Meeting Summary
Present: Gilman, Mang, Rule, Lang, Whitman
This summary was AI-generated to save you time. It may miss or misstate details — verify against the official recording and the transcript.
At a glance
Permanent Supportive Housing
- Councilmembers questioned long-term service obligations and annual operating costs.
- Public commenters highlighted budget overruns and alleged irregularities in billing practices.
- Staff acknowledged administrative cost discrepancies and promised clarified documentation.
- The Council debated the necessity of the project against potential cost increases from delays.
Soil Remediation
- The Council approved a contract for lead remediation excavation at 611 South Montgomery Street.
- Staff noted initial lead levels were higher than first reported, requiring residential-level cleanup.
- Public commenters raised concerns regarding process delays and lack of cost caps.
- The motion to approve the contract passed following discussion on maximum cost limits.
Community Town Hall
- Councilmember Rule proposed hosting a town hall regarding local law enforcement interactions.
- Members discussed safety risks and the potential for the event to attract hostile attendees.
- Safeguards were agreed upon, including vetting questions and providing Spanish translation.
- The Council approved moving forward with staff on planning and logistics.
Financial Consultant Extension
- The Council approved an extension of services with financial consultant Ida Bailey.
- Staffing vacancies necessitated immediate expertise on specific accounting systems.
- Public comment suggested a lower-cost provider, though staff argued familiarity provided better value.
- No new budget was requested as remaining funds from a previous approval will be utilized.
Other Business
- The Mayor noted the Council intends to bring an at-large voting measure to the agenda.
- The measure is scheduled for consideration during the November meeting cycle.
Full summary
- The Ojai City Council concluded a late-night meeting following extensive discussion on housing projects, environmental remediation, community town halls, and financial staffing.
Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) & Dignity Moves
- Cost Concerns: Councilmember Whitman questioned the long-term service obligations and annual operating costs associated with the proposed PSH project. Staff projected an annual operational cost of approximately $500,000, funded by a $2 million set-aside in the ERF grant for four years post-construction.
- Budget Discrepancies: Staff acknowledged discrepancies in administrative cost subtotals ($265,625) and promised to provide clarified documentation on service obligations to the state.
- Public Comment: Attendees Mike Donahue and Clay Creasy were highly critical of the project. Donahue claimed the project is a "disaster" and the Council was misled regarding budget and schedule parameters. Creasy highlighted missing invoices, budget overruns ($9.8 million vs. the $9.5 million cap), and alleged irregularities in billing (e.g., legal fees charged before the agreement was signed).
- Council Response: Council members debated the necessity of the project versus the costs, with some noting that delays in decision-making contribute to price increases.
Soil Remediation (Agenda Item 13)
- Proposal: The Council approved a contract with Pacific Petroleum of California for lead remediation excavation at 611 South Montgomery Street. The contract includes a maximum cost of $123,146 for excavation and $39,161 for DTSC monitoring.
- Discussion: Staff noted that initial lead levels were higher than first reported (106–170 ppm vs. 83 ppm) and required residential-level cleanup. Public commenters raised concerns about the eight-month delay in the process and the lack of cost caps if additional lead is discovered.
- Vote: The motion to approve the contract passed. Councilmember Whitman abstained; all other members voted yes.
Community Town Hall on Law Enforcement & ICE (Agenda Item 9)
- Proposal: Councilmember Rule proposed hosting a town hall regarding interactions between local law enforcement, ICE, and the community.
- Concerns: Council members discussed safety risks and the potential for the event to attract hostile attendees, citing a recent incident involving Congressman Carbajal.
- Plan: The group agreed to proceed with the goal of fostering transparency. Safeguards include vetting questions to maintain order and providing Spanish translation.
- Vote: The Council approved moving forward with staff on planning and logistics. All members voted yes.
Financial Consultant Extension (Agenda Item 14)
- Proposal: The Council approved Amendment No. 2 to a contract with Ida Bailey to expand services for the current fiscal year-end close (2025-26).
- Reasoning: Due to staffing vacancies, the city requires immediate expertise on its specific accounting systems rather than hiring a new firm which would require a learning curve. No new budget was requested, utilizing remaining funds from a previous approval.
- Public Comment: Clay Creasy suggested using MV Chang, a lower-cost provider. Staff argued Ida Bailey's familiarity with the city's complex entries provided better value and speed.
- Vote: The motion passed unanimously.
Other Business
- The Mayor noted the Council intends to bring an at-large voting measure to the agenda for consideration in November.
- The meeting adjourned shortly after midnight.
