Ojai City Council, Regular Meeting

BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 March 10, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:00 – 0:192 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role0:00

City Hall campus master plan update by the Ojai Valley Green Coalition. Yay, all right. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:25

Okay, great. Mayor Gilman, council members, staff, thank you for having me here tonight. I'm Kathy Nolan. I'm the board president of the Ojai Valley Green Coalition, and I'm going to be presenting the project that we're looking at tonight. First, you may remember I've been here several times before with this project, but we're kind of winding up our contract with the Knowing that the master plan will be completed by May 31st of this year, so we only have a couple more months to go. So I'm back here tonight with the same actual concept plan, which is kind of the preliminary stage before the master plan is completed, to just get, I know it's just a discussion item, you're not going to be voting on anything, but some either no's or yes's on the progress that we made and the elements that we're proposing.

And then anything else you may want to add. Of course, we're open to hearing that. I also wanted to just say what I've done since the last time you saw me, which was, I believe, the beginning of November. I did meet with the Historic Preservation Commission and had a concept review, and we had two site walks following the Brown Act. And I will generally say that we had a really good response. They were in favor of reuse of the carriage house, the landmarked carriage house.

We discussed the pergola, which is the wood structure on the south side of the children's garden. Some of it's rotted. It's very short in height. If anyone's walked in there, you kind of feel like you're going to hit your head. So anyway, we were generally proposing that that trellis or arbor would be taken down, potentially repurposed. A lot of it's old-growth redwood, so it could be reused, but the general comments from the HBC were You don't have to replace it. We'd like to see it replaced.

It doesn't necessarily have to be replicated exactly the way it is. One thing I wanted to point out is some of the members on that structure are just like a one-by, almost like a laugh material. So it would be up to the city if they wanted to follow the new fire code for like a very high fire zone, hazard zone area. We may want to eliminate that and what have you. But the point of it is that we're open to repurposing if we can, rebuilding possibly there, and or having it in another location. But the point is we want to make sure that some way a structure very similar will be added back into the project.

I was made aware that the Smith-Hobson family would open up the campus here to the public, or if they were having parties, and they had Japanese lanterns in there, and they would entertain. So, it was definitely this welcoming of the community back into the park, so we want to definitely maintain that. Pretty much everything else that we talked about they were open to. There was a couple items where they said they didn't know. A lot of the HPC commissioners didn't know there was a portion of a miniature concrete golf course.

It's a small feature. It usually has water in it and weeds, potentially mosquitoes. Most people don't know it's there because it's usually been hidden. But we have proposed to take it out, but once again, we're looking for feedback. And then here I am tonight, back again. I'm also going to be seeing the Planning Commission, not until next week. I was hoping to go there with a concept review before this, but just due to scheduling issues, it's going to be March 18th, so I wanted to let you know that.

We have continued with our stakeholder community engagement and general comments. We had a programming survey online that I believe we're having until the middle of this month or the end of this month, where we've been gathering more information. And we've also continued to do our site tours. Commissioner Lang, Commissioner Rulewin, I know Mayor Gilman has been there as well, and I also invite the other two.

Council members and anyone else who wants to come. We're actually having one March 21st, but we've had a really good response. A lot of people don't know, and I've said this before, but I'll say it again, that this property is even here behind City Hall, and I will say most people are really amazed to see how beautiful it is. that the water has come back into the restoration area, the elements of the old historic garden, and the potential for redoing the demonstration garden and making it accessible to all users.

All right, so tonight, so I'm going to bring back, let me see if I've got this going correctly. All right, there we go. So this is the same plan that I actually shared with you months ago, and we are actually working on and we're going to be expanding on it for the final master plan. But we're not there yet, and I did want to get your input. And of course, I've gone to HBC and then the Planning Commission before we start making those any updates or changes. But generally, you know, unless I hear that we want to eliminate something from the plan, it's going to be fairly similar to what you're seeing here, but with more definition, more information.

Let me just check my notes real quick here. So some of the items that I wanted to review are, and unfortunately I don't have a, or I can't use a pointer to point things out, but on our plan we have a proposed, what we're affectionately calling the garden house. And the garden house is, it's a building, it's a structure. We're hoping to do it with alternative materials, building materials, methods and materials.

And on the plan, we're showing it's a little over 1,200 square feet. I've looked at it a little further. We could go larger, even up to 1,500 square feet. We're also proposing a small commercial kitchen there. And we don't have it shown there, but the more we have thought about it, it'd probably be a good idea to have a restroom included. We also are including a restroom that we have located, it looks like, I'm trying to read from here, I think it's number 23, but it's just on the south side of Kent Hall, kind of the southeast side of Kent Hall, and that would be a public restroom as well.

There are some options, and I know I've talked to staff about it, and probably, it sounds like the prefab may be the way to go. I even looked over at the restroom at the skate park, Which could be very compatible to what we're doing here. Of course, we could match the paint plaster color to the city hall and what have you to make it even more compatible. But that might be the way to go.

And there I've got the two restrooms. We just talked about the carriage house. And once again, the Historic Preservation Commission, and so far everyone I've talked to has said, oh yeah, it'd be great if you could use the carriage house. We've got to go into it. Thank you to Brian, who's led many tours. But the big question is the structural integrity of the building. That we don't know.

So I have that on here as well. And basically it would be, I'm kind of throwing out that I'm making a request that we do need a structural engineer to make an assessment. And of course the city would have to initiate and authorize that. The other big ticket item, aside from the building, is the Middle Stewart Creek Canyon Bridge. I'm actually working with PAX Environmental right now. They've actually worked on that project. I'm supposed to be with them probably later this week or next week, but I'm looking at just getting some general costs.

And some of you may be familiar with the bridges that were installed in the meadows by the land conservancy and what the cost is. It's not a cheap date to go through all the regulatory agencies, but it would bring value to the property. It would allow Thank you. Getting more information about that right now. And the other thing, there would be trails on the other side and, of course, signage.

There's an endemic grass species there that is really, I talked to Scott Tomkinson, he's the botanist with Pax Environmental. So far, that's the only place they found it in the Ojai area. So that's pretty special. We want to make sure that it's protected and that there would be signage for educational purposes there. The other issue and the other thing that I wanted to mention was we, I don't have it tonight, but I did in one of our past presentations, we produced a plan, a tree plan, so we had all the trees on the property, but we showed the trees that potentially could be removed in what I would call the areas where we're proposing development or where classes would occur if this project gets installed, or even now people do go into the park.

And basically those species were trees that were dead or diseased, so they could have been native or non-native, and then invasive species like the eucalyptus. There aren't really any palms, there is an ornamental palm at the corner of Ventura, right across from City Hall. Canary Island Date Palm, but people keep saying to me, take it out because of fire, but at the same time, I see a picture in the historical photos of a very small Canary Island Date Palm in that location. So it may not be, it's on landmark property, it may not be landmark itself, but there is some historical value to it. So that's still up in the air, but I certainly would take direction from council or any of the commissions if they said take it out for whatever reason or leave it for whatever reason.

It's a tough call, but I would respect information from anyone on that one. Then, oh, the other thing, back to the trees. So, yeah, so the plan actually showed trees that would be taken out. We have an opportunity, and I mentioned this before in the past presentations, that we can actually repurpose a lot of the wood from the trees that were coming down. I actually met with, I'm sure you have met Sage Stoneman. He's been here numerous times, you know, presenting to council.

And we're actually looking at, you know, we'd have to go by code and, of course, get it all approved. But structurally, they could use a lot of that eucalyptus, which is a very hard wood, in a straw bale cob structure. In addition to what I had proposed earlier, that we can use it for the nature-based play for children, we could build benches. Of course, mulch, that's the no-brainer. Chip up the, you know, the leaves when they happen, use that on the trails. But essentially, a good portion of that wood could actually stay on the site and be repurposed. Which I think is great, if we can do that. So that's another consideration.

Let's see, what else am I missing? Oh, I did speak to staff about potential hours of the park. I know it's early on, we're still just doing a master plan. But from my understanding, most of the parks are open dawn to dusk, except for an indoor event, which would be like a special event. And then, you know, potentially it could be open at those hours in the evening or by a permit if it was a special event.

The other thing I had on here was about signs. So signage is a big part of what we're proposing in the project because we see this as an educational opportunity. So it would not only be just directional of like, you know, follow this path to get to the carriage house, but also information about the restoration project. Historical information about the part of the garden. It's part of the landmarked, you know, the old estate. The demonstration garden, which would be featuring California native plants, Chumash culture, fire-safe plant material, and gardening.

You know, we're proposing to collect rainwater off the roofs of the buildings, so there would be information about that. So anyone could do like a self-guided tour if they wanted to. But we think it's a real bonus to have something like that included in the park. So those are what I would call the main items that I'm hoping if you have any feedback or a yes or a no, or we'll take that information and put it into the plan as we further develop it. That doesn't mean, you know, I'm hoping the master plan gets approved, that's our intention, that after that you couldn't make a change, but at least we were trying to get in the ballpark, so to speak, and we're working on what I call preliminary cost analysis at the moment.

I'm probably about three-quarters of the way done with that. I was hoping to have it tonight, but I don't have it. Just to give us a ballpark, if we did this project, Today and we did the entire project and or you could face it. This is an estimated cost. So potentially we can figure out together how we can make this work. So I don't know if at this point if you want to give me any feedback.

That would be great on those items. And then after that. Well, I'll just show this too, just to give you a quick idea. So here's just some, what I would call, photo imagery of, you know, what things could look like and happen. So at the top you see the straw bale construction. And a lot of people working on the cob finish on the outside. We also see this as potentially a barn raising project, similar to the Libbey Park Playground, where the community came together, organizations came together. It really helped cut down the cost, but it also brought value.

You know, it made it our own for all of us who participated in that. So we're looking at that throughout the project, whether it's the building or the planting, putting in the trails and what have you. Then we're also showing at the bottom if it was rented out, because we'd love to see some revenue streams. We will need money to maintain it. You know, potentially you could have a wedding or something similar, as you see on the bottom left.

If we have a community kitchen, it could be rented out. I wanted to say, by the way, on a couple of our site tours, and we happen to be at the Fire State Council, they did a big presentation at the end of January. I've had people come up to me, somebody from Rotary who said, when can we rent it? When can we rent that garden? We would love to rent it. California Native Plant Society, one of the head people for the Channel Islands Chapter said, We have a big event every year, and she goes, I want to do it in Ojai. I can't find an event. We always have to go to Carpinteria Santa Barbara. When we're ready, how can we help you foster this project? Because we'd like to do it. I also had a local vendor in town who does fermented foods, has a legal business.

She said, she approached me and she said, let me know, how can I help you? Because I would love to rent that. So just sharing that. And then on the far right, the bottom corner, You know, whether it's a lecture or we're doing a workshop, but we also thought about something else and we put down there creative events. Potentially, it could be used as an alternate, you know, I'm forgetting the exact name, but a site where you rent out, like, a table and you've got all the ability for your electronics and Wi-Fi, so somebody could do an online business or some sort of business. And maybe it's only, you know, a certain amount of days a week. But something like that could happen there as well.

And then, of course, we've, like I mentioned, the Fire Safe Council, they've kind of said to us, you know, just in casual conversation, they're doing a big project out at the West Campus for their resilience program. But this property, if we had the garden house, could be almost like a satellite. were for an emergency and you needed to gather and what have you, you could use that space. So I just thought I'd mention that, that there is definitely community interest.

And then just to take a look at, I've just mentioned these areas, but there's the existing carriage house up on the upper left, the existing arbor that I spoke about that has some rot, it's really low, and we'd love to make it functional and relate to the existing one if we can. That was a restroom that we got offline, but it would be very compatible with, you know, the architecture of City Hall.

The creek crossing there is actually from the Land Conservancy, but just for example. And then on the far right, we have the parking. We are proposing some parking. Let me just go back really quick. If you go into Ventura Street, which is on the right side of the drawing, you kind of see the gray, and it would be the southeast corner, so the bottom right corner on the drawing. I'm sorry, I'm having a hard time seeing the numbers. I think it's 21.

We're proposing parking there that would be like an ADA parking area. So that's potentially an area where we could do a bioswale for catching stormwater off the street. And we were just showing an example there on the

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:19 – 0:3234 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:08

right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:10

A couple more things, just a sample of a demonstration garden with signage that you could have pop-up events. There's another nice signage sign on the right. The interior wood on the bottom left is potentially reusing the eucalyptus that we talked about, and then reusing it for a nature-based play in the center, and then bench seating. Those are all just images of potentially what it could look like.

So maybe I'll go back. I don't know at this point if you have any feedback that you want to provide.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed19:44

I just have a couple questions. As far as with the trees, I know when I was first elected, I walked the property with some constituents and they showed me Jan's report that he had did. Are you following his recommendation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed19:59

Absolutely. As a matter of fact, I'm glad you asked me that question. Yes, we are. All the trees are tagged. The plan that we did is actually based on the site survey showing all those trees and then the numbers and the names. So we're definitely working off that plan. And that just reminds me, and I'll say it right now so I don't forget, because I wrote a little note to myself and read, as many of you are aware, I think it was a total of three, but somebody can correct me if I'm wrong. Three coastline folks had debris removed. They died in the vicinity of the children's garden.

I've been in touch with Jan about that, and I kept saying, do you know what caused it? I just contacted him a couple of days ago, again, and I know that he had spoken with Dr. Jim Downer, who's a plant pathologist, retired from the UC system. And they weren't sure what it was, so there wasn't an obvious organism. So my conversation with Jan was, okay, we'd like to do some replanting and or we want to protect the trees that are there. We need to find out what caused those trees to die. Like, did they get sprayed by an herbicide? Hopefully not, because we have an earth-friendly management plan.

Usually, insects aren't the usual cause. They come in after a pathogen, so it's probably some sort of a pathogen. He has an idea, but he's not sure, so I'm going to be talking to him more about that, and if we aren't sure, I would like to, and I will follow whatever procedure I need to do, but to request that we have a pathology test, and it might be on the soil, and we probably can go into the roots or the stump and do a tissue sample to find out what it is, because it could spread. We don't want it to spread, and if we want to replant, we have to make sure that the species we're replanting with are not going to be attacked by the same thing.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role21:58

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed21:59

you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:00

And then just one

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:01

more thing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:02

With

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed22:03

the night on the terrace, I think that's a wonderful idea, but to be mindful of the neighbors. I know there's been issues, and to just add one more thing to the list that could bother their private life or whatever.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed22:17

Yeah, and I'm so glad you brought that up because previous to our contract that we have right now for the master plan, the first phase that we got was a community service grant through the city several years ago, 2022. And that was community engagement. And we held a series of workshops and surveys, had the community come and yes, absolutely, we need to respect and honor the neighbors. And I wouldn't I wouldn't think we'd be having something there every night going till midnight. It might have to be something by special permit. You'd have to follow the noise, of course, the lighting and everything, all of our city ordinances.

And we're open to getting more input from the community about everything, but I agree with you. And then even with the use of the park, we're calling it a passive park. Interesting, at one of our workshops, somebody was saying, yeah, you should put in like a zip line and then this, you know, all this stuff. And I just said, you know, the City Hall is right there, so they're conducting business, right, during the day, and then there are meetings here at night, right?

Yeah, I mean it sounded really fun and everything, but it was like you could pay and you could make all this money. And so I had to explain to him, I said, well, business is conducted here and we have the neighbors, so let's just call it, it's a passive park. So everything is quiet. So if there is anything, you know, where there is some sound, I'm guessing it would be acoustic and we'd follow the, definitely follow the ordinance.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:49

We're on the same page as you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed23:50

are.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:01

Well, first of all, I just want to thank you for all the work that you've done. I mean, I was at the original community gatherings, and I loved the process that you and Betsy led us through. And when I took the site tour, I saw so many of the ideas that had been discussed in those circles. They're being dreamed of and included in the plans. And I had a real, I was fortunate to be on the tour with Julie Tumamae Stensley, and she was telling all of these stories. At one point we were all standing in a circle and she was telling stories about acorns and The Chumash connection to acorns and to the trees, and I could really see the vision of connecting all of these different voices in our community right there in the park.

And so it was really moving to be a part of that and to see how far you all have come. And I guess to that point, I had a question, and that is, are we doing anything, and I can't remember if I saw this on the slides, I know you mentioned it, but are we doing anything to honor the indigenous or honor the Chumash? Any kind of art or installations or memorials?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed25:31

What we've looked at so far, and this project is still growing, is to definitely include information about the plants and the connection to the Chumash. So I envision, and we'll see where this goes, that all the plants will have signage, of course the botanical name, a common name, and a Chumash name, and possibly some Chumash information about the plant material. Number one, I know Julie, she has, you know, been a big part of our community, the Green Coalition and coming into this property.

And there's probably some more that we can add to it, and I'm open to it, in addition to classes and workshops that we can do. So I've definitely talked with her about that. Yeah, so we're still, you know, great idea and deservedly so.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:24

Thanks for being open to that. Any other questions? Mine's related, I guess, to the timeline in your last slide.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:31

Oh, yeah, which I can.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:32

No, which is just I see May 2026 council approval. Is that when you would have a master plan with the detail, the financial detail? Is that the?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:40

Yes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:41

OK.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:41

Yeah. Now this is projected, of course.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role26:43

OK,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:44

so let's just take a look at it. So up on the top left, it says community and stakeholder engagement. That's what we did with the community service grant that we had in twenty So we went out to the community and said, you know, what do you want? What do you see here? And then we also spoke with, you know, commissioners, staff, and what have you. And now we're in this master plan stage. So the master plan, as I mentioned earlier, our contract ends May 31st of 2026. So the plan will be done, and in addition to the, when I say plan, there's actually more than one plan.

But in addition to that, we will have a comprehensive master plan report, and we will have this preliminary cost analysis included in that. I'm also willing, if you wanted me to come back, I don't know if I could get on the schedule, but I could come back sooner with that before May, potentially, or if you needed me to for anything. I'll just say that I'm open to working with you on that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:46

That's great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed27:47

Yeah. And then on the second column over, assuming that the master plan got approved, if it gets approved, it does, the next step is design development. And so design development is taking the master plan and giving it more detail. So when you get the master plan, we're going to have information like six foot wide decomposed granite accessible path. But when you go into design development, we can give it more detail. What's the edge condition? How deep is the DG? We're starting to go into more depth and flushing the design out more.

Mr. Harvey, you can please correct me or guide me on this part. What we're proposing is to have an RFP or, depending on following city procedure, gather a group of a design team. So we would bring in like an architect, civil engineer,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed28:57

So, right, it would go out for an RFP process? It would.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed29:00

Okay, good. I wasn't sure if it needed to happen then. I know for sure it needed to happen at construction documents. Okay, because I know we had talked and I wasn't sure, so that's why I wanted to refer to you. Thank you. And so we're proposing that potentially that could start, you know, anytime after May and potentially be completed by January of 2027. The next phase in the design process on the third column in the kind of yellow ochre color is the construction documents. So the construction documents take that design development even further. So those are the plans that somebody could bill, bid and build off.

So all the specifications are there. This is how you do it. So it's more technical. But you have to build on the master plan to get to that point. Once again, you potentially would have the same consultants on board, but then you could do an RFP for contractors, contractors who would be potentially bidding on it and hopefully installing, and then project management, and then You know, the funding was right, and the phasing figured out. In June of 2027, essentially, you could start constructing.

And then this just gives you a little more information about the consultant team, what it could look like, just to give you an idea. I'm sure you're familiar, you've been working on the Dignity Moves, the OI Permanent Supportive Housing Project. It's a very similar project, but we're showing the Green Coalition up on the top left. Those are the plans we would be doing. You probably have it in your package, so I may not have to read it all. Then, we would have also some expert advisors.

For instance, like Pax Environmental for the restoration, Sage Stowman could be a consultant with the architect and the team on Straubiel and Cobb. This is just for example, and then you see down below the consultant team. The architect would be in charge of the garden house, the restrooms of chads, the carriage house restoration. You may need a geotech report. We're trying to do a minimal amount of grading, but we probably have to do a little bit by the garden house.

Civil engineer would do grading and drainage, site plan, circulation, parking, biospills, and rain gardens. And there's pre-construction management, budgeting, scheduling, value engineering. And then, of course, a structural engineer would be needed probably for the garden house, any structures on the site. So just to give you an idea. So if there's interest, We would love to, you know, just to move forward with this. I'm sure it would probably entail me having a meeting with staff as to next steps.

But of course, we want to go forward. We're hoping you say yes. At this

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role32:04

stage, we're talking about just a presentation one way. Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:08

Yeah. Yeah. Not not to move forward on design development. I just wanted to give you a hint, a taste of what potentially.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role32:15

We're loving it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:15

OK.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role32:17

Yes. Any more questions? Thank you so much. This is incredible.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:22

You're welcome. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role32:23

All right. Thank you so much for being here, team. Any commission reports? City manager's report, please.

0:32 – 0:3912 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed32:38

Thanks, Mayor, just a couple items. We are proposing a community workshop as a follow-up to City Council direction for the community and the Council and some subject matter experts to discuss the proposed Draft Tree Ordinance. We're proposing that for Tuesday, April 7th, 6 o'clock. So, I've not heard from the Council that we shouldn't move forward with that, so I'm going to plan on doing that. We'll, of course, put out notification postings, but we just wanted to make you and the community aware of that.

Secondly, another good news item, in consultation with Ms. Mara and the Fire Chief, it looks like we have 28 people signed up for the CERT training, which is great, so that is moving forward. Very glad, I thought I might have to come here tonight and ask for people to join in, but it looks like we're good. And then lastly, Ms. Cervantes has a very brief trolley update. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed33:35

Yeah, so starting tomorrow, we will have a new trolley driver. So we're excited to get them trained and behind the wheel. And then the next thing is we do have the Outlook newsletter out on the March 23rd. So look out for that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role33:54

Hey, thank you. I know it's wonderful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed33:58

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role34:00

Thank you so much. Okay, we'll move on to some public comments. I only have a couple of cards here. Ron Salarzano, please. And then Clay Creasy.

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated34:14

All right. Thank you so much, members of council. My name is Ron Solorzano, the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley, and I just wanted to give you a quick little update on the library today. We have a special program that started this week. We are partnering, the library is partnering with In-N-Out on what's called the Cover to Cover program. This program is running from March 7th until April 18th. It is a reading program for children between the ages of 4 and 12.

And the idea is that they can come to the library to pick up a reading log that they then are able to fill out, and for every either, for every five books they read or for every 300 minutes they read, they will earn a little card for a free burger from In-N-Out. They can win up to three of those burgers, so that's means reading up to 15 books total or 900 minutes total.

So they can just, you know, families can stop by the Ojai Library, just come to the front desk and ask about the cover-to-cover program. We have a little sign and everything. And yeah, so through April 18th. Other than that, we're just continuing on with our normal programming. We have our Storytimes weekly on Wednesday mornings. We have our Adult Crafting, our Wonder Workshops on Sunday afternoons. Those are going on still as well.

And then I'll also put in a plug, the Pause for Reading program is continuing as well with Therapy Dog Radiant visiting us on Wednesday afternoons. So other than that, things are relatively quiet, but if you ever have any questions about what we have going on, you can always reach out to me over at the library. Thank you so much. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role35:57

Construction timeline?

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated35:59

No updates. I was hoping to sneak by on that one, but no. No, no, no, it's okay. No significant updates as of yet. I will shout it from the rooftops when we have that information. No sweat. Yeah. All right.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role36:11

Thank you.

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated36:12

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role36:12

Thank you, sir. Clay Creasy, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed36:18

Good evening, Councilmembers. I'm talking tonight on financial matters. I'm, as you know, a member of our Budget Committee. I've been on that committee since mid last year. I wanted to give you sort of a brief recap on where I think we stand and some of the problems we have facing us. As you know, with the Ida Bailey and the Kroll reports, we have a lot of financial control issues that we're grappling with.

Some of them are we've seen errors on staff reports, payments are omitted from the warrant list, bank reconciliations are not done or done late or not signed off, contract bidding laws are not being followed, contract payments The city's budget is based on the city's budget. The city's budgets are made over the not-to-exceed limits, or spending authority is being exceeded. Budgets are sometimes unrealistic. There's no long-term financial forecasting that the city does. We have inadequate financial reporting, chronic understaffing, which we all know about, and occasional nonresponse to data requests.

You know, bringing bad news, aha. But it is a sobering list of things. And as we contemplate doing extra stuff, one thing we have to remember is if you don't get the basics right, the extra is very hard to execute. Having said that, we have another very big issue that's looming, which you probably are not well aware of, and that is we are about to, in fact, are now violating a policy that we just enacted last year, and that is the balanced budget policy.

When we did our budget for this year, the budget was balanced. It had $16.9 million revenue, $16.8 million expense. Assuming you approve the legal budget change tonight, which I expect will happen, you will now have expenses of $2 million even versus what was budgeted. Revenues will only be up a couple, 400,000. So you will now have a deficit of 1.5 million, which means we're in violation of the policy that the Budget Committee unanimously approved not too many months ago. So what's that all about? I think going forward what we need to do is convene a somewhat of an emergency subcommittee. It's obviously up to you to figure it out. I would highlight four potential things that this committee should do. Number one, we should Enter into no new consulting arrangements until we figure out where we're going to be on budget.

We need to freeze the city manager's independent spending authority. We need to prepare a realistic five-year financial forecast, and we need to revisit our reserve policy so that it's based on sound professional financial analysis. If we don't do this, your Delta Fund is going to dry up by the end of next year, and I really don't know what's going to happen. Thank you.

0:39 – 0:428 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role39:18

Thank you, Mr. Creasy. Okay, anybody online?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed39:25

Sorry, yes, we have Larry Steingold. Okay. Unmute yourself, Larry. There you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed39:33

go. Good evening. Hello. Wonderful seeing all your smiling faces. Please listen to Mr. Creasy. He knows his business. He knows what he's doing. He's experienced. Many of you, while well-intentioned, are not as experienced. You ignore his warnings, suggestions, however it works. At our peril, not just yours, ours, we're all included here, right? It's like buying property.

Please do not commit us to deals or try to put together deals that commit us long term, that can affect our budget long term if there's a shortfall. Because the economy isn't always wonderful. We aren't always 100% vacant, unvacant, sorry, not vacant. Everything's not always moving. Life goes up and down. So please be cognizant of the commitments we make. While well-intentioned, there are predictable consequences to well-meaning activities and processes.

And sometimes these don't work when things go bad. So we need to keep our budget and our reserves sufficient. So please be cognizant of this. And Regarding property where the closed meeting says negotiation for terms and conditions, there has to be an offer, and if the offer is not public, then it must be secret. So, I mean, you know, that could be done a little better, or maybe it's not as clear, maybe you're not negotiating, and the title should be changed.

But either way, again, please do not commit us to things that could disturb our way of life and our quality of life. We live pretty well in Ojai, and having to not have certain activities because we have commitments we can't afford really could disturb the force here. So thank you very much and good evening.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:04

Thank you, Mr. Stengel. Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed42:08

No, Mayor, there's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:08

nobody.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed42:09

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:09

OK, we'll move on to the consent calendar. I would suggest that we pull number four from consent only because it's we just want to make sure that we're clear on the details on that. But any other items? Great. So can I have a motion to approve two, three and five, please?

0:42 – 0:4924 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed42:32

I'll move to approve the others.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:35

Second that. Should we just do a roll call quickly on that? Thank you.

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move to approve the others. Second that. Should we just do a roll call · 1 under review
Show transcript
Mayor Gilman. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. Yes. Council Member Lang. Yes. Council Member Rule.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed42:51

Council Member Rule. Oh, sorry.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role42:53

Oh, sorry. I wasn't sure if you heard me. No, she was physically gesturing.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8442:57

I was pondering the question. You know, is it I would like to pull the warrant if I can. OK. All right. That's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:06

OK. Oh, well, then.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8443:10

Yeah. So if I could pull three, that would be great. So three and four and then move to approve the others. If we could redo that motion, that would be great.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:20

I'll revise my motion for two and five.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed43:27

Mayor Gilman?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:28

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed43:29

Council Member Whitman?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:30

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed43:31

Mayor Pro Tem Ming? Yes. Council Member Lang? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role43:36

Let's start with number three, the warrants, please. Thank you, Ms. Jo.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8444:01

I was actually going to speak a little bit to the Ventura County Animal Services, but I think that actually what I will talk about that in council members' report outs at the end of the meeting. So I don't think I need to speak to the exact amount, but I did want to give a detail on sort of what we're paying for and what we're getting and where they are. But in thinking about it, I think it's more appropriate at the end.

I will leave that be.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed44:50

I spent so much time preparing this. Okay, so I believe the warrant listing is omitting something that needs to be included because, as you know, Dignity Moves was given a deposit of $5.9 million last June, and from that deposit they have been paying various vendors, including themselves, On a monthly basis since then, that deposit was not a payment for services. It was a deposit to pay for services from other vendors, including, obviously, also Dignity Moves. So the visibility of those payments should be identical to the visibility of payments that the City is making right now in its normal course.

Unfortunately, in order to see them, I have to file a Public Records Act request and go through all those shenanigans, which eventually I get. So the bottom line is the same. But the public doesn't see it. You guys don't see it. I made a point, which you probably or maybe noticed. I sent an email, but nobody responded to it. So I'm hoping you saw it. But the bottom line is, Dignity Moves is paying themselves over $30,000 per month.

of their development fee. At that rate, they will be all paid off their entire half million dollars by this August. Obviously, we don't have a shovel in our ground yet, and we don't even have a general contractor signed up, so it's going to be a while before anything significant happens, but you could easily wake up in a few months and Dignity Moves is entirely paid off, and you have a giant project still in front of you. What is going to be their motivation to do a good job when they're basically working for free at that point in time?

What is the contingency or leverage you have if they do a bad job? You can't withhold anything if it's all been paid. From a financial fiduciary point of view, it is, I called it, the height of irresponsibility to pay that vendor all that they're going to be able to charge us basically before any service, significant service is rendered. So anyhow, long-winded thing. These should be on the warrant listings. It will save me some PRA effort and save you guys some having to dig for the facts. Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8447:12

I actually do have a question for the City Manager and potentially also for the Finance Director. Is, I won't ask is there a reason why, but is there a way to get that monthly accounting for the project visible on the warrants and or as part of an ongoing sort of agenda piece? In other words, yeah, that's the question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed47:42

So I would say the warrant register represents city checks issued. So those would not be city checks that are being issued. So it's a bit of an unusual situation due to the conditions that were resonant at the time we put together the DMA and the You know, the grant requirements. We could certainly, I think what I would prefer rather than commingling dignity moves payment to various vendors within your warrant register, we could do a monthly or a quarterly update on expenditures that they've made. That's fine.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8448:15

Yeah, I think a monthly update as sort of, you know, a tag-on. Certainly, I understand the distinction between warrants, we wrote the check, and, you know, they have the money and they write the check. But I think some oversight of it would be helpful for me, so I'd much appreciate it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed48:33

So if we have agreement from the Council, you know, we can produce some type of monthly update. Thank you. That's fine.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed48:40

Can it go back as far as from day one because I've always had questions about that budget and it's never been, we've never really received how much has been spent, how much is reimbursable and all of that would be helpful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed48:52

Are you asking for dignity moves or are you, what's...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed48:56

Whatever we've put out, there's been a lot of things, like I keep a spreadsheet, you know, for instance, just to throw somebody out there what we're paying, you know, help of Ojai for their issue, like everything that's been spent in regards to Cabin Village.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:07

So that's a different, that's a different request. Okay. So, you know, and I think that the request I'm receiving here is what dignity, what we're What is Dignity Moves expending each month, which is different than all things spent on OTT or the Ojai Permanent Supportive Housing Project? And the reason is some costs are borne by the city, some are not.

0:49 – 0:5642 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8449:33

Yeah, I would second that request. I mean, I don't know if we need to move formally with that, but I think us getting a better handle, and I think just itemized, just items, we can get, you know, a good handle, like 75% handle on what's going on versus like no handle.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed49:53

So, okay, I mean, if I understand this correctly, you're asking for every, every expenditure that has been made on the Ojai Permanent Supportive Housing Project, is that the request? Right,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed50:05

you've told me, like, you've asked three times, like, hey, Kim, do you want to get together and we can go over the numbers and all of that? It's never happened. So if that's something that can be handled through a meeting to go over what's been spent or whatever?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed50:16

Well, okay, so here's the other thing. So, and I'm not trying to get cute here, but we also have some things that cross with both OTT and the Ojai Permanent Supportive Housing Project. So, for instance, you're paying for case management through help of Ojai, which you just mentioned. That's being used right now at OTT. It will also continue into, so that's an example. Same with Ventura County Behavioral Health.

So I think, but I think you're specifically just wanting the permanent supportive housing project and things have been expended towards that, is that right? So I would exclude some things in that request. Mr.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role50:53

Mang, can I just, it seems to me though that's not what you're saying. You have been asking, you've asked what are all the costs of the folks over there right now. That's not the permanent supportive housing project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed51:06

I understand

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role51:06

that. Oh, but you're saying you only want to know about that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed51:09

I want to know about dignity in

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role51:11

this.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed51:12

I'm fine with that. I keep track of everything through the warrants, so I have somewhat of an idea of what goes where.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed51:19

So what I might suggest is we could start with an agenda item that includes expenditures made towards EOI, Permanent Supportive Housing Project, and some of this information you will have already heard. And it will be familiar to you. And then we could, from that point, after the agenda item, proceed with a monthly report showing expenditures made by Dignity Movers.

Thank you. Ms. Cho, does that sound okay? Thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8451:48

And I think it would be valuable also, I mean, I don't know if the request was also to go back to the point where we gave Dignity Moves the $5.5 million and take it from there. That would be very helpful for me, and I can imagine it, let's just, you know, they have to submit, so it's more a kind of easy thing, I think, to pull, so that would be great. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:14

Thank you. Okay, anything else on the warrants number three? Can I get a motion to approve number three, please? I'll move to approve number three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:26

I'll second it. Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:27

Oh, was there anybody online for number three? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:29

Got

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:30

it. Okay, roll call, please, on number

Roll-call vote Passed 4–0 move to approve number three. I'll second it. Okay. Oh, was there anybody online for number three? Thank you. Got it. Okay, roll call,
Show transcript
three. Who was the second? I'm sorry. Oh, you were, okay. Thanks. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. Yes. Council Member Rule. Abstain. Council Member Lang. Yes.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed52:48

Motion passed.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role52:49

Okay, so on number four, just that we had a lot of detail, did anybody have questions about the second reading of this? Or is there anything from staff?

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8753:01

The only thing I would note is that based on the discussion on first reading, there was a request that we provide a little more latitude as far as the frequency of meetings. We did incorporate that, and there is a redlined version that was included in the packet that reflects that edit.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7653:19

Thank you. And can I just ask what specifically was changed on that?

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8753:25

Yes, let me go to that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.7653:28

item. I should have read that in the report.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8753:32

I believe it is in the report. I believe it deals with the frequency of meetings. But the red line is probably the fastest way to see it, and that is on page 41 of the packet. And so it previously read, so initially it says regular meetings of the commission shall be public and shall be held monthly for the first six months following the appointment and swearing in of the last commissioner. Thereafter, the commission may meet on a monthly basis, but shall meet at least once per calendar quarter. So there's the ability for the, there's no No prohibition, and as with all boards and commissions that follow the City's Boards and Commissions Handbook, there would still be the opportunity for them to call special meetings on an as-needed basis.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:31

And so if this is approved, then the next, assuming it will be approved, then the next step would be that we would follow the protocol and start assigning positions, okay?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8454:42

That's correct.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:43

Yes, questions?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8454:44

Yeah, I'm, are we, okay, assigning positions or?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:49

Well, like the process would, if I'm reading right, the process is a council person and the mayor first, right? Am I reading that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed54:57

correctly? And the rotating council, the rotating council person?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role55:00

Well, I'm saying the first one is, let's see, I'm looking right

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8755:03

now. So I believe what we discussed was that we would effectively do like a lottery as far as it's signing. Yeah. You know, the order in which the seats would be selected. Right. And, you know, so obviously the first, I think the first two of the seats, I believe, we We determined would be available for appointment by individuals living in the Valley, but not necessarily within the City.

If the first two seats were appointing someone who was in the Valley, then the other three seats would need to be within the City, but we would select that on a lottery basis.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role55:43

That hasn't changed from the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8455:43

last conversation. I'm wondering about appointment versus nominating and interviewing. Word choice, bad word choice, nominating. For clarification, there

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8755:55

would be a nomination and then the appointment

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8455:57

would be made by the entire council. So we would put out an application and I'm assuming that once we have this vote and if it is approved, we can put the application out as soon as possible?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed56:10

Yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8456:11

Okay. And does that require notice?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed56:14

Yes.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8456:14

Okay. So we would notice it and then we would get applications.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed56:17

The usual process that we follow would be would be followed. The only thing that's a little bit unusual is that this is the brand new commission. Yeah.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8456:26

Great. And the other thing that I would ask to this, and I don't know, I guess maybe I should have done it beforehand, was given that the mayor is on all five of the appointments, I think his name should come out of the hat for order. I'm just curious a question it says three members being appointed for up to four years and two being appointed up to two years. Who decides who gets what?

0:57 – 1:0329 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8757:04

I think, again, that would be part of that lottery process. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role57:08

Just staggering it.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8757:09

Staggering it. Randomly. And the goal, the objective with staggering it is to make sure that you don't have everyone leaving at the same time. You get to build some institutional knowledge. And just for members of the public who might have been looking at the staff report, the note on the change in the ordinance is under the discussion section in the staff report at the beginning of the second paragraph.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role57:47

So you took down the one edit that it would be the mayor. Yep. Great. I like it.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8457:54

Is that minor enough that we can move forward with the item?

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8758:00

Yes, that's not a change to the ordinance itself, so it's just a procedural thing.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8458:06

So do

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8758:06

we need to make a

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.8458:07

motion? Discussion? My

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role58:09

bad. And I have one public comment.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.8758:11

Discussion or any more questions for staff? Any other questions for staff?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role58:17

Okay, I have one card. Bill Miley, please.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed58:35

Hello. Certainly, it's a good idea for our city and our community. I would strongly suggest we include two commissioned positions limited to high school and junior high school appointees. Having viewpoints from younger folks certainly will add a perspective adults don't have, in my opinion. Why not just one position? They could and likely will feel alone and lost in an adult world.

I have seen the reluctance of a youth member of another commission over the years. If I were them, having a similar age colleague would give me strength and support to be active. On the question of staff support, In addition to public works and, on occasion, police and fire staff, I would strongly suggest the assistant to the city manager regularly staff this commission.

The staffing will allow the commission to make its mark. It's a great idea.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:00:01

Thank you, sir. Is there anybody online?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:00:06

No, Mayor, there's not.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:00:08

Just one quick question. I guess that's very interesting what Mr. Miley brought up. We have had some conversations around extending what is currently on the Parks and Rec Commission to the other commissions that has not come before this body yet. So I don't know if procedurally it needs to be all of them, which I think we're generally intending. That, that, okay.

Well, that's,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:00:28

I think the intention is we would like to have it. But that's, that was our, our thought is that that's going to come before you and it wouldn't be for all commissions. Yep. That's the direction you guys have kind of given us for that framework.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:00:38

Yeah. Fine with me. Anything else? I move we approve. I

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:00:44

was going to just make a couple of quick comments. I voted no the first time around. I do see some merits for having this commission, but I also have a general perception that we are having difficulty filling seats on commissions and also that The use of commissions is potentially a dilution of the authority that we hold as City Council people to move these issues forward.

So I expect to again vote no on this one.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:01:41

Now, fair enough. I can answer the first part of your concern, which is we're going to have three more applications this week for Parks and Rec, total Parks and Rec and Commission combined. I'm planning. So I hope we'll get those seats filled ASA.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:01:55

Yeah, I think we just have to see. This probably is going to be a popular commission. I hope so. It's one of those community outreach positions, so we'll see. I mean, we do have problems with commissions, and it might be advantageous for us to take a look at why that is. But also, I look at commissions as a way to educate and to reach deeper into the community and the population to feed back to us in ways that we cannot. So I look at it kind of differently as, you know, education, instruction, exploration of ideas that I may not or the council may not have Thank you.

Sure, did you entertain it?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:03:00

No, well, please.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:03:01

I'll second it. No, lead it. All right. Well, I move that we adopt Ordinance 972, amending Title 3 of the Ojai Municipal Code.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:03:11

Would you mind saying as amended, just with the... As

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:03:13

amended.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:03:14

Yep. Second that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:03:16

Great.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:03:16

Any more discussion? Roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 3–2 move that we adopt Ordinance 972, amending Title 3 of the Ojai Municipal Code. Would you mind saying as amended, just with the... As amended
Show transcript
Council Member Rule. Yes. Council Member Lang. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. No. Council Member Whitman? No. Mayor Gilman? Yes.

OK. Moving on to discussion number six, 2025 Annual Citywide Pavement Rehab Project. Ms. Palmer, thank you for being here.

1:03 – 1:1110 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:03:54

Good evening, all.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:03:54

Good evening.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:03:59

I'm going to hunker down for this packs a punch. This staff report packs a punch. So let me just begin. So I do have a couple of slides. I'm not going to start it. I wanted to talk about the agenda item first and what I'm asking of you tonight. So again, it packs a punch. So the first item is to award the contract for the next year's paving. Yay. The second is to award a professional services agreement for the construction management of that project. The third item is for a design professional services agreement for the next year's paving. And I'll talk about the importance of the continuity on these professional services agreement in just a moment. And the fourth is just kind of housekeeping. We have to file a CEQA document.

And so we've categorically exempt paving projects are always that case. So we opened bids in February. We got five bidders, so this was a competitive sealed bid process. So we opened them at a specific time, looked at all of them. We've worked with four of the five contractors who provided us with a bid in the last four projects we've done. So that's exciting that they actually want to continue working with us. So we're super happy about that. And they're all good contractors. So that was great. And then we had a newbie, which their bid was right in the middle of all the other bids. And you can see that I'm on page 46.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:05:43

Ms. Palmer, would you like questions at the end? Or you tell us, how do you want to proceed?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:05:47

You know what, you ask them as we go

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:05:48

along.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:05:48

That's totally fine.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:05:49

So J&H we've worked with before. I recognize the truck names and all that. But I just see the difference between the lowest and the highest is extraordinarily different.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:05:59

It is extraordinarily different. So the first two, the low bid and the second low bid, are kind of neck and neck. And the third and fourth are neck and neck. And then we've got Rasmussen, way high. So the theory is, and we never really know, but the idea is that a lot of their bid prices come in based on their workload. Based on the work type they want to do and the magnitude, I guess, the volume of work. So Granite and Rasmussen, the number three and four positions, or I'm sorry, number four and five, they're a lot larger contractors. You can see Granite working on the freeway up on the 101, and they're just working 24-7 right now.

So they have much larger projects. And same thing with Rasmussen. So our thinking is that, hey, if they can get us to award them a $5.8 million contract, they'll take it, you know? And it's a huge profit for them. So that's kind of our thinking behind that. J&H has done a great job for us. They recently did, they did our most recent project, and that's the parking lots.

They were fair, easy to work with. We have looked at their bids. They're responsive. They're responsible, which is obviously a requirement for these contractors. So we're very happy about it. Very happy. So the first ask tonight is to award that contract to them at $3.4 million with a contingency. So I want to, and then the second is for awarding a contract to Phoenix Consulting for the construction management of that. And the reality is if you approve this tonight, we will start on the construction management tomorrow, getting all of the contract documents signed, etc. Submissions and submittals of all of the paving and the concrete, etc.

So, and then the third is, is to award the design for next year's project. So this is 2025. We always I know it's a little bit confusing, but it's the year generally because we started designing this in 25. So we call it 25. Construction is in 26. So we'll be starting the design for 26 and we will in all likelihood begin construction on that next project probably early fall.

So we may be doing two pavement projects this calendar year, two fiscal years, one calendar year. So we got amazing unit prices from J&H. And if you flip to page 48, you can see what we have budgeted. And I don't know if you recall this, but when I talked about this project, we were going to include storm drain repairs, and we were going to include sidewalk repairs.

So in our CIP that you approved last spring, last June, I guess, We had the storm drain improvements and the concrete repairs as separate projects in the CIP because we didn't know what that was. So we had separate project numbers identified and separate budgets. At that point, we didn't know for sure if we would be able to combine them with the paving project. We can, and we plan on doing that. So those budgets will be utilized for those elements of the bid.

So if you look at the table on 48, you can kind of track it, and you can see that we've got total project budget of almost $5.5 million for these projects all combined. And all of the projects combined come to about $4.7 million. So we have about three quarters of a million dollars in surplus appropriated money. You have already appropriated those funds for paving.

So, good news. So, as a result of that budget surplus, something that you may want to consider is, and this kind of ties into why I wanted to do the construction management and the design at the same time. Staff has some suggestions and some ideas, along with our consultant who's doing the current design, about some of the streets that are in next year's paving plan that we may be able to bring forward.

So get a little bit of a jump start on next year's. We've most recently, so take a step back. So this bid was open prior to this most recent economic issue that we've just experienced, $100 barrel oil for starters. So we don't know what's going to happen when we go out to bid on the next project. We know on this project we got some excellent bid prices, unit prices for concrete, for asphalt, for etc. So we would like to take advantage of that.

Thank

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:11:08

you very much.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:11 – 1:1612 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:11:30

So as soon as we get started on the design for next year, which again, we will start on that probably discussions tomorrow. We've all, you know, sort of talked about it. But we would be coming back to you in, say, a month or so with a change order request. And after we have identified the streets, we think we can fit in. So.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:11:57

I mean, who could argue with that? Questions,

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:12:00

yes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:12:01

I just wanted to acknowledge that there was a public comment about including another street in the order, and so I think people would be happy if we were accelerating that process. I agree.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:12:17

And so one thing, and of course, I saw the email as well, of course, and I get many more than that one. Many more. And so what I'm trying to stay true to is the PMP that you all approved. And that is planned streets. Now, I don't think anybody's going to complain if we move those streets forward at all. But I want to stay on that cycle rather than, because if, I mean, let's be honest here. If I let the community dictate which streets we were doing next, we would never have enough money because everybody thinks their street needs to be the next one. And rather than using established data, PCI and an approved

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:13:00

plan.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:13:01

So we would be plucking the streets out from the 26th plan and moving them forward. And stay within this three quarters of a million dollars.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:13:11

So yeah, so what I'm understanding is, is that we have three quarters of a million dollars that is because of, you know, good bids and what we budgeted. So we're proposing that we bring in some of the roads from next year into this year, use that three quarters of a million dollars to take advantage of good bids, You know, uncertain economic times, commodities, all that kind of stuff.

So I understand that correctly so far. You are 100% spot on. And so then the idea also would be that whatever money, whatever roads we paved this year, the money that we allocated next year for the paving- The perpetuate. Right. So we would just simply be rolling it on. Absolutely. Okay, thank you. Thanks.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:14:03

Yeah, I do have a couple of questions. So I'm looking at attachment A, which is page 50. And it would be my understanding that these are the streets that are in this contract cycle that we're talking about, correct? But then I got a little bit I'm concerned with the 2025 reference and these being 2026 construction. So I'm guessing I'm missing something there because you've already, you know.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:14:44

It's a little bit confusing the dates. So we we in our PMP, this was the 2025 plan. So we started the design. The 2025 is when we start the design. So so we're starting the 26 design for the paving for the 2026, and that will span two calendar years. So it'll be we'll start in late 26 and we'll be constructing that in primarily in late 26, early 27. So I wish there was some way that I could make those years match, but it just doesn't seem to work out that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:15:20

way. I figured that the map was telling us what we're building, and I just want to make sure. Yes. I will note very quickly, I've been harping on Libby for a couple of years now, and it did not benefit from our rains this year. It's as bad as I've ever seen it. And so what I'm hearing from you is that if we approve this tonight, maybe Libby isn't the first street, but some of these streets are going to begin getting attention right away.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:15:58

So the paving projects, how they work, the contractor comes out, Thank you.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:16 – 1:2545 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:16:33

Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:16:50

Carry on?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:16:50

Carry

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:16:51

on. Carry

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:16:51

on.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:16:52

Thank

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:16:53

you,

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:16:53

Ms. Mario. So the streets that we select to move forward may not be the streets that need a full reconstruction.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:17:00

Understood.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:17:02

We're going to look at them, again, the unit prices. So depending on the treatment of the street, we have some really good costs and we can look at the bid, the amounts that they've proposed to us and submitted. And kind of extrapolate and come up with the cost of a given street.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:17:18

Thank you. And then I'm just seeing since we were pointed to page 114, I guess another part of my confusion was looking at 115. Oh, and Libby is there. Yeah. I missed it last time. OK, good.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:17:37

It's there. Great. Great. But that needs that EDGE, whatever those acronyms mean. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:17:44

Any other questions? Yeah, so you answered this really well for me over email, but I just wanted to put this into the record. So could you talk a little bit about curbs and gutters? I most certainly

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:17:59

can. So there's been a lot of conversation about demonstration projects, et cetera, you know, new sidewalk, new curb and gutter, et cetera. So as part of our paving plans, we're not installing new curb and gutters. There's a lot of folks. It's an interesting thing. We started our street tree planting project yesterday, and we've had four property owners say, I don't want a tree in front of my house. We're like, what? How about two? You know, so there's people in town who don't want curbs and gutters or sidewalks. So I think that's a bigger discussion if we wanted to have a project of installing curbs and gutters in maybe a demonstration street that I know that we have talked about. So that is not included in the paving, although we are fixing, so we have some street trees that are on the oak trees.

that are on the edge of the asphalt, kind of between a sidewalk, a curb and gutter, and the asphalt that are wrecked, and you've all seen them. So we're being very creative in this, and the curb and gutter is now going around the tree to create a larger tree well. We're trying to preserve the trees where and when we can. So that's the only curb and gutter that we're doing as part of the project.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:19:11

And something that I've asked you separately, just to, again, have it be publicly known, there's lots of ideas for where sidewalks should be, where they aren't now, and all of these wonderful things, and everybody has great ideas. That will come, when we get into our budget cycle for the next fiscal year, we'll come up with these projects, and we'll decide, should they be included or not, and that'll be a conversation for that, but.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:19:32

Yes. Okay. And the other thing, we're rolling through our PMP very quickly. And so this is 2025. This one we're talking about right now is the second year. It's the third consecutive year of paving. But the 2022 was the very end of the last PMP that was developed long ago before I came here. And so we've done the first year of the PMP, and this will be the second year of the PMP, and the 26 will be the third year. When we get to the fifth year, we're almost, we're circling back on some of the streets. And that's excellent news because we're now entering a more maintenance mode, which is exactly where we want to be. I was at a conference last week, a Public Works Officers Institute, and he said the best way to save money on your street paving is to maintain it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:20:25

Absolutely.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:20:26

Thank you for joining us. The costs to sort of level out because the treatment is going to be more maintenance. A slurry, for example, or a crack seal, the street's cracking.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:20:59

Did

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:21:00

you

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:21:00

have slides that you wanted to show

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:21:02

us? I do. I want to show you just a couple. And the first one is amazing. It's amazing. So over the past three years, kudos to the Council, kudos to Public Works staff and the consultants we've worked with, but we've spent over three, you have invested $11 million in streets and sidewalk work over the last three years. So with the addition of this one, we'll be at over $15 million.

So that's why we can start talking about maintenance, because of these figures right here. So, excellent news. So, in the next slide, I just put this up here in case anybody had any questions about it. I think I explained it, but I'm happy to spend more time on it if somebody else wants some questions.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:21:49

It's in the report. Yeah, it's in the report. It's page 48.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:21:52

Sometimes it's helpful.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:21:53

I think I understood it when I saw the report.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:21:55

Yeah. Yeah. I just wanted I wanted to be crystal clear that there's four projects really that are a part of this five point five million dollar budget.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:22:05

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:22:05

Not just one.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:22:06

OK,

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:22:06

so And so I and we didn't really specifically speak about this, but in the staff report I'm asking for. So we've got the seven hundred and forty three thousand dollars in the budget appropriated. We've also I'm also asking for contingencies. Now, that's very standard procedure. And every single year I've asked for an award on a paving project. I've asked for contingencies. So a 15 percent contingency is very standard and usual. And what we want to have that on hand for is it authorizes the city manager to execute change orders while we're under construction. If there's some conditions that are, I mean, there's some very peculiar conditions that we have discovered.

And it saves us time and allows the contractor to keep moving forward. Now, the $740,000, I would expect to come back to this body and ask for a change order for you all to see on the streets that we have identified as being able to move forward.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:23:09

So

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:09

there's a potential project surplus of 1.3 million. I expect we'll go into that half a million a bit. We've always stayed under, well under, but we never know.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:23:23

And then

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:23

2025, 2026. So these are the two years. I thought there might be some questions. So these are the streets that we will be selecting from. I know it's hard to see, it's a small map, but you can generally see. So we would be selecting from these streets to move

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:23:43

forward.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:46

Don't know what those are yet.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:23:47

It's on the website.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:48

It's on the website, and I can email it to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:23:50

But the recommendation would be those with the score that dictates the highest need.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:23:56

Well, maybe, maybe not, because here's the problem with that, is some of the streets that are in the most desperate need are also the most expensive streets. So what we want to continue doing is maintaining the streets that are still in a maintenance condition. Nothing's real black and white here, but we'll be looking at it. Well, that's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:24:18

why Libby was not year one, right? In other words, the logic's not

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:24:23

obvious. The logic and common sense is like, we'll do the worst ones first. No, let's keep the ones that are in a maintenance condition in a maintenance condition. And then we'll go back sometimes and have to do a two-inch grind. We're removing two inches of the asphalt and coming back and basically rebuilding the road. So, that's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:24:42

that.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:24:44

Any other questions?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:24:46

I have a question, but I don't think it, I'm not sure exactly who this is for, but I have an understanding that there is, that attachment C, the professional services agreement, did not proceed with the perfect model for public bid process, but that this, and I don't want to get correction on this, but I want the council to understand that there is a process taking place right now to make sure that all of our bid processes are Thank you very much.

1:25 – 1:3213 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:25:58

And so, Bethany and I have spoken about this, so item number one was a competitive sealed bid, public contract law to the T. Item number three, again, we did an RFP. So, we don't do a bid for a professional service, we go out for proposals. And which is a different track entirely from public contract. So and then there's some provisions in our code section that allow you as a body to award a contract that has not gone out, a professional service, that has not gone out for an RFP. So our commitment is as soon as this is underway, So, OK, so back to the third one, which is the design. We did go out for an RFP and we did a multi-year on that. So we're at the second year of our two year extensions. So that's also been handled.

I like to go out for an RFP for multi years because it it it allows for continuity if we have the same consultant doing the design or the CM and have one year, two year renewals, whatever. So we've done that on on number three. The second one, you are correct. And the reason I think that we could declare, and Bethany, you speak if you would like to, but we would like, it's sort of like bridging these two projects. We've got the consultant who's doing the CM, who we're recommending doing the CM, did the design for 25, also doing the design for 26.

Having under consideration moving these streets forward, it's very, very critical that this person is aware and has a lot of knowledge on our city streets and our conditions.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:27:42

Thanks for the explanation. Okay, I'll move to public comments. I have one card, Clay Creasy, and then we'll go online if anybody's online. Bless you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:27:53

Thank you. Very quick comment. Number one, great results on that open bid for the paving. And that is my comment, that when you have a true open bid, it's just anybody wants to bid, you know, here's the notice, send us a letter, you get some amazing results because you cannot predict how individual service providers are going to react. Some are hungry for business and they just want to cover their payroll. Others, you know, are super busy and they just want to You know, make a giant profit if they get lucky.

As you probably know, some of you may, you just opened the bid for the Lead Remediation Soil Removal Project the other day. The low bidder was $123,146, which was less than what Rincon estimated. They said, they guessed it would be $160,000. So they picked up a little space there, assuming they can actually do the job, which is still to be determined. High bidder was $363,163. In other words, almost triple the low bidder.

So every time you're thinking about, gee, the benefits of continuity versus throw it open to everybody, just keep in mind the typical bid spread is way bigger than you would expect. I ran procurement for some pretty big companies in my career. We used to do procurement bids on a real-time online auction. And we would see prices that we just could not believe were being delivered I have very well-vetted vendors who were just hungry for the business for one reason or another.

Online auctions are kind of highfalutin, so I'm not sure we need to do that here, or could. But just keep in mind, every time you decide, I just want to work with this guy, or I just want to have an easy day in the office, you're costing the taxpayers money.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:29:49

Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:29:49

Mr.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:29:50

Quilici. Anybody online?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:29:51

Oh, yeah. To that point, again, it's hard to really determine why we had that $2 million spread. I mean, we don't know what their business is like. We don't know what their business model is. We don't know, you know, the only thing we could really sort of attribute it to is the size of the company and the work they're doing and the hungry, you know, hungry for business, et cetera.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:30:11

We used to have a guy who just would would bid so high because he didn't want the job, but he needed to bid because, you know, he was community and he needed to put a bid in and he would just he would just make it unreasonable. No, no one's going to take that bid. But I threw my hat in the ring as the community expected. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:30:30

Is there anybody online?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:30:31

Yes, we have Larry Steingold.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:30:33

OK.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:30:34

Larry, unmute yourself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:30:36

Good evening. Kudos to Lindy and Public Works. They do a great job. I think that they're doing very well. The roads are well planned and things are going forward. Clay Creasy is correct. Open bidding shows a huge difference. The lower end, are they making their money on change orders? Because a lot of companies exist on change orders. Do the other two companies who made the highest bids, did they have a good experience working here? Did they enjoy the environment? Were there any problems?

Are they expecting issues? Because that will determine their past bidding and their present bidding. And regarding slurry mix, I would see if the people who the roads that you're doing want slurry versus doing it with asphalt. Because if you've ridden or walked on slurry mix, or had experiences after cars have ridden on it prior to drying, you're getting tiger tracks forever.

But otherwise, Public Works is doing wonderful. And again, give them what they want, and if there's a million dollars extra, the $750,000 and the $520,000, why not just do the new roads? And just keep going forward, just raise the budget a million and call it a day. And have them do the rest of them, or do more of them, rather than just a few. So, thank you.

1:32 – 1:3816 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:24

Thank you. I appreciate that. Well, to me, this is one of our central kind of operations and goals and well done and it's impressive. Yeah, wonderful. Well, I move that we approve items one through four as written.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:41

I'll

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:42

second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:42

it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:43

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:32:43

Council Member Whitman seconded it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:45

Any more discussion? All right. Roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move that we approve items one through four as written. I'll second it. Okay. Council Member Whitman seconded it. Any more discussion? All r
Show transcript
Council Member Rule. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Council Member Lang. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. Yes.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:33:00

Motion

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:33:00

passes. Yay, well done. Thank you so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:33:03

much.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:33:07

Wonderful. Awesome. Thanks. Okay, we're on to item number seven. Consider approval of purchase of a single-family residential property at 503 South Ventura Street.

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated1:33:28

Hello. Hello. Good evening. My name is Lucas Seibert. I'm the Community Development Director here for the City of Ojai. The item we have before you tonight is a it's the consideration of the approval of the purchase of a single family residential property located at 503 South Ventura Street. And just so Council is aware, so the community is aware, this item and the offer came before staff.

It's not something that staff went out and reached out to these individuals. So the request and the information that's being provided here was in collaboration and working with the now property owner, the current property owner of 503 South Ventura Street. Just for context purposes, this site is in our Literally in our backyard, it is surrounded by city-owned pieces of property on three of the four sides. The side to the south is the only other area that's owned by private property or a private property owner, which is single-family residential.

The offer is $850,000 for the purchase of this property. And we have a draft resolution before you for consideration as well. So if the Council has any questions of staff, I could certainly answer them.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.871:34:55

And if I may add a little more information as well, if Council, what is being proposed before you today would be an as-is purchase, meaning that the City would purchase the property in its as-is condition with, you know, no warranties as to In furtherance of this discussion, staff did obtain a Phase 1 environmental that identified information that we already knew, just based on the age of the structure. And also, staff had obtained an appraisal, and the purchase price is supported by the appraisal.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:35:40

And just to say, we have it under our goal here, affordable housing or workforce housing, so that is clearly stated in the packet. Any other questions before we go to public comments? Okay, I have two in front of me. Bill Miley, please, and then Clay Creasy.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:36:08

Hello. The proposed contract by the city to purchase property is, I believe, uniquely suited for our city government and for the Smith-Hopson home given to the city by their family in the early 1970s. The eight-plus acres of open land on the south side obviously were part of the gift. In the 1970s, I believe, City Council bought an additional parcel, maybe in an acre, where the community garden is located.

Next to that on the south side is the McRae property. This will add space and potential building to the native environment of the City Hall campus. If I were the Green Coalition, I would be eagerly looking to use the older, non-historical buildings built in their 20s for their cultural center education services. And they have that in their plans. A building.

I am not supportive at all of the idea to use the building there for workforce housing. Such would remove Spider. Such would be removed. A native spider, by the way. The opportunity to enhance the City Hall campus function. Workforce housing will serve one to three. A campus building will serve thousands forever. I knew Ron McKay. I valued working with him and knowing him over a bunch of years.

Years ago, I shared with him that I had lost the function of my right eye. He said, don't feel bad. I lost one, too. Bye, Ron.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:38:20

Thank you, Mr. Miley. Mr. Quilici, please.

1:38 – 1:434 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:38:29

I actually am not in favor of the acquisition of this property for, I think, the following reasons. Number one, as you heard me say earlier, we have a boatload of financial control and management issues that require a lot of attention, and to sign up for a new project while you're not doing a very good job on the basics is not wise. That's one reason. The second reason, of course, is financial. Where is this money going to come from? You just heard me point out to you that we are $1.5 million deficit position this year in the general fund. Our general fund expenses are up 72 percent over three years.

Well, our revenues are up 3 percent over those three years. We are going to swiftly drop below 100 percent reserve ratio, even if we don't buy this property. If you do buy this property and the money comes out of your general fund, then it goes south even faster. Plus, the 850 is just, you know, walking in the front door cost. Now you've got what are you going to do with it, how are you going to develop it, all those costs. We've also got, of course, the ongoing management responsibility, assuming you actually get a building there and have some folks occupying it.

So it's a lot of work at a time when we really should be focusing on the basics. I'm all in favor of getting the trolley revved up to a very good service, for example, and, you know, it's very nice to have One driver, but we've got a lot more work to do there. So you have a limited number of employees in the City, and they will always answer the bell. When you say, I want to do this, I can't imagine the City Manager saying, forget it, I'm too busy. He's going to tell you he can do it, even though, you know, facts indicate it's not so easy.

And finally, of course, the public input on this and planning commission input on this, as far as I know, is zero at this point, other than this meeting. So it feels to me like this would be something that could benefit from a more, you know, well-paced evaluation of the community. But, of course, if you do decide to do this, I have a bridge for sale. So, Lucas, I'll contact you about that.

Thank you. Anybody online?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:41:04

Yes, Mayor Larry Steingold. Go ahead, Larry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:41:11

Thank you. I wasn't going to say anything, but listening to Clay, you have a problem. Either Clay is right and we are in financial turbulent waters, potentially, If the economy hiccups, even if not, we seem to be entering a point of where fiscal responsibility and future fiscal responsibility may take, whether it's a back or a front, may need to take more prominence.

Well, I agree with Bill. I mean, this certainly should be an acquisition. You always try to acquire next door, one way or the other. Is it the 850? Sure. If you could get the property for free, it'd be great. But that's not going to happen because they're going to put it back on the market if you don't buy it. The question is who wants to be next door to the city and pickleball and whatever.

Maybe it becomes the corporate pickleball headquarters of the country. Anyway, but that's the problem. I mean, you have Clay, who certainly knows his business, is saying that you have fiscal issues, process issues, financial issues, technical issues, whatever. You need to correct them because if he's right and you do nothing, then we have a bigger problem. So take heed, listen to what he says, because he knows his business.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:11

Well, it seems to me it's incredibly easy to obfuscate with language. And so to say, look, we are in a deficit position would, in normal parlance, means you don't have enough money. That's clearly not the case. And secondly, we're talking about an asset that can be sold if needed. So to me, it's really not a fair argument of what we've been hearing, at least in the public comments, but I want to hear from my colleagues.

1:43 – 1:5940 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:36

I'll start. I just think, you know, I purchase properties. I have a few. And just for smart business practice, I think there's issues that should we should be aware of or looked into before making the purchase.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:43:49

What would that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:43:50

be? Some like I know we talked before about the violations that are on the property that stopped during COVID. Curious as to what those are. What's the intent for the property? So are we going to, you know, Rip everything down. What are we going to do? What's that cost going to be? I know you said that you did the phase one study. I would like to see that, just to see that it's clear.

Let me see, you know, the testing, if we do tear it down, there's going to be fees. I would just like to see what the cost, what are we getting into? What is it we're going to do with the property? I just think it's smart business. And then HPC, is it any historic structures on the property that would limit what we want to do? I just think getting all the information up front before we make a purchase would be smart business.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.761:44:52

So I'm also not clear about what we would do after purchasing. And I know that the idea of a potential location for workforce housing has been addressed, but we don't have any details about, you know, how many units What, you know, where they'd fit into a market, what we'd rent them for, what kind of return would we get. I'm also concerned that the idea that we got lots of money has never been something that I've been convinced of.

We are aware from our most recent budget discussion that our identification of the unfunded surplus is based upon our expenses from a year ago, whereas Our current year, we were $2 million more than that figure that's being used. I also have this belief that if we move forward with the Cabin Village project, that we're going to have potentially a million dollars just to be able to get the project built.

And then following that, I expect that our annual cost for operating that project is going to be around a million dollars a year. But I, you know, I haven't seen a report yet that tells me, but I think there's a lot of contingencies built into that project. I also have a concern that if we look at the opportunity for this property, we also have to consider the opportunity lost, which means $850,000 spent here is $850,000 that we don't have, assuming we have it, but that we don't have for some other purpose. And I'm not as far along understanding the universe of needs and the costs that allow me to say that this $850,000 is at the top of my list of things to do.

But I do believe that there's some sense in acquiring this property. I'm just not ready to do it now. So what I'm curious about, I mean, is there a potential or what would it cost to acquire an option on the property? where we would have the right of first refusal if somebody comes to the current owner, you know, with an offer. I know that those agreements exist and they're employed all the time, more so in business than real estate, but I have no idea what an option would cost.

So, that's kind of where I am. I'm not prepared to support this purchase, although I think it has potential.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:48:50

Yeah, so my comments are a little bit more complicated. I support buying this property, but only if the motion includes an independent feasibility study within 45 days of the close of escrow about can the ERFA cabin village go there instead of the maintenance yard. I wanted to study, I've spoken about this a number of times, you know, I think that there are questions. What would it be to, you know, renegotiate with Dignity Moves, etc.? But I think the maintenance yard is failing, and I'm looking for an alternative.

We don't have lead remediation. The bids came in $1 million over. There's no contractor selected. The 60-day bidder commitment expires. So I have real questions about whether Dignity Moves is the wrong vendor. And my problem has been is that I've not seen a place that was easily Thank you very much. I am losing confidence all the time in dignity moves and in the maintenance yard as being the appropriate place for that. I see this as, you know, and I've spoken, I think, two months ago to the city manager. I think I've spoken to other people about, is this feasible?

It would have to be redesigned. There's problems. But as it turns out, we have not approved a contractor. If we don't approve a contractor, then the cabin village can't move forward, regardless of what the DMA says or doesn't say or allows us, you know, material breach or not. So to me, once again, sometimes things just feel right to me, and this feels like that property should go in for a feasibility study for the cabin village. We've not broken ground on the cabin village in a year and a half, two years. We still have to pull out the dirt.

You know, it will be a reconsideration of it, but I believe, so my yes vote, and I still want to procure the property, but I want to procure it with a particular condition that we look at it for feasibility for the cabin village. We went into this not understanding anything about Dignity Moves or about their model, and slowly we learned and we learned and we learned, but I'm not comfortable where we're at with Dignity Moves or with what we're building at the Cabin Village.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:58

So let me follow up. Tell us about a feasibility study, what that would entail.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:04

Well, so you'd have to look at what the proposal is for the Ojai Permanent Supportive Housing Project, and that is for 30 single residency units, a common area, etc. Clearly, this is a much smaller property than the lower public works yard. I believe this is 0.2 acres?

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated1:52:24

0.2 acres, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:24

Right, so it's considerably smaller. It goes without saying that if you were going to pursue this and it wouldn't take a feasibility study to illustrate this, it would be multi-story. I mean, that's just, that goes without saying.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:52:36

Yes, so, and as I recall, our original ERF grant was 20 units. Can I just

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:52:43

pause you for one second? Instead of arguing about the virtues of whether or not, how it should be, I was just simply asking about your question, particularly, which was, what would a feasibility study mean? Like, what would it cost? How long would it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:55

take? So, the other thing, it would involve, you know, the configuration, of course. It would have to involve So, it would have to involve HCD, because HCD would have to approve of the change, and what the guidance has been is that if you're going to propose a change, it has to provide either a better amount of individuals served, or a closer proximity to service, or something that they are able to say, okay, well, that's a logical reason for the change. That's what has been explained to us before, so previously, Our initial application was for 20 units, the revised one was for 30. And they said, okay, we support that, we accept that, that makes sense to us.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:53:40

Right, so I think we want to keep it really focused on what the things are. So we would need to go to HCD informally or formally and ask them if this would be possible. So yes, we would need to do that. I mean, if they see the reasoning in this, that's one step we would have to take. We would have to look at the size of the property, figure out, you know, basically if we were going to say 20 or we were going to say 30, what would that look like? So there's steps to it. We'd have to look at the infrastructure. Is the infrastructure already there?

Is there plumbing? Is there electricity? Is there parking? And then we would have to compare it. You know, once we get a feasibility study, we get the feasibility study. That's certainly possible to do. And I would think that it would be possible to do from what I've been researching for around $50,000.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:34

So there's a lot being talked about. So what I thought I heard you say was, can we simply look at a feasibility study at the new location? But you're also suggesting, if I'm hearing you right, potentially new contractors, there's new design. So it's talking about the project completely brand new all over again. If I'm hearing you

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:54:55

right. That's the feasibility study. I mean, obviously we can't put a hacienda style, you know, but we also need to consider, and I think this is very salient point, is what we're not getting anymore, and what we're not going to get, and we don't have a bid that's going to come in at the 9.5.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:15

Well, that's to be determined, because that will be coming next week, or next council meeting, but

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:55:19

I guess what I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:20

mean is there's

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:55:22

Yeah, I'm willing, I want a feasibility study and I am willing to re-look at everything, that is true.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:27

No, I know, that's a big deal.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:55:28

Yeah, it is a big deal, but that's what a feasibility study does. Sorry. And then

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:32

it

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:55:32

can come back to

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:33

us. It doesn't mean just one thing. So if you were to say, let's take as close as we can to the current plan and put it at the new location, that would be one thing. But it sounds like, tell me if I'm getting you right, you're saying, I want to look at all the possibilities, tiny homes, whatever it means, like all of these options for this location,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:55:50

three stories, two stories. Yeah, I don't think it's a choice of endless options. I think that there's very specific things that could happen. I don't think you're talking about, you know, and, you know.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:59

No, not endless, I just mean

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:00

many. Maybe. I think also, you know, so you have a hacienda style and it's now two stories instead of one. What does that actually mean? I don't know. Because I'm not an architect and, you know, I don't know.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:56:15

What I heard you saying was, well, I think you could do it for $50,000 with tiny units. That made me think, oh, this is a complete reimagining.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:23

No, I just think

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:56:23

a

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:24

feasibility study. Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:56:25

Okay. So I have a question because if I'm remembering correctly, this is only zoned for five units. Is that correct?

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated1:56:34

It is zoned R1, which is single family. So the maximum number of units that you could get on there would be the single family residence, a junior ADU, an ADU, and then a tiny house. So you're looking at four units as it's currently zoned.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:49

So part of

CommentLucas SeibertProposedself-stated1:56:49

the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:56:49

feasibility study would, of course, be what is the process of rezoning. Yes. And that's just looking at, I mean, that's not a complicated thing, really. So

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.871:57:05

if I may, because I don't want us to veer too far off the agendized item. I think what I'm hearing from Councilmember Rule is that, at least in terms of her comments, are that she would be supportive of proceeding with a purchase subject to that, including a feasibility study.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:57:28

That is correct, and I apologize for going more deeply into it than we needed to do, but I would be in support of purchasing the property for a feasibility study. And if it turned out that it wasn't something that the council was willing to do, so be it. But I do support the purchase of the property, but I have a very specific potential use in mind that I would like to explore. Understood.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:57:53

Beth, please go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:57:54

So I've had similar concerns as my colleagues about what are we going to do with this property and what is the vision? Because we just heard from the Green Coalition that we have a whole vision for this entire campus. And just walking into City Hall, it's clear that we also need some renovations and some updates. There are expenses that we could put into this building and into this campus to make it better. And at the same time, I understand that there's a real value in this opportunity and having a property that's right next to ours.

for some purpose, whatever it is. And the fact that we don't have a clear sense of what that purpose is gives me pause. And at the same time, I lean toward moving forward with it because it would allow us to extend this This our City Hall campus and the idea of having a city manager's property or you know key staff have having their own housing I think opens us up for Thank you for joining us.

1:59 – 2:0517 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.841:59:45

How about a council member?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:59:47

Do you have any thoughts about what could go there, Mr. Harvey? I know this is off the cuff and just some visions.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:00:03

Absolutely. I mean, I think four to five small units that could be used for workforce housing or dorm-type housing for either, for instance, the city attorney, when she is here working, so she doesn't have to stay in a hotel room. Sometimes we have consultants that need to come present to you, or we incur that cost. Sometimes we hire employees that don't yet have a place to live in the area. Other communities do that. So three to five units for that purpose would definitely fit what I see as our potential needs for workforce housing and, for lack of a better term, transient. And generally centered on

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:00:42

our staff and contractors.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:00:44

For certain, centered on city needs.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:00:47

And I think also, I mean, I've always assumed that, you know, if we do indeed build out, I mean, this is assuming that the cabin village doesn't make it there. Like, what are some other possibilities? You know, having a place for people who, you know, sort of a retreat space for people who come here to do workshops on our campus, whether it's for people who are coming to attend or people that are coming to do study or fellowships or, you know, things like that. I've always assumed that it could also be sort of, you know, an annexed part of what actually happens in, but just to be clear.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:01:26

Yes, after feasibility. Well, I mean, along those same lines, as I was picturing what, or dreaming what this could be or what, what are the possibilities here, I think even extending some of the work that the Green Coalition is doing with the bridge and with With their designs, having it, because Mr. Miley made a really good point, which was, if the city's buying this, this is community property.

And this could be another asset for the community, in addition to, if we did move forward with some kind of staff housing. Then, or retreat space or visiting attorneys space, then we could extend some of the offerings that we have with this campus onto that property. And I think there's also just a, just a reality of that, that's a, it's a difficult property for, for someone, when we heard from, um, from Mr. McRae that the sounds, that there are noises associated with being there and, and, and so I'm also in favor of having, of moving forward with that so that We can create even more of a buffer for the things that we want to do here on campus.

And that would be a way of, you know, keeping a potential homeowner from having some concerns.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:03:07

I want to add to that, too, to me that there isn't a clear sort of laid out plan about the housing that could go there. That doesn't give me any pause. Actually, I just see a lot of opportunity in that piece, which is As you say, it could be for a Green Coalition extension of our property, a workforce housing piece, visiting. So especially that it's a resource that can be resold if needed.

So that makes me less concerned. But yeah, please.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:03:34

Yeah, I'm just going to point out that, you know, if by chance the feasibility study played out, that $850,000 could come out of the grant. You know, just as an FYI.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:03:50

I guess my concern with what you're proposing is that, and I'm happy to entertain it, it's that It sounds quite elaborate, even though it's just a word. So it sounds like a big, big process with moving this whole project further along and much farther back with some jeopardy to the project. So if it were simple, where you could try something out and see what would it be like, what would it look like, I would be much more open to it, but it doesn't seem nearly that simple.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:04:20

It seems that simple to

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:21

me.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:04:24

But understand, understand...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:27

That they're not going to tell me the truth about how difficult it's going to be?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:04:31

Understand that there's a position and that there's a position that we are clear on. We can make it. Thank you. It's relevant to the extent that it is. My thought

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:01

is that with

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:05:02

uncertainty about what we would do with the property, but some consensus on the idea that

2:05 – 2:1014 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:05:30

The property has a certain value and opportunity. I think the idea of acquiring maybe a 12-month option with the purchaser, I don't think that there's a whole bunch of people knocking on the door to buy that place. I think we could hang on to the property until we figure out what we want to do with it, And whether we have the funding to do that and what all of that means without having to commit the whole $850,000 that we frankly may not have.

I understand that we have a reserve, but if we're sticking with the policy, That we keep an entire year's budget in reserve. There's uncertainty in my mind that there is this surplus that keeps getting talked about. I just see so many deficits from that surplus, and I think it evaporates. We can have an accounting right this

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:06:43

second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:06:43

Yeah, so Council may require, we just recently did a mid-year budget update, and you had $5 million on top of your 100% expenditure reserve.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:06:55

I mean, that's just a number based upon a theory that does not include the fact that we spent more than $2 million. We're not using the figure that is the most recent actual figure, which is $2 million more than the figure being used to come up with that five. And we have all kinds of deficits that are unrealized and unreported upon.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:07:25

I would respectfully disagree with you, Councilmember. We don't base our numbers on theories. I'd be happy to bring the Finance Director up here to expound upon that. It's based on, at that time, they were unaudited year-end actuals, but they're not going to deviate very far from that once they are audited. We don't base our numbers that we present to you on theories. We absolutely take exception to that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:46

I would suggest that the Budget Committee is going to take it up to say, does that reserve policy make sense? Because it is a rarity. including the people who spoke here tonight on that committee have voiced that same concern.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:07:58

Most cities do not have the size of reserve Ojai has.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:08:01

That's correct. So it seems to me it's easy to why if you if one were wanting to say I'm not comfortable buying the property that is completely fine. To say we're out of money is not true or that we might be out of money isn't true either.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:08:17

Yeah, the spend economy that this council seems to be engaged in, I don't see it being very fiscally Thank you very much. But that we're not even considering we won't be able to do after we spend this money. Mr. Harvey.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:08:53

So I just want to say we take the fiscal impact section fairly seriously and it's not only reviewed by me but also the finance director and the city attorney and so that's factual information in there which supports what I just said. Now there's something different than what you're saying. If you're concerned about future expenditures or additional expenditures or things that you might Yes, of course, that's a policy decision, but I just want to make it clear to the Council and the public that the City has ample funding on hand if you decide you want to purchase this. It's not going to impact your reserve policy. It will impact the amount you have on top of the reserve. It will eat into that, of course.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:09:37

I have a question for the City Attorney. Is it possible, so I was going to make an amendment to the motion that we put in a feasibility study.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:09:49

I don't actually, I don't think we have a motion

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:09:52

yet. This is a hypothetical. This is completely hypothetical. Oftentimes, last council, we would separate the amendment from the actual motion. So I make an amendment that I would like to have a maximum $50,000 feasibility study to this motion. And then someone would say, well, I want to vote on the feasibility study, but I don't really want to vote on the I don't want it to be combined with the with the actual motion. Is that possible here? Because that's my question. Does that make sense?

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:10:30

Yes. So under the rules of procedure, if a council member made a motion to approve the purchase and and it had a second and then you made a motion to amend The motion to amend could be voted on first, and then the total combined motion, as amended, is what gets considered for final approval. Does that make sense?

2:11 – 2:1638 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:11:11

Because if you're voting on the amended motion, you're voting on them as an entity. And if that were to go down, then you would vote on the single.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:11:22

The alternative scenario would be if you offer a friendly amendment and the maker of the original motion and the second on the original motion are both supportive of the friendly amendment, then you wouldn't have to do that and you could just vote on it as one motion. But either way is appropriate under your Rules of

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:11:40

Procedure.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:11:48

Correct, because I might get Ms. Councilmember Mang in there with me. It's a possibility. But that sounds like that's not

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:11:53

even, that's not something we're considering right now.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:11:55

Yeah, I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:11:55

think

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:11:55

that would be separate because that's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:11:57

not... It's potentially a separate amendment, right? Yeah, it could be a separate amendment.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:12:02

But it

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:12:02

wouldn't be an item... I'm just

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:12:04

saying, I'm not pointing fingers at you. Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:12:06

Okay. Well, we've been talking about this for a little

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:12:11

bit. We could just get three votes and move this forward. It's a feasibility study and it can be broad strokes. I think it is our fiduciary duty to look at other possibilities because we never really looked and we are now way into the weeds and- You made your

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:12:32

case. But what I'm hearing from the people who would execute this is that, is it possible to have a low commitment, broad brush stroke feasibility study?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:12:42

If council wanted staff to do it, of course. We could list out what we see as, you know, the considerations. If you don't want us to do it, then you're going to go out for an RFP.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:12:58

I'm just trying to make it

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:12:59

easy. It's not that I don't trust Lucas to do it. I just want to be clear about that. I've never been opposed to

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:13:13

looking at possibilities. All of them come with caveats that are not obvious, and as soon as you look at it, it's clear why that wasn't chosen in the first place. So I'm just saying that's how it's been so far. So I'm not married to any particular outcome, but if something can be done that is low commitment, low cost, I'm not opposed to it.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:13:40

Okay, and yeah, I'm fine with that. I'm really fine with it. It can be, and if for some reason that it seemed possible to do, then we could discuss if we want to move forward. I'm not doing anything but trying to figure out what would be the highest and best use of that land or how we could actually potentially roll any of that money. The grant would buy it. So that's all I'm saying.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:14:08

Okay. No, I'm here. You make yourself clear.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:14:13

Okay.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:14:14

So then let me propose a motion. Tell me if you think it holds up. That we purchase the property at 503 South Ventura Street and that we add a, it's relative terms, low cost, low commitment feasibility study on the possibility of a permanent supportive housing project on the location. Performed by a third party. Performed by a third

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:14:46

party. Yeah, a trusted actor, you know.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:14:49

Okay, so, there it is.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:14:54

And I think, if I may, the motion would be to approve the resolution that, in the packet, which approves the acquisition subject to the feasibility study that you just mentioned. It includes the authorization to execute the sale and escrow documents, authorization to execute a certificate of acceptance, and also would appropriate As well as making the CEQA determination that the acquisition of the property is exempt from review under CEQA.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:15:30

Thank you for filling that out for me. That's the motion. Thank you. And do you second that?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:15:36

Sure, I'll second it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:15:39

Any more conversation? Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:15:43

Council Member Lang.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:15:50

Mayor Pro

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:15:51

Tem Mang.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:54

I vote no because I just I would like to have more of the information in front of me before I made a decision.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:16:00

Council Member Whitman.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:16:02

No.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:16:04

Mayor Gilman.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:16:05

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:16:07

Council Member Rule. Yes. Council Member Lang.

2:16 – 2:3332 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:17

The feasibility study is the part that's hanging me up.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:16:23

The feasibility study is hanging

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:24

you up? Yeah, because I don't know how much that is going to add to the total amount. And I'm going to have a hard time voting yes until I know how much we're actually looking at, because then we're taking an $850,000 property and then it becomes a million dollar property. I see. And so I'm going to vote no. OK.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:16:47

If it had a dollar amount, does that change it? If there was a cap?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:55

Yeah, if I knew there was a cap, then, you know, if I knew it was $15,000 or even $25,000, but not to have a cap feels irresponsible to me.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:17:09

I mean, let's cap it. I mean, it's a broad strokes. You can, somebody will tell you what they can do for, you said 15, you said 25, let's say 20. I mean, is that acceptable? Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:17:22

I mean, can we modify that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:17:24

You can put that out there. Whether or not you get some responses just depends. I don't know. You probably will.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:17:29

Yeah. We had also talked about Lucas doing it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:17:31

Well, if you want staff to do it and it would not just be Mr. Seibert, it would be Mr. Seibert, myself, you know, Miss Burgess would be probably three or four of us that would do it. There's no city cost to that because you're paying your city attorney cost. That's that's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:17:45

it. Outside contractor was trying to respond to your concerns. I'm sorry, an outside contractor? I missed that.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:17:51

I'm sorry. No, no, no, I looked at Lucas and said as long as Lucas does. But I think also to have, just to hire somebody to come, an outside person just to come with you guys, which wouldn't be an immense expense, just to make sure that there is sort of an impartial pair of eyes who've not filtered this, that would be, I can't imagine that would be over $5,000, really.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:30

I'm just asking a procedural question. Can we go back and make a motion again?

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:18:37

And that we complete the vote on the original motion since the vote was already in process. And then if someone wishes to make an alternate motion

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:45

that motion failed, I think we did the motion. Yeah,

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:18:49

well, correct. OK, good point. Good point. So

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:52

can we have to make a new motion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:18:53

Right.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:55

So if I were to make the same motion, but to put it that it would be staff. Staff produces a feasibility study and includes outside consultation not to exceed $10,000.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:19:10

I'm good with that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:19:11

Okay. That's a second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:12

Okay. All

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:16

right. Mayor Pro Tem Ming.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:20

No.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:22

Council Member Whitman.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:19:23

No.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:25

Council Member Lang.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:26

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:28

Mayor Gilman.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:19:29

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:19:31

Council Member Rule. Yes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:19:33

She passes. Thank you. I appreciate you. Okay. We're going to take a quick break and we'll come right back. Check, check, one,

2:33 – 2:4010 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:33:40

two.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:33:46

Jessica was saying that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:33:47

No, my wife.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:33:48

Oh, yeah, of course. Well, the whole thing's gonna get leveled. Okay. Ready to start. You ready to go? Okay, so we'll move on to item number eight, Mid-Year Budget Adjustment, City Attorney Legal Services Budget.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:34:08

If I may? Yes. Okay, so in February, the City Manager presented a mid-year budget adjustment that included budget adjustments for a number of categories. Included in that was a request to increase the budget for legal services from $688,800 to $1,398,800, which was an increase of $710,000. At that meeting, the Council asked if I could take a look at the expenditures to date and the anticipated legal expenditures for the rest of this fiscal year and come back with a number that I believe might better reflect what the city's anticipated legal expenses might be for the rest of the fiscal year.

Based on that, I have reviewed expenditures over the last 12 months as well as A little bit longer than 12 months, it was probably about 14 months, and I've also reviewed anticipated expenditures for invoices that have been received but not paid, and also anticipated expenditures for pending litigation, primarily Thank you very much. This is based on the following information. So as of the date of this report, the city has actually spent $484,778 of the budgeted amount.

For invoices for our firm, you have a couple that have been invoiced but not yet paid, and that includes For the month of January, roughly $82,000 and some change. It's still in process, but the invoice for February services, which is going to be just under $81,000. And so, I don't have a ton of data on what your actual monthly expenses will be with our firm, you know, as we're moving out of this transition phase into a more normal routine.

So, I do expect that may go down a little bit. I've also estimated $135,000 for legal services being performed by other firms, and so the largest portion of that is related to the Channel Keepers v. State Water Resources Control Board litigation. which is actually going to trial in June. And so in speaking with the city's outside firm or outside attorney who's representing the city in that matter, she estimated that for February through the end of June, her services would be roughly 85,000. The invoice for February has already been paid, so that was reduced by roughly 18,000. So that's where we get to the 65.

And then also the other kind of big ticket item there is outside council services related to the transient occupancy tax audit appeal at $60,000. So with that, I'm happy to take any questions that you may have. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:37:56

And then just to clarify, what I'm seeing on page 146, an additional $100,000 for unanticipated legal services. That's part of the 451 ask.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:38:06

That is part of the ask, and the reason for that is because we just don't know what may come. So it could be other litigation that may be filed against the city. It could be requests from City Council to review or explore items that kind of go beyond what you might expect in the normal course of business. But if we're just kind of continuing with business as usual, I don't know that we would need that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:38:39

So this might be for Mr. Harvey. When I look at page 146 and I see fiscal year 24-25-136975. So this council received that budget and that spend, right? So we were in the midst of that and then we, what the dollar amount is going to be if this is approved will be 1230778. And that's with the $100K unanticipated. So less than last year, but like by $130K or so. Now, does that make sense, what I just said?

I think so, yes. But then the thing I'm wanting to ask is, when we came up with our budget, I think I'd have to go back and look at the recording, but we all thought, let's try to get it back to that pre-current year level, more like the five-something. And we see, because of the change also, but because of litigation that we've inherited and some that's emerged since, we're basically at the current year's level, or the former year's level.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:39:44

I might just add a little bit of context. At the time that that number was determined and the council approved that in the budget, the thought was we want to get a lower amount of legal spend. Shortly thereafter, a decision was made that you wanted to go out for RFQ. When that decision was made, part of the discussion we had with council was that there will be an additional expenditure to this, not only, of course, for the process itself, But also for the overlap between the prior city attorney and this city attorney.

And it's inevitable when you shift like that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:40:22

I believe that. And I guess I'm just trying to also make the point that, let's use the channel keepers as an example. This has been around for a long time, and we're maybe at the homestretch here, but it's something that we are having to work with to complete. So it's our duty to complete it, but we have a burden. Now, that's just one piece of the dollar amount, but I'm just trying to say we're also responding to things that were in place before this council came into being. Okay.

2:40 – 2:4822 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:40:54

I think one other thing I would mention, based on my discussions with the City Manager, is that there was a point in time when the City Attorney's Office was not reviewing every agenda item before it was presented to Council, and was less involved with boards and commissions. So, you know, those things all take time and, you know, obviously we are here to support whatever level of service that City Council expects and desires.

But, you know, I think if there was a shift at some point between a City Attorney's Office that was not reviewing every agenda and was, you know, only providing more limited support, then that would also explain, you know, why there might have been an increase in the last couple of years.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:41:44

And then I'm trying to think of the hypothetical. If this isn't approved, hypothetically, you would hit that budget ceiling, and then if there's a request to do your normal duty, you would say, what, I don't have a budget for it, or I'm going to do the work, and it's going to go on the warrants with the anticipation that we're going to pay you.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:42:06

I think

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:07

what

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:42:10

would happen is that we would likely continue to perform the services, but to a certain extent, if council did not approve actual payment of the warrants, and this is true for any of the firms, Because the amounts weren't budgeted. So if council didn't come back and budget those funds, I would expect there would be a point at which the firms would stop providing service.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:37

Well, we'd have to have a conversation at that point.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:42:39

So we would, you know, I think before that would happen, we'd have some other conversations.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:43

Thank you. I appreciate

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:42:44

that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:46

Any questions? The only

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:42:49

question that's really come up for me is that I've heard the City Manager on occasion say that the City Attorney is part of the management team. Not so much with your firm, but with the previous City Attorney's firm, they were considered part of the management team. And to me, being part of the management team, There's a gray area there where, you know, you're providing legal advice as part of the management team and then you're providing something sort of else as part of the management team. And legal advice is, I mean, that was my...

My feeling about the previous law firm, and so then you're paying a very high consultant price for legal advice. And it's not really legal advice, it's more just like management team. So I, at some point, would like to get clearer on where that line is, if there is still a line. If it's possible to get clear on it, I'm not sure. But I just noticed that the city attorney had never been referred to before as part of the management team.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:43:58

So we don't use the city attorney for consultant advice or for general management consultation advice. It's always something of a legal nature. We just increasingly are seeing with every single thing that we do, if it's a contract, if it's initiative, there is usually some type of legal aspect that needs to be explored. I would rather spend the money up front than spend the money later. I would rather Benefit from knowing that what we're pursuing if it's a council, you know direction or if it's you know, something that Operationally that you know that we're we're considering that we're moving in the right direction So that's what I mean when I say part of the management team what I observed in the transition from you know when I took over from the prior city managers that were here and First of all, the prior city manager, I'm not throwing shade on him, I'm just saying he happened to be a JD, all right?

I don't know if he passed the bar or not, but he had his JD. And so I think that maybe, perhaps, he took some comfort in that. And maybe he felt that with his education, he didn't need to consult to the level that I feel is necessary. That could be. But I do know that the level of consultation from when he was here to when I was here is very, very different, just because I want the City Attorney's Office part of the discussion. So when I delegate an assignment to a senior management staff person, the implied understanding is if you need to consult the City Attorney's Office because you have a legal question, you are entitled to do so. It doesn't mean call them up and ask them, hey, how do you think this reads? Do you like the way I presented this?

No. There's got to be a legal reason as to why you're calling them. But we have a lot of legal pressure on us as a municipality, and we just want to make sure what we're presenting to you passes muster. That's my concern.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:45:44

Yeah, no, and I understand that. I don't think anybody believes that, you know, anybody anybody in City Hall can call the lawyer anytime they want. I don't think anybody believes that. So so that's kind of a straw man kind of thing. But. I think it I'd like some clarification, but but you gave clarification just there, and I agree, I mean, everything now has a legal component and you need to protect yourself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:46:10

So I'll give you some additional just because there's nothing to hide here. We have a weekly staff meeting every Tuesday at 1 o'clock, and we primarily review what's, you know, on either it's a council night like tonight, like what's on the agenda, or what's coming on the agenda. And the City Attorney participates in that because every single time there's some question, you know, it might be, you know, procedural, it might be, you know, did you do this, did you do that, well, oh, remember we have to do this.

So she's always involved in those staff meetings. I have an email group, management staff. You see it when you get your weekly summary. She is included in there. Very rarely does she reply to that with anything other than, you know, hey, I have a concern about this and I need to talk to you about this. It's not, you know. General. So that's how that's how I do it.

I also contact Bethany probably. I speak with Bethany probably once a day, I would say. Not always, but I was

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:47:05

going to say once a week, but maybe twice a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:47:07

week. Depends on the week, but a minimum once a week. But, you know, sometimes as many as five times a week, depending on what's going

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.842:47:14

on. OK, that's fine. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:47:16

Thanks. Any other questions? I don't have any public comment cards, anybody online.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:47:23

Yes, we have Larry Steingold. Okay. Go ahead, Larry, unmute yourself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:47:31

Thank you. I was expecting Bill Miley to be here, but not. How much of the budget is for lawsuits? And Of those, which ones are self-inflicted, or we're defending, or where we are, and what is expected of any new legal costs related to those lawsuits? Is that a number that can get broken out of these budgets? Is that a permissible question, or do you think we can get that from the lawyer, from the city attorney and their budget?

Is that possible?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:48:12

This is for you to be talking and us to be listening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed2:48:15

Okay, then I think this public deserves to know how much of the budget is for lawsuits versus what you need a lawyer for in your normal course of business. Because those numbers are the ones, the 100,000 contingency. What if? The question is, what is our liability on the lawsuits that we're defending? Those are contingencies too. So it'd be nice to know how much of the law costs are related to defending.

Thank you.

2:49 – 2:566 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:49:29

What often occurs in these cases is that someone tries to transpose the idea that you've budgeted an amount and that that has created a limitation on the services being performed. So, conceptually, you know, my understanding is that a budget is a tool to make sure that you have the resources available when it's time to spend it. It's not like a hard and fast thing that this is in the budget and we're not going to exceed that.

Attorney has to do what is necessary to best represent our interests, and it's almost impossible to predict what that is. So, the basic budgeting principle is that you take last year's expenditures, of course Allyshire Winder wasn't here last year, but you take last year's expenditures and you say, okay, well, how is this next year going to be different? And when it comes to legal services, that's really difficult to predict.

So, I mean, I think we have to Approve the budget because it's really conceptually to me Advice to us about this is what I think we're going to spend and Before we would ever get to a situation where you know, we're going over the budget. There's going to be some type of conversation about that Thank you all for joining us. Our, you know, risks and benefits. So I am very pleased and feel very confident that our expenses are going to be better. Legal expenses are going to be better managed moving forward.

I also, by the way, have heard multiple reports about the idea that staff is receiving new information from a new source about best practices, about how to proceed. And that the report back is that staff is very receptive to listening to what that best practices advice is and adapting our processes. So I'm extremely pleased that we have this law firm involved with our representation and I'm very supportive of the request for our amendment to the budget.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.872:52:44

And if I may add on to that, you know, one example, and I think this was referenced earlier tonight on a different item, is, you know, for example, our office has observed some improvements that could be made to the procurement and contracting process. And so, you know, there's an evaluative process that goes along with that to identify that that needs to happen, but then, you know, we're also going to have You know, potentially down the road some other work that will, you know, spin off from that. So, you know, I anticipate that in, you know, the next, you know, few months I may be coming back to City Council to request authorization to, you know, look at, prepare revisions or suggested revisions for, you know, updates to your purchasing ordinance, for example.

And, you know, that to me would come as a separate item, and that would probably be something that would, you know, be within that, what I'm calling a contingency bucket, because, you know, that, but I would look to council to provide direction as to whether that's something you actually want us to pursue before we would just start doing that work. The other thing I was going to note is that, you know, with respect to, And I think this was a question that I may have received from one of the council members previously.

When we look at this, one of the other aspects of this is that I would probably also recommend at some point that we bring back to council a policy or something to incorporate into your council protocols related to council member requests and things that would add some additional controls and for council to consider in terms of and reach a consensus as to how How much time should we spend before a matter comes back to Council for direction and approval to spend an extensive number of hours on it? So while there is this, I want you to know that it's a yes and kind of situation that we would be coming back to you with some other recommendations that might add some more Visibility or require further action from Council before we undertake work that might lead to more extensive legal fees.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:55:18

We appreciate that. Any other comments or questions? Mr. Whitman, do you want to make a motion?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.762:55:27

Yeah, I move that we approve the proposed budget amendment. Thank you. Second.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:55:34

Roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move that we approve the proposed budget amendment. Thank you. Second. Roll call,
Show transcript
Council Member Rule. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes. Council Member Lang. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. Yes.

Super. Okay, we're on number nine. The Green Coalition Proposal City Hall Campus. Thank you for being so patient, guys. Appreciate it.

2:56 – 3:0416 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:56:07

Great, we're just going to turn this over to the coalition, if that's okay, and then we're here to answer questions as well. Wonderful.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:56:14

Hello, dear Mayor, Mayor Bootham, council members and staff. Thank you for considering this proposal from the Ojai Valley Green Coalition. Through the process of gathering feedback on the Eco-Center over the last 18 months, a clear mandate seemed to arise from our residents. Nature-based education is the overwhelming priority, with 77% of respondents indicating they would like to participate in educational activities on the site.

Topics include water resilience, ecological gardening, and fire-safe landscaping. Kathy's beautiful master plan includes five formal areas for educational activities, indoor and out, including an amphitheater and the garden house, which will be a multi-use building. However, until the project is realized, we would still like to engage the public on the site.

This proposal covers a series of 22 planned workshops covering topics, like I mentioned, ecological gardening, water-wise gardening, tree planting, native landscape restoration, composting, and more. And for those who can't make it to the site, we're planning on creating a library of online learning resources, including videos. And these will all be tailored to our valley, unlike resources you can maybe find on YouTube now.

This will promote the community's active vested interest in the site and will build community buy-in and excitement for all the possibilities for our campus plan. We'd also like to invest in maintaining the restoration area in Middle Stewart Creek so this area doesn't become overrun by invasive plants and to reduce the fire risk around City Hall. This programming proposal relies heavily on our nonprofit alliance. Our local green partners, such as PAX Environmental, The Crew, Once Upon a Watershed, Ojai Trees, and Nordoff Nursery. And the majority of the budget is dedicated to funding their work.

The timeline is four months, and we can always renew it if you end up liking our work. So thank you for your consideration, and I'm open to answering any questions. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:58:24

Questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:58:29

So, could you talk a little bit about the site cleanup, like with that, and I know in the project you mentioned removing some of the non-native plants, and could you talk

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:58:42

a little bit more about that? Absolutely. I would be happy to. Over the last 18 months that I've been working with the Green Coalition, we've relied on volunteer labor, and while that's great and the community is like We've been very supportive. We can't do everything with volunteers alone. So this proposal covers the crew coming in with a solid team for one week, basically, with heavy machinery to do brushwork that we can't do with hand tools.

On top of this, they're going to volunteer an extra four days, which is so awesome of them. So this covers all of their labor and equipment rental and everything they need for that project. It won't cover tree removal, which is a whole other project that we might need permitting and specialty equipment for. So that would be a whole different thing.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:59:31

Just on that point, so I'm looking at page 150. So the coordination of the phase one tree removal would be?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:59:37

So that's actually an item that we're hoping we get to this summer, which would be when the tree removal happens. We're repurposing the materials like Kathy alluded to for benchmaking, mulch, and reusing them on the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:59:51

site. Yes, right, okay. Other questions? Okay, I have two public, thank you, please stay close, we may call on you again. I have two comment cards, Brian Akins and Bill Miley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed3:00:15

Hello, Ryan Akins on the Historic Preservation Commission. Been there a dozen years. A key thing on that is the, well, I was the chair of the HPC Commission. I would routinely come to the council meetings, every council meeting, and I would talk with Kathy Nolan, who came to every council meeting, every meeting, and that's how I got to know her so well. As you may know, I try to go to every meeting that has anything to do with anything historic. I heard they were going to build some houses, so I hopped in my car and drove up from off view of the camera so I could take pictures of everything, and that started my interest here.

I will tell you that a couple things just on the fun part. If you take my tour when I'm here, I've missed a couple because of health. I will show you where the miniature golf course is, where the bridge is, and if it rained, the water hazard, just letting you know. What they've done in this, I've been in those meetings from the beginning, it was so inclusive to all of the ideas that were shared. The key part for me in being on the HPC last year, I was made the liaison to the thing, is that we talked about what the landmarks, they had a big, big, big map, detailed map, they gave me a red pen and said put a circle around the landmarks. And so they were very, very careful on that, and that's why we took so many trips to the Carriage House over there, too.

So if you haven't been in the Carriage House, let me know. But again, I wholeheartedly support what they've done. I've been impressed. As I said, I heard they were going to do this when I saw Kathy Nolan was in charge. I knew her and I went there. It's been a pleasure to get to know Lauren Nilsen, who just spoke with you, the Executive Director. And so, great people there, great projects. The other thing I want to do in closing with my one minute is I have come before you and another of the HPC commissioners has come before you and that's clearing out the brush.

So every time I come in, I walk over to that corner And I look at the bamboo, and I saw it tonight, then cleared out. I saw it was in the budget, took a picture, sent it to our HPC commissioner to try to make her happy. And I just want to appreciate everybody that's involved in doing that. But again, this project is fabulous, fully supported, and looking forward to where it's eventually going to go with all of your support. So thank you very much.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:02:56

Thank you, Mr. Eakins.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:02:58

Mayor, Bill Miley is online now.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:02:59

Okay, thank you. Great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:03:02

Go ahead, Bill. Unmute yourself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:03:06

I am unmuted.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:03:08

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:03:08

you. Yes. You can hear me, right? Yep. Good. This proposed proposal is a road that is being traveled and paved and very exciting. Hooray Thank you for your support for the Green Coalition. They are persistent and determined and competent. Their detailed planned events and work schedules for our future City Hall campus is very worthy and trusted. I fully support this contract proposal.

Before these ideas for the eight acres were being discussed, I wandered over the property, especially liking the knoll on the south side where one could almost see views of the entire valley. I was so enthused I used two to three subsequent trips on the property to show some of the then current city council members, rec department folks, and the city manager at sites.

I am glad it is still available for the Green Coalition's creative and skilled leadership. This is a great next move. Thank you.

3:04 – 3:1620 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:04:56

Good evening, Mayor Gilman and members of the Council and staff. I was on that Brian Aikens tour with Kathy Nolan leading the way and Lauren Nelson as well. And getting into the carriage house was kind of a treat. Thank you all for being here. And as we know, when Fred Smith deeded this eight-acre estate to the City of Ojai, recorded January 22, 1979, Book 5309, page 909 of the Ventura County Recorder Records, The Smith-Hubson Foundation envisioned it as a cultural and learning center for this community.

That intent was documented in the Ojai Valley News, and it is actively upheld today by the family in their other foundation work. So tonight's work, tonight's proposal really does honor that vision, and I really want to thank the Green Coalition for hanging in there. They've been hanging on for several years, and I'm really proud of what they're doing. The other thing, you know, they showed up with a green calendar, and they're working in collaboration with all these different groups on this green calendar. They have March 21st, another site tour that's scheduled, and on March 28th, they have a creek cleanup, for the last of the season for the Middle Stewart Canyon. You can find those events on their website. So I just want to say they're organized, they're ready, they've got the staff and the resources to bring this to fruition.

I'm very excited about it. The last thing, I want to say something about PACS Environmental and the work that they've already done to bring along and restore the Middle Stewart Canyon. There's a 10-acre riparian corridor that runs directly through this campus, and this reach of only eight stream segments in the entire city, one of eight in the entire city, is identified as potential habitat for the Southern California steelhead, a federally endangered species. So the state has already invested in our watershed. So this, to me, demonstrates that we are ready to take that investment and move it forward. And I want to say I really appreciate All the work and collaboration that's gone into this proposal. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:07:57

Thank you, Ms. Roth. Any other comments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:08:01

Yes. We have Larry Steingold.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:08:03

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:08:03

Go ahead, Larry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:08:05

I would like to...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:08:08

Oops. Sorry. My bad.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:08:14

There he

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:08:14

is. There you go, Larry. Sorry. Start over again, please. I agree

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:08:16

with Bill and Renee. This is a wonderful project. And I've been here nine years, and these people have been at it. I think it would be great if they could acquire the McRae property at the closing through some loan device from the city that they could repay out of grants, because they could turn that into classrooms. They could turn it into visiting people for all sorts of things. Then they can take it and make it part of the community.

So maybe that's something that they can look at and the city could look at because the $10,000 you're going to spend to check out for housing, that's wasted money. There's only 8,500 square feet there. That's not going to happen. Sounds good, but forget it. But this should be part of them. This should be part of the eight and a half acres. And that should be the goal.

Maybe you want to have people stay there also, but that should be the intent. Because like you said, it lines up with the City Hall property. So, thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:09:27

Thank you, Mr. Stengel. Anybody else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:09:30

No, Mayor, there's someone else

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:09:31

only. I want to say my first reaction, I remember, not the last City Manager, but the one before, James Vega said that We use our nonprofits as an extension of our resources to provide services for our city, and I never forgot it when you said that. And when I see the list, not only the Green Coalition, but I see the crew, PACS, Nordoff, Once Upon a Watershed, Ojai Trees, And I combine that with the people who have approached us that have said, sort of like, clean up your own backyard first, that we have fire hazard here, and I see this here, this cleanup, not only for beautification, but for safety.

I'm very supportive of this. I hope this council is as well. And it seems like it's a great extension of the services we can do. And one could argue, you know, Why not our employees doing it? And they are fully taxed. So they will get to it, but we need it done faster than that. So that's the extension model that we use, so that's my view. Yes, I wanna hear more.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:10:35

Yeah, I was gonna say, not only are our folks taxed, but they're also not experts. They don't have the years and years and years of experience to be able to do this properly, which brings me to the fact that the Green Coalition has been in business since 2006 and have contributed greatly to the city for all of those years, and I'm incredibly thankful I, too, am particularly appreciative for involving all of, not all of, but our major, you know, sort of green and eco companies and spread the wealth to them. I think it's very telling that, you know, the crew is going to donate four days for, you know, In addition to us hiring them, I mean, that's just graciousness that you really can't put money on. And so I'm very happy to know that. You know, PACS, Once Upon a Watershed, Ojai Trees, all of these organizations have worked so hard and so long and so often in a volunteer capacity that the fact that we can actually employ them to the small extent that we are, I think is great.

I think it just speaks so well of us and of what we value. You know, other than that, to me, it's kind of, I'm in 100% support of this. I've spoken to many of you. I'm your liaison, so I do hear about this, but the strides that we're making, It's like we could actually point to this as a best practice. You know, it's something that's truly been successful over the last two years, and that is all on the Green Coalition. I mean, you've just been wonderful and serious and effective and so smart and so much a part of the community. So I'm thanking you and am totally in support of this particular proposal.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:12:40

Thank you. Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:12:42

I'm also in support of the proposal for many reasons, for all the reasons that my colleagues just mentioned, but most specifically for the reason that when we talked about fire readiness and mitigation this year, one of the initiatives that we all voted yes for was to send out an RFP for brush clearing, for fuel removal and brush clearing on our City Hall properties.

And you've done that. You've basically done the work for us in identifying what needed to be done, because you know this property more intimately than most people, and also working with some of our environmental nonprofits People who are contributing greatly to our community. And so I think this makes sense in terms of fire readiness, in terms of removing fuel. I think it makes sense in terms of the overall goals that we have for what this campus can become.

I love the idea of the gardening workshops and the native plant restoration. You're including Nordoff in that, and that's something we've also discussed as a part of fire safety and fire readiness. And so I'm in support of this and I think it's something that we need, that we are going to need to do anyway. So yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:14:18

Any other comments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:14:20

I think it's a great project. What I would like to see, I think you said earlier that you're in the process of getting it all together, dialed in, how much the whole project from start to finish would cost. I'm curious to see that. It would be nice, you know, if we could budget, like, to put a chunk aside, what we're going to do for that instead of just piece by piece.

So that's what I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:14:41

have to

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:14:43

say. Yeah. Yeah, I had the same concern that we, you know, we get Thank you very much. I recall a time when the demonstration garden, composting workshops, and all of that was handled entirely by volunteers. And I like the idea that they'd be handled by volunteers because it brings in a community aspect. So I have some hesitation I have a stronger inclination towards, you know, paying those things where we're making physical improvements that we would be spending money on staff doing the same thing in any event. But, you know, in terms of doing classes and workshops and spending money on those things as opposed to soliciting, you know, volunteers to run and operate those, I have hesitation.

3:16 – 3:2212 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:16:16

Please. Actually, I would love to speak to this because, Council Member Whitman, what you're talking about on several boards that I'm on, two different boards that I'm on, we're having the same conversations. And I think what's happening is that because there is an affordability crisis, young people who would have been volunteers, because I grew up volunteering for everything, and I think a lot of people who would-be volunteers now need to be paid because Things are just expensive. So I think there's a cultural shift moving away from volunteerism.

And I'm not 100% sure, I haven't done the research on this, but this is a topic of conversation that I'm hearing in other spaces too.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:17:06

Just the crew line item, the 12,692, the crew pays their young people doing the work. So I do see, and they're volunteering some time, but those are also young people that are in our environment, in our community. And I was just talking at Nordoff the other day, and I saw there were teenagers in the class who work in the summers for the crew. It's incredible.

So having young people getting paid is amazing. So I'm all for

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:17:34

it. We have long, long, long relied upon volunteers, and they have risen to the occasion for so many years, but I think there's also value in paying people for their work, especially young people. It doesn't help a community to not pay people for the work that they do. It's a fine line, it's really a fine line. People do volunteer, and I don't think we have any lack of people who volunteer.

And I personally am not opposed to paying people for the work that they do. I just think it's something that Especially given the fact that so much of this work has been volunteer already. To me, it's a very small price and a very small percentage of the amount of work that actually gets done. So, I don't actually, while I understand the perspective, and that's interesting what you were saying about just not having the time to volunteer. Like, I was a volunteer. Yeah, we were all volunteers. So that's interesting, I had not heard that. But anyway, that's kind of my perspective, is you have to pay people for work, in this economy especially.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:18:58

I'm going to move that we approve the Ojai Valley Green Coalition request for 41352, and that we approve the budget adjustment and the appropriation allocating that money, and authorize the city manager to execute the professional services agreement with the Green Coalition. I'll second. Okay, any more discussion? Roll call, please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Council Member Rule. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang. Yes. Council Member Lang. Yes. Council Member Whitman. Yes. Mayor Gilman. Yes.
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:19:34

Motion passes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:19:36

Congratulations. Yes, thanks guys. You've tucked it out. Appreciate you being here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:19:43

Mayor, for this last item I'm going to turn things over to Ms. Cervantes. Great. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:19:48

Great, so Mayor, Council Members, before you here is the draft Town Hall and Panel Policy for your review. This draft was prepared at Council's direction to create a consistent, transparent framework for Town Halls and panel discussions, how they're organized and supported. The draft outlines clear distinctions between City-sponsored events, Council Member-hosted events, independent meetings, and hybrid events. Helping clarify when city resources may be used and what support is appropriate.

It also defines roles and responsibilities to ensure compliance with Brown Act ADA requirements and neutrality standards. This is a draft and we welcome your feedback edits or changes so that we can refine to what best supports council's goals and our community's community engagement efforts.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:20:38

Thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:20:45

Go ahead. So I have a general, and maybe it's a request. I think we do need a policy about how town hall meetings work, and there's lots of coverage here on topics that are important. It was a lot of material for me to get through and understand what I thought were good ideas and what I had concern about. And I would love to have time, you know, put this up at the next meeting and I'll be able to come in thoroughly prepared for those things that I have concerns about and those things that I, you know, fully support. And there was both of that in my, you know, read-through. But I just simply haven't I had the time to study this in depth the way that I would want to before adopting a policy.

Other thoughts?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:21:52

I would support waiting on

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:21:54

this. I really appreciated it. I thought it made a wonderful distinction between a council person wanting to do something on their own and something involving city resources. I would be ready to approve it now, but I also want to honor my colleague's wishes.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:22 – 3:2939 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:22:25

Well, I had a planned event. This has been pushed back now two months, if not more, that I've been speaking about this. So I'm a little bit perturbed that we are now pushing it back yet again. You know, the amount of time that it's taken to do something like this, getting it bumped, getting it pushed, not being taken seriously so that, you know, an ordinance actually comes up, change midway, yes, we can do it, no, now we need a policy.

It's highly inefficient and it, You know, I've been talking about it for months and months and months, and I'm not happy, I guess. You know, I just don't think it's fair that I've been trying to get this pushed through, and now we're going to, you know, bump it yet again. It was bumped from the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:28

last meeting,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:29

you

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:29

know. Just to be clear, I haven't seen this. Yeah,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:34

I'm talking about this. Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:35

no, I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:35

know you haven't

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:36

seen it. I haven't seen it until, you know, like 48 hours ago.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:41

That's because it didn't come up. I've been talking about this for months and then all of a sudden, you know, four weeks ago, oh no, we have to have an absolute policy for this. So it's fine.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:56

I'm just... So

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:56

there,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:57

just...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:23:58

This would be my

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:23:59

understanding.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:24:00

Let's finish what you were saying, though, just because...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:24:02

Well, it was bumped from last week to this week. I've been trying to put together this town hall for months and months, and...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:24:11

But the months is the town hall, not the public.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:24:14

The Munts is the town hall, but there was no notice that we needed to have a policy. It was fine, go ahead, everything's good. And then all of a sudden, no, it's not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:24

fine.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:24:26

All of a sudden, it's not fine. You need to have all of this. And so now I'm in a complete time crunch, even though I have confirmed things happening, and I don't know that there's anything to do about that. Except for now, I have to cancel and I have to rethink. And I just feel like... Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:24:52

I don't mean to sound ignorant, but...

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:24:53

It was gonna be, yeah, no, it was gonna be, we talked about it, local law enforcement discussing about federal policy versus local law enforcement. I mean, not directly ICE, but so I have Fryhoff and Chief Abbott, and Steve Jenkins, and potentially others to come. But all of a sudden, I don't have a policy anymore. So now I need to re-cancel all of that. These guys, it was a struggle to find a date that they were all open for.

I guess it just is what it is.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:25:35

So it just my so my intent is not. No, I understand. To prevent or delay. Right. What you want to do along those lines, I I would understand that each of us has a First Amendment right to call for a town hall meeting and that the and that what we would be deciding tonight is, you know, what the rules going forward would be. So the good news is if you move forward with your town hall on the schedule that you want to move forward on, you cannot have violated the policy because the policy doesn't exist.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:26:21

Yeah, it really has to do with, I wanted the city to be a part of that. I wanted it to be something that the city participated in because I think it's much more encompassing. I think that we're talking about...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:26:38

If I might offer, that distinction, it seems to me, is critical and necessary. Because any of us can do whatever we want, so to speak. But if it's a city event, then it seems to me it

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:26:49

requires collaboration. I mean, I haven't received notice about the event or what's planned. You know, the people that you mentioned to come and talk about law enforcement and our relationship with immigrant issues, I think all of those people would be valuable for the community to hear from, but I haven't received the request for this is what the program is going to cover, so I can look at it and say, yeah, I endorse that or no, I don't.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:27:26

Because we were waiting for, this was supposed to be on last agenda, right? And then it was pushed to this agenda. And so, in other words, time is ticking on by. And so in order for me to actually fully explain it, I need to know whether or not the city is part of it or not. So I was, because then I believe it's much more valuable for the city to be part of it.

This conversation started months ago, right? Months

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:27:52

ago. So what's the, it sounds like you already have a date.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:27:56

I already have a date, I already have a time.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:27:57

What is the date?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:27:59

The date is March 23rd. 23rd at 5 o'clock here at Kent Hall. And I have a, you know, I have a format. I've discussed it with, I've not discussed it with Sheriff Fryhoff, but I've discussed it to an extent with Chief Abbott. I keep wanting to call you by your first name. Chief Abbott, and also to a great extent, Steve Jenkins has really been my contact person, and he's reached out to Fryhoff. We've also reached out to Carbajal. And so then I pretty much put kind of a halt on it till I could figure out, till I could get this approval, basically. So it is what it is. The

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:28:41

thing that I would suggest, possibly, if it was me doing it, I would, that's a very touchy subject. And I would be really thinking about how can I orchestrate it in the best way to get the most information exchanged. So for me, it would not be simple. It'd be pretty nuanced.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:28:58

It is very nuanced.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:28:59

I know. So what I'm trying to say, though, is that getting it right with some collaboration from the city, my opinion would be it'd be better than to do it quickly. That's my opinion.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:29:08

Right, except for quicker is months and months and months. I mean, you're just saying, you know, and it was supposed to be on the last week's agenda.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:29:15

No, but, you know, it didn't come before us till recently. I mean, last time, two weeks ago, right? I mean, or two weeks before that. So I know for you, it's been months. That hasn't been the case for us.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:29:26

Right, you did say that you would put it on last agenda and then you pulled it. Yes, of

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:29:33

course. And I notified you right away because they weren't prepared.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:29:36

Right, there's nothing I can do about that. I don't understand that we have

3:29 – 3:3620 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:29:47

In front of us tonight, the adoption of this particular program as a city-sponsored program. So, I don't think we can do that tonight. It's not on the agenda.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:30:03

The only thing we need is this ordinance to pass, basically. That's what we need in order to make it a city-sponsored event. If we want to hold off, I can check and I can see If I can reschedule and to the Mayor's point, I've done a great amount of thinking about what the format's going to be. I've discussed it extensively with Chief Jenkins on what would be the appropriate way to do that, what his experience has been in these kinds of formats.

Yes, it's not in front of you, but the only thing that really needed to come in front of you was this ordinance. Then it is appropriate for me to sort of distribute what the format is actually going to be, so.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:30:54

It's not quite that way, because just looking at one of the items, let's say 155, and you say governance and authority, city-sponsored events require council direction or mayor-city manager authorization by city council action. With scheduling managed by staff. So it's to me, it's not as simple as saying, oh, we just approve the policy and it's a done deal, because I

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:31:17

was not aware that we were looking to approval from either the city manager or the mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:31:22

Well, I'm looking I'm just looking at the policy in front of me right right now. So I didn't write this where we're reviewing it right now. But it seems to me that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:31:31

was never seen that. And now and that actual issue was something that I wanted. You know, to think more, that was an area of concern for me about how we get that decision making done.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:31:44

Here's what I would say. If two council people, this is the vision I was thinking of, if two council people want to do something and they start collaborating about a topic, I'm all, if you're using staff and it's going to be in Kent Hall and it's going to be publicized and all that, it should be something that meets some caliber, it seems to me. So two council people is plenty, but if it's one person who just decides, I want to do it and I want to authorize the staff to do all these things.

That seems like a resource drain that we would want to understand if it's city-sponsored. We all stand behind the city. We're all part of the city. So it would be worth having a conversation about the subject if

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:32:22

it's city-sponsored. That's fine. I really was not, in all discussions that I've had, it was never that it would have to get approval from either the city manager or the mayor. Never.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:32:35

I'm just saying what's in front of us right

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:32:37

now. I know. I understand that. What I'm saying is that that was never discussed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:32:41

I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:32:42

have a question. What is in this policy is that if an individual wants

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:32:44

to have something on their own, that there's freedom to do that. And I know you mentioned wanting support, but you also have an event scheduled, and so I'm trying to see if there's a win-win.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:33:04

Yeah, I actually didn't care about support. We used to be able to use Kent Hall. I used to rent it for $50 for four hours, and that was fine for me. That was enough. Then it became, well, why don't we, you might want to YouTube it, you might want to stream it, you might, and yeah, actually, on really, really, you know, I'm going to start with you, Andrew, and then I'm going to turn it over to you.

Give us your check, and we're good to go. That used to be the way it was. I mean, I've done these forums, as is my right as a council member or any individual. So... It's

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:34:01

fine. You could do it right now. You're just saying you want it to be city sponsored. I did want it to be city sponsored. You don't have to wait. You can just do it and not have it be city sponsored.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:34:12

Well, I think that there was a question that came from Chair Fryhoff, I'm not sure, but it came through, you know, Chief Jenkins about, is this, you know, is this put on by the city or is this put on by you? And at that point, we had already had the conversation about the city being part of it before I even broached it to them. So I more or less said it was through the city. So now I can backtrack that.

Or I can change the date. It just puts me in a very awkward position, and once again, this has been in discussion with the city manager for months and months and months.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:35:01

I would agree, and I need to jump in here. What I need to say on staff's defense is this discussion illustrates exactly why this has to come before city council, I feel. I think it's one thing if a council member wants to have a town hall. That's fine. You want to be an individual and you want to have constituents come in and talk about concerns that matter in your district. Great. You can do it as an individual.

That's fine. But once you know, this this topic is an important topic. But, you know, when you were bringing in our law enforcement provider, it has all the semblance of something that city sanctioned when you have, you know, the entire sheriff of Ventura County here. And I think once we once it started to evolve, You know, we ask questions. We think about things. You know, we consult with the city attorney. We say, you know what, I'm I don't know, you know, because I work for all five of you. I want to do whatever each individual member wants, but I always have to think about the group. And I had to have some pause and say, you know what, I think we do need a policy here.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:36:00

Yeah, no, I understand that. But it was months and months before you came to that conclusion, like months. You called Carba Hall for me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:36:07

I would disagree. I don't think it was months and months.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:36:09

Okay, you can disagree if you want, it's fine.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:36 – 3:4332 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:36:26

Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:36:41

Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:37:01

But again, I haven't started thinking until more than an hour ago. No, no, no, I'm not speaking to you. Absolutely, the fact that I didn't actually see what you were talking about leads me to believe that yes, it requires more, and so what I'm going to have to do, and I still believe it's very important for the city to be part of this conversation. And if that means that, you know, we need a second person and I need to reschedule with the folks, then that's kind of what that means. And that's fine. That is what it is.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:37:39

And

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:37:41

I think if the conversation goes well, it's really important to have a recording of it. This is something that is being discussed about nationally, and we're finding different local law enforcement coming out in different ways, and it's really important for our community to know how our local law enforcement sees this and to have that available for those who can't come and to have it sanctioned, I think, by the city, to have it be sponsored by the city regardless of what's said. So, pardon my dismay at, you know, not Thank you all for being here.

Council members will second it. I have no problem with that. I think that any issue that one council member wants to speak about, most likely there will be a second who will feel that that is a valid and justified way. So, I need the resources from the City. I don't need them, but I believe them that would make a much stronger sort of experience for people. So all of that being said, and I completely understand, Congressman, I mean, Councilmember, I know I'm elevating you. Would you please run for Congressperson?

Councilmember Whitman, I understand that there's a lot here and we do need a chance to review it and come back and discuss it. So it was never, I know that some council members have requested additional time to review the policy.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:39:41

If we were prepared to have a deeper dive into it tonight, I mean, one of the things we could discuss or could have discussed is whether there are refinements or tweaks that need to be made here. It sounds like there

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:39:57

may be. That's why I'm asking for time is because I think, like I said, I'm very supportive of the idea we need a policy. But as far as, you know, the tweaks and the subtleties, I'd like more time to look at those and probably ask questions.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:40:16

Are there any tweaks or clarifications that you might like us to incorporate based on your review thus far? That's where I was going with that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:40:26

question.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:40:27

And not everyone may be prepared to answer that. But I made a note that that first bullet point under governance and authority might be something to look at more closely. But I'm

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:40:41

not sure that's something for you to edit yet.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:40:43

Yeah, so maybe not. I just thought before we come back if there are any specific questions or concerns from anyone.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:40:51

I'm willing to put this on the first discussion item for the next meeting that we have. And I'll make sure that whatever questions I have for staff are presented to them in advance.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:41:07

Another thing I might throw out for consideration is in addition to the policy, of course, tonight we didn't have it noticed as council approval of a specific town hall. But that might be another thing to include as a future agenda item for that next meeting would be to go ahead and add a specific item that's specific to that request. Because an alternative to approving a policy could be approving a specific town hall, but we would need to notice that.

So...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:41:48

Is that something you're prepared to draft?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:41:51

Sure, I can definitely draft it. And, you know, I'm looking at the compliance review, the city attorney reviews event formats, notices, and materials as needed for the Brown Act, ADA, election tiering restrictions, and risk management. So in that question is like, what kind of turnaround time do you require generally for that would be a question.

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:42:16

We can accommodate review for

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:42:18

the

GovBethany BurgessCity Attorneyvoiceprint 0.873:42:18

next council meeting.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:42:19

I wouldn't book a date yet. I would

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:42:22

cancel

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:42:22

my

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:42:22

date. I'm going to cancel the date. Honestly, I've been pushing it and pushing it, thinking that tonight would be, and then I thought two weeks ago would be, and then I thought two months ago would be. I'm good. You know, it's just going to have to be what it's going to have to be. I think that local law enforcement would like it to be a city-sponsored as well. That was the drift I got from Chief Jenkins, is that it was sanctioned by the city would make it so much—would be better for them. So, all done?

I can draft something or I cannot. I need a new date. So

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:43:05

I move that we continue this discussion item to our next meeting. Second. And that Councilmember Rule present her idea for this. I don't know what the format for that is, you know, supposed to be, but maybe kind of take it from whatever is drafted. And so we have, so that we can consider both issues at the next meeting. I second. It's a form and a content.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:43:37

Yes.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:43:38

Great. Okay. Yeah, please go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:43:42

Mayor Gilman?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:43:43

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:43:44

Council Member Rule?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.843:43:46

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:43:47

Mayor Pro Tem Mang? Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Lang?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:43:51

Yes. Okay, that's it. Any council member reports before we split?

3:44 – 3:4716 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:44:01

I just want to bring up a couple of things. One would be like an emergency evacuation plan. It was our last meeting when we were going into closed session, and I will say that when people were coming in at 9 o'clock at night, faces that I didn't know, I for some reason got like a little panicky. I figured out what it was like, oh my gosh, what, you know, looking at the doors. I was there at Route 66 in Vegas when they had that shoot. So it was like, you know, I was trying to plan my getaway and I thought, oh, that shouldn't be for all of us. We need to do something. Yeah, I ran for my life.

So that was something I would like to see if we could do that. And then with as far as with the the new logo, I would like to see that come back with how much it's going to cost to put that logo, if that's what it sticks with, on vehicles, on clothing, on all the stuff, just to see the whole picture of what it's going to cost to make those changes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:44:58

Sure, so a couple of responses. Chief Abbott and I, when he came on board, talked about and we're going to do it. It's just been a bit busy. We're going to organize a couple drills. Back in the day

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:45:11

when we were in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:45:12

school, we all got under the table. And so we're going to invite, you know, the council and the community to be part of these and tabletop exercises that is on our list. So we will get to that. I appreciate that. You've already paid for the effort to create the camera-ready artwork for the new logo. So that was part of the proposal that you already authorized. How we deploy it, you know, depends on what, you know, we're happy to come back to Council if you guys want to talk about to what degree. We can show you that, but basically it's what you already approved, and it's just going to be in a high-res format. In fact, you will already see that going out on social media. That template will be created is being created right now to be in the background, but we can show that to you guys as well, but you did already authorize it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:45:56

Right, no, I know that, but we didn't authorize the expense of what it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:45:58

would take to implement it. You did. With that amendment that you approved, that was... How

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:46:02

much for clothing and do everything

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:46:03

we want to put... No, no,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:46:04

no, no. That's what I'm saying. I'm sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:46:06

But that's unknown. So, like, I'm not going out and buying a whole bunch of new clothing with the logo on it. All we did is we paid for the final camera-ready artwork so that when we want to create something... Right. So you're, like, let's take branded uniforms, for example.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmembervoiceprint 0.763:46:20

I think what you're saying is that if we go beyond the image, To put it on something and it's going to cost money, to put it on that thing, you're going to bring it back to us and say, here's what it costs for us to do 200 sweatshirts. Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:46:35

so our intention this year is, you know, we want to start a process, and we've already kind of sort of done this in the last budget year, but every budget year has some, for lack of a better term, uniforms and swag as part of it. Thank you very much. My thought here is, you know, this is a slow, very slow roll. Like if we bought it, if you guys authorized the purchase of a new vehicle, perhaps it would go on there. Perhaps it wouldn't. We know it. I know the sensitivity.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:47:21

What's that? If you bought a new car, you would be paying for a logo to go on there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:47:25

already. Well, that's true. But I'm also not buying new cars without coming to you. So really, we're talking like sweatshirts and things like that. And it's part of the next budget.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:47:34

Fair enough. Absolutely. And then That's it. I'm good. Thank

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:47:40

you. Any future agenda items? All right. We're adjourned. Thank you.