Planning Commission Regular MeetingJune 17, 2026

Switch meeting
BodyPlanning Commission
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 17, 2026

Click any transcript line to jump the video there.

Meeting Summary

  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

Present: Murphy, Stewart, Schmidt

This summary was AI-generated to save you time. It may miss or misstate details — verify against the official recording and the transcript.

At a glance

Concept Review CR 26-003: Wildflower Hotel Project

  • Staff presented a concept for six standalone hotel units requiring a General Plan land use amendment from Commercial Manufacturing to General Commercial.
  • Discussion focused on traffic impacts, architectural compatibility with the corridor, and protecting manufacturing zones.
  • Staff clarified zoning restrictions against residential conversions and outlined parking and design review standards.
  • The Commission provided feedback without taking a vote and closed the item for future action.

Full summary

Planning Commission Meeting Summary

  • Date: June 17, 2026 Time: 6:00 p.m. – 7:42 p.m.

Call to Order and Roll Call

  • The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. The roll call was conducted, confirming the attendance of Chair Murphy, Commissioners Stewart, Rice-Schmidt, and Hanson. Vice-Chair Chesley was absent. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

Approval of Agenda

  • A motion was made to accept the agenda as presented. The motion was seconded. A voice vote was taken, and the motion passed.

Public Communications

  • Public communication was opened. One individual addressed the Commission, expressing gratitude for the Commission's service and its role in shaping the future of the community. No further public statements were recorded on this item.

Consent Calendar

  • The Commission considered the approval of the minutes from the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting.
  • Motion: A motion was made to accept the minutes.
  • Second: The motion was seconded.
  • Vote: A roll call vote was conducted.
  • Outcome: Passed.

Disclosure of Site Visits and Ex Parte Contacts

  • Commissioners provided disclosures regarding site visits and contacts. No formal action was taken.

Concept Review CR 26-003: Wildflower Hotel Project

  • Staff presented a concept review request regarding a new hotel development at 923 East Ojai Avenue. The proposal involves the construction of six two-story and two one-story standalone hotel units. The request includes a General Plan land use designation amendment from Commercial Manufacturing to General Commercial, the merging of three existing vacant legal lots into one parcel, and consideration of a Design Review Permit.
  • Recusal: One Commissioner recused themselves due to a hospitality business located nearby.
  • Staff Presentation: Staff outlined project details, including zoning consistency, design review standards, parking requirements, traffic analysis, and public art ordinances. It was noted that the General Plan amendment requires final determination by the City Council, while the Planning Commission would provide a recommendation for the Design Review Permit and lot merge process.
  • Applicant Presentation: The applicant presented the project vision, describing it as an experiential hospitality development with keyless access, full kitchens in units, and communal amenities such as a spa, sauna, and outdoor movie area.
  • Public Comment: Members of the public provided statements. Comments included concerns regarding traffic impacts, the potential loss of industrial/manufacturing land, over-reliance on tourism, architectural style compatibility with the Ojai Avenue corridor, and the possibility of future residential conversion. Some speakers supported the project as a way to activate the east end of the commercial corridor.
  • Commission Discussion: Commissioners provided feedback on the proposal.
  • Zoning: Some commissioners supported the General Plan amendment to General Commercial to maintain commercial character on Ojai Avenue while expressing a desire to protect manufacturing zones on Bryant Street.
  • Design: Comments were raised regarding the architectural style, specifically noting concerns about steep roof pitches, dark color schemes, and the scale of the buildings relative to the surrounding area. Suggestions were made to align the design with local guidelines regarding materials, horizontal emphasis, and openness to the street.
  • Land Use: The merging of lots was generally viewed as acceptable to facilitate the development. Commissioners suggested potential mixed-use elements to increase community engagement.
  • Traffic and Parking: Concerns were raised regarding the traffic study methodology and current intersection conditions. Staff noted parking is proposed at the rear of the site.
  • Operational Details: Questions were raised regarding on-site management and maintenance. Staff clarified that single-family residential conversions are not a permitted use in the C1 zone.
  • Decision: No vote was taken. As a concept review, the purpose of the item was to provide feedback to the applicant. The Chair closed the item for future action.

Future Agenda Items

  • Staff reported on upcoming items scheduled for July and August.
  • July 1st: Design Review Permit regarding a size reduction for the Cottages Among the Flowers project and a request for modification of conditions of approval at 315 North Montgomery (noted as incomplete for processing).
  • July 15th: Appeal regarding a tree permit at 304 South Ventura Street (noted as not yet noticed).
  • August: Appeal regarding tenant protections (noted as not yet processed).
  • Action: None.

Reports

  • Director's Report: No specific items were reported.
  • Mayor's Report: The Mayor addressed the upcoming City Council meeting regarding the Ojai Mountain Farm project, noting that previous Planning Commission and HPC meetings were part of the process to resolve discrepancies.
  • Action: None.

Adjournment

  • The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 p.m.