BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 January 20, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:03 – 0:115 turns

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈26s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:12

Good evening everyone and welcome to the City Council regular meeting. Today is January 20th. We're going to go ahead and call this meeting to order, the time is now 630. And we'll stand for the flag salute and Council Member Gama will lead us today.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:55

Thank you Councilmember. We will move to roll call Madam Clerk.

Roll call — called by City Clerk
Show transcript
Councilmember Gama? Here. Council Member Perez? Here. Council Member Lopez? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Here
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:09

and Mayor McLean-Lajon.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role4:12

Thank you and I have the The inspiration for tonight, so I have a couple of just a couple of topics. I just want to touch on but it'll be will be brief, I believe OK. So while late I just want to wish everyone a happy new year. This is our first meeting of 2026 so we're glad that you're with us here tonight. So the start of this new year invites reflection on where we have been, the renewed commitment to where we're going to go.

I believe Port Hueneme is a city defined by resilience diversity and a strong sense of community Over the past year, we have faced challenges together, celebrated milestones and continued working toward a city that is safe, inclusive and full of promise for all who call it home. In the year ahead, we remain committed to strengthening our neighborhoods, supporting our families and businesses and advancing initiatives that promote equity, sustainability and economic vitality.

Progress is achieved when we listen to one another, when we work collaboratively and remain focused on the common good. And I am grateful for the dedication of our residents the City staff, first responders, volunteers and community partners who serve Port Hueneme with integrity and pride. Know that your engagement and civic spirit are the foundation of our city City's continued growth and success.

And now I know that we're gonna have a proclamation on today regarding Martin Luther King Jr., but we just celebrated the federal holiday yesterday, so I just wanna say a couple of words about that, about Dr. King and his words that he has left with us. So he reminded us that progress is not inevitable. It is achieved through purpose, unity, and action His call to service challenges us to look beyond our differences and work together to build communities rooted in dignity, equity and opportunity for all.

Advancement as Dr. King taught is not measured solely by individual success but by how we uplift one another and ensure that no one is left behind. Here in Port Hueneme, I see Dr. King's dream reflective in our diversity, our resilience and our shared responsibility to create a city where every resident feels valued, heard and empowered. Our progress is strongest when we choose collaboration over division, compassion over indifference and hope over fear.

As we reflect on Dr. King's legacy, let us recommit ourselves to advancing the ideals he championed fairness, inclusion and service to humanity. May we continue to move forward together, strengthening our community and shaping a future worthy of the next generation. Let us not only remember Dr. King's words, but live them through our actions, our leadership and our unwavering belief that together we can build more just than a united Port Hueneme.

Thank you All right, we're gonna move to public comments. Do we have any public comments that are not on our agenda on tonight? Not pertaining to our agenda items.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role7:54

Yes Madam Mayor, we have three public comments. First up is Kevin Brannan and then followed by Joshua Tellez.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed8:09

Hello, hello. Good afternoon, good evening city council members that was great introduction by the mayor. You know I'm mixed black white and Portuguese so you know to be a black business owner you know is something I'm proud of and chasing my dream that we do a lot of that is built into it Because of seeing a girl I'm also Irish, you know some Irish black and Portuguese so I've seen Whether you know my last name should be O'Branon And we're Branons because we couldn't get work because we were dirty Irish. We weren't allowed to get jobs So the work that I do it does stem from that You know knowing what that's like? So that's why we do a lot of inclusion and the work that we do but empowering people Realistically right and giving them realistic expectations at the American dream does still exist, right?

And that's what we should be thriving for and striving for. So today we're here though to invite you to check out that this is our blue carpet premiere. This is something new that we have our new TV show called Coastal Critters As you can see, they put me on a comic book with our coastal critters. Somebody made this for me today so I brought it but we just wanted to invite you. It's going to be at the Chinoa Islands Maritime Museum.

This is an art collaboration of video art and musicians that are local so you have a collaboration of artists working together. We partnered with the Oxnard Unified School District. We have a student here that's from Chinoa Islands with Upward Bound. and three other high schools, and we're giving them job placement. As you can see we have payroll stubs here like where we're in economic I think we have eight staff now know that we've grown from just taking kids out fishing so this particular event is going to showcase all of that the economic development that we have partnering with the Port of Hueneme and their speed program Their first jobs watching kids fill out their first job their first time sheet is something that you have to witness for yourself Just to see that process They're first, you know we offer them a lot of first.

Today I just left the Goodwill and they have a big poster up there one of the kids that we hired from Goodwill Industries that worked for us for a while until his hours ran out and how we're using those partnerships that you're talking about again in the community so this Blue Carpet premiere is going to highlight a bunch of that stuff So at the China Islands Maritime Museum, we have 20 VIP spots that are available. We're almost sold out. We could only fit 100 in there and we only have 11 tickets left. We invited city council members, educators a lot of different people not just kids and their families but they'll be there because the show that we're going to showcase them got to have kids there to make sure it doesn't suck you know what I'm saying if you know it's easy for us adults oh that's great but if the kids are booing it then we know it's not really hidden so Anyway, you're invited to come out.

Let us know there is a QR code I passed it around for you to pre-register But if you don't get in in time and you want to show up let me know we do have a couple spots but You guys have helped us for years, you know The city of Port Hueneme supporting us with the CBF and the stuff we do on the pier So we thought we'd come and invite you personally. Thank you

0:11 – 0:1614 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role11:14

Joshua

CommentJoshua TezProposedself-stated11:26

All right, so good evening. My name is Joshua Tez. I am a intern with Real Guppy Outdoors and I go to Channel Islands High School and I'm currently a sophomore. And so we just obviously we came here just to invite you guys to the Coastal Critters, the Blue Carpet Premiere. So it's going to be from five to around 730. We're gonna present two different Showings of our new episodes and well, we just hope to see you there. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role12:02

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role12:07

And Johnny Garcia Vasquez.

CommentJohnny Garcia-VazquezProposedself-stated12:20

Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Once again, I'm Johnny Garcia-Vazquez a former tenant of Park Madera Apartments here in Port Hueneme. Who was retaliatory and illegally influenced to move and vacate Park Madera. After I asserted my California tenant rights of reporting uninhabitable living conditions and safety issues to your code enforcement, which could be public record requested.

Like mold, mildew, termites, lights being off for days in the hallways even though the property manager lived in the same building as I. Two doors down who was also harassing me along with other tenants that were her friends and also I reported hate incidents and harassment to your local police department a couple times. I've tried calling them. Incident and call log reports, and yet your police department told me that they did not have the resources to dispatch anyone even though I was being harassed, threatened of physical harm.

There was hate speech used against me multiple times. And then also my ring camera caught the property manager which she's not there anymore. She was transferred to Ventura. to one of their apartment complexes that is managed by Gardner Management Limited. So I just wanted to come here in front of you, to correct some misinformation that was provided at the December meeting from some of you on the dais along with Park Madera Apartments and Gardner Management Limited.

The issue between me and Gardner Management Limited has not been adjudicated. The Civil Rights Department of the State of California which was a forum Formerly the California Department of Housing or Employment Rights has given me two years to sue and a case is still open with the housing rights center. And then if you guys don't have funds because you have a budget deficit, you can't pass an anti-landlord harassment ordinance maybe the city can provide Workshops on the California Ralph Act because there is a difference between hate incidents and hate crimes here in the state of California. I know some of your police officers have also told me that hate speech is protected, but in California if your civil rights are being violated which housing is civil rights it is not protected And then also if you guys can provide free tenant rights workshops and then if you guys would like a presenter for the California Ralph Act You guys can contact the Civil Rights Department They offer free workshops for staff members here on the dais and also the California your Police Department.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:21

Thank you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role15:23

That concludes general public comment

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:25

Great, thank you. We're gonna move on to our agenda approval I may have a motion and a second to approve the agenda Move to

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role15:33

approve

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed15:35

second

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role15:36

Madam clerk all in favor aye all opposed Hearing none motion passes unanimously

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role15:43

Thank you. Do we have any members of the council with any conflicts of interest related to any of our agenda items?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role15:50

I'm going to recuse myself from discussion on item 8, just to avoid any negative public perception. I'm within the 1,000 radius of Boker Park so I'm recusing myself because of that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed16:10

And if I may, I think I should recuse myself in addition because I live right next to Miranda Park

0:16 – 0:229 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role16:26

Okay, great. Thank you. So we have that recorded? Perfect. So with that let's move on to presentations. Our first presentation is the Martin Luther King committee is here to receive our proclamation and so while you come to the podium we have Council Member Gama is going to read that proclamation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed16:53

Thank you, Mayor Lejeune. I just want to say that yesterday was a very enlightening event as it always is and I think 40 years is a long time to stick with something and I really appreciate the fact that the county entire county was there we had people from Thousand Oaks Oxnard Hueneme Ventura elected officials County supervisors Our Council Mayor Pro Tem, Laura Hernandez. Mayor Lejean was in the choir and she knocked it out of the park so unfortunately I couldn't stay for the entire event. I had to get to Westlake for a meeting but I love the march. I love the participation of the kids and you do a fantastic job. So with that I'm going to read a proclamation for Martin Luther King Jr Day.

Whereas on January 15th, 1929 Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr was born in Atlanta Georgia and whereas Dr. King was transformational leader of the American civil rights movement and one of the most influential orators for peace equality and human rights in world history Whereas Dr. King is remembered for dedicating his life to an unyielding faith and passion of justice and racial harmony by championing principles this nation was built upon, and a strong commitment to his belief of freedom, equality, and justice for all. And whereas Dr. King envisioned a society where individuals were not judged by the color of their skin, but by the contact of their character and that's a quote of Dr. King. And whereas Dr. King sacrificed his life to spread a message of universal equality and justice that was displayed by his efforts to end racial segregation and discrimination through civil disobedience and other nonviolent means such as his heroic leadership in the 1955 Montgomery bus boycott.

The 1957 Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the 1963 March on Washington and the Selma to Montgomery marches in 1965. And whereas Dr. King's words continue to resonate with the world today by reminding us of the imperative to continue to fight for justice and equality no matter the opposition because This is another quote, because the measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. And whereas people throughout the world continue to be inspired by Dr. King's visions and words his strength of character and compassion and his model for peaceful demonstration and dialogue And whereas in 1983, Dr. King became the first private citizen to be honored with a federal holiday not just to celebrate his memory but also to preserve his legacy one that calls upon us all to exercise our moral authority stand up against injustice and protect our most sacred tenet of democracy Now, therefore be it proclaimed that the City Council of the city of Port Hueneme does hereby proclaim January 19th 2026 as Dr.

Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Proclaim this 20th day of January 2026.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role20:11

Go

CommentLoretta Ayers MontgomeryProposedself-stated20:12

right ahead and have some words,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role20:13

please.

CommentLoretta Ayers MontgomeryProposedself-stated20:13

Good evening! I'm Loretta Ayers Montgomery and with me is Ms. Heidi Gayton. She's a Port Hueneme resident. And so we really thank you for this wonderful proclamation. Yesterday we had a wonderful day celebrating a living legacy cultivating compassion and justice in Ventura County. We appreciate your service, your time, your support throughout the 40 years. It was wonderful.

Martha was singing like a bird. Yeah she was. Laura was there pumping her right on. I know it! I saw you! And we just really are just happy to be here this evening I wasn't able to come last year, but I'm so happy that we're able to come tonight and still celebrate this wonderful occasion. Because you know 40 years is a long time to be having a volunteer organization celebrate something in this county.

And Dr. King is the main event. We thank you. We praise you. Would you like to say anything, Heidi? I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed21:39

personally don't get to see it. I do the refreshments, but I know that every year we knock it out the park and yesterday was one of them so thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role21:56

Well thank you and we'd like to get a photo all right yeah you can come right

CommentLoretta Ayers MontgomeryProposedself-stated21:59

on up to the front okay

0:22 – 0:2712 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role22:12

They're just stepping out of the photo. Oh, they're stepping in. We need to have you over

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role22:27

here. Face the camera.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role22:29

Loretta, take a look. I am. And I came. Where am I going

CommentLoretta Ayers MontgomeryProposedself-stated22:34

to know that I came? Yeah. Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role22:42

One, two,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role22:43

three. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed23:23

Thank you for all the effort in 40 years. It's a long time to develop a program and it really shined yesterday. Never retire.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role23:37

Okay, so our next presentation we're going to have a proclamation to recognize the 26th anniversary of the Alaska Flight Memorial flight 261 and our Mayor Pro Temp Hernandez will be reading that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role23:51

Thank you, Mayor. I'd like to dedicate tonight's reading to Mr. Prasad Anirudh's father who passed away over the holidays. His services were last weekend and they continue on their memorializing their great-father who was out here every year since the crash and he will be greatly missed. So whereas on January 31st, 2000 at 422 p.m., Alaska Flight 261 crashed in the waters of off Anacapa Island approximately 13 miles from Port Hueneme and Ventura County resulting in the deaths of 88 souls and whereas the accident was the largest loss of life due to a transportation accident in the history of Ventura County and whereas the crash of Alaska Airlines Flights 261 activated an immediate response from over 75 different federal state and local agencies, the military, local non-profit agencies and private organizations.

And whereas the City of Port Hueneme Police and Station 53 who's here tonight of the Ventura County Fire Department were among the local first responders to assist with the immediate response and recovery. And whereas the families of the victims came together to promote commercial aviation safety by working together with Alaska Airlines, the Federal Aviation Agency and the National Transportation Safety Board. And where it is by the work of many that commercial aviation today is safer, by addressing the cause of this accident and working to ensure this information is used for the safety of those who use commercial transportation. And whereas the City of Port Hueneme continues to host the families of the victims each year on the 31st of January to honor the 88 lives lost and provide comfort and compassion to the friends and families of Flight 261, and whereas it is important to see how individuals in our county and the City of Port Hueneme came to embrace the families of Flight 261 by showing and expressing kindness, compassion, and giving spirit.

And whereas it is important to educate the public about this event of historical significance and how members of our community came together and continue to do so to support the family members of Alaska Flight 261 in this tragic loss of life. And whereas as we gather to remember the 26th anniversary of this tragedy, it is the intention of the City Council and staff to remember those who died and always keep our community a welcoming and warm place for Alaska 261 family members to visit, to honor, and remember those killed on January 31st 2000. Now therefore be it proclaimed that the City Council of the city of Port Hueneme does hereby proclaim January 31 As the day we honor the 88 souls who died on January 31st, 2000 and recognize that the kindness of our community members continues 25 years later.

And we will always urge residents of Port Hueneme to exercise compassion in our daily lives for the betterment of our family members, our colleagues and every individual we encounter proclaim this 20th day of January, 2026. Thank you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:09

We're going to move on to our consent calendar. These items will be enacted in one motion unless a council member would like to pull an item. Are there requests for any items to be pulled from the consent calendar?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed27:22

Madam Mayor, I have a question on item number three. Mr. City Manager should I just ask the question or...

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:29

You just have one question? Yeah

0:27 – 0:3947 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed27:33

I'd suggest pulling it and okay voting on the rest and then we can

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:37

okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed27:37

we'll pull item

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:38

number three

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed27:39

comes

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:39

in anyone else have a request to pull one yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed27:41

I want to pull

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:42

item two

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed27:44

sorry item 3

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role27:49

item 3 so not number 2 is there a motion for item 1 2 4 5 move to approve Okay so let's go ahead and take up item number, oh go ahead. All in favor?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role28:03

Aye. All opposed? Hearing none motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role28:06

Great thank you. Item number three let's go ahead start with Mr. Gama since he started then we'll go to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed28:12

Yes um Mission Square I believe is the current vendor are we switching from Mission Square to a new vendor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed28:23

So, and just for the public following along we're talking about the city's 457 plan which is a benefit we offer to our employees. And so currently we actually have multiple vendors And so Mission Square is one of them. So some people have them, but we actually have more than one and that's part of the issue that we're looking to correct is because we had multiple vendors, we weren't really getting good rates or good deals because we weren't putting all of our assets into one plan to make ourselves more appetizing to vendors.

So probably then your next question is then will Mission Square end up being Final plan selected. I don't know that that's been decided. I'll look to, I know Frank's been working with him. Part of the idea here is we're working with a broker who's supposed to negotiate the best deal for us and so I'll let Frank speak to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed29:19

what specifically that means. So we did go through an RFP process to find a fiduciary who can help us with the financial services and do an RFI for us, to see if we can get a better pricing plan. Mission Square was one of them who did submit their bid but ultimately they were not chosen. They ended up being Empower. That's part of the resolution that's out there tonight.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed29:52

So did you look at? Performance was performance. I will just say that I've been very pleased with their performance

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed29:59

Performance was reviewed even cost was reviewed as well and from the cost perspective As you might be able to see in the council report Collectively all of our participants participants including our employees and retirees was paying a total annual sum about $86,000 out of their retirement funds which Participants pay out-of-pocket. So it reduces their funds for retirement and for growth That is significantly reducing down to I believe 16 8 Right and and on top of that we will have additional fun financial fiduciary service to fiduciary experts who will be educating and helping us through this transition and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed30:46

And I think to sort of directly address your question is, I don't think there was an issue of performance. Like it wasn't an unhappiness with any of the current vendors. It was just that when we had taken a look at it initially, the rates that we were being charged, we weren't getting the deal that we should have been getting based on the size of the contract and the assets. So we really tried to renegotiate that and negotiate the best deal really is what it was.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed31:15

So Councilmember Gama, if you are referring to the performance of your portfolio If that's the question you're posing The new vendor that new records keeper who we're moving to has the same exact lineup And it will be at a much lesser administrative fee

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed31:34

Okay And then when will the transition be taking place?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed31:54

If it's everything goes fall falls into place we're expecting about a two to four month Process, but it could take longer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed32:03

so

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed32:03

if

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed32:04

Any of us were considering adding additional funds would

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed32:08

it gets to no. No that doesn't stop Okay, there might be a freeze period for about a pay period maybe but nothing throughout the process

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed32:19

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed32:21

Yeah okay so during this transition what is, is there going to be an expected duration that there's a blackout period where They're not going to be able to, they're gonna be locked out of their accounts. And have you kind of talked to Empower about this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed32:38

So we don't, we haven't talked directly to Empower but we have talking to fiduciary experts who is working on our behalf and I do believe there's a lockout period if the money is in a certain account. The money, I think it's a cash account where It's held for so many months and so many years, but that you do have access to the account. It just might not be on the new Empower platform. You'll still get correspondences from the old records keeper that your money is still there, but I don't believe there's a...

I have to go look at my records, but I don' think there's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed33:18

a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:19

complete

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed33:19

blackout. The reason why I ask is, you know, there's market volatility. Yes. Members might want to move their money Thank you very much. And then the other part too, if they want access to that money either in a loan. So make sure you ask those questions.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed33:54

So yes so that's a good question Councilmember Lopez. We as a city and all four of our plans don't have additional benefits that come with it So each records keeper has a little bit of money of all of our participants. And because the economy of scales has been divided amongst the four, our services haven't been reflective of the total assets we have. So, we don't have any benefits right now. But as we transition to this new vendor, we will have loans available and our employees will have different options with their money that's in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed34:34

there. Last question is for retirees. There are vulnerable stakeholders ensuring that they're not left behind. You have access? You got records and are they aware of the switch?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed34:50

So far they are not. But our fiduciary experts, we will be doing a marketing campaign to all of our participants to make sure that they have the information that they need to make an informed decision whether to keep it within the city pool or move out of it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed35:10

Just want to make sure that absolutely reaching out. Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed35:12

Yeah, and I hear the feedback is to make sure we're doing outreach and letting people know what happens when and so as of now What we had done was we had created a committee where we tried to have a representative from each department really our Employee group okay? Yeah, you should probably need employee group to be part of it so that they Understand that we're trying to get them the best deal and put more money into their pockets without you know without costing taxpayers anything so That's all we've really communicated with so far. If it's approved tonight, we'll make sure we do outreach and information to all of our affected employees and former employees.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed35:50

Yes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed35:51

Thank

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role35:55

you. So just for clarification, Empower is the replacement company that were that you're asking approval?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed36:04

That is correct.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role36:04

And then Fiduciary Experts was just the broker

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed36:07

It's fiduciary services. So they are bound by law to work on the city's best interest, meaning that when there is market volatility or when there is underperforming assets or stock, I'm sorry not stock options but investment lineups, they will be the ones helping us to change those in and out and helping us with the committees.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role36:30

So once that transition takes place then the fiduciary service experts will So just a question

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed36:39

about any negative impacts with having the four go into one. So not really I think The range of services that Empire provides is everything that encompasses that what we currently have so we are sort of a Unique case where our city has a 401k account which typically are reserved for private entities We have that. We have a four oh four fifty seven B account, which is Targeted directly at public entities, but we have both of them. So both the services will be going along and We do have retirement health savings plan under there But that will be a separate discussion on what we're gonna do with that We're planning to move that over because of the economy of skills, but that's just a separate discussion

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed37:50

If I can just quickly answer, because I think the biggest negative... I think Frank's a little more optimistic than me. So for me the biggest negative is change is hard and you know it means people are gonna have to change their plans and even I told Frank initially I said I don't want to tell you which vendor I have because I don't want to sway you guys but if you don't pick the one I have I'm not going to be happy! And then he didn't pick the one that I have so So even for myself, I don't really want to deal with the change. But when we look and I think the group felt this way too, the employee committee that was working on it is when they looked at the dollar difference that it could make over time by the reduction of fees that are there being charged.

It's worth it. It just it's going to it's the pain to change it but after that we don't anticipate any other real negative. It should all be positive.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed38:39

So yes from there on it should be a long term commitment until we come to a certain point where we believe Services or the cost of services outweigh at the time changing to a different vendor. But having four different vendors in an agency like ours is a lot, and unfortunately over the years we have lost probably all the administrative fees that we could've probably collected it and used it more positively for our employees and retirees but we're at this juncture and we are trying to clean it up now.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:17

I Appreciate the effort because You know you take those cost savings time value of money It's a it's a big move and I really appreciate that looking out for us because it is the fees and it's very difficult to understand the fees And then I have one further question, which is slipping my mind right now. Hopefully all get to it but oh I'm sorry, I misplaced that thought.

0:39 – 0:4917 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed39:49

You can always email us and we'll be happy to share.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed39:53

So we, because I looked into it, we didn't have the ability to borrow against our assets. I think that's what you're talking about,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed40:00

correct? Yeah, we did not have those services

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:03

from our current providers. Right and so then this is a really great alternative for our employees because now you get to, correct me if I'm wrong, you can borrow against your assets and you'll pay 6% and then it goes into your account.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed40:19

Yes, so once we have everything established, we'll have those services solidified with a new vendor in terms of how we're going to administer them. It's kind of a hard process where we either do it through payroll or through personal accounts but we will be having those services added as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed40:41

Right, and I think that's a great addition. So when you take the lowering the cost of this new benefit...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed40:47

It's a very positive change. And just to kind of give you some perspective in this industry, in the government 457 world, the two big players are either Mission Square or Empower. So they're one of the two biggest providers of financial retirement contribution services.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role41:10

Are there any other questions? If not, is there a motion and a second to approve item number three?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed41:15

Move to approve.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role41:16

Second.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role41:21

All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role41:26

Great thank you we're gonna

move to item number six madam clerk do you have proof of publication as required by law and a complete file of reports and exhibits

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role41:39

Yes, Madam Mayor.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role41:40

Great this is the adoption of a resolution granting special use permit number 26-1 for the City of Port Hueneme Color Run walk 5k and kids 1k event and ancillary health care educational booth children activity area refreshment vendors and entertainment will staff please present the report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed42:02

Good evening members, members of the public, city staff. So agenda item number six pertains to a public hearing that will allow the council to consider the adoption of a resolution for special permit 26-1. The special use permit would allow for the 2026 Sea Splash Color Dash event to be held on Saturday March 21st The event, which would be co-sponsored with the Port of Hueneme, would include a 5K Color Run and Walk, a Kids 1K Event, and a Health & Wellness Fair.

It's anticipated that the 5K race would have approximately 600 people, and that the 1K event would have up to 150 participants. The wellness fair, which will be located in Lot C, would include health care vendors, children's activity area, photo booth, a DJ, and various vendors. As the council may recall, this would be the third year that the city has held this type of event down at the beach.

Special use permit is required because the event is hosted down at Hueneme Beach including the promenade and adjacent streets. The event is considered exempt from CEQA because it's a minor temporary use which does not entail an environmental impact. Anna Hanley, the city's Recreation and Community Services Manager is going to walk us through some of the event details including the race route which is really the primary change from last year's event. So with that I'll turn it over to Anna.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed43:43

Thank you, good evening. In terms of the race details this year we're proposing a revised route that removes the Surfside Drive series of barricade switchbacks which in turn reduces labor and equipment rental costs. In order to still achieve the distance needed, participants will be routed northbound on Ventura Road to Seaview Street. Only the south shoulder of Seaview Street will be utilized and the estimated total time of impact will be 25 minutes.

That impact will keep the residents in place for the Surfside 1 complex, Surfside 4, Anacapa View Beach Homes and the Anacapa Beach View condominium complexes. This change though, it also offers variety for the participants that have been in our previous events and so that's sort of a nice change as well. That route can become a little mundane and so we're offering a new view of our city with this proposal.

The event also includes the color run feature as it did last year, and the setup as far as that element is concerned will remain the same. And I'm not sure if anyone had the opportunity to see it but it was visually stunning. It was these vibrant colors that were all lining the sidewalk flanked by palm trees It was an incredible photo opportunity. So as soon as the public's done taking advantage of that aspect of the event, Public Works has offered to clean up the area immediately and restore it to its original condition.

As far as the road closures that I just mentioned, Market Street will be closed north of Anacapa View Beach Homes entrance. The southbound Ventura Road will be closed south of Seaview Street. Excuse me actually it'll be north of Seaview Street. Surfside Drive will be closed west of Surfside 2 entrance through to Market Street. And as far as resident access, the residents of Surfside 1, Surfside 4, Anacapa Beach View condominiums and Anacapa View beach homes may have a brief traffic delays as I described. I walked the route and as I mentioned it was just all told I would imagine 25 minutes at most. It took me 15 minutes to walk this portion of the race route In advance of the race and event, the recreation team intends to go door-to-door with flyer distribution to engage community members as far as this impact and encourage cooperation.

We do have a way to mitigate that if emergencies do arise. We're working with the police department as far as the traffic plan is concerned and we'll be able to manage anything that comes our way However, we figured the most information that we could provide in advance as far as that 25-minute impact, we will do so. We'll also be utilizing traffic message boards, social media and engaging all of the homeowners associations in that immediate area.

Here we have the proposed event site plan. This is the same as last year, so I'm certain that people are familiar with this. This is the area that has the longest impact because it will be where we focus our efforts on the wellness and health fair. We're also providing for your opportunity to view is the race, the new proposed race route which takes participants northbound on Ventura Road and across that shoulder on the southbound side of Seaview Street down to market. And then continue the race route as we've offered in the past.

The second heat and element to this event includes the Kids 1K, so the route will remain the same. And the benefit of this particular image is that it shows the opt-out path for those that do not want to participate in the color run feature of this race, and that's highlighted in the blue that'll take participants through Lot B. As far as the fiscal impact, the event budget approximately is $20,000. That includes the timing service medals, marketing materials barricades, photo booth DJ race T-shirt signage and staff costs. The Board of Hueneme is contributing $10,000 to this event As mentioned, we're co-hosting the event with the port.

Registration fees this year are proposed to be $25 for each 5K participant, $10 for the kids 1K and that will cover the remaining event costs which include... And every participant receives a race T-shirt and a medal. This cost as we are increasing it is still kept lower than neighboring events by a significant amount and that's to encourage local participation.

Beach parking revenues will not be collected for A, B, C, E or F nor along Ocean View and Surfside drives

0:49 – 0:5414 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed49:06

And to wrap up the presentation, just wanted to let the Council know that the Citizen Advisory Commission did review this and made an advisory recommendation that the Council support the event and approve the Special Use Permit. Therefore it is our recommendation that the Council adopt the resolution approving the Special Use Permit number 26-1 and find the project to be categorically exempt from CEQA.

We're available for any questions the Council may have.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role49:32

Great thank you. Any questions? We'll just take questions at this time we'll have discussion later. Councilmember Lopez?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed49:38

Yes, last year and the two previous years did we have any negative feedback from the community?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed49:47

I believe in prior years there was a complaint related to sound coming from a DJ. So we are very intentional now with the placement of speakers facing away from residents in Surfside 2 complex, now is intentionally directed towards the ocean and east or west and never north towards the condominiums We also had utilized the secondary DJ to keep the route engaging and people, you know, sort of pumped as they're going along the race. And that volume two had reached a level in which it needed to be turned down so we're cognizant of that and will start off those events with the lower sound this time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed50:31

Also, one lesson learned last year was the trophies age groups didn't match the award that was being presented. It was weird.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed50:44

Yeah there is I think there was a mix-up with the trophies so we're gonna work on that where last year we yeah like the trophies would say like 35 to 45 but the age group for them that we measured was 40 to 50 you know or something like that So we're going to watch that and then we're open. We also were making sure to have recognition for the kids race as well I think that was another lesson. Yeah, and then I just wanted to confirm yeah with the complaint the first year about sound, I will know last year we actually had several residents come out on their balcony And we received zero complaints so I actually think it was really a community event. Yeah, if we're even the neighbors were supportive of it and so hopefully you know the concern we have I think it's it is a good approach I think with the feedback on the course in kind of cut back, switch back was like the one thing that people didn't really like that much.

So this actually fixes that but there's always a possibility somebody might not be happy that there's that 25 minute road closure that we're talking about but I think if we do good outreach I think most people will understand it so overall we're hoping for a real win-win for everybody.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role51:57

Great thank you. Okay, so no other questions. We're going to now open the public hearing is there any let me see the time is now 719 are there any public comments regarding this item?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role52:14

Yes we have one public comment from Letitia Austin

PresenterLeticia Austin PublicPort of Hueneme so I'm pleased to share our strong support for the upcoming ColoProposedself-stated52:23

Good evening Mayor McQueen-Lajon, council members and members of the community. So my name is Leticia Austin Public and Government Relations Manager and I'm here on behalf of the Port of Hueneme so I'm pleased to share our strong support for the upcoming Color Run slash Walk 5k and Kids 1K This event truly reflects the spirit of Port of Hueneme and the port in the city, promoting healthy lifestyles, creating opportunities for families and neighbors to connect, and investing in activities that strengthen our collective well-being.

The Port of Hueneme is proud to stand with the city in championing events that bring people together. We look forward to participating with you to ensure this year's 5k is not only successful, but a joyful and memorable experience for everyone who participates Thank you for your time and for your leadership and fostering community centered initiatives. Thank you.

Thank you

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role53:21

Okay, great. So now we're going to conclude the public comment section of the public hearing and so the time is now 7 20 Okay so we have before us the recommendation to adopt the resolution approving special use permit number 26-1, the color one walk 5k and kids 1k event. And number two take such action related any related additional related actions that may be desirable is there a motion and a second?

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction53:56

Move to approve

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role53:59

Great, thank you. Are there any additional discussion anyone?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role54:07

If I may, I just want to comment and thank staff for the good work in putting this together and reducing the expenses involved and rerouting the whole plan so thank you great work. Good thinking went into it.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:22

Great, thank you if there's nothing else Madam Clerk please conduct a roll call vote please.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Council Member Gama Yes. Council Member Lopez? Yes. Council Member Perez? Yes. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Yes and Mayor McQueen-Lejeune? Yes

0:54 – 1:1014 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role54:37

motion passes unanimously thank you

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role54:39

staff for your report so we're gonna move to business item number seven a letter of partnership between the city of Port Hueneme and the West Ventura County Business Alliance will staff please present the report City Manager

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed54:54

Yes, thank you. I will present the report and then I'm actually hoping to invite our proposed partner to say a few words as well but I wanted to give some background on this item to start. Last year when we developed our city's economic development plan One of the main areas of need and one of the key items that was identified as an immediate need was the ability for the city to increase, we have the wording in the report exactly. To add additional capacity to our economic development team, to be able to provide economic development support to our business communities. I think we've all sort of heard feedback or gotten questions about How active or you know, is the City Chamber of Commerce active? And that was an area that was identified as a need to really build that connection with the business community and provide opportunities for business advocacy and engagement and networking and all of those types of things.

And so that's been a challenge in Port Hueneme, and we started to do some research and try to brainstorm and come up with some ideas. We started to look at the work that the West Ventura County Business Alliance was doing And for those that don't know, the West Ventura County Business Alliance is a regional business organization that serves as a combined chamber for Oxnard and Camarillo areas. So we looked at that map and we saw Oxnard in Camarillo, and for some reason there was this hole in it that is Port Hueneme. And so it sort of started to get us thinking about You know, is this an opportunity for the city of Hueneme to partner with that group and really kind of...

I always say win-win opportunities don't come around very often but this really felt like one where it was an opportunity The West Ventura County Business Alliance to really like lock up the whole region as far as being able to, like build that network business networking community in that whole region, but also an opportunity for us to sort of get our business community connected with.

One of our own, you know, our Port Hueneme businesses but also the businesses in Oxnard and Camarillo that there's some mutual benefit there. So it led to discussions where we reached out to each other and we talked about I think we both had a pretty immediate interest seeing those possibilities. And so, we talked with the West Ventura County Business Alliance about the possibility of the city partnering and joining that partnership And so what we've put together and worked together to develop is, I would say it's...

We're calling it a letter of partnership. And the idea is we're not really obligating each other to really commit to anything at this point other than The commitment that we're going to work together and we're gonna when there's opportunities to work together, then we will do so and we're gonna You know do things like We're gonna appoint a staff person who will connect with the West Ventura County Business Alliance. And if businesses have questions and they come to us and want to talk to the business alliance will make sure that we get them to them or vice versa if they go the Ventura County West Ventura County Business Alliance and have a question about the city that the Business Alliance has somebody that they can call and try to get answers for businesses.

And then at the same time, the business alliance is committing to basically the same thing of having somebody on their end who will do that. So it's really just building that connection, having somebody on our team, having somebody on their team that can get in touch when things come up or when business issues arise that we can work together to solve And then just promoting the region and working together for the benefit of the businesses within our region, which includes Port Hueneme but also Oxnard and Camarillo.

So I think one of the questions that would typically come up on this type of item would be if I were a council member, but what's it gonna cost? And the positive thing right now is because of how we're talking about, you know, we're committing to partner and like work together in good faith. There really isn't a cost right now to do that. There may be opportunities in the future where we have an opportunity to partner with the Business Alliance and consider our project that we wanna support or fund or whatever But there isn't a requirement in this partnership that we're not required to do that and to just commit to that at this point. So, so we're hoping it leads to opportunities where we all get to talk about do we want to do this new thing that we haven't done?

And do we want to partner and work together to do that? But right now, we've kept this kind of broad enough that we aren't locked into anything that we don't want to do. So again not calling too many things a win-win but this one really feels like it is a win when where Essentially we're agreeing to partner, to work together for the benefit of our business communities. And and we agree to do that and look for opportunities to do that but we're also not committed to do anything you know we're not locked in to do anything that we ultimately don't want to commit to so So we're proposing that the council authorize the city manager to move this forward and take the steps needed to commit to that partnership. And also there'd be some immediate steps like pretty quickly you know putting some materials out and things like that But so we're asking for the council to approve that at this time.

And if it's all right with the council before opening it up to any questions, I just wanted to acknowledge that the West Ventura County Business Alliance Director Andy Conley is present today and so I wanted to give the opportunity. Andy did you want to say anything from the business alliances perspective?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:01:47

Hi, yes I didn't have any comments prepared but just would love to take a couple minutes here to kind of piggyback off what City Manager Vega was saying. So thank you very much Mayor and City Council members for considering this proposal tonight It is as James was saying, it really is a win-win where as the Business Alliance if you're not familiar with our history.

The Oxnard Chamber of Commerce and the Camarillo Chamber of Commerce merged back in 2021 to form the West Ventura County Business Alliance and currently we represent over 500 businesses who are members and that is about 50,000 jobs that represents within those areas We also, you know we still have members throughout West Ventura County some in Ventura Unincorporated and a number here in Port Hueneme. So we still have a lot of Port Hueneme businesses that have partnered with us that we work very closely with so what we see this opportunity is that very natural fit as James said that really does kind of fit that hole to be able to have us that tri-city kind of alliance that really does open up a lot of opportunities both for This is something that I have presented to my executive committee.

It is going in front of our board on Thursday, just same proposal that you have before you and so if both sides come together in agreement we look forward to working quickly to make that happen. There's one thing I do want to kind of clarify really quick as far as the financial part of it, as James mentioned there isn't really a financial part outside of ASC that our city partners really the only financial element for city partners is for the cities to be members So the City of Oxnard is a member, City of Camarillo's a member and that's just any government agency that's a $900 membership each year. That really does just show kind of the partnership there but that's what we ask really if any of our members to have that sort of commitment.

But yeah happy to take any questions you may have.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:04:02

Any questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:04:04

Yes. So I'm aware that you guys have a political action committee, has there been any issues in the past like that you guys were advocating for one candidate or an action that may have been not supported by say the city of Camarillo or Oxnard?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:04:31

Yeah, no great question. Yes we do have a pack that I did want to make clear as well because that is something that we have utilized for helping support you know business friendly like measures and things like that and so a lot of times there has been used with with some candidates, but to answer your question we really haven't had any issues like that. But really with our PAC we wanted to go more towards measures. We just had recently up in Oxnard a measure that was really going to affect the business community and taking away a Melrose tax up by in River Park and that's something that we did Partner with the city on so a lot of times these have come a lot of times in partnerships with the city To make sure that it is something that does its beneficial not only for the business community, but community itself And so those are a lot of times that we have been able to use use that pack But really it is to what will benefit the business community.

Yeah, I was that was only question. Thank

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:05:30

you So first of all, have you identified the city staff liaison and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:05:37

Yes, so economic development is under the city manager's office and so it's typically there's sort of twofold. Myself and Brian Popovich from my office attends now the county economic for the first time we actually have a regular representative at the County Economic Development meeting so he would also be the first point of contact but then I'm the second point of contact. We're not deep enough we don't have that many layers

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:06:05

And the second question is, and there's a little bit of background. Since when I got elected this was something we tried in the beginning and there was efforts made to try to connect to the business community and get more I guess advertising. I'm not really sure what was happening in the city, but there were efforts made to try to connect with the business community and it kind of failed. And what is that going to look like? Is there somebody gonna go out and connect with all the businesses and bring them on board? And is this gonna be kind of like replacing what a Chamber of Commerce would do supporting businesses for instance around COVID that would have been really helpful having one of those types of agencies. But is that same thing along the lines of what we're looking at here?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:06:50

Yeah, I think we're looking at like the general Chamber of Commerce services that are provided.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:06:55

Yes absolutely so to your point it really is just kind of folding into what we're already doing and so those services that were providing for our members and for the cities that we represent uh so around COVID was really making sure that there was that information to the business community what resources loans things like that were available We have a newsletter that goes out weekly, that we if you're a member or not a member to be a part of. Not only has news of what's going on within the Business Alliance but also within the business community and things different laws different ordinances different grants things like that that the business community should be aware of and so that's what we pride ourselves in being able to be that source of information but also working with the cities as well if there is anything from on the city side to be able for that to be communicated And we also have a business advocacy committee which is another ask for the city to have a representative to be a part of that.

That meets monthly and we have members from our different businesses, we have representatives from every elected official from local elected official from federal state county city that's represented there are a lot of utilities The military base, you know a lot of different organizations represented and that really does help too. That's a great way for the city to give a report about what's going on especially when it is in regards to the business community so Like I mentioned everything will just kind of be folded into what we're doing already. If we have different events going on, if networking breakfasts, we have statement series lunches things like that we would include Port Hueneme as part of our kind of our circuit. We already kind of go back and forth between Oxnard Camarillo.

We'll just make Port Hueneme part of that as well so okay thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:08:45

Yeah, I think that the time is ripe and right for this kind of collaboration and networking particularly with the international Carl's company coming to the Channel Islands Harbor which is not incorporated which is right next to the city of Oxnard City of Port Hueneme. So my question is like with a huge investment like that could you walk us through the kinda activities that you may be involved in The alliance would be involved into welcoming Carl's and also making all the players and interested parties aware of the opportunities that that's going to bring.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:09:24

Yeah, absolutely. And we're very excited about an opportunity like Carl's have been working with him closely And so once that was all cleared, now we're helping them as far as Because before they actually had to work with county, now they have to work with the city of Oxnard. It's just that weird being in those boundaries right there and being right next to the military base as well a lot of those different jurisdictions and boundaries but working with them to make sure that they are hitting their timelines and growing because that is something that we see as far as workforce development Economic development and just really the whole growth of this area how it does help benefit everyone even things that we're working with them on as far as making it easier to access.

As you know here in Puerto Hueneme, not the easiest access off the 101 or the 1 and so that is something we're working with them on too. You know as we have people trying to come up maybe from Southern California or other parts of the state to be able to access not just them but how without that would affect the China Islands Harbor and the surrounding areas too Thank

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:10 – 1:2123 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:10:44

you. I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:10:47

think, you know what I'm going to ask? We've had discussions about this just real light discussions but can you talk about what the vision is of the Business Alliance and helping prepare Ventura County and our cities who are non-venue cities for the 2028 Olympics.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:11:05

Yes, no great question so there's some great opportunities coming up that are sports related it's not just the Olympics you have FIFA World Cup coming you have the Super Bowl and in other events too that will be happening here in Southern California And so Ventura County is in a really unique position and has been really identified by FIFA, by the Olympic Committee as one of those counties that will play an integral role in hosting those events. And so we have been working in partnership. So that's a big thing that we do too, is not just partnering with the cities but partnering with the county, partnering with different agencies like the EDC, like the Ventura County Lodging Association and others that for these things to work, for these things to happen really has to have everyone working together and playing their role.

And so we want to play the role that we can. Not only for these events themselves and really make it successful and take advantage of that, but really use this as that springboard for something that's more sustaining. Whereas it's not just a shot in the arm for two four weeks but something that you can use then to help establish other youth sports activities or things like that that could really be help with economic development and community development. Very

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:12:28

good thank you yeah

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:12:29

great

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:12:29

no

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:12:29

questions

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:12:32

Okay, so we have the let's see happy for us the recommendation to approve and propose the proposed letter of partnership between the City of Port Hueneme and the West Ventura County Business Alliance and authorize a city manager to execute and take the steps needed to partner with the West Ventura County Business Alliance such as designating a staff liaison and collaboration for the benefit of the local business community. May I have a

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction1:13:01

motion? Madam Mayor, before you go to that I think we didn't call for public comment yet

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:13:06

oh I'm sorry I'm sorry is there public comment no thank you it was worth calling okay yes so is there emotion in a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:13:19

move to approve I'm just thinking this is a win-win situation. Think of the marketing tool that we can actually use when we have Our sprouts grand opening. Big win for the city, the economic impact that it could actually drive so I was grateful early on to actually take a meeting through Economic Development Collaborative contact met with you Andy and I appreciate you being here and Just that one meeting, turned it over to James and look where we are. So grateful for the communication back and forth so thank you for sticking with our staff.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:14:12

Any additional discussion? Anyone else?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:14:14

I just wanted to echo what Councilman Gama said that the timing is right. There's just so many opportunities that we are looking forward to and it's very exciting because this is long overdue, to have this kind of relationship in this kind of movement toward our economic development plan. So thank you so much Andy. We appreciate it and thank you City Manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:14:35

I just want to piggyback on Mayor Pro Tem's comment. It's like the international appeal to you have this international company coming to Channel Islands Harbor, coming to the City of Oxnard or City of Port Hueneme making a major investment and You know that opens up a whole new stream of visitors And so yeah, it's just really excited great timing and looking forward to your work

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:15:02

Great, thank you. If there's nothing else, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:15:06

All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:15:12

Great, thank you. So we're

moving to item number eight and Mayor Pro Tem and Council Member Nagama has recused himself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:15:33

All right, so

we'll move on to item

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:15:35

eight. Yes. Thank you. Will staff please present the report?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:15:38

Yes and I'm gonna give a little introduction and then I'll hand it off to our Housing Facilities Director Gabby Basuda to give a little more information but I just wanted to give an introduction. This item is probably coming sort of catching people by surprise maybe because We have an opportunity that came up quickly with the deadline relative pretty quickly and so we wanted to bring it forward. We think it's another good opportunity, and so just as a little background introduction is that we had an opportunity to get a significant We had a grant or discount, whichever one you want to call it from a vendor that for a limited period for playground replacement. And because we had recently really tried to ramp up our playground inspection compliance program and we realized On a 20 year old playground you can't fix anymore that we had a need and we had an opportunity.

So we jumped on it. We wanted to bring it forward. And so with that I'll hand it over to Ms. Pasuah to walk us through exactly what we're proposing to do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:17:04

Thank you. Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Temp, council members and city staff well I guess our mayor pro temp isn't here the item before you this evening is a staff recommendation for the replacement of the playground equipment at Miranda and Volker Park Volker Park Playground was last replaced in 2010 and Miranda Playground in 2013, making the playground 16 to 23 years old.

Commercial playground equipment's lifespan ranges between 8 to 10 years but can last up to 15 to 20 years with consistent maintenance. Due to the age of the equipment, staff has been unsuccessful in securing replacement parts citing liability concerns manufacturers will no longer provide replacement parts leaving staff no option but to remove and or board up specific sections of the playground.

The current condition of the playgrounds no longer meet the California health and safety standards This is the current condition of Miranda Park Playground. As you can see, we had to board up a section of the playground. We had a railing that failed and had no other choice but to remove it. We have corrosion throughout the playground equipment along with tripping hazards throughout the park.

And these are just a few pictures that we staff took. But not only that, but we've had members of the community upload asking for replacement. This is the condition of Boker Park which is probably two times worse than Miranda. As you can see from the bottom pictures we've had to remove this equipment, we could no longer get replacements parts so the best we could do was remove the equipment The top picture shows what used to be a swing set, no longer is there. That's now gone.

We had to remove that also along with the slide that is cracked. The city is a member of Omnia, which is a cooperative purchasing agency which conducts the necessary competitive bidding process for all their contracts. Using this platform staff requested a quote from Great Western Recreation at which this time Great Western notified staff of the possibility of receiving a matching grant for the playground equipment This slide is a rendery of the proposed Miranda Park playground equipment.

I wanted to note here that part of the promotion of us receiving the grant was only for specific parts of the playground, so they didn't give us a catalog and say choose and you know you'll get half a discount. They had specific parts that qualified for that. So what staff did is we went ahead, walked the playground and said using the grant you know give us a rendering of what is possible so we got a few samples along with recreation this was the sample that was chosen This playground will include climbing pools, vertical ladders, whirlwind climbers, rubber spring seating, new swing set, observation station, climbing links. And this playground equipment is recommended for ages 2 to 5 and 5 to 12. Cost The total cost for the equipment is, along with material surcharge, freight costs and tax is $366,672.

The bottom chart though shows the total plus a performance bond. The performance bond is something that you can choose not to approve tonight but it is my recommendation that we do approve it. It guarantees the work That is going to happen- along with staff is asking for a 5% contingency. We take that minus the grant that we were awarded of one hundred and three thousand we also have the ability to use an RDA bond that we've had sitting- for a few years more than a few years now- that we can apply to the park along with the state The cost to the general fund be $59,145.

1:21 – 1:294 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:21:53

Can I real quick before you move on, do you mind going back to that slide? I just wanted to point out like the RDA bond in the state of California park grant which ended up being about over $200,000. That those were related to if everybody recalls a couple years back when we sort of, we tried to put a pause on some of the projects that weren't really priority projects and part of the idea was we said that those grants could be repurposed for We're going At that point a couple years ago we put on pause so that we could try to focus on those priority projects and I think with the photos that Ms. Pasuha showed, it shows exactly why we were sort of preparing for this because we knew that the playgrounds potentially if we Couldn't come up with a plan to be able to replace these soon And be able to afford to replace them that it would be a big liability issue moving forward That would probably you know cost us more than it would be just to fix it.

So I Just wanted to highlight that those are, you know, just two examples of hard decisions we made in the past but now Showing why we had to make those decisions and how it set us up to be able to do this now so anyway

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:23:29

This slide shows the proposed Boulker Park playground. Happy to say that we will be replacing the swing set. We'll have an upper body trainer, fun seats, new slides, telescope area, bongos, raccoon spring ride and whirlwing seats and a wave climber. And the cost for Boca Park. The top chart at the bottom, the total is $253,493. Again I do recommend the performance bond along with a 5% contingency minus the grant amount gives us a final cost of $198,222 to the general fund.

Should the City Council approve staff's recommendation tonight, staff is prepared to start the demolition of Boker Playground immediately. Should City Council not approve this recommendation tonight it is my recommendation that we close the playgrounds. Staff anticipates that construction will last from January 21 to February 20 and Miranda Park from February 16 to March 13 weather permitting. In an ongoing effort to maximize cost savings, removal of the playground and demolition will be conducted by our Streets Department And they will also be doing minor sidewalk and minor accessibility repairs in the area in order to allow ADA, the area to be ADA compliance.

And with that I am available to answer any questions that you may have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:25:19

Mayor, do you mind if I add one thing? Because when we write reports we have to write the financial statement or the financial pieces. We write them very governmental like in governmenties. Is that a language? And so when we wrote this report, I think that if it's read one way, it could be taken one way. But I wanted to make sure we explain it accurately because in the recommendation for the report, You know, the approval is for four hundred and fifty six thousand dollars Which obviously is a significant amount of money at a time that we don't have a whole lot of extra money but as Miss Basuah just went through in detail. That's the total expenditures period for both these playgrounds But and we have to get that approval to you know to cut those checks for these playgrounds basically but As we showed, we have several grants and we have the RDA funds to put towards it.

So the general fund impact is much less than that. I think if I remember right, at the end of the day being able to replace two playgrounds for a general fund impact of $257,000. So being able to replace two playgrounds for $257,000 is I would say it's a pretty good example of staff our team really leveraging every dollar to count and matter and looking for opportunities where To be able to do these things very cost-consciously. And then like I said with the just the Reminder that you know, the concern would be if we don't fix it and something happens that you know The saying of you know Pennywise pound foolish to save a dollar now where it would be, you know potentially taking on bigger risks. So ultimately And then the last thing I'll say is I think I told the council anytime I bring a project forward and I recommend to pay for it from From our reserve fund you should You should expect me to have a really good explanation.

And so this is something that we talked about at our staff level a lot of like, is this that thing that's that important? And it is, and I also wanna say, and this is why we made sure to protect the reserve when we did so that we would have the money to address critical needs like this. So ultimately just wanted to explain that the financial impact, the general fund impact is much lower thanks to our staff leveraging all those funds and that for those reasons we recommend moving forward with these two projects.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:28:09

And if I may add just for the record, now that our city manager explained it. For the record you would be authorizing staff to use the California state grant of $192,000 and this is from Miranda Park. The RDA bond restricted amount of $29,639 and general fund Thank you. And this is for Miranda Park right here. So you would be authorizing the use of the State of California park grant, the RDA bond plus you'll be authorizing the use to $59,145 of general fund. Can you go to Volcker Park slide? Yes.

And with Bulker Park, you would be authorizing general fund money of $198,222.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:29 – 1:3633 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:29:28

And the reason for the differences on Miranda Park, there had been a grant that the city got to do like some dream improvements at Miranda Park and we ended up. We said we don't really have money to add a bunch of features at Miranda Park right now so let's take that and repurpose it for this playground but on Bulker, there was no existing grant that we could repurpose. That is correct. Yeah, that's why there's not multiple grants listed

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:29:55

And the RDA is only for Miranda or Beach Park. It cannot be used for any other location but that.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:30:04

I have a question for you. You mentioned earlier, you said if we approve this item then we'll move forward with the work but if we disapprove then you're going to shut down playgrounds and so my question is if they can be shut down why are they still open? That's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:30:31

why we're here tonight because the as you can see from the pictures We could no longer get replacement parts. They're at the end of their lifespan, and we had to move very quickly in order to bring this. But then we were also just really lucky on getting this match grant. So we moved really quickly, worked with recreation, worked with the playground manufacturer to bring this item to you today.

That's why we're here.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:31:11

So let me ask the question a different way, how long is it going to take to upgrade the playground? Less than a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:31:19

month. Staff is ready by if you approve this item tonight, we have construction fence coming in tomorrow morning and public works teams were ready to start.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:31:32

If I could just add to that real quick because we struggled with, you know. Do do we want to say this tonight? You know that we have these concerns and but that's what triggered us to move on this aggressively is to address these. But when we talked and we realized that if it's approved, we are literally going to start tomorrow and we're gonna bring in the fence tomorrow. We figured safe-ish saying it tonight. Great

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:32:00

thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:02

Yes, so. It seems like your phase one is to tear it down right? So and then there's two parts so that's the easy part. When are we going to have the material, the playground to install?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:32:18

The manufacturer has said the material is in stock. It's ready.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:23

OK but when is it going to get

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:32:24

shipped? It's here locally now. If based on the construction schedule, we gave public works about a week and a half to get the grounds ready. February 2nd is with Great Western will come in with the equipment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:44

What are they projecting as far as time?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:32:46

Two and a half weeks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:47

Two and a half weeks so we should have grand opening March?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:32:52

Mid-February. Weather permitting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:32:56

Okay What's the warranty on this equipment?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:33:04

The warranty for just like bubbling springs is eight to ten years. Normal wear and tear is obvious, manufactured defect is warranted but should somebody break something on purpose put a sledgehammer that obviously is going to cost us additional money to repair

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:33:24

So the equipment that we have in there now, did it look like that happened?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:33:29

Absolutely yes. Yes unfortunately we've had equipment on fire. We've just had Vandalism throughout the park over the years. I mean, but staff has done a remarkable job in keeping this playground going as long as it did. I mean we're almost at 20 plus years and we will continue to do that. We have our protocols where we're going to be going and checking out The playgrounds on a monthly basis, just like we do now.

So I anticipate this playground is going to last you 15 to 20 years as long as we do preventative maintenance on a monthly basis.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:34:10

Last question. Is there any plans actually to have a camera in both parks?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:34:18

I will refer I'll have that question answered by the city manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:34:22

Yeah, we will take a look I know We had our dream camera project and then I think we then had to Put that with our budget, which to be clear the council and I we didn't cut the budget for that project. It's just that over the years since we signed the contract things got more expensive so then we had to take a look and we had to sort of prioritize which areas we were going to be able to do because we weren't going to afford as many cameras as we originally thought So I don't remember offhand exactly what made the cut and what didn't, so we'll take a look and we'll get back to everybody and let everybody know. Doesn't mean you know we talked as a group and we were saying it doesn't mean that like if something got cut we can't add a camera later but it's just that my first answer will be I'll try to get everybody list of where we're planning to put the cameras that are currently approved in the current project and then we'll go from there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:35:17

The reason I mention it, the camera would have been viable for the fire at Miranda Park. That's all, that's one of the questions I have, thanks. Thank you.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:35:29

I'm assuming there is a time limit on the grant? It expires now? We use it or lose it. Well, I'm waiting for Bolker Park to be upgraded forever. That neighborhood gets no love.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:35:47

We hope people feel that way. We hope people see what we're doing. It's always great if you have more time and you can go out and meet with the neighborhood and see what they want but for us it's really like...we have an opportunity to do it for much less than normal so you know and get the significant matching grant. So we're hoping that everybody's just happy to see a nice new playground because one of them is over 20 years old, one of them is 23 years old. Is it Miranda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:36:16

I believe it's Boker.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:36:18

Okay yeah that's what I would have guessed I thought I read it wrong but but um so you know it's going to be nice and new comparatively even if it's not even if you know there's little features that people would have preferred to see or things like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:36:30

I do apologize you are correct it is Miranda Park

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:36:32

Okay, yeah, I would have guessed Volker was the older but it's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed1:36:36

yeah, but Walker takes a lot of wear and

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:36:38

tear Do we have any public comments

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:36:44

we do have a public comment it's from Brian Schumacher. Oh

1:36 – 1:433 turns

PresenterBrian Schumacherour advocacy committee who each week reviProposedself-stated1:36:57

Hi, good evening Mayor McQueen, Lajon and council members. My name is Brian Schumacher and I'm the Advocacy and Community Impact Manager for Autism Society of Ventura County. I'm here tonight on behalf of our advocacy committee who each week review City Council agendas to make sure that people with disabilities have a voice in decisions that affect their lives.

We're here today to comment on Item 8, the proposed agreement with Great Western Recreation for playground replacement at Miranda and Bolker Parks. The proposal misses the mark on providing Port Hueneme children the opportunity for inclusive play. We understand this project is time sensitive but we encourage the council to take a brief pause, deny these plans as they are and come back with plans that include all Port Hueneme children Inclusivity, it isn't just about ramps or meeting minimum ADA requirements. It's about belonging for many children with disabilities and their families playgrounds can still be places of exclusion physically socially and emotionally as well Inclusive playgrounds change this. Inclusive playgrounds bring children together.

They support physical, emotional and social development. They teach empathy and understanding. Most importantly they send a clear message to families you belong here. While the proposed designs include some physical accessibility elements, they do not allow for a child in a wheelchair to play on the playground. The cover page on the consultant's proposal, page 5 shows a child playing in a way that Port Hueneme children will not be able to.

Option 1 has no accessible play elements and option 2 has only inclusive swings. When inclusive elements are present, playgrounds become safer, calmer and more welcoming for everyone. We respectfully encourage the City Council to decline these plans as submitted as they fail to reflect Port Hueneme's values of inclusion, access and community. Autism Society of Ventura County would welcome the opportunity to support the city in this effort as the project moves forward.

For more information about Autism Society of Ventura County and our advocacy committee, please contact us at advocacy at autismventura.org We thank you for your time and for your commitment to creating spaces where everyone belongs Thank

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:39:16

you Okay, so we have before us a recommendation to authorize the city manager to execute an agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney and Great Western Recreation LLC for the design furnishing installation of playground equipment from Miranda Park in Boca Park in the amount of $456,532 and authorized additional 5% contingency In the amount of $22,484 for a total not to exceed $479,016. May I have a motion and a second? Move to approve. Second.

Further discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:40:01

Yes. Do you mind if I speak to just the issue? Because it's obviously a priority for us and on Bubbling Springs, a project where we kind of had the luxury of time, we did make sure we went, made it inclusive in every way we could think of. I think just like right off the bat, I'll tell everybody the first conversation that we had internally was that we wanted to go to rubberized surface, which I think is a big part of it versus mulch right and then we got the quote back for that and That's when we started to talk about Okay, so the other alternative is closing the playgrounds right? Because the costs were... Even me with some experience in this I was thinking like it's maybe 50 grand 60 grand. It's not, it's six plus figures and you know and I think all of us have heard about playgrounds in other cities recently where cities have done playgrounds and they're over a million dollars now And so for us, we did that with Bubbling Springs and we had the luxury of having a lot of grant funding and everything for that.

And in this one it's just a different more difficult situation where it's not something we're trying to ignore and we would love to do the rubberized coating for a lot of reasons. For one thing, it's a lot easier to maintain for us and a lot less effort for us but the cost put it out of the realm of possibility for us And so it's not something we ignored or something we didn't care about, but that was just a budget reality for us.

When they're out there doing work that they're going to do some accessibility improvements, we made sure we were making sure that the swing set was accessible. I think there are a couple other things and so you know one of the things for us is, and for cities as a whole is that cities. We've talked about the ADA accessibility plan that we're working on. And just as a reminder, the background on that is that cities know that every city has things that are not fully accessible yet or has things that are not fully ADA compliant but the way things are set up is that like the government agencies and the court systems know That no city has the money to snap their fingers and become compliant in every way overnight.

And so, you know what? What the law is developed to is that cities have to put together plans and in a lot of cases they're 30 years 50 year plans They are not think like there are not plans that they're expecting to implement overnight Where it's gonna be You know, every project we do there should be improvements about accessibility but it's not going to be one fell swoop because we're talking hundreds of millions of dollars to you know to make the city fully, you know accessible and compliant so. So for us, we were looking at this is, we have a situation where the playgrounds are in Disrepair they are not being supported anymore by the vendors so we can't fix them anymore Safely, so our option is to try to Come up with something reasonably cost that we can afford that improves Safety but also you know addresses.

We're gonna try to address some Accessibility issues and make it better but it's not going to fix everything in one fell swoop And so I just wanted to explain that because it is something that we've talked about that is a priority and we try to build that into every project but sometimes it's steps to get to that point.

1:44 – 1:5123 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:44:03

So, I take it we have a contingency plan to make this compliant later?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:44:12

Well, it's compliant. It will be compliant. I think the question is, is it going to be, and I don't know that the phrase that's used is, is it the best level of accessibility and inclusiveness? And the answer to that It goes back to like the rubberized coating is like we aren't planning to put the rubberized coating in because we can't afford it right now So so there isn't a you know, it's always something that council can can in the future Identify, you know when we have the money as something that can be done. But right now That's not part of the plan.

It's not part of the what we're proposing and

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:44:56

So while I so appreciate the public comment and we I have pride in our council. We do our best to create inclusive policies, and I know Ashley Pope will attest to that but unfortunately sometimes our hands are tied. Our budgets are limited. We have a grant that's already expired It's not a perfect world. And unfortunately, the money would not allow us to pick what we wanted in the catalog. We had to go with whatever was unfortunately available. So while in a perfect world, you know, we would obviously make those choices to be completely inclusive and I'm hoping in the future that there is a possibility that it will come up, we will be able to add as our budget allows us to. But I still appreciate staff's time in doing what they can.

That was very conscientious of them to think about ways that we can and to do the best they can with the money available But that's my comment

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:45:57

Great. Thank you any other any other discussion items? No Okay, can we get a roll call vote please?

Roll-call vote Passed 3–0 · 1 under review
Show transcript
Councilmember Lopez? Yes. Councilmember Perez? Yes. Mayor McQueen-Lajon? Yes.
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:46:14

Okay, motion passes with councilmembers Hernandez and Goma absent.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:46:18

Great thank you. Okay

let's move to item number... Let's call them. Thank you for your report Ms. Basuah.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:46:37

Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:46:50

we're gonna move to item

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:46:52

number nine the city council liaison committee appointments for twenty twenty

PresenterLeticia Austin PublicPort of Hueneme so I'm pleased to share our strong support for the upcoming ColoProposedself-stated1:46:57

six.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:47:07

Staff, over to you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:47:10

Yes and so each year typically at our first meeting in January we discuss City Council Liaison Committee appointments for that year so we've put that on the agenda today to discuss The we have pulled up and you may see on the screen in front of you that where we were pulling up the current appointments are we're pulling up the list of appointments for the council to consider now I'm was this updated is it's the updated version or is this Okay, so this is the 2025 list of appointments but we brought this for the council to consider and update. And we have the committees listed in the agenda item which include Beacon California or CJPIA, The City Port Committee, The Clean Power Alliance Board of Directors, The Economic Development Collaborative The Federal Outreach and Advocacy Council, Gold Coast Transit, Port Hueneme Water Agency.

There's more than I remembered. Regional Defense Partnership, SCAG, Southern California Edison Advisory Committee, VCOG, BCAPCD, Ventura County Animal Services, Ventura County Transportation Commission and Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance, and then the Ventura Regional Sanitation District So we have appointments for each of those. And in the chart in front of you, we're showing who is currently appointed there and then it's up to the council to decide whether to make any changes or whether to leave the appointments and we're happy to answer any questions.

With that I'll turn it over to the council.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:49:07

Yeah, great. Thank you. I just want to make sure everybody understands that this agenda item is about representing the different committees so we're not going to be talking about the committees We're just gonna be assigning representatives for the committee And so for you all do you all want to start just from the top and just go down and as we go down? Approve I think it's gonna be difficult to approve as a whole unless We're able to do everything

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:49:38

yeah, I think Council's choice we could do. I think it makes sense. We could go one by one and We can either do one by one or if there is like a simple agreement We can fill it in and then have the council approve the full thing But I think you just okay It's gonna come down to if there's a consensus for each of them. So so it's it's up to counsel

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:49:58

Okay, so let's go ahead and start and then as a council we'll just decide how we want to go through the process. But let's go ahead and start with the first item listed. And so I guess two questions Mr. Gama are you interested in Ms. Hernandez? Are you interested in continuing to serve? In what capacity or is there someone else that is also interested? It's a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:23

question directed to me

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:50:25

You're you're currently

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:27

okay, are

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:50:27

you all interested or is there someone else interested as well? And if there isn't then we'll just kind of talk to you all about

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:50:33

yeah So, yeah I'm very comfortable with the Beach Erosion Authority for clean oceans and nourishments beacon. It's taken me seven years to say that correctly Currently on the vice chair in a you know, there's a lot of Seven years has been well spent on the committee. I think I'm subject matter Qualified to continue on so yeah interested in turning out and same thing with the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority It's a not too much of a commitment there is a drive down La Palma, but I'm interested in both continuing on in both those

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:51:13

okay Mayor Pro Tem I know there was a conversation you all were switching at one time or is this not that item?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:51:21

I would like to remain as the alternate. I do zoom into the meetings and keep abreast of what's being discussed, but this year RDP strategic committee has asked me to bring to them information from Beacon so they are going to be depending on We're going to be moving back and forth, right?

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:52 – 1:5737 turns

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:52:08

How about we go through, get our person in who are set and then at the end we'll just do a move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:15

Okay

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:52:16

all right that's fine

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:52:17

so I could I'll update the form as we go and then hopefully it goes if it goes smooth then we approve like the document

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:52:24

okay anyone interested outside of possibly Councilmember Lopez or CJPIA you're still interested in that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:52:34

Unless anyone wants to take it it's okay

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:52:40

Let's go to the next. City Port, I have some questions about this one so oh I'm sorry yeah I have some questions about this one. I just recently and I don't know if I'm the only one that didn't know but I always thought oh it says historically Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem right? But that is not the requirement. I thought it was the requirement am I the only one that thought that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:53:07

I had heard that too when I arrived, that it was always the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem from the City and then the Chair and Vice-Chair from the Port. But we were that came up in the joint committee this year that the port went in a different direction. And then when we were talking about it, it was said that yeah, it's not actually required to be the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tem or the Chair and Vice Chair. It just there's sort of always had been

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:53:34

okay

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:53:35

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:53:37

but then there's the however part is like and it came as a surprise to me as well because it's like hey Wait a minute. The port didn't alternate their new president and vice-president in and I thought oh that's odd

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:53:51

Okay, so let's go ahead and stick to the City of Port Hueneme. So the question that I have is as a body is it our intent that this be a process or are we going to move as the document states? I'll just say that that it can be two representatives

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:15

Well, my thought process is this. Laura do you want to take? Yes I do. Okay, I will come off.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:23

Okay, so you would be off anyway if we were going to follow that?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:29

Well that's

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:29

not

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:30

according to the rules and regs.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:31

Well well that's kind of why we're having the discussion.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:54:34

I think we should just follow precedent and make it mayor and mayor pro tem and if we want to get into a discussion on on why it should be mayor-mayor pro tem we can have that discussion.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:44

Well then that's gonna be the next item when we go to rules and regs. We can change it there. Right

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:54:51

Okay, we can we can change

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:54:53

No as

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:53

a body I just found out

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:54

I just said that I just found out that it was not but it's not the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:54:56

rule Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:54:57

okay so so we're talking about

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:54:58

the city port standing meeting and so I'm asking the body of

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:55:20

Is there any interest in making it to representatives? That's the question. If no one has a motion, then that's fine But this is a decision of the council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:55:29

so if I may I think where The difficulty comes is is that Should we not be aligned with the way the port operates on this and you know The role of a city council member is to unapologetically represent the interests of the city. And sometimes I feel like, you know, that the port have put their strongest representative of their interest forward and so I think rather than sticking to precedent then we should as a body decide What are the interests of the city worth fighting for and I think that's where we've we've kind of Had a little bit of an issue before is where you know The standing committee would come back and say this is what we decided so either, you know But we've already decided this is not to approve it. So maybe what we need to do is as a body know, decide what are our goals and objectives.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:56:41

I agree and I think that's more of the process that we need that whoever ends up being on the city port standing committee needs to go through to ensure that we are reflecting when we go to those meetings were reflecting the will of the council right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:56:55

And if we could Established the will of the council before we go into those meetings. So I would fully support this

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:57:05

Okay, so so do we want to continue to talk about this one or do we want to go on through the list?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:57:12

I think we already agreed that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:57:13

Back to this

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:57:14

Wait,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:57:17

but we already agreed I'm off and then Laura's in

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:57:21

Not necessarily. There's still some discussion sounds like happening Yeah

1:57 – 2:0319 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:57:27

So you all want to move on and then come back? Okay. Clean Power Alliance Board of Directors, that's Hernandez and Lopez. Is that something you all want to continue to serve on in the capacity that you currently are? Okay. Next is the economic development collaborative. I'm fine with continuing to alternate. And

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:57:52

you know, appreciate the work that Councilmember Lopez did on that when we saw the benefits of that today. That's nice.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:58:01

Okay, thank you. So the next one is Federal Outreach and Advisory Council. Perez? I have no idea.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction1:58:08

It's the advisory council that's connected to the defense communities. Okay

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role1:58:19

any interest in anything adjustments guys are good okay perfect. Gold Coast Transit District that's myself and Lopez, Councilman Lopez I'm willing to continue unless someone else wants to. Okay Port Hueneme Water Agency Myself Mayor Pro Tem and Councilmember Lopez. Does anybody want to switch that out? No,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:58:52

I don't but I do have a question on that How is it that we could have three council members on one committee? Mr. Attorney It just struck me right now, it's like oh.

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction1:59:05

Is that a committee or is that JPA? I'm afraid I don't know enough about the form of that but there are exceptions when it comes to other government agencies rather than being a subcommittee of this body.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:59:17

Yeah exactly. The answer is that it's its own agency that follows its own Brown Act process. So I think that one and the Housing Authority are the two that are similar agendized, you know, they agendize their own meetings and follow the Brown Act on their own. So essentially, you know if three council members got elected to a different you know impossible because residency requirements and all that but bear with me that if three council members got elected to another city in that city You would just be you would be meeting under. You know their agenda as that Brown Act body Yeah, it's not bad analogy, but yeah, but it's its own agency

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:00:03

Okay I'll double check it and send you all just a brief email. Just clarifying what that rule is and how it applies here,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:00:11

right? So because my train of thought is like oh so if I had a question for the water agency Do we have to go to the entire board or could I go to one council member and then? Expect that that council members gonna share that with the two other council members on actually they

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:00:26

can't This is where my you know, what once every couple month reminder that the Brown Act is not here to make our life easier So the you know The answer that is basically whoever's not on that Agency isn't gonna be able to ask the others other than in a notice public meeting Isn't going to be able to ask the others about what's going on in that agency. Are we able to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:00:50

attend the meetings?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:00:51

As a member of the public

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:00:53

I can't Okay, so we'll move on to the Port Hueneme Housing Authority.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:01:06

And so, there can be some adjustment to that or it's not because of the willow?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:01:12

We have the two members. Right now we have one vacancy and we have another member and so we are, we have advertised those two positions to be able to get new members. We haven't had anybody apply yet. So ultimately we expect to have adjustment to those two but not to any of the five council members. Okay. So nothing to change on this.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:01:35

Okay, the Regional Defense Partnership RDP Mayor Pro Temp is currently the alternate. I'm the primary. I almost got to pass this on to Jess last year and so is there anybody else who would like to serve? It's 7 30 a.m. Well it's 730 and I have at 830 and I have to leave early to go to that 830

CommentLoretta Ayers MontgomeryProposedself-stated2:02:05

I'm going

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:02:06

to go ahead and open it up for questions. Asked to serve on their strategic committee. So I'm not just an alternate but I Serve a role on the Strategic Committee, which is the same committee that wants me to bring information on dredging information from beacon and they and they They like me on the committee because my experience with the county and so it's You know, I'm serving as an alternate but I'm also serving in that capacity. And I've seen other cities only have one representative. We don't have to have two but it's nice to have two especially if you go to D.C., it's always good to work as a team.

I wouldn't mind going as primary if you wanted to do alternate.

2:03 – 2:0839 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:03:13

That was easy.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:03:22

And I can go to the Thursday meetings now, I wasn't able to go to the Thursday morning meetings before. Okay great.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:03:30

I'm slower at this than I thought I was going to be.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:03:38

The first Thursday of the, oh you know. First Thursday, let me check.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:03:43

DC Animal Services.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:03:49

Let's just

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:03:49

keep moving on. Okay, Skagg? That's you. You want to continue with that? Yes. That's just a general thing for meeting in May. For that one, okay. Next one is... SCAG as well, that's the advisory panel.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:04:10

It's a Southern California Edison panel.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:12

Oh I'm sorry, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. SCAG? Yeah. Southern California Edison. SCAG. Sure unless somebody else wants to. Does anybody else want to do that? Southern California Edison? No? Okay. VCOG?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:04:34

Yeah, I just joined that so I'm good. Unless, Jess?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:04:39

I'm good. Unless someone wants it. No?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:43

Okay. Interior Air Pollution Control District Advisory Committee. That's Mr. Gama. He's on there for... he's got another few years.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:04:56

Yeah.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:04:58

Four years, I think.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:04:59

It's very, these rules are complicated to say the least. And I'm trying to understand the rule but it is pretty technical and we don't meet that often so.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:16

Okay next one is the Ventura County Animal Services.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:05:21

I absolutely love that assignment. You're good with alternate?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:24

Mm-hmm.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:25

Mike

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:25

Mayer Okay, thank you. Ventura County Transportation Committee, VCTC, I would like to keep that. I'm gonna be chairing this come next month so I'd like to stay there.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:40

Is there an alternate to that?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:43

They don't have alternates.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:44

That must be another committee. Yeah they don't accept alternates there.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:05:49

The next one is the Regional Energy Alliance District. That's you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:55

Yeah they're making some reorganizational changes. I'm not sure what those are on they're trying to talk to board members right now to see because they don't end up canceling their meetings when they do schedule them so I'll hold onto it till now unless somebody else is interested in energy. I think they're just trying to find what works best for them and their staff I think what works best so far has been the meetings of the practitioners, the staff from all the various cities who are doing the work. Those seem to be the most productive and informative meetings, so maybe that's what they'll go to but I don't know yet.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:06:41

Okay VRSD, I'm on that and your alternate?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:06:48

Yes, I'd be willing to give up alternate if I'm taking the RDP one. And the RDP one by the way is going to conflict with SCAG meetings on Thursday mornings so we won't have any representation.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:05

Where is that? Where's the SCAG meeting? It's downtown LA. And that's like early morning?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:07:10

Yeah nine

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:10

o'clock. You can't zoom in?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:15

No

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:07:15

not to the regional.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:07:19

I have one question. The Western Business Alliance Committee

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:07:42

I thought Andy said that we would have a committee member from this council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:07:50

I believe it's a staff person. And the idea, if I remember right, because he and I had talked about it a couple weeks back is it's just a business advocate that if like a business has a problem and can't get like an approval needs from the city that they have somebody that they can call to like at the staff to help them work through the problem so I don't think it was a council member appointment but if if I talk to him in I'm wrong and there is one then we can bring that back

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:08:20

Yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:08:22

that's true. Let us know on Thursday for

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:08:24

sure. Okay so you changed RDP back?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:08:26

So I think I did if I got this right. We were on VRSD and we had a one ad hoc committee still the governance committee

2:08 – 2:1522 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:08:45

I guess I'll stay on that, but is it still out? I mean, I thought they were.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:08:51

Essentially right now they're inventorying. I think what the committee's doing is just doing the working committee stuff of inventorying all the items and I think literally they were out there like last week starting that, right? So I don't think we expect to have any governance. Like we don't have any... Okay. Did you want to just speak to it? Yes please. Trying to read signals.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:09:19

So at this point we probably anticipate very few remaining meetings of the ad hoc group and then hopefully later this year to return to council with a recommendation for the future whether or not there be a full-time committee or whether or not we dissolve the ad hoc group and move in a different direction. We'll probably have a meeting or two with the committee to talk about that before a formal recommendation comes to council but there really Would not be significant time commitment for this group Okay,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:09:54

great. Great with that said I could stay on since it's gonna be minimal if no one else is

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:10:02

Does it still have an alternate

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:10:04

Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:10:09

All right.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:10:10

So is that it? Is that it?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:10:11

I think that's it and the only sort of get back to it was the port, City Port Committee. I think we said we'd

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:10:19

go back to it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:10:25

Oh because we formed that after last year yeah so we would have the yeah although now that I'm thinking about it I guess like hmm For the Hueneme Housing Inc., I'm thinking, though it might be more complicated. We might need to look at that and get back because the council appointed council members Perez and Lopez. And I don't know that that's like now an ongoing appointment. I think you're appointed to do it and I don' think it's subject to be changed every year but I'm not sure.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:11:09

We'll look into it and get back to you guys.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:11:11

Yeah, so for now what we'll do is we'll plan because that was a recent appointment So unless there's an objection will add it to this list And we'll note that its council members Perez and Councilmember Lopez and then we'll follow up with everybody on if that's an appointment that needs to be reconsidered

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:11:33

So we don't have to go down to the AWA. That's kind of outside of our... Those are not

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:11:40

appointed by council,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:11:42

so yeah. Yeah, okay. And so the only one that we have is the city port I've already asked the question if we were gonna we wanted to move to selections or stay where we are it's a board decision if no one has a recommendation then there's no recommendation.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:12:10

I would recommend just leaving it as-is and the reason I say that because When a mayor and a mayor pro tem step into this position, they come in with some I think historically they've come in with some years of experience behind them. And when that doesn't happen then if we don't adequately share information from one leadership group to the next leadership group it inevitably causes issues for the new team going in, if they don't have a good record of what was decided in the previous meetings.

So that's kind of something I witnessed having been on the Port City Committee in 2019 and then 2020. 2021 things got started getting mixed up because we didn't have a process that Councilman Gama was speaking of earlier We didn't have a good mechanism for passing along information and sharing how decisions were made, and taking back information from the council to the committee. So I think that was the thinking at the time that when you appoint a mayor, mayor pro tem they've been on the council for awhile although that doesn't always happen.

My recommendation is that we just leave it as is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:43

I guess this might come up in our procedure manual, but my concern and my desire is for whoever is on that committee goes forth with the majority view of what our priorities are in our relationship with the port and I think that's where so again we would have to agendize, have a meeting and discuss what our priorities are and then hope that on the other side we could stick to agenda items You know, I mean, I'm not trying to say that we're loosey-goosey on an agenda items But what I am trying to say is that we as a body have to send their two representatives over there. I think mayor Lejean did a wonderful job of Drawing the line and saying well, I don't have authority for that right? So again, as we head down and discuss what our priorities are I think then we will have our priorities.

But just to send the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem over there without having that discussion is where

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:15:02

I think in previous years council was not sending our representatives with any direction at all and it's I wouldn't use the word authority but with direction on what Council wanted to To see happen. So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:19

so how do we

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:15:19

know direction because we weren't agendizing the discussion,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:15:23

right? So how do we How do we adjust that?

2:15 – 2:2016 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:15:29

Councilmember Perez and then

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:15:32

so I don't necessarily agree with why the Mayor put mayor put him were put in that because the last few years It's been pretty much a brand new mayor or mayor for Tim. They were newly elected So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:15:45

whatever

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:15:45

whoever is in this position

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:15:46

needs to be

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:15:53

One hundred percent aligned with the city and prioritizing what the city's needs. And Mayor did a great job last year, and I would like to see that momentum keep going the way she ended the year with prioritizing the City of Port Hueneme and what our Priorities are so whoever is in that space and and I think it is about authority. I mean you said it well You don't have the authority and this body has to agree Whatever that authority is given to those two individuals To go in and speak about and you did a great job sticking to that So, I just like to see that momentum continue with whoever's in that space

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:16:33

Yes, so You know, the reason why the committee exists is part of the agreement for CBF. And it's grown over the years to other things, right? So by the agreement It really is CBF. And to me, it's not very complicated what we go to those meetings prep for the alignment of what CAC recommended and what we approved. So to me it's... We are already doing those things so the alignment is there

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:17:26

If I can just note for information, the January meeting of the standing committee has been mutually agreed to be canceled because neither side had time to make their appointments yet. So there's no January meeting. It sounds like a lot of comments are Basically talking about maybe an item to give the council an opportunity to Provide direction to the committee. So one idea could be You know before the before the February meeting which there'd be time at the February 2nd Council meeting There could be an opportunity like an item for the council to discuss Direction and goals and all that kind of thing Okay

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:18:13

Mayor, I have one more comment. I think that's necessary because as Councilmember Jess Lopez said that it's supposed to be about the Community Benefit Fund but there are a lot of times you go there and there are other items on the agenda that weren't necessarily discussed here at this body like the agreement so we do need to kind of figure out how we want to do our meetings for the rest of year and how we want to give those people the authority to discuss anything further

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:18:39

I think since the city manager talked about an item on the agenda later we can ask these two questions and then we can go back to who's going to be on the committee and then we can have a discussion when it's on the agenda.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:18:59

So just today I was looking at, I didn't have time. I was taking my mom to a medical appointment so I didn't have time to watch the meeting but I did review the agenda for the port meeting today and on their agenda they were considering amending the settlement agreement and so you know for the seven years I've been up here we've been told you can't change it nothing could change that's the way it is and then suddenly I see on their agenda today that they're having a discussion to consider amending

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:19:29

This is where I got to refer to what the mayor said to start, because I should have said it. The reminder is this item is about the committee appointments but not about any issues with the underlying committee itself. But if we talked about having an item on February 2nd, okay So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:19:48

we could just defer this so I'll make can I make a motion to defer this item to the next meeting?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:19:53

No So you're saying because I think it's just a terminology are you saying basically To discuss the city port standing committee on February 2nd. Yes that so that would be an option that the council has

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:20:11

Is there, so he made a motion. Was that your motion? Did anyone have... Is there a second on that motion? I

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:20:22

have a question how we're doing the motion if the item isn't technically agendized yet?

2:20 – 2:2728 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:20:29

So I think maybe I misunderstood. What I had thought was essentially the motion was approve the rest of the appointments and have the city port standing committee as its own item on February 2nd so that the council, you know, and I had understood it would be so that the council could discuss goals and direction to the committee. But that motion could approve everything else and then have that on February 2nd.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:20:56

So my motion is inadequate, is what you're saying?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:20:58

Well that was how I understood it. The question to you is was that the motion or not?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:21:03

Your motion is your motion right and so you're asking that everything else be approved this item with the representation for the city port be deferred to the February 2nd that's what I mean if that's your motion that's a motion the question is is there a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:21:21

That's my motion

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:21:27

Second

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:21:27

If there's no second then the motion fails,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:21:35

okay, but she said I'm sorry Okay, is there any discussion

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:21:48

Well I guess I could make my comment. Yes, yeah go ahead. Okay because my comment is in line with it. We obviously have different experiences and perceptions on what the City Port Committee is supposed to be doing and what we're supposed to be talking about so I agree we do need to have that item agendized for discussion.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:22:12

It sounds like things are still up in the air. We're not ready to settle yet So yeah,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:22:15

I

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:22:15

think

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:22:16

it's early and I think I'm adding to what council pro tem Hernandez has said is that yeah we need to Have a chance to discuss amongst ourselves What our priorities are? and then majority Ways rules the day and then move forward with that

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:22:37

any other discussion if not madam clerk Please take roll Go right ahead you don't have to take roll all in favor aye

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:22:47

all opposed Hearing none motion passes unanimously.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:22:50

Okay, so that's the deferring of the city port Discussion discussion or representation so we can go now and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:22:59

I had understood that it was both

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:23:00

I was approving what the city manager had on the board and deferring on that one. That's the motion I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:23:08

heard.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:23:09

But bringing up a technical question, we don't set agenda items anymore like we used to so this is your agenda item you're putting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:23:19

on? The council can agree to an item. The other process we created is for if one council member wants to request

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:23:30

Okay, so

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:23:36

we have that and so

the next item is The review of the City Council policy and procedures manual and resolution approving an amendment and so over to staff

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:23:50

thank you and We've been trying to with We're trying to get into the habit, a good practice of updating some of our policies and procedures annually or at least reviewing them annually. Especially items where there's changes in state laws and things like that are just even changes in scheduling or how like the timing of when we do things. And so one of those items that we've started to do is an annual review of the council policy and procedures.

And so we've placed that item on this agenda for the council to consider adopting a updated manual, Council Policy and Procedures Manual. There's always the caveat of, but it's also on the agenda because ultimately the council policy and procedures manual is The council's document and so the council has the ability to identify if there are any significant changes that they'd like to make. But so, the ones that staff recommended that are generally fairly routine or for item one.

We had, the language previously had identified that the appointment of the mayor and the mayoral pro tem occurs at the first meeting in December even though in practice it had always occurred at the second regular meeting in December. So just was I think an error. And so we realized that and we updated the document to show what we actually, to reflect our current practice.

So we recommended changing that Obviously the council could decide that they want to, you know pick another date and stick to it But we recommended that because that's the date that we tend to use And then we also included that updated process for a council member to request an agenda item That we have discussed and that we've been using so that's also included in the manual We had said when we adopted that new process that we would include it in the updated manual. So it's here I We've added, this is a one of those changes in state law requirements as we added the Levine Act disclosure requirements into the manual so that they would be right in the Council Policy and Procedures Manual.

And then we removed the language that required written public comments to be read aloud because It wasn't a requirement. It was just always it was a practice that I think probably got put in during COVID is my guess and as we've come out of COVID and We've gone back to sort of the standard public comment process, we wanted the manual to be consistent so we edited that. You're

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:26:48

welcome Georgiana

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:26:51

Yeah, yeah, it's a lot. It was a lot of effort. Yeah So we added those four things into the manual again Just they were all basically things that you know what maybe we're errors or law changes and we recommended updating those and then again What we recommend adopting with those changes but also if the council does have any policy changes there They would like to discuss That would be appropriate at this time. So with that I will hand it back to City Council,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:27:22

I don't have any questions about the information but on the Portion that talked about the future agenda items It says the documents going to be attached is it going to be attached in the in this document?

2:27 – 2:3545 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:27:37

Yes. Okay. Regarding that as well, I think I wrote it. I wrote it initially as a standalone but we can attach it to the I think it makes sense to attach it

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:27:47

okay

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:27:48

maybe we should add since I and we were neither aware that it did not include group agenda requests

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:27:57

Let me see. There might be maybe like a phrase or two we can add to it of, maybe it's individual council member requests or something along those lines? We can...we can add something like that. I was trying to find it on the fly.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:28:15

It does say if a council member wants to put an item on the agenda. But I think what you're saying, it doesn't say council members as a body can put agenda items? Correct.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:27

So it does say to place an item on a future agenda, council members shall follow the process outlined below.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:28:33

Right so it's kind

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:34

of... Sorry just Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor your mics.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:28:43

So I think maybe simply enough, we can add individual council member agenda requests.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:28:52

That's probably the

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:28:53

simplest. For clarity sakes. OK. Council Member Lopez?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:28:57

So can we get into this? I have some recommendations. Sounds like it's time to get into it. All right. I'll kick it off. Page 8, chapter 3, paragraph C Bullet two, it talks about approximate five days prior to a meeting agenda packet presentation the city manager shall prepare a staff report for each meeting for future agenda items. Many cities actually can go up to two weeks and like we're getting these Thursday late or sometimes Friday morning is there a way we can change this to seven days?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:29:45

We're reading for your our agendas prepare

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:29:47

agenda

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:29:50

That's the staff has the ability to do so right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:29:52

does the staff have ability from going from five to seven days

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:29:55

Yeah, I think what was there was five to seven days. Is that you said

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:30:00

well it currently five days

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:01

Okay, so seven days out would be the Monday prior no,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:30:07

it would be Tuesday

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:09

Okay, why am I not finding? It's on page

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:30:14

8.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:15

I was on page 8. So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:30:18

it's item number 2, C2.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:31

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:30:33

the reason why I say that is you know a lot of some of these binders can be pretty thick and so if I get this Friday evening you know that's Friday Saturday. I would love to have this maybe Wednesday, Thursday so I can start doing the work.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:30:54

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:54

you're asking for her

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:30:56

to create our binders earlier?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:30:58

Yeah, I understand the request and obviously without talking to all of the department directors and everything is I think it's reasonable what I could say I would say that if the council wants to include that requirement, really it's council direction. It can be in the policy or not but we could add something that just says off the top of my head is never a good idea The city will strive to make the City Council agendas publicly available seven days prior to the Council meetings because it also is about a you know, public transparency thing and giving more time for that but uh where I was thrown off and I didn't want to make it complicated but this part of the Manual is about the Agenda requests, so it wouldn't be adding You know not that I'm trying to split hairs, but it's it wouldn't be adding in here I think you would just be adding somewhere into the policy into the manual That you know the city strives to release the agenda one week prior to the

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:32:20

Agenda released to the public earlier. Well, not not binder.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:32:25

I want my binders

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:32:26

he wants his binder. Yeah a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:27

day early And we I think we do both the same. We aim to do both at the same time. Yeah

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:32:33

they would have to both be released so if you get your binder the public has to get theirs, you have to get your information at the same time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:39

Another Brown Act requirement.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:32:41

So I mean City of Ventura there are two weeks out

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:32:44

yeah. Yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:32:48

but I think it's doable and there's one person in the room trying not to look at right now So, I would say let's go with that and then if we find out that if we talk to our department or you know our staff and everybody just says that's impossible then I'll come back and let everybody know but I think. I get I understand the request, and I will say that you know there's always There's also the public transparency benefit of making the information publicly available earlier, which is always something that is a good thing too.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:33:27

And I would imagine there's also... I don't know how often we get an agenda item that has recent updates. But seven days out, that means it's gonna wait until the next month. Yeah, yeah. There's some other things there's good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:33:47

there's good and bad.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:33:49

So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:33:50

I'm trying to follow with policy and get recognized before I speak. Yes. And I interrupt. I just wanted to weigh in on that idea of having the packets ready seven days before because I know it weighs on staff. I know it's hard on staff. That's the con you know that's a bad side of it and I wouldn't want to do that unless it's absolutely you know, necessary. But the other downside to it is that it doesn't allow us adequate time to ask questions if we have questions about the of staff reports, especially if there's a Friday off.

And we get into Monday and you're like pressure to answer questions before council meeting starts on that Monday so that's another downside but I'm more concerned about the impact on staff.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:34:48

And is seven days the number or do we need another day? Well,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:34:53

the reason and Mayor Pro Tem you bring up a valuable point is that there are times that I do ask questions and it's Friday. They don't get answered either till Monday morning or at when I'm here ready to attend the meeting and then we're discussing those answers so To me, they're important because they can stem more questions than I may have.

2:35 – 2:4011 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:35:33

Encourage us to submit questions so we don't do that gotcha thing on Monday night during council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:35:39

meeting avoiding unfair surprises

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:35:40

Yeah, so it kind of works against it when we Don't have the packet ready At an earlier time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:35:49

Yeah It's one of the things that caught my attention when When I first read the policy and procedures manual is a there was a trend like five years ago all the cities put in Avoid unfair surprises and everybody was trying to do it at the same time to try to really stop the gotcha questions But when they did that most cities also then did increase the time period for the packet going out It's sort of the trade right like okay, if you don't ask the gotcha questions. We'll get you the information early So we have time to have that conversation but when I read it here and I was like well yeah You know, we don't really get it to you as early as some of those cities but then yeah if you can't ask the question then you have a very short window. So I think again I think it's reasonable and if we try it for awhile and we just Find out that it just doesn't work with our staff size because you know, every city is different then we can come back and have that conversation but I think it's it's It's reasonable to try it and we can include that note and test it out Perfect

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:37:01

Did did you have something else? I do have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:03

nothing.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:37:03

You have a couple of things Can we go to government will come back with you could you have a couple of things?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:37:09

I think that this is a simple adjustment and I think that with the taking a step back and like, okay wait a minute. What are we really talking about here? We're talking about starting a process a couple days early with the goal to complete the agenda seven days out And so it's really not creating more work. Now, if you're a person that waits to the very last minute to do your homework and I'm not suggesting James you'd like that but then there would be a problem. But I think that this is a really healthy adjustment For staff and for the council to get it in seven days. Because if you're at a SCAG meeting down in L.A., it's Thursday, then you have an appointment the next day, and you have a doctor's appointment, then you get your agenda. Friday afternoon, now you have Saturday, Sunday and then Monday.

You gotta go to work. So I think it helps all of us but initially you're gonna have to make an adjustment in the way you're approaching it. And I think once that adjustment is made, I think this might work well because a couple of the organizations that I participate on they get their agendas out two weeks from now. I'm not suggesting that but I think seven days

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:38:34

So how do you want to handle this city manager with the suggestions you wanted we're giving you suggestions and everybody there's no Yeah, but you have a cup quite a few things you want to motion for every item or I don't think that's necessary You can just communicate with you. And if everybody if there's no, um, you know anybody that's opposed

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:38:58

yeah, if everybody if everybody agrees we'll kind of Work it into the agreement even if this is just sort of drafty language right now and then at the end Okay

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:39:11

Next, okay. Chapter six, section two. It is on page 25. Okay so section two... 25, so. Okay so I'm sorry the B. Okay so there's B2, staff photos. I'm going to recommend maybe adding bullet number three and this is, I was trying to find the best where to put this and it's, to me it's just hear me out. Hear me out. Okay, it's a restriction on community outreach during election periods. To avoid appearance of using city resources or sanctioned events for political advantage the City and individual council members shall refrain from initiating new non-essential community outreach programs town halls or city funded mass mailing within 90 days of municipal elections in which they are candidates To me, it's a no-brainer. This year 2025 we did one and I think it was April.

If we're only doing one that's fine this meets the requirement and to me it makes sense

2:40 – 2:4627 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:40:44

Okay,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:40:46

so adding a restriction on community outreach during election periods during the last 90 days of prior to an election. Do you want me to read the whole thing? Okay. All right, to avoid the appearance of using city resources or sanctioned events for political advantage, the city and individual council members shall refrain from initiating new non-essential community outreach program town halls or city funded mass mailing within 90 days of a municipal election in which they are candidates.

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:41:21

Can you give an example?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:41:23

So let's say 60 days prior to an election and we have the mayor, Mayor Pro Tem up for an election. And they're advocating the city manager to host a couple events that could look like a political advantage for them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:41:47

So like a coffee with the city event?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:41:49

But it takes a majority. So the mayor and the mayor pro tem can't do it without a majority.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:41:57

I think the concern would be because we do those periodically, right? So the concern would be the fear that like to a council member or two who are up for election would pressure staff into deciding to have an event that is really at least whether it really is or whether it gives the appearance of first

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:42:18

of all, that's inappropriate Pressuring staff we all agree on that. Yeah, of course, that's inappropriate right? Okay. So then the question is Pressuring the city manager No, but I mean we we deal with the city attorney and the city manager

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:42:38

is this specifically a Councilmember initiated outreach or a what if it's a City Manager initiated outreach

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:42:47

well depends like if say

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:42:49

Staffs

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:42:52

I think, I think I know what you're saying because you brought this up before. And so I think City Manager, you mentioned coffee with the city to be able to as if it's an event that I would generally go to or Mayor Pro Tempore would generally go to, to be able to go to that event that the city has put on and then I go and start talking about my campaign.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:43:18

That's inappropriate,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:43:19

yes. Is that kind of what you're...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:43:21

No.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:43:21

Okay so I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:43:22

don't

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:43:23

get it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:43:23

then. So think about this. This year 2025 we had one event. Coffee at Anna Cappuccino in April. One event. Now this is an election year 2026 now we're getting three requests near let's say we get one request in the last 90 days prior to an election. It just looks funny It looks funny to the optics are not good.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:43:52

I understand you, but those council members don't request that the city have

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:44:01

But we have I think the language proposed is basically asking the council to commit that We wouldn't be scheduling those events in the 90 days prior

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:44:11

unless it's an emergency

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:44:12

Yeah, if yeah and then that is the one caveat. I would give is you know If we had an emergency situation like a storm, we're having a town hall meeting It's not about politics You know what? We'll have for those conversations but I think I think the idea would just it's basically an ask for everybody to agree that In that, you know really in that election period that 90 days where the elections are going on signs are everywhere it's full speed ahead and that the council would agree that the city won't have unnecessary community outreach events in that period. And so what I'm hearing and understanding is, you know it's not saying we won't do community events but it's agreeing to like a period that they wouldn't happen. Last year we all talked about it and acknowledged that the second coffee with the city we did in 2024 You know, I can say it was legitimately because we had like it got postponed because people couldn't make it and everything else but it ended up being you know six weeks before the election.

And so I think the idea is basically asking everybody to agree that that 90-day period priors is a that we won't be holding those types of events.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:45:28

But doesn't the FPPC deal with this? Don't they have a 45 day restriction on things of that nature. For example, I've been going on the radio for 6-7 years talking about Hueneme Beach cleanup and the radio station at 45 days out then I can't go on. Facebook

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:45:49

does the same thing with advertising boosting like posts they won't allow you to for election like it's 45 days before

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:45:56

election And I'll just reiterate, I think because I kept hearing the phrase avoid the appearance of the use of city resources. So I think the idea would be you know it doesn't even it's not even necessarily that anybody is doing anything wrong. No, but it's basically a variance it because it might look like that and people might be saying you're just throwing Event for where you know, the incumbent can come Campaign and that's on I'm really

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:46:23

campaigning but being in front visible as a city representative and it could appear as It could appears that yeah

2:46 – 2:5217 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:46:34

What about volunteering at a city-sponsored event, specifically a city booth?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:46:51

It's the council's rules. But my understanding on this would be, I'm trying to think of some examples because it's like, I don't think we do anything like Beach Fest and those types of things aren't within 90 days of the election. So I was trying to think of if there is, let's say Beach Fest was within 90 days of the election, my assumption as the staff person would be well That's not, yeah that's not what's being impacted here because we're not gonna cancel a you know a general like an annual traditional community event because of an election. What about California Coastal Cleanup? I think the idea really is Again, it's a question for you all. But I think the idea was basically like the city won't schedule new community outreach events during the election.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:47:46

That was your language?

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:47:47

Yeah. Okay. I'm a little concerned about that and the reason that i'm a little concerned about that is that because the council members are running for election, I'm not sure why the city now has a responsibility to not do business because individuals are in a campaign. I'd never use any kind of resource, I just wouldn't do that but the idea that we're talking about it and possibly have city manager questioning whether he wants to have an event or not that he wants to have because we're in the 90 day campaign period. That's just my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:29

And I understand. I

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:48:31

understand him 100 percent. Yeah, like we have to as council members you know we have a responsibility and maybe the information in the procedures should be about the behavior of the council member not prohibiting the city for doing city business because they haven't done it before

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:48:51

I could see the concern from Councilmember Lopez's position is that, okay so you had coffee with the city manager and add a cappuccino and there is campaign signs in the window. So now I kind of get it because you know wait a minute you're having campaign you're having coffee with and then there's you know sign that says like this person you know so I don't think we need to restrict activities. I think we just need to pay attention, I don�t

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:49:28

know. I think it comes back to use of government resources use of city resources and we're all you know at the FPPC does rule on that I think there's a I'm going to go ahead and open it up for questions. Yeah, I'm just thinking of government resources like using an email a city email or using You know our picture on it on the dais next to City seal all those things in there. Yeah, that's in there already And and so taking advantage of an event to campaign is they use the city resources That's what I see

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:50:14

But you're not, but not everybody's invited to the coffee. No he changed

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:50:17

it the last one was just come visit your city comes come

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:50:20

meet your city it wasn't it wasn't specific

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:50:22

to mayor or anyone

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:50:38

We advertised The mayor is like the spokesperson for the city So it was coffee with City come meet the mayor, but it was open to everybody and everybody could attend. So Okay,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:50:50

so so

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:51:05

Restriction number three restriction on community outreach during election period To avoid the appearance of yeah, I didn't catch that you didn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:51:17

catch it Resources or sanctioned events for political advantage The city and individual council members shall refrain from initiating new non-essential community outreach programs town halls or city funded mass mailings within 90 days of municipal elections in which they are a candidate So, just we they're important. Community outreach by far is really important and I highly advocate them and I love attending and hearing what our residents are saying.

It's just in that little 90-day window if we had nothing scheduled do we even have anything on tap this year?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:52:01

No and that's what I was gonna say To the mayor's point, I think the mayor had said we don't want to impact city business. I was going to say the onus would be on us making sure we're planning around those 90 days and planning events for either before that period or after that period.

2:52 – 3:1025 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:52:23

It's all important, it's all important. So to me then this 90 day window is and we could even say 60 days I just say as we get deeper into the election that we should be cognizant of what we're doing. That's all I'm saying

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:52:38

I agree. Kind of some of the words, the meaning is kind of ambiguous just all the words together but I do think that that is important and so I'm all for it but I think if you work the words a little bit...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:52:56

Yeah and so we were just talking in I think City Attorney made a good suggestion which would be If there's a couple of things that we know we need to wordsmith then we can get the direction from the council and then We'll get the language and then we'll bring it back on consent at the next agenda So so will if there is a consensus, which I think I think there is but is

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:19

there any opposition to? Taking the thought and putting it into some words

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:53:25

And there's still the opportunity to approve it or modify or deny at the next meeting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:53:29

I don't think anybody could be opposed to using city resources during the election period. I think we all are very Yeah, yeah, we're all very aware that That is a heightened sensitive time but at the same time You know there's things that We like to do and we should be doing in the city

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:55

Councilmember Lopez did you have anything else?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:53:58

None.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:53:59

Okay, so you have the action to go forward? Okay perfect.

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:54:10

No, I was just going to suggest that Councilmember Lopez send us his language so that we can use that as a framework and words method. I have, I was going to comment earlier, I've seen rules like this before and it was implicit in what you said but we didn't really get there until he started talking and usually this has to, its not about restricting community events its about Restricting the highlighting of an individual council member for that event. So as you started to reference in your examples coffee with the mayor is Is a different thing than we're having a community event outreach event about this playground equipment at the park come on out and and discuss it and any of you are welcome to be there how And we can decide how yeah, we agendize those but

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:54:56

great Are there any

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:00

public comments There are no public comments, but if I may Mayor just mentioned as they bring back if we're going to move the agenda packet seven days forward that will adjust your requests for future agenda item timeline. So thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed2:55:20

So do you want me to put that on a future agenda item?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:55:24

No, no. I'm just saying that language will also come back so if you see then you know why.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:55:31

That's kind of like we started this with the four items that we had identified and that's kind of what We find is like we'll change one thing one year and will realize that the next year if we need to change two other places And

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:55:45

I have one too, which I did bring up to The city manager that I'll suggest come through on the next one and that's just on page 1 there's a statement in there that these rules and procedures can only be modified by a Supermajority four-fifths vote which would be contrary to law You can't hamstring a future council from changing their rules By a majority vote you could only do that through your charter if you wanted to do a charter amendment to make that the case but So I would recommend just deleting that line. Oh

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:56:18

Okay,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:19

thank

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction2:56:19

you.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:21

So we have before us recommendation to consider the attached policy or their policy and procedures manual and adopt the attached resolution approving the manual as modified may I have a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:56:35

See I don't think we need a motion not yet. Yeah, because I think we have direction that will bring back the item

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:43

Okay, got it.

CommentVolcker ParkProposed · by introduction2:56:45

We don't have the language for you to approve yeah,

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role2:56:48

okay got it got it great so with that so we'll Move on to No, no requests for future agenda items Then we'll move to the city manager comments and reports Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed2:57:02

You We have a couple of things we wanted to highlight. And so it's funny, it feels like a long time ago but it was just a couple weeks ago. As everybody is probably aware of by now, we had significant storms here in Port Hueneme and throughout Ventura County and some of the forecasts were concerning at different points where there was forecasts of several inches of rain coming down And so, we just wanted to take the opportunity following a series of storms to talk a little bit about that and talk about some of the questions we get is what do cities do when those types of things happen?

So these charts here show the significant level of rain that was being forecasted. I think at different points it was like, there were talks of six inches or even in excess of that which is significant. We also for us one of the things we have started to learn and concern for us is when it's the storms coupled with king tides, that's a time for us to be concerned And so, so we had a couple of those periods where we had to really monitor and watch for those issues. So, so we had that storm period and then we just wanted to take the opportunity to highlight that you know the city's When things go wrong, we tend to talk about what went wrong. But when things go right, we don't talk about it. And so we wanted to talk a little bit about what the city did to prepare for really an abnormal amount of rain I think at this point.

This chart here is taken from the Hueneme Pump Station measurements and That we are currently at 13.21 inches of rain, which is 90% of normal and that's only I think worth something like three months into the year so we're going to have an abnormal amount of rain this year pretty soon. We're going to exceed our normal annual levels. So what do we do when these things happen? The city prepares in advance for these storms.

Have our team start working to clear debris, check waterways, check storm drains, make sure that everything's flowing properly. And then I think one of the key areas that we've really focused on over the last couple years was really developing the partnership with the county. Obviously, the question we always get is are the channel Going down Channel Islands is that the cities are the counties and it's the counties, but we don't want to just tell people it's the counties. So it's not our problem so we're not worried about it because we do in fact worry about it.

We've really worked on developing that partnership where we have really gotten to the point of having contacts that we check-in with in advance of these storms Making sure that the counties, the channels are cleared and we have made our staff available to help when needed. And then also really making sure that we have somebody from the county like really on the line so that when we start to see an issue, we know who to contact. We can make sure that there's a response as needed. And then also just ahead of time making sure The forecast we're seeing because they do have the whole county to watch out for and checking with them and making sure that we talk about those concerns beforehand so that everything can be addressed as best as possible.

So, that's a major focus for us. And then also, you know, we always remind everybody there's what we're doing to prepare and then there's what our partners are doing to prepare. Then the third piece is what our residents should do to prepare it. So we've tried to put an emphasis on Thank you very much. I'm going to talk a little bit about what we're doing. A couple of situations where residents called us and told us that they thought that their drains look like they were backing up. So we went out and responded to those, so it is one of those things we tell people if you see something say something because we check them all. We continue to check them all but at any time in that storm when we're checking one or the other So, as I noted we had a significant amount of rain 13.21 inches by the end of that second storm in January and the good news is that we did not experience any major flooding or damages And so, generally, you know after all that, you know it's kind of one of those ones where everybody was like oh that wasn't a big deal but I think it wasn't a big deal because everybody was prepared and, you know, and put the effort into it.

So we wanted to I wanted to take the opportunity to thank the whole city team for their efforts on it, but also our Hueneme residents because like I said we were getting those calls. We were having people ask for sandbags and we're having people call us when they were seeing issues so it's that partnership to stay storm ready. And then, we wanted to circle back to this.

I think last year the council had asked for an opportunity to have an elected official emergency preparedness workshop or training and maybe more for the public than anybody else's. We wanted to confirm that the County Emergency Preparedness Director Patrick Maynard He did end up doing a countywide. He met with all council members, well he invited all council members and all elected officials from the throughout Ventura County to attend.

He had a series of trainings to be Brown Act compliant So he did those and the public may not know that we had those opportunities. So I know we had that training, and then we wanted to highlight one of the great things in that training was Patrick talked about the role of the staff as far as boots on the ground going out and clearing drains and responding, I'm going to start by saying thank you very much for the opportunity to be here.

Not by being the boots on the ground, typically, but by supporting the staff in their response by communicating clearly with a unified voice and making sure that. Consistent information and consistent embedded information is going out to the public. And serving as a bridge between the community and response agencies by relaying concerns to the emergency operations center, as needed, and asking questions and learning and preparing. I think in his training that was one of the keys that I took away from Patrick's training A lot of it is going to come down to preparedness and have we done enough to prepare? And are we getting the word out to prepare because once the storm hits if you weren't prepared, it's going to be hard to make up for that.

So so we had that series of trainings and like I said he actually provided it to or at least offered it up to every council member in Ventura County. So I think that was a great thing. We more and more I think we have really built the partnership with the County Office of Emergency Services. And so we're going to keep just working to strengthen that. So that's wrapping up the storms and you know I checked the weather this morning because I figured before I say that I better make sure we don't have another one coming in right now. Yeah, I don't see a storm so let's keep fingers crossed Also, another major thing that sort of wrapped up over the holidays was the mid-cycle dredging at Hueneme Beach.

As a reminder this was called the mid-cycle dredge because this was not a year that the dredge was supposed to occur but because last year received a there were issues in their delays and so we didn't receive all the sand that we had anticipated We were all able to collaborate the city, the port, the harbor district and elected officials, Congresswoman Brownlee, others. We all collaborated to partner to get the Army Corps of Engineers to come back for a mid-cycle dredging project and we're happy to report and hopefully you can tell just by the before and after photo it is A significant difference in that before photo was after last year's dredge, so it actually was even worse than that before. But you can see the difference between now with this mid-cycle and getting the amount of sand we were supposed to get, the difference it makes and that we actually have a full beach again.

And so we're happy to report that they estimate that it was one and a half million cubic yards, which the estimate beforehand was a million. So they actually exceeded that pretty significantly. So we're happy with that. We expect that the promenade will be cleared and reopened within the next week to 10 days. So they are completely wrapping up. I think I have maybe one more item. We just wanted to highlight there's the recreation and our volunteers at the museum are partnering to do the Sunday Funday, they started doing these last year so they put out their calendar for this year and so on that flyer to the right you can see the events scheduled this year and so we wanted to share that information with the public and note that registration is Now open and people can apply and register for those Sunday Funday events starting now.

And then last, looking ahead to the February 2nd agenda. We have two presentations scheduled World Wetlands Day and Black History Month proclamations. Consent we have a couple of items on consent but the major items are we have a public hearing for proposing amending the cap on number of cannabis businesses in the city That we had talked about when we did our cannabis review earlier, or last year.

And then for business items are legislative platform annual review. We're bringing back with there had been a request that we were working on bringing back to look at feasibility of a bike lane. And so we're going to come back with our analysis on that. And then we have an opportunity with our public works department to work on a grant proposal that actually could make an impact on really future planning for issues related to the channels. And so, we wanted to bring that grant proposal to the council to discuss at that meeting and then also we just added Today we you know tonight we added Was it one or two items to come back on February 2nd? I think it's the council policy and procedures that should be on consent.

And then the Oh the Port City Committee, that'll be on business items. I feel like maybe I'm missing one But so we'll get those on the list too. Those weren't on the list when we put this together So so a full agenda for February 2nd, sir, and that's all I have

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈16s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:10 – 3:179 turns

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:10:26

Great, thank you. We'll move on to a question if I may? Go ahead, go ahead.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:10:31

Yeah, go ahead. Yeah one item I think we discussed before the holidays was a presentation by David Marin on the state of the county, the Civic Alliance presentation. Is that still on your radar to bring to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed3:10:48

council? Yeah, I believe we've made the request and I think we're waiting on a date from them. Okay,

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:10:53

all right thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:10:59

I just wanted to make a comment with regards to rain preparation. With the amount of sycamore trees, the leaves when they start falling and the rain comes at an inappropriate time, I think the leaves are a real problem with drainage. And I think the city has done a pretty good job in trying to keep up on that And then what we've noticed out at the beach, at Hueneme Beach Cleanup over the last several years all these efforts have really made a huge difference in the amount of rubbish that's making it through the Ormond Lagoon, and I think it's really testament of government working well together.

But there's still some work to be done but compared to like eight years ago, it's a huge difference the amount Garbage coming through the flood control is far less than it used to be Although we did pull out a tractor tire Out of the lagoon this weekend, which was I don't know where this thing came from but it was huge so I think I think all the efforts that That we've initiated and started doing are really paying off. So

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:12:24

Any other questions If not, we'll move on to council member reports and comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed3:12:38

I did attend EDC, the Economic Development Collaborative last Thursday and we got a new Board Chair, Cynthia Herrera, Vice Chancellor of VCCD. She brings a wealth of knowledge onto that committee. And our outgoing chair was Bob Engler, T.O., Mayor Pro Tem. Did a phenomenal job this year so kudos to Bob. It's the only committee I went to. I did want to make a comment about MLK.

I was out of town and I didn't return until late yesterday But I'm here standing on the shoulders of all the advocates of civil rights movement. And I do have a favorite quote from Dr. King and darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. So let's continue to shine that light bright. Thank you

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction3:13:46

So I attended the Federal Outreach and Advisory Council, which is for defense communities, which is what we are. And there's just important things coming up like we're going to start talking about our housing policy for service members as a priority this year, legislative agenda developments supporting the Home Base Act, which is workers comp benefits for certain civilian employees who are overseas.

And also, we got an update on appropriations. So it looks like most agencies are expected to receive a full year of appropriations and defense funding is likely to increase above the president's initial request. Some positive things coming out of that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:14:28

Yeah, back in August I decided to start keeping track of numbers of the number of people that come out to clean Hueneme Beach. Surf rider, coastal keepers and I'm quite surprised as to where we're at now and so we set a goal to exceed 1,000 participants in six months and we are on track Achieve that goal with two Saturdays left. So if anybody wants to come out and join the fun every Saturday Early start 730 a.m We meet at the Alaska 261 Memorial regular start times 830 we quit at 10 regardless so yeah, we're gonna surpass 1,000 volunteers which is pretty awesome This morning I had the occasion to escort Supervisor Lopez over to the Ocean View Pavilion and the work that goes on at the Ocean View Pavilion is very quietly done and not too much notoriety with it, but what event, five days a week where the pavilion is opened up to adult disabled persons who get recreation and a lot of benefit from coming to the Ocean View Pavilion.

And so there's about 80 clients that come there and it was really fulfilling to see the work that, the unnoticed work that goes on five days a week there And it's really interesting because a lot of people are unaware of what they do there, and it's just quite amazing. So I was able to escort Supervisor Lopez and just observe and talk to the staff there and just get an idea of what's going on there.

Like awareness is always like really important and What George and his staff provide to our community is invaluable It really is because otherwise these adults would be staying at home and not getting exercise or recreation And you know, it's just a joy to watch what they do over there. They're just so caring and so great and then The Native American organization, my wife made me aware that the city was removing the reeds from Bubbling Springs Park and I guess that's called Thule. And the Chumash Museum in Thousand Oaks has a hard time getting hold of Thule So maybe we could do some outreach and see if they're interested in collecting the tule so that they could make artifacts and stuff that the Chumash used to use it for.

That's it, I'll be attending Beacon on Friday.

3:17 – 3:2311 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:17:32

So I've attended all my meetings, the first of the year kicked off with RDP Strategic Planning Group. We're saying goodbye to Gene Fisher and welcoming Terry Clark as the new Executive Director. VCOG is planning their agenda of meetings and presentations for the year. Clean Power Alliance is doing well. Let's see, I did attend the SCAG legislative committee meeting this morning and the main takeaway from there was prospects of a multi-million dollar funding for climate change coming up this year. So local governments will be eligible to apply for some of that funding. It could be in the billions but how it's coming from the state is beyond me with the state budget the way it is Yeah, so anyway that's something to keep on our radar when that money becomes available.

I also took advantage of an invite to attend the Immigrant Services Stakeholders Meeting which is hosted by the City of Oxnard at the Oxnard Library and they talk about the impact of the immigration raids that have been occurring throughout the Central Coast. And one of the key takeaways, I won't go over all The items they discussed, but one of the key takeaways that I'd like to share with the rest of you here is they're telling people to be aware of the social media that is inaccurate especially with AI out there. Just always trust but verify, test things out make sure you know the source of where some of this information is coming from because people are playing with AI and doing a lot of things that are misleading. And they're misleading both police and immigrant service groups, people who are out there to help.

So it's really important that we pay attention to that and let people know if something's not correct. Some of the food distribution service sites are allowing neighbors to pick up food for their neighbors and their families who are afraid to come out Animal control is assisting people with pets who are self-deporting. They're doing a really great job and they've received over 200 animals just over the past month. So they are definitely in need of foster homes.

And let's see, I think that's pretty much it. I'll be tuning into the Beacon meeting on Friday and continuing with my meetings as planned. Oh, I did attend the Savvy Seniors on Thursday night. It was a lot of fun. And I have to say it was very entertaining

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:20:23

Okay We talked about MLK that was

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:20:24

a great event yesterday great turnout and I was happy to see Councilmember gamma and council member

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:20:47

Hernandez there, I was looking for you but I didn't see you. But that's okay. My husband

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction3:20:52

and

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:20:53

I

CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction3:20:53

spent the day at Universal Studios. Oh wonderful!

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:20:57

Yeah so did that. I transitioned out of the chair for the air pollution control district. I'm glad to let y'all have allowed me to continue. There was a lot of work we did this past year that we need to continue. So excited about that. Mayor Pro Tempte mentioned that Gene Fisher, the Executive Director of RDP transitioned out after 25 years. He's retiring and I want to thank Madam Clerk for the proclamation that will be taken to his event along with the certificates for the Military Appreciation Dinner this Friday.

I will be participating in the City Selection Committee on Friday morning at 7.30, and then I have another schedule to volunteer with many mansions. So looking forward to that. I'm looking forward to that and I think that's what I have in the horizon coming up. Been attending my meetings, usually my meetings are generally the first two weeks of a month and so looking forward to having another week or so off before I have to go back. But anyway, that's all that I have. Was there anything else?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentFiduciary ExpertsProposed · by introduction3:22:27

Yes, I forgot to mention I'd like to thank the Port of Hueneme. We did a bulker park, a bulker community food distribution. The Lions Club asked the Port to partner with us, and we fed over 200 families. So that was very successful. Hoping to do more of those throughout the year. And yes my passes got blackout day so we go when we can. And yesterday was clear.

Great.

UnidentifiedMayorProposed · by role3:22:54

Anything else? What kind of soup are you? I'm a tomato soup. It's comfort food, it looks very simple but it's really complex with the flavors. You can add a lot of stuff to it. You dip some bread in there your favorite sandwich. Okay so next regular meeting is scheduled for Monday February 2nd at 630. We will adjourn tonight's meeting the time is now 950

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:23:21

Can I tell you what makes tomato soup even better?