BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 June 16, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:02 – 0:317 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:35

Hi, good evening everyone. Just want to call the meeting to order for the Oxnard City Council for Tuesday June 16th, 2026. Madam Clerk, may we have the roll call and posting of the agenda please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47

The agenda for this meeting was posted in the kiosk at City Hall, the Oxford Public Library, the city administrative offices and on the city's website on Thursday June 4th. And the amended agenda on Wednesday June 10th. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:12

Thank you. Prior to closed session we will take public comments Mr. Fisher, can you please provide a statement prior to closed session?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:21

Thank You Mayor the City Council will recess to a closed session pursuant to government code section 54956.9 subdivision D1 To confer with its attorneys the matter being discussed is Brodersen versus City of Oxnard

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:40

Madam Clerk, do we have any speakers for this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:43

Excuse me. Mayor Pro Tem and council members, we do not have any public speakers in person or virtually for closed session. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:51

Thank You madam clerk the City Council will now recess to a closed session and at 530 We will begin with an appointment item. Thank you The City Council has just emerged from closed session, and at this time I will ask our city attorney Mr. Fisher for any announcements to make.

0:31 – 0:375 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:21

Thank you Mayor there are no reports of action out of closed session this evening.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role31:28

Thank You Mr. Fisher

the next item on the agenda is an appointment item scheduled for 530. It's D1 on your agenda it's from the Public Works Department the subject Is Cayegos Municipal Water District rates. The recommendation is that the City Council receive and file an update regarding the Cayegos Municipal Water District rates. And there's a live presentation by Cayegos Municipal Water District staff, and I see that Mr. Michael Wolf our public works director is here to answer any questions any council members have before we begin with the presentation?

Any questions or comments? Okay, turn over to you Mr.. Wolf. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed32:12

Pro tem council members Michael wolf director of public works You've heard me talk in the past about our sources of water that we have for our potable water system We have our own groundwater that we produce and we have groundwater that we purchase from United and we have a third regional partner which is kayakus they are state water project State Water Project provider And they're here tonight to talk about their current rates and future rates. So I'll have the general manager come up, introduce herself and go into the presentation.

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated32:50

Good evening, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members. Thanks for having us tonight. My name is Christine McCaffrey. I'm the General Manager at Cuyahoga's Municipal Water District. I'll be doing a portion of the presentation here this evening. Also participating in the presentation will be Dan Smith, our Manager of Finance. He's going to do all the parts with a lot of numbers and then I'm also joined by Director Jackie McMillan, Director Thiebaud Robert who are Oxnard's elected representatives on our five-member board Directors so if we could there we go. Thank you.

Go ahead and get started as Michael indicated we're going to talk a little bit about rates. So let's see where does it want me to point to advance. It buzzed a little I don't know if that means something About it being happy or unhappy as a device. Oh OK that seems like a OK there we go get the technical difficulties sorted out here and then we'll go ahead and get started Just tell me when it's OK to go ahead and click.

That sounded like something happening. All right, here we go. So as Michael mentioned, the way the water flows to you from Cayagas in addition to the other sources that you receive from local groundwater and United Water Conservation District is it starts up in the northern Sierra Mountains in the Feather River watershed, flows through Lake Oroville and the delta down the California aqueduct That's all part of the state water project operated by California Department of Water Resources.

They sell that water to the Metropolitan Water District, that's actually the largest wholesaler in the country serving 19 million people. We're at the very northern most part of their service area goes all the way down to the Mexican border serving Ventura, LA, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange and San Diego counties. So there's Cayagas, we're a wholesaler. And then of course you Oxnard are your own retail water provider and you actually serve the residents and businesses of Oxnard.

What's been driving rates are a lot of issues that may be likely very familiar to you from operating your own water system is of course the need to invest in aging infrastructure. At this point Metropolitan System is getting up on 100 years old. Ours is approaching Typically our infrastructure is about 50 to 60 years old at this point. We're being constrained on all of the major imported water supplies, State Water Project has had some really wet years of late there were some very dry years as you may recall.

Additionally, the Colorado River while we don't directly receive water from the Colorado River. A lot of Southern California does within the metropolitan service area and so the challenges there directly affect us to the extent that less water is available on the Colorado River, there's much more pressure on the state water project and the Colorado river is frankly in crisis at this point after an extended dry period All of the Colorado River states fighting over that water right now, trying to come to some sort of agreement because there simply isn't enough water to go around.

Metropolitan is investing in a potable reuse project called Pure Water Southern California and as you know, investing in water infrastructure's an expensive undertaking, as well as investing in operational flexibility that is critical to prevent the issues we had in 21 and 22 When we had to go down to one day a week watering because Metropolitan could not deliver water to us, even though they physically had it in storage. Those investments would prevent what happened five years ago from happening again today so I think they're worthwhile investments but they do cost some money.

And once again, I think these are issues that are likely familiar to you as you operate a water utility is future demands have flattened. In fact, demands have gone down. Caiegas for example used to serve up to 130,000 acre feet a year and this year will probably be at about 75,000. The same amount of infrastructure delivering a lot less water. As well as metropolitans made some changes in how they manage their finances in terms of reserve policies and assumptions about how much water they're going to sell.

And then they're also struggling once again with an issue all of us in water are facing, how much of those charges go on fixed costs? And how much of them go on variable costs on the you know each unit of water purchased by a customer? So I'm going to turn it over to Dan to talk a little bit about the rate components on Metropolitan's portion of the rate.

0:37 – 0:455 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed37:59

Good evening, Council Members. So to talk about Metropolitan's rate so there is two components to their rate. There is a variable rate or a volumetric rate and with that there's two portions. There's the untreated water which we cannot get the untreated. We can only get treated water from Metropolitan at this time so we have to pay the treated water surcharge Where they get it to the drinking level that we see and serve the public today.

They also currently are pretty familiar with the two fixed charges they have, which is the readiness to serve charge. And this is kind of the definition that they provide to us as to what that covers. The capital costs of their system capacity that is on standby. That system, that charge is allocated to us based on a 10 year rolling average of our demands. So we come up with a full dollar amount that they need and they figure out how much we get by looking at the average of ten years.

Then they also have a capacity charge, which recovers the cost of the assets that are providing the peak capacity. So during the summertime specifically when everybody peaks off Metropolitan, that's when we take the most water and they base that, they allocate that to us based on the peak day between May 1st and September 30th. We're all on? Yeah, I did. So what Metropolitan adopted for 2027 rates was what they call the 6.2% increase for both 27 and 28 and I state it like that because that's their overall increase that they're looking at which includes both the variable and the fixed rates What we're looking at is the treated water rate is going to decrease by 7% because they're actually creating a new fixed charge, which we're going to talk about on the next slide.

But in order to create that new charged fixed charge, they're actually reducing their variable charge so we're gonna see an increase in the variable but there's an increase to us on the fixed charge side The readiness to serve charge, we're seeing some very high increases in the last five years. This next one is a 23% increase up to 12.2. That's just Caius' portion million dollars that we have to allocate out to our purveyors.

The capacity charges also increasing by 24%, but it's only $3 million in 2027 to us from Metropolitan. Both those charges have been increasing double digits 10 1112% for four to five years, and we can definitely see a big increase in that. But overall, that 6.2% when we take all these into account is only a 4.6% increase in 27 to Cayugas, and we're looking at a six percent in 2028. Those rates have been adopted. That's set. They've adopted these. We know where we're going to be going in the next two years from Metropolitan.

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated40:55

Kind of wrapping up the metropolitan portion of this presentation, I do want to point out that these rates, the initially proposed rates were substantially higher than what was ultimately adopted. And in addition, this new treated water fixed charge is actually a really good thing for Cayagas and for our retailers The way the rate was previously structured, it really for agencies like Cayagas that take treated water all the time we were paying the costs of agencies who took it less frequently and this helps more fairly allocate the costs to the beneficiaries. So this is overall a good thing. It's something Cayagas frankly has been advocating for over a decade and we were finally able to work with our fellow member agencies to make it a reality so a really success story there.

Moving on to the rate drivers for Cayagas, of course the biggest driver is metropolitan rates you know we're buying metropolitan water delivering it to you and our other 18 retailers that 75% is just straight pass-through that's what our our biggest cost is by far but additionally we are also investing in aging infrastructure we have 130 miles of large diameter pipeline ranging from 24 inches to 78 inches as well as pump stations, reservoirs other facilities that are critical to maintain water supply reliability and they need some attention and improvements at this point in their lifespan.

Another big factor is the new model for resilience. This is the Water Resources Implementation Strategy I came to the City Council to speak about about a year ago now Investing in projects that will prevent what happened in 21 and 22, in terms of restrictions from happening should we face similar circumstances again. And then similar financial factors as I spoke about for Metropolitan are as I mentioned our demands have diminished substantially over the last 15 years and while it's a great success story from a conservation standpoint that presents a challenge from a financial standpoint We're also trying to find that right balance of fixed costs and fixed revenue. And then we face all the same increasing external cost pressures that Metropolitan faces, that you face in terms of construction costs and fuel costs which have all increased very substantially and continue to do so.

Turning it back over to Dan for the detail on the rates.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed43:27

I'll be doing this. I'll be talking for a little while now As we get into this, I'm going to start running through a lot of numbers and if you need to stop me and slow me down please do so. First of all the CAIGAS rate. So we have a portion that is also variable rate that we put on top of Metropolitans and it's based on the acre feet that you purchase. That's how it's getting charged and then like I've talked about the readiness to serve charge which is from Metropolitan. We treat as a pass-through. It just goes straight off onto the purveyors including Oxnard And we divide that right now, we're allocating it on a 10 year rolling average just like we get it from Metropolitan. So we just kind of mirrored their allocation system.

The capacity charge, we also have a capacity charge on top of Metropolitan's. It's a little bit different than what Metropolitan does. Our capacity charges based on the infrastructure that we need in order to meet demands when we don't have water for Metropolitan. So we have several assets out there including Lake Bard, the water treatment plant that is there. The well fill that we have that we store water in all of those assets are used to make sure that we can provide water when we're no longer on met and we allocate the cost of those to the purveyors, including Oxnard so that we recoup the cost of those assets.

We base our peak demand a little bit different. We did break away from Metropolitan on this. We do it on the peak week but it's still through that May 1st through September 30th timeline because that's when we do see our peaking and we can't peak all the way into September. May not so much but definitely into September when it's really the hottest months So overall when we take both metrics... Sir, can we just take a quick question from Councillor

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role45:08

McArdle?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed45:09

Go ahead.

0:45 – 0:558 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed45:12

Thank you. I appreciate the presentation. If Metropolitan cut you off and we would rely on BARD and your ability to pump water, would you have enough water to get it to the end of the line Oxnard? And if you do how long would you have that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed45:27

Well it's going to really depend on what time of year but yes we have enough water in Lake BARD and the well fill to make it for an extended period of time. Minimum three months, depending on what we can do out of the well field. Lake Bard 10,500 acre feet that doesn't last us as long but we've got quite a bit of water out in the well field and it's going to be based on how much we can pump. But conservation is probably going to be involved if we're cut off for an extended period of time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed45:53

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed45:55

Was that good? I didn't know you were standing behind me sorry. So, the variable rate for 2027. We're proposing the Casitas rate of $2,118 an acre foot which is a 2.9% increase on that variable rate so it's much smaller and has a lot to do with what Metropolitan's done and the way they're reallocating some of their variable costs onto the fixed cost. We have a readiness to serve charge, that $12.2 million. Of course we're going to just allocate it out to the purveyors and the capacity charge is increasing by 16.8% to $8 million. 3 million's METS, 5 million is CAIEGAS and that is again done by the peak week.

I'm gonna kind of show you...we talked about the flattening of the water as well as the big decrease. You can see that in 2021 we were selling almost 95,000 acre-feet of water And then when the drought hit in 23, we were down to 60,000 acre feet which put a lot of financial pressure on us. We were able to do it on our end without doing large increases. We used reserves. We tried to smooth our rates as much as possible to get us through that time period.

As it slowly came up, our big year last year was at 76,000. We budgeted 75 this year and we are on pace to hit that exactly So I'm feeling pretty good about that. And then going forward, we're looking at 73,500 acre feet in water sales from here on out just to keep it conservative if something changes of course we can update that but we don't see it going back to those levels of 95,000 acre feet. Conservation is the way of life in California and so that's something that's gonna be driving what our water sales are going forward So here's the numbers part that I was talking about. You can kind of see Metropolitan's overall decrease of 7.1%. That includes that 28% decrease in the treated water surcharge, however then you can see that our variable rate is going to go up 31%, and I'm pointing this out because this is an important little thing to keep in mind, that really we're moving some of that treated water from Metropolitan's charge into our charge because we still got to collect the money That Metropolitan is now charging us as a fixed charge, which is up to $10 million this year.

So it's significant when we do all of the charges together you can see that overall in 2027 down at the bottom there the combined all-in rate. We're looking at roughly a 5% increase in the overall rate to the purveyors now each purveyor is different including Oxnard so I have I'll get to it. I've actually pulled Oxnard out to kind of give you what we're looking at as far as Oxnard goes. I've done a five-year analysis, I always do a five year long range plan and this is what the tiered rates are looking like so you can see the tiered rates going forward are gonna be minimalist 2.3 up to the 4.5% increases so it's not too bad overall Really the thing is the fixed charges are going up, which is really where some of the costs are. And so the big number that we really want to take away is actually this all-in percentages to kind of see where we're gonna be when we get done.

Now this isn't an average. This is not going to be directly affecting Oxnard. We'll get to Oxnard. It's a little bit how you guys operate your system, what your sales are gonna be affects what your percentage is gonna be. But overall, we're looking at and this is based on MET's 10-year plan as well. So I've taken what their estimates are and put it into this. We're looking at the fives to sixes percent increases over the next five years.

There are some big increases coming on the readiness to serve in capacity charges Metropolitan does do some of these big projects that they are anticipating So looking at the City of Oxnard and I'm saying their estimated rates that we're looking like for 2027. Of course, the 2.9% on the variable rate, that's pretty much done. That's not going to change but when we start getting the readiness to serve this is an estimate right now because it's a 10-year rolling average. This fiscal year hasn't quite ended.

I also did this in April so I didn't have The April or May numbers, Oxnard is selling a lot more water than I anticipated. But based on that we're looking at a 22% increase in the amount that you've been you're going to be paying for the readiness to serve charge and the capacity charge is also going up significantly for Oxnard about 39%. And there's two factors to that one is that the rate is going up because that amount from Metropolitan went up As well as Kyegis, but it also has to do with the Oxnard CFS that happened between the two years. That number is a solid number that is not going to change. That's what's gonna be charged in 27.

You took more water last year at a certain time that caused your CFS for that peak week to increase significantly which is gonna increase the amount that you owe. So overall, the Oxnard all-in rate and I base it on 8000 acre feet. And I did that because the three previous fiscal years you were basically selling or buying from us about 7500 acre feet to close to 8000.

This year you're already at getting probably 10,000 acre feet so you're selling a lot more this year which actually would lower that percentage But based on 8,000 acre feet you're looking at an overall increase of 5.6% which is a little bit higher than the five percent that I had showed you earlier from our overall calculation for the entire district as a whole.

So our next steps for the 2027 water rates we hold our public hearing on July 1st so it's not tomorrow's meeting it's the meeting after that at which time the board will then consider Adopting the 2027 water rates. We are also currently working on a cost of service study to kind of go over this we talked about that treated water charge that Metropolitan now has a fixed charge. So Kyegis is always just passed all of the water fixed charges through to our purveyors, so we're going to come up with an allocation that does that as well.

Talking with all the preparers, including Oxnard staff as to what is the best way to do it. And so we're developing that and putting that into the cost of service study. With that, I'm going to turn it back over to Christine to finish this up.

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated52:15

Wrap it up. Thus ends the very detailed numbers portion of this presentation. Just want to wrap up talking about some of the things that Cayagas is focused on, some of the efforts that money is going towards. We are pursuing an all-of-the-above approach to improving water supply reliability and resilience for our customers. And that includes partnering with Oxnard and others where that makes sense to meet the needs of our region.

We're currently working on a study to optimize brackish groundwater desalting in the Upper Cayugus Creek watershed. That's looking at about six different brackish groundwater desalter proposals that have been considered in that area over the years, Moore Park, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks. And we're working with eight of our retail water providers as well as the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency to do a comprehensive study and determine what makes the most sense from perspective of cost, yield, ability to move the water and all of the various benefits of those projects.

We're putting together a regional exchange program that would allow our purveyors to invest in projects with each other and deliver that water to each other via our system, either by physically delivering water into our system or by doing paper exchanges. Which is going to create a lot of opportunities for local investment and creative partnerships amongst retail providers who are differently positioned in terms of their access to local supplies.

We're working on some groundwater banking. Obviously, you know there's an adjudication going on in this particular basin that makes things a little challenging but that is something we continue to explore as well as looking outside the region for groundwater banking. We continue to advocate for improved access to metropolitan supplies. They have made some significant investments, but they continue to need to make more and we continue to advocate for Cayagas and all of our retail water providers to ensure that we have the same level of reliability and resilience as all the other member agencies do.

And of course, our ongoing support for water use efficiency including the non-functional turf replacement mandates that are coming into place over the next couple of years and the implementation of the conservation as a California way of life framework. So I appreciate your time and attention this evening. I'm happy to take questions as is Dan if the council has any and thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role54:43

Thank you very much. Are there any questions or comments? Council Member Starr go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role54:48

I was curious, does Metropolitan always go through an intermediary to deal with a city or in some cases does it go directly to the city?

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated54:58

When you say deal, oh you mean in terms of are some member agencies individual cities? It varies. Some of the older ones are what happened with Metropolitan is like the city some of the older cities like Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Anaheim they're all directly member agencies but as Metropolitan grew they realized it was impractical to have each individual city join as a member agency so the later regions that became part of Metropolitan had to do so through a wholesaler. So here in Ventura County that's us I guess what I'm trying to think through is there seems like there's a lot of intermediaries between the state and ultimately the final customer.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:55 – 1:0022 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role55:50

And I'm just trying to better understand the value propositions that are there. Just kind of wondering in my head, why couldn't the state just go directly charge each of the cities for

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated56:03

their... Oh, why couldn't the State Department of Water Resources deliver? What? I think once again it just becomes unmanageable with the number of entities they would have to coordinate with. Okay.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role56:13

All right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed56:14

Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role56:16

Thank you Council Member Sarnik. Council Member Parlo, go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed56:19

Thank you for the presentation. At one of the first slides, you mentioned some of the infrastructure is 50 to 60 years old. We have an issue in the city with some infrastructures 50 years old and we're looking at a life expectancy of 50 years. What's the life expectancy on your infrastructure that's 50 to 60 years old?

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated56:34

Well, it does depend on the infrastructure both what it is and how well it's been maintained and what conditions it's operating in. For our pump stations we've generally found that at 50 years or less they need a pretty significant investment. The electrical systems are outdated, the mechanical parts you know you can't get parts for them anymore. The pipelines we have generally found while from a finance perspective I think we use 50 years for pipelines I'm confident that most of our pipelines have a lot more life left in them. We do proactive inspection to identify areas of concern such as corrosion so we can address those proactively rather than replacing them wholesale, but it does depend on the material of the pipe whether there was a cathodic protection system what kind of conditions you're operating in.

I suspect here you're challenged by shallow groundwater in some locations

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed57:32

Specifically for the City of Oxnard delivering water to the City of Oxnard, cathodic protection for the pipelines? Do you give a report so the city would know what state of condition of cathodic protection is and the life expectancy of the lines. I know it sounds selfish to be asking about Oxnard. That's

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated57:52

a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed57:52

hat I'm wearing today.

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated57:53

Well, I mean, to be fair you're largely at the end of the pipe so you're affected by the health of pretty much everything upstream of you. We are...I would say that we're in very good shape there. Not some of our pipelines have cathodic protection on them and some of them don't. It really depends on the conditions whether that's warranted or not But we are very proactive in inspecting particularly the larger pipes, the pre-stressed concrete cylinder pipes but we've also... We're now using a technology called it's a pipe ball. I know our manager of engineering is here.

Pipe diver thank you that actually we flow through the pipe and it essentially I'm going to oversimplify even though I'm an engineer. It looks for whether there's any areas of concern so that we can proactively investigate and address those

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed58:40

Is there an ongoing pipe replacement plan in your organization?

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated58:44

At this point, the need for one hasn't been identified. We're doing the pipe diver to inspect everything and if we identify areas of concern, we will but at this point things have generally been in excellent shape.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed58:59

Thank you very much.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role59:02

Any other questions or comments? Go ahead Mayor Pro Tem.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role59:05

Thank you, thank you for the presentation to both of you just quick question did I hear you say that some of the pipes are 78 inch diameter because I think the monitors in this room were 70 or 75 inches so that's still not the size of those pipes was massive size there so Thank you for the info on that. Hope folks can think about just a scale of how much water we're talking here and how much is flowing through this entire infrastructure.

CommentChristine McCaffreyProposedself-stated59:30

Yeah, it means your public works director could walk through them without with plenty of headroom to clearance and he wouldn't have to bend over at all. We actually have one of them on our property that's we've taken out because it needed to be replaced. And so if anyone ever wants to come for a tour of our facility, you can see what a 78 inch pipe is like in real life and walk through it.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role59:49

Great, thank you. And thank you the scale of Mr. Wolf there was actually what really hit it home for me so thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role59:57

Madam Clerk are there any public speakers on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:03

I'm sorry mayor and council members there are no requests to speak for the appointment item. Thank you in person or virtually. Thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:00:12

Thank you. If there are no speakers and other comments or questions, thank you very much for your comprehensive presentation. This is only a receiving file and no action is required. Thank you again.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:00:25

Thank you for the staff and directors that attended. Thank you.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:00:28

Thank you. Okay. Commissioner Andrade come on up. Thank Good evening, everyone. Just want to call the meeting to order for the Oxnard City Council and the Oxnard Housing Authority for Tuesday June 16th 2026. Madam Clerk we have the roll call followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and we will also take a A moment of silence for, and I'll talk further about Ms. Peggy Rivera taking a moment of silence for her and also for Lupe Anuiano.

And who is it? And Mr. Robert Hernan. I'll let you talk about the council member. Thank you. Go ahead, Madam

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:53

Clerk. Commissioner Andrade. Thank you.

1:01 – 1:0610 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:01:58

Councilwoman Commissioner Basuah. The agenda for this meeting was posted in the kiosk at City Hall, the Oxnard Public Library, the city administrative offices and on the city's website on Thursday June 4th. And the amended agenda on Wednesday June 10th. I also have an announcement to read Pursuant to Government Code Section 54952.3, each member of the Housing Board of Commissioners present will receive $50 pay for convening this meeting with the exception of Commissioner Starr who has declined to receive compensation. Thank you.

Thank

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:02:47

you Madam Clerk.

The next item is the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a moment of silence. And for that, we will take a moment of silence for Ms. Peggy Rivera. I can briefly speak about her and certainly any council member that wants to opine about her as well. She was a longtime member of this community serving in our homeless Commissioned for over 14 years. Passionate about serving those less fortunate than us. She attended local schools here, was a graduate of DRIFL.

I think Guadalupe Elementary, Adolph Junior High School, Oxnard High School. Was a county employee. Was really well known beyond her advocacy for homeless population she was really well known for her salsa She actually took first place several times at the Salsa Festival and actually went and took first place at the county level, at the fair. And I know that because I know she's mentioned her family members and others that she wants to make sure that she left behind her salsa recipe to make sure others continue making their salsa and the proceeds for that to benefit our homeless community so it was A real tragic loss to lose somebody of her dedication and commitment to our most vulnerable in our community. So a moment of silence for her, and also I don't know Councilwoman if you want to speak to Lupe Onguiano?

Just a moment of silence for her and her advocacy that she's made in our community long-term walks and resident as well, and a champion for women's rights.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:04:28

Yes, I know that a lot of members of the community respect And loved Lupe Anguiano. She was a retired nun who was all about advocating for our community, social justice, environmental justice, women's rights and so much more. So she retired peacefully after giving her entire life to community. I know that Council Member Starr wanted to make sure that we highlight Lupe Anguiano and I believe Council Member Peralta also wanted to do a moment of silence for another individual but Lupe was quite the gem here in Oxnard and I know touched the lives

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:05:05

She was one of the founding members of the National Women's Political Caucus. Go ahead, Mr. Perrello regarding I think the public works person?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:05:15

I'd just like to say Ms. Equiano used to attend council meetings religiously, just to give her opinion. A former employee for the Public Works Department in the City of Oxnard, Robert Hearn passed away. He had been involved in several projects but I got to know him from the levee projects at CR3 and In the past few years, he lost a child and he lost his wife. Recently, he just passed away. He's lost his family.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:05:44

Thank you. And I see that Haley is up here to lead us in our Pledge of Allegiance but... One second, Council Member. I'll let you introduce her here in a second, okay? Council Member Starr, go

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:05:54

ahead. I just want to say that rarely will you meet a person as decent as Lupe Anguiano. I remember first meeting her she Wanted to find out, well what's this guy all about? She wanted to find out for herself what I was like. And she became a big diehard supporter of mine because she actually met me and spent time with me. This is a woman that just builds bridges. She worked for four different presidential administrations, Democrat and Republican.

Like I said, a real decent woman I want to go

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:06:36

ahead and

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:06:44

hand it over to Haley. She's a recent graduate from Frontier High School, who will be leading us in the pledge and then followed by the moment of silence and then sharing a bit about her history here in the city of Oxnard. So thank you so much Haley for joining us tonight

1:07 – 1:124 turns

CommentHaley Villalobos AriasProposedself-stated1:07:01

You can put your right hand over your heart and your left hand by the side. Ready, begin.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:07:36

Thank you, everyone.

CommentHaley Villalobos AriasProposedself-stated1:07:47

Hello Mayor McArthur and City Council members. My name is Haley Villalobos Arias, and my Vice Principal Dr. Monica Robles asked me to come and speak to you all about my personal story and experiences here in Oxnard. I was born in East Palo Alto at Stanford Hospital. And for the first two years of my life, my mother, father, and I rented a room in my uncle's house. Then we moved to Ventura County due to my job, my father's job being in Los Angeles. My father was never a part of my life He worked as a truck driver and was constantly on the road for months at a time.

I never had the father-daughter family lifestyle. When I turned four years old, my mother and I moved out of the house to avoid any more conflicts that usually turned violent. My mother always made sure to give me anything I needed whether it was necessities, love or support. Later on, my mother met a man named Mario Uribe and started a relationship with him.

They both rented a room in my grandfather's house where we lived together. When I was seven years old, my mom had my baby brother. Life was hard at home not having my own personal space. The void that my father left in me was too heavy to carry. Having to watch that my brother had a father that cared for him and not understanding why my dad didn't want to be in my life.

The emotional pain that I experienced during school hours was draining. During my elementary school in Parkview Elementary, I was constantly bullied by my peers. They made fun of me because I wore glasses and was cross-eyed. After elementary school, I joined EO Green Junior High, a much larger school. The bullying continued not as much as Fargue but still happened. The lack of support from teachers saddened me. At this time my mom also had my sister and I was reconnecting with my dad. I found out that I had a younger sister on him and my stepmom's side of the family too.

Balancing the pain of watching my siblings grow up with loving fathers and dealing with schoolwork during COVID time was hard. After a year or so and financial hardship, we were able to move to Somis and transfer there. The school there was different it was a K-8 school and I graduated 8th grade with only about 25 kids. It was a much smaller school and I had a lot of support there too After that, I started attending Adolfo Camarillo High School. That high school was big with many kids. I was failing many classes because I did not understand and was afraid to ask questions. And my teachers would constantly tell me that they were there to focus on the kids who wanted a pass, not the ones who wanted to fail and they never offered me help.

The counselors also had many students they had to check in with, so getting them to call you in for a meeting was really hard. And when they would call me in for a meeting and I would tell them that I didn't get along with the teacher or that the class was too hard, they would tell me there was nothing they can do. All the other classes were full. After three years of attending Adolfo Camarillo High School, I got called into the office and I was told that I had to transfer to Frontier High School because I was constantly absent and failing many classes.

When I got to Frontier High School, I did not know what to expect but then I met many wonderful teachers. They always had time for me, they allowed me to cry, they gave me support, and they always encouraged me to do better. Dr. Robles, the vice principal constantly told me that I was capable of doing well in my academics and always pushed me to not give up.

I am excited to share with you all that I graduated from Frontier High School on June 1st and as the ASB Vice Principal, I spoke during my ceremony to share my experiences at school. I want to personally thank Mark Contreras, Frontier High School principal for his continued support and for inspiring me. Without your support, I don't think I would be here today.

In 2025, I joined a non-profit organization in the city of Oxnard called West Coast Cultural Arts and signed up to the Señoritas Fiestas Patrias pageant where I met a group of young ladies and experienced being part of a cultural pageant. I learned about my personal roots, the traditions and the history of the country where my family comes from. I learned that my accent is my essence in my soul and I am proud of who I am. I am proud to say that I won second place and won a scholarship on September 14th 2025. I was also part of the Escolta and Oxnard Plaza with the Charos Unidas. It was an honor to represent and learn about the country where my ancestors come from After high school, I plan on attending Oxnard College and study to become an ultrasound technician and hopefully work with kids.

I always knew that I wanted to help people and I wanted to work with kids so i think this is my perfect in-between. I want to say thank you again to the mayor and city council members for allowing me to share my story

1:12 – 1:175 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:12:49

Thank you very much Ailey for sharing such personal insights about your life and growing up here in Oxnard. But it really highlights, that's why we do this, it really highlights young people like yourself that given the right opportunities surrounded by good people like you highlighted Mark and Therese. Mark and I went to high school together actually Blackstock is where we met, right Mark? And that's what it's about, right? And this is exactly why as a community we're all here behind you, because I know that oftentimes in our community we have young people that face tremendous challenges. But nonetheless you're resilient and I'm glad that Mark came into your life, gave you that mentorship and then you met others through Fiestas Patrias where it sounds like you really highlighted yourself and connected and I know you're going to be destined to do wonderful things.

So thank you so much for having that, really that belief in yourself to come here and share such personal accounts of yourself. Thank you. Do you want to be on a mark and trace? You highlighted, I know you highlighted the principal as well. Anyone else that you want to highlight that's here with you today?

CommentHaley Villalobos AriasProposedself-stated1:14:03

I think my mom. She's like been my inspiration through everything. I saw her go through one of the hardest times of her life and...

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:14:18

Councilwoman, any comments or if not we're prepared to present you a certificate of achievement. If you want to come up here as well as I think Mark if you want to come up here and others from Frontier and your mom. We'd love to have you up here and take some photos Okay. We will now

move to the next item on the agenda. This is a proclamation. I see Manuel, Gabriel that are out there if you guys want to come up and anybody else from the car club community? Bunch Hernandez if you're out there as well, if you'd like to come up. Haley thank you so much again for your presentation. Thanks Mark. See you guys. Sir, how are you?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:17:24

Thank you. Yeah.

1:18 – 1:305 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:18:27

People are getting scared seeing you guys walk

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:18:32

in here. You got John here too? If you guys are okay, we'll start with the proclamation and then we'll move to some photos. Okay? Well this is a lot bigger than it was last year. This is wonderful to see. I'm just gonna read what we put together for this proclamation. Today we celebrate the Oxnard Lowrider community and proclaim it as Appreciation Day Whereas back in August 2023, the state of California dedicated and declared the first Sunday of summer as California Lowrider Day.

And the city of Oxnard has long been home to a rich diverse low rider car culture that has allowed for the asserting of cultural identity and defying racial discrimination and class identification. And whereas our low rider community has for decades Helped raise thousands for local schools and community-based organizations. And our Lowrider community coordinates annual canned food and toy drives to serve local needy families, and bring joy to children especially during the holiday seasons.

And whereas our lowrider community has volunteered their vehicles and to show for many of our local residents, community members in our city, county and state dignitaries in processions such as the Oxnard Christmas Parade, Fiestas Patrias and the Oxnard Veterans Parade just to name a few. And also, whereas our Lowrider community has established and maintained a mutual respect in partnership with the Oxnard Police Department in an effort to show community unity.

And whereas during the COVID pandemic various car club members joined together to form the COVID Cruisers to bring joy and happiness to many children and families who could not otherwise publicly celebrate special occasions such as birthdays due to social distancing regulations And whereas our Lowrider community is committed to continuing to challenge norms and break past negative stereotypes by instead leading by example in showing their love and respect for the Oxnard community.

And whereas our Lowrider community continues to provide cultural, artistic, and historic significance in the city of Oxnard it is now therefore my absolute honor as the mayor of this beautiful city of Oxnard To hereby proclaim May 21st as the Oxnard Lowrider Appreciation Day. And I tell you, if I could just share a few remarks. Growing up in this city, I remember participating and cruising back when we had it on Savior's Road that I remember working at as a police officer.

And then also, I can attest to being involved with cops for TOTS delivering toys when we were short. These card clubs came through for us giving us toys to give to our needy kids here in our community and also during the COVID pandemic they were so active in partnering with the Police Department to go out there and do just that Celebrating birthdays, celebrating baptisms, celebrating anniversaries with their cars. And look you can see the diversity that is represented here and not too long ago I gave a report when I went to Japan and it was beautiful to see our culture in Japan through the car club and also just the attire.

It's just transcended cultures, countries and peoples. And I'm so glad that we have such a strong, viable car club here in our community. So thank you to all of you. Thank you. I'll hold this proclamation. I'm going to pass it over to Amanda here and then you can present others.

CommentManuel HerreraProposedself-stated1:23:21

Hello, everyone. My name is Manuel Herrera. I'm with Citizens for Better Oxnard. I wanted to thank the mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, members of the City Council for once again acknowledging the hard work and dedication that our low rider and car club community do throughout the year. So at this time, I wanted to present to you the president of the Cruisers Car Club, Gabe Robles.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:23:49

Thank you very much, Manuel. Thank you Mr. Mayor, thank you Gabe Teran also for helping spearhead this. Thank You Mr. Mayor and City Council for presenting us again with a proclamation recognizing Sunday June 21st as Low Rider Appreciation Day in Oxnard we are truly grateful thank you The Clark-Cleveland-Rider community continues to be a positive part of our city. Helping out when asked or if we see a situation that we can help, we do so.

So far this year, we have helped raise thousands of dollars holding shows at Real Mesa High School, Channel Islands, Pacifica and Santa Clara high schools. And we have an upcoming show at Del Sol High School later this year. We brought precious memories to many young people by chauffeuring them to their proms and graduations. And because of the passion of a good man named Abel Velazquez Sr., we brought smiles to the faces of the elderly, by having classic car shows at just about every senior facility in Oxnard.

And the year is only half done with a lot more fundraising events to come This year we decided to give the proclamation to a new car club each year, and this year we chose Switch Car Club. Switch has been organized since the early 70s and has been very involved in community service every year. On Thanksgiving morning for the last 35 years you can find Switch Car Club at Dirty Park hosting their holiday food drive And the following weekend, they host a toy drive. And come Christmas time, Switch along with the help of other car clubs deliver holiday dinners and toys to needy families.

They have been doing this for 35 years. Thank you Switch and all the car clubs, solo riders out-of-towners and all the genres of vehicles who come to Oxnard and support us to help raise funds. I want to say it's a great turnout to see all the car clubs today that showed up today. This is like Mr. Mayor said, it's a lot more than last year and personally I just want to say that you guys all do a great job and keep doing what you do and you guys are awesome bunch of guys so thank you very much we want to present the proclamation to Switch Car Club. We're going to give it to Mr. Dino Pinker On behalf of what you do. Now, just about everything written on this proclamation Switch Car Clip has been part of.

You might recognize the Pinker name his dad served in these halls for over 10 years City Council member and mayor also so Dino thank you much respect for your father Mr. Bedford Pinker thank you very much Thank you, Dino. Thank you, Switch-Carkland. Also I would like to thank the City Council for allowing us to present a special award tonight to a special man who is very instrumental in making lowriding in Oxnard what it is today This man came to Oxnard as a boy with his family in the early 1950s, where they worked hard to earn a living and raise a family.

When he was of age, he felt the need to serve his country and join the military during the Vietnam War and serve proudly. Upon his return to Oxnard, his passion for low-riding cars grew. And with the help of some friends, they decided to unite and form a car club. That's when Oxnard first Lowrider Car Club was born. They were called the Stylistics, and that was the first time you saw plaque in the back window like the ones we use today.

Since it was the only car club around if you wanted to be a lowrider in a Lowrider club I'm sorry you were a Stylistics had... You had to be as Stylistics member. The Stylists had up to 75 members Eventually members began to leave the Stylistics and form other clubs. Johnny Lozoya formed New Image, Tommy Braswella formed The Dukes and eventually grew to what we have today but because of the unity and the leadership of one man We are united more than ever today And that man is Mr. Butch Hernandez Come forward Butch Where's Butch at?

Come forward Who has the plaque? Where's Butch's plaque, I give it to you Alex. Could he go get it please? I just want to say without even knowing it, Butch Hernandez and his fellow Salvation's members they started something that grew and grew and morphed into what you see all these guys today. It's all about unity. He united a few Clarkland members that grew and grew and united us what we are today so let me read this really quick and if Butch just wants to say thank you or something else, he's welcome. But anyway this says, Ventura County Lowrider Icon Award awarded to Bert Fernandez for paving the way for us and your lifelong dedication and continued support to the low rider community. We appreciate you, we appreciate you. You are truly an icon.

Thank you Butch and this is for you. We're really proud of you. If there's any If there's any stylistics members in the audience, please stand up and be recognized at this time. If not, it's okay. Thank you. Do you want to say anything, Butch?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:30:29

I just like to say thank you very much for the plaque, the way that clout... How many of you got what 26 scarves now? 25, 26? Yeah. So appreciate it. Thank you very much.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:30 – 1:358 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:30:57

supports the car clips today. You can see him at every car show that we have he's out there still supporting us to this day and I heard that he made, he loves basketball one time he made a hundred free throws in a row pretty good but anyway thank you once again thank you Mr Mayor and the City Council for another proclamation thank you all And especially you Car Club guys, you guys are all awesome. Keep doing what you guys do. Thank you guys for showing up tonight. It's not about me it's about you I'm just a spokesperson for you guys and that's all I am tonight. Alright thank you very much love you guys.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:31:37

You guys just want to stay here for a quick photo? Can I get your microphone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:32:19

Okay. On one, two, three. Okay, hold on. On three, one two three. All right.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role1:33:31

Joe, good to see you.

PresenterRandy Latimercity of OxnardProposedself-stated1:33:58

I can show my uncle John

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:34:28

Senate.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:35:20

All right, hopefully we can maintain this same level of enthusiasm and positive energy through the rest of this meeting.

The next item on the agenda is Item G. This is for public comments, for items not on the agenda and also for non-action items. There are a number of speakers for this item. We'll start with Randy Latimer followed by Mr. Eric Endrist.

1:35 – 1:435 turns

PresenterRandy Latimercity of OxnardProposedself-stated1:35:58

Okay, good evening Mayor Pro Tem, City Council members. My former bosses over here. My name is Randy Latimer, lifelong Oxnard resident. I currently still live here after retirement 30 years with the city of Oxnard. I'm here with my team, Medallion Events back here. We are actually the new operator for events at Heritage Square So I just want to give an update on some of the amazing things we have going on at The Square.

We started at The Square a few months ago, kind of got a little late start for summer but we had this amazing team back here. You guys stand up. Stand up. Come on. With this amazing team back here, we pulled things together and we are rolling into a very hot summer with events And that's our main goal is to bring events, quality events to the city of Oxnard to downtown. But not only focusing on Heritage Square but expanding to the entire downtown and for it to be a synergistic just effect that whatever's happening at Heritage Square ends up at Centeno Plaza or Plaza Park in a very good way.

So we just want to give you an update on some of the activities that we're doing and some of the things we're planning at Heritage Square. We started a couple weeks ago with salsa nights, live salsa, live band lessons 6 o'clock on Thursday night. Just write it down. Six o'clock Thursday night's lessons, live band, and we're done by nine. So you can go to work the next day or go party downtown in a very safe environment.

This week was probably the busiest week I've ever had in my life. Even as a police officer for 30 years. And we started the week with yoga on Wednesdays, so every second and fourth Wednesday we have yoga in the square. It's free and come out to the square and enjoy yoga, get your good stretch in because you're gonna need it for Thursday night which is Salsa Night Havana Nights and Havana Nights live band. Then we went Friday nights with the start of summer concerts and those were amazing. I know I got 44 seconds Saturday night was the Palamazzo. I didn't know what Palamazzo was before last year, but Palamazzo event was amazing and then we ended on Sunday with the Pride Market. Amazing event! Then we had to clean up after that so we're continuing a very hot summer with continuing...

We have an eight-week salsa series then the summer concerts go and then we'll continue collaborate with our community with the downtowners, with the downtown groups to enhance what's going on in my hometown, my city, Oxnard. So I thank you for your support Mayor, Council, Alex the manager, Eric, do I have to stop right now? Thank you very much but continue to support downtown Oxnard we are realizing our vision so thank you very much.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:39:26

Mr. Andrus followed by Angela Landers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:39:32

Lots of great events downtown as long as it's not at the Henry Levy House, right? Please play my video.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:39:43

Mayor, Mr. Andrus I did not receive your video so... I didn't, I did not receive your video We can come back to you in a few minutes.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentAngela Landers I'mProposedself-stated1:40:21

Hello, good evening City Council. My name is Angela Landers I'm the Juneteenth co-chair along with Julia Dixon We've been co-chairs for Juneteenth for approximately 12 to 14 years, and we are celebrating our 35th anniversary. And it's this Saturday! It's like yay! Okay so I would like to again thank the City Council. We received a proclamation a few weeks ago recognizing Juneteenth I'd also like to thank the city of Port Hueneme. Both communities are our biggest supporters and I'd like to invite the City of Oxnard along with everyone in Ventura County, to bring your family friends and to join us this Saturday June 20th from 10 to 6 p.m for a powerful and joyful Juneteenth celebration So it'll be a day filled with culture, community and pure celebration.

This event will provide live music we're going to fill the park with rhythm and soul creating the perfect soundtrack for a day of unity and pride We'll have delicious food booths and our local favorite restaurants and food, and cultural flavors that will be served with love. As you explore our celebration, we are going to be offering a lot of community booths that provide support for our community and services. We're also partnering with American Red Cross for Community Blood Drive that Saturday so that giving everyone a chance to make a lifesaving impact right here at home.

Throughout the day, you'll have a chance to experience different historical presentations. We'll have that up on stage. We'll also have it out on the grounds. We have amazing educational exhibits and we invite everyone to come out this Saturday again at Oxnard Plaza Park from 10 to 6, our Juneteenth celebration. And we are celebrating our 35th anniversary in Oxnard. So please come out and join us. Thank you. Thank you Ms. Landers.

1:43 – 1:488 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:43:04

Mr. Herrera followed by Ms. Saldana

CommentManuel HerreraProposedself-stated1:43:13

I, too, sent in a video. Hopefully they received it.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:43:19

We will check as soon as Madam Clerk comes back. Was that your public portion? Yes. OK. We'll put it up just as soon as Luly comes back. We'll go to Marilena Saldana followed by Mr. Ray Blattel. This is Marilena Saldana She was a counselor at Winnipeg High School for many years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:43:47

Good evening, Mayor McArthur and respective City Council members of the city of Oxnard. I am here on behalf of the Save Oxnard's Art Carnegie Museum. And I'm here because we are requesting that when you do your budget slash financing plan for the 2026-2027 year, that you give serious consideration to making an allocation or what's the other word that I can use here?

To make sure that you think about how the community now is really beginning to step up to reopen the Carnegie. And I remember being here at a meeting not too long ago regarding the five-year priority for the City of Oxnard and in regards to The reference that was made in regards to three core areas, one had to do with the quality of life. And in that quality of life was the cultural arts. So I just want to again remind you and ask that you give serious consideration to whatever needs to happen to reopen the Carnegie. I also want to ask on behalf of the committee, to have an update on the remains of the Chumash remains and artifacts that are currently housed stored in the museum.

Usually I have to ask people for their time but I'm working on cutting it down. I also just want to give you all a gentle reminder based on the community feedback in regards to the five year priorities, it focused on three core categories one being again, the quality of life and that priority is listed in the arts and culture, the compliance process to open the Carnegie Museum. Thank you for your time.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:46:09

Mr. Blutell?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:46:21

Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem, City Council, city staff and public. Here we are in mid-June and already we've been hearing fireworks for at least two weeks already and we're still several weeks away from July 4th. The current fireworks are rather sporadic and thus will be difficult to detect and enforce. I'll give you that. However, as we approach the 4th I suspect it will get more intense until the Camino on the 4th and then Taylor off again. Recall that last year on the 4th the city erupted in total chaos. Fireworks throughout the city, a total war. Recently there's been a lot of activity on social media next door etc., about illegal fireworks complaints. I don't post on the media however I do reply or comment. My comments generally to the posters are that complaining on social media does nothing That they should join me and participate in council meetings as these are the people who could actually do something.

And by that, I mean the respective city councils could compel their enforcement agencies, police department, sheriff's department, whomever to get serious about enforcing this illegal activity. At a recent neighborhood council meeting, a law enforcement officer...

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:47:33

Sorry, go ahead Mr. Patel. It was just a bleed over, go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed1:47:40

Uh, claim that there will be about 50 uniformed officers on duty on the 4th. I don't know if this is true or not however if memory serves me last year there maybe were perhaps 50 or so citations issued for illegal fireworks. That certainly is not that many relative to what really went on throughout the evening and into the early morning last year. This year I'm hoping that the Oxnard Police Department and whomever supports them Code enforcement and to whatever they truly man up and put a stop to this illegal nuisance. We citizens deserve peace and quiet just as much as the others have the right to celebrate. The right to celebrate does not necessarily outweigh the rate, the right to peaceful evening. There are plenty of public fireworks displays for all to enjoy if this is your thing.

You say it's hard to do but I counter nothing is hard to do if you really want to do it Landing a man on the moon and returning is hard. Enforcing an ordinance is a piece of cake. I urge this council to compel the city staff to strictly enforce this ordinance based on what I've read on social media, I am not the only one who's tired of this but I'm the only one who appears before you asking for help. Thank you.

1:48 – 1:538 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:48:52

Madam Clerk, can we go to Mr. Andrus' video now? Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:48:56

we have his video ready.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:48:58

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:49:01

Thank you. Mr. Andrus, do you want us say a few words before your video or do you want us to just play it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:49:09

Just real quick that this was wrong to block my getting this to Lola tonight. That's violating open meeting laws and equal access for me to get it to her. The harassment from the Oxnard City Attorney's Office continues. This is Eric Andrist, Public Advocate. On June 8th I received a letter from Ginny Kelly our Assistant City Attorney that was arrested in the San Luis Obispo courtroom in October of 2015 for shouting at opposing counsel and resisting a bailiff after a judge had already repeatedly warned her about her outbursts and inappropriate behavior. Apparently Oxnard doesn't do background checks before hiring new employees. She is demanding I limit myself to one email per day, two pages maximum. All emails she says must now be routed through the Assistant City Manager Eric Somstagard, a part-time employee and if i don't comply she is threatening a restraining order against me like she did with Senior Citizen Advocate Larry Stein The letter accuses me of harassment and bullying, among other things.

Let me be clear this letter written by a city attorney to silence a public advocate is itself harassment and bullying which started with an almost identical letter and threats from Assistant City Attorney Kenneth Rozelle back in the summer of 2021 even before we had moved into our house Kelly claims in the new letter that I was trying to open an Airbnb. That is untrue, I was pursuing a bed and breakfast legally and operationally two completely different things. This misstated fact appears in a legal document that has the audacity to accuse me of, and I quote, misstatements of facts and incorrect interpretations of the law. Kelly's letter is riddled with misstated facts and disinformation.

A neighbor instigator has already filed a public record request for this letter, clearly to use as fodder for gossip in the neighborhood. This after Matt and Angela Whitecomb and ex-mayor Tim Flynn held a Christmas tree lane meeting without me even though I'm on the committee. It's this kind of civic disinformation that the city is using to attempt to tarnish my reputation and standing in my own neighborhood. And here is what nobody is talking about, no City Council vote was ever taken authorizing any of this. Neither Kenneth Rozelle or Jenny Kelly has the jurisdiction to unilaterally restrict a citizen's access to their own government. Do any of you on the City Council remember this being brought to them at a council meeting for a vote? Your city attorney's office is exercising powers it was never granted, and you're all just sitting back allowing it to occur.

Have you all forgotten that you're there to protect the people of this city and not there to protect city staff that's regularly now taking part in illegal activities? Oxnard becomes corrupt not only when wrongdoing occurs, but when correction becomes unwelcome. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:52:10

Thank you Mr. Andrus. We will, Madam Clerk before we go to Manuel Herrera's video can we take the virtual speaker?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed1:52:27

Virtual speakers, please press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now. Virtual speakers, please press star six to unmute Virtual speakers, please press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:53:21

Madam Clerk if you'd like... It might be the sound because you can see the... Yeah, you could see it.

1:53 – 1:5914 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:53:54

Mayor? Yes. If I may, perhaps with the Zoom participants as I can see here that it registers if there is sound coming from their end but we're not hearing it on our end, perhaps our folks in the control room could look at that and we can go back to the in-person speakers while that's looked at.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:54:16

I apologize for the technical issues we're having. Well, But we're sorting through that. We can, Alicia Porcel if you want to come up? If you're ready to speak, we can take you now, Alicia. Sure. We can go to Ms. Martinez. Thank you. Hi.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:55:05

We're supposed to take responsibility for what we do, right? Yeah. So I want somebody to take responsibility for what your Oxnard Police Department did Yes, I am an adult and I did get arrested. And I fully understood that. And I complied with every single one of their orders and was never resistant to anyone or threat in any of them. Do you know what they did to me? She slammed my head against the car when I was in handcuffs and they assisted me. I needed eight officers to assist me to the car to get in and I fully well understood I was under arrest. Do you know what it's like to have a grown man almost break your arm to the point of almost shitting yourself? Do you know what it's like to have the sheriffs tell me no, it's not okay what they're doing to you.

They shouldn't be doing that to you and they are and who's going to take responsibility for that because your goddamn police department won't so will you guys? Will you?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:55:58

This is the time that we're just listening. We can't enter into a discussion with you Miss Martinez but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:56:03

No, because you guys everything I do. I have to take responsibility right then and therefore whether be arrested or anything but nobody wants to take responsibility for any of this Do you know where I live now because of your goddamn police department? Oh, just to let you know it might be infested with bed bugs so anything I'm wearing can have it. So just to let you guys know that's my parting gift to you, okay? Because that's where you guys put me. I lived in the same goddamn house since I was 16 years old. Yes, it's a family situation that's going on there. They said she needs... The mom needs to evict me to get out of the house. Right? Then your police department decides, no, no. You're there trespassing. I've lived there since I was 16 years old and now I'm on the street because your police department says I'm trespassing?

Not only that, let's not even get into the false calls they take. I was asleep, asleep in my bed when I got woken up by five officers standing at the foot of the bed telling me, Candace, I said, huh? Can you come outside? And they arrested me for being high And I was asleep. So tell me how that makes sense and how somebody could call the police department and say, somebody's there getting high? I was asleep. I smoke bud. Yes, I do. That's not illegal. It's not against the law. So I don't even understand why I had five officers at the foot of my bed waking me up out of my sleep to arrest me for being high.

So, I want somebody take responsibility for all that because it was I have nowhere to go now. Now, I live on the goddamn streets because the house I lived in since I was 16, I'm trespassing at now," your police department says. So who's going to take responsibility for any of that?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:57:52

As I mentioned, Ms. McIntosh, we can't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:57:54

enter into a discussion about... Right, right. That's the thing is like nobody could do anything about nothing, right? But you guys could arrest me and harass me easily, right?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:58:04

Candace, we got your information. We'll get back with you on this. Alicia Parcella, are you ready to speak? If not, were able to get the speaker a virtual comment? Forgive us as we work through this technical issue, but we're gonna go to Mr. Herrera, we're gonna go to your video next. Do you wanna come up here and say a few words before we open up the video?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:58:44

Mayor.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:58:44

Okay, go

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:58:44

ahead mayor. If I may, I know that, I believe Mr. City Attorney there was recent legislation around the ability to participate through telephone or virtually in public meetings, I believe it's July 1 when some sort of policy needs to come into place. But just to check, because of the Zoom issue we have do we need to take a break to sort that or are we allowed to continue the in-person meeting at this time?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:59:15

I suggest trying again to take the remote callers, see if they are able to navigate the system.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:59:25

Mayor Pro Tem and council members and members of the audience we after our last in-person speaker, we'd like to take just a short little break to do some technical issues.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role1:59:37

Like reboot or, okay. Thank you. We'll go through the Mr. Herrera's video then we'll take Ms. Parcell and then we'll take a short break while we reboot this system. Let's do that. If the video is queued up we can go to Mr. Herrera's video.

2:00 – 2:038 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:00:15

Has anyone at City Hall or in the general public ever wondered, what's the deal with District 3 Council Member Aaron Starr? There seem to be more questions than answers. Has anyone ever wondered why Council Member Starr spent tens of thousands of dollars of his own money to get in a seat he didn't plan to take any compensation for? Or questioned how he is so belligerent to city staff without any fear of censure or recourse?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:00:43

This is being painted as somehow an information problem. It's not an information problem, it's an authorization problem. It's who has the authority to make changes, who has the authority to adopt a budget and make changes. So let me just ask a question, true or false? If the city manager wants to change the budget by spending $3 million less for police and $3 million more for parks, does he have that authority to do that, true or false? Yes or no?

It does not come to the council. We've seen documents presented to us that made it very clear to us that we only approve a total funding number for any given fund, and that the decisions of ultimately where the money gets spent by department is in the city manager's authority. Yeah, I do think this is

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:01:43

just theater. If I can ask you, when have you ever seen a city manager after the budget's passed go and move $3 million from police to parks? Where have you seen that? Perhaps maybe in Parks and Rec on TV. Where have you seen that happen? Where have you seen that happen? That a city manager would move $3 million from the police budget after it was approved by their City Council to the Parts Department.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:02:13

Or what about the fact that he still vehemently defends human resources horror show Phil Molina? Does council member Starr feel any obligation to share with the public his ties to the Libertarian Party and whether he has a libertarian agenda for Oxnard? Has anyone ever asked why his wife has been following volunteers for the recall around, slowing down to intimidate and gawk at them as they exercise their rights to political activism.

Why does Council Member Starr refuse to turn over Google Docs he creates during meetings? Is he communicating with his wife who sits in the audience typing into a Google Doc of her own? Residents of District 3 have a lot of questions that some of you should be asking as well. And if you aren't, well maybe it's time.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:03:10

Thank you, Mr. Herrera. The next speaker, Ms. Alicia Purcell and I think that concludes our in-person speakers and after you we'll take a short break. Thank you, Ms Purcell.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:03:26

All right my other thoughts were not coming together so I'll just respond to that by saying speculation is not fact. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:03:35

Thanks, Ms Purcell. Madam Clerk, with that said we'll take a five minute break while we reboot our system and hopefully be able to resolve this problem.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:03:42

Yes Mayor, that is our last in-person speaker. Thank you.

2:13 – 2:187 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:13:18

Just want to call the meeting

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:13:18

back to order. And thanks everyone for bearing with us. We've been able to resolve the issue, but also at this time just want to welcome anyone else who hasn't spoken but wants to make a public comment. We're still on item G. This is the time and place for public comments for items not on the agenda and for non-action items. If there's no one else here in person we'll go to the virtual speakers. Madam Clerk?

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated2:13:59

Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:14:00

Yes, we can hear you. Please go ahead.

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated2:14:04

Okay good. Hi my name is Doug Portello I'm a 40-year resident of Oxnard. Good evening Mr Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Council staff and the public. I just want to bring to everyone's attention that we lost a very special I want to start by saying thank you to Peggy Rivera Ayala. She was three-time chair of the Homeless Commission. She was a wonderful person who had a big heart for those less fortunate in our community, particularly the unhoused.

And I learned a lot from Peggy, from her wisdom, from her knowledge about an issue that's close to my heart. I was very fortunate to have called Peggy a friend. She was very dear person in my life and we shared a kindred spirit for reaching out to those less fortunate, particularly the homeless And so it was a very sad day to see Peggy's passing. But I think a lot of people in this community and Oxnard, and the surrounding area were touched by a lot of the work and energy and effort that Peggy did, particularly those from very vulnerable situations.

She had a very dear childhood friend that she took in and gave her room to for years Well, that person waited for their HUD voucher and she got her HUD vouchers after eight years. And moved into a beautiful apartment over by 9th Street, and she's doing quite well there. And I think it was just one example of Peggy's big heart and giving space in her own home for a person. And I think that person wouldn't have made it. She was already a senior and had health problems and out on the streets can be very difficult and shorten a person's life. So I just wanna have everyone remember Peggy. Those that knew her and those that were touched by her. And I think there's a lot of people that Peggy touched that may not even know her name, but I just like to share that Peggy was just a super human being and I was very blessed to have called her friend and to work with on that issue with her in the community.

And then I just hope that she rests in peace. Thanks for your time.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:16:33

Thank you. Thank you for calling it. We'll go to the next virtual speaker.

CommentSarah WilczewskiProposedself-stated2:16:42

Hi, good evening Mayor, members of the City Council. My name is Sarah Wilczewski and I'm here to give you your update on the latest abduction numbers since January 20th 2025 and as 9 o'clock on June 15th. In the 805 area code, 2152 people have been abducted in Ventura County. 1038 and here within Oxnard 211. Over the past few months, Oxnard has been getting hit by ice pretty much every day. And it's been rough out there.

And we're coming up on the one year anniversary of. The June 10th raid at Glass House, and we just passed the anniversary of. We're coming up on the 1 year anniversary of the July 10th. Rated class house which took 300 people mostly Oxnard residents and. Uh, we just passed the June 10th anniversary of the smaller rate a glasshouse that took 40 people from their families.

That's really all I have to update on, so have a good evening. Thank you.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:18 – 2:3417 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:18:34

My can you hear me? Yes.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:18:37

Okay, I'm just calling in test system make sure it's working. This is Jason City Attorney's Office. Thanks.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:18:43

What if we're Jason thanks so much for checking. Madam clerk does that conclude the virtual speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:18:52

Mayor may approach him and council members yes that concludes our speakers in person and virtually for items not on the agenda and non-action items thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:19:01

Again, thanks to everyone for bearing with us as we resolve that technical glitch. We will now

move to the next item on the agenda. This is Item H. This is a report from our city manager. Mr. Wynn, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:19:15

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I have nothing for this evening but I will say hello to Jason. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:19:20

Thank you. The next item is Item I. This is the report from council members. Commissioner Andrade, do you have anything to share? If not we'll move to Councilwoman Perez. No? Okay. Councilwoman?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:19:37

Thank you Mayor. Just a quick update on a couple of duties that I've been working on. Councilmember Basu and I met with CAWS in their Youth and Climate Team regarding the power plant at Ormond Beach. More to come on just the outcomes of that. I also had the opportunity to join Councilmember Mayor Pro Tem Turan at the Blackstock Junior High Community Schools end of the year celebration. I also had the opportunity to attend the Southwinds Neighborhood Council, the Philippine Independence Day flag raising. I'm also reoccurringly going through my participation through the Air Pollution Control District I had the opportunity to also meet with our seniors and staff over at the South Oxnard Senior Center, and just wanted to thank all of the team members, particularly Pam.

Thank you for all of your work that you do for our community. It's much appreciated. And most recently, you will be seeing, I think some graffiti abatement along the railroad in District 6. So definitely want to thank all that made that possible. Last week we held our, or this week we held our orientation for the Summer Youth Academy. We are going to be launching our second cohort this Thursday so really excited about that and just wanted to also thank Mayor Pro Tem for joining me in spearheading this initiative and it's good to see the second cohort Yeah, take advantage of the opportunities that the city provides over the summer. And that is my report.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:21:29

Thank you, Councilwoman. Council Member Perrella?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:21:33

Thank you, Mayor. Recently I had the opportunity to attend an event at The Pack put on by the Sterling. It's been a while since I've been in the building but it is amazing when you go in the facility and it's nearly packed, nearly completely full It's great to see that. It's great to see the parking lot, there's nowhere to place a car because there are so many people taking advantage of Sunrise events. I also had an opportunity to attend the all-star baseball events at the Norite and again tremendous event.

Roundabouts looking for things to call 3-1-1 saw the event thought I might as well take a look at it It took me parking three blocks away to find a place to park so that I could walk and see it And it was well worth the walk. It was well worth seeing all four fields work in the same time people from all over Ventura County and some from LA County parents supporting their kids kids having a blast and our city are offering the opportunity for them to have an event and The had the opportunity to attend the River Park Neighborhood Council meeting excellent meeting Had the opportunity and fortune good fortune to attend Filipino Independence Day. The guest speaker was tremendous You got to hear some history about them Filipino flag I don't have time to get into it But if you want to learn something that I never learned in school the history of the Filipino flag And why is designed the way it is?

the next And I'd like to share this. I was at the Filipino event with fellow council members, and I was also at this emergency medical service graduation with fellow council members. 22 new individuals graduated from this program. The sad point? We have local newspapers, some in Oxnard, some in Ventura County, some Internet. I wish they would cover these kinds of events.

This is a tremendous thing. These 22 people will go out and help people no matter what their surname is, where they live, what city. This is a tremendous event and when you hear some of the stories of these children that are now adults and how the lives have been changed through the works of the fire department and the council supporting their activities it's a big deal.

I also had the opportunity to attend a BICEP meeting today. That's my comments Mayor, thank you. There's a Channel Islands Neighbourhood Council meeting on Thursday the 18th at 6.30. Oxnard Dunes Neighbourhood Council was going to have a meeting at the same time, decided from the latest email that I received from the Secretary they've cancelled it so they can take advantage of the Channel Islands meeting. The Colonia Neighbourhood Council will have a meeting on June 24 and the Oxnard Shores will have a council meeting on June 24.

That's it Mayor, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:24:21

Thank you Councillor Moorer.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:24:25

Thank you, Mayor. I've got quite a few things that happened in the last two weeks here but I want to thank Miss Alice Sweetland who's the current chair for the Senior Services Commission and Not only for all of her work, but for inviting me to lunch at the Wilson Senior Center to be there with seniors and see their lotteria and bingo and all the stuff they were doing. And have lunch with them and it was just great to see all the programming that happens there and I appreciate the invite. In all of her work she did share that she will be terming out from her position on the commission And so that is with regrets, but she's looking forward to next chapter where she has plans as I'm sure if we know her. She doesn't have any downtime for her. So just wanted to thank her for that.

I also attended the Blackstock Community Schools meeting, as Councilwoman Perez had mentioned. And I want to thank the Blackstock and Waimea Elementary School District staff for being so open with the community and inviting community members out there and community leaders to see all the things they're doing and how they're supporting community members in this day and age.

Also attended Paletas in the Park with Councilwoman Rodriguez. I'll leave that so she can do that update with Supervisor Lopez. I also attended a few graduations, the Vista Real graduation and that was just a really amazing site. And these are young people much like Haley our speaker today who went to alternative education programs and really excelled in it and just were able to work really well in the way that they needed to and learn in the way that they needed to outside of comprehensive high schools.

It's just great to see their accomplishments. And along with Councilmember Perlow and Councilwoman Rodriguez attended the EMS Corps graduation, and I agree with what Councilmember Perlow said. I hope that our local media and those in attendance can highlight those accomplishments more of these young people who are really venturing down some great career paths for themselves also attended Just today actually, before this meeting ended at 430 and I came straight over here. The Lopez Academy promotional ceremony for Manuel Lopez Academy was the 8th grade students promoting high school. I believe they said they had 220 some odd students who were promoting and we shook hands with all of them I just think of Councilor Perlow when we're trying to teach about a firm handshake and look the person in the eye, and good luck to you and congratulations.

And so I appreciate the opportunity to be there. Also attended the continuum of care meeting with our partner agencies in the county of Ventura And just in Sunday attended the fatherhood summit, which is put on by the county of Ventura as well. I was unaware of this summit and it has workshops and speakers for fathers and father figures and it was a very well done event and opportunity for Community members, anybody can go but it's certainly geared towards fathers and it is a bilingual event. Trilingual event because they offered mixed echo interpretation as well.

And so I just want to thank the folks who put that together and thank them for the invite. And last items here, River Park Neighborhood Council and Carriage Square Neighborhood Council. I was at those and I want to congratulate their executive boards who were voted in that was election meetings for both of them and Carriage Square the chair had to step away for just family obligations and so they have a new chair who stepped in and a few other people on the executive board as well. So congratulations to them.

And for those who don't know, Campus Park will have their groundbreaking June 26th at 11 a.m. at Campus Park on the at the end of the parking lot near the Powell facility and if you go to this city's website, you'll find information on how to RSVP for that and you'll see it on the city's social media as well I'm imagining. And my last thing Mayor, and I'm sure you're going to talk about your piece of this too is July 4th At Plaza Park at 11 a.m., I hope that community members will come out to see a very special presentation we'll be having that is celebrating not only the 250th anniversary of the United States, but more so what it means to live in Oxnard, grow up in Oxnard and be afforded opportunities because your family came here or you came here with your family and what that meant.

We will have three featured speakers, they will be from three different generations. Somebody who just graduated high school just a couple weeks ago will talk about the opportunities that were afforded to them and their family by coming to this community then we'll have somebody who is an adult and in the middle of their career speaking about his opportunities that he has been able to take advantage of and then we'll have a retired veteran Who will talk about the opportunities that were afforded to him, his family as well as those who came after him. So I hope that folks will come out these are all three Oxnard residents who are going to be sharing.

Our community members will relate to any or all of them and their story and their journey. So I hope folks will come out, that's July 4th 11 a.m at Plaza Park. Same spot we do the Veterans Day and Memorial Day ceremonies just next to the flagpoles in the memorial that we have there. So those are my comments, thank you Mayor.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:29:52

Thank you Mayor Pro Tem. Councilwoman Osoa?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed2:29:56

Thank you Mayor, I also attended the Independence Filipino Flag Raising ceremony. I also attended a meeting with BMW North America regarding Arcturus Road and some issues going out there. It was a very, very productive meeting. Thank you to our police department for all their work out there. And I want to invite the community if you have an opportunity to go to the South Oxnard Library, a mural is being painted. It is amazing!

I drive by there every day on my way from home and to work, but it's just an amazing, amazing mural. I don't know if we have like a camera lapse that we should've done? It's just amazing so I invite the community to visit the South Oxnard Library for that. And I want to also wish A happy Father's Day to all the fathers. Today we had a speaker, Haley, who commented her lack of having a father in her life and I just want to say to all those fathers out there and to all those men that are father figures to those kids that don't have a father figure thank you so much.

You are definitely Somebody that kids, adult even adults look up to. So thank you for that. And last but not least I also want to send my condolences to Peggy Rivera's family. Peggy was my appointee to the Homeless Commission in District 5. She had a lot of knowledge, and she did a lot of wonderful stuff for this community. So I just want to send my condolences to her family.

Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:32:00

Thank you very much. Thank you, Councilwoman. Councilmember Starr?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:32:05

I'll keep this pretty short. So on...I went to the West Village Neighborhood Council meeting, and I'm really excited by what they're doing at these two Not so active, but it seems like they've got new leadership and they're vibrant. I saw over 20 people at their meeting plus folks who don't live in the neighborhood were also there, but 20 people just from the neighborhood were there.

I think the new chair, Sean, I think is his name, is really gung-ho and he's out there encouraging people to come to the meeting and apparently it's working really well. I attended the Philippine Flag Raising Ceremony. We have a wonderful, vibrant community here and I think we're very fortunate to have the mixtures of people that we have here in Oxnard bringing different perspectives and their history and culture.

There's going to be a Neighborhood Council meeting for La Colonia coming up June 24th so I would encourage people to attend And then I have a constituent issue. I had a person from, I think it was from the Cabrillo neighborhood called me up and said that there seems to be a little bit of a crime spree involving the theft of catalytic converters. And he mentioned one gentleman a week or so ago who had this happen to him and it cost him $2,400 to get that replaced. Those things are not cheap.

And he's wondering what can we do to reduce the likelihood of that happening? And I said, I don't know. But I'll certainly bring it up with staff at the meeting here and maybe there's somebody from the police department that at some point can talk about what we can do to protect ourselves from this type of theft which is really expensive and traumatic for many people.

So that is everything for me today Mayor.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:34 – 2:443 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:34:08

Thank you Council Member Starr

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:34:12

That's a tough one on the catalytic converter. I lost my catalytic converter once when I went to a movie and that was a very quick job, so I apologize for that. So I did attend...I hosted my office hours on June 6th at the library, so thank you Mr. Magana for coming out and so to some of the frequent flyers who come and flag different issues that they'd like for me to work on and tackle, I really appreciate that communication I'm just connecting with community, so feel free. I am not going to be hosting them on 4th of July. I will be spending time with my family but I will resume in August. If folks want to meet let's connect. So I'm happy to connect one-on-one as well. I also had the Transit District meeting for Gold Coast.

Basically on mid-July we're going to be launching new routes and I hope to hear feedback from community. The goal would be that we would have the ability to go from North Oxnard to South Oxnard Access to transit every 20 minutes or so. So folks who are frequent flyers, I hope that you all can share any feedback, the good, the bad and the ugly. Some of the routes that were changed include the 11th, the 10th, I think the 6th. But please feel free to reach out. I know especially in South Oxnard around the south and J, like in South Oxnard on J close to Clara there's one that I think in theory looks good. Let's see if in practice Those are pretty narrow streets and I hope that it works out. They've tested it, but I want to hear back from any constituents who have feedback on the Gold Coast new lines launching in mid-July.

I know it's called Hobson Park Ace now, but for me it's always been Lions Park growing up. And we had paletas, we ran out of paletas twice the community was out there. It was a little chilly but people were still into the paletas so they served over 144 folks who came and talked to us and I think some of the conversations at hand are just like preparing for natural disasters. I know we have El Nino coming and it's going to be pretty strong so it's just a call to action for folks To be ready and to have a plan in place, and just consider any gutters that can be cleaned or any preparations we can do. We know that some streets flood more than others. I know our public works department is working on that but Anyway, there was a lot of great conversation with community at large.

So Palma seems to be a good way to get people out there so thank you Mayor Pro Tem for joining us then and thank you to any community members who joined. And then I also attended like others have shared the EMT graduation this was cohort three. These folks are coming out, training and just you know it seems to be a very intensive program for them to be our emergency response team. And it's at the Old Oxnard High so the celebration was hosted at the PAL and something that just stood out to me from one of their like just a phrase from their creed they said from the fields to the sea we are cohort three. So I really love that and just congratulations to all the graduates like Councilmember Peralo said there's 22 Thank you all so much for the good work to make that happen behind the scenes.

I can't wait to see about the summer internship programs that happen over this summer and all the different departments and the exposure for our young people, so looking forward to that. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:37:40

Thank you, Councilwoman. Thank you very much. And I'll just wrap up. As you know, I stay quite busy I did provide the State of the City address last Thursday on June 11th to about 250 members of the business community. The State of the City is hosted by and organized by the Chamber, so great for the turnout that were there to hear me speak and thanks to all the executive leaders that were there and personal thanks to Katie our Assistant City Manager who helped me in that process, you and your PIO staff Leslie Esmeralda and Cecilia, so genuine thank you. Sincere thank you for helping me put that whole presentation together.

Also visited Procter & Gamble, that is one of the Goliaths here in our city. They've been here since 1973 so went out there and spoke with their management and as you drive through there you'll see the beautiful artwork that they invested in also the landscaping, the water tolerant plants And, you know, I think what we're doing here in this city and really investing in not only infrastructure but in our green spaces, our center medians making sure we take care of our trees and creating beautiful canopies, palms.

Really enticing investment here in our city becomes contagious because you're seeing that and that was actually shared with me by the Procter & Gamble management, that they received their inspiration by what we're doing here in downtown. So it's beautiful artwork that they did there and how they're taking care of their employees. They've got a little over 400 employees there. 95% of them are from this city alone so you can imagine the economic strength the Procter & Gamble delivers to our city. They produce out of that factory 10% of the toilet paper as well as the bounty, the houndtowels. So they're just a big economic engine here in our city.

I also attended several graduations including the adult school graduation that was held at Pacifica High School. That to me is, all graduations are special but that brings significant for me it's important just because you see a lot of the adults we had one graduate that was in his early 70s and others were there some that I recognized from the time I spent in policing Young people that I arrested when they were teens or others, for one reason or another we don't know the challenges that they face.

themselves, but nonetheless they find that education is a point that they've circled back in just to see what they're able to achieve and how important, how significant it is for them to receive that high school diploma. To me it's very memorable so I was happy to be invited and to sit up on stage and make a few remarks at their graduation. Also invite everyone to participate with us as Mayor Pro Tem mentioned July 3rd, I'm together with the city and in partnership with the downtowners organizing a free event for our community. Hope everyone comes out. It's on July 3rd. We'll do it from three o'clock to 930 p.m.. It's very kid-friendly. We have a kids zone. The choo-choo train will be out there. A lot of nonprofits will be out there. We have beautiful entertainment.

Conveying all the diversity that we have in this city. Live bands begin at 6 p.m., all the way to 930 p. m. And it's all free to our community, we chose to do it on July 3rd as to not do it on the 4th, as to not compete with the pre-planned events already at the harbor and Mayor Pro Tem is actually organizing as he discussed earlier what he's doing on July 4th. So I hope everyone comes out for the July 3rd event. It should be a packed house including a car show that will be out there as well And I think Randy Latimer mentioned the Palomazo. So, I attend the Palomazo. It's just a music jam is what that is in Spanish here at The Heritage and so happy to support programs like that. visionaries, entrepreneurs that are bringing vibrancy to our downtown.

And as well as it was discussed here many of us were at the Philippine flag raising and I wouldn't miss that. Mark Amon, a esteemed friend of mine, I went to elementary school with him since the third grade and we graduated together as did Mark Contreras who the principal here was here earlier. We were in the same class and Mark and I worked together police department for over 25 years Also attended the fatherhood event that Mayor Pro Tem mentioned over at Rio Vista Elementary School and made remarks there, as well as presenting the organizers and founders with certificates I spoke about. Some of you may know I have five kids, and I spoke about my own joys and challenges being a father, as many of you know. It's tough sometimes, right? But the joy that they bring is immeasurable.

I think that's the biggest investment we'll ever make is on our kids. And the last, I've been really pushing out the World Cup a lot and there's been a lot of restaurants here locally that are showing the World Cup. Some of you may know I sit on as a commissioner on VCTC And I pushed for maybe one of the blue buses to be wrapped in celebration of the World Cup. Just because what the World Cup celebrates, especially here in our communities, we're with a mecca of soccer and there's so many groups represented here. We have Colombians, Brazilians, Mexicans, certainly fans of the U.S. team and everybody else. We couldn't get the blue bus to be wrapped in time but we did get a train as you'll see the surf liner. So I pushed for it where you'll see one With the Surfliner train, one of them is wrapped with the World Cup.

So it's beautiful as it passes here in our city again we're a big arts community and I'm just so delighted that they heard me out as to what soccer means to our region here, so important. And then I drove down to, I know Council Member Sewell mentioned it that she had some very deep and robust conversations with the management over at BMW. I just drove out there over the weekend and took a look at...I've been out there before but just to see if anything changed at all to our tourists in McWane I looked at the homeless issue that is there, and Alex and I have really had some really good conversations along with our police chief. And together with our executive leadership team and Councilman Basu and Councilwoman Perez we're going to figure out amongst ourselves what is the best approach to try to remedy what is happening in there?

And I'll just conclude with that. Thank you, everyone. We do have a speaker on this item. It's Eric Andrews. Come on up, Eric.

2:44 – 2:4916 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:44:51

Mayor, just as a reminder for the future... The way your agenda is set up is that non-action items are dealt with under item G. And this comes up sporadically, so you may have forgotten since the last time. But we've tried to make it more prominent on the agenda where G is public comments on items not on the agenda and non-agenda items.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:45:18

Thank you. He didn't forget every agenda item gets public comment. It's the law. It's interesting that Bert and Gabe only talk about positive things they do, but didn't talk about the email chain they participated in trying to take down the people's elected treasurer on their city provided email addresses. Gabe even goes so far as acting as a hall monitor policing the time the treasurer spends in his office Bert forwarded it to the Council, creating a potential serial meeting which is against the rules. The people need to know when this kind of crap goes on with our council members so they know how to vote in the next election. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:46:02

Thank you Mr. Endres. We will now

move to the next item in the agenda. This is Item J. This is the review of the Information Consent Agenda. Do any council members have any consent items they wish to discuss?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:46:20

Mayor Pro Tem and council members, on the information and consent agenda I am requesting that item L2. This is the approval of the Oxnard City Council minutes be removed from the agenda And they will be rescheduled for the June 30th city council meeting. Thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:46:37

Thank you Yes, go ahead mayor pro tem

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:46:43

Thank you, Mayor. I'm not going to pull anything for discussion but I just want to note for the record that for item L5, the agreement with the Oxford School District for the after-school program, I will be recusing myself from that just out of an abundance of caution due to a potential remote interest because of my day job. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:47:01

Thank you. And I know that L7 and L8 This is from the Alexander Housing Authority. What we will, what is the pleasure of Council on the other items?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:47:20

Are there public comments?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:47:22

Thank you, thank you Councillor Stark. Madam Clerk are there any public speakers on the consent agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:47:27

Yes Mayor, we do have one public speaker and that is Alicia Purcell.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:47:44

Item L6, number 2 under L6. A few, maybe two or three months ago, I don't remember exactly, I requested that the list of contracts shouldn't I'm Thank you. Remind you that there are other contracts that are not included in this list, and I think they should be. And especially when they're single source contracts it's particularly important to have those brought to your attention. Thank you.

not transcribed≈40s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:49:11

Any other speakers? Mayor Pro Tem and council members, that concludes our speakers on the information and consent in person and virtually. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:49:22

Thank you. What is the pleasure of council recognizing that our city clerk is asking L2 to be removed and also, Mayor Pro Tem, you're abstaining from L5, correct? Okay. And we can take a separate vote if that's okay on L7 and L8 including the housing authority

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:49:43

I move to approve the consent agenda items, with the exception of item 5. And then we'll take a secondary vote for 6 and 7.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:49:52

OK. I second

2:49 – 2:5731 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:49:57

that. Yeah, 7 and 8 will take a secondary vote.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:50:01

Madam Clerk, call for the vote?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:50:07

Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, if you can go ahead and cast your votes. And this would be for items 1 through 15 with the exception of the two information and consent agendas which are 7 & 8 for the Housing Authority.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:50:28

And also 5 just because the Mayor Pro Tem is going to abstain from making that vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:50:51

Thank you, and this motion carries 7-0. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:50:54

If I can get a motion for L5?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:51:02

So moved. I'll second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:06

Councilwoman Perez? Yes. Councilwoman Rodriguez? Aye. Councilmember Starr? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Teran?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:51:16

I recuse myself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:17

Thank you for the record. Councilmember Parallo? Yes. Mayor McArthur? Yes. And this carries 6-0-1 with Mayor Pro Tem recusing himself, thank

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:51:30

you. Now what is the pleasure of the auction housing authority for the approval of L7 and L8 on the info consent agenda?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:51:42

Motion to approve.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:51:46

Thank you council member. Madam clerk, call for the vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:50

Mayor and mayor pro tem and council members if you can give me just a quick minute Okay, mayor and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote. Thank you chair and commissioners on this motion carries eight to zero thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:52:48

This is the time and place set for a public hearing on item M1 from the Public Works Department, subject 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan. Recommendation that the City Council one receive a presentation and receive public comment regarding the City of Oxnard's 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Coningency Plan Two, hold a public hearing on the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

And three, adopt a resolution to approve the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan and authorize city staff to file the plans with the State of California. The Public Works and Transportation Committee approved this item 3-0 back on May 26th, 2026 And the presentation will be live. Director of Public Works and his staff, Michael Wolfe are here to answer any questions we may have.

We start with the city clerk's certification of publication and bring communications if any. Madam City Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:05

Mayor, mayor pro tem and council members. There was a legal notice published in Be The Newspaper on May 28th and June 4th, and the city clerk's office has received no written communications on this item. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:54:18

Thank you, Madam Clerk. Do any Councilmembers have any ex parte communications or other disclosures regarding this matter to state for the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:54:26

No.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:54:31

Thank you. Members of the public were invited to sign up to speak on this item on the city's website, and a person who did not sign up may do so now by submitting a speaker card or following the instructions posted on the agenda for this meeting and at the city's website, oxnard.orgcitymeetings. The council will deliberate after the public hearing has been closed.

Do any council members have any questions? At this time? Go ahead Mayor Pro Tem.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:00

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Payton. I was wondering if perhaps he can give just a brief overview of the site considering it's public hearing and the public won't be able to see a live presentation at night if they didn't have the chance on their own time to see the video ahead of the meeting so we can give just a brief overview.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:55:16

I think Mr. Wolfe is pointing that the consultant is here. Oh

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:18

my apologies.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:55:20

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:55:20

we'll have a live presentation.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:22

Okay thank you very much.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role2:55:23

The reason why we're having a live presentation because he's not staff

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:27

Sure. And I'm assuming Mr. Payton will do an introductory piece then? Thank you. Yes, this is

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:55:31

the time for any of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:55:32

us if we

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role2:55:33

have questions. Yes, yes sir. Go ahead, Council Member.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:55:37

Mr. Payton, thank you very much, Mr. Wolf and everyone included. Recently at a Fox Canyon groundwater meeting it was brought up by a member of the public myself with respect to what's called artesian wells and it was brought up because I talked to a farmer, Mr. Gramkow, and the issue is the amount of water that is flowing out of the ground. How do we address that? And when it was brought up that the United Water Conservation District My concern is and it was brought I was wondering if our city is involved in that at all.

To the credit of our Public Works General Manager, he has been asking a question which every member of the City of Oxnard I hope pays attention instead of sometimes talking in the back as they are now. With respect to not knowing what's coming in the ground and out of the ground and potentially, as I also wish Caigas had still stayed here, knowing who is going to get charged for the water coming out of the ground?

To the credit of Mr. Wolfe, he wants to make sure Our residents don't get charged for the water leaking out of the ground. And I was wondering if you have any update on information or if you could at least share my comments with CAIEGAS?

not transcribed≈28s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:57 – 3:125 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:57:17

Water resources staff, we've been talking to our code staff about potential issues associated with that well. So we do have conditions on certain parts of the groundwater basin where water's got enough pressure that'll come out of the ground without actually pumping it so as you hear tonight in our presentation for urban water management planning, we take into consideration all kinds of groundwater conditions whether it's artesian this will be called an artesian condition which what you're seeing now Thank you, Councilmember.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestStarrProposed2:58:11

Tonight, we are presenting the City of Oxnard's 2025 Urban Water Management Plan along with the city's water contingency plan for council consideration and adoption. The urban water management plan is a state-required planning document that is updated every five years and submitted to the Department of Water Resources. In simple terms, it evaluates the city's water use, water supplies, long term reliability, drought planning, conservation efforts and how we plan to meet current and future demands.

The Water Shortage Contingency Plan is included as part of this effort, and provides the city's framework for responding to droughts, supply interruptions, and other water shortage contingencies. One point I want to specifically highlight is the role of our community. The plan shows that Oxnard met its state water use efficiency target, and in 2025 per capita water use was well below that target.

That success is not just the result of a document or city program. It reflects the efforts of Oxnard residents, businesses and water customers who have made conservation part of how this community uses water. I want to recognize and thank our customers for their continued support and for helping position the city for long-term water reliability. With that, I'd like to introduce Spencer Waterman with Water Systems Consulting who has been working closely with our city staff on this update and will walk us through

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed2:59:41

All right. Thank you, Chris and thank you Council for having me here tonight. Chris hit a lot of the high points so please forgive me if I repeat some of them but yeah the Urban Water Management Plan or the UWMP. I believe we have a slide okay. I'll give a little overview until we get those slides oh there we go. These are the points that i'll be going through today in the following slides So Chris covered a lot of these, but these are required by the state every five years.

And really the exercise is to compare demands and supplies, determine if there is a surplus or shortage, and then use that to inform planning for conservation or supply changes, things of that nature, and also to prepare for things that can't quite be foreseen like water shortages and emergencies. Lastly they are a prerequisite for grants and loans with the state.

As was noted earlier, there are some communication and outreach requirements from the state. And one of those involves reaching out to neighboring water agencies. So on this slide you can see all the agencies that were sent a notification of preparation letter and we coordinated with some of them on projections such as Cayagas. Also mentioned earlier, there is a requirement to do a public notification and then that went out in the local newspaper And in addition, the draft plan was put on the city's website for review.

In this table, the key chapters of the UWMP are summarized and I will talk about each one of them as we move through this presentation with the exception of the first three which were really just kind of administrative background requirements summaries and things of that nature. The first key chapter is the water use chapter, where we look back at the city's historical water use patterns.

And as Chris mentioned, the city has met the state mandated Senate Bill X 7 dash seven compliance target of 140 gallons per capita per day or GPCD. The city is well below that at 97 GPCD in 2025, and as you can see there's been a steady trend of more efficient use per person historically. So in order to project future demands we looked back at that historic trend that I just showed but we also looked in more detail at the different water use categories so residential non-residential and how those are shifting over time And then we considered another future water use efficiency standard that the state has set that surpasses SBX 7-7.

That new water use efficiency standard comes from the Making Conservation a California Way of Life regulation, and that regulation sets up something that's called an urban water use objective. And so ultimately, that objective sets a formula of different types of water use are split into residential and non-residential, indoor and outdoor water use. And then it sets efficiency standards that gets more stringent over time by 2040.

So in the chart on the right we're showing a green line of what the state estimates the city should be using in the future And then in the orange dotted line, based on coordination with staff we added a trendline that accounts for some uncertainty in demand patterns in the future and growth things of that nature. So overall the planned water demand is expected to meet that state urban water use objective by 2040 like I mentioned And this chart on the right just goes into more detail of what those different categories are for the state based on their formula for this water budget.

The overall projection includes growth forecasts from the Southern California Association of Governments, or SCAG for short and their growth data was developed with the input of community development staff back in the early 2020's. In addition to projecting this state-based projection, we also looked at other demand scenarios but ultimately decided this is the best projection to align with what the state is expecting.

Also to plan for water conservation and water use efficiency in the future. In general, this projection is pretty high level so it does not account for individual developments or projects. Switching gears over to supply. As you all know, the city extracts groundwater and it also receives water from United Water Conservation District that's extracted from groundwater and then sent over to the city.

And then the city also purchases imported water from Cayagas. And that water, a majority of it comes from the State Water Project through Metropolitan Water District as you all heard in the presentation earlier. And so that's the key potable water supplies for the city. And I will note that there have been some reliability issues with the State Water Project due to Delta related issues in the past with the state cutting allocations for state water And so that resulted in 2022, in an allocation reduction to the city.

In addition to that there's an ongoing groundwater adjudication, so the future of groundwater is a little bit uncertain in terms of the city's allocation. On the flip side, the city has been very prudent in proactively planning for you know less reliable state water and uncertain groundwater by developing an advanced water purification facility or AWPF. And so that recycled water is currently used for agricultural irrigation, although as the plan lays out.

The expectation is that they WPF will be used for groundwater recharge and indirect potable reuse or IPR. So I will

move on to the next slide here just to provide a bit more detail. The uncertainty about the groundwater is reflected in the top two rows here, and we looked at the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency's groundwater sustainability plan as well as their first periodic evaluation of that GSP, as it's called. And they lay out multiple scenarios where the sustainable yield of the basin may not reduce in the future, depending on what projects are implemented across the basin by various agencies.

all the way to up to a 40% reduction in allocation. And so we looked at all those scenarios and ultimately decided to project kind of a middle ground scenario of about 28% reduction in groundwater allocation. Now this is just for planning purposes, but we wanted to align with that particular scenario because it also considered the city's plan to implement expanded AWPF and groundwater recharge.

As the water goes down in those top two rows, you can see on the... I guess it's the second from the bottom and the third from the bottom. The increase in IPR as well as groundwater pump back allocation from that recycled water use. In the middle of the chart, you can see that Cayugus Water is expected to remain relatively constant and that's typically used for blending for water quality purposes or but also maintain operational constraints.

So when we combine the demand projections and the supply projections, as you can see in this chart, supply is expected to exceed demand. And so that is one portion of the UWMPs to consider that in what they call an average or normal year. And then we need to stress test it The way the state wants you to do that is by looking at conditions of one single drought year or five consecutive drought years.

So we looked backwards at what those conditions were and then applied them to projections going forward, and ultimately determined that there will be enough supply available to meet demands in all regular and dry-year conditions. Now even though supply is expected to meet demand, as I mentioned earlier the demand projection includes the urban water use objective which is a bit more efficient over time and so conservation programs continue to be a vital resource in order to meet that target from the state.

And those programs are summarized in the Demand Management Measures section or the DMM section The DMM section really looks at long-term water use efficiency, whereas there may be shorter term issues from things such as if a supply is contaminated or things of that nature. That is handled within the Water Shortage Contingency Plan. So the table shown here outlines the different sections of that contingency plan but really at the core of it, it identifies What are the conditions that will trigger a shortage?

What are the various stages of shortage that we will take action at? What are the actions we will take at each stage, and then how will we implement those actions. Lastly, the Water Shortage Contingency Plan also is required to outline a process for an annual water supply and demand assessment which is another report that goes to DWR each year, also in July. And in that report, the city is required to look ahead one year as if the next year's gonna be a drought year and then project if there's gonna be any shortage or surplus in supply and then if there are any corresponding shortage response actions that need to be taken.

The contingency plan is not meant to be really rigid. It's more of a flexible roadmap, and so in this graphic here we're showing what the city stages are on the left-hand side with four stages based on conditions that the city has deemed appropriate and it has experience with implementing the contingency plan since 2020 Very successfully and so the four stages that align with the state's six stages are shown there.

And since the contingency plan was heavily updated in 2020 based on your requirements, and then it was successfully used, we did not anticipate many updates to the contingency plan from 2020 The last thing I'll mention about the contingency plan is due to the more short-term nature of it, it can be updated separately from the urban water management plan between those five year cycles.

So in conclusion we expect that Demands will trend towards meeting the state water use efficiency target, or urban water use objective. And that sufficient supply is available to meet those demands provided there is continued development for the AWPF and IPR. The city has already achieved water use efficiency targets set by SBX 7-7 and it's very well positioned to continue meeting those future targets.

Lastly, DWMP is anticipated to meet all DWR requirements. And with that I'll turn it over to Michael for some closing remarks.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:12:10

Thank you.

3:12 – 3:2014 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:12:19

Good evening again, Michael Wolfe, Director of Public Works. Just want to reiterate a couple things and then point out something in the staff report just for the closing statement here. What you heard from Spencer is that everything in the river water management plan is good news. So we have some really good news that we're presenting tonight and we thank the council for their support and getting us to this point in terms of funding projects, being able for us to have different opportunities to look at flexibility and different sources of water.

And so I do want to cover just one section of the staff report that I think it's important as well If you look at page 733, the second paragraph in the background section. I want to just discuss a little bit about what we wrote there because I think it's a good indication of what the Urban Water Management Plan is used for. So back in 2020, the Urban Water Management Plan assumed a 2025 water demand for the city of Oxnard of 28,819 acre feet.

So think about that. Six years ago, we were doing this urban water management plan and we said, we think we're going to be using 28,819 acre feet in 2025. The actual water demand for the city of Oxnard in 2025 was 23,206 acre feet or about 20% less than what we were estimating six years ago. And I point that information out because while the Urban Water Management Plan is a good planning document there's still projections and estimates And there are some assumptions that are put in there. So this is not an absolute document.

This is a planning document, not an implementation document and the difference there is we use this to plan looking forward. We use this to make analysis and assumptions. We don't use this to fund capital projects. We don't use this to identify maintenance needs. We don't use it. This is not an implementation document and that would be like the Capital Improvement Program. That's an implementation document The water management plan is a planned document and I want to make sure everybody understands that's the lens that we're looking through this. It's a requirement from the state but it's also a planned document and I will just reiterate what Spencer said, if you look at the chart on page 735 our future water availability exceeds our projected demands and I think that's a really good thing and something we should be celebrating so thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:14:55

Thank you, that's wonderful. Thank you Mr. Wolf. I will now open up the public testimony portion of the public hearing. Speakers have three minutes to speak on this item. Madam Clerk do we have any speakers on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:15:10

Yes we do. Speaker please press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now

CommentCouncil Member Starr'sProposed · by introduction3:15:21

Hi, this is Debbie Mitchell from Channel Islands Waterfront Homeowners Association. I just want to say quickly thank you to Michael Wolf for that explanation and the additional notes. Very good news. Thank you very much. That's it. Bye.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:15:37

Thank you, Ms. Mitchell. Thank you. Any other speakers, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:15:44

Excuse me, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members. There are no speakers but if we can just make an announcement if there's anybody in the audience that would like to speak on this item please come forward and fill out a speaker card or if you're joining us virtually please press star nine to raise your hand so if we can just wait a couple of seconds thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:16:19

Madam Clerk, seeing that there are no additional speakers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:16:22

Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, that concludes our speakers in person and virtually for this item, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:16:28

Thank you. We will then close the public hearing for this item. This hearing is now closed. Does any council member wish to comment? Council Member Starr, I saw your hand up, go ahead sir.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:16:40

Yeah just a question so... So I understand that the 2020 version of this is quite different as far as You know, what we projected versus what we ended up changing our figures to this year. And I guess what I want to understand better is are there any consequences if we're significantly off the mark by thousands of acre feet a year? Does it matter in the end?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:17:09

It does matter at the end. The fact that we as a group overestimated our water usage six years ago is I think if you look at it from a financial planning standpoint, overestimate on expenditures, underestimate on revenues. That's a good thing in terms of if you missed the mark on both of those rather than the other way around. So we want to take the best approach that we have, the best science that we have to make our estimations going forward because if we were way off let's say for example By 2030, we're saying that our water demand is going to be 27,000, but it's 37,000. That's a bad thing, right? And not a bad thing because the document is not going to be accepted by the state. It's a bad thing because we still have to deal with that from an operational standpoint.

We still have to deal with that where are we going to get that water from and so it matters. It matters in terms of using our best understanding of history I think I've said this before, if I had a working crystal ball, I wouldn't be standing in front of you today. I'd be vacationing somewhere with lots of money in my pocket. So we do the best that we can with living within the requirements of the state as you heard from Spencer. A lot of this stuff is state required and then there's directives in terms of usage per capita, gallons per capita so there's a lot of those directives that But depending on our customers, you know we don't tell our customers no you can't use that water. If they are paying for it and they want to use it, they get to use it right?

So it does matter.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:19:04

I guess I also ask if the state didn't require this report would you still want to have it? Would it be of use to you or is it mostly we're just trying to comply with the state and we're going to just leverage that a little bit to make further use

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:19:20

There are some things in this document that I probably would say from an operational and long-term planning are not absolutely necessary. But to go through this planning process is necessary, to go through this understanding of where do we think we're going to be in 5 years, 10 years, 15 Is important and yes, we would be doing this and we are doing this. We are doing this from a capital improvement perspective. We are doing this from a staffing perspective So we do this regardless of the state requirements. We may not be including some of the more nuanced components of this report But the information that we gain from this report and the things that we have to think about to get there are things that Chris Payton and his team do almost on a daily basis from an operational capital improvement and staffing resource standpoint.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:20:15

Thank you.

3:20 – 3:268 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:20:22

Along with that line, even if the state did not require this particular report, the state has a mandate over the Fox Canyon area because of salt water intrusion which impacts potentially in the future how much water will be allowed to pump out of the ground. That's something that some people apparently don't understand and with respect to that depending on drastic that number comes in and with the, if you can help us here With the adjudication that is going on, can you give us a best case worst case scenario on this? Because it's very significant to the city of Oxnard.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:20:55

Right so well the first part of the comment was about the Groundwater Management Act and the Sustainable Groundwater Implementation Plan or Sustainable Sigma I forget what the acronym stands for but basically it's this Ventura County the groundwater Basin is under a directive to address seawater intrusion. And so the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency is the agency that's required to put together a plan to address that over by a certain date in the future, and that's part of this analysis that we've done when you read through the actual report itself, the groundwater management plan itself, the Groundwater Management Act requirements and the SGMA and the groundwater sustainability plan in terms of the evaluation that was recently done by Fox Canyon.

It's all addressed in the Urban Water Management Plan. So, the original groundwater management plan that was put together by Fox Canyon talked about a ramp down, groundwater extraction ramp down Before my time here, but my understanding was in the 40 to 50%, 45% range. The new evaluation that was recently approved, I say recently, I think it's been over a year now, approved by Fox Canyon has baseline perspectives but baseline projects so they have potential projects that would come into play that may, that could reduce and or mitigate the need to ramp down groundwater production to get the basin into a sustainable process And so we include that also in the Urban Water Management Plan.

So if you were looking just a couple of years ago, there was a potential ramp down of 45% ish give or take. If you look at the evaluation recently done by Fox Canyon, there are scenarios and projects if implemented potentially don't require a ramp down. So there's some extremes there in terms What could and can happen? As mentioned, we're actively in adjudication as well which is separate and apart from the Groundwater Management Act.

And so that adjudication could also dictate a reduction in groundwater allocation by property owners and agencies as well.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:23:34

One, correct me if I'm wrong, one of the big issues, and you're 100% right there was a potential for no ramp down but it had to do with projects being put into place And the significance of the projects was the cost and how they were going to be paid for. It seemed, as I recall, that was a big part of this equation. How are you going to get the money?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:23:53

Correct. So it's a pretty simple formula. It's a volume formula. You use water on the ground. You've got to put it back in if that water is not available from the rain where you're getting it from or how are you going to replenish the ground? It's kind of a very simplistic volume calculation The cost to generate what would be considered non-native water, new water to the basin could be very expensive per acre foot. You know there's other places in the world look at desalinations. Other places in this state of California that look at recycled water and direct potable reuse which is what we have available to Oxnard in terms of our advanced water purification facility so there's ways to generate sort of the people put in quotes, new water or wet water.

But there's a cost to those projects. That's correct. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:24:48

Thank you Council Member. Any other questions or comments? Go ahead Vice Mayor.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:24:53

Thank you just quickly thank you for the presentation also. Aside from the plan and the public hearing we're having tonight I appreciate what was shared about Oxnard residents really raising the bar for themselves as it comes to conservation even outside of times of established designated drought. And so, you know, I see in the presentation the phrase making conservation a California way of life and it seems that we are a little ahead of the curve on that which is nice. I hope that we can continue on that path but I'm wondering if Part of that, maybe a parallel effort into this conservation we're seeing within Oxnard residents is the consumer market for things like washers and dryers and toilets and sinks being much more efficient with their water usage.

Is that something that we're seeing also with newer developments or as people remodel homes or at ADUs? That we're being more efficient with our water just with our appliances.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:25:58

So the answer, the simple answer is yes. And there's also some state mandates in terms of what can and can't be sold so the simple answer to that is yes we're seeing quite a bit of that conservation component dealing with improvements in technology.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:26:13

Okay and to Oxnard rate payers are they still able to access things through our water division such as aerators for faucets or water hose you know I don't know what they're called, but it's a stopper. So it's not just a hose openly distributing water. Those items are still available? Low-flow showerheads, right? Correct. Okay great. So that's why I just wanted to mention that and I will say in my own home when we had to replace our washer or washing machine That alone made a big difference and then when Thank you Mr. Mayor.

not transcribed≈30s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:27 – 3:3417 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:27:26

I just want to add, we also have the new meters that allow customers to sign in and check when or if they're using water efficiently. And potentially some folks may find why is my water spiking at 3 a.m.? It's because your irrigation sprinkler is going off at 3 am and you didn't know about it. So those are some good technologies that allow us to address those things.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:27:47

Yeah, and there's an app for it as well. Correct.

GuestStarrProposed3:27:50

Yes? Sorry, I just kind of wanted to add on to that. In case the public isn't aware, we are doing a lot of outreach on the new AMI system and there is an app called Ion Water that you can download for free. You can sign up using your account with utility billing and you have all that access right on your phone. You can set up alerts but the program also sends us alerts so we're able to get ahead of leaks with this new system, and that has a lot to do with conservation as well. Just wanted to point that out.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:28:28

Thank you Mr. Payton. Yeah the app I suggest folks download it and check it out, and I see on our water division's website it does mention about leaks and how those can absolutely wreak havoc on people's water bills, but and it'll probably start small and then it'll grow and before you know it if this is your high You're high billing, why am I paying so much? And it would be unbeknownst until you realize it's a leak. So thank you for that.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:28:55

Yeah, I've got the app. It's Iron Water. I downloaded it and it helped me. I had a leak in our toilet and it sent me an alert on email. So we were able to shut off the water. So that's very effective. Thank you. Any other comments or questions? All right. I want to entertain a motion to approve the recommendations on this item.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:29:30

I make that motion.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:29:32

Thank you, Council Member Starr. Madam Clerk, call for the vote?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:29:38

Mayor Pro Tem and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote. Thank you. And this motion carries 7-0 thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:29:53

Thank you. We'll move to the next item, this is Item M2. This is the time and place set for a public hearing on Item M2 from the Public Works Department subject Fiscal Year 2026-27 Resolution and Levy Assessments in the Waterways Maintenance District The recommendation that the City Council, acting as the legislative body for the Waterways Maintenance District.

One, hold a public hearing regarding proposed assessments for the Waterways Maintenance District for fiscal year 26-27. Two, adopt a resolution to levy the maintenance assessments on property within the Waterways Maintenance District for fiscal year 26- 27. Three, authorize the approval of agreement A8620 entered into by and between the City of Oxnard and the Harbor Island Homeowners Association, accepting the donation of $10,000 from the Harbor Island Homeowners Association HOA to support landscape maintenance and on-call services within the Waterways Maintenance District Zone 2.

The Finance and Governments Committee approved this item two to one back on May 26th, 2026 And Director Michael Wolff from Public Works is here to answer any questions. We'll start with the city's certification of publication and written communications, if any. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:31:29

Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members there was a legal notice published in Viva Newspaper on June 4th and the City Clerk's Office has received no written communications on this item. Thank you. Thank you, Madam Clerk.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:31:41

Do any Council Members have any ex parte communications or other disclosures regarding this matter to state for the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:31:47

No.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:31:49

Thank you. Members of the public were invited to sign up to speak on this item on the city's website, and a person who did not sign up may do so now by submitting a speaker card or following the instructions posted on the agenda for this meeting and at the city's website, Oxnard.org, City Meetings. Anthony Miller, Special Districts Manager, posted a video presentation regarding this item and is available To answer any brief clarifying questions Councilmembers may have before we take public testimony on this item.

The council will deliberate after the public hearing has been closed. Do any Councilmembers have any questions for Mr. Miller at this time? Go ahead, Mayor Pro Tem.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:32:31

Thank you mayor and thank you Mr. Miller. I was off on the previous item, and I'm glad we got a live presentation because the public was able to get context behind what we were going to be deliberating about and deciding upon for this particular item. Because if people didn't get a chance from the public to see the video on their own time, would you mind just giving us an overview of this considering it's a public hearing?

CommentMr MillerProposed3:32:59

Absolutely. Good evening, Council. Anthony Miller, Special Districts Manager with the City of Oxnard Public Works Department. In brief this assessment district is... I have to turn to the right section on my packet. I'm sorry. ...is the area on the south end of the Channel Islands Harbor, or the city section of the Channel Islands Harbor, excuse me, the Mandalay Bay area and the Harbor Island area. Mandalay Bay is Waterways Zone 1.

Harbor Island is Waterways Zone 2. Each year the city, the Special Districts Division brings forward a assessment proceedings to the council for decision on assessing an amount for landscape, for variety of services including landscape maintenance, vector control things along those lines. And this district is a pre-Prop 218 district so it was recommended to be assessed at a fixed amount and has not changed since 1996.

In general, the assessments support the improvements specifically within the districts and Harbor Island area. It's the linear park that runs around the condos there and in Mandalay Bay it is the waterways themselves, the seawall areas, the miniature parklets that are between some of the homes and the buffer area along Harbor Boulevard. And that's not an exhaustive list but that's in general what this assessment supports. And that essentially summarizes the district and the assessment proceedings as a whole.

Thank you. Thank you, Mayor. That was my

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:34:29

question. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Any other brief clarifying questions? If not, we will now open up the public testimony portion of this public hearing. Speakers have three minutes to speak on this item. Madam Clerk, do we have any speakers for this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:34:44

Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, yes, we have one virtual speaker

3:34 – 3:4325 turns

PresenterRandy Latimercity of OxnardProposedself-stated3:34:55

speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed3:34:57

You have three minutes.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentCouncil Member Starr'sProposed · by introduction3:35:23

For the last number of years, trying to figure out the best process so that we can eventually pay more money and protect our seawalls. So I just really want to thank them this stalemate with not being able to increase this assessment has caused great concern in our area and now getting communications out to the homeowners In advance enough to not be crying wolf, but to have substantial documents that let them see that we've planned and worked with the city to make it most affordable is really complicated. And I just want to thank them all.

We fully approve

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:36:08

this

CommentCouncil Member Starr'sProposed · by introduction3:36:08

because there's nothing to disapprove at this point. And thank you very much to Public Works and to the city staff for working with us diligently. This has been great, thanks.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:36:21

That's wonderful to hear, thanks Ms. Mitchell for calling in. Any other public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:36:26

Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members that concludes our speakers in person or virtually for this item, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:36:32

Thank you. Seeing that there are no additional speakers then we will close the public hearing. The public hearing is now closed. Does any council member wish to To comment? If not, I'll entertain a motion to approve. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:36:47

So I just want to say for the record that I will be voting no on this recommendation because at no point have the registered voters in this district been given the opportunity to approve this tax in a general election.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:37:00

Thank you. Any other comments or questions? If not, I'll entertain a motion to approve the recommended actions.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:37:07

I move the recommended action, Mayor.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:37:10

Is there a second? Thank you. We've got a motion by Mayor Pro Tem and seconded by Council Member

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:37:15

Basuah. Thank you, Mayor. And Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote. I thank you in this motion carries six to one with council members are voting now. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:37:39

Thank you Madam Clerk This is the time and place set for a public hearing on item M3 from the Public Works Department, subject Adoption of Resolution Confirming Fiscal Year 2026-27 Landscape Maintenance Districts Diagrams and Assessments. Recommendation that the City Council acting as the legislative body for the city's landscape maintenance districts otherwise referred to as LMDs One, hold a public hearing to receive public testimony regarding the proposed fiscal year 26-27 assessments in the city's LMDs. And two, adopt a resolution of the City Council and the City of Oxnard California confirming diagrams and assessments for fiscal year 26- 27 in connection with the city's landscape maintenance districts.

This item did not originate in committee. Michael Wolfe, our Public Work Director is here to answer any brief clarifying questions We'll start with the city clerk's certification or publication of written communications, if any. Madam City Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:38:44

Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, there was a legal notice published in Viva Newspaper on June 4th and the city clerk's office has received no written communications on this item. Thank you. Thank you, Madam

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:38:56

Clerk. Do any council members have any... I'm sorry, go ahead. Council Member Starr, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:39:00

Thank you. So my employer, Haas Automation pays an assessment to Landscape Maintenance District number 30 so I will be recused myself from that portion of the vote.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:39:15

Thank you Councilmember. Mayor Pro Tem? I'm sorry, Councilmember Perot? We'll go to you Mayor Pro Tem, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:39:21

Thank you. I just have a couple questions on this item First one is if we could just get a brief overview of it, but then I have some questions about the item itself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:39:41

On the verge of caution, I just want to make sure. I live in Landscape Maintenance District 13. I live in the District 13 Lavanda. I've spoken with a city attorney and the city attorney says I have the ability to vote on this. I know there are other members of the council that live in districts and we had one recused because of his employer but I want to make sure, City Attorney, that I am in good ground acting on these votes.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:40:04

I'm also in that situation as you know. Mr. Fisher?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:40:09

Thank you, Mayor. So the basic rule under the Fair Political Practices Commission regulations under the Political Reform Act is that an elected official has or public official has a prohibited conflict of interest when that official has a disqualifying financial interest and that type of interest exists if the decision that you are participating in voting on will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect distinguishable from the effect on the public generally directly on the official or the official's immediate family, or a source of income of the official.

So there is a public generally exception to that rule that states A governmental decision's financial effect on a public official's financial interest is indistinguishable from the effect on the public generally if the official establishes that a significant segment of the public is affected by, affected and the effect on the official's financial interest is not unique compared to the effect on the significant segment of the public.

So that regulation of the FPPC is broken down into specific rules for specific circumstances. And one of those circumstances that's laid out is for public services and utilities, and the way that reads out is that the financial effect is deemed indistinguishable from that of the public generally where there is no unique effect on the official's interest and the decision sets or adjusts the amount of an assessment in this case for broadly provided public services that is applied equally, or proportionally, or by the same percentage to the official's interest.

And all businesses, properties or individuals subject to the assessment. So my understanding here is that you are just setting the assessment. You're not changing the rules of how the assessment is applied. You're not changing the boundaries of the district. You're not making a decision that would take it outside the scope of this public generally exception and that in setting the assessment as you do each year You're setting an assessment that is applied in a way that is not unique to your interests.

So whether it's the mayor or Council Member Perrello, and it's rather attenuated if somebody's employer is involved.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:43:04

Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:43:05

Thank you very much. And this also I understand confers to homeowners and renters also. So if renter lives in a district they might want to step up

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:43:18

So in my case, I live in Landscape Maintenance District number 43. But because I'm a month-to-month payer of rent, the city attorney has advised me that I wouldn't be affected by that.

3:43 – 3:5012 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:43:34

OK. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Fisher. Go ahead, Mr Miller.

CommentMr MillerProposed3:43:45

OK, thank you. Mayor Pro Tem, thank you for the question. Again, Anthony Miller, Public Works Special Districts Manager. In short, LMD's have to go through effectively a three part process. We combine two of the actions into one meeting which occurred earlier this month in that the City Council sets a date, excuse me, directs an engineer's report to be created and sets a date for a public hearing. Today is the day of the public hearing in which the assessments are officially approved or disapproved.

And in general, the assessments and their documentation isn't contained within the consolidated engineers report that comes as an attachment to this agenda report Each district is evaluated within the confines of that engineer's report. However, they're evaluated individually. Each district does take care of similar improvements in general. However, each district has different amounts of improvements. Some have different types of improvements. However by and large we are discussing landscaping and lighting.

Landscape and lighting districts are formed under the Streets and Highways Code, and that Streets and Highways Code is the code in which lays out the process by which the City Council has to follow to approve these assessments. In general, the only thing I would say that has changed from prior years in comparison to this year is that recently within the last year the City Council approved a landscape and funding policy or maintenance and funding policy for landscape maintenance districts that sets different guidelines for staff to follow when creating the engineer's report, and also calculating different assessment rates for each district. And that generally summarizes the report.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:45:36

I have just two questions Mayor. So Mr. Miller one One item of interest or a topic that I'd like to cover just before we get into the public testimony portion of this. As it pertains to special districts, can you explain what special district's administrative expenses mean to LMDs? And as a follow-up to that, what services do these costs represent regarding LMDs.

CommentMr MillerProposed3:46:02

Absolutely. So administrative expenses is probably a little bit of a misnomer specifically for LMD Special districts as a division within Public Works provide services directly to these LMDs. Now yes, that may mean the management of contracts or the administration of contracts that provides services within these districts but special district staff also provide direct services on the ground within LMDs responding to constituent Uh, requests responding to calls for service whether that comes from other departments within the city saying there's an issue in an area or from a resident.

But there are specific items in which city staff or special district staff perform work within these districts and provide a service directly to these residents. So administrative expenses or administrative overhead is a function of managing the ins and outs of day-to-day operations within these districts themselves. It's not specifically just an amorphous dollar figure that spread amongst different districts, it does tie back into the proportional size of each district's maintenance and operating budgets. And that's how staff attempts to fairly distribute the amount of staff and overhead expenses that are attributed to LMDs amongst all 36 districts.

Okay, thank you.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:47:21

And along those lines I know you stated it but I think this is a good example within District 2 I have two very small LMDs so can you confirm that the LMD's are responsible for like proportionate administrative costs?

CommentMr MillerProposed3:47:34

That is correct. So the two districts you're referring to, LMD 54 and LMD 11 pay differing amounts of administrative expenses based on again the proportion of their operating budgets that they command. LMD 54 as an example in its last fiscal year part of the expenses will go directly towards things like managing the contract we use to plant trees within the district so there are some two trees that were planted within the district in the parkway there. And LMD 11 on the other hand is one of our CAP districts Their budget is relatively small and also subsequently receives a little bit less in terms of direct services from staff because they frankly can't afford to receive more. So we tie services directly to the amount of budget that each district is able to support.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:48:19

Okay,

CommentMr MillerProposed3:48:19

thank you very much those are my questions Mayor.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:48:21

Thank You Mr. Miller. I was kind

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:48:24

of curious about what the statuses landscaping service contracts that we have. I don't remember when was the last time they came up before us, but are they multi-year contracts? How frequently do they get renewed? Where do we stand today with those?

CommentMr MillerProposed3:48:44

So special district agreements follow the same bidding and procurement rules as other general service agreements throughout the city. In this particular case, the LMD landscape maintenance agreement I believe was taken in 2022. It's three years old at this point and is something that staff is currently evaluating as to whether or not we will be rebidding it.

Since we follow the same rules that the rest of the city does, our agreements can range from anywhere between one 12-month period with the option to extend for up to five years or in this particular case the landscape maintenance agreement I believe was bid to be a three year agreement with two options to extend. So that's currently under evaluation. Okay

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role3:49:26

and one thing I'd like to have a better understanding is getting back to the admin charges so It wasn't that long ago that we had one full-time equivalent person assigned for special districts. And if my memory serves me correctly, I think in the proposed budget, I think we have like 15 full-time equivalents. If I'm wrong, please correct me on that. And I guess I'm just trying to understand why, assuming I'm accurate here, why it takes 15 full-time equivalents to run special districts?

3:50 – 3:586 turns

CommentMr MillerProposed3:50:05

So I will, I can't exactly confirm or you know or match the number of full-time equivalents off the top my head. I don't know if it comes out to 15. I do know that there are a couple staff members that are not fully attributable to special districts. The total number of staff within special districts is not 100% attributable just to LMD's. The Special Districts Division manages 50 districts in total and those budgets vary You know, broadly across the board.

Part of the creation of the Special Districts Division was a recognition by the city that more direct management was needed in these districts to make sure that the city was doing what they were supposed to be doing under the confines of the law. The Special Districts Division allows the city to provide specific services directly to these districts and does not have to share that time with other portions of the city.

Frankly, in my opinion it's actually quite a good benefit to the residents of those districts because they essentially have a staff that is directly answerable to landscaping issues or issues of improvements within their districts that directly correspond to their community in which they live. Now, in terms of the total number of staff members and growing over the course of the last few years there I think has been a recognition within the Public Works Department Special districts do take time and effort to manage properly.

Like you said, there are 50 districts and those budgets vary wildly. LMDs do take a portion of that but they don't pay for the total cost of 15 staff members. They pay for a portion of that. And that portion is proportional to the amount of budget that specific section of districts commands. So I hope that answers your question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:51:59

If I could just add a few things I think it's important When I first got here, I heard a lot from our community about things that weren't getting done in special districts. And so when you look at that from the perspective of whether it was only one person or one FTE and now there's more, I would say there's more stuff getting done. We are speaking to the community and answering what they're requesting. When they request projects we have staff members who can do it. When I first got here there were lots of projects not being There was a lot of analysis not being done. Lots of maintenance items that weren't being done or addressed, likely because there was only one staff member or so assigned to it. Now we have staff members that can do the projects, do the QAQC, respond to requests that the communities are demanding for the dollars that they pay.

So I see it from a perspective of we are correctly staffed now and Folks that have pointed out things that weren't managed correctly when there was one person. And I believe that Anthony's team has made big strides in addressing some of those things because it was too much for that little amount of staffing. So, I see this as we are responding to what the community is asking for.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:53:28

Thank you Mr. Wolf.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:53:33

Mayor, I totally agree with what Mr. Wolf just said. It used to be that tremendous amounts of complaints since there's been a change and people are held accountable and they were held accountable before but they needed to have more human beings bodies on site to make sure the work got done and there has been less complaints some specific individuals have never stopped complaining but there has been showing to the residents that live in the neighborhoods What their money is going for, how costs increase. How there will be a need to increase the cost if there's no cost of living increase in those projects and it's a tremendous improvement that has happened in this part of the City of Oxnard's business.

There will always be people who claim they're not getting what they're paying for. They have the ability to go through a process and to say we had one person doing I take it this way, Councilman Starr. When you make that comment there's an implication that somebody is not doing the work. That's not what's going on and accomplished.

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:54:41

Thank you, Councilmember. There's another question. Members of the public were invited to stand up to speak on this item on the city's website And a person who did not sign up may do so now by submitting a speaker card or following the instructions posted on the agenda for this meeting at the city's website, Oxnard.org, City Meetings. Mr. Anthony Miller, Special Districts Manager, posted a video presentation regarding this item It is here to answer any brief clarifying questions Councilmembers may have before we take public testimony on this item.

The council will deliberate after the public hearing has been closed. Do any Councilmembers have any further questions of Mr. Miller? If not, I'll open it up to public testimony. The public testimony portion of this public hearing is open. Speakers have three minutes to speak on this item. Do we have any public speakers that signed up to speak? I see two here in person. Anybody virtual? No, we don't have any virtual speakers at this time. OK. Ray Blutell followed by Alicia Purcell.

Thank you, Mr. Blutell. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed3:56:01

Thank you, Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. Council members, public, I'd like to preface my comments on this is my understanding of how LMDs were established. A vote was held in order to establish the LMD between the developer and the city. The developer represented all the homeowners. There were no homeowners I think I mentioned before at another meeting, I wish there would be another vote of all the homeowners to see if they want to continue. They had no say.

That's only fair if they had a chance to say do we want to continue? All right. I briefly read the 2026-27 engineers report and focused mostly on my AMD. I note that for 2026-27, the assessment from my LMD increased from $100 per year per unit to $324.42 per year per unit. This is a whopping 224% increase and that's with no planned special project assessments found from our district. This is ridiculous!

The total cost for Oxford Special District personnel plus overhead was nearly $900,000 Plus they hire a consultant to support them. The total cost for contractor maintenance for 2026-27 was $1,683 million. Thus the Oxnard special district personnel consume over one half of what the districts have to pay for contractor maintenance and on call servicing. Special District City staff have 15 FTEs that's in there with nine of the FTEs on the city's payroll deal with maintenance. Isn't that what we have the contractor maintenance for? That's what the 1.683 million is for.

Does this sound right to you? This special district stuff has become quite a lucrative moneymaker for the city And I need to remind you, speaking only for my special district, we homeowners are being assessed extra funds to maintain areas which actually belong to the city. Nothing attributed to the property of the assessed homeowners. Thank you.

3:58 – 4:069 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role3:58:23

Thank you, Ray. Alicia Purcell?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed3:58:37

So I don't in three minutes have enough time to cover all the problems with the LMDs. I'll elaborate on what I've said before, in some areas a large percentage of these funds are not actually used for landscaping and lighting services for the residents in the districts. Way too much money goes to administrative overhead charges and by the way that 15 FTE's came from it's in the budget document that you'll be working with later this evening.

Let's talk about equipment and supplies purchases. It wasn't that long ago the city repaid money to the LMDs for a lot of improper charges, including equipment purchased with LMD funds though the equipment disappeared in some other department. It took the city several years to get around to refunding that money. They said it was because they were working hard to make sure they found it all but Ray Botel and I have looked at a whole lot of other invoices for equipment and supplies purchased with LMD funds For example, I saw an invoice for six chainsaw chains and there was a handwritten note on it that said this was for LMD number 25.

Well, LMD25 doesn't need six chainsaw chains but the accounting shows that it wasn't even booked according to the note that was on the invoice. It went into administrative costs which then gets spread among all the districts This sort of thing happens over and over and over where the invoices indicate it's for a particular LMD. It gets booked to administrative costs, and all the LMDs pay for it.

There's a lot of graffiti removal gel that is purchased. It's often booked into administrative costs, which gets spread across all the districts including at least 10 districts that can only pay for trees, shrubs and ground cover. Now do you think there's a lot of graffiti on shrubs? They shouldn't be paying a portion of graffiti removal supplies. The sheer volume of equipment and tools that have been purchased with LMD funds is just implausible to me, that it's all for the special districts. A lot of invoices say the items were delivered to the Parks Department.

Is there any LMD that needs drywall screws and tools for cutting porcelain tile? There are invoices for that. Purple primer paint sounds like it's what they put on the recycled water pipes, but no LMDs have that, but it gets charged to admin costs and all the LMDs pay for it. It's just there's a lot of weird things in there that don't seem right to me. While it's reasonable that counting mistakes can happen, there's so much of this. It not just mistakes. It seems intentional.

Thank you. Ms.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:01:43

Purcell, thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:01:48

you. Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members that concludes our speakers virtually and in person for this item. Thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:01:55

given that there are no additional speakers then we will close the public hearing. The public hearing is now closed does any council member wish to comment further? Council Member Starr

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:02:06

Yeah. I will be voting no on this recommendation because at no point have the registered voters in these districts been given the opportunity to approve this assessment in a general election.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:02:19

Thank you, Council Member Starr. Mayor Pro Tem, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:02:23

Mr. Wolf, were you going to speak to the items that were just mentioned? I was just going to mention about the speculation that came up just now. I was hoping that we can have a little bit of facts shared.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed4:02:34

Sure. I'll speak to a few and then Anthony can cover some specifics. So there was comment made about homeowners and developers and establishments of LMD's. And I want to make sure everybody is clear that Proposition 218 approved by the state of California voters Proposition 218 implementation guideline and the proposition 218 omnibus describes the process by which this is supposed to be implemented.

Note that process has been followed, I wanna make sure that's clear. That process approved by California voters has been followed. The idea that somebody wants the homeowners to vote, that's not what the California voters voted for Property owners are who gets the vote. Now, some people disagree that developers have the same rights as property owners. They do. They're the property owners. They have the right to vote.

So says the state of California. When somebody buys a property, potentially they didn't do their due diligence They didn't review the documents they're supposed to review. And they are ignorant on the fact that they are an assessment district and now they want to change the rules because they failed to do their homework or failed to acknowledge when they signed a document that says I reviewed my taxes, but I read them and understood I don't think anybody forced anybody to buy a home in Oxnard. I have not heard that conversation. I don't think anybody forced them to buy that home. I think that was a decision that homeowners make when they have the privilege to make that decision.

So, I want to make sure we point out that all the correct processes were followed in this development of LMDs. I'll also say I think it's a little bit I'll take sort of an argumentive stance of why I see this from a different lens. So you have a development, a property owner who's developing their property who puts these improvements in. How are those improvements got to be put there?

Paseos, landscaping, lighting, landscape improvements, entry monuments, they all got put in as part of the development You have people go buy properties of their own will in those developments and now they say, well I don't want to pay for those things. I want the rest of the community. I want South Oxnard to pay for it. I want to take general fund money away from those communities to pay for the landscaping that I should be paying for because I purchased a home in that development on purpose I think that's an unfair conversation to have with the rest of the community, to say you get to change the rules after you buy your property because you dislike assessment districts.

Let's make everybody else pay for those things. I think that's an unfair process. Anthony can speak to some of the other items that were brought up.

4:06 – 4:127 turns

CommentMr MillerProposed4:06:15

So specifically, I want to address a couple of the items that have been brought up in regards to LMDs and special districts in general, particularly for supplies and things along those lines. Now, I will say that I appreciate the amount of effort that it takes to go through individual supply purchases. There are lots of them. There are lots of districts. There are lots of supplies that are purchased.

The first ones that particularly come to mind are, in general we're working with landscape supplies. Now if you're talking about purple primer paint, purple primer paint specifically is something that you put onto irrigation lines. Irrigation lines are required to be primed and then glued together. That is something that any irrigation line needs in order to function properly when repaired.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:07:00

Excuse me? That is recycled and potable water not just recycled as the column was made.

CommentMr MillerProposed4:07:06

Correct it does not matter what type of irrigation line Now something I do want to also point out is that part of the reason why special districts does have as many staff as we do is because we do take special care to make sure that these things are done correctly and we try to make corrections where we do find errors. So in the example that was brought up in regards to 25 LMD25 being billed for six chainsaw chains, that was spread across all districts because all districts maintain trees just because they were happened to be used because a project we were doing an LMD doesn't mean that they should have been billed exclusively for those supplies. So while the invoice may have been handwritten and noted, it was handwritten incorrectly and it was correctly spread across all districts.

These kinds of issues do come up from time to time in which our staff when going through these payments and processes we put them in the place they're supposed to be. Now specifically in regard to Invoices addressed to other departments or divisions. We cannot necessarily, special district staff cannot necessarily direct a vendor or a contractor to address their invoice to a specific division if they have something saved in their system. For example if we share a vendor with our parks division they may necessarily bill something to the city and put parks on the invoice but it's something that special districts division has ordered so these are relatively benign administrative items that I'd be more than happy to discuss with individuals if they have questions about them However, they're not indicative of a wider or broader attempt to pay for general fund supplies out of special district funds.

I can tell you firsthand that many of the special districts don't have the budget to support supplies above and beyond what they can afford and what they need. And it's not something that I have, as a division manager would seek to dilute the funds that are available to these districts in any way shape or form because they're dedicated for certain purposes. And that's really all I have to say about that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:09:03

Thank you and something that comes to mind for me in the education realm is often there will be materials or even an employee who is multifunded where You know, X percentage is paid for out of X type of budget and those programs get to use that material or that person's FTE is split between their program. They'll spend 25% of the time on this 75% on this right? And so I appreciate you giving that additional context on that and like the specific example of the chainsaws. Right away, that's where my mind went of well this is probably meant for multiple districts as my guess because again, as I mentioned education, that's a very common practice where multiple programs are paid for a thing or a few things and those things are spread across those programs to be used proportionally based on how they had funded it.

So thank you. I appreciate the extra information on that. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:10:02

Thank you very much. It's almost like being back in school and I appreciate the public works giving the explanations. Mr. Wolf, thank you. Mr Miller, thank you. With respect to the comment that was made by the gentleman that his fee went from $100 to 300 bucks is there a simple explanation?

CommentMr MillerProposed4:10:21

That can simply be explained by the change in budget year over year. So a district that may see their fee go up could be to a number of reasons, but in this particular case and that particular district there's a plan to address some of the entrances to that community and clean those up a little bit in the upcoming year Due to a couple of call-ins we've received from members within the actual district themselves, to ask for extra services to beautify those portions of the district. And so that is something that's been factored into the upcoming budget for the upcoming fiscal year and their maintenance budget and is a primary reason for their assessment change.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:11:00

Thank you. And I do appreciate the fact that Mr. Wolf explained what the law was, and I'd like to share a conversation I had with Councilman Starr. Councilman Starr, you may remember When they did the groundbreaking for the skate park in La Colonia. And I recommended to you that if we did that again, that you get ahold of the Neighborhood Council Chair from Colonia and invite him because it doesn't look good when you don't invite the neighborhood chair in the district you represent.

And then we had a discussion about why you vote a certain way on items like this? And I explained that in my belief, we're following the law and we're following the law according to the city, according to the state and according to everything else. And I asked you why, and you said because of the Constitution. I mean, I'm following the law the way the law is set up, and you're following your beliefs because of the Constitution.

I wanted to share. I disagree with you, but that's your belief. This is my belief. Thank you. Appreciate the help Mr. Miller.

4:12 – 4:1730 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:12:04

If there are no further questions, I'll entertain a motion to approve the recommended actions on this item. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:12:08

moved.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:12:10

Thank you. I just want to note, too, that we closed the public hearing... Madam Clerk is advising me that somebody's calling in after we close the public hearing so if they're listening, I apologize but the public hearings was closed some time ago. Madam Clerk, call for the vote?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:12:29

Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, if you can go ahead and cast your votes. I thank you and this motion carries 6 to 1. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:12:47

Thank you. I know it's only 912, but I anticipate going past 10 o'clock. I'll entertain a motion to go past 10. So moved. Second. Thank you. Madam Clerk if there are no speakers call for the vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:08

Councilwoman Basuah? Yes. Councilmember Peralo? Yes. Councilwoman Bettis? Yes, Councilwoman Rodriguez? Yes Council Member Starr?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:13:16

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:17

Mayor Pro Tem Teran?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:13:18

I think we can get it done by 10, I'm going to vote

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:20

no. Mayor McArthur?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:13:23

Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:24

And this motion carries 7-0 thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:13:27

Thank you The next item on the agenda is actually 6-2 You

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:34

said no I'm sorry were you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:13:37

I'm sorry, I voted no.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:13:38

Okay, sorry. Six to one. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:13:47

The next item on the agenda is Item N1 from the Finance Department. Subject fiscal year 26-27 Public Safety Property Tax Assessment. Recommendations that City Council adopt a resolution establishing The fiscal year 26-27 tax rates on properties in the city of Oxnard for the payment of voter approved obligations related to public safety personnel pensions expenses.

This item did not originate in committee. Javier Chaguin-Lazaro, Chief Financial Officer for us is here to answer any questions we may have. Before Councilmember discussion, we'll take any public comments Do we have any public speakers on this item, Madam

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:14:30

Clerk? Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, we do not have any requests to speak on Report Item Number N1 in person or virtually. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:14:42

Thank you. Do any council members have any questions? Council Member Starr, go ahead. I do actually.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:14:46

So I noticed there was something new this year so when I look on page 2032 of the staff report there's a line that says add Reserved for cash flow, one-pay period expenses and it's about $865,000. Can you tell me what this is all about and why it's here for the first time?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:15:12

I'm sorry, can you repeat which page are you referring

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:15:19

to? Page 2032 of the staff report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:15:27

Can you repeat the question

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:15:28

please? Sure, on that page is a table which says factors used in determining required tax rate. It includes total property assessed, property value and then some additions and subtractions I noticed one addition was reserved for cash flow 1 pay period expenses for $865,110 and I noticed that wasn't Our last year's report, so I'm wondering what caused this to come about and what is it attempting to do here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:16:03

So the calculation is just trying to be conservative in the way that we calculate the amount that needs to be assessed.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:16:11

Okay but what I don't understand is if this is for cash flow purposes, it's not like we're receiving this money up front Let me restate that. We get two property tax installments during the year, so how does assessing a larger amount over an entire year help with a temporary cash flow issue of one pay period? I don't get that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:16:41

Well, because your comment is only focusing on the way that we receive the fund from the assessment. But then the payment is happening every pay period and this is what it's trying to cover that because there's a portion of payroll that is going to happen. It's going to be crossing fiscal years as well.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:16:57

So why did you limit it to just one pay period? Why not choose 20 pay periods and just say hey, we need the cash flow?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:17:04

I'm sorry, I'm not following

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:17:07

your argument. So let me ask you a question this way. Between July 1st and the next property tax payment that we receive, how many weeks or months is that roughly? When do we receive that next installment?

4:17 – 4:2415 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:17:32

Again, you're focusing on the revenue. This is trying to address the timing of the disbursement. In a fiscal year, you have 26 pay periods and sometimes those pay periods are crossing fiscal years. And this amount is just trying to factor for that's crossing the fiscal years and every year it's going to depend. Some years you're gonna have the full 26 pay periods within the same fiscal year so you don't have to accrue anything. Sometimes the last pay period of the year is going to have seven days in the next fiscal year. So you have to factor those things in there, so we're trying to factor for the disbursement part of it and take that into

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:18:06

consideration. That makes more sense to me. So does that mean that in future years they'll be some years where this is added and some years where it's not?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:13

It's gonna be fluctuating.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:18:15

All right, that helps me understand it. Thank you so much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:17

You're welcome.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:18:19

Any other questions or comments?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:18:20

Actually, one more. How did we arrive at the $9.5 million figure for projected revenue from unitary properties? Because I mean it's great but that figure was only like 6.5 million the previous year so what was causing this $3 million jump in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:38

revenues

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:18:39

from unitary properties?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed4:18:41

We rely on consultants work to estimate those amounts that they are just sort of kind of help us to estimate our property tax for both in the budget and they're the ones that came with that. That is to me. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:18:59

Thank you, go ahead. Good question. Guess my portal. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:19:03

Thank you very much for the explanation. So those credit those questions? Thank you have your.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:19:07

Just impressed. I do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed4:19:14

want

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:19:16

to share my thoughts. And I said this last year, so for some people it's going to be repetition but Oxnard is one of roughly two dozen cities out of California's 482 municipalities that charge its residents an extra property tax to pay for city employee pensions On June 8th, 1978, California voters approved Proposition 13, the Jarvis Gannon Initiative which added Article 13A to the California Constitution.

Article 13A limits the amount of ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash values determined by the county assessor but exempts from the 1% tax limitation any taxes to repay indebtedness approved by the voters prior to July 1st, 1978 So in the 1982 case, the California Supreme Court and Carmen V. Alvord, the court ruled that voter-approved pension costs constitute debt that could be supported by a tax levy in excess of 1% maximum allowed by Proposition 13.

However it does not mandate that Oxnard impose such a tax we just simply choose to do that but one thing I noticed was that according to footnote number two in that case It said that the ballot proposition at the election of April 13, 1948 in San Gabriel was as follows. And this is going to be important because I want to compare it to the language that we had for our measure.

The question that San Gabriel was asked Voters were asked was, shall the City of San Gabriel fully participate in the state employees retirement system of the State of California making the employees of said city members of said system in and under the provisions of the State Employee Retirement Act of said state as amended and levy and collect annually as contemplated in said act a special tax sufficient to raise the amount estimated by said council to be required to provide sufficient revenues to meet the obligations of this said city to said retirement system.

That was the question that was on the ballot, so people were being asked shall we impose a debt and have a tax? Let me contrast that with what we did in Oxnard. In October 23rd 1951, we had a special municipal election with the following ballot question It said, shall an ordinance of the City of Oxnard authorizing a contract between the City Council of the City of Oxnard and the Board of Administration California State Employees Retirement System providing for the participation of the city of Oxnard in said employees retirement system making its local firemen and local police members thereof be adopted.

And by the way that California State Employee Retirement System was later renamed You know, PERS. So the electorate did adopt that ordinance by a vote of 742 to 645. We had a lot fewer voters back then. I doubt there's anyone who is alive today who voted in that election. But what was important is that the question that was being asked of voters was not shall we have a pension plan? We said shall we authorize the city to do it if they want to?

The San Gabriel measure specifically said, hey we're going to have a special tax. We never had that here so I don't think Carmen v. Alvord applies so from my standpoint I just don't think that we can actually charge this tax for that reason based on my reading. I think it's important to mention that whether we collect this tax or not, the city is still going to contribute to the pension costs of its employees. That is something that we absolutely have to do.

But really what this does is effectively all this tax does is it frees up money in the general fund to go to other purposes. So this is not a small amount of tax money. It's $33 per $100,000 in assessed value. So we're talking about roughly $200 a year for let's say a house that's worth 600, assessed at $600,000. A lot of people are financially struggling with high taxes. When I campaigned, people definitely said they wanted tax relief.

So we are the only city in Ventura County that imposes this type of tax and somehow 95% of all cities I believe we should do the same and for all of the aforementioned reasons I stated, I will be voting against any resolution to charge homeowners this extra tax. Thank you.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

4:24 – 4:3314 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:24:45

The fact that the voters of this city voted a specific way and you disagree, and you disagree tonight, June 16th, 2026. You have every right in the world to do that. But Mr. Starr, what do you believe in? Do you believe we should pay the pension Well, we should take it out of some other funds. But we shouldn't honor the voters that voted for this in 1951. I was alive in 1951 and don't think you were even born yet. That doesn't make me better or you better. It doesn't make anybody better. It's just a fact. But since 1951, the residents of this city through their elected officials have been honoring the commitment that was made to public safety. Now you want to dishonor it. You have a right to express your opinion but I think you're wrong And when the residents have continually done this, you need to get more support on the council.

And I understand you're working very closely with three people to take out three people that are up for election. You pretty much have hand-picked them and if you are successful in that, you may get your way next year but this year, I don't believe you're going to get your way because Mr. Starr, you're wrong.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:26:12

So I'm of the position that we adopted Prop 13 in 1978, restricted taxes. There is an exception. It applied in San Gabriel's case because of the way the ballot question was written and doesn't apply in Oxnard based on the way it's written. And that's the only thing I'm saying. I'm not saying San Gabriel was the wrong decision. I am simply saying they made a decision where they could actually do this.

I don't think we actually Had voters make that decision, that allows us to do this. That's just the position I'm taking.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:26:48

And I will share this. Your history and your bank account and your proclivity to file lawsuits, I'm expecting you probably to file another lawsuit. Good luck! But when you want to go against the residents of the City of Oxnard and what they decided to give their public servants, again, you're wrong.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed4:27:11

I know this is an annual item

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:27:30

Thank you, Councillor Perrello. I have a little confusion when the previous two items stated that those are getting a no vote because the electorate hadn't had a chance to weigh in. The electorate did weigh in on this but there's a disagreement still anyways so that's all right. I disagree with sometimes what the electorate puts out there. I mean I've been complaining this evening about how we don't have live presentations for the benefit of the public because of Measure M from 2020. It's all right I didn't vote for it, but they did and that's fine. And I respect that and honor it, but I can disagree with it just as Council Member Starr disagrees with this item.

And just in the way that he feels that things are maybe not correctly written, that's his prerogative. There are channels for that. I don't know if you'll pursue those. But I mean 2016 Measure M was written in a way that violated state law. So when we go over this though As it pertains to what the voters put in place and is still being honored to this day, Councilor Perrello I appreciate a piece that you alluded to on this. This has to do with our public safety professionals and I have full support of our public safety folks who work 24 hours a day seven days a week 365 days a year 366 on a leap year they are always on in some way shape or form And I invite any member of the public and anyone on this dais to visit a fire station, to go on a ride along with our police department.

And you can see day in and day out what they face and what they do. And we get to join them for a visit for a few hours. They would do that for an entire career. The ups and downs and the adrenaline spikes, and the precarious situations that they have to put themselves in as part of their commitment to this community. They more than deserve to be supported As they go through their career and at the end of their careers, so I appreciate that the voters back then had put this in place. I note that where's my math on here someone who was 18 in 1951 would be 93 years old now there are still plenty of folks here we had some of them visit us when the Senior Services Commission came out but Regardless, the electorate's put this in place and I actually respect the idea behind it and what we're doing.

And I imagine there are plenty of residents of this community who would be willing to pay more because of what this goes toward. So I appreciate this being brought forward. It is a special one to this city. And again thank you to my colleagues for entertaining this discussion. And happy to second it. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:30:11

Councilwoman. Mayor Pro Tem and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote? Thank you. And this motion carries six to one, thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:30:30

By the way I'd like to echo what Mayor Pro Tem said we have great police officers and they deserve our support so my experience with law enforcement here has been it's never been less than professional so it's a well-trained group of folks very professionally managed, and I think that our community is better because of them. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:30:59

Thank you, Council Member Starr.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:31:00

Minus the retirement.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:31:02

The next item on the agenda is Item N2. This is from the Housing Department. Subject, authorize the assessment and collection of fees within the Oxnard Downtown Management District for fiscal year 26-27 Recommendation that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the assessment and collection of fees within the Oxnard Downtown Management District for fiscal year 26-27. This item did not originate in committee.

Brenda Lopez, Housing Director is here to answer any brief clarifying questions council members may have. Do any council members have any questions for Ms. Lopez? If not Madam Clerk are there any public speakers

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:31:49

Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members, we do not have any requests to speak on this item in person or virtually. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:31:58

I just want to thank the mayor. I had a question offline from Ms. Lopez and she answered it. Thank you very much for the

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:32:06

answer. Any questions or comments before we entertain our motion? Go ahead, Council Member Starr.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:32:14

So this might surprise some of my colleagues here, but this is actually an assessment I can vote for. Here's the reason why. This is one where it does come to a vote at least every five years and because... And even if you take out the city's vote, the city voted on these property as one of the property owners as well, but even if you didn't count their vote This district would have still been approved by a margin of 72% to 28% back when this last came up.

So because of the fact that they had an opportunity to vote on this, they had an opportunity voted on our regular basis and they're in favor of it, that's... And it's overwhelming. That's the reason why I would be voting in favor of this.

4:33 – 4:3819 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:33:08

Thank you, Council Member. What's the pleasure of council on this particular item? I'm

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:33:14

going

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:33:15

to recommend that you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:33:16

second. Thank you. Madam Clerk, call for the vote. Mayor Pro Tem and Council Members if you can go ahead and cast your vote. Thank you and this motion carries 7-0

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:33:32

thank you. The next item on the agenda is Item N3 also from the Housing Department subject Housing Authority Lower Rand Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher Program budgets for fiscal year 26-27. Recommendation of the Board of Commissioners of the Oxnard Housing Authority, one adopted resolution approving the recommended $8,000,656,418 Operating budgets for the low rent public housing program for fiscal year 26-27, as presented for each project area and approve and authorize the use of $277,566 of unrestricted cash to fund the projected deficit in the Central Office Coast Center.

And two adopt a resolution approving the recommended $36,597,778 operating budget for the Housing Choice Voucher Program for fiscal year 26-27 and approve and authorize the use of $182,665 of unrestricted cash to fund the projected deficit. Just as a reminder this item did not originate in committee and our housing director Brenda Lopez is here to answer any brief clarifying questions we may have.

Before Councilmember discussion, we'll receive public comment. Speakers have three minutes to speak. Do we have any public speakers for this particular item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:34:57

Chair McArthur, we do not have any requests to speak on this item in person or virtually. Thank you. Thank you. Go ahead, Councilmember Starr.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:35:04

Yeah, I do have a question, Ms. Lopez. So regarding the low-rent public housing program budget, so you've mentioned, I see in the report that we're running at a deficit for this upcoming year I was wondering if we expect such deficits to continue in subsequent years because at some point, you know, we run out of money here.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:35:28

Brenda Lopez, Housing Director. Thank you for the question, Council Member Starr. That is correct. Right now we are operating at a deficit. Do we anticipate to continue operating at deficit? It is very difficult to predict, especially with everything that's going on in administration for this coming year. We have a pretty solid idea of what the budget is looking like. However, we continue to hear that it's going to continue to decrease The deficit that we're seeing with the public housing program, it's to the central cost program if you will. So these are fees that we generate that cannot be attributed to any specific public housing unit. So to your point, if we continue to go down this path and we don't have enough reserves, we would need to make difficult decisions on how to further cut expenses.

Right now we are monitoring and ensuring that we streamline everything that we can We monitor, control cost and increase revenue by continuing to provide any more management services which feed into this account. And then just really quick we are looking at a conversion you'll keep hearing me say this conversion of our properties through that tool we're looking at increasing the revenue that comes into operator properties. That does take time though that could take up to 10 years before you convert your entire portfolio

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:36:52

Really appreciate your answer. Hopefully when you come back next year for this same proposal, if you're noticing that we're continuing to bleed red ink, my hope is that you'll think about what we might be able to do in the future to stem that flow. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:37:13

Yes and conversion, we did get our first two properties approved by the government so we are going You're going to start hearing us come back for the first two properties to convert. So there's some work in the horizon to improve this.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:37:27

I really appreciate it, and by the way, I've always been impressed by your reports and your presentation and just your knowledge of how these programs work. So thank you. You've been a real asset to this organization. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:37:41

Thank you. Ms. Lopez,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:37:44

just one clarification when you stated the administration, you're talking about not the city administration, you're talking about the national federal government?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:37:53

Correct Department of Housing and Urban Development establishes our budget and so we continue to hear that some budget is going to be decreased changes to the programs everything's on proposed rule offer comments but we don't know ultimately what it's gonna mean for the housing authorities thank you very much for that

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:38:10

I move the recommendation. I second. Madam Clerk, I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed4:38:12

call for the vote.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:38:12

Commissioner,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:38:13

if you can

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:38:14

go ahead and cast your vote.

4:38 – 4:4712 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:38:43

Thank you. And this motion carries 8-0, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:38:48

The next item on the agenda is Item N4 from the Public Works Department. Subject fiscal year 2627 special tax levy for community facility districts numbers 1234589 and 2003. Recommendation of the City Council acting as the legislative body Thank you very much. Within CFD number two, Westport at Mandalay Bay for fiscal year 26-27. Adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number three.

Seabridge at Mandalay Bay for fiscal year 26- 27. Four, adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number four, Seabridge at Mandalay Bay for fiscal year 2627. Five, adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number five, River Park for fiscal year 2627 Six, adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number eight, Sekioka Farms and Business Park for fiscal year 26-27.

Seven, adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number nine which is North Shore and Mandalay Bay for fiscal year 26- 27. Eight, adopt a resolution setting a special tax rate within CFD number 2003 which is Oxnard Boulevard Highway 101 Interchange for fiscal year 26- 27 And nine, authorize a public works director or designee to execute an agreement for billing of direct assessments with the Ventura County auditor controller to provide the service of placement of direct assessments on the Ventura County secured tax roll.

The Finance and Governance Committee approved recommendations 5, 9, 3. I'm sorry, 5 and 9, three to zero. And items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 with a vote of two to one on May 26th, 2026. And our Public Works Director Michael Wolfe and his staff are here to answer any questions Council may have about all these items. Go ahead Mayor Pro Tem.

not transcribed≈13s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:41:16

Thank you. Just recognizing last year when this came before us, and looking at the Finance and Governance Committee I would like to request that we do a separate vote for CFD 5. And if you're willing Council Member Starr for CFD 9 as well?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:41:37

So you're talking about items five and nine, not CFD nine. Excuse

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:41:42

me, yes

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:41:43

item

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:41:44

nine. Thank you for that. I just wanted to acknowledge the points that Councilor Starr has made this evening for CFD five with the electorate voting on that in 2024 at 75% in the affirmative just as we did last year to give them the opportunity to vote on that versus the other ones? So separately items five and item nine out of the recommendation.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:42:10

Right, I do have some comments or actually some thank yous I'd like to say. So when we heard this at the committee level, I made note that last year I requested the staff report mentioned changes in tax rates and ideally by parcel but in this case we did get that. I want to thank staff for including that information this year I also mentioned that the CFDs for Seabridge were modified by several voter measures, but it wasn't mentioned in the resolution. And I see now that those have now been included in the current set of resolutions so I want to thank you for that as well.

I also mentioned that in the case of the River Park CFD-5 that the resolution did not make reference to the modification made by voters in November 2024 I see that now has been corrected, so I really appreciate that. I didn't see anything in the report that supports how the amounts were arrived at. At the committee meeting staff gave an explanation for what is causing the 10% increase for safety number two Westport at Mandalay Bay. So I'm wondering if they could repeat that explanation here?

for everyone's benefit. And I do ask that, of course the next year we report does include support for how the amounts are arrived at but if you could please restate your explanation from the time of the committee so that everyone has an opportunity to hear that today, that would be great.

CommentMr MillerProposed4:43:46

Absolutely good evening again City Council Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and thank you Council Member Starr for the question Anthony Miller Public Works Special Districts Manager So the Special Districts Division, we talked about the LMD's earlier. Now we're talking about the CFD's. The CFD are most of our larger districts and they are formed under the Melrose Act. The process by which staff goes through with each one of these CFD is we deliberately try to engage with these communities directly And whether that be through a neighborhood council, in the case of River Park or directly through HOAs. In the case of Sea Ridge and Westport we try to directly engage with these residents to get a sense for what they want as a community in terms of their services, improvements they may want to see within the community, reduction in services they may want to see in particular items all sorts of things in relation to what makes up the improvements that these districts care for.

Now specifically with Westport Over the course of the past few years as this district has been managed, there was a period of time in which this district had gone through some fluctuations and what the community perceived is perhaps that their landscaping wasn't being taken care of in a manner that they cared for or they wanted certain improvements like a playground replaced or benches or things like that replaced in their parks.

And for a variety of whatever reasons, years past those things when their eyes hadn't been done in a timely fashion. So in an effort for my staff to make up some ground on those issues, a lot of those issues were addressed in this last fiscal year but we've also discussed with the HOA a need for continued improvement within that district But with that comes a commensurate potential increase in expenses. So while this last fiscal year, staff worked with the HOA at Westport specifically to have an understanding about what their special tax pays for on an annual basis and what their fund balance can potentially pay for on top of their assessment and how much of it would be a smart idea to use. That's the discussion that we had directly with the HOA, and to actually relay that to their community at their HOA meetings specifically.

There was an understanding with the HOA, what staff and the HOA came to during those discussions that the desired level of maintenance within specifically within CFD2 required a higher level of revenue. They're currently using fund balance in what staff would consider unsustainable manner. So rather than immediately jump their special tax up to an exact zero balanced budget, we discussed with the HOA a plan for potentially phasing in increases across multiple fiscal years to reach a level to which their expenses are supported by their revenues on an annual basis. And in general, that's the process we follow with every one of these CFDs. We discuss this with the communities to see what they want to see.

We discuss their projects coming up in the future and what high-dollar items they may want to use fund balance for rather than operational expenses. And we tend to try to have that discussion in an open and honest manner so that way their special tax rates are really up to them in a fashion where they get to help make that decision.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:47:15

Thanks, Anthony. Any other questions? Are there any speakers on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:47:21

Mayor, mayor pro tem and council members. There are no requests to speak on this item in person or virtually thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:47:28

Here may I'm willing to move the ones we separated out items five and nine for a vote.

4:47 – 4:5315 turns

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:47:34

Right now I'll make a comment. I'll second that motion but I'll make a comment as well so I will be voting yes on safety number 5 because the electorate has ratified the tax so But because the electorate has never approved the other taxes and the other CFDs, I'd be voting no on the other CFD's. I'm also voting yes on recommendation number nine which executes an agreement for We have a motion for five and nine.

not transcribed≈25s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:48:39

Thank you. This motion carries 7 to 0, and this is for recommendations number 5 and 9. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:48:47

What's the pleasure of Council on the other remaining items?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:48:50

I'll move the balance of the recommended actions.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:48:57

Madam Clerk, call for the

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:48:57

vote.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:48:59

Again when it's claimed that the residents don't have a vote They voted with their pocketbook when they signed the line, a husband and wife or not a husband and wife. A couple purchased the property with the understanding that the assumption is they read the documents in what they're buying into. And I don't understand again Mr. Starr's train of thought his belief the Constitution overrides law. I don' get it

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:49:33

Call for the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:49:34

vote. Mayor Pro Tem and council members, if you can go ahead and cast your vote. And this motion carries six to one. Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:49:53

Thank you. I think that the way that it was listed wasn't necessarily correct because I don't see CFD number nine there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:50:04

I will make sure to include it in this recommendation. Thank you. My apologies, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:50:12

The next item on the agenda is Item N5. This is from the Finance Department. Adoption of fiscal year 2026-27 proposed budget. Recommendations that City Council adopt the following resolutions A resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard approving the city operating and capital improvement budget for fiscal year 26-27. B, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Oxnard authorizing full time equivalent positions in the city service effective July 1st, 2026 In accordance with the operating budget for fiscal year 26-27. And C, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Oxnard authorizing classification and salary schedules in approving the attached classification and salary schedule.

And D, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Oxnard establishing financial management policies. And E, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Oxnard and appropriation limit for the fiscal year 26-27. And after a resolution of the City Council, the city of Oxnard adopting a master fee schedule. Javier Chigurhi Lázaro, Chief Financial Officer and staff are here to answer your questions.

Staff may have or council may have. Do any guest members have any questions before we take public comment? If not, Madam Clerk, are there any public speakers on this item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:51:48

Mayor yes, we do have one speaker and that's Ray Blattel

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed4:52:06

Thank you again. Good evening. I have been in e-mail communication with the assistant city manager relative to this year's budget I have had questions again this year as to why the total expenditures in 2027 exceed the total revenues, as listed in the budget document. The Assistant City Manager has been very patient with me and very responsive to my questions and I really appreciate that. I really do. I am not a financial wizard. I'm an engineer.

I can balance my checkbook though. Just today I received an email response from him but wouldn't you know it? I'm still confused and haven't responded on him and I will wait for his response and thus won't get into it here. But I do see in the budget document that in the city attorney's office there is one city attorney, one chief assistant city attorney, four deputy city attorneys and four assistant city attorneys. And these are just the main players. The ten that I've mentioned were the top gunslingers. In a city manager's office there are 16 FTEs.

Some people sitting on the outside looking in might consider this bloat As far as the general fund, the offices of the city clerk, the city attorney and the city manager had the highest budget increases while public safety received some of the lowest increases. I guess this shows where the emphasis is contrary to the propaganda continue with Measure O. In the City Council budget there is a person called the City Manager Executive Assistant.

A City Manager Executive Assistant is also listed in the City Manager's office Is this the same person? It appears not since each is counted in their respective office's full-time equivalents. These are just a few things I've noted, quick review. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:53:55

Thanks Ray.

4:53 – 4:598 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:53:59

Mayor we have a virtual speaker. Okay.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed4:54:05

Virtual speaker please press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now. Where is your speaker? If you can hear us, please go ahead and speak. You have three minutes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:55:01

Mayor, that concludes our speakers in person and virtually for this item. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:55:05

Okay, thank you Madam Clerk. Any questions or comments? If not, what's the pleasure of Council on this item?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:55:14

I do have some comments.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:55:15

Go

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role4:55:16

ahead. So most of the budget was really already decided upon before we met on June 1st As a city council, we were given a predetermined list of choices for what we wanted to add on. Any of which would be acceptable to management but I assert that this is what's called the illusion of choice and to give you some examples of illusions of choice would be like if I ask you, would you prefer to meet on Tuesday or Friday?

Either choice is acceptable to me. There's no, there isn't the option of let's not be at all. Would you like the standard package or the enhanced version? Well maybe I don't want any version. Is 1,000 units enough for your order? Well it presumes that you want to order some quantity. I think that after having thought about it after our June first meeting I thought well That seems to be what's happening to us here.

I'll repeat a couple things I've said back then, which was that we are not approving a budget by department. If you look at the resolution starting on page 2331, you'll see that we're approving total amounts by fund including the general fund for $257 million and Measure O for $19 million And then if you look at page 2335, paragraph 10, it states the city manager or designee is authorized to approve any appropriation transfers between departments within a fund or sub-fund.

Any department director is authorized to transfer appropriations between programs within the same fund or sub-fund as long as funding is available in the department as a whole. But we give the city manager the authority to make transfers. Now he's going to say I won't do that I won't transfer this much, but the reality is this is the authority we are giving him.

He can say to his heart's content that he won't do it, but we're giving him that authority here. So from my perspective, I'm just really uncomfortable with the whole process. One thing that I requested in the past is something called a reverse priority listing So let me describe to you what that is. We had that back in Simi Valley, where I grew up. The city departments would give a presentation for the budget, what they wanted to see next year.

And they had to include in their presentation, what would they cut? What would they cut first, second and third if they had to have a 5% cut in their budget? And what that did is it gave the council members information. They knew all right, Maybe if we had to, let's say increase spending in this other area, we could reduce spending in this area for the least valued items.

But we're not being given that sort of information and it's something that I did request last year. City Manager says he just doesn't agree with doing that and that's his prerogative, I suppose. But for me as a council member, this is the type of information that I need to make good decisions so That's just kind of where I'm at from a comfort level on this whole approach.

So, I just don't see that we're really approving the budget by department. We're just giving broad authority and that just doesn't feel like a budgeting process to me.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed4:59:09

Mayor?

4:59 – 5:058 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role4:59:12

Can I go to Councilwoman first? I beg your pardon. Go ahead, Councilwoman.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed4:59:17

Thank you, thank you mayor. I want to address some of the comments directly that Council Member Starr said. And Mr. Starr, please do not sit up here and call me at least stupid because that's the way that I feel that you're addressing the council when you're saying we're having an illusion up here and that as you stated in your last previous comments, the last council meeting, what did you call us? Ornaments on a Christmas tree.

That really makes the general, if we don't speak up as council members people think that you're actually correct which you're not. So I want to make sure that I address those comments. We are elected officials. We do not get into the weeds of the day-to-day operations. That has to do with city management We give them the authority to spend the money. And I'm sorry, I don't want them to come to me to say would you rather have pencils or will you rather have erasers?

No that is not something that I particularly think that we need to be doing up here as a council and for you to say that we are being told What to approve and what not to approve is just so false in so many ways. If I choose to bring something to my fellow council members, it is up to them to tell me, you know Council Member Basuah, it is not going to happen. If you wish to bring an item to the council and you wish for it to get funded or unfunded by all means let's have that conversation but please stop with the narrative That we are just giving an illusion. Because that is just so false, at least from my perspective.

Please don't insult my intelligence.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:01:26

Thank you Councilwoman. Councillor Perlow?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:01:28

Yeah I just wanted to add this. Mr. Starr when you mentioned that the city manager could take the money and do what you know this and that well I just don't want to get the blood pressure of our city manager up like last time When you made a comment, he could take $3 million, take it here. $3 million, take it there and he responded. We don't need to do that again. People remember that and exactly as Council Member Basu stated if you have a view, you can bring it. You are obviously bringing it by funding three candidates to take out the incumbents that are up for election.

They're walking the streets and that's what they're saying and that your choice. That's we live in this great country But put your cards on the table. You don't like what's being presented, you need allies. You're working to get them. I give you credit for that. I don't give you credit for your line of thought.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:02:21

Thank you, Councillor Boehme. Any other council members who wish to comment? We have the city manager and then the assistant city manager it seems.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:02:29

So, Council Member Stroud at the last meeting you said that Thank you councilmembers.

not transcribed≈19s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed5:02:57

So I will preface my comments by saying that, I do believe this is just a philosophical conversation. At least one council member has a different philosophy and I don't have a problem with that and we welcome that but there is an insinuation that Oxnard is somehow kind of doing something different than other cities. This is the industry standard This is how the council manager form of government works.

Every city in Ventura County, almost every city up and down the Tri-County area does it the exact same way. I could read you verbatim from their financial policies of Simi Valley, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Thousand Oaks, Ventura, Camarillo. That's just the way it is. So if the conversation is, we want to do something different than all the other cities and we kind of want to be out in left field and we don't want to do what has been proven to be the industry standard that is certainly a conversation we can have but I certainly don't want the residents watching this evening to think that There is something nefarious going on by the manner in which we administer our budget because we're doing it the correct way, the way that it is prescribed by whether it's generally accepted accounting principles or GASB or whatever.

Having a municipal budget passed at the fund level is just the generally accepted industry standard and so again I hear what Council Member Starr is saying. He just doesn't agree with the way we and all other cities in California do it, so those are my comments on that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:04:55

Mr. City Manager? If I can just add one more comment about the illusion of choices. Those are the best recommendations that your department heads make So the choices are yours, but it doesn't mean you can't introduce a different proposition. A different project, a different service, a different program, a different something else. So I think to sit up here occasionally and to talk about how our department's heads are so terrific and then to say that...

Take it for what it is. I have no respect for that.

5:05 – 5:1315 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:05:41

And the mayor has rejoined us. I've had some comments, Mayor, if that's all right?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:05:44

Yeah, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:05:45

Thank you. Well first, do we have any additional discussion before I turn it back to the mayor or turn it back to myself, I guess as they were? So thank you very much for the conversation on this. Just a couple of quick items. I do want to thank all the work that went into this since the last meeting to this meeting And I note that in the staff report, the items that were discussed quite thoroughly at the last meeting are reflected here and as well as some additional information for the public if they'd like to look at the staff report.

But I think this actually aligns with what we're discussing right now because when we talk about an illusion of choice, I mean, the example of do you want to meet Tuesday or do you want to meet Friday? There's no reason that I couldn't say, well those don't work. I can meet Wednesday. Does that work for you? Or hey let's talk next week. Right, this isn't a binary discussion here and likewise the conversations we had last time about the additional appropriations, those are reflected in the staff report now and yes they were things that were presented to us But at any time, I could have said hey in addition to what we're looking at for the citywide alley resurfacing and reconstruction.

I would love if Mr. Wolfe, we could put $10,000 in delineators for protected bike lane or a separated bike lane right? I could have done that and if you all agreed with it, we could have added in there. That's not an illusion of choice. That's us. Acting as the elected representatives, trying to reflect what those we represent could be well served by in this city.

And that's what a lot of that discussion was last time and Council Member Starr, that's why I really wanted to engage you in that discussion around the youth programs and overtime for community development, the police department because that's what you were elected to do to represent your constituents, the residents of District 3 on that and you chose not to.

In the five-year priorities, you chose not to represent those people and that's your prerogative but my opinion, that's a disservice to the people who elected you. And so in this discussion here as it pertains what we're talking about here I could have asked for delineators, y'all could have supported it, you could've said no sorry, we're not gonna do that. All right, that what this process is And that's what that process was. That's what happened, the way it's presented we've given direction as a council as the elected legislative body up here on what we want to happen in this year's upcoming budget and it's reflected here and that's what we have in front of us now.

The resolution is reflective of this is the budget we've given the staff and they're gonna do what they've been directed to do And the last thing I want to share on this, Councilor Starr. You don't have to look at me but look at every single one of the people again sitting in the audience right now. To say that we have an illusion of choice or that we are ornaments on a Christmas tree these people who work day in and day out to serve this community they put this together they didn't give us an illusion of choice they gave us their professional recommendation what they need to continue to serve this community in the coming fiscal year To throw a tantrum, to stomp our feet, to say I don't like the way this is being done. I'm not going to participate.

Look at them and please understand that these people are professionals in their field and they're serving this community and they're serving us to do the work that we are elected to do for this community. So I just hope you hear those words. And lastly as it pertains Two items here. One is you had mentioned about paving, and you said something that is true which is if we delay paving now, we're going to pay more for it later.

And something that struck me after the meeting was well, we had the chance to pave back in 2022 using a funding mechanism that you disagreed with and sued over that and lost in court ultimately but now we've lost that opportunity. The opportunity costs in that. I appreciate that you understand the importance of staying up on our paving, but that lawsuit cheated this community out of additional paving that could have been done since 2022 till now.

And lastly as it comes to Simi Valley and you just mentioned it here, it reminded me when we met in With the staff, you and me and Councillor Perrello in previewing this. You had mentioned about youth programs. And I'm hoping you can repeat what you'd said at that meeting your experience with youth programs growing up in Simi Valley and the outcomes that came from that. Can you repeat that?

Do you recall? Are you done? No, I'm not done. It's a simple question. I'll repeat it and you can correct me if I'm misquoting you but it was when I grew up in Simi Valley we didn't have programs like this and we turned out just fine. When it comes to youth programs in the City of Oxnard and the City of Simi Valley and I've worked in Simi Valley for years these are not apples-to-apples comparisons here. The city of Simi Valley has some great programming for young people And it serves that community well.

Cities like Oxnard also need youth programming, but it's going to look different than it does for other communities that have different needs and different experiences. And I only bring that up so I hope you can reflect and internalize that statements like that To me, that feels out of touch with this community and the people you represent especially in neighborhoods like Colonia and Rose Park. They need more youth programming or as much as they can get so they have a diverse amount of opportunities to help them as they go through childhood in communities like Oxnard. So I just don't want to harp on you. I don't want to feel like you're being dressed down. I hope you can understand truly how that affected me those words that you stated

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:12:21

That's

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:12:22

my comments,

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:12:22

Mayor. Thank you. I think we're having some philosophical disagreements in the process but if I can just ask for just pros and cons on this item and if there's no further discussion we can move forward with the...

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:12:31

I'll move the recommended action, Mayor.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:12:33

With the recommendation? Any other discussion points, pros or cons?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:12:40

I could vote in favor of letter E which is the resolution of the City Council establishing an appropriation limit which is basically the GAN limit which were required to do anyway I can vote in favor of that. I'm gonna vote against the rest of it. Last year, I requested that we have a vote to commit the funds by department. If we're saying that hey our departments are giving great advice, all right why don't we adopt that then? Let's adopt a budget by department but I couldn't get a second for that and I don't think I'll get a second this time either So at this point, my position stands.

I don't believe we're really adopting a budget in the sense that I'm used to seeing them.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:13:35

Do you want to make a motion to move item E and take a vote on that? And then we'll do it.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:13:39

Sure. Okay. Was

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:13:39

there a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed5:13:39

second?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:13:42

Well, I'm dividing the question

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:13:46

We'll amend it. Is there a second on separating the items and voting on E, and then doing a separate vote on the rest of the items?

5:14 – 5:1917 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:14:01

That's fine. I'll second that. We can do a separate vote on

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:14:04

E. I'm supportive of that. Madam Clerk, call for the vote just for item E.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Councilwoman Rodriguez. Hi, Councilmember Starr? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Theron? Yes. Councilwoman Basuah? Yes Council Member Peralo? Yes Council Woman Bettis? Yes Mayor McArthur? Yes
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:14:26

And this motion carries 7-0 thank you

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:14:29

Thank you and if we can now take a vote on the rest of the items

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:14:35

Mayor Pro Tem and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote Thank you. And this motion carries 6-1, thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:14:50

The next item on the agenda is Item N6 from the City Manager's Department, a subject report on Measure O and consideration of placing the renewal of a half cent transactions sales and use tax measure on the November 3rd 2026 ballot recommendation That the City Council, one, receive a report on Measure O. Two, consider adopting a resolution entitled A Resolution of the City Council of the city of Oxnard, California ordering an election to be held on November 3rd, 2026 to consider the adoption of a measure entitled City of Oxnard Public Safety Financial Stability Measure No Tax Rate Increase And requesting the county clerk to conduct the election and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to canvass the returns.

And City Manager Alex Nguyen is here to answer any clarifying questions on this item. Before Councilmember discussion, we'll receive public comments if there are any. Speakers have three minutes to speak on this item. Madam Clerk, are there any public speakers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:16:08

Mayor Pro Tem and Councilmembers, yes, we have several speakers. We'll take the first virtual caller. Virtual caller, if you can press star six to unmute. And you have three minutes starting now.

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated5:16:26

Hi, can

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:16:27

you

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated5:16:27

hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:16:27

Yes, please proceed.

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated5:16:31

Good evening again Mayor and City Council, staff and the public. Here we go again! We have Measure O that you guys now want to have it where it has no sunset. Well I guess you learned from the first Measure O we're at sunset in 2029 and since then you've been trying to wean yourself off of that almost $20 million a year, apparently unsuccessfully. And I just want to remind everyone and the public about what the reason back in 2008 was given for Measure O.

It was a response to the recession. Well we had a recession and it ended probably about two-and-a-half years later But it was passed. It's a general sales tax increase, 50% plus one and it did pass and we got it. And you guys didn't exactly do the things that you purported to wanna do. And so you did other things for the money. And so our PCI for our streets are 61, that's horrible.

And then when you guys made a resolution to make a goal of 70, much later here we were stuck at 66-67 PCI and it wasn't done. So when we wanted our roads improved and that promise kept the voters passed Measure N. to improve our roads. I went before you several times and said it would make more sense to improve the roads, to reduce the cost of maintenance on the roads. Camarillo figured that out. Their PCIs are nearly 80. And here we are. You want the forever sales tax increase And why should we give you that money? I know you're going to have post-apocalyptic pictures on glossy flyers and the sky is falling. If you don't get that money, well it's just never enough.

It's never enough. You did Measure E. Passed by 56%. You got it! You got the money. $53.6 million in 2023. And what did you do with the money? Well, your first priority was to give huge raises to certain executive members of the team. You didn't do a lot of the things because you didn't have to and you rarely do what's right. You only do what you absolutely have to do.

And it's a general sales tax increase. Basically, you can spend it on anything that isn't illegal. You can't do a DeLorean and buy cocaine to fund building cars but you can do anything else you want with it. I hope the voters... Thank you Mr. Portello.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:19:35

Thank you.

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated5:19:36

...and vote no on this.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:19:38

Thank

CommentDoug Portello I'mProposedself-stated5:19:38

you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:19:39

Thank you Mr. Doug Portello we're just out of time. We'll go to the next virtual speaker.

5:19 – 5:2618 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:46

Virtual speaker, if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed5:19:50

Can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:57

Yes please proceed.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed5:20:01

Hi Council, Mayor Pro Tem, pleasure everybody thanks for hanging in there I know it's late I just wanted to come in and keep it short. I think everybody's going to have an opinion on it. So, I just want to voice that I would like my right to vote on the renewal and that the public gets their right to vote on the renewal. You know there's a lot of material out there to see what it does so everybody can make their own decisions but I just want to put that out there. So thank you guys for your time. I appreciate it.

not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:20:51

Thank you we'll go to the next virtual speaker

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:20:58

Virtual speaker, if you can press star 6 to unmute and you have 3 minutes starting now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed5:21:09

Good evening everybody. Can you hear me? Yes. My name is Randy loud horse. You guys saw me earlier and I just wanted to thank you for sticking in there. It's going to be a long night for you guys but I want to speak in support of. Metro. I'm a lifelong resident of Oxnard and a retiree enjoying my time in Oxnard. I live here, I worked here for 30 years. I am also the board president for the Police Activities League.

So I've seen Oxnard, been there for 61 years And I've seen many changes. I've seen Oxnard and working as a police officer, I've seen us lacking funding. I've seen youth programs not having enough funding to provide after-school programs for our youth. Being the PAL officer when I was, just like Mayor McArthur, we saw kids come in every day and we gave them alternatives for things to do As opposed to going out and getting in trouble. I was also the board president for the Oxnard Drag Racing Against Gangs and Graffiti program, not directly funded by Measure O but the officers who dedicate their time and their personal time they were byproduct of having a healthy city getting support Once again, who votes to tax themselves? But growing up here being a lifelong resident staying here after retirement.

And now as you saw me earlier doing well trying to do amazing things at Heritage Square we need a vibrant and healthy public safety force. We need potholes repaired. More than anything, places for our young people to go and that is our Police Activities League. That is our other youth programs, their senior program that I've seen a lot of these programs not have enough funding to operate and that is a travesty for our community.

I'm part of the community, I give back my family gives back and like that. I'm willing to vote for another measure. That's myself but I believe in our community and you know this, I would really hope that the council looks very closely at

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:24:13

how- Thank you Mr. Latimer your time is up.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:24:19

We'll go to the next virtual speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:24:27

Virtual speaker, if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now. Good evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed5:24:44

Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Can you hear me?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:24:49

Yes, we can hear you. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed5:24:51

Great. My name is Carrie and I'm a proud resident in District 1. I'm calling this evening just to encourage the City Council to allow us residents have a say in the future here in Oxnard by voting to allow this ballot measure to be on the November ballot. We get to decide if there's things that we want to continue how they've been or simply put to go backwards Let's face it, most of the people try and obstruct this measure won't feel the sting of the loss of services in the coming years if we lose Measure O.

They don't care about housing, they don't care about after school programs, alleyway improvements because it doesn't affect them. It's easy to say no to everything that affects everyone else when you don't have kids in schools, you don' need fire services and you don live in a neighborhood tha benefits from the police presence Folks just want to be able to pay less taxes, but we don't want to acknowledge the services that will be cut.

They just want the privileges without any of these responsibilities. I really encourage the City Council to vote to put this measure on the November ballot so residents can be part of the decision-making process. Thank you for your time.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:26:09

Thank you. We'll go to the next virtual speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:26:14

Mayor, that actually concludes our speakers virtually.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:26:17

Then we'll go with the in-person... Do you want to continue?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:26:23

They just raised their hand. You

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:26:25

know what we'll do is we'll go to three in person then we'll back to virtual if that's okay, to be fair. Mr. Ray Blattel followed by Alicia Purcell and

5:26 – 5:317 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed5:26:43

Thank you, good

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:26:44

evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed5:26:47

Mayor, council members, city staff and members of the public there's no doubt in my mind that this council will vote to put Measure O continuance on the November ballot. I'm convinced there is no limit to this city's reach when it comes to tax money. The briefing laments how bad it is and how the city will suffer if Measure O is not reinstated But if you think about it, we taxpayers aren't having the best of times either when it comes to our budgets. Housing costs keep going up, fuel and transportation costs, medicines, food, the list goes on and on. The city is not the only one who are being squeezed. The taxpayers suffer too but I agree it is fair to put it on the ballot and let the voters decide that's the way it should be I've seen the sample of the proposed ballot language.

It says, should we vote for Measure O? You'll get this and you'll get this and you'll get this and you'll get this. That's slick salesmanship. You forgot to provide world peace, provide dissolution to world hunger, and of course solve global warming and a sea level rise. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:27:59

Thank you Mr. Patel. Thanks, Alicia. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed5:28:12

So I'm sure it won't surprise you that I pose this item and it won't surprise me to see a 6-1 vote on it. You have Measure E which is a huge sales tax boost even if you don't get to keep all the money from Amazon that's still a huge boost. The city got a lot of money from COVID. It was a net gain Financially, every dollar that you take in taxes from the families that are struggling in the community is a dollar not putting food on the table or paying rent. Our sales tax is too high.

Measure O should expire. What we have is a problem with allocation of resources. It's not a lack of funds, so this item has some partial survey results included. You got more of this year's survey information than you've gotten in past years but my sources say there's still information missing Last year, we won a public records lawsuit against the city to finally obtain one of the previous surveys that the City Manager did with one of those undisclosed City Manager approved contracts under $100,000.

not put out to bid sole source contracts. Once we got that questionnaire and we compared it to the info presented to the council on October 15th, 2019, the survey had another 38 questions that the council and the public didn't see. They didn't tell you that they use taxpayer funds to survey about our 2020 ballot measures This item also mentions a February 25th survey, and council members were emailed partial results from that as well. The city manager didn't tell you he asked about the favorability of each and every one of the council members by name on the survey.

He kept that to himself. For this 2026 survey, two people who participated in it say that it asked about the favorability of the council member that represents their own district and this survey interestingly was conducted just two weeks after the city manager's friend announced a recall attempt. Again, it's the council member that city managers made clear he would like to not have.

So what else is he doing that you don't know about? Do you think city manager and city attorney should be using public funds to survey about their bosses, and then hide their data from you in the fact that it was done. So let's talk about the ballot question. State law requires it be true impartial prohibits it from being argumentative or prejudicial but the city managers spend a lot of public funds for a survey to ensure that violates all of those standards It doesn't mention storm drains and illegal dumping, which were on the survey because those just weren't prejudicial enough. That's why they're not in the ballot question.

They just list the top 10 things that a supermajority said were extremely important. So this is a bait-and-switch because there's no requirement to use the funds for those purposes.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:31:17

Thanks, Alicia.

CommentSteve HuberProposedself-stated5:31:20

Steve? Thank you. Good evening, Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, members of the City Council. Thanks for hanging in there. Sorry you didn't win your bet there, Mayor Pro Tem. My name's Steve Huber. I live in the Cabrillo neighborhood. I'm going to be short. I am asking your support of the proposed resolution. Please allow the residents the opportunity to vote on this measure and until that measure is on the ballot or once the measure is on the ballot we can have a lot more discussions like we've had tonight.

5:31 – 5:368 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:31:54

Thank you, Mr. Huber. We'll reserve back to the virtual speaker. We'll do another three and then go back to in-person.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:32:05

Virtual speaker, please press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed5:32:12

Hello, everyone. Emmanuel Herrera, creator of Citizens for Better Oxnard, although I'm here representing myself. Look, as you know, I like to keep things real so let me start by saying that nobody likes the fact that Oxnard has one of the highest tax rates at 9.25%. Although I am aware, according to the staff report that 29 cities share the same sales tax rate as Oxnard.

Now let's not forget that one of the reasons people voted for Measure E was because they knew that Measure O was going to sunset in 2029 and therefore our new tax rate was gonna drop well according to my calculations to 8.75% And let's face it, 8.75% sounds better than 9.25%. Now what I would have liked to have seen in the staff report is what would happen if This measure does not pass or if it doesn't go, let's say it doesn't go to the ballot.

What cuts are we expecting? I would have liked staffed to give us a breakdown of what we're going to lose because that's what people want to hear right they want to hear how is this gonna affect us because what we don't want is we don't want the people to just look at oh we're gonna save A ton of money, let's just do it for that reason. But again they're going to have to have reasons to want to put this on the ballot and vote for it. So having said all that I do say that we should always put it up to the voters so I say put it on the ballot But give the people the pros and cons, let them be able to make the right decision. And besides I have syntax, hey that'll help pay for some of the Aaron Starr lawsuits that we gotta pay for.

And if it does go on the ballot just put it right next to the ballot item where it says should we recall Aaron Star or not? So that would be a perfect place for it. And having said all that, I also want to thank staff and the council for standing up to Aaron Starr. You guys are doing a great job. It's about time that he get exposed to who he really is. So again, I say let the people decide so put it on the ballot.

Mr. Mayor those are my comments. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:34:56

Thank you Manuel. Thank you very much. Madam Clerk we'll go to another virtual speaker

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:35:04

I'm virtual speaker, if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

PresenterAndy ConleyWest Ventura County Business Alliance but I'm also a proud resident of the cityProposedself-stated5:35:30

Good evening, Mayor McArthur and City Council members. My name is Andy Conley and I am not only the President and CEO of the West Ventura County Business Alliance but I'm also a proud resident of the city of Oxnard. Back in 2008 Oxnard Chamber of Commerce supported Measure O and we are of the belief that an item of this magnitude should go to the voters As you all know, Measure O brings in around $20 million annually which goes to needed services like police and fire, 911 emergency response, street paving, pothole repairs, youth and soccer senior programs, and other vital services.

Those tax dollars have affected the day-to-day lives of every Oxnard citizen and it should be their decision if this tax is extended. As a citizen of Oxnard, I would like my voice, my vote to be represented in this decision. And as the CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, I want to make sure our business owners and hardworking individuals of Oxnard have their voices represented as well. Thank you very much for your time.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:36:39

Thank you Andy for calling in and for your time. Madam Clerk we'll take one last virtual speaker and then we'll move to Mr. Greg Ryan who's here in person.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:36:54

Thank you. Thank you.

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

5:37 – 5:4310 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed5:37:23

I recommend that the council approve the recommendation of the staff to put Measure O on the ballot. I think addressing the needs of the city, both in terms of what those needs are and what the costs are a conversation that we ought to have with our community and the way that is done in our society as a ballot box Based on some of the earlier comments, I would expect this to be a unanimous vote by the City Council to put it on there with the apparent strong support for submitting items to the voter.

Once again, I think I would like to see this be a unanimous vote by the City Council. Thank you very much and hopefully this wraps up evening for you guys. That's why I don't miss city council meetings. Good night.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:38:18

Mayor? Thanks, Mr Tom Katie for calling in. Yes, Mayor Pro Tem, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:38:21

I just want to say before we go to the next speaker, I voted no for going past 10 so I can go home right?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:38:31

Senior Pastor, go ahead.

CommentMr Tom KatieProposed5:38:34

Good evening Council, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor. Clearly this Almost has to go to the voters, but I also think some of these comments are kind of amazing to me because simply we are a strong city manager government. And the city managers his job to bring you things with an opinion with a direction it is your job to ask questions It is not anybody's job, though, to insinuate that by doing his job he's doing us a disservice. I'm going to be blunt. Alex, don't get mad at me. If there's four of you up there who think he's doing such a bad job, you can vote him out.

That's what council does. But you also can vote him in. He cannot give himself a pay raise without your approval. Now, maybe he could but if you found out that's a different story right? In the same way what's been presented to you tonight I hope we don't spend another hour debating whether or not to put it up to vote. There's been too much of ideological debates up there instead of governing which is of policy direction and doing that. You set policy the city manager is supposed to put it out there He cannot and he will not make Measure O do anything that it is not directed to do by the council because he wants to keep his job.

You may not like how he does it, that's different than somebody who was corrupt and those things. And anybody who has been on this council more than a few years has heard how many times that our city came out of the place that it was because of the leadership of our City Manager's Department I don't agree with everything anybody does, but I don't want to disrespect people for doing their job.

Your job is to put this thing to the ballot. Let's have a political debate at the polls not from the dais. Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:40:52

Thanks, Senior Pastor. Madam Clerk, I think that concludes the in-person speakers, but we'll go to... That

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:40:59

is correct so we'll move on to the virtual speakers. Virtual speaker if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

CommentStacy Miller I'mProposedself-stated5:41:12

Good evening, can you hear me?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:41:14

Yes please proceed.

CommentStacy Miller I'mProposedself-stated5:41:17

Good evening my name is Stacy Miller I'm a resident of Oxnard someone who doesn't come before this council as a resident yet i know many of you tonight's item is really important to speak to in light of what we're dealing with and feeling right now we're watching decisions being made in Washington that affect our daily lives and with little or no input or explanation.

It's frustrating, it feels wrong because it is wrong. Local government is supposed to be different. It supposed to be closer to the people more accountable a place where our voices actually count. Tonight item is not about whether to approve or not approve a tax measure It's a question before the council that's simple. Do residents have the right to weigh in on their own tax dollars?

I want to recognize Council Member Starr's vote tonight on measure, on M1 and M2 because the people did not have the right to vote on it. California law is clear only voters can extend sales taxes Nearly 2000 Oxnard community members took time to participate in the community outreach process. They showed up, they deserve a ballot that's not predetermined outcome by this council.

We've seen what happens when leaders decide that they know better than the people they represent. We don't do that in Oxnard. Whether you support or oppose Measure O, the answer tonight is really simple. Put it on the ballot. Let us as members of this community to decide. It's not up to you, it's up to us.

5:43 – 5:5013 turns

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:43:34

That was a mic drop, boom. That's what it was. Is she still there? Okay. Madam Clerk we'll go to the next virtual speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:43:49

Virtual speaker if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:43:56

Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. This is Nancy Lindholm, a retired citizen of Oxnard. I'm not affiliated with any organization. And I'm also not advocating for the continuation of Measure O one way or the other. I am here to advocate for the voters to decide if they want to continue this tax or not. I specifically would like to remind Council Member Starr That all of his anti-city progress measures were put before the voters. And I hope he will extend the same courtesy on this matter. Thank you and good evening.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:44:40

Thank you, Nancy for calling in.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:44:51

Virtual speaker, if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

CommentElizabeth PaniaguaProposedself-stated5:44:58

Thank you. Good evening, Mayor, Council staff. My name is Elizabeth Paniagua, a lifelong resident of the City of Oxnard and mother of four young children. I'm here today not only to speak on my behalf but that of my husband, extended family and many friends. We all love Oxnard and we see it as the hidden gem of this county. In addition, I'm also a 24-year experienced professional in state and local government so I fully understand Sympathize with the complex decisions that you are faced with day-to-day running the city.

We have ever increasing costs and program needs across our community. Measure O is a critical issue that has the potential to impact the future of thousands and thousands of Oxnard residents for years to come. It could provide public safety, improved critical infrastructure and quality programs for all our families. Thousands of Oxnard residents like myself are invested in the city, its future and want it to improve and keep growing for many years to come for our children.

Oxnard residents should be allowed to personally make their decision about Measure O at the ballot box. I urge each of you to give me and every Oxnard resident the option to choose whether or not Measure O can proceed. Thank you for your time.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:46:24

Thank you, Ms. Boniola for calling in. Madam Clerk we'll go to the next virtual speaker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:46:36

Virtual speaker if you can press star six to unmute and you have three minutes starting now.

CommentCouncil Member Starr'sProposed · by introduction5:46:43

Hi this is Debbie Mitchell I have a question regarding Measure O. For one thing I think it should definitely be on the ballot But my reason for that is that I would much rather Oxnard have my tax funds than the county. And and I have a concern that if we don't have this put on the ballot, and we don''t vote for it or we vote against it That the county would say, hey, you know they were paying this and we should get them to pay this. And we'll tell them that I would much more it could stay that my tax dollars stay very, very local.

Thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:47:27

Thank you miss Mitchell.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:47:35

Mayor mayor pro tem and council members that concludes our speakers in person virtually thank you.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:47:41

I appreciate it. I'll just make a brief comment. Alex, I thank you for bringing this to us. I know Ed asked for this item to be brought to us. As many of you know, I love the trajectory of our city. I love where it's going. You're seeing a lot of investment, a lot of infrastructure. We're modernizing it. We're beautifying it. We are making it more and more safe with our police department, with our fire department staying Great within our response times, and I think if you see the investment that's going on in our city, I like the projection of it.

And so one of the discussions I had with our executive leadership team is to bring this back to let our voters decide. It's their voice. It for them to decide what we want to do with Measure O as opposed to just allowing it to sunset. So I'm encouraged with the phone calls that we received here And I'm just thankful that you brought this back to us at my request. So thank you for that, and we'll open it up for discussions. Go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:48:45

Yeah, I guess I want to ask some questions. Sure. So I'm looking at the resolution starting on page 2470 which includes the following ballot question language on page 2472. So, I'll read it to you. I'll read it and then I'll ask my question. So the ballot title is City of Oxnard Public Safety Comma Financial Stability Measure Open Parent No Tax Rate Increase Close Parent.

And then the ballot question reads shall the measure maintaining city of Oxnard services without raising current tax rates including protecting public safety maintaining 911 emergency response slash fire protection, repairing streets slash potholes, addressing homelessness, maintaining programs for vulnerable seniors, anti-gang slash after school programs. Other general services by renewing an existing one half cent sales tax providing $20 million annually until ended by voters requiring oversight audits public spending disclosure all funds for Oxnard be adopted so that's the questions coming in the ballot My question is, what process did staff go through to come up with the proposed ballot question title and question?

5:50 – 6:0327 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:50:08

Lots and lots and lots of discussion among the executive team. Lots and lots. And then paying attention to our survey results over the years. It's very straightforward. And also, as you know this very well, there's a certain set of rules about the word count and so on. There are rules about how a ballot measure can read. So we just came up with the best language that we believed in to recommend and that also complies with the rules.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:50:37

So I guess I have a question for my colleagues here. Do we all agree? I hope we do. Do we all agree that the ballot question shouldn't be argumentative or prejudicial either for or against the measure? Is that something that we can kind of all agree upon? I see nodding. Okay, good. So staff decided to place a number of services listing them in the ballot question.

I couldn't help but notice that those were the most popular services from the survey And I think that it feels like we're putting our thumb on the scale. Why not come up with language so that the ballot argument is not argumentative? You can certainly talk about the merits of all these wonderful services in the ballot arguments, that would be appropriate But it just seems inappropriate to me to put into the ballot question itself. Let me give you an example of a argument in a ballot question that's prejudicial against the adoption, even though it's all true and just see how you feel about it.

So what if we were to call this City of Oxnard sales tax increase? And then the question would be shall the measure funding City of Oxnard general expenses including increased salaries and pensions for city management City Council travel costs, no bid contracts, litigation, lobbying Sacramento, code enforcing enforcement, existing debt service and other general municipal purposes by permanently extending an existing 1.5% sales tax providing $20 million annually be adopted? Can we all agree that that would be kind of prejudicial against the adoption of that measure? I think it would be.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:52:38

Isn't that the purpose arguments against that's on the ballot? No. Is there room for that?

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:52:45

No,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:52:46

not on the ballot question itself. Right but isn't there room on the ballot for... So put it there. There's arguments

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:52:52

there. Put it there instead so let me suggest this here's a neutral way to write this. It's not argumentative. It is not prejudicial for or against. It just simply says the following City of Oxnard sales tax extension, that's the name. Shall the measure permanently extending an existing 1.5% sales tax beyond its scheduled expiration date providing $20 million annually for Oxnard general municipal purposes be adopted?

Very straightforward. It gives people a choice. You're not putting your thumb on the scale It's neutrally worded, and I saw from the nodding of heads earlier that we agree that the ballot questions should not be argumentative or prejudicial. So I'm asking my colleagues why not use the language that I just read to you as a neutral way of presenting the ballot question?

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:53:56

Go ahead Council Member Perlow.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:53:58

Mr.. Starr you'd asked for an opinion what I think about it absolutely like it. I Don't like it so much. I'm totally in favor of making a recommendation to move the motion as put on right now

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:54:10

But why do you like the language of the ballot question versus

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:54:13

more sense because the one thing that all the voters have not talked about The people that have not talked about including you was it will not raise a sales tax Now you don't want that word in there? but that's why I appreciate the work and The time and the accusation, kind of innuendos that you've made of how much time and efforts was put into this. A lot of time and effort. And I believe this would be the best as...I forget which of them made an assumption this would be a 7-0 vote. You are always advocating let the people vote. Now you want to steer what the people can vote. You've done that with your initiatives.

What's the matter with the City Council wanting something that they want? You have an opportunity to vote on this. You like it, you don't like it? You want to make a motion to do something else? You've got a right to do that. Before you ran for council I would assume you knew that and now that you're on council I would assume you know that.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:55:09

So my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:55:09

question- I'd make the recommendation to move the action as presented.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:55:13

So my question to you still... My question still is Are you comfortable listing all these services in the ballot question knowing that those were the ones that polling dictated were the most prejudicial towards its adoption?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:55:30

I believe I've answered your question. There's a motion on the floor.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:55:33

OK, so then I guess here is where I'd like to argue then because now we have a motion on the floor. So I want to give people a big perspective here 2020, for that fiscal year, the group general fund revenues which includes Measure O was $155 million for that year. 2025, $275 million per year. That's a $120 million increase. That's a 77% increase in five years How many families are you aware of in a five-year period have seen their family incomes go up by 77%?

I dare say not very many. I think we are overtaxed. Now, I think what's going on... In life, I have met people who make a lot more money than I do But they were always broke because they couldn't manage their spending. And my fear here is that it's never enough money, it's never enough. We're gonna have the same conversations down the road about how we can't possibly provide the services even at a higher sales tax rate, that we need to go back again and again and again But no one's asking the basic question, why do you need a 77% increase in revenues over a five year period? Why can't we manage our bills well.

Apparently we don't.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed5:57:23

The answer to that, Mr. Starr, is you haven't been paying attention to how far the city was left to go down even before you shared with us your brilliance of how you wanted a vote no on fixing the sewer plant, let the infrastructure go to hell. Maybe you were an advocate for that, suing the City of Oxnard. That's why you've answered your own question but look in the mirror when you answer the question. You can't kid yourself when you look in the mirror.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:57:47

So I'd like to make a motion to amend. I want to amend it so that the ballot question reads as follows. City of Oxnard sales tax, hold on please. City of Oxnard sales tax extension shall the measure permanently extending an existing 1.5% sales tax beyond its scheduled expiration date providing $20 million annually for Oxnard general municipal purposes be adopted?

That's my motion that we change the ballot question to read as follows. So, that way it's not argumentative.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:58:28

Okay. Is there a second? There's no second. I guess we'll start.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role5:58:34

Thank you so much.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role5:58:36

Thank you. We'll go back to, we've got a motion and a second by Councilman Pascua. Yeah, do you want to say something? Go

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:58:43

ahead. Just as a quick item. It's just an interesting Is there a specific angle or conversation to be having about the ballot question itself? I brought up one from 2020. I won't say the name of the measure, I'll just read it. Shall the initiative ordinance to increase the powers of the city treasurer prohibit the City Council from reducing the powers of the city treasurer, reduce the oversight authority of the city manager and director of finance mandate the city treasurer's assumption of professional responsibilities with authority over $256 million investment portfolio, finance department preparation and submittal of the annual municipal budget and professional financial operations of a city be adopted.

And I seem to recall this was originally named the Fiscal Transparency Accountability Act. Essentially we're looking to get the voters decide do you want to combine the treasurer and the CFO That makes sense, right? Let's do that. Let's combine those two positions with an elected official who in my opinion has proven to be problematic as more time has gone on here, in my opinion.

And so the way that was asked though, if I read that and I had very little information, I'd say okay, so we wanna increase the powers of the treasurer or they have this big budget We're talking about putting our thumb on the scale. I mean, the ballot title itself of everything is just an interesting argument to make when I could go through each of the ballot titles for or excuse me, the ballot questions for each of the different measures that have been put before the voters And again, I mentioned one earlier from 2016 Measure M that was later found by the appellate court to violate state laws.

And voters were convinced to vote for that and then it got rolled back but it also was proven that that was going to force the enterprise fund to run at a deficit The voters need to do their homework, yes. But let's give them some credit here. If they don't want to vote for it, they're not going to vote for it. It just feels like we're infantilizing them to say, well, we're going to put this in front of them and if they approve it I guarantee you down the road we're going to put it again. We're going to put it again.

They can vote no when they feel that this is just not going to serve them anymore. They could vote no on this in November if we put it on the ballot tonight. I understand the arguments, but at the end of the day all those callers folks who are here in person. I agree let's put it before the voters, I understand your language you made a motion for it didn't get a second so all that being said it's just interesting to be throwing the stones in this glass house.

So that's my

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role6:01:47

comments. Mayor, I want to thank the mayor for the comments he just said. I'll tell you why because I didn't get to write the ballot question language for my own measures. The city did and the city wrote in such a way that it would actually be prejudicial against its adoption so thank you for making my point That the city places its thumb on the skill when it puts ballot questions on the ballot and it writes them in such a way to be argumentative and prejudicial. So thank you, thank you,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role6:02:22

thank you. You're welcome. Was the original title, was I accurate on that? The Fiscal Transparency Accountability Act? Well

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role6:02:27

listen if I could just intercede here let's just stick to the pros and the cons on this item. I think we're prepared to take the vote on this item Madam Clerk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:02:40

Mayor, mayor pro tem and council members if you can go ahead and cast your vote. Thank you in this motion carries six to one thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ManagerProposed · by role6:02:57

I could have been persuaded to vote for this if we had neutral ballot question language.

ElectedLuis A. Mc ArthurMayorProposed · by role6:03:01

Thank you Council Member Starr. Seeing that there's no further business on the agenda there is no objection we are adjourned everyone thank you

6:03 – 6:031 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:03:18

Thank you.