notice is that ADUs even if they're rented for high prices can count towards arena numbers even if they're not affordable One thing I noticed is that ADU that's already rented but unpermitted, when it becomes permitted counts towards our RHNA numbers even though it's not new housing.

We could meet our RHNA numbers in this city without building new housing and we have to remember that RHNA numbers Don't capture the need for affordable housing in Ojai, that we've not met the need for affordable housing in Ojai and that we have to go beyond the RENA numbers to do so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed43:24

Thank you, Starchild.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed43:25

Mr. Miley?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed43:38

Hello. That's my standard reading. So, the annual housing element report to the state. As I read it, no low-income housing. I noticed that almost all of the building permits were for accessory dwelling units and I understand that the State Housing Law allows these to be counted for the regional housing number assessment. However, looking at the fair housing chart Showing income level rentals, 99% are rentals. There is no information available to show what rents they're charging.

And I know the state says you don't have to do that. Thus it can be assumed all are moderate income or above. And so I conclude there's not much help for lower-income folks

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed44:42

Thank you, Mr. Miley. Okay anything else on G? I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8444:47

have just a brief comment. Refresh my memory Lucas, aren't ADUs considered moderate income housing just for Forma?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role44:58

Across the board yes

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8444:59

across the board. Okay, and just to point out that the Cabin Village accounts for 30 of the 31 very low income deed restricted housing. Just you know, to the point that, you know, to Starchild's point that it's not It's not actual housing, but so to read these is and I know that the housing element is really about projecting. That's why it's you know six to eight years every housing element, but I did just want to point that out.

Interesting.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role45:39

Anything to respond? Andrew Whitman So yeah, I mean each so there's a reason. I think there's a reason why the annual progress report is literally an annual progress report because it's kind of a tool that's used to kind of gauge where the city is going and it's one of the reasons why, I mean, I know there's a lot of discussion regarding ADUs accessory dwelling units And it's one of the reasons why we already, when we projected this looking at the sixth cycle before we brought to City Council for authorization to submit to the state in 2021 into 2020.

We made the argument early on that, look, our ADUs are going to cover this 53 benchmark easily. And they said not good enough. You've got to do more than that. I understand that you're going to meet that and exceed it, but the ADUs are just one piece to the puzzle. And even the existing non-conforming that end up going through the compliance program ended up getting counted. They exist absolutely. They exist bringing them online to ensure that they are safe In terms of being habitated, that's the important piece for the compliance program. So I just wanted to note a couple of those pieces and you're right in terms of looking at the data from one year to the next, you're going to see some heavy numbers on one end versus the other. It's kind of a sliding scale.

You're not going to have projects all come in at the same time although that would be kind of interesting if that happened. But we tend to see a filtering of projects, even the projects that we have going on right now through the design review phase into the plan check and building permit phase. We're aware of projects that are moving into those phases and either being ready to be constructed or getting themselves into position for that. So it's just... The market in some cases tends to drive that trend.

Thank you, Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed47:34

Stiebert. What doesn't show up on that chart is the already entitled but not yet built Cabrillo and Becker projects, which together add up to 50-something very low in another 30 or 40 low income units. So those will be coming through. They're not yet at Certificate of Occupancy stage, but those will be coming through as well. And

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role48:10

if I could just add to what Mr. Summers was saying, even those projects, we're keeping a close eye on those and we're getting constant updates. Some of those require federal funds, state funds in order for them to move forward and some of them don't. Some of these projects that are moving forward are being funded internally and they're not looking for any sort of grant funding or support.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8848:36

Yeah, just a quick comment and Lucas and Matt can correct me if I'm wrong but a lot of what we experience and have to comply with in terms of state housing law never examined Ojai. It's designed on a statewide one-size-fits-all And ADUs have been given special treatment because the legislature decided that they could remove regulations for the construction of ADUs if they declared that those are affordable.

Period, end of story, we don't get to debate. Because the legislature told us that. That's often what we're dealing with when we're addressing state housing rules and where they get to call something affordable, the developer gets all kinds of benefits because it's quote-unquote affordable but it really may not provide benefit to our community based upon our community needs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:44

Thank You Mr. Whitman. Ms. Rule did you have your hand up?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8449:49

Yeah, I did. I just wanted to and a kind of you know, I wanted to say once again to Lucas thank you very much for all of this information and You know when you look at the tables, you know it's proposed there are it tells you what it is proposed units affordability by household incomes And once again, I think that the more the council and the community understands How this is working, and it's not that complicated.

I think the better off we sort of all are to know that things are in process. You know, applications have been submitted for instance. That's where some numbers come up and you know certificates of occupancy have been approved. Those are different things so this chart is really I find it very very helpful and you know I know having served on VCOG which is where we get our RENA numbers from the county and I know, or SCAG. And I know that all of those are changing and they're now going to start incorporating specific numbers for very low income. For instance it used to be that low income included Very low and very very low, but now they're gonna have their own numbers for that. So we'll see changes as they come

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:23

Thank You miss rule Mr. Montgomery's there anybody online for this item

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7451:26

mayor? We have no raised hands on the cake Can I have a motion to approve item G?

0:51 – 1:0920 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:37

Great,

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion and second. Mr. Montgomery? Roll call.
Show transcript
motion and second. Mr. Montgomery? Roll call. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes Council Member Mang? Yes
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7451:49

Motion passes

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8451:50

Well, I know what I wanted to say. I wanted to say that—I'm sorry. I want to second what Councilmember Lang said about Ojai really has done a phenomenal job in meeting our RHNA numbers. I think we're one of the only towns in the county that have done that. And we've pushed through these units in order to meet those numbers, but also in order to try to start providing the housing that our constituents need. I'm really proud of that. It's something to be proud of.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:23

Thank you for

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role52:23

all your work

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:23

Mr. Seibert It's

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role52:26

the support through council that makes that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:27

possible. Understood We're on item H, may I speak to it or would you like to speak to it first?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed52:34

Go

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:34

ahead Just this so this is the two council member request reinstatement of Susie Taylor's chair Parks and Rec Commission That came from difficulties in communication Then very good meetings and I feel very confident that we have a very solid communication plan So we can forward this Commissioned to be embodied, I think we can start interviewing as soon as next week and we will endeavor to do so.

And that the communication that was worked on to try to bring a resolution prior to that, I will take full responsibility. I wish I would have done more but we have it resolved and I think we're good, we're in great shape and we have three, we need four more and we've got a plan.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed53:19

I just wanted to add to this that I've spoken with Chair Taylor and also Vice-Chair Inter, and I just want to thank them for being so on top of things and for their incredible service. And I should have listened to Councilmember Mang last time. So anyway, so there's I just wanted to say that we have an incredible team with Sage and Susie. And I'm excited that they're that we're moving forward again.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:55

Anything else? All right. Motion to Ditto. Is that a motion there?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8454:02

Sure. I make a motion that we reinstate Susie Taylor as chair of the Park and Recs Commission

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7454:09

That's good. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed54:10

second.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion that we reinstate Susie Taylor as chair of the Park and Recs Commission That's good. I second. Mr. Montgomery? Roll call.
Show transcript
Mr. Montgomery? Roll call. Council Member Mang? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes, Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes

Ocean

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7454:20

Pastor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed54:20

Thank you so much thanks guys moving on to our sole item left public hearing number two design review permit regarding proposed permanent supportive housing project located at 408 South Signal Street Mr. Seibert,

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role54:36

whoever's taking the lead. It will be me but it's going to be a village to kind of walk through this PowerPoint presentation if I could have the PowerPoint presentation brought forward. Good evening community members anybody that's watching in TV land My name is Lucas Seibert. I'm the Community Development Director for the City of Ojai. I've operated in that position for the last five years. The item before you tonight is the proposed cabin village, permanent supportive housing project. Before I go into the presentation, I want to note a couple of things first.

There's a number of technical reports that are still online on the landing page for the Cabin Village through the city's website. In addition to that, there are summaries that are in the back room. I ask you to take a look at those. I think we have one each for each of the eight technical reports. Don't take those with you. Please provide those to the community. It roughly sums up about 800 pages worth of information and technical information and guidance as well.

In addition to that, there was a comment letter that was brought forward and we took the opportunity as staff to respond to that comment letter because it had a lot of technical pieces tied to it. That response letter as well as the original letter is also in the back room. There are several copies and copies to that letter are also before the council on their dais as well tonight.

Next slide please. So the item tonight includes several different pieces. More importantly, let's identify who the applicant is. In this case it is the City of Ojai. The proposed developer is Dignity Moves as a non-profit. We have both Joanne Price and Jeff Gattis here tonight to speak on that. The proposed project architect is Dylan Johnson. He is not here tonight but Dignity Moves representatives will do an excellent job of talking through the design pieces in terms of elevation, site plan, floor plan. The proposed landscape architect is Kathy Nolan. She is here tonight as well and we'll be talking through the landscape pieces. We also have, I think online—let me just double check—we have Jan Scow here to talk through any sort of... Oh! He's physically here, okay.

He's here tonight to talk through any and respond to any questions regarding any of the treaty pieces to this proposal. And then we also have the civil engineer, Caitlin Bush, who is here to speak regarding the engineering pieces, ADA, all those wonderful things. So recommendations, this isn't the verbatim pieces. This is really kind of the 20,000-foot level but it's really the approve the lower public... In terms of the recommendations by staff being brought forward to this body tonight is to consider approving a lower public works yard as a location for the Cabin Village project The second piece is to consider accepting the public comment, which as a public hearing that is what we'll be doing at one point in this public hearing setting. And continue the hearing until the development management agreement is brought forward and then to that point regarding that the director or to direct the city manager to negotiate the development management agreement on the proposed project site and bring the project back to City Council for final approval.

So really tonight we're looking at The project as a whole, and then identifying its location in terms of whether or not to earmark that moving forward. Let's first talk through just briefly existing site conditions. The existing use for this site, you can see it in yellow kind of in a rectangular form is the lower public works yard. The zoning for this from a technicality standpoint is public or PL that has a general plan designation of public And the surrounding uses to the north is vacant parcels, which are city owned. To the east is a remaining public works maintenance facility as well as the offices also publicly owned. To the west beyond Ventura Street is single family residences and to the south is also single family residences abutting this property.

Next slide please. Consistency, at the Planning Commission meeting in November of last year and then again it was really kind of talked about fairly specifically and intentionally. And that is the permanent supportive housing as a similar use. Now what I want to first talk through is the why? Why are we having this discussion regarding the similar uses category? Why are we talking about permanent supportive housing as a similar use to something else within our use charts? Well, our use charts do not identify permanent supportive housing as an identified permitted or conditionally permitted use within our charts, our tables within the use charts themselves.

Our code actually has a provision built in that allows for those types of uses that are not specifically identified within the use charts themselves to be identified as a use that's similar to another use that's identified within our zoning, and more specifically, as a use that's identified within that zoning category. So, in this case the permanent supportive housing as a term, as a use is and we believe is similar to offices government services. Now the justification for that is something that's definitely boiled down in one of our attachments I'm giving you kind of a high level piece from a justification standpoint it's folded into first The use itself as office government services typically have a state funding mechanism tied to it, plus local control.

And what that means is it's not something that's privatized. It's not something that has private monies tied to it. These are public monies. The ERF grant is one piece to that puzzle. As local control the city itself is controlling The ins and outs in the daily operations of this type of use moving forward. Additionally, when you're looking at similar uses, you're also looking at what other similar uses are within the PL zone? Well, of the 78 parcels that we have that are zoned and identified as PL or have a general plan designation as P, There are four that we've identified that are either a mixed-use or multifamily, that have that similar use category. And there's even one that from a density standpoint which then bleeds into the zoning consistency and general plan consistency that speaks more specifically to density as it relates to the similar uses category.

So I think it's important to understand When you're going from a use category that isn't identified and then marrying it to or identifying how it's similar to another use that's identified within the use chart, I think it's important to note that offices as government services has the The best fit for what we're talking about here. The use itself includes residential uses, but it also includes support services as a permanent supportive housing model and I know we'll talk about that more with representatives from from Diggity Moves, but I think it's important just to understand this is kind of setting a table as to how and why this use has a nexus if you will to the offices in government services.

Next slide please. Now, there were a number of public comments that came in both on the November meeting with Planning Commission as a public hearing for comments to be received and then again at the February 19th meeting with the Planning Commission. And I think it was a combination of the community coming up and speaking and raising concerns and questions but also Planning Commission recognizing those questions, concerns and then folding those into what we've identified as 19 comments that were received. Now we're happy to report that of those comments that were received, we've either addressed or considered all 19 in looking at this There were plan revisions that we physically met with the design team and Dignity Moves to go out and physically understand what changes could physically take place that wouldn't take this project into not being Not being feasible, I guess to a certain degree.

So the plan revisions nine in total. I've highlighted those here unit size windows we're gonna be talking about each of these specifically as as the plans are unfolded through this PowerPoint presentation The general comments, 10 out of the 10 we've either addressed or considered throughout. And those will be discussed as well throughout the plans and as a part of this PowerPoint presentation. But I wanted to just note those as we move forward here. So next slide please.

Technical reports. There were a number of technical reports that evolved as this project evolved, and that started in August of last year and has progressed into what we have here today. Eight reports are prepared by professionals through what's referred to as the phase one and then eventually the phase two. And then there was a soils report done, traffic demand analysis that was done for this project. Noise or sound depending on how you're hearing it. Land survey, biological resources assessment and then tree protection.

All of those are important even as a site being vacant all important pieces regardless of whether the city's doing it or a private developer is doing it this is just the standard procedure for operations now the overall cost For that is right around $68,000 in terms of what we're looking at here. Next slide please. Actually go back to the previous slide just real quickly.

The Phase 2 has had quite a bit of public comment. We've seen a lot of that come forward, and even there was responses that were put together that's on the Council's dais, responses to very specific pieces to the Phase 2. We'll have RENCON who put together that Phase 2 speak to two pieces to that later on in the presentation. And as a matter of any sort of responses that come forward through public comment.

Next slide, please. So here's where I'm going to turn it over to Caitlin first who is our project engineer and she'll speak to the changes that came forward really kind of from the February 19th Planning Commission meeting. Thank you, Caitlin.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed1:06:32

Good evening, everyone. Thank you. So the building has been sited in order to save as many trees as possible. We understand the importance of vegetation and mature oak trees to this community and we've done our best to honor that importance. The building footprint actually has been pushed west closer to Ventura Street compared to what was seen at Planning Commission. I'd like to point out this plan is oriented with north to the right, as I direct you northeast-west.

Vehicular access will be provided off of Montgomery Street including fire access. The red line work shows fire access coming up Montgomery and then that T shape is the Fire Department turnaround. ADA access has been moved from being provided from Montgomery Street. Now we are providing ADA access via a ramp to Ventura Street. This was in direct response to public comment and commissioner input This ramp would be compliant with all building code.

We still are proposing to provide pedestrian access to Montgomery Street, however this would not be ADA accessible. There is a sidewalk following along the north side of the proposed driveway down to Montgomery. This would allow residents to be able to more directly access Resources on Montgomery Street such as the Ojai bike path or help of Ojai down on Montgomery Street as well.

However, this access to Ventura Street we believe will be ultimately safer and it connects directly to an existing sidewalk on Ventura Street. I would like to point out that this ADA ramp would be lighted Again, this was proposed at Planning Commission but it was a question that did come up in public comment a few times and our landscape architect Kathy Nolan can touch more on the details for that.

We have also increased the size of storage on the north side of the proposed parking lot, again in response to public comment. At this point that is considered a flex space as we get into final design and we are able to more accurately gauge what residents' needs are going to be. We can pinpoint what exactly that storage would be whether it'd be bike storage, storage for belongings, what have you.

We do have proposed bike racks in front of the proposed storage buildings as well, again in response to public comment. So I think that is a good summary of what is being proposed at the site now and what changes we have made since planning commission. If you have any comments, I'm happy to answer now otherwise I will hand it over for building design discussions.

1:09 – 1:185 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:09:45

If we could, let's try to hold the comments or questions until the end. If I could have Joanne Price as well as Jeff, if you guys could come up and kind of just speak to this site plan as well? And then after this, we have floor plan and then elevations to follow.

UnidentifiedBo ReddProposed · by introduction1:10:03

Okay, good evening. I'm Jo Price. I am co-founder with Dignity Moves and also Chief Real Estate Officer. And I just want to say that I am standing behind a very talenting group of architects. So you've just heard from Caitlin Birch, the engineer, and Kathy Nolan, landscape architect. And one thing that always strikes me when I come to Ojai is how special this community is. And that's in the design, the aesthetic, the community itself and we want to honor that in the design. That's why we've moved away from modular construction because what this community really needs is architecture and aesthetics that really fit in with the vibe. I think there's a vibe here in Ojai And that comes down to like you know the old Spanish tile, the red roofs, the arches.

The quality of the materials and that goes into like the windows. Like the windows, the recesses, the aluminum. They are materials that are very long-lasting, but they also give the quality that this community needs and the durability. This project is permanent housing. It's to last for 55 years. It's going to be solar ready, but it's also gonna be sustainable so you probably heard that we're designing the building probably in a straw bale It talks to our ethos, it's dignity moves. We're all about innovation but we're also about being sympathetic to the communities in which we move into. So this project is designed around a courtyard and Jeff can speak to some of the services but what this really means is everything is on site. This is a very well-designed thought outside with comprehensive services and that courtyard is going to be the healing place And what we hear a lot about is we don't want people loitering on the streets, on the sidewalks.

Well here we have a community where everything is onsite for pets, for planting, for healing and most importantly this is a project that will actually get the city to a functional zero and that's important and you should be proud of that when I looked at your unsheltered numbers This project will get you there. And what that means is people do not have to resort to, and neither will they have to live on the streets.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed1:12:37

Thank you and good evening. I wanted to speak to the intention of this design, but not only the intention of this design but the entire project itself from inception. I've been involved in this, I feel like close to two years now that I've been engaged with the community including engagement with the encampment which is now Ojai Tent Town and the level of effort from the city manager, from city administration and the City Council they help support Not only Ojai Tent Town, but getting to this point so that we can get people from tent town to this site. And I would have to say for you in the 40 years that I've been involved in projects and study I've done in my own lived experience with the subject matter which is why I do this work, this is the most important project I've ever been a part of.

And it's not by the size of the project, but again, the intention of the project. I've been worried about housing insecurity and climate change for decades, and here we are, and we're in that crisis. It's now found us, it's found everybody, and we're finding more and more people falling into homelessness precarity. We're seeing numbers in LA that are staggering from those fires where people are getting pushed into homelessness. So building a climate-focused, environmentally focused project like this to me is catalytic. That Ojai could be the lead in doing this, that we could take this around the state and to other communities to build these projects that are more integrated, more nature-based and more environmentally sound and move forward.

I don't want to see us keep building the same way. We have to change the way we're building and we have to change the way that we're living together. And that's why from a communal perspective, this is how people really are meant to live together. In these communal spaces, sharing space, that's how recovery works. That's how healing works. It doesn't work in isolation. It works when we work together and this site is designed to bring people out to work together, to live together, to heal together, It creates both a sense of agency, but more important what I would like to see and what I think we need as a culture right now in these divided times is a focus on interdependence. And this site is an interdependent integrated site. So I'm just so honored to be here and to be a part of this, and I thank you all for your effort.

The level of local skill that went into this has to be noted too, the low level of talent—we're drawing local talent onto this project to make it really shine not just for Ojai, but beyond. Thanks again.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:15:08

Hold on before you go any further, Jeff. Before I move to the next slide, I think you're going to be able to speak to the floor plan probably better than I. But I think it's important to note from the Planning Commission and within those two meetings that we had in November and again in February there was a lot of discussion, and I think Kathy may even speak to this as well during the landscaping, a lot of discussion regarding further enhancing the bike and kind of that bicycle access and parking And we've included that in the site plan itself. And in addition to that, there was a charging piece and element to that and we've included that as well. I know Kathy's got that dialed in through her landscaping as well. Excuse me.

So if we could let's move on to the floor plan. Next slide please. So here it's actually designed around 30 individual units, and two of those are actually double units. And then to the front or to the north is where the communal spaces are in terms of food and then restrooms and... I'm sorry, restrooms and then also office space as well. Jeff, could you speak to kind of the orientation, the reason for this proposal? Sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed1:16:32

And you're referring to the design with the communal rooms, the site, the size of the rooms, just the flow of the site in general. This is akin to a number of the sites that we built. They're gated, they're inward facing so it's drawing people off the streets to live together again and draws people out as you see the rooms, people move out into the common areas. Those common areas are central How the people live together, and even when you see in Ojai Tent Town that's how people are living together. So it's really bringing the way that people are living together in a tent town into a space where there's going to be a similar and familiar feel to it. That's a trauma-informed approach.

Many times when we bring people in, when we just drop them into an apartment on their own it's a very destabilizing process. They go right back into isolation and it really affects their recovery. The fact that we have common areas for people to come and hang out together and see each other, the fact that you go to a common kitchen and you can eat together, you can choose to eat together. There'll even be food events there where we'll have events where people will eat together barbecues things like that. It draws people out of the room Thank you all for being here.

That really hampers your ability to move forward in recovery. And again, this site draws people to move in. So the common areas, the kitchen you see, there's a dog run in there so we'll have people out to have their dogs out there to take care of them. All these things draw people out together. Food is one of the biggest deals there is and even with staff working with people there, the property manager, case managers when they come in not only do they have the office, they have places to sit with people Thank you, Jeff.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:18 – 1:245 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:18:46

In addition to that, I just want to cover some of the pieces that came out of both the November and again in the February meetings with the Planning Commission. And really kind of hearing from the community. One piece that I want to note is now there are windows within Initially, we were looking at just a skylight or clear story kind of piece. But it's gone beyond that and we have full windows with ingress-egress opportunities there as well.

I think the other thing that I wanted to note and just kind of understand from a history standpoint, when this project first came forward in November before our body for the community to kind of weigh in on something. The idea was for each of these units to be about 120 square feet in size. Recognizing that the community wasn't willing to accept that and wanted to see more push the envelope further We came forward with then a proposal for about 160 square feet and then boosted that to 180 and recognized the opportunities there with the restrooms.

In November, there was no interest or not necessarily interest but there was no foresight to the restroom aspect. We just saw an opportunity for it to just be a place to reside and then all the other facilities were somewhere else Here, we're recognizing that opportunity for each of these individuals within these spaces to have a place to sleep as well as a place to use the restroom from that standpoint. So it's been a progression of the design over time.

Moving away from the model of, as Dignity Moves said, identified individual units kind of sitting in a tiny home format into what we're seeing here which is really three separate buildings that have one communal roof here. So just wanted to note those pieces. Brian, anything else from Planning Commission?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed1:20:52

Yeah, so regarding what Lucas was speaking to kind of where the progression of the design over time how we were initially looking at 30 modular tiny homes of 120 square feet. They have now been expanded to 180 square feet All including their own en-suite bathroom, which was initially intended to be a shared sanitation facility. So this is really unlike anything DigniMoves has ever done and we're going above and beyond in that regard. And as far as expanding the units any further...

We have looked at that and we've determined that it would unreasonably impact the tree canopy as there are already going to be five trees to be removed out of the protected 59, and six out of those 59 trees will be majorly impacted. Our initial goal was to impact zero trees But with this design, considering how robust it is and full-fledged it is, we think that it's a fair compromise. And replacement is also planned and we'll get into that in the landscape section of this presentation.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:22:23

Thank you Brian. Next slide please. If I could have either Jeff or Joanne to come up to speak to the elevation piece, I'll just kind of give the intro. When this was brought forward initially it really in November it kind of had the same look and feel as it did in February. The biggest piece and I would say the biggest thing to take out of this is the change for the windows, and more importantly on the back side of each of these sides. There was a lot of blank space. These windows have offered an opportunity for some undulation and some character.

UnidentifiedBo ReddProposed · by introduction1:23:07

Yeah, the windows help elevate the quality of the building but they also act as egress from the bathroom. So these units are each about 180 square feet. They have the sleeping room so you have your private space with room for desk storage and then the bathroom where you have regress out. But you can see that that aesthetic when you look around town it's very in keeping with the town's aesthetic And the architecture, we've really tried to make a mark different, like radial difference between pedestrians and vehicles. That's very important to have that separation. And even from the street level, we're only about 25 feet from the street level from Ventura.

We're within walking distance But you've got like character in the quality of the materials. The windows are recessed, you've got the stucco, you've got the red roof tile and you're saving as many trees as possible. We're avoiding the power lines and it's very in keeping with the other buildings that you have here.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:24:19

Thank you. Yeah, the stucco I think does an excellent job of staying in tune with what kind of Ojai has as a theme. Next slide please? Let's dive into the landscaping with that. I'd like to invite Kathy Nolan to come up and speak with some potential color commentary from Janskow.

1:24 – 1:339 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:24:50

And that was adding at the front doors, I believe it's a, what's the proper word? Almost like an opaque glass that would allow more light into the space. And I know that was one of the comments that came up at Planning

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:25:02

Commission.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:25:04

Frosted, thank you. But I couldn't help but see it there so I had to mention it. So with the landscape, we actually have two areas. We've got the interior courtyard which really is the same as we presented in November and I'm happy to make comments about that but I guess I think the first thing I'm going to comment about is the changes that we made on the exterior of the building since our February Planning Commission meeting So I think the biggest thing was that we did change the ADA access, as Caitlin mentioned. And I wanted to say my landscaping on the exterior of the building really follows where the grading has happened so it's not overly landscaped number one because we have existing vegetation a lot of oak trees that really provide the screening on both Ventura and So that's all going to stay.

The property is well canopied with native oaks, is what I'm trying to say. But the big thing that I wanted to bring up again was—and we went over this in February—that we applied the state fire code in the landscape. And what that means is there's a zone zero that starts at the building and it's five feet out. Generally, basically no plants are very minimal planting, no mulch is allowed unless it's bare soil like say decomposed granite or gravel so nothing flammable. So we're honoring that first zone. The second zone goes out 30 feet and as one of the public comments we had earlier about fire, when you start looking at the new and latest fire code for landscaping it's very strict I mean you literally have to get your ruler out to figure out how far apart the plants are, how tall they're going to be, and a list of prescribed plants that you can kind of pull from so it's very limited But at the same time, are making it very beautiful and aesthetically pleasing.

And so we got that Zone 0 out to 5 feet, Zone 1 goes to 30 feet, and then the next zone 2 goes to 100 feet. Which pretty much, I've got it on the plan you can't really see but if you look up close zones are all labeled. The other thing that I wanted to point out was and it's been mentioned already by the other presenters our intention when we went into the project was you know to try to preserve to the best of our ability all of these protected oak trees As we move the building around, it turns out yes, we are going to have to remove five oak trees. Some trees are impacted.

That said, we are required to do what you call remediation or mitigation and that total dollar value is $34,200. On the plan, you see the green circles Those are indicating the mitigation trees. But I also wanted to throw out, and I don't know that... Are we looking at the tree protection plan at all in the slideshow? I don�t recall.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:28:16

Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:28:18

it's not on there. It was submitted to City Council and on the last page, I think it was the L12 sheet. I actually have a mitigation table that says the dollar amount and the reason I'm bringing this up is if City Council wanted to make comment or have the discussion or if they preferred We can do different combination of trees that potentially maybe would not all be planted here on the site, but it could be planted on city property. So I just wanted to throw that out. The challenge was if you look at all the existing tree canopies On the site, there's not a lot of room to add trees. So predominantly where I've added the trees are there's one at the entrance down on Montgomery Street or the driveway. I allowed side access if you're pulling in and out, you would be able to have clear good visibility.

And then there were five trees located up before the ADA ramp is that is a slope But it's fully exposed and it's a south hot exposure, so in my opinion that was probably the best place and really one of the only places I could add more trees. And so now and eventually that staircase and ADA ramp would be shaded from like hot afternoon sun. The other thing I just wanted to briefly mention—I know it's been kindly loosely discussed We have a storage area, we had the bike parking. The bike parking is actually covered by parking and it's shown on the plan. There's also a pet relief area there because I do know a lot of the residents do have pets so we accommodated with that and then of course there's a trash enclosure area.

I just wanted to mention that New pedestrian path going up to Ventura Street or walk and staircase, and the ADA ramp are both lit with landscape lighting. So there's a bollard which is basically a light on a low post for the ADA ramp area, and then the staircase and the adjoining walls all have what you would call like a step or recessed light. So it's all low voltage LED lighting, so energy compliant.

I also wanted to address too that Caitlin our civil engineer designed several bioswales there on one on the east side of the building and one adjacent to Montgomery Street. So potentially you know any water that we're capturing is going to go back into the site which actually will help Potentially depending on how much rain we get, groundwater recharge and or just minimizing irrigation in the landscape.

And then I can just briefly touch on the courtyard area if you want or if that's enough information for tonight.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:31:15

Well, we've got two more slides. Yeah, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:31:17

could address

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:31:18

those. Could you speak just briefly on the greywater conversation that we've been having?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:31:22

Yes, so we did have a conversation and that topic came up and I actually loved doing projects with grey water but this is what came up in the conversations. So there's three types of approved in the code grey water systems. The simplest one is laundry to landscape. Basically, your washing machine water goes out into landscape. You create an underground storage area with mulch. The microbes in the mulch actually will help break down any organisms that you may want to address.

The second one is a simple system, and that's the system where you could include the laundry but also your showers and sinks. Not your dishwasher, not your dish sink, obviously not the restrooms, meaning the toilets, but you could do the showers and sinks. That water in addition goes out into a dugout area that's typically mulched The mulch and the microorganisms will help clean up the water.

The third one is a standard system, it's more complicated and this is where you're actually capturing the water going into a tank, you're filtering it, and you're pumping it so it has to be regulated a lot more. The hot item that I brought up was if you're gonna do any of those systems You should be using a biocompatible or biocompatible products. So that could be laundry, shampoo, soap, anything you could use in the shower to wash your hands.

The question came up is that something we want to do on the site? Not that we don't want to do gray water but I think it's more like an operations question would these soap and the laundry soap and the shampoo Thank you very much.

1:33 – 1:416 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:33:36

All right, thank you. Next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:33:37

slide. So this is a courtyard and I'm sorry the courtyard looks so black. It's the way the hatch turned out but I'm really excited about this courtyard. And as was mentioned earlier, I just see this as the place to hang out What I try to do is to give it kind of a bare bone structure so that it functions, but at the same time there's flexibility. On the north side or the upper side of that courtyard, I'm showing picnic tables accommodating actually more than 30 residents probably up to about 48 so you could have guests. The tables could be moved, you could roll a barbecue in, you can change the configuration Then in the center, there's a central courtyard tree.

I kind of vacillated about what to pick but I wanted to meet the fire code too so I actually picked a fruitless olive that will give shade. Basically no fruits or you won't have the mess but the width of the canopy would actually and could easily be maintained to meet the 10-foot, keep your canopies ten feet away from a roof in the fire code. Then to the south of that, you'll see the rectangular boxes. Those are actually raised garden beds. I'm not going to specify what goes in it because I want the residents to be able to have ownership and be able to do that. I'll make some suggestions, but that's going to be up to them. They're surrounded by some beds where they can do flowers and herbs and what-have-you.

And I do know a lot of the residents in Tentown who I've personally met do like to garden. It's very therapeutic, it's very healing, and it's very grounding. It happens to be one of my favorite things to do too. And then on the south side, the green rectangle. It's actually a lawn not for pets so this will be for people I mean you can come and take a nap on it Have a picnic, do yoga, tai chi. But it's a used kind of a green area for the residents to use as well. We're proposing architectural string lights in there so that'll be kind of a fun atmosphere.

They're all shrouded everything as far as the lighting goes is dark sky friendly and meets the code And I think it's kind of a good general description.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:36:05

Okay, last slide, I think.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed1:36:06

Okay, good. This is just a sample of the plant palette and there's our native oak on the left. We also have the pink-flied one as a native redwood. But then I wanted to say basically all the plants on the exterior of the building are California native plants. On the inside we do have the edibles and a little bit, you know, Mediterranean palate but all generally will meet Our Modified Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. And I forgot to mention in the courtyard, I do have several planters with citrus.

Good to eat very iconic for Ojai and use it in the kitchen but there's a sample of our bio soil plants and I do want to mention that the Planning Commission talked about screening us adding a plant screen and I did add one. It's on the south side of the project Which is actually pretty heavily vegetated, so a little bit of a challenge. But it's not a dense hedge because the fire code doesn't allow it. The new fire code you've got to have spacing between the plants and there was also mention about adding a vine on a fence at Planning Commission. Once again, it's not encouraged or depending on where that fence is really not allowed in the fire code. So I wanted to say, I listened but I'm just responding that because of the fire code we're not going to be doing that.

There's a sample of the bike parking up on the right. We did take fencing that was out on the south side of the property and now the only fencing is on the north side just kind of up beyond The dog relief area and the bike parking. And that connects to the public works yard, the matte bronze finish of six foot fence. And then on the bottom right is the decomposed granite that we are proposing for the sidewalk area along Montgomery.

I think that's it.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:38:01

All right. Thank you, Kathy. Next slide please. If I could have somebody... Yes, thank you.

UnidentifiedBo ReddProposed · by introduction1:38:12

I'm co-founder with Dignity Moves, and when we first started, we were a nonprofit startup that was born out of the pandemic. And we were created to end or bring scalable solutions to end homelessness. And in terms of absolute numbers, we absolutely killed it. In a matter of a short few years, we have built 500 units, served over 850 people. At the end of this year, we would've built 1,000 units And we built so at a fraction of the cost of permanent housing and in a matter of months. Just yesterday, we handed over a site that built 150 units in 11 months. So from that side, in terms of absolute numbers for a non-profit developer, we've built lots of units but really it's not what I'm proud of most at Dignity Moves What I'm proud of most is our ability to change, spur change and change systems.

Like when we first started out, we were looking at homelessness but we've got so much educated around what homelessness is. It's very complex and we look at it as unsheltered homelessness, unsheltered homelessness and we're really focused on the unsheltered parts. That's the most visible that's what most people are worried about businesses general public And when you really hone in and understand the causes of that unsheltered homelessness, it really spurs you on to bring people indoors and to do so quickly. The cost to leave people on the streets contrary to popular belief is at least $250 per person per night. It's anywhere between about $70,000 to $90,000 per person.

And most of that is borne by the healthcare system. When I've got a cough or wheeze or sprained ankle, I go to the ER room. If I was on a site, I would go to the nurse on-site so I'd get local care. I wouldn't go to an ER room where it costs $7000 a visit. And then people talk about criminalizing homelessness. The cost to keep somebody in jail overnight is about $200 per person, per night.

When you're bringing people indoors to Dignity Moves communities like the one in Hohai, we're talking about $100 per person, per night. But on top of that, they get the care supportive services that they need and there's measured outcomes where people can really start to rebuild their lives because they're coming from a place that's safe and secure. We can never get that efficacy of services when we're dealing with people on the streets. First and foremost, they need to be brought in So, they're in the right mindset and then they can stabilize and move on to become like members of the community and work in getting the health and care they need.

We've even brought about change at the state level, and last year we introduced a bill SB 1395 that really solidified interim housing as a bona fide use of state funds because the cost to society is fiscally responsible to bring people in. There's measured outcomes And it's the right thing to do. And it's also what the general public is asking, please bring people indoors. So that's what I'm proud of most. I appreciate your time on this item tonight and your support. Thank you.

1:41 – 1:4910 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:41:59

So here, now I just want to preface this with we're not asking for you to make a determination regarding CEQA tonight. Instead what was provided in the staff report was informational pieces in terms of the qualifying exemptions regarding what this proposed project brings to the table and really we're looking at infill development. This is really considered being an infill development project And then also, and I believe this public resources code section in terms of how it acts and its actions became effective in January of this year. So it's very brand new in terms of how it's being applied.

So those are the two pieces that we're seeing as how this qualifies through exemptions within the California Environmental Equality Act. Next slide please. So next steps. So what we're looking for tonight from City Council to consider, and it's threefold. This is the full readout. I'll read it out specifically and intentionally. So it is to consider the following. Approve the proposed Lower Public Works Yard project site as a location for the Cabin Village Project contingent upon the city entering into a development management agreement to develop the Cabin Village project on that site and approve the design review permit.

Additionally, continue the hearing on the design review permit until such time as the City Manager brings back the negotiated Development Management Agreement and direct the City Manager to negotiate a Development Management Agreement with Dignity Moves. For the design and construction of the Cabin Village project on the proposed project site, present the negotiated development management agreement, design review permit and associated CEQA environmental findings and determinations to the City Council for its consideration and possible final approval as a future meeting of the City Council.

And any other necessary approvals." So with that are there any questions from council?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:04

And just, I suffer from this too. Sometimes I want to go right into the deliberation part so we want to reserve this for any questions that are specific. Possibly we'll take a five minute break and then we'll go to some public comments and then deliberation. So questions for staff? Yeah, I have some.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:44:24

Somewhere along the line, the question of bathrooms came up It was explained that there were a high percentage of people living in the units that either didn't have the ability or didn't have the willingness to clean up their own bathroom space. And so, it was explained that the reason that communal bathrooms were being designed in is because Thank you very much.

Planning has gone into the idea of how bathrooms are going to be managed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:45:39

Sure, I can take that question. So I think the headline on this one is like the design of the project, the population has evolved a bit too from the time we started the discussion. We have We've had some folks exit from the program and we've really made a focus on those who are participating now or essentially, for lack of a better phrase, preparing for or trying out for the Cabin Village project.

It's a behavior-based model that we operate under, and we are looking at folks that can make that transition from where they are now to permanent supportive housing. And that's the big change that has happened since then. I'm not saying that there's not going to be any potential need. Admittedly, we'll learn a lot probably in the first few months of operation and we may have to make some modifications from what you've seen before in the cost model.

You may remember from the cost model is an attachment to your agenda report? That there are a number of administrative services provided. And if we needed to modify that and have that born from grant proceeds, we would if the need was there. But the focus primarily has been to make sure that those who'd make the transition over can handle it and they're prepared to do that. Thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:47:12

I have a question regarding a proposal that we received for an

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47:14

alternative location that came in the public comments for using the city property. And I'm aware that we have a very detailed response to that, but I wanted to hear from staff. What are the benefits to the public works yard as opposed to the city property, the campus, the City Hall campus or an alternative property?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:47:59

I think we first need to set the table with this one, and that is that we're operating under City Council direction for the Lower Public Works Yard. We're not operating under direction to evaluate the feasibility of other locations, and that's also not one of the items on the agenda tonight. With that said, we have looked at approximately 10 or 11 different locations And it is staff's opinion, informed opinion that this is the most suitable of all the locations that we've looked at.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:48:29

Thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:48:33

Yes? I've been contacted by a number of people to ask if we're going to spend all this money on construction in Ojai. Can we actually use Ojai contractors, laborers, suppliers and all that so that it benefits the local economy?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:49:02

Mr. Seibert do you want me to address this?

1:49 – 1:5415 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:49:07

So, as proposed the project would go through dignity moves given their Prior experience in putting on these kinds of projects successfully, including in adjacent communities and as reflecting the state grant application by which the city and the county and Dignity Moves all jointly applied for the project. Shifting to a new RFP process to look at potentially a different developer would trigger a whole new rejigger with the state regarding the grant process because what was approved was the city, Dignity Moves and the county So revisiting that along with revisiting other site locations is something that isn't within our present direction from the Council. That all said, I would expect that Dignity moves and the City would look for local contract opportunities as much as possible.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:49:56

So that just brings up a question when you said that with the grant, it's dignity moves the city and the county. I haven't seen a commitment from the county. So where does that come in?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:50:05

The county commitment was in providing staff support for the application itself and putting together the application for the grant not in funding the project in full. And I'll ask Mr. Harvey to jump in on more county support.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:50:15

Sure. And we've heard and we do have, I can see her name on the screen right now, Ms. Kimberly Albers with us this evening via Zoom. What we've heard before from the county in the town hall meeting and other discussions is the county primarily is coming in once this project is built. And once the ERF grant funds have been expended, it's the county's expectation that the city is going to use its state funds to build the project. And once those grant funds are exhausted, that's when the county is looking to come in. If we want details on that, we could probably hear again from Ms. Kimberly Albers who is on the line if you like.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:50:52

So when did you find that out? That's the first I've heard that they're willing to make a commitment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:50:57

It was during the 24th panel when they were speaking here,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:51:01

and if I'm actually Miss Albers, if I'm correct in understanding what you said at that meeting, it was that we have to have permanent supportive housing in order to receive any other funding from the county. Is that is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:51:16

We can ask Ms. Albers are you able to unmute

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed1:51:21

I am. Thank you. Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:51:23

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed1:51:25

All right, so just a couple of clarifications there. So I'm just going to read exactly what I said at the meeting because I think that way I don't mess it up. County staff are working closely with the City of Ojai to identify funding sources to support the Cabin Village Project and the future residents after the funding from the Encampment Resolution Grant is exhausted.

And what I explained was that funding to support permanent housing is generally awarded in competitive cycles that happen on an annual and biannual basis. So currently, we're still waiting for 2025 funding amounts to be determined at the federal level. County staff will assist in preparing the City to apply for these funding streams and work to make sure that those that are at the Camden Village are connected to Medi-Cal, which will also provide housing tenancy as sustaining services and enhanced care management in this project so that during the EARTH period, they're already linked to these services and they offset services costs to the City.

The shelter cost share agreements that have been discussed previously between the Cities and County would not apply to this project as this is not shelter but permanent supportive housing dollars use these alternative funding streams such as home and community development block grants and other sources for longer-term sustainability. We'll also work to connect with the Housing Authority so that there are potentially, if there are vouchers available right for the tenants at the site. So a committed partner to try and make sure that we find these resources that can apply to permanent supportive housing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:07

Thank you Ms. Albers Okay. Yeah, let's see I'll call on you next. Sorry, I didn't

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:53:15

see.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:53:16

Sounds good. Thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:53:16

Thanks. So this question from a number of community members They're observing that there are people, I think this is for Chief Newman, but they're observing that there's people who appear to be camping slash residing in Libbey Park particularly in and around Libby Bowl. And they were questioning whether there was any you know How does this plan to move those folks, and how does this potential homeless project fit into the people who aren't brought into that program?

1:54 – 2:0312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:16

Great question. So just because there may be housing, well let me back up for a minute like City Manager Ben Harvey said currently we have the individuals in the Ojai tent town and that's who this project would be for so once or if and when that project is up and running that would not prevent us from using our resources to manage other individuals that might be within the city. So just because there's housing available doesn't mean it's open to anyone that is homeless within the City of Ojai. We would still have those resources available to us when we do do enforcement and we would still have resources in terms of partnering with other organizations, private organizations We offer services to those individuals, but by no means does it mean that they would be able to receive services from this project at all or that we would not be able to use our enforcement resources for that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.881:55:15

So I guess following up though is there a plan to enforce the no camping restrictions on public properties?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:55:25

Absolutely, if that is the direction and currently that is what we do. And we have already done that with individuals that are not willing to accept services. We do enforce the county ordinances in terms of illegal camping and illegal storage of property.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:55:43

Could I piggyback on that? So the other thing that needs to be mentioned is we're going to be bringing back before the City Council in possibly next month, as soon as next month, a proposed agreement with Ventura County Behavioral Health for a community services coordinator. And this is also identified in the cost model attachment. And this individual will be working not only with the population at Ojai Tent Town and then if you decide to move forward, the Cabin Village Project. But also greater Ojai for those individuals that are able and willing to accept services. And that will be very complimentary we feel for the sheriffs in their efforts. In fact they'll work closely with the sheriff trying to find a match for those that are willing to accept services to help them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:56:31

Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:33

Yeah, so I'm actually going into page 1014 or 2-1 under the recommendations number 3. I'm curious about what a development management agreement with Dignity Moves might look like. So you know, I have—I've heard from my constituents many times over $10 million for 30 units. How does that work? And that the standard for affordable housing or permanent housing is about $500 per square foot.

So I'm wondering, you know in that development management agreement is there going to be transparency and accountability and really an understanding of how $10 million gets spent? for 30 units. So I'm curious, I just want to talk about the Development Management Agreement and also I think that I understand that Dignity Moves—and I love Dignity Moves, I'm just trying to get clarity—will not be indemnifying the City which is I won't say normal because I don't know if it's normal for a nonprofit, you know, this type of housing. But normally the city would be indemnified by the builder but will not be—Dignity Moves will not be indemnifying this city and so I'm curious about how that development management agreement would work and, you know, the kinds of things that would be in it.

So that's my first question. What kinds of things are you going to be negotiating basically?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:58:30

So happy to cover that, and I'll start with the agreement and then I'll ask the Dignity Moves folks, Jeff, to emphasize or discuss the cost component. The Development Management Agreement will be the basic agreement by which the City contracts with Dignity Moves to approve and build the proposed Cabin Village project if approved by the Council. It will cover price terms, include the requirements for the cob construction, the sustainable construction Thank you.

It'll also include insurance, and we haven't negotiated all of the details given awaiting direction from Council. So there will be limited indemnity details to follow. We need direction from the Council to negotiate the agreement in full. I know the idea of no indemnities floating in the community is raised by Councilmember Rule, but we haven't yet negotiated those terms.

I would expect we will have limited indemnity reflecting the state grant funding components And then with that, I'll turn it to Dignity Moves regarding the cost component. Thank you.

UnidentifiedBo ReddProposed · by introduction1:59:44

And I'd like to touch on the indemnity because we do have indemnity clauses in many of our DMA agreements with cities and municipalities. With regards to costs, we're very transparent. There's a detailed construction budget. The numbers that were put forward were by a local contractor All our consultants have been local, and so what that 10.8 includes is both hard costs and soft costs which includes all the design fees, engineering fees, permit fees, FF&E, but we're very open book And those costs, we don't hide anything. We'll present everything to the city. We'll work with the city staff and they will be...

The bids are proper estimates that will be based on the durance as we go through the process and they will be sourced with local contractors as far as possible.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:00:42

Great, thank you. I just thank you for the idea around transparency and accountability and being able to follow the financial trail, I think is really, really important.

UnidentifiedBo ReddProposed · by introduction2:00:53

Absolutely. It's

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:00:55

everything that even though this is a grant from the state, everything that we spend in the long run We'll not be there to provide services, you know, after the build. You know what I mean? So if it costs... Do you understand what I'm saying? I'm saying that even though it's $12 million from the state, if we spend all $12 million then we take on responsibility. If we spend $10 million then we have $2 million of taxpayer money that is, you know, that we aren't going to be drawing on out of our funds so Kind of where that comes from.

I did have yet another question. The design review permit, is that something that the Planning Commission has to provide? Because I was under the impression that the Planning Commission was completely advisory here so I'm just wondering about that Lucas or Ben or Matt.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:01:59

Happy to take that question From a design review standpoint, a DRP as we tend to call it, typically it is handled at the Planning Commission level and less appealed to City Council. Because this project is on the grounds and it's city-owned, the site itself, it is brought forward to this body for final determination. Sorry, just to get back to what you had said earlier.

There were comments that were received from the Commission on two different opportunity levels one in November and then really the crux of everything that came forward was in February at that 19th meeting and that really provided an opportunity for public to weigh in on the project itself, but then also for the commission to marinate some of their comments, questions, concerns and raise those forward and then bring those forward to this body for final consideration.

So it's a recommendation... I wouldn't say a recommendation because we didn't actually ask for a recommendation at the February 19th meeting. It was really comments that were really brought forward to this body.

2:03 – 2:1527 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:03:14

So we are going to get a design review permit or we really don't

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:03:17

need it? Yeah, this is living under the design review permit application process.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:03:21

The application process. Okay, thank you and finally the can of worms you might say. The associated CEQA environmental findings and determination to the City Council so when I go to page 210 I thought we already do we already have findings? And I heard you mention something about there were new CEQAs Guidelines around infield housing, I just because I don't know. I'm curious but it seems to me that you pointed out all of the requirements that were necessary for a Class 32 exemption.

So are we coming back with the CEQA? Does that need to be reevaluated? That's my question, I guess.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:04:12

Fully baked is probably the best way to identify that. It's really identifying the CEQA exemptions that apply, that we believe apply to this project and then having a fully vetted out exemption kind of determination for this body to respond on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:04:32

The staff report contains an initial assessment of the exemptions, both the Class 32 exemption for infill development projects and the new one which is the special statutory exemption under Public Resources Code Section 21080.10 for contracts and services to assist unhoused persons. Summarizing. And so the staff report covers it at an initial level. The CEQA findings, the formal approval if made by the Council will come in a future meeting in which the Council would adopt a resolution that would approve the Development Management Agreement, make the CEQA findings with all of the associated backup and approve the Design Review Permit. And that's what's not on tonight's agenda. That would be next time or as the Council may direct as to timing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:05:19

I just have a quick, silly question.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:05:22

Just a really quick follow-up. Council will be deciding if the CEQA findings that is presented are to be approved or moved forward? It's a council decision in other words to approve the CEQA findings. Am I understanding that correctly?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:05:38

Yes, the council's approval of the project will include approving the CEQUA findings

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:05:43

Okay, and so just a quick note is I would love to hear more about statutorily exempt pursuant section to Section 21080.10 of the Public Resources Code just because it seems to be new. So I'd like to hear on that. So that for me is my first three questions. So thank you very much for answering them. Much appreciated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:06:13

On that last question, if I may Mr. Mayor and Council? Yes. On 21080.10, I'll turn that to John Fox our outside council.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:06:20

Okay, whatever. Who I believe is on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:06:21

the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:06:21

Zoom. Yeah we don't need to do it now just just I'm curious because we will have more infill projects and potentially it would be something for council and or planning to really understand. That's all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:06:34

And just to clarify that, the new law is not for infill. The new law is for services for people experiencing homelessness. The infill standard is existing standard infill laws.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:06:46

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:06:47

The new law is for contracts and projects that provide services for persons experiencing homelessness or unhoused persons.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:06:54

Okay, and we can talk about that in the future. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:06:57

you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:06:58

Just real quick, what is fully baked?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:07:03

How

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:07:03

did I use that phrase?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:07:05

As in, it's the resolution that is not yet drafted. And that would be the resolution that would be approved next time or considered and approved if the Council so desires. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:07:16

Anything else? Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:07:16

please. I just want to hear it out loud. I've had some constituents concerned about the soil quality and the toxicity of the land, and I read in the report that no contaminants of dangerous levels were found but that there were some contaminants that were found. Could you please speak to that a little bit?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:07:40

I would turn that to the, I think we have Andy Nelson with Rincon that's on Zoom and he can certainly speak to that. I know we provided a summary and then some details to that point as well but I think Andy is our resident expert on this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:07:56

And Rincon is our professional environmental consultant firm that completed the phase one and phase two? Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:08:05

Hello everybody. So a little bit of background on myself, I'm a professional geologist working for Rincon. I've got about 23 years of experience in the industry. Our office is in Ventura so this site we definitely take seriously it's in our backyard. The whole point of what we did in our investigation at the site was to try to identify if there were any contaminants at this property We advanced six soil borings across the site to depths of five feet, and we collected samples at one feet and five feet below ground in each one of those borings. We also collected two samples from a stockpile of soil that was on-site. We sent those samples off to a lab and we tested for just a variety of constituents.

Hydrocarbons, gasoline, diesel, oil, VOCs, PAHs, metals, pesticides, herbicides because there was really no known source but we just needed to evaluate if there is anything there. What we found was in two of our samples There were concentrations that came back, they were higher than the other sample concentrations and it sort of warranted a little bit more evaluation. So one of them was an arsenic concentration and that was detected in the stockpile sample. And the arsenic concentration was at 13 parts per million where most of all the other samples were in the range of two to five parts per million.

There's naturally occurring arsenic in soil in Southern California, so we compared the concentrations we found on site with those naturally occurring concentrations and it was that one concentration was one part per million above naturally occurring background concentrations. So to us It's something that needs to be addressed. It's not necessarily a health risk from our standpoint, because you have naturally occurring arsenic already in soil.

The recommendation we had for that was it's in the stockpile. That stockpile is going to get removed from the site when it goes to get developed. So that's already been addressed. When the site gets developed, that stockpile is being removed. The arsenic would no longer be a concern. The second item was a concentration of lead that we detected in one of the soil samples, and lead also is naturally occurring in soil but the concentration that we found at that it was a five foot deep sample, it was also higher than most of the other samples that we collected.

The samples that were the rest of the site they were in the range Let's see, anywhere from, we were looking at 9 or 10 parts per million up to around 21 parts per million. And the sample that we got at 5 feet was 83. So it was definitely higher than the other ones. It also required a little bit more evaluation. There's different screening levels that are used when you are looking at metals and different concentrations of contaminants.

One of them is for a residential use, and it's the screening level that DTSC, Department of Toxic Substance Control issued, and for a residential use The DTSC screening level for lead is 80 parts per million. So our concentration was 83, so just slightly above that residential use scenario. So what we've proposed is going back out to the site Doing some step-out borings right around that one sample that we got, collecting additional samples to try to delineate the extent of lead in that area. And then based on that our recommendation would be as they are grading the site to excavate that soil out.

So as it stands right now, there's really no health risk that we've identified. That soil sample was at five feet. We collected a sample at one feet so even shallower. That one foot sample was well within that normal background concentration range and it's within the same range as all the other samples. So there's no direct contact exposure risk right now. That five-foot sample, as it stands, there is no pathway for exposure.

But in a residential scenario, the DTSC screening level has been exceeded. So that's why we were saying we just need to get that sample, that area where that sample was collected excavated out and disposed of. The other part of it that we did so that's the sort of health risk portion of it. There's also the waste disposal. So once they start digging the soil up you You were going to dispose of the soil and you have to properly dispose of it. So landfills require separate tests to see whether or not a concentration, any contaminant might be considered hazardous. So knowing that we analyzed that lead sample and we analyze it for what's called STLC and also TCLP as it's basically a leachability test the lab will run so when a Landfill accepts the soil, they will know is there potential for that contaminant to leach from the soil and say enter a nearby stream water body.

So we did that test and it actually came back as California hazardous so when that soil is disturbed excavated out it will be managed separately from the remaining soil on site, and it'll be taken to a landfill that will accept hazardous soil. So those are sort of two different things that we were evaluating. One was the health risk and the other part was the soil disposal options.

We're going to get more information when we go back out and we do these step-out borings, and that's planned for next week. So we are going to be collecting more samples all around it And that's going to get us a better idea of the volume of soil that has those high lead concentrations and options. Let's say it's just isolated to that five foot interval, that's easy enough to excavate out. It's a vacant lot right now if it's more widespread there's different options of dealing with it but we are going to be Talking to the DTSC, they can be an oversight agency throughout this process. With the intent that we get the ultimate letter from them stating no further action, the property has unrestricted land use and it's clear for development. So once we get this next round of investigation done, collect our additional samples, we'll have a better idea on the volume, and that's when we're going to go to the DTSC.

They can provide oversight and give us that letter.

2:15 – 2:2112 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:29

Just a question, just in the way that you're speaking right now and I want to go to Mr. Seibert here so we see that there's more testing that needs to occur and we see that there's some soil sample that has to be managed when you hear that report or when we look at the report is that par? Is it normal what you expect or is it extraordinary in any way or should we be concerned is the question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:15:52

Right, yeah. So to put it in context, so my experience is on contaminated properties I have a lot of experience dealing with commercial properties, industrial properties oil fields residential like the whole gamut and i have seen a lot in gas stations everything too this site to me is on the very low scale of contaminated properties. I almost wouldn't consider it a contaminated property because the concentrations that we saw still, that arsenic concentration is one parts per million above background. The lead concentration is still within the range of background concentrations It's above average, but it's still within the range. The residential screening levels that the DTSC sets are very conservative so they want to definitely protect human health so they are pretty low.

aren't very mobile in soil, so it's not like let's say a gasoline release where the gasoline will impact the soil. There's vapors coming off of the soil that can get inside a building they can impact groundwater then the groundwater moves off site. Metals are pretty immobile and there's also a pretty low risk for exposure because unless you're generating a lot of dust unless you are digging in the soil you're not going to get exposed to it as easily as say VOCs or gasoline So to me, this is an easy case to resolve because the site's undeveloped and a shallow excavation can remove these elevated concentrations. So yeah, to me it's on sort of the lower scale of contaminated and I almost wouldn't even call it contaminated.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:17:41

Is that going, if this, if the next set of tests finds that we do need to do some kind of remediation effort or some kind of soil, some kind of excavation as you're describing. How is that gonna add a substantial cost to the overall project?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:17:59

So the grading that takes place on the site, if I am correct, I've seen some of the grading plans. It looks like there's going to be cuts on-site up to about 5 feet 6 feet deep So if the excavation in the area where we had this lead concentration is going to six feet, that's going to remove all of the lead just through the grading process. So it wouldn't add any extra cost but let's say the grading in that area only goes to one or two feet then our recommendation is to extend that down until you get through that area of elevated lead.

There will be some additional disposal costs because that little pocket of lead is considered hazardous, so that's going to have to get shipped off separately. Now the amount of cost I can give you a ballpark number but until we get really better handle on the volume of it, it'll be a big range.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:59

Thank you. Anything else? Yeah, yeah. I see Leslie.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:19:05

Yes hi um quick question so you said that you got your soil sample from both kind of surface one foot but also five feet and that if the excavation or the grading were to go down to If it was going to be at one foot and you had to go down to five, then there would be extra costs. But you didn't go down to like six or seven or eight, right? So it's possible that—and would that be part of your step-out process to go deeper than five feet to figure out how deep this actually goes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:19:48

Yeah, so we're planning on going to 10 feet this next time. We want one boring in the same location as the last one that went to five feet and so we're gonna extend that down to ten feet where you're collecting samples as we go and then four additional borings, one in each direction stepping out and those are also going down to ten feet with samples collected at each depth going down

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:20:11

Okay and so, and then you know we will have a map of grading basically that we can cross-reference with how deep those you know how deep or not the lead actually goes or the arsenic.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:20:24

Yeah exactly yeah in the arsenic again the only one that was above the background levels it was in the stockpile right and that is planned for removal

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:20:41

Right, and so are you going to have to step out from the stockpile or are you just assuming somebody dumped this in here and the arsenic was in it and we're gonna take it out? And we're gonna take the arsenic out with it. Is that...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:20:53

Yeah, since it's only detected in that stockpile. There's no need for additional step out samples would just consider that whole stockpile to have arsenic but the concentration of arsenic isn't considered hazardous. That's just it's just above background but it can be taken to any landfill that will accept soil.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:21:15

Got it and this might

2:21 – 2:3625 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:21:20

whoops

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:21:22

It makes, you know, understanding that remediation is possible and without an extreme effort. I'm assuming that is correct? That no matter...I mean we could find something where remediation is, you know, extreme but we're not talking about extreme remediation here are we?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:21:41

No, not at this point. Not unless something more surprising comes up during our next round of soil sampling

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:21:50

Do you think that there's a chance for that? I mean, would you have seen something by now or is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:21:55

it... Yeah. I know sometimes you don't want to speculate because we're just dealing with science and the data that we have in front of us but I can speculate and the thing is there's so RINCON did a phase one assessment which is the whole historic review. You look at aerial photos, you look at building permits, you try to find any potential The sources of contamination for a property, its historic use. If it was a gas station then obviously there's a good potential for contamination. We didn't find anything during the Phase 1 review.

The only thing we identified was the stockpile of soil because it was reportedly brought from different sources and we didn't know where they were brought from so it could have any number of different things in it. So that was the one thing we identified in the Phase 1. When we were doing our soil sampling, the Phase 2, we also I walked the site and I'm looking for sources of contamination, stained soil, drums, leaking drums, anything like that. I didn't see any of that. I did see materials are being stored out there so we placed the locations in areas that we felt would have the best chance of finding something but still no idea of a source or a release, anything like that. So the samples that we got, there's no indication that there would be Any issues at the site?

To me, it was a little bit of a surprise to find the lead in the arsenic. And by doing these step-out borings we'll see what they...what it comes back with but I don't have any indication that we're going to have any higher concentration than what we've already detected.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:23:35

Right. So so what I just heard was that you did not try to avoid places that might have contamination. That instead what you tried to do was to Go where you thought there might be contamination in order to do your due diligence. Did I understand that correctly?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:23:55

Right, yeah so for example there was a 100 gallon little fuel tank that looks like it hasn't been used in a very long time we put a boring right next to that because if there was any fuel in that and let's say it leaked we're going to pick it up on our soil samples. There are other areas of the site where they're just being It's a bunch of stuff that's being stored on-site, terracotta tiles and things like that.

I'm looking at the ground, I'm looking for any signs of contamination and we're putting borings where we suspect maybe something was stored there but has been removed but now there's no indication, but let's put a boring over there so it's placing six different borings across the site I think you've seen the square footage of that site. It's not that large, so six borings is pretty representative and you should be able to find something if there was contamination of that property.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:24:50

Right. And finally, my last point is what would give me great confidence—and I'm assuming are you going to go to the DTSC for the final sign-off regardless of what is found in this second sort of review? So we'll get that regardless? It's just how tricky it's gonna be to get that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:25:18

Yeah, that is definitely the intent. We want a letter from an oversight agency that can Review all of our reports, write comments on our reports. Say that we have done the appropriate work out there and that they feel like there is no risk to human health or the environment. That if our plan is go out there and dig it out, remove it off site, that's adequate and that they give us that final letter saying no further action because it can come from us. We can provide our recommendations but it comes with a whole lot more weight if it comes from the DTSC.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:25:58

Correct. I will point out that the DTSC has dodged the Santa Susana toxic site quite well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed2:26:08

Yeah, that one is a lot more complicated. It's

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:26:12

a lot more complicated, I know but but I agree that you know some sort of sign-off by the DTSC would be important so thank you for that and thank you for answering the question. Much appreciated.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.882:26:24

Mr. Whitman, you had a question? Yes I know we've had many assurances that people who become residents of Tent Town will have some connection with Ojai, but I still keep getting questions about what the criteria is and asking for an explanation of some people who have gotten up in front of City Council and talked about moving here a couple of years ago, who were members of Tin Town.

And I know we have a local ordinance that puts locals first essentially and I guess I'm wondering is there a place where the community can look and see you know like objective criteria for being a resident? And does the city do any type of a review or confirm that they meet our criteria?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:27:35

So, let me address this question. It's actually a two-part response. The first is we're proposing to take advantage of Encampment Resolution Fund grant and that grant is made available to take an existing homeless encampment and transform it into permanent supportive housing. So if you were in the encampment at the time that the application was made, if you were one of the residents there then you are potentially, if you're able to and we talked about that earlier make that transition into the Cabin Village project.

So yes, you could have been living in that encampment and maybe you lived in the encampment but you did not necessarily have a connection to Ojai. There potentially could be folks in that situation. The vast majority of our participants are from Ojai. I think I've told this story a few times, I'm going to tell it again. We have City Hall employees who are classmates with participants in Ojai Tent Town.

If we have Availability within Ojai Tent Town, and the population is relatively stable. It doesn't come up very often. We get vacancies usually if somebody finds housing, if somebody unfortunately has to go to skilled nursing or this doesn't happen really at all anymore but previously it used to be if somebody was incarcerated that would create a vacancy All the intake screening is done through help of Ojai. And by design, they try to make a connection to did you grow up here? Did you work here? Did you become homeless here?

What is the connection to the Ojai Valley? But it's not something where you have to show a birth certificate that shows that you were born in Ojai or give me your high school Diploma, that type of thing. It's more of a soft determination and for the protection of those vulnerable people that we're dealing with, we don't open up the file for scrutiny from the public for obvious reasons but we rely upon Help of Ojai who is making entries into the homeless, the HMIS management system based on their findings. And when they do recommend a new participant to join OTT and when you join OTT, Ojai Tent Town potentially if you are able to adhere to the behavior-based model, you could make the transition over to the Cabin Village. It's a consultation with the city and so help of Ojai comes to us and they say we've got this person...

We recently had an elderly woman who is from Ojai who experienced homelessness and she is now living in OTT I hope that answers your question. Well, we're hoping that that's a very small number. And we're thinking that those people that are unable to move to the cabin village are going to need extraordinarily higher services than what we were able to offer in the cabin village. So that might be mental health services that require much more around-the-clock care, medical services. If you need skilled nursing I think is the biggest example.

We do not have a nurse on site at OTT, and we will not have a nurse on site at the Cabin Village Project. So you have to be somewhat relatively independent—and I use that term relatively because you could certainly have mobility issues. You could have moderate mental health issues. You could have substance abuse issues, and that would not disqualify you from moving into the permanent supportive housing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:31:40

So what happens in the event with somebody with mental health issues that starts to cycle, spiral down or whatever? Then what is the plan to help them?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:31:50

So we treat every single situation on a case-by-case basis, and we have to evaluate what's going on and what to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:31:55

proceed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:31:57

So the WEA is City Administration, and usually that's me. That is our homeless coordinator. That is one of our lead volunteers. That is the city attorney's office sometimes. Sometimes that's also possibly the sheriff's department depending on what's gone on. It really depends on the situation, and we're really trying What we're very aware of is that we don't want to exit somebody from Ojai Tent Town only for them to be a situation for somebody else in Ojai to have to address or deal with. There should be some compelling This person, like I said, this person really needs care that we can't provide here is usually the primary reason. Or this person just absolutely refuses to accept the behavior-based good neighbor agreement and we've had that happen too.

We've had people that just won't comply and what we tell them is moving into the cabin village is no different than moving into an apartment complex There are rules there, too. You can't go jump in the pool at midnight and hoot and holler and yell, etc., right? Any landlord-tenant agreement, there are rules you have to adhere to, and this is no different.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:33:11

But how valid would a document be, the Good Neighbor Document if you're dealing with somebody with mental health issues? Are they truly capable and can be held accountable for something that they may not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:33:23

understand? Sometimes no and sometimes yes. And I will tell you that we do have some participants that do struggle with some mental health challenges that are very successfully able to adhere to the good neighbor agreements Part of what we've found is that there's a community that has been created in Ojai Tent Town. I think that's largely due to the work of Ames Weiss and the St. Francis Challenge, and so people look out for each other. And what I've seen is that when somebody was really having a difficult time, there's often somebody else who you know is in tune with this person's challenges and can help them, and that's happened a number of times.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.882:33:59

So I have a couple of follow-up questions there. You mentioned there won't be a nurse on site, are we contemplating that there's going to be anybody on site?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:34:13

Yes, we are. And this goes back to the cost model that's an attachment. So we're contemplating and then I do need to point out there is an error that's been pointed out in the cost model. The cost model incorrectly states one case manager. It's actually supposed to be two case managers. So, there's two case managers. There is a Ventura County Behavioral Health Community Services Coordinator that's also a case manager of sorts. There's going to be a property manager. There's going to be security.

Those are all presences that are going to be there on a daily basis. It's going to vary, and so what we've talked about—and again I would probably if you want some specific details, Kimberly Albers or Jeff Gaddis are the ones who have actually created and put these together. What they've told us—and again we can certainly call on them At the front end, you have a need for more services and that mostly for the optics of the community really. For example, you might have a lot more security at the start even though you don't necessarily need it but maybe the public and the community feels better with that. We've seen that here at OTT.

It's arguable if we really need the amount of security that we have here now simply because it's stabilized quite a bit, but I would maybe encourage, if you're willing, Ms. Albers to better answer this question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:35:38

I would just add on the panel on the 24th, we talked about these questions and one of those answers was in the beginning phase, you may have somebody there 24 hours a day for a while between The staff that's called and the help of Ojai people, and then eventually you'd have your county support. So it seems to me we will have to evaluate as it goes on if I heard what you said correctly. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:36:02

Because somebody with mental illness, you know, you can be fine today and you can have something at midnight one o'clock in the morning where they won't... Tina can verify that nine times out of ten they don't meet criteria to take them to get the help that they need so what happens?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:36:19

So if I could just jump in, we have that currently. We have folks with mental illness and so we have on-site security and we also have a community. And so we have kind of both things working together if somebody's having an issue. Security...

2:36 – 2:375 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:36:32

They're trained for mental health issues? I'm just saying this and I don't mean to sound snotty or whatever but I think I've told you that I had a brother that had mental health issues and myself and my two sisters took care of him. We had everything, conservatorship, medical and legal power of attorney, everything You know, he wasn't unhoused. He went from me to my other sisters and when he would cycle or do whatever, he could identify that he needed help but there was no facility. I'm sorry, we have one county hospital for mental health issues with 30 beds

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:37:04

So your brother might not have been a candidate for either OTT or the Cabin Village Project. I didn't know your brother and his situation, but I will also point out that we are planning to have that Ventura County Behavioral Health Community Services Coordinator who is a trained clinician.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:37:20

When I'm sitting with my brothers so he was one person there was three adults caring for him with his mental health issues and it was a full-time job

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:37:28

Yeah and I'm saying, I don't know that your brother would have necessarily been somebody who could have adhered to the good neighbor agreements in OTT and therefore probably wouldn't have been able to transition over to the Cowan Village project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:39

Also we're in a situation that if what we have lived with before this moment is they would be in Libbey Park or in the river bottom. Yes, okay. We've been at this for a while. Five-minute break? Okay if everybody needs that five minute break yes and then we'll come back and we'll do public comments.

2:51 – 2:5712 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.742:51:18

Meeting time. Meeting time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:27

Okay everybody,

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.742:51:27

let's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:28

sit down and get

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.742:51:28

going!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:39

Welcome back everybody. So let me say two very short things. The first short thing is we have about an hour and 15 minutes of comments, so I just want to alert you to that. We have a lot of familiar names. So if you have said it and said it well, saying it again doesn't make it stronger. You could say ditto or you've got me and we've got you. We've got it. It's clear.

Or say whatever you want to say of course. So what I'm telling you is you don't have to repeat yourself if you've said it already. We completely hear you. And the second thing I want to mention People are going to say things that you like and you want to affirm. We get it, but please be quiet so we can move this on. And if we hear there have been some instances of people vilifying a side that's not theirs, we're all here together and we have differing opinions about this, and that is totally okay.

So let's let that be okay, and if we do see some vilifying, we're gonna ask you to not do that. Okay? Deal? All right, here we go! Sue Williamson, David Chapman and Ruth Miller.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed2:53:07

Wow, I wasn't expecting to have to go first.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:10

Lucky you!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed2:53:12

Well, I just want to say this has been very informative and I'm so impressed. Everything that has been raised by the community has really been looked into and responded to very responsibly. I'm very impressed with all the work that has gone on. My question is what is the government for in these days? It seems that government is turning into a profit-oriented business.

And rather than what I feel the government is for, which is to provide services for people that need them. That's why we pay our taxes. That's why we're here. I don't think that wherever you put this project, you're not going to come up with some kind of opposition from the neighbors. This is consistently always happening. I went on AI and I asked about if there were any validity to all the fears that people raise when it's near their house.

And sure enough, it was very interesting because AI does a pretty good job of surveying a lot of things. Basically what it said was that those fears are basically unfounded. I think I sent a letter to you guys saying all this and someone here also pointed out all the various information about How having a project like this lowers the costs to the community, police services and healthcare etc.

And I'd also like to point out that a lot of the people already have services. You were worried about the bathrooms being cleaned. Well right now people that are in The Cabin Tent Town have people that come and help them do their laundry, help them clean up. This is part of the services that are already available to people so you know the city is not going to have to be paying for all these services they're already taken care of this is not a legitimate reason to oppose this project So I'd just like to say, I support it. Let's move on. All these questions have been answered. It's time to help these people. They've been sitting there. It is going to get hot this summer. Let us get this going.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:55:49

Thank you Ms. Williamson. David Chapman, Ruth Miller and Dean Wigger

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 30Proposed2:55:55

Hello Mayor and Council, thank you very much for all the work you've done on this long journey. I'm representing Friends of the Cabin Village Project and just want to say that we've conducted two petitions to support the selection of the public works yard. First, we did a manual signature campaign which we initiated through our support network and at community sites Second, we did an online petition through Change.org. To date we have collected a total of 818 signatures of support from both campaigns, 246 from our manual signatures efforts and 572 from Change.org. These results reflect the larger community's support for the public works yard Our thanks go out to all of those who have supported our initiatives, and we just ask the Council to please vote yes on The Yard.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:56:59

Thank You Mr. Chapman. Ruth Miller, Dean Wigger and Klaus Peter

2:57 – 3:024 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 31Proposed2:57:08

Good evening, I'm Ruth Miller with the Unhoused Task Force, Friend of the Cabin Village and Tent Town on-site volunteer. I want to thank the City for its continued support for Tent Town and for its ongoing efforts in the creation of the cabin village. Tent town while not perfect is much better than sleeping on the street however it's not sustainable and while better than the street it's not great The tents are cold in the winter and, as we saw yesterday, very hot in the summer. One of our older residents with fragile health said the inside of his tent hit 103 yesterday.

He had to stay there because he was on medication that didn't let him get up and about. Cabin Village will provide much-needed basics for our elderly and disabled. I also want to thank Dignity Moves for their ongoing support in helping Ojai find solutions for its unhoused. Most of you don't know, but Dignity Moves was contacted by the Unhoused Task Force two years ago. They have participated and given much needed advice every step of the way They stayed true to the effort through all of the ups and downs.

Dignity Moves spent hundreds of hours helping Ojai with its objective in housing our vulnerable neighbors without receiving any monetary compensation. Their non-profit mission is obvious, to provide housing for the least of us. There's no developer who would have stayed with the project with no contract or a surety of compensation The City and Dignity Moves has spent the past seven months working on a plan for the Cabin Village at the City Maintenance Yard.

There's been much research into other possible locations, however, the City Maintenance Yard remains the most viable location. It is underused piece of ground already owned by the city. The project won't disturb any environmentally sensitive areas, and it provides privacy to the residents as well as a community due to the trees surrounding it and its close proximity to services.

It's time to break ground at the maintenance yard and properly house our most vulnerable neighbors. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:35

Thank you, Ms. Miller. Dean Wigger, Klaus Peter and Clay Creasy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed2:59:45

Well, I would like to start off by saying ditto because I have been up here before but I'll try to read fast. Council members, I'd like to start off by commending you for all your efforts and diligent support in listening to the various arguments for and against the Cabin Village project. I feel like many of you took the time to listen to your constituents and I'd like to personally thank each and every one of you.

I hope you will take heed to the many pros and cons that have been presented to you this evening regarding the siting of the Cabin Village project and the troubled maintenance yard versus remaining on the city-owned Kent Hall property. In my personal opinion, as a contractor and builder with development experience, I can assure you that the challenges represented when choosing the Kent Hall property are far less difficult from a builder's perspective and represent a vastly improved environment for the future residents of Cabin Village.

In Kent Hall, the site allows for increased square footage of the individual living quarters. The proposed maintenance yard design of 9 by 20 represents not much more than the standard minimums required for prison cell in the U.S., much less maintaining storage space for individual belongings. And Ken Hall, there is no risk for contaminated soil representing the city's potential liability for future health risks and lawsuits brought on by the lead and arsenic poisoning as has been evidenced to exist.

In Ken Hall you do not have to relocate the maintenance yard to somewhere else much less encumber the residents with the close proximity of the daily operations being proposed to be maintained a public works yard. And Kent Hall, you aren't challenged by a close to 30-foot elevation change and the many challenges represented by the access for fire department and mere everyday ADA ramps to get in and out of the site.

In Kent Hall, the residents are living amongst a park like environment experiencing nature and the real rehabilitating effects it has to offer. In Kent Hall, there is a much adequate parking. Unlike the complete refusal of the current design at which Public Works claims that parking is exempt based on manufactured exemptions of calling this project a government facility when we all know it's actually a large-scale high density residential facility that requires parking.

Finally, in reference to the major disadvantages of the Public Works Yard, if you choose Public Works, you are forcing this amongst the single-family residents that exist on all sides clearly going against all the city planning element and the advice of certain Planning Commissioners who have pointed out to you the shortcomings of this project in relation to our cities zoning and planning element.

Comparing the future plan, excuse me, I'm going to skip that. Getting on. You have a difficult choice to make and I think it deserves your attention to further investigate the original intention of this ERF grant with a motion to continue planning of this project at Kent Hall. Thanks very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:18

Thank you Mr. Wicker. Klaus Peter, Clay Creasy, and Daryl Ralston. Klaus Peter? Oh yeah great.

3:02 – 3:073 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 32Proposed3:02:36

Hello everyone. I hope this will be very short. My first comment is, that this will all work out. I think this would be the best outcome if we can move forward with this and spare us the agony of more repetitious arguments back and forth, and huge legal fees because if we had a better council in the past, sorry to say that, we wouldn't have had Those tremendous legal fields that I personally feel should definitely not be repeated in this case. Having said that, you have a formidable opponent as several did this whole write-up that we got and the response from the City Council.

I think most people picked it up but I'm just saying what I'm referring to. This was from Mr. Clay Greasy, and the speaker before who clearly say they suggest a different location. I don't necessarily agree with this but I think there should be as very serious look at a backup plan. Because if these people prevail, and they might legally or otherwise, I am not convinced that there is a serious backup. You said you looked at 10 or 12 locations? A serious backup would be someone saying like where else on City Hall that we already own could we do this if the people from Persimmon Hill get their way?

So it's my caution other than that, I think I hope it will all work out and let's keep this whole process very transparent, especially with the dollar score. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:04:30

Thank you Klaus-Peter. Clay Creasy, Daryl Ralston and Delaney Labar.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 33Proposed3:04:41

Thank You Mayor Gilman and council members and Weston. gave a little handout, and I was instructed by Wellston to tell you, Mayor Gilman, that I had done that. It makes it officially something you can look at. So hopefully we've crossed that bridge. My handout has three parts to it. The first part talks about why a location at the City Hall lot to the immediate west of the Kent Hall parking lot, why that would be advantageous The second section shows why it would be much better for Ojai taxpayers, and the third section shows why it would be much better for the Green Coalition.

Let me start with the first page on why it's better for Cabin Village residents. Councilwoman Lang, you asked the City Manager to explain why the Cabin Village and Maintenance Yard was different, better or worse than another location. He declined to answer that because he said his mandate is only to talk about maintenance yard. Unfortunately, he's correct. That is his mandate so we can't expect him to go far afield but that's not my mandate and I can tell you why the cabin village at Kent Hall would be vastly superior to the maintenance yard.

There are 10 items listed there and in sake of time I'm not going to read them all out loud it's several hundred feet closer for residents to walk to the facilities they need to go to Pedestrian walkways are much less treacherous. Parking capacity is much better, including for emergency vehicles. There's a lack of exposure to busy streets. It's more remote from neighboring residences.

There will be good access to green space. Residents can potentially even get jobs doing park maintenance there. There's no worries about toxic chemicals. You have Random number that Andy Nelson, the geologist, declined to tell you how much it might cost depending on how these extra borings turn out. But that's a wild card here and you would have space to expand if you wanted to.

Secondly, pro forma economics are much favorable for the City Hall location. I think it would save $3.8 million in total versus the maintenance yard. You can see these numbers here. Why would it save that much money? No need for a new parking lot, no need to pay for elaborate ADA access etc. I do have one show-and-tell that I'd like to share with you. I thought it was a typo when I saw that they were going to install six trees that had circumference or had diameters of 36 inches. They assured me it was not a typo. This is how big around this is how big around at 36 inch diameter oak tree is and they're gonna install six of these on that lot. Does anybody here really think that's gonna happen?

It was confirmed to me in follow-up comments that it was not a typo. If they double down on that...

3:07 – 3:134 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed3:07:59

Honorable Mayor and Council, first and foremost thanks for your dedication and commitment. It really is valuable to our community. There's a plan to locate Cabin Village in the City Hall parking lot And that site offers numerous advantages to the city public work yard. And here's a few, there's an option to make the living units larger and this was brought up at the recent Planning Commission meeting where enlarging the units was beneficial so that's possible at that site.

The location is financially more feasible because you won't have to purchase a property to replace the public workshop and an estimated cost of $1.5-$2 million. There won't be a need to remediate contaminated soil at an unknown cost, there won't be need for a lengthy ADA ramp at another cost. And the savings may well be available to offset the annual cost of Cabin Village.

The City Hall location is much safer for pedestrians, residents and visitors because there's adequate parking and there will not be a need to traverse South Montgomery Street which has a high traffic pattern and almost a blind curve. Residents and visitors can enjoy a park-like setting, and still have seclusion if they desire at that City Hall site. So in closing, I ask that the financial considerations be paramount, and please do not award a contract to Dignity Moves without a competitive bid.

It doesn't matter where grant money comes from, it's still the public's money, and it still needs to be accounted for. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:09:55

Delaney Labar, Renee Roth and Matai Blacklock. Okay thank you Renee Roth, Matai Blacklock and Liz Otterbein.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:10:10

Good evening members of the council Early on, I tried to get a meeting with Mr. Harvey and he did actually make time to meet with me and I did say that I was a big supporter of this project and I still am a big supporter of this project. And I want to support this project fully and 100% but I'm just not there yet. I want to thank Kathy Nolan and the architects and the expansion, and all the things they've included in the project. I just do not believe this is the right site.

Okay, so first of all, I want to say that I have attended three of the World's Cafe events that the Green Coalition put on. I think Rachel you may have been at one of them And the number one priority was always to address the unhoused population in the park that was limiting public access and planning for future use. It has now been addressed with a temporary tent village that has been set up in the parking lot, So, it has been contained. It is being managed. They have the buy-in process to get into the program but again this is not the Green Coalition's decision. This is the City Council's decision based on input from the community. I've heard several people say well the Green Coalition doesn't want it down in the In the area on this side of the campus, the Green Coalition doesn't want it.

What is that? This isn't the Green Coalition's decision. It's your decision and I want you to really seriously give this site some additional thought. And the first time I did walk through this, it was with Connor Jones on a watershed walk-through. We did it on another walk-through with Kathy Nolan. I think I've walked through it four different times. Every time I've walked through it, you know what I said?

This is where the unhoused population needs to be living. I felt it, I knew it in my heart. I can't explain why I knew it and then I talked to Clay Creasy, I saw his plan, I saw that what he was trying to do was provide benefits to the community, to provide benefits maybe even to Kent Hall. Maybe we could reinvest some money in Kent Hall by having some additional funding available Without all the impediments of inaccessibility, it's just too inaccessible for people to get up and down. I think the ingress and egress are just horrendous. I'm a trip-and-fall person. I don't want any more trip-and-falls.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:13:14

Thank you Ms. Roth. Mattai Blacklock, Liz Otterbein, and Betsy Sticks

3:13 – 3:215 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:13:26

Good evening. Very cool to see this moving along. I brought this up last time, but I wanted to kind of add some more detail and just curious about next steps for discussion. And I also want to make this clear to everyone while y'all are making the decision. How many people here by show of hands are concerned about fires for Ojai in the future? We have one person in front of me raise their hand. Two, I think everyone might.

Cement accounts for 8% of total greenhouse gas emissions. I heard stucco being mentioned as the outside exterior surface for the building whether this is at the proposed site or another site. Clay is an abundant local material. I'm sure there's a city site somewhere that we could harvest clay from. I'd be very curious to see what line item budget, and also Diggity Moves is doing a great job shout out to the architects and the whole team but imagine the vision where this Location is a training ground for the future of natural building to build resilient fire-hardened homes in our community. Clay plaster cleans the air, naturally removes volatile organic compounds from the air providing a safer respiratory environment For the residents, many of whom may have health conditions that could benefit from a really grounded healthy space.

Imagine there are over 2,000 high school students in Ojai if the number I looked up was correct. Imagine bringing groups of high school students by. Instead of having contractors who are being paid to apply cement, a caustic material, we could be doing this with kids I've been at numerous natural building workshops where kids as young as two years old are actually contributing to building these homes.

I came from a tech background and left that world, and came to Ojai to root in the community of people like Connor Jones and Sage Stodeman and all the amazing permaculturists and builders who are here creating a vision where we all want to live in. might not be here 100 years from now. There are clay buildings that have stood the test of time for thousands of years. We could have yearly workshops where students are coming back, learning how to maintain these buildings. We're using local material. There's a petition in LA that has received over 3,000 signatures of people interested in using earthen materials for rebuilding natural homes. We're working to train contractors and people to be able to help harden their homes with natural, abundant local materials.

We could all participate in a workshop. The people from Persimmon Hill, the people who are for this site could come together and collaborate on building this structure to some extent together.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:31

Thank you Mr. Blacklock. Remember what I was saying? Thanks guys. Liz Otterbein, Betsy Sticks and Bill Miley

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 34Proposed3:16:50

Good evening. I've been a resident of Ojai Valley since 1985, so that's 40 years. I've worked 17 years at the Psych Hospital in Ventura as a psychiatric nurse. First, I feel in my heart that caring for human beings is probably the most important duty we have Second, I've been volunteering at OTT since January. And I've met residents. I've done groups with them and I've met really smart, educated, caring human beings that need support.

My third point, it's a little bit out of the Ventura thing but I want to point out that people who know Ventura, do you know the Ventura Inn? It's a building right in the town. I'm bringing it up because I think there is an element of fear of what those people can bring to town. Ventura Inn is right in downtown Ventura Nobody knows. I was sending lots of patients from there, right out of crisis team and it was right in town and people are just being housed and there was no known disruption.

And my last point will be maybe we could be a model in Ojai to give people dignity. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:18:27

Thank you, Ms. Otterbein. Betsy Sticks, Bill Miley and Shanti, the last name looks like Shandosham. But Betsy, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 35Proposed3:18:40

Hey guys, nice to see you. Thank you Council, Mayor and staff for all the hard work and due diligence that have gone into this project so far. Much appreciated. It's really important. I want to share with you two things that I've learned over the last several months while teaching yoga at Tentown. First, I learned or rather relearned that we are all here together having the same human experience regardless of our DNA, family histories, choices, political parties or bank accounts.

We all experience thoughts and feelings including sadness, anger, fear, joy and love. We're all very resilient. We are all having an experience in a physical body which may include, at times, low back pain? Anybody? Inflammation? Anybody? Difficulty sleeping? Anyone? Digestive issues? Anyone? Headaches, anxiety, depression, addiction, fatigue, etc., etc., etc.?

Luckily, yoga makes us feel better and helps us remember our connection to ourselves, each other, and the planet. Second, I learned for the first time what it feels like to experience an open-hearted and healing yoga class. And then return to my cozy home with a roof, heating and cooling, hot water, a full refrigerator, and most importantly safety while knowing that my fellow classmates returned to tents.

They are camping year-round in a parking lot. Imagine that! As one resident said, everything is harder. I recommitted after each class to help the residents transition to a better situation. Clearly our economic system is off balance when so many members of our community lack the basic needs of adequate shelter, safety and respect. We have an opportunity tonight to make life so much better for our 10-town residents while being a beacon of forward thinking, compassion and solutions to make it a better future.

The population of Tentown is stable. A large percentage of the group are senior citizens. We can do better than the tent town outside. Let's take care of each other and move forward. So just say yes, thank you. And just one more moment because I have 23 seconds in my four years in office. I heard so many residents say they would like this eight acres to be a public park Over and over again, they would like to fulfill the destiny of the Smith-Hobson family who donated the property. They'd like Stewart Canyon returned to a natural state so that's I think that's really huge in terms of what the community wants. Thank you.

3:21 – 3:296 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:45

Bill Miley, Shanti, okay. Shanti then. Shanti's gone too. Okay. Carol Wade, Anita Cram, Mary Forrest. Carol Wade please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 36Proposed3:22:18

Pretty dramatic entrance. That was great! Sorry about that. Hi, I'm Carol Wade and I want to first begin by thanking you all for taking the time and the very strong and intense effort that's gone into looking at all the details of this project. I really do appreciate that. I also appreciate all the people who've come and their thoughts and their time too. I'm here to speak in support of the cabin village and the city-owned lot at the public works yard. Funding for the issues surrounding the unhoused populations come from local, county, state and private sources. Responses are by the police, by ambulance services, by fire departments, local hospitals and jails are greatly increased with unhoused people with no permanent place to be.

All of these services are more expensive to taxpayers than providing safe housing with supportive services. Harm reduction housing approaches to dealing with houselessness saves money because the cost of emergency responses, the things that I listed before police, ambulance, fire departments, local hospitals and jails is greatly reduced. More importantly basic human decency tells us to protect the most vulnerable among us, who happen to make up a majority of the unhoused population.

Those are seniors, veterans and disabled people. We have the money. We have the place. We have the people to help. Let's do this. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:24:11

Thank you, Ms. Wade. Anita Cramm, Mary Forrest and Susa Francina

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:24:30

Good evening, everyone. I won't go through all the hours that we've put into this and all the months but it's time. It's time to say yes and to move forward. I would like to address a few things that have been said. First of all, Kent Hall has never been tested for toxins. No one can stand up here and say that there aren't ones here because that information has not been evaluated Kent Hall is a much more sensitive ecosystem from an oak woodland perspective, and as was previously mentioned, Stewart Canyon. This is a watershed. It's a waterway that goes from the mountains, it goes down Kenyatta, it's the creek that goes by cottages among the flowers. It is a sensitive oak woodland ecosystem and watershed.

You know, there really aren't the dollars to increase the size. We already heard that tonight, that they increased as much as they could. Access will also be given from Ventura in addition to Montgomery. It's not just a Montgomery access anymore. The Natural Builders Workshop is a really good idea. I've been involved in several projects where community came and learned how to do natural building and contributed to the building practice. I don't know if that's logistical with this, but it definitely can be a community effort. And the other thing is that multiple funding sources have been mentioned identified tonight, and it has been stated many times through this process that that funding cannot be accessed until the housing is built. So please be compassionate.

It's time. It''s a much more protected site there. All the amenities can be met. Let's go forward with a yes vote tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:26:23

Thank you, Ms. Cram. Mary Forrest, Sousa Francina and John Boetti

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 37Proposed3:26:43

I want to first of all thank West and Grace both for giving me a way to get up here. I'm a resident, I guess you'd call it, of OTT, Ojai Tin Town. I'm introducing myself a little bit here, and I was an RN for over 20 years in my past. Then I went back to school and got an anthropology degree. There was a domestic issue after all this happened, and I left the state.

I think she was a psychiatrist, not psychologist. But she said this was an order for me to get help. If you just go to the library and figure out what kind of mental illness you have, come back to me and we'll put it through." And that was her solution. I didn't go back. But I did go through multiple spirals of what was going on with this system. And finally, maybe a year and a half, two years later, a public health psychiatrist decided after talking with me for five minutes that I had a major mental illness and gave me a prescription for which, as a nurse, I knew was going to mess up my brain. I couldn't believe he was going to do that because the diagnosis was incorrect.

So he gave me the prescription and it goes on from there. My point from this is that sometimes Our problems are society-made, not individually made. And that doesn't mean always the case but it is sometimes the case that we as a society are causing a lot of problems. Now, that being said, you know when I came to this and I am so grateful. I won't go into all the background but I'm so grateful to have this OTT to be able to exist I want to bring up some things from my anthropology. Okay, you're right, I see this. So let me just say this. Architecture affects how people think. It molds their thinking and they—I'm not going to make this—there's problems with pheromones and the architecture that you have...

3:29 – 3:387 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:29:50

I'm sorry Mary. We have to go on. Thank you, I'm sorry. Susan Francina, John Boetti and Grace Molloy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 38Proposed3:30:08

Good evening Council. Am I okay? All right. So actually this is a wonderful, potentially a very wonderful moment. I like to think that I was the first person Ruth Miller or among the first people Ruth Miller contacted over two years ago so I've been on board hundreds of hours to arrive at this moment And I want to express my full support for all the wonderful, incredible, intelligent comments made prior. And I sent in a letter—I don't need to repeat what was in the letter—to express my support for the Cabin Village Project in the Public Works Yard And I would say that the overriding, Anita Cram expressed it very well.

The main reason I would not place the project in the eight-acre campus is because providing housing for 30 or more residents simply is not compatible with a community vision for a quiet nature based park. We need this refuge. There have been previous attempts at placing housing in that parkland, and it was completely voted down. The community did not want it.

And I also went to all the meetings—not all but most—and I went to the most recent Ojai Valley Green Coalition workshop, and it was overwhelming Repeatedly, this is a potential demonstration project for land that respects the... I feel like I'm going in and out. We're respecting the rights of nature by using this as precious parkland with possible cob house for a caretaker. And the other thing I want to say is that I did walk the land with the representative from Persimmon Hill who wants to move the project there, and I was very open to hearing what he had to say. But present at that meeting was a professional licensed land surveyor—I have his letter And I can share it with you. He was adamant that the land would be, there was too much potential disturbance of the natural native habitat in order to make it work and then Jeff Gattis expressed concerns about security.

Once you start having to put up fences, you're disturbing the wildlife habitat Plus think about the light, the noise at night. 30 people you can't expect them-

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:33:15

Thank you Ms. Fanzina. John Boetti, Grace Malloy and Brad Smith

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 39Proposed3:33:23

Good evening, Council and staff. I want to thank you so much for the efforts that you have put into this subject. It's remarkable how much time and effort you put not only here but when you're at home in your offices it's really appreciated. So thank you. But first of all, I just want to say that I am in total support of this project. I have some questions, some practical questions about the buildings that interest me.

I also want to just comment on the gentleman who compared these nine by 20 dwelling units as prison cells. If you're living out in that tent and it's 103 degrees out, being in a 9 by 20 dwelling which is more space than is out there now that's heated and air-conditioned is like home sweet home. So I really took offense to that. But I just want to say that looking at these, I love these buildings. It was mentioned that the buildings were going to have tile roofs. I was wondering if standing seam metal roofs were considered for this because I think it would be cheaper there. They last a long time.

Cheaper both in material, I believe and in labor costs, so I would consider that. The other thing is that the common area where there is a proposed shade tree which is great but are there other considerations like shade structures? So if those folks can enjoy being outside as we all know these summers are pretty difficult without shade structures available And I'm interested in knowing, someone mentioned that it took like 11 months to do the last project to build it. I'm wondering if we're using straw bale construction or cob construction how long that would take?

Who the contractors are that that would be bid out to? And yeah, that's pretty much all I have to say. So thank you and I totally support this. Please pass it tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:35:56

Thank you Mr. Boetti. Grace Malloy, Brad Smith and Jane Walter

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 40Proposed3:36:02

Hi everyone, I want to also thank you specifically for how many times you've answered the same questions over and over again. It's a very impressive stoic vibe you're putting off. And before I forget, I want to just piggyback off my dad who just spoke. Daddy! Just to say, I think the standing seam is a genius idea because another reason for that is the tile roof thing and this kind of addiction to mission style architecture that's like The colonizers way is something I think we should all reconsider a little bit before we decide that that's the vibe of Ojai.

Love a standing seam! So this is a really exciting evening, you five council members have the opportunity to do something really wonderful so innovative and so thoroughly vetted I'm in support of the Cabin Village at the Public Works Yards site as detailed in tonight's meeting via all three recommendations by staff. Please proceed as quickly as possible. I listened very carefully to all the meetings this year about the cabin village, as well as the town hall and read staff responses to Clay Creasy's letter.

And I tried really hard to find like solid cons just to play devil's advocate with myself, but I really couldn't. All I could find was prose for this site and a lot of the facts that have been kind of like misquoted about Toxicity in the soil and things like that. I know that you all have been listening carefully and have the correct facts. Please listen most closely to all these experts who are unanimous in their support and approval of this project, as proposed at this site. All the amazing staff hired carefully and thoughtfully by the council here have addressed all your concerns so thoroughly. They're so excellent at this. Please trust them and move forward.

All the contractors and collaborators the council has hired and worked with feel so confident and well-researched that this project at this site will work for all members of our community. The budget's been vetted, revised and honed, help, dignity moves, the county and many other supportive services and partners are on board. Please, council members listen to the voices of the experts. Know that they're correct and amplify and serve the voices and needs of our community members at the highest risk who need this help the most. Approve this project tonight please. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:49

Thank You Ms. Molloy. Brad Smith and then Jane Walter

3:38 – 3:447 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:38:59

Good evening Council Members. Thank you all for getting us here. It's been a lot of work. I watched it intimately. Your staff, Mr. Seibert, good job. There's been a lot of noise about this project but we heard tonight cut through the noise although there's still some noise back there I fully support the project. I fully support the maintenance yard location for this project, and I fully support Dignity Moves as being the provider of services to carry on from tonight. I urge you all to vote yes. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 41Proposed3:39:49

Hi, everyone. I think most of you were or all of you were at the panel that we did a couple of weeks ago regarding this project and when I got here an hour-and-a-half ago or so, I think it's important to just remember that this is permanent supportive housing. We are working with vulnerable people who are unhoused who has been mentioned several times tonight are living in tents Moving them into housing is going to change their lives.

The issues that they are dealing with now will be addressed and some of it might be solved, so when I hear us talking about the like what-ifs of this happening we know Housing First is a proven tactic to dealing with homelessness There has to be a little bit of trust in that. What we're doing here exists and happens in other parts of this county, of the state.

So I really urge you guys to keep that in mind as we go through this. And I've also been Council Member Whitman, you brought this up in terms of like how are people connected to Ojai and what is that criteria? So I was asked this after the panel too. So our program for years at this point, in order for us to support someone with intensive case management they have to have become homeless in Ojai. So for us, that is the bare minimum and that looks a lot of different ways. It's not the exact same thing in how it's fielded with every individual but I think just because I hear it a lot and I know it's a question that people think about a lot, I think there's this narrative that people are going to come in droves from other parts of the county or the state to move into the cabin village And I just do not see that happening and that being a reality.

I'm happy to talk more about it later or if people have questions about that, but yeah, just want to again remind you guys again this is like a permanent supportive housing program. There are lots of things in place to support people and just to keep that in consideration as you vote tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:41:58

Thank you, Ms. Walter. That's all the cards I have. Anything online?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:42:01

Yes, Mary, let's move on to Zoom. First we have Larry followed by Mike and then Leanna. Larry, you have the floor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 42Proposed3:42:08

Good evening. Thank you very much for doing the phase two. Unfortunately, obviously there are some issues. I'm just wondering is the remediation going to be part of the cost of the construction or is it gonna be outside the cost on the city? Also if it came back dirty What is Plan B? Was there ever a Plan B? Has this always been the site? So, I mean that's my question because if it did come back dirty after all this and it could take, I don't know, $100,000 to do the remediation, $50,000, $2 million a year. It doesn't matter. The question is, Is there a Plan B And is the plan B, the Kent Hall site? Obviously that's where they are. And they're housed today.

The other question is in the state of California if I remember correctly you need, if you have 16 units or more, you need a full-time manager on premise. I know these aren't tenants, they're residents or however you want to call them But would that not follow that? Don't we need a full-time manager on site? There are more than 16 units, and that's state law for a normal apartment house. I do believe so you would think you may want to require that as part of your expense.

Maybe it's a therapist who lives there and they get rent free but that's their deal. Maybe that works. So anyway, you know I'm with Klaus. You know where is plan B? Please because this has to get done. We need to move on and everybody needs a home so thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:44:14

Thank you Mr. Dangold.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:44:15

Mayor we'll take one more in-house Mary Wells

3:44 – 3:5210 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 43Proposed3:44:24

First of all, I'm very impressed with what you've done. What you've put together the plan. I'm not in favor of the location for various reasons and I feel like when you have people living there that first of all there's the soil problem that I think is a problem but when you have people living there with disabilities and they're in wheelchairs or Not able to walk well.

Going up and down those hills just doesn't make sense to me, you know? I know they're making a ramp but it's still going to be an incline. And now that there's the possibility of Tent Hall being a location... The other thing that bothers me a lot because I drive Creek Road quite a bit if I'm going to Ventura, Absolutely shocked at how much traffic there is coming Creek Road into Ojai now and vice versa.

And when they get here, it's either Montgomery or Ventura streets so I just feel like it's setting those people up that have disabilities that are using walkers and wheelchairs Trying to manipulate with all that traffic is another problem. So I like the plan that you've put together, but I would really ask that you consider not using the service yard.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:45:51

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 43Proposed3:45:52

You're very

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:45:52

welcome. Dr. Williamson, I did not put your card in the right place and I apologize for that. Please come up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed3:45:59

Sorry I got off on the right, wrong venue at the first time. Many of the things that was going to bring up have sort of already been answered but I would like to ask a simple question in Ventura County and Santa Barbara County similar Cabin City projects have they been in single-resident areas or not? As far as I know, they've not been in single resident areas anywhere else in the county or Santa Barbara. Does anybody know that?

We'll ask that question in a moment. There will be a couple of questions at the end of it. The second thing is the entrance on Montgomery is just a horrible entrance, having driven that street day in and day out. It's a dark street, it's curvy, and to be able to access off Montgomery you've got to put in a sidewalk all the way past Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:47:30

Mayor, we have David who submitted a card.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 44Proposed3:47:40

There's been a lot of talk, obviously. I think we all want to build something to help the people in need. One of the speakers came up and said you know there's a lot of professionals that have given you lots of information and you should listen to them and I think that's true. You have a planning commission and two of those planning commission members wrote you a letter and that letter basically said this is not the site for this I'm going to give you a little bit of background on this.

Mayor, you and I talked on the phone a long time ago and you asked me, David where are we going to put this if we don't put it there? And I didn't have a good answer for ya. But after talking to some of my neighbors and residents that live around here they kind Change my mind a little bit and I have a location for you now And I believe that the original site the original grant the original number 20, you got 12 million dollars You can put it right here. You can have the money to do it make them larger if you want The city will have better oversight of the location the city employees that seem to be really for this project also They can be here to manage it because it's right in their backyard also with the rest of us. It's in our backyard I think Kent Hall site is a much better location than the site that you're currently possibly going to vote on tonight.

But either way, I know you guys are all trying to make the right decision for Ojai. I think we all think we need to do something and we should help the people that are in this room and that are living in tents. We definitely need to do something so thank you very much for your time. I appreciate it. Congratulations. Thank You Mr. Mendoza

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:49:39

Mayor will move back to zoom yeah next we have Mike Leanna then Steven okay Mike you have the floor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 45Proposed3:49:45

Thank you. One interesting quote from Andy Nelson that's, I took some really good notes. I'm an excellent note taker. He said, quote, I almost would not consider it contaminated. Almost would not consider it contaminated. Very interesting. And he also said, It's on the lower scale of contaminate. So let's make sure you process those words closely. Second, or I kind of think of that as almost saying like it's almost would not consider it bankruptcy or I almost would not consider it cancer. These are important words that he said.

Okay a couple one other thing I'd like to remind you is that you guys swore an oath to uphold certain principles and the general plan in the general plan said that all projects must not have enough And I want to make it clear that this is going to have an adverse effect on the general welfare of the community. So keep that in mind, please. Also keep in mind that 500 people signed a petition respectfully asking you to not go forward with the maintenance chart.

Another 500 people also agreed to that. So that's 1,000 people that are respectfully asking As David just mentioned, two esteemed members of the Planning Commission said and I'll quote. The density for the site was not brought before the Planning Commission for review given the Planning Commission has not reviewed the density requirements of the site and the proposed development does not meet the character of the adjacent land uses per housing We believe the City Council should not vote in favor of the Cabin Village project at this location.

So as you figure, as you go forward to vote I'm not sure how you can vote yes tonight. I recommend you vote no tonight maybe yes some other day but definitely not tonight with everything that's been shared with you so I respectfully ask you to proceed in that fashion and thank you for listening to these words And to David's words and everybody else on all sides of this issue.

And I got 44 seconds left, so now I'll give it back to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:52:17

Thank you sir.

3:52 – 4:0418 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:52:20

Next we have Leanna followed by Steven and then Shanti. Leanna?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:28

Hi can you hear me?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:52:29

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:52:30

Hi good evening City Council Mayor and City Administration Thanks to all of you who have worked on the Cabin Village, and I know you spent many late nights on this project. And I want to thank you for your decisions to provide the interim support you have for the people in OTT. Our city manager and his team are to be commended for their exhaustive work culminating in the 800-page staff report. It's an impressive document showing their commitment to this project.

We are almost at the finish line But there are still people in our community who want to continue looking for alternate sites. Some people I've heard tonight do not realize apparently the current and proposed Kent Hall location is already surrounded by residential homes, and all of those homes are closer than any are to the public works yard. Some people want to use our parkland rather than an underused maintenance yard.

And some do not realize that the eight acre campus, and in particular the Stewart Canyon area is an important cultural site to the Chumash. And the cost savings at the Kent Hall lot you heard from a speaker tonight are really just facts not based on facts which are not in evidence. Some, who with their faux cries of concern for the unhoused seek to further delay this project yet another seven months.

And at this point it's just noise designed to delay and kill the project. Let's get over the hurdle of the location tonight. There is no valid reason to say no to the public works yard. The city has the money, the city has a good site and the city has the plan. Show us that the city has the will to say yes to this almost ideal location for this worthy project. Thank you.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:54:25

Thank you. Next we have Steven followed by Shanti and then iPhone. Steven?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 46Proposed3:54:33

Thank you. Mayor, can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:54:36

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 46Proposed3:54:37

To all the council members and the staff for a wonderful job in really vetting this issue I strongly urge that you approve tonight the proposal for the public works yard each month that goes on We're not really serving the interests of the community or the homeless. I'm listening to the people of what it would be like to live in a tent, an alternative is the project that's being proposed.

Each day we delay, we're not doing our duty, our service to these people. The public works yard has been fully vetted. There is going to be issues with every location and A lot of people have said tonight on both sides, we need to do something. And what I would suggest is if we don't do anything The practical alternative is to continue to house these people in tents.

That's not what we want to do, that's not in their interest, that's not going to get them back on the road to stability and that's the whole purpose of permanent housing here. So I would urge you to make your decision and just ask yourself this question if you had a friend We're a close relative that you couldn't care for as part of your family, like Councilwoman Mang was able to do with her family. That's a great thing. That's what we all want to do. But we all know there are people out there that don't have the family support. Society has to support them and we want them living in a tent They want them living in the type of permanent housing that's being proposed, you know by the Dignity Moves Project. So I ask you to support it and support it tonight each day, each week, each month that goes on we're not doing our duty to these people who deserve it thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:56:35

Thank You sir.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:56:36

Next we have Shanti followed by Jean. Shanti do you have the floor?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 47Proposed3:56:42

Hi, Shanti and I are sharing a laptop right now so this is actually Ian Campbell speaking. I just want to start by thanking the City, the City staff, all the community members for working on this project and for taking this issue seriously. I'm in support of the project, the Cabin Village Project My main thing that I want to share is that I feel like there's kind of this weird dynamic where we're always talking about community concerns and trying to hear everybody's viewpoint, but it feels like the elephant in the room.

Thank you very much. But what matters to me most is that their agency and their needs are respected and uplifted the most because anytime you have a project like this, you know, that is for somebody else. You got to talk to those people right? So I would just recommend that, you know, it seems like the City Council as the deciding authority Should perhaps have a meeting, a forum with the Tent Town residents and it seems like maybe some of these ideas and generalizations might get resolved by talking to the people themselves. I know the city staff already works with the residents so that already happened so thank you.

Yeah, just wanted to share my support with that. Oh, and then another thing that I just want to prioritize is the safety of the site. It seems like the appropriate sampling is being done on those soils and you guys will take into consideration how the grading will impact these materials, these metals. But yeah, other than that, full support.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.743:58:56

Thank you, sir. Next we have Gene. Gene, you may unmute.

CommentGene ChiragaProposedself-stated3:59:01

Okay. Good evening, my name is Gene Chiraga. I totally support having a Cabin Village project but I think that the project proposed by Mr. Creasy at the Kent Hall location...I'm not going to repeat things in it you have copies of it he's met with every member of the City Council about it in the past so I know you're familiar with it but I want to hit on two points One point is, I don't think it's good for the dignity of the residents that are going to be living At the Cabin Village location, if the City Council decides to approve having it in the old maintenance yard next to the remaining maintenance yard that's not a dignified place to live.

And I don't know if anybody has talked to current residents or future residents about that It's going to be noisy. And just, you know, having that type of equipment and the noise and everything else when you have a choice of being actually much closer in a more natural environment near Kent Hall, that's a major consideration. The second thing—and I have a background as a mediator for the Central District U.S. District Court As an ADA mediator, and one of the issues I found from Mr. Creasy's proposal of not having to deal with is a 300 plus foot ramp I think it would have to be about 327 feet.

Is that something that people who have disabilities, wheelchair-bound people, people who need to have a ramp because of the slope problems that they wouldn't have at Kent Hall Why would they want, and this is going to have to be bending and moving around. It's not going to just be a 300 foot straight ramp. It won't fit in that location that way so you actually put people through this process who are already disabled of going through in kind of a circular or rectangular Move of a football field, of moving just to get to the sidewalk on Ventura Street. You don't have to do that if you have it at Kent Hall and I think these are serious considerations that affect the residents, the future residents that have been overlooked and I think that is a reason not to approve tonight the location at the maintenance yard It's just crystal clear to me that's not good for the people who are gonna live there.

Thank you.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.744:01:59

Thank you, sir. Our last raised hand we have is from our user logged in as iPhone. You have the ability to unmute now and you have the floor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 46Proposed4:02:08

Hi

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 48Proposed4:02:11

this is Marcy.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.744:02:13

Hello

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 48Proposed4:02:13

anyway I want to say With regard to everyone who has supported Cabin Village being located in the public works yard, ditto, dito! I could go on for three minutes saying my ditto but what I want to mention is this idea that's floating around that was created by a Mr. Creasy, resident of Persimmon Hill I just feel that there's been a lot of insincerity floating around that plan.

The plan, we've seen how long it's taken to vet and draw out and think about the plan for the public works yard. To really vet his plan would take at least another seven or eight or nine months which in effect would delay the project and, in effect, kill the project because the money needs to be spent by then. So I think the insincerity is that all of these people speaking out against the public works yard pay lip service that they want to provide proper housing for OTT people but really they just want to kill it in its entirety and rather than saying that they come up with crazy reasons I think, yeah the Green Coalition doesn't control what the city does with its land. But I think what it demonstrated to me and I went to all the World Cafes is that there's a resounding number of people in Ojai that want to use that land for a park space, for a natural wonderland really and preserve Stewart Canyon and all of that.

You can't put housing in there! That was attempted before and it was shot down Thank you. There's really only one way to go on this, and that's to move forward with what's been vetted, with what's been worked on, with what we've talked about for months and months and months and months. And go forward with the public works yard and the cabin village as created and put forth by Dignity Moves. I think it's something that we will all be proud of, and we can all continue to enjoy all of that wonderful land, all that natural raw land Thank you for your time and do the right thing.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:05 – 4:228 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:05:03

I just had a couple questions from the comments and then I would love to hear from my colleagues. So this is, I guess this would be for if it comes, if the testing comes back that it's exorbitant to try to mitigate the site what would happen? What would be the next steps you would come to us and say the cost is going to be too high or something like that or what would it be?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:05:27

Cost could be one piece. The extent, extending out beyond the four boring locations that Andy had identified could also be another piece to that puzzle. When we had started talking through some of these different scenarios There's just, there's more potential scenarios than the two that were just discussed. Because it's a lot of different ways in which to address it and not only that but there is a department above us that we would definitely need to vet some of that out, ask for different clarifications on how we're looking to address this as well.

It's kind of like hey here's our playbook Department, what do you think? Does this make sense start to finish? Do we need something that needs to be ironed out even further?" So they're kind of a resource for us as we work through this as well. I know Andy was talking through, oh, this is what we would do but I do think that there's a need and an understanding that there's another party that needs to be brought in to help vet this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:06:38

And then I asked you this question a couple days ago, and I said that it's easy on a project where a lot of work has already been done on the project to continue on with the project. Sometimes it's called inertia bias. And I asked you sort of point blank, okay we've spent time and energy, a lot of resources on this site Are you confident that if we were to proceed with your expert opinion, we're not having inertia bias. You have looked at some of those other sites to the extent that they came before you. This is the clear choice from your view?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:07:13

Yeah, I hadn't heard the inertia bias before so you had to explain it to me. So I appreciate that. So here's kind of how I responded to the question you brought forward a couple days ago. This isn't the first site that we've reviewed. This is the 10th site that we've reviewed and taken kind of a walkthrough and had conversations either with the county or other private potential sellers of properties. And not only that, but we brought expert community members, real estate community members who understand the different sites that are out there given the parameters that we had talked through so it wasn't that this lived within a vacuum of this is the site, this is what we're moving forward with There was a lot of considerations, and even in the staff report it identifies kind of the three different pillars that we used in evaluating each of these sites.

And I will admit there were ones that we thought were the winners and they just weren't so we had to move on to a different site. And from an inertia standpoint, the financial piece. This is what I said two days ago and I still stand by it. It's really up to this body to determine that. Obviously staff will advise if the number seems high like oh geez there's a technical report coming forward that's $150,000.

That doesn't feel right. Let's take a closer look at that. We haven't seen that with any of the reports, they've all been within reason in the experience that I've had working with the different agencies at this level.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:08:49

Yeah just a couple thoughts and then I would like to hear from my colleagues. One is that we keep repeating ourselves in some ways because we keep having forums like this so I realize some of that's necessary because not everybody's present for them all but one is that there are many cities in Ventura County who are receiving these kinds of grants So we're not alone in that, and so I hope that at least works on some of the concern about people coming here if we build this thing. The second is that I do believe that there are some differences in the view of saying well, I don't like this site but I want another site or I actually don't want this in Ojai at all. And that's fine. That's a completely fine view, but if we say not this site but the real intention is not in Ojai at all I would hope that we would just be clear about that which is again completely fine view and some of you some of the audience has shared that view with me in the past and I think that's completely good um but just to be clear not to move it a little further on And then I think the other thing is, it seems like we're having a conversation but it's not correct to say oh we have this site at South Signal or we have this site over here in the park.

That's not really what we're talking about tonight because we do not have that as was pointed out. It has not been vetted. We have not heard the community concern. We don't actually know what the cost is. We don't have the grading. We don't have the expert testimony and so on. So to think, oh there's a site that looks better. Any site would look better because we haven't heard the fight from the neighborhood yet so every site would look better in one regard. So I just want to say we have to be really clear to say does this seem, in my view, does this seem reasonable that it meets our concerns? That it accomplishes what we're intending And if we were to look at other sites, we would have to be asking the question in what way does it demonstrate enough to be better, to be worth even the possibility?

But that's not well, we're not looking at two sites even though it appears that we sort of are in the moment. That's my view. Please go.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:10:54

Okay. So I have we've been talking about this for a really long time. I've met with people from all different perspectives, including the one that you mentioned of let's not have it here at all or let's send the money back. So I have come to a very well thought out, well researched, well experienced point of view on this subject and perspective. And that is that I am in support of the public works yard.

And there are a couple of things that, after spending the last several days re-watching and re-watching the Planning Commission meetings just to make sure I was catching every detail and reading most of the 800 pages in the report. A few points that really stood out to me were the tipping point. The architects and the engineer and the landscape designer have really considered every angle, and they've considered the sound, they've considered the safety, they've considered the ADA accommodations They've actually even given a little bit more space.

This is really a conscious project on all levels, and even having a trauma-informed perspective where there's a community courtyard so that anyone who is in the neighboring house adjacent to this property Thank you very much. And I think there is nothing better for someone who's going through the kind of hard, hard times that the people in—that our residents and our neighbors in these tents have been going through. There's nothing more resourceful than knowing that you can walk out of your house and you can be with a friend.

And you can share a meal together, and maybe that meal is being brought by a volunteer or maybe that meal is something that you picked up at Rainbow Bridge and brought back. But it's yours. It's your home. And I've been asked—and so number one the design considers the neighbors. It considers the residents. It considers the neighbors. We are getting more soil testing. I am sure that we will have reports coming back to us in the future about that.

To the point that was raised here, we don't know about the feasibility of this property. We do know that there are a lot of cons to the Kent Hall property Not as many cons to the public work yard property. We have looked at properties in the county, we've looked at properties all over the city. This is the best option that we have and one other thing is that I've been asked how would you feel if this was in your backyard?

What most people don't know is that I've spent a lot of time with the residents serving meals, volunteering. And the way I see this Cabin Village project is that this isn't—this is a permanent shelter but really it's sort of like living next to a really nice stylish apartment building And so I've thought a lot. I've lived in some places in West Hollywood, you know?

I know what it's like to live in a place where you don't feel safe and being next to this project as its designed according to the specifications that we've seen, I think it would actually add to the neighborhood because Everyone here is so gracious, and I realize that we're talking about a model where people are probably going to be transitioning out or maybe the same people won't be here forever.

But the people who are here now have a community and because of the agreements that they make They're conscious in how they interact with the neighbors and how they interact with our city staff, and how they interact with one another. They really care for one another. So I would put a motion to the table but I'm going to let my colleagues speak.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:16:01

Ms. Rule?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:16:03

Yeah, so for me it's not if but there is a sense of where. I have been listening and reading and thinking and you know we did not ever look at City Hall. We looked at other places around town. We didn't look at other places around town because some people didn't want to look at them But we never really looked at the City Hall campus. But I do understand that, you know, we would start from ground zero if we were to consider it. For me You know, there's pros and cons on both sides. The biggest cons to the maintenance yard is certainly is the accessibility for you know those who are mobility challenged it is 300 feet of a winding Thank you all for joining us.

The toxicity, I think the toxicity will probably work itself out but I think it will take a while. If it were really if I were really considering it, I would think that you know being able to potentially and I'm interested in what the other council members would be is having a very clear plan B and investigating the City Hall There's definitely, I definitely have problems with it. Oh dear! I just came up major on my screen.

So you know one thing of course the City Manager has said that you know we have to spend 50% of the anticipated Cabin Village project development costs approximately $4.5 million By the end of June 2025, you know for me all the design that's been done could almost translate to the space on the City Hall campus. In other words it wouldn't be redesigning this, it wouldn't be redesigning the architecture certainly would be landscaping but if we could save two million dollars and give a million dollars to site improvement on the Middle Stewart Canyon. Is that a trade-off that we would make? Maybe, maybe not.

But so I just see the pros and the cons kind of weighing, you know equally weighing but then when I think about it if I had a mobility challenged Parent or grandparent, where would I want them to be? But then again... You know, if I had some wild animals and I wanted them to really have space where would I want them to be? So I'm trying to figure out how I think this will go. I think that there's a lot of infrastructure costs to the maintenance yard.

That was always my third choice on where to put this And I remain conflicted about it, but as I've said, it's not an if we do this. It's just simply a where we do this. So I am interested in my other council members' perspectives and I hear Council Member Lang's certainly her perspective I would ask maybe we do, you know, if City Hall is not the first choice, we at least use it as a backup and start doing some research on it. We don't know how long it's going to take to get the maintenance yard in some sort of state or how long it's going Thank you all for joining us.

There's some real-time elements to building out the maintenance yard. And as I said, everything that Dignity Moves said about that space is not specific to that space. It's really specific to the communal living and I think could be transferred over to the City Hall campus, and what would that actually do and be for the residents? We have not spoken to them.

It's a much more gradual change, and if you're talking about very trauma-informed situations, the smallest change is always the best. Pros and cons, I'm conflicted. I will listen to my other council members and once again reiterate for me it's not an if but a where.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:22 – 4:2919 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:22:07

Miss Rule, if I could ask just because the timer went up. But can I just ask you? That's okay. Let me ask your question of staff though is it could another location let's say it happens to be here. Can a plan B at least preliminarily be looked at without too much of a dollar commitment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:22:25

Well, I think we first need some clarification. When you say here, what does that mean? Does that mean the Kent Hall location that was on the application or are you talking about Mr. Creasy's proposal by the garden? Which one is it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:22:40

I hear you. That's a clarifying question. Well...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:22:45

I mean, and that's what I would think.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:22:46

You see the difficulty right as direction would be needed. And I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:22:52

would tell you that we would treat it the same way we have treated the maintenance yard. We, you know, we would start with all the questions and then we would commission the studies and I don't know what would come back. I do know that this would probably, this location if we're talking about I'm just going to call it the demonstration garden area. There would probably be a Chumash tribe component that we did not have at the maintenance yard that I would need to consult, I know that's a consideration.

But anyway, there's no short answer. And when you talk about the feasibility study, there is no such thing as just do a generic feasibility study. In the environmental consulting world it's various compartmentalized studies to determine impact. Potential impact and how you might mitigate them. Mr. Seibert, do you want to jump in there?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:23:50

You know, when we started this process, we started it in November-October is when we started vetting these technical studies and we finished that in February. September to February. It's a five-month, and I will admit myself and Brian working on that it was around the clock aside from any other things we were working on as well so it wasn't that oh we're just constantly having...it is five months it's really fair to assume that's the timeline.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:24:33

Thank you. I appreciate both of those comments, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:24:37

So for the sake of time Leslie, I agree with practically everything you said so I'll save all of that so whatever she said ditto. One of the other things I feel like we've lacked operational and building expenses with budgets. I know that Mr. Harvey has produced, I guess it was Alameda, and that to me wasn't a budget So I haven't seen anything, you know. I've asked like how much have we spent and my response or my reply was always well, you know a lot of it's reimbursable. Well it's like okay so let's just have another column. So it's like you know if this wasn't so big I was gonna spend this weekend going over the last year of warrants to see how much we've spent thus far with tent town and how much has gone that type of thing. And then my other thing is just you know the The email from the two city planners, you know that's big.

This is their job they were given this task and this is what they come back with and I believe in what they're saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:25:50

Can I just ask a question? So it was the question simply what's the total amount spent on OTT thus far.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:25:57

Like how much have we spent in, you know...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:25:59

Just accounting, yeah. But I guess what we tried to provide in the attachment to the agenda report was, you know, a cost model which is akin, kind of an apples-to-apples type thing. Here's the cost model for what we believe it's going to cost to run The Cabin Village. Here's the cost model for what we think, you know, it's going to cost to continue to run Ojai Tent Town.

You would have some additional costs that we've spent during the duration, you know just buying the tents. Hiring this person, hiring that person. We could provide you with that number. I don't know how helpful it would be to you in your decision-making process.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:26:35

Well, I would just like a number and I would like to see where the funding is so in two years when we don't have any money if the grant is all spent Where is that money going to come from without saying we're gonna apply for grants and philanthropy? It's like, I think this is a great project totally for it. I know the community is but I want it to be successful. I don't want to take the 12 million dollars for something that we can only have for two years and then when we don't have money Do we open up the books as I've said before to the community to say, okay Where do you want to scrape off? It's a million dollars to run. Do you want to give up on pavement? Do you want to you know cut back on the Sheriff's Department where do you want to do this to make it continue because You know, yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:27:24

So yeah And I just I think I think some of these things are answered in this cost model attachment, you know For instance, we're estimating it's around six hundred thousand dollars a year to run the cabin village project We're estimating that at least for the first few years, that's offset by revenue that matches that because the proposal is that you were setting aside $2 million in operating subsidies. That's how a big chunk of- If there's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:27:52

$2 million left after

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:27:53

without

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:27:54

it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:27:54

Well, and that's what we believe will be. And that's from looking at the costs of the construction. We're believing you're going to have $2 million left over that you can carve out for future operating subsidies, which you've heard from the county representative is once this is built, once you have permanent supportive housing, that's when we can come in and that's when we can try to find ways to help you offset that. But they of course deal with their own funding challenges too. You also heard that they don't know where the federal government is.

But with everything that we do, we approve a budget on a yearly basis. And you know, we have to respond to whatever challenges we are dealing with in June when we adopt the budget and we are nimble and we make changes accordingly. That's why you have almost $20 million I'm not saying go spend and get crazy, but that's the type of financial operation we run so if you do run into difficulties you have wherewithal to pull and fund that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:28:56

If I might say, the question that you're asking Ms. Mang is it that's still irrespective of location that those budget questions would be either location or any location but then the other point is we're spending money right now having these folks be right here so there is an expense that we have taken on so unless one were to say let's just have everybody leave which nobody wants to say that so then there's already I mean if we want to trust this budget and money is being spent right now

4:29 – 4:4213 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:29:30

All right.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.884:29:38

I kind of feel like the tail has been wagging the dog on this project for quite a long time. Historically, we started out with a large homeless population in Libbey Park about the time that I was elected in late 2022 they migrated to the City Hall campus And they were in the riverbed, and anywhere and everywhere. And so we supported an idea to bring them out of the riverbed and onto the parking lot.

And then the idea of a grant was available And, you know, we'd been talking about the idea that we needed temporary housing. A roof over the head so that we could get services in to identify those federal state and nonprofit programs where people could be placed. And I think the community was very much in support of doing all of that. But somewhere along the line of, you know, applying for a grant, I only kind of really understood recently that a condition of that grant was that we provide permanent supportive housing And I think the reason the county has denied us at every step is because the county does not provide permanent supportive housing.

They have zero permanent supportive housing projects that are operated by this county with county funds. And the conversation we've never had is, what type of a program is right for Ojai? Because this is a state-generated type of program. They say you got to do it this way and so you gotta do it that way but we've never talked about the alternative ways of addressing homelessness And I think our most intelligent conversation and approach to this, but we haven't really gone there as well. How much can we afford reasonably? You look at our budget, you look at our income, how we would fund our share of costs.

And then once you figure that number out, how do we best use that amount of money to get the best impact on addressing homelessness. And I don't think we're taking that approach, we're just marching down this path that the state has given us. So the housing first model and the permanent supportive housing I am certain it's absolutely the best way to take care of an individual, or in our case a group of 30 people.

But I think our problem is a lot bigger than 30 people and we're shooting all our resources at this one 30-person project. And I would love to be able to say hey, I helped 500 people who were on the verge of losing their homes to stay here. And so, I'm much more interested in what was discussed earlier tonight that we would do rental assistance. Now, the details of that are You know, would be important. But I'm very concerned that we're counting on federal funding and I don't think anybody who counts on federal funding today is making a smart decision.

State funding is going to be impacted by federal funding and so what state funding is available? I don' t know. And non-profits I mean, people are not going to jump up to give us money after we've taken on this plan. The people who donate money are going to be donating money where there is no provider And there needs to be a provider. We're going to step up and say, hey we're the provider now.

We're taking care of all these people. I don't expect to get any financial support out of that. It's gonna it's gonna be our substantial financial burden And I don't think we've figured out how we help the most people.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:35:01

If I can reply to you, it seems to me that... and I was sitting in the audience when this all happened. It was, I believe it was between our city managers where Carl, I think, misspoke about what the intention of the grant was. The grant always said permanent supportive housing So to think that it was something and then somehow it switched was, it seems like a misunderstanding not a switch just so we're clear about that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.884:35:28

We didn't see the grant until long long after the grant was applied for and it's not because we didn't ask to see the grant

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:35:37

Okay, well in any case the second point though is that I would suggest that when you say let's work on rental assistance. I very much want to do that as well but i'm not seeing this as an either-or decision especially because the rental assistance will be with from our general fund and that we'll decide what to do and this is not from our general fund At least for this first period of time, and we see what the cost would be going forward. So the either-or argument doesn't seem correct to me. It would be more like saying how does this become one component in our large plan of housing? That's how I see this piece personally but...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.884:36:17

Yeah just a couple of quick points and I'll finish. I think we have seen a program that found rural property And did not enter, you know, did not disrupt the neighbors in the Mesa project. And I think that if we had that vision in mind and we could find that type of property, I think that'd be a much better way to approach this. It really kind of, you know, disturbs me to my core to think that we can say this is okay in this neighborhood but it's not okay in that neighborhood. And I don't like hearing neighborhoods pitted against each other, saying it's okay for you to have it but it's not okay for us to have it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:37:18

Just to say the MESA model might have a 50% philanthropy component so if you want to make a budget case, the budget is not there and they spent three years getting it together.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.884:37:29

Look, before two years ago The money that we spent on homelessness was limited to what we did to support the Grange Hall. And so I'm totally supportive of the idea that we need to make a substantial investment in addressing the homeless issue, but I think we've been shot out of a cannon down a path without really spending time talking to the community about what they're really comfortable about doing and You know, so the county has decided that they're not going to be in the housing business. I don't think we should be in the housing business either. So I just want to respond to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:38:19

Councilmember Whitman's We had statements about either doing rent, like helping with rental assistance and this grant funding. And the grant was part of the state's encampment grant. The state had a goal, Newsom's administration had a goal of helping cities to eliminate encampments. And this was all because of the Supreme Court ruling that limited cities, so this funding is a once Maybe in a lifetime or once in a very long time amount of funding that's here.

And so I think the rush to, it was a rush, it felt like a rush to do the grant, to write the grant is because we had a real need to find an alternative for the camping that was happening all over city properties that wasn't the tent town that we have. There were safety risks, there were fire hazards, there were health consequences. So this process sped up because it was responding to a need.

And so I look at this grant funding. We couldn't spend it on rental assistance. This grant funding is specifically to help shelter unsheltered people, and we will have to figure out as a city how do we do other types of initiatives that help the overall issue of homelessness? And I think we're all committed to looking at that. Help of Ojai is doing that, their boots on the ground. The county is doing that. We have the continuum of care and so there are... That's a different pool of resources and a different pool of resources that we're going to have to come up with but this is what we have for right now and what I'm hearing from our staff and from Dignity Moves is that if we delay this project, there's a chance that it's not going to happen.

And we can't give the money back. I mean, we can give the money back but then we've already spent the money. So to me, I think it would be I think it would be a good idea to move forward with this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:41:15

I feel like we've talked, do you want to entertain the motion you were considering?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:41:22

Yes, I'll go ahead and make a motion to approve this. Thank you. Okay, so I'll make a motion to approve the lower public works yard as a project site to continue with the design review permit and to direct the city manager to negotiate a development management agreement with Dignity Moves.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:41:56

Second.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:41:58

Can I ask just a friendly amendment and it might not be that it's possible. I still, if there were the need for a Plan B, if something were to happen is there a way for us to put in the queue the City Hall campus or is that just not even possible? I guess I'm not asking for an active Plan B where we have two things going on simultaneously, but I'm just wondering if there is the appetite for that and if there is a way to do that.

4:42 – 4:4511 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:42:45

So, I would say that I don't see a clear trigger point that would cause the Plan B right now. That's my issue and we're certainly planning on keeping Council abreast of what goes with the soil testing and we're gonna expedite that depending on direction. Discussions have already happened with Rincon Consulting to that end they're ready to go Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:43:30

I

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed4:43:42

feel very comfortable with our Community Development Director who's done a number, he's been involved with a number of different site studies and reviews. He has a good sense of what's a concern and what's not a concern but I know you want to say something as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed4:43:56

Yeah, I was going to say we have a collective sense of experience in assessing site-specific situations. So we'll be able to apply that professional knowledge to come back to Council if something metaphorically blows up. The second point on note is that the motion, if approved, moves it forward but is not the final action. We will not come back to Council until we have that additional information from RINCON which they're already ready to fast track forward so you'll have that information before the final vote.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:44:22

Great, thank you. I see a pathway if something drastic were to happen so thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:44:30

Thanks for that reminder. Okay, I think we have a motion and a second. That's clear Mr. Montgomery?

Roll-call vote Failed 2–2 Moved by Rachel Lang · Seconded by Andy Gilman Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Lang with a second by Mayor Gilman to approve as recommended. Roll call. · 1 under review
Show transcript
Yes, we do Mayor. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Lang with a second by Mayor Gilman to approve as recommended. Roll call. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Yes. Council Member Whitman? No. Council Member Mang? No Council Member Rule? Mayor Gilman? Yes.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.744:44:54

Motion passes three to two.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:44:57

Okay, man. That was a long item.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.844:45:06

And we don't have another one!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:45:08

Nope, we're all done. Without anything else, we will adjourn. Oh wait, what do we need to do? Sorry. Hold on one second. Is there a manager report? No. Any council member reports? No? Nothing to report? And then future agenda items will continue on our goal setting. Thank you so

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.744:45:49

much, guys.