BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 March 16, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:04 – 1:3510 turns

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role4:27

Session portion of the regular council meeting today is March the 16th. I'll call this meeting to order, the time is now 5.01. Madam Clerk please take roll.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:39

Councilmember Lopez? Here. Councilmember Perez? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Here. Mayor McQueen-Lachon? Here and let the record reflect that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:48

council member

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role4:49

Gomez

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed4:49

absent great

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role4:51

we'll now take public comments for items not on the agenda for closed session sorry

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role5:00

no public comments for closed session

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role5:02

Great. Thank you Mr. Attorney city attorney, will you please read the item into the record?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed5:10

Certainly we will be going into closed session this evening on two matters pursuant to government code section five four nine five six point nine subsection B related to anticipated litigation The first of these matters involves facts and circumstances involving a request from the Oxnard Harbor District To amend an existing settlement agreement that stems from prior litigation between the parties. Council meet in closed session to discuss the impacts of the proposed revision and any potential future litigation issues that may arise related to that subject matter.

In addition, we'll be going into closed session on a second item With regard to a threat of litigation that we received based on a claim made by an attorney that represents Chief Michael Federico seeking reimbursement for additional attorneys fees related to two settled cases that are entitled Federico versus Hernandez and Hernandez versus Federico respectively. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez will be recusing herself from this item

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role6:18

Great, thank you. Any other conflicts of interest to disclose? If not we will recess into closed session the time is now 5.03. Well, good evening everyone and welcome to the regular scheduled council meeting. Today is March 16th. We will call this meeting to order at 632 and we will let's see yes we will take roll

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈6s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:35:42

Did you want to do the flag salute first? Yes. Pardon me? Councilmember Gama? Here. Councilmember Lopez? Here. Councilmember Perez? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Here and Mayor McQueen-Lejeune.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:35:58

Great thank you we'll move to the flag

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:35:59

salute.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:36:07

After me, ready begin. Okay, now we will move to the inspiration by Council Member Perez.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:36:37

Thank you. So about two years ago I created Alliance Club in the city which was focused on community service and just helping out where there's need and I want just want to give an update this club is small of about 30 members but we've been doing a lot of things in this community Some of them, we spent about $7500 just in this year alone in supporting local organizations. Some of those being FoodShare, Nate's Place, EO Green, The Night to Remember, Port Hueneme Little League, Real Guppies, Reach, Hueneme High School,

1:37 – 1:4414 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:37:12

Bulker Community Food Drive Teacher of the Month, Ocean View Pavilion, Read Across America and United Parents. Those are just some of the organizations we have worked hard to support and we have many more on the list to do so but I just want my inspiration is for all the people that volunteer. We're a 100% volunteer club and we have a lot of hours that we devote to the community and that's just my inspiration for today is volunteers.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:37:40

Great, thank you Councilmember Perez. All right we're now going to move to Mr. City Manager for our closed session report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:37:49

I believe that's gonna come to me Madam Mayor.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:37:51

Thank you. Oh city attorney I'm sorry. It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:37:53

okay yeah we have no final reportable actions from tonight's closed session.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:37:59

Great thank you. We'll now move to public comments for items not pertaining to our agenda items. Madam Clerk do we have any public comments?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:38:08

Yes, we have some public comments here. First up is Luis Mendez

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed1:38:18

Thank you, good evening everybody. Mayor, Mayor Pro Tempte, council members and residents and staff. First of all thank you Misty for the inspiration I am also aligned with the Port Hueneme Lions Club and it is about volunteers and I want to say a special thank you to mayor Martha McQueen Lejean for volunteering to be a guest judge at our student speaker contest last week so we appreciate your support that you've given our club The second reason I'm here is just to provide a brief update on the Ventura County Area Agency on Aging. I know I talked about it last time, about the status of the services that were being transferred to the state out of the Ventura County budget At the last Ventura County Board of Supervisors meeting, they did stop the transfer of services.

It is something temporary. They did stop it for this year but they are still going to debate whether they will be funding the programs through their general fund for the next fiscal year coming So I still think it's important. I know some of you guys, I did email and you did respond back to me. Still working with other outside agencies that kind of potentially fill in some of the gaps for the seniors living in Port Hueneme for when those services actually do go away. So it has been canceled for now but with the financial status being uncertain in Montero County with federal funding That is something I'm looking forward to potentially working with you guys and other Stakeholders in our community to help the elderly residents in Port Hueneme.

So right now we are okay But making plans for the future, so thank you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:39:53

Victoria Solomon

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed1:40:00

Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members. Thank you guys for being here. I have been parking off of Bolker Drive for the last few months and I have been seeing all the work that's been going into that park and I appreciate how much work has gone into that park. The disability friendly swings have been really nice to see people swinging on those and enjoying them But parking along that area has been really tough. I know that the parking in the city of Hueneme is really difficult just because there's not a lot of it and with more housing going up, I know there's going to be less and less parking available to the residents.

So I want to ask you guys to help us not get ticketed. Nobody likes to get a ticket on their car. And I understand the California Daylighting Law does allow for Tickets to be given even though there isn't any signage or painted curbs in that area But sometimes, you know if you're parked there because there's literally no other parking in the area and instead of Coming out and going out for lunch and seeing that there's now a ticket on your car cuz he parked in the only spot available last night If that curb painting could be done or even stop signs placed along those cul-de-sacs where you can kind of gauge where that 25 feet is or However, it's written into the code. I think that would be really helpful to have the residents not have an animosity towards code enforcement My husband is a police officer actually out in Philadelphia It's really hard living so far apart But I know that community policing is really really important for that policing community because the better Engagement that you have with the community the more Buy-in that you have that people want to Thank you for your comment.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:42:00

Did you have any?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed1:42:01

City Manager. Yeah, can I just ask Victoria if you have information on that if you would send it to our city clerk's email address and then she can share with us and we could take a look at it.

CommentAnn HojaProposedself-stated1:42:13

Good evening everybody. I don't know if everybody knows me but I'm Ann Hoja. I'm the regional librarian from Ventura County and I'm home based out of the Ray Prudhoe Library. Well, I don't know if you've seen it but the last few Monday mornings And all through the afternoon we've been having a new program, it's called Workforce on Wheels and Workforce Development Agency, it's a very large trailer and in it is a full employment office. It has faxing for computer work. They do resume works. They help you do job searching. They help you learn how to do a resume and how to go for a job interview. And there is always a bilingual speaker. on the trailer every time they come.

It's really an amazing program and if anybody wants to come see it, it's pretty...it's going to be very nice. They also are going to be holding meetings, I mean sessions at the Solis Library. They're also reaching out to different areas. There's one up in St. Paul over a day-a-weekday visit but we're the one place that it's weekly right now So I have lots of flyers that I can leave for you.

And also we are starting to work with Goodwill and Ventura County Department I want to call it by the old name in the last county I worked for, but also the unemployment and employment services that the county does for us. There's another one called NextGen which is for 14-23 year olds that we're going to be starting to work with. And then also Goodwill will be bringing people on site where I can help teach them job skills and realistic jobs that they can do at very basic entry levels. And when I heard Area Agency on Aging, I used to do that at my other library where we taught the seniors job skills using computers. So we're going to do all that.

We're finding that young people don't have any kind of business awareness. They don't know how to read paragraphs, they don't know how to write a resume or write even in basic language that would be useful for business so we're trying to do all these skills. So just let you know and I have lots of little handouts if anybody wants them later on. Thank you so much and next time I come out tell you about all our programs that we're doing at the library too. Thank you and have a very good evening.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:44:49

Great thank you.

1:44 – 2:0317 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:44:53

Greg Ross. Zach Believa you'll be after.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:45:05

Good evening. Greg Ross, Madam Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, esteemed council members thank you for listening. Resident for 56 years in Ventura County many years in Port Hueneme I always say this but it has to be said this City Council is much more reactive than any place I've ever lived when I ask or someone asks for something This council reacts, and usually they do it in such a way that it's really good for the community. So thank you for that.

So I'm here with two things, and I have to speak quickly because it's two things instead of one normally. You should have a packet in front of you, and I'd like you to not ignore for the moment the first page. The last three pages are about lithium-ion battery fires. Now I'll give the port a lot of credit. They're trying to be green, they're doing a good job at it actually but and they're taking really close care of these lithium-ion batteries that they're storing there because they're not just on the railroads that come off the electric vehicles, they're on the cranes, they are going to be on the trucks, they are offloading Huge batteries from other ports.

And it's a danger to our community, because guess where the wind blows? Carpentry of Malibu 95% of the time. So 10-20 thousand people are in harm's way if there is a fire. What's in the toxic gases? Hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen cyanide Cobalt nickel I could go carbon monoxide could go on. It's really dangerous people will die So we need a amber alert type system That no one has to sign up for that We all our phones are gonna light up if there's a problem, so please think about that now Running short of time my first page talks about What it's like to live for three weeks and in Ventura, where we live.

These are the things that happen to us and it involves noise, pollution, and I've played this for you before but I can do it again. They tell me that this is an actual in-service training. Well guess where the training happens? It happens right on the wall on the east side of the port That training is obnoxious and it happens once a week. And it's terrible, the noise is terrible.

So here we go. That's what we hear once a week. That's just wrong. They don't like us over there. The port doesn't like us. Thank you so much. Thanks for listening.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:48:15

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed1:48:15

you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:48:17

Zach Boliba?

PresenterZach Boliva I'mCommunications Public Information Officer at the Port and just here to share a cProposedself-stated1:48:27

Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, members of the council. As mentioned my name is Zach Boliva I'm the Director of Communications Public Information Officer at the Port and just here to share a couple small items that hope will be helpful for informational purposes The first is that our parking garage environmental impact report with the Oxnard Harbor District Is at the beginning stages It was recently introduced to the public at our last board meeting to ensure transparent communication and invite feedback We're always open for comments but wanted to highlight that the project is starting the EIR process and will then be available for public review in the summer of 2026 with the final EIR adoption anticipated for December of 2026.

And just secondly, to clarify discussions had at the last City Council meeting a Port City Standing Committee between the Oxnard Harbor District and the city of Port Hueneme was originally established in March of 2007 The settlement agreement of 2015 established a committee to vote on CBF projects But should not be confused with the original committee named Port Development Review Advisory Committee of the OHD and Harbor Ad Hoc Committee Of the city of Port Hueneme. It was established to meet monthly and maximize communication and work together and for convenience I've left copies of that original document with your clerk tonight. Thank you

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:49:41

Thank You

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:49:44

Mitch Disney

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed1:49:53

Good evening everyone. Mitch Disney, I am a homeowner since 1991 in the city of Port Hueneme. Over the past several decades the port of Hueneme, the port has continuously strived to increase its cargo volume despite its relatively small size. In fact the port has increased cargo volume by 80% over levels just 10 years earlier And now recently the port has announced plans to build a three-to-six story, 7500 space parking structure on its premises allowing the port to roughly double the thousands of automobiles currently offloaded each year.

As the port devises new ways to increase its cargo volume, we can expect an increase in associated impacts on the city and its residents. The port is an important commercial facility to the county and state but it's location within our city means virtually every bit of its cargo must be processed within our city and also be transported, whether by truck, by rail or in the case of much automobile cargo, by the driving of each and every car over our public streets.

Street maintenance costs are borne by taxpayers and with more vehicles using city roadways there is increased wear and tear and traffic congestion Also as cargo volume increases, industrial activity within the port itself increases including more diesel powered vessel activity, forklifts, loaders, countless trips of on-site diesel truck movement. Not to mention the off site movement of those trucks all of which increase particulate air pollution and noise also all of which affects city residents.

Increased traffic activity on our city streets also increases the demand for city services like police and other emergency responders. Is the city taking all necessary steps to ensure that these existing infrastructure costs and indirect external impacts from the port are going to be paid by the port itself rather than by city residents? The port is an impressive economic engine with broad benefits for the city, the county, the state and even the greater western U.S., but residents here within the City of Port Hueneme who most bear the brunt should not be made to indirectly subsidize the port's activities.

On behalf of all city residents, I ask that you all please take all necessary steps to assess and evaluate all impacts of the port both direct and indirect on the city and its residents. And take all appropriate measures to protect the taxpaying citizens of the City of Port Hueneme from unfairly footing the bill for the port's impacts to our town. Have a good evening!

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:52:56

That concludes public comment. Great, thank you. We are going to move on to our agenda approval. May I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:53:07

Move to approve.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:53:08

Second. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:53:10

All in favor?

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:53:11

Aye. All opposed?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:53:13

Hearing none, motion passes unanimously.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role1:53:16

Thank you. Does any member of council have any conflict of interest related to any of the agenda items? We're going to move on to our presentation, the 211 Ventura County 2025 Stats and Service Update for Port Hueneme. For tonight's presentation we have Mr. Gerardo Gonzalez from the Community Information Associate Director from 2-1-1 Interference Ventura County.

Thank you for coming over to you.

CommentGerardo GonzalezProposedself-stated1:53:47

Good evening Mayor, Council Members and City Manager. Thank you for having me here today. I'm Gerardo Gonzalez the Community Information Associate Director with Interface 211 and I'd like to update you on the ways that 211 has been assisting Port Hueneme residents over this past year For those who may be unfamiliar with our services, 211 operates under Interface Children and Family Services. We serve as a countywide information and referral hub linking residents to more than 2,000 health and human service resources throughout the region.

Last year, in 2025, we received over 18,000 calls and texts countywide while our website welcomed more than 25,000 visitors. Each of these interactions represents someone finding their way to the services that they need and a path forward. In 2026, we celebrated over 20 years of providing 2-1-1 services to the community. 2-1-1 represents just one part of Interface's comprehensive mission.

Interface runs 30 distinct programs across six different departments, domestic violence and child abuse prevention, human trafficking prevention and intervention, justice services, mental health and trauma treatment, and youth crisis and homeless services. This broader network allows us to do more than just simply refer. We can frequently link callers directly to other interface programs to suit their situations.

211 stands as the county's most extensive information and referral resource for residents seeking help. Our team assists callers in locating and accessing the services that they require, from housing to food programs, mental health support to legal aid. We're available 24-7 every day of the year understanding that urgent needs don't wait for convenient hours.

Accessibility is core to our mission. Residents can connect with us in three simple methods and that's by calling 2-1-1, texting your zip code 2898211 or visiting our website at 211ventura.org Regardless of how someone makes contact they'll be connected to one of our trained community information navigators Now I'd like to share some specific data about how we served Port Hueneme callers in 2025. So, we took a total of 538 calls from Port Hueneme residents throughout the year.

I'd like to provide some context around this number. Many Port Hueneme residents contacted us multiple times throughout the year, meaning that the 538 calls came from fewer than 538 unique individuals. I believe that this pattern actually demonstrates something positive. It shows that residents view 211 as a reliable resource that they can return to as their needs evolve.

A single caller may reach out first seeking housing options and then give us A few weeks later seeking rent payment assistance and perhaps a third time when they need food assistance. Since we gather demographic details from each call to track community needs and trends, you're seeing the total call volume here rather than a headcount of distinct individuals who called us from Port Hueneme.

Breaking down who we served, 202 represented first-time callers to 211. 52 were families with young children under the age of five. Eight callers reported the person in need was pregnant. 41 calls pertained to someone at risk of losing their housing and 64 calls were from someone already experiencing homelessness. These numbers give us a snapshot of the challenges facing some of our Port Hueneme neighbors, particularly around housing stability.

Each call represents someone working through challenging circumstances. Let me tell you about one. Several months back we heard from a Port Hueneme resident, I'll call her Anna. Her landlord notified her he was selling the property she'd been renting for over 14 years giving her only 30 days to relocate. As a single mother with two children ages 8 and 13, she faced a daunting task finding a new place meant coming up with first month's rent and the security deposit money she really didn't have saved When Anna contacted 2-1-1 our navigator recognized she needed more than just apartment listings Our team connected her to programs offering moving assistance Help her understand her tenant rights regarding the notice period and linked her with food pantries So she could preserve the limited funds for housing costs We also ensured she knew about our free taxpayer tax preparation through our Vita program Since every dollar counts when you're trying to come up with a deposit When housing becomes unstable, families need comprehensive support across multiple fronts.

Not just a new address but help stretching their resources, understanding their options and accessing community programs that can ease the financial pressure. This is why 211 is here. So looking at the primary needs, Port Hueneme callers expressed through 2-1-1 calls. Housing claimed the top spot which is a pattern that we see countywide that's not unique to Port Hueneme at all.

Second came individual family and community support encompassing services like the Area Agency on Aging which was one of the top referrals that we provided as well as case management and services like holiday gifts and toys. Third was food and meals, reflecting the basic needs some families struggle to meet. These patterns tell us that some Port Hueneme residents are confronting housing challenges while simultaneously needing broader family support systems and help putting food on their table.

This comparison shows Port Hueneme alongside other county cities in terms of 2-1-1 calls. Housing needs dominate across every community, so no surprise there. Clearly a countywide struggle again not unique to Port Hueneme. What sets Port Hueneme apart is how food and meals ranks as your third highest need, while cities like Oxnard see income support in that spot and Thousand Oaks sees mental health services. So it's fair to say that a significant number of our Port Hueneme callers are specifically calling about access to food And lastly, beyond linking residents to existing resources we offer several specialized programs delivering direct services over the phone through VITA.

Our volunteer income tax assistance program we offer appointments to no-tax preparation for income eligible community members helping them claim their maximum refunds and accessing Tax credits that they're entitled to. Our PSPS initiative supports our access and functional needs population in advance of public safety power shutoffs via care coordination case management, and delivers real-time help during actual shutoffs covering things like lodging, meals, transportation, a portable backup battery all at zero cost to residents. And this is in partnership with Southern California Edison. This program is specifically for high fire risk areas.

Port Hueneme isn't necessarily an area that's impacted, but we are commonly active, for example in cities like Ventura, Thousand Oaks, Newberry Park, Simi Valley, Moore Park, et cetera. Ventura vs. Hate assists those who've experienced hate incidents in filing reports and accessing the appropriate services that they need. Through ECM, our Enhanced Care Management Program, our team delivers comprehensive case management to Gold Coast Health Plan members helping them address both basic needs and health needs through coordinated care all at no cost These initiatives allow us to offer hands-on support to some of our most vulnerable residents and completely over the phone.

I appreciate your time this evening and thank you for your continued support of the work that we do here in Port Hueneme. Should you or anyone you know require assistance, you can reach us by calling 211, texting your zip code to 898211, or visiting our website. Thank you so much.

2:03 – 2:1320 turns

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:03:19

Great, thank you. Are you open to taking any questions if anybody has anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:03:25

Appreciate the information, Gerardo. Good stuff. 2-1-1 always provides good information to our residents. My question is what was the common denominator with nearly 300 calls for housing? What did 2-11 see?

CommentGerardo GonzalezProposedself-stated2:03:45

So the primary need around housing is low income subsidized rental housing and that's about 60% of the calls. And then the other 40% were related to emergency housing, so either someone who was at risk and they're calling because it's kind of imminent, they'll become homeless. We support them in hopefully preventing that from happening, and then also exploring the options if it does. And then we have those that are literally homeless and then we're supporting... So we are actually also members in the continuum of care here in the county so we're part of HMIS. So anybody that calls who is already literally homeless according to HUD definition, then we can actually complete an intake over the phone 24-7 that will put him in line to be able to access Housing services through the county Appreciate it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:04:36

Thank you.

CommentGerardo GonzalezProposedself-stated2:04:36

You're welcome

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:04:37

great. Thank you anyone else If not, thank you so much for it for your thank you Okay, we're gonna now move to the consent calendar Well, we will take all items will be enacted in one motion unless someone would like to pull an item But before we get there do we have any public comments for our consent calendar? I

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:01

No public comments for consent.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:05:04

Great, thank you. All right any items to be pulled from the consent calendar? If not is there a motion and a second to approve? Move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:05:16

Second.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:05:18

Great Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:19

All in favor?

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:05:20

Aye.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:05:21

All opposed? Hearing none motion passes unanimously.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:05:25

Great thank you Okay, so we're going to move on to our public hearing which is item number eleven. This is major modification permit number PHMA 25-1 to plan development permit number PD 303 Anacapa View Beach Homes plan development regarding a 206 square foot second story addition to the existing single-family resident and exterior modifications including replacement of the roof deck and railing, the garage door And the wood siding with HOA-approved materials and colors located at 294 Whitecap Court, Port Hueneme, California within the Anacapa View Beach Homes Plan Development. Madam Clerk do you have proof of publication as required by law and a complete file of reports and exhibits?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:06:21

Yes Madam Mayor.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:06:23

Great, will staff please present the report? Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:06:25

and Mayor yeah before we hand it over I just want to take one moment to introduce the council to our new Community Development Director you'll notice when we wrote the report we had our interim Community Development Director and we thank Kim Pearlhart for all her help here as our interim over the last six months But I'm happy to announce today that joining Jose, who will be presenting on this project and has been working on this project.

But Tricia Meyer is our new Community Development Director. And I'll just note quickly that Ms. Meyer worked for the County of Ventura for many years spending the past 18 years as a manager with the county in the, as the Planning Manager for the planning program section So we're very excited to have her skills and her knowledge coming here to Port Hueneme, and I wanted to give Tricia just a moment to introduce herself.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:07:35

I'm very pleased to serve as your Community Development Director for your community and I look forward to supporting the council goals, as well as working with the city manager and the executive leadership team here in helping move forward projects that are important to your community. So thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:07:54

And then with that well, we also thank Jose for his work during this period and I'm gonna hand it off to Jose who has been really working on this project to present on this permit

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:08:07

Hi. Good evening all so before you today is going to be planned our poor way need me major modification 25-1 This project is known as 294 white cap court. I So the project location is to be located at 294 Whitecap Court. This is within the Anacapa Beach Homes Plan Development, originally entitled as PHPD 303 and it's zoned Single Family R1 Plan Development. As you can see on the left-hand side this is joined in with Surfside 1 to the bottom there along with Anacapa View Condos and Seaview Street to the north.

To the right you'll see the layout of the existing home. A little bit of background, so as I mentioned previously this plan development was originally approved in 1975 since then there's been ongoing modifications since 2020 and 2022 to really update the architectural standards colors and materials of the site Modification review from the planning's perspective always ensures that any application that comes before us is really consistent with the community design standards and approved plan development.

And so, with that we do note that there is going to be changes in architectural design, different sort of fashions come and go, and so that sort of provides a little bit of flexibility for the owners there through these modifications. There is a main item here before us, which is why it came in through a major modification. And that is that the municipal code requires that any deviation of 10% for increases of floor area are subject to this major modification. That's why this is before you for consideration tonight.

So now to the applicant's request, it's to add a 206 square foot second story addition to serve as main living area. This is going to be built on top of the existing roof deck and this would constitute a 17% increase in internal floor area. As part of this project, it'll have other major components that are allowed based on our current rules And the former mentioned deviations from the approved modifications to the plan development. And this includes a replacement of existing deck and railing, replacement of garage door and wood siding.

All of these components have been approved already by the HOA and that was approved back on September 23rd 2025. The applicant's request can be seen down below. On the left-hand side, you'll see the existing footprint area. You'll note that there is a deck on top of the garage and so what will happen now is that some of that area will now become part of that 206 square foot second addition. So it will kind of lever over some of the area there onto the actual garage.

The existing garage is 405 square feet and so the full build-out area will be fully within the gross floor envelope area that exists currently of the home footprint. The additional slides sort of tie everything in together. As I mentioned previously, the materials and the sort of deviation of colors and materials that you see here have been approved in 2020 and 2022 through their own subject major modifications before council at the time.

And so with this, the deck remodel calls for it to be replaced and be more modern by having 42-inch glass, some stainless steel railing, and painted raw iron to match. You'll also notice that there's going to be new hardy plank siding that will be installed there. That material is a little bit better for the coastal areas and the maintenance is severely reduced as opposed to having traditional wood.

The wall finishes, this kind of goes a little bit deeper into the hardy plank lap siding. The applicant decided to go ahead and go with that smooth finish. This diagram that you see here comes from the previously mentioned modifications to the plan development. And then here are the color schemes. The site currently has that pure white that's there, that will remain and that's the main stucco finish of the home but to update it, it'll have a morning fog hardy plank color and that's right there in the middle of the screen.

The garage door will also be upgraded, and it'll feature more of a modern door. And this would again be consistent with the windows that exist on site and the HOA approval of styles that can be selected from. The CEQA exemption for this is a class one. This project is exempt as it is only a minor alteration to the existing developed site, there will be no expansion of use or the footprint build area.

Fiscal impact, there is none. Strategic plan consistencies, there's two. Levels of service for residents and businesses and promote operational excellence in all city functions and embody best practices as municipality. With that, the recommendation is to go ahead and adopt a resolution that conditionally approves major modification PHMA 25-1 and to find the project to be categorically exempt from CEQA.

This will conclude staff's presentation but the applicant and owner of the property Ms. Nancy Cole will be having a couple of words about the project.

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:14 – 2:2223 turns

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:14:02

Good evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:14:04

Thank you so much, Council, for giving me the opportunity to chat about the addition. And thank you, Jose, for all your work that you did coordinating the public hearing and all of this presentation and also Erin Knight who works with the city as a contract employee and she's been very helpful too. So I really appreciate that. You know in Port Hueneme there are no review restrictions in law And, but I want to be mindful of that because people love the ocean and obviously it's Anacapa View Beach Home so we want to preserve views. So this project is just extending out the living room about 10 feet. It's not going to affect anybody's view of the ocean in my neighborhood and there's condos behind me and it won't affect their view either.

I want to tell you, I'm from the Midwest and this is my dream. Sorry to get emotional but this is my

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed2:15:01

dream to have a house out here and I feel quite lucky that I found Port Hueneme a couple years ago when I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed2:15:08

had the opportunity to buy this house and I'm just thrilled to be part of this community. I don't live here full-time, I go back and forth but it's just a joy for me to come back here and I think it's a wonderful small community and I really think it's special so I'm happy too if this adds any value to anybody else's house you know I'm happy to add that too I do understand that construction can be very much an inconvenience to neighbors, and my contractor is a local licensed contractor. And he will be very mindful of the inconveniences of that and try to minimize that as much as he can for my neighbors.

So really, I want to thank you again for your review and just for being... This is...I went to a meeting a month ago, a council meeting, and I don't know. You guys do a really nice job. Thank you.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:16:01

Great, thank you. And wonderful to hear that you love it here. So are there any questions for staff? Any questions at all? Yes,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:12

so some of the public comments talk about some things, inconsistencies with the HOA review process and I was wondering if you reached out to the HOA if you followed up on any of these issues, any discussion was had regarding for instance How one property was approved for a certain extent versus another property was not. Was there any follow up with HOA regarding this?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:16:38

So I spoke with the applicant regarding the last minute comments that were submitted. And I did review the file again, making sure that we did receive the proper HOA approval letter and we did as far as the process that goes on within the HOA related to the other matters as to why one was approved and was not. That was not discussed since that wasn't before us today.

To my knowledge there hasn't been any planning entitlements that were submitted for the other cases so the city can...I can't comment on those.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:17:08

Okay, is the HOA representative here by chance?

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:17:20

My name is Tony Montanaro. I'm the chair of the Architectural Review Committee I'm not sure what you're asking here but We reviewed the plans and talked to all the people involved. We got letters, approval, email approval from the one homeowner on the right. The other homeowner was actually part of the HOA review committee so he recused himself. So two out of three, we okayed it. And the other homeowner sent me an email that approved the...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:18:05

So then I'm confused why some of the public comments we got said that you did not follow protocol requiring neighbor's approval and the approval of the Architectural Review Committee

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:18:16

if- That's not true. I don't know what to tell ya. That's absolutely not true.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:18:21

Okay and then I don't know if you've, well some of the comments were one individual wanted to extend their living room. They got approval they only allowed to go five feet but this specific proposal is being allowed ten feet there's just some issues with

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:18:40

yeah. If i could jump in because I think So we received some comments from different neighbors and I think maybe one way to say it with all due respect to everybody is, we don't have any background on how their situation was any different or if it was completely different blocking views or what have you. As far as the city goes, our determination essentially amongst our code requirements one of our requirements is that we have the HOA's approval and we have the HOA's approval. We can't really speculate or comment on why other people may have not gotten HOA approval but I think just confirming that the HOA has approved it then our recommendation is to proceed It's no judgment or anything and the people making their comments, we don't know anything about that.

And so what's before the council is approving this project that the HOA has approved?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:19:39

Understood I just wanted to get some clarification as to some of the comments that were being made like they didn't get the neighbor approval when obviously it appears that they did. So I just wanted to follow up in regards to those questions.

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:19:52

I actually have a copy of the email that was...I sent out an email On September 22nd, and I'll read it for you. It says here is a revised application for Nancy Cole for her proposed addition. I believe she has addressed all questions that you and the Rifkins have had from the first proposal. Gail and I, Gail is the other member of the Architectural Committee have approved of this application. If you have any concerns please let me know. I will be sending this to Shereen who was the CPM property manager.

On September 25th I received an email from the Leversons saying I approve as well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:20:44

That was mainly just my curiosity as to why yeah, but thank you for answering the questions

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:20:48

great. Great Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:20:50

Did you have a question?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:20:51

I'm pretty familiar with the neighborhood and I think from my perspective of the view I have I believe this unit has a very very Long driveway is that correct? Yeah.

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:21:04

Yes both of them do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:21:07

Right, and I think that would account for any variations with others because some of the driveways are extremely short but this one is my recollection is correct it's very long and deep. And so I just wanted to ask that question. The question I have is that long driveway probably aided to the functionality of this project?

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:21:32

Well actually, you know like most of the concern with our people in the Anacapa View Beach Homes is view. And that's our main concern so to make everybody happy we want to make sure that nobody's view is blocked And we're talking the ocean view, we're not talking about looking at the street. We're not talking about looking at your neighbor's house or whatever. We'r e talking about the view of the ocean and that's how we kind of base a lot of our decisions on.

We didn't find any problem with the obstruction of the view at all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:22:15

So I guess my question is so that long driveway may be part of the reasons why others say if someone had a smaller driveway they may not gain approval.

2:22 – 2:2818 turns

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:22:29

Well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:22:30

from the HOA committee?

CommentTony MontanaroProposedself-stated2:22:32

Yeah, most of the houses do have very, very small driveways. This is a really unusual situation with the long driveway. Right,

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:22:40

okay. Okay, great. Any other questions? Great, thank you. So we'll now open the public hearing. The time is now 720. Are there any public comments regarding this item?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:22:53

Yes, we have two in-person public comments but like City Manager Vega said we did receive two written comments for this item which have been provided to the council beforehand and a copy is in the front should any of you wish to see it.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:23:06

Okay so those are the only comments? No one's in the room? Yes.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:23:09

Perfect.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:23:11

So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:23:12

first Christy Leverson

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed2:23:20

Christy Leverson, my mother purchased this home in 1978. We've been there for over 40 years, 45 plus years and I wanted to note that Tony's approval that I had on the email that said I approved, that was last year of 2025 and then the HOA bylaws you have to move forward within 90 days of requesting any kind of addition And that was a real red flag to us because as we started to look at everything, we started to realize that I was only allowed—my mother was five feet out. This particular home has a breezeway that is between the garage and the home.

So we were only allowed to go out five feet from there. And I was happy with, and I'm good with her coming out five feet but as we looked at this more and more we realized we didn't know about the materials. Now this evening was a very informative look at everything in overview. We have the color, we have lots of things that really cleared up a lot of issues.

But our driveway, and we're really set back so my mother when she purchases home She got that lot for a reason. She paid a premium price for it, and she has a really long driveway. In fact I let all the neighbors use my driveway because sometimes there's no parking around and you're kind of limited. So all I'm asking for is consideration that I would like to have the home go out five feet. I'm fine with that to go with existing materials If you look at our home, it blends in like you would never know that that five feet came out.

That's what I want to appreciate your time and thought on this. Thank you. Thank

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:25:09

you Greg Ross

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:25:22

Good evening again I serve on the board of the Homeowners Association at Anacapa View. Greg Ross, I work with Tony Montanaro who's also on the board. I'm gonna boil this down to two things real simple one is in our community it's a cliche but it's all about the view. It's all about the view and it's not about the view down the street it's about the view and the ocean So that's one, and the second thing is we've got homes that are worth a fair amount of money. They're not like two, three, four million but they're worth a fair amount of money and we want our property values to increase because it's good for everybody so if we can get a home that's going to have a higher valuation It only helps all the others in our community. It's a small community, it's only 84 homes.

So those are my two comments. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:29

There are no more in-person comments? Great thank you.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:26:35

Okay so public input has concluded I will now close the public hearing the time is now 724 We have before us a recommendation to adopt the resolution approving a major modification number PHMA 25-1 294 Whitecap Court, Cap Court Major Modification Project and find that the project to be categorically exempt from CEQA and take additional such additional related action that may be desirable.

May I have a motion and a second? Move to approve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:27:12

Second

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:27:13

Okay. Is there discussion? Any discussion?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:27:22

Yeah, I did want to comment on the five-foot difference between the neighbor's home and the proposed project You know I because we don't have any background staff doesn't have any real background on that five foot difference. You know I I have to vote in favor with the staff's recommendation so that's that's kind of my feeling about it. So just wanted to share that

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:27:56

anyone else. Any other discussion. Okay, if there's no discussion we're going to go ahead and take roll.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Council Member Gama? Yes. Council Member Lopez? Yes. Council Member Perez? Yes Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Yes And Mayor McQueen-Lejeune? Yes

2:28 – 2:4017 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:20

Motion passes unanimously

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:28:22

Great, thank you. Let's see so I will call to order the special joint meeting of the City Council and the Housing Authority we will now recess the city council regular meeting and call to order the City Council and Housing Authority special joint meeting it is now 726 Madam Clerk will you take roll?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:44

Council members and housing authority members Gamma

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed2:28:48

here

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:48

Lopez? Here. Perez? Here. Mayor Pro Tem and Vice Chair Hernandez? Yes. And Mayor and Chair McQueen-Lajon?

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:28:57

Here.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:59

Let the record reflect that Housing Authority member Brown is absent.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:29:03

Great, thank you.

We'll move to item number 12 fiscal year FY 2025 26 midyear budget update will staff please present the report

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:29:15

Yes, and I'm gonna hand it off and introduce our finance director Ashley Shaparo to take lead but I just wanted to give a brief introduction. Primarily just to note that generally for a budget of our size roughly 29 million dollars A mid-year budget review that has only minimal changes of a few hundred thousand dollars with revenues and expenses both matching and remaining balanced is a good mid-year budget, and a relatively uneventful mid-year budget.

So I just wanted to note because the last couple years we had had significant changes and significant discussion about about changes that the hope is as we sort of fine-tune the budget and really get our hands around all of the revenues and the expenditures, that they should be less eventful moving into the future. And I think this was a good step in that direction.

But with that, I will introduce Ashley to walk us through the midyear budget update and the recommended changes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:30:31

Thank you. Good evening thank you for your time we'll go over the current FY 26 mid-year budget updates The midyear budget review is good financial practice as it provides an opportunity for both council and departments to pause midway through the year and review spending to date. It gives us a chance to make necessary adjustments based on our current cost estimates on both the revenue and expense side that will help us making our make a framework for the development of next year's budget which you know we will be approaching you with a review of that in the coming months.

As a reminder, the original adopted budget for this current fiscal year was passed and presented to you all in June of 2025. What we do is we collect six months' worth of data, produce some reports, provide them to departments and work through it with them that way we can make sure every department's needs are met to reach their set goals by the end of the fiscal year upcoming June 2026 As we go through it, you'll see that this year's mid-year adjustment mostly accounts for and provides an update for a few technical adjustments, net zero adjustments between expenditure accounts. If you look through that very long attachment A was a lot of just shifting between operational accounts for departments between supply accounts and their contracts but there we will highlight here just a few of the major changes as well as CIP schedule revision.

The good news is we are on target to meet our larger revenue budget goals such as property tax and sales tax And all departments are continuing to work within their budgets so at this time, we are requesting a net zero change to the general fund and We'll go over the general fund first Here's a small summary chart of the revised changes we're recommending. And so again, back in June what we passed is that first column there.

Our current revised budget includes that adopted revenue of 27.8 million and expenditures of 29 million because we did adopt a balanced budget aside from the use of our CIP reserve. Those projects will be funded from the reserve And then that's that column one. Column two shows where we're at to date now, because as you know throughout the year we do come to asking for appropriations for specific items that weren't previously budgeted as well as we have a rollover of any purchase orders that we did not end up completing by the end of the prior fiscal year and so that does adjust our budget midway throughout the year.

So that brings us to that 28.2 figure For the general fund right now, as I mentioned we are requesting a net zero appropriation because we are asking for the $376,000 revenue adjustment to the positive. As well as appropriating $376,000 in operating expenses. So because there will be no change to fund balance from the adopted budget let me get you a summary of what makes up this $300,000 request for appropriation.

Upon review with Departments of Actual Performance and Updated Needs, staff proposed changes are mostly made of net zero between accounts but these are the major adjustments to more accurately represent revenues and expenditures throughout the rest of the fiscal year. Here on the revenue side, the largest adjustments are the one reduction to local cannabis industry revenues.

This is to reflect a continued decrease we're seeing due to the economic uncertainty and challenges that we did bring forth with the passing of this adopted budget. We are seeing a continued decline so I did want to revise this figure closer to actual. At adoption, we did mention we could be back multiple times. And fortunately this is the one reduction that we are presenting at this time. We don't have to do so with our larger revenue sources. Our property and sales taxes are on trend as I previously mentioned but with cannabis, we are at about 480,000 to January.

It's really hard to nail that figure. As you know, we do present payment plans from time to time when cannabis businesses come and ask us for that We do have our annual audits with them and the businesses, and sometimes we find that they did overpay us throughout the year. And then sometimes we see that the opposite, that they underpaid us throughout the year. So this budget is one we're going to continue to bring to you all as we continue to collect better data on the trend.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:35:23

Actually, can I just add right there to that? Just big picture. So the cannabis revenue had peaked at $4 million a year and this year as part of the budget we were trying to be realistic so we reduced it to 1 million and it's I think coming in at close to 900 thousand. So just as an example and just you know when if you're asking you know didn't we know that cannabis revenue was going to drop why didn't we make that adjustment We made a significant adjustment and made significant reductions because of that, and it's actually still coming in less than what we thought. So that's something that we'll continue to give updates on and bring items about into the future.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:36:03

Thank you. One question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:36:06

Sure. On cannabis, so when you state revenue is that what's come in or what has come in and what is owed?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:36:18

That's what's come in through January.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:36:20

Okay, thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:36:23

This year this decrease of cannabis revenue was offset by an appropriation of one-time funds so we did get our storm reimbursements and Payout from insurance. We also have some cost recovery for property remediations, a reimbursement for city staff time and permits as well as vehicle damage reimbursements from insurance. You'll see there one-time large project that did raise our permit revenue, citation revenue and so all these one-time revenues that we're appropriating are able to cover this reduction in cannabis and able to cover The expenditure appropriations that we're going to be reviewing in the next slide.

And so here are the expenditures. So summary of key expenditure changes, as you know with adopted budget when we did come to you all to do our best to present a balanced budget staff did make a lot of reductions to their department budgets they made so responsibly at a level in which they felt they'd be able to continue to operate continue to meet service levels and goals set by council for the year So at the midway point of the fiscal year, staff have been really diligent in managing their expenditures to date and that's why our request for appropriations is this small. People have been working really hard and I'd like to thank departments at this time for really monitoring their budgets and doing all they can to remain efficient.

The first appropriation item is our largest one. It is for police patrol overtime. This is caused by a current vacancies within the department. We have three vacancies that are HR and Police Department are really working on getting filled in a timely manner as well as to retirements. We also have quite a few grants that we have our department has been diligent about seeking them out which do cause more overtime as well but they are fully reimbursable which we can review in the next slide We have an increase to credit card fees because we did reach out to council somewhat recently to pass through to customers, but that is taking a little bit longer time to implement with our new financial software and get everything set up online. So we do have to continue to cover those a little more long, a little few more months than we anticipated when we made the budget so we are asking for an increase there.

We're asking for an increase to fleet divisions, external vehicle maintenance budget because we do have an increase in outsourcing of repairs as some of our staff have been on leave. The department does its best to try to do as much internally and as cost effective as possible but we did get a request at this time. We have an increase for police support overtime, which is dispatch related overtime in relation to the amount of time it takes to cover trainings for new and ongoing staff as well as general coverage for use of leave.

We are requesting a new PD evidence freezer. There's, it's aged equipment time to replace it we do have state mandates that we have to retain evidence for certain period of time and obviously make sure that one freezer does not go out on us before we can replace it so we're trying to stick ahead of that schedule We have some other miscellaneous personnel benefit and wage increases and movements to adjust because of retirements or increases to benefits.

And so these are our larger appropriation requests at this time. The good news is quite a few of these are one-time expenses, so it's always good when we are asking you to appropriate as I mentioned the storm, some of those insurance payouts. It's one for one. We're getting one-time revenue in that we really can't count on annually moving forward and then we're asking you to appropriate for one-time expenses here as well. So that's always nice when that lines up.

Let's see here. All of the requests that are listed in that long attachment A that we're asking for you at this time are movements between accounts with net zero impact. As a reminder, we've made many reductions from prior years and we're going to continue to try to right-size our best, continue to review with departments and make sure that our budgets are aligning with our needs.

2:40 – 2:5022 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:40:52

So the police patrol overtime caused by three vacancies, is that $180,000 in addition to what is the current budget?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:41:02

Correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:41:03

So from 630 plus 180 in overtime?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:41:07

Correct, that's what we're asking at this time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:41:10

And there's a few reasons and the next slide will speak to it too. But the other point on a couple of these that are related to staffing, just keep in mind that if we have an employee leave, we can't we don't necessarily reduce their ongoing salary budgets. You know, the regular salary because you still have You know, you still plan to fill that position or like this notes to you with like when an employee is on leave. You still potentially, you know, you don't control when the person comes off leave or any of that type stuff so you still have that position but there may be savings there but we don't, you can't like plan for it or you can't take the money from there. So you give the overtime so that we can fill the spots when we need But it may ultimately be sort of balanced out by the reduced costs of salaries.

And Ashley can probably explain that better or tell me if I messed it up, but it's an accounting

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:42:13

issue. So the grants in addition to the grants and that's on top of the 630 plus 180 plus the grant over time so what's that total sum?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:42:28

This 180 accounts for some of that grant overtime.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:42:31

So it's not in addition to?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:42:33

It's in addition to the original $600,000 figure that's budgeted now. It'll be 180 on top of that some of which is grant overtime but I do have free on the next slide those grant figures as well as some historical data that I do think will put this a little bit more into perspective

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:42:51

Yeah, I think there's a couple of questions up here. So just let me make sure that it's clear as mud in my head. So while we're not changing the budget as it relates to these three vacancies and the retirements, the $180,000 is addition to the budget but in those positions where you have three vacancies and possibly two retirements whatever that time is That funding is not being used, but you have to keep that funding there because they are positions and you don't want to move that. So at the end of the year there may be the shifting to where the $180,000 has not increased the budget it may be under because those spots are vacant.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:43:32

It may be yes and this is our best guess with the overtime we know we've already committed to at this point in time because of grants, because of these vacancies When it comes to that vacancy. And you can ask the department heads, I say don't look at it. Don't look at vacancy savings. Let's not bank on that as money that we can use for something else because every time there is a retirement, we have to pay out their annual leave banks.

Every time there is a new person filling that vacancy, I don't know where in the range we're going to get. Are we going to get an officer who has 10 plus years experience? That chief is really going to want and it's definitely more expensive than the person who vacated the position and I only budgeted At the prior person's range for the year. So because of all these unknowns I really try to be conservative when it comes to budgeting for wages cuz I don't want us to be short Great Thank You

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role2:44:26

councilmember gamma and then mayor pro

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:44:28

tem

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:44:28

and then on the topic of being conservative so when it comes to appropriations for police overtime There is a lag per se to get reimbursed on that overtime, right? So at some point maybe at the conclusion of the budget year we'll see an appropriation for possibly $180,000 to cover whatever grant overtime was generated. Is that correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:44:51

When we come to you all asking if you would approve us applying for or receiving this grant money, at that time is when we do budget for the incoming revenue for that grant and an estimate of the overtime for that grant. Sometimes they reach out to us and say, we have more funds left on the table. This other city didn't end up getting this task done for us or this project done for us. So we will come back and review how much we need for the grant portion of the overtime as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:45:23

Right and then one question the city manager and perhaps you as a so when there's vacancies what we're Realizing here. Is that public safety continues to be our top priority? And we're staffing to provide the needed patrolling and Police, yeah services to protect our community and that's a good thing correct,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:45:45

right? Okay And, you know, subject to future budget discussions and future budget decisions about what is the appropriate levels where we're staffing to the current level of service. I wanted to just note on the overtime issue and I lost it. I'll give an example. I was trying to think of the example about what Ashley was talking about, and one of the grants that we were able to partner with sheriffs on this year was the Retail Theft Task Force grant And so that's an example where when we first agreed to it, they had offered up essentially we have this funding that we could contribute if you guys are willing to assist with Retail Theft Task Force. So we accepted that and then they were trying to get partnership from all the cities and some cities in our county were struggling to have enough officers.

I'm going to go ahead and open it up for questions. There's more available because some cities couldn't take it. So now then that's part of what we're coming back to say, you know That's now essentially an option for the city and it's just You know, the challenge is I know like people don't like to hear over time but if you can get another agency to pay for more officers on your city streets, and it's not impacting your general fund, I think there's a There's a conversation or at least a like a need for us to bring that to the council and have that conversation so And so Ashley's next slide shows some of those

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:47:47

grants I think you did answer one of my questions regarding the retirement. So we don't we really just have three vacancies Not five.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:48:00

I believe it's five

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:48:01

It's because of the retirements. So we have five vacancies.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:48:07

I believe it's actually four and then one frozen position, technically. Yes. And so generally when we have 20 to 22 officers that's not an insignificant amount of vacant positions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:48:28

Great. Sorry about that. Thank you. Go right ahead. We wanted to list out the grants we've been referring to as a reminder. These are the three approved grants that have overtime funding specifically, and the total is just over $200,000 that will be reimbursed for overtime hours for this current fiscal year by June 30th. What I wanted to present by this historical actual here at the bottom is that as I previously mentioned you know that with this budget we were really trying our best to hold departments, to ask for cuts, to ask for reductions, to try to bring balanced budget.

You can see based on the historical trends we've simply cut the FY 26 overtime budget too much. It's a much lower amount when you compare it to prior year actuals especially when you consider that every year one hour of overtime is more expensive dollar wise so we're constantly running reports and showing departments where they're at hours wise for their divisions of overtime and PD consistently I want to show you that trend when we did reduce the budget to $627,000.

All of these grants that we did end up getting into consideration, not taking the vacancies into consideration and it is much lower than our prior year actuals for the last four years. So I did want to point that out that I do think we just did cut too much when you consider all those factors and the cost of overtime going up over time so this shows you the proposed revision for the 807 total which we would be increasing from 627 to the 807 with this appropriation

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:50 – 2:5714 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:50:41

Real quick. So we implemented the new Police officers employment agreement when was that? Because that that wouldn't impact these numbers significantly Yeah for this fiscal year,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:50:55

right yeah for this fiscal year there's a Relatively, I don't want to say minor because every dollar counts but there were a few years of large increases which I think shows up with seeing the big changes in this year. It's a smaller adjustment from the last contract so it would be again just every year it becomes that much more expensive for every hour of overtime and so the same amount of hours could be Is probably 20 25 percent more than it was three years ago, right?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed2:51:33

So if you're just looking at the number and not considering the increases ours health and welfare Increases and all that then you're you know You I think the case could be made that we've done a very good job of managing our police overtime in Austin

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:51:47

And I was going to note that, you know, Ashley's I think actually is correct that I was too idealistic thinking I could have the lowest overtime ever after prices increased 20%. But but I will say in my defense and I think it was a strategy is like we wanted to make sure that we were trying to hold everybody really to Like, what can we really get these costs to and just sort of remind everybody. And this is ongoing with all of our staff is reminding everybody that budgets are tight and that we have to sort of protect every taxpayer dollar. So that's been part of the goal with it even if it was a little unrealistic. And then also just it is hard to show apples-to-apples because And so getting a grant dollar might not necessarily be a bad thing, but it still shows up as an expense.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:52:41

I would argue because of the grants and because of the vacancies we never know how many officers are going to move on or leave. The fact that this many happened at the same time could not have been predicted. So just throwing that out there for reasoning.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:52:56

Thank you Ashley. So quick question. How many positions in the police department are ineligible for overtime? Imagine the chief and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:53:07

probably just the chief in commander

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:53:09

Albertson or

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:53:10

an end admin. Yeah so

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:53:13

ineligible actually to three. OK thank you. Sorry about

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:53:19

that. Moving on. So that was our recap of the general fund, the appropriation on the revenue and expense side. And now we're moving on to all other fund adjustments. Looking at proposed revenue appropriations you will see gas tax has an appropriation for interest funds We recently approached Council last fiscal year with a contract to work with Chandler Investments and luckily we're on budget for that. In fact, for this fund in particular we're coming in over budget so we are adjusting for that to make sure we're accounting for gas tax monies in as closely as possible You will see the grant fund has a $19,000 appropriation. This is a transfer in because the general fund will be funding the design portion that we began for Miranda Park before we decided that we would better utilize the State of California grant that we received recently.

We approached with The Miranda and Volker Park playgrounds instead to use those grant funds. So this is to reimburse the grant fund for that. Next you will see the housing fund 702 has the same amount of revenue in as expenditures out. This is for our housing assistant payment revenue every year they give us an update and let us know how much we will be receiving so that we can again get those out to our folks on the housing assistance program Expense side, you will see mostly CIP. This is streets projects using gas tax funds, TDA funds when we approached you all with the adopted budget, we made it a big point to try to use our other funds or other funding sources for projects first and then go to the general fund if we needed to and so this is another example of Public Works doing that using their street funding for additional projects.

And on that note, I wanted to summarize the larger changes to our CIP schedule. At this point in the fiscal year, the Public Works team paused assessed prioritized projects to let me know what monies they needed to appropriate so they can get all of their projects done by the end of the fiscal year You will see that we added the, we recently came to council with the Volcker Park playground. We're adding some additional ARPA dollars there because we do have to fully expand our ARPA dollars by December.

So this is going to be used for the walkway portion of that project. We have a lot of gas tax funds being appropriated here. I did want to point out that one reduction of $250,000 for the Surfside Village resurfacing. That is because the Public Works team was able to revise the scope of work for that project and they were able to find a more cost-efficient measure to still get the same amount of work done there so we can luckily reduce them and utilize those funds for another project that they intend to get done for this fiscal year And appropriating a grant fund for the citywide parking lots as well as TDA funds for the bus stop improvements.

Questions?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:56:44

Just to add, I believe this is generally true. As I think all of the increases there are because wanting to actually get more done not just cost increases so the saving was because of yeah that you know the saving that Ashley noted but as far as like the parking lots it's not that the cost of The parking lot work went over budget. It's that we want to do more parking lots and we wanna utilize that funding, and then that's essentially the case. I believe it's the case with each of these is that it's- Adding

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:57:22

projects.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed2:57:23

Yeah, adding projects based on our workload and what we think we can get done this year and what we can afford to get done this year. Thank you.

2:57 – 3:1117 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:57:39

Now to give a fund balance update for those funds that did indeed have an appropriation request. As mentioned, since the general fund request adds to both the revenue and expense sides in equal amounts there's no change in fund balance at that time which is why you don't see it included on this list. Some adjustments are clerical I really benefit from this mid-year review because I can pause and take a look if I was able to get revenues pretty spot on or not so you do see That current fund balance estimate for where we are today prior to the appropriation has some negatives on it. And that's because when we come to you all with a new budget we haven't fully finished the current year so we were still finishing up FY 25 when we approached you all with FY 26 figures and we did end up spending a little more of those TDA funds and ARPA funds than we had projected.

So now I am proposing changes to their revenue side to get that not in the negative. So it's a clerical appropriation that I'm requesting of you all to fix that. The others show a healthy fund balance for gas tax. Public Works has to reach out and give a list of projects every year so they know exactly how much funding they can expect for the year, how much to appropriate and spend down while keeping a healthy fund balance for their operational needs throughout the year.

Same for TDA there. They're spending what they're getting in and reporting on those, so they're very small funds. But the Water Operations Fund, also you know we're going through our rate study right now. So we are trying to build up that reserve for their CIP and the major appropriation fund for them was that front of to PHWA for their CIP and plant related projects for the year. That's why I see that negative it's for capital for the plants.

Moving on, the recommendation is to approve the current FY 26 mid-year budget adjustment and appropriations. Looking ahead we will be back with the revised 27 operating and CIP budgets likely in May June time so pretty soon We will come to you with FY 25 audited data. That way we have a good fund balance starting point to review with you all, to see where we left off at the end of that fiscal year as well as a revised five-year CAP list and updated fund balance estimates.

Any more questions?

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:00:12

No public comments Great so we have before us the recommendation mayor

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:00:23

Mike

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:00:24

I'm sorry We have before us a recommendation to appropriate and adjust the current budget as defined in the FY 2025 26 proposed mid-year budget and capital improvement project schedules May I have a motion and a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00:42

move to approve

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:00:44

second

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:00:45

Great. Any discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:00:47

Just a comment, congratulations on the award that you won recently. Thank you very much. First time in forever I think so good job. Thank you

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:00:56

very much. Great any other discussion? Great thank you. Here we have Madam Clerk please take roll. Okay

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:01:05

all in favor?

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:01:06

Aye.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:01:06

All opposed? Hearing none motion passes unanimously.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:01:10

Thank you and thank you for your report very detailed report thank you Okay, so it's time to adjourn the special joint meeting of the City Council and the Housing Authority and reconvene city council regular meeting. The time is now 7 58. Okay and then we're going to move back to the council meeting business item number 13 2025 annual general plan and housing progress report.

Will staff, city manager or will staff please?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:01:43

Yes thank you and yes I'm gonna handle this I decided not to make Trisha do this on her first day or her first council meeting it's a for it's a backward looking report so it's only fair that uh I have to provide it but This is the item, the annual general plan and housing progress report is the item that every year by April 1st we're required to provide to various state agencies like State Housing and Community Development HCD. And so every April 1st, we have to provide an update on how we're doing with implementing our general plan and how we're doing with implementing our housing element. And so it's really just mostly about, well I was gonna say it's mostly about a chart with some numbers on our housing reports but that's really the housing element and then the general plan is more focused on policies and things.

But we'll walk through a little bit of background on this. So as mentioned, this is that annual report it's required per SB 35 and AB 879 and it's required to be completed and reported to HCD in the governor's office of land use and climate innovation by April 1st of each year. HCD officially certified the housing element on October 5th, 2022. And so and these numbers are the same as last year and the year prior but it's our Raina requirements or regional housing need allocations and our Raina requirement from the state is 125 units which includes 16 extremely low-income units, 10 very low income units, 16 low income units, 18 moderate income and 65 above moderate income.

And so now that we're essentially through year three on this RENA cycle, we've actually started to have some significant progress in meeting our RENA requirements A big one for communities in Southern California is ADUs, accessory dwelling units. As those get permitted, those count as units in the above-moderate category. So we had a theory and I think it's sort of proving out that just from our ADUs we'd probably meet our above moderate income reiner requirement This year we made more progress in that direction with 15 ADUs permitted and 16 completed.

From 2022 to end of 2025, we also have now had 19 low-income units which means we've actually exceeded our number on low income. Unfortunately those don't now apply to the categories You know that we're not meeting yet, so we still have some work to do on extremely low income and very low income. But that is an accomplishment that a lot of cities struggle with, so it's not something to brush under the rug. So we've had 19 low-income units total and 35 above moderate income units total in that period. So significant progress on the above category as well.

The housing element also contains, in addition to the RHNA, it includes 21 programs with that rezoning and zoning amendments that we did last year. I'm sorry, it was November and December of 2024. We now have all 21 programs either in process or completed so we'll be reporting that to the state and that should be a positive as well. And one issue, there's a lot of good news I would say or a lot of progress.

Sometimes you discover an area that you're gonna need to do some work on and so as part of this year's progress report, this is a good problem to have but what we found is that we are starting to build up a large housing asset fund balance. We have about $6 million In our housing asset fund balance for the successor agency It's not general fund dollars. It has to be used for for these housing purposes But essentially we're getting to a point where we're gonna have to do a project or do something related to housing and so So that's a task for myself in our housing director to start working on and we already are starting and and we started to talk to Some of the different experts about how we can move that forward. So, that's something that we kind of have to put on our radar this year as a goal for us is to start working on a project that would utilize some of those funds.

We have a couple of ideas but sometimes those are lengthy projects or ones where you have to purchase property so there's some wild cards in there as well. That's something that'll be worked on this year. The housing asset fund may not accumulate what is called an excessive surplus. So we aren't there yet, but we're getting close to that point. I think I skipped over that first bullet or the first point there which is that each year also we're allowed Housing asset fund for administrative costs and you can only bill up to a certain percentage. And so our amount has to be under 186,000 and We have been able to operate efficiently and we actually are only billing $97,000 So that's another positive. So just generally I think You know the progress report The general plan of progress report, the housing successor agency report I think show that we're making progress in areas.

We're doing the work we need to do and now we have a project we'll need to work on to try to get some of those other numbers that we need to hit for RENA purposes. And so we'll just keep making progress. I think there's two years left in this cycle 26 and 27 and then it will be another round of RENA and new RENA number. So over the next two years We have work to do, but we're on a good path.

So with that, we are recommending that the council authorize staff to submit this annual report to the California Department of Housing and Community Development and the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:08:29

Great. Are there any questions? I had a question. Go right ahead.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:08:34

So the two categories of extremely low, the 16 units and the very low-income 10. How much of that have we impacted?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:08:48

There's three categories that we have not had units built in our community during this cycle. Extremely low income, very low income and moderate income. And so those three are the three we're not getting. Typically with extremely low and very low, that's going to be a challenge for us just always because we're a built-out city and in my experience the way I got those units in other cities is when the developer is going to come and build a project And they want to essentially, you know, they've got to go through the city and get the permits and everything to build a new development on a vacant parcel. The city has some ability to negotiate that and try to actually obtain extremely low or very low income units for us because we're a built out city and we don't really have new developments coming.

That's always going to be a challenge. We've talked about in the past that every parcel, we're going to have to be dedicated. We're going to have to not let good opportunities go to waste because we don't have very many of them left. But sorry, to answer your question, zero extremely low income, zero very low income as of now. Thank you. Maybe assume that we'd get some of those units that way.

But I know that there's still a lot of details to be worked on that, but we do have a few projects that we're sort of like working on not eminently but over the next few years that would, that we're hoping will help us get there. But Willowbrook could because as the council recalls one of the reasons why we created that went through that RAD program was so that Willowbrook could potentially raise funds Do an expansion and actually increase the unit so that the Council or maybe I think we're kind of learning all this. I think it's the housing Inc board But potentially the council would probably be able to weigh in and identify which categories to target

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:11 – 3:1932 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:11:07

I think my recollection was that the Willowbrook's already can't be counted in the Rena numbers, but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:15

Existing if the existing Willowbrook units But if we if we

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:11:19

remodel them right but remodeling them isn't

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:22

no she wanted to add more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:11:23

Right.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:24

Yeah knows I think there is The initial idea for the rad conversion was to potentially expand them and actually increase the unit count

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:11:32

Okay What happens if we don't make those numbers?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:11:38

So as of now, it changes each cycle. But basically this cycle the state wanted everybody to get really serious about meeting the requirements and wanted us to do everything you know a stricter housing element stricter rezoning to support this and do everything we could to really encourage it and not like discourage or not approve housing projects. And so we haven't done that, right? Like we've done the zoning and then we haven't vetoed any housing projects that have come before the council. So I think as of now we're meeting what the expectations are from the state but over the next couple years as projects come forward we have to keep doing that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:12:27

But we're supposed to hit 125 units by what, 2027 I think? Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:12:33

And so...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:12:34

I don't think we're gonna do that. It just doesn't look like we're gonna do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:12:36

that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:12:37

So my question is like what happens?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:12:40

Yeah, so I would say and it's always changing. That whole world is changing at the state level but I'm really not aware of too many cities. Well let's take Ventura County as an example because I don think a single city met their RANDA requirements last cycle And I'm like, maybe Oxnard but I don't even think Oxnard did. And so you know, I would say, wouldn't it be surprised if a lot of cities didn't meet their goal? I think the expectation is that we'll do what we can to meet the goal and we have experience with this now that if we ever do not support a project that would help meet these goals HCD hears about it and they call us and we have to get on the phone with them. So, right when I first arrived in Hueneme, we had one of those calls and we worked it out so we don't have a record of the city blocking low-income housing or housing in general.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:13:40

So you mentioned in this report it mentioned Surfside Hotel Does it account for all the units there or just the ones facing Hueneme Road? I think my inclination is that those 41 are just the units facing Hueneme Road because another Sixty I believe

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:14:01

on the back. So Surfside Hotel And tell me when I am going too far, but right now they're currently approved project it includes some I Think it was low category low income units But it's also includes other uses so not all the units count towards this only the ones that are for low-income housing, so So that would be something and if depending on how that project proceeds, that's something that could be considered in the future is potentially how that would apply here. But we're working as the council knows we're working with the project applicants on that to try to move that project forward within the next few months.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:14:47

And then one last question, you said new numbers. So there's going to be a new round of numbers coming out. So that will be on top years I think so. Will it supplant the number that we're sitting on right now or will it? Add on top of it.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:15:04

Yeah, in the past what's happened is if you make good progress then at the end of the cycle they come back and they actually make the allocation statewide. So it's like Paul might know more about this than me but I think the way they do it This many million in Northern California and this many in Southern California. And then I think, I used to know this better, I might be like mixing things up a little bit but I want to say it's like SCAG then actually is the agency for Southern California that takes those millions and then starts You know, allocating them. So generally if we're doing what we can and we do a good job they just give you a new number that year but every five-year cycle it's gotten stricter and things that used to not... It just changes things that were okay in the past aren't okay and there used to be a saying that cities don't have to build units they just have to zone for them but that's kind of even changing a little bit of like well we better figure out how to get people to build them

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:16:08

I was in a SCAG meeting when that number was allocated and I asked them, have you been to our city? Where am I supposed to put 125 units? Should I build in the ocean? It's ridiculous.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:16:20

My mind might not serve me correctly but I almost thought that the last allocation was like single digit.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:28

For us, it's 125 this time. I want to say the last time, I think it was less. I want to say it was like 58 or something like that but

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:16:36

yeah

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:16:37

but you know there is and another thing was like cities the cities that got more involved in that process you can kind of you know help explain your case and I think we'll try to do You know that more in the future, but it's it kind of shuffled there were cities where their numbers went significantly up from one cycle to next and then there were others where I went significantly down so But it's just I don't think a lot of people understand that It's literally like skag gets millions of units and they have to look at all the cities and allocate them So they kind of don't let anybody off the hook really you know The thought process really is if everybody does their part then we'll have enough housing. But it it's it's challenging for sure So in general though the I think we it's a generally positive report and those are the challenges is that You know, we'll have to what?

I think the takeaway is that if extremely low-income or very low income or moderate projects come before the councils. We should be receptive based on our arena requirements and I think we are but it's just You know, getting those projects to come forward is part of the challenge too. So generally we recommend approving it so we can submit to the state our progress over the last year.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:17:57

If there aren't any other questions do we have any public comments?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:18:01

No public comments. Okay,

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:18:03

so we have before us a recommendation to receive the information for the annual report and to submit it is there any? Is there motion in a second

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:18:15

move

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:18:15

approval second great any further discussion not madam clerk please take roll

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:18:22

all in favor aye all opposed hearing none motion passes unanimously

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:18:28

Okay, so we're going to

move to item number 14. Out-of-State Travel Requests and Council Direction for Regional Defense Partnership Lobbying Trip to D.C. Over to you City Manager.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:18:41

Yeah this is just on each year or I think we started this maybe two years ago Each year, the council has a policy that the council approves any out-of-state travel request. And so each year the regional defense partnership proposes a lobbying trip to Washington D.C., so the out-of state travel request has to come to council for consideration. But on top of that I think it was last year or the year prior the council had said they wanted to as part Also give input on goals.

I believe the council members who would be participating, Mayor McQueen-Lajon and Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez probably have more information on what the goals of RDP are so I will hand it over to them.

3:19 – 3:2722 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:19:41

One of the meetings I attended over the last two weeks was a strategic planning meeting, and that's the group that decides on what issues we take to D.C., and who writes the white papers, and how we conduct ourselves in D. C.. And it's going to be different this year in that we are going to limit the programs and projects, we're gonna limit the advocacy for only those programs and projects that are already in the pipeline. And that's what we've been getting from the meetings, the installation meetings, the command meetings that we've been attending on the base. I think for the most part when you look at the city's goals and objectives That they do align, they do support the projects that we're going to be advocating for.

But I don't think, I do not think that they're looking for new projects. They wanna just support those projects that we've talked about from our base meetings and those that are already in the pipeline. So that's the change. I think that there will be an opportunity to talk about dredging when we meet with Congresswoman Brownlee's office. We always have a moment to thank her for the, her work on ensuring that we get the dollars that we need to do the dredging and this time around we can confirm with her that we're going to get enough money to do the full dredging project but that'll be about it.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:21:32

Yeah, thank you for that. As Mayor Pro Tem mentioned she is on the strategic planning committee for RDP and so what I will just kind of say that last year if y'all remember we did a presentation to share what RDP is about and the work that they have done, and the successes that they have had over the years. And so any success of our military facilities and our military members are a success for our community. So I'll just end with that.

Through RDP we have brought many, many commands to the city of Port Hueneme, to the Naval Base Ventura County And when we have more people, we generate more money. And so if there is anything then we should remember that there is a true connection with the work that we're doing in support of the military installation whether it be the Navy here in the city Port Hueneme, Point Mugu or the other branches of service. So yeah.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:22:42

So I just wanted also to add that both the mayor and I feel this is very important that we represent the city at these meetings, and that we attend the D.C. trip to provide input at the meetings. I am paying out of pocket because since our budget was cut several years ago there's just not enough money for council members to do two large I usually go to the League of California Cities conference, and then if I can go to D.C., but there's just not enough. $3,000 doesn't cut it. But I feel it's important enough so I'm going to pay out-of-pocket to go to D C this year.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:23:28

And I'll just add that I haven't traveled this year so I haven't used any of my travel budget

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:23:34

I don't want to sound negative or at the risk of sounding negative. So, I think you know our sole focus should be streets infrastructure projects and you know a lot of the Navy base employees don't live in Hueneme and I see the traffic on Pleasant Valley on Channel Islands up Victoria at the main gate I mean, the traffic impacts are huge. And so just like we heard earlier with success with those revenues from what buying boots or you don't pay taxes on groceries, fast food but yes there is some revenue generation but also just recognize that there are expenses and impacts.

So for me, I just wanna see us hyper focus on Infrastructure projects to maintain our roads and of course the sand and Because those are the two big things for us and regardless of what new missile they're building or whatever They're doing on that. I'm done, you know the base You know when there's more impacts it impacts our city roads and stuff like that So I just want to make the point that I think it's probably more important to focus on infrastructure support

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:24:53

Great your comments are noted. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:24:55

I do at the risk of sounding positive, I have a spending account that I never use and don't plan on using so I can allocate money from mine. And I would be give approval to authorize my spending account to be used if

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:25:12

necessary. I think as part of the item if the council wanted to approve utilizing those funds we'd be able to do that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:25:21

That's great thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:25:23

There's no point, it's already allocated in our budget. It's not being used so...

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:25:26

Any other?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:25:28

Just have a comment. RDP actually was very successful in keeping both bases here during the BRAC realignment and me personally I got to come home because now there's shore duty here at both bases This is the home of the Pacific Fleet, E2D Hawkeye community. I'm a civil servant. I live in Port Hueneme. There's a lot of people like me that live in Port Hueneme. So RDP does have value.

It's home of the drone airspace. And so looking ahead, we're looking at expanding Point Mugu which brings more people to the area and Port Hueneme is ideal location because it's near both bases and its cost of living is a little cheaper. A little gem by the sea right? So I see this as a positive thing increasing property values for our community. So yeah, RDP for sure. Keep lobbying.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:26:39

Thank you.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:26:39

Great. Anyone else? No one else? Are there any public comments?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:26:44

No public comments.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:26:47

Thank you. So we have before us the consideration of out-of-state travel for myself and for Mayor Pro Tem. This is gonna happen through the 19th, through the 23rd of April. We have discussed funds and there is some funds available in the travel budget. Is there a motion and a second to approve the recommendation?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:27:16

Move to approve.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:27:17

Second. Great, any further discussion?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:27:20

Just to be clear the recommendation didn't have the budget issue so it's approved the recommendation and include included this

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:27:27

budget allocation. Thank you all right any further discussion if not madam clerk will you please take a vote

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:27:34

okay all in favor aye all opposed hearing none motion passes unanimously

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:27:40

great thank you we'll move to the city manager comments and report

3:27 – 3:4217 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:27:50

I just have a couple of things. We have a couple of events coming up and then a couple updates we wanted to give so I'm going to pull those up here. Actually, a lot going on right now. Wanted to announce our March 18th, which is coming up on Wednesday. So Wednesday from 4-6 p.m., again we're partnering with the West Ventura County Business Alliance to have a welcoming ceremonial ribbon cutting at City Hall to celebrate the new partnership with the West Ventura County Business Alliance You may have noticed driving in that we no longer have a front lawn, which is the location that we were planning to have this event on. And so just as a reminder, we're going through that turf remodel project and that's a grant It's actually a great grant because it was a grant that we don't even have to touch the money.

Another agency hired people to do these drought-tolerant landscaping replacement projects, But the challenge with that is getting all that free, you know work and free materials is that we're kind of on their schedule. So they called us and said they can come out today and get started. So it wasn't opera, you know ideal so it'll be a slight change of location instead of being out in our beautiful weather out in front of City Hall will be in this council chambers with with our ribbon.

So we'll announce this and we'll notify people that we're moving it just slightly into the building, but you know it's a good excuse. It's hot right now so we'll use our air conditioning as the excuse. But we invite everybody to come out Wednesday for that and then next Tuesday we have our grand opening of Bulker Park Playground. Bulker Park is now open as mentioned earlier. We're pretty It's great to hear other people are happy about it.

In general, I think it's an improvement and we were able to do it really budget-friendly and in a very cost effective manner. We were able to include some things like that ADA accessible swing set. So I think overall a win for the community, but we want to celebrate it. We wanted to get it open as soon as possible, but we do want to celebrate it and so we're inviting everybody to a grand opening on Tuesday the 24th from 5 to 6 p.m., and there will be free ice cream for the first 100 servings. So everybody's invited to that.

And then right after that on Saturday, we have our annual eggstravaganza. That one we were ahead of the curve and we had already moved it to Bubbling Springs but that also moved because of the turf removal project that's also gonna start at Miranda Park. So this year it'll be at Bubbling Springs Saturday March 28th from 9 a.m. to 11 a. m. And that's a free event for ages up to 12 years old. So we want to invite everybody and remind everybody to join us for that. I didn't include it because it's already sold out, but the other event this Saturday is our annual 5K.

Just as a reminder, anybody who maybe booked that awhile ago that it's coming up this Saturday and that's the 5K we're putting on in partnership with the city and the port. And then somehow another Beach Fest is coming up. It does not feel like it but we have application deadline for vendors on March 31st 2026 which is just a couple weeks out so we wanted to remind everybody of that And then to mark calendars, this is that new date we had identified last year and I think it worked pretty well. We didn't have the conflicts of other events that we had in the past so we're planning to keep that this year for July 11th and July 12th.

And then we wanted to give an update. We got some questions last week about, I think the maybe at the last port meeting there was some comments about the city and port reporting. So we just wanted to give an update. We had brought an item to council a couple months back talking about this. And so we just wanted to sort of update everybody on where it stands. And so I'll just go through these quickly but the city import teams Both continue to work through compliance issues for each party related to the city and ports revenue sharing agreements. On August 28th, 2025 the city submitted a report for 2025 and then on January 20th, 2026 we submitted the new revised report in the format that the port requested for 2024 so We're still working our intent was just as we talked about with the council is sort of one at a time sort of work back through those, but I think at the last meeting there was some confusion where we got some calls from people asking if the city hadn't submitted any reports dating back to 2016.

So we just wanted to remind everybody that the city has submitted seven of the 11 reports dating back to 2016. Those seven, I think the conversation is about the formatting of those and whether they're adequate So the city and port at a staff level, we've agreed that the attorney's offices from each agency will meet to discuss the adequacy of those reports. And then we'll know more about those seven reports but we were working back through them as a courtesy and we had gone back through 2025 and 2024.

And then just an update, on February 12th we did receive a records request for all records related to all expenditures since the initiation of those reports back in 2016. So we have a pretty small staff so we're shifting our staff to responding to the Records Act requests because those Records Act requests have legal deadlines that we have to respond within certain timeframes So we're going to be focusing on those requests in the coming months, and then we'll kind of get back to it. I wanted to give that update for sort of all involved to just know what we've been working on, what's been submitted, and what we're still working on.

And then the last thing is April 6th, 2020 or the next agenda our upcoming agenda forecast. Right now we have presentation scheduled fair housing month proclamation autism acceptance month proclamation in Port Hueneme Police Department annual report and then for consent we're planning to bring forward that Grand jury recommendation that all police departments update their radio system. We're planning to bring that forward we're working through all that and getting all the costs and everything and then The safe streets for all grant contract agreement were planning to bring forward And then for public hearings and business items, we plan to bring forward the Port Hueneme movie nights permit the Hueneme Beach Festival permit and and then The park reservation process update.

We had it ready for this meeting but the agenda, we had a couple urgent items come up so we're planning to bring that at the next and then we'll have, we have that prepared. So these are the items currently scheduled for April 6th 2026 and that's all I have today.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:35:45

Anyone have any questions for City Manager? Nope okay we'll move on to the council member reports. We'll start with Council Member Lopez and then Perez

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:35:55

Yeah, I've only attended one item which was the Hueneme Housing Inc board meeting. We are a fully staffed board now we have seven members and we did get a good survey back from the Mar Vista residents and we're looking to improve some of those things within that building and the RAD conversion is near complete so we're moving on.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:36:24

Great thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:36:26

Yes, I attended my meetings and I'll be at the 5K with a poor Hueneme booth giving away free vegetable plants. So come see me for a free vegetable plant.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:36:41

Yeah, last week I attended the California Coastal Commission meeting which was held in Ventura and I went there to support beach volleyball. And it was quite dramatic. The California Coastal Commission decided to I want to start by saying thank you to the board of trustees for allowing us to do this. The Ventura College girls volleyball team, the Ventura High School girls volleyball team.

I mean speaker after speaker after speaker after speaker and what I noticed is that the California Coastal Commission then they're pretty serious you know there's a process now to try and get this decision reversed and so I was very intrigued and then I started thinking about the ports project over here and they're asking for public comment. And so my question maybe that could be answered is like, does the California Coastal Commission have anything to say with a multi-level parking structure at the Port of Hueneme?

I don't know it just seems they're really concerned about these volleyball courts.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:38:04

Can I ask why they said they were concerned about them all did they say why?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:38:08

Environmental reasons dunes, I don't know but the courts have been in the harbor area They're protected by the jetty and they've been there forever. So anyways, it's really interesting No, no down at the Ventura Harbor It

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:38:23

just was very very interesting to see the amount

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:38:26

of effort that was put into this issue, so I thought I'd bring that up.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:38:40

We can... I don't know if it would need... I guess the answer to this would depend on what the answer we find is. I don't think it would be a long enough answer to your question of you know, is there coastal commission review of projects at our beach or projects at the port? We might be able to just get that answer and send it to the council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:39:03

And we have coastal commission approval for the RFP, right? Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:39:11

So anyway

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed3:39:11

it was just a question.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:39:13

We can try to send a little update to the council on that.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:39:18

Thank you, Mayor. Yeah so I also attended the Coastal Commission hearing at the Ventura County Government Center and there were some items affecting Ventura County that I was hoping to be there because I was interested in seeing the decisions on those but I must have left before you got there because I think they broke for lunch and then they resumed in the afternoon oh the second day that's right they were there for two days So yeah, I was there the first day and I just thought it was really interesting on some of the items that were coming before them.

We should be following these because we might one of these days have you know some of the similar issues that other cities were bringing to the Commission. Learned that turf, that artificial turf has to go be approved by the Coastal Commission and so I had asked about our turnkey project to make sure we weren't using any artificial turf which were not. So good to know and so that was very interesting.

I've mentioned the RDP strategic committee already, attended my SCAG meetings down in downtown LA. I had the pleasure of welcoming the Port Hueneme Little League at the opening ceremonies doing the welcoming speech on behalf of the mayor and the city council I'm happy to see the Lions Club there and Councilwoman Perez was there with her team. The Cal City's Channel Cities meeting also met, I'm vice chair on that we're planning to do a local meeting and dinner To be held sometime in June of this year in the city of Ventura. So as soon as I know those dates I'll share those with council in the event any one wants to attend which I do encourage you to do so because there are always good opportunities to meet with other elected officials from other jurisdictions for VCOG meeting we're looking at bringing in a speaker to discuss code enforcement for street vendors.

I know we've talked about it a little bit here at this council so those interested might want to sit in on that meeting I wanted to ask a question about the discolored water announcement that went out today. I didn't see it till this afternoon and I was happily at home washing dishes, taking showers you know refilling my cat's water dispenser so I don't know why it was discolored is it harmful discoloration?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed3:41:58

No, and so the announcement was that I think if I remember right a car hit a fire hydrant which then made us change something. I didn't get the full explanation but it was just that the water was going to have a different appearance but that it wasn't related to quality or anything like that. So yeah, somebody hit a fire hydrant so that's what caused it.

3:42 – 3:464 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:42:27

I'm drinking water. Thank you for that, appreciate it. We did have our faucets weren't dispensing water there for a while so but then it came back and everything was fine. I also like to ask for council to adjourn the meeting in memory of Eric Bear who is a former Port Hueneme lifeguard. There's a paddle out for him on the same day as the splash run It'll be held at Silver Strand on the 21st, and Eric is a mentor to many of our lifeguards here in Port Hueneme.

And overall he's worked for the Harbor Patrol Department for awhile, for Ventura Harbor Patrol. So it's going to be a big to-do recognizing his service and honoring his life. Again that's March 21st over at Silver Strand. That's all I have.

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:43:28

Okay, great thank you. Okay so I attended my meetings up to today. I did attend the first robotics event which was really nice it always is and was able to speak on behalf of the city. Thank You Mayor Pro Temp for stepping in with a little league opening ceremony and appreciate the opportunity to be a judge for the Lions Club speech event. That was really, really nice. It was on the topic of mental health, surrounding mental health, and three individuals got an opportunity to pick a topic within that, and they were three very good speakers. Yeah, it was definitely hard to choose.

I did want to say, speaking about speech contests, just want to inform everyone that the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority Incorporated, they have an annual speech contest where Oxnard School District, the elementary schools, all of them have internal speech contests. and a winner of the speech contest then go on to this African American Speech Exposition. And so it is for the first time, it was live streamed so it is on YouTube. So if you want to see the young students present their speeches and the winner was from Elm School she was a fifth grader.

First time the school ever in 40 years 43 years The sorority's been doing it for 40 years, first time that school has ever won the award. And so very nice that person, that student will be the guest speaker next year at the MLK event, the Ventura County MLK event and through the year she'll be doing speech, performing her speeches at different events. So I ask you please go out and see these young people and giving their speeches. It was a really really great event And so that's all I have. Is there anything else?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:45:35

Cesar Chavez holiday and Cesar Chavez March, I think on the 31st or no it's on a Sunday yeah

ElectedMartha R. McQueen-LegohnMayorProposed · by role3:45:45

okay And I'll do one thing and then we'll adjourn. Wanted to say happy birthday to Council Member Gama, today is his birthday. So happy birthday and then I'll adjourn tonight's meeting the time is 843 in the name of Eric Baer. Meeting is adjourned.