UnGovr Transcript
iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.0:05 – 0:062 turns
Thank you. Good evening. Good evening, I'd like to call this meeting to order. Ms. City Attorney are there any reports from closed session?
There are no reportable actions tonight Madam Mayor.
Roll call — called by Unidentified speaker 3
Show transcript
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled — click to expand
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, the first item on the agenda is Item 1D1. Presentation of Certificates of Completion of the Spring CERT Graduating Class. And Emergency Services Coordinator Shannon Johnson is here to present this item.
Mayor Cavanaugh, members of the City Council, good evening. Tonight we are recognizing the Spring 2026 Community Emergency Response Team CERT training class. This year marks the 32nd year that Simi Valley has offered CERT training. In that time over 1600 participants have completed this hands-on 24 hour disaster response training course. This training is free to the community, thanks to our partnership with the Ventura County Fire Department who provide instructors and equipment. We would like to extend a special thank you to Ventura County fire instructors William Michael and Ron Oatman as well as the county CERT program director Steve Lazenby.
We would also like to thank the city's Disaster Service Worker Volunteers and CERT volunteers for supporting this CERT training. The volunteers with us tonight are Phil Ancrum Ed Baker, David Fisher, Katrina Vertuno, John Gusan and Kathy Tonoli. We thank each of you for your time, service and dedication. Over the course of six weeks these graduates received training in key emergency response skills including disaster preparedness, disaster psychology, medical operations, fire safety and suppression and search-and-rescue.
We thank all of tonight's graduates for their dedication to the program and congratulate them on their graduation. We asked them to encourage their neighbors to take CERT training for when disaster strikes, the more prepared we are, the better our community will respond and recover. The next CERT class will be offered this upcoming fall starting September 9th. For more details visit the emergency services page on the city's website.
At this time we invite the graduates who were able to attend to come forward as their names are called to receive their certificates. Steve Adashi Peter Andelman Michael Beeth, Malika Buland, Paul Campanella, Julie Clayton, Richard Fernandez, Holly Hoffman-Fernandez, Virginia Guerrero, Don Lee, Gina Lorenzo, Curtis Morissette, Tricia Potter. Claudia Rojo. Emi Sandin.
Perla Teran Lopez. Brian Vega. Regina Abaca. Aubrey Tokusanu. Mason Tokusanu. Himabindu Vanapinta. Veda Devakatra. and Vihas Devakatra. Congratulations!
Wow, this is really a good-sized class. Did you all learn a lot and have a good time? I'm a CERT graduate so I'm proud to say that. I think some of the best things we can do for our community because in times of emergency such as earthquake or fire, we don't have enough law enforcement and firefighters to help each and every one of us So if you're trained, you can help your family and then you can help your neighbors. So that's what you guys have all done. I'm so very proud of you and just want to say thank you for doing all of that. And thank you to our wonderful DSW volunteers they do a great job too. And our fire chief Dan Horton right here. So thank you Dan for being a part of this too. And Eileen for supervising it.
You wanna say anything Chief? He did just get promoted to assistant chief
Thank you, thank you everybody. And to our CERT class on behalf of the Ventura County Fire Department I just want to offer a sincere thank-you and appreciation for what you do. Stepping up to serve your community is it's honorable it's selfless and we applaud you on a job well done. Thank you so much.
She's gonna organize her pictures Thank you.
Congratulations, each of you.
CERT is just such a great organization or a great class to take, so I encourage each and every one of you to do it. You learn a lot! And I have a go-bag ready with the tool to turn off the gas and a hard hat and just all the little things you don't think about at Thomas Guide because your navigation doesn't work when there's no internet, so keep that in mind. There was no Wi-Fi.
My Thomas Guide is very old, thank you, but at least it's got the basics. All right I think we can
move on to our next item now.
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is Item 1D2 presentation of a proclamation declaring May 2026 as Mental Health Awareness Month and Community Services Coordinator Ryan Fowler is here to present this item and accepting the proclamation is Chris Turner Executive Director of the YMCA
Good evening, Mayor Kavanaugh and members of the City Council. This evening we are recognizing May as Mental Health Awareness Month. To accept the proclamation I would like to ask the following individuals to come forward just to the left of the podium. Chris Turner is already up there, good job. Chris Turner is the Executive Director of the Simi Valley Family YMCA.
Youth Council Members Jia Bhatt and Surya Ravikumar. Youth Council Chair Jasleen Kangura And I would also like to invite Rithmika Naveen, Youth Council Teen Wellness Committee Chair to come to the podium and read a statement on behalf of the youth council.
Good evening, Mayor Kavanaugh and members of the City Council. My name is Rithmika Naveen and I'm a senior at Oak Park High School. Developing and maintaining healthy physical and mental habits is essential to building a strong healthy community. While one in five people will experience a mental illness during their lifetime everyone faces challenges that can impact their mental health.
Despite ongoing misconceptions, mental health is just as important as physical health. And serious mental illnesses, though often misunderstood are highly treatable and more common than cancer, diabetes and heart disease. In fact they're the leading cause of hospital admissions nationwide with effective treatment individuals living with mental health conditions can recover and lead full productive lives.
Promoting mental wellness is a shared responsibility among businesses schools government agencies healthcare providers community organizations and residents The City of Simi Valley remains committed to fostering a healthy community and encourages residents to explore the valuable mental health services and resources available by visiting the city's website at simivalley.org In support of this commitment, the Simi Valley Youth Council continues to lead efforts to reduce stigma and raise awareness through various campaigns, youth summits, and the upcoming Teen Wellness Night on May 22nd, 2026 Therefore, we ask the City of Simi Valley to proclaim this month of May 2026 as Mental Health Awareness Month to support and promote mental health awareness in our community.
Thank you.
Thank you very much. Chris did you want to say anything Chris?
I just want to say that Simi Valley has a lot of amazing young adults here and they are leading the charge for mental health and making us all a lot healthier so thank you
Desiree.
Hi everyone, so as Ruth Mika mentioned we do have our upcoming Teen Wellness Night coming up the Youth Council we really prioritize mental health as one of our initiatives and Teen Wellness Night is a great community event for you to bring your friends and family and really enjoy de-stress during the springtime of year. So we really encourage you all to attend our Teen Wellness Night it's here at the Simi Valley Public Library on May
0:17 – 0:2214 turns
22nd. Thank You Mayor Kavanaugh
Thank you. As a little plug too, for the first time ever our softball community is having a softball tournament June 27th and 28th for mental awareness and they will be making a donation to the new crisis stability unit in the name of somebody who recently we lost to suicide so thank you.
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 1D3. Presentation of a proclamation declaring the week of May 17th through May 23rd, 2026 as Public Works Week. And Public Works Director Ron Fuchiwaki is here to present this item and accepting the proclamation are Assistant Public Works Director Al Sexton and Assistant Public Works Director Engineering Chris Oberender.
Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. I want to thank all of the audience members for coming out for Public Works Weeks. It is my pleasure this evening to join the City Council in proclaiming the week of May 17th through May 23rd as Public Works Week. Not only is it a time to recognize the efforts of the Department in managing the city's infrastructure and providing excellent customer service, but it is an opportunity to recognize the men and women that operate and maintain those facilities and provide services to the community. These facilities and services include engineering, streets and highways, landscaping, public buildings, water sewer, environmental monitoring and transit.
I am especially proud of our Simi Valley Public Works employees that work day and sometimes night to ensure the community has a well-functioning and well maintained public infrastructure. Now I would like to join the City Council in proclaiming the week of May 17th through May 23rd as Public Works Week in the city of Simi Valley.
Ron, this is going to be your last time doing this. He's retiring at the end of June after how many years? After quite a few years, so yes. And what is it you like to say? Public works keeps things flowing? How do you say... You say it better.
Well keeps things flowing, keeps things running.
Make
sure the water comes out your faucet and make sure your waste water goes down the toilet.
Exactly! So it's a very important aspect of our city services right gentlemen? So we just want to thank you guys for everything, you and your crews and everyone in Public Works for everything you do. Wave to them say hi offer them a bottle of water when it's a hot day you know just to be nice so we have a great community so would you like to say anything? You will, okay. Thank you.
Yeah I just want to say thank you and accept this on behalf of all the hardworking Public Works staff that we have here at the city and it's an honor to lead that group and it's really a pleasure for these people to know that they bust their back every day and they are the backbone of the city keeping vital infrastructure going so thanks everybody.
Thank you so much. Come join us, it's your last one.
I know he should have, huh? And Ron was being modest. He has 25 years with the city and 50 years in total in public service. There you go, 50 years in public service.
Would you like to say anything, Ron? Okay. Thank you all very much.
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 1D4. Recognition of the Wastewater Collection System Work Group of the Sanitation Division for winning the California Water Environment Association CWEA Local First Place Award and Statewide Third Place Award for 2025 Collection System of the Year award for a medium-sized collection system. And Public Works Director Ron Fuchiwaki is presenting this item Supervisor Keegan Shirk and Chip Marquette and Rob Pratt, Wastewater Collection System Tech 2 are here for the presentation.
0:23 – 0:297 turns
Good evening. I saw it sitting there. I'm like what is that? Okay that is pretty big.
Good evening again Mayor Cavanaugh and council members. Of course you see Keegan, Chip and Rob up there they're part of our sanitation crew our collections crew they're the ones that when there's a sewer blockage was in one of our sewer lines they're the ones that go out and unblock it and keep the sewer flowing Al Sexton and I are pleased to announce that our Public Works Wastewater Collections Systems team was awarded first place for medium-sized wastewater systems by the California Water Environment Association at their Tri-Counties Awards dinner in December of 2024.
And there's a nice trophy there that they won at that event. And just recently the team was awarded third place out of 17 local sections at the annual CWEA conference in Sacramento. We didn't get a trophy there, we barely got our certificate. The California Water Environment Association or CWEA is a professional organization dedicated to advancing the wastewater management and water quality sectors in California. CWEA was founded in 1928 and represents over 10,000 professionals in the water environment field including wastewater collection system technicians operators, engineers, laboratory technicians and other specialists involved in wastewater management and resource recovery. Tonight's awards are given to agencies that demonstrate outstanding performance in maintenance programs, regulatory compliance, safety training and operational excellence.
It acknowledges agencies that maintain reliable sewer systems, prevent sewer overflows and ensure environmental stewardship. The wastewater collection system work group has a staff of nine, three of which are here tonight and is one of four sections in our sanitation division and public works. These rarely publicly acknowledged dedicated employees keep everything flowing from the east portions of the city to the water quality control plant and then disposal into the Arroyo Simi.
Winning this award is considered a prestigious recognition in the wastewater industry, reflecting leadership operational excellence and commitment to public health and environmental protection. Please join me in congratulating our city's Wastewater Collection Systems team in achieving these prestigious awards.
Would you like to say anything? Just
real quick. For those that don't know, we're a medium-sized system in Simi Valley. That means we have over 400 miles of sewer line that these individuals maintain and keep flowing. Not only do they keep it clean by roto-rooting the lines, but they also video them and see if there's any fun things in there. And there's all kinds of things they find in there from time to time. So appreciate the hard work they do, and it's a pleasure to have to lead this group so thank you.
No, they're done. Congratulations and thank you for all you do. You want a picture? Get Ron up here too. She likes it over here with the background. Thank you very much, thank you gentlemen for all you do. The last one holding it has to take it home right?
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 1D5. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to Outgoing Community Projects Grant Review Committee Members and Deputy Environmental Services Director Cynthia McCullough is here to present this item.
Good evening Mayor Kavanaugh and members of the City Council. In 2011, the City Council and Waste Management executed a Memorandum of Understanding which provides annual grant funding of $150,000. The city council awards funding to non-profit organizations for community projects and programs that benefit the Simi Valley community. In 2017, the City Council created the Community Projects Grant Review Committee consisting of seven representatives from each one of the four neighborhood councils, the Council on Aging, Youth Council and the community at large.
The review committee provides public input and a funding recommendation to the city council for consideration. Each year, the requests have well exceeded the amount available and all deserving programs and projects are not able to be funded. This year, the review committee first met on April 15th to develop its review process for evaluating the 26 eligible funding requests that totaled over $802,000.
On April 22nd, the review committee met again to receive public comment presentations from applying organizations and discuss the funding requests. After discussion, the review committee concluded its service by providing its funding recommendation for City Council consideration that will be presented later this evening. To show our appreciation, the review committee members who are present this evening are asked to come forward to be recognized for their contribution of time, leadership and service to the community.
Representing Neighborhood Council No. 1 Paul Chandler, Neighborhood Council No. 2 Gail Sutton, Neighborhood Council No. 3 Steve Busco, Neighborhood Council No 4 Deanna Block The Council on Aging, David Lewis. Youth Council, Amman Sudreeth and the community at large, Nadia Karpansky. Please join me in congratulating them on a job well done.
0:30 – 0:3712 turns
Sorry they weren't in order so I kind of got a little lost there. Thank you all for volunteering or voluntold on this committee. It's probably one of the hardest jobs that, of any of the committees that we have because the requests always exceed what the availability is. So thank you all for your hard work on this and making those hard decisions. That's kind of, that's one of the reasons City Council formed a committee so that we didn't have to do it.
To be very honest. So but we thank each of you for your contributions to our community. We appreciate it.
Madam Mayor and members of City Council,
the next item on the agenda is Item 2, Public Statements on Appointments, Special Presentations and Informational Reports. We do have one speaker for this item this evening, Brian Schumacher.
Hello. Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh, Councilmembers and staff. My name is Brian Schumacher and I am the Advocacy and Community Impact Manager for Autism Society of Ventura County. I am here tonight on behalf of our dedicated advocacy committee who review city council and school board agendas each week to ensure that people with disabilities are included in decisions that affect their lives.
So we appreciate the city's proclamation, recognizing May 2026 as Mental Health Awareness Month and wish to offer our strong support. And congratulations to the recipients at Autism Society of Ventura County. We believe that it's important to share that mental health challenges and mental health crises do not present the same way for everyone. For neurodivergent and autistic individuals, signs of distress can look very different from traditional expectations. What may pair as defiance, withdraw agitation or behavioral escalation can often be signs of a mental health disorder worsened by anxiety, sensory overload, communication barriers or unmet support needs.
For many autistic individuals, what is labeled a mental health crisis is often a systems crisis. A breakdown in environmental supports, communication access or regulation strategies. Additionally, autistic people face significantly higher rates of mental health disorders, suicidality and are at risk during behavioral health crisis interventions. With this in mind, awareness must include understanding that prevention and crisis response approaches need to reflect those differences.
This means disability-informed training, culturally responsive practices and coordination with families and community based providers. When we broaden our understanding of what mental health looks like across neuro diverse populations, we reduce stigma, reduce unnecessary escalation, increase safety and positive outcomes. We appreciate the city's leadership through this proclamation and look forward to continued partnership to ensure mental health systems serve all residents, including those who experience the world differently. Thank you.
Thank you.
Madam Mayor and members of City Council,
the next item on the agenda is Item 3B1 Informational Presentation by Youth Council Member Gia Bott
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and distinguished members of the City Council. My name is Gia Bott, and I'm a sophomore at Santa Susanna High School. I would like to give my sincerest gratitude to you for your continued support of the Simi Valley Youth Council. Your support allows us to grow as youth leaders and give back to the community. As a member of the Youth Council it's an honor to be able to come forward today and share our most recent updates on events and initiatives.
On April 27th, Youth Council Chair Jasleen Kangura and Vice-Chair Nandia Krishnamoorthi presented at the California School Health & Behavioral Health Conference. Their presentation was called The Power of Partnership, Youth Leadership in Action. The goal of this conference was to be able to educate school based health professionals on how they can allow their students to thrive and succeed. And they did exactly that. We are happy to announce the applications for the 2026-2027 Simi Valley Youth Council term have closed with over 90 applications. We will be holding interviews for new members in June. For returning members, interviews will be held on May 26th. We're excited to welcome new and returning members to the Simi Valley Youth Council next term.
Our next big event is Teen Wellness Night on May 22nd from 5.30pm to 8pm at the Simi Valley Public Library. Our hope for this event is to have students from all over attend and provide a healthy last few weeks of AP testing! We'll be featuring therapy dogs on the spot, on-spot volunteer opportunities with the ability to earn service hours and mental health boots on prioritizing self care. After the event we hope attendees support our not one but two fundraisers at The Yogurt Land in Panda Express located at the Regal Center right next to the library. Proceeds from this fundraiser will benefit the Ventura County chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness whose goal is to advocate for and provide support in crisis resources to those affected by neurological disorders.
On May 19th, Youth Council members Surya Ravikumar, Ethan Bott, Jeslene Kungura, Serena Kungura, Friday Night Live mentoring member Leila Salinas and myself will be presenting to the school board informing them of youth council events and initiatives we have also completed We will be discussing items such as social media campaigns, our recent youth impact forum, teen wellness night, youth summit, underage drinking and gambling prevention grants. And about Friday Night Live mentoring in the Friday Night Live Youth Summit that occurred in Anaheim last year.
On May 30th from 11 a.m to 1 p.m, the Youth Council will be holding our first ever Field Day event at Royal High School, a free event to raise awareness about the dangers of drinking and driving. This event will include an activity hosted by the Simi Valley Police Department. To end the Youth Council term we are excited to announce our annual escape room on June 18th and 19th, an event I'd like to say is a Youth Council favorite The theme for this year is Bank Heist. It will be hosted on the Berylwood Teen Center in partnership with the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. All profits made at this event will benefit a local nonprofit organization.
I highly encourage everyone to stay connected with the Simi Valley Youth Council by following us on Instagram, Facebook and YouTube at Simi Valley Youth Council as well as on TikTok at SBYC 2929. Once again, I would like to thank Mayor Cavanaugh and the City Council for inviting me to speak this evening and for your continued support of the youth efforts in our community. Your commitment enables us to create meaningful change, and we are truly grateful. I'm happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you.
Thank you. Mayor Pro Tem Litzter has a question or comment.
Gia, thank you that was a wonderful presentation. And did you really say that you closed with over 90 applications?
Yes, we're really happy about it.
That's huge. And for the audience, will you remind how many candidates get to be selected?
0:37 – 0:5416 turns
For the new members, so we take nine returning members. So that leaves 15 spots out of those 90 applications.
So it's outstanding and selective. And just a reminder, tell us who the schools that are represented. I just think that's fun to put out there.
I think it's a variety from all over the SVUSD district, from Royal High School, Westlake High School, Oak Park and Simi Valley High School of course and Santa Susana.
And also the middle schools too if I'm not mistaken so wonderful collaborative effort with all of our students and thank you for a great year in all that you're doing and look forward to the wellness event so thank you so
much. Thank you so much.
Councilmember Ayala?
Thank you. So the work that you guys are doing is so impactful that each year, the number of applicants continues to grow and it's because of the work that the members in the group do. And so I know the members of the grant committee thought they had a tough job to do but this is 90 applications and they have to select a total of 24 right? And I'm not looking forward to the 26th or something because I have to sit in on those interviews and actually help to tell students that they did not, are not going to continue onto the Youth Council.
In advance, don't get selected to continue. That doesn't mean that your service to the community has to stop. There's still a lot of other opportunities that we'll make sure you have available to you so that you can continue to serve but thank you for all you do Mr. Fowler again you do an amazing job with the youth and you need to be applauded for the continued growth of the program over the years.
Thank you, Gia. That was a great presentation and yes Ryan Fowler does a wonderful job but I have a question so your what's the date again of the escape room?
The escape room is happening, I believe on June 18th and
19th. And you said it was bank heist? Yes. Well, I'm a banker so I think I need to go do that. But do you bring your own teams or can individuals come? I'm not sure how it works.
You can bring friends and you can meet up with people who come there too. It's a collaborative event.
Okay sounds...I will make sure I'm there if I'm in town. I guess I want to see how it works. All right thank you very much we really appreciated it great presentation
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 3C1. Presentation by Commander Darren Mueller Traffic Bureau regarding the newly acquired specially marked police vehicle. Following the verbal presentation it is recommended that we take a brief recess.
Mayor Gavina, members of City Council. You were lucky enough to have Sergeant McAllister here. In the words of my brother from North Dakota he said what are you doing tonight? I said I'm doing city council. He said will you be sitting there while that young guy talks and the answer is yes. Sergeant McAllister.
Good evening. I'm here tonight to give a presentation on our newly acquired and recently put into service police vehicle or patrol vehicle So especially marked patrol vehicles, a police vehicle that has minimal or subdued exterior markings and lighting basically making it less immediately recognizable than our traditional black and white vehicles that we have out there on the roadway every day.
It's got a low profile appearance, but it's fully equipped with emergency lights, sirens and all the law enforcement equipment that a normal black and white vehicle would have. The purpose of these vehicles is to allow officers to more easily blend in with traffic, which will allow them to be more proactive identifying dangerous driving behavior to include speeding, distracted driving and reckless driving behavior.
So when it comes to legality, 4800 of the California Vehicle Code talks about a traffic officer on duty for exclusive or main purpose of enforcing basically the traffic laws. So it says they shall wear a full distinctive uniform and if the officer while on duty uses a motor vehicle, it shall be a distinctive color specified by the commissioner. When they say commissioner, they're talking about the CHP commissioner.
All Simi Valley Police Department officers operating specially marked patrol vehicles for the purpose of enforcing traffic laws will be in a full distinctive Simi Valley Police Department approved uniform that clearly identifies them as a peace officer. So what are the laws and the legality when it comes to the markings? So you'll find these in the California Code of Regulations, Title 13. And basically it has a whole list but the ones we're gonna work on today is basically vehicles except for motorcycles shall be painted entirely white or white except that an area not less than including the front door panels shall be black or the vehicle can be all black except than an area not less than and including the front door panel shall be white or the vehicle could be any other color with any color front door panels.
So this is straight out of the title and regulations. So the only caveat to that is the initial or name of the governmental entity operating the vehicle shall be displayed in sharp contrast to the background on the front door panels, and shall be a such size shape and colors be readily legible during daylight hours from a distance of at least 50 feet. So California Highway Patrol started using these vehicles, introduced these vehicles back in May of 2025. They started with 25 and put on some of the most problematic freeways and highways throughout California. They currently have a fleet of 100 specially marked patrol vehicles.
They have multiple color vehicles and they're spread out like I stated among the most problematic stretches of California highways. So, we're going to use them similar to what CHP would use them for. We're going to use them to deter dangerous driving behavior like speeding and reckless operation. We're going to use them to identify violations that may not occur around clearly marked patrol cars. Everybody knows what our black and white patrol cars are with the light bars on top. Anytime someone sees it they do the best driving they've ever done in their life.
You know, which is good. Trust me that's a good thing too but there are some times where you know we need to be a little more less obvious to be able to take care of some situations and problems that are going on. We'll address distracted driving including cell phone use behind the wheel this vehicle will enhance overall traffic safety and help reduce collisions it's gonna provide a proactive enforcement tool to help keep Simi Valley roadways safe So we're gonna use them in high collision corridors and major thoroughfares with a history of speeding and reckless driving. Everybody knows what those major roads are, LA Avenue, Royal, Cochran, Erringer, Madera, First Street. We're gonna use them in school zones and nearby residential streets where child pedestrian safety is a priority.
I get calls and complaints all the time about people not stopping at school buses going by school buses with the stop arm out everything like that. People not yielding so we're gonna use them in those areas. We're going to use them on the busy commuter routes during peak morning and evening traffic hours. And we can also use them in commercial areas and shopping centers with heavy vehicle pedestrian activity just to keep everything safe.
There's a few pictures. So, like I stated this vehicle went into service April 28th of this year. It's been basically out on the streets for roughly eight days now. It's assigned to one traffic officer it's his vehicle he uses every day so since it's been in service there's been he's written that traffic officers written a total of 30 citations and given two warnings 15 of them are for speed there were two cell phone violations one red light violation and 12 other violations of the speeding violations every one of his citations for 50 miles an hour or more over the speed limit So, a couple of interests.
The officer got a driver going 67 in a 45 and the comments are the best part. Basically the driver stated I saw your car thought it was a security car at first. And then one of the better ones we have so we had a driver going 81 in a 40 on Royal And basically the driver said he thought it was a park ranger car and nothing would happen. So, the car is useful. It does help us do our job a little bit better and we can hopefully once the word gets out there that's out there people won't really know what it looks like and it'll help keep down our speeding collisions.
Any questions I'm available? And like it was stated the cars out front if anybody wants to take a break and go look at it real quick.
Any questions from council? Nope, all right. We're going to take a quick five to seven minute break to go out and look at the car so then we'll come back. Thank you. We're now coming back into open session, Madam Clerk?
0:55 – 1:0110 turns
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is Item 4, Public Statements. During this agenda item four, the city council will hear public statements from the first 10 persons who have submitted speaker cards. After the first 10 persons have spoken, subsequent persons who submitted speaker cards will be called to speak during Agenda Item Number 6. This is a continuation of Agenda Item Number 4. Agenda Items 4 and 6 are the times allotted for public statements on all items other than public hearings, appointments, and information reports.
In accordance with the protocols that were adopted in October 6, 2025 if 20 or more speaker cards are received each speaker's time will automatically be reduced to two minutes each. We have received 33 speaker cards. Each speaker will have two minutes to speak. Persons addressing the City Council will be requested to state their name and community residence for the record. Madam Mayor unless you have any comments we can begin with the first 10 speakers.
Please begin.
I will call three at a time. Ben Davis, Mark Luker and Jerry Quintana. Good evening Mayor, Council Members and
City staff. My name is Ben Davis, President of Piccola Tiny Homes here in Simi Valley. Thank you again for your time tonight. Tonight I want to talk about affordability. In the year 2000, Simi Valley's median household income was about $70,000. The median home value was about $240,000 This means one would need to work 3 1⁄2 years while saving 100% of their median income to buy a house Today Simi Valley's median household income is about $122,000 so about three quarters more than in 2000. However the median home value is now $845,000 which is three and a half times more than in 2000 This means one would now need to work seven years while saving 100% of their median income to buy a house. So literally double the time. In the year 2000, someone could have bought two houses for the cost of what they have to pay today even taking into account the differences in median wage and it's not just housing.
California gasoline was around $175 a gallon in early 2000 and as I was driving over here today, the cost of gasoline was at $6.15. That's three-and-a-half times more than in 2000. I'm sure that everyone listening has felt the squeeze of rising prices in all aspects of their lives. So this is the reality that families are living in, the essentials have outrun what ordinary people can comfortably afford and traditional housing options are not keeping up.
This is why movable tiny homes can't be ignored. So tonight I want to respectfully ask again, we have not seen the report and I would like to ask for a date that it will be brought forth. The cost of living is not going down and the people of Simi Valley need solutions. Thank you for your consideration.
Thank you.
Mayor Cavanaugh, Council. I read over the weekend the story in The Acorn about the city wanting to take back control of the public library from the county. If the article is correct financially it seems like a no-brainer. I do have a concern though we have at least one council member who's 100% Trump MAGA Republican what are our assurances that Mike Judge or any council member isn't going to suddenly push to ban or even burn books that they don't agree with?
Thank you.
Jerry Quintana?
Madam Mayor and members of the Council, my name is Jerry Quintana. I'm here to speak in support of the grant request by the Samaritan Centre of Simi Valley. I'm a 26-year resident of Simi Valley and one of over 100 volunteers who serve at the Samaritan Center. I volunteered there for over three years. As you may be aware, the Samaritan Center provides food pantry services to the homeless as well as to those who are housed yet are experiencing food insecurities.
The request for grant is for the replacement of sheds associated with the food pantry service The Samaritan Center receives donations of fresh, canned and dry goods from both private individuals along with local businesses. In addition we receive a monthly shipment of canned and dry goods from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The storage of donations and pre-sorted goods is accomplished with the use of multiple sheds. Several of those in use are aging plastic units that are too small and can often be too full to allow good access to all items.
I would best describe the older sheds as large garden sheds, their deteriorated condition leaves them susceptible to rodent entry Space is also a critical shortcoming. Accessing the stored items can be difficult due to the limited space and narrow aisles. Just last week, a portion of the monthly USDA food delivery had to be redirected to another provider as there was no space in the existing shed.
Awarding the requested grant to the Samaritan Center would allow for the replacement of the oldest and least functional sheds, and improve the efficiency capacity and safety of the food pantry operation. Thank you for your consideration.
Thank You
1:01 – 1:076 turns
The next three speakers, Ray Binstock, Joseph Metcalf and we have Jody Lewis and Scott Constuzos on the same card. So Ray Binstock.
Good evening. My name is Ray Binstock, I represent Many Mansions a non-profit provider of affordable housing and supportive services. We currently serve 52 formerly homeless Simi Valley residents at three different communities Casa de Paz, La Rejada and Peppertree. Thank you for having us here this evening. We are so grateful to the city, for the City Council's partnership which allows us to offer dignity, safety and stability to vulnerable households. As the Community Project Allocation Committee heard several weeks ago one of our Simi Valley residents testified how the stability of a home and resources staff provided supported her as she went through recovery and finally earlier this winter obtained steady employment for the first time in many years.
We're very proud to be working together to benefit the Simi Valley community
Thank you.
Good evening. My name's Joseph Metcalfe, I just want to bring to attention 54 days from now we're going to be celebrating when America annihilated Britain in a war and I want to address that right now but I want to address it in a very positive way in how are we gonna celebrate that here in Simi Valley so I'm here speaking on behalf of a public community organization called Simi 250. Simi 250 is put together to celebrate to America 250 in a really special way, like it's never been done. Fourth of July has never been done like this in Simi Valley.
What we're gonna be doing and we want to make everybody aware that we are gonna be asking businesses and everybody to get involved. First of all with businesses, we'd like to get a $2.50 experience or a 4th of July signature special so that people who don't normally get to experience things in Simi Valley will have an opportunity to get it at an affordable price So it's an opportunity for residents to come out to local businesses and celebrate. On July 3rd, in the morning of July 3rd we're going to be starting with a 5k run which will start at Duck Park and go along the Arroyo back again.
Very fun event and that's for all abilities so if you want to walk it bring your dog bring your kids that's absolutely fine In the evening, we're going to be doing a car cruise which is we're asking everybody to dress their cars red, white and blue and drive through Simi Valley through a 15-mile designated route ending up at Santa Susana Community Park where we have a free movie in the park.
On July 4th itself, we are going to be doing celebrations at the Reagan Library from 10 till 3. I want everybody's get involved with that. And then of course in the evening, the Kiwanis is organizing a pre-firework show at Santa Susana Community Park from three till nine, and then at nine o'clock for the first time ever in the history of Simi Valley. The Simi Valley Symphony Orchestra will be performing the fireworks live and the fireworks will be synchronized to that. So we want to invite you to get involved, the community to get involved and celebrate in a really big way in Simi Valley. Thank you.
Greetings, Mayor Cavanaugh and council members. My name is Jody Lewis and I'm the Booster President for Simi Valley High School Football. I'm joined here today by some of our football players who just left practice. So in response to the recent Simi Valley Acorn article published by Virginia Seton on May 2nd, I'd like to correct several factual errors that she stated regarding our application for the Community Projects Grant, our football program and its equipment needs. The Simi Valley High School Tackle football program supports an average of about 150 students annually or 1,500 athletes over a 10-year span. The CIF regulated lifespan of a football helmet is only ten years and every helmet must be recertified every single year by an approved reconditioning vendor.
Any helmet that fails recertification must be removed from use and replaced. And a new football helmet actually costs between $500 to $1,000 not 45. I understand how Ms. Seaton was confused considering that the total amount that we had requested was actually across 1,500 students using the athletes over a decade and so that long-term investment was approximately $46 per athlete reflecting cost distribution over time and not the actual price of a helmet.
Furthermore, our athletic department works very hard to support all sports. Funds are limited and football does not receive funding from the school. Simi Valley High School football does not receive gate ticket revenue. When Ms. Seaton referenced booster raised funds that refers to fundraising done directly by our student athletes their families and community supporters The booster-run snack bar revenue ensures that none of our athletes go without. We don't turn any kids away from our program.
It covers the cost of athletic equipment, spirit pack assistance, pregame and after game meals, transportation and other operational necessities. So the Simi Valley football program is a 501c3 non-profit and we've followed all of the required protocols to submit for the CPG grant application. Many nonprofits in our community are well deserving of the support, but our student athletes are also equally deserving of safe properly certified equipment. Thank you your
time is now up I'm sorry thank you
1:07 – 1:135 turns
The next three speakers James McGillis, Doreen Stoutland and David Lewis.
Mayor Cavanaugh, members of the City Council and staff. I'm James McGillis, a proud resident of Simi Valley, California. On Cinco de Mayo, I had the pleasure of dining at Maria's Mexican Restaurant here in Simi Valley. There was live music, attentive staff and excellent food. I highly recommend this family-owned local establishment. As I looked at each of the five TV screens placed around the restaurant, I could watch golf, baseball, soccer or basketball. Then to my dismay, a local politician's face flashed on the screen one after another Scenes of immigrants being detained zip by, following by the politician's smiling face and a request that you vote for him on June 2nd. So there I sat in a restaurant owned run and staffed by individuals who might be immigrants or the children of immigrants.
I wondered if an ice raid would spoil the celebration that was in full swing last September we celebrated Hispanic Heritage Month here in Simi Valley. I remember everyone on the dais smiling down as our mayor made the formal declaration. So which is it? Do we support diversity and inclusion in Simi Valley or do we want to clear out all Hispanic people so their homes can convert to short-term rentals? During the height of Hispanic Heritage Month in September 2025, the Simi Valley City Council voted formally To oppose the California congressional redistricting plan known as Proposition 50. One council member was quoted as saying, I would not only like to oppose the map but as a city opposed the whole ballot proposition.
On Election Day, November 4, 2025 I was canvassing residents to sign a petition supporting a ban on short-term rentals in Simi Valley. Three of us collected 430 valid signatures which will likely be ignored later tonight. Waiting in the line of 250 voters at sundown that night was a preponderance of Hispanic voters. Proposition 50 passed in Ventura County with 60% approval. Tonight, I stand with all our residents either documented or undocumented in opposition to anyone who supports the detention and deportation of the innocent. Thank you.
Hi, Mayor Cavanaugh and City Council along with staff. My name is Doreen Stoutland and I'm a resident of the Woodlands. I would like to inquire whether the city is aware of the upcoming expiration of the statute of repose related to Runkle Canyon LLC? Under California law, a developer's 10-year infrastructure or construction warranty period commonly referred to as the statute of repose limits the time in which the latent construction defect claims can be brought involving structural elements, foundation and major infrastructure whether seen or unknown.
It is my understanding that the 10-year period for Runkle Canyon may expire at the end of this month based on the closing occupancy date of the first home in the development. I'm also aware that after this period expires responsibility on ongoing maintenance infrastructure issues may shift to the property owners HOA common areas and the city for public infrastructure, which would include future responsibility for roadway deterioration, potholes and other public school maintenance issues.
As you know there has already been a settlement involving one of the homes as well as a current lawsuit involving 19 homeowners however it is my understanding that these matters do not include potential future impacts to the HOA or to the City of Simi Valley. Given the significance of this deadline, I respectfully ask is the city aware of the pending expiration of the statute of repose for Runkle Canyon LLC? Has the city conducted or commissioned any recent inspections or assessments of public infrastructure within the development prior to expiration? Does the city anticipate any financial or maintenance exposure Once the statutory period expires, I thank you for your time and consideration. I would reference you to the 2025 California Code.
Thank you. Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh and City Council. I am a member of the COA Executive Board and had the honour of being chosen to be on the Grant Committee, and subsequently the honour of chairing it. The system that was put into operation is kind of flawed. For only $150,000 offered for over $800,000 in requests. So I would like the City Council to consider the following things.
That the amount be increased to 300,000 I know that the grant comes from the waste management, but perhaps you can find money elsewhere. Also we were told that there has to be a minimum of $10,000 offered to each organization. I'd like to suggest that maybe drop that to 5,000 and that way more people could be awarded I must say this, I'm well known in the city.
I've been here since 1972 and after this grant was done, I had many, many calls, personal calls and unfortunately not all of them were positive but having done that, I would do it again and I appreciate your time and I hope that you can consider what I was suggesting. Thank you.
1:13 – 1:208 turns
The last of the first 10 speakers, Cindy Slack.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and members of the City Council my name is Cindy Slack and I am the president of the Simi Valley Library Foundation. I have lived in Simi Valley for 42 years raised three kids here and lucky enough to have three grandchildren being raised here I'm here this evening to sincerely thank you, along with our partners at Waste Management for the generous Community Programs Grant. We truly appreciate your confidence in our vision and our commitment to investing in the people of Simi Valley.
We understand how important it is to ensure these funds are used responsibly and in ways that benefit the greatest number of community members. In a city now approaching 125,000 residents that responsibility becomes even greater. We also recognize there are many deserving organizations throughout our community that are equally in need of financial support and we remain hopeful there will continue to be additional opportunities and resources available for all who serve our residents.
This grant is not simply funding improvements to a building. It is helping strengthen a place where our community gathers, learns, connects and grows. As many of you know for more than four years we've been working through the steps necessary to not only renovate the library but also in transition ownership of the library to the City of Simi Valley so we may create greater opportunities to raise funds for long-term capital improvements.
The community room serves everyone. Children attending programs, students studying, nonprofit organization meetings, seniors connecting and families gathering. It is one of the few places in our community that truly welcomes all generations. Our residents deserve a library that reflects the pride and standards of this community with your support we are moving closer to creating a library that is safe updated and welcoming Thank you again for your generosity, your partnership and your belief in the importance.
Thank you, your time is up. Sorry!
Madam Mayor and members of City Council,
the next item on the agenda is public hearings. This is a time for testimony on public hearings under consideration of matters as presented out of this agenda. Let the record show that due notice was given as required by law and an affidavit to this effect is on file in the office of city clerk. All comments submitted by e-mail have already been provided to the City Council and will be made part of the record, however they will not be read by the city clerk this evening. Speakers will be called on in the order in which their card was submitted to speak for this public testimony item 5 for a period no more than five minutes each. Persons addressing the City Council are requested to state their name and community residence for the record.
Comments shall be limited to matters relevant to the item on the agenda and may be ruled out of order if comments are unrelated to the item. The reports of city staff relating to these matters shall be made part of the record at this meeting. If you challenge in court any of the City Council decisions made here tonight, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at this public hearing. The time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 Item 5a, a public hearing to consider adoption of a resolution approving the issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds by the California Public Finance Authority to finance or refinance the acquisition construction improvement and equipping of a residential care facility project for seniors located at the southwest corner of Tapo Canyon and Guardian Street Simi Valley, California.
The reading of the resolution is as follows Resolution number 2026-12 A resolution approving the issuance of revenue bonds for residential care facility for seniors project by the authority for the purpose of financing and refinancing, the acquisition development construction improvement and equipping of certain facilities for the benefit of Enzo Verde. And Assistant City Manager Angel Sierra is here to present this item.
Before we begin are there any ex parte communications to report? Please proceed.
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh and members of the City Council. We are here this evening to conduct a public hearing pursuant to the Federal Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act or TEFRA. Pursuant to section 147f of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, TEFRA requires that a public hearing be held by the governing body of the jurisdiction in which a project to be financed with tax-exempt financing is located.
and that the governing body approve the proposed financing. In accordance with these requirements, the city published a notice of public hearing in the Ventura County Star on April 30th, 2026. Tonight for your consideration is resolution number 2026-12, a request to approve the issuance of one or more series of tax exempt revenue bonds by the California Public Finance Authority or CalPFA in an amount not to exceed 450 million.
The proceeds of the bonds will be issued for the benefit of Enzo Verde, formerly known as Kendall at Ventura, a non-profit organization to finance or refinance the acquisition construction improvement and equipment equipping of a residential care facility for seniors located at the southwest corner of Tapal Canyon Road and Guardian Street. The City Council previously approved joining the CalPFA and subsequently approved a TEFRA resolution for this project in January of 2023.
However, due to project delays, increased costs and a change in the borrower's name, the prior approval has expired and a new TEFRA hearing is required in order to proceed with the next phase of financing. The action before the Council tonight is to conduct the required public hearing and consider adoption of a resolution approving the issuance of the bonds by CalPFA. This action is solely for the purpose of satisfying TAFRA requirements and does not constitute approval of the project itself, which must still undergo the City's standard review and entitlement processes.
The bonds to be issued by CalPFA will be the sole responsibility of the borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal or moral obligation or liability for the repayment of the bonds. All financing documents will include disclaimers stating that the bonds are not obligations of the City. The City will bear no cost in the issuance of the proposed debt This is a private loan with the borrower and their bank. This concludes staff report and is available for any questions.
Thank you, Mr. Sierra. Are there any questions from City Council members?
1:20 – 1:2527 turns
Mayor Pro Tem Litster Thank you, Angel for your report. Just a quick question. This was originally approved in 2023. It's returning because there has been a name change and there is an expiration. I guess my first question, the first $29 million that has already been issued was under a different name. Does that...I guess the question is Is this next entity still obligated for those bonds, or is it just two separate entities now that we are basically authorizing? How does that work?
I would actually welcome up Bradley Forshner. She's with the Enzo Verde marketing team.
Good evening. Could you repeat the question?
So just a curiosity, I know that the name has changed from Kendall Ventura to Enzo Verde. The initial $29 million was authorized with the original name. We now have a new name. A curiosity, are these two entities that are now obligated or are they still one and the same just with the name change?
No. Enzo Verde will be the only entity responsible for this. Kendall at Ventura has exited the project and has no responsibility
there. So they assume the initial 20? Correct. Okay. And the request up to $450 million, does that mean we're really authorizing $421 million
It's a not to exceed amount of 450 million.
Got
it, okay
and this is just an aside because I will tell you I think that the project is well we'll get to all that. A beautiful community it'll be beautiful when it is built my question is I know there was some in the project itself is the reason you're here today because they have are progressing further along in the process? I'm curious I know that they were trying to get a secondary access for instance do you know has that happened
regarding the easement is that your question
Yes, whether or not they needed a secondary fire access.
That's part of all of it but the easement is moving along in the discussions with AJU so we're still on track and looking like we're making good progress there.
Okay
wonderful
thank
you. Thank you
any other questions? All right thank you seeing none at this time I would like to open the hearing for anyone in the City Council Chambers wishing to be heard on this matter. City Clerk?
Madam Mayor we have no public testimony cards for this item
Thank you. This, are there any other further comments or questions from City Council members? All right this hearing is now closed I will now entertain a motion
Madam Mayor, I move the City Council adopt resolution number 2026-12 approving the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Public Finance Authority in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $450 million for the benefit of the Enzo Verde formerly known as Kendall Ventura a California nonprofit public benefit corporation to provide for the financing or refinance or the acquisition of construction improvement and equipping of the Enzo Verde residential care facility for the elderly project.
Second. Thank you, call for the vote.
The motion passes unanimously.
Madam Clerk we can proceed to the next item.
Next item, Item 5B. A public hearing to consider Simi Valley Municipal Code Amendments Z-S-2025-0006 to regulate allow short term rentals in residential zones a determination that the amendments are exempt from the California Environment Equality Act and introduction of an ordinance The reading of the two ordinances are as follows. Ordinance number 1369, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Simi Valley prohibiting short-term rentals citywide and amending the Simi Valley Municipal Code to permit only those land uses identified in Title IX Or ordinance number 1370, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Simi Valley for Municipal Code Amendment Z-S-2025-0006 to regulate short term rentals in residential zones and a determination that the amendments are exempt from the Environmental Equality Act.
And Deputy Environmental Services Director of Planning, Sean Gibson. Planning Principal Planner Naren Gunasekara and Associate Planner Alexander Klingman are here to present this item.
Thank you before we begin are there any ex parte communications to report? Seeing none we may move forward thank you.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh members of the City Council tonight's presentation on short-term rentals will be by associate planner Alex Klingman
1:25 – 1:371 turns
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and members of the City Council. On December 15th, 2025 staff presented a draft short-term rental ordinance to the City Council. The council made several modifications and directed staff to present the ordinance to neighborhood councils and planning commission. The neighborhood councils reviewed the ordinance in January and all four voted against it with three recommending a ban.
The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council deny the ordinance and ban STRs citywide. However, if STRs were to be allowed both the Neighborhood Councils and Planning Commission made the following recommendations. To require stricter occupancy limits per unit. To require safety inspections. To prohibit STRs in close proximity to one another.
To prohibit STRs in ADUs To include a cap on rental nights per year and on total STR citywide. To require a minimum nightly stay, and to require all STRs to be hosted. Potential amendments to the ordinance are provided to you as attachment H. If the council wishes to incorporate any of these changes they can do so when the ordinance is read. In March, the City Council requested a professional survey be conducted to determine broader community perspectives on STRs.
The city contracted with True North Research Inc to conduct the survey and they allowed True North to develop the survey questions based on their extensive experience. Surveys were conducted with 670 registered voters in Simi Valley. However, to obtain a valid sample size only 500 respondents were needed A majority of the respondents were long-term residents and homeowners aged 50 and over, which is reflective of the greater community demographic.
The survey results showed that 72% of respondents were in support of STRs, 12% in support of STRs without any regulations, and 58% in support of STRs with regulations in place. And 24% were opposed to STRs. Approximately 63% of all respondents supported the framework of the ordinance as presented tonight, and a copy of the complete survey report is provided as attachment I.
And with that two options are provided to the City Council for consideration this evening. To adopt regulations to permit STRs or to prohibit STRs citywide Each approach has regulatory, administrative, enforcement and financial implications which I'll explain in the presentation. And with either option staff recommends a deferred implementation date of January 1st, 2027.
This would allow staff time to identify existing STR operators and inform them of the changes. Operators would be required to have a valid permit by January 1, 2027 to avoid enforcement If STRs are allowed, a permit is required and is limited to one per person or legal entity. This permit would need to be renewed annually and a site inspection would be required to confirm that the site is up to building code.
Permit fees and a business tax certificate would also be required and a nuisance response plan would need to be submitted which would include a contact of the person responsible for responding to complaints within 30 minutes. This information would also be mailed out to the neighbors within 200 feet for unhosted STRs. And just to clarify, if any issues arise residents do not have to contact the STR owner they can still contact code enforcement or the police department as usual.
The operational standards would ensure compliance with the building codes such as smoke detectors and pool gates Occupancy would be limited to two adults and two children per bedroom. Guest vehicles would not be permitted to park in the street. Exterior noise monitoring devices would be required, and party houses or similar event venues are already not allowed in residential zones but the proposed ordinance includes an additional prohibition on any paid events or group events with non-registered guests.
The city's current vendor, HDL, will administer the transient occupancy tax and business tax certificates for STRs. There is a $2,500 one-time setup fee for this. HDL will play a key role in tracking STRs across platforms like Airbnb, and they'll also assist in the compliance aspect of sending notices to noncompliant operators and providing education to those operators through their existing STR programs.
The cost for this compliance aspect is approximately $14,000 for year one and $9,750 annually after that. Permit fees are based on cost recovery which includes staff time for reviewing applications, coordinating with other staff on enforcement issues, admin staff time and a building inspector's time for pre-permitting inspections HDL costs will also be included in this and are split amongst 70 permits.
And this is based on prior discussions with vendors that of the approximately 100 known STR operations in the city, about 30 of those would drop out after the initiation of an STR program. Based on that, the permit fee would be around $741 which is relatively less compared to the average of seven surrounding jurisdictions which was $936. The other element of STR regulation is enforcement.
Violations related to STRs would fall into two categories, operation without a required permit and operational violations such as noise parking or parties. For those operating without a permit if HDL cannot get compliance then code enforcement and the city attorney's office would step in Enforcement costs for permitting compliance can range from $360 for a notice of violation to $8,000 for full-blown legal action.
The estimated annual cost for operational enforcement is anticipated to range from $1,800 to $17,000 per year and this assumes that we would get four to ten complaints annually. Some of these enforcement costs may be recovered through nuisance abatement filings and through penalties and fines. And Senate Bill 60 allows STR violation fines up to $1,500 for a first violation and up to $5,000 for three or more violations.
And for reference in the past year the city received 10 STR complaints with five of those being for repeat addresses. The annual net revenue is estimated to be approximately $152,000 in the first year and $163,000 after that. Revenue includes TOT, business taxes and the permit fee. First-year costs are anticipated to be higher due to a one time permit setup and website update expenses which are non recoverable.
These estimates differ from previous projections, and one reason for that is that the initial estimates included the cost of hiring a full-time code enforcement officer. But based on the relatively low number of STR related complaints received so far, staff anticipates that existing code enforcement staff will be able to administer this program. Staff has also determined that a simplified vendor service model without features such as a 24 hour hotline are sufficient for the city's needs.
And staff time to prepare the ordinance has been removed since those costs have already been incurred. While an STR program is expected to offset administrative costs and generate some net revenue, revenue generation is not the primary purpose of the ordinance. The main goal is to establish clear operating standards and provide a framework for monitoring and managing short-term rentals in a way that supports neighborhood compatibility and addresses community concerns.
The actual net revenue shown here could vary depending on future enforcement activity and related costs, which may be up to $25,000 a year since only a portion of these costs can be recoverable. Next we'll go over option two, which would be to prohibit STRs. Under this approach, STRs would be prohibited under the general provisions of Title IX, which do not allow uses that are not specifically listed in the development code.
The city's enforcement focus for a ban would be on identifying existing STRs and enforcing them to shut down through voluntary compliance and enforcement actions when necessary. The city has two options to accomplish this, use HDL or an in-house approach under SB 346. And as mentioned before, HDL would provide real-time monitoring of STRs and would contact operators to let them know that they're not permitted.
The estimated annual cost in year one is about $14,000 to set up the program and 9,750 annually after that plus any CPI adjustments. If the SB 346 in-house approach is used, the city would have to request listing data directly from hosting platforms and staff would also prepare and distribute initial code enforcement notices. The estimated cost for this is $11,537 in year one which includes initial data requests, staff and enforcement time, and a one time initial mail out cost. And then 2,250 annually after that to request data And while the in-house approach may appear cost effective, SB346 is relatively new and untested. And the data provided by hosting platforms may be incomplete or delayed.
This approach would require significant ongoing staff time for mailouts, enforcement, compliance tracking and operator education. Staff recommends utilizing HDL because they have an already established tool for identifying active listings across multiple platforms which would ensure more complete and timely data when compared to SB 346. It's also important to note that whichever approach is selected does not have to be permanent, for example if the council chooses to prohibit STRs the city could utilize HDL during the implementation period and later transition to a more in-house approach if needed.
And similar to the enforcement costs I mentioned before Those costs can range from $360 to 8,000 depending on the case and operational violations can cost anywhere from 1,800 to 17,000 per year. But again, the total cost to the city may be affected by these numbers and cost recovery is not certain. The following alternatives are available to the City Council.
One, to introduce an ordinance amending the Simi Valley Municipal Code to prohibit short-term rentals in residential zones or two, introduce an ordinance amending the Simi Valley Municipal Code to regulate and allow short-term rentals in residential zones or provide staff with other direction. The Planning Commission recommends alternative one. This concludes staff's presentation and we are available for questions.
1:38 – 1:4322 turns
We surveyed 670 people. So what would you say to the residents who are concerned that 670 people doesn't represent 130,000 in the city?
I can take that. So the survey company that we engaged with takes a survey sample as essentially representative of the registered voter population in this city So, just to simplify it if you take 100 people for the survey that would be representative of. If there are X number percentage that are registered as Republican X number percentage registered as a Democrat X number homeowners.
All of those are factored into that survey sample to ensure that it is reflective of the entire population of the community, that is a registered voter. And they do only survey registered voters to ensure that it's the bare minimum of active members of the community.
So you're saying that the 670 would be an accurate representation of what the public feeling would be?
Yes.
If we were to move forward, because there are STR owners in the community already, how would they be notified of the new requirements and all of the dates so that you make sure that they're actually following the process?
The HDL vendor has a program set up where they will monitor STR listings and they will reach out directly to those STR operators to notify them of the changes. And if there's the effective date of January 1st.
Okay, and then the third thing is you had mentioned the TOT revenue that would come into the city if this were to, if we were to regulate. My question is are there any restrictions on the TOT like how the TOT can be used or does the city have free flexibility to use those in whatever capacity we most need at that time?
I'll take that one too. TOT comes into the general fund and there are no restrictions to it so we can allocate it wherever it is best needed. The theory behind TOT is that it's used for things like community safety, policing, beautification streets roads to attract people to want to come to the community and stay here
okay all right that's it for now thanks
thank you councilmember Rhodes
Yeah, I actually had one more question on the taxes and I didn't notice it until tonight. I don't know why it went over my head there but t-bid we have a transit occupancy tax we also have
a We have a TOT and a
t-bid And and I didn't see t bid numbers or was that included in the transit occupancy tax assumption?
The TOT number that's included is, I believe separate from the TBIT number. So the TOT is specific to the city and then the TBID goes directly to the Chamber of Commerce.
And in the if we had an ordinance approving the existence of STRs and collecting transit occupancy tax, we would also then be collecting TBID from those same.
That's correct.
It just doesn't come to the general fund it goes into the trend.
The TBID yeah so and the TBID was excluded from this report. Okay purposely yes okay
For the community's sake, will you explain what TOT and TBIT are?
Oh sure. Sorry. Government alphabet soup. TOT is the transient occupancy tax so it is applied to people who stay in a short-term rental situation or a hotel room. So does apply to people who are staying from outside of the community. It's not a tax on our residents. So currently our transient occupancy taxes 10% for anybody who's staying in a hotel room or lodging in the city of Simi Valley And then TBID is an additional 2% that is directed to the Chamber of Commerce to help promote the community and encourage people to stay in the City of Simi Valley. It stands for Tourism Business Improvement District, and the Chamber of Commerce manages those funds.
Thank you. Are there any other questions from Council?
Mayor Pro Tem Lister Thank you. Just some questions as I was reading through the report that I'd like to maybe understand a little bit better. As I understand it, whether we approve or whether we ban, the city is recommending HDL for compliance. Did it appear to me that in essence the compliance costs were very close or very similar regardless of which path we choose? Is that accurate or could you distinguish between the costs For me.
1:43 – 1:4916 turns
I've put the cost up on the screen. Yeah, in both cases in year one the cost is of course a little bit more due to set-up fees that we would need to put into play for either option but this would be under the prohibit
Just to, oh I'm sorry go ahead. Oh I'm sorry just to clarify the cost, the HDL costs would be the same whether we prohibit or whether we allow because we're using HDL's compliance component in this for this costing so the compliance component is where they monitor the listings and then they contact those listings and request compliance so that there's compliance to get a permit over the closed down it's pretty much the same cost
Got it, okay that's what I was trying to sense. The HDL is virtually similar or the same but the difference is in the permits that are collected in terms of and maybe theoretically the number would reduce over time?
So if you just for an example if we prohibit it in the first year we're gonna be expecting HDL to basically remove all the SDR listings And then we have the regulations are known. So if you know, if somebody's trying to start an STR in Simi Valley and they do a bit of due diligence They'll know that STRs are not allowed so we expect that number to keep going down And sometimes some listing companies like Airbnb will not even list Units if they're in a jurisdiction where it's prohibited so we expect the first year to have a lot of enforcement or relatively a lot, and then as we go along that number should reduce. So if you want to, we don't even need... We might not even need HDL in the second, third, fourth year because the numbers are going to be so few.
Okay, thank you. Page six it talks about basically well who allows STRs et cetera? One of the groups listed there of course is the County of Ventura which allows STRs and I think that's mentioned they have to hire two employees to oversee them et cetera. How many county islands do we have within the city right now? Seven is it?
There's like nine county islands.
Nine county islands, so if I understand correctly regardless of what we do today those nine county islands within this city can still have host STRs correct?
That's correct. My understanding is that Ventura County only allows STRs in the coastal zone so since those nine islands are not in the coastal zone they wouldn't be able to get permits
But anything that the county regulates would apply in their county island area. So while they may not allow them currently in anywhere but the coastal zones, if they were to change that it would apply to the county islands areas.
Okay and so you're saying the listings that I see in the county are that aren't coastal are illegal?
That would be my understanding yes
Okay. One of the, I'm sorry this is just kind of a, I was reading through the basically the ordinance if we were to allow them one of the requirements is an installation of a noise monitor for instance how is that actually utilized? Is it connected somewhere? Is it, I just want to know the purpose how does that work
So there's different noise monitor models available. There are, and again we haven't done, we've done a bit of research on this. We haven't looked at all the available models. What they do is they basically, they're at the property boundary and they record noise levels in decibels so if there is a code enforcement issue, code enforcement can go and check that noise monitor to see if that complaint is actually reflected in the decibel level recorded by that noise monitor.
But we would need to, the ordinance lets us request a wide variety of things from STR operators. We don't want to spell it all out in the ordinance because every time technology changes, we'll have to come back and redo this process. So we would be looking for a modular noise monitor where code enforcement could just plug in their iPad and download all that noise data There are also privacy issues, it can't record voice like actual words and things like that because of privacy regulations. So just purely decibel levels.
Got it. Noise monitors were also created to alert the homeowner of noise, potential noise violations so if something happens at their house they're alerted before the city's alerted so they could resolve before it even becomes a complaint.
One more question. I know my questions are all over the place, but thank you for humoring me. I read carefully the Neighborhood Council Summarization Report. I wanted to understand the discussions that took place there et cetera. I know that in those entities you have voting with the board members and then you have also voting with the general public and in all cases there was general public in attendance. I guess my question is The general public voting limited to people that live in the district, or could it be someone that went to all? I'm just curious how that works. It's basically anyone in attendance can vote, or is it just if you live in the district you can vote as far as public attending?
It's limited to people living in the district. People who are not in the district can speak but the public vote is limited to people in the district.
1:49 – 1:556 turns
Thank you. Any other questions? All right, at this time I would like to open this hearing for anyone in the City Council chambers wishing to be heard on this matter so Madam City Clerk please proceed.
Thank you Madam Mayor. The first speaker is Chuck Leck
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh and City Council members. I'm Chuck Leck and I serve as the Government Affairs Director for the Association of Realtors. It's a group that handles all of Coneo, Simi, and Moore Park. Property rights really form the backbone of what the American economy has established in setting boundaries that courts will enforce them. This includes the ability to lease the property to someone else for a set period of time.
Let me begin with one popular saying, timing is everything. If this issue were banning short-term rentals had been before the City Council 12 years ago it would have been a hypothetical situation. What's changed since then? There currently are approximately a hundred properties that are already operating as short-term rentals. This is no longer a hypothetical situation, you're dealing with people's businesses and the way they do some of their lives and their property rights.
Their concerns about rising are arising about a single property That should not drive a citywide ban on all short-term rentals, particularly those with a long record of compliant operation. A citywide ban on short-term rentals would significantly disrupt existing local businesses, not only for the homeowner but the other businesses that those renters utilize and the Simi Valley families who rely on that income.
These businesses have operated because they feel the need and property owners exercise their established property rights to fill that need We suggest the city should adopt clear administrative standards and enforceable rules rather than impose a blanket ban on existing businesses. Let me finish with another saying from the final words of the Star Trek officer, Spock.
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one. I'm not in your situation You have to make a decision for the whole city, and I believe the whole city needs regulation and not a ban. Thank you.
Thank you.
I will read three names at a time so you know who you follow. James McGillis, Lynn Eason, and Anthony Eason.
Mayor Cavanaugh, members of City Council and staff as you know unlike many others who will speak here tonight I'm a proud resident of Simi Valley. Tonight we will hear from each of our council members they'll speak regarding legalization and or banning of short-term rentals. Many will quote from the independent 670 registered voters who were surveyed, they will not mention that for the purposes of the survey quote short term rental properties were defined as private homes that are rented for less than 30 days end quote we all know that the current STR inventory includes rooms, ADUs, pool houses, barn-like structures, unfenced pools and a single family home on Amarillo Avenue divided in as many as six different units. I do not care how many other cities used a similar bogus survey to promote the legalization of residential motels This $30,000 cost is a sham created to entice participants myself included to regulate with strong enforcement in the proposed city ordinance.
There is no cap on the number of off-site host on number The number, location or potential offsite hosting of STRs. An Airbnb superhost could live in Camarillo and never even visit the local STR that they manage. I predict that any member of the City Council who votes tonight to legalize and regulate short-term rentals will lose their next election bid. One council member will lose his primary election on June 2nd. On November 3rd our longest serving council member will lose his race against our mayor. A currently appointed council member will lose his council race to one of several opponents. The remaining council member will lose their seat in two years' time. Our mayor will be re-elected, but only if she sticks to her guns and votes to ban short term rentals.
It only takes three of you with a conscience to stop this dark money takeover of our residential neighborhoods and win your elections. Vote to ban short term rentals. Thank you.
1:55 – 2:034 turns
Good evening. My name is Alene Eason and I have been a resident of Simi Valley for 42 years. Additionally, I worked for the Simi Valley Unified School District for 25 years until retiring. City Council, tonight you will be discussing whether to legalize or ban short-term rentals citywide. Your decision will affect the safety character and quality of life of the city you have been entrusted to protect.
Simi Valley might become less attractive to people looking to move here that will affect businesses as much as any tourism revenue might bring After speaking here for more than one year and consecutively for the last nine months, I believe I have exhausted presenting the reasons for this council to consider banning STRs. You may wish to believe that there is no support for a ban and only three to ten people in the city wish to ban STRs?
That is not true, even your survey finds that to be false. Also the petitions with the 430 plus people, all the four neighborhood councils and the planning commission are all proof that a ban should be seriously considered. Be cautious in making your final decision tonight because it has the potential of adversely affecting our city for years to come And before I sit down, I would like everybody who's here for banning STRs to stand up. Stand up and let them know it's not three to ten people. It's not three to ten people. In the petitions we got, it was going out and talking to people and explaining to them what short-term rentals were, what exactly we were talking about. It wasn't a survey. It was talking to people and explaining to them what you all want to do to our neighborhoods So thank you everybody for coming out tonight and please do the right thing.
Good evening, didn't know I was going to have five minutes so this is very short. My name's Anthony Eason, I'm a 42 year resident of Simi Valley After a year and a half, the City Council may actually make a decision tonight on residential short-term rentals. The council should consider input from petitioners, decisions by the four neighborhood councils, the decision of the Planning Commission, speakers in favor and against, and now survey.
The recently completed survey should hold no more weight than all the other input the council should be considering. The survey is opinions of 670 out of the 85,771 registered voters of Simi Valley. Actually that's... That is less than 1% of registered voters. Actually that's 0.78%, closer to three quarters of 1% of registered voters. Is that actually representative of citywide opinion?
I'm sure the professional survey company who is being paid will say yes. I think the public can decide for themselves. If you believe the numbers provided by this survey, it indicates at least 24% of those surveyed want STRs banned. Using that percentage, it would translate to at least 20,585 registered voters supporting a ban. Not the three to ten individuals insinuated by a council member.
I am proud to have been an advocate for and hopefully represented well those voters these last nine months at these council meetings. Council members, consider this topic carefully make the right choice and ban residential short-term rentals. Thank you
The next three speakers, Matthew Abbey, Robert Lickins and Richard Holloman.
Good evening, council members. I stood before you in past meetings sharing stories from the heart, the families who found comfort in our homes during cancer treatments, surgeries, floods and final goodbyes. Tonight, I want to speak about something bigger, the long-term future of our neighborhoods and the real people who call Simi Valley home. For 23 years, I taught in the Simi Valley Unified School District, which is at Santa Zana High School.
That work was about building up our community one student and one family at a time Today running short-term rentals is still about serving people. Only now it's how I support my own family and help many people in Simi Valley, the homeowners keep their homes. After 10 years and more than 20,000 nights hosted, I've learned this well run short term rentals actually help preserve the character of our neighborhoods.
The home stay in top condition because guests expect it and hosts are rated on it for each stay. Gardeners are, gardens are maintained. Upgrades happen regularly. The owners stay deeply invested in their properties. These aren't absentee landlords. They're local families who care about Simi Valley. I've seen how this flexibility strengthens families. One longtime Simi homeowner needed to leave the area temporary for work but wanted to return every month for the weekend.
Short-term rental income lets them keep their house without locking into a long-term lease. Another family whose home was built by their grandparents nearly over 100 years ago now face $40,000 a year in property taxes with a step up in basements on inheritance. Short-term rentals are the only realistic way they can hold on to that legacy. Without that option, more homes could slip away from the very families who built this city.
A ban would take away that flexibility and that opportunity. It would punish every responsible host and homeowner for problems only perceived by a few because no hard data suggests otherwise. That's not fair and that's not Simi Valley Way. Please vote to support the hardworking families, the well-maintained homes, the compassionate service these rentals provide.
I'll also say it's tough to come here and just see so many people thinking one way. The rest of us are out in the world just actually making things happen. We're so busy taking care of the people that we're working for, the families that we serve, the guests that we have. I mean, we're just constantly bombarded trying to get five stars all the time like that's all you think about Because it means that much to us. And so, to go grab a whole bunch of other people that come in and do this week after week after week like we don't have time for this. This is not our hobby to just show up to these meetings every week and say this stuff. We're just too busy working and serving. So I just want you guys to know where that's coming from.
It's nice to feel supported sometimes. Let's choose regulation that strengthens our community and is working very well in other cities and in the county, instead of shutting doors on the people who support Simi Valley. Thank you.
2:03 – 2:113 turns
Good evening, Mayor and members of the City Council. My name is Robert Likens and I appreciate the opportunity to speak tonight about the positive impact of short-term rentals. For me personally, short-term rentals made it possible to completely transform a heavily neglected property into a beautiful well maintained home for myself, my wife and my two children. What was once a rundown and overlooked has now become something that adds pride to the neighborhood and creates a welcoming place for visitors.
Short term rentals encourage property owners to invest in their homes. Owners renovate, improve landscaping, upgrade safety features and maintain their properties at a much higher level because guests expect quality accommodations. These improvements often raise the overall appearance and value of surrounding neighborhoods as well. They also support local economies, like we've talked about. Visitors who stay in short-term rentals spend money at local restaurants, coffee shops, grocery stores, gas stations, retail stores and entertainment venues. That revenue stays within the community and helps support local jobs and small businesses.
Another important point is that many of us who host are also travelers ourselves. When we travel, we stay in short-term rentals because they provide a more personal and community based experience than a traditional hotel. We enjoy supporting local homeowners in other cities just as visitors support ours here. Responsible short term rental owners care deeply about their neighborhoods. We want quiet so you will be encouraged to put up the sound listening devices Respectful guests because this is our home and our community too. I believe thoughtful regulations like option one And responsible hosting can allow short-term rentals to continue benefiting homeowners neighborhoods local businesses and visitors alike And then I was going to speak to your question Councilmember Ayala you're asking about how are we gonna?
You know make sure that these Hosts are gonna. You know follow the regulations and put up the sound Devices and all the other things, and I really don't think that's gonna be an issue. You've got a hundred houses plus or minus 100 houses with Really only five of them that have had maybe two complaints. So we're invested, I mean if it doesn't work out then we're going to have to sell our houses and move so I really don't think that's going to be an issue.
Paying the permits, paying down a lot of the fees that you guys, I mean you asked option Ms. Pro Tem Elaine, you asked the cost involved. It's going to be a lot cheaper in my opinion for the city to allow these because you're gonna be bringing in some revenue, you're gonna bring in your taxes. You're gonna bring in some of the other things as opposed to the expensive to regulate and then also I think it was up to $14,000 and it was a number for fines. It was almost the same on that. So there would be less, it'd be actually cheaper for the city to regulate. And so thank you again guys appreciate it.
Thank you.
Mayor, City Council, staff. I applaud the difficult decisions you make and the time you put in on our behalf. My name is Richard Holliman. I'm a 55-year resident of Simi Valley. I am a local realtor for 37 years. I was past president of our Simi Valley Moorpark Association of Realtors. I am also a certified real estate expert certified by Ventura County Superior Court So I have lots of knowledge whenever I come forth with the information that I'm coming forth with today.
I also live next door to the Poltergeist House, so I want to disclose that as well. So I am here today to speak for a complete ban on short-term rentals Some people today will say that it is the right of a homeowner to have a short-term rental. And actually, it's the opposite. It's a residence. A home is in a residential community and to put a hotel in a residential community is wrong.
For somebody to put a business in a residential community where people are raising their families is wrong. It was never the right of a homeowner to create a business in a residential community. A hotel is a family, excuse me, a hotel and a family community is not what the neighborhood is built for. People want to raise their families and communities, not have a hotel there.
We have plenty of hotels in Simi Valley. We have a hotel that is permitted And has not been built yet. If we were short on the need for hotels, that would already be built and it would be fully staffed and fully rented out. What I want to address today is Megan's Laws regulations. It regulates sex offenders. Okay, it regulates them where they live. And it regulates pedophiles, child abusers and they're required to disclose where they live okay?
A short term rental does not count as where you live, it's where you're visiting. There is no way to regulate and if there was, it would already have happened over the last 10 years The fact that you can have a sexual abuser, pedophile or rapist come next to your home because somebody has set up a short-term rental there. I don't think you as city officials want to be known for putting pedophiles, rapists and child abusers into a family community.
I don't believe the Simi Valley citizens are okay with short-term rentals next to them, allowing those deviants to be there. And I also don't think the homeowners are okay with the fact that the value of their home will decrease whereas it's been stated oh well they're improving the home and whenever they come in and put it out to rent it out. That may be correct but As a family member, you can't go, hey kids, go out and play in the front yard because you don't know who's going to be there.
So if you're concerned about the citizens of our city, I want you to contemplate the fact of your kids, your grandkids. Do you want them to be able—you can't put them out front in a family neighborhood because you don't know who's going to be next door? Because it's going to change every two, three, five days. Is that what you want to create for our community? I don't think it is.
My request is that you protect our citizens, protect our families, protect our children and that you ban short-term rentals in Simi Valley. I'm also going to ask that as the speakers come up that they disclose where they live and if they have short term rentals whenever they speak I want to thank you for your time. I appreciate all of your efforts. I understand there are difficult decisions that have been made, but in this situation, I don't think it's actually that difficult and I really believe you want to support the citizens of Simi Valley and that you want to support making sure we have a family community to raise our kids in. Thank you.
2:11 – 2:173 turns
The next three speakers, Nancy Zeis, Heather Moss and Ryan Higgins.
Hello my name is Nancy Zeis. I do live in a neighborhood where next door to me they were allowed to build a rental in their backyard. They also rented somebody in the home so now there's six cars For one house, I can never park in front of my house. Across the street from me there's another rental that people come in and out of like the last gentleman said two or three days sometimes longer they also have parked cars so I'm asking what kind of real regulation are you going to do about the cars because in our neighborhood there's nowhere to park?
I think that's sad. I totally agree with the last gentleman. How do you know what's coming into the rentals? They aren't passing any kind of survey before they come into the rentals. I think as you respect the neighbourhood, I've lived in my home for 46 years so it's a big change to have that many cars always parked in front of my house. Thanks.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh, Council Members Ms. Argybright and Ms. Gutierrez. I am Heather Moss a 15-year Simi Valley resident and business member. I urge you to ban residential short term rentals citywide. My family and many neighbors did not receive the STR survey. Contacting a small group while excluding several hundred thousand other residents, registered voters and homeowners is not an accurate representative sample.
Responsible cities have banned STRs in favor of residential character stability and safety Simi's own planning commission unanimously recommended a ban on STRs, along with our neighborhood councils and 430 residents who signed a petition to ban STR citywide. Simi Valley has long prohibited commercial businesses in residential zones. STR slipping in under the radar never made these unregulated lodging operations permissible.
Bad actors, crime tourists and pop-up brothels. They deliberately seek out STRs. Simi Valley should prioritize residents, housing concerns, property values and safety not unlicensed lodging businesses exploiting our neighborhoods. At various recent meetings many STR operators stood before you They flat out lied to your faces and concealed that they do not live in Simi Valley. Many do not live on site at their STRs.
They downplayed the true scope of their high turnover transient lodging operations, and many operate multiple STRs. They are not their primary residences. Some engage in what's known as rental arbitrage by leasing properties in our city to re-rent as STRs for profit, further reducing long term housing availability to others. Superhost status is code for packing in lodgers 24 seven with no regard for our neighborhoods Those that boasted of never having an issue or only having one issue that was resolved in one hour. That's all a lie.
They have numerous negative lodger reviews mentioning unsanitary conditions, safety and maintenance problems at their properties and unresponsive off-site hosts. STR operators are not paying TOT tax. Most don't have city business tax certificates and no one is regulating or vetting these operations for safety, occupancy, density, traffic and parking issues or building code compliance.
If the city refuses to ban STR Citywide, then please immediately require TOT collection on every booking and do so no later than 45 days from now. Their free ride needs to end! Enough with the delays while STRs siphon businesses away from licensed lodging businesses who are already struggling with high vacancy. Simi Valley is not a monopoly board. Homes are not hotels. Please ban STR citywide. Thank you so much.
2:17 – 2:245 turns
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh and members of the City Council. Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight. My name is Ryan Huggins and I am the 2026 president of the Kineo Simi Moorpark Association of Realtors. And for full disclosure, I also own and have owned and operated short-term rentals over the last several years. As realtors, we take an oath and are committed to protect the individual right of real estate ownership and to widen the opportunity to enjoy it. It is our position that a ban on short-term rentals would significantly impact and potentially negate the rights of homeowners.
Many times in real estate transactions, a seller must close escrow before their purchase is finalized. In these cases both parties often enter into a seller and possession agreement. which can last anywhere from a few days to several weeks and typically involves compensation. A total ban on short-term rentals would unintentionally eliminate this essential and widely used practice.
In addition to the practical use in everyday real estate transactions, many hosts rely on these rentals to combat inflation by supplementing social security or pensions or to provide long term care for elderly family members. While short-term rentals have existed long before the Internet, the rise of online platforms has significantly expanded their ability to be marketed.
Sites like Airbnb, VRBO, HomeAway and TripAdvisor make it easier than ever to be a short-term rental host. These sites all have good neighbor policies, keep hosting guest reviews and have mechanisms for hosts and those in neighborhoods to file complaints for bad operators. These companies will ban problematic guests, hosts and even properties from their platforms. Several of them also perform background checks on guests and hosts.
According to the city, there are approximately 100 short-term rentals within the housing stock of more than 44,000 residences. Per AirDNA, a short-term rental tracking site, of those 100 short-term rentals, the average occupancy rate in Simi Valley is approximately 56, that's 5-6%, equating to approximately 200 days out of the year being rented out. We would also like to highlight the results of the recent survey commissioned by the city, which found that 72% of respondents supported allowing short-term rentals in Simi Valley. This reflects not only our position but also the views of the clear majority of the community.
We encourage leaders of the great city of Simi Valley to follow the example of other cities by adopting clear and enforceable rules, along with administrative standards and reasonable restrictions for short-term rentals rather than pursuing an outright ban. Please vote to support an ordinance that allows allowing short-term rentals within the City of Simi Valley. Thank
you.
Patricia Fleury, Paul Hodges and Ted Mackel.
Hi I'm Patricia Fleury. I've been living in Simi Valley for 50 years seeing a lot of changes and what I don't understand is that you approved more or less Rocky and Mike to spend $30,000 on a survey when we had resident people that went out, Lynn and Anthony and Jim and all of them, and did it for free. And the... What do I want to say? The figures that they came up with were almost half-and-half And you don't acknowledge that. Why don't you acknowledge our residents who have worked in behalf of trying to make this legal go?
I live next to short-term rentals, the house in back of me is a rental but the people there are transitioned for every six months We've had trouble with fire hazard. We've had trouble with parties, we've had trouble with farm animals and you say oh Pat what's a chicken or two? We had goats and it took code enforcement months to get rid of the goats and when we got rid of the goats what these people do they brought in a horse So, and now we're having trouble with them stacking trash in front of their garage. So you want to live next to a short-term rental? You want to live next to a house that has six to eight people in it? And that I turn to you guys because At one point we went over this, you said two adults and two children in a five-bedroom house is 20 people.
And you came back to me at the next meeting and said you had scaled that down to a total of eight people. Tonight on your slide presentation we're back to 20 people I ask you to reduce that number if you're going to not ban STRs and I'm begging you three because I know Rocky and Mike have already joined the STR family. I'm begging you three it's not a good thing, it lowers the value of our house, it brings in all kinds of strange people they're not the the realtor next to us does not have any landscape or does not keep up the property Please don't allow this.
And the other thing is, did you check with the hotels? Is this going to take business away from our hotels? Are we going to start losing that business in our community? I mean, so please there again. And I could turn around to all the people that asked you to ban and I could go ditto, ditto, ditto because I'm in the same boat as to what they have conveyed. So thank you. Please give this a serious consideration.
Can we go back to the eight people per house instead of 20? Please. Oh, I guess you can't talk to me, huh? Okay, thank you very much.
Thank you
2:24 – 2:325 turns
Good evening Madam Mayor CB City Council I've attended numerous city council sessions far more than I ever have in the 35 years I've been here, which I'm somewhat apologetic for. With regards to STRs, I've heard proponents of STRs speak in favor. However, I have yet to really hear a response to how it makes the community better, how it supports young people possibly buying a home later on and not having to move from where they grew up. I don't hear that. It seems to be singular at this point.
It's about money for various reasons, and I can appreciate that. A member of the City Council had made a mention of a fairly energetic group of people that went out and did surveys, and that referred to them as a vocal minority against SDRs. It's not true. Of course all four of the neighborhood councils voted to ban STRs. That's a mechanism used in the city to report back to the City Council for advisement purposes as to what those neighborhood councils feel their constituents have their feelings about.
Not only did the neighborhood councils decide to recommend banning STRs, The Planning Commission unanimously agreed to recommend a complete ban of STRs. Now those are, if I am correct me if I'm wrong, those are appointed by you guys. To just take and ignore that is simply moving the goalpost down the road when a very questionable, under the circumstances but questionable a survey that was generated and created very very quickly and produced the results that we saw tonight.
So from my point of view I think it's time to do the right thing and to ban STRs in Simi Valley. Thank you.
Good evening. It's been a while since I've been here and thank you for joining the meeting few months ago in honor of my father. I got that certificate, it was very much appreciated by my family. I own a long-term rental. I don't own a short term rental, but I'm opposed to the ban. Short term rentals located in residential neighborhoods bring foot traffic and out of town spending directly to local mom and pop shops, grocery stores, cafes, restaurants that may not be typically seen by tourist revenue. Hosts who frequently leave guidebooks recommend their favorite local spots further driving business to neighborhood staples.
Short-term rentals allow everyday homeowners to diversify their income. This extra revenue can be crucial for residents looking to afford rising property taxes, pay down mortgages or manage general cost of living. In some cases the supplemental income allows families to keep their home rather than being forced to sell to developers in gentrifying areas. Local job creation. The operation of short-term rentals creates direct need for secondary services, boosting local gig and service economies. Posts regularly hire local professionals to maintain their properties creating steady work for housekeepers, cleaning services, landscapers, pool maintenance workers, plumbers, electricians, general contractors and local property managers.
Increased tax revenue. Many municipalities now require short-term rentals to pay the same transient occupancy taxes, hotel taxes and sales taxes as traditional lodging when regulated and collected properly this generates a significant stream of tax revenue for local governments these funds can be injected back in the community to support public schools parks roads maintenance and affordable housing initiatives Neighborhood revitalization. Because hosts rely heavily on positive reviews and photos to attract guests, there's a strong financial incentive to keep properties in excellent condition. This can lead to homeowners investing in significant renovations fully furnishing and updating updating, maintain landscaping and restore storing older unutilized properties.
Over time this consistent upkeep can improve the overall aesthetic and safety of a neighborhood In highly popular destinations, traditional tourist centers can easily become overcrowded. Short-term rentals can help disperse visitors across a wider geographical footprint. This not only spreads the economic benefits across different zip codes but could also relieve pressure and congestion on main tourist hubs and public transit in those areas.
Temporary housing to bridge the needs of people selling homes while waiting for their next home to be built or give them beneficial edge up to buy in competitive housing markets. For those of us who are real estate brokers, sometimes we'll sell a house and someone's going to need temporary housing. These Airbnbs fill the void, gets them in a place where now they can go out and compete in the market.
Being a long-term rental owner, one of the big things we see and we see as real estate professionals when we go into these long-term rentals they're in very poor condition. The landscaping isn't taken well you got paint peeling, you go in and the way landlords paint and slap or slap paint over everything. Long term rentals tend to be the worst properties on the block The short-termers, they're out there. They're putting in furniture or carpet fully everything plates glasses dishes for all the people that they want the place to be very nice They want the five star review While local mom-and-pop landlords actively maintain their properties, absentee landlords may defer maintenance to maximize profits. A high density of poorly maintained rental properties can lead to an increase in municipal code violations, structural decay and aesthetic blight over time this physical neglect Can suppress a property valuation of surrounding owner-occupied properties.
And what I hear tonight is people are confusing long term and short term. The short term properties aren't the Munster houses on the block, it's the long term rental properties and the parking issues that come with this. I have a house right down the street from me there's over 20, 25 people. It's a long term rental. It has been a rental since I've been living in the neighborhood for 20 years. It is the eyesore
I'm sorry your time is now up.
Thank you.
Thank you.
2:32 – 2:385 turns
Mike Little, Annie Rice and Jonathan Beck.
Will you repeat the names, please?
Is Mike Little still here? How about Anne Rice?
Good evening. Thank you so much for the opportunity for us to speak to you again. My name is Anne Reese And I have lived in Simi Valley for 42 years. Like most people, my husband and I moved here because we wanted clean neighborhoods, good schools and a sense of small town community. We were told that Simi was a bedroom community. We were told it was filled with cops and they rolled the sidewalks up at 9 p.m., and coming from L.A., I was like yes!
We loved it. I'm really surprised that we're still debating short term rentals because we We learned about the 430 signatures that were obtained by some local residents, not through a survey with perhaps misleading language in it. If somebody had asked me about a private home I might feel differently about it than the short-term rental. Plus if there's 670 Responses of which 62% were in favor of it. That's kind of a wash with 430 petition signers who wanted them to be banned I don't see that that's a big difference there 62 percent of 670 I'm not going to be able to do the math that quickly but um, I was at the neighborhood one meeting where it was banned and The other three neighborhood councils also banned it. And as someone else said, the planning commission came back with a unanimous ban.
I find it amazing that all these people can say no and yet all of a sudden now we're up discussing this again like it's some great thing. I'm opposed to this for a couple of reasons. One is we have lived in our home current home now in Simi for 38 years. I have, I retired two years ago as a registered nurse having spent 50 years working in hospitals and various other venues saving our money to be able to afford this house Now I understand that someone can buy the house next door to me and immediately turn it to a short-term rental, and what I say or what I think means nothing?
I find that unbelievable. If I own my home, why don't I have a say into what's happening? Fiscally, I don't think it's a great idea. I see there's new numbers now that city staff has put up but in the ACORN in January, there was talk that it would need 18,750 fully reported short-term rental nights per year or nearly 100 nights per listing assuming the 100 compliant units to break even with the cost that will be incurred in this including hiring staff Now the staff is just going to kind of appear magically, I guess.
And again this is anecdotal. I worked 50 years as a nurse and nobody ever gave us anything. I can't afford a second home to rent out as a short-term or long-term rental What I have is the house at 3086 Springfield that we've been in for 38 years. If my property values go down, who do I go to? How do I get that back as a 72-year-old woman Nobody gave us anything.
I'm happy for the people who were able to have these wonderful houses, and I know my time is running out but anecdotally my son lives in a beautiful home in Moorpark and he says mom we don't have that problem it's banned in Moorpark there are no short-term rentals My daughter lives in Wood Ranch in a gated community. You think they're allowed to have short-term rentals there? So the question is, who's more equal here? What neighborhood are we going to put the potential of having a bad short-term rental that will last forever? I'm not going anywhere. So that's something I'm going to have to deal with forever Thank you for the time.
Thank you.
2:38 – 2:436 turns
Hi, my name is Jonathan Beck. I've lived in Simi Valley for 40 years. I love this place. You can't beat it. There's no better place in the world. But I just have one question for you on the council and you folks. How many of you would like to live to a short-term rental that had seven units?
Anybody want to do that? Sir, you need to address the council. You cannot address...
Come to the Texas track and you'll be able to see it in action. So I hope there's no grandfathering. There should not be more than one person in addition, and the person who owns the house should be there or there should be some close contact. Now there's a couple things that I want to think about here as far as Simi Valley is a city and we're here for the people, not for the profits.
And we have a central government, a federal government that's full of greed, graft and corruption. And we need to stop that in our city. So I'd like to ask each of the councilmen if you will have any relative connection investment or some benefit that you're going to derive from this short-term rentals, you should recuse yourself And honestly, do you have any?
Mr. Judge?
Sir we can't respond to you at this point in time. What
about you Rocky? You're not going to benefit from this? Honestly, are you going to tell the rest of the people here? What about the rest of you? I mean we're a city. You heard of the rigged survey it's a fake news, rigged. It's a hoax. And we have to think about, we the people. We want our own home. I don't want to be living next to a pedophile or some other person. Who knows? Do you check their references when they come in every day? How about the parking situation?
How are you gonna park all these cars on the street? And, you know, you're gonna say, oh, the rules say they won't do that. But then we have to come around with somebody checking on them every day and it's ridiculous. That 72% against what 23%, that's ridiculous. That was very, come on! But the point I'm making here is that we're here for the benefit of our children And our children's children, our investments in our homes. I bought a home for $100,000.
Now they're going for... There was one in the Texas tract that went for 1.1 million dollars and what if this person with the seven units decides to rent it out into each person and charge them $1500 a month? How much money is that going to add up? What's going to stop these people from turning them into long-term rentals and it's going to be a situation where we're going to be stuck in the middle and these lot of lawsuits and people you know saying well I have this, I invested all this money.
If somebody, all these units because there's a shortage I know of housing and everybody is able to build a little shack in the backyard, a granny shack. Well that's great but it should be for family members. It shouldn't be for a profit you shouldn't make a profit off your home I'm going to make the money. Showing their preferences for certain political beliefs and, you know, we are Simi Valley. We're a nice quiet community and we want to keep our values, our houses, and we don't need a bunch of strangers coming in. I mean they're like strange people but they're going to move in and we'll get to know them.
You know? I want to get to know my neighbors. I know my neighbors. And I know each and every one of them. And I know that each and every one I talked to did not like the idea of a short-term rental next to them. And you're telling me 72% of the population, they probably said well yeah, I could put a short term rental so I'm going to say yes on it. But that's not the idea. We're not here for the money, we're here for the beautiful life, the hills, the mountains of Simi. I love this place. So I hope you guys will do what's right and recuse yourself if you're gonna make money off of it and vote no for no more short-term rental. Why should we even have to ask about it? Like everybody has been saying, we're here and we don't want this!
And listen to what we have to say, all right? Have a good
night.
2:43 – 2:534 turns
Leo Preti, Carol Fernandez and Stephanie Bunker.
Good evening Mayor good evening City Council thank you for giving us a chance here to speak our mind I've come here several times and I'm a little baffled too how all our neighborhood councils came up with Everybody hating this idea and some sort of a survey, which I can't really have much faith in. I'm not saying they did it wrong. I just can't have faith because it's 180 degrees from what your constituents are saying.
So without getting into the survey, and I never received one either. I know you're not going to pass it out to 150,000 people but I find it very disturbing that that company you guys hired came up with With a result that's 180 degrees off from us. I would find that concerning, especially if it's you using city money to get those results. This is a bad idea in so many different levels. It really is.
Everybody's talking about the money you're making. You're not gonna make that much money and you're not... The city, you're not gonna make that much money when you get the money to enforce it and everything else? I don't even think you guys are gonna break even. I really don't. And as far as controlling parking, you can't control parking. You could tell the person who owns the house that whoever rents this house they need to park their vehicles in the driveway. I get that.
But if you're having a party, Mayor, and you invite me and I bring six friends of us and we have six—we pay registration. We have the right to park in the street? And especially the people who rent those homes are going to be so restricted in what they could do. If you're going to rent a hotel or home, or be out on the beach in Monterey, you want to be able to invite friends and have barbecues outside. So you're going to raise your voice. You've got 20 people inside a room. The volume is going to go up. You guys been in restaurants that the volume goes up with one loud person.
It's almost Pollyanna to think that this is going to go really smooth and you guys are going to have everybody in place to take care of all the fines, and now the homeowners are going to be there. It's not going to happen. It is going to increase our parking on our street. I live up from Anthony, and they had a short-term rental there when they had the fires going.
And we had two huge dump trucks parked for over a week in front of our house. That's wrong. It's wrong, that's why they have zoning. That's why I'm like, I can't go in my house and start building a spaceship. I'm not in a commercial zoning, I'm not in a manufacturing zone. We have hotels, we have motels. You know it's a bad idea. The only... I have to go make a call but just put... I'm gonna try to synopsize this real quick. How would you guys like to have a short-term rental next to your house?
right next door to you, or two of them right and left of you. I know it's great when you get it, you can have family over and everything else but why should your constituents pay the price of inconvenience on a bedroom community because you guys want to change horses in the middle of a stream and have hotels in residential areas? And I'm not saying they're good people, bad people, pitiful, I don't know anything about the people, I'm not going to judge their characters or who they are. It's just a bad idea in city planning It doesn't make them bad people that they want to do it. Doesn't make us bad people that we don't dig it, but we're the ones I've been here for 34 years and I'm probably the rookie in this group.
You know, and I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in my house and in Simi. And my children grew up here and I spent money here and will continue to do so. But another thing you have too is guys like me now that I'm an old guy, I could go ahead, I can sell my house and move. I could also do that and take all of that money that I spend in your city and tax everything else and just take it someplace else.
I could always do that if I'm not happy with you guys, you know. But the information you guys got outside of this and I want to say this bogus company you hired to get these numbers everybody else says it's a terrible idea even if there was a good idea which it's not your constituents are saying don't do it! You guys have to serve us. I feel like we're serving you keeping an eye on the house over here who's that whose car is that? Hey man I don't want to hassle that I want to come home and relax. I don't want to know who's next door outside of my neighbors that are there. It's a bad idea, guys. And the money is not going to be that much money. It really isn't.
It really isn't. Anyway, thank you for listening to me.
Thank you.
Good evening Mayor. Kavanaugh Council members and staff. My name is Carol Fernandez, I have been a Simi Valley resident for 53 years. I've seen a lot of changes in the city. Some good some not so good. Many of us moved here to Simi Valley for the quiet safe bedroom type community. We commuted out of Simi each day to work there was no jobs here We now have people staying here in homes during the week, working constructions jobs, landscapers, painters, et cetera. And then they leave on the weekends.
They stay in the homes. I don't know if they're SDRs. I do know of one around the block from me that I don' know of this other one but the one I was talking to the guy there and they have little toys out front, a little pony ride thing for the kids and stuff. And I said oh you have kids? Oh no that's just a show. For what? Oh because we're workers if we come here at night and we just sleep okay so it seems kind of funny to me to have things like that going on It does bring more cars at this particular house. There's quite a few trucks at night, pull in and as we all know 72 hours you can park on the city street without moving your car so as far as saying that you have to park into the driveway that's not a true thing that will happen I feel that we have ADUs popping up Lots of people renting out their garages and rooms.
We can't do anything about that because that comes from Sacramento. We're hearing about having these tiny homes come in, maybe that'll be good. People that can't afford their big houses anymore to maybe move into a tiny home or they can still stay here. I feel that times are hard for people. Everybody wants to make money, I understand that But don't want to go out and work anymore. We have, as you come into our neighborhood, a house with an ADU, the garage rented out, something in the front that they added, and I can't tell you how many cars.
And I can't believe that the guy had the nerve enough in a conversation to say, I don't have to go to work anymore. I just rent. I am a renter. I have a home out here that I rent, belonged to my mom. We used it. Unfortunately we had to put her in a home. She got so bad. I watched who I rented and the 10 years that she was in that home, I rented it to two people Planned on selling it, but I still have it because thank goodness. I have a police officer that lives in there, loves him, the neighbors love him. He's one person there, has his kids every other weekend. It's a great thing. But when he decides that he doesn't want to no longer live here and retires, moves to another state, that house will go up for sale because I wouldn't do that to those neighbors You know, I feel that you could be, you know everybody wants to get on the bandwagon.
You give an inch and take a foot. People don't always obey rules or laws. Do we in Simi Valley really want to open our city to short term rentals when we can oppose? Read in Orange County and Santa Barbara, they are tightening up on regulations to help preserve the city's quiet bedroom communities. Orange County has 19 cities have banned SDRs. There are cities like Simi Valley, Elisa Viejo, Garden Grove. No, they're not your hot beachfront high-end homes like a Newport Beach where people want to go and stay on vacation and respect the house, do their vacation and leave.
But they are nice. My kids only stay in SDRs. A lot of people like SDRs. We have done it in certain communities. I don't see Simi Valley as that community. I'm sorry your time is now up. Thank you.
2:53 – 2:593 turns
Good evening, City Council. My name is Stephanie and I am a homeowner here in Simi Valley. Neighborhood Council 4 recommended to ban short-term rentals. These rentals add speculative prices to our housing market which can reduce affordability for all residents as it is our country has already been stretched thin due to corporate price gouging. Also our schools have significantly declined in enrollment which hurts our schools Banning STRs can help improve school enrollment. If we learned anything from the 2009 housing market crash, I strongly recommend that city council stands in solidarity with their neighborhood councils and its planning commission and put a ban on STR rentals. Thank you.
Todd Taylor, Kimberlyn Paul and Heidi Sabota.
For short people. Good evening Mayor Cavanagh City Council my name is Todd Taylor I've been a Simi Valley resident for over 17 years homeowner for 13 years And for clarification to others, I was actually an STR operator for eight years. We've hosted probably...I won't repeat it. I've been here the last five times so you've heard a lot of what I've had to say.
We posted over 300 people, we've had over 250 reviews, all five stars. We monitor the people. We look at every person's review. If they don't have a review, I actually have a little bit of an extra benefit. I'm a private investigator so I tend to run their backgrounds. Not something that everybody has that benefit but I will tell you out of all those people, I've only declined one person. It wasn't severe but I just decided it wasn't comfortable Airbnb allows us to decline people just because we're not comfortable with them. So there's a lot of things in place that do protect us hosts.
I want to address, and it just came up the other day. I want to address what's been said about the 430 petitions that went around. I had a gentleman come up to me at the Chamber of Commerce and said to me, hey, I just want to let you know I signed that petition. I was forced into it because they just really, he said the Easterns came around. He said he lives close by and they kind of just intimidated him and to get them away from him, he just signed it. He said, I'm really sorry that I signed that.
Keep in mind a petition is something that you're only getting one side of. The survey is something that you're getting multiple sides of. They don't want to tell you anybody who said, oh no we support STRs. Then they just don't sign that petition. So that's something to keep into consideration. I'm assuming hopefully that you're at least not going to do a complete ban.
And if the city is choosing regulation, now I'm continuing to listen to my speech here. If the city is choosing regulation rather than a ban then regulations should be reasonable targeted and based on actual impacts not the fear of what might happen there are several concerns with this proposal First, the ordinance completely prohibits guests from parking on public streets. Yet residents, their family members, contractors and guests can all legally use these same streets every day.
If the city has decided STR's are legal through regulation then creating separate parking restrictions for one class of homeowners becomes difficult to justify. We already have parking enforcement laws. If someone blocks a driveway, creates congestion or parks illegally, enforce the existing laws directly. Second, many of the standards in this ordinance are subjective and vague terms like unreasonable noise disturbances and untimely corrective action leave room for inconsistent enforcement and complaints based on personal dislike rather than actual violations.
If the concern is nuisance behavior, then nuisance laws should be enforced equally against everyone whether it's an STR long-term resident or a large family gathering. Third, the ordinance imposes unrealistic requirements on property owners including responding to complaints within 30 minutes. It may sound good politically but in the real world people travel, sleep, work, lose cell service or may simply not be immediately available. Regulations should be practical and enforceable.
Fourth, the proposal creates a significant new regulatory structure Involving permits, annual compliance certifications, monitoring complaint tracking appeals reporting requirements and penalties where each day can become a separate violation. Yet very little evidence has been presented showing widespread ongoing problems in Simi Valley that justify this level of government expansion And that's really the key issue tonight. If the city believes STR should be completely banned, then that is one debate.
But if the city chooses regulation, then regulations should focus on actual nuisance behavior not create layers of restrictions that treat responsible homeowners differently from everyone else. Deal aggressively with bad actors. Enforce nuisance laws strongly, but avoid creating overly broad regulations that risk selective enforcement, unnecessary bureaucracy and restrictions that go beyond solving actual problems. Thank you for your time.
2:59 – 3:045 turns
Hi, good evening. I didn't know I was going to come and speak tonight. I just thought I would sit in and listen but I've been compelled to make some notes so thank you for giving me the opportunity. I've been a resident of Simi Valley for over 25 years. I'm an Airbnb super host and I am actually a super host. I am not just pretending to be one. It's very difficult to get that designation. You have to jump through a lot of hoops and you have to be in the program for quite a long time, and I've had that designation for about five years now.
I also work a full-time job in addition to being an Airbnb super host. Because of the pandemic, I work remotely for the most part. Sometimes I go into the office but I am on the premises all the time. This is a part of my home it's not the whole home and so I am there to answer problems or issues or concerns or anything that comes up from my guests I've talked to my neighbors. They don't have a problem at all with me having an Airbnb across the street, and if they did they would let me know and I would address those issues and concerns. On a personal note, I lost my mother about six years ago, and I am a single parent. This is a way that I supplement my income, and if I did not have this as a side business I would have to move out of state like so many others have.
This is a little business that just provides a little bit of extra income for me. With that money, I use that money to put back into the property to keep it updated and landscaped in the pool and all of those things to attract people to come to the Airbnb for that experience. The reason why a lot of people have started using short-term rentals and especially Airbnbs is because of the experience. I ask my guests Why do you come to Simi Valley? If you want to go to Santa Barbara or you want to go to Universal Studios, why do you come here and they tell me because I don't have to pay for a parking fee. I don' t have to pay for internet use. I get a concentrated personal experience that you're going to give me because I'm focused on them and no one else.
I understand about noise, I understand about disruption. I understand about traffic. I understand all of those things so then why don't we just enforce the laws that we have on the books instead of a complete ban for everyone? I own a property. My parents worked hard for me to own a property and I'd like to keep it. So thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, good evening. My name is Heidi Svoboda. I'm a longtime resident of Simi Valley. I live roughly at Sycamore and Alamo. And 33 years I've been there. I know my neighbors. I love my neighbors. And even the ones I don't love, they're mine. My concern with the short-term rental wouldn't just be the noise, the parking, the parties. It would be that revolving population of lodgers that would be coming and going in my neighborhood.
I've raised my kids there. Many of the families in my neighborhood have raised their families there. It's not a community where we should have a hotel in our neighborhood. We have plenty of hotels in Simi Valley, and I think that's what the lodgers should use. Every time we have a short-term rental added in our community, that'll be one less home that somebody could rent or possibly that would be listed on the market for someone to buy.
So I want you to consider that for the people that live here, that it's not a good idea for our community. Thank you.
Thank you.
Gerald Pitsdick, Steve Thompson and Vanessa Bellum. Gerald. Steve Thompson.
3:05 – 3:113 turns
Hello, Mayor Cavanaugh and City Council members. Since you're voting tonight on whether to approve short-term rentals or have a ban Here in Simi Valley, I assume all of you have discussed this issue in great detail and have most likely made your decisions. After listening to all of you over the last several months many times, I've witnessed your ability to recognize the important details while possessing the common sense to block out fabricated stories.
We all know that short-term rentals have existed here in Simi Valley for about a decade with very very few issues Mr. Gunasekara, I'm ruining your name there of the Planning Commission stated at both the City Council meeting and Neighborhood Council meetings I attended that there have been virtually almost no complaints other than the Poltergeist House The numbers that they put up today Showed that there's roughly a hundred short-term rentals here in Simi Valley And on average, they're rented out or booked 200 days a year.
That's 20,000 bookings. 20,000 days they're booked and you had 10 complaints. That's an astronomical number of bookings compared to so few complaints. So all of these stories about what's gonna happen and this is gonna happen and that's gonna happen Short-term rentals have been here for 10 years, and none of these things are happening. This is very clearly a very successful problem free activity that has taken place in our neighborhood for years.
I wrote to all of you last week my thoughts and suggestions to have a plan that allows short term rentals and has regulations that would also provide a happy medium for those residents that are opposed. I have faith in all of you to make the right decision tonight and not eliminate more than 100 home businesses here in Simi Valley that provides a valuable service to this community. I hope you will approve short-term rentals tonight so we can move forward and finalize a set of fair and effective regulations.
Thank you for your time, consideration, and professionalism.
Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight. My name is Vanessa Milan, long-time resident of Simi Valley. My husband and I bought our first home here in Simi 17 years ago, and we have proudly raised our family in this community. We have two sons—one recently completed his MBA program at Channel Islands. And our youngest is a student athlete, one of these fine young men you had the opportunity to meet earlier today from Simi Valley High School.
He hopes to join the Ventura County Fire Academy after graduation next year. Like many families in California we have felt the pressure of rising costs over the years property taxes insurance utilities college tuition they all continue to increase And for many middle-class families like us, it has become harder and harder to stay in our communities. The communities we love.
Operating a short term rental has helped us bridge that gap. It has allowed us to remain in Simi Valley, to support our children's goals and to continue investing in our home and community. For the past four years, we have responsibly operated our short term rental while following the city rules and regulations During that time, we have welcomed people from all walks of life and many of their stories have stayed with us.
We have hosted families returning to visit loved ones, people attending weddings and funerals, workers temporarily assigned to local hospitals and businesses, and guests caring for elderly parents during difficult times. The strange people that many have referred to here Our young gastroenterologist from Argentina who came to walk, to work alongside our doctors at Simi Hospital for several weeks.
Another family stayed with us after being displaced by the fires and they were incredibly grateful that they had a safe place to go to during this stressful time but also that they were able to bring all of their belongings with them whatever they could fit in their cars These are not party goers. They're not disrupted visitors. These are real people, these are families who contribute to our local economy and our community.
Eliminating or heavily restricting short-term rentals would not just impact businesses it would impact families Families like mine who rely on this additional income to afford the rising cost of living in California, families who have worked hard for decades to build a life here and want to continue calling Simi Valley home. I respectfully ask the council to continue supporting short-term rentals and to avoid decisions based on a small number of unfounded concerns.
Please allow families like ours the opportunity to continue operating responsibly, contributing to the local economy and welcoming visitors to the community we are proud to call our home. Thank you for your time tonight.
Thank you.
3:11 – 3:2912 turns
Madam Mayor that was the last speaker?
Thank you does staff desire to respond to any of the comments or issues raised
Yes. To clarify Mr. Mikula's comment about barns or sheds being used as STRs, just to clarify accessory structures that are non-habitable meaning they're non conditioned space, they are not allowed to be used as short term rentals? And then to clarify the comment about the proposed limit, so currently as proposed the ordinance limits two adults and two children per bedroom.
Given the feedback from neighborhood councils and planning commission one possible modification that we've included in the staff report is to potentially limit that number based on Based on something similar that Ventura County has which is a total cap at eight occupants Thank you, so if that's something that the council chooses to incorporate this is provided here tonight as an example And then in response to some of the nuisance concerns, there are a lot of existing protections already in place specifically with noise.
There is an existing noise ordinance that would need to be complied with and that's something that is enforced through our current enforcement actions and through PD. Similarly with complaints, there was a concern about responding within 30 minutes That's something that's included in the ordinance as a protection measure and as part of the nuisance response plan. It is still possible that you can call code enforcement or PD if issues arise and the respondent can't respond within 30 minutes, it's still a protection that's in place there.
And then to clarify a little bit about this survey Statistically, to create a valid sample only 500 respondents were needed. With the 670 respondents that answered, that gave a 95% confidence level with a maximum margin of error of 3.8%. So this bell curve here shows that if you were to increase the sample size, meaning the number of respondents, that margin of error is it changes very minimally. It changes fractionally so for example if you double the sample size to let's say 1200 residents um the margin of error really difference the difference between that would be 3.8 to 3.5 so very minimal and that's what's considered diminishing return so as you put more effort into it, more effort increases but the results do not. So hopefully that clarifies a little bit.
Just one thing to add, the rental arbitrage that was mentioned, one person leasing and then renting multiple properties. We would verify ownership of the property with Ventura County tax records and that would be one legal entity or one person who owns that property would get one permit so that rental arbitrage would not be possible.
Thank you. No further comments from staff, thank you. Are there any further comments or questions from City Council members? Council Member Rhodes.
Just to be clear on process that we are responding to what we heard from the audience or these further questions of staff?
From the audience
I don't want to go out of order. I'm excited to be here tonight because this is democracy at work for those who say hey, this took too long to get this up here. It took the right amount of time to get to everyone's voice being heard. And I start tonight asking the same question from a year ago, which is what is the problem we are trying to solve? And I think that both sides articulated extremely well what the problems they perceived to be with a ban or an ordinance to be.
I tried to keep a list of what the big concerns were and parking, a hotel next door. parties, property value decrease, code compliance, multiple units on the same property, affordability of housing. And these are all important topics. These are all things that we should be concerned about if we want to have peace and harmony in our neighborhoods. I said what's the problem we're trying to solve, and that's we want to actually keep our neighborhoods under control.
And then if you're going to ask that, you have to say what's out of control? What's the actual problem number that we're looking at? And staff gave us a good snapshot of having Of all last year, of all 100 estimated units 10 calls and five of those properties were duplicate calls. So the problem that we perceive or fear is perception and fear it's not actual And I even had conversations with those that are adamantly opposed and saying, I think that we're going to be able to get you what you want but not in the way that you wanted. If we produce an ordinance that has expectation levels that demonstrates what we want from renters and what we want from owners and how we want people to behave And then we can enforce it and not at a loss for the city, then I think we've accomplished the goal that everybody wanted which was a peaceful neighborhood.
The perception of what might happen, the biggest fears on that list are either already covered under an existing ordinance if you have a problem call it in or In the ordinance that's being proposed here tonight, it covers in more detail those aspects of how to be a good neighbor. So I want to thank everybody that came to talk on either side of this issue because I think what I heard from every single person was we want a good neighborhood.
We want to live in peace and harmony with our neighbors and to look out for the entirety of Simi Valley. The funny part about it is if we hadn't had that one house, and I'm sorry you had to live next to it. If we hadn't had that one house show up with great fanfare, we never would have actually paid attention to this matter because it was not a problem to be dealt with but now here we are. So a responsible city council says let's deal with it Let's organize it. Let's not overburden the city to solve a problem until it is a real problem, and let's not make it cost the city any money solving problems that don't exist. So a total ban would cost the city money to solve problems that don't exist and an ordinance would be at least break even.
Numbers that I have seen are I would I personally have a disagreement with the staff report They were very conservative and their numbers of rentals. I think the air DNA quotes are probably closer to reality, but either way it ends up being a Not a burden upon the city to do this so So thank you for participating in this process because I think we're gonna get it right I'm looking forward to A vigorous discussion up here on the dais about it. And I think, oh, I'm sorry, I did want to address a couple of things.
There's been some insinuations about graft and trust me there's not enough graft money in the world that would move any one of our opinions on this thing. It was insinuated at our last City Council meeting as well. If there are any financial interests that we have elected officials have, we have to disclose them on forms so go and scour the forms and build your conspiracy theories about how much money were making on the backside from all of these but that's just not a reality.
And then polls and surveys We tend to be skeptical of a result that doesn't give us the answer that we like. And I am skeptical of the petition that was put out because it didn't give me an answer I was satisfied with. If I was given the question, do you want to live next to a hotel and have horrible problems? I would say no, I don't. And I would sign your petition. And I think that's what has been presented to us.
But this survey, we specifically took an outside company that does this professionally to get us to a margin error of less than 5%, they got it to 3.8%. And if you want to know what the questions were, the sequence of it, the breakdown of the demographics, it's all in the report. It is there for your perusal But if you're predisposed to disbelieving the information, you're probably not going to turn to that page and look.
But I encourage you to do so because it's all there and it was not influenced by us. We kept our hands off of it and let the other company do their job. And they produced this result. So Mayor, that's all the comments I wanted to make at this time.
Thank you. Council Member Ayala?
Thanks. The first thing I wanted to mention was the a couple of times the Texas track seven units property came up and not for today, but I think if we can just look into that because whether Regardless of the decision. We make tonight that just doesn't seem that that should be there's something that there's a problem there so if we can just take that
and I believe that I'm aware of And I believe staff is aware of which property that is, but for the folks that mentioned that property. If you could see Stratus Peros, he's our Director of Environmental Services. He's in the back. Raise your hand again, Stratas. Make sure that he has the address of that property or the location of that property so we can ensure that that's the one that we're already working on.
Thanks. The other thing is, I know there's was going to be concerns about the survey and so I'm glad that Alex brought up the screen because what it shows is that 670 people were responded but whether we doubled that or tripled that or quadrupled that, the survey results would still be the same with 95% confidence level Right. That's how the survey works and I so, I think that's also very important to do.
And so you know I always like to make these decisions and things not on personal feelings but on the information that's been presented and as you all know I listen to all of you and respond to your emails and everything so I have a really good feeling as to where people are standing And so I'm going to be looking down, because they took a lot of notes from things.
And what I would say is that the three main concerns that people have brought up with STRs over the past year and also tonight and also in the emails I get and also from the Neighborhood Council report and also from the Planning Commission, they are... The ordinance really minimizes or tries to eliminate them. So the first thing is that People say that they're concerned with problems. There's gonna be problems with people if we allow them to rent the STRs and We have to remember that the data shows that since we've been discussing this in 2025 all of 2025 and up through 2026 a Total of 10 STR related complaints and only at only five addresses, right? That's what the facts show Now, I know it's an issue though because 82% of all respondents indicated that there should not be a permit issued for an STR that has a history of violations.
So to address this the ordinance includes that a permit can be denied if there is an enforcement action against an STR. So it's already built in there that if someone is violating it, that when they go to renew that STR permit, it can be denied and we can get rid of the person who is not being a good owner. It also includes a stipulation that paid events or group events with non-registered guests are not allowed. That was also added to the ordinance.
And for added reinforcement, I'm going to ask the staff to provide to the council the number of complaints specific to STRs maybe every six months. Just so that we can monitor it and if we need to make changes, we can based upon new information if that were to be needed. The second one is that people talked about here tonight the negative impact on housing availability and that if we were The ordinance includes that a person or legal entity may only hold one STR permit at And the other thing that I think we have to remember is that up until this time, we've had an unrestricted open door STR policy. You didn't need a business license, no inspections, no fines, no tax. It's been easy to actually have an STR. We've said just come in and do it.
So if we were to see a dramatic surge in people wanting to have an STR, the time would have been when there was no rules you could just come and do it So the ordinance we're considering actually creates more barriers to entry, not fewer. And so I don't know if we would see the increase in STRs by restricting them Because that would have, it seems it would have happened when it was easier to actually do it.
As an added reinforcement though another request of the staff is a report on the STRs again maybe every six months so that we can monitor and see maybe we're wrong. Maybe it did bring in more than we expected. And then at that time we can address it and decide if we wanna put a cap, if we wanna do a lottery system something like that. The third and final one and then I'll stop The ordinance then requires a proof of liability.
Wanted us to require a pre-permitting inspection, to make sure that all of the rules were followed. So I'm going to ask the Council's support that we add the language from page 38 from the staff proposed language that includes a pre permitting inspection as part of the licensing process if we were to move forward with the ordinance. And then just two comments, one to the Planning Commission and the Neighborhood Council.
I wanna thank you for all the work that you did and it's important to recognize that many of the concerns that you raised were instrumental in creating the ordinance that was then brought before us so your work was not taken for granted, it was actually taken into consideration and placed in there. And to the STR owners if this goes forward then I expect you to follow the process, follow the rules, follow the timelines and to uphold your end of the bargain that as you have stood here and said you would if this council were to say that we are going to regulate the STRs.
So thank you.
3:29 – 3:427 turns
Thank you. Council Member Rhodes?
Yeah, for staff I had one more question. There were comments about ADUs and using them as short-term rentals. Could you please specify again the difference between a state sanctioned and a different ADU and what could and could not be used as a short term rental?
Yes, per state law, state-exempt ADUs are not allowed to be STRs because they require an occupancy of longer than 30 days. And state-exempt ADUs are typically JADU's that are 800 square feet or under in size so those would not be allowed to be STRs. ADUs outside of that limitation under the proposed ordinance would be allowed to be an STR.
So for those who are short-term rental operators and you have a state exempt ADU, you need to start considering what ramifications are for that because that's a state level law. And once again we're falling into that every time something is frustrating you can point uphill and find a law that Sacramento built. So put that into your considerations
Thank you. Any other comments from anybody? Mayor Pro Tem Lipster?
I didn't even push my button yet! You were reaching for it. I was reaching, I was. This has been quite a conversation to listen to the past year and a half, and to read everything from letters to the editors to personal correspondence. And clearly there are passionate people on all sides of this issue. It is very clear. I appreciate that you've all taken the time to share those concerns, interests.
And I have to share anecdotally so you can appreciate how difficult this is. Today, as I picked up my granddaughter, we were talking in the car from school and I said tonight we're talking about SDRs and I explained what those are. Oh, you need to ban them. We need to be safe. That was my 10-year old granddaughter. As I'm driving to the city council tonight Legally dialed my next door neighbor who I was speaking through the car. I want to be very clear Who I know her husband had brain surgery two days ago And just wanted to check on her and see how she was doing as I'm driving Mentioned and so we I got that update, and I explained it was on my way to And this is going to be the big topic. And she volunteered, oh it's property rights people need to be able to control their property but you really should regulate them carefully so that it doesn't infringe on neighbors and so that was my next turn.
So just within a period of an hour and a half I'm getting both sides of the equation from little bites of the elephant or what their experience is and so I realized very much we are subject what our exposure and experience has been. And that's probably part of the problem, and I'll be honest because I've been very conflicted about this because in my life when I have used short-term rentals they have been such a blessing, and I'm being completely honest.
The last maybe three times I've used them in the last four years And I don't do much vacationing and traveling. I was in Boise attending my brother-in-law's big birthday party, and I wanted my children to be able to stay near me because they were traveling from Utah and I hadn't seen them, and I wanted them to be in a house together with me. So grateful to Boise, I was able to rent a short term rental there.
Then a year and half ago, my mother was in intensive care assisted, she didn't know what was going on but it was near death stuff, and she was in this special hospital. She'd been shipped down from Idaho to Utah, and I wanted to go and make Thanksgiving dinner for my father who was there sitting in the hospital room. And so I'm grateful in Bountiful, Utah, I was able to rent a short-term rental where I was able to fix Thanksgiving dinner and my father could come and eat with us.
And then even this last Christmas, and I'm being honest with my youth. This is full disclosure. Even last Christmas two of my children were gathering in Utah and they're all adults. I have five kids. And I thought this is a way I can get them all the kids together. There's not enough room in that in my son's house but I can rent this house and then come over and have Christmas dinner with me. And that's what I did. And in that instance, I don't think they would've been allowed to do it here if we were to even pass this because it was a family that literally cleared all other things out So I could rent their house for four days so they could save enough money to buy plane ticks to go on a cruise with their family. I mean it was just, so it was just, I was blessing their life and they were blessing my life.
So anyway those are the last three times I have used short-term rentals. And so I think okay I've been blessed by this am I to deny that blessing in my own community for others who have Similar needs, it's not going to resort. This is the internal conversation I maybe shouldn't share as much but this is my internal conversation that's going on. That being said, I served on the Neighborhood Council. I very much welcome their efforts to try to do the right thing, to listen and to hear all sides et cetera and so I value and so I was trying to read carefully what What their concerns were, does this being addressed? Why did they vote the way they did etc., etc.? And when in fact I almost left to go get my notes because they're back in my office.
But I went through and carefully saw each neighborhood council how many votes yay, how many votes nay for banning etc. What I found is that it was a mixed bag yes They all ultimately voted, had concerns and voted against it but inevitably there'd be one or two who thought well yes. It was just really clearly it was a difficult decision for everyone but I value their input. I value the Planning Commission's discussion and in fact so much so you may have noticed there was one planning commissioner that was not there Happens to be my planning commissioner, but he was the one that was in the hospital and not there. And he listened to the whole thing and when I saw him, he said, I would have been the one vote the other direction. So that's obviously not on the record, but I'm just sharing that conversation.
You wonder why I'm confused? Why I'm concerned? So I just wanted to share that this is difficult. We want to do what's right that's up here. We all love our community. We love our neighborhood. We want to make it the best. And as with some of people, as they were speaking, I was concerned that we are conflating long term with short-term rentals. I was a little concerned about that having once owned a home that I rented out that was destroyed by a long-term renter.
I recognize there's a difference between The basically the monitoring that we have to do for short term versus long term. And so I just, those of you who've discussed excessive parking et cetera all of that, those are some of the questions to take up already regardless of what we do right now with our code enforcement to be sure anyway. Yes streets are for public parking but I want to be sure that some of things you're observing in terms of trash et cetera if they're long-term rentals and there's issues They need to be addressed, so I just want to go on the record of saying that.
So anyway, clearly I don't know exactly what is the right solution here. My gut says that for certain people that are very responsible and respectful this is an important part of their life to have these short-term rentals And so I'm mindful of that. But if we are going to go forward with it, we need to make sure that it is in no way infringes on the rights of neighbors and that it's good for everyone in the community.
So those are my thoughts as I lose my voice.
Thank you. Okay. As I sat up here, I made notes pros and cons every time somebody made a comment and they almost equal out. They really do. You know property rights versus unknown people living next door to you. Usually family versus a constant change of people coming and going. And I can go on and on all these things that are just different but You know, my first instinct was to ban. And the reason I wanted the ban was because it wasn't a problem already so why make it a problem? We had no problems with it if we did the ban and people continued to operate the way they were there wouldn't be any complaints and nobody would bother but we did have an instance where there was a home that was being utilized for more commercial use and so that brought up the concerns and they're valid concerns And so I think it's important that we look at all the pros and cons across the board.
It's not an easy decision, I'll be honest one way or the other. I do believe in property rights you own your house you should be able to do what you want to do but I also believe my neighbor has the same property rights and they're entitled to be able to live peacefully where they live. I do agree with the short-term versus long-term rentals I live on a street where there are three, I can tell you there are three houses within ten houses of me that rent out rooms because by the cars. The last one just sold and there are six to eight cars there every day and I know it's because they're renting out rooms and maybe do a couple in one room so there's two cars and you know that type of thing and it can be very inconvenient. I'm lucky where I live they don't park in front of my house But I have a big driveway, so I don't worry about the parking in front of my house.
But I know other people do and I worry about the particular house I'm talking to is actually on a curve. So coming around that curve you have to be very careful because there's cars on both sides. So I have to slow down and make a wide curve and I worry about we have little kids in the area It's just, I've been trying to write down notes and trying to figure out exactly what the good and the bads are.
If we if we allow them, they have to be strictly regulated. And this is the only way that we're going to be able to do it is with an ordinance. I don't know that we can ban them now at this point. I also looked at the survey and the survey is 2-1 in favor of it. If you look at the questions, the actual company explained and went over it with us. They had positive leading questions they had negative leading questions and then they had the general ones in the middle and it enabled you to answer questions So they weren't leading like most, like they could have been. So they gave it both ways so you could answer it correctly and get a clear answer of what the person thought who was answering or who was completing the survey. I liked the fact that the survey was truly representative of our community in the age brackets and the homeowners and that type of thing I really appreciate all of you that have come up here and said how long you've lived here.
I've lived here 57 years, I had to count it out because I couldn't remember how many it was but the problem is with Simi Valley this is our biggest problem I've said it before we've made it such a great place to live everyone wants to live here so everyone wants to come visit their family here the traffic I hear about traffic all the time it's because everybody likes to live in Simi Valley It'll be interesting to see if there are any other comments up here. I think staff has done a great job in trying to formulate an ordinance, especially when we started pretty much without anything.
I think I'm going to stop with my comments right there and see if anybody else has any comments. Okay no so there are no other comments at this point in time. So are there, does staff have any response to any of the council comments?
3:42 – 3:4812 turns
Yeah I believe there was one comment referring to a possible addition on page 30 so if there is a motion You may want to decide whether to include that as well in your
motion. He's talking about my suggestion that staff had put in some language, I think they're going to bring it up on the screen, that would require a pre-permitting inspection and the reason I brought that is that the survey showed that 85% of all respondents, whether they wanted to ban them or regulate them. So it was across the board said that they wanted a pre-permitting inspection as part of the process that they thought that should be required.
I'm
sorry, I thought there was an inspection already in the ordinance? Did I misunderstand that?
So there's an inspection clustered in With the permit fees. There is another section in the ordinance that lets us, that gives staff leeway to add certain things and an inspection is one of those this language we included because There's a bit of a difference between staff making decisions and the council making decisions in terms of the ordinance. So it's safer to put this in, but even without this there is language that says staff can decide on what application materials and our exact procedure to issue those permits. And the building and safety inspection is one that we included.
We included an hour of a building inspector. The
key thing I heard was you said it's safer to put it in and that's what I'm relying on for my suggestion that we put that in there.
Any other comments? Council Member Rhodes.
On the inspection, whether it's the pre-permitting inspection or done with the ordinance as written, when staff said we predict that only 70 out of 100 will go for a business license There will be some percentage of people who have what many have described as overbuilt their houses or have built rooms that are not permitted and so on. I want to find those and encourage them not to have a short-term rental, and would finding that require this language to be in the ordinance? Or would it be a natural course of inspection anyway?
And I'm good either way. I just want to make your life flexible and easy so it doesn't always have to come back to us, but if we can get to that end result without that language, I kind of like giving you flexibility.
Generally, so I'm a planner not a building inspector but building inspectors do have leeway when they visit sites to inspect other things. For example if you get a water heater permit they can tell you that you don't have your smoke detector installed correctly. So if they do see evidence of... They will inspect the areas that are being utilized for STRs So if they see, our inspectors are very good in identifying sort of jerry-rigged stuff, those things. So they would flag that to us and we would inspect that further and potentially open up a violation on that. And we would not issue STR permits on a property that has existing violations. Even if it's like an unpermitted patio or something like that, we would still not And so
that, being able to handle that is existing in the ordinance as presented without this modification.
Well in the ordinance it's a policy procedure on how to issue a permit. The ordinance locks in that requirement so there's no debate on whether it's going to be modified in a future procedure.
I would recommend that if this is something that council wants to ensure is consistently applied, regardless of the staff that's in the position that it be incorporated into the ordinance. My question though would be to the city attorney. Is this one of the modifications that could be made to this ordinance tonight? Or would this need to come back?
So as part of I was going to get to that, thank you City Manager. We would just part of the motion whatever language that the staff has produced just identify where in the ordinance you would like that my concern you know previously when I had spoken to the city manager was saying if there were any other changes that would require maybe further analysis or drafting of certain language that we don't have before us that we would consider possibly bringing this back for a first reading another first reading But since we do have language that is being presented and considered, if this is something that the council would like to identify as part of the ordinance, we can absolutely do that tonight. And then I would just ask that we be very clear about where in the ordinance, I don't know if staff has a recommendation of where that can be inserted so that way the second reading goes smoothly.
3:48 – 4:037 turns
Niren, you know where it should go?
We do, it's section 5-46.06 application procedure of the ordinance
Thank you Any other comments questions from the council? Staff any other further Comments Okay at this time this hearing is now closed and I will entertain a motion
Madam Mayor, I move to introduce Ordinance 1370 amending the Simi Valley Municipal Code to regulate and allow short-term rentals in residential zones and a determination that the amendments are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act including adding the language we identified for modification to pre-permitting inspections. Second.
Thank you, call for the vote.
The motion passes unanimously.
We're going to close for a 10-minute break. Recess for a 10 minute break. Thank you everybody. We're going to call this meeting back to order. Madam Clerk, would you like to move
4:03 – 4:086 turns
forward? Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item six public statements. During this agenda item six, the city council will hear public statements from persons who had previously submitted speaker cards and did not speak under agenda item number four. Speakers will be called on in the order in which their card was submitted to speak for this public statement's item six for a period of no more than two minutes each. Persons addressing the city council are requested to state their name and community residence for the record.
Madam Mayor, unless you have comments we can begin.
Please proceed.
I will call three speakers at a time so you know who you follow. Virginia Seaton, Jennifer Frank and Nikki Leon.
Hello. I attended the grant hearing and I take offense that the Simi Football Boosters said that I did not know the facts. I checked with several people that were also there just to make sure I had the facts before I would write an article to go on The Acorn and this is what I heard at the hearing, that they requested $70,000 but they wanted 150 helmets at $45 each which would only be $67.50 After the hearing, many people were upset that the football boosters who rated fifth, okay? Like there was a recommendation for the top whatever.
They rated fifth and yet they were recommended more money than the previous four. And after all the recommendations were made The city there's a city lady that said There was some unused funds from the previous year and I figured they should give it divvy it up among the top ones or Give it to the next person or the next Organization, but they gave it all to the football boosters. So they're rated fifth and yet they get more than the others So I researched their charity and it turns out, I researched on GuideStar which is a place that you can go to see charities what the revenues and expenses are.
And for 2025, their revenues outpace their expenses by $12,309. Now, I think the Boys & Girls Club or Body Brain Train or The Library I'm
sorry, your time is up. Thank you.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh, members of the City Council, city manager Argybright and fellow community members. My name is Jennifer Frank and I'm a board member of the Simi Valley Library Foundation. Our mission is to raise money for the renovation and revitalization of our library. I'm here tonight to show my strong support for the Library Foundation's Community Projects Grant Proposal, to refresh our library's community room.
The Library Foundation is so grateful to the Review Committee for recommending funding for our proposal. The community room is the most utilized space in the entire library with 20,000 people using it last year alone. Years of heavy use have caused a lot of wear and tear, leaving it in need of a lot of help. The community room is used for a variety of events. The library uses this space for many of its programs and speakers.
Outside organizations also use this room on a very frequent basis for various events. The Library Foundation's full funding request of $37,350 would provide the community room with a long overdue refresh It needs new durable carpet that is clean for children to sit on. A fresh coat of paint will work wonders to make this room welcoming for everyone, and a chair rail will prevent damage to the new paint and keep the walls clean for years to come.
Comfortable chairs and new heavy duty tables will create a flexible space that will meet a variety of needs. A smart board will enhance presentations and learning experiences. The need to update this room is evident in its current condition. Modernizing this room will ensure that it remains functional, welcoming and responsive to the growing needs of our community.
All of these upgrades will benefit our community for years to come. Thank you all for your time and for thoughtful consideration of our request. Thank you.
4:08 – 4:159 turns
Good evening Mayor, City Council members and community. On behalf of Body Brain Train I'd like to sincerely thank you for your continued support through the Community Grants Program. Your support allows us to continue growing expanding and bringing more wellness opportunities to seniors in our community. We'd also like to thank Waste Management for sponsoring this grant and recognizing so many incredible non-profits making a difference throughout Simi Valley.
I also wanted to share a quick update on what's been happening with Body, Brain, Train! This past Saturday we hosted our annual Punchathon Drumathon fundraiser and it was an amazing event filled with movement, music, and community connection. Council Member Joseph Ayala, thank you for being there and spending 75 minutes drumming and moving alongside our seniors.
Our members absolutely loved having you there. We're excited to share that both our Fit Drumming classes and our Thousand Oaks Fit Drumming programs have now regular wait lists each month because of that growth we're currently looking into adding even more weekly classes We're also continuing to expand our programming here in Simi Valley. Some of our newest additions will include body brain train dance class, and sound healing classes as we continue to explore new ways to support both physical and cognitive wellness.
And thanks to the funding we received, we are finally moving forward with the completion of our online certification program which we hope to launch in late 2026 or early 2027. This program will allow us to train instructors, program coordinators, and fitness trainers in our methods so these classes and resources can expand some more facilities both inside and outside of Simi Valley.
At the heart of everything we do is our belief that movement makes miracles, and we truly appreciate this council's support in helping us continue this mission. So thank you again.
Thank you.
The next three speakers, Vanessa Bellum, Tammy Jordan and Tracy Hemnick. Vanessa? Tammy? Okay, Tammy.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and council members. I am Tammy Jordan with the Rotary Club of Simi Sunrise. For 30 years we have told our kids to go to college get a degree and avoid trades But here we are, 2026. Perhaps we were wrong. The proof is sitting in every AI server farm in America, quietly eating the careers we promised them. Not in 10 years, it's happening right now.
There's a 16-year old in this city who doesn't know what she's going to do with the rest of her life. Her parents are stressed, she's stressed, College feels like a financial cliff. The military isn't for her, so she's just waiting and waiting. And the longer she waits, the more she believes there's nothing for her. And what if the only reason she thinks that there's nothing there is because nobody has handed her a tool?
That's what the Rotary Club of Simi Sunrise is trying to fix. The U.S. Department of Education says by 2030, and that's just in three-and-a-half years, 2.1 million skilled trade jobs will go unfilled in this country. You can't automate a plumber who climbs under a crawlspace. You can't replace a carpenter's creative skills or electrician's judgment with a chatbot.
We are putting on an expo, free ages 13 to 24. It's hands-on. It's not a job fair with brochures. We are asking for your financial support to get the word out, to put the expo on for introductions to school districts, workforce agencies and businesses. The trades built Simi Valley. They're going to continue to build what comes next.
Thank
you.
We
need your help. Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh Members of the City Council and staff, my name is Tracy Hemanick and I serve on the board at the Samaritan Center. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. First, I'd like to sincerely thank the council for recognizing the need our community and voting to fund our grant proposal. I also appreciate the city council time consideration as a recommendation comes before you today Every day, the Samaritan Center serves individuals and families experiencing food insecurity and hardship due to rising costs and unexpected life challenges.
In 2025 alone we serve more than 3100 individuals through our food pantry. While we receive a large volume of donated food, our ability to safely store and efficiently distribute those donations is limited by deteriorating plastic storage sheds that are vulnerable to weather and pests. This project offers long-term practical solution by replacing those aging sheds with weather resistant storage units. These improvements will help protect the donated food, improve organization and inventory management and allow staff and volunteers to better serve the community.
This investment is not just about increasing our capacity to support vulnerable individuals and family while ensuring donated resources are used effectively, efficiently and responsibly for years to come. Again thank you to the Community Council for your support and thank you to the City Council for your continued commitment to serving our community and considering this proposal tonight. Thank you for your time.
4:15 – 4:207 turns
Pastor Amanda Berg, David Griggs and Jared Shapiro.
Good evening, Madam Mayor and council members. My name is Amanda Berg and I serve as the pastor at Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church in Simi Valley. And I'm here tonight on behalf of our Stillwaters food pantry. And i'd like to thank you on behalf of our church, our volunteers and all the people that rely on Stillwaters for your grant support We have neighbors coming to us with everything from unexpected hardships and job loss, to limited means and rising costs.
And we want you to know that your grant support does more than help provide thousands of meals to folks struggling in the community. It also offers hope and dignity and compassion. And it's a tangible reminder to those that come That Simi Valley cares about its neighbors. And it's good to know that the committee and council values serving the most vulnerable among us, and so we're deeply grateful for your past and continued partnership and generosity, and for getting to work together to make a real and lasting difference in the lives of so many here in Simi Valley. Thank you.
Good evening everyone and Mayor Kavanaugh. Mike Judge, good to see you again this Saturday night. I hope you enjoyed playing poker. While driving around Simi Valley, I found these signs littered all over the place on public land It says neighbor kidnapped here. This is an anti-ICE propaganda scheme, and I want to know what we can do to prevent these things from showing up in the future.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
I removed more than 10 of them from public land.
Thank you, sir.
Hello Mayor Kavanaugh, Council and the Grant Board. On behalf of Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church, our Stillwaters Food Pantry, the 40 plus volunteers who donate over 200 hours every week and more importantly on behalf of the 280 to 305 families that rely on this pantry each week to receive needed food for themselves and their children. Meals that otherwise may have been missed, we thank you.
We're blessed in this community to have the support of our local grocery stores, FoodShare of Ventura County, Food Drive sponsored by local scout troops, the post office and other generous organizations We're blessed by the many donations from concerned citizens who see the need and want to be a part of the solution. For that, we are truly grateful. Food insecurity is all around us. It's not just under the freeway underpasses or down on the riverbed.
It is very much likely in this room tonight. It hides in our neighborhoods even in the upscale ones. It's in the single mom or dad working two jobs trying to feed the family and meet the basic needs, but not making ends meet. It's in our seniors trying to live on their fixed incomes and losing the fight against inflation. It is in the unemployed and the underemployed and so many others.
As we move forward through the years, I would ask that this need be at the forefront of grant considerations. We live in the greatest country in the world and with that, we still allow people to go to bed hungry at night. I believe as Americans, it's Americans that were better than this. So I thank you for your time. I thank you for your past support, your support tonight and your future support. Thank you.
4:20 – 4:267 turns
The next three speakers Pam Castro, Richard Perrini and Pauline Kissick.
Good evening
Mayor Cavanaugh and City Council, my name is Pamela Castro. I am not a resident of Simi. I've only been a resident maybe three years during the COVID for protection of others but um my late husband was an educator here practically for 42 years he actually lived here probably more than he lived at home so we uh Simi is part of 50-50 for us called home. I'm here representing food share of Ventura County County Food Bank and the reason why I'm here is to brag about your city. We, I handle, I'm the agency relations manager for the county and handle all of the agencies in Simi Valley alone you have about 14 distributors 17 different kind of programs that we bring in just in Simi Valley distributing foods for all different kinds of programs many of your pantry coordinators are wonderful partners But I want to let you know the capacity, a couple things about Shepard of the Valley.
We have Samaritan's whatever as community but I wanted it to just brag about Shepherd of the Valley a little bit all of all of the other partners are wonderful but We have an auditor, State of California. I handle the USDA commodities and distribution throughout this county. Shepherd Valley got picked for an audit from the state of California. They came through with a triple A rating.
One of the best. We recently highlighted Sheppard Valley in our yearly video as one of the best, and they were the home for the workshop that we got 200 of our agencies to come to show off a model agency of how it should be done, follow the rules and how you handle people with compassion. Thank you very much. Congratulations. And you should be extremely proud that you're being represented by these incredible people.
Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor's Council and staff. I'm Richard Perini. I am a resident of Simi Valley and I wanted to bring you the good bad and ugly. The good being the Samaritan Center is having their first annual second chance prompt And we're excited about that. It'll help our unhoused and some other people, like people who wanted to be prom king like Joe Grinstead.
So you can definitely help get Joe to be the king of the prom. My bad is I would like to encourage the council to talk to our school district because we currently don't have any resource officers for these students. I think it's dangerous and I think security should not be an afterthought For these children, so if we can kind of get them to pick up two or three that'd be great.
And my ugly is something that I started coming here 15 years ago on the safety on some of our streets especially Royal Avenue. We had a serious accident on Friday and it caused We'll say a young man, 10 years old, clavicle injury and concussion and a mother who was distraught. The problem with Royal Avenue is we have an S-turn in the morning. We have a sunrise that blinds the drivers. These two specific drivers could not see each other due to the amount of commercial parking that we have on Royal. If we could open up and create visibility, I think it would prevent a lot of these accidents. And that would simply be the eastward looking towards the Arroyo.
But if you guys can look into that, it'd be wonderful. Thank you very much.
Good evening, Mayor Kavanaugh, council members and city staff. My name is Felene Kissick, the director and manager of Beginnings Brew Coffeehouse at New Beginnings Church here in Simi Valley. We are here tonight on behalf of Dr. Clifton Clark, our pastor who is overseas tonight. Thank you for the opportunity to speak tonight regarding the Beginnings Brew Coffeehouse Community Project Proposal.
This project is about far more than coffee. It is about creating a safe, welcoming community. A space where people can connect, build relationships and experience a sense of belonging in our city. Beginnings Brew is designed to serve as a place where neighbors can meet, students can study, seniors can gather, recovery groups can connect and conversations can take place in a warm and welcoming environment.
The funding request before you is not for cosmetic improvements. It is specifically tied to essential upgrades required to satisfy Ventura County permitting standards so that we can operate responsibly and safely. This investment helps move the project from a vision that we've had, to a reality. The return to the community is a clean space, a local economic activity job support partnerships with local suppliers for our church. This project represents our ongoing commitment to serve the broader community beyond our Sunday mornings.
We are inviting the city to partner in strengthening community life. Thank you for your time and consideration. Thank you.
Thank you.
4:26 – 4:329 turns
The last three speakers, Lisa Johnson, Eric Kissick and Oscar Azmitia.
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and council members and staff
here.
I'm here to request that a portion of the grant monies be allocated for Beginnings Brew Coffeehouse As a neighbor coffee shop, it provides or will provide employees of the area, the businesses and offices and professional buildings all within a radius of just this couple blocks. It's across the street from the Simi Valley Hospital where my son-in-law works.
And he has said on several occasions that he would love to have an opportunity to go somewhere else as an option rather than always the cafeteria there in the hospital And it is such a short walk that he could do that easily. And co-workers have also stated that same information and what Felina just mentioned, that it is a beautiful setting and very peaceful kind of to regain regroup yourself and be ready to move on with the rest of your day.
The coffee house is very relaxing. I've been in there, I've been blessed to be invited to some of their events through their church and the space is just gorgeous. It's a beautiful and inviting area. And my husband also works from home and he has mentioned several times can we get in there? And it's not open yet and it's had several things that have stalled and slowed down that option so he has asked to just have a place that's not the big businesses of Simi Valley that is something a little bit different and unique. So, we've been just very blessed to be connected with that church even though that is not my home church I really feel that they would be very deserving of a small part of that percentage of the grant so we thank you very much for that consideration and have a good evening.
Thank you
I apologize, we have five more speakers after Eric and Oscar.
Good evening, Mayor Cavanaugh and the council. I'm also work volunteer for New Beginnings Brew Coffeehouse and my wife and I are the managers of it and some of you came to the grand opening back in 2024 and I remember Elaine was there and Rocky was there. It was great and if you know anything about Pastor Clark he's a man of vision He is full of vision. He has upgraded that campus in ways I cannot tell you, he's trying to do a basketball court to reach the community. He wants the coffee house to reach the community. We have nurses from the medical building next door and I restocked the inventory throughout the week every day. I have to go in there and check make sure your inventory is up to date for all the different church activities that we do.
And the nurses come up to me and the doctors, and they say, are you guys going to open it up for us so that we can, instead of sitting on your picnic tables, we'd like to go inside and be able to have a latte or espresso? And I said, we're working on it. We're working on it. So we really need your help though where we can upgrade Beginnings Brew to a commercial standard It's an investment in people and it will allow the food service, the outreach and support programs to operate safely and sustainably under Ventura County environmental health guidelines.
We really want to reach people, that is Pastor's vision and be there for the community. And we have free Wi-Fi and a great place to bring your laptop and do your work and relax and have a good cup of coffee. Thank you.
Good evening, Mayor and members of the City Council. My name is Oscar Esmitia. At a very young age I was drunk driving and I got into a tragic car accident. The injuries I suffered from this accident left me paralyzed from the waist down due to severe fractures on my spinal cord hip multiple ribs and other parts of my body Through faith and rehabilitation, I learned how to walk all over again. I am extremely grateful to the AA program for my continual recovery. It would be unfortunate not to have the support group to look forward to weekly at Beginnings Brew Cafe. The cafe keeps the doors of hope open for those who are still suffering in their active addictions. Beginnings Brew helps many to reach their sobriety goals There are men and women that have walked in the cafe emotionally, mentally and spiritually broken.
However they have walked out with brand new faith. I am one of those individuals who has been rehabilitated through this place of gathering. I recently celebrated 11 years of sobriety and this has empowered me to remain of service to those who need guidance towards reaching their sobriety goals. Beginnings Brew provides more than beverages It provides belonging. With proper upgrades, it can meet all the health standards and continue to grow as a community hub.
Thank you for your time. God bless you.
Thank you.
4:32 – 4:3811 turns
Candice Skor, Linda Kaplan and Sandy Otto.
Good evening,
Mayor almost good morning. Good evening, Mayor Kavanaugh and members of the Council. My name is Linda Kaplan and I'm also a member of New Beginnings Church and I have volunteered at the Cafe a coffee shop for about three years. I would be incredible to get this grant To upgrade our equipment to a commercial standard and also allow the space to better serve families individuals and those in need I truly feel that the coffee shop is an asset and gift to the community In the time, I've been there. I have witnessed unhoused people who wander in And find a safe haven to get out of the cold and get a hot drink and a pastry, which we will provide to them for free.
We also have a food pantry that we can go to and offer them a box of food at that time. So I've seen that many times plus many people. I have witnessed people going through very difficult times and coming into the coffee shop in need of prayer. A simple thing but a way to help people who are very distraught May have bad ideas in their head. The coffee shop is warm and inviting and people feel comfortable there One day a woman who was distraught came in and said she was kicked out of the hospital And needed to call a friend to pick her up I lent her my phone and got her some coffee, and she was able to share her struggles with me She said she was walking around crying a lot and very lost and saw a The cafe signed and felt God led her to us.
I was able to pray with her and make sure she was safe until her friend arrived. When we were open to the public, Simi Valley Hospital nurses often came to sit in our beautiful yard and have a cup of coffee. This is definitely a place for them to just get away from it all and relax So this cafe is one of our pastor's many visions for our church, not only to serve good coffee but to have a safe place in the community. For these reasons and more I feel that Coffee Shop is a great asset and blessing to Simi Valley. Thank you for considering this request.
Thank you.
Sandy Otto?
Good evening, Mayor Cavanagh and City Council members. Thanks for having us. Thank you for hearing our plea tonight on the benefits of our coffee shop at New Beginnings Church. Our mission is to serve the community of Simi Valley by providing the coffee shop as a safe haven in many different ways. It's a gathering place not only for good coffee but for people who are looking for someone to talk to, lean on, pray with and which then turns into friendship for all of them.
Beginning Brews is a safe place for people who are grieving over the loss of their loved ones from overdoses. We have a support group that meets once a week. It's also a resource center for the community as we have lectures on different topics to educate the community, such as assisted living signs and symptoms of senior decline. We have lectures on Medicare for our baby boomers and we have men and women's retreats. This is just to name a few of the benefits and the reasons we want to upgrade our coffee shop.
We always want to offer the best of services that we can to the people of Simi Valley. And, um, we're looking for your financial support and we thank you for your consideration in that matter.
Can you state your name for the record please? Ma'am, can you say your name for the record?
My name? Yeah. My name is Candice Skor. Thank you.
The next speakers are Michael Shaw and Leslie Dumont. Leslie Dumont? Madam Mayor, those were the last speakers. Next on the agenda Is there
anyone that has any comments? It is late. Mayor Pro Tem Litster.
I'll make it fast! Back to the very beginning, I was going to tell Mark Luker about the library take back. Very proud of the efforts there to try it and has nothing to do with banning books and Mike Judge so I just wanted to go on the record that it was way back three hours ago. I wanted to thank Joseph Metcalf for his summary of CME 250. It should be a wonderful thing that we're doing. All of the comments about, you are all such wonderful people that do so much good in our community. We're gonna be talking about the grants in just a minute, so I won't make any comments there except to say that we love you and appreciate all that you do. And I think that, I know that there was more I was gonna say but that's it. I'll end it there. Thank you.
4:38 – 4:4710 turns
I will make one quick comment just for Shepherd of the Valley. You guys are awesome. Last year when we had the PSPS and the Target stores all shut down, I was able to connect them with you guys and you went over and it was your distribution day worked out perfectly on that day so that was a great thing. It was a great save for everybody so I want to say I know you guys do a great job so thanks.
We can move on.
Thank you. Madam Mayor and members of the city council, next on the agenda is item seven, the consent calendar. And there are four resolutions for your consideration this evening. Consent item eight, resolution number 2026-13, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Simi Valley approving updated citywide publicly available pay schedules effective May 18th, 2026 in accordance with the California Code of Regulations title two section 570.5 Consent Item 9, Resolution No. WWD-305, a resolution of the Board of Directors of Ventura County Water Works District No. 8 approving the initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Crown Hill Water Storage Tank and Knolls Zone water facilities project.
Consent item 10, resolution number 2026-15. A resolution of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley approving the fiscal year 2026-27 road maintenance and rehabilitation project list and expenditure plan cycle 10 and amending the fiscal year 2026 27 budget And consent item 11, resolution number 2026-16. A resolution of the City Council of the City of Simi Valley accepting the final map and approving the subdivision improvement agreement and securities for the construction of public improvements for track number 6085 located at 1845 Oak Road.
Phew that was a lot thank you. I
move consent.
Second. Call for the vote?
The motion passes unanimously. Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is Item 9A Award of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Community Projects Grant Program Funds and Deputy Environmental Services Director Cynthia McCullough is presenting this item.
Before you start, Ms. McCullough I just want to double check with everyone that they have no conflicts with any of the applicants and or the proposed receipts of funds okay thank you City Attorney wanted me to do that so we're good go ahead Cynthia
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and members of the city council As mentioned earlier tonight, in 2011 the City and Waste Management executed a Memorandum of Understanding which provides annual funding of $150,000 to the city for community projects and programs at the City Council's discretion. Subsequently, the City Council developed the Community Projects Grant Program to distribute the funding and created the Community Projects Grant Review Committee to enhance the public's input into the process for developing funding recommendations.
The application period for the fiscal year 2026-27 funding cycle began on January 14th, 2026 and concluded on January 30th, 2026. A total of $802,921.23 was requested from 26 eligible nonprofit organizations that applied for funding. As you heard earlier this evening, the review committee met twice, the first meeting established The review and ranking process, the second meeting allowed for organizations to present to the review committee to make its funding recommendations for the fiscal year 2026-27 funding cycle.
The review committee funding recommendations as displayed on the screen are organized in order of review committee ranking. The following 11 organizations are being recommended for funding this evening. The Samaritan Center, Simi Valley Library Foundation, Body Brain Train, Vets and Valor, Simi Valley Football Booster Club, Boys and Girls Club of Moorpark in Simi Valley, Gigi's Playhouse Simi Valley, Many Mansions, Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church, For The Need Foundation and Sarah's House.
Only the first agency is being recommended for full funding. A minimum of $10,000 is recommended per request which is consistent with the eligibility criteria that was adopted by the City Council. The review committee's funding recommendations attempted to maximize funding to as many organizations as possible while considering the needs of the community and recognizing that many deserving organizations and valuable projects would not receive funding.
Due to unexpended funds returned to the city from a previous awardee, a total of $151,347 is available to award for the fiscal year 26-27 funding cycle. The review committee recommended a total of $151,300. It is recommended that the City Council award the remaining $47, determine final award amounts and authorize the city manager to approve the final scopes of work.
This concludes the presentation staff and I think some of the organizations are still here to respond to questions.
Thank you Cynthia any questions concerns from council? I'm just waiting for the names to pop up, sorry. Council Member Ayala?
Well we have to figure out the $47. I mean in reality we do right because we have to do it. The other thing I would say is a couple of just points. The last time when the council first adopted this and made the rules it was 2017 so we're going into year 10 starting next year and so we might want to look at some changes to how we do this I don't want to make any decisions now, but just some ideas. And these are really based upon the gentleman who was named the chair of the committee. He actually... Mr. Lewis? Mr. Lewis. A couple of the things he brought up to me even outside the meeting was that the ability to when they were doing the process this time around The people did the scoring and he said the scoring was then placed up for everyone to see, and then they had discussion.
And he thought it'd be more beneficial that you had the discussion before you did the scoring because there might be something that another member felt or saw that someone else didn't see and it could impact how you actually decide to vote. The same way we do up here, we discuss first and get perspective, and then other people. And then we decide okay this is what we're going to do based upon what everyone's doing so I'd like to as we're thinking of next year think about that the second thing is that um I know that there's a column that says were they awarded funding in the past just simply yes no but we the city grants funds funding multiple times throughout the year not just one And so one other thing I'd like to suggest is that going forward, that since we track that data.
That when you provide the packets to the committee. You also let them know what City funding, each organization has received in the past and in what amount. And I'm not saying it disqualifies someone from getting funding but I think it's a good data point for the review committee to see as they're making the decision based upon who has received funds. And the third thing I would say is that $10,000 amount was made back in 2017 And we now have more nonprofits serving our city and more diverse needs in our city. And so maybe one thing we do, as he suggested is consider not significantly dropping the minimum of 10,000 because I think you dilute it if you do it too much but even the committee thinking of like a $7500 mark or something like that where it would allow us to serve even more Non-profits going forward.
And then just one little side note, if the council were to decide to give funding to an organization such as TradeWorks, I only say that because I'm on the planning committee for that so someone else would have to make that motion and I would have to recuse myself from that vote just to be transparent about it.
4:47 – 4:5210 turns
Thank you. Mayor Pro Tem Litster?
I concur with what was just mentioned, and I actually thought maybe it was going to be a Tempe item that I was going to make just that it might be appropriate to re-evaluate how the way this is done. $150,000 doesn't go as far as it used to but I know that that was put together with MOU with Waste Management. I know this is the year that we are supposed to be revisiting that And I would love it to be a discussion where we say, you've gotten all these great things. We want that up, et cetera.
Just for maybe our city manager is where are we in that process? Doesn't solve the problem today for needing more money but is that something that might be happening soon?
I need to bring an item back to you guys. The agreement is expiring shortly so...
And I hope that there's an opportunity to renegotiate, to
discuss. And I also want to mention and I want to punt it back to Cynthia related to the last time that the council discussed the parameters for the program. While the last time that there were changes made to the program was in 2017, I believe that the council considered potentially making changes in 2024-2025
Yeah, so the eligibility criteria came to Council December 4th of 2023. At that time we presented what was originally the criteria in 2017 and at that time Council was okay with continuing with that same eligibility criteria.
So it's been reconsidered since 2017 but certainly if it's the request of the council to bring it back and have that conversation again we can obviously do
In the past, I have occasionally tried to move money around and find other pots. I don't know that we have that at our disposal this time around.
Certainly if that is the council's direction, we can identify additional funding. However what I would say is that during the council priority setting process there was additional funds identified through that process as well as at the budget workshop for projects that were identified as a priority for economic development That the city is using one-time funds for so I would recommend that we focus our efforts there based on the council priorities, but Certainly whatever is the council's direction
staff will follow Well and I just I I just want as a general commentary. There's such so much so many great things happening and and and places we couldn't I would love to include more money spent even from the vans for the YMCA to Transport for Water and New Beginnings, your little coffee place is fabulous. It really is deserving of being updated and so I would absolutely give you the $47 but that's gonna do nothing for you just for the record. That's where I'm most in $47 but I would love to have maybe discussions.
I think the awareness of what you're doing is a good thing and I'm hoping Thank you. This time around I know how hard in fact, I spoke one of the people that was part of that committee said it was probably the hardest job he's ever had to try to make this decision and just how difficult it was. And then he agonized when he read the letter to the editor in the paper because anyway, it was agony for him and so I just appreciate what everyone is doing to try to allocate these funds.
So, I don't know that I have any other recommendations to change things. I did have a question though actually for the library foundation given that we're desirous to obviously hopefully we will acquire that building my fingers are still crossed that it will be and once and when that happens I'll speak positively when that happens I know that there will be architectural renderings drawings etc to expand change the entrance etc which might affect The community room.
And so my question is, and I want that to be the most amazing community room we've ever had. But I guess my question is, my understanding is these funds have to be used within a year or they are pushed back. And so is there an exception in the library's case for instance? Or can we say And I owe you, we will give you that money once this is resolved. I don't know, I just, I'm concerned. I want you to have the money and be able to really use it and not carpet and paint and then say oh wait a minute, we're gonna tear this room down and make it twice as big and put in chandeliers and swinging trapeze. I mean facetious but you know what I'm saying?
4:52 – 5:0136 turns
Come on up.
While Cindy comes up, I do just want to address Councilmember Litzter that funds do have to be expended by the next fiscal year. However it is at council's discretion if they would like to make an exception for any organization simply because it is the council's discretion for the criteria on when it needs to be spent
Okay, so to address your question. It's a good question We also we're excited about the steps moving forward for ownership But that could be such a long term because there's so many other steps once we do get ownership when we get ownership Right Samantha I can tell you that there's that could take years
There's well, there's a variety of projects that the council will that we would want to do at the library just from a Um, infrastructure standpoint, you know upgrading electrical and things like that. I have a meeting with the county CEO on Wednesday to begin those discussions so hopefully sooner rather than later but obviously those conversations can take some time. So the community room is a cosmetic upgrade as well as making sure we have clean carpets.
We would have to look at the project as a whole because there are a variety of upgrades that we Would be interested in making to ensure that the library is continuing to meet the needs of the community throughout the entire building And provide more flexible use and so that we would want to look at the building as a whole
It's a non capital improvement You might recall. We did the teen lounge yes last year, and we've just about finished that I think Yes Sort of like lipstick on a pig right so but it's serving the community now while we put the rest of this and You know,
and I know wait. I wanted to deny you the funds. I just want to be sure that
And it's worthy. I know we asked
ourselves the same question,
you know why do we do this if we're going to rip it out? Okay at some point possible but it's a long term even if we do debt ownership it'll be God there's architectural stuff there's all kinds of bureaucracy that we have to go through to start to make any of those changes so for now the community room is being used by more people in the community than anybody any other location This would serve it. I think there's a plaque on the wall that the rotary from 2009 was the last time that room was touched mm-hmm so for upgrades, so That's our last project before ownership
I Hear you okay
Okay,
thank you.
Anything else? Okay I'm going to be the elephant in the room then. Simi High School football so the comment was that they were number fifth but yet we're giving them the most money so that is a little bit of a concern and I have a concern not nothing against Simi or boosters or whatever but this is the first time we're awarding money to one of the schools And I don't know if we're setting precedence on this or I'm concerned about that because we have every school has how many teams of different activities. So, I am just if we're giving to one school why can we give to the other school and vice versa and or we have you know football we have And I understand the importance of the helmets, I do. That has nothing to do with it. But you have lacrosse and you have girls flag football and you have girls softball and Royal has swimming and water polo.
I'm worried that we're going to dig ourselves into something a little bit with this. So I just wanted others' opinion. That's a concern. I am not saying yes or no. I just wanted to bring that up on the dais. Sounds like nobody else has a concern. Yeah, but let me get comments here first.
A reasonable concern I don't think I'm moved by it because we're not giving to the schools, we're giving it to a booster. And if we gave it to the police foundation for a project, it's like giving it to our own city but it's not. We're giving it to the fundraising arm that does good work with it so... If it were actually giving it to Simi High School I would probably have a big problem with that they were already paying for their crossing guards and resource officers Yeah, I can see the non-profit buffer between the entities.
Okay that's why just want to make sure we had... I'll be honest I don't necessarily like it only because we're opening up a can of worms but we can address that when we review our policies maybe we want to save we want to limit it you know a limit dollar amount or whatever so don't worry I'm not kidding. We don't really normally like to change what the committee envisions But that was a concern and I just wanted to bring it up. And nobody else has a concern in the same way, so we'll go on.
Although I think it's valid, it's very valid. It's opening up an avenue because we've been approached in the past to do like well other.
Other yeah just because there are so many school booster clubs and or clubs and teams and that that's the only concern even though I went to Royal I'm not picking on Sami. You can come up for a second if you like, sure.
Can I also just ask staff for clarification? Did we receive an application from the Royal High School Booster Club?
No, there were no others. I'm just bringing it forward. Hi ladies.
It's a great you know absolute you know what you're saying makes sense when we applied I was very it was very important that there was a protocol in regards to what a nonprofit is and we met every criteria of what the checklist does just because we were being proactive and trying to find ways to fundraise and find grants shouldn't Punish us because others other nonprofits that are maybe related to school didn't apply I think it's important to know that this is not money coming from the city directly. It's a grant as a process You've got a voting he's got a protocol is to be honest. I went to a meeting and in between that I was the only non-profit there.
And they were talking about an open forum, like how we were going to grade this? What are the things? And I was taking notes like okay that's what they're gonna talk about because it was open nobody else showed up just I showed up so I don't understand that you know if if there is a legal process of here's a nonprofit these are the things you have to submit I don't think it opens up a can of worms. If there's a true nonprofit, they should be able to apply. It could be a Royal Football. But to be honest most of them are non-nonprofits. They're a leg of a booster of ASMB. We are a true nonprofit and we followed the rules. We applied. We went to every meeting and we had a true need that we literally cannot afford and nobody can give us money for.
No, I'm not questioning any of your stuff. I just because there are so many schools involved that's the only thing.
But your point is that
you were a
registered non-profit as opposed to
booster clubs? And they did and they followed all the... They did everything they were supposed to do. I had no concerns with that whatsoever
To clarify, most booster clubs are all 501c3 nonprofits. They are registered nonprofits and they actually have to apply for it so if they ran through the ASB through the school, they are not a nonprofit. I'll be honest,
I did not realize you did not get any ticket money?
None of the ticket revenue goes to...
Yeah, I assumed that went to partially at least into it.
We
actually
so probably at both high schools football probably funds all the other...
Exactly! That's why I was surprised at
that. Yeah, yeah
I was surprised at those. It
covers security, it covers a staff to be there right? It covers a plethora of other things.
5:01 – 5:0630 turns
It's valid, it is valid but I just thought the booster club would at least get a portion of it. You
know it's unfortunate you know safety equipment is expensive right? Oh I
looked it
up! We do have a large program and just from the timing of when our recent coach came into the program we had a plethora Safety equipment that came in at that time, because honestly Simi Football didn't even have footballs when he came in. But all of those things are starting to age and so even though we're trying to fundraise, we also have students who cannot pay their spirit fact fees but like I said earlier, None of our kids go without. We feed them all very well if you ever want to come have a meal with them and transportation and whatnot, so everything's covered for our kids. Oh you have to pay
for the buses too don't
you? Yes we do take some of the spirit pack cost comes from the parents paying for it
But not everyone can afford,
so I understand. That takes us down another conversation about transportation and being short staffed. So we now have to charter buses. We have
to pay overtime for those buses out of our
money. All right. All right.
There's so much but you know it's just a matter of like we want our kids be safe that's the bottom line.
No it is. That's extremely important especially at their age. Yes. I mean this is when it starts. Exactly. Thank you for sharing all that information. I appreciate that.
Madam Mayor, if I could interrupt for just one second. Thank you. I'd like to move that the City Council meetings might be extended beyond the midnight deadline to conclude the agenda section 2-1.106 of the Simi Valley Municipal Code. Second.
Call for the vote
The motion passes unanimously
That just allows us to go later, nothing official. All right. I'm sorry? I just had one question for Stephanie if... Okay that's fine.
I was going to say are there any more questions? Yeah. Cynthia, I'm sorry. It's late 1130. Cynthia I'm sorry about that. This is the point system that was rated What is, I'm just kind of curious to see what next came in order after?
I actually have hard copies. So each one of the representatives provided a point, allocated point amount for each one of the agencies. In column I it was the total score for each agency. They were then sorted in highest to lowest and the committee decided that they were going to look at a natural break So between 12 and 13, there is just shy of 10 points. So they decided to allocate funds to those top 11 and that's how they came to the determination.
Got it okay That this is helpful for me because yeah Thank you
Any other questions, concerns, comments? If not I'm open to a motion.
Well we still have to decide on the $47. Oh sorry. And if we split it evenly it's four dollars and twenty, no I'm just kidding. I would just make a recommendation we pay for one more class at Body Brain Train.
Sure we can give it to Body Brain Train so we'll amend it to eighteen thousand forty seven dollars for Body Brain Train
And then everything else will stay the same. I just want to make that on the record, okay?
We tell the committee this is one of the hardest decisions to make so I'm open. Is there any other corrections or comments? Do we have a motion?
I move the item with the corrections of the $47 or the disbursement of the 47 dollars to body-wearing train. Second.
Call for the vote.
The motion passes unanimously.
Thank you all for being here.
Madam Mayor and members of the City Council,
the next item on the agenda is to adopt a resolution implementing a previously approved schedule of sanitation service rates and fees consistent with ordinance number 1363 and authorizing the County of Ventura to collect residential sanitation fees on the tax roll for the fiscal year 26-27 The reading of the resolution is as follows. Resolution number 2026-14, a resolution of City Council of the city of Simi Valley implementing a schedule of sanitation rates and fees previously established by ordinance number 1363 and authorizing the County of Ventura to collect residential sanitation service fees on the tax roll for fiscal year 2026-27.
And Public Works Director Rahm Fuchiwake is here to present this item.
5:06 – 5:2219 turns
Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and council members. On May 19, 2025 the City Council adopted ordinance number 1363 which established a schedule of sanitation fees and charges for five years including fiscal year 2025 to 26 through fiscal year 2029-30 The adopted five-year rates are needed to fund infrastructure rehabilitation projects, to maintain facilities and to ensure reliability of wastewater treatment and the collection system.
The rates are based on the cost of providing sewer service as outlined in the sanitation rate study adopted on May 5th 2025. The current single family sewer rate is $56.73 per month. Ordinance 1363 established the fiscal year 2026-27 rate at $58.72 per month, an increase of $1.99 per month. Rates for all of the customers for FY 26-27 are outlined in Exhibit A of the proposed ordinance.
It is recommended that City Council adopt resolution number 2026-14 implementing the previously approved Schedule of sanitation service rates and fees consistent with ordinance 1363. And authorize the county of Ventura to collect residential sanitation service fees on the tax roll for fiscal year 2026-27, and staff is available for questions.
Any questions of staff? Mayor Pro Tem Litzer
Actually, I don't have a question. I wanted to thank this being put on the new business schedule just because I think it's good for constituents to know what we're doing and I appreciate that but as I understand, I know in the past there was a discussion of how this has generated the rates in Ways Week but I think we're past that point. If I understand it, we've already said it, it's passed five years if we don't approve this then there's really no We would send out monthly bills. Just out of curiosity, what's the option? I mean...
We wouldn't be able to put it on the tax roll. We wouldn't hit the deadline so we would have to do it ourselves which would be much more costly.
Right and it's really a cost that's borne by the property owner correct? That's correct. Got it okay well I'm certainly willing to make a motion thank you um I move that we Basically pass this, whatever the official saying. Get to the official. Tell me to read it? I move to adopt resolution number 2026-14 implementing a previously approved schedule of sanitation service rates and fees consistent with ordinance number 1363 and authorize the County of Ventura to collect residential sanitation service fees on the tax roll for fiscal year 2026 27. Second. Call for the vote.
The motion passes unanimously.
Thank you.
And the Mayor, members of City Council next on the agenda is 10A council member reports
and they should be short because it was only one week so starting with council member Ayala
that's what you think sit back So on May 5th, I attended the naming ceremony for the Bob Huber Crisis Stabilization Unit, the new facility on LA Avenue. On May 6th, all it takes real life, real skills workshop hosted by Lori Woodley at the movie theater. It was well-attended by representatives of the police department, the school district parents and students On May 7th, I attended the day of prayer here at City Hall.
I then went to Garden Grove Elementary for the Teacher of the Month ceremony so congratulations to Leslie Brooks and then I attended the 4th of July Planning Committee which Joseph Metcalfe outlined all of the great stuff that's happening there. May 9th,I went to the ribbon-cutting at the Postelería Right, did I say that correctly? Okay. And it's really because they make pozole and that is their specialty so that's why they named the restaurant that.
And then on May 11th which was today, I attended the Council on Aging Committee meeting and I just want to make a plug that their concert that supports the Meals on Wheels program is Sunday June 14th at the Santa Susana Performing Arts Center and they are pretty low in ticket sales. They really need people to buy tickets, and they've only sold about 122 tickets out of 400 seat auditorium.
And again for the community members who are listening to this or still awake All of the money goes to the Meals on Wheels program, which is a really important program for people in our community. So if you can make it out, go to the Santa Susana Performing Arts Center website and get your tickets. And that's it for me. Thank you.
Thank you, Council Member Rhoads.
Thank you, Madam Mayor. I also on May 5th attended the naming ceremony for the Bob Hueber Crisis Stabilization Unit. Couldn't be a better name for that building and what deserving great servant of our community for that to be named after. I'm sorry he couldn't be there in attendance himself, but it was great seeing his sons and wife and other members of the community.
On May 6th, I attended the SKAG annual conference. And it started with a CV-linked tour, which is nearly 500 miles of bike and golf cart path initially started by a Go Human grant through SCAG that proves those little grants lead to big things. And also that day we had our EAC meeting for SCAG. On the 7th, still at the SCAG meeting but the General Assembly meeting I was the voting delegate for our city and we approved a slate of officers and improved changes to the SCAG bylaws.
On the 8th, I attended the Respec Memorial and I wanted to thank Simi Youth Baseball for stepping up opening the facilities. I didn't count them but my guesstimate that there were nearly a thousand people in attendance at this event and it was moving touching and so sad that we had to have it On the 9th, I attended the Westlake Village Fire Safety Day and got to talk to their CERT people and other members. And we had some great discussions about fire resiliency.
And then also that day I rushed back just Got there in time for the ribbon to be cut at the new restaurant. Congratulations to Anna and on the 10th, Happy Mother's Day! My gift which I asked what would you like was hard labor and I did nothing but pull weeds and cut branches all day so that ends my report.
Thank You Councilmember Judge Thank
you, Madam Mayor. On Tuesday May 5th I too attended the naming ceremony for the Bob Heber Crisis Stabilization Unit and I couldn't agree more with Rocky's comments. Wednesday May 6th I too attended the SCAG retreat in the EAC meeting that day on Thursday I also represented the VCTC for SCAG at the Regional Council and Policy Committee. Rocky told you what we voted on. On May 8th I attempted to get to their memorial service for the poor kid It was accidentally delayed.
On Saturday, May 9th I attended the ribbon-cutting for the Pozzolaria and I also attended the St. Peter poker tournament put on by the Knights of Columbus. On Sunday, May 10th happy Mother's Day. That's end of my report.
Thank you. Mayor Pro Tem Litzter?
Yes! On May 5th I too...I think we all attended that wonderful naming ceremony such a delight to have that action. I'm so pleased that has been built in our community and very appropriate for Bob Huber to be the namesake for that. Also on that day, met with a constituent who wants to be involved with Film Simi. On Wednesday May 6th, I followed up with meetings with Anthony Angelini about film issues just part of our ad hoc committee discussion with him. Also, I attended the Ventura County Behavioral Health suicide prevention update. And I share that it was a Zoom meeting, and I just want to share quickly some of the things, my takeaway from that. They talked a lot about how things are changing within the county as far as health services with recent legislation and funding et cetera.
But I was there specifically for a friend who has had two instances of suicide in her family. Specifically I wanted to hear the report on the Arroyo On the bridge that goes over 23 connected and I'm sure Mike knows all about this from VCTC, but I found interesting the bridges built in 1993. That basically with with the fatalities of any suicides have been experienced there the project to make that safer was initiated in July of 2022.
Funds and design were approved in August of 24, and it was scheduled to be completed this Saturday. So two days ago it should have been completed. Is it not yet? As I drove it, it looks...I can see the fencing on both sides. It's going to be
closed sometime this weekend.
Okay so just so you know okay then we're then you're up-to-date as but it just shows that what I found interesting is that That one of the reason takes well, I should say that Caltrans said that they never didn't in the past have not really had a funding arm for projects that are of that nature to protect against suicide etc. But it was actually AB 2267 that has actually now Provide pre-approved designs and ways that they can actually get funding so in the future it won't be so bad for other places.
Anyway, that's it for that but that was interesting. Also attended the Studio Movie Grill event, a great program and I know our police are getting involved with it Thursday May 7th. Attended the YMCA 27th annual prayer breakfast at CLU. Also attended our National Day of Prayer here where They prayed for all of us and all that we're doing. Attended the Teacher of the Month event as well, and then completed it with Arts Commission interviews that day.
It shouldn't have taken so long but we agonized and finally came up with a decision. But they were all very good candidates. Friday May 8th I did attend the Respect Memorial service and dinner and I will say that my... Ditto to all that Council Member Rhodes said, my takeaway that this was a good beloved Young man, kind good friend brought others to great spiritual depths and his hair was very important to him.
It was it was I would say it was just lovely to get to know him a little bit more and so sorry for his family and for the loss of our community. Also, I will say that I attended briefly leadership senior's leadership which of course you went to all day as a steering committee Fred Bowermeister conducted it, but I came away understanding better the difference between non-profit and not for profit. Anyway, May 9th attended the ribbon cutting for Pozolovia.
Mariachi was probably one of the biggest ribbon cutting parties we've had in a very long time in our community. And yes, to me soccer all sorts of fun stuff in the community that day and Happy Mother's Day and happy and thank you to all the wonderful men that supported this Happy Mother's Day events. And so that concludes my report.
Thank you. On Tuesday, May 5th I also attended the naming ceremony for the Bob Huber Crisis Stabilization Unit. I was actually honored to be able to speak. I met Bob it'll be 30 years well I knew him as Robert O. Huber Law Office but I met him as Bob in Rotary in November of 1996 So we're coming up on 30 years. So a wonderful, wonderful man. What I didn't mention that day was and I should have is Bob brought in the first female Rotarian in our district and that was Elaine Freeman who's retired from our park board but Bob was the one to sponsor her and bring her into that club so that was pretty cool And it was always, the turnout was wonderful. It was just such an honor to see everybody that was there and his wife Deb and his sons both spoke or all spoke.
It was really moving and very well deserved. On Thursday May 7th I attended the Housing Trust Fund Dinner with our own Stratis Perros who sits on the board there so that was a great event raising funds for them And then on Friday, May 8th I attended a barn dance at the Strathern. It's always a wonderful place to go to have events there, put a plug in for them and Saturday, May 9th I volunteered all day for a softball tournament for our Rotary Club and that's where The idea of the mental health softball tournament came up. I was talking to Dan Potter, who puts on most of the tournaments and he said we're not going to do Play for a Cure anymore which I was a founding member of that and he said I think I want to do mental health and I said that's perfect timing because of the new crisis stabilization unit so he said we will make a donation to that in I wanted to make sure that was publicized.
That's it in regards to my activities. Item 10B, I know another Councilmember wanted something and I was going to request something on SROs to look at where we are at on it and ensure we get some SROs out there before the school starts and you had responses
5:22 – 5:2714 turns
Do so. The police department is currently focused on the recruitment of detectives we have three detective vacancies, one of them is the internet crimes against children vacancy so those have taken priority and the Police Department still responds to emergency incidents at schools as needed. So while we don't have a dedicated resource there currently. We do anticipate and we do respond as needed.
We also have someone who is an SRO who is currently on leave, we anticipate that person returning before the beginning of the new school year And then we will be recruiting for The other vacancy position as soon as those detective positions are filled
Thank you. I would also like to look at possibly expanding that if possible to three SROs? I don't know what the budget allows, the chief's back there having a heart attack
sorry. If I can add to that. I would suggest that we not put a number.
Okay,
just expand the program. Not even expand. I think what I was going to propose is that we need a joint working group between, that includes members of the City Council, city staff, police and the school district to really figure out and put together a comprehensive plan which includes a long-term funding mechanism for the SRO program so that it's actually solidified with everyone.
Because I think when we put a number, we're not taking into account what the police might consider is the right number of their school district. We're just assuming it's three and I don't know if we can do that.
I did have a meeting with The superintendent of the school district regarding the council's priority to recover costs for the SRO program and the crossing guard program before our trade agency meeting at the end of April. And, um, the school district did propose that they would be willing to potentially sharing costs if the council would be interested in going and partnering on a ballot initiative to increase tax by a quarter or a half cent, and then let the voters decide if that is something that they have an interest in funding. So there's some other notes I have as well but certainly we can, if it is the desire of the council to create a working group, we can bring an item back for further discussion to form that.
I'd be willing to do that
I just think it gets us to, if we have a working group, it gets us to actually moving towards something.
Well our city manager has gotten farther than we have so far. So that was good. Thank you.
Mayor Pro Tem Litster? So another item then are we... Just the discussion this evening about the grants. I would like to, I would absolutely like to maybe look at a couple tweaks as Council Member Ayala mentioned I think, for instance, we maybe look at the frequency. Maybe we should discuss frequency if they have gotten it five years in a row. Maybe we cap that at a certain amount every five years or something. There are ways to share it around more possibly. So I don't know if that is something that we need to bring back. Is that an agendized item?
If there's consensus for that.
I'll second that. We have time for that because it won't happen
right away, so that's not an immediate... Not immediate. I just think before it reappears in conjunction with getting more money from waste management Please any other
All right, then we're going to adjourn tonight in memory of two very special people. So first off, we're adjourning in memory of Mary Spillman. Mary and her husband moved to Simi Valley in 1962. She was a founding member of the team to open our hospital here in Simi Valley because we didn't have one. She was a key role in establishing our police department and our neighborhood councils And she was very active at St. Rose, among many other things. She was pre-deceased by her husband Bob who I also knew very well. 65 years they were married before he passed so we're journeying in memory of Mary.
And then we're also adjourning in memory of John Becerra. John is a former council member, Glenn Becerra's brother. John was the first grandson to his grandparents who moved here. His grandmother moved here in 1911. Grandfather moved here in 1923 and they met in Simi Valley. They married had seven children and John was their first grandchild. So it's a big loss for the Becerro family. So with that were adjourned.