UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:02 – 0:0915 turns
Good evening and welcome to the City of Port Hueneme's regular council meeting. Welcome again, we're going to call this meeting to order. The time is now 530. Madam Clerk please take roll.
Council Member Gama? Here. Council Member Lopez? Here. Council Member Perez? Here Mayor McQueen-Lachon? Here And let the record reflect that Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez currently absent
Great, we'll now hear a closed session public comments or public comments relating to closed session and they'll be limited to three minutes each. Madam Clerk do we have any public comments?
Yes, we have two public comments first is Theo Provencio followed by Leonard Castillo
Okay, well I'll make this short. Good evening Mayor and members of the City Council. My name is Theo Provencio. I'm a D5 operator with the city water department. Been here for 13 years. I am here tonight to speak on behalf of the dedicated city employees who keep our community running every single day. I am standing before you because we are at a critical crossroads and the current proposal on the table simply does not align with reality.
The city is currently offering a 1% cost of living adjustment COLA per year for two years. While we understand the complexities of municipal budgeting, we must be honest about what a one percent per year offer means in the current economic climate. Inflation is significantly higher than one percent. Housing, groceries, utilities, health care have all surged.
To offer a 1% adjustment in the high inflation environment isn't a wage freeze. It is, in practical terms, a pay cut. Every day the city staff show up to deliver the high quality services our residents expect and deserve but right now those same employees are struggling to keep up with the basic cost of living of surviving in the very city they serve. When wages fail to keep pace with the real world, we risk losing our experienced dedicated personnel to neighboring cities or the private sector. High turnover unfilled positions ultimately cost the city more in recruiting training and loss productivity Thank you.
We urgently call on the city to return to the table with a meaningful, realistic offer that reflects the true cost of living and shows real investment in the workforce that keeps the city moving forward. Thank you for your time and your consideration.
Hello Council, Council Members, Mayor. My name is Leonard Castillo I'm the Chief Negotiator with SCIU Local 721. I am before you and speaking on behalf of my members and just wanted to convey the reality that our members that serve this community and all your employees are facing the reality that In terms of their salaries, in terms of the benefits. The cost living in this climate is something that needs to be addressed and I do want to acknowledge that the city is moving in the right direction at our negotiations However, it's at this point as it stands just not enough for my members.
So again acknowledging that you're moving in the right direction and that there is movement I do want to convey that we acknowledge that and ultimately, we want you to give the additional authority that is needed to your bargaining team to come to a deal so we can go ahead and come to agreement before this contract expires. With that being said, we'd also like to, you know, we're reaching out to you to see if you have the availability to open a special session on the 29th. A special session on the 29th would be ideal considering that we do have bargaining prior. We have a few sessions before that date and with that date if we can come to an agreement and an agreement that our bargaining team can endorse We'd like to have that on the calendar so that we could vote on the contract and then get it to you to be fully authorized.
And ultimately, again, we're just here to speak to the matter of the fact that these city workers they put in this time to serve the community. They are a part of the community. Some of them are your constituents We just want you to Consider these, you know these these asks at this point in time. Thank you
Great. Thank you
And that concludes public comment
great thank you we're gonna
move to our next item closed session item Mr. City Attorney, please read the closed session item into the record
Thank you. We'll be entering closed session with respect to Government Code Section 54957.6, Conference with Labor Negotiators with the agency's representatives including Frank Lee, James Vega and Charles Peretz and we will be discussing the agreement with SEIU Service Employees International Union Local 721.
Great thank you. Do any members of the Council have a conflict of interest in this matter?
I don't have a conflict of interest, but do we want to share ex parte communications? Do
you have one?
There is no legal obligation to.
1:05 – 1:157 turns
Did you want to read? Anyone would like to read the Juneteenth? I'll do it. Good evening everyone and welcome to our City Council meeting Monday, June 15th 2026. We are going to get started calling this meeting to order at 633. And so we'll have council member Gamma lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Right hand over heart Great, thank you. Madam Clerk please take roll. Council Member Goma Yes.
Council Member Lopez? Here. Council Member Perez? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Hernandez? Here. And Mayor McQueen-Lajon?
Here Okay, great. So I have the opportunity to do the inspiration tonight and it comes by way of the event that I went to this weekend where it was commented that we don't believe people really know who we are and what we do so I'm just going to share a little bit about The service support and services we have going on That support our residents and then I want to talk a little bit about that one organization So as we begin tonight's meeting, I would like to take a moment to reflect on one of the greatest strengths of our city.
Not our buildings, not our streets, not even our beautiful coastline but the people and the organizations that dedicate themselves to serving others. A community is measured not by what it achieves, but how it cares for its residents. In Port Hueneme and throughout Ventura County we are blessed with the extraordinary network of non-profit and service organizations that work tirelessly to meet the needs of every generation and of every stage in life.
For our children and youth, organizations such as the Boys & Girls Club of the Greater Oxnard and Port Hueneme provide safe places, mentorship, academic support and opportunities for personal growth. Their work helps young people build confidence, character and hope for their future. For our students, organizations such as the Oxnard College Foundation and educational mentoring programs throughout the county help remove barriers to higher education through scholarship resources and encouragement empowering the next generation of leaders.
For our seniors, organizations such as Ventura County Area Agency on Aging provide vital services that promote independence, wellness, nutrition and social connection ensuring that our elders remain valued and engaged members of our community. For the veterans and military families, organizations include Gold Coast Veterans Foundation who offer support resources and advocacy for those who have sacrificed in service to our nation.
Their efforts remind us that honoring our veterans require more than words it requires actions For families facing hardship, organizations as FoodShare Ventura County work every day to combat food insecurity and provide nourishment and dignity to those in need. And through service clubs such as the Lions Club International, The Salvation Army and the Divine Nine fraternities and sororities like the one that I'm a member of that was founded as early as 1906. We have faith-based organizations community volunteers and countless local nonprofits acts of kindness and generosity are transformed into meaningful change for our residents That said, the reason for this reflection on this topic tonight is that I've had the opportunity to participate in a couple of events hosted by Seroptimus International of Channel Islands and the statement that people don't really know who and why they exist.
So I want to just share a bit about them. Suroptimus International of Channel Islands Chapter serves both Oxnard and Port Hueneme, is a beacon of hope for girls and women. They provide scholarships through their Live Your Dream Award offering financial support to women who are primary breadwinners They also create care kits, run anti-trafficking initiatives and mentor girls through the Dream It Be It program.
These efforts ensure that women and girls of Port Hueneme not only dream big but have the support to achieve those dreams. Now I'm going to go off script Because as I read each of these, I saw a connection from the city of Port Hueneme. We have people that are on most of these committees that are doing the work of these organizations and even for the ones that we don't have someone specifically on, I have always seen Port Hueneme residents participating in those events I mentioned the Boys and Girls Club. I know our Councilmember Perez, I don't know if she's still on the board but she was on the board to that. I talked about Lions Club, Salvation Army.
We have people that give to our community all the time we have our council member Gamma, who leads an effort to keep our beaches clean. We have Councilmember Lopez who is our liaison to the Veterans Ad Hoc Committee. We have our Mayor Pro Temp that is in several organizations that support our residents here in the city of Port Hueneme and I too do my very best to participate in supporting our events. I did want to mention we have with the Ventura County Area Agency of Aging, we have a liaison, Luis Mendez.
We have for our food share, we know that we have community members that give away food to residents and those outside of our cities all the time. So the City of Port Hueneme is showing up as residents are showing up and are really doing great things for the organization. I see Mr. Vega here with the port. We know that they're always out there giving to the community It's wonderful to work in a city and to belong in a city that cares about its members and communities abroad, so thank you to everyone who continues to do the work for the residents and community members here in Port Hueneme and Ventura County.
So while each group may serve a different population, together they are the backbone of a thriving Port Hueneme. Their work reminds us that when we care for our children, support our students, honor our seniors and uplift families in need We create a city where everyone has the chance to thrive. So thank you to everyone who gives their services and support to our residents and to communities that we touch. As elected leaders, we recognize that government cannot do all the work alone.
It takes partnership. It takes volunteers. It takes nonprofit leaders, donors, advocates and everyday residents who choose service over self-interest and community over division. So tonight, let us express our gratitude to all those organizations and individuals whose work often takes place quietly behind the scenes but whose impact is felt throughout our city every day.
May their examples inspire us to continue building a Port Hueneme that is compassionate, inclusive and united in service to one another. Thank you. All right, so we are going to move to our city attorney for the closed session report.
Thank you Madam Mayor there is no reportable action from closed session tonight.
Great thank you. Madam Clerk do we have any public comments not related to the agenda items?
Yes we have two general public comments one from Rich Rollins followed by Johnny Garcia Vasquez
1:16 – 1:214 turns
I really was quite impressed by this opening Statement that you made as far as like how our community gets involved in a variety of different things to make our Community and our citizens a better place I'm going to talk to you in the short time on three different items The first of which I want to thank the city staff. I know they've had some challenging employee Staffing schedule problems, but they saw fit to Reorganize their staff so that the senior exercise program Which has been going on for a number of years could maintain and keep up Monday Wednesday and Friday I think you made a lot of seniors very very happy. And I want to thank Mr. Vega and the staff for doing that The second thing I want to pass out to you, a while back you approved the Nate's Place Pickleball Tournament and I want to give you a little bit of update.
That's going to be happening this Saturday and we have well over 100 participants so they're going to be raising a lot of money for Nate's Place and I want to give you a little flyer real quickly That's why I play tennis, so I can run back and forth. Anyway it's been a really big success. REACH and Nate's Place have worked together to really do a nice event this Saturday which will I think highlight the city of Port Hueneme The final thing, we had just gotten word as you know we're going to be doing the Veteran Banner Program and we have now received all the banners and we hope within the next week or so to work with Public Works to get those up.
We are also hoping to do some form of an unveiling ceremony and perhaps do a little walk and we hope that you will all be involved in that And we have, I think we have between 13 and 15 banners. Am I correct?
16.
16 now. 16 banners which I think is an excellent step our first time doing that so we hope that you will be involved in that. We will be giving you word when we actually do the different ceremonies and unveiling. That's about it.
Good evening Mayor, Council Members. I would like to wish you a happy Pride Month. Additionally thank you for the pride month proclamation that your city presented at the last council meeting however that is not enough in Port Hueneme there is an ongoing climate of homophobia within your city for the LGBTQIA plus community Council should consider the passage of city ordinance, measures or directives that protect and serve such constituents from ongoing hate incidents, hate speech, harassment or the direction for the establishment of a police commission that holds your police department accountable to respond to residents who are subject to hate incidents, hate speech, harassment and threats of physical bodily harm. Because the response from your police department of, we do not have the resources to dispatch anyone is very disgraceful and unethical.
As a lack of dispatch response by your police department to such hate incidents and threats of physical bodily harm could rapidly turn into hate crimes within your city. For example, such as the former hateful hate crime murder of Larry King at EO Green Middle School which is nearby here in South Oxnard. Additionally council should consider directives and requirements for council city staff and your police department to become knowledgeable and educated on the California Ralph Act so that the civil rights of your constituents are upheld here in California under the current law.
Negligence and lack of leadership action to protect and serve those in such protected statuses by council and your police department will just lead this city to become the hateful City-by-the-Sea instead of the friendly City-by the Sea. Or maybe, this city is already the hateful City-By-the-Sea Thank you. I wish you all a happy Pride Month and wish all the homophobes and bigots here in your city, particularly Gardner Management Limited staff and those residing at Park Madero Apartments and everywhere an unapologetically super uncomfortable month because love not hate always wins. Thank you.
1:21 – 1:2820 turns
Great, thank you. With that I'll move to the approval of the agenda. May I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda? So
moved.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously.
Great. Do any members of the council have any conflicts of interest to disclose regarding the agenda items? No? Great, thank you. We're gonna move to presentation, our first presentation and that's the Juneteenth proclamation and I want to welcome Mr. Bruce Stewart, Ms. Toby Gibson and Mr. Buddy Gibson up to the podium. We're gonna take a picture when you're done so come on out. This is for the Juneteenth Celebration Committee of Ventura County to the podium and Mayor Pro Temp is gonna read your proclamation
Proclamation Juneteenth and the 35th Annual Juneteenth Freedom Day Celebration. Whereas on January 1st, 1863 President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation declaring enslaved people in Confederate held territories to be free. And whereas on June 19th, 1865 Major General Gordon Granger rode into Galveston Texas and announced that all enslaved people were free marking a defining moment, Marking a defining moment in the nation's journey toward liberty and equality. And whereas this historic event gave rise to Juneteenth observed annually on June 19th, which commemorates freedom and honors the resilience achievements and contributions of African Americans. And whereas June 19, 2026 marks the 161st anniversary Juneteenth was first recognized as a state holiday by Texas in 1980 and is now celebrated throughout the nation with a mission of promoting knowledge, understanding and appreciation of African American history and culture.
And whereas the first Juneteenth celebration in Ventura County was held on June 17th 1989 and for more than three decades community organizations volunteers and residents have continued this This tradition and whereas the 35th annual Juneteenth Freedom Day celebration will be held on June 20, 2026 at Plaza Park in Oxnard featuring cultural and historical exhibits live entertainment local artists community resources and family friendly activities. And whereas the city of Port Hueneme wishes to recognize the significance of Juneteenth and commence the Juneteenth Committee of Ventura County California and its community partners preserving and sharing this important history. Now therefore be it proclaimed that the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme does hereby recognize Juneteenth as a commemoration of freedom, perseverance and the ongoing pursuit of equality celebrates the 35th annual Juneteenth Freedom Day celebration to be held on June 20th, 2026 and encourages all residents to learn about the history and significance of Juneteenth and participate in the celebration in the spirit of freedom, unity, respect and hope proclaimed this 15th day of June 2026.
Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem. Now we're going to turn it over to Mr. Stewart I believe and you can bring whoever you'd like for he's the Juneteenth Celebration Committee of Ventura County President so over to you Bruce.
Yes
thank you very much for that proclamation and thank you very much for the years of support that you've shown the Juneteenth Committee of Ventura County We really look forward to this year, it's our 35th annual and we're really excited about it. One thing you forgot to mention was that we're going to have lots of good food if you come out there so please come on out!
And we're gonna have three live bands, we're gonna have the Goleta Sound, we'll gonna have the Sunday Praise team and we're going to have What's the name of the group that played for you, buddy? The band that played at your party.
I can't remember their names because they changed it.
Oh okay but it's a soul group, yeah. Seville, that's the name of the group, yeah. Okay and so we're really looking forward... We're going to have lots of demonstrations. We're gonna have an African drum group this year, the National Anthem of the African-American National Anthem, which is usually sung by one person. She's going to have a full choir. The Bethel A&E Choir is going to be backing her up. That's going to be a stirring thing to see. Also on a sad note I know that you remember that the Buffalo Soldiers join us every year with an encampment and a big exhibit. Unfortunately on Memorial Day of this year the leader of the troop passed away So they will not be there this year, but Buddy Gibson is preparing a special tribute to him where they usually are.
So please come out and see that. And let's see, are there any questions you might have of me about Juneteenth? I think you summed it up quite well in your proclamation.
Well, I know I'll be there, but for the rest of the audience and council and people and staff, do you want to tell us where it's being held and the time?
Okay, yes. It's going to be held at the Oxnard Plaza Park that's 5th and C, you know B-C right there, the big park. It's going to start at 10 o'clock and this year we're gonna extend an hour it's gonna last until 6 p.m., because we're gonna have a lot of things there to show you they're going to be over 60 booths They're going to be selling crafts, they're going to be giving information.
The Red Cross will be there taking blood donations so it's gonna be a fun time. Right, we have face painting. We have a train ride. We play soccer pin. So there's lots of things to do. That's
a lot more than I remember from last year.
Great. I think we have one more comment.
How many food vendors are going to be there? Because I'm interested in the food.
Yes, yes we're gonna have five food vendors. We're gonna have soul food, we're gonna have hot dogs, you can have ice cream, lemonade, barbecue, you name it, we're gonna have it. Catfish.
Looking
forward to it thank you.
We're gonna come down and take a photo
1:28 – 1:345 turns
Yeah, I'm gonna be late. I'm gonna give them to everyone. Oh, come on.
One, two, three.
Okay, we're going to
move to our next presentation and that's the Hueneme Beach Festival community invitation. So come on up Mr. Amanolago and provide your presentation.
Good evening Mayor and City Council I'm gonna update everybody for this year's Hueneme Beach Festival for July 11th and 12th So the festival this year, it should say 2026 but will be held on Saturday July 11th and Sunday July 12th. 2026 from 10 a.m to 8 p.m we will be opening an hour earlier this year for the festival on both days part of the reason is because of the Copacabana Beach soccer tournament on Saturday We noticed last year that a lot of families were waiting around to get in and get food from the festivals And they were out there since 7 in the morning so We decided to change that so that way once we're done playing, they can get in and get food for themselves and the families and the athletes before they all got to go back for their next game.
Again, for the community is a completely free event and there is free parking for everyone throughout the two days besides our normal general parking and our parking lots. The Port Hueneme and Wilinus will also be providing their port lot as well for overflow parking for everyone with the shuttle service to the entrance of the festival. Quick festival layout, Ocean View Drive will be used as a main entrance walkway and feature a first aid tent. Informational booths and food in general retail stalls. Parking lot B will be used to host our live entertainment main stage area with our food court and alcohol servicing area with all the seatings and chairs with the umbrellas. East Ocean View Drive and parking lot C will feature our carnival area by Castle Entertainment their food vendor and additional arts or crafts and an additional alcohol serving area.
On Saturday the 11th, again Hueneme Beach will have the Copacabana soccer tournament. And then Surfside Drive will remain unchanged and open to the public so there'll be no traffic impact for the flow for the pedestrians. Here you'll see the festival site plan. So again it will show Lot B, you'll have the main stage food court area with the chairs all the way down Ocean View Drive will be all of our informational booths, our sponsor booths arts and crafts going down to Lot C where the carnival area will be at And for entertainment for this year. So on Saturday, we will start off the morning with Maury and the Heavy Hitters. We will then go with Alice Bryan. He's a local country singer. And then we will transition to Fermin Fusion Salsa Merengue band for the evening.
And we will finish out with the Outlaw Mariachis. They are a cross between English rock and Spanish mariachi. It's a unique group that we'll be playing at the festival. And then throughout both days, we'll be having DJ Myron playing music throughout the main acts. On Sunday we will have, we actually will be beginning Sunday morning with In Stone in the morning then transitioning to Led Zeppelin again. We will then have Corazón de Maná and Banda La Veranosa Los Zacones de Vigil throughout the evening and the DJ.
For Saturday, the beach soccer tournament as it's already approved through a separate plan. There will be the fields one through nine and ten for the event. They'll have their parking and we're in coordination with our event coordinators for the festival And then the Youth Poster Contest. So you'll see all the posters we have up today. On the 11th, we will be announcing the winners for those poster contests so the committee is going to get together so we can notify the winners and then we'll have them there hopefully the day of the event so we can present them their Chang sponsored by Lujan Transportation and their framed poster.
For the community, the website is active and the QR code is active as well. For the pre-sale carnival rides it's $30 for 10 rides. The sale will end on Friday July 10th before the festival starts so we encourage everybody to get their pre-sale tickets because you'll get more bang for your buck with that pre-purchasing your carnival tickets And then on the 30th of this month, you'll see these two mailers will be going out to all the Hueneme residents and their utility bills. One will be promoting our police explorers and joining our program, and the other one will be the information for the festival and the link to the carnival rights. This will also be a mock-up of our posters that will be going up throughout the city in the community and our banners that will be going up with the help of Public Works on Ventura Road and CI and CI in Victoria.
And then while this will be the other sponsor poster that will be going up in our local businesses and throughout the city. When our gold sponsors this year Skunk Masters and Viper Security, Puerto Hueneme, Darvick Productions and Wellness will be our gold sponsors. Silver sponsors will be E-Rentals, Kona Big Wave, and then our bronze sponsors, the Port Hueneme POA, Renewal by Anderson, Lowers College, Farm Fresh to You, Ventura County Coast, Liberty Military Housing, Vallarta Supermarket, and Carnitas El Brother.
Any questions?
1:35 – 1:4028 turns
I have a question about the contest. So, I noticed a lot of entries that more than what you're used to getting
So we actually have a little less than last year. One of the things we realized was, we got a letter from one, I think it was from Ocean View School District so they actually had 190 posters that were turned in but she wrote a letter saying only 30 students turned in their waivers or entry forms so she withheld the posters So, we're going to evaluate what we're going to do next year because it would have been like almost double the amount of the posters and what we had. And then we actually so we reached out to all the major school districts on Michelle from finance got ahold of the Hueneme School District, the Oxnard School District and the schools in El Rio and they disseminated out from the district We got some feedback, some teachers said their students kind of refused to do it.
Some of them did or they just didn't participate. So we actually had a larger reach than we did this year for the posters but we did get a little bit less that got turned in.
Can I ask just one question? So talking about the art again, do the students know what the result could be if their poster was the best? Like are they shown pictures of the last winners
So when we give the notification, besides the waiver form, we have a separate form outlining the prizes that they go in and the details and the event. So they're given all of the information. I think some people just didn't – the parents didn't want to turn them in so then the teachers would held the artwork because they didn't have the waivers from.
Okay, great. Thank you. Did you have something there?
Yeah, a couple of questions. Yes. I wanted to know if you have updated your website, if that's the location we can go to or refer people to get information on parking and how to get to the entrance and all the logistics.
Correct, yes the website is open. It's updated.
And did you use a committee this year in your planning like we've done in previous years?
Yes we had our committee.
So the committee
members we had Jose from Community Development, Michelle from Finance then myself and my brother from the Police Department and then Veronica from the Community Center.
Okay well tell them thank you very much for all the hard work.
Thank you
Councilmember Lopez and then Gama.
So I could see that you brought forward some lessons learned from last year when you stated that you were going to move the vendors to an earlier start, was there anything else that we learned from last year?
That was really the only main thing that we got from the feedback from the residents. It was just people waiting to get in, to get the food. Other than that, we didn't receive any major complaints besides traffic. Just people trying to park or having to walk a distance. But it's something we can't control given that it is a festival. So we did have the, like I said, we had the shuttle from as far as from the port all the way right up to the entrance of the festival. Whereas in years past they still had a distance to walk in, the drop off is in front of the festival.
So, I know that seating is kind of limited and some of the events brought out huge crowds. That process like bringing a foldable chair
As far as into the
bringing in with you like carry. Oh,
you mean like a lawn chair? So that was we actually did not refuse lawn chairs last year so we did allow patrons to come in with their lawn chairs since we do have the grassy know more accessible. So we, um, the direction that we had given the security whether they had it, we let them come in with it because people did set up their chairs on the grassy know last year. Okay, so we're not prohibiting those
And then I didn't hear post Beach Fest that there was no noise complaints, correct?
Not that I recall.
Not last year. I think the year prior we got one and not last year we received.
Correct, yeah. And then perhaps it was more of those like we had with the car show two years ago with some noise complaint on that one.
And then the mailer, I like that. We should be using that more but that's just more of a comment. Thanks.
And then as far as getting out, as far as advertising, just so you guys know we will be running our media ads through 95.9 and the Mambo show starting two weeks prior to the event as well as on Radio La Seda will be coming out as well and then we also will be boosting our posts through the Hueneme Beach Festival Instagram account and the Explore Instagram account where we get a bigger reach actually by boosting the post to the different regions in the area.
Thank you.
There's one other minor change that impacts the council. And I think we gave you guys a heads up, but we were going to adjust the timing of the council presentation and the hero presentation also to just try to have that at a time a little later when there's more of an audience than there had been last year. So so that was the other small change we talked about.
1:40 – 1:4734 turns
Are you going to do a, I don't even know what it's called but you'd take all this artwork and put it on a banner and then put it on the entrance. You gonna do that again?
Yes, we're gonna do that again. We actually digitized everything already so we're gonna be getting the banners made just like last year to post on the entrance of the festival.
Yeah, I think that's a really good thing to do and I'm kind of sad about all the artwork that didn't make it. Correct. Maybe we could try and get them.
Just kind of back to your committee, what roles do the explorers actually have in the planning and organizing of these events? Since now they are the lead benefactor of any proceeds that we incur. What's their involvement in the planning?
So the Explorers, because they are in school so we don't have them here on the planning process during the day. That's why we have our city committee and myself and my brother are the head advisors for the Explorer program and part of the non-profit. So we handle the bulk of the, I guess you could say more of the administrative logistics where the Explorers have a big hand is actually the day of deployment of the two days of the festival. They're the ones doing our traffic control. They're the one setting up the items in the festival. They're doing that late night pickup of the trash Resetting everything coming into the morning set up even the to the umbrellas the table mats I'm getting that done and then just being a presence in the festival selling the water Again with the beer because we do have the beer booth it is for the Explorers But we will be having the Explorer's parents and families who are over 21 be the ones managing that while the explorers were handling everything else.
I was asking because I just think it's such a great opportunity for them to learn how to Organize and plan for events. And so it sounds like they've got the logistics side of it, you know setting up that day But the planning side I thought would be wonderful opportunity for them to learn how to put these events actually together, right? I understand they're in school. Thank you
great Nothing else. Thank you so much.
Thank You
Okay we're going to move to our consent calendar. Before we get there, Madam Clerk do we have any public comments for the consent items?
No public comments for consent.
Okay great so the consents calendar will be approved in one motion unless a council member would like to pull an item. Any items wishing to be pulled? I'd like to pull Item 7. Item 7? 3
and 5.
Okay with that said is there can I get a motion and a second for all other items so that would be remaining consent items yeah so that would be one two four six.
Second
okay great thank you. All in favor? Aye.
All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously
Okay let's take item number three.
Okay this is a continuation of the memorandum of understanding with Hueneme Elementary School so it's I'm reading the report and it looks like it's cut in half, the funding 53,000 per side there is a So if the district is capped at approximately half the cost, who covers the internal staff hours for managing the contract? The city may not. I mean we may absorb some of that cost so it talks about four hours of overtime. So I was kind of curious have we breached that before?
Do you want to answer that? Commander Owens has been working on this program with school district for many
years. Yeah, so that was built in because when we first decided to get rid of the life or the crossing guard program internally as a city and We decided to enter into the MOU at the School District It required a little more work on our part because all this process was brand new We've been doing this so long now that Really the staff report and reviewing the amendments in the contract is really the only amount of work I do on it at this point.
Finance does some stuff, but it's just not the amount of administrative work that it took when we first got it off the ground. So all city management services, the contractor, they handle everything now pretty much.
Yeah, I was gonna answer and say Commander Albertson and Ashley in our finance department make it look really easy. So I don't think it's too much effort but I was hoping that that's how they felt about it too so... I
guess if it was a competing contract then they would probably go into negotiations and this could probably...
That would take more time?
That would take more time. Got it. Yes. Okay one last question on here for the City Attorney knowing that the Cross Guards is like listed as top five dangerous jobs in the world We have a six million dollar cap for our insurance. Is that viable for us? Are we well protected with that?
I really don't know our JPIA side of things, James. If you do there's usually excess carriers and there's other different levels to that so I would defer to them on what exact coverages we have but six million wouldn't be it would be high for an initial coverage with an umbrella after that or in excess
And I'm going to see if our Deputy City Manager, Mr. Peretz has additional information there. He's been working with CJPIA for many years so he might have it or can get it.
Yeah, I'll just echo generally what the city attorney said we do have a primary general liability policy as well as an excess general liability policy. I don't have the specific coverage amounts But that's certainly something that we can get and provide to counsel in short order
Look access coverage is usually are quite significantly higher in amounts, but they take something got it
All right. Those will only two questions.
I have thank you. Can I follow up on that? um, but the JCPJ Yes They've reviewed this and they've given their opinion, if there was an opinion to be given I'm sure. I
believe they reviewed it over the years. I don't know that we had them review just the one page amendment this year.
I will add this while he's coming up here, is that the proposed contract with the contractor supplying the services provides indemnification for the city. So right off the bat before even JPIA is involved or any retention or anything kicks in from us, the contractor and their insurance is primary and comes in first.
And that's where our $6 billion would stack upon their mandatory coverage amounts? So moved.
Second.
1:47 – 2:0244 turns
All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously.
Item
number five talks to the interim policy for processing residential projects under state housing laws and my question is pretty simple During the 2024 zoning revisions with state laws, what specific steps are being taken to ensure that we – I mean it seems like we're going to fail this three years in a row. There's no penalties is that correct? So
we're working with them. So
there's no
penalties I think if we if we planted our feet in the sand and said we weren't gonna work with them then there would be Penalties which typically are I think I think the state has put out a list of cities who weren't working with them And who were gonna get penalized and I think The first thing is they're ineligible for any state funding or grants or things like that. But we weren't on the list, and we'll knock on wood that we don't. This item is actually sort of intended to keep us on the right path with the state.
In short just anybody who maybe sort of missed that starting part but we were notified by HCD a couple years back Upon their review of our code and housing rules that they think that there's a few areas that we are stricter than they would want us to be. And so, we have been working with them over the last couple years to try to sort of you know here's a revised version does this work and then we actually have had several meetings Uh, conference calls with HCD staff like where we have their team on the phone and our team on the phone or in person are on the phone or via zoom because they're in Sacramento.
Um, but we've had a lot of those meetings and I think they're generally pretty happy that we've actually made good progress. I think there was a point a couple years back where they weren't so happy with us but now they feel like we're making good progress. And so this is actually the result of When Tricia Meyer, our new Community Development Director came aboard we reached out to HCD and kind of confirmed that we're still intending to work with them. And they asked us for basically a memo that says that we don't plan to challenge state housing rules and we plan to comply with them so that's what essentially this is.
So I think they're seeing it as we're continuing to try to work with them and we aren't just saying like we're not gonna change our rules to match your rules.
So in table a Table a has it lists all the properties and one of them is called out by a parcel number Which is the 99 cent store lot? which we rezoned Last year. Mm-hmm. Has there been any activity on that?
The the 99 cent store lot so Well, yeah there's been activity but not this type of activity and let me explain so you know 99 cent store went out Dollar Tree went in. But where these would be applicable would be if they came in and they wanted to apply for a conversion to housing then basically what we're saying here is that we would follow state law which state law we've talked about it a lot at council meetings State laws really at this point saying if somebody wants to put housing in you have to let them put housing in, you know with very few restrictions. So if there was a developer who came in and said I have a great idea and I want to develop that site into housing as long as they follow the state law they'd be able to but we haven't had anybody come in with that When it opened up from a $0.99 dollar tree, went in fairly quickly and our most recent conversation was they seem to be happy there so I don't think they're looking to redevelop that but it's possible and there's always when we talk about the housing there's always like the risk that if somebody does come in and this happens in some cities where somebody comes in and goes I follow the state's rules and so now you can't reject this project so there is that possibility but I always you know, I've said this to HCD that I don't know.
I think our community does support affordable housing and I don't think that it's necessary like we're not looking to not comply with those We just haven't had developers come in trying to do that
Yeah, just that looked like the biggest acreage of lots that we had and that could meet the mixed zoning requirements Okay, that's all I got
If there's nothing else can we get a motion for number five?
move
to
approve
second
all in favor
aye
all opposed hearing none motion passes unanimously
great now we'll go to item number seven
okay so I asked to pull this item because the process is such that the Nomination and appointment of the annual hero award should go through council for discussion. And I think that was The process and the recommendation from the Citizens Advisory Commission and prior to this meeting taking place over the last couple years, Meaning to communicate with the CAC regarding the review of the applications for the Hero Award. One of the issues I've identified and have observed in the meetings is that not each application gets full treatment, and this happened once a couple years ago with a teacher who had received numerous nominations but because The CAC didn't know who she was, it got set aside.
And then this time there was another applicant I believe her name was Stephanie Kimberling and I think she got dismissed because there was not enough information on her or that nobody knew the applicant. It concerns me that is being used as a criteria for dismissing Thank you very much. That was on the application, but I continue to see every year we're nominating ourselves. We're nominating members of our CAC. We're nominating members of our council now and it's just this really should be for the community and that's what I hope we can see more of in the future.
Charles if you want to comment on the Kimberling applicant? I watched the meeting but I missed that part when you guys reviewed it so Can you explain what happened with that particular application?
Sure, I think you summarized it fairly well. Staff in its review process did reach out to the individual that nominated Ms. Kimberling, tried to obtain additional information about her efforts and the positive benefits of her efforts, the location of her efforts, who what where so to speak and unfortunately the communication that staff had with Individual that nominated miss Kimberling did not reveal specific information that would help either staff or the CAC Conduct a review of the nomination. So that one Not for lack of effort, but really There wasn't adequate information from the submission Nor from the follow-up to provide an adequate assessment of the person's contributions to the community
I think it was her mother who nominated her she used to be a crossing guard here
Yeah, even that wasn't clear. The individual did have the same last name but when asked about the relationship the response wasn't clear on that matter either.
And I couldn't find anybody who knew her at Surfside 3 either so I appreciate the effort but I think in the future I'd like to see the applicants thoroughly given some time and knowing that you went beyond your responsibility and trying to locate You know, the nominee and get more information. I appreciate that. So this brings us to the nomination recommended by the CAC, which is Stephen Gama for his work on the beach.
And that was not the recommendation it was for the people
I
was going to get
there
okay but you said his name and that's not correct so
that's the
nomination
yeah that was the nomination form
yes
and so the recommendation was to recommend an organization in association with a beach cleanup and I'd note think the CAC went into detail about talking about which organization it should be, but being that REACH has supplied him with the buckets and some of the equipment maybe that would be a good way to recognize their contribution along with the beach cleanup. Now I certainly agree GAMA merits recognition in this For his time on cleaning up the beach, 11 years is a lot and it's very quite admirable that he's out there every Saturday doing this. And I understand that that's the direction we're going to move in and invite him to bring his organization in but I just wanted to suggest that maybe Reach might be at least included in that recognition.
You are going to be able to vote on this? There's
no financial interest, so I can't think of any legal obstacle.
Because it is concerning, I think a little bit that it isn't an election year. So I just wanted to raise that and so the timing is interesting but nonetheless, I believe he totally merits it. You know, I think I do support it. I just wanted to put those comments out there so
thank you. Okay let me just for clarification Deputy City Manager can you just explain for us what was the decision from the CAC?
Sure a brief summary we received three applications this year as mentioned there was a nomination for Kimberly Stephanie Kimberling. There was a nomination from the property manager of Thank you, Mr. Chair and members of the public. Whether or not sitting CAC members or sitting council members should be recognized. There was discussion and recognition that last year there was a nomination to specifically recognize the volunteers, including Mr. Gama and others that are involved with the cleanup effort. And ultimately, the action taken unanimously by the commission was to recommend that the 2026 Hueneme Hero Award recognize all the volunteers that participate in the weekly Hueneme Beach cleanups.
Thank you.
Yeah, I just want to say last year we recognized the volunteers with the Lions Club of which Misty and I are a member but reach contributed Minimal amount of support ten years ago in providing like 10 blue buckets since that time We've me I've gotten Amgen has donated and $2,000 which we use to buy pickers The refill shop in Ventura which the eco environmentally friendly organization is delighted to provide us with the buckets and And then I fund the ergonomic handles, the stickers and stuff like that. So the real exciting thing about this is the amount of volunteers over the years and if this were to pass, I would invite as many participants as I can and everyone up here has participated But most importantly is the youth involvement that we've had over the years and it's really, it feels really good to see that many of these kids have gone on to do great things.
They're in college, they're engineering students and they come back to Hueneme as adults and they come back and visit and I really think that's what Focusing on and honestly, it's not about me. It's about the volunteers our coastal environment and getting involved and for that These youth have been highly involved and the optimist club the seroptimist Club comes out Martha's group comes out, the police explorers come out. So we have large groups and so if this were to pass my hope is to flood the stage with so many volunteers.
What Mayor Pro Tem was talking about in our inspiration tonight is exactly what makes Hueneme, Hueneme. It's that people care about our city, our environment, our museums, our recreation department, our pickleball players, I mean, our veterans and our city is really unique in that so...
Well, I'm glad that we understand now that this is going to be going to The volunteers, and we will recognize them should this get approved at the Hueneme Beach Festival because the recommendation didn't say that. So it was not clear. Yeah,
the CAC kind of came up with that. Yeah I did. I
watched the meeting so I understood
that. And I
wanted us to have an opportunity to talk about it Because we should we should weigh in on this.
2:02 – 2:0913 turns
Yeah, I guess the last thing I'll say about this item and thanks to Mayor Pro Tem for pulling it was So when I think of the Heroes Award I think of someone doing something that is, I don't want to say extraordinary but someone who has really done something for our city that to go unrecognized would be really a shame. So when I was reading through, I did read that the CAC, there was a statement in here that said that if the beach cleanup doesn't get it then the second choice is this. Well when I read the nominations I didn't really find any information in the other two. So, I just want us as a city and the CAC not to think that we have to pick someone if the information doesn't you know it's not at the point that they should be a hero right?
And so, that's why I would like to get because one thing we don't want to do is diminish an award and just give it to someone because we can and the title of his heroes award. So I just want to make sure we think about that when we move forward
One suggestion would be the recommendation can include or the motion can include whether to approve the recognition but also scheduling a council review of the criteria and direction to the CAC in the next couple months.
We'll go ahead and make the motion to accept the CAC's recommendation and the City Manager's suggestion that we have an opportunity to review this policy and send some recommendations to the CAC.
All in favor? Aye. All opposed? Hearing none, motion passes unanimously
Great, thank you. We're now going to
move to item number eight that is our public hearing levy and collections of the annual assessments for assessment districts number 87-1, assessment district number 91-1 and district 95-3 and agreement with the Ventura County Auditor Controller for billing of direct assessments. Madam Clerk do we have proof of publication as required by law? We
started the assessment process last week so we talked more in depth about it but I will hand it over to our Public Works Director Fred Camarillo to give us a little bit more background on this next step.
Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council, members of the audience. As our city managers stated at our last council meeting you adopted the resolutions that started these proceedings and preliminarily accepted the engineers reports which detail what the three separate Funds will provide as far as services we have the lighting district, which essentially is Those funds are used to pay for the street lighting bill The parkway and medians which can be used for any work done within our parkways or medians we've a few years ago as you may remember we entered into a contract with a landscaping company and so they've been doing contract work on that we've been using the fund for that to help pay for those services and Then we also have the drainage assessment district which covers the bubbling Springs corridor, but only The channel itself As you know, we've been in a multiyear project clearing the reeds out from the channel.
And we will continue to do that. One of the things that we're looking as I mentioned at the last meeting was we are going to be seeing about getting a permit that we can obtain to do less manual labor tasks and be able to control through spraying. But that's something that is ongoing and we'll be coming back at some point once we get more details on what that is going to take in order to get the permit established.
Tonight is adopting resolutions that will go ahead and say that you want to enact the intent or the ordering of the levy, so essentially we'll report all the information to the auditor And they will assess the properties on their tax bills, and the ordering of the levy also formally accepts the engineer's report separately. The three reports authorizes the city manager to enter into that agreement with the county To put that on the assessor role. It also directs the city clerk to have all the documents filed with the county and then it closes the process, so all that has to be done and turned in before July 7th.
And if you have any questions I'll be happy to answer those.
Are there any questions? We will only take questions at this time.
So knowing that we're still assessing our lighting with SE, so we're going to conduct this levy based on just the data that we do have right?
Correct.
So we won't see the true lighting costs until next year? Which is 90% LED lights across our streets. We don't know if that's made an impact or not.
Yeah, as I mentioned at the last meeting we are going to be submitting a full audit report from SCE which will give us details on what Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We don't know what we're being, if we have the correct tier for what our lighting currently has. Because there's been some things that have been changed over the years and we're not sure that the tiered rate that they have applied to those is accurate.
2:09 – 2:1616 turns
Okay, if there's no other questions I'll now open the public hearing for public comments. The time is 736. Madam Clerk are there any public comments?
No public comments.
Okay, great. Public comment period has concluded. I'll now close the public hearing. The time is 736. So we have before us the recommendation to adopt three resolutions of the City Council of the city of Port Hueneme California one for each of the following districts lighting maintenance assessment district 87-1 Parkway and Medium Assessment District 91-1 and the Port Hueneme Drainage Maintenance Assessment District 95-3.
Ordering the levy and collection of assessments with fiscal year beginning July 1st, 2026 and ending June 30th, 2027 pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 authorize a city manager to execute the agreement with the Ventura County Auditor-Controller for the billing of direct assessment. May I have a motion and a second?
Move to approve.
Second.
Is there any discussion?
Yes, I probably should have asked a question. But my understanding is that this was a mandate of some sort in 1991 or I just heard 1976 and could you tell us the benefit to the public for having to go through these assessments every year?
Yeah, so the Fred can jump in whenever you'd like but essentially cities had the option of creating an assessment district to therefore then charge for those specific services. But for the idea being that people who are in those districts get the benefit of those services so they contribute into it and so I think ours were in 1987, 1991 and 1995 We created these districts whereby the people in them pay and one of the districts covers your lighting costs. The other one covers maintenance costs and things, the maintenance related items.
So in the planned development like Surfside Village, there's streetlights and this is how we pay for those? Or is that
not? I'm not sure if it's Surfside Village specifically. I'm not sure if Fred does know.
Yeah, there are some that are city-owned so we have 91, I believe, city-owned lights. 91? Yes. The rest are all owned by SCE and so anything that's owned by SCE also they also perform maintenance on those if something happens to them. With the city-owned ones, they will perform the electrical services for it. But it's a city owned. Then we would get a charge for that.
And the City Manager is correct in how he explained that. So to your question, how does it benefit? An example of a couple things. For the parkway and median and the street lighting, everybody gets assessed those because the parkways and medians and the street lights run throughout the city. The entire city. So everybody gets that. The drainage, on the other hand, is separate because that is for the Bubbling Springs Corridor. So only those properties that are runoff, so essentially between J and Ventura Road from Bryce Canyon down would get assessed because their street flow runs to that corridor. So there's less units assessed in the drainage, because anything on the north end of town does not get benefit of draining to that channel.
And then I imagine that the county has their own assessment district for their
flood control? Yes they have some different things like for vector control and West drain that runs down the middle of Channel Islands Boulevard. So they have other assessments that get divvied out as well to people because it is something that serves the general public
If I could add one thing just kind of more general budget related is so These are also just a good example though when you see that our assessment districts were created in 1987 1991 and 1995 And then try to think of any business today that would still be charging the price it charged in 1987 and how they would do that. And one is either they change the price, right? Like every store does or they cut the service you know.
So these are actually like really good examples like the lighting district in particular is just... That is a straight check to Southern California Edison And over the years, their rates have increased as everybody knows. Everybody pays those so now the money that was approved to be collected for Edison isn't enough to pay Edison right? So then that leads to our general fund subsidizing those costs or us having to look meet with Edison to figure out how to reduce those costs Or what a lot of cities are doing now because a lot of cities were in this boat, but then they now are creating overlaid districts which now basically add on the inflation on top of the underlying district. And so those are all like these are good examples for just sort of the general budget picture of any business that's trying to charge It charged in 1987 probably isn't in business anymore.
And so it's just one of those things you have to adjust and figure out
So I think you just Reminded me that of our 91 Lighting units, I think we went to LED lighting a couple years ago an effort to reduce the cost associated with that How's that working out?
That's what ones I would say, you know give credit to the and the work that they've done where they have been able to keep these costs sort of within, you know, the realm by constantly working on trying to improve those things. But at some point it's, you know, at some point you just have to figure out how to adjust. So we're probably getting to that point like I said a lot of cities are doing the overlay districts now because costs are increasing.
2:16 – 2:3013 turns
Anything else? Questions, comments. If not Madam Clerk please take roll.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Motion passes unanimously
Great, thank you. Thank you. Oh, you're standing for that. Great, we'll move on to number nine. This is another public hearing and adoption of 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Resolution. Madam Clerk do you have proof of publication as required by law in a complete file of reports and exhibits? Yes, Madam Mayor. Thank you staff please present the report and
I'll just note quickly I know the PHWA members already heard these presentations so you guys are lucky in getting to hear it again but items 9 & 10 are connected and so we'll have one presentation with our team for that is for both of those items so it'll be a little different than what we normally do but each of the items By law, because of the process we have to bring them as two separate public hearings. So with that I'll introduce Fred Camarillo our Public Works Director to introduce our team on items 9 and 10.
Yes, good evening again As our city manager noted there are two separate items that need to be approved tonight both Fall within the urban water management plan what you're going to hear about and then the water Shortage contingency plan is a section within the urban water management plan And I will turn it over to our consulting engineer who? Put these together Mr. Jake Comer from Weston Associates
Thank you Fred, thank you Mayor and Council good to be back up here again All right So yeah the urban management plan as we call it a UMP for short is a planning tool for water agencies It's required by state law And it's a good source of information especially in terms of updates with general plans and other planning documents So it's per the Urban Water Management Planning Act with the most significant update back in 2009 and several in 2020 as well.
Those required are those with 3,000 customers or 3000 acre feet of water or more and they're due every five years. The last one back in the 2020 UMP was due July 1st 2021 and this 2025 UMP will be due by July 1st 2026 And some updates to the water code, although none specifically to UMPS in particular. There's a lot of indirect ones in regards to water usage and so there's a list of those and we included more updates and information in the report itself.
A little breakdown of the UMP. There's nine sections with intro, through service area, water source supplies, water use. As mentioned, the Water Shortage Continuity Plan is basically section eight and it has as mentioned a standalone document that you will adopt separately and main reason being is because it'll be enacted separately so during times of drought when either The state requires a level 2 or sorry any sort of shortage levels 1 through 6.
The city will have to enact their water shortage contingency plan in accordance with that so for example back in 2021 it was a level 2 action announced across the state, so the city had to enact their stage two from their water shortage contingency plan But also, secondly the city can enact it on their own if there's any local supply issues. If maybe a pipeline breaks or if there's leakage or just severe drought issues regionally you can enact it on your own as well.
And some highlights, so we cover the city service area with a population of about 21,400 people. With no major planned developments, we see experience steady growth minimal over the next 25 years reaching about 24,600 by 2050. And we have images of the water service area, which you're all familiar with. We have a few other various different maps and figures we put throughout.
And some more highlights. Obviously the water is obtained from the Port Hueneme Water Agency. And the water from there consists of the two imported sources from one of which pulls from the Oxnard Basin and the other which is from the Bay Delta and the Colorado River. And again, we go much further detail about these sources. We follow it basically from where the water enters that gets to the city all the way up to its original source and then like vice versa, we go from the usage all the way down to each user and we bring it down so you get a full following of where the water is coming and going.
And we even include water losses into our analysis as well When we came out here for the kickoff, we were able to visit the Brackish Water Reclamation Demonstration Facility and so we got to take some photos. We included that in there so we have some up-to-date photos to help make the report more robust and not just checking off all of the boxes with the state.
Some more highlights, so about 5,900 meter connections in 2025 with imported water supply reaching about 1,700 acre feet. We show the supply capacities which again that's the import of water from going to the Water Agency and we basically took about 53% of that being the city's minimum available supply And that procedure was based off of the 2020 UMP cycle, and it seemed to work out well. So we carried that over, and it shows basically that reduced capacity. And for our analysis, we want to show the minimum available supply so that when we project forward, we're able to look at a more constrained analysis, not just giving what is fully available but minimum available shows more tighter situations We'll get into basically in the analysis, we don't just look at normal years.
We also look at single dry years and multiple dry years. Multiple dry years being a five-year consecutive drought period Thank you. There's no wastewater collection system, and there's no recycled water. Although the city's customers for potable water use they send their wastewater to the City of Oxnard and they benefit from the indirect potable reuse of recycled water from the Advanced Water Purification Facility by injecting it into the ground and then eventually pulling that same water up that gets imported into the city It kind of helps to maintain that sustainable amount of groundwater.
And there's also ground water recharge through injection wells adjacent to the Advanced Water Purification Facility. So more highlights, like I mentioned we include water loss in the demands which was about 1700. Taking that into consideration, taking into consideration the current population we see about 71 gallons per capita which does meet the 2020 per capita target of 109 GBCD.
That was set back in 2020, actually prior to 2020. So I think that was 20...that's for the 2009 law, the SBX 77 I mentioned and that doesn't change and part of the water code they want to just keep seeing how these agencies meet these targets so Well under that, about almost 40 GPCD less which is a really good result. So we projected again demands going to 2050 and we included some passive savings due to better efficient facilities more stringent water conservation measurements from the state as well as just the city at large and we have shown about 1800 acre feet of projected demand by 2050 And now we'll jump into the Water Shortage Contingency Plan.
Again, it's Section 8 and it covers the different six levels of the response actions or shortage levels. So as I mentioned when the state previously enacted Stage 2 they determined that there was about a 20% reduction in the total average supply across the state So by enacting stage two, the goal was to implement the shortage response actions that align with that to reduce water usage by 20% to bring us back into balance there. So we show a description of those mandatory compliance with stage one being voluntary and basically permanent always in place, the rest of them being mandatory and their actions get more and more involved as the levels increase Is there
dates associated with those level of reduction?
Oh, like how much time to a one if you go to five. No and I know yeah it's interesting because the only example we have because these contingency plans all before 2020 it was kind of a free-for-all where everyone had their own but in 2020 the state said hey you guys need to show basically like a crosswalk to these six here and so since then we've only had the one example where stage two So I realize it was not the best example because then after stage two was gone, it wasn't like it went to stage one. It just kind of went away. So I haven't seen a stage three enacted and then it gone down but I believe that would be the case.
In time frame that's actually a good question We wouldn't be able to have that. We do have with the response actions percentages allocated with those, so basically if these actions are performed and we don't exactly specify guess how long but until I believe they'll just be enacted till the reduction but they show percentages for each of those.
So I recall that we stopped watering the mediums, and is there a percentage of reduction? Is there a metric that we as a city could be informed of because you know the downside is we no longer have vegetation on the Ventura Road in the medium and on the outside. So question then it's like well how much savings did we get by doing that
Right, and I know for this though the response actions would be to reduce irrigation on lawns. So if you've already done something in place, I guess that would fall under stage one as a permanent action. Off the top of my head, I couldn't give you a percentage. I'd have to look at like the area and compare it to like the full area that's being irrigated right?
But yeah, so
this turnkey turf thing which we're going through right now. And you just look out front, we terminated the, a lot of people ask us and sometimes we don't have the right answer but my answer has always been like well we're, the state's mandating us safe water and this is why And
that's where it's somewhat different. The response actions being that like the turf, the non-functional turf mandate, right? Which we do include write up on as well too and that's in the early instruction section but that's something Is somewhat separate because that's, I guess permanently in place and that's ongoing. Whereas these are in basically emergency situations enacting these so I know like like phasing out turf isn't a good emergency action because By the time you get done, hopefully it's gone. I mean if it's still around you have bigger issues but most of these look at more immediate effects to reduce use and increase supply so although there are reductions yeah they kind of stack on each other I guess. Madam
Mayor can we finish the presentation before we ask questions?
2:30 – 2:357 turns
No problem, yeah. It's good to cover it up and you've heard it before as well so I think that's probably why. So moving on again we throw some visit the facilities we include some photos and write-ups and this is another example of a potential emergency situation say there's an issue at the plant where the water is received there's actions to remedy usage and supply elsewhere Yeah, but basically we're all the same anyway. But in terms of the conclusions, so we saw water supply capacities which are solely imported water are sufficient to meet demands although near the time of 2050 under drought conditions there is less supply Thank you very much.
And next steps, as mentioned there's the two separate resolutions for each of these and then within 30 days our staff along with city staff will submit the adopted to DWR provide the CD copies to state and library in the county and then work with the city staff to make this available on the website. And now I can open up to questions
How many city wells do we have and how many are infected by saltwater intrusion?
I think there's four at the top of my head, if I can remember. But basically the aquifer we're standing on is basically infected for lack of a better word. So those are all within that area. And they maintain them so they are functioning but they're just not being used because of the amount it would take to treat that.
So is there a possibility that in the future that the saltwater could be pushed back naturally?
So, naturally is not likely especially just with trends are going and sea levels rising. Water's kind of coming more inland right but like the Advanced Water Purification Facility that takes recycled water a lot of that All right.
So from 2021 to 2026, there was unaccounted meter distribution water loss. Looking at the report, what was the major contributor to those water losses offhand?
Offhand, no. Only because we basically pulled from the validated water loss audits, right? Those are done annually. There's a certified validator that does that and there's a whole analysis that goes through it. We basically just pulled the end result which determined the amount from there. Off the top of my head I know we do somewhat of an analysis further into that, but we don't really break down what the audit shows. And sometimes they don't always necessarily show it because some of them are just standard to the state.
Usually I know in the audits itself they take into account real loss which is like main breaks, right? Like leakage. But also there's apparent losses where meters are maybe not reading correctly, maybe you're actually underproducing or overproducing. So I know from my experience one of the things I would recommend and this is probably a serious case not fully knowing without having in front of me but for most audits that I've seen and I've seen a lot of these is there's not usually meter testing done so basically they're not flow testing or calibrated. And that's like the big thing to verify how much water is coming in Okay.
2:35 – 2:4120 turns
I guess this is for Fred, specifically on facilities using potable water for non-functional turf. I know we're pretty aggressive on converting our sites. How many more are left?
We have several. We have available to us a map that the state actually provided, high level overview of everything and they've actually determined based off of what they see as what are non-functional areas. So we're going to be going more into that. We can separate it out into layers and then get into even smaller like section by section of areas that we're going to do, but we haven't gotten that map completely. Because it does talk
to before January 1st, 2027. Did I read that right?
For
the mandate to
get out convert all these sites That's What the mandate is the reality is it's not gonna be possible to do all that But we are working at getting there and part of that is also showing that you've not completely ignored it, but you're working towards it Okay. Got it
So this applies to local businesses as well that have landscaping in the front or?
It's based more for the residential program and like city-owned properties. So like anywhere where we have a good example is out in front of our public work yard, we have a strip that's out there that's we know that is a non-functional area so those will be Those types of areas will be areas that we know eventually we're going to have to get to and convert those.
So one is that the one we approved last meeting with the Longshoremen building, they have a lot of non-functional or they have a lot of nice turf. Not turf but landscaping. That were native, low water? So correct. That met that requirement? Yes. Got it.
Okay, that's all I got. And one other thing to, you asked a question about Metering what like water loss? We're gonna be comparing but we need to we need to go through The summer so we can see because we know that's our high water usage when we had all the grass out here So we'll be taking all of the meter readings and looking and then at the end of the summer We'll be able to compare and truly start telling how much water we save just with this project And we'll do similar things to other areas at the park, you know. All that's going to be converted so we'll be able to take those readings as well and compare them to what typically ran through those meters and doesn't anymore once we get all the drip irrigation installed and all that.
I'm not a plant expert, but is there a way that we could probably list those plants on our website so that they can see?
What we use and they could probably model. They all need help, like they're just asking a lot of questions.
Yeah no we can put a list together I mean we have the original plans and layouts so we can just easily pull those off and create a link on our website to the plants that have been used by us for our projects. Awesome thank you.
So in front of Public Works when the non-productive landscape area
Non-functional
turf. I don't even know if it's turf, I think it's ivy but what does that mean? You're going to just let it turn to dirt or does it mean you're gonna widen the sidewalk?
I mean, we'd have options. If we wanted to that could be something that we also did to widen our sidewalk which would help meet ADA requirements which we also have to do as well or turn it into a low water usage planted area. Converting the sidewalks obviously would be a much more expensive endeavor but it's possible. We have decisions that we'll need to make on what makes sense. I mean, we have competing interests.
Right and I've been watching this very closely and I see all the irrigation lines being laid across this big dirt area that used to have turf. And I noticed that wherever there's a plant there's a couple little holes in this There's multiple levels of pipe, and so are we certain that that's going to result in saving water?
It's intended to. And that's why I said we'll be able to actually tell by pulling meter readings from the past to meter readings that will be current and actual and compare
them. Going back to, are the meters going to be calibrated and flow tested before?
They do get calibrated and we're also looking, one of the things that we went through in the budget is we're going to be looking at doing a whole citywide upgrade to all of our meters. So it'll be the advanced metering technology so that will also help in the long run because those things We're going to go ahead and open it up for questions.
2:41 – 2:5425 turns
Great, thank you for your questions. So I'm now going to open the public hearing for public comments. Madam Clerk are there any public comments? It's 8-0-8.
No public comments.
Great, I'm going to conclude the public hearing time frame and now we are going to take the recommendation Which is to adopt the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Resolution for management of the city's water resources. May I have a first, I mean a motion and a second?
So moved.
Second. Any further discussion?
Are we also adopting the water shortage contingency plan along with... For the next one?
It has got to be done separately because it will open and close the public hearing.
If no discussion, Madam Clerk, please take roll.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 moved. Second. Any further discussion? Are we also adopting the water shortage contingency plan along with... For the next one? It has got t
Show transcript
Motion passes unanimously
Great, thank you. We're gonna move to public hearing item number 10 and the hearing and adoption of the 2025 water shortage contingency plan resolution. And so back over to... Oh Madam Clerk do you have a proof of record?
Yes Madam Mayor.
Okay great, thank you. Over to staff. Do you have anything? Nothing additional to add. Okay I was, I was gonna say there should be no questions okay but I do have to open if there's no questions have to open the public hearing for public comment it's 8 10 madam clerk are there any comments
No comments.
Okay we're gonna conclude public comments at 8 10 so we have before us the recommendation to adopt the attached 2025 water shortage contingency plan resolution for management of the city water resources may I have a motion and a second?
So moved.
Second. Any discussion?
I have a discussion. Knowing that I did take a tour with Dennis and I got to see in real time what the water pressures Water usage was going in real time, seeing it on a big screen. They identified actually a leak in Naval Base Ventura County because they know what the pressures are, they know what the usage is and this thing was just dumped in like a faucet.
They had a broken water main and then so he called Naval Base Ventura County. He says hey you guys need to look at your water. You guys have a massive leak going on. And 15 minutes later yeah they did have a leak There are a lot of tools that we have but with the new water meters, that should be very helpful to us. That was it.
Great thank you. Anyone else? If not Madam Clerk please take roll.
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0
Show transcript
Motion passes unanimously
Will these new meters be able to help you tell when my daughter's spending an hour in the shower?
On a serious note, by HOA we seem to have leaky sprinklers all the time. It is frustrating when you see sprinklers.
Okay let's move to item number 11 Mr. Camarillo thank you so much for your report and thank you for the presentation Number 11 is a discussion of proposed short-term rental regulations and direction regarding the revised ordinance. Staff, City Manager is that over to you?
Yes thank you we'll have a brief presentation Just go over from a high level. You may recall that we had discussed the, we've discussed the short-term rental compliance program several times over the last, since about October of 2024. It's back on tonight for some direction and so just some background was that in October of 2024, city began receiving short-term rental complaints from community members A couple months following that time, council directed staff to explore short-term rental regulatory options.
From February through June, staff held community surveys in a public forum here at Council Chambers to get community input. This is one of those topics where there may be 1,000 different opinions on What exactly should be in the rules, but most people generally agree on 99% of it. And so we hold the community surveys and public forums to try to really iron out what those consensus items were.
And so then we returned to Council in August of 2025 with all the feedback from the surveys and the forum. Council received the feedback and ended up directing staff to draft an ordinance with what we called reasonable good neighbor standards, and density restrictions. And then that ordinance came back to council in November of 2025. We held a public hearing to review the draft ordinance and council directed staff to remove the separation requirements, if you recall we had included requirements that units had to be 200 feet away from other units, other short-term rental units So we had, I think feedback from owners at that time who said that they had concerns that that would limit even if there was only a couple of them it could limit if there's two next to each other.
So that council directed staff to remove that requirement and then the other requirement that was highly focused on was the owner posting notice requirement And so several owners attended that meeting and raised concerns about posting their personal information. So council asked staff to kind of look at what some other cities had done, some other agencies had done in return with alternatives to that posting requirement.
We'll go over really briefly what was in the draft ordinance and then we'll get back to the alternate posting options on the next slide. But just as a reminder of what was in the ordinance at that time when it was presented, it was essentially a program that would require annual permits and business license from STR operators. It established occupancy parking and quiet hour standards with those being the main three areas we heard concerns and complaints about being the number of occupants, the parking impacts, and the quiet hour rules.
So it included those standards. It required a nuisance response plan and a local contact, meaning the owner could hire a property manager or something to be local and respond to complaints about the units. It established enforcement and permit revocation procedures And then it also required TOT hotel tax compliance as part of that as well. And then it established a citywide 10% permit cap, you may recall we talked a lot about that because part of our challenge Here in Hueneme is that any area that is in the coastal zone We have a limit that typically the Coastal Commission has to review and approve the ordinance And they have not historically approved any that are more strict than about a 10% permit cap there's been a couple of exceptions that where cities created whole different processes, but Just as a general rule that 10% rule seems to be what they typically approve.
And so, so that was what was in the ordinance, as I mentioned a moment ago the council directed staff to come back and remove the separation requirements and give alternate posting options. So the separation requirements, we will remove those. And then the alternate posting options, we've identified three pretty simple posting options and again all of these, we looked at other cities and these are all processes used but there's also a dozen other ideas that are used too but these seemed like three reasonable ones that were workable and that address some of the concerns raised at the prior meeting.
So option A would be continue to require an exterior posting, but simplify the information on the posting that would be displayed. And so instead of having all their identifying information it could just be a notice that gives the permit number and the 24-hour contact phone number. So that essentially all that a neighbor would need to know is if they hear noise, they hear a party They can go, I think that's a short-term rental. If they look, they see that it's a short-term rental with the permit number and they get a phone number that they can call and complain to. So that's the simpler process.
Option B that we provided is... We talked about this too and I think at the time some of the owners had said that they preferred this option at that time But the no posting, no exterior signage but what's called the neighbor notification requirement. And essentially what this would be would be requiring the owners each year as part of their permit process to mail notice or mail or provide notice to owner to the neighboring housing within 200 feet that they are a short-term rental and provide that person their information directly So there's nothing that gets posted so the general public doesn't know, but the neighbors within a certain radius would know.
And then that notice should have the information including a nuisance response plan and the 24-hour contact for if there are any issues. And then option C, which is one that we saw pop up more frequently or more recently I think it's a newer idea is simply having a placard with the QR code that doesn't have any other information. But a neighbor would be able to go up and do the QR code that would take them to a link that would give the information.
So those are three potential posting a notification options. And so, based on the last review from Council where most of the ordinance there wasn't really a dispute it was removing the separation requirement and remove and then basically coming back to council with three options for that notification. This item could be as simple as council choosing one of these and then we would build that into the ordinance and return to council. Because it's an ordinance, it has to be a public hearing. We'd have to give public notice so we could return probably I would estimate legally we have to provide a certain amount of time but that's probably six weeks that we can return to council with that item Or if more significant changes are desired and we want to go back through the whole ordinance, then that would be a longer process.
But we wanted to sort of end on this slide with the note that it could be as simple as just choosing one of these and building that into the ordinance. So with that, we are here to answer questions and take direction from the council. So that's all I have.
Great. We'll start with Council Member Lopez. Do you have any questions?
Sure. So looking at this section 5671D, states that operating STR without a permit is a misdemeanor offense and I kind of just want our residents to hear this because I kind of briefly talked to Paul the attorney Can you talk to this, walk us through what we can legally do if someone's operating without a permit?
2:54 – 3:0524 turns
So generally violations of municipal code are misdemeanors by default, so there's nothing really unusual there. The question is more about the enforcement practices in most cities and from what I've seen and it's true of Port Hueneme as well. Enforcement is done administratively first and criminally in unique circumstances or repeat offenders or things like that.
Since I've been here, I haven't been sent on a single criminal case so it doesn't appear to be a major source of enforcement. But it is a tool and it is very common practice to make violations a misdemeanor. What I would suspect to see in any kind of ordinance for STR enforcement primarily an administrative citation type program first, and that's because the state allows for significantly higher fines for SDR violations than they do for other types of code enforcement nuisance violations. And that's just to offset the cost-of-doing business nature of okay I'll pay the $100 ticket if I'm going to bring in five thousand dollars this weekend kind of mentality So I would assume but I don't want to step on James's toes on how it's enforced, but that's commonly how that's done.
So City Manager are we going to initially contract this to go and search Hueneme to find all our SDRs?
So there's, it's a complicated answer. We currently contract with HDL who are sort of the sales and hotel tax experts across the state if not the country. I don't know a city in Southern California that doesn't contract with HDL because they're so sort of omnipresent in all cities So we contract with them. They actually have access to identify short-term rentals, and we have had some conversations with them and they have identified some units.
We also... There are state laws and bills and things like that pending that are supposedly going to require Airbnb and I think Airbnb and VRBO to notify cities But the breaking news on those is that those organizations are lobbying heavily to try to kill those things, and they've killed them a couple times in the past. We would intend to use HDL, continue to use HDL. But like we said before with part of this is we don't have more resources to put towards this. We have one code enforcement person currently at the city handling all code matters and this is not gonna generate any revenue. This is not something we're doing for revenue purposes it's purely for you know the benefit of the community And so we wouldn't have additional resources, so we want to make sure that we can do it efficiently.
So we'd be using our HDL current resource, we'd be using our code compliance if people start calling us and saying that they know that their neighbor's doing a short-term rental and they have proof of that then that's something we could do or if they call us and say my neighbor has a short-term rental and they've posted it and they aren't following any of the rules and that's something we can follow up on?
So we do both of those and then in a perfect world what we're hoping We've kind of been hoping it for a while Is that air B&B and VRBO are end up being required by our state? Officials if they stick to it to actually just notify us automatically when anybody uses their platform Which would really be the that'd be the best case, but they're lobbying heavily against that.
So got it That's all that's so many questions I had
great Thank you
So it looks to me that the beach area is going to be the main draw for short-term rentals. To me, this is a revenue opportunity even though it's not a big no on you're shaking your head. If
you're looking at it as a revenue opportunity, you will be disappointed.
Okay, so then I guess that answers my question. My question is rather so the T tour was it to t? Okay, that's the hotel tax right? So that's all we're gonna generate from this Is there any way we heard somebody like say if you have a four-bedroom oceanview Surfside for Short term rental. I imagine you could get three grand. I hear some of these prices three grand a week You know from outside and so we can't alter Like say if there's somebody getting $3,000 a week. We can't say okay Well, that's should be, let's just say $500. No you can't do that.
Nope without going through the Prop 218
tax process. You'd have to set that for everyone and so you would have to set that for all the hotels and everything like that too. So it's one tax rate. It's whatever the hotel taxes is set at which Por Hueneme again has one of the lowest tax rates so 10%.
So just to finish this up I am disappointed because I know it takes a lot of Resources to maintain our beach and and other things in our parks And of course, you know we we do need revenue. So but um,
yeah, I guess just to be fair the one way You know, it's kind of funny right? It's a catch-22 the one way that this would actually generate revenue is is if everybody started doing it, which is not what we actually want. Right? And we want that balance and the rules are intended to keep the balance. But typically I think right now we're aware of about 12 that actually like have rented like that actually rent And my guess this is off the top of my head, but my guess is it's probably you know Maybe it generates maybe five thousand dollars. So my
overly optimistic view that there's gonna be 220 short-term rentals basically a hotel motel not the Holiday Inn in Hueneme does no that's not gonna happen
So they can operate now, right? And we don't have 220. So now we're putting more regulations into place so I don't anticipate there'll be more after that. Maybe potentially we find out about some more but Like we've done that a little bit over the last six months, but it's not a huge number. So I don't anticipate that it'll be anything significantly different from what we're already seeing. It's just that the ones that we see now will have to follow the rules.
And this question came up in regards to one of the public comments we received. I believe I recall that if an HOA was formed before 1976 then they could ban short-term rentals, is
that correct? Yeah the idea is that they existed before the Coastal Commission so they had authority over it and everybody who existed after the Coastal Commission, the Coastal Commission now has authority.
Right and I think we determined there was one HOA in the City of Port Hueneme that surfsided. That's not four,
Thought it was two, but I always get it mixed up of if it's two or four. Which is it? Surfside three. Yeah. It's one of the surf sides.
Okay. Great. Do you have any questions? Okay great. So do we have any public comments? Yes. First
is Patricia
Le
Pen.
Let me see if I can do this right now. Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Members and City Manager Vega. I'm here today as a member of Hueneme Wave. We're a newly formed organization that is working together to preserve what's wonderful about Port Hueneme and work to enhance the parts of Port Hueneme that need a little lift. I'm speaking today in support of the draft ordinance on short-term rentals.
Our group met and we spent a fair amount of time looking at the proposed ordinance, and even with the change of not posting the sign or posting the phone number, we spent a lot of time looking at what other cities are doing And a lot of cities already have a way that you can go in and put in an address, and it'll tell you if that is a licensed entity. And then if it's not, you can just click a button and report it. So we think there's a lot of technology that will make that much better. It also broke my heart that this isn't going to be a revenue-creating ordinance. And so I looked at Ventura, Newport Beach, Santa Monica and Huntington Beach and I noticed that there was a trend in what they were doing that they require The permit number and the tax number are in all advertising, and that includes the VRBO and Airbnb.
But then I stumbled across in October of 2025 SB 346 was passed by the legislature And if we put in our ordinance that we require facilitators, they're calling Airbnb and VRBO facilitators. If we require them to tell us that we can request from them on a monthly basis everybody that is on their platform And then you could just go in and see who's being rented, and so you would be able to more easily get to the revenue. But it's required that it be in our ordinance that we require the facilitators to give us that information.
Also, all of those cities have a very big fine and it's Ventura it's $1500 for first offense in Santa Monica is $1000 a day Newport Beach the first time as a warning with 48 hours to comply After that, it's $1,000 a day. And anybody that opposes to a big fine for not adhering doesn't plan on following the regulations so thank you.
Thank you.
3:05 – 3:1210 turns
Pat Berberich?
I'm also Surfside 3, which by the way you know we don't have to obey that. We don't have that problem of the short-term rentals what we have is a problem with people doing it anyway and tracking that down but that's a process. We'll take care of that I'm Pat Burbrick. I'm a long-term resident of Surfside 3 and a member of the steering committee and here's As Paige has already said we want to preserve the residential nature of our community and we want to enhance the areas that need attention.
But there is one issue that we want to bring up here a little bit of an addendum to what she was saying The City of Oxnard Ordinance prohibits short-term legal entities that are not a natural person. And this has been approved by the Coastal Commission, that no permit will be issued to corporations, no permit will be issued to a property owned by six or more owners unless each owner shares a common ancestor This ensures that the owners remain invested in caring for their property and not just trying to drive as much profit as possible to passive investors.
So we are requesting that this clause be added to the Port Hueneme ordinance. If other cities around us ban corporations and we don't, they're gonna come after us. So then you end up with a corporation owning a whole bunch of condos and just renting them out short term. And then it becomes kind of a dystopian world in my view because suddenly you're losing neighbors now, so anyway.
So representatives of our little group Hueneme Way will be sending each of your documentation of the Oxnard Ordinance as it applies to this and we appreciate your attention to this matter. Thank you so much.
Paul Quigley.
Hello, Paul Quigley, Hueneme homeowner, organizer for STRfreedom.org. Thanks once again for having me. I appreciated the City Council's accommodation on making changes to the original proposal for the short-term rental ordinance, in particular the elimination of the separation requirement which when you think about it is onerous at the very least. Exterior signage I know is under consideration.
The main concern with external signage is that it presents a security risk to the operators, they can be easily targeted by criminals. Approach would be option B, which would be the notification of the neighbors. Which provides for a much more secure mechanism to ensure that everybody around knows that particular operations, particular house is being operated as a short-term rental. Another onerous requirement which I saw still in there talks about parking and use of garages being made available.
And I'm not sure what the city is trying to achieve by mandating garages being available to guests, I think it's overreach. So I would request that the garage requirement be eliminated. The other thing that I think is very important and the city has really, I think dropped the ball on data-driven approaches. And take the opportunity to come up with the metrics to provide the data right?
To monitor the effectiveness of the ordinance. So I think this should be included in the ordinance itself that the ordinance is going to be reviewed on an annual basis for effectiveness right? Is the ordinance achieving its intended goals, right? Is the city realizing an increase in complaints or a decrease, right? So let's have the processes and the mechanisms in place to gather the data. I mean you have a city analyst put the analysts together to work to put some some numbers together and provide more transparency.
The city has a transparency problem here, I'm sorry, particularly with these complaint rates. I think by having metrics, by having data driven, and by having transparent reporting you're going to take a very emotional issue and provide some sanity to it What I'm seeing is just a lot of rumor and innuendo. And
it's an approach that's misguided. Thank you, sir. Your time is up. The other thing to think about is the
benefits. Okay, thank you sir. These short-term rentals produce significant amounts of tax revenue.
Sir your time
is up.
I've
contributed over 3,000...
3:12 – 3:2232 turns
Sir we appreciate your public comment but your time is up. Thank you Let's see, any other public comments? No other public comments. Okay, so we have before us a recommendation to discuss and propose short-term rental regulatory framework with particular focus on posting and notification requirements and provide direction to staff regarding any desired revisions to be incorporated into the revised Short Term Rental Ordinance for future consideration.
May I have a motion and the second remember this is just to say that we're we want to move forward with the discussion
Don't don't we want to make recommendations, too. Yeah,
I don't know that we need emotion at this time We just just you can have open discussion There's a consensus that you want to make a motion to support and direct staff to pursue then that
would be appropriate sounds good Thank you so much
So looking at the first thing that we need to have consensus on right now is the potential posting notifications. Initially I did like modified option A, but actually B has – I actually do like B. I think B meets for the most, most people's requirement. And I did go through five STR of other cities. It's a mixed bag of yeah it's this. So we're not far off like we're really close. We just have to have consensus on what we want to do.
I'm gonna lobby for option B
Yeah, I like option B. The only concern that I have is that we're leaving it up to the homeowner to actually do this and so what if they don't do it then?
Well, it should be part of the permitting
process. Well, I understand. So should permitting period right? So that's the only concern I have with this. I absolutely can be persuaded, I do hear the comment about one safety. The other thought that I had is if anything is selected that causes the neighbor to have to go to a home that's already experienced in a nuisance That could actually be unsafe, right? Correct.
Yeah and they so think about it She probably had this person probably has the postcard on the refrigerator Doesn't need to go engage the house They have the data and they can make the phone call
You know, I support option B and I hope that the recipient of these notifications is better organized than I am with my mail. Because at the point in time when it's an emergency, you know, dang it where did I put that thing? And if there is a true emergency just like you said, I don't think we want People engaging in what could be an unsafe situation. One of the things I'll agree with our last speaker is like, maybe we should have a discussion like what is our mission as a city with STR's? What is our goal? Clearly it's not going to be revenue generation, but what is our goal? Public safety. Okay then in all our considerations of our ordinance we should draft it towards public safety however I have a different view on making it a target.
I think thieves are looking for high-value items So I think thieves would, you know, I think kind of takes to me and they're looking for high value items, jewelry, cash. I don't know. I just like the requirement of mailing. Um, I really don't like having a placard on the window not because someone's going to break into the place when it's empty but because they might break into the place when there's tourists who may have high value items with them. So, you know it goes both ways but yeah so I'm a little unclear like what is our mission? What is our mission as a city and maybe someone could help me understand that with STR.
Yes, so I do like be as well but let's be real and honest How many of us throw away all of our junk mail anything? It looks like a postcard. I keep none of it So what's the likelihood that many people in the community have the card that has the information for this? STR So what happens if nobody keeps the cards? So who's gonna have the information and how you're gonna know who's going to have the information I think although it's a good Option, it's not fail-proof.
Having someone put a little sticker with a phone number only and their permit number no other details about who they are or where they are just a way to contact that's easily found doesn't have to be on the window could mean some other area maybe around the mailbox if we were talking about safety issues and not wanting to approach the residents but I don't know I throw away all the cards that come in I never keep any of it
So City Manager, I read something in the report that spoke about the possibility of having not this in the actual having the city possibly having a link on the website. Did I? Okay
So That's something we could do a few ways, but I think we had specifically talked about it with option C where essentially that would be a Code that would take you to a link that then had information But we went we have talked about internally the idea that like there may be a way we can figure out one way or another to still like if we did the neighbor notification requirement and Maybe we still have like a way to sort of anonymously post at least like the contact information on the website or something. And then it's at least if you remember, okay my neighbor has one and I think they were number 10. I've lost the card but now you can go on the website and try to get their contact information.
That's tricky as well right? Yeah. Because if you're talking about people like Council Member Gama was talking about anybody could go to a website and put in an address and find out information.
But what about my neighbors operating an STR and they're not legal? I mean, but that's again. That's something that we should be interested in
right? Well, that's just a that's just a code compliance complaint then if that if
that's no But it could be it could be much much more in the event of a crazy situation Right because okay you're gonna call the police
Mm-hmm
Yeah, in the event of like an emergency you're going to call the police still nothing on this will change that. But this is just anything short of that shouldn't involve calling the police. So I...
Hold on just one second. Mayor Pro Tem. Thank you
mayor. Yeah, I'm fine with B but it seems to me that most HOAs have a property manager who should also have these numbers Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And the other recommendation I was going to suggest is that we take a look at Oxnard's ordinance has suggested and incorporate the sections that the Hueneme wave group had recommended
For
the corporations, yeah, I think that's
what you're saying. Yeah, no corporations,
I think I agree with that too because You know if you look at
Do
you
have anything else? No, I think that's it for now. Thanks
But if you look at like Surfside 2 which is probably what 35 units You know, that's a ripe Venue for a corporation to come in and make an offer that everybody can't refuse, you know
Could I just make a point of order? This has been happening for several meetings now. It's just, can you wait to be called on by the mayor before we speak even though we're still trying to have a discussion sometimes it's difficult because you want to jump in but if you could wait that would be good.
Should I wait? Okay. I'm done.
Okay so I had written this down um that cuz we've we've been kicking this around about 18 months And we get bogged down. The meats and potatoes of this is really good, and what we should have is a trigger point. Mandatory one-year review so that we can get our lessons learned. What worked? What didn't work? What can we amend? And continue improving this document.
We're trying to get it so perfect that we can't make consensus, and we keep kicking the can down the road. I think what we need to nail down, come up with the posting, give council direction so that we can get this going. And have that one year from now at the top and say hey is there anything that we need to fix on this? Thank you.
3:22 – 3:3023 turns
Can I ask a page. What did Oxnard's ordinance call out in terms of notification requirements you know which option they were
Actually have it open in front of me right now because I was when you mentioned the other thing on that So I was curious what they did. I haven't gotten to that section yet, but if you okay continue
So city manager what What specifically would you like from us tonight? So do you want to kind of go over topics and let us say yes or no we wanted in or do you how do you want to
I think it's a simple, so we have the underlying ordinance. This was the question that the council wanted to revisit and choose an option. So I think it's choosing an option here. And then the one thing that was mentioned that we, it's funny last time around we had said when we brought the ordinance back we said that when we We'd come back at a later time to talk about the potential fines for violating some of the requirements. But now that we are taking another stab at drafting the ordinance and I hear sort of a consensus, and I think it's true is that our current code that just has bare minimum fines isn't gonna work so we should include some recommendations for looking at some of the neighboring cities and having similar fines for violations of those good neighbor standards So I think if we get direction on which option and then to proceed with the, to also include the specific penalties for violations.
Then we'd be able to bring that back. If it's that simple, we could probably bring that back within three or four meetings.
But I think the language too is for non-corporations shouldn't be permitted.
That could be a choice for Council the challenge or you know the reason why staff doesn't have a recommendation on that is. It goes back to what's the, what's the purpose that we're trying to accomplish and well we heard when we had all those meetings with From the members of the public, it was my concern is that the person next to me will run one and not be good neighbors. So we wrote an ordinance that makes sure that whoever it is that owns it if they're gonna be expected to make sure that they're following these good neighbor rules so for us like that hasn't been an issue brought up previously but it's a council choice.
Just to speak to that I mean they also want to be able to contact a person If there is an issue with the Airbnb, they want to be able to pick up the phone and contact that owner and not get a corporate recording.
But either way, even the owners are probably just going to have a property manager? So either way you're contacting a property manager.
I can follow up on that if you want. With respect to the noticing and posting requirements, Oxnard has an inside-the-house posting requirement that includes all of that information 24 hour contact all of that inside the house but not an exterior posting requirement. They It's part of their permit fee, but it's the planning division that sends out the public notice to all neighbors in this case within 300 feet of the property.
Of the pending application. So there's...it's similar to your option B there. The notification is done by the city though. I'm not finding anything with respect to this corporate prohibition. There is a rule about if you're the owner of a vacation rental property, you can't be the owner of another vacation in the city which may be the intent would be to cut down on the corporate ownership people buying up investment properties For the purpose of SDRs So that might be where that's coming from but that's the reason I went there in the first place because I was a little concerned about a Prohibiting corporations who the Supreme Court feels are people And there's a lot of I didn't think that that would pass muster just to say corporations can't own property and do this But it looks like maybe the intent here is to prohibit multiple owners
Yeah, I appreciate city attorney doing some quick legwork. Yeah, so my I Want Fines, I think fines should be significant because I think what we're trying to do is shape behavior and And again like councilmember Lopez says you know a year for now We should revisit this and we should see okay What are we doing? How are we doing? But if we have a permit holder in the city who isn't following our rules in regards to STRs, I think we should have a heavy fine. Not $100 fine but something that's significant so that we get the behavior that we expect.
We looked up quickly a couple of samples and it looks like the state caps it. What
were the numbers I gave
you? We saw one quickly where its first violation 1500, second violation 3000, third violation 500.
And that's the cap pursuant to state law which is Only for STRs. It's unique to ST
and is that what's in our ordinance? I haven't no
The last time around we had said we'd get to that in the future Yeah, I'm saying I think we all would agree because essentially that you know You hope that no one violates it But you don't want them to violate it very often and we don't want to have just a hundred dollar
fine
yeah, and use more staff time that costs more than the violation is so I think that Approach makes sense for a lot of reasons so we can build that into the ordinance with council's direction
And I did find that corporation language finally. Okay, they do have something which Again concerns me but I don't know I'd have to look into this They do have a prohibition on vacation rental permits issued to property owned by a corporation unless Every shareholder or partner of the corporation is a natural person. Corporations that are made up of
corporations... Your feeling is that's maybe unconstitutional?
Well, I question it but I think they're trying to get around it here by saying you can still be a corporation and do it as long as your corporation isn't wholly owned by another corporation
So like a family or family, a family, the
family trusts are allowed. Right? Explicitly that's not a corporation but if you're an LLC which would be a comp and common full disclosure I own an SCR in Lake Havasu. I'm quite familiar with SCR laws. Good place. And I own that property in an LLC but it's just me and my wife we're the members So that would be allowed under the Oxnard Ordinance because the corporation is wholly owned by natural persons. But if it was a corporation that was owned by three other corporations where the shareholders or subsidiary type things like that, that's what they're prohibiting.
I don't know if that's lawful or not. I haven't done the research on that. It's novel. I haven't seen that particular restriction before but I did locate it. They do have that.
3:30 – 3:4025 turns
So I think we have consensus.
Yes, does anyone else have anything else? So City Manager, I think you all have what we've communicated out.
Yeah and so like we don't really need a motion because we are just gonna return, well return with an ordinance. So we'll return with an ordinance with option B selected and the STR specific penalties and I think I heard the corporation language.
And then one year review.
One-year review my suggestion because it has to go to has to go to Coastal Commission which might take a year so yeah, my suggestion would be Maybe let's say we could probably word. It's something like one year after implementation Yeah, and then that way we actually have a year of data not four or five months
on that note how? What's your estimation estimation on? Getting it back from Coastal Commission
Yeah, it's been tricky figuring that out because some things are quick and some aren't. I mean, I guess just a rough estimate is I would think it would be like three to five months.
It's not years.
And I guess another thing we have to remember is while we're reading these other ordinances, a lot of those cities are not in coastal communities. Mm-hmm are and some of the cities have different rules for within the Coastal Committee, you know coastal zone
coastal ones I know are much much stricter than this But they also have quite enhanced enforcement along with it. So their police and their code are actively involved With it so that you know there it's we're talking about communities where $3,000 wouldn't even get you a day let alone a week
Okay, Mayor Pro Tem has something.
Yeah I had just a couple comments regarding the mission of what it you know that Councilman Gama raised the question on and that you know our mission I think with the STR's is yes public safety but we also want to encourage good neighbors but we want to encourage people to have a place where people could come here and vacation and it could be light tourism But it's, I think we want people to come and visit Hueneme but we want them to be good neighbors.
And I forgot the other thing I was gonna say.
That sounds like a pretty good
description. So it's not, I just don't wanna leave it at public safety only.
Right.
That sounds too restrictive. You know, we are the friendly city by the sea or we try to be.
I think City Manager is writing this down so I think he'll probably come up with
something. And oh, the other thing I remember, I just want to thank Hueneme Wave group for coming out and sitting through everything to make your public comment and you sir in the back. Thank you for coming in And offering your comments, much appreciated. Okay
if there is nothing else regarding that topic we'll move on to the city manager comments and reports. Thank you
and try to keep it brief but got a couple of things we wanted to highlight. We wanted to first thank everybody for coming out and celebrating the grand opening of the Miranda Park playground And so we had an event out there on June 9th that was pretty well attended. I think, in fact, there were too many kids playing and that was the obstacle to holding the ribbon cuttings. Yeah no not yet.
So we want to thank everybody for coming out to that and celebrating with us We also, this actually came up I think it was in the PHWA meeting and I missed the opportunity to highlight it but we mentioned the fact that all the cities and the county work together on a hazard mitigation plan and this year is a big update year coming up. And so we in partnership, all the cities in partnership with the county wanted to get the word out that on Wednesday June 17th and they're trying to do it in a central location sort of for the whole county. So at Camarillo in the public library in the community room, the county will be holding the 2027 hazard mitigation plan public workshop And so our team is working with the county to update our Port Hueneme City plan, but these are actually public workshops to try to get input from everybody on potential hazards involved and needs from those hazards.
So everybody's invited to that workshop on Wednesday at 6 p.m.. And then, I know it was our presentation so should not be a surprise at this point but the beach festival. We actually don't have a, we technically don't have a council meeting before the beach festival although I know we're talking about potentially having a special one for our labor negotiations if needed but the beach festival returns on July 11th and 12th.
So we invite everybody to come out to that event from 10 AM to 8 PM this year. Free parking and free admission. And so our next council meeting, because of trying to sort of stagger our summer break so that we have a meeting every month in the summer, we have our next meeting about a month from now on July 20th. We actually do have a pretty full schedule already.
Presentations from FoodShare Ventura County Park and Recreation Month proclamation, then we have a public hearings. We're trying to stay more on top of the cannabis businesses and potential changes there so we're bringing back two development agreements for review working through issues with some of those businesses. So those are listed as public hearings And then three business items currently scheduled the audit report. We are working, we've asked our auditor to make sure we get our audit report in time to present it to council on July 20th and we've been assured that that will happen.
We're in that in-between year where we're converting to new auditors. Beacon has made a request for budget adjustment, so we asked them to come give an update and explain that request to the council for consideration. And then actually you may have noticed the last item. We originally had it on the agenda for tonight, and it was the community benefit fund item with a port.
But we ended up agreeing just all the people involved in the review process. Making sure everybody sees it and is comfortable with it. We ended up agreeing to push that item to July 20th So everybody has time everybody would have time to review that so that we'll be bringing that back which I know that's a hot topic, but the you know short version ahead of that meeting is that essentially It's the renegotiated amendment that would sort of streamline, with the intent of streamlining the community benefit fund project process for both the city and the port. So that is currently scheduled for July 20th assuming that everybody involved reviews and okays it by that date which we are pretty confident about so.
When you say everybody involved do you mean
It's our staff and port staff. Okay, yeah, so we're Working through it So right now that's the plan for July 20th. So pretty heavy agenda And we will bring all these items when we convene again next month, thank you
Great Thank You city manager. We'll move to a council member reports and comments councilmember Lopez
Yes
Over the last two weeks, I did attend the Miranda Park Playground re-grant opening. That was a lot of fun. Mr. Softy and Bubbles are always fun. But the amount of kids, holy! That was probably the best event that we had a good turnout on for the playground. So that was really good to see the residents really enjoying it. And then kids throwing rocks at each other was kind of funny too.
Even though we didn't, we had a meeting that was canceled for HHI, Hueneme Housing Inc. I did go back and I took my notes and I wanted to report out so the board is updating internal controls by adopting 11 point formal financial administrative policy to ensure accountability and strict credit card limits fraud prevention We are reviewing a upgrade to the elevator, ADA units modifications remain the primary forthcoming capital goals that we have on tap.
So we're setting the foundation for that nonprofit so we're moving really at a fast pace trying to get it right the first time. Also, I did talk to the Veterans Ad Hoc Committee. Right now we have tentatively scheduled to install the banners the week of the 22nd. That week you'll start seeing banners flying around the city as an initial batch and then there's still another three or four more banner applications that just came in that we're going to review.
So, we're going to get through those fast and try to get those on order for the applicants. And that's it. Thank you.
3:41 – 3:5010 turns
So I spend a lot of time in Miranda Park walking my dog and what we saw on the grand opening is pretty much a daily occurrence there. And this council, city staff over the last seven years, we have revitalized our parks and recreation, we really have. Living as close as I do to Miranda Park and being to see the transformation, it's amazing. You know, I like to count people in the morning 730 walk there could be as many as 60-70 pickleball players and some tennis players It's pretty amazing to have witnessed that transformation firsthand and I'm really proud of this council in the city You know, maybe down the road we could get a turnkey turf update presentation. And it's pretty...
I see it moving along but I don't know the scope of the project how long it's gonna be going on and so forth and so on. But it's definitely moving along. Looking forward to the beach festival. Thank you.
Thank you Mayor and thank you Councilman Gama for thanking staff for the Miranda Park grand opening and all the work done there. I want to ditto that, was really appreciative of all the effort that went into make that a nice playground and see it was so much fun seeing all the kids playing there and in the grand opening was quite pleasurable it's nice very nice I sit on a lot of legislative committees.
And right now what I'm trying to do is put together a list of legislative pieces that I think the city might be interested in. I'm working on it, there's a lot of legislatures and sessions so there's a lot going on but there's some in there that I think we should be paying attention too. So I'll be sending those over to you James and should I send those to Brian as well? Is he our legislative person?
Yes, so Brian and I work on the legislative platform. So anybody who sees any laws passed and has any either questions or just want to flag them for us just send them to the two of us.
Yeah there was one interesting when I saw today's them wanting to amend cities asking cities to amend their general plan to include child care I'm like, wow, that's really digging deep into the weeds. But yeah, luckily League of California Cities is opposing it but I'll get that over to you as soon as I can. There was an email this morning about us, the feeding of the ducks at Bubbling Springs and I responded to the individual and then talked to the Audubon Society because I'm a member of the Audubon Society and I just did some work with them last week so I've got I've got Kristen on my speed dial and reached out to her. She says she's gonna get us some information on what the signs might cost, I talked to REACH they said they would pay for them but at this point I kind of want to just...I don't know if we need an agenda item for it or to discuss it further or if it's something that just can be handled administratively because I know there's going to be other costs other than that the materials itself It
depends on what costs are covered and potentially what costs aren't. I know we're in the loop, so based on what we hear from those groups will determine if it needs to come back to Council or not.
I will have a proclamation request under agenda requests, so that's all I have. Thank you.
Great, thank you. As I mentioned earlier in my inspiration, I did attend a Suroptimist event this weekend and it was their installation of new officers. I participated in the pride proclamation and flag raising from At the county, our supervisor V&A Lopez led that. There was a great event I ran into Councilmember Gama at the Ventura County Museum for the parallel histories of Ventura County during the U.S. Revolution exhibits. They did have a great presentation, Chumash presentation they brought over to the mall it was great seeing one Since we did put one on our library, in our library mural. So it was really nice getting a chance to see one. It's not completed yet but it's almost completed. They're building it here in Ventura County.
I did also attend the Ventura County Community Summit on Robotics Autonomous Systems at the port that was really well attended. There was a group of students who are not from specific schools, like we have our Hueneme robotics team. They're actually made up of kids from multiple schools and they are actually the autonomous robotics champions in the US. And they actually, their robots actually shoot balls into a specific basket area. And so all teams did the same things, and you could see them like you would see the robotics over at the port kind of moving around but they made more balls than any team by hundreds.
And these were young kids building robots. So it was pretty amazing just to see them and the fact that they were there. You got a chance to talk to them was great. And again, the ribbon cutting at Miranda Park was great. I mean having too many kids there is a good problem to have and so I think the parents were as not surprised but you could tell they were having a great time as well. So it was good seeing that and then I attended this weekend Oxnard State of the City presented by Mayor Louise MacArthur. So it was really good. It was really good.
Yeah, I was surprised no council members were there. They talked about the Brown Act and I was like okay this is the state of the city so anyway but it was really good and so other than that just attending my meetings and so everything is going well.
Mayor reminded me how wonderful that event was at the museum. And we learned some things, and one of the things we learned is that tummel, when you look at it, they wheeled it in and it's what? 20 foot? I mean, it's amazing. And when you look at it, it looked like it's welded together, right? And I was like, how in the world do you weld wood together? But what it is, it secured tar.
And so the Chumash would collect tar from the beach and they figured out a way to engineer it into a bonding that's truly amazing. So yeah, it was quite remarkable. Thank you for reminding me. I forgot.
So that's all I have. Is there any... Oh by the way, did anybody forget something? If not, we're going to adjourn tonight's meeting. Okay, if nothing else I'd like to remind everyone that the next council meeting is Monday the first Monday in July due to the summer wait a minute the first Monday in July The second the 20th Yeah, July yeah on July 20th Due to the summer recess and so our next meeting will be the 20 at 630. So the meeting is now adjourned It's 916
Why, I mean.