BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 October 13, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Scheduled start 6:00 PM · clock-time estimates pending review

0:10 – 0:259 turns

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈26s recited, not transcribed
ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.860:00

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:07

indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Thank you.

Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:35

And approval of the agenda, I believe there's one item we want to move

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.900:38

correct? Yes Mayor, we are recommending that item number 12 be continued to a date uncertain. And we have a little more work that we want to do before we bring them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed0:59

Okay item number 12 postponed to a date, to a later date. Any other changes to the agenda?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:05

No I'll move approval of the items of the other items.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:10

Okay second.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:12

Second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:13

okay Want to do a roll call on that? Yes, mayor. Sure.

Thank you So we'll move on to presentations. Our first is a proclamation honoring Library Week 2026, and we have something wonderful to read if you'll indulge me. I usually don't read them all in their entirety but this one's so good. Whereas the Ojai Valley Library Friends and Foundation Raises substantial funds through our twice-sold Tales bookstore, book sales and community donations that enable the three libraries of the Ojai Valley to move from very good to great. Providing the resources for additional programming including supplemental staffing much needed equipment support for children's programs and special events throughout the valley near here whereas the work of their friends highlights on an ongoing basis the fact that our libraries are the cornerstones of the community Providing opportunities for all to engage in the joy of lifelong learning and connect with thoughts and ideas of others from ages past to present, in a free inclusive and welcoming setting.

Whereas the friends understand the critical importance of well-funded libraries and advocate to ensure That our three libraries get the resources needed to provide a wide variety of services to all ages, including access to print and electronic materials along with expert assistance in research readers advisory and children's services. Finally, whereas the friends gift of their time and commitment to the libraries and the bookstore set an example for all in how volunteerism leads to positive civic engagement and the betterment of our community. Therefore let it be resolved that this that the city of Ojai and this council proclaim October 18 through 24 2026 as friends of a library's week.

And you have something you want to say yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:13

Hi, I'm Judy. I am the president of the Ohio Valley Library Friends and Foundation and it's a real pleasure and honor to be here tonight. Thank you. Some of my board members are here with me for this and various other reasons and I really appreciate them being here Our libraries are really, I think the jewel of the valley. And I have always felt like a library is the heart of a community and our Ojai Libraries certainly do that. If you haven't been to Miner's Oaks to check out the new Miner's Oaks Library yet, you should take a visit there. It's a wonderful facility and they've done a great job.

And if you order a book from the library system, you can pick it up there but I found out there's a drop down tab. You have to check where you want to pick it up Because I got told I have to go to El Rio to pick up a book. That's the top of the list, but I learned my lesson Anyway, thank you for having us here tonight. We really appreciate it. Our board member Lisa Braithwaite has a brief announcement she'd like to make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:19

Thank you. I just want to invite everybody to come to Jim and Rob's next week because for National Friends of the Libraries Week, we are doing a fundraiser on Wednesday night the 21st. Jim and Rob's is going to very generously donate a portion of their food sales to us from 5 p.m. to 9 p. m., so come get, you know, a corn burrito and come join us at Jim and Rob's next week, 21st, five to nine.

Thank you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:51

and please let's come

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.864:52

if I want to invite my colleagues for a quick photograph Everyone come on into the horseshoe

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.625:43

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:44

you very much. Our next presentation, two of three, we will reveal

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.625:48

the 2026 Ojai

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:48

Day

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.625:48

poster

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:51

and poster

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.625:51

competition winner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:53

Yes?

PresenterBrianna I'mcity's recreation departmentProposedself-stated6:16

Good evening Council, City staff and Ojai Community members. As many of you know my name is Brianna I'm a Recreation Coordinator with the city's recreation department. I'm going to be presenting the Ojai Day poster today as we look ahead to this year's Ojai day celebration this Saturday October 17th from 10am to 5pm i'm excited to share one of the traditions that captures our community's creativity Each year, local artists submit their visions from the Ojai Day poster and tonight we're proud to announce the 2026 winner Rocio Mariposa with her painting Ojai Morning.

Rocio shared that her inspiration came from the way the morning sunrise over Ojai feels magical and timeless just as it did a hundred years ago as it will forever generations to come. Please join me in celebrating this year's selected artists and the beautiful artwork that will represent our city spirit for Ojai Day 2026. Congratulations, Rosita.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:20

So wonderful.

PresenterBrianna I'mcity's recreation departmentProposedself-stated7:21

Beautiful. Amazing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed7:38

Yes, please. I wanted to thank Brianna and everybody at the rec center. They were so nice to work with and so helpful. And I'm just really grateful and grateful to be living here in Ojai. Thank you. And we'll see you at Ojai Day. We'll be right next to each other this year as well. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:03

Fantastic. Our final presentation is from the Ventura County Civic Alliance to provide the state of the region report results and Ojai data.

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated8:30

Thank you. I think we have a PowerPoint that we're going to write.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:41

I haven't looked up.

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated8:44

Okay, good afternoon. Good evening. I'm David Merrim with the Ventura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room instead of my legal women voters hat today. Oh yeah! So thank you all and want to share with you this report it came out in 2025 but we do it every two years and it's still got a lot of great information So we can't go around sharing this report without the generosity of our sponsors. Two of our larger ones here, the Ventura County Community Foundation, Community Colleges of Ventura County and then our domain sponsors then they're all listed in the back of the book California Resources, County of Ventura, Channel Islands University, Lima Nera, The Port of Wene'mu and the Office of Education So some quick highlights, like I said we do this every two years.

It's been a while since i've spoken to this council all of our sources are listed beginning on page 113 so anybody that wants to do a deeper dive can certainly do that it's available for the public it's free to download at www.civicalliance.org And the Ventura County Civic Alliance is a neutral. Unbiased nonprofit 501 C3 and we, uh. Try and just feel that this is our mission to share this kind of data.

Okay. So here's some of the main things to look at. It's the population of Ventura County, so the green bar is the total population but the blue bar is the population under 18 and you can see that Ventura County has lost about 10,000 people in the last seven years but we lost 20,000 zero to 18 year olds So we are getting older and that's what the purple line represents, the aging of Ventura County.

And it's very pronounced in

Roll call, called by Weston Montgomery
Show transcript
Thank you councilmember Whitman. Yes council member May may approach him man. Yes Councilmember rule yes councilmember Lang. Yes, Mayor Gilmour. Yes.
not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated10:35

Ojai although there was a dip recently so in Ojai your average age hit over 50 years old twice and then it started a little decline and I just think that's for a variety of reasons. Yes sir?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed10:50

First a question would you like to wait for any questions until the end which is completely fine

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated10:55

Uh, I'm flexible either way. Although I know you're sort of on a tight timeline if you don't mind. Okay then I would love to take questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed11:07

Like 1970 Ojai census, the average was 35. And you were checking with this data so we've aged dramatically in 50 years. Right and

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated11:17

it's not just the aging but it's the decline in the birth rate. We are not attracting young people to the community and this is throughout the county but it's just this changing demographic and I'll show some more slides about this as well You can see that in Ojai, the amount of young people that you lost was not as bad compared to some other cities. You actually grew a little bit in population but you are attracting older people, in a sense.

We'll get into some of that more as we go along, but please just catch my eye and I'm happy to stop. Agricultural county, Ventura County top crop continues to be strawberries over $700 million. Avocado was number two in this report in 2024. But the interesting thing about agriculture is it's been plateauing for quite a few years at around that $2 billion mark. So, it used to be almost 5% of our economy but now it's down to about 3.3%. So, it's very difficult as you all know for farmers. It's the water, it' s the crops, it''s the labor, it ''s the pesticides.

In the community engagement your elected officials, I'd like to point out the stats for Ventura County. So through 2025 the blue is Democrats reds are Republican green are no party preference you can see the growth in the no party preference over the last 20 years most of the growth has come at the expense of Republicans and when we look at it by city You'll be probably not surprised to see that Ojai has the largest majority Democrat in the county, followed closely by Oxnard right there. So Oxnard of course having a much larger population, much larger difference. But what's interesting also is only one city has a plurality of Republicans, and that's Simi Valley. So they have slightly more in Simi Valley. Now of course that's registered, that's not turnout and that's why the parties are always trying to make sure these registered voters actually show up and vote.

I'd like to point out about the nonprofit sector. As I was driving in today, I saw the sign of Ojai and you have the little strips for each of your nonprofits so thank you for giving them recognition. In Ventura County we have over 11,000 people working in the nonprofit sector and that contributes about half a billion dollars worth of salaries. So it's an important sector although there could be a lot more philanthropy in the county that would help that grow.

So, in the economy this is hard chart to read but I like to just show it so that you know how to look at this later at your leisure there's three pages like this in the report service providing goods producing and then government the top half shows the number of jobs in each of these industries the bottom half is showing you the average wages so where we see the actual That's fine.

So where that is seeing growth like financial activities, you can see there is mine either. I believe you Weston. OK, so you could see the nice improvement in financial activities. One hundred twelve thousand dollars as an annual wage. But we've been losing jobs in that particular sector. So the imbalance in Ventura County is that we are growing some of these industries that pay the least, like travel leisure and hospitality. It's a good entry-level job and nothing against the Ojai Valley Inn it's great what they do but we need to attract these high paying jobs you hear that over and over Okay, county gross product this is similar to the nation's. You can see that back before the Great Recession that's when that peak was when we had $72 billion then the Great Recession knocked the wind out of us.

We plateaued for pretty much 10 years after that a little bit of growth into the 60s now during this period the state and the nation grew significantly So Ventura's economy did not keep up with the nation, but we've started to see a little bit of a pickup. But still the concern would be when we have another recession how will we weather it after looking at this kind of report? Taxable sales Ojai is right there in the mix you've been holding steady with the taxable sales which obviously funds much of your work You can see that Oxnard dominates and Oxnard is the only one that had significant growth. And the reason is one word, Amazon. Once they put in that Amazon warehouse and they got a lot of those sales taxes. And I know there's work trying to figure out how to equalize that but you can see the places with the auto malls like Thousand Oaks like Oxnard Even Ventura do very well.

You need a Costco. Well, I don't know if you have to buy one. I don't even know if it would go over well to have a Costco here. But some of these other cities do have it. Here's where you're outstanding. This is the chart where Ojai dominates the entire county and that is the amount of transient occupancy tax. The amount that is coming from the Ojai Valley Inn and all of your other facilities. But yes, when you look at your tax I think it's 10 or 11 percent on a $500 a room night that helps to do that so I'm sure we all share the great gratitude for the leisure and hospitality industry here in the area. Education, this touches on what I mentioned at the beginning about the declining birth rate. The green on the bottom is the grades 9 through 12, the high school, the blue on top is the TK through eighth grade.

And you can see in both of them, they sort of parallel each other how we were growing, growing and then we got into the middle of the 2000s and we peaked and then we've been on a decline ever since and it's going down. But what I'd like to share is in that upper left hand corner, it's probably too small for the audience but in 1973 our population was about 420,000 50 years later, our population doubled almost exactly from 420 to 838.

But during that time the number of students went from only 107,000 to about 122,000. We doubled in population, but our enrollment only grew about 20%. And that is the most significant demographic issue I believe facing Ventura County. So here's what it means for your Ojai Unified School District. The top line is 2021-22 and then the blue line is more recent 24-25. You can see the decline in enrollment over 10% And I'm often asked, well isn't that because everybody is homeschooling or everybody's going to the private schools? But the reality is private schools are facing the same challenges with a declining birth rate.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:29

Correct me if I'm wrong, that private school number is countywide. Correct. Yes. Not city. Right

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated18:35

It is, I think only schools with like three or four more students. So a two-person school doesn't get on this chart but yes that is countywide to see that decrease so because you're looking at Ventura Unified looking at closing schools and talked about here as well it's not just a single like oh our schools are no good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:54

And you won't get this till your next report but the 25 26 26 27 you'll see it slightly increased.

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated19:02

Good for you yeah It's definitely important. Yeah, we have a per pupil spending in here you can see Ojai does not get the kind of level spending that some of the other districts do And test scores, so this is a we show the test scores for every school in the county. And the state does this measurement and there's 4 metrics that they use the number of students that meet the standard. That almost meet the standard didn't come close to meeting. or exceeded. What we report are the number of students that met or exceeded the standard, I think that's what we would all share is we want our kids to at least meet the standard and so you can see Ojai there in the green on the end uh i had to cut the chart to put it in the powerpoint it starts at 60 percent and goes down to 30 so barely one of your schools even meets 60 and this is the english the math is worse But it's nothing particular to Ojai.

Across the county, you can look at individual districts and see the ones that are high performing, the ones that have a huge spectrum, and others. We did not have one single school in the county where 100% of the students met this standard in math. Only one of them met it in English. But I do like to share this chart because it's good news if you are thinking about school, if you are thinking about college, if you have children or grandchildren The longer you stay in school, the more you will earn for every year of your life on average. So, you can see that a high school boy could maybe expect to earn $46,000 for his career but if he stays in and gets a bachelor's degree it doubles. Multiply that by the 30 plus years they'll be working. It's a huge amount of money if somebody is saying, I don't know if I can borrow that $10,000 or $20,000 for student loans.

If they're committed to education it pays off. Unfortunately girls are not the same compensation but the chart is the same for females. So some quick numbers on land use and housing. The countywide, the starts were a little higher than they've been so highest since 2017. Good news for Ojai home ownership 65%, not really a surprise. The downside of that though is that means there's less apartments, less rental homes and you can see what your median home price was.

Apartment rents are skyrocketing across the county. It's really a supply and demand issue. Ojai is sort of in the middle of the pack, a little lower than some of the other cities. One way to be affordable natural resources this is also good news about Ventura County we have great air great ocean water. Great hiking, great forest solar capacity. We have continued to add solar capacity. We now have almost the same amount in solar capacity as a small generation station like the ones at Oxnard.

public health this one is the main statistic for what we were talking about in the beginning Mr. Mayor as far as the declining birthrate you can see that in 1990 the birth rate was 19 births per thousand residents In 2023 that number was almost half, 10. And so what's happening you all know this I mean there's three main reasons it's expensive so young people say i can't have kids it's too expensive I can't afford to live here or kids say you know what we're just going to wait you know we're not we're only in our 20s we just got married we're gonna wait till we're in our 30s to have kids And so we prolong that and then finally, a lot of young families decide we can only have one child or maybe two because the cost of childcare. So all of these things are combining across the county to see this decline.

You can say well, okay. How do we solve this though? But there could be policies and I say this to every city council and Leslie's I mean, Mr. Rules heard me say this at BCOG is that Can we have our employers do more could just to pick Ojai Valley in shift hours a little bit so families could coordinate can they give Women who are nursing a little bit more time for breaks for pumping can we do things to? Build child care centers where the jobs are and Jen has a great facility right next to where they're at You don't quite have that commercial sector here But place like Ventura could we do that and I encourage the city managers to talk about this in their city manager meetings because Without more young people, we're not going to be able to attract the businesses that we want to come here because there's not going to be a labor force for them.

This is new in the report and you're welcome for all that good news I just shared. So this is new in the report as far as cancers. We break out the incidence of cancer and we break it up by breast cancer or prostate and leukemia And we looked at the 20 or so largest counties, and these numbers are age-adjusted and gender adjusted. But you can see that right there towards the top number seven or eight is Ventura County right behind Marin and Sonoma. So why do we have more incidents of cancer? It could be that we have more people coming down with cancer for environmental or genetic reasons. It could be that we have better doctors who are detecting it. I don't have an answer on that, but what's interesting is that Sonoma, Marin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara are all coastal counties.

Could there be some connection? Or is it just correlation? So no answer. This is the one with breast cancer. And now we can talk public safety, so our county sheriff's department and Sheriff Fryhoff loves this slide. You can see that Ventura County is the safest at least in this report 2024 crime stats. We are the safest of the 15 largest counties in the state and it's actually been this way for a few years. So we continue to be a very safe county, and we also break out these numbers by cities. So you can see that Ojai did have a little uptick there in violent crime but you're so small that it's like two or three assaults could really change. Yes, Ms. O'Rourke?

0:25 – 0:309 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8825:39

Yeah I was wondering is anyone tracking the ICE activity and trying to match that against potentially a baseline or in some way to pull that out

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated25:53

It's a great question. We don't have any data for that yet in our next report, perhaps we'd be able to make a look. I'll make a note about that. I don't know how federal arrests correlate with state arrests so I'll have to ask the Sheriff Department's team that looks at these stats as well but that's a good question just what has happened. That's the violent crime, and this is the property crime. More like you would expect of Ojai, a little decline there as we go along. So I'm at about the halfway mark. No, I'm joking. We're almost done.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed26:30

This is like so interesting. This is

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated26:32

amazing. All right. Well, I know you have a busy agenda. But here we are with food aid. This one is surprising in all cities of the county that people are surprised just how much their neighbors are taking advantage of food that's being provided, in this case by FoodShare and you can see that that's about what 241 A thousand pounds, so almost 800-900 pounds a day is coming into Ojai to help feed your family.

And you look at some of these other cities it's all been skyrocketing and as you probably all know with the passage of the HR1 You're going to see more cuts in some of this funding and families will need to turn to more support. So another nonprofit that's doing great work, but it is surprising everywhere I go just how much is being shared. Here's the homeless counts you've been able to plateau for the city of Ojai.

Some of the other larger cities have had some declines. It's ongoing problem and I know your council looks at this very compassionately and intently. And wrapping up here with transportation, just a slide about how many people are working from home. So we chart this against other counties and you would believe that when COVID hit around 2020 we saw the numbers skyrocket relatively speaking but we saw the increase. But even after the end of the pandemic people said oh I still like this and so we have a lot of people who are continuing to work from home and so we mirror the other counties So with that, I think that's my presentation. I appreciate your time. I'm happy to answer any additional questions for the audience again this is available at www.civicalliance.org and i've got about a dozen books i'll leave them on the back if anybody wants one.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:28

Any questions from the council? That's beautiful information. Yes, thank you so much.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction28:34

This is so fascinating and it's great to see too where we can improve and where we're doing a good job. I don't recall if you said this or not. Is the data collected from a variety of sources? Is it surveys? How is the data

PresenterDavid MerrimVentura County Civic Alliance wearing my civic alliance hat here in the room insProposedself-stated28:58

collected? Good question, thank you. So the data's collected generally we start at the federal level so it's called the American Community Survey which is part of the U.S. Census and we gather a lot of the data there such as gross county product other numbers Then the next level is the state. So we go to the Department of Finance, the sales tax, the transient tax. All of those come from state-level sources. We do have a couple of things that we do on our own which is we retain a contractor to do a lot of the nonprofit sector data.

Most of that comes from a group called Candid. So, we try to go out and look at the sources verifiable. We don't really allow a group, let's say I think of somebody but we just don't let the Chevron station send us the numbers that they want us to use in a sense so we are going against state data and it is all listed in the back there if anybody wants to do little more research.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction30:02

Excellent thank you so much. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed30:03

so much for the presentation okay my pleasure Isn't it incredible? We're going to move on to any commission reports. None received, Mayor. And then City Manager's report.

0:30 – 0:409 turns

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8330:19

Thanks, Mayor. A couple items this evening. We do have two new city employees with us and I would like... Don't worry, I'm not gonna ask you to say anything but if I could have Addison and Rocky come forward to the podium just so the Council and the viewing public can see them. I'm just gonna read a little bit here. So here they are. On the left is Addison, on the right is Rocky. Well now they're switching it up on me. Okay, other way around. Rocky Rockwell joins the city as Transit Operations Supervisor. As an Ojai resident, Rocky brings a strong connection to the community and is excited to serve its residents while working with the iconic Ojai Trolley.

Welcome Rocky! Thank you Addison Hernandez joins the Community Development Department as an Associate Planner. Addison will serve as the primary contact during scheduled planning counter hours, assisting members of the public with questions about planning, zoning and development. So Council and community please join me in welcoming both Rocky and Addison to our team. Thank you guys!

Thank you both very much. Appreciate it. And just one more brief announcement, this Wednesday that would be tomorrow there is a town hall being presented by the Ventura County District Attorney Eric Nazarenko. It's a public safety update with a question and answer period following that This town hall is not going to be a City Council member town hall that we discussed at a prior council meeting. This is going to be hosted by yours truly with the assistance of Norma and this will be the DA just providing an update and taking questions it's from 6-7 p.m. It will be right here there are flyers in the back of the room thank you very much

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8832:02

Just at one point, I'd like to add that the DA is an elected position. So this is an elected official who has chosen to come speak to his constituents. So if you are a constituent and you have a question, your vote counts. So thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed32:17

OK, moving on to public communications. These are public comments that do not have an item on the agenda. I have three cards. Ron Salazano please. And then Carol and then Peter Laramondi.

CommentRon SolorzanoProposedself-stated32:35

All right, thank you so much members of council. My name is Ron Solorzano I am the regional librarian for the Ojai Valley and i just want to give a little bit of an update on how things are going uh first of all as everyone knows the Ojai library is being renovated still. I was there today took some pictures inside they've been making a lot of progress on the electrical work mostly right now but they're starting to do some work on the floors and the some of the wall areas as well A lot of holes being drilled, a lot of wires being pulled. And as far as I am aware we are on schedule so we're still looking at that spring 2027 reopening date in the meantime you know some of the my colleagues with the friends had mentioned the Miners Oaks library.

The Miner's Oaks library is doing great right now I over double the number of people coming in that they're used to. So we have a lot of our Ojai friends coming and visiting us at Miner's Oaks. We also have folks visiting us down in Oak View, those are our two closest libraries here in the valley. Both of those locations have so much going on. They have game days, Lego days, they have pause for reading with the therapy dogs.

That's going on I believe it's Wednesday at Miner's Oaks, Thursday at Oak View. Then we have the story time of course going on. We have story time Tuesday morning at the Miner's Oaks Library at 1030 and then we have a story time in the afternoon in Oak View at 3 p.m.. So there's so much going on there, I encourage you to check those libraries out if you haven't already. And then the last thing I want to make sure to plug is the Friends of the Library will be having their annual Ojai Day book sale still here in front of the Ojai Library right here in downtown. So come on by during Ojai day weekends they'll have the book sale going on Friday Saturday and Sunday and that's all I have for now and thank you all so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:30

Thank you sir. Carol please, then Peter Laramindi. Yes please.

CommentCarol SmithProposedself-stated34:40

Good evening council my name is Carol Smith I had the privilege to serve as City Council and twice as mayor for our fine city. I ran for election three times. I was elected by at-large voting Each time, and the first time I ran, my second opponent was a very well-known chap in town named Lenny Klaif. And when the results of the vote was taken, I had won by four votes.

So if people tell you their votes don't count... They are wrong, but I'm very unhappy to tell you at this point thanks to Sacramento's draconian law that we must do regional voting. My vote is now worthless. All that Mr. Whitman has to do to win his seat back is vote for himself, one vote. He is running with no competition. Ms. Mang when she ran two years ago all she needed to become a councilwoman was one vote. She ran unopposed. Mr. Gilman has no competition he needs one vote Why in the world would I vote for these people? They only need one vote.

I suggest everyone who is in the same position where their council or person has no opponent not to vote. This is not democracy, it's authoritarianism. in the worst way, and I can't believe that Sacramento could make us and every other small town do this. I worked so hard. I came to the council. I said please run for council. I extolled the virtues. I said you'll get great health care etc., etc. Did people step up? No! We're just not big enough We only have, I think 3,000 registered voters.

We do not have four neighborhoods and a mayor as a separate position which by the way is ridiculous but i will talk about that another time we don't have enough people to fill those positions normally you should have a conf a contest of two or three opponents and now we have three people who basically One vote, and then guess what? They're on the council again.

I'm serious about this. I am so upset they have taken my right to vote away. I have no choice. This is a serious, serious issue. I am glad we talked about the library and all but I'm telling you everyone listening, this is... We have lost our rights to vote for candidates of a complete slate. One candidate is authoritarianism I can't say more about it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed37:43

Thank you, Mr. Peter there Mindy please and then Brian against Hello.

CommentPeter LaramindiProposedself-stated37:57

Hi, hi council and city staff. My name is Peter Laramindi and I live on Drown Street. I wanted to talk today about traffic. I'm sure this topic's been reiterated multiple times discussed at exhaustion but anyway, I looked up in the last traffic analysis for the 150 Ojai Avenue was done in 2016 as far as I'm aware That needs to change, something needs to happen.

With that traffic lights are erratic at best as far as timing and so I think that causes issues. I brought one of those traffic light issues up with council before and that's at Fox in Ojai Avenue. There's a discrepancy between when pedestrians are able to walk and cars turning left You have that discrepancy, there's no unison so you have multiple settings. Causes more traffic I assume and then my other little diatribe again is about traffic.

I'm sure this has been brought up before too but the four-way stop at drown is confusing at best And I think that needs to change. And my other issue with council that I hope can be addressed at some point is the different speed limits, particularly north of Ojai Avenue. You have 30 miles an hour, 25 miles an hour. I mean you have 30 miles and 30 miles an hour on Kenyatta with no sidewalks People I noticed that there's an all these new flagging for those speed limit signs People are gonna speed if they have that 30. They're gonna go. I can go 32 33 34 I think it should just be 25 period and Hopefully that can be done. Okay. Thank you. Thanks, sir. Appreciate

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed40:04

it All things that we could bring to our Commission Brian Akins, please. Um

0:40 – 0:468 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed40:14

Hello council, pleasure for me to be here. Oftentimes when I come before you have multiple hats on sometimes the museum which I've been a board member for 17 years. Sometimes the HPC 12 years but the thing I enjoy the most each year is putting And doing a commercial for Ojai that's coming up this Saturday from 10 to four. If you don't recognize why I have this on, then you definitely need to come to the jail that's down there.

You'll be one of many when you say I've lived here for 50 years and I've never been in the jail. We love that because we're gonna lock you up for five minutes at least for taking that long to get there. But it's just a wonderful time. The other benefit we have is that there's, in the Historic Preservation Commission, there is a committee that's been putting together historic artwork that will eventually go along the bike trail. So we'll have some samples of that there at the Ojai Jail also.

Another interesting thing is at 11 o'clock and at 2 o'clock We have Richard Sennett. Richard Sennett is the authentic Ventura County ghost hunter, always fun to have him tell stories about the jail and so we invite you to come down there and to enjoy it. And for Chief Abbott Don't worry about handcuffs. I bring my own, I have a whole selection. You know if you're lucky you might make the paper like Stephen and I did last year so just watch out for those cameras okay? So anyway again I want to thank you all and what a wonderful event and it may be less than 100 degrees on Saturday fingers crossed. Anyway thank you all we'll see you Saturday Thank you, Mr. Higgins.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.8642:09

That's my last comment card. Is there anybody online? Yes Mayor we have one raised hand right now for our general public comment period. Brian, Brian you have the ability to unmute and you have the floor. We have no other raised hands after that. Brian I'll give you the ability to unmute one more time and no response so I'll say last call

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed42:34

Is it my turn, Brian Rosen? Yes. It is.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:37

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed42:39

Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed42:40

Yes we can hear you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed42:41

Because I can't hear you but you can hear me and I don't know why there's no sound on my side but you're sure you can hear me right? Okay I am very very concerned about the They turned off all the electrical outlets and the homeless people can't charge their phones or anything. And it's a great hardship for people, you know in the park and in the arcade plaza nobody cares about the homeless. I mean, I guess they want to drive them out of town and they won't be able to charge up there, their phones. And also it's very difficult to drive an electric bicycle. I have an electric bicycle. It's a wonderful specialized bicycle And it doesn't go super fast like some of them I have to pedal, but I need to be able to charge it and they turned off all the electrical outlets in the city manager said they were going to do some charging stations.

But I don't know when that's ever gonna happen take a very long time and bicycles really make a difference we need to. Ojai truly has become more and more Car City USA, and we're discouraging bicycles. If somebody drives from Ventura or Santa Barbara there should be a place they can charge their bicycles up at a reasonable rate. And it's all very disturbing that they're just so much trying to discourage us riding bicycles and encourage car driving.

And also the crosswalks are difficult. Why don't you do something like in Encinitas or Santa Monica, where you have the diagonal crosswalks? Where everyone gets to cross in all directions at once and it's very difficult to be a pedestrian. You have to cross one way and then you have to wait to cross the other way. And you could do that on a couple of your intersections maybe just two.

And I just think it's so sad what's happening that more and more automobiles everywhere And also, I was thinking about all the noise every morning. The animals are terrified because all the leaf blowers go off all at once and in the lawnmowers in the city employees are busy doing the parking lot by the arcade plaza with the leaf blowers What did we do before leaf blowers? Ojai was not a filthy place. It was very nice and people, why don't we do a week without leaf blowers so we can have some empathy for how they used to do things. Things were very good and I don't think the people really want leaf blowers. They would rather go back to rakes and brooms like 1983 and before. And that little grassy lawn in Arcade Plaza it's so small then somebody could just use a push lawnmower We don't always have to use technology just because it's there.

These little lawns like in front of City Hall and the Arcade Plaza, you can just use a push lawn mower. So let's... Animals are terrified! They've been terrorized since 19... whenever leaf blowers first came on the scene and every morning everywhere you see...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed45:46

Sorry that we're out of time but thank you I have everything noted. Anybody else online? That's all Mayor. Okay All right, we're moving on to the on the consent calendar. I have one public comment card on the consent calendar. Mark epic please you'd like and then if anybody else wants to comment on the consent calendar please do give us a card Mr. Miley okay come after come after mark thank you Well, because you gave me the clue. You gave me the parenthetical. Thank you for that.

0:46 – 0:5326 turns

CommentEl RioProposed · by introduction46:23

You get an A. You get an eight. Mr. Mayor? Good evening City Council people and staff. Good evening. Thanks for letting me speak after years of public hearings and countless deliberations by the city council and the Parks and Recreation Commission. It is apparent that one segment of the community is simply trying to delay the adoption of Ordinance 974 By raising issues stemming from 50-year old documents, the 1971 deed conveys Upper Libbey Park to the city and the mid 1970s federal and state grants to the city for the original 1976-1977 construction of the Lower Libby Courts.

It is alleged that there may be restrictions contained in these documents that might somehow preclude the adoption of the Ordinance 974. Which merely deals with the use of the Libbey Park Public Tennis Courts for the playing of tennis. But no such restrictions exist. The 1971 D pertaining to Upper Libbey Park merely specifies that the park is to be used as a public park and place of recreation and pleasure for the people of the Ojai Valley, and that the city make appropriate portions of the park available for tennis or a tennis tournament and similar non-profit recreational events such has been conducted in the past and may reasonably be expected to continue or expand in the future.

It is implicit in these decisions that the city has a discretion to determine which portions of Upper Libbey Park may be used for particular recreational purposes and which recreational uses will be allowed on the purpose-built tennis courts. Further, it is beyond our argument that the city's 50-year historical use and proposed future use with the adoption of Ordinance 974 of both the Upper and Lower Libbey Park Tennis Courts clearly complies With all the relevant restrictions contained in the referred 1971 deed and the 1970s federal state grant documents, there is nothing in any of the old documents that precludes current adoption of Ordinance 974.

Thank you for letting me talk to you. Thanks. Thank You sir Mr. Miley please

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed49:05

Hello. Hi. Item eight, I support the second reading and a yes vote of the Levy Park Tennis Courts Use Ordinance. I have evidence to share tonight supporting that it's an audio recording. I made this audio recording several years ago, a pickleball play at the City Hall Court while waiting for city council to start I made three minutes, and I'll play 15 seconds.

It was an overflow crowd requiring the open patio to be used for folks attending the meeting. I sat on a chair. There were one or two pickle courts being used. The patio is about 100 feet from the pickleball courts. It was just before council meeting starting on Tuesday evening. Several folks were playing. This 15 seconds is from the three minute. At the end, you will hear someone walking on the adjacent gravel driveway and this is it.

I hope you heard that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:44

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed50:47

I'm going to play it again.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:49

Mr. Bailey, we totally understand. I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed50:52

have three

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:54

minutes. Great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed51:09

This sound Which can turn into noise, depending on who you are. It's why I support the ordinance. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:21

Thank you sir. Anybody online for consent? No Mayor, no Zoom participants with raised hands. Okay then I'll move to my colleague. Does anybody want to pull any items from the consent calendar?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8851:31

Yeah, I'm going to pull number eight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:33

Okay. Anybody else? Okay well let's pull number five Anybody else?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction51:43

Well, I don't necessarily need to pull it. I wanted to congratulate the commissioner Judy Murphy for her reappointment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:50

Let's pull that because I want to do the same. I'll thank you for her continued. So then we will get a motion for four and seven.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction52:01

A motion for four and seven.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed52:03

Second. OK. Let

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion for four and seven. Second. OK. Let us do a roll call,
Show transcript
us do a roll call, please. Thank you Mayor Pro Tem Ming. Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Council Member Rule? Yes Council Member Lange? Yes

Let's go to number five the city warrants That's okay there she is Thank You Miss Palmer Appreciate it

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9352:36

With page number 60, Wildan Engineering. What is the staff augmentation services for $12,521.25? I was just curious what department.

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction52:50

That's for our Community Development Department. OK. All

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9352:53

right.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8352:54

We can ask our director to talk more about that if he'd like. I

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9352:57

was just curious because I haven't seen this on the warrants in a very long time, maybe summer was the last time I saw it so that was, I was

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8353:04

just curious. Is Mr. Seibert somewhere nearby? I know he was here earlier there he is in the back. Hello Mr. Seibert come on forward do you remember what this item is for? If there's something to say, something interesting

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9353:12

to

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8353:12

say. I

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9353:12

think with the one guy that left that's what I

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8353:16

would have to... It does lag a little bit so I don't know in particular.

0:53 – 0:5828 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9353:22

Thank you

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.8853:22

sir.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9353:22

Does he have the answer?

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.8853:25

I don't have the specific answer, but I do know when I'm signing these they tend to be in the 1,000 to 2,000 to 5,000. 12,000 does seem a little bit higher than what I normally see when I sign.

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction53:35

I believe that 12,00 is a grouping of different types of staff augmentation so Yes all for community development so I believe it's some permitting building and safety. I think there's we've lumped it all in together but we can break it out if that's fine.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8353:52

We can definitely break it out and we'll also send you an email detailing this particular one thank you appreciate yep yep thank you sir

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:59

okay motion to approve consent item number five please.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9354:04

I'll make the motion to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed54:05

I'll

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion to approve. I'll second. Roll call · 1 under review
Show transcript
second. Roll call please. Thank You. Council Member Ruhle? Council Member Lange? Yes. Council Member Wood? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang? Yes! Mayor Goodman? Yes

And then I think we have some consent here to thank Ms. Murphy for her continued role on the planning commission and any objections? Wonderful, so let's do a roll call on that just to confirm. Oh

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8754:33

go ahead. I did want to say something. Go ahead please. You know I did think about this reappointment a little bit and the determining factor in my deciding to reappoint Ms. Murphy Is that she is possibly, probably the strongest planning commissioner on. The idea that every time a matter comes in front of her. She's asking questions and asking her colleagues at the commission. How is this project going to impact? The neighbors of the project I think that's a really important thing.

Something that our commissions perform and she has been the strongest of all the commissioners.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction55:24

And if I could add, and you can tell that she reads every word because she's usually the one who is editing and saying on page 77 of this section. And so I just wanted to also just acknowledge her diligence and the meticulous way in which she approaches any decision that she's making.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8855:49

Yeah, I just wanted um she's been working on land use and housing issues. Bill when did she work with you? 2015 2016 maybe 2005 but but she has been part of this land use sort of zeitgeist for many, many years. And so I really want to commend her for that regardless of the disappointments that she may have had in processes over the years, she's gotten back up and back in front and still moving forward. And I think that that's resiliency in action and I really appreciate it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed56:26

Awesome. I move that we accept the reappointment of number six Judy Murphy

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction56:34

I'll second it.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move that we accept the reappointment of number six Judy Murphy I'll second it. Okay, roll call
Show transcript
Okay, roll call please. Council Member Ruhl? Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang? Yes Mayor Gilman? Yes Council Member Lange? Yes
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed56:44

So we move on to number eight

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.8856:47

Yes, so I just wanted to note that I've had a very – I've had a discussion fairly in depth with our city attorney about deeds and about what they say and about you know what is enforceable 100 plus years later etc. And at this point, I am comfortable saying that there aren't any red flags in the deeds that would stop this from moving forward unless we were to potentially tear every word and every letter apart. So for that reason, I don't see the deeds as being an impediment, not that I wouldn't have liked potentially to tear them apart. But that's not the case and the council has voted and has spoken. And so I just want to say that I'm here with it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed57:44

Okay, thank you, I appreciate that. I move that we forward number eight.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.9357:51

I'll second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed57:52

Thank

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.8657:52

you,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed57:52

roll call

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 move that we forward number eight. I'll second. Thank you, roll call please. Second by Mayor Pro Tem May. Roll call.
Show transcript
please. Second by Mayor Pro Tem May. Roll call. Council Member Lange? Yes. Council Member Ruhl? Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Mang? Yes Mayor Gilman? yes

Thank

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.8658:07

you for that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed58:09

okay we're done with consent we're moving on and it's seven o'clock we're doing pretty good let's do our first public hearing number nine our Fiscal Responsibility Act

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8358:19

I'm going to ask Mr. Seibert to come join us again up here at the dais if he would please

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.9058:26

We also have a brief presentation. Yes,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.8358:29

City Attorney will be providing that. Thank you.

0:58 – 1:1124 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.9058:50

All right, and if we could go to the next slide. So just at the highest level this is a TEFRA public hearing. TEFRA is the tax equity... I'm gonna oh yeah that would no that would be great The Tax and Equity Fiscal Responsibility Act, it is a federal law that has certain requirements related to certain types of tax-exempt financing. So we'll have some slides that go into that a bit more but just for those who are listening, that's what TEFRA stands for.

As background, in 2023 the City Council approved a 50-unit 100% affordable for rent housing project at 320 Bryant Street. The project is being developed by Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation They have submitted a request under TEFRA and the Internal Revenue Code for the City Council to consider adopting a resolution approving the issuance of private activity revenue bonds, and I'll come back to what that means, by the California Municipal Finance Authority or CMFA for the benefit of Chaparral Place LP.

At the end of the day, what we're asking the City Council to do is to approve a resolution that authorizes the Mayor to execute a joint exercise-of-powers agreement with CMFA to approve the plan of finance for CMFA to issue and reissue revenue bonds. And the total amount of the bonds for the project would not exceed $25 million. So TEFRA for those who are not familiar with it, and it was a new federal law for me as well.

It is a federal law that requires local approval for issuance of certain tax-exempt private activity bonds. And what that means generally is that when public agencies issue financing, it must be for a public purpose as opposed to a private purpose. But there are limited circumstances under which private bonds may be issued that are tax exempt. Under TEFRA, in order to issue these bonds a notice public hearing is required and under both TEFRA and the CMFA joint powers agreement those have to be approved by the City Council for the city in which the project will be built.

This is a lower cost financing tool because you don't have the cost of the tax being included as part of the financing cost. And so it's a resource that's often used for qualifying private, generally non-profit projects that serve a public benefit and you will see these being used generally for things like affordable housing, hospitals, non-profit projects and sometimes other limited purposes.

The public hearing is required to gauge community input before a project is allowed to continue with the tax-exempt financing. Just for the record, the notice of this hearing was published in the Ojai Valley News on October 2nd. And once the hearing closes, if this is approved and so this is typically the city manager signs documents on behalf of the city but because of the requirements under the federal law.

The mayor would be required to sign the documents So CMFA, because this is also new for probably many members of the community. CMFA is a joint powers authority it's a public entity, a governmental entity established by the state or in the State of California. It was created in 2004 to fund Cultural nonprofit community development type activities statewide. It includes more than 350 different municipalities and it was formed to assist local governments, nonprofits and businesses with issuing these types of tax-exempt bonds.

This is a request that's coming from the project developer, and if approved then CMFA will serve as the issuer of these bonds and the holder of the bonds. In order to join or in order to have CMFA provide the funding, the city must join CMFA. And so as part of that, if this is approved by City Council, the city would become a member of the CMFA by executing the joint exercise of powers agreement CMFA will only approve the issuance of bonds once the city approves the issuance and also approves joining CMFA.

The membership according to the documents, the governing documents for CMFA it carries no cost and does not increase or impose any financial obligation on the City of Ojai. Some joint powers agencies will require financial contributions from their member organizations to fund their operations. This is not one of those, so their costs are funded through their financing activities.

If the city council approves this, the city may withdraw at any time by written notice to the CMFA board including even after the bonds are issued. So there really is no consequence to the City of Ojai by joining CMFA. And that's the next slide, that there is no legal or financial obligation for the city if the city moves forward with this resolution. The obligations of the CMFA are not the debt's liabilities or obligations of its members. They do not bond the full faith and credit of the city's general fund.

They are revenue bonds that are paid for by the project that would be funded through the bonds. Additionally, all of the financing documents include language that the bonds are not obligations of the city. And so they're payable solely from Chaparral Place Limited Partnership Funds. Beyond holding the hearing and adopting the resolution no further city participation or action is required.

The last slide addresses the fiscal impact. As mentioned, there's no cost to the city for joining. Also it may be a small amount of the issuance fees but CMFA does share a portion of its issuance fees with member communities and so some small portion of what they generate through this financing does come back to the community In addition, it would come back to the city's general fund and could be appropriated by City Council for any lawful city purpose.

And so that is all I have. I don't know how to turn off the screen but if there are any questions, I'm happy to take those and I know Mr. Seibert is here to answer questions and also Ms. Palmer if there's a question for the finance department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:01

Just for clarification I think I know the answer, but for the public this is not a new project. It was named Cabrillo Vista and now it's Chaparral Place same property same work.

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:06:11

Correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:13

And there was people, I'm asking you to say what you've already said four times. There was some confusion when it was published in the Ohavelli News is the city having a bond measure on our ballot? You know on the ballot and the answer is no.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:06:27

No the answer is no this does not require a bond measure because it does not it does not encumber the city's revenues.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:37

Any questions?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:06:38

Yeah, I just wanted to this does not encumber us at all. And but if we were not to pass it then they then Cabrillo would need to go to an outside funding source potentially a commercial funding source which would be more expensive which would take more time and that would be their option at that point.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:07:03

That is correct, and so we would have to look to Cabrillo to answer any specific questions regarding their funding or financing alternatives. But certainly the purpose of using tax-exempt private activity bond financing is because it provides a lower cost of financing a project than would be typically available on the commercial market.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:07:27

Okay, can you see any downside to doing this?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:07:32

Just curious. That is a policy question but what I will say is that the city has, as noted at the beginning of the presentation, the city has already approved the land use entitlements and so in terms of the project itself it's already approved. So I don't see a downside for the city from a legal standpoint. Thank

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:07:54

you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:07:54

Any other questions?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:07:56

And just to wrap up that line of questioning, just to be clear if they don't have the, if they're not able to secure non-profit status and go through the funding channels that they have established then it's potentially It would be a potential consequence that then the low income, the number of low income or the amount they were charged. Is that

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:08:19

correct? So under the project approvals from 2023 there are affordability covenants and I'm looking at Mr. Seibert to confirm what I just said is correct but so they would be limited In terms of the rent that they may charge by those affordability covenants that were approved in 2023. So if, if the cost of financing goes up it makes constructing the project more complicated or maybe more difficult but they would not be able to raise the rents. They would have to find some other way to recover any additional costs that are incurred

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:08:58

Great thank you.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:09:00

I actually have a follow up question usually rents affordable rents are within a range there is floor and then there's a ceiling so you know you may if and I don't know the specifics of what if they actually you know determined a exact number for the rent or if it lives in the floor to ceiling, which would mean that if things got more expensive and they were in the middle, they could go up to the ceiling.

Just kind of a question so that it's only relevant if they have an exact pinpointed number and no wiggle room up to a ceiling amount?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:09:41

So it would depend on the level of affordability that was required when the project was approved. And I don't know, Mr. Seibert, if you recall if it's moderate, like if it's low income.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:09:53

I have right here as

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:09:53

well and I'm sure everybody. Yeah, the numbers are 41 that are at a lower income level and then you have nine or eight, in fact, that are at a very low income level So there's the income qualifying feature. I think we talked about this briefly through the affordable housing agreement, which will be coming before this body in the near future. Both of those pieces are important because there is the income qualifying and then there's rent burden. Both of those pieces together help to qualify those individuals.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:10:27

Got it. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:10:29

Just to add that the breakdown on not on the, but the number of units it's 10 1 bedroom units 26 2 bedroom units and 14 3 bedroom units serving residents who are at or below 30%. Or 50% average. Any other questions?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:10:47

So just to say you couldn't charge more than 30%, but you could charge less than 30%. And then if your expenses went up, you could go up to 30%. So if you had decided that it would be 23% of their rental income and then the costs went up or you couldn't get the financing that you wanted, you could conceivably go up to 30%. That was kind of the point I was trying to make.

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:11:15

That's correct. And on top of that, there is an annual evaluation for each of those individuals to ensure that they continue to fall within that category.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:11:23

Any other questions? I'll move to public comments. I have two cards, Larry Stangold and Bill Mike.

1:11 – 1:1616 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:11:33

Good evening. Hello. Hi. I hope the project goes through I also hope you acquire the lot next door for a park for these 249 people and the 75 kids because they need a place to play. But more importantly with the bond, I know we're not responsible for the debt. But if there is a shortfall in the expense or in the project itself, you should consider making part of this that either we will or we won't pick up the difference to keep the project going.

Because if construction costs are more than $25 million and they're three quarters of the way through it or 99% through it, they're going to have to find more money. If the expenses are exceeding because if the debt's going to be like a 1.5 million, that's 2,500 a unit. Plus expenses and taxes and utilities, and God knows what else. There's going to be a higher expense.

And Chapparal or Cabrillo is gonna be short so you might want to consider acknowledging the fact that either we're gonna have to step in or not down the road as a political decision. Because otherwise, if the project craters then someone buys it takes it out and the tenants may have to leave. So I'm just think just be aware of that going in. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:12:57

Thank you Mr. Stengel. I think one clarification is on page 78 it says this is part of the financing effort not the totality of the financing effort so that might be premature. Mr. Miley please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:13:19

Some of us already know Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. They built the Montgomery Oaks in the 80s, and then a few years later built Sycamore Homes on South Fulton. This presentation seems more like it's about the California Municipal Finance Authority. As to my recall, there has been no update on this project for months to the public. And now the public gets a notice about state bond funding.

I guess some information is better than zero. Most of the administrative memo is about the finance authority. Hardly anything about the housing. I would have preferred this item include an updating statement on the project, its current development, where it's at in city planning, total cost. What other funding might be necessary? How does our finance department have any role in this funding over the many years?

Just how did Cabrillo get authorization for a $25 million loan? Did the city recommend bond funding through the California Municipal Finance Authority? The city nor the finance authority has any responsibility for paying the money back. It would be helpful to know where the bond money came from, which state proposition authorized it. What's the interest in length of payment?

This is a huge funding of a project. Does such funding preclude other funding for affordable housing coming to Ojai? In ending, it's a worthy project. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:37

Thank you. Anybody online?

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.861:15:41

No Mayor, no raised hands on Zoom.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:43

Mr. Seibert do you have any update on the progress of the project?

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:15:48

Yeah so it's gone through plan check meaning it is ready for issuance of building permits at this point.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:54

Super.

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:15:55

So it's right at the doorstep.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:15:56

Wonderful I'm assuming that's why we're seeing this now.

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:15:59

Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:16:01

So any discussion?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:16:05

I mean it doesn't seem like there's anything negative to it unless there is a discussion about that. I'm happy to make a motion.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:16:14

I'll second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:16:15

All right, wonderful.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 motion. I'll second. All right, wonderful. OK, I think we're ready. Roll call.
Show transcript
OK, I think we're ready. Roll call. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang? Yeah. Microphone was off but I heard a yes. Oh, I'm sorry, yes. OK. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Lange? Yes. Council Member Ruhl? Yes.

Thank you very much, thanks for being up here. Okay we I think we're doing good let's go on to number 10 everybody's okay? Approval of the resolution of the Ojai City Council declaring the real property at Montgomery Street as surplus land

1:16 – 1:291 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:16:58

and we also have a slide some slides for this thank you So this item pertains to the exempt surplus land declaration and approval of the affordable housing development and disposition agreement for the project at 408 through 410 North Montgomery Street, which is has also been discussed as the Habitat for Humanity tiny home project. The recommendation in the staff report, and I wanted to highlight this because again it's a resolution that's approving other things would be that council approve a resolution declaring that the city owned property at 408-410 North Montgomery Street be exempt surplus land under the California Surplus Land Act. And also concurrently approve a disposition and development agreement, which I will refer to as the DDA because that is a mouthful.

Authorizing the transfer of the property to Habitat for Humanity to develop affordable housing. So the property information And I'm not going to read every single bullet point, but this is an approximately 0.2 acre site at the southeast corner of Franklin and North Montgomery. It was acquired by the city in August 2010 and then transferred to the former redevelopment agency in 2010 for affordable housing purposes.

After the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, it passed to the successor agency for the City of Ojai and then ultimately came back to the city. Under Assembly Bill 1484, it was the only successor agency property in Ojai's long-range property management plan trust fund and so the grant deed for this property carries a use restriction or reversionary clause limiting the use of the property to affordable housing.

Um, prior council action so there's I started in December 2023 not before that but I just mentioned there is some prior history. In December of 2023 Council preliminary lead decided that the site should be used as an affordable tiny home project And entered into a memorandum of understanding and exclusive negotiating agreement with Habitat for Humanity of Ventura County.

The project is for a five-unit affordable housing project that includes four tiny homes in one single family home Earlier this year in March, April and May there were discussions with the council about the project and the proposed ownership structure. And the project entitlements were ultimately approved on April 16th. Subsequently on May 12th after hearing information related to the ownership structure for the project Council ultimately directed staff to return with a DDA conveying the property to Habitat Subject to affordability covenants and a resolution declaring the property to be exempt surplus land So that is what brings us here today Under the project DDA, the project will be developed by Habitat for Humanity under city oversight Habitat has identified or for the city a total estimated project cost of just over 2.6 million dollars that would be funded through a combination of grant funds and funds provided by Habitat.

And there is a source of funds included in the first attachment to the development and disposition agreement, along with a project budget. Units will only be sold to lower income households with occupancy restricted to the qualified buyer's household subject to a 45-year affordability covenant. So the first step in disposing of city-owned land is compliance with the California Surplus Land Act. And under this law, local agencies are first required to make surplus land available for affordable housing or recreational use before disposing of it in some other manner.

And so typically when you have property that is subject to the Surplus Land Act, there's a notice requirement where notice must be provided to certain types of agencies including agencies that provide affordable housing and provide an opportunity for those agencies to request to purchase the property. Where property is exempt surplus land It may be disposed of using a shorter, more streamlined disposition process.

So under government code section 54221 lowercase f1 capital F exempt surplus land includes There are different types of surplus land, but one of the definitions of exemplar surplus land is a housing development that restricts 100% of the units to low or moderate income persons. Restricts at least 75% of the units to lower income households which does not include the moderate income category.

This project does meet those requirements. or the definition of exempt surplus land at a regular public meeting. There is a process that allows public comment without a public meeting, but in this case we're bringing it to a public meeting If council approves the resolution then the city would submit the resolution to the California Department of Housing and Community Development Which then has roughly 30 days to review the information and provide confirmation that the property is exempt surplus land.

Generally, that takes 30 days or less it can take longer but my understanding is that for projects involving affordable housing projects they do try to meet the 30 day requirement So I've included a lot of this information in the staff report, but because it's pretty dense, the agreement itself and all of the exhibits were over 100 pages. I did want to summarize some of the key terms in the development and disposition agreement.

Just at a high level, this agreement serves as the mechanism for the city to convey the property. The actual conveyance happens at closing on the real estate side of it through execution of a deed but this functions like a purchase and sale agreement in a more typical transaction. As exhibits to the agreement, there is a project scoping document that describes the project. Again, the budget, a schedule for performance, the source of funds as well as forms of the grant deed, a master affordable housing covenant agreement and the actual covenants that will be recorded against the property.

As well as other restrictions on transferring the property before the release of, like we have other requirements that apply during construction that get released once construction is completed. As far as other key terms, you know city approval is required under the DDA for all funding sources other than grants so if Habitat for Humanity were to pursue commercial financing That would be something that would have to come back to the City Council for approval.

Also, the city has the opportunity to review and approve their marketing and sales program. Additionally, if there are construction costs that increase by more than 10%, the city has the ability to review that. And there is a right of reverter if Habitat fails to commence construction or suspends the project or attempts to assign the DDA without the city's consent. But that is before the homes are completed and purchased by other people.

Um, so the city is a beneficiary of the agreement and also have the covenants running with the land. So if in the future any of the affordability covenants or other covenants in the materials are not complied with, the city would have the ability to sue to enforce those covenants. Also as I mentioned, the agreement includes as an exhibit the Master Affordable Housing Covenant Agreement. This is incorporated into the DDA and the grant deed.

It includes requirements that homes that are constructed under this agreement are only sold to what is defined as an eligible purchaser that meets the income requirements for the agreement. There are also limitations on the maximum loan amount and required down payment as well as the 45-year affordability covenant. The next to last bullet point on this slide points to something that I know was discussed in some of the earlier council meetings, but I know we're happy to take questions on it, that we do have prioritization for what an eligible purchaser would be, and this is based on the city's I'm going to go ahead and get started.

Area and sphere of interest and influence, and then qualifying past residents as a second tier or persons who work in the area. And then after that would be other eligible purchasers after 120 days. So those are identified as like first priority, second priority, third priority in the master affordability or affordable housing covenant. Also under the DDA, there would be some obligations on the part of the city.

The previous council direction was to donate the property to Habitat for nominal compensation that is generally like we put $1 in the documents. We did get a comparative marketing analysis from a local real estate broker who estimates that the property is currently valued between 550 and $600,000. It also would require that the city or have the city agree to waive all city impact fees, traffic mitigation and Quimby Park fees and other impact fees that other private development would typically pay.

It also provides for the city to complete certain offsite improvements Including installation of a stop sign and establishment of a crosswalk with Habitat being responsible for all other off-site improvements. And then at the end of the transactional part of this process, the City and Habitat would each pay one half of the escrow and closing costs. So that concludes the presentation and I'm happy to take any questions from the Council.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:29 – 1:3832 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:29:06

Yeah,

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.931:29:07

some questions with and it seems to happen often with the fiscal impact that it's in the agenda item. And there's never a dollar amount with the fees that we're saying so I know escrowing that is probably very minimal and if it split between the two people but you know it would be nice to see what the fees are traffic mitigation fees you know the Quimby Park fees all of that stuff I would like to see that included And then I think because it is, you know, our land public land that, you know, I know back in the previously that I did ask for an appraisal at that time.

Lucas, you had said that the property was valued at about 700 and then once they built this stuff, you're looking at a million dollars a unit. And then, I noticed that the fee here from Ms. Hanson says 550 to 600 So I would like to have something more, you know, dialed in a true actual amount that was agreed on when this was approved to sell or to give them for $1.

And I think that's all that I have so thank you.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:30:28

Before we move on I don't know if the city manager has any of those costs or staff have any of those costs

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:30:35

Did we did we get an estimate revised as well on the traffic?

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:30:39

so if you Group all of them together. It's about $4,000 in terms of the overall savings

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.931:30:46

No,

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:30:48

that's that separate I'm only talking about like the impact fees and the building permit cost fees those all those pieces Grading grading permit those pieces Yes,

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:30:58

sorry but what about we're also looking to think for an estimate of the installation of the stop sign in the

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:05

That is probably in the $10,000 to $15,000 range in terms of bidding that out.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.931:31:12

So 20,000 would be a safe number?

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:14

I think that's probably a safe number.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:16

Thank you. So for the impact fees, that's money we're not getting. It's not money that we're spending.

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:26

Correct. Yeah, that's a part of the fees that come in. Right.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:29

Generally on fiscal impacts do we generally include monies that we're not going to get as opposed to moneys that we're going to spend?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:31:39

We haven't. Okay. We can certainly do

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:31:42

that. I'm just curious because it's two different things completely like writing a check is different than not getting a check

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:31:49

But I would say that from, you know, just a bottom line standpoint. I don't think that's because that's something that the city would not be receiving if this is approved as written. I think it's information that is at least a fair question to get an estimate on.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:32:09

Any other questions? Yeah, okay. Can we limit the agreement so that the purchaser actually needs to be a Ojai resident as opposed to somebody within this sphere?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:32:31

So I think certainly from a legal standpoint if that is the direction that City Council provides we can agree to limit that agreement or limit that requirement at least for an What I would say from a prioritization standpoint is we could add an additional priority tier, if that was the direction from Council. I don't know that you would want to make it a mandatory requirement without having these tiers of priority in case

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:33:00

no eligible purchasers... I'm headed there and so my next question is Can the city include a right of first refusal or, you know, a purchase option if it's not being purchased by a resident option? So that we would step in with the option to purchase. And if we decided not to then it would go to the sphere level but at least leave open And potentially extend the time to find an actual city resident to occupy. So that sounds like a discussion that we can have after. Yeah, and I guess the question is can we do that as opposed to should we?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:33:50

I think legally, at least for purposes of these documents it could be something that we could legally include in the agreement assuming that Habitat for Humanity was agreeable to that. What I would say though is what I don't know the answer to is how that affects all of the other documents that Habitat has regarding their financing and other requirements so I think from a strictly legal standpoint, we could include it as a requirement of our agreement.

There may be some follow-on questions we would want to hear from Habitat regarding that and I do think they have representatives in the room tonight.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:34:31

And then we have another question. We have, as I understand it, so covenants impact the affordability They're tied to the deed, correct?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:34:48

They are recorded with the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:34:50

deed.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:34:51

Recorded against the

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:34:52

property. But for what period of time does that recording run with the land?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:35:05

So actually the affordability covenants here would be recorded before the deeds. They would be recorded before Habitat sells the property to the eligible purchasers, and as written they would apply for 45 years from the date that they are recorded.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:35:23

So the purchaser if they came to a point where they wanted to sell less than 45 years? Um, they would be required to comply with the same conditions that, uh...

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:35:43

They would, but there are also certain requirements in the, and I magically got to the exact right page. In the packet on page 177 of the agenda packet, there are provisions that deal with transfers by the owner. And so if there were a transfer to an eligible purchaser It provides limits on what an owner can receive or if they transfer to an ineligible purchaser, then there's basically a financial consequence and any proceeds above the amount that they are allowed to sell it for are divided between the city and the owner.

So there are requirements and consequences if someone were to try to sell. Now that's in addition to the requirements that Habitat imposes in their agreement with their purchasers, which I think also may be recorded against the property.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:36:58

They actually went through that last time explaining that they often... If somebody wants to sell before the term is up A very common scenario is Habitat acquires it back and offers the same situation starting over again for that conversation.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:37:15

I do. Yeah, but I want to you know so that's that's an option for Habitat. I want to do all we can to guarantee that this property this asset is Um, going to be affordable for the benefit of a resident. So. Uh, we.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:37:40

And if I may, while you're formulating that thought, I also wanted to note that on that same page of the packet at the top of page 177 there is a provision that already provides that, at least with respect to future sales, that the city has the ability to purchase the homes. So it's a little bit different than the question you asked before. But if someone attempts to transfer the property, the city will have the option to purchase the residence in accordance with that provision.

1:38 – 1:4316 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:38:20

Okay so under that scenario that they want to sell That the current owner wants to sell somebody without complying with the covenants, either Habitat or the City could choose to step in and acquire under the terms of the affordability. And then my final question is Is the 45 years the maximum period of time that we can impose an affordability covenant?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:39:08

I think from a city standpoint, it is probably the maximum that we can impose. I think Habitat has the potential ability to impose longer covenants because they're not regulated in quite the same way as we are under state housing laws but I think that was also consistent with what was approved as part of the land use entitlements. Any other questions?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:39:36

Yes, I had one. So just to follow up to Council Member Whitman's question about if we do eventually start a community land trust for example and that takes on a separate entity that is in partnership with the city would we be able to write some kind of language that would include that entity in addition to the city or habitat first right of refusal?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:40:07

So we would potentially, we would have to modify this as written. But what could be done under the language that's here is that the city could exercise its purchase option and then could potentially convey the property to a community land trust.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:40:22

Okay thank you. And then I keep on remembering that we talked about 55 years As the deed and perhaps I'm remembering it incorrectly but in my mind, I had 55 years captured from previous conversations.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:40:42

I think that number may have gotten thrown out at some point and I don't know if that's because that may be part of what's included maybe in the habitat project for Port Hueneme but we would have to look to Habitat to confirm that There are different affordability requirements for rental projects versus projects that are for sale, so that may also be part of the distinction.

But I think we did look at this and it would be a 45-year requirement.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:41:16

Okay. Maybe it was in the discussion from Habitat's side or something else, but it just sticks in my mind.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:41:25

I agree that that

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:41:26

was in my mind too,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:41:27

that I had been hearing and thinking we were talking about 50%.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:41:32

Right. Which is significant when we're talking about affordability. A lot can change in 10 years. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:41:45

I'm looking at some of the past periods that we, it looks like 45 has been what's been listed.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:41:54

As I recall it and I heard the 55 as well but I have it associated with rentals a 55 year deed restriction on, I think it was the Becker project honestly anyway, I don't know but that's what I have in my mind for it was for, I dunno

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:42:13

Mm hmm. And then I'm sorry, I haven't read all of the there's a lot of information here. I know one of the things that we discussed was that it that the property would be owner Thank you.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:42:46

It's I think what we would probably do is look at that as whether the city needs to either, and we would probably coordinate with Habitat as well. But the city, as I mentioned before, would be a third-party beneficiary of all of these requirements so worst case scenario, the city could actually sue the property owner And request an injunction that they stop renting the property.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:29

Yeah, just page 97 right in the middle of restriction and that the units be sold only to the qualified buyers denied to be lower income defined to be lower income households in compliance with the master affordable housing agreement and a requirement that all units be occupied at all times only by the household of the qualified buyer. Page 97.

1:43 – 1:5012 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:43:54

I think Darcy said he'd go there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:43:56

Yeah, Darcy has said that before. Any other questions before we go to public comment? I have one card Mr. Bill Miley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:44:24

Most of you don't know this, but I've been involved with this property for seven years. Originally with John Johnson. Did I hear correctly? What was the size of the property? It's only 8800 square feet.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:44:39

It's about 0.2 acres. Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:44:41

a point two. I missed the point. Thank Considering the land options that are available, this one seems like a really good deal. Is there any joint ownership of the ground? Does the city have responsibility for landscape maintenance? Who has responsibility if there are individual house owners who own their own land? Is there any common space At what point does Habitat walk away? I understand 45 years. I, too was going to push for 55.

What about a homeowner who refuses to fix the pipe or leaky roof? The city's move to give this to Habitat is really good and we get a really good project

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:50

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Anybody online? No raised hands on Zoom. My understanding from past conversations is that the city is not responsible for any of the landscaping or the maintenance of the

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:46:02

building. So if this is approved, the city will not have any responsibility for those things. That's

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:46:09

what we discussed. Also, if I recall correctly, Habitat has the purchaser enter into agreements that address the maintenance of the property.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:46:28

And just in case anybody does want to see it on page 175 of the packet, would be the leasing and occupancy requirement as well as an annual certification by the owner that the property is owned and owner occupied.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:46:52

So it's always been my interest that this property be used for low income housing. And because there have been people who think that I've been trying to, you know, to halt the project, but not by intent. You know, my concerns have always been that we Uh, honor the you know the spirit of the deed restriction that says that. You know so the city acquired the property um because of a issue with the prior owner uh that was not abated and we ended up owning it and the City Council at the time then did a transfer of the property With a deed restriction that is, you know, very generally or for the idea that we let the property be used for the best longest use of affordability.

That's achievable. I still believe that using the community land trust was the best way to do that, but you guys have voted differently. So I'm not going to be arguing about that tonight, but I do believe that if we can modify how the agreement currently exists so that the purchaser needs to be an Ojai resident And that if it's not, then Ojai has the right to step in as a purchaser.

And if not, then it reverts to the sphere of influence and all the rest of the terms. So I'd like to see us do that because Because fundamentally, this piece of property belongs to OI residents. And I want to make sure that an OI resident... If we can... I want to pick up the idea that if the 60-day marketing effort doesn't find an OIA resident then we're going to be motivated to find that OI resident and then we'll have a period of time To find the Ojai resident and if we can't, then then we let it go to the sphere of influence. Right?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:49:41

Yeah I actually wanted to when I was talking to our city attorney about this earlier today you were mentioning a tiered structure because I think in addition to residents of City of Ojai we also have people who get priced out or who Go to college and are looking to move back, to be by their families. And so I would ask for a friendly consideration of people who used to be Ojai residents who are coming back home.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:50:16

Yeah, I'm fine with that. So if you just to say the priority is listed out on page 161 so the one that you just suggested so that would be if you look at the second bullet point on 161 yes Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈32s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:50 – 1:5946 turns

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:50:48

Thank you. Yeah, I think that would be an important consideration.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:51:12

Just for clarification when you say because it looks like it's a tiered structure right now but tell me if I'm not

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:51:17

getting it. That's what I was going to say we do have a tiered structure right now with really I would say three tiers where we have Kind of a first here that applies during the first 60 days of the marketing effort. Um, that would only that would allow a purchaser for to be within the city of Ojai area of interest and sphere of influence as this 1st year. The second tier would be individuals who are eligible purchasers who are past residents, who have lived in that area of interest or sphere of influence for at least 10 years and left within the past five years. This is what I was referring

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:52:02

to. Yeah, and

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:52:06

so I wanted to make sure that yeah, I was just

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:52:08

it was clear if

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:52:09

you're proposing a change

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:52:11

What I'm proposing is is Piggybacking on councilmember Whitman's Suggestion is that Is that we do look at this as a tiered structure in the way that it's written in the okay in the agenda report

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:52:28

and So just so I understand, and I said you know Ojai residents first. Are you...and then there's going to be a tier where the city can step in?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:52:42

Correct.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:52:42

But are you proposing that top tier is going to include not just Ojai residents But also the people who can show that they have 10 years of residency in their pets.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:52:58

I, or

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:52:59

do you want that in a lower?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:53:00

I am proposing that we follow the tiered structure in this which is the prioritization on Ojai residents.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:07

Well right

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:53:07

now it says

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:08

Ojai resident sphere event so. You're saying omit that part. I'm just looking at

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:53:15

the first bullet point. Okay, no that no I'm not I'm saying we follow this structure okay yes I think I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:22

not understanding what you're

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:53:23

saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:24

so you're saying go with it exactly as written

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:53:28

If there is a way for us to break that down further into Ojai residents first, then spheres of influence. And if there's a way to like put sphere of influence and prior residents in the same tier, that's what I would prefer. Thank

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:53:45

you. So tier one would be actual Ojai resident. Tier two would be sphere of influence or 10 years of residency. And then the third would be Ojai's right to purchase and then it would go to the final, what's currently the

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:54:08

third tier. Thank you yes that is what I'm... That's very close to what you're saying. That's what I heard. I'm piggybacking on what I heard you say and adding that to it. That just

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.931:54:21

brings up a question for me. What is the definition of sphere?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:54:27

There's a map, there's a map. So it leads up to Oakview basically not including Oakview. It's the valley I mean there's one that's a valley and then there's another and I think that's the sphere but then there is a more confined one that's within like you know Mile of the city limits or

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.931:54:51

and is that the one that we would be using?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.881:54:54

There is a specific sphere of it.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:54:57

Yeah, there's so the local agency formation Commission for Ventura County Adopts a sphere of influence study for each community within the county that I'm going to butcher this, but it includes basically areas that are outside of the municipal limits of the city but are effectively part of the planning area where there can sometimes be an overlap in services. Those are people who may not live within the city, but they're like city adjacent. I do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:55:30

have it pulled up. Let

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:55:31

me give you an example if I could, yeah so you know where I live right? I'm outside the city limits but i'm within the sphere of influence that little area my little neighborhood is just the very edge and then that's it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:55:43

there's

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:55:43

people

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:55:44

whose address is Ojai that aren't in the sphere of influence still they're even outside of the sphere

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.831:55:49

Well, that's a different thing. That's related to postal delivery and that's a whole separate...

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:55:55

I have this understanding that there's actually two rings beyond the city. And what are the labels for the two rings?

GovLucas SeibertCommunity Development DirectorProposedvoiceprint 0.881:56:05

So the influence is that we just, you just talked about which is correct. It's like a little bubble around the city and the area much larger is called the area of interest and that runs all the way down to really the Edison curve and then almost to where Santa Paula is but it's like maybe a mile in from there.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:56:25

So can I say what I heard you say? And you could tell me if it's right. So if we were to change the priority listing on 161 it would be The first priority period would be residents of the City of Pohai. The second priority period would be residents of the Sphere of Influence and or 10 years living within the Sphere of Influence, or five years. I'm just copying the language here. The priority is ten years and left within the Pacific. That would be our second

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:56:59

priority. And with that also include the area of interest or just the sphere?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:57:05

I'd like to limit to the sphere. The sphere's fine, but hopefully they'll all get filled really fast and this is their moot point.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:57:13

Right, right. And not only that, but I also want to clarify for the record that after these tiers, after we've gone through and seen these tiers can't be met and the city doesn't want to purchase the property, then it goes into the open market and then it does include the sphere of interest or people who are outside even the sphere of interest So I didn't want anybody to think that we would have vacant properties sitting unused when people need affordable places to live. So there is going to be still an open period.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.901:57:48

And then just again for sake of clarity in case this gets rolled into a motion, Would individuals who work, so right now under the second tier in addition to the past resident language that's included in the language here. We also have a person who works in the priority areas as part of that second tier and was that?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:58:12

Yes absolutely Because that includes our teachers and our health care workers and those who work at Libby Bowl. I did

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:58:22

not state that, but thank you for saying that it's after the semicolon or a person who works in the priority areas as a secondary priority. Thank you. And

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:58:29

then my personal preference would be to give the, so if it opened up to the next second tier I'd want the person who had 10 years of residency in the city of Ojai have priority over the people in the sphere of influence.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:58:55

I would counter with either one of those categories having equal

1:59 – 2:0812 turns

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.871:59:05

And I hope it's a moop. Yeah, I think that if it's not selling whoever is on city council at the time is going to be making it very... I know Habitat's gonna do their marketing as well but I think once people understand that they can Acquire this property way under a market rate. I think There's gonna be people who are gonna come out for I just I just I Just feel like it's our responsibility to make sure that this asset continues to be an asset for residents, you know,

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction1:59:54

I think so I agree with that and Also, I think one thing for us to consider as we're thinking about this is that Habitat for Humanity projects requires sweat equity And so anyone who is going to be entering into a purchasing agreement, it's gonna have to have the wherewithal to build the house. And so that could limit the pool. That could create a natural filter by which a very select few people would be able to fulfill that obligation and apply in the first place.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:00:38

On page 161 of the packet in paragraph B, there are requirements related to the marketing efforts that Habitat must use related to its efforts to secure eligible purchasers. And so also included in that are requirements that the city will use its best efforts to identify and assist Habitat with contacting nonprofit organizations and business organizations or associations to try to help them secure eligible purchasers. So even without anything else, the city is going to have an obligation to try to help Habitat identify eligible purchasers with or without the purchase option and I wanted to make that

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:01:27

clear. Does that extend to the city Working on If for that individual who mr. Bailey we can't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:01:41

care Thank you

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:01:42

for that individual who qualifies in every respect, but their physical ability to provide sweat equity I'd like to see us doing what we can to Provide you know Volunteer efforts to provide that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:02:02

person, you know, just to say ruled out that we were having repeated conversations. But Darcy's there do you want to is there anything you would like to address directly? Thanks, please. Well, just because we could just keep talking and talking but um, you know the facts

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:02:17

First of all, thank you. I appreciate all the work. We've been working with the city attorney trying to get this put together. It's been an interesting journey. A couple of things that... I do want to address the idea of a 45-year extension. One thing to understand is along the agreement that you're going to be agreeing to tonight there's a parallel habitat agreement And in that parallel agreement, there are a number of things you're talking about adding to the agreement tonight. Such as we don't allow our homeowners to sell their units Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Also in the covenant that they signed with us is, as Whitman said, that there are agreements within that covenant that require them to maintain their properties along the lines that are in the agreement that the Attorney has put forth for you tonight. We manage that process as well. Third, if in your I think you're talking about your third tier There would be for us a question of if the city was to buy the property from us What that price would be and what we would agree the sell price Would it be the market value of the property? Would it be That has that would have to be determined ahead of time. Well, I'm just gonna make very clear this And also if the city was to buy the property, Habitat would then no longer have any liability or responsibility to maintain that property.

That would be the City's responsibility to maintain that property from that point forward and would in turn void any agreements that are part of the Habitat agreements would not be part of whatever Agreements you would sell. And then the next thing I'd like to address is we have, through Habitat International, there are a number of rules and guidelines that we follow with regards to how we advertise, how we market.

There is a specific process that we use to ensure that we hit all the targeted audiences that could qualify to buy the unit. And so we have, there is a process that we use. What we do would appreciate the city's help if they wanted to participate in that. And then lastly I would share as you guys were talking about is there are two elements in the agreement that are impacted by some of the discussions you're having here today.

The way the agreements work with Habitat homeowners is they are selected before or right after Andy and Jose start construction, right? They're selected. They're not homeowners yet but they're selected because they have to participate in the construction of their units which is the wet equity. They do not become homeowners until the end of the process and they go through escrow then they are officially homeowner but they are selected at the beginning of the project. Now, very rarely does it happen but it does that sometimes people are selected at the beginning of the project and they get to the end of the project and they're no longer qualified.

It could be you know that they got a job there making a million dollars or they didn't pay their taxes or they bought two new cars or whatever whatever the reason may be the beginning they're qualified and at the end they're not What is in the agreement, we have an obligation to fill all five units in a timely manner and if we don't fill all five units in a timely manner then we are penalized. So there are some timing things that are critical in the agreement that you're discussing tonight that some of the things that are I'm The selection process no longer exists.

The current federal guidelines that have been established by the current administration have narrowed the qualifications of individuals that can be possible homeowners of low-income property. A real simple example would've been that prior to this administration, we could have sold a house to a legal resident who was married to a DACA Those things, it's no longer the case. The only people that qualify for habitat homes that are low income built and furnished and supplied by America Build America as Andy and Jose will tell you are legal citizens of United States of America. That we've already found is narrowed the pool significantly.

So when you're considering these things Those are the restraints that Habitat is operating under when we're looking at finding qualified families that meet the qualifications for homeownership.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:08:16

If I might ask, without any edits, the priorities that we offered in the original piece on the same page, so Ojai residents and sphere of influence etc., Those are ones that you were able to live with, generally speaking at least as a start.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:08:32

Yeah absolutely I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:08:33

think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:08:34

what you guys talking about is great. We want to sell to people who either work or live or have established some residency in Ojai.

2:08 – 2:1410 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:08:46

With what was just discussed as far as the two tiers, where I was going to go if you had said we want to add a third tier is that would affect some of those timelines that Darcy is talking about because as he noted they have a certain period of time within which They're supposed to identify who the eligible purchasers are. As was discussed, you kept it with two tiers so that wouldn't necessarily change the timing we just adjusted who's in which tier a little bit. So I think from a timing standpoint now the open question and this is still for council discussion is whether you also want to add in this concept of the city having the opportunity to repurchase a unit Upon completion of construction, if no purchaser is identified. So that's an open question.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:09:41

And Darcy asked that question and my thought would be that we would be confined to the same covenant which means that it needs to be affordable so our sale would be affordable so it would be based upon The value of the property with that covenant in place.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:06

If I might offer, I would suggest that we modify the first priority to be Ojai residents and we modify the second priority to be Ojai resident sphere of influence and the rest. And I would leave out the first right approach or the opportunity to purchase after a tier three. That makes it really simple and clean to me with small modifications.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:10:28

Yeah, so two things. I don't think that we should be in the business of being a landlord like everybody else. I hope that it wouldn't come to that but I don't think that you know we then want to be in a situation where we'll purchase it. I'd rather find some other solution. I definitely agree that you know Ojai resident comes first. I do believe that a person who works in the priority who I would say who works in the city It's really important that we house those people. That's tier two right now? Yeah, I'm just saying but it's tier two now. But I think it's more important than someone who lived here for ten years and then went away for five years and might be coming back. To me, it just is but I'm just saying

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:16

My hope is if the flexibility of the second tier being sphere of influence residents, people who used to live here don't now or people who work here. You have that in your tier two?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:11:27

Yeah no I hope that gives

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:11:28

you

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:11:28

enough flexibility to fill it. There's no there's no priority in the tier 2. It's all grouped together and The second thing is, is the model of Habitat is sweat equity. So I'm not really comfortable with saying that if there's somebody who's eligible in all ways but they can't actually do sweat equity. That is something that's fundamental to the principle behind ownership is that you put sweat equity so I would not put that into...

Yeah, did we speak to that? Oh okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:12:09

Yeah yeah I mean Councilman Whitman makes a good point our goal is building not houses but homes and community And in some ways, it's unfair for four families to be out swinging a hammer in the heat of Ojai. Putting up walls working with Andy and Jose to lace cement and do all the things that they do when they build these homes and somebody else house number five Not having that requirement. That builds some issues within the families that are gonna be owning those homes from the very start.

I do know it's a sensitive issue is how do we navigate that? Habitat has struggled with that for years and years and years, it's a difficult thing. But I will say they can acquire sweat equity three ways through Habitat rules and regulations. They can either have family members or Work on the units and there's certain percentage of the hours that they can do.

They can do volunteer work on other projects, and they can also then come and volunteer in one of our restores or other way but it's broken out into a certain percentage for each one of those areas. And then there is also if, as I said earlier we get to the end of the road and then somebody doesn't qualify and they've put in 500 square equity hours on the bill. There's a process where we can either compensate them for their work and there's a formula we use you know for minimum wage and those kind of things And then the person that is replaced by them has to put the sweat equity in another unit, or pay us the value of what that sweat equity is to build it. So all these things there are things in place to cover these.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:14:09

It also seems like they are all tied together. And one thing I will say from having built a house, you learn your house, you learn how to fix your house, you learn the materials of your house. I mean it's the difference between buying a house and building a house. The knowledge that we bring and the associated commitment but just like you know how the gutters went up? You can fix those gutters. Those kinds of things are really really important I'm

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:15 – 2:2017 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:15:00

We're investing a million dollars. I mean, so yeah you know we believe in what the city's doing. The work with you know the planning department and even the struggle to get to this point. We believe in the project. We believe in the city. We believe in the housing needs that you have and where You know, we're putting our own skin in the game to some degree to ensure that it remains affordable for 45 years or even longer depending on how that process. And it's fair to say that the Port Winnipeg project had 50 years because they were a single family home.

Tiny Homes is a new Thank you very much. They won't live in a house, tiny home that's 510 square feet for 50 years. They just won't. So it's kind of a new little model for us but we think we've looked at all the different scenarios and we think the city attorney has done a great job. He was very hard on us. To get to this point, but I think these are good questions and good things to discuss.

But we're on board. Thank you.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:16:27

Yes. Would it change from your perspective if we added some kind of language into 2.3 section A that said the city would have or the city or associated community land trust would have a first right of refusal? Technically, that language wouldn't change the structure of this because it would basically be after the first two tiers are met before it goes to open period.

One little caveat

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:17:01

there. Yeah I don't have a problem with that. I think that's something you might even want to consider later on maybe after the 45 year period Maybe the buyers of the units at that point are your land trust.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:18

Interesting, so just to say what I heard you say, 0.3 would be that the city and or its designated land trusts would have the first right of refusal for purchases in a third year

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:17:30

situation? Correct, yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:17:32

And you're okay with that?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:17:33

Okay great thank you. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:17:34

i'm okay with bringing all the applicants to the city to review prior to

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:17:40

Yeah, no that I think in a clarifying that there is a Although it's called sweat equity There's a path for somebody who doesn't have the ability to sweat to actually put in the time they work in a store yeah, they work and in a capacity that maybe Was concerned about the person who doesn't have the physical ability to swing a hammer and and you say that there's two ways

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:13

Yeah,

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:18:13

then

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:14

I'm doing a senior. That's bought by my house They will have to provide Somebody who's related to them or connected to them to come out and swing a hammer with both hands Because that's a third, a little more than a third of the sweat equity model. And I can't, I mean... I'd be violating my own bylaws if I didn't require that as part of that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:38

That's not unique to other organizations? I'm okay with that. So let me try out the motion and tell me if I'm not getting it right.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:18:44

It would- Oh go ahead. If I may, just to make sure that assuming, I want to make sure council understands the change we would make related to the first right of refusal So what we would add in would be after the first priority and second priority period, we would add in an opportunity for the city to exit. The way a first right of refusal works is that basically the city would be able to purchase the property under the same terms and conditions as another potential purchaser.

And so we can add some standard language in related to that. The terms and conditions would not be spelled out here because again, those would be under the same terms and conditions as another purchaser. I would say that if we get to that point, as Mr. Taylor mentioned, you know, we would end up having, you know, the purchase price would be one of those terms as well as any other terms and conditions.

If the affordability covenant has already been recorded, as Councilman Whitman noted, all of the requirements in the affordability covenant would apply the same way to the city. And so if once the motion is outlined, I just wanted to make sure that the council understood that that would be how that would get reflected.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:20:01

Yeah, I'm not sure and I'll need to go back and have our attorneys look at this I'm not sure that Habitat can sell the property back to the city or to a corporation or a business. I'm not clear on that, to be perfectly honest. I've never done it. I've never heard of other habitats doing it. I am not sure that's something we can do but I'll look at it and see.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:20:32

So so I think where that would leave us is if Habitat determines that they cannot agree to that, then we would bring this back at the next council meeting. If we approve it with that modification tonight and that's not something that they can legally do, then you would bring this back?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:20:49

Can we just say that if they can't legally do it, that we don't have to bring it back?

2:20 – 2:2619 turns

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:20:56

That would be up to the council.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:20:57

Yeah, I mean that to me makes more sense than having it come back again because we basically go over the same stuff. I would agree with that. So if possible this but if not possible based on you know the legal sort of guardrails that Habitat has in other words if it's an either or let's just go for it.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:21:20

My concern about that would be You know, if we propose it in a certain fashion and they say, well, we can't do that. There may be something that we can do that would accomplish the same purpose. And so it may be that they come back and say that this is how you would have to do it. We would need these assurances or guarantees. And I'd want the opportunity

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:21:54

Just as a suggestion, why don't you delegate that determination to your city attorney?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:01

Sure, I would happily do that too. Thank you Darcy. So here's so what I heard was and this will be the motion if if you agree.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:22:13

I'm going to get this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:22:14

okay. So first off on my approved the I'm just going on the recommendation first approved the resolution of the Ojai City Council declaring certain city owned real property located at 408 410 North Montgomery Street city of Ojai to be exempt surplus land under the Surplus Act number one And then concurrently approve the disposition development agreement with the following changes.

This is on page, now tell me if I miss anything. Page 161, the first priority period is reserved for City of Ojai residents. That's our first priority period. Second priority period has all of those constituents but added City of Ojai, residents of the City of Ojai and sphere of influence And then we're saying that there is a third bullet point, which is the City of Ojai or its designate community land trust has the first right of refusal for purchase subject to legal verification. Whatever that word is as determined by the city attorney.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:23:25

Excuse me, Mayor. Yeah go. Did I hear you mention a person who works in the priority area? Everything into just added sphere of influence people. Double check and make sure that was included. Everything

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:23:35

that's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:23:36

in

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:23:36

second prayer. And it includes the ten-year resident who has moved away.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:23:44

It's really taking all that language and simply just adding in front of it or whatever people who live in the city of Ojai or sphere of influence. Is that sufficient, Ms. Burgess?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:23:56

Read the last part on the third bullet. Well the last part is a little tricky. That's the part I want to make

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:00

sure. The last part is if there's a third bullet or third priority, the City of Ojai or its designate land trust has the first right of refusal for purchase pending legal determination by our city. How's that?

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:24:22

What I would propose, it's gonna be slightly different. Would be that it say if no first or second tier purchaser is identified at the city or community land trust established by city as a right of first refusal to purchase property So long as...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:25:01

It's agreeable by Habitat for Humanity.

GovBethany BurgessCity AttorneyProposedvoiceprint 0.902:25:02

Yeah, so long as Habitat for Humanity governing documents and I would say they're and funding because I know that there are some grant funding permits And then I guess the if not is Evaluation of suitable alternatives by city

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:25:31

attorney. Yeah, thank you Thanks for thanks for be working That's a motion act stamp

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:25:38

Me too. And before I vote, I do really want to thank Darcy and Habitat for Humanity. I think in all the questionings and all the line of discussion, I don't want it to get lost how important this project is and how grateful we are to have you as partners. And this is going to help so many families and it's gonna help our community. And so I'm really excited about the fact that we're moving forward with this, and that we're doing this for the people who are going to not just benefit from being in the houses but all of the volunteers who are gonna benefit from being a part of this process. It's really meaningful, so thank you. And I will second the motion.

Roll-call vote 2–0 motion. Roll call. · 2 under review
Show transcript
Roll call. Council Member Ruhle? Yes. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Mang?

2:26 – 2:376 turns

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:26:32

I just feel the right thing for me to do is abstain because originally, I voted no and even though I think this is all good, I just don't feel comfortable with saying yes being I did know the first time so abstain thank you.

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:26:45

I

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.862:26:45

thought the same thing. Mayor Gilman? Yes. Council Member Lange?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:26:49

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:50

Motion passes great we'll take a five minute break thank you so much Two one two. Hi. Oh, thanks man. Okay. Good. Yeah.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:37:03

Okay

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:37 – 2:5638 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:34

We're going to start our meeting again.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.862:37:41

Mr. Montgomery, are you ready? Yes, Mayor. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:37:52

Okay everyone we're back and we will now

move on to item number 11 professional services agreement with I.A. Bailey.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:37:59

Thanks Mayor, I'm going to hand things over to Ms. Palmer our acting finance director. Ms. Palmer take it away

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:38:05

Thank you. Mayor and members of the City Council, the item before you tonight for consideration is Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ide Bailey to increase the not-to-exceed amount from $167,000 to $290,000. In January 2026, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 increasing the not-to exceed amount but limiting the scope of services to support with system implementations and 2425 year end close efforts.

Staff returned in March to expand the scope of services to include the 25-26 year end close efforts while keeping the contract amount the same. Tonight, we are requesting an increase of $123,000 to assist with the 25- 26 year end efforts. Most notably, I'd Bailey would assist with capital assets and construction in progress schedule of expenditures of federal awards, GASB's 87 and 96 for leases and subscriptions.

Year-end audit fieldwork is currently scheduled for the week of November 30th. With Ide Bailey's knowledge of the City's financials and increased support, we can remain on track for this deadline. While not specifically related to amendment number three, I also wanted to provide a quick update on the fiscal year 24-25 financial statements. As Mr. Harvey noted in his weekly summary we received the first draft at the end of September and have completed an initial review.

Comments and questions have been sent back to our auditors who are now working on a final draft The financial statements were in line with city expectations. And I'm happy to say that we ended the year with a positive net position, which is a great indicator of the city's financial health. The annual comprehensive financial report will be shared with the City Council as soon as it is ready, which should be prior to the end of the month. And with that, I'm available for any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:39:53

Questions? That I guess so the the operational need that's coming before us is part of that would be that we are missing a staff person that we used to have. Is that fair to say?

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:40:10

Yeah, so the request for the ID Bailey is some of the higher end technical support that unfortunately, we are currently missing or we have we just don't have the bandwidth to complete all of that for our November timeframe

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:40:27

And then what I'm, I'm just going to kind of say what the staff report already says. But if we were to pause right now and say well, let's just go ahead and go with a new hire or let's send it out to bid that is not good. That's gonna move us so far off track by the end of the year. That's the argument for the amendment.

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:40:46

Unfortunately, if we do that I wouldn't be able to give you a timeline today because we most likely would not meet the November timeline and we would need to reschedule. And I don't know when we could get on the auditor's calendar so I wouldn't be able to provide a timeline but it most likely would not be the November date.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:41:06

I have a question.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:41:10

I'm just curious if being late with closing the books and all of that stuff, does it put the city in a position with like late fees penalties losing any type of status or anything like that?

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:41:24

So the city's been proactive about communicating with other agencies when we won't be meeting deadlines and requesting extensions, which then result in no fines, no penalties, no issues. So as long as we're being transparent and communicating with other organizations, we haven't experienced any of that.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:41:44

And then I was told like, I know with the staff positioning and all that stuff that what we've been through. But I've been told that's not a valid point to make why things are so delayed.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:42:01

What would be sorry, what's the rationale there? I don't understand that. It's just

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:42:04

what somebody said and I'd never heard it. And I thought oh my gosh and I was having visions of another business in the area.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:42:10

So so i think is just as Miss Palmer was just indicating part of the reason why we're asking for this approval for a contract amendment is because We're missing a higher-end staff person at this point, and we need somebody with that level of expertise and understanding of our environment in our systems. And that is what iBailey brings to the table. They're very familiar with what we have.

We don't have to bring them up to speed. And they have people because they have a very deep bench that are all the way up to You know, beyond even our expertise because of the type of work that they do. This is money that you already approved in the budget even for this type of activity. You approved this to be used for contract accounting services so you're not appropriating any additional money or not taking from your general fund and program balance we're just asking you to Embellish that contract amount so that we can finish this effort, stay on track. Our commitment which we've been saying for I think six months now is that this fiscal year will be caught up. We'll be at the end of this fiscal year sooner than you know.

But everything takes time, and it's not just a matter of throwing in some bodies and making the wheels go. It's having that understanding, having that knowledge, knowing where to go, knowing who to talk to, knowing how to do the work. And that's really what we need. And if we don't do this, it's fine as a council choice but then we can't commit to you that we're gonna be caught up by the end of the fiscal year because we don' even know what the auditor's calendar would be. That's part of the challenge. You have to get on the auditor's calendar and with this, we can't.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:43:55

Let me ask this. This could be for either one of you. So I did look at the budget and I do see the 175 contract services there so we already approved that which is great and so we're not talking about a change as was pointed out Was the vision for that contract services for something other than this? In other words, I'm trying to anticipate. We would have used that money for something else but we're using it for this

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:44:16

no so when we were putting the budget together. Um, we were anticipating using I'd Bailey to. I mean, obviously it was our dream that we would scale it back and we would be able to bring a lot of these schedules and reports in house. And unfortunately that's just not where we are this year but we put the money in the budget specifically for I'd Bailey. To remain on track, because that's a huge council goal. It's a huge goal in the department and so we put the money there knowing that we would use I-Bailey to some extent and that it was incredibly important to remain on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:44:54

track. Any other

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.872:44:58

questions? So I'm interested in whether Yeah, I mean do we need to look at whether the amount that we've allocated is insufficient to take care of our next period for budgeting purposes?

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:45:40

So I can jump in there. So what's going to happen concurrently, which we're not talking about is we're launching a recruitment for the finance director. We've already hired the accountant. So once we assuming we are successful in our recruitment, which I believe we will be, we will then have five members, am I counting correctly? In our finance department, which for our size of organization is definitely sufficient And with being caught up, we should be exactly where we need to be at the end of this fiscal year.

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:46:13

And I'll just note, we made some changes with the people that we currently have on the team that we feel is better suited to them and their strengths. And so I think we're going to start to see just cleaner work and better productivity in general in the department by having the right people in the right places.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:46:36

Well, the other thing is we have some supervision that we didn't have in the past with the accountant on board now who's got this expertise that can supervise those at the lower rungs of the department which is very helpful. We just went live with our electronic timesheets by the way. Yes we did.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:46:53

So they feel that they could dial everything in in the timeline here? Could we get that in writing like what for some type of a time frame to see by this date here's what we're gonna do

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:47:05

From I-Bailey.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.932:47:06

Yeah, I can reach out to them. It's been kind of like open and it's like oh my gosh.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:47:10

We can get on the phone with Brad who is the partner there and have him detail exactly how they're going to do it and he'd be glad to do it.

CommentRon SalazanoProposed · by introduction2:47:17

Yeah, they know our timeline. They know that we have audit in November and so they know that this is going to be a push. We're gonna need to have all hands on deck. All hands on deck. And deliver this audit clean and on time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47:31

And just you said this a minute ago, but so the 2425 audit. You've you said we'll have that by the end of October? Yes. Correct. Right. Super.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:47:43

And our first review of it shows that is positive

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47:47

deposit. Yes. Anticipate I have no public comment cards on this anybody online. No raised hands, Mayor. Any more questions? All right, well I'll move that we approve and authorize city manager to execute amendment number three to the professional services agreement for Ide Bailey increasing the not-to-exceed amount from $167,000 to $290,000.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction2:48:15

I'll second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:48:16

Okay,

Roll-call vote Passed 3–1 move that we approve and authorize city manager to execute amendment number three to the professional services agreement for Ide Bailey incr · 2 under review
Show transcript
roll call please. Council Member Whitman? Yes. Council Member Ruhle? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Mang? No. Mayor Gilman?

Okay, we moved 12 to a later date. So we're on to 13. Thank you Ms. Palmer. Appreciate it.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:48:35

Nice job.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:48:38

Number 13 concept review pilot the Slow High project.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.832:48:44

Okay thank you. Give us a moment here. We're going to load a presentation Uh, this is a concept review item. It's just an idea that we would like to run by you all. This is brought to you by Councilmember Rule and Mayor Gilman. And again, just let us load this. Chugga chugga! Let me check and see if we're loading it tonight or for another meeting date. I'm going to give it just a couple minutes more, then I can definitely just speak to this. So let's just see about what I would like to have some of the visuals on display if I could.

That's the idea. Thank you. All right, well why don't I just get started and just kind of unveil what we're talking about. And then if the presentation comes along that's great. We don't have to read every single slide. Okay so this is an idea for a pilot program which means you know it's got a defined beginning in an end and an evaluation that comes along with that and a determination to be made if it's successful desirable or otherwise And the concept is what's called a slow street.

And this is something that's not unique to San Francisco, but San Francisco is where I am most familiar of the concept and it's very simple. You take a street that is not a major arterial meaning it's Okay, so this is a next slide please. Okay. This is an idea, like I said the familiarity that I have for it and why we're here tonight this is from Council Rules time living in the Bay Area is from San Francisco there's a street called Page Street and it is a through foot through the city going through a neighborhood and what the city discovered was that commuters were using this as a shortcut to get from point A to point B But it's primarily residential. And so they devised this very clever means to slow down traffic where they put up flex posts on half of the street, okay?

So half of the street is not boxed off by these flex posts, okay? Flex post meaning sign that you can actually knock down and it bounces back up Flex posts and then on the middle of the street also a signpost designated as a slow street. And then on the asphalt, the same types of things that you see with sharrows, green markings on the street to designate this is where bicycles ride. And when you come up to the street it announces that this is a slow street. You are able to still drive through it. You are able to still park on it. You were able to still come in and out of driveways But you have to, if you're in a car, navigate around these signs and then slowly drive forward. There are signs that announce this is the slow street.

So can I have the next slide please? What you do when you reduce the ability to just zip into this street and zip out of the street is you reduce the volume, and you increase people walking in the street or biking in the street or pushing their strollers in the street. And that is part of why it is so attractive for the area we're proposing North Fulton Because there are no sidewalks on this street.

And you do see a lot of people walking in the street and this is not just only on North Bolton, there are plenty of other streets in Ojai where you see this as well. On top of all that we're a dark sky city, we don't have giant streetlights overhead and also we're just a town that enjoys the outdoors and likes to walk And that's how we get around. This council has talked a lot about trying to increase traffic safety, you know reduce volumes and just slow everything down and this is a way that we could do it again. This is just an idea but this is one way so the implementation measures are what we talked about these flex posts street signs and marking and that's how you designate it of course there's more than that if we were going to do this It would be a campaign, it'd be a public awareness campaign.

We would build the knowledge that this is the street designated for this purpose. And it doesn't just only have to be this street either. Could be other streets on top of it too. We picked this one because it was a logical place to launch it. Next slide please. So this is just our very rough visual, but you can imagine that's a flex post and it has the slow high moniker that we came up with. And half the street's open, half the street is marked off. We actually would probably have two slow high signs right next to each other just to completely mark off the one side. And if you were going to access the street on a car, you would just simply drive around that sign to get in there. We could have the signs start further back. So if we did decide to do this on North Fulton, it could start after the Westridge market.

That'd be fine. You know, you could start at Oak Street and they could just be the second area. It doesn't. We're just trying to prove a concept here and see if it works at all. Next slide, please. How would we do that? Well, it's a small area. We could certainly hit it door to door. In fact, Council Member Rule has offered to go to everyone there and explain to them what we're doing. We would want to do flyers. We'd do social media.

You know, we would have a community meeting. And at the end of the evaluation period, we would want to bring everybody together and talk about how it went and if it was something we want to continue or not. A World Cafe type approach. Next slide. This is not going to be something that's very expensive. I don't think it will cost anywhere near $50,000 but it could cost up to that amount and that's just a simply purchase the signs install them and do the pavement market. The promotional part about it would be born in-house.

Next slide. That's what I have happy answer any questions? It's your idea, you

not transcribed≈26s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:56 – 3:0417 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.882:56:36

bet. So this happened during COVID and it was a lot in the Bay Area because people were out walking but North Fulton we have a lot of walkers, we have a lot of families, we have a lot of kids and we're a dark street and I know my neighbors walk I see them strolling, I see them biking. I see the kids out playing basketball and to me this is something that it doesn't...

It's not regulatory. It doesn't tell people that they can't go down the street but it asks them to understand that perhaps we want to start thinking about slow streets And North Fulton, yes it is my street so I know it really well. I know the families there. I know the ones who have kids. I mean I know them and they walk you know they walk and you have two arterial roads park which is the next street over which only has one half of the street is houses it's it's a very large street and a park. And then you have North Montgomery so I believe that if we were to move in this way where we're not demanding that people don't drive down the street but we start sort of informing them that there are other streets to get from Ojai Ave to Grand. And you don't have to go down North Fulton it doesn't in any way suggest that residents Don't go down this street, residents don't park there.

It's kind of a residence only street if you agree. There is no cop there saying you can't go down the road and it's a pilot and I saw it work. I've seen it work in various places where they get the message that it's slow street and everybody in Ojai knows that families like to walk. You know, they know that people bike and that they stroll. And so to me it's kind of...

It kind of hits all the boxes without demanding that people don't drive down this street. And I think it's also to move the community towards a different way of traveling through the downtown area Thank you. Speaking to the folks that walk, and just in an hour-and-a-half I counted 16 groups walking down North Fulton. Whether they were with kids, two adults whatever, walking down North Fulton it's going to get dark soon early and you know it's dangerous yeah

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:38

So, the question I have and whoever wants to answer it is fine. Like on page 280 the public outreach I guess what I didn't understand, and I understand this is a concept review and we're just talking about the concept. Due to limit size it is unrealistic, it is realistic to forecast direct interaction so I hear the door-to-door walking and then there could even be a community meeting. Is the community meeting to gauge buy in or is the community meeting in the vision to express here's what we're going to do? Do you have any questions?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:00:11

I thought the community meeting really was to get feedback after it's done. What worked, what didn't work. How would you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:00:21

feel about – I'm just asking the question of before to say what do you guys think of the site?

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:00:26

I'm absolutely fine with that. I've done a very antidotal, like the people that are walking on Fulton, I have an idea what do you think? They think it's a great idea but I have no problem with...

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.833:00:38

An idea if I could just jump in and what you see in some other cities sometimes is sometimes there's a neighborhood that wants to enforce specific parking for that particular street only right resident-only parking or whatever And what some communities do is they make there be a vote of every property owner on the street. And then they actually, this is a little bit different than what we're proposing, they actually pay for the signs to be installed. That's a different concept but you could do the same thing. You could determine all the property owners.

You could do a survey, you could do a vote, you could do number of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:09

different things. We see similar things besides the engineering recommendation but speed hump policy also has the buy-in of the residents.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:01:17

So, I have a question. Because I went down a deep dive when the Slow Down Drown movement started. I love my drown neighbors and at the time James Vega who was the city manager said that the city tried sharrows and tried doing curbs and that it was a real disaster because they had people having accidents or older residents not remembering that they were there and hitting trees.

Have we looked at any other traffic calming measures? First of all, when we talk about anything in the streets, that brings up a concern based on what we were looking at with previous efforts. Have you looked at other previous efforts in this city

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:02:10

I would say that on the corners there are lights, which is the only place that these would be. Right? So, I mean when you draw at every corner there is a light right and especially on Ojai Ave so it's not like it's in the middle of the dark area and there's a curb that he didn't know about Right, it's something completely different. It asks you to slow down and understand that this is a street where we are trying to prioritize walkers and bikers in different modes of transportation.

So there's nothing in the street itself, in the middle of the dark street

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:02:49

Even though there are signs that you would have to drive over. So

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.833:02:52

you don't drive over them, they are flex posts and if they are struck they are going to bend down. You drive around them. I

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:03:01

think I just have concerns based on what we were trying to figure out and this is for the discussion so I'm gonna

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:03:08

quit talking. I just have one question though which is when we get into The notion of traffic calming, or just any kind of. We have had a we've started a precedent although it's very new but going to the public safety with that in mind so I just I'm positing that for my colleagues too.

GovBen HarveyCity ManagerProposedvoiceprint 0.833:03:28

That's an option too.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:03:31

Yeah and we can't. They're backed up, they don't meet. This would be six months down the road if we were lucky. So it really is a matter of... And we have the safety commission in San Francisco that has done all of the research. It's not Ojai but, you know... So,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:04:03

let me maybe now's a good time if it's okay. I'll go to public comments unless there's more questions Okay. Well, I do have a

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:04:09

question If you if you manage to Reduce people driving on your street does it increase the value of your property?

3:04 – 3:1015 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:04:26

I mean, what does that even mean? Because the value of the property increases. It

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:04:32

means you're not supposed to participate in a discussion that changes the

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:04:38

value. Oh, you're asking... That

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:04:40

sounds like an intention question.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:04:43

I mean, I don't know if it increases my value and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:04:46

I have no intentions are very hard to gain

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:04:48

either. Increasing my value increases the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:04:51

value. I'm handling it. I am handling it please. I will ask you to defer that intention question. Oh, so there are no. No, I didn't say there's no intentions. I'm saying intentions are hard. Let's just go with what's in front of us. So here's a proposal. I'll go to some public comments and see what the public has to say. Thank you. Larry Steingold please? And then Sunday Rylander and then Bill Meisner.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed3:05:23

Hi, I'm speaking as a commissioner not for the Public Safety Commission. Based on the slow street programs in purple this is a perfect example that something should become before the Public Safety Commission we have met, we have worked on e-bikes, we have worked on traffic calming, we have lost two members We have canceled the 10-19 meeting because we are lacking.

We have a meeting, so it's not that we're not meeting and that I take offense to. I didn't say we weren't meeting. No, you did. Please let's just talk. But this is perfect. This is something that should go to public safety Because this is where it was designed for to talk about traffic, pedestrian safety. Automatic traffic sign or data driven not anecdotal. Okay so that's what it was designed for and that's where this should actually be going.

From here, and then it comes back with our suggestions that wherever the suggestions is voted on. And then you go from there and you can take the advice or not or however that works. But that's where we should be going because that's what the Public Safety Commission was designed for to do exactly this. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:06:50

Thank you sir. Sunday Rylander please and then Bill Mudd. Hi.

CommentSunday RylanderProposedself-stated3:06:56

My name is Sunday Rylander. I'm an Ojai resident, I purchased my home on North Fulton 27 years ago. I own a business downtown, I employ six local employees. I also work full time for local business. I served as the chairman of Parks and Rec Commission for three years then I've been an activist and served on board. I've been very active in the community. I am busy. I came here tonight because this is a waste of time And I needed, I felt I need to speak about it. I have nothing against obviously bike riding and safety. I've raised my kids on that street with a lot of other folks.

It's fine. I walk every night on that street. I'm fine. Please take no action. You're comparing San Francisco with 4.6 million people to Ojai with 7.5. San Francisco is the fourth most populous city in California. The thought of, I'm calling it slow die, but this is Ojai. $2.5 million was spent on slow street at the end of the day, it's still going on. I did my homework.

It's not all great. It was done during the pandemic. It also caused a lot of accidents because people with the things sticking up in the street just came around the corner and hit them. You're turning into the other lane to get around one of the, I forgot the name of them. The things that are standing up. It said that this for biking neighborhood recreation and over vehicles through traffic, we have a stop sign in the middle of North Fulton people come they slow down they stop and then they head on other streets do not have a stop sign so it makes sense.

That you're already slowing if that makes sense. I feel like this was forced upon us, the neighbors I've talked to don't want this on our street. There's so much traffic control and other necessity and other streets in downtown Ojai and city streets like Montgomery and Signal that deal with tourism and need parking and the thought of wasting $50,000 to stick some crap on a street To hopefully people go around is a complete waste.

It's a complete waste of your time, when would you have time to enforce something like that? And do we really want you doing that? When do we want you to work on why you spent hours working on this? What a waste of time city staff Lawyer time, $50,000 again is not a little bit of money. There's a lot of other really important things we could do with that money.

So it's not this like horrible idea. It's just that we don't need this. Does that make sense? We don't need it here in Ojai.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:09:59

Thank you. I appreciate it. Bill Miley please. Oh, Hila. Okay.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.863:10:05

Leanna, did you want to speak on this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:10:07

Leanna please, do you want us to speak on this? No, you don't need to.

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.863:10:09

Mayor we have two raised hands for Zoom. First is a Zoom user labeled iPad9 and second would be Karina. iPad9, you have the ability to unmute and speak.

3:10 – 3:1510 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:10:24

Can you hear

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:10:25

me?

ElectedAndrew WhitmanCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.873:10:26

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:10:28

I have several comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:10:30

One is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed3:10:34

I am sure there are other narrow streets in Hawaii that need to have consideration of traffic and pedestrian activity. Also, I was born in San Francisco and I learned you never speak of San Francisco as Frisco And please don't speak of Ojai as J, slow J. It's always Ojai. So that intellectually emotionally bothered me. It seems to me that the best thing the council can do tonight is to refer this idea The two commissions, the Public Safety Commission and the Planning Commission for concept reviews.

And to look at the issue of what is the data we can get that shows difficulties and problems on various streets in our city? The streets that are west of Signal Street mostly have intersections with stop signs, which slow traffic. The ones that are east only one or two have stop signs. That's a problem so and maybe you should criticize the people who designed the city They made the streets so narrow.

So please, send this to the Planning Commission and the Public Safety Commission for further activities. It's really the issue of slow down the program that the dot-com company is promoting as well as the concept. Thank you. Thank you

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.863:12:50

sir. Next we'll have Karina. Karina I see you've unmuted.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:12:56

Good evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:12:56

Hello.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:12:58

Hi, I think it was about 2 years ago almost to this meeting that I stood in that chamber and tried to express the importance of traffic calming measures in this town and I was pretty much smirked at by most of the council and city staff. And after the new year, we got the traffic officer, the motorcycle traffic officer since that seemed to be the only way the town could conceive of slowing down traffic here in Ojai.

So you can imagine...I took this personally when I saw this on the agenda Fulton was going to have this demonstration. We have a group on Drown Avenue that for 10 years has advocated for slow down drown. We have an engineer on our street who drafted plans, incredible plans, on how to narrow drown, how to keep the parking etc., and I'm just surprised that this would come up. I'm surprised it would be Fulton Street, that as a previous speaker pointed out has a stop sign in the middle of it.

The way Fulton Street is described you could describe almost any neighborhood street in Ojai. I think this is extremely short-sighted. I think we need a broader look at all of our street planning. You do this on Fulton, everybody's going to want it and then we're not gonna be able to afford it just like you said about the speed bumps so I oppose this. I don't think that there is massive amounts of traffic on Fulton.

I don't think it's needed and I would really appreciate it if you would put our funds and your energy into other things. Thank you.

3:15 – 3:2331 turns

ClerkWeston MontgomeryChief Deputy City ClerkProposedvoiceprint 0.863:15:04

Thank you, that's all me. Okay.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:15:09

First of all, Drowned Street would be fine. We talked about that and basically Drowned Street and Fulton Street both have stop signs at exactly the same place and the only place which is Oak. It's the intersection where Oak and Fulton and Drowned hit. They both have stop signs It's not, it's four blocks from, I mean there's, let's see. I'm 400 so there's at least 500. There's five blocks between Ojai Ave and Grand Avenue with one stop sign, okay? Same as on Drown. I don't have a problem with it being Drown. I mean if people feel like they've been working on this for so long Drown is fine. I go down drown, I go down Fulton. I think Fulton's a better street but I certainly didn't do it to improve my property values for God's sake.

No, don't stop. I'm asking everybody to stop. Enough is enough. Enough is enough. You stop! Enough is enough.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:08

It was it was done already.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:16:10

Yeah, I know it was done already but the point being is that I have no allegiance to either Fulton or Drowned. I do believe that we need a street from Grand to Ojai that is walkable And with one stop sign on five blocks, you have three blocks before you hit the first stop sign. Then you got another two and a half blocks before you hit Grand Avenue. That's plenty of time for people to speed and they do speed and our neighbor across the street had his dog killed.

You know, so I don't actually understand what the problem is. And you know, I'm just trying to make it possible for people in the downtown corridor to walk at night and not be at risk. And it might be that adults walk fine but we have kids We have kids on bikes. We have a lot of kids, three kids with their parents, with the parent trying to keep an eye on those three kids. And as far as like San Francisco it's just an idea they did it all over the country and they actually San Francisco just has all of the data around it.

And so, you know, nobody is trying to say that Ojai is San Francisco and whatever's good for San Francisco is good for Ojai. We're saying there is an idea and there is a project that happened that was very successful. If you look through Ojai and you don't believe that we need to have a street that kids and families in downtown Ojai can walk, we have kids that are playing basketball in the street.

You know? If you don't want it, so be it.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:18:00

I acknowledge my appreciation that we're bringing something forward to talk about a very important topic. As Karina mentioned, this is something that we on DROWN have been working on. This is something that we've talked about at a lot of different meetings and how to slow down traffic so that it is safer for pedestrians. You know, this is one of the reasons why we had the speed hump policy put into place But I also agree with Karina in that we need to think about this in a holistic way.

And I don't know if piloting one project right now, in this way is the next step. I would support having the Safety Commission look at this from a holistic perspective. What are other cities our size doing? What kinds of projects could work here? Maybe this is one that they bring into it, but really taking a hawk's eye view And seeing what has been done, because I just have this vivid memory of sitting in James Vega's office.

And us having this conversation, me saying we want speed bumps on drown. They've been trying to get this done for ten years. What are we gonna do about the culvers? We had an in-depth conversation and he told me that they have tried so many different things here. That haven't worked for one reason or another. So having the Safety Commission look at recommendations for street calming measures, I think would be something that would be beneficial. We also did, I'm going to back up, this council has done several things to work on street safety. We did the speed hump policy We did a whole traffic study looking at slowing down the speed limit on certain streets. We had the stop signs put in and I heard someone today talk about how they're not as effective as we expected them to be, but we have actually done a whole lot with street safety.

And so I'm interested in seeing what other suggestions would there be? What else could we do?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:20:19

It seems to me, we don't have to belabor this too much. You know, I wanted to talk about this because I'm interested in hearing ideas. I do think that the discipline that we inherited with the Public Safety Commission, they took some initiative We asked them to look at a speed hump policy, and they are going to bring back to this body. A traffic calming policy with higher speed humps is only 1 of the solutions. So I would love to see them think about this as a solution getting data on the street so it's not anecdotes. I think that would be where the thing. I think we heard from 1 commissioner and we have another in the room.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:20:56

You know, I actually broached this to them months ago. Okay? You know,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:03

I would love to see them take it up and then we can be that more disciplined way to look at things. Yeah,

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:21:07

I think it's fine. And I think we just it's not about traffic calming. That's what I it's an idea around making it taking as many cars as you possibly can off of particular streets. And it's not about it is about pedestrian safety, but it's about having a walkable safe Ojai.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:31

I think they

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:21:31

can take

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:32

that principle and really

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:21:33

work on it. And you know, it's a principle is what it is. And like I said, I'm fine with drowned doesn't matter to me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:21:41

If there's just I'm suggesting that we send it to

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:21:44

the commission. It's great to send it. OK, if everybody wants to send it to the Safety Commission, fine. Let's send it to this.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:21:49

I would prefer doing no.

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.933:21:51

I just wanted to say like, you know, so if every night when I turn on the news, I find out about Super El Nino it's coming and all of that. I would much rather take $50,000 give to the commission to say what are we going to do? We have the head of public works that's going to be retiring. When is somebody gonna come in? What do we have in place? Like, I would rather spend their effort doing something that's an emergency for the whole community. We have $20

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:22:16

million in reserves. It's not even $20 million in reserves

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:22:20

to have this conversation, but we get it. There's not either or

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:22:23

so to prevent to prevent World War Three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:22:27

Yeah,

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:22:28

I'm going to make a motion that we take no action tonight and that we direct the planning the Safety Commission to add to their agenda, the Public Safety Commission that we have them add to their working agenda to bring back suggestions for traffic calming measures and slower streets.

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:22:53

I would second that, and I would ask them to also evaluate property values when they do that. Do they go up or do they go down?

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:23:01

Thank you. I don't want to add that. I'm not going to add that to my... Why do that? And I see the chair of our public safety commission here nodding his head.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:10

I am seconding this motion right here. Shake your head.

CommentLarry SteingoldProposed · by introduction3:23:15

I'm shaking

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:23:15

my head. You shake your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:17

head all you want. We're almost done! Time, time, time, time. Hey, I'm asking you to stop. Please stop. Please stop. No, I won't. Because she's

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.623:23:27

always

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:23:28

the

ElectedKim MangMayor Pro TemProposedvoiceprint 0.623:23:28

one... I'm good for that. Absolutely. She can flap her mouth and nobody can do it. No I don't do that.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:23 – 3:231 turns

ElectedLeslie RuleCouncilmemberProposedvoiceprint 0.883:23:43

You and Mr. Whitman should go out and do something.