Ojai City Council Regular Meeting

BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 8, 2025

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:003 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:02

First off, can we have a report out of the closed session Mr. Summers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed0:05

Yes, thank you Mayor. So the Council met in closed session and considered two items. First a performance evaluation for the City Manager on that the Council provided direction to staff and Council took no reportable action. And then the second on the performance evaluation for the City Attorney there the Council also began the discussion but we'll be continuing it to the April 22nd meeting provided directional staff and council took no reportable action. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:30

Thank you with that we will end the closed session and begin the open session Yeah, so artificial but here we are. If that's all it takes let's start again with a roll call please Mr. Montgomery. Yes

Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 15
Show transcript
Mayor. Mayor Gilman? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Here. Council Member Rule? Here. Council Member Whitman? Here. Council Member Mang? Here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈20s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:57

Thank you very much and the Pledge of Allegiance please Mr. Montgomery.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.701:00

Yes welcome community please rise as you're able ready begin

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:24

May I please have an approval of the agenda or changes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:27

Thank you very much.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:45

On item 3, the Finance and Budget Committee, I'd like to pull that one. Councilmember Mang and I spoke at length about the budget committee. We both support that we should have a budget committee, but its composition is an issue and we've learned some information from our new finance director in terms of cities who have gone without a resident model. In other words they didn't have any residents on it.

Other cities have one resident. I think it would be a good idea, and also I guess the finance director is coming up with new analysis about our investment model. And so our thought would be to bring it back fairly quickly with a report from staff about what's the proper composition of our budget committee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:15

That reflects something that I was also interested in, which was adding not the composition but adding a piece to the appointment which would be an interview among a subset of the committee whoever that's composed of. So I think that makes sense if I'm hearing you right. We pulled that to say we want to look at the composition first of the budget committee and I'm suggesting the process bring it back very quickly so that we have a budget committee for the next cycle. I'd add

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.873:40

that to my reason. Thanks. That we look at the process

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:45

Okay, any objections? All right. So we will move... Oh good.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.873:52

Yeah and then I've also got a number five So this is the City Council protocols, and I think that there just hasn't been enough time from receiving them to go through. My mom's memorial service was over the weekend. I didn't even see the protocol on the calendar until Sunday night. I've spent quite a bit of time with it, but you know, I do have a job so it's... There are things that I would support, but there are things that I'm concerned about that I think I have a lot of questions That would be better that I ask our city attorney, potentially the city manager, and come prepared to potentially suggest some modifications of what's I'd request that indulgence that we move that item to our next hearing.

It's sufficient if it fits the calendar. That's my only reservation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:29

Because that's our second part of the strategic planning. Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.875:33

so if you wanted to go to the next meeting after that I'm fine with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:37

That sounds more reasonable. And I would like to suggest, I hear you, is that we would take a very conservative approach in general up to that time and basically not have to push any of those limits until we figure those out in terms of what kind of meetings do you have when? Yep. Yes. Okay. Yes, any objections? All right, we're gonna have a shorter meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed6:05

than we thought. Well and Mayor if I might? Yes please. On top of this staff has a request too and Mr. Seibert is here to make a request to the council as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed6:14

Thank you okay so I have a request for consent item number 1e to be pulled from tonight's City Council agenda with the opportunity to conduct Additional review of the applications submitted and consider other opportunities to further public engagement through these two groups. And really, that's the Climate Action Plan group as well as the Economic Diversification Group. That's really what we're looking at here.

The matter was scheduled before this body for tonight from the February 11th meeting I wasn't here, and I accepted the time stamp on that. But the reality is that when you're doing applications and you're vetting that, you really do need more than just the time that was allotted here. So I'm asking to pull it for staff to do the additional analysis and then kind of make sure it's fully baked before it comes back here.

Any objections?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.787:09

No, but I do have a question. Just more specifically, what does fully baked mean? What is vetting mean or are you just going to delve into that and open it back up and assess everything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed7:19

I'd like to dive into that more. Mainly the if you see in the

0:07 – 0:1712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed7:22

staff report, I have 19 applications to choose from. Yeah. And of those there was a discussion before this body that we really kind of stay in-house, meaning only those individuals that are residents within the city or within the sphere of influence or sphere of influence That narrows it down to 14. I need more, I'm more of a pool than that. More of a pool to choose from than that because right now I'm very limited in terms of who I can select. Between the two groups?

Correct. And within the one group, Economic Diversification, it's three different groups One of the groups really only has one person there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:11

I just, so I am in support of that. And I just also wanted to note that you're also, in addition to being in the city, you're also looking for individuals with experience in the subject matters that are listed for climate and, you know, for economic diversification. Climate science and policy. Both yes. Public health. Okay. So just double checking that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:39

Absolutely.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:41

Great, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:41

Okay so we'll pull consent item E. Any other changes? No Mayor. Okay any move to approve the agenda as amended?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed8:53

I'll move to approve the agenda. Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:55

second any objections? Okay great all right wow what are we gonna do here no just kidding so we have an approval of the agenda so then first we have a presentation from our police chief on 2024 year-end crime statistics for the city of Ojai Welcome back.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed9:17

Good evening, Mayor, Honorable Council and city members. So this presentation was already in the works before we made our transition so we figured it just might be a little easier if I go ahead and present this to you. So tonight I'm presenting to you the City of Ojai Crime Statistics for 2024. Next slide please. Just a quick mention before we start these. So usually when we stand up here and give you crime statistics, we usually have a comparison from the year prior. Unfortunately in early 2024, we transitioned our crime reporting and how we report our crimes to DOJ We used to use Uniform Crime Reporting, now we use National Incident-Based Reporting. So it's quite different and unfortunately because of the reporting we do not compare apples to apples so for 2024 we don't have a comparison from 2023 for you.

Starting in 2025 when we make those crime statistics presentation for you in 2025, we will again have that comparison for you. So for 2024, these are our basic crime statistics. Very high level what you're looking at is our calls for service in the city only which were just over 3,500 calls for service Our response time, 6.64 minutes. That is strictly our priority one which we would consider our urgent calls, so emergency-related calls that we're usually responding with lights and sirens to. Our arrests, 261, which includes both felony and misdemeanor arrests and our traffic accidents, noninjury 46 and injury 32.

Next slide please. So now we break our crime statistics down into three categories. We categorize them into crimes against persons, crimes against property and crimes against society. Here is you will see the numbers in crimes against persons for the city. You will see we had one homicide that was strictly in regards to a traffic fatality. We had 73 reports of crimes against person's total Sex offenses, we had two. Aggravated assaults, 17. Simple assaults, 51 and intimidation and kidnapping, two incidents. The majority of our aggravated and simple assaults which that includes both felony and misdemeanor assaults the offender was known to the victim so I just really want the public to know these are relationships that are already known these aren't just a random people usually coming up and assaulting someone that the relationship has already been established there The intimidation and kidnapping incidents were in relation to domestic violence.

So again, not some random kidnapping incident going on here in Ojai. And the increase in assaults is consistent with prior increases that we've seen starting coming out of COVID. So they've steadily increased coming out of 2021. Next slide please. Crimes against property. In 2024, there were 149 total reports of crimes against property and that consisted of two incidents of robbery, five of burglary, 51 of larceny, three of motor vehicle theft, two of arson, 46 of vandalism and 36 of fraud and forgery.

Arrests were made in both of the robbery cases, and again when we talk about robbery cases this isn't like bank robberies that we're talking about here. Really it's just a person-to-person theft but because there is a use of fear involved in that, it's classified as a robbery. Our burglary cases consisted of two residential burglaries and three commercial burglaries, which is a reduction compared to the previous year. Burglaries pretty much stay the same in how we report them so we knew that we had less incidences of burglary than we did the prior year.

Larceny includes petty theft, grand theft and shoplifting. The number of occurrences is consistent compared to previous years when we just look at the incidents of what the thefts were entailing. Check fraud and forgery has been a frequent trend here in the city of Ojai, along with phone scams and identity theft. And again, the offender in this case is almost always unknown because typically they're using internet or phone scams to lure victims into sending money via mail by other means which leads us to very limited resources in terms of investigating them.

Next slide, please. Crimes against society. In 2024 there were 55 total reports of crimes against society which included narcotics violations, weapons violations and animal cruelty. Due to the nature of how we report crimes against society typically an arrest is always made in these cases. So out of 55 total cases there were 54 arrests in these incidents. Next slide, please.

In this slide you will see basically it's just a comparison of all three categories the crimes against persons property and society and as you can see property crimes make up pretty much more than 50% of our crime here in Ojai which for us is preferable to see crimes against property versus crimes against persons next slide please This slide will tell you how the percentage and how many cases were cleared by arrest in crimes against persons. We have a 78% clearance rate, which means we're making arrests in 78% of these cases, which out of 73, 57 were cleared.

Crimes against property at 26% clearance rate. And the reason that is so low is crimes against property includes forgery, fraud, identity theft. And again, the suspects in those cases could be in another state, they could be in another country when they're sending emails and phone scams. So those are very difficult to investigate. Crimes against society, again, the nature of how they're reported, very high clearance rate of 98%. Next slide please.

Our traffic citations for... that says 2023, my mistake. This is 2024. Our highest traffic citations were given by means of, as a result of using the phone while driving. No, that's not a surprise to us. We've over the year we're looking at the cause of a lot of accidents and that's what a main cause of accident was, was driving distracted. And then you'll see the following numbers in terms of what the other citations were given for.

Next slide please. That's a short brief overview, quick overview of our crime statistics. And for the public these statistics can be found on our website at VenturaSheriff.org and can be viewed on our forward-facing dashboard that's available. But for 2025, and I'm sure Captain Jenkins can probably expand on this a little bit more. But as the Council you know that you approved our traffic motor and we are diligently working towards that and giving updates to the City Manager about how we're moving along and progressing in that so we're hoping to get that moving for 2025. We're hoping to bring back our foot patrols and our bike patrols Something unfortunately we couldn't do last year because of staffing and overtime, but hopefully we'll be able to do that again in the coming year.

So with that I will open it up to any questions that you may have of myself or Captain Jenkins.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:20

Is your new title Commander?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed17:22

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed17:22

So Commander, I heard you say that the matrix are different. I understand that but just your general feeling year compared to year on year would you say Ojai continues to be a safe place no real trend change?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed17:36

Absolutely. Yes, I can speak to that because I do live here and so it is pretty important to me but yes generally speaking our crime statistics even though we're not comparing the same thing from 2023 to 2024 the city of Ojai still looks pretty good in terms of our crime statistics and I would say yes it is a very safe place to live.

0:18 – 0:2641 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:01

I think I read something that said that Ojai was the safest city in Ventura County

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:05

Oh, I won't go that far to say that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:09

Well, I don't know if that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:10

true. I don't know. I know there are other cities in the county that would love to claim that as well. But yes, we're doing pretty good here in Ojai. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:21

Any questions? And I failed to welcome Chief Jenkins here to our table. Welcome! We love having you here.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8718:29

Yeah, I guess I do have a question. How is larceny distinguished from those other theft-type of crimes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed18:37

So, larceny really includes—is inclusive of grand theft, petty theft. It's just a kind of overall category that you can throw all the different thefts into. We distinguish when we're looking at really getting down and breaking into felony versus misdemeanor. That's where we're going to look at petty theft Grand theft, motor vehicle theft. But generally speaking when you're just kind of giving a general idea larceny includes all those different types of thefts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:12

Any other questions? Yes please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed19:16

Of the different types of crimes, do we have a sense of how many crimes were perpetrated by residents of Ojai versus people who are visiting from out-of-town?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed19:28

It's a great question but we do not keep statistics like that. If that's something that you would like to do, we would really have to delve into and look on a case-by-case basis to extract that information.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:40

That's very interesting. Anything else? Thank you very much, Commander Newman. Appreciate you being here for everything you're doing. Okay great we will open it up to public communications. Currently I have one public speaker card and that is Larry Steingold. Hello Mr. Steingold

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed20:06

Good evening. Thank you, thank you actually for the honor of being on the or being asked to be on the advisory group. Hopefully you will not use science education and degrees as a bar to get people on the climate. It's raining outside I know about weather right but I'm not on that. A shout out to Public Works and Park & Rec. Public Work, the road work is amazing and roads are getting done. I think that's wonderful.

And Park & Rec, the brochure and the activities and everything is... Please go read it. Please look at it. It's a wonderful thing and they're doing a great job. On the budget which since it's no longer on the agenda I would love you to look at lowering the minimum $200,000. We're not New York, we're not L.A., we're not Ventura. We have $16 million to spend. I know it may be a burden on staff occasionally to respond but a paragraph on each item going through-I mean you don't have to be-you have to have knowledge of budgets. You could have three people on it which I think you should have more than two.

Where are the stockholders? You're the board of directors, they're the company. They're doing a great job, you're doing a great job but somewhere along the line five $50,000 checks going sideways. I come from the state of Rhode Island so it's like things are like that. So please lower the threshold and consider having more than two people from the public because there's a lot of educated knowledgeable budget people Thank you very much.

I'm not sure. I'll

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed22:26

respond once you're finished.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed22:27

Okay, I hear they are doing more testing to see how deep and what have you. That's a good thing. Be thankful we don't have VOCs otherwise the project would be doing for years. It'd be going somewhere else. Removing dirt is just the number. Thank you very much and have a nice evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:46

Thank You Mr. Stengel Did you want to respond, Mr. Harvey?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed22:51

Yes Mayor, so in response to Mr. Stangl's question I believe he was asking about phase two testing for the Cabin Village project and he is correct consistent with council direction and discussion at the last meeting. Rincon Consulting has embarked upon additional testing we expect to know more in next couple weeks and pursuant to council direction We will come back with the results of that when we bring the proposed development management agreement with Dignity Moves. Those will both come to you together and you can review them together, and we'll obviously keep the public in that as well. Thanks.

Thank you Mr. Harvey. Can I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7823:25

ask a quick question? Do you have a timeline for when that will be coming back?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed23:29

Yes, good question. I think it's, we have placed on the working agenda for the first meeting in May.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7823:36

And the Contract for Dignity Moves will be coming back for that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed23:39

Both together, yes. Thank you so much, appreciate it. And just on that topic in the event let's say RINCON Consulting needs more time then we will move it to the second meeting in May and if that happens I will certainly let Council and the public know.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7823:52

OK, and you will keep those two items together regardless of any delay for one. Absolutely. OK, thank you so much. Appreciate it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:59

Thank you, Mr. Harvey. Anything online? Mr. Montgomery?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7024:02

Yes, mayor. Let's take this time to speak to our zoom participants. We are on public communications with which is our general public comment period. I have no raised hands now, but I do want to make sure we utilize our hybrid format here. Last call to raise a hand before we move on to consent calendar And we'll move on.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:21

Thank you very much, and we did talk about our agenda but now we're on the consent calendar. We pulled item E so that will not be there and do we want to talk about any of the other items or pull them out separately? Yes, Mr. Whitman. Yeah

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8724:34

I'd like to pull C and F for discussion purposes. Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:42

all right anything else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:45

I had those on my list too.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:49

Wonderful Yes.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8724:53

Is it time to talk about C or do we vote on the rest of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:57

it? Should we vote on the rest and then OK, so what do I have an approval for items B, A, B, D and and that's it. ABD.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7825:07

I'll move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:09

Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7825:10

A second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:11

All those in favor are. Do we need a call? No. All is in favor. Yes. OK, great. All right. Let's talk about C.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8725:19

So My question has to do with the type of trolley that we're looking at

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed25:26

purchasing.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8725:28

Is it the same fuel of the one that we're operating right now? And how are we going to fuel, where are we going to fuel and how are we gonna fuel these new trolleys?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed25:45

Mr. Alameda is here prepared to answer that question. Wonderful

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed25:50

Thank you for the question. The two trolleys that we're looking to purchase under this purchase agreement are both identical in model build look and fueling as the ones that we currently operate, so currently we operate three propane trolleys and the fueling source is over at Public Works Yard. So everything will operate as it does now just will have more capacity and more reliable truck.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8726:18

So, at the south end of Signal is where the fueling takes place?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed26:23

Correct. We have an agreement in place with a propane provider that comes and fills our tank there.

0:26 – 0:3316 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:35

And the background being, the previous council had approved an electric trolley I believe and the delay in that is impacting the service we can provide. Do you understand that correctly?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed26:46

Correct. Just to step back a little bit, the city used to operate two routes, an A and B route. And with our existing trolley fleet, we had one go out of service and the city purchased another propane one, 1,000 oaks about a year-and-a-half ago to stabilize. We're only operating one route now and we're barely able to do that because the two of the trolleys are well over their usable life and aren't very reliable So bringing these two on will stabilize the service and potentially bring back that second route. We did want to go all-electric, that was the intent. Council approved the purchase of an electric trolley. The manufacturer was bought by a larger company and they're looking at retooling their manufacturing process so the one we purchased is still going through the queue.

That's been delayed by about 12-14 months, but it's a total unknown if we can buy additional electric ones at this time. And if we were, it would be past the ones that we have online now still being in operation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed27:55

So

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8727:59

just following up on what you just said, I want to make sure I understand it. We're still in line for a single electric trolley when that trolley arrives and is in service we would potentially Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed28:36

And

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8728:39

I guess this is for a future agenda item, potentially. But we looked into it and thought about how to transition into an all-electric fleet. That's something we have to discuss as an agendized item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed29:06

Yeah, I think my question too was so we don't have any sense of because they're revising their manufacturing. We don't have any sense of when new electric models would be available or is it possible that there just wouldn't be anymore like that they would discontinue trolleys or the electrification of trolleys and that we would potentially be looking at other options if we want to electrify

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed29:35

So, the one that we ordered that is I mentioned still going through was expected to come this July. Now it's looking like will be coming February of 26th. At this time they still plan to manufacture electric trolleys but they want to basically retool how they're put together. They're looking at redoing the chassis and how they're built So they're basically re-engineering the design from what existed to something new, and that timeline's unknown.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed30:08

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:08

you. I just wanted to offer that I received four constituent comments of people who used to use the beeline and they're eager to use the line again so I'm eager to restart that service. So I know my voice has already been registered there but I think it's a real treasure that we have and I'd love to see it be its fullest sense.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:30

There is enough money in the FTA fund to purchase the electric bus?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed30:36

Well, actually there's some good news on that front. So, as you know we brought on a new Transit Supervisor, Anthony Bally, who's introduced the Council and is with us tonight. But he's been very successful in unwinding a lot of the funding that is available to us that we weren't necessarily obtaining in the past. There was a lot of funding at both state and county level that we weren't maximizing. So yes it is true that we have the FTA Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee.

So we're in a good spot for both capital operations and doing way more robust maintenance.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed31:49

And then just one other question, so I see here on the invoice that they are you know of course we know they're used their 2020s no warranties or anything like that does somebody from the city go to check it out? You know like your mechanic or whatever person to make sure it's a solid purchase

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed32:07

Yeah, they are going to be shipping them here and our mechanic will both check them but before they go online they have to go through. It's a pretty robust DOT inspection so we basically do for lack of a better term a pre-DOT inspection to make sure it's going to pass but these are done on a regular basis even on the ones that we own So before it's put into service, it'll pass all the checks. And if it were to not be serviceable for some reason It would be returned.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed32:36

Okay, and then with a 2020 do they go like so many you know like a car? It's a certain mileage, and then it's like okay. Do you know the mileage?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed32:45

Yeah, so both of these we do know the mileage one is about 30,000 and one is about 40,000 keep in mind that we have a trolley right now operating as And that's way past its usable life. But the mechanic that we brought on has really worked wonders to keep the fleet going forward.

0:33 – 0:3924 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7833:14

Yeah, so if we were to assume that we had one trolley for each route and we're buying two and we get an electric one then have three which would give us an opportunity to potentially either add a new route or do something with a trolley perhaps trolleying people from where they park their cars way over there into downtown or something like that. Is that correct? We would have potentially another vehicle Andrew

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed33:55

Backing out the one that's probably going to go offline soon. These two used ones, the electric ones. Anthony, our new transit supervisor does have some ideas about some supplemental routes we could do to

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7834:08

serve the public better. That would be really nice. My car has 280,000 miles on it. I wanted 300,000.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:15

Ms. Rule, I'm definitely seeing this as a future agenda item meaning we would want to look at the routes and Take advantage of this great Ojai service and

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7834:23

amplify it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:38

Purchase two trolleys.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7834:39

I'll make a motion to purchase the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:41

two trolleys. All second. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Great, let's move on to D amendment to the Professional Services Agreement. I don't know how do you pronounce this name is it Tripepi?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed34:57

Yes, I'm sorry. Forgive me, I was on the wrong one. We're on D

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8735:00

not F.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed35:03

No, I think we're on F. Sorry, D got approved. Sorry, we're on F, my fault, my fault. That's okay, they're both Tripepi Smith items so it's understandable.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:12

Understood, yep, sorry, we're on

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8735:16

So I'm the one who pulled F, but although I guess Councilmember Lang was also interested in pulling that one. I looked at the branding that's been produced and I'm not a fan That's maybe just personal taste, but I'm perfectly happy with continuing with the city's official brand. I would not rule out seeing a different branding and being interested in that branding, but the ones that we've developed that were in front of us I'm not crazy about the font, I'm not crazy about the colors and I'm not crazy about the graphic. So that kind of covers the whole thing right? Fair enough.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed36:22

Council decision and we would be happy if council wanted to direct us to Throw this back and maybe ask for some additional options You could also I could bring back a future item with inform a subcommittee on this topic. I mean it or we could just abandon it whatever Council directs is perfectly fine. We spent, we did spend some money it wasn't a huge amount of money was $14,400 you know and perhaps not all that would be sunk costs that were lost because maybe they're you know if you read I'm sure you did you know the the background there they're trying to pull colors from the existing approved Seal and I think that might be appropriate if there was gonna be a different logo But it's it's all fine. And then if council wants us to go through that we're happy to do that You guys give us the direction and we'll do that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed37:14

Did you have some feedback?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed37:18

Well, first of all I wanted to say that I really like the idea of having a consistent look and feel for all of our PowerPoints, for everything that's coming out of the city. This has been something I know I've talked to you about and it's been really important to me to move forward on this so I want to thank you for taking the initiative on this. I also wanted to look at, you know, I've heard from some constituents who were reluctant to move forward in this specific direction.

And so I would like to take some time with it, get some more feedback and see if this is the direction that we want to go. I personally like the colors. I think they're friendly, I think they're bright and I think they pull out colors from the logo or from the seal. And I like one of the round primary icon So if so, if it's possible for us to perhaps talk about other options. Of course

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed38:33

we could bring this back as a future agenda item and I might just include this as a starting point and then we can build from there and this would probably come back sometime in May if that's acceptable to Council. Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed38:43

yes

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8738:44

Yeah, and I guess my suggestion would be that if Councilmember Lang wants to potentially team with one other council member and participate in a little guidance on... I'm way under qualified to be that person.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:04

The mayor is a graphic designer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed39:05

Before we get down there, let me ask the city attorney. I think I'm feeling I probably would need to bring that back and put that as an agenda item if they're gonna be forming a subcommittee but I don't want some guidance here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:17

I don't feel the need to be on a subcommittee but it could just be early feedback. I think it could be an

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:22

informal working group so it's continue the item to return with further input from the mayor and Mayor Pro Tem as a working group Thank you very much for

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed39:31

moving forward with that.

0:39 – 0:5026 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed39:48

I'm sorry, I was confused when we were polling things. But item D, I wanted to talk about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed39:54

What did you have a question about?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed39:56

Well because I see it's not a huge amount $5500 a month but I did a little looking into it and the amount there is very limited community input talking like comments shares this and that and I just had a thought Like, could it be to partner with either like Ventura College or Channel Islands with a student who this is their thing? Social media, fresh new. Engage them. You know what I mean? You can give them far less and they would be so grateful, so happy and maybe somebody to start getting younger people involved because that seems to be what we all want and we don't know how to go about. So I thought could this be a start to do something like that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed40:46

So procedurally, are we on? Do we want to talk? Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:50

let's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed40:50

do it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:51

I'd like to entertain that that we could

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:53

bring up talking about D.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8740:55

I'm okay with that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:57

It was approved but council meeting is still going so Council could discuss it further. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed41:02

so we're on D. A couple things. Of course we can do whatever Council wants us to do obviously So this particular amendment just gets us through the end of the fiscal year. You know, we transitioned Ms. Revere over into a recreation manager role and there was a need for somebody to fill this. I was going to bring back to the Council in the new fiscal year a comprehensive contract with Rebecca Smith for the newsletter and for social media management.

We could involve an intern in that effort, what we see is we have up to five posts a week, we ask for really quick turnaround, we asked for quick revisions, we contact them at night or sometimes on the weekends You could have a person doing that, but they have infrastructure such that they have somebody on call. They also have a supervising manager. So it's a team that you get and it's a bit more robust than just relying on one particular individual.

Like the intern concept which you're speaking of, these are younger people. I think the oldest person on the team outside of the supervisors and the directors is 25. So I feel like we're getting a lot of folks that this is their... Well, we're tapping into the youth and I have kids too and I know that we all go to our kids when we want to know about anything digital or social media.

But, you know we can work on that. And we can address that too. I've learned and maybe you all know this, I wasn't aware of this but you can boost your posts and I've been learning on how that Mayor Pro Tem, this is your world. Right right so We can certainly do that, that can be part of what we request however I am also mindful from my own experience I very rarely like or comment on a post from an agency or an organization. I tend to mostly focus on individuals, but that's my personal preference.

But I mean, I think that's something though. That's good constructive criticism I could definitely bring back to them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed43:37

I would offer this working on let's say at schools and things like that where there are feelings like let's get volunteers to do things and the difficulty that I have found is they have to be pressed. You have to be able to call a phone person and say get here now the phones not working then the volunteers don't work well for that. This isn't that but I'm looking at the team right now on their website I do see it is nice to be able to press somebody on a weekend and say, go for it.

And I also agree though that if we say our PR strategy, we should come up with targets and say what's our strategy? What are we trying to do? If it's getting more likes and more shares, that's the strategy. That Ben can, that Mr. Harvey can implement. So that's part of the strategy. Who are you trying to reach? So maybe that hasn't been articulated well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed44:23

enough. And this would also, sorry to jump in, but this also might be a good opportunity for a subcommittee at City Council to give me that type of direction that you guys would like. You know, this is what we want to see and how we want to see it. And that's great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed44:37

I'll just add one more thing and that is on another board that I serve on, I am the Marketing and Outreach Director And trying to get volunteers to post, and I have great volunteers but trying to get them to post things in a timely manner or like meet deadlines is really hard. And these are all ages from the 20s up to the 50s you know so so I think when you're paying someone it really they haven't a vested interest in doing what we want them to do.

And I'm really supportive of looking for interns or volunteers to help, or who want to learn more about how the city works. But I just think that paying someone is the only way that we're going to be able to stay on point and get our work done. And I think they're doing a good job Thank you all for joining us. You know, she was split in all these different directions with events and with all these—with events, with social media, with PR. And so I think it's helpful right now as we are reorganizing that aspect of staff to have a contracted group in our back pocket.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:07

And they could help us with strategy not just implementation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed46:11

No, I definitely took that as a note and yeah, and I think they'll be there their kids so you know they're They're receptive to constructive criticism.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8746:19

Yeah Thank you. I think just a quick comment and so This is a subset of You know what? We're talking about is the subset of this, you know issue which is that Most of the people who are participating in our You know, commenting on governance tend to be 60 plus. There's plenty that are less than that but I would love to see more of the you know 25 to 50 age range and so You know, I know it has to be probably another agenda item at some point in time. But I really think at some point in time we oughta look at how do we engage that age group in our governance?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed47:19

That's part of the strategy. So that's a good one right there.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8747:23

Look for hit that target. And you know, just mention that our planning commission now has, you know, two newer individuals who are... I'll guess at their names. I mean their ages but I'm gonna...I should probably guess low for it. But you know they're probably in their 30s somewhere give or take and that's not that usual for us either and but if they're both making fantastic Contributions to the dialogue and kind of, you know, spreading our interest level.

Very thoughtful. So I would love to see more of that engagement from

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:17

I agree 100%.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7848:19

I'm just going to really briefly. So we, I've had communication from constituents over the last year or so about engaging students and with the, I'm not sure what it's called now. It's not the Mayor's Council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed48:37

The City of

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7848:39

Ojai Youth Council, potentially even interning kids that have just graduated high school. We have on the park and recs we have a student representative. It seems to me that it might be really wonderful to see if the other commissions were open Even if it's a graduate, someone who is here for the summer or can be their last year in high school, a student representative and that way to get them involved and to offer some opportunities to Ojai youth.

It seems an easy way to do it, as well as potentially interns in city departments. Then we can bring this up as an item if that's a possibility. Maybe you have people who'd like to intern in the finance department or the planning department and if directors were willing to do that, which they may or may not... As we always say, free labor baby! Kidding.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed49:44

As luck would have it, our HR manager is hearing all this and I see she's writing down notes so good.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7849:48

Yeah, yeah. It's a possibility. I think it would be wonderful for all parties. It's a win-win-win. So great. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:56

very much. Yeah. OK, so I think you have direction that's good. Yes, thank you. I am seeing a card from Elena Daly, but I do not see her in the room anymore. Great. And then Mr. Steingold, I see that you want to talk about Dee and I want to ask you, is it useful? Is it necessary? Is it kind? Is a true?

0:50 – 0:559 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed50:15

My daughter has her own company. She has 16 points of contact, okay? No I mean email, phone calls, texts. You want to be engaged. You want everybody to be engaged. Does that mean you want responses? You have to respond to everybody on different groups and different platforms. You don't. Mr. Harvey when he first came on board said he wants all your stuff to go to him first before it goes to different employees. Everything goes through him.

I mean, right now you have a website. I go on the website. You have a Facebook page? Great! But you can't go on every group. If you go on every group, you could have 30, 40, 50, 60 conversations and now you're involved in all of them. And how do you respond? Do you respond to city councilors or do you respond as people? No disrespect. Okay, seriously. I mean if you had a media person—you're already on cable TV. You're on Zoom. You're on Facebook. You're on Nextdoor. You're in the newspaper. You get emails. What kind of engagement and back-and-forth do you want? If you want people to show up, fine. If you want to get constantly inundated with emails that you all have to personally respond to or not, that's fine too. That's your job.

But do you really want to have to be on... You put five things on Facebook a week Fine. It's $2,500 a month. If you're going to have a media person, have one person deal with all of it. Deal with the email issues. Deal with the Facebook but not on every group. You'll go crazy because you're on Ojai Community and Ojai Social and Ojai this and Ojia that. And you're like who is responding? Do you really want to engage people on each comment? I'm sure you don't Okay, you really don't.

Okay? Because it's painful. Okay so that was my I mean if you're gonna do it have a goal what is the goal is the goal is to get people involved fine

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:18

that's the strategy

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed52:20

No, I mean fine. You want them involved. That means making them knowledgeable. That means giving them stuff they want to get aggravated enough to come down here. Seriously. I mean that's why people get involved because they find something. Information. Do you really want to have to engage outside of here? I mean you see him at lunch. You see him. That's fine. They come to your home. Whatever.

But you don't want to do it online. Now you got to go as a city councilor or as Rachel Lang. I'm just saying, please be careful because there are predictable consequences to getting really involved and all. You're on Facebook, fine. If you want somebody—I push stuff onto other groups, fine. But you don't want to. Just the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:07

advice. Thank you, Mr. Stengel. We got it. There's a capacity question that we're going to have to answer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed53:12

Well, Mr Mayor, can I just jump in on this? Our policy and I think you all know this, so it's one-way communication. We're posting information out there for the public to see and of course the public is entitled to make a comment or However, we are respectful of people's First Amendment rights and we understand that there is not really a way as Mr. Steinkel points out to engage and so we just allow the posts in the comments to exist. And sometimes there is a question that is just remaining unanswered and fortunately thanks to all of you I often hear about that. We're usually often able to find this particular person and email or call them to respond and that's frequently what we do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:52

No thanks. And these are just, this came up actually in the League of Cities very common a huge issue it's with social media it's a really common thing so I think you have your direction thank you okay great so I think we've answered all the consent items if I see that correctly and we approved what we needed to approve already I believe we pulled D out do we need to approve it again?

Okay, great. No it's a proven before then we're good and we have direction we pulled E and we have direction to staff on F all right so now we're onto discussion number two annual schedule for joint City Council city commission joint meetings

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed54:29

Thank you, Mayor. Mr. Montgomery will be giving this staff report. Thank you.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7054:33

Hello again, Mayor and Council. We have a simple report. There is a need to reintroduce our joint meeting schedule for our four city commissions. Staff has presented a very simple schedule set to repeat. We just had the Historic Preservation Commission joint meeting so we started with the Planning Commission then the Arts And then the Parks and Recreation, and then Historic again.

The second part of this approval requested from you Council is that we've heard from a few of you that there's a need for a longer joint meeting so we've recommended starting at 4 p.m., so from four to six p. m. on a regular council meeting date that meets the need of our working agenda within each quarter. Any questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:22

Thanks for the clear report. Discussion or questions?

0:55 – 1:0016 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8755:27

Yeah, I guess four o'clock can be difficult for me. But you know, we can work on that and figure out how we did that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:41

Thank you. I have no public comments on this item. Do we open up to? Also, no raised hands. OK. Any other questions for staff? So the request for the two hours actually came from the commissions to me and I hope to some of you that what they're hoping is that they're sometimes asking for more clarity on direction. They do want to report out all of those things. And it seems like it's a great opportunity if we can pull it off. It gets worth it. And that's the hope.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8756:13

Okay. Yeah, I'll just comment briefly that the Planning Commission in anticipation of their meeting with us were very intent on having a good discussion about what they were going to use that time for and prioritizing it and that they are You know, somewhat I think similar to historic preservation but a little bit different. But in their desire to get more direction from us in terms of the role that we want them to play as they are going through their decision-making process.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed56:58

And it could be that what Historic Preservation did recently, there was a big discussion to be had but there is a subcommittee or an ad hoc committee that's going to do that. The direction was to have them do it. That's a great model too so we can always adopt that model as well if we can't make the forum platform then that discussion gets moved off which is completely fine.

Okay? Do I have a motion to approve item two?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed57:25

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed57:26

and will you second? Okay great. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Great motion passes thank you we took three off and now we are on to number four adoption of a resolution amending the salary schedule to add the classification of human resources risk manager unauthorized specialty pay for US gymnastics certificates certifications rather for fiscal year 2425

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed57:51

Yes, Mayor. And we're just going to allow a brief moment to allow Ms. Rivera and Ms. Holman to join us. And we're going to split this up into two pieces. I think what we're going to flip flop it around a little bit and we're first going to discuss the gymnastics classifications and then we will or I will take it and discuss the human resources risk manager. So with this junction, I'm going to hand it over to Miss Holman.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:18

Welcome.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed58:19

Am I on? Good evening, honorable mayor and council members. Tonight we have before you a recommendation to amend the city's salary schedule to authorize specialty pay for recreation employees that hold certain USA Gymnastics certifications and to add the classification of Human Resources Risk Manager. We're just going to focus on gymnastics at the moment. As you may remember last November, the City Council directed staff to restore staffing to gymnastics programming and to retain the current gymnastics programming and structure. After evaluating the needs of the Recreation Department, updating the current job classifications to include specific gymnastics activities provides us with the greatest flexibility to ensure that all recreation programming needs are being met.

Certifications from USA Gymnastics are a requirement to continue to provide gymnastics programming at the current level, as well as being necessary as the program continues to grow. We propose authorizing specialty pay to those employees assigned to gymnastics that hold the required certifications in recognition of additional training that they are required to obtain.

Per Council's direction, we met with staff assigned to gymnastics programming and members of the Ojai Valley Gymnastics Parents Group to keep them apprised of these recommendations and our commitment to continue supporting the gymnastics programs in the future. The rest of the staff report has other information for you. That's the conclusion of my briefing on the gymnastics part of it. At this point, we can either have City Manager Ben Harvey take on the rest of the staff report adding the classification of HR Risk Manager or we can question the gymnastics part of it now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed59:53

Yeah, thank you Miss Holman. Maybe perhaps it'd be a good moment to take any questions from the council on the gymnastics component and then we can move into the other part.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:00

Yeah I did have a question so the gymnastic staff that you said they were apprised of this work are they approving? Are they happy with the work and they've agreed on that dollar amount more or less? I mean in other words do you have consensus there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:00:14

I assume so. We met with them and they seemed pleased with it, and they seem pleased with their involvement in the process for the continuing process in the future. Any

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:25

other questions?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:00:27

So the staff members who are impacted are going to be spending time working through those certifications?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:00:39

They already have

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:00:40

them.

1:00 – 1:0815 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:00:43

And they have had them, and they continue to do their continuing education to continue to get them as they expire.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:49

It's a response to an existing situation is how I'm seeing it. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:00:56

Great. Okay well why don't I take on the next part of it? Yes! And I'll ask Ms. Holman just to remain and Ms. Rivera thank you for sharing that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:06

Thank you so much

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:01:07

for being here. Okay, this next item is a little bit different but the council is the body that approves changes to the city's salary schedule and so here we are implementing a proposed new position. One of human resources and risk manager. Prior to this you may remember well didn't we have somebody in that role? Yes, yes we did. We had somebody as a management analyst who was filling in that capacity. You may require Mr. Petner was in that role However, we've never had until in recent history at least certainly in the time that I've been here somebody who's qualified to serve as a human resources and a risk manager. The incumbent that we have and sorry I'm going to talk about her she's sitting right here I know she's alive and she's with us is a CalPERS retired annuitant from the City of Camarillo who was willing to come out of retirement in order to serve again as a full-time city employee for the city.

You may recall a similar situation with Ms. Palmer who came out of retirement to become our full-time Public Works Director, so it's a fortuitous opportunity where we can take advantage of somebody who has done this work before in a regional city, Camarillo. We're kind of becoming Camarillo East if you will but that's okay with a lot of expertise there. We want to take advantage of it But this also kind of fits with what I'm really trying to address, which is continued professionalization, reducing our risk and exposure, adhering to best practices. And it's a lot easier and more effective to do that with somebody who has done the job, who knows the work, who has the context versus somebody that I may have to—and this is not a knock on Mr. Pettner, he did an outstanding job But there was a lot of on-the-job training that had to take place because he just wasn't familiar with all the roles and responsibilities.

This position fits into our existing family of jobs where we have IT manager, we have the accounting manager so it's the manager family of jobs or this would be going in the same bandwidth and I'd be happy to answer any questions you have about that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:03:20

So I do have a couple of questions, and. I'm cheating because I already talked to our city manager about this earlier today, but my support of what we're doing with gymnastics and. And I have a great deal of concern about exposure to liability rising out of especially the higher level gymnastics athletes and that we are taking on the primary role of having the person who's instructing on the safety, you know protocols. So if something screws up We're the employer of the person who screwed up and it can be very expensive to resolve a claim arising out of that type of an accident.

And what the city manager explained to me today, so I just want to make sure everybody kind of is in the loop, is that we are going through Thank you very much. You know, give us kind of a higher liability limit on what we can pay in terms of the claim. And my support is very much dependent upon the fact that we put all of that in place.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:04:58

And if I could just expound on that. We're actually doing three things. So, pursuant to council direction, we met with the insurance authority and by the way this classification is the primary liaison to the insurance authorities you might guess as the risk manager They understood Council's concern. They also wanted to point out to us, and I explained this to Councilmember Whitman today too that you know yes gymnastics does have risks but we also have member agencies that have boxing and other high-risk sports There is an umbrella, an additional umbrella policy that we could purchase and we are looking into that. The other thing we're going to do is they said why don't you have a local gymnastics third party like UCSB, the director of their program come over and look at your operation and give you any suggestions as to things that you might consider?

And we're doing that as well. So, and we of course were going to keep the City Gymnastics employees and the parents group involved of this. And Ms. Holman would be heading up this, well she is heading up this effort and would continue to move this forward. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:06:06

Yes, so I was aware that you were taking those steps and it was pursuant to our council direction. So that's good. So I absolutely support this and we do have insurance and I'm glad that we're shoring it up. That's why we have insurance, but an umbrella policy is not a bad idea either. So yeah I support this 100% and would make a motion that we move forward with this both the new hire and the classification for the gymnastics instructor.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:44

Let me take your second, but then we just want to open it to public comments online. Oh I'm sorry. No that's okay. I know it's just going so well. Yeah

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:06:49

yeah yeah okay go for it. So sorry. Mr.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.701:06:52

Montgomery is there anybody online? We have no raised hands on Zoom Mayor. I have no cards and no cards will just give our zoom participants an extra moment they need to raise their hand as a courtesy Please continue.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:07:06

I just wanted to thank both staff in the gymnastics program that I see in the audience and also staff here for working to really resolve this issue in a way that is a win-win for everybody, and I hope that the gymnastics staff feels that way, and the parents group. And I applaud what our city manager and team have done Rectify the situation and make it safe for all of us. So yay you! I'll second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:35

that. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:07:36

any discussion? I just wanted to add too that our gymnastics staff is nodding their heads for the people who can't see they're nodding their heads and we're getting approved nods of approval And so I feel confident in moving forward with this direction and thanks staff and also welcome to Ojai We are so grateful came out of retirement to join us. We've heard amazing things about you from other Camarillo annuitants, and so I feel very secure having you as a part of our team.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:11

Second that. Okay, Mr. Montgomery, do you want to do a roll call on this?

Roll-call vote 0–0 Moved by Rachel Lang · Seconded by Andy Gilman · 5 under review
Show transcript
We have a motion by Mayor Pro Tem Lang with a second by Mayor Gilman

1:08 – 1:2221 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.701:08:21

to approve as recommended.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:08:44

We are on our last item, number six. Ordinance Adding and Repealing Certain Sections of the Ojai Municipal Code Related to Regulations of Moveable Tiny Houses. Mr. Seibert, welcome. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:08:59

just want to note it's 7-16. 7- 16. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:03

know! What is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:09:03

happening there? It's so crazy. Did

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:09:04

you take about three hours for this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:09:09

I'll just take a moment for the PowerPoint to come up. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:09:15

We want new branding on that when it comes through. I'm kidding, it's beautiful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:09:21

All right so good evening Mayor and Council Members my name is Lucas Seibert. I am the Community Development Director here for the City of Ojai. The item you have before you tonight is one in which you have discussed previously but not since 2023 and the reason for that and all next slide please Before I go into the history, I just want to give you some photos of examples of what this tiny home or tiny house's piece looks like. It includes fairly small, compact, not more than 440 square feet in size, tends to be a story and a half, not more than 14 feet in height.

And here are some examples of it with deck without deck on chassis on foundation. Next slide please. Ah, history. This has really been discussed since 2016 when social media and certain programs came about regarding tiny homes and that discussion then bled into council having conversations in the community having conversations that then led to Planning Commission City Council involvement in 2018 Ultimately, not moving forward with anything. It was kind of shelved at that point for a couple of years and then brought forward again through goals and priorities by Council in 2020, and then led to a two-year startup pilot program although it does say October 21st. It's actually 2021 when that went forward, not 2022.

The interesting thing is through this pilot program, aside from other tiny home ordinances that have gone forward, this was a two-year pilot program just to get an understanding of the impacts and the way in which this would be used and massaged through the city. And the limitations were two years, not more than 10 that would be accepted and approved each of those years.

And then after the two years an evaluation as to whether or not to go further modify kind of lessons learned from that two years. So in 2023, right before the program ended, staff brought forward kind of the lessons learned piece. And at that point council had said yeah let's take this through the entire process And what that means is developing a draft ordinance, kind of hearing from the community going and vetting it through planning commission which we have done.

And then bringing something forward and that's where we're here tonight. Next slide please. The pilot program first outcomes and lessons as I had said before But what I didn't mention was the fact that there were two tiny homes that have been developed and currently exist, and are sited in our city. So on average one a year. But there's a reason for that. The process that we had in place is cumbersome, required a lot of I guess we were calling it red tape at the time still is and we looked at ways in which to remove some of that red tape but then also recognize that there may still need to be some of that red tape or even considerations of not moving forward with certain things just based on logistics to a certain degree.

Barriers to the entry, third party ANSI inspection requirements. That's kind of an interesting piece that was really the biggest hurdle that each of these individuals in fact we had applications that were submitted and then they would immediately just withdraw the application They sensed and started doing the research and realized that the hurdle was not insurmountable because we've had two, but extremely difficult to navigate that process.

And then the other one is lack of specific guidelines due to being grouped in with the ADUs. So remember those too. Continued interest from the residents post program. I've already checked in with staff We've got eight people on a not a formal waiting list, but we know of eight people that are interested in moving forward with this So it's one of the reasons why it's being brought forward tonight Next slide please So recommended modifications, and we've got five points here. And really what it boils down to is the ordinance when it was brought forward in 2021 as a pilot program, it was folded into the ADU ordinance. And really what that meant was it was an either-or.

So you either have an ADU or you have a tiny home, or tiny house. Not an ADU and a tiny house. What this ordinance is recommending, it's been vetted through the community and through Planning Commission on two different occasions, is kind of separating the two. So now there's a new ordinance that's being brought forward as part of the discussion tonight for consideration.

Additionally, there was feedback from the two individuals that brought forward the tiny homes and ended up getting them sited. And one was the expense for the pads so trying to reduce some of those costs while may seem incremental each of those pieces could be the wavering on whether or not to move forward with it. Additionally, removal of requirements for the third-party ANSI which I had mentioned previously. That was probably the most significant hurdle in terms of inspections for prebuilt tiny homes.

What we found in doing the research and reaching out to these manufacturers is that they already have third-party, or they have ANSI inspectors doing the inspections throughout. And not only that but they'll do surprise inspections to ensure compliance so it's not like hey on Tuesday we're going to be doing an inspection. It could be at any point in time And then allowing tiny homes to be built on-site. So before, everything had to be sited, meaning it was really on chassis or you're craning them in...

bringing them in. Here we're talking about potential stick build which then leads you into having third party ANSI qualified and Land Leasing Opportunities It was partially brought up by this body in 2023. We did some research and then vetted it through Planning Commission, as well as the community certainly weighed in on that as well. And you're seeing that built into the program brought forward tonight.

Next slide please. So additional barriers that weren't mentioned were deck requirements barrier, 80 square feet. Again it's an expense piece. Is it considered to be excessive? Proposed alternative is just to eliminate the deck altogether. One of the reasons that in having conversations with Planning Commission and some community members It's not, it's we're no longer looking at an ADU or a tiny home. We're looking at ADU and a tiny home.

And as long as there's enough space the deck may not be necessary. It's no longer requirement. It is kind of a luxury, an added item. The second point was one that was not mentioned and is not included in the ordinance, but had quite a bit of discussion. And it's barrier and it's the connection installation as being an expense and somewhat invasive. There are some opinions there.

Proposed alternative to consider now mind you I want to make this very clear. It's not in the ordinance currently compostable toilets as an idea. Tiny homes, as an example. We've just got some visuals so you can get an understanding. It's typically very tight, kind of Tetris in terms of how you make that space work and operate None of these photos are taken from the two that we have in play.

I'm a little bit protective of the two that we have, so these are just examples. Next slide please. So this is really kind of additional information as it relates to the ANSI inspectors. Initially when we started doing the research, we had assumed that there wasn't anybody that was local but what we found is in fact there are after doing a little bit of a deeper dive in terms of some of that research these are the two companies that are localized and would be able to do that kind of third-party inspection for that stick built option.

Next slide please So with that, what we're recommending tonight, staff's recommending is to receive the information. Open matter for public comments and then consider introducing the draft ordinance establishing the regulations and guidelines for the movable tiny homes. So with that if council has any questions I can certainly

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:19:14

I'll just respond to say, I did inspect one of the homes that are here and it looks very much like the photographs. Meaning high quality, very interesting, livable everything that those photos did show so those aren't just the best there's also a good one here and I will say I've used compostable toilets in India and they are perfectly fine. That's my experience. I'll offer that any other questions for staff?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:19:38

Yeah, please. So the ANSI compliance that's done if you're manufacturing in a factory, let's say. That compliance carries through when it's delivered?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:19:53

Yes and the confirmation on that is really a sticker.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:19:56

Okay, great. And then as far as having an ADU plus a tiny home is there any lot size constraints on that or? No. Okay, great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:20:10

I will say this we did have quite a bit of discussion with Planning Commission on what sort of range that would look like and I think what we ended up arriving at is if it fits It fits. If it doesn't, it doesn't. Okay.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:20:22

Yeah. That sounds reasonable. I think you guys did a great job in moving forward after our last discussion and making it possible. It is time for people to start grappling with compostable toilets. It just really is time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:20:46

I would just like to mention, if there is an interest with Council bringing in additional information to kind of get to a comfort level and understanding how it operates and the disposal and that stuff. We've already vetted that through Planning Commission so we would just simply bring back some of that information and then just verify and clarify. And I do believe that there is a representative here tonight that could probably speak on that as well, just to kind of start the conversation.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:21:11

Yeah, when I worked at Williams College, they had a building and you know, they put in a compostable toilet and the undergrads lined up to use it. They really wanted to see how how it worked. Crazy kids, crazy kids. To answer the question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:21:25

because we're in question session here. The way in which it was presented to Planning Commission as an either or not a hey, guess what? We're moving towards this. There's no other option. It's it's an option becomes an option at that point.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:21:38

And you're right, I mean as it stands now to hook into the sewer system is quite expensive. Even though that may be changing now that HCD has taken that over but as it stands now that's gone through the courts and it's a significant expense and it's ongoing so anyway

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:21:59

Thank you. Other questions for staff?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:22:00

Yes. So here's the fun thing about this, right now the ordinance does not have a requirement for parking on site but

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:22 – 1:2712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:22:21

If the Council wants to require a parking space on-site, covered or uncovered, or whatever standard that you're looking for, that is open for discussion. Absolutely. I will say when it was vetted through Planning Commission they grappled with it as well but then offered the recommendation not to pursue it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:22:40

And I'll just add that the element of no parking requirement stems from the fact that they started as another flavor of ADU, and state law prohibits parking for ADUs. Parking requirements for most ADUs and now actually all ADUs. So that got maintained over but obviously movable tiny homes pulling them out of the ADU context could be put back if council so chose.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:23:01

That's very interesting because logically you might argue they're the same thing roughly speaking. If you cannot park in one why the other? Any other questions for staff? Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:23:12

yes. I want to understand the if it fits it fits comment a little bit so but my starting point is I want to understand that you can have an ADU and then you can have a tiny home. I have a kind of a general understanding that there's a law that allows you to have an ADU But it doesn't allow you to have two ADUs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:23:43

Unless you're multifamily.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:23:45

Or the second ADU is a junior ADU, because there's flavors of

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:23:50

ADUs... So are we treating Tiny Home as a junior ADU or the equivalent? No, a junior ADU would be attached. What are we doing conceptually in terms of saying okay You can have this type of structure, and then you can also have this type of structure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:24:09

Excellent question. This sounds very familiar to planning commission discussion almost a year ago. So, you can have a junior ADU or an ADU. The junior ADU has to be attached to the house, and there's a limitation no more than 500 square feet in terms of adding square footage but the overall square footage can't exceed 500. An ADU can be attached or detached. The method by which you do that really depends on the room that you have within the residence, or the property in question.

Even more importantly are also the setback requirements and the height restrictions that go into play here, depending on how it's oriented. Now I will admit the ADU law changes as the wind blows and what they're doing really from what I can tell from the state is they're looking at how cities are restricting it and then figuring out ways to pull back those restrictions. It's like cat-and-mouse essentially. Not a bad thing, but if you're trying to understand how to regulate it and tell the community and you're telling the community one thing and then you realize it's actually another.

The ADU piece that's kind of the moving target can be attached, can be detached. You have setbacks, You have a square footage maximum, 800 or 1200 depending on the scenario. And that's maximum and it has to be allowed. The way in which the tiny home piece works in terms of what we're looking at here, it's a 440-square foot maximum. The setbacks are the same as what we're looking at for ADUs so it's four feet for rear, four feet for side. The height limitation is not more than 14 feet What we're finding with these is that the height limitation, all ADUs have a height of up to 16 feet. What we found is that most of these ADUs end up being 14 even on chassis and it's taken from grade. Tiny home do you mean? What did I say? ADU twice. Oh sorry!

That's okay. That's the interchangeable piece. We're trying to separate it. Understood.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:26:21

Okay so... We have our own distinct ordinance. We're proposing our own distinct ordinance for a tiny home, and the only restrictions to somebody building one of those would be that it fits within the setbacks and the lot coverage and all of those things that would normally apply.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:26:50

Correct. As well as, so for instance just to add on to that another layer that isn't necessarily baked into this ordinance but already exists and something we'd be considering and that is any mature trees or for instance oaks or sycamores those would also be in consideration as well.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:27:13

So it's almost the ability to do it as a matter of right, but you've got to fit everything that is presented.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:27:23

Correct. You're basically checking a number of boxes which is what we were doing before. The biggest check was the third party ANSI piece and that was one that took some finessing I didn't quite understand it until I had a resident who was the first of our tiny homes bring a PowerPoint presentation and kind of walk me through what he had to go through. And I was like, that feels excessive considering.

1:27 – 1:3661 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:27:58

My biggest reservation is about the ADU program. I think ADUs are great, especially if they're affordable. They've all been called affordable by law.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:28:13

By design.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:28:14

But that doesn't keep somebody from building an 800 square foot ADU and charging $6,000 a month for somebody to rent it. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:28:26

it's typically market rate, right? Market rate but we get to count them as affordable.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:28:32

Right. All per state law. So I know we're not talking about ADUs tonight I would love at some future point for us to look at how we can bake in more affordability, you know as a city adopting. I wouldn't think HCD would be mad at us if we were insisting on more affordability but how, you know, I don't know the mechanism for doing that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:29:02

So if you're at, are we in Q&A here or are we in discussion? We're still in Q & A. We haven't had a public comment yet. So responding to your question regarding ADUs, deed restrictions are not allowed. We're not allowed to place a deed restriction on ADUs.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:29:17

Let me jump in on what—that is exactly right, but an option we can take a look at. As we know, we're coming back next time with a further discussion of our goals and our tactics. One of the goals set was affordable housing. A tactic could be looking at incentives to increase affordability. One of the options in that front could be saying above the state law minimums, which we cannot require affordability, above those state law minimums in return for affordability Details is not tonight's agenda item, but that's something we're planning to bring back as a conversation to have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:29:50

I had actually that exact same question and one thing I was going to see is if there would be any way that we could in addition to bringing that back for future conversation, if there was any discussion or has been any discussion about expediting permits or doing something for a guarantee of Not just affordability, but like low-income or very low income rentals. Has there been any discussion about

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:30:20

Not with Planning Commission. That's something that we could do, though.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:30:22

Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:30:23

And that's also part of what we're planning. We haven't yet got to Planning Commission, but that's what we plan to bring back as a good idea. Affordable housing goals and let's not lose that potential tactic,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:30:32

right? Because this is I mean, that's the goal of this whole program was to increase our affordable housing stock.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:30:39

Yes. And then one just one quick question with the size. Is there a limit to the amount of occupants you can have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:30:47

Not that I've seen.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:30:48

Okay, so you could have a family of five or whatever if that works for them? If you feel like you can fit five into a four-story place.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:30:57

They're really small,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:30:58

right? Oh absolutely but you don't... You know

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:31:01

yeah. I believe the fire code has certain limitations as well. We'll confirm with fire. I think it's probably good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:31:08

I'll get back to you on the number. I haven't seen a limitation because there's access and egress typically through the windows Great, so let me open it up to public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:21

comments. Oh! More? Okay, okay

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:31:24

sure. So I know it's a really small sample size but have there been complaints by neighbors about the installation of a tiny house you know next door in the neighborhood?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:31:40

Not that we're tracking yeah no Somewhat surprising, I'll have to admit. Given that it's the first two.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:31:48

Yeah, I mean, I think we have some history of people complaining about trailers. Yes. And you know, in the public right away and otherwise typically like because it's in the front of the house or whatever but this is a different animal

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:32:07

You probably drive by one many, many times and you don't realize it's there because it's on a very public street but it's so well done. It looks like it should be there. Yeah I've been in one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:32:19

So the other interesting piece and could be part of the reason why we haven't seen really any complaints on them is One of the requirements in this draft ordinance is that those units have to be really kind of in the back of the property, not front and center. That is not allowed at least through this ordinance.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:32:42

Yeah, so you have two scenarios. Basically one could be an empty lot where you're going to put it rather than build because that's incredibly expensive or whatever. You want to rent out your land and someone is going to put on a tiny home. Is there any limit? So it's an empty lot and one person brings on a tiny home and then their mom comes or whatever and they want to bring on another tiny home. Is it one per lot, regardless of whether or not you have a main building?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:33:12

Yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:33:13

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:33:14

One lot requires a main building for single-family. For multi-family, you're allowed to have two and multi-family would include your R2, your R3 zones R3, there's not a lot of R3 zoning.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:33:29

Okay so you're talking

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:33:30

about

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:33:30

your zones but not necessarily built out? It's what the code would allow? Correct. Not necessarily built out?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:33:39

What it would allow yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:33:40

Yeah okay all right and then I certainly Thank you for mentioning the Oaks and the Sycamores. I think that's something that we should consider, for sure. You've been to Mesa, right? Would you consider those to be tiny homes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:03

No.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:04

And why not?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:05

Those feel like RVs. Or I'm sorry, those feel like camper trailers.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:10

Those are like camper trailers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:11

Yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:12

OK,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:13

from a design standpoint, you're looking for consistency with the main residence here? Not necessarily exact same design, but consistency. So for instance, if there's a Spanish style home, we're not looking for a modern style design.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:28

So so there are design requirements to this. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:32

I did not. You're saying the Mesa homes, you would call them camper trailers. Mm hmm. I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing Maybe we are. They look like homes, they look like there's 10 homes in a semicircle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:45

So they look like RV trailers? No. Or do they look like

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:50

tiny

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:51

homes? I think so.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:52

Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:34:52

they look

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:34:52

like tiny homes and I think they're on a pad.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:34:54

They looked very similar to what you were just showing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:34:57

That's okay, just so we don't go down the wrong road. But they're classified as tiny homes. Mesa calls them tiny homes and they were brought in as tiny homes. That's a county property.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:35:09

Yeah, it's a county property. I was just curious. East End right? Yeah. It's up

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:35:14

Gorham. Not far. They might be taller than the height requirement but they are... They look like very big tiny homes. They look very similar to what you showed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:35:26

Maybe I'm looking at something different. That's okay. I was looking at something a few weeks back. Maybe not the same thing. Yeah, I mean Mr. Summers is holding up a picture

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:34

of what they look like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:35:36

Yeah, that's not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:36

what I remember. No, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:37

didn't think so. That's okay! I think these would qualify as tiny homozoic and they're tiny for the public but it's available at MESA's website.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:43

Mm-hmm. They're fancy inside. Yeah, they're lovely. Any other questions?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:35:49

No let's move on and we can come back in discussion if I need to thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:53

great let's start with Daniel is your last... Is it Griffiths? Thank you please come forward good to see you

1:36 – 1:413 turns

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated1:36:02

Hello, my name is Daniel Griffiths. I am the owner of Ventura Tiny Homes. Thank you so much for letting me come and talk. I got to be a part of talking with Lucas about a bunch of the things that have gone on. Actually, I'm the one that built the two tiny homes that were permitted and placed here and have had a great relationship with the owners as we've walked through the permitting process and figuring things out So, I too have a list of people in the Ojai community who are looking to do tiny homes. Very excited about it.

As I've heard you guys speaking even tonight, it seems like you guys are excited about affordable homes and just providing opportunities for people to place additional dwelling units on their property. There are a lot of confusion, there is a lot of confusion in the terms and this is something that we found out along the way. ADU is an umbrella term, tiny home literally means 400 square feet or 440.

Sometimes it's on wheels sometimes it's not what they're proposing is for a tiny home on wheels it can be taken off the wheels and set down But it actually is DMV certified, and it does have an ANSI certification on it. It is really exciting to have this as an option for people. When talking about affordability, even our most expensive tiny homes that we build the absolute elite top of the line I'm going to start with you, Andrew, and then we'll move on.

And when you think of that as like what the rents are, you're looking at closer to $2,000 a month cap. I mean, people aren't spending much more than that to live in something so small. But it is exciting to talk about affordable homes. I am happy to be a resource if you have more questions. I don't have much more to say other than thank you Thank you very

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:38:29

much. Bill Miley, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:38:51

Hello. Hi. Livable tiny houses I have been consistent about this subject. They are inappropriate for Ojai. They are inefficient in space because they have limited space. They're claustrophobic, in my opinion. Costly by square foot in measurement and will, without deck requirements, accumulate outside the structure much of people's stuff as there is no effective storage inside.

They may be cute and in the past they've been talked about being cute so are baby alligators. Check out the Tumbleweed Tiny Home site. They've been around for years in Colorado I gave you that link Those are $90,000 and more. About five years ago I tried to encourage the then-City Council to adopt a housing ordinance supporting park homes and turn down tiny houses.

Park homes have a maximum of 399 square feet, full ceiling kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, living room. And today Lake Cacitos is purchasing them for tourism at about $80,000. They arrive on wheels but they can't be towed. What appears to be slipped into this ordinance is allowance of two on a site. The sales tax used by retailers, this trashes Ojai in my opinion. Turner Parks were developed for a reason.

No trailer lots in residential zones, in my opinion. This bothers me so much that I misspelled the word residential in the email and left it there. Okay if you approve this we will potentially get up to two on any approved site a home with a minimum of 190 square feet on the first floor An option for composting toilet, which dries out the waste. But no mention of how the toilets used compost will be disposed of. Maybe the City Hall could have a receptacle for waste?

Or is it just garden fertilizer? Waste disposal should be a separate item on another agenda. Pooping goes on all day in community. That's why we have waste systems. Tiny houses on wheels have a purpose, travel. Goodbye! Good luck! Good travel! Allowing a tiny home to be constructed on the side is problematic and can go on for months. Oh I haven't got around to it. And then in end, OI does not need tiny houses on wheels. They need park homes.

1:42 – 1:5038 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42:03

We've got it Mr. Miley, thank you. Anything online Mr. Montgomery?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.701:42:08

Mayor we have no raised hands on Zoom. Okay.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:42:12

Is there anything that you could clarify for us, Lucas?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:42:15

Just quickly. And it's something I mentioned in kind of in the discussion with the Q&A we were having earlier. In reference to the two units or the two tiny home units that would be allowed yes to multifamily no to single family majority of the areas within Ojai are Our single family, the areas, the zoning areas that I mentioned before, the R2, the R3, or the RO. Those are all multifamily. Aside from that it would be one.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:42:53

And limit would be two on those?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:42:56

Limit would be 2. It's specified as 2 not oh hey this square footage if you can fit it within the parameters that we had talked about earlier then it would

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:43:06

Okay, great. Thank you and you're just talking about setbacks four feet?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:43:09

Setbacks yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:43:10

Okay all right thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:13

Any other comments or questions?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:43:16

Yeah I have a few comments. This is an extreme example but I think most people who have spent time driving to and from Ventura may not be as noticeable now but In Casita Springs, there's a lot where they've got like eight 10 by 10 structures. And I'm not even sure what they're for but maybe they were. I'm really supportive of the tiny home concept, but I want to make sure that we do it right. And I don't want to have a property that's densely populated with Multiple tiny homes.

I love the idea of being able to spread our affordable housing in 400 square foot increments around the community as opposed to plopping and then, you know, a huge number of units in one neighborhood.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:44:30

Can I give you, can I give the council kind of an example of a scenario that could play out and the way in which this ordinance as drafted wouldn't allow this scenario as it would play out? So let me give you the ADU scenario. Multifamily someone comes in they're like hey I want to do my two ADUs on site. And we're like okay figure it out. They come back with two ADUS and they're on top of each other ADU law allows that.

Scenario with a tiny home, they come in and say hey I want to do my two- I already have my two ADUs that I've done that are two story. I now want to do my two tiny homes and we say great show us how you're gonna make that work and they come up with the two story what's our response as this ordinance is drafted? Correct So 14 feet as a height limitation makes it so you can't stack them.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:45:35

And they're limited to two?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:45:37

Correct, two in terms of setbacks

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:45:42

Only in a multi-unit, only in the zone that is multifamily. The zone multifamily, which is not too many. I mean, we're mostly zoned single family. We are

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:45:52

mostly zoned single family but there are areas that are... One conversation. Yeah, there are areas that are multifamily so... Ask your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:59

question to Lucas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:46:00

Yes? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:46:00

was just curious. So you could have two ADUs and two tiny homes, so a total of four?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:46:06

Potentially for multifamily yes on top of the density that's already existing Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:46:14

And that wouldn't change the property to a multi-family zoned property if it's a single, okay. So even though someone would be renting out an ADU and a tiny home and living in their main home, it still...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:46:31

Yeah so just to clarify that question, so if someone came in and said hey I have a single family residence, I already have built an ADU, and on top of that I have the junior ADU My property is multifamily. We'll say no, it's not. It's still zoned single family. So now you are just not allowed to do more than one tiny home.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:46:56

The zoning map remains the zoning map. R1 zones, RO 1, RO half, etc., single family zones, whatever amount of ADUs you can fit per state law in one movable tiny home. The multifamily zones are three or four, etc. You can have whatever amount of units you're allowed by multifamily zoning plus two movable tiny homes plus whatever amount of ADUs you're allowed by state law.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:47:22

And it's up to, I think that's the important piece to note here is that you're trying to fit it onto the site and maybe only one

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:47:29

fits.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47:32

Well, I'm just trying to girl math for the sake of girl math. So with like a house, how big of a lot would a residential home have to have to fit the maximum?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:47:45

What might be helpful is that when this returns, depending on what happens tonight, we could bring... We did this for Planning Commission. It was kind of a good exercise to go through some different scenarios on the square footage and using some real examples. I mean obviously we'll take addresses off but we'll use some real examples.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:48:02

That would be useful. So just sorry. I would really like to have kind of the public have a chance to jump up and say whatever it is they want to say. Thank you. I just want to say on behalf of the Board that our Council is pretty enthusiastic, supportive of moving forward in some way so my thought is that it would be great if we brought back a couple of issues Yeah, and get some warning of that for tonight.

I guess I'm assuming that we're not going to reject the idea out of hand.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:49:03

Can I jump in really quick? There's nothing that stops the council if the council wants to have a workshop in between the first and second read, if you like. We were happy to do that if that would provide some comfort.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:14

That's interesting. I just have one question about the, on the composting toilet you have it listed as a proposed alternative so what your Tell me if I'm understanding you right Mr. Seibert that you would say Sorry when you say there's a barrier To to the sewage we can leave it as is until we explore this compostable issue at another time

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:49:35

Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:36

because you're proposing this we don't have to take them both together now We can come back on that okay? Because that seems like a more complicated issue

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:49:43

Well, it sounds like a great idea. I think just understanding all the nuances with it. Right. Seeing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:49

some

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:49:49

examples,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:50

that kind of stuff would be great.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:49:51

So the idea is that anything that would be approved before we figure out the compostable part is going to have to be a connection to the sewer?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:50:01

Correct.

1:50 – 1:5612 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:50:06

I'm confused as to what we need to figure out about the compostable toilet.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:50:11

No, I hear what you're saying. I'm gauging possibly the crowd here but I was trying to see if since we have the expertise here on the qualifications on how big they can be and all of that kind of stuff, we don't have a lot of experience with it or I want to hear otherwise. How confident do you feel about that option? Mr. Seibert, I guess that's a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:50:33

real question. Can I ask one more question before you respond to that? Because I'm also aware that we have single family houses here that aren't on sewer, that are on septic and so could you in while you're responding to this question about the compostable toilets can we also talk about the difference between septic or if that's an option as opposed to compostable

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:50:59

At a high level, the difference between like septic versus sewer versus compostable toilet at a high level. And mind you I can get you more information to at least so that your you feel educated about and informed about the differences. Septic is all underground and typically done through something called leach fields. We all kind of understand that So, it's fine and dandy as long as it doesn't rain. But the problem is when it rains, it tends to then overflow which then creates some issues. Compostable toilets are completely enclosed from what I can tell. I mean, I don't have direct experience with it. It's just the stuff that we've presented to Planning Commission.

And maybe Daniel could speak on that a little bit too. He's more of the resident expert on it. But the way in which they're managed, it sounds like it's an infrequent basis versus the septic, which that only needs to be cleaned out every few years. Versus sewer, we all know sewer.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:52:13

I would like Daniel actually to speak to if there are standards. I don't know, but yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:52:24

Tell us about the projects and how they're

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated1:52:25

working. The compostable toilets. First of all, the concept behind proposing compostable toilets came about because a few of the people that approached me to have Tiny Home built had a property where the only place that they could put it was across the stream, and there was no way of running to the sewer line. Because of the elevation of the stream and where they were putting it, they also weren't allowed to put a septic tank. And so, we had brought this up as an option to people who couldn't connect to the sewer or weren't allowed to put in a septic tank. Not as an option of like you can choose one of three whichever one is cheapest but The concept being this is the third and final and only option for some people, because there are a lot of people in Ojai who have larger properties.

And the inability to connect to the sewer or a pumping system to bring it 400 feet was The concept behind the composting toilet is that our tiny homes are built about two to three feet off of the ground, so all of the sewer, all of the drainage system is raised above the ground and then it connects to the main sewer or whatever sewer you're going to. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much. Again, the capacity of waste in this scenario even if everyone in Ojai put in a tiny home only a small fraction would need a composting toilet and that small percent would only produce a little bit of compost. So it is more presented as an alternative not as an alternative but as a last resort

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:55:03

But it doesn't have to be, I'm sorry. My other question is did I just hear you say that basically the waste gets removed from the house and has like a septic tank only? It's not, it's a composting tank that then does what it does outside of the house so it's not actually in the house any longer.

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated1:55:24

There are many options for composting toilets but this is the one we were hoping to recommend because it's separate from the unit

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:55:33

Right, and just the cost. Even though if you're spending $80,000 or $100,000 another $10,000 or whatever it is to hook to a sewer but it can be even more than that. It can be very expensive to hook to a sewer line.

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated1:55:46

One of the projects we did, the permission to connect to the sewer was $17,000. Sewer line itself was another $16,000?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:55:54

Right exactly and that's been upheld by the courts even though those costs for ADUs but anyway yeah thank you so that would be an additional $35,000

1:56 – 2:1165 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:56:10

So, either one of you can answer this. When you do a composting toilet, then what's the plan for the gray water? I mean, I have some understanding that the county is not very receptive to graywater systems. So if either one of you can address how... Because you're going to have a gray water issue, you know? You're gonna have to deal with it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:56:48

I

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated1:56:48

have a partial response. One of the main scenarios here is that this is a very small capacity, it's a single bathroom in a very small kitchen so there isn't as much volume as a gray water system would be in a larger

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:57:04

house. 440 square feet likely two residents and you could have I'll get to the limitations in terms of the number of individuals you'd have in one of these 440 square foot. The gray water is kind of an interesting piece because that could also be re-piped and then reused to a certain degree. We're talking about that for various projects on a regular basis, not a requirement but there are plumbing code standards when you're applying that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:57:38

And I have another question and that is, you know should we consider maybe prohibiting the connection of a tiny home to a septic system because we've got kind of an overburdened situation in the valley as it is?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:58:02

The connection into an existing septic system is kind of interesting because, as we found out through LA County anytime you're doing that there is typically in talking with the building official. There's typically a reporting that needs to go out once you connect to an existing system to ensure that it can handle the additional load. And that reporting system is extremely expensive, and it's annual.

So it almost becomes cost prohibitive to do that, especially for something like what we're talking about here. Could you could we take that measure? Could this body take that measure? Yes. I think it's almost cost prohibitive just do it anyway.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.871:58:46

Yeah. So the connection to the septic tank is going to be excluded by economics

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:58:57

I would assume so, yeah. The reports from what I've heard from residents talking about going that route have identified somewhere in the neighborhood of eight to ten thousand dollars for each report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:59:10

And I would note that the current ordinance as drafted and is presently in place does allow septic, but again it's an option subject to those economic components. The Council could prohibit septic and require sewer or require a sewer or composting toilet or keep it all three or pick two. You've got choice.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:59:30

I would support, you know if it's economically unfeasible and people aren't going to do it but I would also probably support making it taking it out as an option just because even if people had the money to do it and decided to do it and got through the compliance issues annually. Probably still don't want them to do when we get a heavy rain. I would like to investigate more the idea of gray water and recycling and the ability to do that, so that might be out of scope of what we're talking about. But I think it's also as we move forward in an attempt to bring in sort of forward thinking processes for recycling water and water management. We might want to put some sort of information around how that might work, you know just to make it easy for people or potentially you might have that already it might be something that would be an easy drop-in I'm not I'm not suggesting that you do it for your business, but I am suggesting that the city as part of what it does to support this also gives people ideas on how they might do the gray water recycling.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:00:46

Mr. Harvey, I just want to clarify you suggested that if we were to go forward tonight but before the second reading there would be a kind of workshop where we could look at examples and things

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:00:56

like that? We could if council wants to do that absolutely we'd be happy to do that okay thank you yeah and you could slow walk it as much as you wanted to no there's no violation in spending more time to adopt an ordinance of course

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:01:10

yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:01:11

I just have one question about electricity. So, I'm assuming these are all electrified that we're not using gas infrastructure? Is that correct?

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated2:01:22

It depends on what's allowed. The two that we've done before have connected to, one is connected to the gas, one is connected to propane. We can do all-electric and do solar. We can do a hybrid of many of them. It's not always cost effective to do all electric and solar with a unit as small as it is if someone has solar in their house already but there are a lot of different ways of doing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:01:52

Thank

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:01:54

you. Is there a reason that we're not talking about incinerating toilets? I know it's a different cost structure, but my understanding with an incinerated toilet, I mean it's kind of all gone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:02:11

I've done zero research on that. I can look into it

CommentDaniel GriffithsProposedself-stated2:02:14

The one thing that I have learned in my research about incinerating toilets is that they're not fun to live with permanently. They're great for temporary use if you have a cabin that you visit occasionally or if you have, you know, a travel trailer with one in it. I've steered people away from them because it does create some smells. It does have some not great long-term stuff, and the units themselves aren't necessarily designed to be used full time for someone over a long period of time.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:02:53

Anything else? I just hear the word incinerator and I'm like, ooh, red flag. High

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:02:59

energy use potentially.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:03:00

Yeah, okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:03:02

So I think we've gone around but we have a proposal here and we've heard it well. We've heard an offer of a workshop so I would like to entertain a motion that we accept the proposal for the change and I would include the compostable toilets as an option Would

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:03:25

you be willing to take a friendly amendment that we disallow

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:03:30

septic?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:03:32

And that we put in some sort of protection around lot usage for the sycamores and oaks. Maybe, maybe not. I don't know.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:03:43

Do we need that? I mean, I'm happy to do that. But I made the assumption that we had that. We would have that already. Is that incorrect

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:03:48

within our true ordinance? We've already got that protections in place. Yeah. It would require them to do a tree report and then have an arborist provide assessment. And

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:03:58

thank you. Not necessary.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:03:59

So is that a second

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:04:00

then from you? So I OK, I would like to see the information about composting. I believe that I would be supportive of composting, but I think we need to kind of receive the information so that we know what the you know pros and cons and they potentially raise questions. You mentioned you've done that for

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:04:26

Planning Commission? Yes, for

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:04:27

Planning Commission. I'm you know, I'm happy to have this Come back on the composting issue, but I'd really like to see that material. Look

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:04:40

it's a dirty conversation, but we will

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:04:42

have it at a workshop. I guess potentially we could, I mean... We could have moved that around. I'll ask City Manager, but if we approve tonight Then we can't just like get the information and then approve it on the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:05:08

second. No, you could make changes in between the first and second reads so you absolutely could... We could add

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:05:16

composting as

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:05:17

a... I'm going to let the City Attorney weigh this is a legal question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:05:21

Yeah, so if we introduce the ordinances proposed tonight with adding compostable toilets as an option and disallowing septic as a not option. You can introduce that tonight, and then come back next time with more information on compostable toilets. And at that time...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:05:38

Wait, I think we're talking about having a workshop? Are we still- is that or is that no longer part of the...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:05:45

No, that's the part that I was asking for clarification. Is that- I didn't hear that in your motion. Is it in your motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:05:50

No, and I would want to have the workshop in between. So now you have a workshop.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:05:55

Yeah, right. So you start off with the first read with these and they could be expounded upon and discussed in the workshop, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:06:01

Yes. So it's first reading here then a workshop. And then if you're prepared for it, you could do second reading at the workshop. You could also have the workshop just be a workshop.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:10

Let's have the workshop be a workshop, come back here again. And I think the question that Mr. Harvey is getting to is could we remove the composting based on after-the-information and keep the rest at the second read? As long as we can do that.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:06:22

You could delete it at second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:24

reading like that.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:06:25

Yeah just to know if we were to delete the composting we would be adding $35,000 to the ticket. Oh no, I hope we don't. Okay. Yeah, I hope we don�t. I just want to make sure we're clear about that. I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:37

hearing Mr. Whitman say that he thinks he would approve it, he's just asking for the information. Just to make sure we

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:06:43

have our safety obligation. So we had the limitation of 10 units per year in the in the pilot program, and of course we only had two over the course of two years. But I guess one other protective measure that I want to do is can we extend that limitation per year as to whatever number is reasonable? It sounds like if we said 10 We're not likely to get a... I don't know.

Because we're loosening up the... We're making it easier to do this, so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:07:39

Yeah, it's divorcing itself from the ADU regulations, so.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:07:43

I just don't want to suddenly have like 40 of these in our neighborhood saying, you know, what did you do to us?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:07:50

I think there's two ways in which it could potentially to address your potential concern, and that would be to put a limitation on it. To cap it. The 10 was never really a scientific number. It was like, hey, let's—10 sounds reasonable, right? And council was agreeable to that. The other option is to come back after a year and evaluate the number and see if it's more than 10, then why is it more than 10? What's going on?

I can tell you right now we've got eight waiting. And it sounds like either they're overlapping with what Daniel was talking about or it's independent. So...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:08:29

Yeah. So I'd like to make a friendly request, a friendly amendment That we put a 15-unit limit on a calendar year with the idea that we'd revisit that number after a year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:08:50

I'm open to that. What I think is that, the reason why I'm open to it is that if we found that they were very successful and we were pleased with the outcome, we could always come back and raise the limit. But if this gets a lot of support going forward and we start to see these then, I think that would be a wonderful thing to see in a great addition to our allowances for housing.

You okay with that? Okay enough?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:09:27

Okay, enough.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09:28

Whatever. I'll take it. Okay so we have a motion and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:09:33

a second. Can I jump in? Sorry one clarifying thing. So we're talking about a first read tonight obviously then a workshop then a second. I'm going to ask if the council would have the appetite for slow walking this so that the workshop takes place sometime during the month of May 2025 and the second read comes back sometime in the month of June 2025

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09:53

One question for that, and I want to ask the pending projects. Are these... And not to say that they should drive this, but I'm just asking the question. Are they waiting for us to say yes to go?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:10:05

They've been waiting since 2023.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:07

That's my only hesitation there, but not to say that need drive it, but be more eager if we could possibly do it sooner is my request.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:10:18

Yeah, agreed. And given that people have been waiting since 2023 for these revisions so they actually can build would everyone you know 8 and 8 is 16 but any would anyone object to 20 to see how it how it plays out? So these people that have been waiting you know they can move forward and I personally doubt that within a year, 20 are going to

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:10:47

go. I'm fine with 20. I was kind of debating 15 or 20.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:10:51

Great. OK. I think 20 is good. That way we've got covered people who have shown an interest. Thank you guys.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:10:58

So sorry about the timing. So could the workshop be in the first part of May and then the second read comes the second meeting of May? Is that acceptable? Acceptable enough. We can't return at the next meeting. Understood. OK, I get that.

2:11 – 2:1529 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:14

Plus, I think that's reasonable. If we try to do any sooner, I don't know that it'll be complete like... I need a little bit of time. Okay!

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.872:11:24

And then we're gonna get the composting... We'll need a little

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:29

research later. Yes, the workshop will include that but... Absolutely. When we come back to Council in June, we will have that. End of May? I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:38

sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:41

Beginning of May for the workshop. Second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:44

meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:44

in May, second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:11:45

read.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:45

And when we come in for the workshop, we'll have the ordinance adjusted to reflect tonight's discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:11:51

Maybe a compromise. Okay, could we have a compromise maybe for the first meeting in June for the second read? I'm sensing my director having... Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:59

there's a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:11:59

lot of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:11:59

things on the plate right now. If we're just trying to be fair, I would prefer the first meeting in June and that one I can feel comfortable

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:07

with. I want to defer to you on that.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:12:10

I'm very excited to hear about compostable toilets, the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:12:14

options. Mr. Montgomery are you willing to read it

Roll-call vote Moved by Andy Gilman · Seconded by Leslie Rule
Show transcript
back or do you want me to say what I think it is? We have a motion by Mayor Gilman with a second by Councilmember Rule to approve the item as recommended and direct staff to provide a public workshop for input before returning for a second reading and adoption And including in the ordinance, the compostable toilet as an option and to not allow the septic tank option with a friendly amendment to place a 20 unit limit on the first calendar year of ordinance adoption. And for staff to return in May with a workshop and the first meeting in June for the second reading.

Well

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.702:12:57

done. You're killing it! Council Member Meng?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:13:04

Yes.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.702:13:04

Mayor Pro Tem Lang?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:13:05

Yes.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.702:13:06

Mayor Gilman? Yes Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes Motion passes. All right, wow

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:13:13

exciting. All right that's it council member reports anyone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:13:23

I don't know if we should bring it up. Rachel, when we just got the new rotation with our liaison positions and Rachel when we were handing out duties she has far more than I took so and I'm willing to step up and take her place with the HPC continue with that that I have been in continue with the parks and rec to give her a time for herself or work and all of that stuff so I just wanted to bring that up to let you know if

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:13:52

So if I understand this correctly, Council Member Mang would be assuming two commission liaison roles taking one from the Mayor Pro Tem and I'm seeing head nods from the council. I'm seeing no disagreements so we'll take that as direction Mr. Montgomery will update everything accordingly. Mr. Seibert you understand that you have the same council member it's easy for you right okay there we go thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:14:18

Related, just to keep everybody abreast that we in working with the chair and also the vice-chair of the Parks and Rec Committee that we will have some interviews possibly as soon as Monday and also the following Friday. And we hope that we will have candidates to affirm here at our next council meeting and then we would have a working body and all of our commissions will be up and running.

Stay tuned! Yeah, anything else? And I'm assuming we'll do future agenda items. We'll continue on our strategic planning and tactics. City Manager Report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:14:55

No report, but this is also a time if the council does have future agenda item requests. Yes, long term we would like to use the work plan as the guiding light, but we're not quite there yet so please if there are future agenda items this is the time. Great.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:15:08

I'm going to once again request an indemnification agenda item. I'll make a formal request as well. I've made an informal request, but I will formalize that request. That is a...I think it's the Mayor Anything that needs to be looked at, so hopefully that will make it onto the agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:40

Anybody else? Okay then we are adjourning. Thank you very much.