UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review
0:06 – 0:065 turns
About ready to start. Hi, Steve. Ready to go? All right. Here we are. Welcome to the special meeting, Tuesday, June 17th. Mr. Montgomery, will you please
Roll call — called by Kim Mang
Show transcript
Thank you,
and
will
you lead us
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
Can I have an approval of the agenda?
I'll move to approve the agenda.
Thank you. All those in favor?
Aye.
Any opposed? Okay. And now we will go on to the workshop. Mr. Harvey.
Thank you, Mayor. Before the Council begins, I just wanted to maybe point out a couple housekeeping items related to the documents and maybe a recommendation for a proposed approach. So, first of all, we have the meeting packet. Which is basically exactly the same as it was on June 3rd when the meeting was cancelled. So it's the same package just carried over. We did that very deliberately because we didn't want anybody to get confused about the material or think that there was a change that they missed or whatever. So that's one thing. But, with that said, I know that I've heard from a few council members that there was a little bit of concern in staff's zeal to consolidate and combine and crystallize. We may have left some important proposed goals on the editing room floor, and that was not intentional.
So, we have a couple different documents here, and one, thank you Mayor, was created by the Mayor, it's a little hard copy, there are copies in the back of the room if you didn't see this. Yes, March 11th, and this is a little more verbatim from Council members, so if you don't see it on the big giant Jumbotron spreadsheet, It is likely on the smaller spreadsheet. So thank you, Mayor, for doing that. And Mayor, maybe as an approach, it really, you know, the other thing I hear from council members is, you know, we're trying to crystallize and maybe, maybe try to finish a goal or two. So maybe you want to, you know, focus on the first five, if you want, and try to dial in on those. But again, whatever you, whatever you guys want to do, it's your meeting.
But that's just a
thought. But we haven't done eight and nine yet. Correct. That's true too. So there's that. And just for clarification, are these from
Wes's notes? So I was going to get a tip. So what this is from is the video from March 11th that was typed on the screen while we were all working. And so I basically just had the video, typed up the notes as it was talking. That's exactly what's here. So it had the ones that we started with and the ones we came up with at the time. Now, just to remember, the first five we did in that fashion. The ones remaining, not eight and nine, we basically used the spreadsheet. So those don't have sheets here. So just to follow on with what Mr. Harvey suggested, what we could do is Here's a way forward if you guys have an appetite for this. Go through the first five. Make sure that what we wrote out in that meeting is on the spreadsheet. That's just an idea because we said before some didn't make it onto the spreadsheet.
So if we say, well, that's one way we might start off is just make sure our intentions are all there. We could go to 8 and 9. We can look at that. We can also try to dig into 1 or 2 to actually get something started on. Let's say items 1, 2, 3, or 4. That's an idea. And I wanted to offer one little caution, which is we do want to have very big conversations around strategy, and I hope we have those for months. What my own view would be, we don't want to wait months before things start that we think we're probably going to vote on already.
Projects that we think are going to go. So my suggestion would be we continue to have the big conversations, but we actually launch a few things that we feel pretty good about. That's my suggestion to you, but I'm open to your ideas.
And I just have
something,
and I don't know if it would be helpful, it could take a lot of time off of our evening. Leslie and I met for hours and went over the document versus the previous document, and so we, I had the one document that we came up with, she had this, and we went through, so I don't know, like, for instance, affordable housing, number 1C, we had listed as number 7 when we made our Goals and Texts. So I don't know, like, to go through that, if that would be helpful and nip some of the time off. I'm willing to share those numbers that we took the two things. I think
we're actually saying the same thing, because look at the sheet here. So you say, Investigate an Inclusive Housing Ordinance is number seven. And you say, oh, it did make it onto the sheet, so then we can say, oh, great. So then you would say, oh, great, that one's gone. Okay. So I think it's the same thing. Okay.
Yeah, I think what Council Member Mang is saying is that we've gone through the process. You did it already. We did it already. Okay. And so as a matter of time, I like your idea of moving forward with those things that we think are high priority and we think we can agree on rather than, you know, putting them. So I would say that I like that idea of moving forward on that which we know we want to move forward on or have the discussion. And, you know, since Kim does have the final map, we can work through that on the goals that we think, we feel particularly strong that there was a disconnect. Some of them I think we don't think, we don't feel particularly strong that there was a disconnect. Some of them we do.
Like for
instance, number one, it might not have been on this goal, but maybe something else. So we didn't have number one.
It's in your 1F on the sheet. So 1F, establish, research establishing a housing trust. I hear what you're saying and I do like expediency. I guess I'm saying that you guys made the list. Even if we could just spend literally 20 minutes and just map them really fast?
I'm all for that. We have a way to start because we did it. So I'm going to look to Council Member Mang and I'm going to go, did we map that? Yeah, right. But everyone should contribute.
Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Okay, so how
about this then? Yeah, go ahead. I do have a question, though, saying, you know, identify things that we move forward on. So are you saying, you know, put that at the head of The things that get onto an agenda with a
0:13 – 0:1917 turns
staff report and a recommendation for action. Are you talking about like just adopting them now? Because I think we have to do the...
We
talked about this, the Mayor and I spoke about this earlier today. We know that we have to bring something, a policy back, and anything that we're spending money on, we would have to bring back to Council for public Thank you very much. At the next meeting or in a meeting soon that we can agree as a council to say, this is really important and let's bring this up for consideration sooner rather than later. So let's move forward with the things that we can move forward, that kind of a low-hanging fruit. And then really thinking about it in terms of long-term, short-term, immediate, short-term, and long-term goals or strategies.
I concur 100%. Mr. Harvey, any objections to that?
It's your meeting, Mayor. Absolutely not.
It's our meeting. Okay. Well, before we start, and Ms. Mang, I would love you to take the lead on that. Let's do the public comments while we're here, before we get into it. So let's start with Larry Steingold, Lanny Coffer, and then Sylvia Falstich. Hopefully, I'm pronouncing that correctly.
Good evening. So what I understood to say was that there is some low-hanging fruit. There are some things that we think that there will be a majority, if not a supermajority vote on. We think that it will need to come up today. We will suggest that it come up next week, be put on the agenda, and discussed next week for a full-blown public comment, etc., etc.
So move it forward today to go on the agenda for the 24th. Sorry, now
with that, I'm going to have to say, wait, no, we can't do that. One of the directions I received from the council is to speed up the posting of the agenda. And we are really shooting to make this next agenda, that agenda. We'd like to post it on Thursday, no later than noon. And so we're in the finalization process of that right now. So I can't take on any additional agenda items for next week at this point.
But we can say as soon as possible or...
You can say that, yes, but I'm just telling you that it will not be on next Tuesdays because next Tuesdays is already baked and ready to go.
Oh, and this just goes on and on. So, if it's not on the agenda for the end of June, and we have a new fiscal year starting July 1, how do we reconcile that? Is it because the budget is a living document?
All right. Then we only have one meeting in July. The second meeting is when we're taking our time away. I did want to say,
though, the point that you're making right now, Ms. Rule, is that's what I was trying to say is we're going to approve the budget, presumably understanding that is definitely going to change with things we're going to bring forward. No question about it.
Great, okay, thank you.
Okay, thank you for
waiting, Mr. Stengel. Because of everything that's in here and all these things, it would be nice if there was interaction or other minutes provided to the public because as you have your conversations, there will be more questions and more ideas and more suggestions. Anyway, Housing Commission, explore it, just create it, the Housing Commission, and get on with it. You want to find a housing trust? Just do it. And it needs to get funded, okay? And thankfully, we dodged two fires. Right? The wind was going in the other direction. But what if the wind was coming here? Are we prepared? Don't you think because the budget is a living document, you can pencil in half a million dollars for a fire safe council? Wouldn't that be nice? Then we can just do it and get it done and move forward because the city and the employees and the staff, all well-intentioned, do not have the expertise, the time, or the desire to do what needs to be done.
And quite honestly, you know, why not? I mean, let's be proactive. That's what planning is. That's what city councils are. Let's try to be there before it hits because fire is so goddamn awful. How about a parking commission? Parking and Traffic Commission. So lots of small cities have lots of committees to provide resources, data, information, and talent, whatever, to the city councilors.
So why not use it? I mean, we have a lot of ideas. You guys can't do it all. You know, there isn't that much time, and you certainly have other lives. Some of you do. Some of you don't. But this is, oh, and for the Sheriff's contract, we need to find an alternative. I don't know if the City of Ventura has been asked, or somebody, that we can use leverage against the Police Department. No disrespect.
But without leverage, there's really no negotiation. It's sort of take it or leave it, and leaving it is undesirable. This looks good. I hope we all get stuff done. But the fire thing is important. 2017 was the Thompson fire. That was my first fire. I really don't want to have to evacuate again because we didn't do our job here. So please just pencil the budget in so we can get it done. Thank
you. Thank you, Mr. Steingold. Lanny Koffer, Sylvia Faustich, and Christine Golden.
0:19 – 0:2916 turns
Thank you, Council, for this opportunity to speak to the value of including Cluff Vista Park, Ojai's native plant demonstration garden, in the City's goals and plans. Botanically, culturally, and environmentally, Clephasta Park is unique among the city's properties and deserves special attention in any plans revolving around environmental concerns and climate resiliency. The park's native plants evolved with Ojai's climate, soil types, and wildlife. The indigenous Chumash people of Ojai literally have thousands of years of co-evolution and relationship with the native plants. In addition to Chumash-inspired art installed in the park, Cliff Vista Park provides a rare canvas on which to paint a picture of the Chumash and the rest of us, interacting with the edible, medicinal, and otherwise useful native plants of Ojai.
From an environmental perspective, Cluff Vista Park serves as a demonstration garden with important benefits. To name just a few. Saving water. Once established, many native plants need minimal irrigation beyond normal rainfall. Low maintenance, less water, little to no fertilizer, little to no pesticides, less pruning, freedom from pesticides. Native plants have developed their own defenses against many pests and diseases. Since most pesticides kill indiscriminately, beneficial insects also become targets. Reducing or eliminating pesticide use keeps garden toxins out of our creeks and watersheds. And wildlife viewing. It may seem obvious, but research shows that native birds, bees, butterflies, and other pollinators prefer the native plants they've co-evolved with for millions of years.
I would love to take the Council and City staff on an herb walk at Cluff Vista Park so you can experience firsthand what I'm trying to put into words here. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Copper. Sylvia Faustich, Christine Golden, and Renee Roth.
Good evening. I kind of get shy talking in public, so I kind of wrote my notes down for
you guys. Don't worry
about it at all. Okay. My name is Sylvia Falstich. I'm a recent retiree from the NBC Naval Base at Point Magoo as a flight test engineer. I've lived in Ojai for 36 years. I've heard through the grapevine today that the Ojai trial Trolley might be removed, and I just wanted to discourage removing this great public transportation when Ojai is getting busier. The trolley has been around for 35 years, and I think it should continue to exist for the following three main reasons. One, it's a unique form of transportation that makes people smile, helps kids, seniors, disabled, and others. Two, the only form of transportation within the community since the Gold Coast Only Travels on Highway 33 and Downtown. And yeah, the other one, the trolley can travel through streets that the Gold Coast is unable to travel.
And thank you for your time.
Thank you. And just to let you know, our intention actually is to increase it, not to take it away.
Oh,
great.
Yeah.
But thanks for being here. Christine Golden, Renee Roth, and then Randy Coggins.
Is this good? Okay. First of all, thank you very much for this opportunity to make my point again, because I did send all of you an email, and I appreciate if you've read it through, because I'm not going to get into all the things I put into the email. What I want to bring to mind is that when Clough Vista was established or founded or built in 2001, the city made a commitment, and I have it in writing, That it would maintain, I'm quoting, it would maintain the site and the completed improvements in a first class condition, end quote. And that it would, quote, maintain the site's landscaping on a weekly basis, end quote. So I just want to bring to mind that you're the next generation. You may or may not have been here when the park was founded.
You may not be aware that, as I put in the letter, it's a who's who in Ojai of all the people that contributed to the founding of this park. And it has gone to something in a handbag. And we've been working really hard. This is not about the public art. I'm glad that Rachel asked that. This is not about the public art. This is about the native gardens. But they can't stay the way they're going to be put back in order, but they won't stay that way unless you budget money. And this is not an unusual request. Back in 2016, then Public Works Chair, Greg Grant, asked City, City Manager and City, If they would please give him a budget, a monthly budget, and they hired Orion Landscaping to come in and do what the city workers cannot do. So that's what we're asking for you to do, which whatever goal this fits into.
And I want to extend the invitation, Lanny has agreed to do it with me, is to give you a tour of Club Vista Park. I will include the public art if you come on that tour because I think you'd be just absolutely astonished at what's up there. And Lanny will do the native plant bits. So, Ben, if you'd be willing to work with everybody, I think Lanny needs this to happen during the weekday, during a weekday morning when it's nice and cool, figure about 45 minutes, and we'll give you a tour of Cleft Vista Park. And you really do need to see it. I also want to thank Ben and Lindy Palmer and Bridget Mara and the staff. It's just been incredible. They have met with me and with Jessica Thompson from Green Goddess Gardens, and they have been so supportive and so wonderful.
And now the ball is in. You've got the ball. So thank you, everybody. Any questions? I'm available, Ben, if you want to ask questions. There's a relationship here with the Land Conservancy, which is a little tricky, but as I said, I've got documents, and I'm happy to answer questions. So put it in there, guys. Thank
you, Ms.
Golden.
Thank you. Renee Roth, Randy Coggin, and then Bill Miley.
Good evening, Mayor Gilman, Council Members, and Mr. Harvey, and staff. Great teamwork. I love seeing that teamwork of people working together to build a collaborative group who can support our parks and our community. So tonight's meeting is about setting priorities, but I want to raise What I think is a critical question, how can you really prioritize effectively if you don't know the budget constraints, the staffing capacity, and funding tools available?
And we also know the city manager is short on staff right now. And there's some transitions going on with staffing. So I think you're going to have to leverage a little bit here. So let's take, for example, wildfire safety, something I've been speaking about often. A priority we can't afford to postpone. I submitted a public comment. I don't know if any of you had a chance to look at it or go to any of the links. There's a lot of information in those links. And I was urging you to adopt a Zone Zero defensible space standards. Those are coming from Gavin Newsom per executive order by December 31st. So let's be ready for them.
Update our codes and develop formal partnerships to get this work done. So what I didn't include in the letter, but I want to emphasize right now is that California has already invested heavily in the exact tools we need. Stephen Hawks, with the Insurance Institute of Business and Home Safety, testified at that April 24th hearing. There's $185 million available from Cal Fire's Wildfire Prevention Grants Program. There's $135 million allocated for home hardening retrofits right now with California wildfire mitigation program. A $25 million set aside for defensible space financial assistance. So the state of California is committed to this. There is grant funding for this.
These are funded through Prop. 4. Do we remember Prop. 4 that was approved last November? Ten billion dollars in general obligation bond funding. That means we have to step up and ask for that funding. They're not going to give it to us. So we also need help defining high fire risk areas within the city and surrounding neighborhoods. So we also have to remember right place, right plant in the right place at the right distance with the right kind of support. And I'm really asking for the city to support that right now. We have strong partners like the Ojai Valley Fire Safe Council, the crew, they're already writing grants and working with the community. But the city needs to step up and appoint a liaison, a line pri- Thank
you Ms. Roth. Randy Coggin, Bill Miley, and Anita Hendricks.
0:29 – 0:3714 turns
Thank you, Mayor and Council. Thank you. I'm here this evening as a board member of the Ojai Valley Fire Safe Council. Shortly, you will be prioritizing your goals for the coming fiscal year. Our hope is that wildfire safety and risk mitigation will be your number one priority. As most of you are aware, the Fire Safe Council has submitted a proposal to the City to perform the work required under that priority. The Fire Safe Council is prepared, and most importantly, capable of professionally and expertly performing that work. Now is the time to act. In fact, we're kind of behind the curve. We're in fire season now, with Ventura County Fire responding to brush fires on a daily basis, Some of you, some of which have been in or near the Ojai Valley.
As some of you may be aware, just yesterday they responded a full brush fire response with 150 firefighters to the 60-acre Maria fire in the Santa Clara River bottom in Santa Paula. And less than three hours after that response, they had to respond to a second full brush fire response with 140 more firefighters To the 34-acre Howe Fire in Piru, the required mandatory evacuation.
My concern is that if your intent was to approve our proposal and next week's agenda is already baked, then the discussion of that approval could not occur until your July meeting. And you only have one meeting in July, which means that if a public service, a professional services contract was going to be developed, that probably could not come back to you until August.
Even if we were to start the work next month, we could have some impact on this fire season, but there was still much to be done. However, one fire season is the harbinger of the next, and at least we can begin getting the city prepared for what's coming. If you approve our proposal, my hope is that it's not just an agreement between the City and the Fire Safe Council, but that it's also the beginning of a lasting partnership between us. A partnership that will serve to benefit the City and its residents now and well into the future. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Coggin. Anita Hendricks, Bill Miley, and Carolyn Goldwasser.
I have a question, first of all. The other part of the agenda here, are there going to be time for comments from us when you guys are going over all of this?
That's what we're doing
now. Oh, I thought I was in public comment time.
This is just general, but tell us what your comment is.
Public comment. The trolley still only has three drivers, and apparently there's one woman who fills in on the weekends. So if a friend of mine was going, who doesn't have a car, was going to an event, she had a ride over, but there could be a post if somebody's on vacation or sick, and she would not have a ride back because there was no one to fill that. The Supervisor. I came a few weeks ago and asked for, I wanted to get more information about what was going on. I was referred to the man who is now not here, who I guess had been accused of taking city funds. So I didn't get a good answer from him. And I'm aware that the real supervisor is somehow on leave, an indefinite leave. Maybe, if somebody can verify this, he's still getting paid, but he doesn't get to act as a supervisor for the trolley.
This is disturbing to me, when these people really need to be. This system is flailing right now. They're doing the best they can, and I have to admire them for their efforts. We need to get better benefits, better pay. They're part-time so they don't get any benefits. Why aren't we getting? Have we had any applications? Because I know somebody said they're taking applications. Have you had any applications since the last meeting? And we need to look on creating better work conditions. Have there been any notices in the paper and other places that we need workers?
Very frustrating because there are people who rely on the trolley and it doesn't seem to be moving forward. Students, elders, low-income, disabled, etc. rely on the trolley service. Please, please act expediently and get us some more drivers and if we've got a fiscal budget here to deal with, let's get some money out there and put more energy into creating an attractive situation for drivers to be in.
If that's truly the answer and why we don't have sufficient trolley drivers. Thank you.
Thank you. Bill Miley and then Carolyn Goldwasser.
Hello. Is this about the goals?
Yes.
OK. But to begin with, I wanted to say that my family was here when Coff Park was a shale gas station.
Mm hmm.
and among others we contributed to. So, these are kind of refined new suggestions for some of the goals. One, affordable housing. Consider using housing trust funds for aiding low-income homeowners of older uninsulated houses to insulate them, especially the exterior wall. Consider allocating a portion of the TOT revenues for ongoing support of city homeless prevention rehab services, including onsite housing and casework.
Wildfire Safety, please consider adding barricade gel, which I have bought from my house, product, to be sprayed on the structures and the trees and such, to prevent the fire from burning it down beforehand, before the fire. Six, Diversifying Economy, Tourist Management, please develop an ongoing survey for tourists For, Their Needs, Their Wants, Their Demographics, Expectations, Suggestions, To find out who's coming here, why, what they want, and what they don't get.
Deal with the Chamber and the tourist vendors, motels, hotels. Climate Resiliencies. Please consider creating a low- or no-cost program for house and building owners to have an energy audit to determine energy-saving improvements. SCE does that, like the one we're doing for our own buildings. It will provide motivation, in my opinion, for such improvements. It's important to know exactly what exists before deciding what to add, remove, or change.
And then consider implementing the Sierra Collective Biobasin idea a couple of years ago. And last, under Communications, consider crafting an annual report to the public on city government added to the financial report. This will increase citizen understanding of what the city does, how it does it, where the money goes, and why it's important. And last, please modify the tactic of taking audio recordings of closed sessions. Thanks.
Thank you, Mr. Miley. And Carolyn Goldwasser.
0:38 – 0:448 turns
Hello, Mayor and Council. Thank you very much. My concern here is regarding the goals for the future, and I have only lived here nine years, but I've been visiting Ojai for many, many years. I'm concerned about the garden. Behind City Hall that could be renovated and made to be a recreational, educational, useful asset instead of just a place you have to weed whack the weeds away from.
Right now, there is a composting part of the garden that is operating, a man named Brian, I don't think he gets paid, I think he's doing it as a volunteer position, but he's there many mornings and he'll help you put your kitchen scraps in the right bin and put some, you know, give you some compost to take home for your houseplants or whatever. The cities I have lived in, in between visiting here and now living here, one of them was Portland, Parks and Rec administered the waiting lists and the fees for the community gardens in Portland. It was considered a recreational, educational pastime that people could do. In community, learning from each other. You have that plot, I have this plot, I learned something from you. Sometimes we have educational presentations.
The sign down at the garden says, I believe, Ojai Community Demonstration Garden. It's completely piped. I'm not sure the state of the current hose is, although I did water a mulberry tree down there recently. There was water and there was a hose that worked. I used to have a pot there, actually, quite a few years ago. But it could be renovated in a way that would be beneficial to everyone involved and beautiful. People could grow flowers or vegetables or herbs or whatever.
And the space is there. The Recreation Department has a catalog that comes out every year, and they say these are the recreational activities in Ojai, you know, would you like to participate? Always, in every place I've ever been part of a community garden, a fee is charged to cover the cost of the water. It's standard, so that can be done easily, and the city shouldn't be out any money for doing this.
Maybe the Green Coalition would like to help organize this, but I think the Parks and Rec would be your best bet, and it's right down there, and it's already, some of it is in beds, some of it is not too well organized yet, but it used to be a functioning garden, and I hope you'll put this on your goal for the future. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Ms. Goldwasser. And just to let you know, the Green Coalition is working on it right now, so we'll forward these ideas, too. Thank
you.
Mr. Montgomery, anything online?
Yes, Mayor. We currently have one raised hand for our City Goals item, and it's Starchild. Starchild, you can unmute, and you have the ability to speak.
As Pirate Burns and Santa Paula Smolders, we stand united. We're all NIMBYs when it comes to fire. But just as fire can erase the Ojai we love from our valley, so can losing our values, the foundation on which our community stands. Justice and courage, inclusivity and respect for individuality, compassion, community, family. One of the primary purposes of civilization, and certainly, Its primary strength is the guarantee that family life can flourish in unity, peace, and order. Said Attorney General Robert Francis Kennedy as he spoke out against the racist immigration policy of his time. Today, our policy is hardly any better. Immigration raids have brought our neighbors anguish and torn apart families.
By hunting nonviolent undocumented immigrants at their places of work, and on their way out of immigration hearings. Federal agents tear at the foundation of our civilization. Driven by impossibly high quotas to achieve the largest mass deportation in history, they bring terror and havoc to our community. They desecrate our founding principles. All men are created equal. Robert Francis Kennedy, a senator, said, Our attitude towards immigration reflects our faith in the American ideal. We've always believed it possible for men and women who start at the bottom to rise as far as their talent and energy allow.
Neither race nor place of birth should affect their chances. And President Reagan said the promise of America, and I would believe surely the promise of Ojai, is a shining city on the hill. Open to anyone with the will and heart to get here. If you believe in these values, if you believe that the American dream should be universal, eternal, a dream that will never die, then have the courage to stand for your values, stand for justice, and declare Ojai a sanctuary city as your top priority at the next meeting. And don't let it be said that you spread along other priorities, like giving the city manager a raise, and made two existential threats to Ojai, fire, and the loss of our values, a priority that could wait until next season. Instead, call a special session, address fire, address this threat to our values, make Ojai a sanctuary city, and make Ojai fire safe, and do it this month.
Thank you. Thank
you, Starchild. No more raised hands,
Mayor. That's all. Thank you. Okay. Excuse me, you have something else to speak about, about the goals? Okay. We don't have public comments at a special meeting, but say something quick, but please don't snap next time, but say what you need to say.
0:44 – 0:5452 turns
Okay. I just wanted to say a couple of things. In the financial section, we had a recreation director who didn't work out. I don't know how much the severance pay was for that. Does anybody know how much he was paid when he left?
We're not going to do back and forth, but go ahead and speak.
Okay, we have an Assistant City Manager, I believe, I don't know what his official title was, who apparently may take off with a bunch of money. These are costing our city a lot of money. I don't know how much a severance pay is. I would imagine tens of thousands of dollars, but I don't know. I think we need to have a different, another oversight committee on hiring or else we have to have an extra person checking on hiring and on the finances. We can't afford these kinds of errors. We can't afford it. You're looking at finance, very important. We need to throw money more into our trolley system and getting some competent drivers. For housing, very low, extremely low, and senior housing.
Community Pool at Soule Park. Let's go for it. It's way overdue. I don't think we need to emphasize tourism anymore. So much of our housing is impacted now. We don't need more people coming here and our streets and everything. Thank you for taking the extra time to accommodate me because I did not understand the way that this was divided up. Thank you. I hope you take my concerns into consideration. Of course.
Okay, so how about a way of starting, because I liked the chart that I was seeing
there.
So maybe, and I'm ready to hear from other people. So we're starting on Goal 1.
Starting on Goal 1, we had, on this sheet, 1C was number 7 in our original. Yep. 1D we had is number 10.
1E
was 4 and
9. 1E, Identify Opportunities, Create Workforce Housing was 4 and 9. Great. See, you can see that they did consolidate. Right,
exactly.
1F
we have number
2. Yep, the Housing Trust.
And 1G we had number 5.
Wait, so 1F was 1 and 2? No, just 2. Because it's 1 on the original. Research and establish a housing trust. That doesn't matter. Okay. So it's here.
And 1G, we had number 5. And that's so we didn't have our number 1, 3, 6, 8. Okay. So there we go.
So on your sheet, tell me if I'm getting you, so one idea was maybe ill-formed. Research expanding with Spring Oaks, that was our number three that we had come up with. Not very, maybe that's not explicit enough. And then number six, collaborate with Ventura HomeShare on a HomeShare program. And that's it. And eight. Oh, and eight. Research potential City Council budget policy related to housing allotment. But that was related to goal eight, fiscal sustainability.
Please jump in, Mr. Harvey, if you think you remember this part.
As far, sorry, on number eight specifically? Yeah. Okay, give me a moment, I'm sorry.
Research Potential City Council Budget Policy Related to Housing Allotment.
I think this is a... Is
this for
staff or housing allotment?
I don't recall the... Is this
the...
Inclusionary housing?
I think that's... Bail idea?
The what idea? The housing for the foundation you're talking
about? No, it's like a housing trust, but it's a way to secure deeds as affordable housing and the city can pay into, like basically pay to have folks secure their deeds as affordable in perpetuity. I think Vail is doing it, but it takes a lot of money to do that.
Bill is purchasing deed restrictions, making the property Affordable in perpetuity in exchange for some amount of money that they figure out in doing that. And then the people who live in the property have to live within a certain distance from Vail. So we have a lot of items across all nine goals where we say research, And I think we need to be a little bit more proactive in how we're identifying those. And so I think maybe for each of those, we look at some language that says, Staff report concerning subject matter and recommendations for action.
And, you know, place on the agenda, and we can do, you know, priority one, two, and three, depending on how quickly we want it to get through. But that's just my suggestion.
No, I have a similar thought, but different language. It was something like If we could settle on the tactics that we've got now, we prioritize them in some way to say to staff, this is what we'd like to see first. So if you have five research or come up with some kind of proposal, what would we like to see them work on most immediately? That's another way of saying what I think you said, if I heard
you right.
Yes, please.
Yes, so I agree with Councilmember Whitman that we do have a lot of things that, you know, say staff will research, or research, and it occurs to me that number five, creating a housing commission, creating commissions that would actually do the research for you, With, you know, citizens that are deeply interested in this concept would free up staff, would engage community, would get us a wide range of sort of, you know, approaches to take. So I think
That's an interesting idea.
I think creating a housing commission and commissions, or a housing commission specifically, since it's such an engaging question for our community, and push off, research this for us, would, and then potentially put, you know, a member of planning on it as well. I know that there is some, Reluctance to engage the community sometimes in these kinds of things because you don't know what you're going to get back. But I think it's worth, we've heard consistently for two years that the community would like to engage in commissions around this. And secondarily, I think that Ms. Roth, They put their house in a Section 8, and she can speak more to this, deeded environment. So, that already exists. You know, it's not a sort of a A standalone, but it does exist with Section 8, that you can deed restrict your house in Section 8.
I'm not sure what you get back as a benefit for that, or if you just simply do it out of an altruistic. Can I just pause
you for one second? So just so we don't lose track, how about this? If we look at the numbers that didn't make it onto the sheet, for example, number three, research expanding with Spring Oaks, I'm happy to remove that. That was the one I forwarded. and then our other one, eight, Research Potential City Council Budget Related Policy. Mr. Whitman, I wasn't sure if you were suggesting that should be included and added, which is fine, if so, but agreeing on what's here and then have that conversation, if that's okay? Because I think what you suggested is good.
What were you trying to say about number 8? Should it go in? When number 8,
it's actually,
I
believe it's at 1F.
Number 8 is 1F.
So in looking at it, it looks like what staff did was
they
combined the housing financial goals into one research project
to report
back.
for Budget Allocation and also a trust.
Yes.
Yes. Can
I offer another process?
Yeah,
sure. Suggestion. Yeah. Take it. You can shoot it down, but I think it might help for us to have You know, to rank our tactics, like, most, like, so, rank three, two different ways. One, most important to least important, and we can all vote on those. But then, also, within those, within six months, a year, two years. So, that way, so, for example, and Council Member Whitman, to your point, instead of just saying research, it can be
0:54 – 1:0129 turns
So, could I just jump in here? Ultimately, what we're looking to do is we're looking to create a work plan based upon your established goals and tactics, and the work plan will then have a corresponding timeline. And that will come once you decide, yes, these are our tactics, and we come back and say, this is the estimated cost, because there will be some that you might say, well, we don't really want to do that, that costs too much, or we need to swap out some. So,
the prioritization, if I'm understanding what you're saying, is something we're going to do but not tonight.
You can do it tonight. I just wanted to point out that I think you don't need to establish the timeline. If you're making it a priority, then it's inherent with that that you want that before something else. We just need to determine what that timeline is. So what I wouldn't want you to do is say, I want this in three months, only to have us come back and say, wow, well, we looked at this, and this is actually going to take a year.
Is it helpful, though, Mr. Harvey, to at least take the initial part of the idea to say, let's say these tactics under affordable housing are the ones we've settled on. to at least for you to understand which ones are... Yes, your prioritizing them is very helpful. I think that's worthy. And
that's something that we can do. We could actually vote. And that could probably expedite the process.
One didn't make it, so I want to make sure. It's collaborate with Ventura Home Share on Home Share Program.
And perhaps what would be easiest is because your list is comprehensive and Council Members Rule and Mang cross-pollinated the lists, perhaps what would be the fastest would be just to use this for that voting. Does that make sense?
Sure, that's fine. So, Weston, what we could have Weston do.
Just to say, things have gotten added to the spreadsheet that are not, no, no, no, it doesn't mean that it changes, it means like the, let me see if I have this right. Your 1G is 5, oh yeah, no, okay. So, it's actually, well, you guys consolidated a few things into 1F.
We have the reference now based upon what the Council members provided. So we can probably reverse engineer it. If you want to, just for ease of operation, just prioritize this. That's fine. I think we can go back and
work through that. Or we can prioritize here and do a quick, you know, is it on here? Do we need to take it from here? Did we find it on
here? Number two, that second thing we just did, I think.
Thank you very much.
And Weston, just for your notes, I think we came to the conclusion that number 8 is on there. It's the big sheet 1F. So you can remove 8 from the bottom there, please.
Wonderful. Thanks. I have a couple of comments on what we've just talked about. One is that with respect to a housing trust, I mean, the public needs to know that we don't have one of those. I have a general understanding, but I want staff, and particularly legal counsel, to give us information about, you know, the correct structure for, you know, how does it work well, because normally it's a community working with a non-profit.
And so, you know, part of the plan or program, I think, needs to be the You know, identification of a process and potentially attracting a non-profit to assist us with that. Maybe there's community members who are gung-ho about doing that, which would be a best case scenario. And then my one other comment, and I think this is going to come up two or three times tonight, but we create a commission I think that we need to get a report from staff about the potential composition and the issues and the pros and cons.
and make a decision about, you know, so how are we going to collaborate so that it's our commission as opposed to a runaway commission and that it's providing the most useful information to us and to staff.
My understanding of what Ms. Rule suggested was if that makes the high priority list, that's exactly what staff would bring back is how our commissions, you know, constituted, what would their mandate be, etc.
I think, yeah, there are many housing commissions in all, you know, small, medium, and large towns. So it wouldn't be hard to look at models and look at bylaws and see which one we thought was most effective here. I
think that's
great.
So let me, if I want to build on what you said, If we wanted to vote on those, you know, 1A through 1G, and say, what, one is high priority for you, two is medium, and three is low, if we each did that, how is that, how is that going to work for you, to capture this?
Is this useful? Yeah, I mean, you could just go, yeah, okay, best way to rank them. Yeah, you could do that.
Here's one problem, though. If you
said, hypothetically, you said, they're all important to me, I'm giving them all ones, or all threes.
Well, and then there may be structural things for the for staff in terms of, you know, putting the chicken
before the egg. I have an idea. I have an idea. Why don't you just help us, please, by limiting the priorities. Why don't you just really say, only come up with like three, you can each have three that are your main priorities. Let's do it. Then, you know, we understand they're all important.
Okay. So we take five minutes right now, we pick our top three, and we report them. Okay. Just one for
now.
Because then we'll go to number two and check the
list. And we'll ask you when you're finished so that we can have a prioritized goal, right? Yeah, yeah. Okay, thank you.
1:02 – 1:0977 turns
Give me a thumbs up when you're ready. Okay. Cool. All right. Yeah, I know, right? These are good
ideas. Can we do, like, top tier, second tier? Yeah,
then you get to say one through
seven.
Ready, Mr.
Whitman?
Well, I've got two. I'm not sure about which I'd put third, so if you want to go, then I'll
say my two. Ms. Rule, you want to start? Oh, well, it's all fine.
But I will. Okay. Okay, so number one is 1F, Housing Trust. Number two is Identify Opportunities to Create Workforce Housing, 1E. And number three is Explore Creation of a Housing Commission. So my order is 1F, 1E, and then 1G.
Okay.
Cool, please.
All right. So, uh, one... Weston, are
you ready
for
us? Yeah. Give me just a moment, please. Yep, no problem. And sorry if this is a little rudimentary. No, no, you're doing great. I'm going to write Rule 1, 2, and 3. Yep. Does everyone agree with... Do
we need the number priorities? I don't think so. Yes. Oh, do we?
Yeah, you probably do. I would just do... But you don't know the person. R1, R2, R3. Thank you. Okay. Nice. All right.
Okay.
Okay, mine is, number one is 1F, and number two is 1E, and number three is 1G. Is that the same that you have? Oh my gosh, this is
incredible. So am I. That means we're on to
something. Although I ranked them as like three points, two points, one point instead of like one, two, three, but like that, yeah.
This
is good.
You give me the thumbs up when you're ready.
Okay, I'm ready.
Well, we're just going down the line. I'm waiting for
Wes, I'm sorry.
That's okay. Okay, so it's the same. One F is one, one G is two, and one E is three.
I mean,
that's still top three.
Right, yeah,
yeah, yeah. Got it. Okay. Ready. Yeah, Ms. Mang, please go. We're just going down the line.
Okay, I have, just like Andy, so my number one is F, number two is G, number three is
E. Great. I think we got a winner here. We got some winners. Yeah.
All right. My number one is... Pardon
me, Council Member Whitman. Council Member Mang, your number two was G? Yes. Thank you. And your number three was E? Correct. Thank you. Sorry, Council Member Whitman. Please proceed.
Yeah, my number one is F. My number two is... I've marked up the old numbers, so I've got to find them. What was number two on the It's March 11. It's F. Oh, it's combined within there. All
the financial housing things are in one item.
Okay. So, and then my next is 1E, but it's specific to strategies for partnering with the school district on Workforce Housing at the location they're pursuing.
So that's a subset of E, is that okay?
Yeah, I'm not embracing that universally, I'm embracing it for that specific project. Okay.
And you
have one more vote. Let's see. So it sounds like 8 is also subsumed within 1F? Correct. Yes. All right. Well, those are the ones that I support strongly.
Great.
We've
got a plan.
Great. All right.
Good collaboration, guys. Loving it. Okay, that's really good. So you know those are our priorities and you will come back with options.
Yes, so our direction would be to focus on the priorities for timeline and monetizing.
Lovely. All right. So I'm on goal number two. And so Ms. Mang, do you want to tell us what your list has?
Okay, 2A is number four and two.
Home, Hardening Incentive, and Firewise Community.
Okay. 2C is number nine.
So, wait, what was 2B?
We didn't, it
wasn't on, didn't make the list. 2B or not 2B? Oh, yeah, Shakespeare, love it.
Okay. 2D is number three.
Wait, I'm sorry, 2C was what?
Number nine.
2C with nine. Okay.
2D is number three.
Wait, hold on. Promote participation in VC Alert and promote programs such as Ready, Set, Go. What did you say that was? Nine. So my nine is emergency response training for city staff and officials. Not quite the same thing. But that's okay.
So then that must be different from what our...
Possibly.
This is different from the previous... That's okay. ...full things, but yeah. Okay, no problem. And then we move down to 2H. We have number seven.
So wait, 2D was?
2D was number three.
Okay. All the
way down to 2H, we have number
seven.
2I, we have number 10. 2J, we had 11. And then 2K, we have number one.
Okay.
And 2L we have is number five. So there's only two items off your list that didn't, but are
they
what's
here?
Oh, right. Okay. Right. So let's see.
1:09 – 1:1429 turns
So I guess when we see on our list, on the March 11th list, number six, Land Clearing Implementation Plan, in a way that could be, when we say pursue grants and partnerships, that could fall in that, so it's kind of too high. Pursue wildlife grants, regional partners to further efforts that reduce hazardous conditions and fuel sources.
That's what I was thinking too, that I, the fuel sources would be
landscape or land clearing.
Do
you want to add a note of FAMA including land clearing implementation plan to have it reflected? Sure.
Yeah. Is that going to be recorded, Mayor? On 2I, add.
We just can't hear when you guys are talking, please, guys. Include land clearing implementation after 2I, if that's okay. Like after the period after sources. Or comma, including land clearing. That's good enough, yeah.
So I have a question for my colleagues. If we wanted to put, because there's nothing straight out that says enter into agreement or a proposal to do this. There's, you know, Work with, you know, agencies and things like that and pursue wildfire prevention grants. But I'm wondering if it is possible to add something, you know, something to the effect of, you know, move forward with the Fire Safe Council's proposal.
You know, that would be, I don't know if that's too granular, but that would be something specific and that I would like to vote for. I think it moves, you know, we don't need to discuss why I'd like to vote for it. I have a
suggestion. On 2I, if you said pursue partner agreements for wildfire prevention, grant acquisition, to further reduce hazardous conditions fuel sources including land. So I would be changing a little bit about 2i in the beginning to say pursue a partnership. That would work for me. And then grant is one of the things they're doing.
Can I add one more thing to that too? So their proposal also includes 2a. So that, I mean, and a couple of these other bullet points, too. So if we were to add that language to 2i, we could add 2a down there.
Bring the language from 2an to 2i. Yep. Does that make
sense?
Mr. Montgomery, are you getting
that?
I would
write it
as add
all language from 2A to 2I.
And 2F too, because they also include, not city infrastructure, but their proposal also includes fire hardening, Support and Volunteer Training and things that would include 2F as
well. So do we first of all have agreement to bring 2A and 2I? Because what I would suggest is we just would do a strike through on 2A and just copy Copy the language, put it into the cell with 2i, after you've done that, then do a strikethrough in 2a because you no longer have that separate one, you've now folded it into 2i. I agree. If you guys are okay with it. Excuse me, if the Council is okay with
it. Yeah, yeah. So, I do have a concern that we're soul sourcing without giving... Hold
off, Weston.
You know, without giving anybody an opportunity to say, hey, we can do this better and cheaper. So, I think we should be moving quickly towards, you know, getting a program, but I don't think we can say, hey, let's do this with FireSafe Council until we hear what other people, once we say, hey, we're going to do this, we're going to devote, you know, whatever, hundreds of thousands of dollars to it, There may be lots of people who would ask to be a participant in that and we should not foreclose that by picking one contractor without having ever even identified what our plan is and what we
need to work for. I hear part of what you're saying, but part of me said that none of this is brand new. And in a way, I personally do see the Fire Safe Council as being uniquely qualified in that way, and I haven't heard from anybody else at all.
But I think
wasn't there
some work with Mr.
Roper
a while ago?
1:14 – 1:2014 turns
Well, I know that after the Thomas Fire, that there was a grant opportunity to remove, you know, the most flammable trees from the most serious areas, and there was a different contractor that was hired over Fire Safe Council, so somebody thought that there was somebody else Qualified who could do it better, and we should at least look at what, you know, give people the opportunity.
So I have a couple of points to make on that. One is the Fire Safe Council is uniquely qualified. There's, and for the fire hardening that you're discussing, There were two proposals put in, and one of them, the Fire Safe Council, and simply Ojai doing business as fire hardening put in another, and the way that they got that was that the people giving the grants said they never received the Fire Council's proposal.
So, I think, you know, let's really be clear on what that actually was. I don't want to get into an argument about it, but we do also need to be accurate as to what happened with that situation.
I don't want to fight about things that aren't in front of us right now, so we're talking about principles at the
moment. And I was just going to say that if we, so let's, we're going to bring back This topic of conversation, the proposal from Fire Safe Council, there will be a public discussion about that subject specifically. But I think it's safe for us for this conversation to say in 2I, pursue wildfire, pursue collaborations or partnerships with agencies to help reduce hazardous conditions in fuel sources, including land clearing implementation and create Help Create, Educational Outreach Program, Regarding Defensible Space and Home Hardening
Measures.
Is it possible for the City to put out a request for a proposal and what would that timeline actually be? Because what we're trying to avoid here is this, you know, we're in the middle of fire season. We've gone through two fire seasons. We have a full-blown proposal by, you know, an organization that most of us feel are uniquely qualified. So, what would a timeline be for putting out a proposal? We can also vote on a particular proposal. That's also an option.
I think it's realistic that you could have as a concept review item at your July meeting something like that. And we could, if we made headway at that meeting, we could in July put something out. And then usually with an RFP or an RFQ, you normally have at least a 30-day window for a response, often more, but that's usually what we do.
I'm, I mean, the fire's so close to us. My watch duty is going off right now as we're talking about this. I think this is something that we want to speed up. So if, I mean, if it's possible to even, I mean, we can talk about having a special meeting, because I do, I do, I really, I hear your point about having other, other possibilities or having other proposals. and at the same time I feel every day that goes by and the weather is hotter and it's drier, everyone gets nervous.
I do want to hear from all viable parties. My hunch is we're probably going to vote for them from what I'm hearing right now, so I don't want to delay it too long. So if we held a special meeting, I would want to do that as soon as possible, that other people could weigh in. But again, it would have to be something quite extraordinary from what we're already seeing. And
do you think this would be a good opportunity to, like the previous goal, is to include community members? This is a big topic.
This community member would be, I'm saying in that sense, well, two parts. One is to have a long, a big conversation about the general plan. What we're hearing from the community, at least what I'm hearing, is to engage with the fire safety. I'm not hearing engage with anybody else, personally. But then secondly, I think on the staffing question that we heard, that we have some shortcomings. We have to engage with community partners. So I'm hearing that in that sense, too.
So perhaps we have a special meeting and we can listen and take a vote. I mean, let's listen to the community. Let's listen to the Fire Safe Council. Let's listen to anyone who does not support that proposal and what they would otherwise support. I feel a real sense of urgency. We all feel a great sense of urgency.
It is the one
thing that can wipe out the town.
1:20 – 1:2645 turns
And I would also say that if anyone's listening to this and you have the capabilities of offering similar services, reach out to staff. It's not that we're closed off to others, it's that we have something right in front of us that's comprehensive, that if we were to say, let's go, they would be ready to roll with it and they have the expertise to do that.
So I could offer you another option, because, you know, we've got the Fourth of July holiday coming up, you've got the budget adoption. I mean, if you were okay, we could, it would be tight, we could create a concept review item to discuss this at your meeting on the 24th, but I won't be able to publish it Thursday morning. It would come out late in the day on Friday.
or maybe even Saturday morning. So it's contrary to what you want with your agenda publishing, but you can't, you know, we can't do both things.
I would be willing to push the agenda going, coming out early Thursday, another agenda cycle in order to get this done.
Okay, so could we have the grace to possibly go as late as, I mean, we always are in compliance with the Brown Act, always, always, but with agenda publishing particularly, but it might be as late as Saturday morning. Wesson, I'm not going to do that to you, but it'll help you. I would vote for that. Me too. Okay, so we're reversing course a little bit here in this next packet. The city clerk's office can't adjust. Okay, city attorneys, I appreciate the
flexibility. Thank you, Mr. Weston. Very flexible, no
problem. It seems that that move, thank you for squeezing in, it actually checks several of these goals, as we pointed out, so it makes this prioritizing a little bit easier.
Okay, all right, so thank you. And
I just want to apologize for bringing up past stuff. There's no reason to do it. Yeah,
I mean, there's no reason to do it. Yeah, we've got it. No, no problem. No problem. Okay, so everything else seems to have made the list if I did my
Mayor, stop me if I'm going in the wrong direction. Council Member Mang, on our first goal, we are going to add items that were not on the March 11th list. For the second goal, are we adding any items from March 11th that are not on the list?
The only one that I don't have, eight from your list. So I think eight
was actually 2A. Well, it's
2A folded into I. Oh, we
did put
it into I, okay. It's 2I now. Yeah, I think that's
how
it is.
No,
good,
good. You're being
conscientious.
So on the very bottom here, are we adding anything from March 11th? No, everything's there. I'll delete that. Yeah. Okay, thank
you.
So, now we do our take our five minutes and vote. Can we,
sorry, I just want to make sure here. Wesson, could you please, okay, I can't see it. Could you read back what 2I is now? Yes,
and I'll start with
this. Maybe you can just expand the screen if you, of course, and then Council can look at that. Maybe not, maybe, sorry.
No, that's good. Can
everybody read that? Pursue, with the addition of Mayor Gilman, partner agreements regarding wildfire prevention grants in cooperation with providers slash regional partners to further efforts that will reduce hazardous conditions and fuel sources, this is an addition, and include land clearing.
It looks like pursue agreements with partners to get grants, but grants is just one of the items among the many items. So sorry if I misspoke there. So it would be pursue partnership agreements in cooperation with provider regional partners to further efforts. And grants is just one of the pieces down below. So I wouldn't put wildfire grants first in cooperation with. Does that make sense what I'm saying?
No. Okay. It looks like it's saying pursue partner agreements in cooperation with wildfire prevention grants in cooperation with provider regional partners. It's pursue agreements with partners to further efforts, reduce hazardous conditions, land clearing, get grants. So grants is just among the list of things after regional partners. So I think it
You could cut wildfire prevention grants, that
phrase,
and then move it into the list.
And also G partner agreements in cooperation with you could, I don't know why that's parenthetically even there at all. It's a
change that you made. I think he was trying to notate.
Pursue cooperation, or pursue with, pursue,
yeah, pursue partner agreements and cooperation with providers, regional partners, to further efforts that will reduce hazardous condition, comma,
and fuel sources is right, reduce hazardous conditions. And fuel
sources, including land clearing and grants.
and Grant Acquisition. Well, we're like wordsmithing this thing.
It's really just
a list. There's no
hierarchy. I was trying to cut it into a list.
But if we're going to vote, we want to make
sure this is what you guys want it to be. Let me paste this back in. Yeah, that's good. And include land clearing. How does that look?
1:26 – 1:3035 turns
After land clearing, you could have comma educational outreach programs. Isn't that in the... Well, you're pulling from 2A, but you can delete the 2A and just have Educational Outreach Programs is just among the list. Basically, it's covering the pieces that their proposal have included.
Yes.
Cool.
Okay, so just
read it one more time. To I, pursue partner agreements in cooperation with providers slash regional partners to further efforts that will reduce hazardous conditions and fuel sources. Wildfire prevention grants include land clearing, educational outreach program regarding defensible space and home hardening measures and provide assessment tools.
Did we get everything? Okay, thank you, Leslie.
And also, just a little thing with your, you're saying you're used item number 4, 2, 10, and 8, and also 6 is a part of
2I
as well.
Thanks. Thank you. And I'll clean this up a little further afterwards.
Cool. Nope, that's good. Okay, so now we're gonna vote. Oh wait,
sorry. Can I do one more thing? Yeah. Can we merge 2C and 2D? Yep. So they both fall under the category of communication?
They're in communications,
right.
Alert systems?
I'm totally for
that. Okay. So in the combination, would it just be explore feasibility and cost to implement local warning systems, such as warning sirens, reverse 911, backup systems for communication, VC alert, and
ready,
set, go?
I mean, VC Alert exists. It's on. When you're waiting to log in to one of the commission or whatever, it's like there. VC Alert. So, I don't know what more we can do, but You know, the program exists, and we should certainly encourage people.
Yeah, I think that's part of it. I mean, when I look at that, I think if we're... I can make it easy
if you want. This is a simple copy and paste, actually. Just copy C, put it at the end of D, because they're related, but different. You're trying to promote participation, so it's a separate sentence. Yes, so just cut 2C, put it at the end of 2D, do a strikethrough on 2C, and then you've got all of it there. It's two separate sentences.
You want to make every vote count, huh? So you're trying to get as many into one thing as you can.
Exactly, because all goes into communication, which I value highly.
You're right. Yes, that has been completed, except... Okay, so now, but you've crossed out 2D. It's been added to the... So do the reverse. So get rid of 2C. We're keeping 2D, but get rid of 2C. I understand that the numbers are gonna change again, but just... So I don't get confused with my notes. Sorry, give us a moment,
Council. That's
good.
Yeah, thanks, man.
There
we go. Okay. It's okay. You've got them both. Now you have 2C in 2D. That was the main part. The words are all there. You can put it at the end if you want. That's fine too. Completed. There we go.
Thanks.
All right. Okay. Okay.
All
right.
Okay, take five minutes.
1:31 – 1:3732 turns
And certainly feel free to say no. Can I add a phrased 2E? No? Okay. What would it be? It would be including but not limited to alternative building materials. But I'm okay with just having that assumed
as we do it. The alternative building materials is in the climate mitigation.
Okay.
All good
then.
Okay.
Can I add something to 2E perhaps? Evaluate building and planning standards instead of just building standards?
I mean that's, I would have had that in the same thought, but building and planning standards is what you want it to be. Are they
the same?
No. Okay. I would agree with you that for staff's purposes, they will understand the building as the building part of the Muni Code. The planning part of the code is a different part of the code. They're
two different codes, yeah. Fine
with
me. Okay.
Thank you. Sorry, do we have any action based upon this last interchange here with
Planning Standards, if there are three that agree. Yeah. Okay.
And planning. Okay. Thanks. Sorry. Thank you. Yeah. Mr. Montgomery, you got that? Yes. Okay. Thank you. Thank
you. Ready to go?
Ready to go.
Ms. Langlois, you start this time.
Okay, this one was really hard. I have a number of scratches. Can I have like a 1A, 1B? Okay, so my number one is going to be 2D. And it was a very close tie with 2I. So, 2I. And then, The last two, it was really between 2K and 2L, but I ultimately went with 2L because that's something that is more of a long-term initiative that if we start now, future councils won't have to deal with. So just making a case of 2L is my number three.
Got it. Ready. I'm cheating a little bit because 2I is my number one, 2D is my number two, and the reason I didn't pick 2K is because I'm hoping that it's going to fold into 2I, so 2L is my number three. Thank you.
Got it. Ready?
Okay, I have my number one is 2I, number two is 2D, and three is 2K. All right,
so mine are, so 2I got modified a lot, but I would put as number one, identifying You know, those measures that we feel we need to take as a city to reduce fire and then, you know, how do we implement that. So I'll just vote for 2I, but my number two, I'm solely voting for the, the only one voting for this. I think that 2H is really important. And it's really, and it's really simple. And then I think my, Third would be 2D. The idea of a siren system, primarily.
2H is a close one for me too, so I bet it will come up soon. Yeah, luckily. Yes. Ms. Rule. So, 2I is
number one, and 2D is number two. CD, whatever, whatever number we, 2D is number two. And then I was going to go for 2E, but I think that I can back channel that. So and it's also in the other part of it is in another goal. So I am going to go with 2L as my number
three. Wow. That's pretty good. Recorded. Thank you.
Great, so just to recap on the last two goals, we have three, we have clear consensus on what our top priorities are with this council. Okay, thank you.
All right, 7.30, all right, we're doing good. So looking at your list now for goal number three, Arts, Culture, and Recreation Funding.
Okay, 3A we have is seven.
Nonprofit Summits, 3A you have as number 7. The number 7 at least from March 11th was Nonprofit Summits with Local Partners.
That's okay. That's okay. 3B for 7.
1:37 – 1:4561 turns
Thank you very much.
I think it's two.
Yeah,
the cultural contribution of looking to put money to the Arts Commission.
And so
it may, I believe it also, I'm looking for it.
Number two from March 11th is 3A and 3K. It's 3A and 3K. Got it.
Right. Okay. 3C, we have number 10.
3C, number 10, yep, okay.
3D, we have, we felt that it was 3, 8, and 13.
Okay, well, yeah, okay, Creative Capital Campaign, so it'd be just specific to the pool, though, right? So you're saying 3D, or which
one? 3D, we thought it could go into those three categories of 3, 8, and 13.
Well, I think it's 8 for sure, right, clearly. The problem with 3 is that one's so broad. Because that would be all the new opportunities that the Parks and Rec Commission would be doing. So it's one of the things they would do.
Okay, so we'll take 3 off?
Maybe. Yeah, but definitely 8. And which other one did you say? 13. 13. Yeah.
I'm recording 8 and 13 for 3D.
Well, 13's multi-generational activities, including community choir, that's not 3D. Yeah, I don't think so.
That's, yeah, that's different than the pool. The pool is a real specific. So that
must have been a different, okay.
That's okay, but we've got it. So we got, yeah, 8 for sure. It's 8 for sure. Okay, cool. And then
dog park. 3E, we had number 9. Correct, yep. F, we had 12 and 11.
Oh, yes, right, 12, but then 11, oh, the community mural, I wasn't sure if that was the one that's supposed to be here or not, but definitely 12 is right.
Okay, and then 3H, we had number five. 3I, we had number four. 3J, we had six. And 3K, we had two.
Yep.
So 1, 3, and 14 are what we didn't have.
1 is number, is 3B.
3B, okay.
Yeah, 3B is 1. And then the Established Parks and Rec Commission is actually accomplished.
Oh, right.
You know, the 13 could go under 3B, so establish a cultural arts roundtable with local partners. I mean, we could just leave out 13, and the arts roundtable could come up with their own ideas of what would best be needed.
Yep. So the only one I wasn't sure about now left is 11, we had, what came up on the list hearing people talk was community mural, different than the mural here. But, I don't, it wasn't me, so I don't know who brought it up. I
brought up the mural here.
Yes,
and the mural here is... I don't remember the community mural.
Okay, well fair, we can leave that one off then, I guess. If you guys are cool with that.
Was there a location that was specified? Just...
I just looked at the end product and saw the list, and I transcribed the list. I didn't listen to the entire conversation about the causes.
I think what was, I think what was, it was like a welcoming mural, or from what I remember, there is this, this one was different. Yeah. But it was having, really establishing, like when you come in town, you know this is an arts community.
Okay. Pardon
me, Mayor.
Yeah. Can you please, is there action for the mural?
No. We're saying that from the March 11th, number 11, community mural didn't make it to the spreadsheet, but maybe it
need not.
Thank you.
Here's a question. If something like the mural in Kent Hall is already, if certain people, members of the community are already talking about that and it's, if we don't vote on it as one of our top priorities, can we still bring it forward as an item?
Of course, but what we're going to try to do is, especially the smaller things, we're going to introduce goal alignment on the agenda reports, and we're going to ask every report to align with the goal. They're not always going to, but we're going to try. But you guys have the ability to bring forward whatever you want. That's your
role.
Yeah, because it seems in these there are some that are very big and some that are, I mean, very general, very big, and some that are very specific and
smaller
or
bigger. Plant, don't plant list on the last goal is probably something that we can just take care of and move forward.
Well, there's probably one out there somewhere.
I guarantee my wife probably has one of those. From a local community that's got the same kind of plan.
It goes to your point about saying some things are going to be very long and difficult, but important to start. Some things are sort of the quick hits. So I'm hoping we can get a sense of our capacity, you know, and see, oh yeah, these are fast things that could actually be accomplished in one conversation. We shouldn't lose sight of those. But the important
thing is really just to focus on the priorities, because that's what you guys want to move forward first. No, of
course. But we won't, these won't go away.
We've learned our lesson, nothing falls on the
editing room floor. Okay, sounds good. Alright, so do we feel ready to make some voting now? Okay.
Well, I have a couple of comments. Oh sure, go. And maybe these are along the lines of consider not voting for this. I think that the I don't know what the organization is called, but they have run our 4th of July for a long time, and I don't want to step on their toes. I think we can, you know, liaison with them, encourage them to move programming in a certain way, but I would hesitate to dictate to the current group who's doing that.
It's also my understanding that we are well into discussing with the school district an agreement related to the use of that swimming pool they're
building.
So I would hesitate to start a Thank you very much.
1:45 – 1:5250 turns
Right, so I'll just say, I think that, you know, a shared use in discussion with a smaller pool at a school is not the same as a
community
pool.
Everybody's going to express their priorities by their voting.
Yes.
Right. One quick question though. The CalifVista Park that got brought up in a couple of public comments, does that need to be an item here or is that an expectation that that's more like when we look at the budget in general that we can reconsider that? I'm asking
Mr. Chair. So with that one, I would probably recommend that you make that one a tactic simply because it's going to involve Money, it's going to involve a proposal, it may even involve an MOU. I'm not, I mean, it's something we, you know, we will do, definitely, but there are some parts to it.
So might I add then a 3L, Clef Vista Park Maintenance, or something like that? Sure. Okay.
Would that not fall under 3K in some way? I mean, that's a very broad consideration, 3K, and 3L is a very specific.
Yeah, with due respect, I see 3K and 3L a little bit different. Okay. If you guys are okay with that.
Well, and then the 3K is, I don't know that it would make it, but let's say, hypothetically, it does make it. It becomes this kind of pool from which we then prioritize these kinds of things, it seems to me so. But I don't know if it's going to make the cut or not. So, Clough Vista Maintenance, we'll just add as 3L for now, if that's okay? All right.
Me that if 3K did make the cut, that 3A would go into 3K.
That would have to be determined, yes, agreed. That's why in the original March 11th, they were one item.
I like the idea of combining them into one. gives me an extra vote.
Yeah,
exactly.
Council's okay with that? I don't
know. So the original, the original March 11th item was Ojai Cultural Contribution, annually 1 15th of the TOT, dedicated to non-profit applicants influenced arts, culture, recreation, and tripling the Arts Commission grant funding with cost sharing from hotels. That was intended to say that 1 15th TOT that the Arts Commission grant increase came out
Which is fine.
Yeah. I mean, that was the intention. That's how I remember the whole conversation as well.
Well, I'm happy to have it be the way. Yep. Okay. Well, are we okay with that?
So I have a question. Can we put the community pool in 3K?
Well, that's what I'm saying, though, is that we're not going to determine what goes into 3K yet. It's that we're basically saying we have a priority of one-fifteenth of the TOT would be a fund that we would then evaluate projects and get proposals from.
For we are putting the arts grant program.
That would be the one
exception.
But that's maybe a logic for keeping it separate.
So I would just really, I understand you guys are jockeying for votes on items, but keep the tactics very specific. That's the idea, because they're supposed to support the goal and be clear, you know, as to what's happening with each, like, oh, that's what we're supposed to do.
So I can, and so maybe this, here's a suggestion. Keep 3A and 3K separate. 3k though it's it's meant to reflect what the council used to have which was you'd have this annual period where nonprofits would make applications and and that kind of notion so it's trying to resurrect that which is what this council did in the past something like that
Thank you all for joining
us.
Yeah, and it's very specific, and I would like to not not have to vote for it, but, you know, I might not not have to vote for it. That's a lot of double negatives there. I know, so you just figure out where that goes. I did have one question. Oh, I wanted to talk about 3G because, as I recall, didn't we have the people who put on the fireworks show come and say that they were very into doing a drone show, but that they couldn't do it this year? Didn't we have those people?
I didn't hear it that way.
I did. Did I hear that incorrectly?
That's
what I remember. Two of
them
came. Yeah, they met with me a couple times. What I took from it was, you know, we obviously know this year is already set and they purchased it. They said that they were receptive to the idea, but they were concerned about the costs. And so that's what I got from them about it.
I got that they were concerned that if they were to go to Drone, they would lose their provider who does the fireworks. That too. That's what I remember them being specifically concerned about. So, if you're going, go strong. And the
cost was an issue they did bring up,
right?
That we would absorb the
cost. We would absorb the cost, right? The city would participate in the cost of that. Okay.
Okay, so before we vote, is there somebody who can explain 3B to
me? The intention with that was that in the same way that we would engage with the community with panels and things like that, that we could have some Roundtables where artists could come together with a council person that could understand needs from the arts community hearings. It's almost like a more specific business grouping that we're hearing directly from folks. So that was the intention there.
It could also just be widely public, but I was thinking of a way that artists in our community could explain, here's what we're facing, our needs. Even things like when we hear about outdoor markets, When we hear from the vendors themselves, it opens my eyes sometimes to things I didn't understand. So it'd be a place for looking at that.
I'm gonna throw something else out there if you like. This might, maybe you could have your cake and eat it too. Usually we deal with our advisory boards bubbling information up to you. They're making recommendations. You can direct them to take something on. Of course. You could ask the Arts Commission to explore this.
Yeah. Yeah, that's a great idea. Yeah. And
I think when I read that, I was thinking in terms of what, of community input on what they wanted to see from the city and how they wanted to see us support, give us input on how to support the
arts.
I see that. I wasn't thinking of it that way, but that's interesting too.
1:52 – 1:5726 turns
I'm just wondering, too, with extending the bike path, should we elaborate more on that, like, you know, checking for partnerships? Because that's going to be very pricey.
So what I'm seeing on my list is extend bike path to Soule Park with county partnership. There is
a cross-reference
to 4G, which is Explore a Land Use Agreement with County regarding the Ojai Bike Trail to include a maintenance program.
So, my understanding is that the bike path to Soule Park has a, and this is past history, is that the expense of building a bridge over the river has been an impediment. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean we shouldn't Go through the exercise of getting the information that this is how
much,
and you know, maybe the community comes out and says they want us to spend
it. No, it's just that. It's finding out what does the design look like, what does it cost, how long will it take, and then we decide it's too much, or it's great, let's do it. Yep. Okay. We're voting now. This isn't the time for that, I'm sorry. Anita. I'm sure everybody feels their input's important. So hold on, let's see. Last one's up. Give me
a thumbs up when
you're ready to
go.
Is Willie ready? I am. Okay. Okay, I'll start since we're just taking turns going
down. Sorry about that.
No, no, no worries. Sorry, I missed it. Number one, increase funding for the arts grant program. Got that, Mr. Montgomery?
Please use the
letter. 3A. Thank
you. 3A,
and the number two is 3K. And then three is 3I. Bike paths. Thank you. Ready. Ms. Mang, do you need a minute? Yes. Okay, Mr.
Whitman? Yeah, 3I, because it comes up repeatedly. With the different projects, I think we need to look at it, let the community know what's going on there. I'm going to say 3F, because that was my proposal. and then three, oh, the new one, looking at, I wrote it down as Clough Vista Management. Okay, yep, great. That's my number three.
Okay,
great. That would be 3L. I wrote it as Clough Vista Park Maintenance. Yeah,
yeah,
okay, great.
Ready
now? Okay, yes. Number one is I, number two is F, and number three is K.
Okay.
1:57 – 2:179 turns
Ready? Okay. Yes, please.
Okay, so, just, I think, Number one is create a capital campaign for a community pool at
Seoul.
3D. Sorry about that. Two is 3K because I, for me, 3A and 3L are part of that. So I would further break that out. And then number three is 3H. No, I'm sorry. It's 3I. This one was really hard because some of them were so broad and some of them were so specific, and it seemed crazy to go with a dog park, you know, over, like, money for everything in the, you know, everything that needs it, right? Anyway, so this one was particularly tricky for me.
Okay, so my number one is 3A. Number two is 3I. And then I was going to do 3K and 3L, but they're already mentioned, so I'm just going to say 3J was the other one I had tied for.
So you don't have the slam dunk that you
had? No, well, 3i is, I'd say it looks like 3i and 3k. Am I getting that correctly? And then I think 3, yeah, then 3a and 3f are tied. I mean, we could just, we could just bring back one through four here and just, you know. Do it. Yeah, let's just, if that's okay, we'll have four in this one. Okay, great. Make it easy.
Cool.
Okay, so this is good. We're at 8 o'clock. Let me check in with everybody so we can take a break and then think about, do we want to proceed? Do we want to stop for now? There's some low-hanging fruit. I'm sure all of us would love to forward, but maybe it's time or not, but let's take a break and then we'll come back and take a plan. Check, check, check. Hello everybody, welcome back.
All right, so here's what I want to ask my colleagues here. Okay, so it's 8.15. We can obviously, we can try to tackle one or two more of these guys. We can stop. We can, I know we, there's some things that we know are low-hanging fruit that we would like to move forward. Maybe that's, we could spend half an hour on that. I'm open to suggestions. What do you have the appetite for?
2:17 – 2:2640 turns
I'm good with moving forward. Let's, let's get a, maybe we get, Two more? I mean, they're going pretty fast.
No? Okay. I'm down for whatever. I'm hydrated, I'm caffeinated. It's not a no from me. We're here, and I don't have a vote. I'm, yeah, serving your
pleasure. I just wanted to follow up and understand if we did one or two more. So if we did, yeah go ahead. I'm happy to go at this for another hour or so.
I would suggest, yeah, I think in an hour, we could do four, Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvement, and then five, Public Safety. But then, I would say that we then leave March 11th, and we now are on to just the spreadsheet, where we get to Diversifying the Economy has more to talk about, and then the Climate Mitigation and Resiliency has another. A lot of some conversations that probably won't be for tonight. So, maybe we can tackle in two more, but then, I know we're talking about having all these things adding to the agenda, but we do want to come back and then do the other ones in not too long of a time.
This might not be popular, but you don't have to take a recess in July.
We also could have another special meeting. I mean, if they're not painful, then it's easier to have them more frequent. You know, honestly. That's true. Shorter, you know, come in, do the work, and leave, I think, is a reasonable, also a reasonable option.
You're probably running out of time for the near future, right? Because you've got the 4th of July holiday, and people tend to be gone, or whatever. Yours truly will not be around during that week, but, you know, July?
So, I'd say that we have July 8th. Our meeting is scheduled on July 8th, but then
I'm out of town the 14th,
15th.
But I could do that following
week. July 1st would
be Tuesday.
I won't be there, and I know the City Attorney is going to be, the Assistant City Attorney I think will be here, but yeah, I won't
be there. Yeah, don't go anywhere.
You're gone when?
I'm gone the 14th through the 19th.
Okay.
And it's a work thing.
Yeah, no, no, of course. And then, so then, and will you suggest, and you're gone on the 22nd? Or you're gone after
that? Of June or? July. No, July, I'm, you have me that month, I'm
around. Okay. Okay.
Yeah, so I think, I was just, so it sounds like the Mayor Pro Tem is out of the picture on the
15th. Unfortunately, I can't.
But the 22nd or the 29th, if the Council would want to do that. I can do the 22nd and I can do
the 29th. Well, let's have the 22nd, yeah. Is that okay with you guys? Well, so
my thought is that, so the 22nd would have been, The 22nd would have been the meeting that we've told people you're not, so there may be people who, and I gotta consult with somebody about whether, you know, plans have been made. In fact, I was just thinking about that today. But the 29th would not be Something that anybody expected to have. So I'd propose the 29th, or I'd prefer the 29th to the 22nd for the reason that we've kind of told people they weren't going to have to
be here on the 22nd. Okay,
so we're going to have a goal meeting on the 29th is what I'm hearing. Whatever we don't finish this evening will be picked up then.
And there's going to be another one after that.
Maybe. We'll see. Maybe. Likely. Yeah. But OK, good. All right, Mr. Montgomery, OK, thank you. Thanks.
Um, can I bring up one thing too? Just, uh, there was, there was a question about the, if we go back to the, the fire, uh, proposal, the Fire Safe Council proposal, um, there was some confusion about that. I just wanted to, to bring it up just for the record to say what our intentions are for the meeting on the 24th. Um, I just, what, what was your understanding of that?
So what I thought council told me to do was bring back a concept review item for the development of an RFQ or an RFP in relation to the items. Well, I do want to meet with a lot of you, all of you individually on this, I think, but I mean, taking items from goal number two, and basically asking organizations and or companies and or agencies to respond and provide the following services or provide a proposal for the following services. That's what I was envisioning because I think that's what I was hearing is there was a desire for the Council to develop the menu of things that they would like to be addressed. I think that's what
I'm hearing. My understanding of that agenda item would be that we would take the proposal that was created and have a concept review based on that proposal. I did not hear that. Okay, I'm glad we're clarifying this.
I certainly, you know, it could be part of the packet. It's their material, their proposal, so I don't think I'd feel good bringing it in as my agenda item and saying, hey, you know, pick this apart or whatever. I mean, it could be
I was thinking of it maybe slightly between the two, meaning we've set out to say we have some of these goals and we know we need an education piece, we know we need a plan for removing fuels, we need an education part and so on. I mean, if we could hear proposals at the next possible meeting, that's what I would love to see, because it feels like we're kind of wasting time in a
way. You probably won't hear proposals, right? Because if other groups are looking for this type of thing, it's not going to be We haven't posted it somewhere on a list serve or a message board or the logical place where you put your RFPs, RFQs for response. This is just a general report. And because you haven't taken action, some groups are going to be reticent to submit because they're, well, you know, I don't know if the council is going to do this or not. They're going to talk about it. Why would I submit something?
And I think we have to discuss a scope of what the city is going to undertake, which a substantial part of it is private property. So, you know, we have to discuss what we're going to say. Hey, we want to promote these programs. We need to talk about what the extent of those programs.
See, I would say this is where I feel like we can just, we could spend months talking about the things you're talking about right now, where it seems to me what we know is To have a plan that every neighborhood starts to become fire-wise, for example, we know we want it, and neighborhoods are already doing it. We don't have the capacity necessarily in the city staff to do it, but we do have it in our non-profit partners. So then I would say, we should be talking about the larger plan, meaning short, medium, and long-term on the fire mitigation, but I guess I think my expectation is we have this very robust proposal that already meets several criteria. So if we spend months talking about what are we talking about, about which fire loads and all that kind of stuff.
Here's another thought. All right, how about this? You have a concept review item where you have a choice. You could either, I mean, you could do a number of things, but the recommendation would be either direct staff to develop a scope for an RFQ or an RFP based upon council discussion, or Thank you. Thank you.
2:26 – 2:3233 turns
I prefer that as the staff report. So that way, if there is a majority decision to move forward with it, we don't lose any time. Because we're already, I mean, if we're talking about the going dark in July and August, the two meetings, Then it puts us back well into fire season to be moving forward with some of the proposed suggestions or the proposals that we want to implement. So does that sound? So the staff report would say Would offer us the recommendation of either... Come up
with your own menu or take this item that's already been submitted and either accept it in its entirety or pick from it for what you
want. And we would get public input and we'd be able to, you know, we would be able to get public input about that proposal specifically or about any other
options. And regardless of what, like, okay, so no matter what you do, you are providing direction, but you would still need to If you decided to go with the Fire Safe Council, there would be a subsequent item where you would have to approve the contract, right? I don't, well, I mean, you could.
Wouldn't at the first meeting you're talking about, if we hypothetically said we're going with the Fire Safe Council, we're directing you to negotiate a contract with them to
come back? You could do that, yes. Yes, you could do that.
Okay. Good. I'm glad we clarified that. Me too.
I mean, one of your members is not present for this discussion, but I mean, I think I feel comfortable having options for you guys that I think have kind of caught what I'm hearing from all sides, I think.
Okay. Yeah.
So.
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. Thank
you. Sure. And Weston, I'm going to probably lean on you to help me as I put this together to make sure I get it correct. Thank you.
Thanks for doing that. Moving on to number four, Infrastructure Maintenance and Improvement. Okay, what do you
got? Number A, we had two. Yep. B, we were questioning if it's number one.
No.
Okay.
Sorry, Council Member, do you want me to provide some clarification? I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm looking at the wrong list. Forgive me, forgive me, forgive me. Give me a moment, sorry.
No,
it's not, too. Okay, so, the pavement condition index is the state of the roads, and the thought is, that's part of our problems in Ojai, is that the state of the roads are so bad that the pavement condition index is very low, and if you're paving more frequently, maintaining your index is going to be, okay.
So, this is what's interesting. So, number one, advancing the road paving timeline, I see how that turned into 4B, possibly. The intention was just an idea, which was that I had mentioned sometime before. If the money's there, and if the contractor resource is there, could we accelerate the timeline so it's, we're paying in our next cycle, we have double, whatever, pick the number, some double, extra amount of work that you're paying for now that you were gonna pay for the year after, the year after that anyway.
But if I could, Mayor, I think, you know, your goal is to improve the road. So rather than just saying I want to speed up the program, what you're really wanting to do is you want to improve, you want to improve the roads, right?
This actually would be under, it's more like financial stability. So it was trying to say, how could we save money? Again, just researching, not doing. If we accelerated the road paving timeline and we saved money over the longer term, does that make sense? So I thought
that... Pave more now so that the conditions are improved so that when you go to repave them, they're not in such deplorable state. Yes?
Or, you know that you're going to pave a certain number of streets in the next fiscal year. If you were to add 20% more and do them this year, you're paying this year's rates instead of two years' rates. Now, there's going to be logistics, though, that Ms. Palmer is going to know. She's going to say, oh, here's why it's a problem or whatever. It's just asking the question.
Okay,
so
I think both of those things that have been communicated are Should be goals, I
suppose.
Both the idea of can we accelerate our program and what would that entail, but also are there efficiencies around scheduling that would make sense to move it forward on a situational basis.
And again, maybe there's probably facts that we don't know. And we'll say, oh, this is why we can't do that, which is okay.
But it sounds like maybe you're also asking for a white paper of sorts almost, right? Is this possible, less so than, I mean, is that, am I understanding that part right?
I think possibly, so it would be, again, it would be having Ms. Palmer here saying, well, if you had a contractor who had the capacity to say, yeah, we could do 25% more now, how would that work in the general plan? So it's a research project, I
guess.
2:32 – 2:3851 turns
So, I mean, if you wanted to say, it could be a 4I, advanced road paving timeline to reduce expenditure, you know, overall expenditure, whatever.
Just a research. Oh, I'm sorry. Or I. Right, right. Mayor, do you mind restating that?
Research advancing road paving timeline to reduce expenditure. Or reduce expense, that'd be better. Again, not do, just research.
Research advancing road paving timeline to reduce expenditures.
Mm-hmm.
Okay. Weston, you, Mr. Montgomery, you good with that? Okay, thank you.
Perfect. Okay, thank you. Okay, 4C we didn't have. Yep. D is.
That's just one of the things that Ms. Palmer said, we have to do this and none of us thought of it on our own. That's
true. 4D, we have
three. Three. Research approaches to provide pedestrian. Okay,
yep. E is five.
Yep.
We don't have F.
Right, same thing.
G is seven. And H, we had four.
Yep.
Thank
you. So
six is not on this
list. Okay, right. City Asset Maintenance Schedule. Right.
So that's in addition to streets we're talking about. I guess so. Buildings and equipment.
Buildings mostly, but yeah. Yeah. And also this is related to, you have your list, but then you, you know, have the The next major improvements that need to be made at each facility and then the estimated investment that it will take. So in other words, you know, this building needs a new roof that's gonna cost $50,000. We've got three more years till we have to do that. This building needs a, you know, panel upgrade that's gonna cost this, and
yeah. We should
have that. So I don't see number three listed on the For, so did
I miss that one? It's 4D. 4D. Research Approaches to Provide Improved Pedestrian Crossings at Arcade in Montgomery. Okay. It's in our CIP budget already. So, let's work. Okay, yep, yep. Okay, great. I'm
thinking this, Leslie, if you recall, F, I wrote on my notes, Ojai Avenue.
Under 4F? Yeah,
does that make?
Yeah, it's, Ms. Palmer brought it up, ATP Phase 2 options for City Council to consider that she's going to bring forward. Okay, perfect, okay.
Yeah, we were.
And that is actually going to happen regardless.
Yep, that was one of the ones we didn't come up with on our own, but needs to be on the list.
and I assume that the 4C stormwater drainage is also going to come up.
You don't have to vote for it. It's going to come no matter what. We're going to do it regardless.
Save your
votes
for last. So, Mr. Montgomery, so 4I you've added. Yes. And then, did we say that it would be 4J City Asset Management Schedule? I can add that. Okay. I think we
did. I think, do we have that? My only question is, I wonder if we have it under financial. Okay. If we do, great. We might. I just need a reminder.
It's similar, complete inventory of equipment and fleet, not exactly the same.
Okay, it just talks about... Oh, well, 8G is actually...
That's what I would say.
Yeah.
Then let's have it stay there.
Thank
you. Okay. I think we got it. Okay.
So I apologize for stepping out, but I do have a quick question. Are just 4D and 4F the only two that are coming up that we don't have to worry about voting
for? 4C. 4C as well. Okay, thank you. No, no, no. 4C. Oh, 4C. 4C and then 4F. For
F. And also, yeah, the pedestrian crossing is in the CIP.
Yeah, so for D, we don't have to vote on it. For D, okay. You guys are taking away my top votes. Well, that means things are going to happen. You can still vote for
them. Okay, true, you can still vote. Okay, so for C, for F, thank you.
Oh, that's great. Okay. All right, let's vote.
2:38 – 2:4638 turns
So just a question then, if we chose to vote for C, D, or F, would it bump them up on the list of priorities?
No, because we actually have a real need to bring you those regardless. We'd be really remiss in our
duties. So, what is proposed with respect to 4G? Because I would understand that the county Owns and Maintains the Trail What are we proposing to add to that scenario?
They would like for us to own and maintain the trail. And so, normally, if you take something over, there's a number of ways that that happens. Usually, the first step has happened. They brought it up to standard, so that has taken place. We need to know what the maintenance of effort is. We need to know if we have the equipment to do that. And then sometimes, when you do these type of interagency agreements, Thank you for watching!
So with negotiating, could you tie in that extending the bypassing part of the negotiation?
If Council directed us to, it all could be included, absolutely.
That's a good idea. It would be
a smart business move. You could tie it together.
I mean, that's why it's cross-referenced with that prior goal.
Yeah, they're motivated to unload that.
Let's talk. Yeah.
Discuss Soule Park with them too. I'd bring it all up. You could. You certainly could. Well, we'll come back to it at some point, I
guess. Yeah. But on a serious note, do you want to wordsmith any of these to reflect what Council Member Mang just said?
Yes.
Okay.
I would.
So 4G, maybe expand that a little bit. Council Member Mang, do you
want to? Yeah, I don't know what the wording, but yeah, definitely put it into negotiations for taking over the trail.
Well, I think I'd keep those issues separate, but they're related, so it makes sense to talk about them at the same time. But they are different concepts. I wouldn't want the breakdown of one negotiation to prevent the other.
So I guess we're asking Ben to use his negotiating skills to bring it in as appropriate or leave it out if it's a deal breaker.
And you know if Soule Park comes up that we're interested in hearing about Soule Park too. Exactly. Thank
you.
Okay. Enter into negotiations. Negotiations with the county.
Okay, so on 4H, This came from somebody else, so I'm probably not going to articulate myself very well, but my understanding is that there is a concept in Public Works, which is a parking study, which is kind of a comprehensive assessment of How parking is being used now? How fully utilized is it? Who's parking? Where? And so, I mean, I'm interested in 4-H if the idea is that we're going to do a parking study and get a whole bunch of detailed information about our parking
issue. I agree. So, my intention with 4-H also is that The Chamber did two traffic studies, but we can gather as much information as we got. For example, one in the Chamber study, they showed that most of the traffic comes in up Montgomery because Google takes people on Creek Road and they come up Montgomery. Then you would say, what are the options we can be looking at to get people out of their cars as fast as possible is what's in, I know, many people's minds. So is it that there are parking lots that are visible and close? Might we investigate those kinds of things?
Oh yeah, great. That's the... No, wonderful, please do. She couldn't help herself. So, I think the intention is data-based and getting our traffic reduced is the real point, right? So, through whatever that means, but say more. You know more than we do about this, right? And then turn your microphone on. Okay,
so we're talking about a lot of things. I probably should have been up here sooner. The parking, honestly, on this list is the least I know about. I don't know what we are doing in terms of that, but we should be doing something.
I remember us this discussion about this and one of the things that we talked about in that as part of this topic in the March meeting was looking at that the school property that the stretch of the property that they have that could be designated as a parking lot so I think
It was
more about looking at the locations that we have. Right now, that we could either contract with the school district or that we could establish a parking lot. So this had more to do with that than it had to do with the study.
So I was thinking, there are some studies already, but that there's, like you said, just looking at the parking prohibition on, you know, in front of Jim and Rob's, that just, why could we change it? The other is the vacant lot by the Arts Center, the other is OUSD. And then the AT&T parking lot behind the museum, just looking at all of those things, or working with the Ojai Valley Inn for what they're going to develop on that front part. Could it be a trolley stop? You know, I mean, just, there's all these things on the list to say, getting people out of their cars faster, I think should be a priority for
us. And a lot of these parking issues will be discussed at least along Ojai Avenue in front of Jim and Rob's when the ATP Phase 2 project comes forward. So a lot of these are very closely tied in together. They really are.
Yeah.
And I have sort of one question. As well as figuring out how to get people out of their cars, is embedded in this figuring out how to get them into Ojai where they want to go without using their cars, i.e., More trolleys, more e-bikes or, you know, rickshaws or whatever. Is that also part of this? Could it be part of
it? It could be. I mean, the other thing that I recall was, you know, you don't charge for parking anywhere. And, you know, that's something that, you know, and you also don't do parking enforcement. I'm sorry, Chief, I know you do a little bit, but I mean, we don't have a dedicated officer that really just only does that. That's right. That's
correct. Okay, I think I understand. I would probably...
But, you know, if I could just jump in one more time, it might have to even start as just a general concept review discussion on parking. What is the Council's appetite? What do you want us to do? And then we can go from there. Because there's a lot of things about parking. I was going
to propose that exact
thing. You know, with a new hotel coming online, your climate's going to change a little bit, and your needs and wants will change, too.
2:46 – 2:5135 turns
So we would change that item to bring forth a concept review.
Maybe give us a menu of the parking-related topics, but that's what I would suggest. You could have this concept review discussion, discussing availability of public parking, Sorry. Wayfinding was one of the other items. Alternate transportation modes. And I don't want to say monetizing. Yeah.
And the trolley's already on number six, by the way. Diversifying the Economy has the trolley on there.
I'd also like to see that. You know, that study that identifies, okay, you know, here's the parking that we have. Who's parking there? Why are they parking? How long are they staying? What stores are they visiting? I understand the Chamber may have done some of that, but I think as part of that, What comes back to us is you could retain this firm to do this type of analysis for you and bring you back
data. Chief, I'm just curious, like when we've had concerts, do you get more calls or more neighbors complaining somebody's blocked my driveway or anything like that? Have you noticed a change?
At least for the last few weeks,
no. That's great. Okay, so we know the item at least, right, to prioritize? Okay, any other need for clarification?
So I'm just sorry, the working title I have is just Parking Concept Review, Multiple Topics. Yep. Is Council okay with that? Yes.
Okay,
Mr. Montgomery, you good with that? Should I proceed
with that exact wording?
I think so.
I think that's good for now because it is multifaceted and we understand there's going to be many aspects to this. Part of it is Literal new parking lots potentially or whatever, more trolleys or whatever, whatever it means. We all know what the goal is.
I'm ready. Okay. I have for my number one, I have G.
Councilor Toon, your microphone, please. Oh, your microphone, yeah.
I'm sorry. So G is my number one, H is two, and I is three. Okay.
Ready. Mr. Whitman, are you ready?
Not ready, but someone else can go.
Okay. Ms. Rule, are you ready?
Yeah, I think I am. Okay. G is my number one, H is my number two, And I am going to go with four as my number three, even though I definitely want to explore water conservation projects. Wait, when you said
four, what's four?
Oh, I'm sorry, A. A. So I'm sorry, G is one, H is two, and A is three.
Okay. All right. Thank
you. Got it. Yep.
Okay, so I is 1, A is 2, and H is 3. This
one's a good one. Ready, Mr. Montgomery? You tell me when you're ready. Now. H is 1, A is 2, I is 3.
Ready.
Mr. Whitman?
Yeah. I'm going to say I is 1, H is 2, and G is 3.
So this is another one where you've got a tie. We could also bring back four in this one.
If you're okay with that. I'm fine with that. Thank you. It's nice to see a lot of convergence on these ideas.
Well, we eliminated half of them. And we eliminated three.
Right. Okay, last one for today, probably. Public Safety Number
5? 5A, we have 6 and
2.
2:51 – 2:5742 turns
B, we have 3.
Just one slight pause. You said 5A was, it's definitely 3, and then you also said what?
5A, we said six and two.
Okay. Okay. Because I think one thing just to say, traffic calming measures, even though that word is used, I think, let's see. Okay, no, I see that. Okay, never mind, my mistake.
Okay, B, we have three. Yep. C, we have 10. E, we had six. F, we had one. G, we had nine and eight. And we didn't, we weren't too sure with H.
That's a staff addition. That's just, rather than being reactive as we are now for code enforcement, having council establish what priorities are for us. So, in other words, not just taking phone calls and going out and responding, but you tell us, these are the types of issues that we want you to go out there and proactively address. You would have to spend more money, obviously, on that, but if you wanted to do something like that.
And that's
something
we're going to
do internal. Well, you as a council would decide what the priorities are, but then it would be very external, the enforcement, right? For instance, you say, you know, we want to crack down on illegal fence height in front yards. Fence heights are only allowed to be, what, three or four feet, and we know there's a bunch that are ten feet. We want the code enforcement officer to go out and actively work with the property owners that have those that are in violation to bring them down.
Okay. And that type of code enforcement is something we currently contract out.
Well, no, what you just, all you're doing now is you're chasing, you're putting out fires. So people call and complain about something, and that's what we go do, versus you saying, these are the types of things that we're most concerned about in this town, we want you to actually go out there So the public is now driving the process. It's complaint-based enforcement, which
has kind of been the Ojai model for a long
time,
which I'm not Thank you very
much.
So is there like a list with that? How many times do you go out?
We could provide that to you if you wanted us to help you develop that list. Absolutely.
And then I guess there's a fee depending on what it is that varies depending on the pilot.
We always try, we hate citing. We always try to just bring the issue to the person's attention and, you know, voluntary compliance is always the best
bet. And so then we'd do something like we're doing with all of this stuff and we'd come up with a list of the types of code enforcement issues that we want to be proactive about warning and then citing. I
have a suggestion for 5B could be molded into 5A if we just added a little, so creating an e-bike policy and educational campaign.
And I'd also add the Chief is right here, but he's actually actively working on this as we speak. I know he
is. So if you guys are okay, we can fold 5B into 5A. So creating an e-bike policy, educational campaign, and research
traffic calming measure.
Let's let Mr. Montgomery catch up real quick here on that one.
An educational campaign, and research traffic calming measure. Thank you.
Can we also, I mean, I think 5E also would fit in with traffic calming
measures. I totally agree with that.
Yeah, but I think the better thing to do is to take the traffic calming measures out of 5A and move it down into 5E.
Well, I'm going to blur things up a little. No, no, no. Sorry, Council Member. I'm going to blur things up because I believe we already have direction to come back with a speed hump policy. I think that was already provided and that's already on the working agenda. Am I misremembering things? I could be. Do you remember that?
I'm not sure if it's on the working agenda, but we're working on it.
I think we received direction to come back
with
that.
Yeah, I don't see it right this second.
Because I remember having a discussion about borrowing. You know, we're aware of these policies from other jurisdictions. We've had some discussions. Council directed us to do that.
We've had conversations around temporary speed humps in
neighborhoods to evaluate. So a policy. So I think you can have your cake and eat it too on this one. I think you don't have to vote for this one. Fantastic. I love it.
Thank you. So we're just deleting 5E for now? Well, you
can leave it on there. Leave it on there, but you're going to achieve this tactic without voting. What? Wow.
Yeah. Okay. I'll take it.
2:57 – 3:0436 turns
So, to me, traffic calming measures is a topic unto itself that we need to address because we've got pretty widespread concern amongst residents that people are driving too fast. Do you want to make it be
its own item? Is that what you're saying?
I think so, although I was going to throw it into 5E, which we're already dealing with.
So, uh... What about 5F? And making that an option, if you do a...
I think that's separate. I think, you know, traffic, because traffic calming measures are, you know, reducing, you know, road diets, I mean, converting roads from two-way to one-way, I mean, those types of things.
Traffic Calming is a very large, broad topic and I think it would be helpful to us if we can sort of focus it a little bit better.
Are you
saying like a concept review?
Yeah, because we would need direction on the types of things that the council has appetite for. So, for instance, they might not want to pursue turning a two-way street into a one-way street.
I mean, speed humps is a technique of traffic calming. Right. So, it's a subset of that. So, you know.
Right. But there's a lot of other ones. There's
a
lot of other ones. I mean, I think at one, I'm trying to remember if we didn't do bulb outs at, on, did we do that on Montgomery?
So we had a period of time where the city was installing bulldozers and curb extensions, and then that was pulled back, and right now we're not doing them. We could. It's a policy decision.
Yeah. I think there was a reaction that they were not aesthetic. Even if they were effective, they were not sufficiently aesthetic.
And this specific topic will probably come up in a big way when I discuss the ATP Phase 2 project because there is, in the preliminary design, some bull bouts on Ojai Avenue.
So we're going to have a concept review of traffic calming that will dovetail potentially with the ATP? Or is that no? No. Okay. Because I think a traffic calming concept review is really, really important. I also think that it should be expedited because it's dangerous as it is now. So I'd like to, if we do do this, also make it potentially, you know, a special session or, you know, something where I think it is of interest to most of the community. And I've already made some suggestions that I'd like to amend.
What if we go with the suggestion we take away in 5A, it ends with creating e-bike policy and educational campaign period, our new 5B, research traffic calming measures? Yeah. You guys are okay
with that? Yeah. I don't disagree with that. Public Works, Public Works, Public Works, Public Works, Public Works,
Public Works, Clock ticking on the funding. So it would be great to understand what your appetite is for these traffic calming techniques so we can incorporate those into this
plan. Okay. Mr. Harvey, you suggested, I don't know if it would go here, but possibly just to research a parking commission. Would this be the place for
that? Traffic Safety Commission. Traffic Safety Commission. That's what I meant. Not even, no. Not research. I would say implement. Great. That was my... And that's
the other place where I was talking about, you know, we create a commission, so it's very important to know. Who would be on it, and what topics would be available, and so that would come back to us as an item.
In a real quick nutshell, it'd be a Brown Act Commission, appointed commissioners, the staff liaisons would be the Chief of Police and the Public Works Director, and anything related to traffic, infrastructure associated with traffic, you know, enforcement, All those things first start there. So most communities, when somebody complains about something like this, or brings forward an issue, the first response is, well, you need to first go to the Traffic Safety Commission to discuss this item, because then you've got the Chief of Police and the Public Works Director sitting there, you've got your Commissioners, and then they decide if it bubbles up to the Council or not. So that's, is that if I, and when you, sorry, the last thing I'll say, when you do that, then you get away from the whack-a-mole approach that we do now, where whoever's screaming the loudest, we go respond to.
Okay, so we got, I think there were a couple of different comments about crosswalks. Mm-hmm, those would go there. And so that what would happen now is that that issue would They'd be invited to present their concerns at the Traffic Commission hearing, and then they'd kind of vet the issue and decide what part of that...
So your Public Works Director would say there's a false sense of safety in a crosswalk, and the Chief of Police would say, yep, and you're going to need an engineer to install one here, but the warrants might not merit it, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Or, we should put you on that commission. I have a job. But no, most communities have this and
it's
very useful.
Can we add this as a 5I then, as a Research Traffic Safety Commission?
Again, I'm going to advocate for just create. We'd come to you because you'd have to be modifying your code, and you're having another commission, but I really think, it's crazy for me to say this, I know, but I really think you probably do need this commission.
Yeah, I
agree. And I love the idea of it being kind of an ombudsman type commission. It gives voice in really important ways when people can be angry.
A shared enemy. Okay. Well, great. Let's do some voting. Now, we're not going to vote for 5E. I checked that out as not needed to be
voted. That, for me, should be on our working agenda list. I heard direction to do that previously.
Okay.
Great.
3:04 – 3:1242 turns
Can I just ask, is 5E going to include, in addition to those temporary speed bumps, the concept of the The pavement, the broader pavement bump?
Yes, it would be integrated. The idea would be that you adopt a speed hump policy, and we decide where those are going, and as we pave the roads, they become integrated. They're not these things that are...
Okay, and we don't have to vote on that one, because that's coming to us.
We're already
doing that.
Okay, good. Mr. Montgomery, can you scroll up so we can see just 5 A and B? Okay, thank you. Oh man, this
one's hard. I'm ready. Okay, give me
one sec. I
have a question. 5F go into Traffic Calming Measures, and yes, I am trying to condense
that. I would advocate no. Okay. Because I think this is a separate thing, and they're both good items. I think you could achieve an easier victory on a tactic by just having them separate.
Got it. Thank you.
On that one is, is the state going to be, I mean we're talking about Ojai Avenue, is the state going to be?
There will be some limitations, right? So Caltrans always gets jurisdiction on their roads, so there might be some carve-out. You're absolutely right. But I think, you know, the Chief and the Public Works Director and I have talked about this a lot, and I think, Chief, please weigh in here, but if it's a residential, give me the definition again with the vehicle code and the miles per hour at 25, if it's defined as residential, then that's the
Yeah, so if it's defined as residential, then it's automatic 25. You know, the city doesn't need to adjust any or put up signs or, you know, I mean, it's good for everyone to know. But if you want to adjust lower or higher, that's where you need a traffic engineer to come in and give that recommendation based on what they're seeing and how the roadway is and the level of traffic. And they go off, usually they're 85% of what people are traveling. So that, you need that recommendation, though, for a commissioner or a judge overseeing traffic violations to uphold that, you know, that enforcement.
That sounds complicated, but I would love a 20 mile an hour, but it sounds very complicated, so.
And I think it's probably going to be unlikely that we get to 25 along a state highway.
Right. Right. But I think it is achievable to get 25 most other areas of town. I think so. I think so.
And we have many, many streets that are designated residential already. Yes, we do. So they're already up to 25. I think I'm happy to
share that. Grand is 30, for example.
And
I understand, talking to the Chief on another occasion, that going below 25 becomes problematic. Particularly in terms of going to enforce a speeding ticket for somebody who violated the 20, but not necessarily the 25.
The same rule applies for the traffic engineer. They have to be able to say, yes, the street should be 20 miles an hour, not
25.
So that's the issue. So if the city just automatically put a street at 20 miles an hour, What gave you that authority? What gave you that right? Where was the study? And the judge is going to ask that. Like, what's the justification for lowering it from 25? And let's just say, hypothetically, the city did that on their own, then a judge is probably going to override that and go, no, 25 is residential. Where's the traffic engineer report?
And I have one quick question. We had talked about the motorcycle officer being enhancing sort of the e-bike educational component. So can we scratch out 5A or not as already being done? I know, I'm pathetic, but you know, I'm just trying to get here.
I think A is more comprehensive than just that.
Okay, all right. Yeah, I'm good with that. Thank you.
Well, we don't have all of our policies defined, do we, or do we?
No, so, what we're doing is on the education end, and we are doing some enforcement, and we're doing, I don't know if you've heard some complaints come in, but, it's starting, I'm hearing them, but basically what we're doing is an educational, we educate the kid and the parents first, before citing them, and then if we see them again, because we're documenting it, If we see them again, then they're getting a citation. But where the Council might want to keep that in there is e-bike policy. You know, we're just going off the vehicle code. You know, sometimes it's nice if the city comes in and has other policy.
Yeah,
so
just to make sure I understand, because I had been thinking that this was including Whether we were going to adopt a program that required a license, and then whether there were, you know, some restrictions outside the vehicle code that we wanted specific to e-bikes.
And
that, is that something that you're kind of looking at and bringing to us, what maybe some other communities have done about
Well, Chief, actually, I can, I think before you were here, we sent a memo to the Council on this issue, so I'm happy to resend discussing the options of what kinds of policies the Council could adopt. I think we know of at least one other jurisdiction, but we can work with the Chief if he's aware of any others that have successful ordinances. Yeah, I believe, I want to say Rancho Palos Verdes. Somewhere down south, a little bit more as a successful e-bike policy, adding safety elements like lights and helmets and those types of
things. I think that's what we need to do. I mean, your point is that 5A is more robust than... That's my thought. Yeah, I think it's
correct. I took it to be that way, too.
Are we ready to vote? I am. Ms. Rule, are you ready to start it up? Okay. Ms. Lang, will you go?
Sure, I'll start. Okay. So number one is 5I. Number two, 5A, and number three is 5F.
Ready. I can go if you want. Oh, go
ahead.
Yeah, so number one is 5F, number two is 5B, and number three is 5I, only because I'm sure we're going to get to 5A.
3:12 – 3:1738 turns
Man, this one's really hard for me. I really wanna do four, but I'm gonna do five I, five B, and five F, but I'm building in five A. It's coming
through. Yeah,
it's
there. One is I. Or no, I'm sorry, one is H, two is I, and 3 is B. Okay.
All right, I've got A as 1, I've got I as 2, and I've got B, Traffic Calming, measures as number 3.
So it looks like we have three that are the winners, if you will. Right? Five I, five B, and five F. Is that what everybody else has? Okay. Those are the top three.
And five A close second.
I was really considering 5H to be on my list.
Maybe
I should switch one to get it on there. What one is the highest? The highest
vote getter is 5I, I
believe. Okay, even though I love 5I, I'm going to switch it to 5H.
Okay, so now I'm in a position where suddenly I have five, not four. I draw the line at four, okay, five, not okay.
Is 5H likely to kind of come to us in some format at some
point? Well, you guys always have the nuclear option. You can, at any meeting, during the future agenda item section, you can say, Thou shalt bring back whatever. You always get to do that.
I manipulated that one to try to get it up on the list, so let's just go with, I'll go back to my original, so that you don't have to struggle over having 5.
Okay, so to be clear, you're back with 5I.
Yeah.
Thank
you. Okay. So we're back to three. Thanks. But again, you have that authority, of course, to give us that direction any meeting.
Well, I think when we talk about, when we do talk about measures as they come up, we may get more ideas, right, that you
fall
into. True.
Yep. Mr. Montgomery, is this clear, the document, as far as what we've done? Yes.
Everything's recorded.
Good. Great.
Thank you. That was really helpful. I really appreciate that. The only thing that's coming up for me, just something that I want to bring up with you guys is just thinking about people that, or organizations rather, that we have had relationships with before that have provided services that are coming up on our list. We didn't get to them today. For example, the next one, diversifying the economy. And what I would like to propose Again, this is a unique provider that's providing a unique service, and that would be the Chamber of Commerce. And what I'd love to propose, I'm entertaining this for my colleagues, is to think they have a proposal that needs to be finessed a little bit, but something to bring back as soon as possible. Hopefully, it wouldn't take too long.
Some kind of pilot project for three months to get them started on their proposal that we can then finesse with them because they're already doing work this very month. And so this council used to support them, stopped in the prior council, but I would love to renew that relationship. So without getting into the entire contract, which needs to be understood and publicized, is to reestablish that relationship with them, again, as a three-month pilot until it gets settled. So I'd like to propose that we consider that even for the next item, but I want to hear from you.
Yep, I'm in support of that too.
I
think I'd have to see what the scope of services and hear from staff and all the rest of that, but I don't object to accelerating it, getting in front of us with the proposal being flushed out.
So we could bring that at the meeting in July, I feel. A three month professional services agreement for your discussion and consideration. If that's okay with everybody.
I would support that as well. Thank you. Mr.
Montgomery, you want to put that on the working agenda, please? Under my name, under
discussion. And
if
it does move forward, we would still have the option to backdate some of
the payments? Council is able to pay, and yes. Thank
you.
3:17 – 3:2410 turns
Okay. Good work, guys. That was really something. All right. Anything else? Okay. So we will move on to the next item on our agenda, which is... We'll move now to the closed session, of which we have one public comment. Mr. Miley, are you still here?
Yep. Thank you very much.
Hello.
So, this is what I understand. This is about Council Member Rule's indemnification issue in suit against the City. What's it all about? As I understand, the City has drafted an indemnity offer after seeking an opinion and justification from an outside law firm a while ago. They suggested $125,000. Even before the airing of the offer, Rule and Attorney turned that down with a comment that attorney fees are way beyond that. With the process of indemnification apparently agreed upon, the City decides to make an offer.
I know that this was not voted upon by the City Council. It's not official. The City Administration was authorized, as I see it, to seek outside counsel for the offer, implying we want to settle. I read the state codes regarding government officials and employees being protected from civil suits claiming injury. Government Code 825. Third paragraph, quote, exceptions to the duty to identify or provide a defense include when the employee acts with fraud, corruption, or actual malice, end quote.
The ultimate outcome of the civil suit seems to be irrelevant under the law. I didn't see any fraud, any corruption, and actual malice ever being presented. Please follow through on the City's offer for an indemnification award adjusting the amount to verify legal services documented with time-dated subject records. It's time to bring this contentious period and subject to closure.
The residents of Ojai deserve a logical, reasonable, and fair end to all of this, subject to California state law and fairness. Who got harmed and how much? That drove the lawsuit. I believe the real harm now is, with this issue lasting about two years, is that the residents of Ojai are now faced with a somewhat dysfunctional council process costing lots of money, potentially. Fairness with the law seems to be the key. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Miley. Mr. Montgomery, online?
Yes, Mayor, we have two raised hands now, one from Starchild and then from Larry. Starchild, you may unmute, and you have the floor.
This Council should offer Leslie Rule nothing less than complete indemnification, and not just because it's the right thing to do. It will also be less costly for the City in the long run. and will remove the threat of lawsuits that is stopping candidates from running for Council. It's clear that Leslie Rule has the right to be indemnified for blowing the whistle on this Council's continuing practice of placing one item on the closed session agenda and discussing another. This Council should thank her for standing up for transparency and the public's right to know. How long will you quibble about how much you are willing to pay to indemnify Leslie Rule?
I will only deny the truths in the Superior Court ruling that Leslie Rule did not violate the Brown Act. Even if you believe she did, despite the Court's ruling that she did not, how can you believe she acted out of malice and not a good faith dedication to the people's right to know? How much of our money are you willing to spend to pay Leslie Rule less? Attorney's fees, staff time, and what you pay for indemnification will already add to more than if you had just indemnified Leslie Rule from the beginning. If you insist on not fully indemnifying Leslie Rule now, the only sure effect will be to make citizens think twice before running for Council. Who can afford to pay the price to defend frivolous lawsuits? It's time to do the right thing and put the question of indemnity behind us.
In addition, it's important to me, as a constituent of Ms. Rule, that she have a place at the table in this closed session meeting. We elected her to speak for us and she shouldn't be silenced by the mayor or the council or anybody else. She should be allowed to speak and to represent us in this very important issue. Thank you.
Thank
you. Next we have Larry. Larry, you may unmute and you have the
floor. Thank you. Good evening. When this is all over, I would love to see an accounting of the dollars spent Out of pocket for legal, for staff time, and for everything involved from this, from the beginning when it started. Because that money could be going to fire hardening, climate mitigation, traffic, parking, the homeless situation, housing. It's wasted money. It does nothing for anyone, except make others better off.
Anyway, thank you. Just deal with it and make it all go away at this point.
3:25 – 3:261 turns
Taylor about it, and I do completely understand and am willing to move that way. So, and likewise, any comments that I kind of make would be advocating for my position, which could also be, could come back to bite both myself and the Council, which I definitely do not want to do. So I have the great luxury of going home and walking my dog. But I did want to show you one thing only because I am a very proud mama. So some of you may know or you may not know that my son is a High Court English Barrister and he's taking the California Bar because he's very worried about his mama and he's Oxford educated, he's a debater by trade, and Thank you. Okay, we will adjourn. Thank you.
