Ojai City Council Special Meeting

BodyCity Council
MeetingSpecial Meeting
Date📅 November 18, 2025

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:0010 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:01

We're ready, Weston?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:03

Yes, Mayor, we are ready.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:05

Okay, everyone, welcome to the Tuesday, November 16th Council meeting. Roll call, please.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:11

Thanks, Mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:11

Mayor Gilman. 18th. Did I say 16? 18th. Thank you. Thank you. Good. Great. Keep me

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:18

on. Mayor Gilman. Here. Here. Mayor Pro Tem Lang.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:23

Here.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:23

Council Member Mang.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:24

Here.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:25

We have Council Member Rule participating remotely. She's not logged on yet, and Council Member Whitman is on his way.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:31

Thank you very much. And Pledge of Allegiance, please, Mr.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:34

Montgomery.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:34

Yes.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.730:35

Honorable Council, Mayor, community, please rise as you are able. Ready, begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:45

republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:54

And approval of the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed0:59

I'll move to approve it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:00

Yeah. Any objections? Nope. Okay, great. We'll proceed. And we have a presentation. The City provided a partnership with Argomen, providing soil and compost to community members. Yay!

CommentJackie RojasProposedself-stated1:22

Thank you, Honorable Mayor, Council Members, and members of the public. My name is Jackie Rojas, and I am in the Public Works Department as Admin Analyst 2. So it is my pleasure to open this presentation tonight and highlight a new program that reflects Ojai's ongoing commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship. As many of you know, the City of Ojai has been working diligently to expand sustainable resources and climate-friendly programs to our residents. One of the most impactful ways we're doing that is through our partnership with Agriman, California's leading organics recycler and a long-time advocate for healthier, more resilient communities.

Tonight, we're excited to officially introduce the Free Mulch and Compost Program. Through this partnership, Ojai residents will now have access to free bulk mulch, free bulk compost, and for the very first time in Ventura County, free bagged compost. We're proud that Ojai is the pilot city for this expanded offering, and we appreciate Agriman's collaboration to provide this for our community.

We also ordered a large pallet of four-quart bags of compost, so be on the lookout for those, as we may be handing them out at various city events, or even hand them out if you want to come and say hi to our wonderful staff in Public Works. This program is more than just a resource to our community. It also helps us meet our requirements under SB 1383. This is the state's mandate to reduce organic waste going to landfills.

And more importantly, this entire effort is fully funded through CalRecycle's grant, meaning the cost to the city is net zero. The program will operate through a coupon-based system on Agrimen's online ordering system, with eligibility extended to all Ojai residents and businesses located within the city limits. The program officially launches tomorrow, and all coupon and ordering information will be posted on our website, so residents can begin placing their orders right away.

I also want to acknowledge our Public Works team who has been working closely and diligently with Agrimen for quite some time to shape this program into something that truly benefits our community. We anticipate the program will be very popular, therefore the remainder of the CalRecycle grant will be set aside to support this program the remainder of this year and throughout the next calendar year.

While we have not yet received word on the grant funding beyond that time frame, we will be exploring opportunities to continue supporting this program as part of our next fiscal year budget discussions. So with that, it is my pleasure to introduce the Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Agriman, Cody Kane, who will walk you through the program details and share how residents can take advantage of this program.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:22

Thank you very much for that, Jackie, that introduction. I mean, there's not much to follow up on her. She pretty much covered it all. But let me try and share my screen here. And bear with me until we get just what this should act like. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed4:41

I'm going to share this. OK. Yep, we see it. Can you see my screen? Yes, we can. OK. Okay, so now I'm going to try something else here and try and... Okay, well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:06

I'll tell you what. I will just start with this. That should work. Oh, wait, you're seeing the wrong screen now. Hold on. This is what I mean. Sometimes this likes to... I'm going to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed5:20

stop sharing and start again. Stop. Okay. All right. Let's try this again. As you should see. Let's do it again. Okay. This is a screen. Let's see. It doesn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:46

work. Okay. That's your

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role5:47

presentation. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed5:48

You can see the presentation? Yeah. City of Ojai? Okay. It's not showing me now. There we go. It took a while. Okay, so let me run through this with you. I'm not going to put a presentation mode because it takes over two screens for me and I want to make sure I get this right, so this should be clear enough. So, as Jackie had mentioned, we've been working with the Public Works Department for many months to come up with a bespoke program that is unique to the City of Ojai. As you all well know, the City of Ojai is a unique town and it's in a unique location.

With unique geography and unique residents. So from that point of view, we wanted to build something that we thought reflected the residents of the city and gave them an opportunity to benefit from the SB 1383 program that has been mandated by CalRecycle. So let me just go into a little bit more detail about what the program is. So it is, again, what Jackie said, a constituent compost and mulch giveaway program.

We've been running this now for a number of years in the county. The first was the City of Ventura and it's now expanded to the City, the County of Ventura, Fillmore, Camarillo, Oxnard, Santa Clarita, and then we're also working up north as well. So, it's a very popular program, and the BAG program has proven to be exceptionally popular. So, I'm really excited for the City of Ojai to be able to, you know, participate in the BAGs. First city in the county, as Jackie alluded to, so congratulations on that front. So, let me just talk to you a little bit more through this. So, what is the, you know, Compost and Mulch Giveaway Program? Basically, collaboration between Ojai and Agri-Mint, and also AquaFlow. So AquaFlow is a distribution partner for us, and so they're, you know, in the City, so it makes it a lot easier for residents to collect material locally, as opposed to having to shoot down the hill to our Agri-Mint facilities there.

So we're providing free, high-quality compost to most of the residents and businesses of the City. As Jackie said, this helps the City to meet SB 1383 procurement mandates. For organic waste diversion and greenhouse gas reductions. So our product is very highly rated. There's really nothing else that we can qualify for. We're OMRA listed, Title 14 compliant, certified by the CDFA, U.S. Composting Council, the LGMA.

And we're being used on farms all across the state currently. We're made from 100% recycled green waste. It's free of biosolids and any animal material or byproducts. So it's very important for us because that maintains our armory listing. And there's a lot of regulations around biosolids and animal, you know, byproducts. So we steer clear of that to just have a clean green product.

So the coupon details are basically, as mentioned, bagged compost 100, bulk compost 100, and bulk cover mulch. We don't have bagged cover mulch because CDFA hasn't yet approved our bag. So soon in the future, we're hoping, if we can ever get it through their strict processes, we will see a cover mulch bag product. So, and again, mentioned the first time anybody in the county has worked with us on distributing back, so this will be exciting. So, the coupon parameters are valid from tomorrow through the end of the year.

We're actually, you know, the idea is we'll have an ongoing coupon program that won't stop, you know, obviously, should the funding be available, and we'll just change the coupon code come January 1st, and so then a new code would be used for 2026. So we want to, it's a short period of time as you can appreciate, November 19th through the end of the year. Not a bad time to be planting in Ojai, coincidentally, so that's a good time for us to be making product available. So it'll give us, it's a pilot, you know, you get to see how it works, we get to see how it's working in the city and our relationship with AquaFlow. And, you know, if there's any feedback, we want to get that. We want this to be a home run for the City of Ojai, and we think we know how to do that, and we've done it multiple places already, and so we're looking forward to being able to do that with the City.

And so, essentially, the use will be per residence. Now, we actually made a mistake earlier, and we had resident And then we found that there were some loopholes there, and people started, a lot of people lived in one location all of a sudden. So, we started to, you know, figure out things as we went, but this, you know, gives us a great opportunity through our program, shop.agrament.com, our platform, we can track all orders. So, per residence, they get one use, and they get up to five bags of compost per Thank you all for joining us.

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:11 – 0:1712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed11:03

If they want to get bulk material, they can have two uses of the coupon code and up to 15 yards of compost per use. So that is a full, basically, bobtail truck for us. They don't have to take that much. They can take a lesser amount if they so desire, but we want to give them the opportunity to maximize the use. We found that when we expanded the volumes available to residents, they took advantage of it in previous programs, so we wanted to make sure that we're not shortchanging those who want to take advantage of the access to the material.

So again, this is for a resident's a single physical location, so one coupon use per address. The coupon program details and compost bags can be picked up at Aquaflow at 1940 East Ojai Avenue. And again, bulk compost and mulch can be picked up at 201 Kinetic Drive in Oxnard. Any deliveries that go into the city is a flat rate of $270. I know it's a little bit painful, but it is difficult to get up into Ojai with trucks and so on. So that's really a reduced rate to guarantee, but it is The city would just cover the cost of the materials.

So how does a resident order? Well, first of all, they're going to find the information at your city website. I'm not going to repeat that. You can see it. Then they'll follow the instructions and place their order on our website, which is shop.agrumen.com. And they will be required to register themselves in there so that we can identify each individual who uses the coupon code. So that's tallied at the end of the month, and you will see that and exactly which resident purchased, how much they purchased, and where the material went to. We will confirm the address of every resident that places an order. And so we have set up an automated system because it became very complicated with lots of systems going on simultaneously. We couldn't manually do it for each city, so we've now set up a GPS coordinate system where it will tag every address that comes in and check it to see which compost program it qualified for.

So that's something we've done to improve our systems to make it a lot easier for the residents to kind of know quickly whether they qualify for one or another of coupon codes. We've got lots of them in the in the county going right now so for that reason it's important that we always make sure that the resident knows where they live because sometimes residents think they're in a city but they're in the county or vice versa just because their address says one thing they they think one thing without knowing that they're not in the place they think they are. So, we sometimes have to manage that. There are lots of other programs in the county, so we can often point them to an existing program if it's still running. Let's see, that pretty much covers everything on my presentation.

So, I want to open this up to questions. If anybody has anything about Agriment, about the program, about anything specific, please open it up. Thank you. I was thinking

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role14:15

this could go in the Ojai Outlook, possibly, right? Some link there to let folks know about it.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call14:20

We could shoehorn that in, yes,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role14:21

absolutely. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed14:25

go, please. I toured the Harrison facilities and saw them taking the plastic bags with organic waste out. Is this connected to that operation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed14:38

In a sense, I don't know if you're familiar, we recently opened the Mountain View Food Waste Processing Facility in Oxnard, and that's the only one that exists in the county. And so we're basically taking, we're going to be taking all the food waste from the Harrisons, and we're still arranging private contracts with different haulers and private food production entities that are going to bring their food waste to us.

But yes, we do work with the Harrisons very closely. We provide a lot of their organics management, so they will do some diversion at their location, and then they will send the food waste. We'll either go to Simi Valley, which is then sent up into Kern County, but now with the option of Oxnard, we'll be able to redirect a lot of that food waste to our facility.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:27

Excellent. Thank you so much. This is very exciting. Organic waste is such a huge contributor to methane gas and to the warming climate, so this is great to see that we are going to be the first city in the county that is receiving the benefits of this win-win operation.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:47

Thank you very much. Any questions? No, that's wonderful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed15:49

Thank you. Well, thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to seeing a successful program moving forward. Absolutely.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:58

All right. Appreciate it. Wonderful. All right. City Manager's Report, please.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call16:04

Yes, Mayor, a couple things this evening. First, I'd like to call Ms. Leah Palmer up to the podium to start things off, if I could. Give her a moment to come on up. So, Leah is our new accounting manager. She joined us, I think, last week? Yeah. Okay, great. Let me just read to you a little bit about Leah. So, she brings with her 10 years of accounting experience. She began her career in the private sector, where she learned the cornerstone accounting functions of accounts payable, accounts receivable, and treasury management. And from there, she moved into public accounting, where she has had the opportunity to work on payroll, budgeting, grant management, audits, and the annual comprehensive financial report.

Leah holds a Bachelor of Science in Business with an emphasis in Business Management from Cal State Northridge. Leah is dedicated to ensuring the accuracy and integrity of financial records, adhering to government-specific regulations and compliance and accountability in the use of taxpayer funds. All exciting stuff. Thank you, Leah. We're super excited to have you join us. Anything you want to say while you're up there?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed17:18

Just thank you for having me. I'm really excited to join the team and get to work with everybody.

0:17 – 0:2312 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call17:24

Thank you. Welcome. Thank you, Leah. Welcome. Thanks. Next, I think I want to kick it to the clerk to talk about our board vacancies and our appointment

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7317:37

process.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call17:37

Mr.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7317:38

Montgomery? I'd just like to start by saying, from the city clerk's office seat here, we had a minor error. That's why the community and council are missing Two council members right now, and we just had one mistake on our time on our printed binders, and it shows the importance of printed binders, and also how one small mistake can have a big impact relating to our community. So we understand that, and we will always improve going forward. So, city commissions. We have a lot of commission vacancies. There are three in total, which is a big deal. Planning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and Arts Commission.

We have conducted outreach through advertising the Ojai Valley News, social media outreach, and our city commission vacancies webpage. So, all the clerk's offices webpages are up to date, and you can always, any interested community member can always go to our city website. So, a little rundown. Planning Commission received no new applications in this process, but I would have to say, for the record, Mr. Steingold did apply again. He would call me out on that, jokingly.

So, there are four applications on file there. Historic Preservation has one new application on file. For total and Arts Commission has two new applications on file and two new and only two on file So thank you to council members and mayor for the footwork there. I'm getting some you know dedicated volunteers to serve on commissions last report there was council action for a regional board to for the area housing and Authority, AHA, we re-noticed that in the newspaper and there were no new applications on that and we intend to bring Mr. Steve Mason up for reappointment since there are no more applications and we intend to get that on our December 9th agenda.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role19:26

Thank you. Wonderful.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call19:28

Thank you, Mr. Montgomery. Thanks. Two more brief things. Just with the recent rain event, I just want to extend my thanks to the Public Works Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the Ventura County Fire Department, who were all very busy over the weekend. I know I live on the east end, and at my house, last time I checked, it was something like almost eight inches over the last several days.

So, thank you for all the work from our crews and teams. And then lastly, for those interested in anything related to the Ojai Permanent Supportive Housing Project, the bid package was posted on our website on November 7th, 2025. So, that's on our landing page. And that's all I have this evening. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role20:09

Thank you. Wonderful. Now, what's not on the agenda, but what should be, would be Commissioner Reports, and we have Commissioner Wright for the Arts Commission to give us a presentation. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed20:24

Good evening. Mayor Gilman, Mayor Pro Tem Lang, City Council Member Mang, Mang and Lang. I know, right? City staff, the community here, thank you for this opportunity to update you on the Arts Commission. For our meeting, which is on this Thursday, the Arts Commission is scheduled to receive the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations for grant awards. The Arts Commission will review and vote on each applicant's proposal and finalize the award amounts.

And this will be the completion of the 2026 grant cycle. From there, we will send our recommendations to you, the City Council, ASAP, for your approval. And of course, we're hoping they'll appear on a very soon agenda. We'll see. We had 28 grant applications, which was nearly double from last year. And that includes individuals and organizations across many artistic disciplines, including dance, film, theater, fine art, music.

I'm sure this is because of the increased budget from $30,000 to $100,000. So, once again, thank you so much, as somebody would say, for the raise. And you're all invited, and you're all invited to attend the meeting on Thursday. You can see firsthand our hard work and careful consideration of each of the grant proposals. With the grants behind us, we will move on to updating our five-year plan, something that's required of arts commissions.

Under the leadership of Chair West, we will focus on the following key issues. Collaborating with Ojai Chamber of Commerce on a study for creative and economy impact. Continuing our assessment and maintenance of our public art collection. Assessing the methodology and calculation the city uses to calculate the percent for the arts. Expanding our education and mentorship programs for creative professionals and aspiring artists.

And cultivating and bringing on new commissioners. Sounds like we have a couple applicants, so that'll be moving along. So thank you for your time this evening, and I hope to see at least some of you this Thursday, 6 p.m., 6 p.m., at the Chamber, the City Chambers.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:01

Any questions? Good work. Loving it. Loving it. Thanks. I have no public comment cards. Mr. Montgomery? Yes? One

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7323:14

moment, let's ensure.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:17

I have some for items.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7323:19

Let's just tell, we have one Zoom participant, and I'm speaking to a Zoom participant. We are entering our general public comment period. Just give you an opportunity to raise your hand in our hybrid model.

0:23 – 0:2928 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:31

Mayor, it looks like we can move on. Thank you. Wonderful. Thanks. Okay, we'll move on to the consent calendar. Does anybody want to pull any items from the consent calendar?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:42

I'd like to pull item number 7. I have a question about it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:45

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:47

I have a question with 5 and 7.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:50

Okay, 5 and 7.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:52

But I'll

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:53

move to approve the rest of them.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:54

Okay. So I have a motion to approve 2, 3, 4, and 6. I will second that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:01

What are we doing?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role24:03

He

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call24:03

wanted to do the discussion

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role24:05

item, so

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call24:05

if

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role24:06

we get through this, then

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call24:06

we'll get to that. Just to confirm, he indicated he had nothing on the consent that he was interested in, so thank you for asking.

Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Appreciate that. Thank you. No, that's good. Okay. Yeah. Okay, well, so we, you seconded, right? So you can call the roll then, I guess. You can do a roll call. Yes. Council Member Mang. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7324:24

Motion passes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role24:25

So let's look at number five, and then I guess here's the time that I would ask for any comments on consent item five. Seeing none, okay. Did you have on?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed24:39

Yeah, I just had it. It's basic. I was just curious as to why we went so far away. Where is it up north that we didn't go locally to Ventura County to different fleet organizations? You know that. And then my other thing I just wanted to it's not a big deal, but if you notice on the back page, the contract has an expiration date of eleven eight twenty five. The source, well, So I just want to make sure, like if we go ahead with this, that it doesn't come back and then there's a change and then there's more money and all of that, that it's, it's throughout, there's a couple of them with that date where it's expired.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed25:22

And we'll verify that too. It may be that that expired and then the next one just picks up where that one expired. We put the staff report together before, before that date, so that's probably what has happened here. And we go with SourceWell, so it's, they do the bidding, Other agencies, County of Ventura, sometimes City of Oxnard, City of Ventura, all the other agencies around. And so we're able to piggyback on that. And it depends on where they get the best pricing for the vehicles. It happens to be in Northern California. The last time we bought an EV truck was from Sacramento, Ford Sacramento. So it just kind of depends who's got the vehicles and the pricing that they give these agencies.

Fair enough.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:07

Anything else? And

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call26:10

then I might ask Ms. Chode if she would just come up for the next item.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:23

This is your first time up here like this, right? Welcome. You want to start?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed26:33

Yes, so this, and this is for the security for the tent town. And the contract amount is, I mean, it's a significant amount. And my question is, is it better to go with a contract, to contract this out, or would it save us money? Would it, is there, would it be more cost effective to bring these services in-house and to hire our own security team?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:03

Can I ask, my related question, the note I wrote is, are we happy with the service as it is, just as part of the conversation?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call27:11

Sure, so let me start with that. Yes, I would say that we are happy with the service, and it is a little bit of a unique security detail. It's not like other assignments. It's one that requires some understanding of the specific needs of the population. And their vulnerability, and that is something that we've really enjoyed with Secure All. In particular, they have folks in their leadership team that have actually experienced homelessness themselves, and so that's been very helpful in dealing with some of the unique challenges that we encounter, not only with our participants, but those that try to prey on them, because that really is the main reason why Secure All is there, is just to protect them, not so much Protecting the community from the participants, because that's not what we experience.

It is multiple officers with the ability to fill in folks when somebody becomes sick or whatever. We could staff up with our own team. That is something we could look at if council wants us to. I don't have a number for what that would be, but I would say that we are happy with the service that we do receive, and it's been good for the city so far.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed28:32

So I will add that there is an added benefit here to having a contractor because they have their own insurance in addition to our insurance. So any liability, right, there's an opportunity depending on whatever occurs that it could run through something other than the city's insurance.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call28:51

The last thing I'll add is that at this point they've also formed close relationships with the leadership of the camp, Ventura County Behavioral Health, Ventura County Sheriff's Department, so they're pretty established in our community. Chief, would you weigh in on that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed29:11

Thanks. So occasionally I do check in with the officers and I do get a little bit of feedback from the deputies. They feel very comfortable with Secure All. The security officers Really understand the city and kind of what we want and our expectations. And really where I'm impressed is they've really kept the rift raft down at night and they have a good pulse on it. Believe it or not, they don't call us too often for stuff. They handle stuff on their own. It's only extreme issues that they call us for. So I'm actually impressed with the job they're doing.

0:29 – 0:3610 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role29:57

Because the dollar amount is high, of course, we see that and it gives us some pretty serious pause. We also understand the service they're offering.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:05

But that's another thing with the accounting to me doesn't add up. First of all, my first question is, I'm just curious with so many people, you know, working in finance, that why a contract expired so many months ago without somebody catching that? That's a big thing with security to not have a contract, in my opinion.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call30:25

Well, actually, this is related to an item we've spoken about with the Council before, and that is the accounts payable module. We're deploying an automated module as part of our enterprise system, and Ms. Cho can jump in here. That's important because it won't allow contracts to be paid, or invoices to be paid, rather, unless the contract is current. So it impacted a multiple number of contracts, and I think you've seen that so far. We've been trying to slowly catch up, but we're close to getting close to implement that. And Ms. Cho, do you want to talk about the rough timing and what we're doing right now to test that module? Ms.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed30:58

Cho Yeah. So with the implementation of the purchase order software would help support We have the financial and budgetary controls in place. So with new contracts that arise, we'll enter that into our PO system. And some of the details that would be included is like the contract terms, the amount, all to exceed. So as we get invoices in, it will kind of automatically have a running total balance of like what's spent and what's remaining. So that will, I guess, We provide additional, I guess, added layer into our budgetary controls in that aspect.

Our department, in conjunction with Springbrook, provided trainings to the departments to use the PO software. I believe just today we were able to get access to the live version, so that we'll be able to kind of test out the workflow to ensure that there's no I guess kinks in the system and that we also are working on a procurement policy to go in alignment with our purchase order module.

So with that, I would think that beginning in the new calendar year, we could see that in place.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:25

Perfect. And then as far as some of the financing or the fees and everything, so it says $542,400 services through June 30th of 26. I have, because I've asked in the past for accounting for Tent Town Cabin Village, and so I've created my own spreadsheet and going through the warrants From the city, I have $341,785 that has been paid through the warrants through November 2nd.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role33:00

Just for the security?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:01

Yes. So that leaves, that's a difference of $200,615. You know, divided, so that's four months, or eight months. And then if we divided that, it's like $25,000 a month. But we reduced the hours in June to $10,900 roughly, so I feel there's like an overage, like a $100,000 overage. The math doesn't math for me, so I.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role33:32

So we're going to, it sounds like what, tell me if I'm getting you right. If you were to sit down with Ms. Cho and see how, what's not, what's not correct here on the accounting part to see where it's different.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed33:43

Well, it would be helpful because I'm just going, if you're going by warrants, I have, you know, I have them through the whole year going through that to have that, so why is there, you know, and I'm not putting any blame, please trust that, and I don't mean to come across as that person because I know you're coming into a lot, so I'm totally willing to work, but I would like to see it add up better or explain, you know, because that's quite a bit of money to not have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed34:09

Yeah, if you want, I could kind of just give a brief explanation of the numbers that are listed on the report. So the total contract price for the $542,400 is from the inception of the services that are provided from Secure All Security. So the amendment number two is a request for $294,900. And this contract, or I'm sorry, this amendment covers two fiscal years. So that's why the comparison is a little bit, I guess, skewed. So of the $294,900, approximately $100,000 of that was spent from March of 2025 to June of 2025.

I have kind of a breakdown of those invoices that I can share with you that totals that $100,000. But additionally, on the second row, that 43,600, those are for invoices paid through October of 2025, but covers July to September services. So just because of the timing of when we receive the invoices and when we pay it out, there is a little bit of lag time. So what you see, the 43,600 are for services paid through October from July to September.

So with that, that 294 So, the budgetary impact for this second amendment for the current fiscal year would be approximately $195,000, which is the $294,000 minus the $100,000. And to date, we spent $50,000, and that covers September to the first half of November.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:36 – 0:4045 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role36:14

So tell me if I'm wrong, those numbers actually sounded very close to what you said the discrepancy might be. Did I get that right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed36:20

It appears to me, but I'm just, yeah. I don't know. To me, when numbers don't add up, you know what I mean? So do you show in your thing from January to November how much you have showing that we've spent for security? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed36:38

have approximate numbers by fiscal year. So in 24-25, so that would cover June of 2024 to July of 2025, I have approximately $350,000. And for this current fiscal year, starting from July to current, what we have paid is approximately $50,000. And so with the remaining budget, when preparing for the amendment, it was approximated about a little less than $15,000 per month. And that's a little bit of a cushion because I, for example, with holidays, there's like a time and a half charge. So just to account for a little cushion in that estimation.

But for example, in the past month, it was a little under $13,600.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role37:33

Okay. Well, what I'm also hoping is that with Ms. Cho here and the systems we're talking about, that everything would be matching much more clearly in the things that you bring up. Are you feeling confident in what you just heard or not confident?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed37:50

No, I hear what she said. Absolutely, I hear you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call37:54

Okay. But we're happy to arrange if you want to sit down with Ms. Cho to go through the numbers, of course. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed38:02

Perfect, yeah, I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call38:03

think. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed38:05

If I may add on the question for number five, the information that you're looking for is the last page in the last paragraph. The contract is in effect until 2026. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed38:18

So it was just a typo?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed38:19

No, it's SourceWale does their contracts super weird. And so this makes it look like if you don't First of all, they use European numbers in the dates, which is hard to clock. But they usually have a one-page extension, which next time we can put at the front to make it more accessible.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed38:43

Ms. Palmer? Yes, I was going to say that as well. A lot of times they have sort of a one-year extension, and it happened to be on the very last page, so it extends to November 8th of 26, for clarification.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role38:55

Wonderful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed38:58

And then if we could also acknowledge public comment for the entire consent calendar, too.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:02

Okay. Yes, let's do that. Sorry if I misspoke. I thought I did that, but maybe I did not.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7339:09

I have no raised hands on Zoom, Mayor. Okay. On consent, Mr. Stengel?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:14

Okay. Thank you. All right, so then I guess I will move to approve consent item number seven.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:23

I'll second it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:24

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:25

And five

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed39:26

mayor?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:26

Yes, please. Five we did already. Did we do five? We did not. Oh, five and seven

CommentKim MaxwellProposedself-stated39:32

together. Sorry. Thank you.

Roll-call vote Passed 2–1 move to approve consent item number seven. I'll second it. Okay. And five mayor? Yes, please. Five we did already. Did we do five? We did no · 1 under review
Show transcript
Roll call. All right. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Yes. Council Member Mayne? No.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7339:43

Motion fails.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:46

Okay.

CommentKim MaxwellProposedself-stated39:48

Hello.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:51

Are you not wanting to approve seven? Oh, sorry, did I misunderstand?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed39:56

So when could we meet to go over numbers? Where'd she go?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call40:00

Okay. She's here, yeah. I can send you an email and we can put

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:04

together the availability. Okay, perfect then. Does Leslie need? Hello? I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:11

didn't know that she was here. Were you here for the conversation on the consent item that we're talking about, five and seven?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:16

I was not.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:17

Okay. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:18

just joined

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7840:19

when I heard the vote.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:21

So let me just make sure, so are you- Okay, so we'll

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:22

go ahead then and go and then I'll meet with her and we can go over the numbers.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:26

You're saying you don't want to approve seven or you do want to approve and you will meet? Sorry, I'm just asking for clarification.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:32

We can go ahead and approve and meet of that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:34

Okay, approve.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7340:37

So then a yes on five and seven. Okay. Mark that vote as yes for Councilmember. Thank you. Motion does pass.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:42

All right. So we're at a slight impasse here, which is we are at the discussion item number eight, and Mr. Whitman was asking to be a part of that, and he should be here any second. He should

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call40:52

be, yes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role40:53

So let's take a ten minute break.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:54

Perfect.

0:52 – 1:0740 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:07

Check, check, one, two. Welcome back. Thanks for the break. So we will start with a roll call again. Mr. Montgomery?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.7352:17

Yes.

Roll call — called by Mayor
Show transcript
Mayor Gilman? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Here. Council Member Rule, remotely? Here. Council Member Whitman? Here. Council Member Mang? Here.

And Ms. Anderson,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:31

remotely for Ms. Rule?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed52:34

Yes, Council Member Rule, can we just have you disclose whether there are any individuals 18 years or older present in the room with you and if there are, the nature of your relationship.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7852:44

There are no individuals in the room with me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed52:47

Perfect. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7852:48

Thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8352:50

If I can. Please. I wasn't here at 5. My binder says six.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:58

Yes.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8352:59

Sorry about that. I wanted to be here for the start of the meeting, but I had no idea we were starting at five. And

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call53:06

our apologies. We completely understand. We take full responsibility for that. We're sorry. No

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role53:10

worries.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call53:11

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role53:13

OK, let's move on to item number eight, the concept review community aquatics program. Mr. Harvey.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call53:18

Yes. Thank you, Mayor. Joining me for this item is Ms. Rivera. And I just would ask that the PowerPoint be brought up. Give it a moment. Okay, there it is. So there has been some talk at past meetings about the Nordhoff High School pool and potential involvement with the city, but this really is the first time we've come to you with a real introduction to what is possible Over there, and really getting the Council's input so that we can take direction and move forward. So as you saw from the staff report, there's at least five options that we have identified. Of course, there are more, and we'll take whatever direction you provide. But let's walk through those options that we have come forward with, and then we can go from there. So next slide, please.

Right, so as I indicated, this is a concept review, and you can, as Miss Anderson likes to say, you can trash or treasure what we propose. You can select one, some, or none of these options. You could bring forward your own. This does align with your arts, culture, and recreation funding City Council goal, and whatever you do decide, if it's not already a tactic, we will want to amend your goals to reflect that. Next slide, please.

So one option is that we could create a city-run community aquatics program at the Nordoff High School pool. Many of you may know from living here or from just paying attention to our salary schedule, we have had lifeguards in the past. They're still on our salary schedule. We wouldn't just grab that classification and run with it. We would want to do a considerable amount of research and come back to you with a thoughtful concept if we were going to propose one. We would look at other municipalities and agencies in the region and see what they're doing. We would talk to our insurance authority.

We would speak with other experts on what's involved with putting together an aquatics program. And we feel that we could do that well within 90 days if that was something you wanted us to pursue. So that's one option. Next slide. Another option, and you have heard from members of the community about this, not only here at these council meetings, but also in email, and I'm sure you've read editorials and letters to the editor in the Ojai Valley News.

We could look to support a community-run aquatics concept. If you were interested in doing that, there is a grassroots group in the community. They have suggested that The City allocated $10,000 in seed money to be provided via a professional services agreement with a group who is local, Lane 4 Fundraising. They have been involved and are working on other community aquatics programs, and they could put together what a model might look like for OI, what's involved, details of that. So that's another option you have.

And again, that probably is a 90-day timeline. If we were going to come back, maybe less, but that's an option. Next slide. This is not a new idea, but this is also something to consider. The City of Ojai provides recreation, as everyone here on Council knows, not only to Ojai residents, but to those in the Ojai Valley and beyond. There are facilities not only within the city's organization but also in the school district and also outside of Ojai that are used for recreation. And so we could explore the concept of creating an Ojai Valley-wide special recreation district.

It would be funded through a parcel tax. That's our initial recommendation. We would want to work closely with the City Attorney's Office and others, and this one probably would require the full 90 days if we were going to be asked to do this, but we could do that and explain how this might work and what might be involved and what the impact might be to our own Recreation Department and our infrastructure. Next slide, please.

This is what I would call related, not necessarily 100% an aquatics program, but this is a related use, and that is that of creating a community splash pad. There are some locations in and around town, including some at Surzatti, The County Soule Park, also at Nordoff High School, all would require some analysis and some evaluation, but we could come back to you with this.

We'd want to tell you about what's involved with, you know, not only building, but maintaining and operating. Some of you, particularly the Mayor Pro Tem and Council Member Rule, have been very active in this area. We were aware of vendors that do this type of work, and I think even the Mayor Pro Tem has already established some relationships with them. So we'd be happy to come back with a report, probably less than 90 days, on what is involved with this.

Depending on where it would be located would determine the various agreements that are required. This would be a city capital improvement program item for likely the next fiscal year if we were given direction.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role58:57

Can I ask you one question about option three? Now when you said you would have 90 days to come back with a proposal, but that would go to a vote. So we're talking about a 2026 vote on item three, the valley-wide

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call59:09

Oh, oh, oh, sorry. Going back one slide.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role59:11

Thank you. Yes, that's

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call59:17

a very important point. This would require a vote to be at the general election in November 26, but we would come back to you with specific information on what's involved. Thank you for pointing that out. Let's advance back to slide four, or option four, pardon me. Okay, I think that's all on that one. Next slide, thank you. This has been talked about at prior council meetings, particularly by Councilmember Rule, and that is the potential for organizing a capital campaign for a new community pool at Soule Park.

Obviously, this would require coordination with Ventura County. We have been successful out there with other recreational ventures, notably the pickleball courts. But if Council so directed, we'd be happy to come back to you within 90 days with what we feel is involved with that and the effort involved. Next slide, please. And then as I indicated, there are certainly other options out there or combinations thereof of what we've provided or things related to this topic, so certainly you're not limited by what we have in our agenda report.

I know that we have representatives from the Ojai Unified School District here with us, including our Superintendent Knox, so thank you for being here. We also have representatives, or at least a representative, no, I see two, from the grassroots community pool effort. So, Ms. Revere, did I neglect to mention anything? No. Oh, actually, yes, I did neglect to mention one thing. Maybe Ms. Knox is going to speak to this during public comment. I'm just going to mention this as an aside. This is kind of a late-breaking item.

I did speak with Mr. Olson, the Assistant Superintendent, about a very recent conversation that the school district had with the YMCA about the Nordoff Pool. There have been ongoing discussions since the YMCA indicated preliminarily that they were not interested in providing a contract aquatics program. They have come back since and said they could consider bringing back something limited in scope like Saturday swimming lessons at the pool. And so Mr. Olson indicated he's expecting a proposal from them in the next few days. Of course, he said he'd be happy to share it with us and send it over to us. But that just took place after the agenda was posted. We became aware of this late Friday in the day. So I think, OK, Ms. Knox is nodding her head.

And that's just a

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:01:51

Saturday.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:01:52

That's what that's what they came out of the gate with. But again, it'd be interesting to see what was actually in their proposal.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:59

Because do we know the total number of hours or days that the pool that we're talking about covering? I've never heard a number. I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:02:07

don't I don't have a number yet. I mean, and I would ask maybe during the public comment,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:02:11

we put the superintendent on the spot. Right. So when we're going out trying to figure things out, here's what we're looking at to see if anybody.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:02:18

And a good point, you know, in these analysis periods, these 90-day periods when we're tasked with doing something, you're absolutely right, that would be a baseline thing to know. And we also would want other feedback that you'd want us to explore,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:02:31

you know. If I might suggest, you could say, what are the hours that students are not using the pool, and you would want to look at what hours would the community like to use the pool and see where they overlap, right? That's the idea.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:02:44

Which we could get,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:02:45

right? We already have

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:02:46

a little bit of the first. Yeah, we'd be happy to take any of that direction. So why don't I stop talking and then turn it over to you and the community. Let me, we do

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:02:56

have some public comments, but any questions for staff

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:02:58

before we go

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:02:58

to the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:02:58

public? I do have a question. The November 6 Parks and Rec Commission meeting There was an agenda item related to the community pool and there was a decision to create an ad hoc committee. And I scratched my head a little bit on that one because I had understood that City Council had an ad hoc committee. That doesn't mean that there's There isn't the potential for having a committee for both the Commission and the City Council, but I would think it would be important to make sure that we coordinate if that's what we're doing. Now, I got some feedback from staff that we hadn't created an ad hoc committee, but I had remembered You know, my memory was that we did, and I think at that meeting, Council Member Rule pointed out, Her belief that we had an ad hoc committee of the City Council.

So I guess I'd like clarification. Do we have a City Council ad hoc committee?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:04:15

We're not aware of one. There's a couple ad hoc committees involving the school district that I'm aware of. One is for the workforce housing, and that is the Mayor and Councilmember Whitman. There's another ad hoc committee comprised of Councilmember Rule and Mayor Pro Tem No, Council Member Mang, excuse me, I'm sorry, for items of curriculum and students. Right, student-related items.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:04:44

Just to clarify, as I recall, the ad hoc committee with Council Member Whitman and the Mayor was to discuss the Nordoff pool, was not to discuss a community pool or a pool It's an ad hoc committee, a two-to-two with the school district. So while there might be a bit of overlap in that, if we build, you know, in other words, the ad hoc committee That the city put together was only to discuss the Nordoff pool. It wasn't to discuss these other options. It's specifically with the school district. And so at the same time, while I think the point is well taken, that there's that the two ad hoc committees should be, um, You know, should be speaking to each other. The purposes of the ad hoc committees are different.

The Park and Rec wants to do their own evaluation, although they obviously did not know at that point, because I'm the Park and Rec liaison, they did not know during that meeting that this was going to be an agenda item, although they probably know now.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:06:08

Okay, I think that's probably... So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:06:11

the minutes that we have for the meeting where the ad hocs were created don't reflect this additional committee. So I think it would be helpful if you could just affirm who you believe is on the ad

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:06:23

hoc committee. I can tell you what I think happened. We saw that this was needing some guidance, and I started by approaching OUSD, asking questions. We came here, Mr. Whitman and I decided we would be Brown Act buddies on this issue, and we have met, we've talked, and there's been some conversation with the OUSD, but I don't recall that we formally said, here's an ad hoc committee, and we chose the people. I do not recall that piece.

On and off.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:06:51

It's an easy fix tonight, right? We can just affirm who is on the pool ad hoc committee, and then you can make a choice. The commissions are your commissions? Sure. They work at your direction. You can tell them to this is a council matter. They can dissolve their ad hoc committee. You can look at strategies for you to work with them or give them direction on the parts of this issue that you would like their feedback on. You can make a decision about what you want and then send the draft to them for feedback. You have a lot of options. So

1:07 – 1:1318 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:07:26

I'm wondering if what we decide tonight will guide what we what our next steps might be.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:07:30

Yeah, and just maybe be thoughtful about how you would like the Parks and Rec Commission, if at all, to be involved in whatever your decision

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:07:38

is. One thing that, you know, so I was the liaison before Councilmember Rule, and the Commission has already done some research into these options. And they started with a discussion about a partnership with OUSD, and then it expanded into a larger conversation about the feasibility for a community pool. So I feel like they already have done some of this groundwork.

And it would behoove us to involve them in the process because they're in it. Yeah, I

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:08:22

agree. I think just a conversation to clarify roles and goals. with Ms. Rivera and any other staff members and the committee members and just make sure that we're not, you know, marching at cross-purpose.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:08:49

Absolutely. Ms. Rivera, does that resonate with your understanding of the situation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:08:53

Yes, and one thing that the Commission did mention is that they just want to be part of the talks. So I think that's why this came about. So, you know, as long as they're in the room or know about the talks, they would be very, very happy with that as well. That's good.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:08

I'm glad we're bringing this up now. Yeah. Yes, Ms.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:09:10

Rule. I don't know if this is discussion, but I think the park and recs, you know, they've been thinking about this for 20 years. They've been, you know, two of the members have been on that commission for 20, 25 years, and they've been thinking about this the whole time. So I agree with Council Member Lang that it would behoove us, you know, it would be smart to get their participation.

You know, as much as is possible. They've done a lot of thinking for a long time about this. And so they should certainly be at the table as a stakeholder in this discussion, you know, if for no other reason, as community members.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:49

For sure. No, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:51

you. Mayor, it

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:52

seems

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:52

like we've moved past questions and

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:54

maybe we should

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:54

take public comments so that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:57

we can finish the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:09:57

robust discussion.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:09:58

I asked a question of Ms. Rivera to say, is that her understanding of the situation? Okay, let's go to public comments. First, I have Cheryl Knox, then I have Bill Miley, and then I have Larry Stengel. Thank you. Thanks for coming.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:10:13

All right. Hi, everybody. Mayor Gilman, members of the council, staff, it's very nice to be here with you. For the public who does not know who I am, I'm Dr. Cheryl Knox, the superintendent for Ojai Unified School District. So I just wanted to be here to, first of all, thank you all for putting Actually items 8 and 9 on the agenda today. We're very excited to be here to talk to you about both of these and eager to hear, you know, how we can partner and have your support. So I just wanted to bring to everybody's attention that I did write a letter to our entire Ojai Valley community. It went out last night through our channels and I believe all of you have hopefully seen a copy of it.

For our audience who might want to look at it, who have not been able to, it's on our School District Facebook page, and we did post it on our website tonight, so if anybody wants to read it. But I think, you know, it was purposefully to try to clear up any what I would call false narratives out there about the pool, and to really explain two things. Number one, We are so eager to share our pool with the community. It is a beautiful $15 million Nordoff Aquatic Center and our students are using it and will need to use it, but there are a lot of times throughout the day that we can share it with the community.

The second thing that the letter explains is that the state funding that the school district receives has to be spent and prioritized on the educational programming of students. So we really are not at leisure to pay for the programming for the community, and so we are dependent, as a school district, on a partner. And we are certainly hoping that the city is possibly going to be our partner in this. Historically, you have been. I think into the early 2000s, our last understanding was maybe around 2008, the partnership ended. You guys used to rent our old Nordoff pool and run programming.

We're eager to do something like that again. Obviously, this is all new for us with the new pool. But again, I just want to point out that, you know, a huge thank you to our community for passing both Measure J and Measure K, bringing this beautiful aquatic center to our community I think there are a lot of ways to be able to use it together, and we appreciate the conversation you're having tonight. I think there's a lot of different pathways to get to some kind of partnership with either you all or the other organizations who are interested in supporting this, but we are willing and able. I know there's a lot of questions about the hours and when it can be open.

We certainly are eager to open it in the evenings, sort of 6.30 to 9 p.m.-ish, and Saturdays and Sundays, and certainly throughout the summer. We know those are really the freest times. We have concerns about issues with student safety during the school day, but we are not opposed to talking through those kind of issues. That would be sort of a negotiation and a conversation about what kind of programming is offered then and how we can do it safely during the school day.

Once we have, you know, somebody...

1:13 – 1:194 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:13:22

Thank you so much, Ms. Knox. Bill Miley, Larry Stangold, and then Kerry Johnson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:13:34

Hello. Hi. These are impressive five options to choose from. All potentially interesting and adding benefit to water recreation for the city and the Ojai Valley and visitors. I'm a member of the new community group named Ojai Community Pool Foundation. It formed, as you may know, from the need for a structure to enable full community use of the new Nordoff Pool Aquatic Center.

My comments are mostly on one and two. Numbers three, four, and five certainly have future merit, but are huge figurative mountains to climb. Number one, authorizing the City Park and Recreation Commission. Like all other activities this department has been offering for decades, water recreation is essential and was in the past with working public pools. Having a list of such past offerings certainly is a way to start.

This form of programming does not offer overall community use, operation, and management, or unscheduled time for open swim, Recreation Guide for Families, and others. Number two option. Consider supporting the initial funding research designed by Lane 4. $10,000 element. It would be an initial phase of a more active design package. Both items 1 and 2 have value for instituting community use of the new Nornoff Pool.

However, my opinion is, without the informed creation, created, information, created, By option number two, pool community study at Lane 4, no possible structure for operating the pool as an aquatic center for school and community is possible for evenings, weekends, and summers. It's been estimated that a community pool, student-use pool, would cost a million dollars to run over a year.

I urge your council to seriously consider supporting, quote, the Lane 4 path forward, enabling measure K-Bond approval to become a reality for a community school aquatic center. And I'm a member of the Ojai Community Pool Foundation. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:16:24

Thank you, Mr. Miley. Larry Steingold and then Carrie Johnson, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:16:32

Good evening. I agree with everything he said. I'm in the same group. I'm also on the Ojai Unified School District bond over citizen bond oversight committee. We came up with a number of a quarter of a million last year, and that's just to have the pool there. That's not on, that's not used, that's not doing anything, and that's putting money on the shelf for future repairs and renovation.

So that's just a budget number for OUSD, and thank you very much for your letter. It was greatly appreciated, and I think it's wonderful. City run community pool, I see that as a given. They already have the scheduling, they have the people, and it's like plug and play, and somebody's got to do the scheduling, somebody's got to do the collecting of the fees, somebody's got to do all that. We already have it. It's a number. Monetize the cost of having them do it. Having the park and rec operate that portion of the pool, done. Lane 4, definitely.

Number three, that's probably eventually what's going to happen, because the shortfall from the pool and the cost is unsustainable by the city, because the city's only going to contribute so much money, and unless the county kicks in, bless their heart, for the 20,000 people that aren't in the city, there'll be a shortfall, and that money's got to come from someplace, and it's not our pool as a city resident.

So that, and it's a parcel tax, I don't know, 20,000 parcels in the city, in the area, and at $20 a piece, it's 400 grand. And it would only be for the pool. My fear with the Park and Rec District collection is that it creates an empire for hiring people and doing stuff. The money can be collected by the county, given to the city, and they pay the bills. We don't need any more employees to run the Park and Rec District. They're somebody's cousin. Splash pad, why not Libbey Park? Somewhere or someplace where it's close to where there are people. Sewell Park is nice, but it's a bit out of the way for most of the population. So closer in would be nice.

Libby or Nordoff or someplace. Sewell Park, unless we own Sewell Park, why would we spend $10, $15, $20 million on county property? Because the ongoing cost of that pool is going to be as much as The pool at Nordoff, and the pool at Nordoff, if it was bigger, we could do meets or national, whatever, bigger, and if that's what we're gonna do, great, but raising 18, 20, 25 million plus another whatever it is every month or every year from the city, we already have budget lines we're incorporating, whether it's the Ojai permanent housing or something, we're accumulating all these permanent expenses, and I don't think a pool Is sustainable.

1:19 – 1:287 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:19:35

Thank you, Mr. Stengel. Kerry Johnson, please. Thank you.

CommentCarrie JohnsonProposedself-stated1:19:41

Hello. Hello, Mayor and Council Members. My name is Carrie Johnson, and I am a product of the Nordoff Pool. My family moved to Upper Ojai in 1969. We are a swimming family from Orange County, and one of the reasons we headed down the hill into Ojai rather than Santa Paula is that, oh, I had a pool. Myself and my four older brothers joined the swim team and doubled the number of members. Within five years, the numbers were close to 75 kids in this program. We had a fantastic coach. We created a fantastic community of swimmers.

Other than AAU swimming, there was also a very strong influence at Nordoff, and his name was Warren Glazier. He was a teacher there. He had the pool deck decorated like a dock. Lots of pilings and very thick rope everywhere to keep people away from the edge of the pool. One of Warren's aquatic-based classes was first aid, CPR, and water safety instructor. I got my first job, I took the class, got my first job lifeguarding at the Racquet Club at the age of 15.

I worked there year-round through the summers. and during school until I got out of high school I went on and swam in college and then at that point I got a job for the state parks as a state park lifeguard at the beach in Ventura. So I have been, let's see, in college, let's see, I'm sorry, and soon got involved in the Junior Guard Program once I started guarding at the beach.

I have been blessed with a privilege to serve well over 25,000 kids and their families over the years, many of which are from Ojai. If you are unfamiliar with the program, our goal is to get kids ocean safe. You can't do the Junior Guard program unless you know how to swim, though. Rather than thinking about how great it will be to have a new pool over the years, I have gone one step further and thought about what I would do with that pool.

The potential this beautiful pool has is only limited by creativity and direction. If the pool was open now, I would have it split in half and do both club water polo on one side and youth and master swimming on the other. Half-week days after the high school team is done, so each half of the pool would have its own program going on. What a way to start building the high school teams as well.

Right now, the pool gets used once a year by elementary school practicing snorkeling for their fifth-grade trip to Catalina Island. This is great, but why not have each fifth-grade class come to Nordhoff one day a week for appropriate level swimming lessons, self-rescue, and rescue swimming techniques? So many kids don't know how to swim. Don't even have swimsuits. The best rescue I have had was not in the ocean,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:22:43

but... Have this be a to be continued. Thank you. I appreciate that. Is there anybody online,

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.731:22:59

Mr. Montgomery? Mayor, we have no raised hands from our two Zoom participants right now.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:23:05

I thought we were more popular. Okay. All right. Well, let me just, I'll say something that Mr. Whitman already knows, which is we were present for a Lane 4 presentation, so we did hear them present and offer this, basically this initial feasibility study where they would look at They would work with OUSD, look at hours and need, and they've done this before, so just, I know they haven't presented in front of us here, but personally, I would feel confident if we were to choose that as one of our options that we would initiate with them to see, my opinion is, it does give us an outside view of somebody who is experienced to say, here's what we have seen, here are pitfalls to look out for, here's what it would cost just to, for my other council members who have maybe not met with them.

Not to say that's the only thing we should say, but that's one.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:23:57

Yeah, so I wanted to say that in addition to the idea that the Parks and Rec Commission has been grappling with this issue for a couple of decades, there was a very concerted effort. There was a pool committee for Ojai. And so I think, and there's a lot of those members of that committee are still in the community, so additional download of information and ideas should come from them. One of the things that I just learned yesterday is that that committee discussed at length the splash paddock.

And I don't know exactly, you know, what their conclusions were, but I think it would be good to get a download. From them and maybe, you know, maybe there's materials to acquire. I agree with what the mayor just expressed and I kind of see one and two potentially being merged or a hybrid and I like the idea of getting an independent report That talks about existing programs in other communities where you've got a school-based pool, and then you've got multiple jurisdictions combining for that community pool access concept, and some information about, you know, how much those programs cost to run so we can compare what were projecting.

I think that option three Is something that we do have to look at, but I would suggest that that gets tabled until our new City Council takes the chair, because I think the idea of going through the process of, you know, creating a special district and getting advice about pros and cons, it's gonna be in their lap eventually, and we should hear Their advice along, you know, with staff and so I would suggest we take three and make that a future item and I'm interested In the scope of number four, you know, so explore the need. I certainly, if we're just looking at how much How much desire from the community is there to have a splash pad? And I also think where would that be is a, you know, important question.

So, I would potentially support doing that because I'm envisioning that being not a big expensive project to engage in. And then, you know, for number five, I think that That would be the fallback. In my mind, that would be the fallback. I think the communities made a big investment in what they understand to be a community pool. And I think we ought to, you know, make the effort to see if we can create the community pool program.

That was my sister speaking earlier. And I would, we did have a great asset in Teaching water safety, life-saving skills, above and beyond the exercise component. I'd love to see that come back.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:28:27

I would reflect, too, number three is pretty long-term, so it doesn't address the need, really, for the community immediately. So I do like the idea of that, but not to solve this problem right now, maybe in the future. Let me hear from others. Mayor? Yes, please. I wanted to speak up for Councilmember Rule. Oh, please, Leslie, go ahead and raise your hand. You're muted.

Leslie, you're muted.

1:28 – 1:357 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:28:52

Okay. Yep. I actually see all of these as being worthy of investigation, and I don't Because there are such questions about a Nordoff pool being a recreation pool. I understand it being programmatic, and that's great. I understand having, you know, this program going for so-and-so and this program going for these kids. But what I heard over and over is families wanting a place to take their kids to go and have A water experience, not to have them swimming down lanes and not, I mean, of course, taking courses on water safety is great.

And so, because I am not convinced the Murdoch pool is I would like to see all of these investigated. I agree about the special district, recreation district. Valley-wide, they were to say no, well, we would be like we would be nowhere. So, I guess my point is, is that I think it is worthy to investigate a capital campaign to see what that would look like, to get a sense of what it would cost and if it would be possible to raise that sum of money.

So, only because, like I said, I'm not convinced that the Nordoff pool is going to serve the interests of, you know, families who just want recreation. On hot days, you know what I mean? So is it possible to make it, to have a community pool? So I think it's important to investigate that only because it comes up all, you know, every time this conversation comes up, the same sort of options come up. So I, and I think that, The Park and Recreations Department, if they wanted to take on investigating, you know, with the city, what a capital campaign might be, as you know, Mayor Gilman, you know, we have, we put a candidate on the Park and Rec's department commission that is a very experienced capital campaigner, has, you know, I don't think he would be daunted By any, by the amount of money that a community pool would cost.

I think that that is a doable possible, you know, Steve Bennett got a $650,000 for, you know, rehabbing Sarzadi, right? I mean, he got that and we still have that to spend. So, I would not want to not investigate that option for those reasons. No, thank you. And I would like to investigate all of the other options because once again, I don't think it's an either or. It's possible that the Nordoff pool is going to serve certain functions, right? I mean, it's going to be a place where you can get these kinds of courses and you can have these programs and you can have, you know, you can, you can train swimmers and all of that.

And we potentially might need another sort of pool for the community.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:35

Thank you. Yes, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:32:37

Yes, I agree with Councilmember Rule. I mean, I agree with a little bit of everything I've heard tonight, but I agree with her that I would like for us to work with, I mean, the Parks and Rec Commission has already been doing a lot of this work. And it just feels like there's a disconnect, that we aren't bringing them into this conversation in a way that's really meaningful.

Because this is a, the question of what pool is going, what aquatics program is going to work for us transcends, it's bigger than just the Nordoff opportunity right now. So, I would be in favor of slowing this down and bringing the Parks and Rec Commission in, working in conjunction with them to have an ad hoc committee, and then bringing it back with more developed That's about the pool.

About the splash pad, we haven't, if I'm correct, you can correct me if I'm wrong, but in that funding that we received for the park renovation of Sarazote, We still have some money available. If we wanted to look at a splash pad, I think that could be a separate thing, that we could look at that location, because we already have money for that. And so that could be an option that would be more immediate than looking at, you know, a buildout at Seoul and involving the county or anything else.

Good

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:34:36

question. I hear what you're saying. Would you stop number two, let's say the late four people doing the feasibility study before you involve the Parks and Rec, or would that be in concert?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:34:47

Hmm. Yeah, that's a great question.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:34:50

The only reason why I offer that is because it seems to me, even though that the Parks and Rec has worked on this, they're going to have some just other expertise that these folks may not have just not having done it before in other places. Just an idea. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:35:04

I don't think they're mutually exclusive. I mean, I think if this I think this group, we heard it in public comments. We had feedback that came in through email. Yeah. I think this group is Thank you all for joining us.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:35 – 1:4230 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:35:37

To get this pool moving is not something that can be underestimated. You know, the motivation, the self-starting of all of this, you know, so I see them sort of as fundamental to moving this forward because they're so highly

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:35:57

motivated.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:35:59

And so I think that number two, for that reason, is very, very important.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:36:06

No,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:36:06

that makes

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:36:06

sense. Yeah.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:36:07

Yeah, so because we'll get a return on that because this group really wants to know the answers to these questions. And they have been very active to date.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:36:20

Yeah, and I think they could work with the Parks and Rec Commission. But yeah, I agree with Council Member Rule that they're very, I mean, they're so excited about it. And it's great to have community involvement. So I don't see that. I see these as being two separate

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:36:41

things. So, I want to hear from Ms. Mang, but Mr. Harvey, I want to ask you this question. So, if you say, oh, we want to do 1, 2, 4, and 5, possibly, or at least, how is, I mean, are you saying, yes, you guys want to do all of that? Is that reasonable? Of course. I mean, I think, you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:36:58

know, we would, if we're bringing back everything, It would depend on how you want it. If something's ready sooner than 90 days, we could certainly bring that back if you wanted everything to come back together. But yeah, we would get going and

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:37:15

get to work. Because see, just if I'm hearing my colleagues correctly, we could initiate Lane 4, that's number 2. We could work with Parks and Rec around just the quick feasibility around a splash pad at Zarazoti with some funding that's already there. So that's, you've got number 4 there. And then We can then look at the possibility of number one and then, you know, if we I'm on the the three and five seem longer and harder, but not out of the question. And then involving the commission, I think, makes perfect sense.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:37:47

Sure, all this is possible. We can bring back

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:37:51

everything or nothing. Ms. Mang, did you have something

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:37:53

that you wanted to say? Well, I just agree with what everybody has said. The one thing I struggle with is number five. I agree with everything that everybody said tonight. The one thing I do struggle with is number five, investing millions of dollars into a property that we don't own. I struggle with that with Pickleball, too, you know, so that's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:38:13

I mean, between all five, that one seems the longest out, I guess, the longest term, and maybe the less possible, but interesting, I suppose.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:38:21

And just on that point, I think the Nordhoff Pool took about $15 million to build. And my understanding is that Mr. Steingold is correct that, you know, it costs $250,000 a year just to let that pool sit there. And then you do programming and you're talking about annual costs of a million dollars. A capital campaign to raise money for the pool would also have to include an endowment that would help generate that million-dollar expense.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:39:04

That would be difficult. And then I guess one other question, Mr. Harvey, that I'm thinking about is that as the YMCA is working with OUSD, you know, as a possibility for a day. That's interesting to see if that develops as part of the mix, so having some time.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:39:21

Sure, we'd bring that back as soon as possible if there's the possibility that, you know, swimming lessons could be available at that pool on Saturdays. Now, I will point out that Mr. Olson did mention that the school district would be looking for the city to underwrite that, so that would definitely be coming, you know. Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:39:55

With the expense of a city-owned pool, even if it's in, you know, a county-owned property. But, for instance, I think Help of Ojai got a 40- or 50-year lease to the Honor Farm. I'm not sure, but I know it's a really long Beyond the life of a, beyond the, you know, sort of the life of a pool. And the next question is that we've been discussing, and I understand that this adds, you know, more complexity to it, but we've also spoken about, you know, absorbing Seoul Park as a city park, since it is in the boundaries of the city of Ojai. And, you know, we never have really moved forward with that with either, you know, Ventura County supervisors or Ventura County Parks and Rec. And it might be a conversation to have.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:40:54

That might be a preliminary conversation, possibly.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:40:56

Yeah,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:40:57

for sure. Just to clarify my thought for you, when I think of, hypothetically, if the why was to run Saturdays at OUSD and we underwrote it, that's so that it can open right away-ish, so that it could start, so it isn't that we're committing to anything like a tenure or anything. It's more like just

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:41:16

Okay, yeah, no, I understand that. I wasn't meaning to make the equation between the YMCA Saturday program. I was more speaking about if we were to be a full-time underwriting partner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:41:28

And

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:41:30

so we would need to know What the costs of that were versus what the return on the investment would be versus the cost of a pool that was ours and what the return on investment outside of what that would be, days, times, what it would be. I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:41:47

totally understand. I was thinking one is more immediate and

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:41:51

the other is more long. That's all. I would agree that immediate is great. Let's get that pool open. Let's get people in that pool. Let's get the kids. Let's get the families. Let's start with what we can do and let's do it. And so I think that's sort of I mean, I'm totally for that. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:09

So can I modify? Here's just an idea. If number five turned into something like a preliminary conversation around what it would mean for the city of Ojai to absorb Soule Park.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:42:22

I would want our city attorney to weigh in

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:24

on that. How do you feel about that? I'm saying you're only like, you're just the beginning. You're not even, you're just making a couple of phone calls.

1:42 – 1:5165 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:42:32

I think those conversations have taken place and they didn't mature. We might be in a different

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:42:42

environment

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:42:42

these

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:43

days.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:42:43

I would also say that this agenda item is very heavily the pool.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:48

I would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:42:48

encourage you to have an item that comes

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:51

back. That's fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:42:52

That's fine.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:42:54

So if I might suggest to my colleagues, it seems to me that We're pretty settled on 1, 2, and 4. And that 3 and 5 seem a little longer out. And if I will offer that we ask the staff to pursue 1, 2, and 4, and then possibly we would come back on 3 and 5 at some later time to revisit. I'd support that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:22

I would as well.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:23

That's my motion then, I guess.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:29

I would like to have something in the motion that talks about Parks and Rec.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:35

And we involve the Parks and Rec. Commission in the committee. Yes, exactly. Are we okay with that addition?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:43:41

Can we clarify who the second is? I heard a lot of support.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:45

Mr. Whitman was the first person to say I would support

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:43:47

that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:47

Are you okay with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:43:48

that? Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:51

And are you okay with adding the Parks and Rec. Commission as the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:43:56

I think that we should have the discussion with the Parks and Rec Department about how

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:44:03

we move

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:44:04

forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:44:05

And then just to clarify, is the Council interested in creating its own ad hoc or are we relying on the Parks and Rec Commission ad hoc at this time and then a report back for your consideration?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:44:18

Because how does that work? Because I recall when we were voting on the ad hoc for the workforce housing, and when Mr. Gilman said, oh, and that would be the pool as well. So just, I don't know if that causes any friction or anything, but that was definitely discussed.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:44:35

So, let me, can I just jump in there really quick? So, what meeting, can someone please remind me what meeting that took

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:44:41

place at? So,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:44:43

those minutes have been approved, right? So, the best practice would be, you know, once the minutes are approved, that is your official record. Now, we can always go back and revise minutes based upon the video, but that is what we operate from. It's important. You've got a whole batch of minutes on this meeting agenda. It's really important that you take a look at those because if we got something wrong, it happens. But, you know, on this particular item, I think it's fine. We can easily cure it by creating an ad hoc committee here right now. But that just wasn't our recollection. And when I went back

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:45:20

to the minutes. But my suggestion on that point would be That we scheduled the meeting that I mentioned with the Parks and Rec Director and the two individuals that volunteered to be part of the ad hoc committee. And that, and the mayor and I, and that we discuss roles going forward. And if it doesn't make sense to have a city council ad hoc committee at this point in time, then we don't. And if it makes sense to have, you know, I think we can just discuss what should happen going forward. And then we can bring that back.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:46:06

Certainly, sorry to step on you. Let's just create that ad hoc committee in this meeting, and then if you want to dissolve it, that's fine. If that's okay. That way you guys aren't acting as Brown Act buddies, you're just acting in a direction from, if that's okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:46:17

You have direction from Council to be engaging and doing the things that you'd like to do. That's great for me. That's okay. I'm happy to go back and watch the tape. I didn't have time today when it came up. If that if that would be helpful.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:46:32

So we're saying that if we were to proceed and say, since Mr. Whitman and I have been working on this already, we proceed with it, but we involve the Parks and Rec Commission in our conversations.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:46:41

I'm all for it. And we we come up with a way of including their involvement in ours that is harmonized.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:46:49

Great. Love it. Oh, yeah. Ms. Rule. You're muted still.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:47:00

What is the downside to including five? Because if we go all through this and we find that You know, OUSD is going to provide some things, but it's not going to provide everything that we want. Like, I don't understand what the downside of investigating five is. I never, I just don't understand it. And especially as the Park and Rec Commission was enthusiastic about doing that.

I mean, we couldn't make a decision on the Nordoff pool without having information about what it would cost or what the process would be for building our own pool. How could we make that assessment? I would

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:47:52

say the downside is, at least right now, is it seems if I was going to be involved in a capital campaign to look at the land and the cost and how to raise the money, that seems like a huge task. That's when you ask what's the downside, that's what I would say.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:48:05

Because it's too large a task?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:48:07

I'm saying if we think of all the tasks, I would not put that at the same par with 1, 2, and 4. But in other words, I would do 1, 2, and 4 more immediately. I would not do 5 immediately if I had to do either or.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:48:23

And it's without prejudice to 5 becoming a sharper focus as our discussions evolve about how to do this stuff.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:48:35

What gives me a pause is that it's initiating, the way that it's worded, it's about initiating the capital campaign. It assumes that there is a decision to move in this direction. Is that? You

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:48:49

could change the language and provide staff direction to explore the feasibility instead.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:48:55

And I don't see the downside to that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:48:59

Of what it would take to construct and... Engaging with the county

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:49:04

if there's even

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:49:04

an

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:49:04

appetite. I know you're saying you don't see the downside and I was telling you why. Or how it

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:49:08

would be more complicated than having Lane 4 do a whole build out or negotiating with Nordoff as to what, when, and what, and how, and how we, you know, I mean, those are deep negotiations that require compromise. No,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:49:26

I understand. I'm trying to say the Lane 4 proposal is the feasibility study for working at OUSD.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:49:33

Right, but OUSD has, I mean,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:49:36

that's, I mean, the scope is much smaller and it's more pointed and we would get that information faster. So if you said, let's engage with Lane 4 on a proposal for A pool at Soule Park, that's a different proposal that seems much more elaborate. So when you just ask what's the downside, that's how, that's, I'm not saying we're not going to do it, I'm saying I just wouldn't put that as the highest priority, that's all.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:49:58

I would say it seems much simpler because when we start negotiating with OUSD about, you know, whether or not adults and children can be in the same place at the same time, you're talking about very deep conversations. You're talking about You know, laws and you're talking about liability and you're talking about all kinds of things.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:50:18

So let me just let me stop you to say,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:50:19

yeah,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:50:20

there is a proposal. There is a motion that was seconded for one, two and four for now that we modified to add the the ad hoc committee with the Parks and Rec Commission.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.781:50:31

OK, so I would like to suggest a friendly motion that we instruct the city manager to do initial Investigation as to what it would cost to have a capital campaign. You know, like what's the cost of, you know, that's my friendly amendment.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:50:55

I'm not going to accept that for now, but if you want to make another motion, you certainly can.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:51:00

And I would just like to clarify that Council is creating an ad hoc that is open to discussing with Parks and Rec. Ad hoc. It's not a combined committee.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:12

P.S. I'm looking at August and it says appointed to Council member and it does not have the pool. It only has the housing. P.S.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:51:19

Yes. I'm happy to go back

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:21

and watch the tape if you'd like

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:51:22

me to and if we got the minutes wrong.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:25

I've got it. Anyway.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:51:27

One

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:27

question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:51:28

So, you know, a lot of this, every one of these options has a 90-day cap. Is that hard and fast? Could we extend it out to five months, six months?

1:51 – 1:5817 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:51:44

We're happy to take more time if you'll give it to us.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:51:46

Because that that would give the parks. Well, that will give the parks and rec more time to be involved. That would give them more time because they're going to be exploring the ad hoc committee that they have. It's already exploring option five. So if we if we extend this, give a little bit more time, then then I think we could have more. The only concern about that is that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:52:12

there is interest in getting

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.831:52:13

community members into the pool as quickly as is practical. It's not going to happen on a bullet train. You know, unless YMCA comes in with some type of wonderful proposal for doing that, but the sooner we move, you know, things forward on these issues, the sooner we're potentially looking at actually getting lifeguards on the deck and people in the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:52:57

pool. That's my interest as well. So if it was that you give us a report out of where you're at in 90 days, but- I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:53:04

think we could accomplish a lot. I put those numbers in there thinking that that was feasible. And we're really talking about the second meeting in February 26. And really, we would want to have as much information as possible to you at that discussion.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:53:17

I like that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:53:20

Sorry, Mr. Clerk.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.731:53:21

Yes. I just have a question, Mayor, just to be clear for the record. Okay. The creation officially now of this ad hoc would be that extension of the Councilmember Whitman and Mayor Gilman? Yes. Ad hoc committee? Mm-hmm. Thank you. Working with the Park Center Commission. Thank you for confirming.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:53:38

Okay.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–1
Show transcript
All right. We're ready for a vote. Roll call. Yep. Councilmember Rule. No. Okay. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Council Member Mang. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lange. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.731:53:55

Motion passes 4-1.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:53:56

Okay. All right. This is exciting. All right, cool. Yes, thank you, Ms. Rivera. Okay, we're on to number nine, Ojai Unified School District requests for a pledge for a career technical education facility program grant match for the modernization of Attila Auditorium.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call1:54:17

Mayor, I know that the Ojai Unified School District is here. They have provided a presentation, so this item is coming from you and the Mayor Pro Tem, but I would make a recommendation that you allow the school district to show their presentation to kind of prime the pump, and then perhaps you can take it from there.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:35

Yep. Thanks. Sounds good. Thank you. Thanks for being here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:54:42

Yeah, thank you. So again, Dr. Cheryl Nock, Superintendent, Ojai Unified School District, here with Kim Hoy, serving in many roles at Nordoff, our dance teacher, and also the Visual and Performing Arts Department Chair, and then very importantly, our teacher on special assignment doing all of the administrative work to oversee our career technical education programming. And so we're here together to present this proposal.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:55:09

So we have a beautiful slide for you just to invoke the history of Matiloha Auditorium. First built in 1929, subject to some real issues in 1933 with an earthquake that really took it down, and it was rebuilt. You see this article from 1936. Just wanted to acknowledge the history of it. This was back when Matilla Hawes Campus, as we have known it, was really Nordoff Union High School. So, we wanted to be able to just invite you to that, and also to acknowledge that this was originally a Works Progress Administration.

Project under FDR. And in fact, the cost of the school district was only $4,000. So with that, we want to share with you more about a very special opportunity we have. With timing, we would not have expected. We want to honor and share how career technical education is a complicated space among the Department of Education. So with that, I'm going to turn it back to Cheryl.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:56:16

So before I dive into this slide, I just wanted to pull us back to a 30,000-foot view because I'm sure people are asking why we're not using bond money to renovate this auditorium. Over 10 years ago, we had a needs assessment done, and over $100 million in projects were identified. You know, there were a lot of needs in the district, including new roofing, plumbing, sewage, piping, that kind of stuff, and so HVAC, Those sorts of things, of course, our Aquatic Center, we're super grateful for our community for passing both Measure J and Measure K to the tune of $80 million that has been infused into our district and has transformed our sites in the last decade. But unfortunately, this auditorium did not make the list.

And now we are in our final millions of bond dollars with projects already identified, including rebuilding the stadium, which we all know is a priority for the community and for the district, and renovating kitchens. There are many other items that are on that list that are going to more than exhaust the bond funds. So when we came to looking at the funds we could offer as a district with what we have in other funds, including developer fees, The district is able to put forth $750,000 toward this grant. We're looking to get the matching dollars, which Kim will talk more about, from the state.

But we really felt like this was a good opportunity to reach out to All of our community members and organizations who prioritize the performing arts, who prioritize the arts, because this is an ask of our entire community to be able to step forward and say, we're willing to help out, we're willing to pledge whatever dollar amount. Because again, any dollar amount we get up to 1.5 million, we can ask the state for matching funds. So we're here today because as we've talked to people throughout the community and asked members of the community and organizations, they have told us other entities to reach out to, and you're one of the entities that they encouraged us to reach out to. We know that prioritizing the performing arts is very important, or the arts in general are important priorities for you all.

And so we're here today to ask, you know, would you be willing to pledge $250,000 toward this grant ask of the state.

1:58 – 2:062 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:58:30

With that, we also want to mention that the nature of the timing is tricky. We want to be really forthright about that. The State Department of Education provides us a lot of grant deadlines. And so, for example, in the last two months, we've actually submitted two other CTE grants. So we just mentioned that context for your understanding that as a small school district, we're actually one of the few districts, there are only 40 districts in the state of California that receive multiple layers of funding and we are one of them. So we're tiny but mighty and we look for that and so this opportunity, we've been looking for this opportunity, we've been waiting for it.

But also we wanted to be sure we were in a good enough standing to be able to actually fulfill it as a district and pursue it. So I also want to just mention that this is personal to me to some degree. I'm one of the few people in the community who, since 2005, I've directed close to 30 performances. With student numbers anywhere from 20 students to 99. And so I can tell you I have lived, eaten, and slept, and breathed the space, and understand intimately that we have a jewel in the rough currently.

As she is 96 years old, we have this special opportunity. The opportunity requires a one-to-one, dollar-for-dollar match. As Cheryl mentioned, the district has initiated a $750,000 contribution towards the match. And then we personally have raised, it's actually up by $1,500 today, $921,000 in change. And so, just to be clear, where those monies have come from, it's come from our advisory committee. We have an advisory committee of approximately 33 individuals.

representing multiple organizations, I think I counted 11, and ultimately most of those organizations either use the space or support programs that have used the space and would like to use it again in the future. When we think about CTE, I'm guessing perhaps you might not be familiar with that terminology. Most people don't know what career technical education is.

So if you could imagine this, it is the potential for students to acquire specialized skills over the course of multiple classes. So for example, at Nordoff, we have multiple pathways. Those pathways are broader than the pathways that use this facility, but In particular, theater, dance, and now digital media could be able to use this facility for specific industry training.

What that looks like is students would take a minimum of 300 hours of coursework. Over their high school career, now because we are consolidated, some of our pathways actually are starting with junior high students. So for example, in the grant, we wrote down about 500 students per year use the facility. Also our elementary music program, as well as our high school musical. So it really touches a large majority of students. And again, you might think only 500, but imagine that over many, many, many years ahead.

I also want to point out the nature of CTE, that it's aligned with state standards. So, our teachers are expected to hold responsibility for instruction of those standards. So, we definitely do our homework, we attend professional development, we are expected to prepare students for careers. One of the issues for us currently is that our facility does not allow for our instruction to be equitable compared to other places, other school districts. When our students walk into other locations, they think, oh wait, it's like that over there, but we have this. And so we definitely have some work to do to bring our facility to industry standard in a few areas. Safety, lighting, sound, projection, as well as seating. When it comes to lighting, we are aiming to avoid having any folks, we don't have students climb on ladders, but we're aiming to avoid having community members have to climb on ladders.

Currently, if anyone wants to focus a light or move a light, they actually have to get up on a ladder. And in fact, if you can imagine that and extrapolate that to as many as 50 lights in the space, it's extremely time-consuming, it's inefficient, the lights are broken, or if they're not broken, they're very hot, and every single group who comes in to use the space has to reinvent the space for that purpose. We are aiming to have a full lighting plot that is hung, that is no longer a situation that students can't program. We could have students actually learn how to program and focus those lights. We could have students learn how to program sound that would make it so the acoustics in the space are appropriate so audience members can enjoy at the current level of what technology makes available.

I do want to mention the total budget because you're probably wondering how much is it going to cost. A new facility would cost far more. What we're looking for is a budget of between three to four million dollars. We are coming to the city today to ask you to be a partner. We recognize that we have a responsibility to gain as much momentum as possible on this project. We have been continuing to do our homework, and even Friday, we learned that the 96-year-old Douglas fir flooring that's in the auditorium where the audience sits, the nail bed is coming up from underneath it. And so, we have a diligence that we must fulfill on ensuring that we make it so that the next hundred years, you know, in a hundred years, they're going to say they did a good job.

So, for example, we'd like to replace that with maple floor, which will last longer. In fact, the stage floor is made out of maple. And so, it is in far better condition. So, we mention this to you just to give you, like, the taste of that. And with that, I also want to mention that 85% of our advisory committee has pledged towards that $170,000 plus there. We've had a few industry members provide sizable donations and sizable pledges.

Let's move on. You might wonder why the city should contribute. I personally did the analysis of the use of the auditorium. 40% of it is used by, when I say it, I mean the use, the rental of the facility, is by local community groups. When we think about what it means to community members to be our partners, this place has a really soft spot in the heart of the community. It is the only facility within the city limits that can accommodate as many as 290 folks as audience members. So in terms of what it provides, it's unique in that respect.

I also want to mention that the nature of our relationship with our advisory committee, it's not a one and done where I'm concerned. I look at it like we have a responsibility to collaborate and to ask for input, to ask them, hey, what do you think about this kind of seat, for example? And you can see a wide variety of organizations, including post-secondary partners, because we do have a responsibility to ensure that our students are prepared to go on to whatever it is they're interested in.

Along with that line, I'm going to turn this over to Cheryl. She'll tell you a little bit more about the timing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:06:21

Yeah, so we're on a very tight timeline. We do have to submit our grant by December 1st, which means we need to have final pledges by November 20th in order to know what we're asking the state for. Again, we're here asking for $250,000. This is a unique opportunity. It is a competitive grant. And the more partners we actually have and pledges we have look very good for the grant ask of the state. So that's what we're asking for from you all today.

2:06 – 2:1321 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:06:51

Just also want to mention that we know this aligns with a number of the goals for the City of Ojai. Obviously arts, culture, and recreation funding, but also the infrastructure. One of the things we are dedicated to is ensuring safety in the space, and so asking ourselves, for example, the electrical panel, that needs to be upgraded. That needs to be upgraded so we can be safe and ensure that when we turn on lights for each production we don't short out the space, but it also ensures that we don't actually accidentally have a fire. So we want to be really thoughtful about that.

And then ultimately we do want to encourage us all to consider how we can partner One of the things we do want to ensure is that we want to have a way to sit down and discuss the potential for a master joint use agreement with the city. And I think this is reasonable to say it's not just about the auditorium. Obviously, there's conversation to be had about multiple spaces.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:50

And I'll just say one thing, which is I attended a meeting on the 22nd where this was proposed in detail and thought it did match our goals. Now, I will say the reservation I had was my preference would be I would or some of us would come with a proposal that we would sit on, it would go out to the community, and then we would come back in two weeks or a month and then vote. We don't have the time for that. But that is the way that I'm hoping that we do work is we have the time to think about it, but I bring it to the colleagues here to say, you know, here's this timeline and might we consider it. So any questions for these guys before we go to public comments? Yes, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:08:28

So I had a question, thank you for your presentation. So let's say, so you said the funds are only due approximately one year if the state, so we don't know for sure if the state's going to accept it. What if, now this is just like hypothetical worst case scenario, what if there is some kind of major disaster and the city doesn't have that funding? Is it legally binding?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:08:55

No, we don't see it as legally binding. A year is a long way out, so lots of things happen, including perhaps the district has more money that it could allocate, you know, depending on what happens in our different funds. So, you're not on the hook for it, but it is, you know, definitely considered, you know, pledged to us so that we can be confident in how much we're asking the state for.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:09:17

And a follow-up question to that. Let's say you apply and you don't get the matching grant, but you're going to proceed with the fixes that you need. I'm presuming you are requesting all of the pledges. You'll continue to request the pledges?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:09:29

I foresee that we would come back to you with a proposal at that time. We would actually say that to anyone who had pledged. If you're pledging, you're pledging under the assumption that we're getting the grant. We will know around March 1st if we've received the grant. But we also want to allow a six-month timeline thereafter for the request of those as actual dollars. But I absolutely understand the challenge of a pledge is that it's a good faith commitment. But we also, we know real life happens.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:00

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:10:01

I don't anticipate that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:02

happening,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:03

but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:10:03

just, you know, wanting to cover all bases. And I hope you get the grant. Yeah, and I hope you get the grant too. It's a healthy question.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:08

Any more questions before

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:10:09

we go? Yeah, sure. Actually, for Council, You agree that if we do a pledge, there's no binding aspect to the pledge?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:10:20

We would need something in writing to that effect, that the city, based off of resources, we have a clause that we can include in contracts, that basically the city, at the time that the money is due, if we don't have the resources or the budget to do it, that we won't make it. That has

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:40

to be a big deal. That's a fair question, though. Any questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:49

Okay,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:50

okay, thank you very much. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:52

you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:53

All right, so I have first Kim Maxwell, please, then Sven Schellgren, and then Bill Miley. Thank you.

CommentKim MaxwellProposedself-stated2:11:05

Good evening, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and the Ojai City Council members and staff, and good evening to all my friends and neighbors from around the Ojai Valley. It is a pleasure to share this little valley with you. My name is Kim Maxwell, and I have been launching stories loudly and unapologetically in this little town for about 33 years now. I am a co-founder of the Ojai Playwrights Conference, now in its 29th year, and I am the founder and principal of Kim Maxwell Studio.

I am here tonight because I am throwing my whole heart and soul behind this breathtaking and this incredible effort to upgrade, I mean, it's such a wonderful project, to upgrade our beloved Matilla Auditorium, and I am hoping to convince you to do the same. Our auditorium is a gem of a building, but she has fallen into disrepair over almost 100 years of service to this community.

I have seen everything on that stage, from adorable and terrified kindergartners in ballet recitals to Broadway actors reading their brand-new words of Pulitzer Prize-winning playwrights. It has been home to more town hall meetings and benefits than I can possibly recount. Matiloha Auditorium is a part of the tapestry that makes Ojai, Ojai. Holding hundreds of people at a time, she has always stood for the community having a voice, and we need that now more than ever.

And in this moment, when there is a matching grant to do a serious amount of heavy lifting for us, this is the very best moment for us to invest in the voices, hearts, and talents of our friends and neighbors. Please, please join the multiple organizations and dedicated humans devoted to upgrading, maintaining, and filling the four walls of this invaluable community landmark with joy, excellence, and opportunity to reach for something maybe even a little further than we think we can.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:13:14

Thank you, Ms. McLeod. Sven Sheldren, please, Bill Miley, and then Leanne McDonald.

2:13 – 2:197 turns

UnidentifiedKerry JohnsonProposed · by introduction2:13:25

Thank you to the and staff and the community for this opportunity to speak in support of agenda item number nine. I'm the Director and President of the Ojai Film Festival. I'm also on the board of the Ojai Arts Center and I've been on the boards of OPAT and the Ojai Arts Center Theater Group. I've developed and produced and experienced in the audience content.

In the Matilla HA in different formats for eight or nine projects over the past six years, probably providing 50 rental days. It's a unique venue that we don't have anything like in the Valley. We've got lots of 80 to 120 seat venues. We've got the Playhouse with over 200, but this is close to 300, and it's a gem, even as it stands right now, but it deserves to be upgraded.

It could provide benefits for residents, visitors, and tourists. It's a great location, ideally placed for students, mentors, professionals, and elders. This proposal would result in an amazing creative laboratory for development, training, and presentation. This would be a state-of-the-art and creative support that would be a magnet for resident industry veterans, people who live here, who kind of stay off the beaten path, but who would come out and join visiting professionals and experts to help develop projects and train our students and enhance our audience experience.

There's a lot of new visionary media opportunities coming in immersive projection, in interactive cross-collaborations with theater, dance, music, gymnastics, that we could work into this facility. And the education and career training of all these formats, as well as the business aspect of teaching students how to run this type of operation, would be huge. This could be staffed by students with some training and mentor support, but they could learn about the business of entertainment and performance, as well as doing it firsthand and developing their own project.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:15:55

Bill Miley, please, then Leanne McDonald, and then Larry Stengel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:16:04

Hello.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:16:05

Hi.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:16:07

I was born three years after 1929, when this was rebuilt. Considering what I look like and how I function, I could also use modernization.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:16:24

Oh, you're coming to us for some money now?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:16:30

Tourism provides much of the economy of our city. The art elements located within the city and those brought into the city are key elements that create attractions for our tourism economy and benefits our city residents and valley residents. Our art commission was recently granted by council a local grant funding budget for the new year of $100,000, triple the previous year, all because of this valuable community artist element.

Plus council goals and tactics are also on the artists. The above, as I view it, creates a foundation for considering the district participatory request. Modernization is the official term they use in the requested letter. Such potential funding opportunity does not occur every year, only occasionally according to the author. This funding, Career Technical Education Facilities Grant, requires a one-to-one match.

The district has apportioned more than $900,000. The total is $3 to $4 million. My connections to the Matilla Auditorium, including having my three children attend it, Beyond Topatopa and Nordoff. Also, I have a connection to the 1929 architect, Roy Wilson, as both my wife and my wife, Cookie, and I knew Zelma Wilson. So, city tourism general fund monies are lovely and abundant.

They certainly help our government function. Measure C funds are capital improvement programs. Money to Modernize a Matilda Auditorium fits the framework of strengthening our arts community for now and long-term futures, a great investment of tourism revenue. My contributing to the grant shows the state, community, and city support and adds uniqueness to their proposal. I would hope your council would meet the state's...

2:19 – 2:3014 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:19:13

Thank you, Mr. Miley. I'll take you out to lunch whenever you want, pal. Leanne McDonald, please, and then Larry Stengel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:19:30

Hello, City Council. Thank you for allowing me to speak on this measure. I am a community volunteer, a supporter of Nordoff High School and the arts education there, and I'm also the parent of two students who both benefited From the Arts Education at Matiloha, at Topatopa, through our community organizations, and under the tutelage of Bill Wagner, Kim Hoy, and John Hoy at our high school.

I encourage you to pledge as much as you possibly can towards this project. This is the foundation of building not only our community relationship with the school district, But showing your promise to the children of Ojai that you believe in them as the next generation of professional performers that can come from Ojai and return to Ojai with their craft. Kim Hoy and her management of the career technical pathways at Nordoff, she has opened doors for so many students to learn the craft in ways that they can walk out of Nordoff High School and into a profession that will pay them, not necessarily needing to pursue a BFA or even a BA in the arts from a four-year university. They have the skills to do that because of the training and the on-ground expertise they've been able to gain.

Now, if we want to continue that promise to our students, to give them that true pathway, we need to support them with industry standard equipment. Thank you. Thank you. I ask you for the youth of our community coming from, oh yes, coming from our elementary schools, coming through Nordoff High School, as they embark on their performing arts journey, support them with a modern industry standard and safe facility. that they can enjoy and master these performing arts and master these technical skills to take out in the world and enrich all of us in our own lives. So thank you so much.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:22:27

Thank you very much. Larry Stangle, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:22:34

Hi. Whatever they said, again.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:22:37

Cool.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:22:39

This is a good thing. I would love to be here for the 100th anniversary, and I want to be here when Bill's here, when I'm his age. Don't we all? Yes, really. My daughter was in community theater. She went into corporate work. She now is the founder and CEO of her own company. And theater is a great skill, whether it's in voice, or how to act, or how to be aggressive, or do whatever you have to do. Technical skills are wonderful. Pledging the 250 is a good thing. If you gave them the 250, I think they'd be happier.

Okay? Now, however, however, there is a way to that. If 40% of the citizens of Ojai use the facility, and we also use other schools, the $250,000 could be given to them and we can take control of the chaparral building as a long-term ground lease. So we could control chaparral, they could have a quarter of a million, and we're good to go, right?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:23:39

He's negotiating for

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:23:40

OUSD, right? All the fees that are paid by Ojai citizens to use their facility could come out of the $250,000 until it's used up. So instead of spending $10 to be on a school tennis court, it would be nothing for a city resident. That way, at least we're getting something beyond, hey, we feel good, this is good for our kids, this is great, but we're getting something concrete in return for the quarter of a million, instead of just laying it out.

Because a pledge is fine, but they'd like to see the money so they could get going, because if they could do the electrical now, or they could do something now, it would be maybe a lot cheaper. So that's one way, and yes, I'm negotiating because no one else is going to. Okay, you're right, I can't help myself. You're right. It's a habit. But seriously, I mean, you get something in trade.

Getting chaparral control of those buildings for our non-profits, for our businesses, for our citizens in the city is not such a bad thing because it's going to happen one way or the other. Eventually, so why not just look into it now, here's the money, that's fine, or come off of it, something concrete. Thank you.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.732:24:58

Thank you, Mr. Stengel. Anything online? Mayor, we have no raised hands for this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:25:02

Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:25:07

Wait, what? Oh, did somebody come online? No, no. Oh, okay. Okay. Well, let me just offer one thought, which is the argument about that Matiloha needs to be renovated, that's probably clear to everybody. The question seems to be more apt is, why should we help? And then it seems to me the answer is that because you have 40% used by the community, I have rented it many times myself personally, and that our own, while OUSD spans further than the city, it also includes our city. So it's our people, our residents, our children, and our future.

That the way that Mr. Miley pointed it out is while we are in a very healthy sort of tourism situation, it does seem to me it's an interesting way of taking that money and putting it into community life. And so that's what interests me about it, but that's my perspective. And as far as the negotiating about what we can get, I'm trusting them that when they say that we want to negotiate some something with us, because we are interested in other aspects of OUSD. And I'm sure that will come up because our relationship continues to grow.

But I want to hear from you. Yes, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:26:26

I was just going to say that, you know, I think there are lots of opportunities to look at what a joint use agreement would look like. For example, look at having classes through the Parks and Rec Department for theater, for music, for, you know, we've had community, I've had community members come to me and say, we'd love to have an intergenerational choir running through the Parks and Rec program. So this would open up, this would expand, the partnership could expand the capacity for that.

We could also look at city events. We could look at organizing or arranging, to Larry's, I like the way that Larry suggested this or proposed this, but in a way, in the same way that we offer legacy events, the use of Libby Bowl, Perhaps there's some kind of agreement we could have for granting organizations like the Film Festival or the Music Festival, for example, collaborations with the auditorium.

And so these are just things that I've been thinking about because I have heard questions from community members of what are we getting, I mean, what are we getting for this? I personally think There is a lot that we're getting with the career development for the students. I was a theater person. I was a theater major. In a similar way of what we heard with the aquatics program, my theater education in high school and college just shaped my entire career.

And in many ways, it made me who I am. And so thinking about giving that same opportunity to junior high and high school kids in our community is, I think, when I think about all the ways that we could spend our money. Developing children for their futures is like going to be up at the top of, toward the top of my list. And, you know, this is a pledge, so this is something that we're, that we are committing to, and there are a lot of variables that could unfold Between now and when the funds would be due, the funds would, I believe the funds would be due in the next budget cycle, is that correct? So they would be worked through that budget cycle?

Is that correct? Yeah,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:29:17

that's my understanding of the timing. Pledge now, money's due, fiscal year 26.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:29:23

Right, so this is something that could, that the Budget Committee and that we as a Council could look at next year too and make other adjustments to make it feasible so that it's not creating additional, you know, so it's not adding something new. We could look at At the overall budget and see where we might be able to make some adjustments to accommodate that.

But I feel like anything that we do for the kids of this community has a ripple effect. And it can help us to attract, having a state-of-the-art facility can help us to attract teachers. Thank you. Anybody else? Yeah.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:30 – 2:4522 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:30:33

I moved to Ojai when I was in the second grade, and I was coerced into being a trombone player. And continued with that through the twelfth grade. So I was thinking if there's a list of people who spent hours on that stage. I'm so I'm not at the top of the list, but I'm somewhere pretty high up there because I was in three ensembles at Nordhoff that played regularly at the auditorium. So I appreciate that it's a wonderful asset.

I have reservations about the idea that we have $250,000 available without first assessing all of these things that we have. I've got two issues about our budget. One is I don't have a clear understanding of what funds we have that are not, like, already committed and, you know, liabilities and or, you know, things that we have to pay for in the future. And then, secondarily, we've just created a list, finally got to the point where we actually have a list of priorities And we haven't allocated yet what, you know, what those things are going to cost.

And we haven't put this particular project in the middle of that. So I The mayor made the comment early on that would normally be a thing we'd take maybe a couple of months and more than one here, you know, one meeting to talk about. And that is something I'd want to have on this project. I understand that there's a time crunch. So, I'm There was, you know, some giggling while Larry Steingold talked about what we could get in return, but that's exactly where my mind went on this is, you know, what are we getting as a community if we invest in this and, you know, and this is another time issue.

is that I would really want that kind of spelled out. And I'm not sure exactly what the most valuable thing we could get as opposed to relating it to the Chaparral campus. I don't think I would go there. But the concept of An agreement that allotted, you know, allotted the city a certain amount of time and use of that auditorium. And then, you know, we could potentially allocate to community groups, but it would be kind of the city's thing to do. I would want to see something like that.

If I was to be, you know, supporting, I'd also want to have, you know, a really very clear and specific contract spelling out, you know, rights and obligations between the school district and the city. I'm sure it's too late, but I'd like to see the county. I'll say this almost every time we talk about something where we're funding something for the entire valley, you know, where's the county?

And I don't think at this point I would commit To 250. And I'm about done, but. I think I could probably support pledging a hundred thousand that wouldn't get them. I feel more comfortable with the idea that we That we probably have $100,000 and that it might not, you know, kill off some other project that we decided is a priority of ours?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:36:07

I can just respond. I hear what you're saying, and I have a lot of those reservations, too. When we saw the list of the goals, we were, in my view, tell me if I'm wrong, Mr. Harvey, we're still well within what Mr. Harvey had called the Delta last year, it seems to me, and we also heard from Ms. Billings that There was something which we need to understand further, some further money, so I guess if you say the difference between 100 and 250 makes you more comfortable, they both seem like they're well within the comfortable range, but, well, you tell me if that's true, Mr. Harvey. I know you're, I'm not asking for the budget report, I'm saying from the revenue that you have seen so far and anything over the 100% reserve, are you still seeing An ample margin there, or not.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:37:00

It's likely you have that with the accommodation of your 100% general fund expenditures, which you keep in your reserves. I'm going to hedge a little bit because we haven't really yet, as you've indicated, drilled down on every single tactic and put a real precise number on it. You've also made some commitments to funding areas, fire hardening, climate, et cetera.

You know, you likely have it, but again, I'm at a little bit of a disadvantage and we did not, you know, I don't have that detail in front of me. And there's some variables, sorry, real quick. There are some variables, this is an interesting economy that we're in. We are continuing to see stable occupancy rates at our hotels, which we rely upon greatly, but we just came off a huge weather event that does impact visitation.

There's just a lot of areas. I don't know. I just need to tell you all this so you think about it. That's what

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:38:14

you have to consider. The thing that when we received the public comment from Mr. Creasy, I expected him to say, don't do it. But when I saw the opposite to do it, that made me, and he's on our budget committee, that actually gave me Less reservation than I had had, to tell you the truth, is his recommendation to go forward.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:38:35

Can I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:38:35

also just quickly point

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:38:37

out that Mr. Creasy uses

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:38:38

Matilla Hawk Auditorium for his, he's executive director of OPAT. For sure. So let's make sure that that's in the mix as far as the budget, et cetera, et cetera.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:38:58

Oh, you're saying he's interested.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:39:00

Well,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:39:01

I mean, sure, sure, sure. Of course. Of course.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:39:03

Yeah. Fair enough. Absolutely. I mean, I just we're all interested. So I think that that's worth noting if you're going to note the other things as

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:39:11

well. Fair enough. Fair enough. Thank you for saying that. I was thinking that and probably wasn't going to say that. But my concern is that, and this is a long-term concern spread across a lot of issues, you know, that what we've been referring to as the Delta, my understanding is that's money that We received from the state or federal government related to COVID and relief money that was, you know, provided and it was, I kind of, I Somehow it was, it was, my understanding is it was kind of funneled into a spot that was not as readily identifiable, but when Mr. Harvey came in, he identified that money. Yeah,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:40:15

I just, so I just would say this just to clarify, I regret using the term the Delta, but let's let's characterize it a little differently. So, In general, over the last two years, your revenues have exceeded your expenditures. You've underspent. You've had some positions that have gone unfilled. We've had some projects that we weren't able to realize. We've still accomplished a lot, but that's the majority, and our local visitor-based economy has performed well, and you've brought on some more restaurants, and you've brought on a new hotel. So that's kind of, it's not so much federal government money that we've squirreled away, it's just that, you know, We've done decently well and we've not spent a huge amount of money. But you've identified a large number of things that you want us to work on.

And that's what I really just want us to be mindful of. We have nine goals with three to four tactics for each goal. Now, that's your decision. You are the policy makers. You can decide to spend that money however you wish. That is clearly your role. But it's my job just to tell you You know, keeping at least 16, 17 million liquid on hand is not easy to do. We've done it. But you do have to be mindful that that's what you want to do to avoid negative impacts from a downturn, which I would suggest, seemingly, you know, that we're so reliable, reliant, excuse me, on TOT in particular, and sales tax. It's very, very important. So I don't have a My guess is you probably could afford that number without dipping into that 100% reserve. But again, I really want to talk about, you know, how you've talked about, I want to spend a hundred thousand, excuse me, a million dollars on this.

I want to spend a million dollars on that. Okay. I've got this list of tactics. I don't have, for instance, I mean, I don't know how much a community siren or two of them costs. I have an idea. I don't know for sure. So that's just why I just need to tell you that. And then on top of all of that, let's not forget that you fund a workforce, right? And when you're talking about things like benefits that are going up and you may want to consider a COLA for your staff in the next fiscal year because inflation continues to rise, your cost pressures are increasing, too.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:47

So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:42:47

you just have to keep all of that in mind. It's not a giant pool of money that we're drawing from.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:54

So just money being a fungible, I guess the way I think about it is, if I think, oh, money from the TOT, that, in my view, it's something that we all have to, in a way, we have to tolerate tourism in a certain way with housing or rent prices and also traffic. And that's one way that we could say, one of the ways that we tolerate it for our economy is to take some money and put it back into the community and community life, such as the increase in the Arts Commission grant. So when I thought of this money going to OUSD, it was something more along those lines,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:43:28

in my mind. Let me jump in and say one more thing, and the Mayor Pro Tem brought this up, and I can give you another avenue that you can reconcile all this. I mean, it's a pie, and the pie only very incrementally grows, and so if you're comfortable with making difficult choices come budget time, because you've Committed or you've spent in certain areas, it could, you know, you could be saying, well, you know, maybe we don't have a motorcycle officer next year. Just don't, Chief, I'm just, you know. Or maybe we pave, you know, two less streets. I mean, those are things that cost a lot of money, but that's really what we do, right? Or maybe we don't provide this type of recreational programming. I don't know, but you just, it's a tradeoff, right?

So you just have to be ready to make, you have to acknowledge that that is what comes when you make these types of decisions.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:44:22

The

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:22

timing's just unfortunate. The timing's, it would be wonderful to have gotten more. It's a shame, like if it was next month, because we're trying to get the Budget Committee together to do it. I feel bad because I totally believe in OUSD and all that you have to offer, but to me, just the timing with not knowing our finances and where we're at, like Mr. Harvey, the things he was saying are big.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:44:46

So just to give you the counter, I feel like we're being overly cautious, I guess, not to say I don't want to be cautious, but to say What we have been living with is to say there's a 100% reserve, which is almost unknown in cities. And then what we had read before was $4 million extra. Now, extra doesn't mean whatever, but what I would be unhappy with, I guess, in some way is if we get to that budget review committee and we say next month, oh, we're at this 100%, oh, and then there's $3 million on top of the 100%, I would say, Wow, we missed an opportunity is what I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:45:22

would say. But it seems like a good taxpayer spent, in my opinion.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:45 – 2:515 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:45:42

I'm fine. This is a very complicated question for me because when I hear terms like, you know, developing kids for their highest potential, well, who doesn't want to do that? But there's 50,000 ways to do that. And is this the best way? And does it help the kids who have the least opportunity to fulfill their potential? And are we actually, you know, are we rehabbing a building and using, you know, And, you know, how much technical education money for it?

You know, how many kids are actually, if this is a career technical education, you know, money, how many kids are actually going to be, have their hands on the lighting board? Or are we worried about putting a floor down? The process just has not worked at all. We're not supposed to bring things in and make a decision in three days. And I've heard the mayor many times say it sounds like the tail is wagging the dog.

Well, there's never been a more example of the tail wagging the dog in that, you know, we have a time constraint, so let's do it. There's just There's just so many things to this. I understand the wanting to get this money in order to make, to refurbish Matillaha. And in the process of refurbishing Matillaha, we're going to get career technical education out of it.

You know, so I don't need to sort of recap, you know, like, I mean, we just gave money to the arts. What about career technical education for things like welding or, you know, other types of, or automotive, or the things that perhaps people who aren't born to the world of, you know, performance is, you know, the highest expression ever of anything. Maybe we should be looking at providing them with some more potential.

And so to me, this is very, very complicated, and I'm really not prepared to speak to it. I understand the reasons to do it. I understand the roadblocks. For me, like I said, process has not been followed at all. There's been no, we know, We don't even have, I would be more inclined if, for instance, we did get something in return, but yet there's been no, you know, sort of effort to make that happen for us in a deal, right?

So, I don't know. Yes, we have money. Yes, we should spend money. But we just decided that, you know, we weren't going to spend $100,000 on some part of fire hardening because it wasn't a good use of the taxpayers' money. When I think about this, when I think about giving a gift to the people of Ojai, I think about a community pool. I'm sorry. That's a gift.

This is a gift to a very particular audience in a very particular way, to a very particular group. of community members that we already support incredibly. Is there any other group, perhaps, that we could turn our eyes to supporting and help enabling? So that's where my crankiness and not feeling well and being flush and red is getting me. Sorry.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:49:44

So my question is, and I'm just reading tea leaves, you know, maybe there's not support for 250, but I wonder from Councilmember Mang and Councilmember Rule, There is an appeal for me that there would be matching funds if this happens. And so is there an amount? I threw out $100,000. That might be beyond what. But if there's some amount that we could, you know, end up doubling the amount that we're

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:50:27

Can I just piggyback on that? Another thought, and I'm sure you've already contemplated this. Correct, you could commit a lower amount if you were so interested.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:50:41

Okay,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:50:45

you could commit a lower amount than what is requested. We could come back. It doesn't mean that you can't still contribute to this project. It's not going to help with the matching funds, but you could, and we could do it in a manner that you're more accustomed to how we work, which is more of a concept review, and here's a potential agreement, and here's how it might work.

And you could do it at a time when you know, you have a better idea, like I would suggest after, you know, the mid-year budget or even around the time that we're putting together the budget for 26, 27, when we really have a good idea of what's available and we've monetized all your tactics. Thank you.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:51 – 2:5626 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:51:42

And I would like to add to what Mr. Harvey said, if you considered it later after having an actual view of what your budget is, that would also give you space and OUSD space to negotiate what the benefits are that the City would be able to get out of this agreement, right? There's not space for that conversation right now because of how quickly they need an answer.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:52:07

I have a question. Is, is there a way that we could, that we could offer some type, some type of language for their grant? Like that, you know, the city is invested or, you know, is, is, is there something, is there some kind of language that we could use that would say that we are, that we are contemplating donation but don't have a certain amount.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:52:32

That might be, I'm interested in OUSD if you have a perspective on that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:52:36

My guess is that if they need to show a certain amount of pledges, and I would encourage you from the question earlier, if you're going to pledge, yeah, like we can add, yeah, pledge. Because what'll happen later on, which I wish I had added earlier, is they're relying on that funding. So if you're pulling back the plunge, they're still gonna have to come up with that 250 if the city doesn't. So just being thoughtful about that. There are things that we can do, but at the end of the day, that's a real consequence if the city pulls the money back.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:11

I wasn't imagining we would do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:53:12

that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:53:12

Can I add something important? Yeah, I wasn't imagining that either. Because isn't it like March, There's something where you get your points to know if you move to the next level March

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:53:21

1st, we would know that We do have a portion of the grant where we have to indicate the percentage of individuals and members of the Advisory Committee Essentially our industry partners. So if the city were to sign on as a partner Without a pledge it would actually reduce the percentage that we would have to place there

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:42

I think what I'm hearing is what sounds like may happen is there will be a pledge of a certain amount and the possibility that when we understand our situation better and we can work with you in more detail, there could be more later.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:53:55

It will be an ongoing project for

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:56

us. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:53:58

would just make

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:54:00

a

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:54:00

comment.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:54:01

I would support $100,000. I would go up to supporting $125,000 to $150,000 probably. I feel really bad. I mean, I understand the need. So I would certainly support $100,000. If people could dig a little deeper and a couple go to $150,000, I would support that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:54:24

So, I have a question for Council. Could we, you know, make the pledge contingent upon working out An exchange with the, you know, a bargain with the school district on how our investment, you know, gets converted into community access to the property.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:54:57

Yeah, I would say that you can

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:54:59

do that. And we could do that as kind of an open language thing. We don't need

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:55:03

to

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:55:04

create the terms right now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:55:05

Yes, you could do that, understanding that we would have to work that out in the future, but that the city in making the pledge is interested in some kind of public and community use or something similar in exchange.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:55:21

And then a second term I would want is that It's contingent on receiving something in the nature of a work plan so we understand what it's going to be, you know, what our money is going to be spent on. And then my final comment is, 100 is probably my threshold.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated2:55:53

What's your threshold?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:56:00

My threshold would be 150, but I'm also, yeah, my threshold would be 150.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:15

I like everything you said. I would like 150 and then all the other pieces you said I would also like to see. So there's an agreement that's open that we get something, we work with them about what this joint use agreement will be. And that we understand we're privy to how the plans are working

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:56:33

out.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:57 – 3:0124 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:57:00

Go 125 and then

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:57:02

we've got four.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.832:57:17

There's a certain symmetry to that because with the matching funds, assuming we get it. And I would do that, and actually the third condition would be that if the grant isn't given, that we're back to school, you know, that doesn't mean that they can't ask us for money, but that pledge is off the table and Which is what they proposed anyways, is that they would come back to us if they were proceeding without the grant money.

So, I'm still at a hundred.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:57:58

I could do a hundred to make it a 4-0 vote. And I just want to say that you can learn welding in theater. My final project in stagecraft was welding a great big steel wall.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.782:58:19

Yeah, you can learn cooking,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:58:24

too. I love there to be four, but it seems to me 25,000 more would get them 50. That makes a big difference. So I would like to propose that we have three votes at 125.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:58:39

Mayor, to clarify, are you making a motion

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:58:41

to include the terms that Mr. Whitman

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:58:43

included? And 125.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:58:50

Do I need a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:58:51

I'll second it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:58:52

Okay. Okay, I think maybe we've talked it out.

Roll-call vote Moved by Andy Gilman · Seconded by Rachel Lang
Show transcript
Mayor, let's recite the motion. We have a motion by Mayor Gilman with a second by Mayor Pro Tem Lang, to proceed as recommended with the pledge, but for $125,000, contingent upon working out an exchange slash bargain with OESD with the return on investment, and contingent upon a work plan received. And if the grant is not received, the pledge will be off the table, considering another option.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:59:29

I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call2:59:34

think there's three conditions that I heard. One was, this is all contingent upon an agreement with OUSD. And the agreement would contain three primary components. One, ensuring community use. Two, requiring the receipt of a work plan. And three, just the condition which OUSD has already agreed to. Just having an agreement that if the grant is not received, that the pledge is no longer valid.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:00:05

And then OUSD would return, but maybe that doesn't have to be in the motion. They will do that anyway.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:00:09

The pledge is not valid just means that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:00:11

it's not valid. Yeah, fair enough. Okay.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:00:14

No, that's good. Thank you. Fair enough. So can you repeat that back, Mr. Montgomery? Let's make sure we got that correctly.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.733:00:22

Yes, for the $125,000 and contingent upon an agreement, three parts. One, ensuring community use.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:00:28

Agreement with OUSD, right?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.733:00:30

Correct.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:00:30

Okay, thank you.

Roll-call vote Passed 3–2
Show transcript
Number two, ensuring the work plan is received. Number three, that the pledge, if no grant is received, the pledge is no longer valid. Okay. All right. Roll call. Council Member Whitman. No. Council Member Mang. No. Council Member Rule. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang. Yes.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.733:01:00

Motion passes 3-2. So we've

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:01:04

been at this for 2 hours. Let's take a 10 minute break and come right back.

3:09 – 3:1411 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:09:36

. . . . .

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:09:37

. . .

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:09:37

.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:10:04

Check, check, one, two, we're back. Thank you all. And we are on item number 10, receiving a file speed survey report and authorize an appropriation for the speed survey proposal provided by Phoenix Civil Engineering.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:10:22

Thank you all for being here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:10:42

Thank you very much. So, I have a slide presentation for you. And we've got a couple of consultants in the front row who I would like to introduce you to up front. We have Mr. John Turner over on the right there with Phoenix Consulting. You've seen his name a lot. And his sub-consultant is Mr. Andrew Yee, who is the traffic engineer. Both seasoned veterans and have put this together. So they're here to answer questions. I'm going to go through the speed survey results for you, and then I will turn it over to them for any technical questions you may have.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:11:35

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:36

So, and this is again in response to the City Council goals, community concerns, And furthermore, it's a requirement for us to have a speed survey on a regular routine basis. About 7 to 10 years is what we should be doing, a speed survey every 7 to 10 years. And we haven't been able to find any evidence of one in the last couple of decades. So it's time. So here we are. And I also wanted to make mention, this is a speed survey. We did not Take traffic counts, this is not a volume survey.

We can all agree up front that over the years, I've lived here for almost 30 years now, and I can anecdotally say that volume has increased. And I think we are all in agreement on that. We've had numerous conversations. But that's not what this is. So I am just going to get started. Get started on the background here. Traffic safety, we know, is a concern for the community. It's a concern for you folks as well.

February of 25, the City Council authorized the hiring of a motor cop. We almost lost tonight.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:12:50

Oh, you mean because of what was said? Oh, geez.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:12:52

He was offering it up. I got it. I got it. I'm fine with that. And then on October 21st of just this year, so just a month or so ago, the council authorized the formation of a public safety commission, which we are moving towards. So the council has taken steps to address traffic and address safety issues. And this is just one element of that. So why a speed survey? To comply with California Vehicle Code requirements for establishing enforceable speed limits. We need this in order to establish speed limits, reduce, or whatever the case may be. And it ensures that posted speed limits are both legally and defensible, and that is something that our police chief is very concerned about. If we post a speed limit, he wants his officers to win in court.

And then under the California Vehicle Code, cities must base posted speed limits on an engineering and traffic study, which is what we are talking about tonight. And please stop me along the way. You don't have to hold your questions. So some factors to consider in developing speed limits is spot speed and 85th percentile speed limit, which is the speed below.

At or below which 85% of drivers travel, and I'm sure you've heard that term, that's what it means. Also, some other factors come into account, collision rates, mid-block crash data, level of pedestrian bicycle activity, land use and proximity to schools, and any other unusual conditions or hazards that erode blind corners, etc. And a variety of other factors.

So it's not just technical data, collection of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:14:36

speeds.

3:14 – 3:2435 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:14:42

So previously, the 85th percentile was the gold standard for setting the speed limits. In 2022, effective January 1st of 2022, AB 43 was approved. And so that allows a lot more flexibility for Thank you very much. And I would probably defer to Ms. Anderson to speak about the, not right now, not right now,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:15:20

but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:15:20

if questions arise, on the enforceability of that and whether or not AB 43 could apply to some streets for us. And our traffic engineer would also speak to that. So, the survey data that I'll be presenting tonight, we collected data from 20 segments. We call them segments, so you'll see along Grand Avenue, there's three different segments along Grand Avenue, and just from Street X to Street Y, Street X to Street Y. But, so these are segments, and traffic data was, speed data was collected in those segments.

Based on the information that we collected, the data we collected, the recommendation By the traffic engineers to reduce the speeds on three streets, Country Club, Foothill, and Fairview. And I'll show you a map and we'll talk about that. And again, five miles per hour is what the reduction is recommended to be. 35

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:16:14

to 30. Yes, 35 to 30. Or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:16

30 to 25. Or 30 to 25.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:16:17

Yeah. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:22

So, I know that this map is small, but I just wanted to sort of highlight the segments you can see around the city where the information was collected. So, throughout town, on all collector streets, except one with the exception of Quiama. That's the only residential street. The default on all residential streets is 25 miles per hour. So here's the first couple of segments that we surveyed. So Quiama from State Route 33 to Del Norte, and I've got next to it the 85th percentile was 34.

Posted speed's 30, and the recommended speed is 30. We've got Del Norte on Ojai Avenue to Quiama, and again, 35, 30, and 30. I don't need to keep reading. You can read it as well. So those, the posted speed and the recommended speed are recommended to stay the same. There are no changes there, but just illustrative of the areas that we have collected data. So we've got Quiama. Del Norte to Chico, the 85th percentile, 25 miles per hour, that's what 85% of the people were driving.

Posted speed limit, no posted speed limit. Residential, so we would assume it's 25. The recommended speed is 25.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:17:39

Can you pause on that one for a second?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:17:40

Sure.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:17:40

So when I look at the chart and I see there's many places where there is the assumed speed limit is 25, but there's no signs posted. So do we take from this that the effort would be that we do post signs?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:17:54

Indeed, yes. Okay. Yes, and that will be discussed later on in the slide, but I appreciate the question, yes. We do plan on installing speed limit signs. More, you know, more places. And then we've got El Paseo just parallel, pretty much, in front of the school there. 85th percentile is 30, and recommended speed is 25. And that, again, would be the assumption that it would be 25 miles per hour.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:18

Isn't right in front of Ojai Valley School to Ojai Avenue, it says 15 right there for a minute.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:18:24

On Ojai Avenue. On Ojai Avenue or on El Paseo?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:28

No, on El Paseo.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:18:29

Like,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:30

right in front of Ojai Valley School, I thought it said 15th.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:18:34

Which is very weird. I don't know, but I will know tomorrow.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:39

Oh, yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:18:40

There. Come on up. This is Andrew Yee. He's our traffic engineer.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:44

OK.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:18:45

Mr. Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. Yes. My name is Andrew Yee with the L.S.Y. Enterprise. Yes, you're right. There's a warning sign. It's a yellow regulatory, which is the regulatory white sign. So you will have regulatory sign and the warning sign near the school so you can emphasize the crossing.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:19:05

Right. Okay, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:19:07

Thank you. Questions?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:19:11

No. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:19:13

So the next two segments are on Country Club from Ojai Avenue to Amber and from Amber to the city limits line. Now this is, this stretch here, the recommendation is to reduce the speed by five miles per hour. The posted speed limit is 35 and we're recommending down to 30. And again, we would, we would repost signs. We've got, now here is, we've got Fairview from the city limit line to Foothill, and there was a recommendation to reduce the speed there from 35 to 30.

And Foothill, and all the way down Foothill from Fairview all the way down to El Toro, I believe. Yeah, to reduce the speed down to 30 as well from 35. We've got Aliso from Foothill to Signal, and that's two segments, that's why there's two blue squares there, and that is just maintain the speed limit at 25. And then we've got Signal from Oak Street all the way down to the Ojai Bike Trail, and you can see the 85th percentile changes a little bit, it was a little bit higher on the north side of Ojai Avenue, but again, the recommendation is to maintain. Throughout this, Throughout this entire study, we have not found excessive

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:20:36

speed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:20:39

Again, it's a speed survey, not a volume. And so they're two very different things, and again, we know about the

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:20:46

volume.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:20:48

So we've got Ventura Street, and the 85th percentile was 23 miles per hour, and we're recommending it maintains at 25. Montgomery, all the way down. Again, 25 mile per hour speed limit, and we're not seeing a whole lot of, you know, a whole lot of speeding going on there. And then we've got Grand Avenue. Now, this is the only area in town that we're really sort of seeing, I don't have a laser pointer here, but on the far east end here, from Golden West to the city limits line, you can see what the 85th percentile is, it's almost 40 miles per hour.

And of course, as you drive west, it continues to sort of decrease.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:21:31

Well, because it opens up when you head

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:21:33

east like that. It does, it does. And it's like, yeah. So it's kind of an interesting data points here. So, the key takeaways here and the next steps is we would be coming back to you. This is a draft report. We would like to file it and, you know, turn it into a final report. We would come back to you with a resolution to establish these recommended speed limits and obviously post signs accordingly and any other recommendations you may have or any concerns you may have based on this data. And then, of course, we would coordinate with the Police Department on enforcement updates, et cetera, and any possible field modification signage, et cetera.

And then the last step we would be doing, or simultaneously we would be moving forward with this data on Developing and creating a speed hump policy, which is another one of the council goals and direction. So that will take some time, but this, we needed to get this information and this data collected first. So that's kind of where we are. That's kind of where we are. So we're open for questions. I can answer questions, or either of our two consultants here can answer questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:22:51

I'm just curious, when I look at the dates, you did the surveys Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. And traffic changes, now it's like Thursday afternoon when the people are coming in for the weekends. And I was wondering, is it possible to have either, you know, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, have, because I think it switches

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:23:11

the makeup. It does. And again, I just want you to keep in mind we weren't counting traffic. We know that a lot more people come into town on Thursdays and Fridays. We could do that. I would defer to Mr. Yee here to see if, I mean, there were some streets that he had to go out numerous times to even have enough cars to, you know, to collect data.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:23:32

Typically, when you do volume count, you usually use Thank you very much. This sample is your picking sample, so you're indiscriminately picking the sample size during the day. Sometimes I have to go out there early in the morning because I think Country Club, I couldn't get any samples. So I end up going four times in one second. If that answers your question.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:24:16

I was going to say some of the streets, like Country Club is one that you could say tourism would definitely affect that street, but then there's other streets like Grand, All right, thank you very much.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:24 – 3:3749 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:24:55

So I think the way I understand the issue, if I understand what the traffic engineer said, is that although your counts are going to vary, the driving behavior is not. And I think your question is, well, if it's primarily tourists, Or if there's a much richer percentage of tourists, is that going to affect that assumption that the speeds are going to be the same? So I'm interested in if you can just clarify a little more.

So the question is, I think I understood you to say that from a traffic engineering perspective, the assumption is that the speeds are going to be the same no matter what day of the week it is. And I guess what I understood the council member to ask is, If we've got an influx of tourists on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and they don't drive like the local residents on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, is that, I mean, have you already kind of looked at that and it just doesn't happen that the speeds are different?

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:26:21

My experience, there's no data that supports that. Either way, they either drive faster or slower, so it's hard to answer that question. Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:26:34

It seems to me you could say, if everybody's going to take the Arbalada because they don't want to go downtown, then the volume goes up, but I would suggest the speed either remains the same or possibly goes down with more volume through the Arbalada, let's say, or on Grand.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:26:49

So let me make some argument to you. Let's say if you're driving Sunday, do you tend to drive slower or faster on Sunday versus Monday when you go to work? And there's much lighter traffic on Sunday, correct? So it's very difficult to... Here there's more traffic

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:27:09

on

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:27:09

Sunday.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:27:09

I think it's being a tourist town. They come in Thursday afternoon, so the bottleneck, it starts at the Y and it goes through town. The weekends forget going through, and then they leave Sunday. My vote is don't drive. So there's a time

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:27:21

when we don't have the bottleneck? Just to say, Chief, most of your tickets are going to residents, correct? That's what I heard you say the other day.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:27:31

Thank you. Yeah,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:27:32

no thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:27:33

Yes. So I would say what we're seeing is Those Thursdays are through the weekend, more tourists coming into town. It's the locals that know the side streets, but the volume goes up. So I would argue, you know, we see a lot of more stop sign violations, but we don't see the speed necessarily going up. Does that make sense? Because just think common sense. Higher volume, that's actually going to lower speed.

If that makes sense. Yeah, no

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:28:04

higher volume with lower speed, but you're seeing more infractions through the neighborhoods.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:28:09

There's other infractions of locals trying to get through the streets faster, but they're not necessarily speeding. It's usually the stop sign

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:28:17

violation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:28:18

That's great. That's a really

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:28:19

nice picture. I mean, it's a

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:28:21

clear picture. But did you catch, sorry to interrupt, but did you catch the last part of what the chief said with that? And I think this is key. Which was? Go ahead and say that last part of the statement. The infractions are?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:28:32

The high number of violations are the stop sign violations. People are still trying to get through the streets quicker, but they're rolling through the stop signs quicker, not the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:28:46

speed.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:28:48

So question whether we're talking about stop signs tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:28:56

We weren't specifically talking about stop signs. We're kind of focused here on this traffic study, but we can talk about that at a later date. Yeah, for sure.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:29:05

I would think if he has a question related to that. Oh,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:29:07

for

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:29:07

sure.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:29:07

Well, I did get a couple of calls, and one of the things they mentioned is that there was an accident near Eucalyptus and Foothill recently, and the perception of this One resident that was talking to me was that that long downhill stretch, a foothill with actually no real inner, it kind of encourages people to really go. And another person talked to me about the stop sign that we placed at Church and Quiama, they perceive that there's been a big change in, you know, reducing speed, but also Making it a lot, kind of, safer or comfortable to make the turn from church on to Quiama. So, positive

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:30:05

change. I have heard that as well. Positive change. Yes. Positive change. I have heard that as well. For sure. That stop sign there has been...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:30:11

There used to be a straight shot, and now it's easy.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:30:14

And then, maybe a little more mixed on the ones we placed on Grand, but... Yeah. Because there's some folks that, you know, but this person was trying to convince me that people, for the most part, support those stop signs because they do slow traffic. Mostly, that's true.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:30:34

And, you know, we are completely in support of doing that, too. Not a problem. I mean, it's this whole discussion about safety and whatever we can do, safety measures.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:30:45

Absolutely.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:30:46

So I brought up at one point in time the concept of speed humps, and you mentioned that in your report, and I'd love to have one or the other of our traffic engineers talk to us about The difference between a speed bump and a speed hump. I kind of understand the difference, but I've seen the speed hump used in different Communities, much more so than speed bumps on regular residential streets.

And I understand that there's some concept that you can design the hump for the speed that you want people to slow down to. And could either

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:31:43

of you kind of... Andrew, would you like to come up and speak to that?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:31:45

Well, because that's what's coming next, right, is what we're going to do after this study today.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:31:52

We don't talk about speed bumps anymore, because those are a little more harsh to go over. So, nowadays, you are going to a little bit gentler, kinder speed hump that impacts how fast you're going. So, the faster you go, it's going to have a more impact, and then you go over. And also you also design it such that you have a slot in the middle of it so that usually the fire engine can go through without really slowing down significantly. So those are the things get into the design.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:32:22

Can I ask one question while you're here or for either one of you? So what determines where speed humps will be placed?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:32:30

Well, there's a lot of different criteria that we can and that's what we would be developing. We would be developing that. The County of Ventura is the standard that we've used before, but there's other standards. So we would be looking at a variety of different placement and yeah, a lot of details. Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:32:50

Okay. Thank you. Any more questions before we go to public comments? All right.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:32:58

I actually have a

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:32:58

question. Oh, please go ahead.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:33:00

Yeah, I was just wondering. So on one of your slides, Lindy, you mentioned that there'd be possible field modifications. And I know that I brought up before the traffic calming measures that San Francisco instituted during COVID when they wanted to make the streets more walkable and bikeable, where they didn't just close, they didn't close the street, but they did a sort of I won't say gentle, but sort of a rerouting by putting up a sign, for instance, that said, you know, we'd like to have our neighbors walk this street. Could you please take another, you know, take another street? And I'm wondering if those kinds, if that's what you mean by possible field modifications, and could you investigate those more subtle ways to divert or calm traffic?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:34:01

We can certainly, all or anything is on the table right now in terms of traffic calming, and we could certainly look at that. I know there's been conversations about some field modifications on these downtown streets that we have, the downtown gridded streets. So, yeah, I mean, anything and everything is up for discussion at this point.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:34:24

Because I had, I think I mentioned it in a session, but perhaps it was only with Mr. Harvey about those kinds of tactics that San Francisco used very successfully to get sort of compliance and understanding from the citizens about wanting to live, you know, In harmony with those who would want to walk and or bike or had kids or whatever, without closing the street per se.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:34:53

Okay. Thank

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:34:55

you. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:34:56

Okay, I'll go to public comments. First, Adam Keir, please. And then Tina Broman and then Alan Mintz. Thank you. Hi.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:35:07

Good evening, Mayor, Council Members. I am Adam Kier. I'm a resident on Kuyama, and I'm going to be very brief because we're all tired.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:35:18

Thanks for toughing it out.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed3:35:19

So I have a letter, I think, that's in the binder, and I won't rehash that. Just one point that I want to make, and that's with respect to AB 43. And Lindy did a really good job of summarizing those provisions that were enacted in 2001. And I'm only going to speak about Cuyama. I don't know about the other speech, but as you saw in the presentation, the 85th percentile speed on Cuyama was 25 miles per hour, and the recommendation is 25 miles per hour. Obviously, the AB 43 tools were not taken advantage of in setting that speed limit. Also, as Lindy explained, the AB 43 allows you to reduce the speed When you have what they call a safety corridor, which is that, as was summarized, if you have narrow streets, blind corners, if there's excessive or intensive use by cyclists, pedestrians, if there have been bad accidents.

And Puyama has all of that. We had a woman killed on her bicycle by a truck, by a car, just a few years ago. My neighbor has had Thank you very much. Thank you very much. One other point, you mentioned that the speed limit is not posted on Koyama. It is posted. There's at least three speed limits. Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:37:20

Thank you so much. Tina Brumand, Alan Mintz, and then Larry Stengel, please.

3:37 – 3:4312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:37:30

Hi, everybody. I'm Tina Brumand.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:37:33

Brumand, sorry. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:37:35

Ready?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:37:36

No, I mispronounced your last name, and I appreciate the correction.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:37:38

That's all right. It's my husband's last name. My last name's Toter.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:37:42

Oh,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:37:42

gotcha.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:37:44

You should have wrote that on the card, man. That's all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed3:37:46

right. That's all right. Okay. So anyway, I am here to talk about traffic. I was at the MAC meeting last night, and we have had a long, ongoing traffic problem. I want to say first and foremost how much I appreciate the Ojai City Council. I have worked with you guys, different people in these seats, but for a long time. And what I will say is the City of Ojai has been so responsive, putting in the stop signs on Creek Road.

Ventura Avenue and wherever else going in. They've been a big help. That is a deer heavy area. We have lots of deer crossing through. We haven't had a lot of deer die in that area. Guess what? They're dying down further on Creek Road, which is not your problem, but it is all of our problem. Right, we have one valley. We have an Ojai area plan that is actually going to be changed by the County of Ventura as it relates to our traffic policy in an effort to eliminate the requirement for businesses to conduct traffic impact studies as they go in.

It's a problem. I think many of you have heard or have said and stated, not only do we have a speed problem, we have a congestion problem. And no one is working on the flow of traffic. People are making their own solution, which is going through stop signs. Like a California stop trying to get out, it's not safe anymore. I recently visited Chico, California and had my husband drive me through Paradise, California because I watched the lost school bus on a plane.

That movie, we all need to watch that movie and get really serious about how many people are we packing in this valley. Because what the County of Ventura would like to say, or for all of us to believe is, that the City of Ojai put limitations on development because we had a traffic problem. That's actually really false. The City of Ojai and the community of Ojai put a limitation on development because we acknowledged long ago that we had a traffic problem that is at a level F failing grade. We continue to have that same problem.

We do not work on flow. We work on reducing speed limit. That's great. I want the speed limit reduced on Creek Road, certainly. I want no passing. I want stop signs. I want all of that. But what I'd really like better is that we all get together as a community to really dive into this because it's really interesting to me that we actually recognize that we have a congestion problem. Stuff's backed up to Villanova Road, but we're spending 50 grand on speed studies. I understand they need to be done, but they haven't been done for like... Thank you.

Thank

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:40:45

you very much. Alan Mintz, please, Larry Stangold, and then Michelle Thomas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed3:40:59

Thank you very much. Thank you. Along with Mr. Kira, I'm a resident of Ojai Street between Del Norte and Chico. That portion of Cuyama is very narrow, very winding, blind corners, no sidewalks. It is not safe to drive there. It is not safe, it's not safe to walk your dog, bicycle, what have you. There's children living there. I recently took, you know, a little examination to walk to our mailbox.

which is on the inside of a blind corner. Standing at the mailbox, people coming around the corner have less than a second to see us. And if you've got somebody who's looking at their cell phone or talking to their children, My wife or I are going to get hit by a car. There was a study done, I believe, two years ago that looked at the volume of people driving on Kuyama.

This is when we had a conversation with members of the City Council, Police Chief Lindy. The average traffic for a residential street is about 200 cars a day. We have over 2,000 cars a day. And that has gone up in the last several years because of the congestion at the 33-150Y. To both reduce the speed, because the streets are, the condition of the street, the characteristics of the street don't support 25 miles per hour, and also try and discourage people from using that as a thoroughfare between Miners Oaks and Ojai.

It just, the street can't support 2,000 cars a day. Thank you. Thank you, sir.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:43:20

Larry Steingold and Michelle Thomas, please.

3:43 – 3:4915 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed3:43:27

Thank you for doing the study. The Arbolada. I know. Arbolada should have been in the study, right? There are no sidewalks. Even if you put in sidewalks, people aren't walking on the sidewalks. We live on Pleasant. Nobody walks on the sidewalks except three-year-olds with a bicycle. Everybody else walks in the street, even with all the sidewalks. We have speed bumps on Drown.

We have one street that makes no sense on daily, which is 30, and everything else is 25. Not that I'm, I live there, I don't live there, but still, it's not consistent. We need speed humps, speed bumps, something in the Cuyama, in that area, the Arbolada, bring it down to 15 miles an hour. I mean, we created the problem. You have two streets coming into town. Now we're at the ATP2, which will shrink Ojai Avenue even smaller, maybe, with bumps in here and there.

And the traffic's just going to get slower. And locals will more and more go through Cuyama. They have no choice. I mean, we come in last night at 9 o'clock at night. Ojai Avenue's backed up. I'm not taking Cuyama, but still. So I think what you're doing is wonderful. Please do more. And people speed when there's no stop signs, whether it's on Kenyatta or Foothill or coming down Signal. But stopping on a hill with a stop sign is going to cause more people to go through the stop sign.

Also, right-hand turn, no right-hand turn signs either need to be enforced or removed because nobody's stopping, very few people are stopping at the one-on signal on the north side. They just aren't. They don't, well, now they can actually see the sign, but in general, they're not stopping. They just go. And they're doing a great job with the two lines in front of Vons. People still are, muscle memory, 20 years of turning into Vons, that's going to happen forever.

Anyway, but thank you, keep it up, pay them, and put them on to speed humps or speed bumps.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:45:45

Thank you, Mr. Stengel. Michelle Thomas, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:46:00

Hello, I'm sorry, I'm winging it again tonight. First, I'm Michelle Thomas. I live on Grand between Mercer and Gridley. So, yes, the stop sign has been very helpful. Thank you, and I wanted to personally thank everybody on the Council, City Manager, staff, Ms. Palmer, Police Chief, everybody for the work on this issue. It's scary out there when you're walking your dog, and I appreciate it.

I see this as a public safety issue, as an animal safety issue, and an environmental ambience issue. It'll one day also be an evacuation issue. The city is connected to the greater county. Issues originate in the county and come into our city and then leave out the county. So I just find myself wondering, why are we spending $52,000? The county, are they monitoring? I don't know. I'm catching up. I've been out of town for a while.

There was a terrible accident on Creek Road just last night. I'm sure you're aware, or maybe you're not. It's just scary. I just want to again point out the speeding starts and ends in the county. We have a terrible ingress and egress issue. I left here in May. It's one lane on the Denison Grade. It's still one lane on the Denison Grade. When fire trucks have to come in and people are leaving, what happens then? The San Antonio Creek Bridge is still Super narrow, how are fire trucks going to get in when all the tourists who don't know even where they're going are leaving? Back to speeding, I've personally been affected. We had a house in the Golden West area almost get run into by a car that blew a turn. So, one of these days you might look, I see Golden West turning into a shortcut for, probably for locals, avoiding the traffic on the weekends.

Okay, that's it. Thank you all very much. Appreciate the attention to the issue.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.733:48:12

No raised hands on Zoom, Mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:48:13

Okay, wonderful. They're reminding me of something. That parking lot that's right next to Libbey Park that says only right-hand turns, which is great. I was thinking, oh, we should have that on all the parking lots so that people aren't waiting to make a left or jetting out. Anyway, side note. All right, so... I do have a

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:48:36

question. Please. Was the speed study done in part because there has been discussion over an extended period of time about going to a maximum 25 speed limit for the entire city?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:48:54

The speed limit, the study was done, it was multi-pronged. One, that it's been a discussion amongst you folks for a very long time. Secondarily, we haven't had one done. Again, we needed to do one. It was time to do a speed study. Not that issue specifically to reduce every speed down to 25. That was not the real driver of this.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:49:22

But third, there was also interest in developing the speed bump or speed hump policy. In order to have one, you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:49:28

have

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:49:29

to start with data.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:49:29

We need to know what the proper speeds

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:49:32

are.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:49:33

That explains a lot.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:49:34

Right, exactly. The follow-on to that question, though, was, I guess it's a technical question of which I do not know the answer. If the Council had said we would love there, hypothetically, to be a 25-mile-an-hour citywide speed limit, is that possible? Is it allowed? I mean, that's a question that I don't know the answer to. Mayor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:49:52

Stanton Andrew, can you speak to that? If we wanted to go 25 miles per hour citywide?

3:50 – 3:5953 turns

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:50:03

Speed, there is basic speed limits. So no matter what the speed is, you have to drive safely with the prevailing conditions. That's the basic speed law. You can arbitrarily set the speed limits. However, I don't think you can enforce it because it's not done properly done. Especially, one of the reasons you do a speed survey to have effective enforcement. That means police can use a radar unit to enforce speed.

Otherwise, they cannot. You can speak to that. So I hope that answers the question.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:50:41

I have one more. So the AB 43 was mentioned. I did a little bit of reading about that, and my understanding is you can't implement AB 43 without a traffic engineer saying, whatever the speed you're selecting is the safe speed.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:51:05

Correct. Correct. That's an engineering traffic survey. Are you talking

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:51:09

about criminal? Well, so as we've seen the listing of the different streets and the speed limits that are being recommended, that's the assessment of what is the safe speed for that street. And so if we go outside of that, we're potentially have some issues.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:51:32

Well, potentially, but AB 43 allows us to reduce the speed. So the 85th percentile is set, and we can round down as well. It allows us to do a round down of about five miles per hour. So if the 85th percentile speed is 23, we can go down to 20. We don't have to go up to 25.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:51:57

So if we were to say, hypothetically, if we said, oh, as one mitigating measure for now on Quiama was we lower it to 20, we could do that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:52:06

I believe so.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:52:08

Is that correct?

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:52:09

Yes. Koyama, there's a section in the vehicle course section. When you have a narrow street, engineering study is done, and you can make a justification. You can go down, lower the speed limit to 20 or 15. Okay. And based on this study, the 50th percentile speed is...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:52:32

I have it right here too.

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:52:35

22, so it is justifiable to reduce down to 20 miles per

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:52:40

hour. But you, did you, sorry if I heard you, did you say it could even go to 15?

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:52:47

Yes, code allows that if engineering study supports that. But in this case, as I mentioned, the 50th percentile is above 20.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:52:56

Okay. And if we ask you to do that, you're okay with the idea that you'd identify that as a safe speed for that street?

CommentAndrew YeeProposedself-stated3:53:06

Yes, it supports my co-speaker code, so.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:53:09

And we've discussed this outside of the report, and he, Mr. Yee, was comfortable recommending Quiama to 20. So, I mean, that could easily be included in this resolution as we reduce the speeds on the other three streets as well.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:53:23

So there's one other thing that was discussed besides speed bumps in the We talked about the idea whether there would be, it would be feasible And how much it would cost to do like a DG walking path that would run somewhere from like, you know, the Presbyterian Church and then all along Quiama out to Del Norte, so that The folks in that neighborhood would have that kind of safe harbor and you could walk your dog on a three or four foot wide path.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:54:15

That would be

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:54:15

on people's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:54:16

property, like on one side.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:54:17

Yeah, except for I think we have an easement to most, no.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:54:22

So, this is an interesting fact that is existent in many, many areas in the city. So, the paving portion on Quiama is somewhere between 19 and a half. Thank you very much. And so the challenge with that is, and that's throughout the

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:54:58

Arbolada.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:54:59

And so I've noticed, I can't recall the street, but there have been some property owners who have placed a DG trail on the frontage of their property. Now, again, it's our public right-of-way, so we have every right to require the property owners to push back their improvements about 15 feet. We would do it by survey, of course, and stake the front of, you know, their property line, i.e., our right-of-way line, and now we have this potential 15 feet for some safety improvements.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:55:32

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:55:32

did you say the street

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:55:33

is at 19 or 20?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:55:35

So you're talking about two and a half feet? It varies, but it's about 19 and it varies between 19 and a half and 20 feet wide.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:55:41

OK, so if we wanted to put a four foot wide path in, there's on one side. No, you know, no question that we would.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:55:48

No question that they would. We would have the access.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:55:50

That's interesting. And so,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:55:53

yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:55:53

my I would be really interested in You know, I'm concerned about how much it would cost to, you know, kind of to figure all of that out, but I'm really interested in what the ultimate cost would be of developing that path, because I could see that, I mean, I might make our friends from Cuyama a little bit angry, because we might, that might encourage more people, but if it became more of a pedestrian area, then, I mean, I could see people And I know that there's a lot of people who walk the streets of Bowai extensively. We put a path in there, and I think it'd be a very popular path.

So I'm just interested in what it would cost us to do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:56:44

that. So I just would like to encourage us to get back on the subject of speed. But I love the idea. I love it. Sooner rather than later an item needs to come back to allow for this space. That's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:56:59

all I was

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:56:59

encouraging. I know, but I just don't want to

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:57:02

get us too far. I would encourage though 20 there. I would offer that now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:57:08

Well, maybe some mechanism we could get this in front of council would be we propose a project in our next year's CIP, sort of a feasibility study, if you will, you know, of something like that. On the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.833:57:23

path.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:57:23

On the path. We come up with the limitations of what, are we talking about Quiama, are we talking about Del Norte, which streets are we talking about? But maybe a feasibility study and look at just, you know, see what it would cost. I mean, we'll have to survey all the property. We'll have to come up with some sort of a design, etc. Then we'll work with the property owners, because they've got to move their improvements out of the way. So there's a lot going on.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:57:47

It solves a lot of problems, even if we put speed humps there, because there's no place to walk, even if there's any cars at all.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:57:54

Right. Exactly. They're walking on the street. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:57:57

Yes, sir. Can I address two things? So, one, lowering all speeds to 25.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:58:06

Okay, okay. No, no, no, I wasn't doing that. I was saying just only 20 on Quiama. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:58:10

okay, okay, okay. So we're good on that? Yeah. Okay. And then Quiama... No, no, it's cool. No, we wouldn't be able to enforce that. It's a speed trap. That's what the engineers said. And then Quiama, I would just offer, wait until the Traffic Safety Committee is put together, and I think some good ideas might come together, and then we come to you Guys, we can't

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:58:32

hear in the audience, please. Thank you. Say that last thing again, please,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:58:36

Steve. I would wait until the Traffic Safety Committee is put together, and then let us really kind of brainstorm ideas about Kiama, and then I think, you know, come to you with that. Yeah,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:58:47

and I think just to follow up, that could be a first quarter thing. You've already given us direction. I know the City Attorney's Office has already written the ordinance, so we can bring that forward.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:58:55

Awesome. Wow, that's great. So then what you're asking for is to receive and file the report and then also to allocate the $52,000.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59:06

Yes. I'll make a motion to allocate the $52,000 and to receive and file the report. Do we want to add to change the 20, the- 20 on the Kiyama? Yeah, 20 on Kiyama. We give her that? I second

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:59:19

that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59:19

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:59:22

Coming, coming. That's next. That's

3:59 – 4:0416 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:59:25

next.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:59:27

You'll be among the first on the list. Okay? I

Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 · 2 under review
Show transcript
need a pause. Mayor Gilman, did I hear your second on that? I seconded. Great. Roll call. Mayor Gilman. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Council Member Mang. Yes. Council Member Rule.
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call3:59:43

You're on mute, but you said yes, we think.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.733:59:46

Let's wait. Did you say yes? Thumbs up. Okay. Okay. Mayor Pro Tem Lang. Yes. Motion passes. Okay. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:59:54

Thank you, John and Andrew, for being here. Yes. Thanks, guys.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:59:57

Appreciate it.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:59:58

You don't need

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:59:58

to stay for the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.783:59:59

rest. Mayor Gilman, I'm going to have to go away.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:00:04

Okay. Feel better. Okay. Sorry. Thanks. Nope. Get some rest. Okay. Thank you. Thanks. All right, thank you very much. That was really great. On to number 11, Climate-Related Expenditure Report and Progress Report on Citywide Facilities Electrification Program with Climatech.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:00:24

Yes, thanks, Mayor. Ms. Palmer, again, is going to remain up here and start things off. As you have indicated, we do have two representatives also here from Climatech that will be giving a presentation. So, Ms. Palmer, how do you want to proceed?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed4:00:36

So maybe I'll just give a brief overview of what we have done so far and then turn it over to Climate Tech to talk about what we're going to be doing. Great, thanks. So we've heard it several times from the City Council that you wanted an expenditure report on how we have spent, how much money we have spent on projects, climate related. So we've got some We've got some tables in your packet there. So we really sort of got started on being proactive on making some changes last fiscal year, so 24-25. So at the end of the calendar year, so about a year ago now, We started replacing all of our gas HVAC units, not HVAC, water heaters, and what we could do, we called it the low-hanging fruit. What we could do, what we could do quickly, what we could, we had a couple of rebates that we were able to use by the end of last calendar year.

So, bought some vehicles, some EV vehicles. So, last 24, 25, I think we spent about half a million dollars on climate-related improvements. So, after that happened, we, The city manager and I had a conversation and we knew that the direction was to do a more a global assessment and look at all of the city facilities and come up with some sort of long term strategies on converting, et cetera. So we went out to an RFP.

We ended up hiring or hiring climate tech last June, I think, June of twenty five. To put together a long-term strategic plan for us. So Public Works staff and others have been working very closely with Climate Tech over the last six months and have done assessments, building assessments, and gone out on site to look at all of our city facilities. And they're coming up with some plans for us.

So we've spent, in this current fiscal year, about 170,000. So we've spent almost 700,000 in the last two years, really in the last year and a half on climate related improvements. So I would turn this over to Climatec at this point. They have a slide presentation for you and can talk about what they're doing moving forward.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:03:09

Welcome.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:03:12

If it's helpful, we have some printouts of the presentation.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:03:17

Thanks. Thank you.

UnidentifiedSarazate ParkProposed · by introduction4:03:23

Hi, good evening, Honorable Mayor Gilman, members of Council, City Manager Harvey, members of staff and the community. Thank you for having us tonight. We're excited to share a preliminary view of the Citywide Energy Modernization Program. So the goals of this program are all about energy and modernizing equipment that's past useful life and inefficient, electrifying any gas and equipment that uses fossil fuels, and then through these improvements, reducing Greenhouse emission and overall decarbonization. And then also a large piece of the project is leveraging any grant opportunities that are available to you and putting together a program that essentially pays for itself.

Lindy kind of gave a little snapshot of the process today and where we've been. So in June of 25, this past year, we were selected through a competitive RFP process in which the city solicited the services of a design build energy service provider. And since then, we've been working, as Lindy mentioned, closely with staff and preparing a preliminary scope of work.

And we were able to evaluate current utility consumption, We assess citywide infrastructure needs and then we put together a feasible scope of work that we are going to share with you tonight.

4:05 – 4:202 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:05:01

So a little bit about our program. It's covering four main areas. First, focusing on your heating and cooling equipment, which includes electrification of gas-consuming equipment. Any HVAC units that are past their useful life or in need of replacement or inefficient. Adding air conditioning to the Martin Gym, where you currently don't have cooling. And then, usually these measures are coupled with a building automation system, but the City has already invested in a smart building automation system, and that has a lot of useful life left in it. So, this would just be getting all of the new equipment connected to your existing system.

As for lighting, the city has a mixture of older generation inefficient fluorescent lighting throughout the city. You may have heard that there's new Title 24 requirements that's basically banning all fluorescent lighting in California. So not only is it inefficient, but the cost to replace These fixtures has just gone through the roof because you can't get fluorescent fixtures anymore. So this would be standardizing on LED throughout the city. You've done some LED here and there, but this would just be standardizing on it throughout for the interior and exterior and sports lighting at the Sarazate Park.

And then we're required by Title 24 integrating occupancy sensors and dimming sensors as well. In terms of building envelope, usually building envelope is not what you would consider a lower hanging fruit. Our scope of work is really focused on measures that can pay for themselves through energy savings and grants, but we do think that there are some Improvements such as, rather than replacing an entire window, there's film that you can use that really reduces the amount of heat transfer that comes in. And some lower cost measures like that that might actually make sense in this program, but we need to do some further evaluation.

And then for renewables, it's kind of a mixture of what you see here. So orange throughout all of this, I just want to explain, is everything that the city has already done. So you've really made, as Lindy shared, a lot of great progress on your goals in these infrastructure areas. What's in green is what would make sense for us to potentially include in this program.

The site said it makes the most sense because of where the solar can fully provide a cost savings benefit to pay for some of these other measures. And where you're going to maximize the federal incentives that are currently available before they expire. At other sites, it's not to say that you couldn't do solar, but it would really just be more of a having solar for a long way in the future, kind of hedging against utility rates well into the future, not necessarily a full return on investment in the near future.

We've selected at the sites where we think it's really going to provide a strong return on investment for you. And then at the sites that you see in blue, that's where you have some various programs that city staff and our engineers are working together to take advantage of assessments from the Clean Power Alliance that's offering Resilience and energy generation at sites they had to do an evaluation, but some of these sites where it doesn't make sense for the federal incentives, it maybe is a good fit for that program. So that's what you see in blue, and that might also include other work that the city does on its own. But we're waiting for them to do their assessment.

Before we step foot on site, and we're gonna share some pictures of some of the existing conditions, our first step is to really do a deep dive on what you're currently spending. Every meter throughout the city for energy, gas, and water, and then also comparing that to what efficient baselines are in this climate, or from your neighbors. Also, what rate structures you're on, and then we wanna see the impact of what rate increases have done, and what they're gonna do. Over the last five years, your electric rates have increased 73%. And those type of annual double-digit rate increases are expected to continue for the foreseeable future. So it's not about just saving today. It's really hedging against that impact of rising utility costs and getting ahead of it so that you can keep those dollars in your facilities rather than paying them to Edison.

So the next few slides give you an overview of some of the existing conditions. These are just a sample. They're not all the infrastructure that we're looking at, but it just gives you a sample of some of the existing conditions for HVAC, lighting, and other elements. And I just want to, you know, Lindy and her team and staff have done a really good job of keeping older Buildings and older infrastructure running, you know, in great, you know, condition, even though it's, you know, in some cases like 25 or even older and well past its useful life. So they've done a really good job. This is just about kind of like getting rid of the gas consuming equipment and updating to more modern standards for efficiency.

Kent Hall, a number of units, Sarasota Campus, you see up in the upper left hand in the gym, they just have heaters installed in there. And so it's good in the winter, but with the growing number of hot days, you know, cooling would be really nice for the building occupants to have in there. This gives you, this is a good snapshot to kind of show you just a mixture of different lighting temperatures and types of efficiency, like these older generation lights that you have throughout the city really can see the difference in the crew building.

Some of the exterior lighting, can't always tell when you're looking at it if something's LED or not, but you'll definitely be able to tell the difference afterwards in terms of just the quality of the consistent light temperature throughout. More of Libbey Park. Sarazate Park is, you know, there's interior and exterior lighting proposed for the Sarazate campus, and then Sarazate Park also sports lighting, which is a different type of category of lighting fixtures, and those would benefit from an LED upgrade.

Also, the controls upgrade, too, associated with that. So this is an overview of a preliminary scope of work. I want to emphasize preliminary. Our job was just to, like Lindy said, assess your infrastructure needs in these areas and then do a feasibility of what's a potential scope of work that can be procured under the government statute that our company, Climatec, operates under. And specifically, that statute is called Government Code 4217, and any projects that we do as the design-build implementer, it's required that the savings generated by those improvements pay for the cost of the turnkey program. So it's not to say that there's not other measures that, you know, you will want to pursue in the future, but those would be through a separate procurement.

Or through some of these no-cost programs that are being offered by CPA. So this summarizes it. So our job tonight is really just to answer questions, and this is a check-in point to see if we're going in the right direction. We've had great collaborations with staff, but this is kind of the part in the process before we invest. We're doing the assessment for all of this and the development of this at our risk.

And, you know, based on what projects you decide to implement, we charge a fee on the turnkey design-build program. So up to this point, we're doing it at our risk, and we will continue to do it at our risk for finalizing the development of this. But before we do it, we just want to make sure we're not biting off more than you're wanting to, you know, take care of right now.

So this is the categories, and it's also summarized in that matrix in your packet. In terms of the funding plan, I mentioned it's just preliminary at this stage, so we don't have a final not-to-exceed pricing on your program. What we do know is how much can qualify under that 4217 procurement, and we think it's probably in the range of about $2.5 to $3 million is going to be your cap of what kind of program you can do under this type of program.

So, the idea is, once we've determined what the scope of work is, we're going to do the detailed engineering that's required to give you not to exceed pricing, that's budget certainty without risk of change orders, but also timeline certainty. We're going to get all of the lead times on all the equipment. We're going to provide an assurance that you're going to meet the Inflation Reduction Act deadlines that are coming up in July to get the incentives that you're eligible for. We're going to Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you. The performance of the solar is really important. Not all solar is created equal, so having a performance guarantee on the solar, those are all kind of the components of it. And when we put that, when we finalize that and put it together is when we can give you a really more detailed look at the price and savings at whatever level you want to see it, basically.

Environmental benefits from implementing the program, if we were to do the full amount of scope that we reviewed as a preliminary tonight, it's about 7.1 million pounds of CO2 reductions associated with that over the life of the new equipment. So it's very significant, very much aligned with your goals for decarbonization. And with, you know, the electrification, I would think that some of these are probably even understated. It's just based off what the EPA estimates are. But with gas going up and energy rates going up, we think that it probably could even be a lot more.

A part of our expertise is not only implementing the program and helping you to get the funding, but also helping you to communicate what you're doing and engaging your community. A lot of these are, you know, other than solar and lighting, some of this Thank you all for joining us today. It also is really helpful for getting potentially, you know, there's various awards, green energy awards and green standard awards that you can qualify for as a city or a community, and having a way to share your story is the first step in being able to qualify for some of those.

A little bit of kind of where would we go from here. So after receiving your feedback tonight, our next step would be to work with staff to finalize a scope and funding plan. As we shared back on this in terms of like federal and state grants, We anticipate there's probably about maybe a fourth to a third of the program is out. There's grants that we can identify that can be paid, can pay for the program. The rest is a matter of identifying funding to pay for construction today, and then you would pay yourself back through savings. Some cities, they use financing mechanisms. Some cities use their own capital and pay themselves back because the savings are accrued over the life of the equipment.

But at a minimum, it looks like it's about 250,000 from your CPA grant already for the electrification that this would help you to check the box on that. And we've met with them and already confirmed that the equipment we would be recommending qualifies for that. And the other one is the federal Thank you very much. And the cool thing, this is a new development, is that Ojai is considered an energy center for Department of Energy standards, so you get a 10% bonus on top of that, and that is to incentivize this region to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. And so, you're not only getting the local programs from, like, CPA, but also a kicker, basically, from that. So it's a 40% rebate that you would be getting back after it's implemented.

So back to the timeline. So we would finalize kind of what that funding plan looks like. There's a whole legal and due diligence review that we would be, I'm sure, working with Ms. Anderson on our agreement terms. And just, there's just a number of things that need to be done to get the due diligence review done. The soonest that this would be, not And it might be too soon for you guys, but the soonest that our engineers could have this done would probably be your last meeting in January. Maybe sometime in February is as quick as we could go. Once we mobilize on construction, you're looking at about 12 to 18 months to get it implemented. And then measuring the savings and complying with the grants is part of our turnkey service as well.

We'll stop there, and that was a lot of information, and answer any questions you

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:19:57

have. But what you're asking for tonight is to say, what you proposed, does that meet our vision of what we would like to see you be doing? And if we agree, then you're going to go off and come up with the plans that then would come to us?

4:20 – 4:3137 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:20:09

Yeah, so basically you're, I don't even believe that there's an action item for this, so this really is just, we want to hear your feedback. We can even have a follow-up, you know, Some type of ad hoc review or some, you know, other type of information that you'd like before determining. It's just, in good faith, we would be investing a lot of resources to go to the next step. And we just want to make sure, does this scope of work and this concept and this timeline align with your goals? Do you see any concerns? We'd kind of like to get those all out on the table now.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:20:42

It sounds amazing to me, but I want to hear what you guys have to say. It sounds incredible. So I have a

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:20:47

question. In the scope, we've got three different solar parking structures. Where are those going to be located?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:20:59

Yes, good question.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:21:01

While you're looking, when you said Ojai is an energy hub that we would get another 10%, what determines that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:21:07

It is a This like the secondary study that was done on regions that have a higher reliance than other regions on fossil fuels. So Ojai and Santa Clarita Valley and a couple other regions like in the North LA County and Ventura are on this map of qualifying. So it's like low income areas qualify, but only very few areas in the state meet the threshold.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:21:40

I didn't mean to interrupt. Please wear the solar panels.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:21:43

Solar panels are at Sarasota Campus, and that would be coupled with Battery Historic, at Libby Bowl, and at Ojai Skate Park.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:22:04

And they'd be essentially like what we have in the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:22:07

parking structures, yeah. And so, you know, some other things. You know, Kent Hall would maybe be another area that, you know, is a good candidate. But just with the current, you know, situation with the parking lot, it just seems like it's a long ways away from that even being something that you consider. And then even the elevation of it, it might not be ideal. Another area that might be a good fit is like the police.

But it's also a really small parking lot and we wouldn't want to put it on that terracotta roof. So most other places we just have found that the load is too small to make it work. It doesn't mean that maybe it couldn't work with something like the Clean Power Alliance where they're doing a site lease power purchase agreement. Maybe for them it would make sense.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:22:59

I have a concern that by the stroke of a pen, money goes away. And I don't want to say too much more about that. You mean like federally? Yeah, that funding just, poof, goes away. So I'm hoping that we can, you know, get a proposed work plan as quickly as is practical for your organization. You mentioned late January. Is that the fastest practical?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:23:35

I think definitely the January 27th. I mean, I just think with the holidays, it really depends on cooperation of contractors. Part of our detailed assessment is actually walking all of the trades, right? During the holidays, you're not always gonna get the availability of everybody that you need. We will do our best. I think that you guys are... This scope of work is pretty straightforward compared to sometimes we're doing work that's water and waste water and complete redesign of mechanical systems that just takes a long time for us to get our arms fully around. This is pretty...

Cookie cutter for our world. So I'm hopeful that we can move quick, as quick as possible. But I don't want to promise anything.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:24:21

Okay. Okay. Thanks. I guess I'd like to see. Well, we should take comment. There's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:24:29

no I don't have any public comments.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:24:31

Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:24:32

Maybe online.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:24:36

Yes, ma'am. We do have one raised hand. Okay. Steve call me. Thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:24:40

Hi, Steve. Steve, you have the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:24:42

opportunity to speak now. I had to unmute here. I made some written comments and I would turn your attention to those, but I won't repeat any of them. I do want to say that this team at Climatech and the company Our experts in energy efficiency. They are a subsidiary of Bosch, which is an international company that does this really across the world. My concern is that we need to move more expeditiously.

And my I've I'm going to say this, frankly, progress to date has been slow. Over two and a half years ago, inefficient and potentially unsafe status was identified for the HVAC systems in city buildings. A year and a half ago, the council, you, your council approved for fiscal year twenty four, twenty five. $347,000 for the needed HVAC improvements. Clean Power Alliance gave another $250,000. So there were, as of June 2024, there was $600,000 available that could have been put immediately to an RFP to The firms that do this kind of thing to replace, especially the rest of the low-hanging fruit.

In the status report, there was only $40,000 of the $600,000 available that was spent. Now, the reason for urgency was hinted at. Much of what we're looking at that make this really attractive rely on the Inflation Reduction Act and federal money that has flowed through to some of the organizations, semi-public and public organizations that provide these funds. The Inflation Reduction Act money Which for homeowners ends this December, extends into next year. But if we don't meet those deadlines, we lose that opportunity. And given the administration in Washington, I'm not confident that That money isn't going to be clawed back. So I really would like to leave you with a sense of urgency to move this forward as expeditiously as possible. Thank you.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:27:22

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:27:22

Thank you, Steve.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:27:23

That's all, Mayor. Well, I, so just on that one point, I was in the audience and I remember when that came up for the prior council, but I also recall that it was severely underfunded when we had to look at the infrastructure that was also needed. So that's only part of the story, right, if my memory is serving me correctly.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed4:27:43

Yeah, I think what he's referring to is the $347,000 on the Phil White

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:27:47

letter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed4:27:49

And after staff looked at that, agreed. It turned out to

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:27:53

be more like a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed4:27:53

million. Agreed. It was grossly underfunded for those improvements.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:27:58

And beyond that, I think what we wanted, we wanted a comprehensive effort led by somebody who was an expert, who could be the firm looking for all the opportunities to do it in a more holistic manner. We deliberately parked the money from CPA after getting guarantees from them that it would still be available because we knew if we took that comprehensive effort, we could throw that towards it. So that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:28:20

kind of explains it better. I would not have the perspective that it's been very slow. It seems more like it's been prudent. That doesn't change what we're asking of you, which is to be as quick as you could be. I favor that 100%.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:28:38

On the point of the CPA funds, Mr. Harvey, we did speak with him today and confirm you have three years. So we will make sure for that. And then on the Inflation Reduction Act, yes, we will do what we can. And I just want to mention We as a company, because of having the backing of a company like Bosch, we are able to make decisions about how we are going to prepare for this July deadline and projects that we know that are pending. We're going ahead at our risk and ordering panels because panels were three to four month lead time. Back six months ago, and now they're like six to seven month lead time. So just to get ahead of that, we're making that strategic investment, and we do have City of Ojai on the list of a potential city that would benefit from that if you move forward.

Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:29:33

please. Can I put a motion on the table to move forward with the work plan as expeditiously as possible? I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:29:41

second that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:29:43

Yeah, I just want to make a couple of comments. I won't say much more than what Mr. Kolamei said, that I'm really pleased with City Manager, Public Works Director, in bringing climate tech I feel really strongly we're in good hands for this pretty substantial project. And I'm also very, you know, kind of committed to the idea, because of everything that I've read, that, you know, switch over towards electrification.

It isn't just a clean planet thing. It's a smart, you know, if we're operating as a business, we should be looking at innovations like this because over the long term, it's going to save the city a lot of money. And and so I feel good about having that dual benefit. And so. You know, however, however long it took us to get to this place, I am so pleased that we are at this place and and thank you for helping

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:31:07

us. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:31:09

Ditto on that. One hundred percent.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:31:11

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:31:12

All right, we got a motion.

4:31 – 4:3620 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:31:15

And a second?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:31:16

I second

Roll call — called by Kim Mang
Show transcript
it. Thank you. To move forward with the received work plan expeditiously. Roll call. Mayor Pro Tem Lang? Yes. Council Member Rule is absent. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Mang? Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:31:31

Motion passes. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:31:32

you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:31:34

Wonderful. Yes, thanks. Wonderful. We can get through these last two, you guys. We can do it. We can do it. Two more? Well, the last one is really super short. And this one's short, too. These will both be really short. We're on the purchase of the new custom built dais for city council.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:31:52

Right, and we are going to bring forward Mr. Han to explain briefly how we- Thank you, Mr. Palmer. Appreciate it very much. Thank you. How we followed up on council direction. Yep. Mr. Han, welcome. Thank you, Mr. Han.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:32:11

Hello. What we have before you to consider tonight is the revised design and estimate for the new City Council dais. As you can see on the screen, I went, I took your input, went back to the manufacturer, and this is what we came up with. This is a horseshoe shape. It's still going to have all the provisions for supporting the transition to a paperless agenda.

One thing I didn't talk about previously that I think is actually pretty cool with this is it is structurally supported. And we'll be on casters, which means that if we have a special meeting like another Chicago, I can never pronounce that, we can actually move it and use this room differently. I really appreciate your guys' input on this. I think we came up with a much better design.

It looks like exactly what we were asking for, to me. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:33:24

forgot to say, it's very similar in dimensions. We're going to lose about an inch and a half on either side of the room.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:33:42

So it's gonna be about this much wider. It's gonna, the end of it'll be about 18 inches more into the room because the circle where the city manager and I are sitting will be the end of the circular part, and then there'll be two more seats that are straight. I love it. I've been doing City Council meetings for a very long time. What you may not realize is every time we had a meeting over there, we had to set up chairs outside because there was too many people in the room.

We can accommodate Before the pandemic, we could get almost 40 people. It was like 36 to 38, depending on the chairs in the room. After the pandemic, it went down to about 30.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:34:40

Well, but also, Mr. Hahn, it's an ADA issue as well, and so the bathrooms here are ADA compliant. We have the, I'm going to use the wrong term, but what's the term for the hearing impaired that is in our

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:34:51

monitors? Yeah, we have a hearing loop in this

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:34:53

room. Right, the hearing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:34:55

loop. We also have on those back monitors, if you've ever noticed, they have closed captioning live during the meeting. No, no, no, it's cozy over there. We get that question a lot,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:35:06

I know, I know. This is the fire terminology, but I'm going to use it. I think there was also an issue of defensible space, because we did have a couple of episodes of scary times at the dais, and Trina Newman thought that this would be a more secure way to manage.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:35:34

It's really clear with the exit points here. It's really

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:35:38

very... And we did replace all the decking out there, so it's actually safe to run out now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:35:45

Could we get a lighting setup? Stage lighting?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:35:51

All kidding aside, you know, these are the types of improvements that will be made as part of what we just last heard.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:35:59

Well, I appreciate the way you did, and to me, it's great. I would love to accept it and make that motion to approve the new design.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:36:06

So I'm going to make a comment, and I'm not going to stall out what we're doing, but I would have loved to have seen us work with somebody right here in Ojai, but At least someone from California and maybe not someone from Texas. But those are my comments. Okay.

4:36 – 4:3914 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:36:35

Is my ear for a second failing me tonight? No, it hasn't happened yet. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:36:40

I'll second it. Okay.

Roll call — called by Kim Mang
Show transcript
Any more comments? Okay. Roll call. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Lang. Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Council Member Mang? Yes. Council Member Rule is absent.
ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:36:55

Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:36:56

Thanks, ma'am. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Hahn.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:37:01

I have just a quick question. Sure. Do

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:37:03

you want Mr. Hahn to stick around?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:37:05

No, no, no. Okay, okay. Thank you. With the budget where, you know, you said it's a 52-2 to pay for the new desk, it comes out of the budget. I was just curious, like, how much money I'd have to look at Fund 33. It's an account that we have for improvements for our facilities. Specifically, I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:37:27

think Fund 33 is for Kent Hall and City Hall, but I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:37:29

could get you how much is in there.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:37:51

We have Channel 10 money, which is, this is essentially our

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:37:58

studio.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed4:38:01

I have $20,000 in there. We pre-purchased the surfaces for you guys last year, so I'm going to convert the money that we had budgeted this year for that. Thank you. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:38:32

All right, we're on the last item, 13. Right, we'll be short and sweet on this. I have an idea. Well, okay, the reason why, I'm going to be out of the country until the 16th, so originally we thought, well, what about 13th? But I just have a proposal, but maybe it's not possible. Right now, our first meeting would be, that would be our first meeting of the year. The next one would be the 27th. But just an idea, if we feel like there's a lot to do, if you guys were willing, would you be willing to do the 20th and then the 27th?

So it'd be, I'm just throwing it out there.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:39:11

So I have one other alternative to that, and that would be that we go ahead and do the 13th. We make sure that the calendar, the agenda doesn't include anything that you have a strong I have no problem with that. I'm going to have email and all that kind of stuff while I'm gone.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:39 – 4:4524 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:39:56

I'll be in a rural place in India, so it's not likely that I could zoom in, but we'll stay together on the agenda. I'm totally cool with that.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:40:11

City Manager, I'm guessing that we have enough items. We'll have more than enough, yes. And I'm totally open to you say, you know, if something gets on the list and you'd prefer that be held back until you're back. No problem. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:41:10

So

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:41:10

like if when I come back and you guys go, oh, there's a skate park on top of City Hall that you voted in or whatever. It'll be okay. Yeah. All right. No, it sounds good to me.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:41:20

So do you need? No. Can I just make that motion?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:41:24

Do you

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:41:24

have enough detail?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:41:25

Well, we would just need a motion if we were going to cancel it, but we're not canceling it. Direction received. Not at all.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:41:32

No,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:41:32

I'm totally fine. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:41:33

Really quickly on Councilmember reports, something that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:41:36

will be of interest to you guys. I did attend the MAC meeting last night, and Supervisor Libre was there as well. Traffic came up, and so they are proposing a valley-wide traffic committee, which would have two MAC people on there, people from the community, possibly Chief Jenkins, two people from this body, or at least one. So I would like to bring that forward at a future meeting that we could pick two people that would like to be on that.

Nothing's been decided yet about when to meet and all that, but the idea is that it's kind of like what Tina brought up earlier, which is they're looking at changes about traffic, how it affects us, how we can affect what's happening in the Valley. So it's just trying to have a Coherent, valley-wide plan. I love the idea.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.834:42:35

I like the idea too and I guess we'd have to put it on for a formal action, but I think we heard from the community member that Tina knows more about traffic than anybody in the Val.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:42:54

For sure. No, it's something that we definitely, and Michelle, who's here, was there last night as well. Absolutely, 100%, and we really should be a part of that, and we will.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:43:05

Okay, so two members?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:43:06

Two members

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:43:07

are requested. So, Mr. Montgomery,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:43:09

we heard through Mayor. Now, the first, just so we have a timeline, the first meeting would not come back until that last week in January, so we're not in a big rush. We can try to pick somebody at one of our meetings coming up forward, but they wouldn't report on anything most likely until at least, the earliest would be end of January, if not late February, I mean early February.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:43:33

Should be a fairly quick item on the agenda.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:43:35

I would say so. Just picking two of us and we'll figure out what the scheduling will be with the supervisor. And then, oh, sorry, you got that?

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro Temvoiceprint 0.734:43:44

As a routine item, we're gonna bring forth our regional boards for the year on January 27th, and we can, if it's reasonable to do that. This might be

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by roll call4:43:52

before that. Sounds like we, let's try to fit this in in December. This'll be a short item.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:43:58

Yep, and then, just to get you hopefully a little excited, the student council meetings are going really, really well, super exciting, they have tons of photographs, but imagine like 20 teenagers in here Talking about all the places that are really cool in Ojai. And what's becoming really clear is all the students at all the high schools want a place where they can all hang out together and get to know each other. So there's something coming possibly with OUSD. And then lastly, there is developments on the water adjudication. And I think we'll have more to talk about possibly at the next meeting.

Cool. That's it for me. Anybody else on council member reports?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed4:44:40

So I just wanted to say that I attended the California Transit Association Conference last week and got a lot of great information about different ways that we can support our clean energy initiatives here in town, and also I'm working with Gold Coast to see about perhaps making a donation of a used shuttle bus for OUSD, but this is something that's like in the works and it wouldn't be for another eight months, but they're being very, very generous and responsive and we have a great working relationship with them.

4:45 – 4:451 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:45:28

Yeah, okay. Any future agenda items that we need to add? Meeting adjourned.