UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:00 – 0:015 turns
Welcome back. Good evening everyone, we're going to get started again. Quick announcement before we restart which is today is Leslie Rule's birthday and there are cupcakes on the back table. Help yourself.
Kim Mang, thank you very much.
Thank you, Kim Mang. And there's also some bread back there which is sourdough. There is nuts in it but homemade, help yourself. And Mr. City Manager, Mr. Harvey please report out of closed session.
Yes, Mayor. The City Council went into closed session for the purpose of city manager performance evaluation. That was the week before. Okay, sorry. City attorney performance evaluation correction. The City Council did provide the city manager with direction however there is no reportable action at this time. Thank you.
Thank You Mr. Harvey and with that we will adjourn the closed session And we will open the Open Session. Thank you very much. Mr. Montgomery, roll call please.
Roll call — called by Andy Gilman
Show transcript
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
Do I have a motion to approve the agenda?
I'll move to approve the agenda.
Second?
Second.
All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? Okay great and I see that we have a presentation from the Ventura County Fire Marshal. Hello sir
Welcome. Good evening, Mayor and City Council. Thank you for having me. My name is Joe Morelli. I'm the Ventura County Fire Marshal. I am going to discuss with you tonight the CAL FIRE Local Responsibility Area Map Release. A couple things that I want to share with you this evening. First, what are local responsibility areas? The history of the maps, the CAL FIRE development of the maps and the state law requirements that apply for the different mapped areas. Next slide.
So I don't think I have to spend a lot of time on this. I will share that CAL FIRE considers fire history when they're developing their new maps. The last time the maps were developed was 15 years ago, and we've had quite a bit of fire activity in the last 10 years. Fifteen of the top 20 most destructive fires have occurred in the last decade. So things have changed.
The maps that CAL FIRE has proposed take into account fire history up until 2019, their next update will include fire history after that. Next slide. I'll share just a little bit more on the history and then I'll get into this but The Local Responsibility Area is an area that local government is responsible for providing fire protection and prevention. Another area is called the State Responsibility Area.
Here in the county we have both because we're a contract, one of the seven contract counties in the state So we have a contract with Cal Fire to provide fire suppression and fire prevention in the state responsibility areas. Those maps were updated a couple years ago, the local responsibility area maps. Just a brief history, in the 1980s there was destructive wildfires in San Bernardino County and there was a number of structures lost followed by a fatality fire in Oakland Hills in 1991 I think they had 30 fatalities from that fire. They lost 3,000 structures and with each one of these major fires, that's usually when you see changes to state law.
There's a lot of that happening right now, a lot of legislation in the works at the state level. So these maps were developed and the maps affect where building codes apply, where fire codes apply Local planning decisions. One of the most frequent questions we get, and we'll probably get one tonight is how does this relate to insurance? So I'll just share a little bit about that right now.
The California Insurance Commissioner's Office has provided a public statement indicating that these maps do not affect insurance. I'm not going to stand here tonight and guarantee that for you. That's coming from the California Department of Insurance, but there are different maps that the insurance industry uses. The CAL FIRE maps are primarily used for land use planning decisions.
It tells us where to apply the different home hardening requirements, 100-foot defensible space. The insurance maps are risk maps So, while they take into account the fire hazard and they may look at fire hazard maps, they're looking at other elements that aren't just the geographic area. They're looking at what has been done in an area to reduce the risk. I'm glad to answer any other questions on that at the conclusion of the presentation, to the best of my ability. I am still trying to understand the insurance industry myself, and I'm around this quite So, so far what's been completed? The State Fire Marshal released the maps on March 10th.
And this is the first time that in the local responsibility areas they have different classifications of hazard. There's moderate hazard, high and very high. And the name is as it implies, there's different levels of hazard. And in the past only the very high fire hazard areas have been mapped. Now state law requires the local responsibility area to map the moderate and the high fire hazard areas.
which expands again the areas where home hardening requirements apply. The law requires that we make these maps available within 30 days to the public, and they're within a week we provided I think here at your City Hall. We have...I don't know if it's up here in the room? We had provided a map, but we have it on our website as well. And I'll provide a QR code here in a moment so you can look up your property that's usually what people want to know is are they in a mapped area now?
Next slide. So this, what you're seeing here on the left side and the next slide will have the QR code but it shows the, this is a CAL FIRE resource. On the left side it shows you what the current mapped areas are and then on the right side if you go to the next slide as you can see it's quite a bit of an expansion in Ojai So that slider will show you what the maps are now and what they're proposed to be.
Overall for Ojai, the expansion of the area is substantial. Countywide it's a 108% increase. Ojai is 464%. So I mean just from looking at those two slides if you go back for a moment from there and then next slide so as you can see it is substantial I'll talk about what the implications are of that. Okay, on the next slide, I'll leave this up for a moment. For anyone who wants to get this QR code, this will take you right to the CAL FIRE page and you can look up your property. They have an address finder.
So I'll just leave that up for a moment, and I'll start talking about what the implications are. So in the very high fire hazard areas there's a few requirements that apply. The 100-foot defensible space which are requirements that we've had in Ventura County for the last 90 years progressively more restrictive over the last 90 years. I think it started at a 30 foot defensible space and went to 60 feet And then for the last 30, 40 years it's been 100 feet.
So those laws for defensible space apply in a very high fire hazard area. Go to the next slide. So defensible space, home hardening. That's for any new construction. There are requirements in the California Building Code for ember intrusion-resistant vents, fire-resistive siding, Class A roof and about five other features for hardening your home. And then Assembly Bill 38 inspections, which is any time for the last five years state law has required that anytime someone sells a property in one of these areas that they provide a disclosure to the seller to the buyer.
That they're in a mapped area and that they obtain an inspection from the fire department to verify that their property is in compliance. The high fire hazard areas, those real estate inspections also apply. And as I mentioned this is the first time the high fire hazard areas are being mapped for the local responsibility areas so it's quite an expansion on the number of inspections you'll be seeing us up here more because of this quite a bit more and then the home hardening requirements of Chapter 7a what is different about the very high in the high Thank you all for joining us.
What this means looking out for the next one to three years is due to the Palisades and Eaton fires, the governor issued an executive order for the State Board of Forestry to speed up the development of the Zone Zero regulations. And Zone Zero is really what they're looking at—it's the weakest link right now in defensible space laws in that first hundred feet You can have everything right, but if you have
0:11 – 0:181 turns
vegetation against your structure and an opportunity for embers to ignite the vegetation and spread into your structure then it's all for naught. So the state has recognized that. The fire loss information shows that is a vulnerable area and the requirements are coming out by December are going to apply to all existing homes in the very high fire hazard areas With a three-year timeline to comply, and it will immediately apply to any new construction.
Here in Ventura County we already have requirements for new construction that's a zone zero noncombustible so we're already ahead of the state for new construction the existing occupancies I mean if you can imagine for all of us our own homes I mean the implications are substantial for the county and for Ojai So that's coming. Next? So, the Ventura County Fire Protection District as your fire department we are adopting the maps. This doesn't have to be done separately for any cities served by the district so we will bring to the fire board of directors the maps on May 13th for a first hearing and a second hearing will be May 20th Something that's been upsetting, I think to the community is that the state law doesn't allow an appeal process where someone can appeal the state's decision or their proposed maps.
The law only allows—and that's different from 15 years ago—the law only allows for the district to expand an area We are not proposing any expanded areas at this time. As you can tell, they've already done quite a good job at expanding the area significantly and then the maps will be effective July 1st. I just want to share briefly about what we're already doing with our program We do 19,000 defensible space inspections annually in the county. 6,000 of that 19,000 is here in Ojai and we expect that to likely increase.
We do landscape plan reviews for new construction. As I mentioned, the AB 38 inspections and then our wildland unit so we have two different units one is focusing on 100 feet around the structure and then anything outside of that we have a wildland unit that does prescribed burns in the county, fuel reduction projects. They use goats, any tools or resources available to them to reduce a fuel load and to mitigate the fire behavior.
We also have been doing quite a bit more community engagement, and our involvement in partnerships with the Fire Safe Councils is growing. Supporting firewise communities and then engaging with the Wildfire Collaborative. We're also on the Board of Forestry Fire Risk Reduction Community List, so if anyone is asking what is a district doing for us? When it comes to your insurance there's what's referred to as a SAFER from wildfire regulations.
These are through the insurance industry, and they have 10 home and parcel hardening measures or community-level mitigations that can be done that can help someone if they're aware of these regulations. In some cases—and there's no guarantee—it can help someone keep their insurance. It can help them get a discount. Although not substantial, but being on the Board of Forestry Risk Reduction List is one of those.
It's a designation we obtained last year so that applies to Ojai as well and then being a Firewise community those are the community level mitigations all the others are some of the things I already mentioned that really align with the building code home hardening having the right attic vents I'm glad to answer any questions on that. Next slide. So, I mentioned our engagement and involvement with the Fire Safe Councils which is just going to become an even more important partnership and they do quite a bit of work in the community and some things we partner with them.
There's things that they do that aren't really best suited for the fire department For instance, they go and they do home ignition zone inspections. Sometimes people don't want the fire department—someone who has enforcement responsibility coming in looking that closely at their house—when they do it through the Fire Safe Council, they can get an inspection that doesn't come to the fire department. It's really just more of a recommendation-based.
They do a lot more for the community as well. I mentioned statewide is safer from wildfire regulations, and I would recommend anyone interested in this to look at the California Department of Insurance website and look at these steps if you're wondering what can you do on your parcel in your home. Not only too—and I will say that they've done quite a bit to align with the State Fire Marshal's Office And the things that they have on there, when you have proper defensible space, home hardening, the chances of your structure surviving increase by about 60%.
So these mitigations actually do make a difference as far as reducing loss and then hopefully help people with their insurance. Next slide please. As I mentioned, the state law does not allow for public comment. They said that public comment is not going to change Thank you very much. Any thoughts?
0:18 – 0:2610 turns
I have, yeah, I have a question. So you mentioned that hundred foot distance and then I'm also aware that with oak trees there's a five foot clearing so you know what if you have an entire oak tree in that 100 foot space?
So the State Board of Forestry, I've been attending the meetings. They have both informational meetings for the fire department but they're sharing the same information on the public meetings and I've been attending those. What they're talking about with that is they're looking at what's reasonable to allow to stay so for instance if you have a fully mature tree like an oak tree and it's you know the trunk of the tree Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
But they realize that, and we do too, that just may not be realistic. Here in the county alone, when you look at how many properties we have here in Ojai and then countywide, there's 95,000 properties in these mapped areas. And it has to be a realistic path for people within a three-year time frame. The example you brought up is one of those items that right now, I don't know where it's going to land.
But that's one of the examples they're saying well there has to be some allowance for that versus planting a new oak tree which I wouldn't recommend anyone actually but planting it within five feet of the structure versus what's a 50-100 year old tree. Yeah
yeah I'm more interested in that hundred foot There's some arguments that they're Only marginally combustible or, you know, they're not combustible in the same sense say a Mexican fan palm or eucalyptus tree. But what are we expecting of residents? You know who look at fire hardening their property and they've got a mature oak tree within that hundred foot perimeter where we're trying to get rid of anything
So within 10 feet of the structure it should be limbed up and kept away from, you know, the smaller branches and leaves kept away from this structure. But outside of the ten feet other than limbing it up at the bottom a third of the height of the tree or approximately ten feet just to keep the ladder fuels from igniting the tree is what we're looking for so it's more maintenance it's not Thank you for joining us.
Yes, thank you. I think to Council Member Whitman's—to piggyback on his question, Is there, are they also looking at different things that could help like for example planting native plants that are known to help prevent the spread of fires and I mean are they looking at those kinds of things too?
They're not getting into that level of specifics. What they are discussing is how many plants can be within five feet of a structure, if any. So whether to allow any or to allow potted plants in clay pots, not plastic pots and then how high can they be? It's going to be interesting. I don't know where they're going to land yet but it sounds like the direction things are going is that there's going to be some allowance. It's not going to be non-combustible, nothing that can burn which in that case All we would have around homes would be rock and, you know, cement statues.
I did have a question. This isn't the first time I've seen the map and it looks like if I compare the map prior to the map current one all along San Antonio Creek is now red. If anyway that's not but what I guess what I'm wondering is when we are thinking about what to do in our valley and all the measures were thinking about I know part of it is the Arundo removal down the creeks and all those kinds of things. And when I look at this map, and I see it bifurcate the valley, then I think that's the place where if we can work with our nonprofit partners to work on that area the most, that seems like that's where the fire would come through if this map's accurate. Does that sound reasonable to you?
You don't know the creek
yet. Yeah, and I will tell you, I've been the fire marshal for the county for 10 months. It's been quite an interesting time to start here. But I'm still learning the county.
He's going to show you that. So if you look at that, see the swath that goes vertically down the middle of the valley? If you were to pull, you don't have to but that's San Antonio Creek. And so Soule Park and Soule Park Golf Course are on the south side there that we're seeing So if we look at the map prior to that, that's not a hazardous area right there along that creek.
Anyway, you don't have to answer that question right now but it's something I was thinking about is what in general we're all thinking about is what's our best effort? What's the low-hanging fruit here that we can work with?
Well, I mean, I'll answer part of it and then I will call upon my backup here. I've got our Division Chief Nick Cleary here and then our Fire Prevention Officer Mike Warford to add any comments to this. The low-hanging fruit is that five feet around the structure. That is the most vulnerable area. It is the weakest link in defensible space While I think the community is not going to like it, it actually makes a difference. So what we already have in place and then next to that there is on CAL FIRE's website, it's also on BCFD's website, there's a list of low-cost home hardening and retrofit items that can be done. I would say the attic vents keeping the fire out of the attic Keeping the embers out of the attic is probably the second best thing that can be done, other than getting rid of that vegetation or reducing it significantly around the structure.
If you can keep the fire... Once an ember gets into an attic and ignites, it's about 85% chance that that structure will be lost. So those would be... And it's really the least expensive thing you can do. You can go to Home Depot or Lowe's and get some 1-8 inch wire mesh, put them over your attic, and it can make a substantial difference. And I want to see if our Division Chief has anything to add as far as the fire risk.
If not, it's okay he doesn't have to come up here.
0:26 – 0:3113 turns
Thanks council, thanks mayor. I think just to answer your question looking at that map and that's the hard part it's we need to take the global approach of prevention because even as a fire agency we don't know where that fire is going to start. Is it going to start on an east wind day? On a north wind day? On an onshore day? And basically that's just looking at that fuel bed and saying hey that's gonna carry fire either from the south in the north or north to the south. Is it gonna start on Nordoff Peak, CSAR all these different areas we just...I think the global approach to fuel reduction is the biggest thing. We need to be preventative So we don't have to respond and have the recovery side of our efforts, if that kind of makes sense. So looking at those maps, working with the Fire Chief Councils, working with the Los Padres National Forest, where can we best take advantage of doing fuel mitigation?
Whether it's goats, mechanical prescribed burns, pile burns—that's the hardest thing because we can't predict where that fire is going to start.
I have a quick question. In Northern California, like up in the Redwood areas, houses have started putting sprinkler systems on their roofs and I've heard both sort of opinions. One is You know, not really. And the other is, yeah, it works pretty good. So to me, so I'm just curious because it seems that would be something that you could do an automatic sprinkler system on your roof that you would activate and it would saturate at least some part of your, you know, area around your house. I'm wondering, do you have any opinion on that?
I do have an opinion. Okay, I think it's big looking at the big picture putting sprinklers on roofs It's one way to deplete the water supply very quickly and divert it away from The use from the fire department where you're really looking at all the structures and evaluating what can be saved The other thing is it's not with vegetation It takes some time. The best thing to do is ahead of time, keep your vegetation watered not when the fire's coming because it's too late at that point anyways and if you're putting sprinklers on the roof and you're thinking that that's going to make a difference that the fire is gonna evaporate Any moisture that you add right before the fire, the best thing to do is one, remove vegetation that you can remove.
That's number one. What you already have there, keep it well watered. That can make a difference but a last ditch effort to put sprinkler and water spread around the structure is not I don't think an effective use of the water And also, it takes time for that fuel to absorb the moisture. So you'd have to have those sprinklers on for a long time for it to make a difference.
Okay thank you much appreciated
and there are some studies out on that from the IBHS their conclusion was it's not effective they have a lot more details than I just provided but if you like to read more details there is a report out on that
Great, thank you very much. Thank
you, Mr. Morelli. We appreciate it. Thanks.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you. Well, we've got our work cut out for us
just a quick comment on piggybacking on your comment about the Arundi. It's a plant I'll never be able to pronounce correctly, but The I think there's a, there's a lot of room for exploration about removing that plant which From my experience on the groundwater basin board, the removal of arundi is returning water flow to our creeks. And so that's one of those dual-purpose things where we can get double bang for the buck.
Probably most of it is outside of our city limits, but that doesn't mean we can't work with other organizations who are looking at doing that. I think that would be probably worthwhile to look at.
Absolutely. Thank you. Okay great. Thank you for that. Is there any commission reports? No Mayor, none submitted. Thank you very much. We'll go to public comments and Mr. Danch please come up. I know you want to talk about this subject right now.
I
was going to add to the discussion of sprinklers as a fire thing, but I think Joe covered it pretty good. But I did just recently review the IBHS report and so yes, I want to emphasize what he said and that is that all these other mitigation measures are much more important should be done first because they can be relied upon It's a guerrilla tactic.
0:31 – 0:4130 turns
I mean, it'll make sense if your house is out in the middle of
nowhere. That makes some sense if you're independent water supply, independent power you can control when you need to control it. You know that kind of stuff but in an urban situation where we risk the kind of conflagration we saw down south those systems would be completely ineffective
and Yeah, and I think that the best argument is that it drains the water from places that are strategically much more important.
They can be fed by a pool and everything else but they're still... yeah if everybody turned one on and tied to domestic supply then you'd have a rapid drop in pressure.
Yeah okay thank you. Okay I'm sorry. Thank You Mr. Danz.
And let me call up um is it Lei? L-E-I City Staff? Lei, thank you so much oh thank you please thanks
Good evening Mayor, Council and Ojai community. My name is Leigh Talaro and I'm honored to be your new Recreation Coordinator for the City. I am thrilled to be here tonight and even more excited to share some great updates with you all! To kick things off, I'm happy to announce that registration for our Summer Activity Guide officially opened last Tuesday. You may have already received your copy in the mail, but if not don't worry we have plenty available at the Ojai Recreation Department located at Sarazote Park. So feel free to stop by and grab one! This summer our main goal is to welcome more people into our recreation center and strengthen connections through fun and inclusive programs. We want to provide a variety of activities that are accessible to everyone in the community, a safe and enjoyable space where you can try new things learn new things and meet new people.
We're not just adding new activities for youth, adults and seniors. We're also expanding many of our current offerings. For our kids we're excited to offer gymnastics birthday party rentals perfect for high energy celebrations. Summer day camp is back and better with amazing new field trips to places like Ventura Pier Beach, Sky Zone, the Sea Center in Santa Barbara and more. And we're also thrilled to bring back horsemanship lessons. For our adults, we're expanding our offerings with even more opportunities to get active and have fun. Join us for a drop-in basketball and volleyball on Sundays or take part in the return of our Aikido and pottery classes. And lastly, for seniors, we plan exciting new excursions including a trip to Lotusland and a Lake Casitas boat tour in June.
To beat the summer heat, we'll explore cooler trails in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties We're also launching a new Thursday social club with bingo and pain and sip class, a Hawaiian lei necklace workshop. And we'll wrap up the month of May with the new Elvis movie. There's so much more happening and I encourage everyone to check out the full activity guide for all the details Thank you so much for your time and I can't wait to meet all of you at our upcoming programs and events, including our open house on May 24th and 4th of July picnic immediately after the parade. So mark your calendars it's going to be a great time! The Recreation Center is here for you all and you're always welcome. Thank you.
Thank you so much. Okay, great. And Larry Steingold
Larry Steingold, good evening. I would like to thank Public Works and Toro for all the roads that they're doing. I know it's difficult but it will all be done within a few days, I believe in a week if we can please have a road budget that goes forward from now until forever because that's how long the roads are and they don't get taken from us but I would also like to thank Park & Rec because that they're doing that's a wonderful job And if you haven't been to parks and recs and haven't looked at the catalog, please do.
It's fun.
Thank you Mr. Steingold. I will echo that Zerzoni Park this weekend looked it was like a million people were there and having a great time and it was wonderful to see any public comments online?
Mayor we only have one participant and no raised hands but let's just tell our participant we're taking general public comment now And we'll move on, Mayor.
Thank you very much. On to the consent calendar. Does anybody want to pull anything from the consent calendar?
Yeah I'd like to pull
H. Anything else? Okay do I have a motion to approve all the consent items but H?
I'll make a motion to approve. Thank
you, second? Second. Okay great all those in favor? Aye. Opposed okay H
yeah
just give something to say oh
no no getting ready if there was a question on H yes I don't have any problem with the appointment we're making I just wanted to get a report I think this makes Commissioner number four.
Correct.
Where are we on getting commissioner? Number five, I can answer six and seven. And yeah. Yeah. So oh, go ahead.
Yes. So I have Andy and I have the final appointment which will be a number five providing that just next appointment, the next appointment pending item five will be our interview will be on Wednesday. So that's it.
Well, so I can say so we do have three as you pointed out. Here's our number four. So the intention currently would be to have each council person in turn have their picks meeting with the chair and myself. So that we began that with Ms Mang and then Wednesday with Ms Rule And we will continue to proceed through the applicants. Presently, it would be up to seven and then there'll be one appointment.
I have a meeting with this with the superintendent of OUSD the week after next for a possible student appointment but they can meet presuming this would go forward. They have a quorum to meet
right? Right. They'll be able to meet with four optimal to get to five and then eventually to seven.
As it currently stands, that's true. But yes they can meet with four even with the body of seven
Mm-hmm. Okay
Great Yes, okay Do you have a motion to approve H then? Yeah All right Any seconds?
Thanks.
Okay all those in favor. Aye. Aye Great we have a Parks and Rec Commission now that has a quorum that can meet yay. All right Yeah, yeah. Okay and we'll proceed, we'll keep going on the process. Moving on to discussion item number two City Council goals and tactics.
Okay great mayor and council thank you very much I'm going to allow our chief deputy clerk to situate himself just for a moment because what he may or may not do depends on your direction so as you know we've been on the journey of developing our goals and tactics now for a little while here Where we last left off, we made it through goal number five, public safety providing tactics for all those goals that we made it through. You have nine so that left us four more goals that did not have any tactics in the interest of trying to give you a starting point this evening your staff went through and provided potential tactics for The remaining goals, so that all of your goals now have somewhere to start at if you like.
As our Assistant City Attorney likes to say, you can trash or treasure what we've provided. No offense either way. We also wordsmithed some of the goals, excuse me, some of the tactics that you submitted. The Mayor pointed out to me that in our zest to edit, we inadvertently removed a tactic or two. So our apologies there. We're still in the process of trying to formulate all the tactics that we'll have to go with our goals, and that's why we're here tonight. A couple different approaches that you can all take.
I know that you all read your packets and are prepared for your meeting so if you want to just dive in and wordsmith a tactic or add a tactic or remove a tactic, we can take that approach. As I said, Mr. Montgomery is prepared Do some editing on the fly, if you will. If you don't want to do that and if you'd prefer to kick this to a subcommittee to work with me and then come back, that's certainly an option too or there could be some other direction that you might want to provide but we're just trying to simplify and expedite this because we really want like you do of course to have the goals in place before the budget is adopted. The budget of course should reflect the goals and the tactics that you have So, that's kind of a very short presentation.
I'm happy to answer any questions before you go out to comment and then have a discussion. Thank you.
0:41 – 0:4612 turns
Anybody have any thoughts they want to kick it off? I'm hearing you say that we could dive in, spend time going on the items that we did not finish or going back to these that had some smithing and refine. Or we could have a subcommittee work on these things, bring it back to this body with more detail spending more time in that group just to clarify.
That's one approach. There are many, many other approaches you could take.
We have six through nine to do
still. That's what I thought we
were going to do, so it is time to do that. If there is agreement? I am going to lean on Mr. Montgomery. I very wisely left my reading glasses at home, so you are going to have to unfortunately. Please, if you – I think what we're going to do… It's not going to help me. That's kind of you, but I thought maybe Mr. Montgomery could simply read all the tactics that we provided for each goal that you didn't get to and you could tell us if you want to revisit or move on? Does that sound okay?
Yeah, should we do public comments and then go to
this? You can certainly do that. Let's do that. Okay. That was wisely said. This will be the discussion portion when we come back then.
Okay, great. So let me start with Betsy Sticks. Thank you. Then Molly, then Ruth Miller. Okay, thanks. Hello.
Hi.
Hello.
Brought a handler. Good evening, Mayor and Council, and thank you for all your hard work and dedication. Happy Earth Day birthday, Leslie! It's a great day for a birthday. So that makes every day your birthday, right? I would like to take a moment to introduce Harry to you. Harry is a Humane Society of Ventura County alumni and a resident of District 2. He was born and raised here, as were his parents and his brother. He's a real local.
He was six months old when the four dogs were surrendered to the Humane Society after their human family in consultation with the Humane Society decided that they could not take care of him. Harry and his brother had Parvo, and they were nursed back to health by the Humane Society's medical team. I'm happy to report that all four dogs found loving forever homes in our community.
And now just look at Harry, two years later, participating in democracy! It's so cool. Harry is just one of so many animals that the Humane Society has saved. As a new board member, I request that you consider a few items related to animals as you review your budget and goals. As you are aware our community is filled with animal lovers and taking care of our animal companions is a top priority for so many of us.
We have been called the most animal-friendly city in the country, which is a huge honor. Here are three ways in which we can continue to be a beacon of compassion and care. Number one, the City enters into a professional services agreement with the Humane Society to support its many services and allow its essential work to expand. Number two, the Council passes an ordinance that supports renters' rights to have animals in their homes without charging extra fees. Number three, the Council brings forth a quality of life resolution that articulates basic needs for companion animals such as food, clean air, water, exercise, time outside if appropriate and attention.
Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem Lang and Council Member Rule for committing to supporting these initiatives. Much appreciated. Thank you council for continuing to care for the furry and the fluffy members of our community whom we all love so much and who depend on us for their ability to survive and flourish. As Gandhi said, the greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated. The same goes for a city.
Let's lead the way towards a more compassionate world. So I have 18 seconds public service announcement. The Humane Society birthday bash is June 14th. Tickets are now on sale, going fast! It's the 93rd birthday. We're having a live and silent auction, a wine pool and more so please come and support the animals and support everything you can for the environment get off gas and oil and everything we have to do must consider D through a climate
Thank you, Miss Dix. Next please, Molly and then Ruth Miller and then Larry Stangold.
0:46 – 0:5711 turns
I don't have a dog with me, but I do work with a lot of them at the Humane Society. My name is Molly. I'm the Development Manager at the shelter here in Ojai on Bryant Street. My primary function is to engage our community, to raise awareness about the services our shelter provides and to secure donations and grants to subsidize these services for the people and animals of Ojai.
In 2024, we process 614 local adoptions. And in 2025, we've already processed 159 and currently have 74 animals in our care. We perform free and low-cost spay and neuter services to public cats and dogs four days a week and free and low cost vaccines every single Saturday. Our staff administers around 150 vaccines on average at a single public clinic. As a 501c3 nonprofit, we rely solely on sponsorships to make these services available to our community for free.
Another service we provide to the city is through Humane Investigations. We have a team of humane officers who play an important role in animal protection by investigating situations of animal abuse, like Harry, and neglect as well as enforcing anti-neglect and anti-cruelty laws in the City of Ojai. Officers are employed by the Humane Society and are confirmed by the Superior Court, and may exercise the powers of a peace officer to uphold our state's animal protection laws.
Currently these services are provided without any monetary support from the city, county or state. Lastly, our staff has assisted with evacuations from multitudes of natural disasters over the years including the Thomas and Woolsey fires. The equipment training and readiness to assist in evacuations are funded entirely by our donors. Our town is filled with compassionate individuals who truly care for animals, and the love we show towards them is a testament to the kindness that defines Ojai.
Thank you for considering these significant proposals. Let us continue to make Ojai a shining example of compassion and care for all living beings. Thank you. Thank
you, Molly. OK, Ruth Miller, Larry Steingold and Bill Miley
Good evening, I'm Ruth Miller. Most of you know me as an advocate for unhoused humans but I spent about 10 years volunteering for quite a few of the shelters throughout Ventura County. Spark, Carl, Ventura County Animal Services and The Humane Society. And not to be outdone Betsy but I adopted two dogs from The Humane Society One of them came from a hoarding situation where there were 26 dogs in horrific condition. They were filthy, they were matted. It was truly disgusting but the humane officers went in determined that it was best for the animals and the humans who were supposedly caring for them brought into the Humane Society we spent days washing them clipping them training some of them and Because I'm a sucker, I adopted one of them.
But both of the dogs that I adopted lived long wonderful lives and I just was really blessed to have them. Thank you Humane Officers for doing that. I'm really pleased to find out that the Humane Society is under completely different leadership Least of all, our own Betsy Sticks is now on the Board of Directors. So I have every reason to think that things will be truly wonderful over there. She's shared some of the things that they want to do and improve and I think it's Just beyond wonderful that they're wanting to expand. They've always been great proponents for spay and neuter.
They had a big endowment, and they're using it in order to do as much as they can throughout Ventura County. They've also been helping our OTT residents. If you didn't know this already, they bring food They bring cat litter. Anything our residents need for their animals, they take care of them. They're providing expensive flea medication. If any of you have animals, you know how expensive that is.
And they even provided a test for parvo for one of the residents. Little doggie had an upset stomach. Of course when you're around close proximity with other animals it's important not to spread parvo. It's a horrible disease. And they did the testing themselves and took care of it. So thank you for considering cooperation with the Humane Society and helping them continue with their valuable work.
Thank you, Ms. Miller. Larry Steingold, Bill Miley, and then
Starchild. Larry Steingold. Strategy and tactics are wonderful. But what I see here is a lot of initiatives. That means things have started without a lot of community input. There've been a lot of things that are ongoing, we talk about traffic, we talk about parking, we talk about all these things but there's really been no... A lot of community inputs has been coming constantly but this is all formalized.
There are initiatives here, they've been started. Did you approve them? I don't know. Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. If you didn't... Then who did? City manager, he has a job to do. I don't fault him for taking the bull by the horns and getting stuff going. That's great. But there are times when the city leaders need to be—to do the initiatives, need to approve the initiatives. Need to approve spending of money.
Need to approve contracts being signed for future events because things that are decided now will affect us next year, the year after, and forever. Great, I know we've all been talking about speed bumps. It's been taking years and unified speed. There are three speeds in this city. Daly, Arbolada, and everywhere else. That doesn't take a whole lot. Okay? But in general these are initiatives. You can't have initiatives without approvals.
And without approvals it just can't run amok. Not to fault anybody, I know the machinery of government has to keep going. They have a mission. It's called Mission Creep. It is called Justify Yourself. It is called We've Got Too Many Things To Do. You have way too many things on your plate. Okay? It's either hire more employees – don't do that, don't do this – but these are initiatives so please knock out the ones that have been started without your specific approval and vote or that aren't required by the state or the county Thank
you. I apologize if it's unclear, Mr. Stengel. These are getting these initiatives on this sheet and not beginning many yet until we can prioritize and then vote on so even though it says status indicator initiated there would be it all have to be voted in. Mr. Miley, hello. And
just add to that in addition to that funded.
And funded, correct. So this is getting them on the page first. Hi, Mr Miley.
Okay, I have a suggestion for goal number seven which is the Climate Resiliency Goal.
Thank you.
I got this today. This is an energy audit like the water audit that was initiated by the community movement several years ago and Casitas offers water audits free of charge As we have hundreds of houses built in the late 1960s and before, it is known that building standards did not include energy-efficient elements then. Most leak heat out in the winter and in the summer along with old appliances.
Multiple companies offer energy audits including Southern California Edison without charge. I suggest our city develop an incentivized program whereby homeowners could get a basic energy audit, first as part of the building permit if they ask for that or a stand-alone review given the building such a critiquing assessment. It's kind of like a physical exam for human body. Provides the homeowner with an objective picture of their climate resilience.
We, they would then be headed in a great direction. So I have a couple more for six to nine. Six. Consider adding, that's the economy and tourism, consider adding an ongoing survey document by guest services, motels, hotels, cottages, to learn about tourist motivations and demographics. Are they new? Brand new? Are they returning? Where do they live? How far did they travel? What are their plans when they come here? And what they wished for but didn't find.
Seven, that's another on the seven. Considering using your Housing Trust Fund money for low-income homeowners with houses that have no insulation in the exterior walls. Goal number nine and last one. Consider having a city produce an annual report to the public of the Ojai government and what it does for the year. This could be done in three formats. A document with all the details for reference, a one-page publication in the Ojai Valley News and an extra long one page multifold handout.
The purpose would be to be more transparent, deal information, what does the city do for its residents, building more positive attitudes And maybe get the Nordic High School teachers and students to help. And Pasadena does that, and has been doing it for many years. And this is the recent one for this year.
0:57 – 1:0612 turns
Thank you Mr. Miley, and I think you'll be happy to know that the document that's linked to the agenda, that spreadsheet, there will be something like that that we'll be working with the community so you'd see projects and see how they go. So Star Child! Thank y'all.
I'm grateful that City Council made affordable housing goal number one during the first Goal Setting Meeting on March 11th. Five of five council members came together to recognize affordable housing as top priority for the city. Defining affordable housing is a bit like people with visual impairment describing an elephant, a humanely treated one. One describes the ear, another a trunk.
Some like me see the solution as more supply. Others see it as stabilizing and protecting tenants in their homes, protecting them from no-fault evictions. Others see it as subsidizing families on the brink of homelessness. The truth is we're all right. There's not one solution. We need to come together and work together, sharing ideas and building a coalition in this spirit you made a bullet point number five creation of a housing commission on affordable housing and homelessness that was on 311 if you look in your packet today you'll see it's absent There are six bullets today, most of them under the column initiated. I heard from the mayor that this might mean a future initiative.
One thing I would say is that many of these items are things the city's already working on. In fact, I would say all of them are. Doesn't the problem of housing affordability merit the city do more than what it's already doing? Shouldn't the city do more and continue this status quo? Let's do more than what's already been done. Let's unite this city to answer our common challenge I heard the City Manager say that he omitted some of the bullet points, that was an error.
It's time to correct this error today and make Affordable Housing and Homelessness Commission part of the proposed goals. It is time to create a Brown Act Affordable Housing Commission in Ojai. Thank
you, Star Child. Anita Cram, please?
Good evening and happy Earth Day everyone. Happy Earth Day birthday, Councilmember Rule. So I think it's really appropriate on Earth Day climate resiliency and trees and Measure C. I just want to remind you of the voters will to have money funneled into trees through Measure C, which my recollection says that City Manager said at one point goals that this is the appropriate place to bring it up.
So, you know when it comes to climate resiliency trees are a huge thing. Unfortunately sometimes when projects start it's looked at that trees are easy to replace just plant another one And that isn't the case because you will never sequester the amount of carbon that a mature old oak tree does. You will never provide the cooling from transpiration, which is an evaporation process for cooling and you will never provide the shade nor the amount of habitat that it provides. So I just want to really remind you, the voters spoke on this. Please honor us. Thank you.
And then just a reminder, just so everybody understands. I'm just going to read Measure C for one second. Here's what it says. In addition to annual revenue to fund city capital improvement and maintenance projects including street paving, fire mitigation, code enforcement and climate change mitigation until the voters decide otherwise be adopted. Just to be clear, it's many things not one. Okay anything online?
Yes Mayor we have one raised hand from Renee. Renee you have the ability to unmute and you have the floor.
Yes, thank you very much. Happy Earth Day everyone! I sent an email earlier and I do thank you Mayor Andy for Making that statement about climate change mitigation for Measure C funds, because I do think that this is a underutilized area for the use of Measure C funds. And I would like the city to make A distinction between climate adaptation, and I'm not trying to be wordsmithy here but I do think it means different things to different people. The idea of climate adaptation meaning we're going to adapt to hotter, more extremes, more fire.
Be more resilient in terms of planning for fire and extreme weather events versus mitigating climate having to do with reducing carbon emissions and climate action as we have to reduce our climate CO2. So I think there's only so much we as a community can do, and I would like us to focus on what we as a community can do within the education and collaboration and outreach focus that we as a community can help each other adapt to what's happening in our climate area. And I do think that should be a focus, yes trees are important, yes shade is important, yes water supplies are important Fire resiliency and all those things go into that climate action. And I didn't see any of those elements in it, and I just hope that becomes a new focus for that area in your plan.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much Renee. That's all Mayor. Thank you. Okay Let's go on then to starting at number six
Stand by while I share screen here. Thank you
And while he's doing that, just to clarify Mayor what you pointed out to the public. The attachment is a proposed work plan document and so it contains the goal, the supporting tactics, the responsible department who we're envisioning will be working on implementing the goal. There's a status indicator drop down and there are many different statuses so that we can move things along and show accurately where they are These status indicators that are indicated currently are not relevant. They weren't thought about, they're just placeholder if you will.
The first indicator is initiated meaning like as you pointed out if the council decides to go with this goal and this tactic then Okay, it's been initiated. That doesn't really mean much has happened so that's you know we can change those words on the status indicators if those cause chafing that's just what they are thank you
mm-hmm
Thank You
1:06 – 1:1513 turns
okay okay so I've got a bunch of stuff on number six okay if you want me just to go
ahead yeah and then mr. Montgomery what what's the best way for you is it making is it adding to this making a separate document what tell us how you want us to work
I can add to each of the lettered items, 6A, B, C ongoing. Formatting-wise, I can add to the bottom of each of these or creating a whole new list.
I guess there's going to be additions or enhancements to what you see here and then things that aren't on any of those so then you let us know what's best for that?
I can add a few more if the list is getting longer.
This is a Word document, right? So you're just inserting a row so we might just be going across two pages if we have to but we can be very nimble
or just even say 6AA, 6AB and we
know they're gonna they're going to be separate. Staff will go and beautify the documents afterwards. Perfect
okay Okay, so I've got a few measures here that relate to attempting to capture revenue from non-TOT visitors. So you know other than the bed tax how do we Gather funds that are not directly taxed from the many hundreds of thousands of people who visit Ojai. So I'm interested in looking at A sales tax increase. I think there's a lot of work to be done on explaining the impacts of that, but I think we need to at least look at whether increasing sales taxes would be beneficial.
I'm interested in looking at a system that would require A visitor to pay for a parking space that a resident would be exempt from. I'm interested in whether there are ways to charge a fee for day trippers. I read about a couple of communities that charge a $5 fee for anybody who comes into their town, So I'm just interested in what, you know, if it's feasible. We have an issue with the...
we can't set up a ticket booth because we're on a state highway but... We can
certainly explore some opportunities for additional revenue. The First Amendment rules will hamstring us a bit but we could...
Yeah, so right now I think we're doing pretty good with the TOT but that maybe represents less than a quarter of our visitors And, you know, hopefully the whatever fees we collected would go towards mitigating the impacts of tourism. But a tax on the tour companies that come in with buses and again these are just ideas I'm throwing out. Are they feasible? And then is there a way to disperse The tourism impacts that happen in the first two blocks east of Signal Street. I don't know that there's an answer to that, but I think we should at least look at that.
We have talked about this before and I don' think we've gotten very far with it, but the idea of having a tax associated with non-resident ownership of residential property. So, I'm interested in getting the information that allows us to say... With all of these things, I am always interested in seeing what other communities have done successfully I think that in terms of mitigating the impacts of tourism, We could do more to communicate and educate visitors about our cultural sensitivity, our environmental conservatism, and what they can do to contribute to that as being a respectful visitor.
I'm not really clear on this. We could talk to the Chamber and other merchants, but I think to drive people to sales taxes we could promote our local businesses to the tourists who are coming here. And then I'd also like to explore the idea of working with our hotel industry and the idea of soliciting donations. that allow us to support our trees, our culture and support affordable housing.
You know with a message that says look you know there's a cost to this tourism that we're accepting and we need to be able to... We need to be able to support. You know your donations could help us address housing so that we remain the place that you like to come and visit.
Thank you for that. Do you have something you want to
add? I do, I have a couple of things that I want to add. So after going to the EDC, the Economic Development Collaborative meeting last week we talked about the impact of tariffs on our local communities and tourism is one thing that Ventura County is already seeing a reduction in from especially from people who would be visiting from other countries And so I think economic diversification is something that we really need to be considering as some of the uncertainty, as the word that kept on coming up over and over again plays out. And so, I would like for us to add, you and I had spoken with a consultant who could help us identify potential manufacturing companies or other businesses that we could attract.
And so I'd like for us to work with a consultant to develop a plan for diversifying our economy. And Ben, is that what you meant by 6D, the Commission Economic Action Plan? Okay. So 6D. I'm making a case for that. The other thing I would like for us to do is to explore working with a grant writing consultant of a firm that could help us identify state and federal funding sources for some of the projects that we have going on.
I receive grant emails every day, and it just like, oof! It fires me up that we're not pursuing or at least trying for some of these grants. So I would like us to look at that. Also, I think—I'm making another case for 6F, and I think actually, to Councilmember Whitman's point, perhaps instead of looking at a tax, we could look at charging for parking and having our electric trolley or having a designated trolley service Having one parking space where people like buses would come and they would pay a fee, and then we could utilize our trolleys to transport tourists throughout town.
So I think—I'm making another case for 6F but I wanted to nuance it a little bit and say how can we make revenue from our visitors with parking that wouldn't have Those are the things that I wanted to add on this one.
1:15 – 1:2614 turns
To add one small piece to 6F, can we add also the exploration of parking lots? So there's a couple parking lots that we have already begun to have discussions around. The Planning Commission had some discussion around that so that could be part of that too is the acquisition of more lots.
Yeah and that was Part of my concept when I brought up the parking is that we would have to pay for parking. That we would figure out a way to exempt our local residents from that payment.
I'm sorry, I have one more thing that I wanted to add and I don't know if it's appropriate here for number six or if it's better for number eight but we have had so many local businesses. We have this great formula business ordinance that we all unanimously, the previous council unanimously voted to approve but we have had local businesses be priced out of their leases, of their commercial rental spaces And with what I've learned last week, prices on things are going to go up. So as a part of working with the Chamber, I would love for us to find ways that we can help our locally owned businesses thrive And one of the things that I would like for us to consider, and I don't know if I'll have support for this. But the way that we protect renters, residential renters, is there a way that we could protect our local businesses who are renting or leasing office space?
Because that is what I've heard Many times, that is one of the challenges is the rent, if the leases go up and then they can no longer afford to go into business. So I don't know if that's possible but I wanted to just put
that
into
the... In fact, I've asked Matt if he could look into whether there is a possibility of rent stabilization for commercial rentals? We did it for residences. Can we do it for rentals
So it's similar, I had an item which is rough re-unit. Is specific building of affordable office startups or some stabilization? That's one and I did hear from that from many business owners that the rent goes up and they can't afford it. Alternatively but similarly this kind of shared workspace we work model where you see a lot of people working in coffee shops in the morning perhaps there's some kind of space Mr. Harvey and I have already talked about that possibility, where there are things like printers and paper and all that, where you see other cities do have this and it works and it's interesting so it's all shared in this kind of affordable office workspace idea. Ms. Rule did you have an idea?
Yeah, so I kind of melded the two into tourism diversification as well as sort of economic management. But when I'm thinking about sort of tourism, I'm really thinking about diversifying such that there is a reciprocal relationship between those that live here and those that visit here, and we've talked about this before. It could be a nature-based eco kind of tourism where that is what we were known for offering as opposed to potentially not that I think that this is bad Thank you very much.
And you know certainly not, I don't want to say adventure tourism but heading out into the hills going on those kinds of experiences. I think one thing that I do notice about Ojai Tourism is that this is a really great place to be able to come with your kids and your dogs And that is an unusual type of tourism experience that you can have where that is welcomed. And I think it also is a very lovely type of tourism to have.
So, you know I look at that and I can see how we could sort of use that and also to meld into this idea about the diversification. As far as economic diversification, we've talked about it before but Not unlike what you said about sort of, but incubating artisans. We have the Thursday farmer's market and that really does for some people serve as an incubation for a business.
They can get a start, they can sort of manage their business, they can figure out what works and what doesn't. Incubating local artisans, I mean that would give people an economic base as well as keeping a very creative and based economy here as well which has always also been something that we've been known for but you know our artisans are certainly priced out of the market.
So for both the creative economy and also, you know, the incubation helping individual artisans. And that might be markets. And so there is a tension between those businesses that can afford to rent space in buildings, commercial buildings And those people who either can't do that, don't have the business acumen. It's not their thing. They are more into free-flowing textiles and stuff. I would like to be able to support them as well and that may come up with our markets, the markets that we're thinking about but that's another place where you incubate businesses So, those are the things sort of that I've been thinking about. And you know the cultural and our heritage whether it's Chumash or whether it's Theosophy or whether it is Krishnamurti or you know agriculture being able to play on that and you know sort of highlighting that also supports those particular Thank you.
Thank you very much. The things that are specific and special about Ojai. And giving those who need an economic boost, giving them the opportunity to stay here and do it. That's what I've been thinking about. Oh, one other thing I didn't actually cover. It was sort of renewable energy integration so whether we've talked about this is sort of like ecotourism but it's also could be a really good way to To do what we want as a city and to also, as an educational environment as well. And people will come here to learn and to experience things that aren't based on your appetites essentially.
I think that's something that people would be willing to do especially people with kids and dogs. You know, they want to go up and do something.
I just have one addition. It's actually a potential add-on to something that both the Mayor Pro Tem and the mayor mentioned on the idea of providing workspace. I would like to see us look at the incubator program that City of Ventura has adopted You know, to see if that's a fit for the City of Ojai or if there are aspects of that we can utilize within that same goal of helping people start a business without necessarily having rent commitment.
Super. So we have a ton of them
Yeah, so maybe here's a thought and you don't have to go this route but maybe we could just go by the tactics we already have in the attachment and I could please do a show of thumbs up or thumbs down on each one. And if I get three thumbs up, I'm keeping it. If I don't get three thumbs up, i'm not keeping it. Does that seem reasonable? Then this is going to be a little clumsier. We would have to go through each council member's suggestions and do the same. And if you don't get three thumbs up, we don't keep it. Is that acceptable?
Well that is just one possibility and that is there's a lot of overlap in some of the pieces so just throwing it out there. There could be a finessing of a consolidation of them to a more limited number You know, cobbling together a couple. We probably couldn't do that right now but then it comes back and we say okay we've got 20, we've got 15, 10 max or whatever we agree on so that's just a step.
So that's fine so I hear what you're saying maybe either you direct staff to do that or you assign a subcommittee to work with staff to do that and you come up with like maybe a ceiling and each goal has no more the next number of tactics and then maybe we can also at this time this is just an option Give you a preliminary, we think we can do this or wow that's not gonna be possible. Because as you're presenting this, we're trying to see can we stuff this into the next fiscal year? Do we have the funding for it or not? I know Ms. Billings is probably losing her mind over there. How are we going to pay for this, right?
So okay, that's a good approach.
And I think a lot of what I said actually would go under 6D. If you commissioned an economic action plan, then those could all be subcategories of things to consider and that would just dump right in there actually.
1:26 – 1:3544 turns
Maybe not encompass all of this, but parts of it.
So if I'm just to beat this to death... This way we can make it through potentially all the goals and so this will come back to you a final time which is totally fine. And then you could say yep looks like you got it or nope. With refinement and consolidation? Yes. Okay yeah
I have a question. Is, in the interest of saving time, is there a way – this is the question for our city attorney – is there a way for us to do like a survey where staff could send us the list with all of the different initiatives and we could put our votes for it and then send it in? So that way, for the next council meeting We have the names of who voted for what, the items that are three or more votes.
Yeah, we wouldn't call it votes. It'd be comments, right? But the way that I've seen that done is we email out the list including the new items and then have five columns with five council members and then you know support not support check minus thumb up thumb down some metric right and then all five columns are made public and then all of that is put in and then the recommendation from staff is based on this information all public all five columns are public We're gonna bring back these goals That's something that some other cities have used. And then we take public comment, of course, on that whole thing before it's adopted. That's an approach.
I've seen that done before. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think – I'm just trying to make this visually acceptable. I think I'd get rid of for now the status notes. Yeah. I'd say we take the status notes call and write that as a five. I just want people to be able to read that. That's fine. Yes. It's doable for you? It's doable. Thank you. Especially because, as we pointed out earlier in closed session, I'm not divulging anything that's private. We've got another week,
There's five Tuesdays
in this
month. April has five Tuesdays, yeah.
So that gives us some... but then you guys all have to review and vote? Yeah no problem.
And that doesn't create a Brown Act thing for us to be advocating.
Just don't be sharing amongst yourselves. Individual emails. Just email me only. You structure it. I'll start, yeah so you can only get
back to me.
And then
everything is public all those emails will be public of course. When you say there's five Tuesdays this month you're not suggesting meeting again are
you? No no no I'm just giving myself some time to make sure I put this together it gets out to you you get to vote on it you bring it back to me yeah that's all
The other one, while I have the mic, I'd suggest is a number of the items by Councilmember Whitman on revenue raising would seem to come in under that 6D in terms of looking at those revenue-raising options. It would
seem. Possibly, I mean the only thing that I—and I think this maybe has to go to the survey. How many of these are 218?
Oh any time we touch the word tax, we're going to the voters.
Yeah and then you know just quickly on that topic, I'm sorry since you—I just want to mention this one thing. Yeah a visitor tax if you were—what was it? A day-tripper tax whatever. Okay, so this is not exactly what you're talking about. We're not a gated community. We can't charge at the gate like they do in like a Pebble Beach obviously or something like that but and don't hate this but some communities have an admissions tax and that's for like a tour or an experience now that's definitely it's something it's a 218 type thing but that's you know visitor-borne and you primarily see it in places like Catalina Island Going on a snorkel trip.
I understand Venice, Italy has a $5 tax for any visitor to Venice, Italy.
That's true. The Italians have a different set of rules regarding taxation than
the Californians. I do understand that we would have to go through a ballot measure if we did it but I think it's far more likely We're going to
move on to the next goal eventually here, but I'm going to probably classify these under taxes and incentive type. I'm going to try to group it in that area because that's a lot of what I've heard in this discussion is I'm interested in a tax or I'm interested in incentivizing something. There are other things that were talked about too, but that was kind of a general – okay
Just on a point, I would split up. I wouldn't use 6D for both taxation and for the kinds of changes or approaches that I suggested. I think they're two completely different things. Understood. Okay, thank you.
And just to do a time check, we could probably talk about this all night. So if we've just spent 40 minutes on one... so I'm thinking we're gonna get to do one more? Unless we want to stay here all night? Okay, neither do I. So let's do one more and see where we're at.
It's my birthday-birthday.
That's right! You gotta go party! You got the hub, the hut, there's all these places to go. Okay, so climate resiliency. I'll throw out a couple. So, one idea under climate resiliency was to research a road paving demonstration project using alternative materials in a neighborhood. I was thinking of the trolley actually being here as well and we already approved the purchase of two so that's in the works which is wonderful I was thinking, maybe this falls under the affordable housing piece but something like quantifying traffic and housing as a climate measure in general. I don't know what that means exactly, but if we could do any... When we look at traffic in general, as we think about our climate mitigation or action, we're also thinking of housing and jobs here as a place of doing that.
So I donno if that means how we're asking questions or what we're doing, but I'm thinking of it that way. And then-
Mayor, can you help us with that? Sure. Sorry. Give us give us another pass at that one.
Okay, it's so if we are looking at for example and this is one of those things that overlaps over many areas if we say we are developing alternatives for workplace that's not tourism so we're diversifying the economy so now fewer people are commuting out because they work here and live here now That to me is climate mitigation. So I'm trying to think of a way to say, when I think of our climate response or environmental protection in general, I'm thinking of all these things at once so maybe it doesn't need to be said but as we measure these things, I am thinking about it that way.
The more categories of goals that a particular tactic hits, maybe the more valuable that goal is because we're accomplishing
multiple.
Multiple goals.
So maybe it doesn't need a separate item but it's something I do want to think about as a value.
Yeah, I agree. It could be something like the intersectional nature of blah-da-blah-da blah-de-blah. I mean it's all how they affect each other. That's the point that you're trying to reach and that one can't be discussed in isolation from the others. I mean it can be but
Maybe that's just more like a conversation, I guess.
I don't know. I mean, I think... I like calling it out. I don't know... Intersectional nature is what people call those kinds of things. The intersectional nature of traffic, housing and Economic diversification or whatever you wanted, however you wanted to say that. So
I think actually this fits in with one of the tactics that I had in mind which was finishing our climate action plan and looking at the intersectional nature of all of these different issues could go into the climate plan.
Okay so Mr.
Montgomery back up on
this one just zero that one all the way out. There we go. Okay, so we're gonna say thank you Mayor Pro Tem. You want to just articulate that again? I think that kind of hit on...
So finalize work with Ramey and Associates who we've already brought forward to contract with, work with them to finish the Climate Action Plan.
But do you want to mention?
Yeah. Including and including in that climate action plan a and a hard look at the intersectionality of housing, economic diversification traffic and and climate mitigation.
Thank you.
1:36 – 1:4220 turns
Mayor Pro Tem, I believe I missed one. Housing traffic, climate mitigation, economic
diversification.
Thank you.
Another way to capture that is the jobs housing mismatch. Our residents and our workers aren't the same.
Please repeat that.
Jobs, housing mismatch. Just as a reminder so we know what we're talking about here. Thank
you. I had a couple other little ones. One is to investigate and potentially make ministerial alternative building materials. We've begun to do that but that can increase? So in other words, if we can see that it's resilient and it does a really good job on let's say Cobb etc., those become part of what we can have in our code. We expand that.
And we might check with Lucas because that is in the international code already. Great. And so it may not be.
I believe we're already actually working on this, I think. Wonderful. This is part of our...
It is in the states. The housing element requires us to approve alternative materials at least in broad concept. We can look into detailed
pieces of it.
There are codes already that are approved and...
Actually, sorry to interrupt but is Mr Seibert online?
Standby, I'm sharing screen right now.
And while he's coming in, I will note there is a bill that's pending in the legislature which would freeze all building standards as of June 1st or June 30th of this year, which is designed to stop the next building code cycle from taking effect. If that passes, that may complicate things but if it passes we'll figure out where our pathways still lie.
Okay, so I've got one that potentially picks up those ideas which is that we work with educating builders and architects on energy-efficient appliances. Usage of energy efficient appliances. Of course they could also I'll be educating on energy-efficient construction practices and general materials. And then, I've got several other programs. One is to incentivize energy conservation by And I don't know the full, you know. There's variables on how you would do this but potentially you offer a grant of a down payment for an approved list of energy efficient appliances that and then and or I would like to start by thanking all of you for being here.
was fairly well incentivized, and that's been taken away. Maybe we could give it a boost? And battery backup for solar. You know, come up with a menu of what things we want to promote and how do we want to do that in terms of grants and or low-interest loans And then not just our grants, but potentially finding federal state grants if there's such a thing that we're going to see in the next couple of years.
Let's see. Look at installing EV chargers I'd like to thank you all for being here today. So there's several things that I think, you know maybe they're definite climate measures but they're also over a very broad spectrum of quality of life. We've talked about this promoting pedestrian and bike safety in the community as a means of reducing car travel And so I'm not sure that I want to necessarily put that in climate, but it kind of fits.
Let's see our tree inventory and a planting program so that we are actively capturing carbon And, you know promoting our urban forests not just what we have today but making sure that we've got the You know the trees that are going to be 100 year old trees a hundred years from now
Councilmember May I point to 7b? See if that maybe hits what you're looking at It's enhance existing tree canopy and maintain health of existing city trees through an expanded City program. I
Yeah, but add a planning program to that. Planning,
okay.
Planting or planting? Planting. Thank you. Planting new trees. I think we've already got this potentially somewhere else but the idea of Thank you very much.
1:43 – 1:4814 turns
I'll add one that I forgot to mention is begin the research of bearing utility lines and a microgrid for the valley, working with the county. Just like a small thing.
Yeah. Converting the city fleet of vehicles to electric
I think we have that under 7a, but we can expand that if you like. We have developed recommendations for the replacement of city vehicles with electric or zero emissions vehicles when feasible.
You do have that
there? Yes, we do.
OK. I'd like to see us have This actually goes, you know back to six But also seven and the idea is that when we're making decisions about Land use And or Economic development That we I always ask the question, which a couple of our planning commissioners have been really good at. Which is, I think we should always be asking our commissions in this body, is this good for Ojai residents?
And if there are negative impacts, are there ways that we can mitigate those in terms of quality of life for OI residents? That's complex law, but to what degree can we add those types of measures?
Can I get a couple of other thoughts from these guys? Okay. Yeah, go ahead please.
First of all, I was wondering if there would be support for changing the name of this from Climate Resiliency to Climate Mitigation because I think a lot of the initiatives that we're talking about and that we've proposed are really addressing, protecting the environment number one but mitigating the effects of greenhouse gases and pollution and things like that.
So I want to add just a couple of things. One is I like Bill Miley's idea of doing an energy audit I think let's start with our city buildings and city properties. And along with that, I think we have already started the process of moving forward with replacing some of our... Go ahead.
Yeah, so 7C is actually a comprehensive effort. We're going to be coming back to the council in May with a recommendation to go- we did an RFQ, we have a recommendation for a firm and we'll be finishing that process of going through not only of electrifying all city facilities but availing ourselves of grants as we do that and trying to determine you know how efficient we are or are not
Great,
fantastic.
Then the other thing I wanted... So I wanted to add also something about water and I think improving increasing our water conservation efforts by exploring the use of greywater recycling rainwater capture I think some of this would include our storm drainage systems, and as the mayor was talking about a demo project. So looking at ways of building water conservation and improving rainwater capture.
I also want to look at community composting possibilities. I know that EJ Harrison has Thank you very much. of discarding our food waste in the right way. Four percent, this is it's embarrassing so I want to do an education or look at an education program about food waste and an exploration of the possibility of community composting.
Where does that percent come from?
That comes from EJ Harrison.
1:48 – 2:0730 turns
We're not great on a lot of other measures that Harrison does in terms of how much is being recycled. So we could potentially kind of look across the board, I think the food waste issue is important.
Thank you for bringing that up. To that point, I think if we just look at education options for educating the public about what we're doing here and what we can do for recycling efforts I want to hear from my other colleagues as well, but I wanted to add two more things. One is we could be partnering with the Clean Power Alliance more closely. They have grant funding available and I'd love for us to be 100% on the CPA.
So that's one thing, and then also there was one other thing that I had on my list. I can't remember it, so I will circle back around. But I'll let others...
Mayor Pro Tem?
Yes.
Could I confirm the first bullet point for the title change? Was that climate mitigation?
Climate mitigation, yes. Thank
you. Yeah, that
sounds
good. So I have a couple of tag-ons for the mayor pro tem's comments in terms of the water conservation. We should look at providing grants for containers. for holding roof runoff, which is one of the most efficient ways of gathering additional water. And I think it's worth pointing out we had nine inches of rain this year. We may see some more but multiple years at nine inches and we're back to a 25% capacity in our lake.
So we need to keep in mind, we've been very fortunate last couple of years Our history hasn't been great. And then the idea of a microgrid came up, and I think my understanding is that the most feasible Thank you very much.
Ms. Rule? Thank you, so in the same vein as the education and outreach I think it's really important for people to understand the role of nature in climate resiliency. So as an educational outreach whether its water, whether its fire, whether its trees, All of the ways that nature can play into climate resiliency, I think that would broaden people's understanding of the things that we can possibly do. And so that would be—I'm not sure how that would fit in but...
I think it's really important that people do understand that, and I don't think the people do right now really understand that. And the other thing if it is indeed fossil fuels and emissions we don't really have a way actually when you think about it I saw this driving today There were so many people, most of them young on e-bikes. Like they're out of their cars. I don't even think they're going to want a car. You know? I think they like getting on their e-bikes and they like going. So I think that we should encourage that actually. I mean we're trying to get people into bikes and There's the e-bike and they're doing it, which led me to sort of the idea of a transportation corridor. We don't have a consistent way to get from Ojai to Ventura.
And all we would really need, given the amount of people we would be transporting there, would be a van. You know what I mean? I mean you could run a van once an hour, even once a half-hour straight down and pick up The bus or Main Street in Ventura, which of course the kids will e-bike down there. But I think that's also a model and that would give us a transportation corridor that would allow us to do some more infill housing because it would put us within the scope of the state regulations. I'm not sure if they have you know, a size requirement but they do have a frequency requirement and we don't need a big old bus.
Right, so different than fixed route transportation this is a shuttle that you're talking about. So they're not making multiple stops or are you looking for something that just says point A to point B? Well
they could make multiple stops but yeah I'm looking point A to point B with very few multiple stops like sort of a limited express, it could be an express but a limited. You know so maybe you pick up here, you pick up in Oakview, you pick up in Casita Springs and then you're into Ventura. So that it's quick and easy, and pretty pain-free. And that gives us a transportation corridor and makes us eligible for things from the state that we might not otherwise be eligible.
Councilmember Lang, who is on two of the Ventura Transportation Commissions. We might think about that and see what their kind of take on it would be or you know we could indeed do it if it was just a van running downtown I mean you know so that would sort of cut emissions as well, if people had an easy way to get down to Ventura. They might very well decide to do that especially with all the trouble on 33 all the time. So anyway those are my suggestions. Thank
you. Yeah we got plenty
huh?
Maybe this is a good time to stop?
Okay,
I mean I think we have a lot.
Any goals? Eight and nine? Well
I'm
proposing another session.
I think so. Okay so can we just go through what the direction is one more time sorry just to make sure we're clear right. I think what you want us to do is take back what you said and you said I think distill and synthesize And then blast it out to all of you so you can vote, right? And then bring that back along with goals eight and nine at the next meeting. Right? Assuming we can fit it in there.
And would you... Can we add goals one through five just to review those one more time as part of voting? Yes. So we can
pick some
of the maybe oversights. Yeah.
I think we can do that. OK. That sounds clear. Mr. Montgomery is the direction clear that you're capturing. OK,
great. Next meeting is May
So here's a question. Would it be helpful for us to send you anything we have for 8 and 9 to include on that so that way it could reduce the discussion of those two items? Yes, yes. And that way even though we might not be able to vote on those yet because we haven't discussed them... You're just
providing me
one-way feedback that I'm
considering. Wonderful! And you have several that are already on 8 and 9. Right, great. Good idea thank you for that. Thanks! We're getting there. All right do we have enough energy to do number three now or do we need a break? You guys tell me. Break! Five minute break. Let's come back. Thank you, we're on to item 3 mid-year budget update fiscal year 2024-25 and amendments
2:07 – 2:1313 turns
Mr. Harvey yes mayor we're going to kick this to our interim finance director Ms. Billings please Honorable
Mayor, members of the City Council. I'm Christy Billings serving as your Interim Finance Director for the city and with me is Norma Cervantes the city's finance manager and tonight I am presenting on the mid-year budget update And update to the auditor rotation and general fund balance policies, and requesting approval of an audit services agreement. Since it's a lot of topics I'm going to break the report down into the four sections and then we'll stop for questions afterwards. We do have a short PowerPoint.
The city of Ojai is fiscally healthy, and the budget was prepared in June of 2024 very conservatively. Staff has reviewed the budget spending and we are on track with our current budget plan. However, a few things have come up and staff is requesting an adjustment. Next slide. So if we can go to the advance one more slide next slide Next slide. Okay, now we've got it.
There we go. This table shows the general fund of the city where the City Council has the most discretion in spending. The second column labeled Current 2425 shows the current budgeted revenues and expenditures and then the next column shows a recommended adjusted budget. Please note that a $525,000 adjustment to expenditures is being requested by staff. This increase is for legal services and accounting services.
Next slide. The next slide shows the City General Fund balance, the amount the city has in its savings at the end of June 2024. The City General Fund ended with you can see the number up there, the twenty one point seven million dollars and this was 167 percent of actual expenditures. The recommended 24-25 midyear budget adjustments will bring that percentage to 116% of budgeted expenditures.
Please remember we budget very conservatively, and you can see there's a big range between those two numbers. Okay, the next item is a general fund balance policy. This policy recommends that the city set aside 100% of the prior year general fund actual expenditures as reserves. This commitment has always been a part of the city's financial management but it has not been formalized in a policy.
The reserve is to be used for unexpected financial challenges. The next item in the report is an Auditor Rotation Policy. The State of California requires that the City rotate engagement partners on an audit team every six years, and this rotation may occur within the same firm. The policy before you recommends rotating engagement partners every five years and audit firms every 10 years.
The proposed policy also includes a provision that allows the city manager to defer auditor rotation at the ten-year mark in exceptional circumstances, which is staff turnover or economic uncertainty. Finally, staff is recommending that the City hire Rogers, Anderson, Mallody and Scott, known as RAMS for short. RAMS is currently completing the City's 23-24 audit and has served as our auditor for five years. They would be hired to complete our 24-25 audit through our 26-27 audit.
They would rotate our engagement partners so we'd have a fresh look at the financial statements. Retaining the existing firm would allow for us to regain momentum during the finance transition and to get back on track with our reporting deadlines. And now, if there are any questions of staff from the council?
I will have discussion, but I don't have questions at this moment.
So I'm I'm trying to understand the idea of auditor rotation, but then we're proposing a multi-year contract for the Rams firm. Am I mixing apples with oranges on that?
You are not.
Okay.
The city has currently retained RAMs for the past five years, so this would be the natural break in that to go out for another firm. We are in May of the current fiscal year and we need to begin our audit As soon as possible. So there was a quote obtained back in 2024 and that quote we did review with some other local agencies to see if that quote was within ballpark of what we would receive by going out to bid, and it is within range.
If we were to go out to bid at this point, it would delay the audit. We're recommending that we use this instance that is in the policy and as in many cities policies to Allow the city manager or the City Council to say yes, we're gonna get our quote We're gonna go back out and we would retain them. It would still be within the ten years.
So you're
recommended
Okay, so I think I understand now but I'm gonna repeat it. So you're recommending That we rotate auditors, but in order to do it efficiently, it's gonna take us till 2027 to get a new one. Yes. Okay. Thank you. Anything else for
now? Yeah, please.
Microphone,
yeah.
2:13 – 2:2019 turns
On page 3-3 at the top, I'm looking at the table and it says, so I understand ending fund balance. And so your, the recommended 2425 midyear budget and underneath that it says 20 million 637 dot dot dot. So that is That figure basically is the budget at the end of the 24-25 fiscal year or it is the midyear budget.
At this point, it's probably your ending budget because I don't think we adjust the budget again very much between here and the end. But we're calling it the mid-year budget. That's the budget if we take the actions tonight which are recommended that would be your ending balance at June 30th.
Okay, so that's the ending balance. Okay, so that was a little confusing to me because you know, yeah, thank you and then so the operating expenditures transfers So last year the operating and I'm assuming that the that relates to The general fund correct? Yes. Okay. So last year it was 13 million It was $13 million. This year it's $17.9, which is quite an increase.
Almost five million dollars, which is quite a large percentage. How did that happen? I mean, it might have well been in the budget except for that we are going from reserves of 167 to 116. So my guess is we're taking it out of the reserves? Curious. Thank you.
OK, so you the 13040 that you see over here and their actual is the amount that you actually expended in twenty three. Twenty four. Yes. Then the seventeen point eight is the amount that's been recommended. That's that's your budgeted amount.
OK?
And there are several increases. I looked at that myself and thought Wow, that was a big increase. One of the larger increases was a sheriff contract which increased by $750,000. There were miscellaneous software upgrades and tree maintenance, park maintenance. A lot of maintenance has been recommended for the 24-25 budget Along with the salary and benefit adjustments for the comp and class study, which were a smaller percentage of all that.
Yeah.
So while you are taking a little bit, you can see that that fund balance in 23-24 was $21,746,000. Yeah And then it goes down by that Thank you very much. It is now May. Norma was hired by the city only about five months ago, and I have only been here two months myself for a month. So the reason why I'm stating that is This is what was adopted. It doesn't look like we may meet all of those expenses yet, and we'll know more when we get to the end in our audited and have everything finalized in about October how we did on the budget.
But those percentages relate to the reserve?
They relate to the reserve as a percentage of the expenditures.
As a percentage of the expenditures they relate. OK. OK, all right.
So as those expenditures get are when they were budgeted larger, then that makes your reserve percentage a little lower.
Got it. But have the actual figures of the reserve changed or just the percentage of the budget?
Your actual reserves at June 30th, 2024 were $21,746,377. And they're recommended to they will go down to $20,637,377 if every single item is expended that was budgeted. OK. OK, OK, thank you.
Right. So which brings me I mean, and I talked to the city manager about this, which is not having any other data. There's no context for this. It's impossible to actually figure out in this with this particular with this administrative report like what these figures actually relate to because there's no context for it. So and I know that we're almost it doesn't really matter because at this point we're at the end game But I wanted to just be confused publicly.
Your
adopted budget book would have the details?
Yeah, exactly and I think the last time that we talked about this we talked about coming back with details you know we weren't able to make decisions because we didn't have enough details but comparatively we had Many more details. So anyway, hence my confusion But I know that we're at the end of you know, we're sort of at the end so
If I might just be able to jump in really quickly too obviously We've gone through a transition in the finance department as well And so that it's a lot a lot of drinking from the fire hose for Miss Billings Stepping into this role. So I'm understanding what you're saying, absolutely. And I think, you know, what the realization was we're going to start the real budget process for the next year in about a month and we thought, you know, we could do what you were talking about and bring everything right now only to subject you to it again in another month. We thought let's just at this point
Yeah, no I know and Ms. Billings and I had a great meeting so I kind of understood that but for the public who might not really understand that I thought that I would publicly be the guinea pig here as to what I do and don't understand. So thank you and welcome yes and thank you for meeting with me we had I thought we had a great meeting.
2:20 – 2:3421 turns
If I might just to clarify my understanding, I think tell me if I've got this wrong. If I look at page 3-2 and I see that table and I see that there's the current revenues in the 16757 that remains but I see the expenditures transfers out increases by 525 if I look at the difference there and when I see the operating use of the fund balance under their current 584 but now it's the 1109 That is the expenditures as we have, which is essentially over our budget what we've adopted.
And then when I look at our end fund balance on the next page, what we were just referring to, that's the actual amount of money that we have to pay all of our bills and extra. That's the 100% of the reserves and more. So that's what we'll be talking about in a moment. So we had to use some of that money to make up for some of the extra expenses that you're asking us to transfer today.
Got it? Okay? All right, let's go to some public comments. I have two in front of me. Mr. Clay Creasy please and then Bill Miley.
Thank you number one. I feel your pain on the budget issue but Mayor Gilman I have to blame you because it was on February 7th that you told me gee whiz we have a mid-year review coming up you might want to look at those numbers And that started me down the path that I'm unfortunately still on.
You're blaming me for your unhappiness? Or are you blaming me for our collective unhappeness?
I'm blaming you, period. However, I did have some of your bread and it was good so partially redeemed yourself. And number one, and I know I'll use all three minutes and then it'll go leap but Christy thank you for investing nine million dollars in the LAIF fund on March 24th. Because of that this city will make roughly a hundred thousand dollars more in interest in the balance of this year than it would have had it continued down the path that was going prior to that That $100,000 actually should show up as a revenue benefit in the current mid-year review.
I presume the reason it's not in there is because there's something else maybe going the other way and the two may net out—who knows? It's not that big a number. With regard to the big issues in the mid-year review now, the one you did in early February which kind of didn't happen due to all the problems we're aware Most of those appear to have disappeared or been fixed here. There are still some glitches, they're not world-class glitches but for bean counters like me any glitch at all is a glitch. The one thing I'll point out is the suggested increase in the city attorney's budget has actually grown from where it was in February and February was around numbers $425,000 now it's up to a $500,000 increase Some of the last two months have seen another $75,000 of legal expense show up.
So my suggestion to you is to approve this now because if you postpone it another month he'll probably be up to a hundred thousand so you gotta lock him into the number he likes now. The second thing and much more important is—the thing that Councilwoman Rule was alluding to—this $167,000 went to $116,000. You're a million dollars over your spending budget right now We've got inflation, we've got a coming recession. We've got what I call the legal wild card that can make $1 million show up when you least expect it. You're gonna go from 116 to below 100. Your draft reserve policy right now says that if you're below 100, you need an emergency declaration to spend money. Those are not that easy to get, point number one. Last point in the last few seconds Very technical, but I think your reserve policy language as it is in the package right now has some formatting glitches in it.
So even though I think the 100% number is right, I think you should re-look at how that's actually drafted and make sure all of your columns are on good shape.
Thank you very much. Bill Miley
Hello. So when I get up, I have to be stable before I walk. That's of course what we want for our budget. So I read it all. The economy is doing well. The tourists are still coming and it sets our revenues in good numbers but the legal budget increase, in my opinion, is not a good number $500,000 more legal fees? More? What does our current attorney contract charge per hour? And I'm waiting.
Helpfully the administrative report has a list of costs for legal and see my comments that was the email okay so here are my comments on the list The increase in legal services is to accommodate, that was the report. Short-term rental enforcement including outside counsel for hearings and my comment is if you had used a process server which I have mentioned to you before this would not be needed.
You would have got the notice served Transit occupancy tax enforcement, including outside counsel for hearing. My comment? Why can't our city attorney do the job? Why an outside counsel? Criminal code enforcement. My comment? What codes are being violated and are we getting fines? Calvin Village and Ojai Tent Town, reimbursable through the encampment resolution. My comment?
How much of the $500,000 will be reimbursed? Outside Council for indemnity claims and watershed litigation. My comment? Bad attorney advice got us into this ongoing position, along with the Brown Act violations by former elected officials. Increased labor and employment matters." My comment. Does this relate to improper management decisions? An increase in third-party subpoenas involving the city.
Wow! This is new to me. About white city functions and responsibilities. Requests by the City Council including requests by two council members. My comment, how much does it cost for a special two-city council member agenda request for the city attorney to prepare? And last, other developer reimbursement works. I don't know that sounds good. Anyway, wow.
Thank you Mr. Miley. Mr. Montgomery anything online? No raised hands ma'am okay Well, I had a couple of items. If it's okay, I'll start. There are two, I guess that I'm thinking about. The first is the increase in the legal expenses we're all concerned about, of course. And so we've had a lot of interesting conversations with Mr. Summers and we think there are some interesting things we could do and part of it is the discipline of the council. And I'll give you an easy example.
myself, I might say oh Mr. Summers would you mind looking at X Y & Z and of course he wants to accommodate that and I don't ask how much money is that gonna cost to look at it? And so part of it is having the discipline to say is this something that we actually want to take on and and having the will of the council so What we will all begin to work on is a mode where we would say preliminarily, what would be a budget B to look at an item like this? And that's something that I think we've all agreed to take on sincerely and lower our legal spend in that way. So I know I'm taking that on myself. That's one. The second thing... So I'm gonna repeat myself a little bit. This is now onto the amount of the reserve So there is a 2021 ordinance that was adopted, which was 50% of the budget reserve that year, 2021.
And so that's the last one that I could find that was approved by the council formally. Now if there's another one that I missed, I'm happy to be corrected there. So it's kind of funny, the way I think about it is we are in a very interesting situation in that we are so reliant on the tourism tax. And we know that because of COVID or a Thomas fire, that could all dry up instantly. So I completely understand that and I also understand from serving on prior boards We had a circumstance where we just kept acquiring grants and different things, and we just kept the money in the bank. And at some point, we felt like our reason for being was to get money and keep it in the bank. And at some point, the board had to look and say—this was a school board—actually, the classrooms need the money.
We have the reserve that's sufficient. What I would like this board to consider—and I'm not attached to a number Thank you all for joining us today. That when we look at all of the tactics that we have on our screen there, we will not be able to do all of them. And that's okay too, to have that kind of discipline but we may want to go somewhere between 50 and 100.
I'm not trying to be spendy. I am trying to say we would want to have the flexibility of saying pick the item, a housing trust or whatever we say. That is actually a good spend That doesn't require an emergency movement to bring about. So that's what I would love us to consider is either build in a tiny bit of flexibility there for the right spend or change the number a little, 80%, 75% pick the number just to ponder. I'm not married to any number but just more like a moat.
I thought at some point, I have a vague remembrance of us approving an 85%.
We've had a few in the past in a couple of different ways. Most recent, I believe last year's budget book is which was approved by resolution did have 100% reserve in last year's budget but of course it's a policy decision that the council can revisit as desired we have the ordinance in 21 there was a reso before that So it's been done a couple of different ways. We'd certainly recommend whatever number the council selects, let's put it in this reso.
You're saying last year you approved 100%? The council did. That's what I mean, the
council
did? No no no, I knew what you meant. But it was embedded within the budget so it wasn't its own reso. Right and then just to something you said Mayor if I might, we can take direction if Council wants Some cities, and Ms. Billings and I have discussed this, have layers of their reserve where they're able if council so desires to go into it for strategic purposes, grant match, capital project et cetera. So we can, and we're happy to come back with revisions down the road once we get through the budget. That would satisfy me 100%. Okay. We can do that. Absolutely. And maybe that's something that the Budget Committee can discuss and make recommendations?
And then I'm just assuming, so correct me. The layers potentially involve that there are certain ways we can use our money that are actually very secure
Well, it's not really. So just what it does is it just gives council some flexibility and it establishes in the ones that I've had in the past and other places where I've worked you have like a floor Where you say look? I need to keep X amount on hand at all times for cash flow debt obligations etc You know, this is my—that's that number. And then between here and here I'm feeling less good about using the money but if I had to it would be for emergency purposes, you know, natural disasters, et cetera. Up here I'm feeling kind of pretty good because I've got my cash flow, I've got enough in case there's a true emergency. Okay, I can be strategic about this and maybe use this layer for a grant match or something like that or a capital project, et cetera.
So it kind of builds from dire to luxurious, if that makes
sense. Whether you access the layers
is
on an item-by-item
basis
and assessment.
Yes, yes it would definitely be something where that's a very specific decision made by council to activate a particular... If we do the reserve policy this way I'm not saying this is you know Ms. Billings and I will further discuss that is how I've done it in other cities but there are other ways to do it too and maybe Ms. Billings you want to jump in on that?
That's the prudence I think that we would be wanting right Thank you very much.
2:34 – 2:3911 turns
I'm going to start with you, Andrew. Andrew Whitman is a member of the Board of Governors. He's been working on this for a number of years now.
Oh, we're dipping into the 100% as if that's something that's been existing for all time which isn't the case. You see what I mean? So that if we said there's a building trust, for example, or housing trust, that might be the right investment that might go into the 100% reserve but it's – I wouldn't want to personally feel the barrier of saying is this a big mistake because we're breaking a big rule but it's recent.
It's understood. That's all, that's it.
Although could you there this is the general fund balance policy is a change from the existing General Fund Balance Policy which is it's to be used for capital improvement or things associated with capital improvement So I think that's also important to know that we are moving from where we from our previous balance policy to a new one. So I just want everyone on the council to also understand that that is a change that we're making. I don't disagree with the change, but I just think it's important to know that that is the change.
This is a new proposed policy, but it is a policy and at any meeting if you guys so desired, we could modify your policy.
Right, I just-
Yep. But you're correct, Council Member, absolutely. I thought
it was worth bubbling up
to. No, absolutely correct and if I could, can I have Ms. Billings weigh in on revisions to the reserve policy and strategic uses and so forth?
So this reserve policy has a couple of strategies. One is that the auditors, when they present your financial statements like to have these different layers listed where it talks about the non-spendable fund balance or restricted fund balance committed so on and so forth. This calls out what our council relies on for some of those. The 100% number, because it was referenced 50% in some documents as you stated Mayor Gilman and then it was referenced at 100% in other documents.
I went with the 100%, because that's what was in the budget document that you had just passed. That number is something that you might want to look at and vet. It does state in this policy that you can use that money for cash flow purposes, so cash flow purposes being if you were anticipating a grant to come in or the timing of maybe your taxes money only – like a lot of our tax money comes in April, so maybe you're waiting on that tax money, so you have a momentary dip.
That wouldn't call for a resolution in this policy. I think when the council has more information, like you've done some looking at your new budget and what uses you might have or what these goals that you're setting And you get an idea of what you're saving towards, you may want to layer that back. But as City Manager Harvey pointed out, that's a matter of saying we've looked at this a little harder and we're going to reduce that number.
The most important thing for any organization, just like it is for us personally, is that we have a goal of a savings and that we strive towards it. And that we know we have that because there's a lot of uncertainty going on right now. Economic uncertainty, political uncertainty that could impact us and we are a city that has a rather limited base of taxes and sources So that's a nice, setting that high number.
You don't want to find yourself in a situation where you can't ride out the counter.
It's important to just read the last sentence, which is the City Council retains the flexibility to amend the policy at any time as needs or conditions change. And this is a policy so it's not first and second reading. It's something that can be changed as quickly as anything can be changed in city government.
And for purposes tonight, if I'm following what the city manager said, we can adopt 100%, but we can continue the discussion about this concept of layering and how we access that.
2:39 – 2:4827 turns
You can assign it to your budget committee to do at the next meeting when you formalize that?
So, I think it's important to have the 100% policy. There is a legacy that we stand on with having that kind of fiscal responsibility that I think is important for us to value and to carry on. Also, I do agree with you and with what Clay was saying earlier about how because there is so much uncertainty and there is economic uncertainty that it's important. With that said, can we break these into four different items to make a motion? Could I make a motion about this and then we could carry on the other
discussion items? You can move all as one or you can
move them in
pieces.
Okay, so I'll make a motion that we amend the fiscal year
budget as shown in attachment A. That
we adopt a resolution
establishing our
general fund balance policy And basically all four of these adopt a resolution with the auditor rotation policy and authorize the city manager to enter into the professional services agreement.
I'll second.
Yeah, that's fine with me. Anything else?
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Motion passes
Thank you.
Yes, nice to have you here.
Okay number four contract with Ventura County Behavioral Health for intensive services coordinator.
Mayor, give us just one moment. We're going to cycle up a couple of staff and bring on another. Here's the Assistant City Attorney. And while we're doing that, Mayor and Council I also want to advise you that we have a couple county folks joining us via Zoom. One is, there he is. One is our supervisor Matt LeVere and one is Connie Moreno-Parraza, I hope I got that correct, from the leadership team at Ventura County Behavioral Health. So they are here to answer questions from council to correct any misstatements that I make and certainly questions from the public because we know I will for sure.
Okay so great looks like we're all set. Mayor would you like us to proceed? Please! Great. So, before you tonight is a proposed contract with Ventura County Behavioral Health for a coordinator to serve the City of Ojai. Not just Ojai Tent Town, not just potentially your proposed Kevin Village project but within the entire city limits and this is brought before you because as I have been on this homelessness journey since I arrived here over a year ago what has struck me is a number of our folks experiencing homelessness have behavioral health issues.
They are, some of them happen to be participants in OTT but many are not and are throughout town and we are routinely confronted at the city level with calls for service with someone who might be camping somewhere or somebody who might be sleeping somewhere or someone who might be bathing somewhere And again, these are individuals. Usually these are not violent episodes. These are just people that they're doing their thing but really what they need is they need someone to connect them to services and programs. What we have been doing is we've been doing kind of a catch-as-catch can type approach and the Chief of Police can jump in here any moment. Oh, we also have Sarah from Ventura County Behavioral too. Hello, Miss Sanchez. Thank you.
What we've been doing is we've often been dispatching law enforcement to address these individuals. And, you know, law enforcement is coming at this often with a different perspective as they should because they're looking at it from a safety perspective but they're not necessarily sometimes but not necessarily trained behavioral health specialists So, we became aware of a program that other cities do where they have these coordinators available. They're often embedded within the Sheriff's Department or the Police Department and they go out in tandem. We're opting for an approach where they're taking direction if you guys decide to move forward here from the city but possibly—and I'm arm wrestling with the Chief on this—having their office in the sheriff station down the street.
Because it is, you know, a logical thing that they often are going out to a call and both components might be needed to address a particular situation. You may ask yourself well heck didn't we just approve a case management contract with Help of Ojai? How come Help of Ojai doesn't handle this type of service? A couple of Ojai will tell you that they are their case managers as far as connecting people to benefits and housing and opportunities, medical health opportunities, transportation etc. for greater Ojai and also certainly Ojai Tent Town where they have a contract but they are not behavioral health specialists either and it really takes somebody who knows and understands this so If you don't mind, I'd like to please kick it briefly to Connie and or Sarah just to embellish what I've said and then allow the Assistant City Attorney to finish up.
So, Connie, may I indulge for a moment? Just have you finish out anything I didn't say about this contract that needs to be
said. You are thank you so much. Connie Mora-Praus is the Director of Behavioral Health. I don't know, Supervisor Lavier, would you like to say anything before we give us just a couple of pieces of information on if he froze? It looks like it's
He looks frozen,
yeah. Thank you so much. I have my amazing, amazing chief division chief Sarah Sanchez who will be the lead for this project counting on your confidence to move this forward. So yeah, we are very excited. Everything you said is correct. We do encounter a lot of the folks who are on the street or at risk for being homeless who are experiencing mental health or substance abuse conditions. So I'm going to have Sergei do just briefly a little bit on the services that we're planning to do with this great partnership With you guys. So go ahead, Sarah.
Thank you. Good evening all thank you very much for the opportunity to be here this evening really as it was noted it's really a proactive approach with a behavioral health specialist that Can focus on supporting being proactive with the community members that are unhoused and need that linkage and support. And connection to our mental health services in our substance use services to ensure that they get their basic needs met so working very closely alongside Law enforcement, city staff.
In other cities it's been really great partnership that has been a benefit to the community so again if approved it would be a great benefit to the City of Ojai and we'll be glad to be out there full-time to provide the much needed support.
This particular position that
we are putting in this partnership is qualified and trained not only on delivering the services or connecting, but they're very well trained on engagement and outreach because sometimes it takes a lot of contacts for us to convince folks to get to the services. But our staff that will be placed there will be co-located as was mentioned earlier It's very critical that they're integrated into your day-to-day of your city, into the communities that they're serving. I don't know, Supervisor Levera, I wasn't sure if you wanted to say anything?
Regarding this partnership,
I think we lost him. He's having a connectivity issue
again. OK, back to you then.
Great. And I'm sure I left things out that I want the assistant city attorney to maybe round out the conversation.
No, I think you did a great job of covering it. I will say in my experience working with agencies and homelessness, it's not one department and one provider that's the solution. It's typically a team approach to doing that. And this is a huge tool, I think, in our tool belt to connect people to services outside of the city, right? And the county has such a great network of resources.
I know my commentary isn't legal but this is a really great opportunity to provide those services to folks in Ojai who are un-sheltered.
2:48 – 2:535 turns
Great, the supervisor may come back on. He is having connectivity issues. He did apologize for that so he will probably want to make a couple comments but we'd be happy to take questions before you go out to public comment. Thank you.
If I might ask Chief Jenkins how does this proposal feel for you?
First off, I'm very thankful for the city and the approach they take for our unhoused. I like stories. Can I tell you a story? So we take someone who's in the park who's unhoused has mental health issues. Of course someone calls, so the deputy arrives. The deputy contacts them right away. The person is on the defense, right? They don't really want to interact with law enforcement So then the deputy goes, well is there a crime? No.
And then the deputy goes, okay well I'm going to walk away. I'll complete a CIT card, a crisis intervention card. We'll submit that. Sometimes there's a delay in getting that card down to behavioral health but they do review that. It could be days later. Well then you have behavioral health officials reviewing this go okay you know there is services we can maybe provide this person Well now we've got to find them, you know it's because you're not in the moment right and so that's the other issue is that behavioral health now has to go out.
You know from their office down you know in Ventura or wherever you're at come up try to find them and that's a whole challenge in itself versus what we're talking about now is behavior health will be, the official will be housed in the police department. They'll be working side-by-side with us they have they'll be attending briefings so when a deputy says hey I contacted so and so last night But behavioral health officials right there go, okay. I'll jump right on it. I'll go out and contact them this morning or So not only a better communication between the two Better teamwork is what we're finding too, you know because it takes a team right to solve this issue And so not only is it are these separate agencies? No now we're working as a team We're actually directly talking to each other daily And then when a call does go out of disturbance or some kind of contact in the park, guess who's going with the deputy?
The behavioral health agents going out as well and we're, as a team, going and contacting the person. And what I love about what I've heard is sometimes the deputy will step back and behavioral health takes over, right? And the deputy's now just there for like security purposes and then right there they're connecting services with that person and getting people on the phone and getting things moving So now you don't have any kind of delay, you know. You're not trying to search for the person because the deputies are finding the person and it's just that direct access to services that right now that's the missing link, you know, for law enforcement.
The last thing is access to Like a database that Behavioral Health kind of has on the people and what services they need. You know, law enforcement really doesn't have that access right now so that'll be nice too to connect the two. So thank you Chief.
Mayor if I could, Supervisor LaVere is on the line his camera's off but he would like to make a statement if you would so allow. Please so
yes Matt. Thank you Thank you, Mr. Harvey. Thank you, Mr Mayor. I want to start by just commending the city manager and the City Council for considering this tonight. Ms. Moreno-Paraza and Ms. Sanchez are the true experts in this but I would just add that we have seen a lot of success with the RISE program countywide and knowing the situation in Ojai, knowing the challenges that you face with the homeless residents in Ojai, I think the RISE program is a perfect fit Thank you all for joining us today. I want to start by saying thank you so much for what you hope to accomplish in that it really specializes in assisting individuals who are either unable or unwilling to access mental health services on their own, and when you have people who are either refusing treatment or who are unable to access it without assistance, that's where the RISE program and its leaders step Thank you, Mr.
Mayor. Any questions for staff? So will the ERF grant, the half that will be paid by the ERF grant kick in immediately?
2:53 – 3:0018 turns
Yes, so we're able from conversations with the state HCD in particular any type of program that helps those within the encampment OTT prepare to transition over to permanent supportive housing is an eligible expense. If and when the council decides to enter into agreement with Dignity Moves if you take that step we will be amending our application to the state and this would be part We're going to go through all the expenditures, including what the budget would be for the Cabin Village. The budget for this is showing them what we're planning on drawing down and it can be expenditures made now, expenditures made in the past and expenditures made in the future.
OK, so that's good. The only thing that kind of, in all of our talk about can the county support us and how they can support us? We've always thought that they could support us with services. That they couldn't support us with housing per se. But we're going to pay the county, so I'm wondering if there's any room for negotiation or discussion over a period of time that – because obviously some of the folks around are from the unincorporated areas.
which would be county responsibility. And the county has sort of touted that, you know, they're a partner in this so I'm wondering if that's a possibility?
So, a couple things. So we currently have county services now. The RISE program does have representatives that come up and assist in Ojai. In fact I'm aware that Backpack Medicine and the RISE program will be on site on Thursday of this week you know so they do come up here regularly and are regularly engaged one thing we don't and the chief can jump in here This is a contract for within the city limits of Ojai, and so it's addressing individuals who are within the city limits who have an issue. We don't in general determine whether we're going to engage or not engage based upon where you're from. Right, so we don't have data on that either. So somebody's camping in Libbey Park, we need them to move along.
They may be from Ojai, they may be from the Valley, they may not be. But the idea is they're impacting the quality of life of everybody who does live in Ojai and that's really where we're going with this. Not only are we trying to connect folks that need services to services but we're trying to improve the quality of life for everybody else that has to live here and The problems that come with those who are experiencing severe mental health issues. And Chief, I don't know if I said that correctly? Okay so he's agreeing.
Yeah, no I understand that. Thank you and I agree it is about the quality of life for Ojai citizens as much as it is well maybe not as much
but... If I could just add on to that but you are correct I mean so yes we are looking to turn up if you will the amount of county services we are receiving by having our own dedicated person so this you know we do get services now They do come out here regularly. This is just making sure, as the Chief pointed out, this is somebody who's going to be here five days a week embedded within his team and that's the difference if you want to do that.
Thank you. Ms. Meng?
I agree with Leslie. Could the county step up with these fees to help us?
Let me just make one clarifying point. Do we want to do public comments right now? Are we in discussion or questions? Are you sure? Okay, any more
questions?
No, I do have a question.
I want to first see if I can understand the City Manager in the sense that these fees are not going to be used to have a response in Miner's Oaks. Only within the city limits?
Right, like all our jurisdiction begins and ends at the city boundaries. It doesn't mean you know so the chief will have a pursuit that might start in Ojai it ends up in Miners Oak but we're responding so okay so if you're camping in Miners Oak we are not going out to Miner's Oak to address the issue. You move across into the field over across from The Meadows yes we're gonna go address that.
Right, so we're not distinguishing based upon where they're from it's where they are when the service call is made
Our authority is within the city limits.
Okay, and then I have a general understanding that the state has taken on the issue of behavioral mental health and they implement it through the county but the state does not transfer any of that obligation to us
In general, in talking public administration theory? Yes. That is in general. However, there are exceptions and those exceptions we're required to provide for the health and safety of our residents. And so that's the exception.
Right. So the issue is whether we should be picking up and paying for additional services That the county isn't currently supplying us, and I guess I'm struggling with the idea that the county isn't currently meeting the needs that exist for a program that the state and the county are supposed to be taking care of.
So sir, I just would say as I said earlier this is a service that we are currently receiving. We're looking to embellish that service and this is definitely, as you were pointing out, a policy decision of the council. Definitely 100%.
3:00 – 3:056 turns
Okay, we'll move to public comments. Let me start with Ruth Miller, Larry Steingold and then Bill Miley.
I am Ruth Miller with the Unhoused Task Force, Friends of the Cabin Village and OTT onsite volunteer. And I really don't have much to add to what's been said except for what I've personally seen and that is at OTT just being unhoused is traumatic And that leads to depression, it leads to anxiety. It leads to poor self-esteem and all the problems that go with those conditions.
And I think that the people at OTT could use more services than they're currently getting as far as mental health. Some of them are getting therapy which is, I'm seeing very helpful. They love their therapist And they tell everybody, you know, do this. It's great. We do have some who are I think more mentally ill than others. They need more help than they're getting.
They're not violent. They're not really much of a problem, but they're not leading their best life. What I also see is that the people in the public, we have some severe mental illness. All you have to do is watch Facebook and see the situations predominantly at Libbey Park that the public deal with these very sick individuals who don't want to get help, who aren't having people making outreach contact with them.
They get to see people in uniforms, no offense but it's not touchy feely. It doesn't lend itself to trust and for those of us who have had mentally ill people in our lives we know how important trust is. We know how important having somebody that they know Not just once, not just twice. Multiple times to get to know them, to get to know their needs and then to try to lead them into a way of dealing with the mental illness that they don't even recognize they have.
And that's not going to be done with our current situation. We need more help. Our people are suffering, they are the least of us. The mentally ill are the least of us." And at the beginning of this... Sorry I got a little emotional there. I met with Chief Jenkins and we're already brainstorming a little bit and you haven't even approved it.
I'm sorry, could I ask Ms. Miller a question? So given what you've heard tonight or what you've heard basically about the program, do you think that the severely mentally ill that you're speaking of or some range within that would be helped by this approach, you know, going out there. I mean it from what I understand you saying is that it takes time and it takes a lot of touches in order to build the trust. Does this seem to you like a reasonable step to build that trust? That's going to be necessary. And I know that you have extreme people that are extreme and then you have everybody. You know, there's a range so it will help some people I'm just trying to figure out, like in your experience.
Well we've got... First of all you have to find them and this is an opportunity for somebody in the community who knows where they are who can find them and once they're found then you can build a rapport with them and there's no guarantees We know that mental illness, especially things like schizophrenia, bipolar are very hard to treat under the best of circumstances.
But without this they won't.
Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate your insight.
Let me have Larry Steingold please and then Bill Miley.
3:05 – 3:113 turns
Larry Steingold, I support—I think a lot of people support this approach. Why we're splitting it and we're paying for half instead of it all coming out of the, you know, half budget from us, half from ERF? Why not all from ERF? Does dignity lose less profit? Sorry, shot across the bow. But, unhoused versus housed. We're now going into the nursing home business, the assisted living business as a business.
We're gonna apply for insurance contracts, we're gonna apply for this, we'r gonna have employees, we can have a building over there for house people just so that our Thank you all for joining us. That of our $16 million that's going up and down, that this is coming out of our budget and not to assume any compensation from the state or the county. If we do, great! I think it would be wonderful.
But I think the public has—we have to know that and be upfront about it because if there's a downturn in the economy which programs are going to get reduced? Roads? Probably. How about this program? Probably not. Police, probably not. Certain areas. We just have to—and you've got all your priorities and all these tactics and all these strategies, and none of them have dollar budgets based on them, whether they're predictable consequences or unpredictable consequences. They all have expense, and it would be nice to say we have a billion-dollar money tree hanging around to do all these things. But please just be honest and say we can't afford all these things, and we've got to do something a little different? I don't know what, but either raise the TOT, target the sales tax on weekends or—but everything requires—if you're going to do parking, it's going to require enforcement.
Everything. It's all going to come out to how much can we afford and how much are we prepared to give up for people who live in Ojai? I think we're all prepared to give up something for people who are homeless or unhoused, or whatever you want. But at the end of the day it's still a zero-sum game. We can only spend so much. So thank you. Be wise.
Thank You Mr. Stengel. Bill Miley
Hello again. This will enrich the programming needed for our City Homeless Rehabilitation Program, as I call it, both to the current tent village and soon the cabin village and also people who are not in those. It was good to know that services will also be provided to homeless folks not in the residential dwellings But I understand mostly enrolled in care help offered by Help of Ojai caseworkers.
Now for the key element, I think it's a key element for fairness and equity. Ventura County government's participation when considering many of those currently enrolled in Help of Ojai and entered into the housing element Cabin Village, are likely residents of the unincorporated parts of the Ojai Valley. I don't know how many. Their historical residency requirement of one year being met with non-City Ojai Valley residency addresses.
I strongly suggest that Council authorize this contract But in addition, and very importantly, direct the city manager to start or continue discussions with county administration on an equity funding arrangement for per diem costs payment by county government for their residents who are paying for theirs and ours. Not only for this behavioral health contract, but also for the overall city homeless program.
Fairness, equity, responsibility for residents is needed and we're doing that, but it also has to be fair. And I have a few more comments that I wrote down while we were talking. This is limited folks. Eight hours a day, five days a week and homeless is 24 seven. I heard that this is going to be mostly beyond the tent residents. I didn't read that in the administrative report, and I hope it also includes actively tent and cabin village residents. RISE, okay, what's RISE? Rapid Integrative Support and Engagement Program by team! That sounds great, okay.
My understanding is that any homeless person In this area, who's around a while gets known by help of Ojai and hopefully if they're willing will become registered in their casework program. You've heard me say that I think tourism over the years has contributed to homelessness.
3:11 – 3:2719 turns
Thank you Mr. Miley. Mr. Montgomery anybody online? No raised hands on Zoom, Mayor. Thank you. Let's go to discussion. Ms. Mang, you wanted to speak?
I have... yeah so I'm just concerned so somebody with significant mental health needs so if they're not getting services now through Health of Ojai what makes you think that they'll accept them Thank you all for being here. To give them the help they need. If it's after hours, because like the person that you're saying would be employed is every other Monday through Friday with weekends off, what happens on Friday night when Billy goes manic
and... So something to add about this contract, this team is not crisis intervention. They're not responding to medical emergencies. They're not detaining people, right? So if that occurred They would get the contact from Chief and they would go out into the community, engage with those folks. And like Ruth was saying build a relationship with them in the hopes that that relationship is leveraged into connecting them to services because there's trust that this person is trying to help them.
So page 412 does say that, it says item number two. The program is not a crisis intervention program and emergency response program nor does it include psychiatric mobile response. I guess, one answer to the situation is if we don't do something different then what's going to happen is what's happening right now. And I think one thing I'm noticing is that we tend to respond or we hear from our constituents people are in Libbey Park or behind Libby Bowl those kinds of things and they may or may not be in the tent town And the police usually do get called, but we're looking for some way that if there's a crime not being committed they leave and then we see them the next day.
Tell me if I'm wrong here, but I think that's what I'm hearing. So something to intervene in that way is what I'm interested in.
Can I jump in really quickly? This is a proposal for a limited duration, right? So if this is going through June of 26, then you have an option to renew for two additional one-year terms, if you so choose. So you're not obligated to this forever and after. And so if we find that this is not impactful, okay. But that was our thought, was not to commit the city forever but basically doing what we're doing now, we know what the result's gonna be and that's why we're looking to do something differently.
Yes, please. Can I add? So this is like it was said earlier and this is a very proactive approach you know to our mental health and yeah because you got to figure mental health is like the number one issue for the unhoused okay so Really what you need is, you need a team whether it be law enforcement for security. You need the mental health so behavior health is going to handle that part and then you need the social worker right? So you contact someone who's not in the right mind frame they're just saying no no no no no to services well the social workers are not gonna be able to help them you know we're not gonna get them permanent housing because there's not in the right mind frame They don't really want to talk to law enforcement.
So then you need that mental health professional, that expert to go in and talk to them and be that soothing calming voice right? And yes it may not be one contact or two or three it may be the fifth contact in Thank you for joining us. Bam, and they start doing all their magic. And then the social worker comes in when now they're taking their medication and they got the right services, now the social worker comes in and can now reason with them, hey let's get you an ID, let's get you this, let's now get you permanent housing. So really this is really the link we're kind of missing to help the solution here.
Yeah, I am in support of this for that very reason. You know, I think as you were saying so many people reach out to us because they're like business owners who are behind the arcade and having people doing drugs on their property on their places of business and these are We want to take a compassionate approach using the chief's language, a compassionate approach that doesn't involve just Some kind of punitive measure, but that involves really meeting them where they are. I think it's an important missing piece to the safety of our community—the well-being, the safety, the health, the enjoyment, the comfortability of people to be able to go to the park and know that they can bring their children there and not have to worry about someone bathing in the fountain So and I am also, I'm in support of spending the money too because of what our city manager said that this is a contract.
There's an end date, it started at an end date. And so we can assess and see how does this work? And if we're getting half of this covered through the ERF grant then to me it all makes a lot of sense and I think it's going to help a lot of people
Mayor Connie, I'm sorry if I could jump in. Connie had, she has her hand raised, she wanted to comment on 24-7 services if I could please?
Yes, Mayor Gilman and Council Members, I just want to let you know that we Behavioral Health as the County Department, we provide services to the most chronically mentally ill and addicted persons in the whole county We do have Sarah, our Sarah Sanchez also oversees the 24-7 services. So we want to make sure that with this program that has been proven successful, RISE, we want you to have that program started in that area. We will definitely help in linking the folks to the right services. We have a whole array of services.
We also are as you have heard probably in other meetings, we are beginning the Proposition 1 Behavioral Health Services Act Planning process, and we will definitely want to hear from Ojai City of Ojai and the area so that we can start identifying getting data on the needs that you're presenting. Sarah also oversees all our housing and our homeless services in the sense that we have different housing options as well. We want to work with you with this partnership so that we can start linking all those folks, identifying those folks with our trained staff to get them to the right level of care.
We want to help and we do want to provide you the services as it was mentioned earlier. You deserve, the community deserves equal equitable access to the right services for the right folks that you have in your community so I just want to offer that And again, hoping to enter into this partnership so we can expand those services even better. Thank you.
Thank
you. I am also in support of this. I think that it is necessary. I mean, I think that the Ojai residents definitely benefit Because, I mean, I know the ERF money is really city money but half of it is paid for. Yet we get a full-time team and we're only paying for half of the full time team in one way of looking at it. There's another way to look at it but that's also really, really important is that you do have a full time team for half the price and that's just a practical application but more importantly An obligation to serve the residents, those people living here be they unhoused or in the tent town with services that we can provide. Listening to the experts who's saying that this is a model that will most likely work. The idea of the team I mean it makes perfect sense and building trust.
So, you know, I just—I think for Ojai residents as well. We do hear somebody's in Libbey Park, they're taking a bath in the fountain, they're living on—they're living in the bowl and this is the most reasonable way to address that that I can see I wish the county was paying for the whole thing, and I think we could make that argument. But I'm also well aware that you are doing your planning for one—sorry, I can't think of what's the word? It is a proposition.
Proposition 1, and I do believe that we will be able to advocate for Ojai to see how this goes. And as Mayor Pro Tem said it's for a year so we can judge it also as a pilot program to Thank you very much. In troubled times because of that, in mentally troubled times because of that all the way to people that you know have serious Serious mental health. We just simply can't not deal with that So for that reason I am also in support of this
Thanks anything else? Yeah so I've got concerns about this program. Not that it should be provided, but whether the city of Ojai should be providing it as opposed to the county. Addressing the homelessness issue started as this idea that we're gonna get people out of the woods and the creek. We're gonna get them shelter And then they were going to be placed with services that would be provided by state, federal and non-profits.
And they'd get placed. It's evolved into we're the primary service provider Which has, you know the state has an obligation to provide these services. We've heard a lot of testimony today about how dire the need for those services are. I have not heard an explanation for why the county is not providing those services but I'm perfectly happy to have a county staff person come join with our police force to be part of this team But I haven't heard the explanation for why we are paying for that when the county has the legal obligation to provide those services.
The county can say they don't provide these services. They've told us we don't do permanent supportive housing, but they have decided to apply for our grant where we do provide permanent supportive housing? The county doesn't do it because there's some prohibition. They've made a policy choice That they are not going to provide the type of housing that we've entered into, that the state made available. So we're now taking on the whole obligation of the valley.
Because the county, you know if the county provided permanent supportive housing they'd be providing 75% of the units that are going to be necessary for the cabin village.
How are we taking how are they how are we taking the obligation of the value?
That's who is permitted to be a resident at the
tent town.
Mayor? Supervisor LaVere does have his hand raised. Please, let's hear
it.
Please come
in Mr. LaVere. Thank you. The point has been raised about why doesn't the county just pay for all of this and I think it's important to remember that It's correct. The County does get funding from the state to provide these services, but I'm sure that this Council has experienced similar to mine when that oftentimes when the state tells you have certain obligations to perform whether it's a city or county, the funding you get is not nearly what you need to meet the needs of those services. And I can say that, I wish we had quadrupled the funding from the state to meet the mental health needs of Ventura County but that the reality is, is we get a fraction of the money that we need if we were going to provide the full comprehensive services that every city in the county wants.
I mean, I would love to embed five full-time RISE people in Ojai 24-7, but we don't get a blank check from the state. And I think the County Behavioral Health is doing the best they can with the money they get to meet the needs countywide. And that's why as the City Manager mentioned, we're up there as much as we can right now whether it's backpack medicine, whether it's RISE with the resources that we have and I think what the City Manager is recommending is going above and beyond What we're able to offer, given the state funding we do receive to provide these services.
And so if you want the expanded services that are mentioned in this agreement, I think that's why this is being proposed. But I just wanted to make sure that the public and the council knows is that we don't have a bunch of money sitting around in bank accounts not being used. Our public health professionals do such good work And it's a constant challenge to get the funding we need to provide care and service for Ventura County, given just the tragic extent of mental health challenges in the county.
3:27 – 3:3914 turns
Thank you, Supervisor.
Let me just finish up my comments. I'm also struggling with the idea that this is another part of a broad spectrum of not just how we address homelessness and the issue of homelessness, and how are we allocating funds? And we need to have a comprehensive approach, not just to address those people who are currently homeless but those people who are at risk of becoming homeless.
We don't know what funds we have available for us. We had a lot of uncertainty about the current status of our budget We have a lot of uncertainty about what state and federal funds are coming into us. And so, you know at a minimum I would like to see us pursue further negotiations with the county about them picking up more of the financial obligation. And I'd like to see us have a more comprehensive plan for, maybe this is unreasonable but I think we should be allocating an amount of money out of our annual budget that goes to homelessness, but then making very hard decisions about how we're going to allocate that.
We're not doing that. The tail's wagging the dog, you know? We're running down the road with a plan, you know, that was sent to us by the state and we're spending money on that plan but we're not thinking about the comprehensive issues that our community has to deal with and how we're gonna address that. And so I would like to see us dig deeper into our budget issues as well as our negotiations with the county over this issue.
I'm just curious because this, it said addressing those with severe mental health issues. So when you get calls say at Libby Bowl or whatever how many of those that you go out to with an unhoused or mental health issue? How many of those, how many calls do you get and of those calls, how many meet the criteria to get the help that they truly need? You know what I'm saying? Because they have rights so somebody is in a severe mental health Thank you very much.
So I don't know how many of those people, or how many times do you go out to a call and they don't meet the criteria to get the help.
So I don't have those numbers so I can come back to the council with those. All I can kind of point to is... So I've been in close contact with Camarillo. And so Camarillo has this model right now. You know that they have behavioral health, they have a social worker, Thank you all for joining us. Definitely has a better idea of who this person is because of behavior health and all the conversations they've had about the person. And so, they know the person by name. They go back, refer them. So, the very next day let's say this is a Sunday night but very next morning Behavior Health's in their briefing and then they're talking to hey we contacted so-and-so last night okay again okay I'm gonna I know where that person is and they go it's like that familiarization right And then they go, they contact and see what they can offer the person if the person's willing to accept.
So really the nighttime stuff that's not going to really change.
The
weekends okay but what does change is that very next morning someone's there You know, invested and they've already had hopefully multiple contacts already with the person. Does that make sense? It's a familiar face to trust. Maybe it would help behavior health. How does it work right now? Can you explain that to the council? A referral, sometimes there's days delay. I know their caseload is super high by the way so that's another issue.
That's why Camrio went with this model. You have someone who's dedicated their full time for the city versus they share cases and you could get different people and again it could be days later because our case load is so high
Thank you. I can speak to that in regards to the collaboration, so yes, the staff would be Monday through Friday 8 to 6 p.m., but we can leverage resources throughout our department. So our mobile crisis services are available 24 hours, seven days a week work very closely with law enforcement. So if there is a behavioral health crisis, law enforcement will call directly to our mobile crisis team to then triage and be able to send out a team if there is a behavioral health crisis that we can leverage and assess the situation further. And given the collaboration, the idea and what we do with other cities apart from the City of Camarillo, we also collaborate and have this agreement in place with the city of Simi Valley. So it's that rapport that's built by our staff and law enforcement together where it allows that opportunity to that engagement We collaborate within our department and leverage the resources we have within the department to ensure that it's not just RISE that is contracted through the city doing all the work.
It's really leveraging all the different resources to ensure that we're meeting the needs of the individual in hand, because there are complex needs with what is...it's not a quick solution where at one contact, we're going to solve all the situations but Thank you all for joining us today. I want to start by saying thank you so much to all of the Councilmembers who have been working tirelessly to make sure that we are able to meet the needs of each and every one Within RISE, so RISE does go out currently to the City of Ojai as apart from the other cities they as well go out to an engaged individual. So this opportunity would really be able to be focused and dedicated to the city. So it's worked really well with the other cities they've you know continued the agreements ongoing
Thank you, Ms. Sanchez. Let's get close to concluding, but Ms. Lang, you have something to say and then Ms. Rule?
I just had one thing and that is I wanted to speak to Councilmember Whitman's comment about the tail wagging the dog because in some ways we have spent the last couple of years responding to needs And it's been hard to have a proactive approach when we're living in an unprecedented time, in terms of the mental health crisis. And this started in COVID and it's accelerated There's, without a systematic approach from a federal and state level we as communities have to look at how we're going to care for the people who live here.
not just those who are struggling with mental illness and homelessness, but also for the residents who are concerned about those individuals and concerned about some of the fallout from those mental health conditions that affect the people in our community. And so I think that That this We Are One community addressing a problem that is a huge problem, that is connected to all the things we've talked about tonight. Housing, climate, you know the fires left so many people unsheltered.
And so I think that we can, we are creating goals and strategies and plans for the future. And I think that needs to happen regardless. But I think this is something that we can do right now That is necessary. Something that I think would benefit the people who need it the most, those who are really struggling but also that would benefit all of us and the safety and well-being of our community.
If
I can add something about funding and your options, once you have permanent supportive housing in place it unlocks doors for you from a funding standpoint. I know in this moment right now that we're talking that's uncertain. It's unlikely that that's going to continue in perpetuity but by having Permanent Support of Housing, the county has said that there is more funding and grant funding available. And I heard tonight in one of your goals that you're considering is having support with grant writing. Right? So there could be opportunities in the future for the city to not have to carry this burden by itself.
Thank you, Ms. Anderson. Ms. Rule.
Yes, so I was going to say and I think we've discussed this before it's not an either or. We do and you can let me know City Manager. Within our goals we have a housing trust, we have rent stabilization, we have rent assistance So we are looking to a full range of solutions. This is just, to me, an immediacy issue that the state is paying half of it So there's that as well.
To me, we are trying to develop a full-fledged robust program to support potential unhoused, and those that are much more close to losing their housing. That is in the works. That is a strategy that we have come up with tactics for that I think it was our number one goal and I'm as committed to that as anything but I see this as... We really are We're the compassion we want to see and we are lucky that Ojai can actually do this.
I'm going to make a motion that we approve the contract with the Ventura County Behavioral Health for Intensive Services Coordinator. And I will leave it there, even though we can have further discussions on how we might like to see negotiations- For the one year period? Yes, for the one year period. Thank you very much. Cool.
I'll second it.
Roll-call vote Passed 3–2
Show transcript
3:40 – 3:4416 turns
Motion passes 3-2.
Okay that was good though because there's a lot for us to think about and talk about Last item, two council member requests. Introduce ordinance modifying Ojai Municipal Code to allow change for Parks and Rec Commission member composition.
Okay, I'm happy to speak to this.
Go
please. So I don't know it was a year and a half ago we asked each of the commissions to decide if they would like to stay with their number five, if they would like to move to seven. And of our four commissions all did something different. The HPC decided to go to seven. The Planning Commission decided to stay at five. The Arts Commission decided to go to five, but to have the option to go to seven because they weren't comfortable onboarding five people at the same time. And the chair of the Park and Rec's department somehow got left out of the conversation for Parks and Rec.
And she and the vice chair were very clear that they wanted to remain with five, with the option to go to seven. Because at this point they were two and the idea of onboarding five was a little bit overwhelming. And that was the same argument that the Arts Commission used as well. They may very well want to go to seven, but right now five is the amount that they felt that they could handle and given that we did give the opportunity for each commission to make that decision and we abided by what their decision was thinking that they knew best I felt that, and I think Council Member Mang as well, felt that we should give this opportunity to the Parks and Recs Department to go to five, get themselves settled, figure out what they wanted to do.
And then with their new members decide if and when they wanted to go to seven. So hence that is this ordinance. It is to rectify the fact that The Park and Rec's department did not make that decision for themselves. It was made by Luis Gomez, and I'm not even sure how that happened but—and also that it makes perfect sense that they would be able to—that they would want to onboard three and then potentially move to seven so hence this motion.
Okay any questions? Okay let me take some public comments. So Brian Akins please and then Bill Miley.
Brian Akins with the Historic Preservation Commission, 10 plus years and we definitely wanted to go to seven. Since that time, since we made that decision, we now have seven folks, myself, Gina, now the Chair, Craig Walker, Rick Visacci, Randy Leavitt, Laurel Moore and Lorann Sims. Five of those seven have come on board since Three of you were brought in, and I work closely with you. And I appreciate the fine talent that we've been able to bring in. So I've watched the—and I agree with what Councilmember Rule said. However, I was this last week babysitting grandkids because somehow we're cheaper than a L.A. babysitter which I hear is like $40 an hour, and our gas is free.
We give it to them. So anyway, after taking care of three and six-year-olds that night I was looking through the new agenda. I saw what it said here. I hear what you just said but when I read it through in the text it says, In its discretion the proposed ordinance would also allow the City Council to appoint a three member commission. Not to appoint three members to the commission, a three member commission is what... That's a mistake.
Well, that's what I read and that's why I'm here.
That's why I'm here until 7
minutes till 10 tonight.
I did not catch that. Did anyone else catch that? I mean Bill caught it because he made a comment but I did not catch that.
It's inherent in the phrasing of the text. The Parks and Rec Commission shall be composed of seven members or such lesser number as may be appointed by the Council. The council could lower put a lower bound of five if they want. OK, but the inherent in the text is three, five, seven never have an even number. So if the council wants to lower bound it shall be composed of five, six or seven members as appointed by the council. Something like that.
Is that how it was for the for the other appointments?
Arts Commission has the same language that's here and nobody focused on it.
Sorry about that. But it's the same
language.
Yeah, my bad. I didn't see it. All good. Thank you, Brian.
3:45 – 3:5120 turns
Chair Trent, Chair Quilici, Chair West would never go two years without holding a commission meeting. And so it was more than just what took place in those two years and there was some confusion but they did come out and say they wanted to go to seven but they would remain at five at the time. But again no commission meetings in two years is disappointing. So again, that three was what brought to me because I just can't imagine a three. Who would you talk to?
You can go to any favorite other than looking in the mirror.
I misread it as a three-member quorum would be sufficient for a five member commission.
That's what I thought.
But thank you for pointing that out. No, you're right. You're correct. Okay.
Well, I pay attention and commissions are important to me and I know how hard it is again working with all of you fine people in getting quality people at the council. But as we proved, it can be done. Thank you all.
Thank you Mr. Eakins. Mr. Miley?
And thank you for your service, Mr. Ekins. Yes.
This is like ripping an issue That we've whipped it many times over. It's like, we keep going up. Okay the Park and Rec Commission was comprised of five members historically until 2024 when it was increased to seven that's how I remember. Better valley representation as I remember however one the council took no appointment action to fill vacancies Now, from about mid-2023 to now.
Why no public report was ever made that I heard? There were at least two submitted applications dated 12-23—I was one of them—that were never acted on. Two, the chairperson appointment was ambiguous until last meeting. Three, why now is there a minority request to lower the commission seat numbers to five? And then we dealt with the issue of three, okay? And then I laughed and said, Commission of three members?
I'd like to be on that because it would be easy to make all sorts of good things, you know. Okay, four, what's missing? What is missing or the reason Reasons to lower the number of seats and examples. One, no one applied. That's not true. Two, those interviewed were not worthy. I don't think that probably happened. And three, too many interviewees advised opinion servicing and biased self-serving opinions.
I don't think that's fair. I don't know what the reasons why this didn't happen. So my opinion conclusion is other city commissions have at least five members and this one should too. I think you agree with that? I also direct the City Manager to develop a summary statement as to why this Commission has been ignored and disabled, in my opinion, for one-and-a-half years without any action to create public interest and appointments by the Council during this time.
Let's get it publicly commented on and included and move on. So the past is troubling. Park and Recreation Programs and its department deserve much more upright management and policymaking. The recreation guide, which just came out again, is so great! And it's many programs are so good, and they continue. Thankfully.
Thank you Mr. Miley I have no objection to having the commission be five. Does anybody have an objection to that? Yeah, I do.
Okay. We don't have any evidence in front of us. We have what Leslie Rule says and there hasn't been a commission so my suggestion would be we let them seat five and then the five who are on the Commission can say, yeah we continue with the selection process to make it seven or they can say no we don't want that. But we did go through a process to say that the Commission should be allowed to select while there hasn't been a commission.
They couldn't have had a meeting and, you know, I frankly think that this is a manipulation of who can serve on that commission.
Well, Ms. Mang is the co-sponsor of this so we don't just have Ms. Rules work.
Use your microphone. So I did the interviews, was it Friday? And I had chosen three people, interviewed the one and then I guess the other two... We
have two more tomorrow.
Two more tomorrow and those two are part of yours?
No it's two different people I think. I'm not sure because I'm not sure who you were supposed to interview but I just gave my list to Christy. I just have to say that I'm offended, Council Member Whitman, that you would suggest that I am not telling the truth about what Suzy Taylor said. She's
not the
commission.
No, excuse me, she's the chair and secondarily... She is
not the commission. Hold on, wait, hold on, Leslie please just one second? No, no, I'm going to say stop. So there's no reason to have this pitch. So what we have is, the rest of the commissions do have five for the most part. I'm not seeing why this one can't operate as five and we have the opportunity to keep interviewing and go more so I'm not understanding the passion here.
What's the passion about?
I understand that the motion was to stop at five, not go to seven.
3:51 – 3:5732 turns
I was getting ready to do my appointment and working with Susie to start my interview process. And she communicated to me, wait, don't – I'm going to try to get this back down to five. So this is – so I know from two of the members of the commission, the chair and the vice chair that they really want five and that they wanted it all along. But they need
to have three more people weigh in before The Chair and the Vice-Chair do not control the Commission.
I hear what you're saying,
but go ahead. So if I could clarify one other thing because this is to your point. They actually did have a discussion according to Susie Taylor they had a discussion Thank you all for being here. And they don't even quite know where things fell through the cracks. But this is amending something that they felt they wanted, and I wasn't a part of bringing this forward. I just know from my own conversations with her that this was something that they had discussed.
And I've spoke too with both Susie and Sage, and they did say that I would be easier to work with.
And they should get consensus from the other three who are going to join the commission and decide after
that? They had the discussion. With the previous commission, when they were meeting, they had the discussion and they told Luis. And what Luis brought forward was not what they wanted. They had the discussion so
For me, if you have five people on a planning commission which is so... No I'm saying I'm using planning as an example that is functioning well. It seems to me five on Parks and Rec will function equally well and they can go to more if they want. So I think we have heard enough in a way to bring this forward.
If somebody would like to make a motion that would be great.
Yes, I'll move that we let's see. I'll just read the recommendation is, let's see here, that we modify the Parks and Rec Commission to establish what's the best way to where Mr. Summers you have a suggestion?
Yeah, the motion is to introduce an ordinance modifying the Parks and Rec Commission allowing its composition to be up to seven as appointed by the council
We're saying up to seven, but they can operate now.
This is exactly the wording that is for the Arts Commission, and that has been going on for a year-and-a-half with no problems.
Okay. So what's at stake? Just so I'm clear... Let's say we pick someone tomorrow and we forward it to the next council meeting. They will have five. They will have five. Now my thought was we keep interviewing, and we see if there are more good candidates to go forward, but if the chair—and the chair is part of that!
Right. And so that is the conversation that the council has with the chair. But I mean,
that sounds
fine. That sounds fine if that's what's happening. That's fine. That's not I think that's what's happening. It's not the way it was communicated as a stop at five. So did you read
the ordinance?
Well, no, no. Stop. No. Well, well, we're going to stop. Well, that's enough. OK, so then let's let's do it then. We then have seven member or less commission. That' Okay, I'll also move.
I'll second.
Okay Mr. Montgomery
Yes motion Mayor Gilman a second Mayor Pro Tem Lang and I would like to read the ordinance language please The Parks Recreation Commission shall be composed of seven members or such lesser number as may be appointed by the City Council
okay
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion Mayor Gilman a second Mayor Pro Tem Lang and I would like to read the ordinance language please The Parks Recreation Commission shall
Show transcript
Motion passes
Okay, any council member reports? Okay, City Manager's report? No report. Thank you. Future agenda items? Yes, okay.
I would like to bring forward a speed hump policy. Hold on one second please guys. Mr. Whitman please. What is it? I would like to bring forward a speed hump policy.
Yeah well that is part of your goals and tactics. Do you want to do that in advance of adopting the goals and tactics?
And I will second that.
Okay,
cool
all right is there a desire for a particular time
frame? As soon as it's possible for staff to prepare.
3:57 – 3:5929 turns
Speed hump policy
okay And Chief Jenkins has some interesting ideas about, some temporary ideas that would be really interesting to try out and then monitor. So I would love to fold him into that. Yes?
I just had a question wondering where it stands with the Budget Committee.
Yes, next meeting it is coming to you. Yay! Ms. Billings is bringing that forward. Thank
you.
And then I have one more just thought. Sure. Fourth of July is coming and I thought it would be a cool thing if like the City Council, everybody that sits here, if we were on a
float.
My God! I've been waiting
for two years for someone else!
I don't know who's
in town for Fourth of July, but I'm like... I've tried for two years to get a city float. I even volunteered to make paper roses and make it.
Here
we go! I'd like to work on that with you. Okay,
perfect. Somebody who has a flatbed?
No, I'm going to get the Adamson's Towing. Oh
yeah, of course.
Alright,
okay.
I'll let Kristi know. Kristi Rivera.
Way
to go. Wow, I don't think I've seen her this excited in some time.
Okay. Yes? So I would like to propose an agenda item to talk about... My brain is dead. Larry help me out here we talked about it. Ember screens, yeah requiring ember screens. Thank you. My brain is dead. Yeah so...
Also in the goals and tactics? Yeah
also in the goals and tactics but I'd like just to move that forward. I think that it's time. It's time to do that.
So is there a second for that? I'll second that. Okay so speed humps and ember screens and a float okay got
it. And a float we need to move on those.
Okay thank you
Okay?
Meeting adjourned.
