BodyCity Council
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 August 10, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:12 – 0:122 turns

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role12:40

Good evening, I'd like to call this meeting to order. Mr. City Attorney are there any reports from closed session?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role12:45

Thank you Madam Mayor nothing to report out of closed session.

Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈33s recited, not transcribed
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role12:48

Thank You. Mr Mike Cort will you please lead us in the flag salute?

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States Thank you, Mike.

Are there any items for agenda review?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role13:36

Yes Madam Mayor item 7 on the consent calendar has a supplemental agenda item.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role13:42

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed13:43

I move that all resolutions and ordinances presented tonight be read in title only, and all further reading be waived.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed13:49

Second.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role13:50

Call for the vote.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role13:55

The motion passes unanimously.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role13:57

Thank you. If any member of the City Council may have a conflict of interest or any reason why that member must abstain from consideration of any matter on this agenda he or she should so declare at this time. Seeing none we may move forward Madam

Roll call, called by City Clerk
Show transcript
Roll call please. Council Member Ayala? Here. Council Member Rhoads? Here. Council Member Judge? Here. Mayor Pro Tem Blitzer? Here! Mayor Cavanagh? Here
Agenda Discussionitems moved / continued / pulled, click to expand
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role14:11

Clerk

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role14:13

Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, the first item on the agenda is Item 1-D1. Presentation of Certificates of Commendation to the Simi Valley Girls Softball 10U Gold Champions. And Deputy City Manager Heather Semagaysay is here to present this item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed14:36

Good evening Mayor and Members of the City Council and to our special guests in the audience Tonight we're proud to recognize an outstanding group of young athletes who have represented our community with determination, teamwork and incredible success. The 10U girls softball team had an exceptional 2025-26 season finishing their fall select in all star sessions with an overall record of 119 wins nine losses and one tie.

Is this not? Did I hear something incorrect? This was right, right? OK. Further reinforcing how awesome you all are, during their All-Star season the team finished second in the district, fourth out of 54 teams at the state championship and first in the inaugural USA Softball Pacific Coast Tournament of Champions, one of the highest levels of competition for 10U athletes.

Their success is a testament to the hard work of these players and the support of their coaches and families Tonight we recognize the 12 players who make up this outstanding team, and I hope I pronounce your names correctly. Erin Park, Ava Motter, Kaitlyn Ouellette, Katelyn Corradero, Kaylin Averengia, Kayla Fairman, Leah Murado, Mackenzie Magana, Mackenzie Youssef, Peyton Contino, Riley Houshong, and Stella Bryan.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role16:49

And we have something for the coaches, too. Evan Bryant? I'm so very, very proud of you guys. This is going to sound really old but I played Senior Valley Girls Softball when I was a little kid except we were called Little Miss Softball in the 70s. But my daughter played and you guys the record you have is the best I've ever seen especially in girls softball. So that's fantastic. You all need to be very proud of yourself and thank your parents and coaches because I'm sure they spent a lot of time on the road and in the parks and siblings one of you has a brother that's on the 16U team Okay, yeah I met him. So he'll be here in two weeks so we'll be honoring them. You've spent a lot of time on the road do you ever get it home? Ever make home?

Coach would you like to say anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed17:54

I'm just super glad to be part of this girls are very proud of you thank you for just allowing me to be part of it appreciate you guys

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed18:07

I just again want to thank our families and our parents. It was the best group of families we could have asked for, and just the entire city in the SVGS community has been so supportive, and we appreciate everybody.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed18:26

Yeah, just going to echo that. I just think these girls wore these Simi Valley jerseys throughout the whole summer proudly They just did absolutely amazing. You girls know how much we love you guys, so yeah. Thank

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role18:37

you guys. Well, you put Simi Valley on the map, so we appreciate that. Let's make a nice picture. Heather wants to take a picture. She likes that background up there. So kind of angle here. Just gather here. Yeah. Come on. Yeah, we can go behind them. All right hold your yeah hold them up nice there you go perfect. All right, congratulations again. You're welcome.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role19:55

Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is Item 2. Public comments on appointments, special presentations and informational reports. We do not have any speaker cards for that item. Janet, do we have anyone?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed20:11

We have no hands raised. Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role20:16

Madam Mayor and members of City Council, next on the agenda is Item 3A.1 Designation of City Council

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed20:23

members to interview... Sorry, Madam Clerk? The caller just put their hand up for this item I believe. For Item

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role20:31

2A?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed20:32

Yeah they raised their hand.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role20:37

If you're participating by phone and wish to provide public comment for this Public Statements Item 2 please press star 9 Can you go ahead and unmute? You may begin to speak.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed21:21

They hanged up. Madam

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role21:24

Mayor, are there other speakers for this item? Yes, thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role21:32

Madam Mayor and members of City Council next on the agenda is Item 3A1 Designation of City Council Members to Interview and Nominate Prospective Neighborhood Council District Three Executive Board Members and Community Services Coordinator Kelly Duffy is here to present this item

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed21:49

Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh and members of City Council. Neighborhood Council Executive Board members serve staggered two-year terms with approximately one third of the seats expiring every eight months. At this time, Neighborhood Council District 3 has 8 executive board members and 5 vacancies. Executive boards require a minimum of 7 members to maintain a quorum and may have up to 13 members total.

Since maintaining at least seven members is essential for conducting business, filling these vacancies is important to ensure the board can operate effectively. A special recruitment opened on July 22nd, 2026 and will conclude on August 14th, 2026. To date six applications have been received with one applicant subsequently withdrawing The term of appointment for the new executive board members will begin on October 1st, 2026 and conclude on June 30th, 2028.

All applicants must attend the mandatory orientation on August 27th and participate in an interview to be eligible for appointment. Staff recommends that the City Council appoint one subcommittee comprised of two council members to interview and nominate Prospective Neighborhood Council District 3 Executive Board Members. This concludes the report, and staff is available for questions.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role23:25

Mayor Pro Tem Lipster?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed23:28

So just to be clear, this is district three that we're talking about which is the district that I represent. I'm always happy to send the committee however I will say that I did personally text and invite a handful of people and maybe on this instance knowing that we needed applicants and so it might be better on this instance for me not to be on the selection for that reason. So I just put that out there.

And I believe that Councilmember Ayala just said that he would be delighted to serve on that committee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed24:01

I'll take your spot, as with one or the other. You

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role24:04

don't want to? I will if nobody else unless somebody else says... Okay. Oh let the mayor do it! That'd be

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed24:08

lovely.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role24:08

Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed24:10

you. I would love to motion that we

not transcribed≈7s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:24 – 0:4014 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed24:12

have Mayor Cavanagh and Councilmember Ayala serve on that committee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed24:16

Second.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed24:17

Call for the vote.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role24:25

The motion passes unanimously.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role24:28

Thank you, before we start our next presentation I was going to allow the girls if they would like to leave they don't have to stay parents. I know they're excited getting ready for school right? So congratulations again Thank you, Madam Clerk.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role25:00

Thank you. Madam Mayor and members of the City Council next on the agenda is item 3C1 presentation of the 2025 State of the Region by David Marin.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role25:18

I know you do a wonderful presentation but I think they are done for the evening

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed25:39

I'm proud to be here in Deer County. And we release this report every two years and go around the city council members, get rid of that echo.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role25:53

You had this problem earlier so you're going to see what someone can do.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed25:57

Should I wait?

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role25:59

Yeah if you like just listen in. It's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed26:02

bad enough to hear one of them say that too. All right. Is that OK? Yes, now you're

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role26:14

good. Sounding

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed26:15

better? OK, good. We cannot produce this report without the generosity of our sponsors. Here's a few of our larger sponsors, the Ventura County Community Foundation, Community Colleges of Ventura County. It was working a moment ago. Okay, maybe that works. And that concludes my remarks. Thank you all very much. Okay so California Resources, County of Ventura, Channel Islands University, La Minera the Port and also the Ventura County Office of Education. So we're grateful to them and all of our sponsors. So the State of the Region Report is published every two years. We are 501c3 neutral unbiased. We are focused on sustaining the quality of life and I would like to acknowledge our former board president, Samantha Arkbright who has served us very well for many years.

The report's available to those in the audience or others who want to download it for free. It's at civicalliance.org and we list all of our sources starting on page 113. So I want to start off with some of the numbers about population. This is not actually in the report when we were producing this, the federal government was on one of those breaks where we couldn't get census data due to funding. County of Ventura so the purple line is the median age you can see right away that we are getting older Population about nine years ago was 847,000. We've declined by 10,000 people in just those few years but interestingly if you look at this blue that's the 0 to 18 population so that declined almost 20,000 so all of our loss has been in the young people so it's wonderful to see those young girls here today we need a lot more of them Here is the numbers for Simi Valley.

You are older in Simi Valley than the county at large, your average age is now at 41.9. Your population has pretty much held even you lost about a thousand people the last seven years but your zero to 18 year olds declined about 3,800 during that time. Much like most of our cities we're seeing a decline in the young people only Fillmore has actually had an increase So that's a very big challenge, I'll talk more about that. Here are some highlights though from other sections of the report. Agriculture, the strawberries remain top crop $700 million. Agriculture is about a 2.1 billion dollar industry. It used to be 4-5% of Ventura County's economy but it's shrunk a little to 3.3%.

Community engagement, your elected officials. I'd like to share stats about the state of registration in Ventura County. Green is no party preference, red is Republican and blue are Democrats. So you can see that the Democrat number has grown a little bit over the last 20 years but the big growth has been in no party preference people who just remain independent and that's mostly come at the expense of Republicans countywide But when you look at the numbers by city, it's a different story. Several cities have a majority of Democrats, most of them have a plurality and Simi Valley is the only one that has a plurality of Republicans but keep in mind this is registration not voter turnout as you are all aware it's really who actually shows up to vote and Republicans tend to vote more than Democrats I'd like to share this about nonprofits, and there's a lot of good data in the report.

And you don't have to read it from one end to the other. You can jump around. There's just a lot of great data. But we have over 11,000 people are working in the nonprofit sector generating over $500 million worth of wages, and that was back in 2024. So very important keeping our whole county and community together. This is a tough one to read, but just to explain how it works when you read it later. The bottom is showing the average wage in these industries so we can see that financial activities pays about $112,000 The top half is showing the number of people working in those sectors.

And what we see, other than an education, is that we are losing workers in the higher-paying industries but we're growing workers or staying at least level in the lower paying industries. So this is, of course, the challenge for you, the county and all the cities, is how can we attract higher paying jobs? How can we retain those companies that are paying better. Obviously leisure and hospitality, it's a great place to start but as an example Simi Valley I think you lost Farmers Bank of America over the years and it would be wonderful to see them come back someday.

This is the Gross County product, very similar to the national. We redo this chart every two years so those of you who have our older books it looks completely different because we restated every year for the inflation adjustment but going up to about 2009 you may remember the Great Recession. We were doing really well great recession hit And we staggered for a while, we lost ground most every year. And then we plateaued and we've really had anemic growth since then. We've only had one year 2021 where we had over 3% growth. And this is why the rest of the state in the nation has been sort of not on steroids but surging along. Ventura County has not been able to match those other areas.

Taxable sales, Simi Valley holding its own at about $2 billion. Most of the cities have seen a decline except for Oxnard and that of course is the Amazon effect so I know you're all working to figure out how to get some of that money. Tourism, this is great news. I'm sure most of this or much of it is from the Reagan Library bringing in over $2 million of transient occupancy tax.

Ojai just really crushes it you might say and that is the Ojai Valley Inn with their high room rates and all that but Oxnard coastal cities do pretty well, the outlet malls. It's tough I think for Simi Valley to be a mecca for tourism but you are doing well and it's growing Education, I know that you do not manage education but show you some highlights. I talked earlier about the decline in the number of youth 0 to 18 this is where it starts to manifest itself so the blue line on top is the K through 8 grades Green line is the high school years and we are right here at about 2025. You can see we've had a slow decline over the years for the K-8, and we're projecting a continued decline over the years but here's something that'll stagger you a little bit.

50 years ago the population of Ventura County was 420 20 or 50 years later, we doubled. So we've grown from 420 to 840 but the number of students in that time only went from 107 to 122 barely increased by 15% while the rest of the population doubled so we need more children And here's how it shows up in some of our school districts. Conejo Valley has lost, so the purple is 2021, blue is 24. You can see the decline there. Moorpark Unified really losing a little ground. Simi Valley Unified also losing ground. I'm often asked isn't this because of homeschooling and private schools? But the answer is no, it's because of a decline in the birth rate. Because even the private schools are seeing the decline.

Test scores, there's a lot of information in here. I won't slow you down or I won't slow down with that but if you're the commentary written by Tony Biasatti is very helpful to understand the range of achievement and lack of that. Community colleges more parks doing very well they're the blue other schools are about holding their own. I like to share this because the educational attainment for those in the audience and on the dais The value of education if your child or grandchild wants to stay in school, it pays off in a huge amount over the course of their lifetime. The average male graduating high school can look forward to about $46,000 of annual income but if they stay in school and get a bachelor's degree That will double and that's what they can expect to earn year after year after year.

So when you do the math, it is a huge amount of extra money that somebody can make with more degree if they are motivated to be in school. And I would say it pays for these student loans. It's a worthwhile investment. in the appropriate industries. Housing, we're coming back a little bit of growth not high. Simi Valley sort of right in the middle as far as the median home prices $890,000 in 2025 and it's a little bit more than it was the year before. Apartment rents make up one of the highest costs for our young people this is what starting to make it hard for us to have more children because our young people can't afford to live here and then they are Thank you very much.

I'll move along for other things. Solar, great news there. Beautiful place to live Ventura County that's unbeatable. This is the chart that really shows the decline in the birth rate so we are showing the number of births per thousand residents and we were doing really well back around 1990s and the 80s averaging in the high teens number of births and that's just cratered over the years down to 9.9 and 10.2, so young people have three things going on one is it's expensive so they leave the area we lose that they stay here but they put off having children instead of having in their early 20s they're waiting till their late 20s or maybe their 30s and then the third thing is they're deciding to have less children so we may have all grown up with three or four kids as our next-door neighbor and that But now we're seeing families of only one child or two.

And what's driving that is besides the cost of housing, it's the cost of childcare. It costs $15,000 a year to put your infant in childcare. It's even more if that child is a toddler. I'm advocating to every city, and hopefully the city managers when you're all together can solve this wrinkle. But if we can bring down the cost of childcare just somewhat, subsidize it other ways then that can be a magnet for employers. It could be a magnet for young people because we are in a battle to keep our young people and not have them move to Riverside, to San Bernardino. We need to attract them and attract them from other areas. So when you see childcare A place like Amgen provides childcare, but they still charge their employees the full rate. But imagine the beauty of being able to drop off your kid near your work if we could open up childcare centers that were close to employment centers so instead of having to get up in Simi Valley drive to Moorpark to drop off your child and then come back to work here at City Hall or somewhere else if we can bring childcare closer, if we can make it more affordable I think that is one way to help bring down to keep our young people here and attract them This is new in the report.

We've added cancer rates, we're looking at the top 15 to 20 counties across the state. We broke it out for three cancers leukemia breast cancer and prostate. And this is the overall of those these numbers are age adjusted and gender adjusted and the fascinating thing is that Ventura County ranks fairly high in the amount of the incidence of cancer. Don't know why that is, it's often pointed out that several of these other counties are coastal counties. I'm not sure if that has any relationship. Some people tell me well maybe we have better doctors so we're detecting it but I don't know if that's actually true or wishful thinking. So a lot of good data and the report there's the breast cancer one.

Public safety, Ventura County continues to be one of the safest counties in the state. Actually the safest and I'll just move right along here, Madam Mayor. Simi Valley still 2.1 million pounds of food distributed in 2024. Transportation there's a lot of statistics but I'll end up with this one Even though the pandemic is over and people are going back to work, we're still seeing an increase in the number of people that are working from home. And that continues to match all of the other counties nearby.

I'll stop again. This is available to the public at civicalliance.org. I have a handful if anybody wants to hit me up outside, I'll share a few as well and of course you have some here for your staff. One final announcement, the Civic Alliance will be hosting a conference called The Future of the Region. It will be on September 14th in Camarillo and we will have a guest speaker talking about these demographic issues And I think it'd be fascinating. I know that you'll all be on our mailing list and hope you can attend if there's any questions, I'm happy to answer them. But thank you all for your time.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:40 – 0:4811 turns

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role40:28

Thank you for your presentation. Are there any questions? Council Member Rhodes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed40:32

I just wanted to say thank you. This resource sits on my desk, and if it could come out every year that would be better. I know that's a burden. It's absolutely packed full of actionable data. And so thank you for putting it together, and the overview while is extremely fast, I know I have a copy I can dig in and really get the data. So thank you. Yes, thank you sir.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role40:59

Thank you for your presentation. Anyone else? No, that means you did a great job. Thank you David we always appreciate it.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role41:16

Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is Item 4, Public Statements. If you are participating by phone and wish to provide public comment please raise your hand by pressing star 9. While waiting to be recognized please remain on the line and listen to the instructions. Agenda item number four is a time allotted for public statements from individuals who have submitted speaker cards as well as those participating by phone.

During the agenda item four, City Council will hear public statements from the first ten persons who have submitted speaker cards after the first ten persons have spoken subsequent persons who have submitted speaker cards will be called to speak during agenda item number six which is a continuation of agenda item number four Gender items 4 and 6 are designated for public statements on all matters except for public hearings, appointments and informational reports.

Speakers will be called in the order in which a card was received and will have up to three minutes to address the City Council. Speakers participating by phone will be recognized after all in-person speakers have been called. When the clerk recognizes you, you will be prompted to press star six to unmute your phone before addressing the City Council and we'll have up to three minutes to speak. The mayor will notify you when you have 30 seconds remaining.

Persons addressing the City Council are requested to state their name and community residence for the record. Madam Mayor unless you have any comments we can begin public statements.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role42:36

Please proceed.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role42:38

Madam Mayor we do have 11 speaker cards would you like me to call them all during?

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role42:42

Yes let's go ahead thank you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role42:46

I will call three names so you know who you follow. Ben Davis, Dale Steinick and Michael Shaw.

PresenterBen DavisPicola Tiny Homes here in Simi ValleyProposedself-stated43:01

Good evening Mayor, Councilmembers and City staff. My name is Ben Davis, President of Picola Tiny Homes here in Simi Valley. Thank you for your time tonight. This is the 10th time I've stood here at this podium to talk about our housing crisis and tonight I'm glad to bring some good news but first a hard fact You heard David and his whole entire presentation. And to add to that, as of 2023, 51% of adults ages 18 to 24 are still living in their parental home, hence the no child. Not because they want to be there but because the housing math doesn't work for them yet. And when they look for a way out here's what they run into. A foundation bill ADU in our area costs between $200,000 and $500,000 And takes a year to year and a half longer to build than a movable tiny home.

As well as the average house in Simi Valley is $890,000 now. That's the gap for our young people and honestly a lot of our seniors too are stuck in which is exactly why what happened since I last stood here matters so much. So Council Member Ayala you asked for this issue to be placed on a future agenda and Council Member Lister you seconded that motion. I want to thank you both Publicly and sincerely, you didn't just sit through nine speeches. You acted on them. You put your names in this in public on the record and moved it from a hallway conversation to an actual agenda item and that is the kind of leadership this issue has been waiting for and I will not forget it so thank you I would like to also extend a formal invitation to Mayor Cavanagh and any other Simi Valley residents or anyone who wants to come see.

Please, come see a movable tiny home for yourself, come tour our facility, walk through unit and see exactly what we've been asking this council to consider. I think it will make the case better than any speech I could give from this podium. So thank you Councilmember Ayala and Councilmember Lister and thank you Simi Valley for getting us this close.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role44:57

Thank you.

CommentDale SteinickProposedself-stated45:08

Hello Mayor and City Council. My name is Dale Steinick, owner of Ultimate Locations and author of my house is a great location I have an ongoing list of homes and businesses that I've listed for filming these places are ready for filming Restaurants, Big Z Restaurant, Ozen Sushi's, a bar, PCS Bar and Grill, Tattoo Parlor, Vellum Studios, Hair Salon, Fringe on the 5th, Samaritan Center, Laundromat, Simi Suds.

Recreational facilities, the bunker a clubhouse which is an indoor has indoor golf screens. Laser tag extreme indoor laser tag D-bat indoor batting cages private homes that I have a private home that has a golf putting green a soccer practice field and pickleball plus 100 paved and unpaved spaces and a clear view of the mountains and hills north of the property. I have a ranch, a 15-acre ranch that has 50 plus unpaved parking spaces, 20 paved parking spaces in view of Simi Valley and a 3,000 square foot home. The homes range, and I have about 20 of them at this point. It's an ongoing list from 1,500 square feet to 7,000 plus square feet To the production companies, Park Pictures, Heather, call me. The Lincoln Lawyer, Richard DePetre, call me.

David Park, The Falling, call me. Gilbert Perez, call me on Malo. Nick Chandler, you have my number. Taylor Sheridan Group, Michael Dunitz. Gloria Sanchez, which is Will Farrell's group. The Hawk. Derek Alvarado. You know me. Call me. Ian Bogart. Alison Cox. Kyle Hollinger. Brian Love. Patrick Pardot. You guys call me. Jason Strickland, producer. Kelly Harris. I know you have my number. With all these people come to Simi Valley. Try us out! Work here.

Because we have the shops, we have the stores, we have the homes for all your productions. I have probably minimum of five of everything. Call me. If you hear this and you're not on my list, and you are a property owner or business owner, I'm easy to find. Call me get on my list so you can be part of this filming that we want here in Simi Valley. Thank you.

Thank you. Any questions? Oh, you can't take questions? Not now.

0:48 – 0:544 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed48:18

Good evening, you all. I missed your last meeting. Your knucklehead buddy here went and thought it'd be a good idea to take a labor job for six weeks. Instead of saying stand shoulder to shoulder, I was shovel to shovel with a lot of the people you'll hear me advocate for. I tell ya, I don't think it was such a great idea but I did meet a lotta great people and wonderful stories and it just solidified the efforts I make when I talk to you guys about The things that are going on that people can't come up and talk to you about.

And part of that is going back to the Michael Robinson incident, and I was so affected by that I brought you all books on what we were gonna do about now The last time I was here, I said racism in our city schools. Well it's that beating took place at the Regal. It isn't just our city schools and no offense you guys but you know, I don't think any one of you have experienced a bad racial happening to you So the reason I keep harping about it is, I'm hoping maybe we can put a commission together. We can look into it a little deeper because our City Council's silence is insulting to all those young brave kids that came up here and testified. And those weren't made-up stories, those were real life stories and I think it behooves us to pay attention to it and give it the serious concentration we should.

So with that, I'll use my last little bit of my one minute left where I got to start ragging on waste management again. I was reading in the Times, there were three sites that were approved to take the waste that came from that city that burned and they had to evacuate the whole city and we were one of those three sites. Now, I don't know how you check but I'd surely like to know did any of that rotten material make it out to our landfill according to the LA Times it did?

And now we're the brunt of every time there's some toxic stuff to get rid of, let's send it to Simi. So I think it's uncool. I hope it didn't go there. We'll talk more later about their expansion that's coming up and they're raising our rates which I'm not in favor of. Okay thanks for listening you guys. Talk to you later.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role51:20

Thank you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role51:25

The next three speakers James McGillis, Anthony Thompson and Anthony Eason.

CommentJames McGillisProposedself-stated51:34

Madam Mayor members of the City Council and staff I'm James McGillis a resident of Simi Valley at their most recent meeting the Tree Advisory Board also known as the Planning Commission approved the construction of 58 new single-family homes near the northern end of Cochran Street to facilitate the construction the tree advisory board also sanctioned the destruction of five native oak trees for the future construction site. As you know, the City's Hillside Preservation Ordinance bans construction on any slope of 20% or greater. Through a loophole big enough for a Mack truck, the developers can grade entire hillsides down to less than 20% and build whatever fits on the property. Prior to approval one tree advisory board member expressed his appreciation that the developer did not request a density bonus for this development.

He never mentioned the majestic oak tree at the top of that hillside which was soon to be destroyed for all time. The only reason the developer did not request a density bonus is that they could not cram even one more residential lot onto the project site. In fact, the footprint is so full there will be no sidewalks in the new neighborhood. I have a new hobby. I travel to all the future development sites in the city and photograph native trees slated for destruction. For instance, I went to Oak Road and found the city's heritage oak still standing After 350 years, it appeared indifferent to its imminent demise. I have a suggestion for both the Tree Advisory Board and the City Council. Every time you sanction the destruction of a native oak tree, you should post a sign nearby.

It would state the time and place of the public wake and final tree-hugging ceremony at the site prior to the chainsaws going to work. Then young and old alike could bid their heritage and what remains of the natural environment here in Simi Valley a sad but fond farewell Have you driven up Tapo Canyon Road to Lost Canyons Road lately? Without so much of it as a whimper, oak trees up to two feet in diameter have been felled chopped up and carted away. At the intersection of the two roads there used to be a natural area surrounded and shaded by native oaks Now look at it, looks like a strip mine. It may be time to repeal the Hillside Protection Ordinance and the Mature Tree Preservation Ordinance. Instead we should have a new ordinance that requires at least one oak tree be sacrificed for every acre of new development.

That way, if no oak trees are available on the proposed site, the developer could be required to select an oak tree at some other location in the city and personally cut it down using a City-approved chainsaw. If you listen outside at night I'm sure you will hear the owls all over this valley calling out for their failed and lost habitat. Thank you.

0:54 – 1:003 turns

CommentAnthony ThompsonProposedself-stated54:20

Good evening, I'm Anthony Thompson. I'm a resident and a business owner here open for business closed for bureaucracy. That's what residents expect when they report a problem. And that's what our city should deliver first. I want to recognize what speed of enterprise is and what works. Ryan Ventrella, George Goodwin and the streets maintenance team deserve credit for responsiveness. A concerned resident flagged down the street maintenance crew about an issue on the northbound side of Sequoia right before the 118 freeway and it was addressed within 24 hours. That's service that's excellent service and the kind of urgency we should expect citywide The issue, the condition of our street signs affects the public's perception of Simi Valley especially along gateway corridors such as First Street leading up to the mall.

If you get off First Street go towards the mall every sign is whitewashed and bleached so you can't read it. The other thing, down Royal Avenue I had the privilege to take when the Hummingbird Ranch nest was up for sale. One of the primary owners of the Hard Rock Casino, we went down Royal and he couldn't read what street they're on. I was showing him the Wood Ranch area.

The condition our street signs affects the public's perceptions And I have documented from 17 different videos where of the different pictures were residents sent to me and in preference and also in. The fairness to the city asked the residents and said, you know there's a website. Go put your complaints on there because the city can't see everything that's on the street so it's up to us as residents to identify those all as well but we shouldn't rely solely on the residents to discover and report predictable infrastructure failures. So a practical solution I came with, I'm in the sign business and these failures are predictable. A sign replacement strategy should be based on orientation as expected for replacements For example, south and west facing signs generally needs replacement in seven to nine years because it's always facing the sun, always getting the UV rays.

East-facing generally takes about eight to 10 years and north-facing can add 12 years or more. It all depends on the DOT requirements and the sheeting that's used. I recommend the city establish a proactive replacement schedule by sign category, location, orientation, and the condition. The reflective sheeting usually last is the least expensive replacement of the sign. The most expensive and the most predictive model is the road closures and traffic control that's needed, public works labor and equipment, man lifts and vehicle deployment.

And the replacement of substrates such as aluminum galvanized steel those are all the lower costs so I would say a strategic remove or replace system to preserve usable I have a request involving public hearing notices this evening.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed57:48

Public hearing notices are essential tools for community engagement and government transparency. Notices alert citizens about government activities, proposed projects or changes that may affect their community. Notices provide an opportunity for residents to voice their opinions and concerns regarding proposed developments or changes. They invite community members to participate in the decision-making process, ensuring that diverse perspectives are considered. They help ensure transparency which fosters trust and encourages civic engagement.

I believe the city is currently meeting its legal obligation by publishing notices in the Ventura County Star. My request involves the addition of a notice published in another paper as well, the Simi Valley Acorn. California Government Code Title 7 Chapter 2.7 Section 65090 Paragraph C states quote In addition to the notice required by this section, a local agency may give notice of the hearing in any other manner it deems necessary or desirable.

Although not being necessary, I believe it would be desirable. This could inform more residents of these hearings and encourage more public participation in local government that could provide City Council as well as the Planning Commission with additional perspectives to consider prior to making decisions at these hearings. I don't know if the City Council needs to do anything other than instruct a city manager that you would like this additional notice published as well. I believe the additional costs to the city would be minimal and be outweighed by public benefit.

It is my understanding that the Ventura County Star has a circulation somewhere in the vicinity of 12,500 in Simi Valley As of April 2024, the Simi Valley acorn had a print circulation in Simi Valley of 34,257. I'm not totally sure of the Ventura County star number but I believe the circulation of the acorn to certainly be greater than that of the Ventura County star in Simi Valley.

This would allow more notice reaching more residents and hopefully more public participation as well. Thank you for your consideration.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:00:08

Thank You Mr. Eason

1:00 – 1:054 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:00:13

The next three speakers, Frank Tomlinson, Kate O'Brien and Travis Foster.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed1:00:35

I brought a little something that we made up so you guys could see a little bit of what we're imagining with what we do with the sign program at Vets and Valor. I hope it gives you a little perspective, a little context to what we're thinking about making it a community event, making it veteran-centric to the newly separated veterans that are coming out of the military honoring them and just making it a day that they were able to connect and be a part of the larger community. Maybe find a home, a place where they're able to work, where veterans are appreciated and hired.

We have all of those connections and we continue to make more every day. I did want to read this. This is actually because I thought that this was ironic. This was actually posted in the Simi Valley Community Forum last week A gentleman, single dad of four veteran who had been employed yet homeless since December. Today finally signed a lease for an apartment however I'm moving with no furniture. I don't see us having enough for some time but hopefully gradually save up Save up or getting donations over time. Does anyone have any sleeping bags, an air mattress they're willing to donate? These are the kinds of people that this effort that we would hope to you be able to use and access our larger community and the veterans that are out there that are on social media I mean this is probably a little bit more of an anomaly to be honest with you with veterans that are out there But it's hard trying to find them in the community.

Things like the 13 Souls Run that we're helping organize, we're hoping to be able to start making those connections through that. This would be another way that we'd be able to help make those connections. One of the reasons and I haven't shared this up till now but Right outside these doors, there is a banner that hangs for Joshua Collins. He was killed in action in Afghanistan 2010. He's a friend of ours up at Vets and Valor. It is amazing to be able to drive by and see that every time that I pass and come up here but what he did was amazing because he actually served in Afghanistan He separated from the Marines, went became a LAPD police officer for a couple years but he was pulled back in. He was EOD. He was killed by roadside bomb in 2010 but what he did is he had bold leadership.

I hope I exemplify that by coming here. That's one of the reasons why I continue to do this and hopefully that this is just something that we'll be able to change together okay? Thank you. Is it okay if I let people, if I put these by the door? If they want to see what this looks like. Am I allowed

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:03:26

to do that? That's fine thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed1:03:32

Good evening, everyone. Kate O'Brien here and I'm speaking to you today primarily about the Samaritan Center. I'm on the board and I have a secondary thing which I will announce. Samaritan Center we are our next fundraiser is going to be the Mount McCoy hike which will take place on October 17th We meet at Rancho Madera Park on Lake Park South Avenue to start and we go up the hill. Now, Simi Valley as we heard earlier has roughly 152 homeless people plus several people who are food insecure which means they have to choose between putting food on the table and keeping the lights on. We help them as well. We help the food insecure. We help people who are homeless 152 homeless people is a manageable number. Every dollar we raise does a tremendous amount of good, it's not like L.A.

County where you walk down the street and there are tents, you can't even walk on the sidewalk. We have better control than that so October 17th we will have flyers. The reason they're not ready now is because we had to change the date. We originally were on September 19th and there were two other significant events that day October 17th. Meet at 8 o'clock, Rancho Madero. Flyers available? I will be passing them out everywhere I can.

Second thing also about food insecure people, our noontime Rotary Club of which Council Member Rhodes and myself are both members is having our annual 27th, I think, pancake breakfast on October 10th, which is the week before the hike. Council Member Rhodes is going to expand on that during his time to speak freely. So I'm sure we're all looking forward to hearing it.

And so here we are, thank you. Thanks Kate.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

1:05 – 1:114 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:05:52

Good evening. I'm back for the same reason I was here two weeks ago, the growing coyote problem in the ABC tract. I am extremely disappointed by the response I've gotten from both our elected officials and members of the community who refuse to give this issue the seriousness it deserves and I will be keep coming back until something gets done Last time, the council pointed citizens towards information on the city's website about coyotes and told us not to leave food and water outside. That's not a solution. It's putting the onus on citizens to account for the city's mishandling of an environmental hazard. We're not writing essays for a fourth grade biology class. We don't need what essentially amounts to a Wikipedia article explaining what coyotes are.

We have residents losing their pets, and we need to know what's actually going to be done about it. I've also heard repeatedly online, just keep your pets inside. Animals are meant to be outside. Cats enjoy being able to explore hunt and go to the bathroom outside and people leave their dogs outside in fenced backyards all the time. Why is it acceptable for dogs to be outside in people's backyards and cats not too?

Suddenly it's the owner's fault when cats get killed that's a double standards And then there's my favorite excuse, the coyotes were here first. No, the coyotes were not here first. I'll say it again, the coyotes were not here first and for good measure, I'll say it one more time, no, the coyotes were not here first. I've lived in Simi 35 years and I've never seen coyotes roaming the neighborhood and eating people's pets until 2022 or 2023. This is a relatively new problem facing our community and it's getting worse. And school is nearly back in session.

Last spring, 7.45 a.m. in the morning while kids were going to school I personally saw a coyote walking through my neighborhood in broad daylight. It was missing patches of fur surrounded by flies and God knows what else was wrong with it and it was heading towards blocks where children were going to school at Santa Susana Elementary School and kids and things people should be scared of that We're seriously going to wait until a child gets attacked before we do something about the problem. A coyote bite can mean serious wounds, infection, potentially rabies treatment. I don't want to stand here after somebody's kid gets hurt and ask why nobody did anything. And for anyone who thinks that this only affects people on the outskirts of town, ABC Tract is three minutes away from this building.

This is not happening far away. It's happening right here in our community so do something. Work with Ventura County Animal Services. Work with California Fish and Games and Wildlife. Determine what can legally and ethically be done to identify, trap, and remove coyotes that are repeatedly killing pets, displaying signs of illness or creating a threat to public safety. Look to what other cities are doing And while I have you all, yes the rent is too high.

What the first two speakers said is true but nobody buys houses anymore they rent apartments. Rent needs to be $1,000 or less for apartments for young people like myself to be able to live here. Thank you have a good night.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:08:52

Thank You Mr. Tonneson.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:08:56

Excuse me I'm sorry sir were you Travis Foster? Okay do we have Kate O'Brien? Ken Hurst, Madison Walrath and Jamie Sanchez.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:09:33

Good evening. First, I want to mention that we had our second Simi Immigration Coalition town hall meeting last night. It was well attended including Councilmember Ayala and we had several good and useful presentations about the legal landscape from Ryan Valencia from Assembly Member Jackie Irwin's office, lawyer resources from Vanessa Frank and Mariposa A one-stop web resource portal from two on one and a passionate description of the effects of immigration enforcement on Simi families.

Second, sadly, the number of ICE detentions in Simi Valley has grown to 53 now. Since I last talked with you about FLOC, the Simi Valley Police Department has worked to improve the FLOC search audit log. The old reason column is no longer reported and in its place is the offense type. This appears to be a change from a free-form reason to repetitive menu pull down, but each search now has an indication of why it was being done.

The audit file now appears to be updated about once per week instead of daily. The user ID column remains redacted. I understand the SVPD is auditing to make sure that our data does not go outside California as some of our neighbors' data did a few months ago. With the user ID being redacted, it is not possible for citizens to see who was using our data. This is a primary function of the search audit logs and existing logs cannot fulfill that function.

I filed a Freedom of Information request with the city asking for the redacted column. I was told there were no responsive records, which I understand to mean that the city does not have the user ID data. I do not understand how the Simi Valley Police Department can be verifying that their data does not go outside California and also not have the user ID data?

When I asked the city this question, I did not get an answer. Since this is a primary goal of the search audit logs, I would like to request that the user ID data be available to allow citizens to understand which organization is accessing our data. Thank you.

1:12 – 1:186 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:12:06

Good evening Miss Mayor, Council. I am also here to talk about the coyote problem what can be done about it and why it is so important to have safeguards in place without placing all the burden on the residents where government intervention is required There are state laws prohibiting the relocation of trapped coyotes for ecological reasons, and I recognize that these methods are historically ineffective. There are concerns about displaced wildlife following the fires. When animals lose their homes they must find a new one.

But this becomes a problem for both the animals and the residents when the animals pose a risk to health and safety. Notwithstanding the pets who have been eaten, when someone reports a large coyote with mange and missing fur surrounded by flies and near groups of school children that is a public health concern. Waiting until there is an interaction at that point not a mere sighting but an interaction per your words is unacceptable and irresponsible.

We cannot wait until somebody gets hurt or sick According to the Ventura County Animal Services Coyote Management Plan, this falls under the definition of a wildlife problem. The excessive attacks on domestic animals alone constitute several priority two incidents in a short amount of time. Your failure to take appropriate action on your end is inconsistent with this plan which I found linked on the city's website in the same place you have urged us to look for information.

I am not advocating for eradication. There are humane, sustainable solutions to problems like these. Wildlife sightings can be reported to the Simi Valley Animal Shelter, Ventura County Animal Services and the City of Simi Valley. Permanent signage can be placed with phone numbers, QR codes to websites, et cetera. Spaying and neutering efforts can be considered following an environmental impact report to ensure sustainability and harm mitigation Problematic coyotes known to cause continuous issues could be humanely euthanized by the VCAS.

Neighborhoods could develop coyote watch programs in coalition with the animal shelter, assigning block captains to share information with neighbors, assess coyote issues in each neighborhood and discuss solutions and take a proactive approach to education and hazing. In addition to active intervention because at this juncture education alone is not enough.

Other communities have implemented all of these things. They are viable, they are effective and if you doubt this I urge you to look into them anyway. Take the time make the efforts get other wildlife programs involved reach out to the animal shelter reach out to the VCIS. I know i'm out of time

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:15:11

your time is now up

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed1:15:11

but um thank you let's work together

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:15:15

thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed1:15:33

Before I begin, I want to acknowledge that we are gathered on traditional lands of the Chumash people. I honor their enduring connection to this land and pay my respects to their elders past and present. I usually have a speech that I write beforehand. I was too angry to do that this time around so I'm speaking from my heart more than anything. I recently read that article and I'm sure as all of you know what I'm talking about The whole reason why I started speaking here was because of Michael Robinson and what happened to him.

And the number of times that we called the police during that first month or two, to get protection for him and had no help from anybody said just leave it alone. It's just a random car. Don't worry your shoe will be fine eventually. It traumatizes me to know that kid who is still a kid How much that affected him, he doesn't even feel safe here which is why he moved out of this place because not even his home residence was safe for him at the time.

I make $60,000 a year to see that that's where public safety money came from like I cannot understand that and I think because I've learned a lot here, I will say that. I've learned a lot from you Mayor, you and a little bit from Litzer. And what I will say to you is if this happened to your son how would you feel? If this happened to your daughter, your grandkids, your kids and grandkids, if you have any I don't know. I don't look into your personal lives like that but I know that if this happened to my son I would continue to stand here and know what is going to change in this town to make sure Every single citizen is safe.

Not that they have to leave to feel safer at a homeless shelter, to know that they're going to be a father themselves and fear their own child's safety. Yes, Michael is going to be father soon. Now imagine what he feels like knowing that his daughter is going to be in this town and he can't do anything to protect her. I have spoken about awareness. I've spoken about so many different things, but this right here is the reason why I started here and I will continue to advocate for those who fear that no change will ever happen.

Now, I hope you also will continue to come to the town hall meetings and maybe advocate for those who can't speak for themselves either. Thank you. That's all I got.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:18:07

Thank You Ms. Sanchez

1:18 – 1:3421 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:18:13

And the last speaker is Ashley.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed1:18:29

Good evening, Council. I'd like to start by acknowledging the Simi Immigrant Coalition's incredible work and efforts here in our city. The back-to-school resource fair and supply drive as well as our second immigration town hall were a big success and we could not be more honored to help serve our neighbors and community. Made possible by the hard work and dedication of many locals from all walks of life. Longtime activists, community leaders are incredibly passionate youth organizers and everyday people like you and me.

Together we can learn grow and work towards a future for this city that recognizes supports and appreciates all of its people. Special mention in overwhelming gratitude to Joseph Ayala for your presence patience wisdom and school supplies Mayor Cavanaugh, we look forward to your attendance at our next meeting. I'm unfortunately going to switch gears and ask a question many of us are wondering which is why $60,000 city dollars were spent on law enforcement overtime for an adult that committed a hate crime and then doubled down on his violent threats because he's the child of local law enforcement Would you do the same for any member of this community or is this special treatment? And I think, you know, the answer. This room knows the answer and the city knows the answer.

This is not what equality looks like. This is favoritism. And honestly, it's disgraceful. Thank you for your time.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:20:07

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:20:12

Madam Mayor, that was the last speaker, and we have no speakers on calling in either.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:20:18

Thank you. On to the next.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:20:22

Madam Mayor, members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 4A, City Council comments regarding public statements.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:20:33

Does anyone wish... Council Member Ayala?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:20:38

Lots of different topics tonight. Thank you. Ben Davis, thank you for coming again. I know that it's now being We're going to have that sometime soon, that we can actually take an actual vote on that. Mr. Shaw, thank you for coming as well and always being that old man like you say who can just say whatever he wants to say and be okay with it. project as we, I'm sure as we get closer to that vote and all that entails. Mr. Thompson thank you for coming and acknowledging the city workers because they don't often get acknowledged for the work they do. I saw something similar a City Manager where there was just like a little tree branch in the middle of the intersection and I was parked at the intersection and there was one of the city work trucks at the light They just didn't sit there.

They actually got out of their trucks, paused traffic went out there picked it up and that wasn't what they were on the job to do right and they still took the time to do that. So thank you for bringing that up We'll look into the public hearing options Mr. Eason to make it more accessible I think we always need to have more people involved, Mr Tomlinson, and I don't know if he's still here from veterans. I don't know if you were here at the last meeting but we did make a motion at the end and moved forward to work on a options for the council to vote to work with the better way of distributing those flags with services. So that we're going to come back on that, but thank you for continuing to speak out on that. Ms. O'Brien I think is still here.

I was there last year at the hike. Remember it was kind of sprinkling that day. We still did it. I'll be there again this year. The Coyotes, thank you for both speakers especially the second speaker who you brought up a lot of solutions which I really appreciate. You just didn't... It was like this, this, this so excellent. And for Ms. Sanchez, Ashley thank you this is kind of after the fact right it's done but thank you for continuing being advocates for not just Michael but for anyone else that might come after thank you for being here

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:22:57

Thank You councilmember Mayor Pro Tem Litzter

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:23:02

I concur much food for thought and discussion and just a couple of things. Actually, I wanted to thank Mr. Thompson for the education on signage and your suggestion for solution. I know there was a time that I called in repeatedly on a particular sign on my driving to school It's an awareness and it's something that we could and should discuss. And yes, Mr. Easton I liked your suggestion about potentially placing in the ACORN as well. Certainly we want people to be aware and involved.

Mr. Tomlinson I think has left, but he spoke to the banners and the restoration and I think his involvement is very positive. I wanted to speak just about his support of the 13 souls run which is taking place in two weeks. I was going to let my fellow council members know that I have signed up to bike on that 13 mile run which is actually bicycle, you guys can run it, but it is really lovely Community supports the veterans in that fashion, and I appreciate his support which helped make it occur again. And so it is online if anyone would like to sign up and what's fun is you can do it for I think $20 or if you want to pay $65, you can get a t-shirt out of it.

But it all goes towards a good cause. Kate, thank you for talking about the Samaritan Center hike to Mount McCoy. As I understand the way it works too is if you can get sponsors to sponsor your hike that is what you really want to happen so I just thought I'd share that little piece too that I noticed as I was reading about your efforts there. So thank you.

Regarding the coyote discussion, thank you again for being here. I know we responded that ultimately animal control gets involved when there's altercation but you're completely right when you observe something that could turn into an altercation that is when calls should be made and so we'll have maybe for the discussion I hope sidebar about with the animal control what can be done there And I wanted to thank Mr. Ken Hurst, who is here there you are blessed for organizing the gathering that you had Sunday. As you recall I was had to go play them music elsewhere and so I missed it this time but I know I spoke with Councilmember Allen he said it was just very well organized. And the attorney who returned and spoke, very knowledgeable. So thank you for those efforts.

Your concern about the flock cameras and knowing who is accessing it certainly I think has some validity and might be a discussion to have with our attorney on what is required and how that should be looked at so thank you for bringing that to our attention. I just want to conclude by saying thank you to all of you who have expressed your desires for a community where everyone is represented and is treated equally and fairly.

And we appreciate your comments, and I understand that we need to be all doing more. So thank you, everyone.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:26:17

Thank you. Okay I'll take a moment. Again thank you everyone for coming out we had a lot of various concerns tonight which is nice to see our community taking the time to come forward and letting us know what's going on. So Ben, I definitely want to see one of yours. I've seen them online and in pictures but i wouldn't really want to see them are you going to be at the street fair again this year?

Well I'll be there before that, but that will be a good time for people to view those too. Mr. Shaw you're always bringing stuff forward to us so thank you. I'm glad you had to work this time though. But I do have a response for you on waste management, on your waste management concern. City Manager?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:27:06

Yeah, thank you Madam Mayor. So Waste Management did accept food from the freezer section of the warehouse in the Boyle Heights area and that was food that was going to melt but it was all really within the scope of their day-to-day operations they did not accept any of the burnt food or the building materials that all went to other landfills so I just want to make sure that that's clear to the community

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:27:29

Thank you. The city manager had let us know that but she explained it much better than I would have, so thank you. The reason I teased him about going to work he's been retired how many times? Five times? You keep going back to work. So let's see thank you for the street sign acknowledgement and information Mr. Thompson. Veterans stand down. Frank we also have a the veterans uh the park district puts on a big veteran Program on Veterans Day. I don't know if you want to combine into that or if you want to kind of keep it separate, I can talk to you afterwards we were just looking at that. Kate, I will sponsor you to hike up to the cross.

Okay, you all have my sponsorship that way I don't have to do it. I'm no dummy and Jamie and Ashley thank you both for always being here and continuing to advocate for your our community and for those that can't speak for themselves and Mr. Hurst if you give me a date I'll put it make sure I can try and get at the next meeting because we've each of us should go to at least one I think that would be fair for everybody and we get to know what's going on a little bit better in our community And I think that was it.

Oh, coyotes! I know there's not a whole lot we can do as a community but let me reach out to VCAS. I actually am a commissioner on VCAS so let me reach out and see if they can give us something to work with or maybe some ideas that you can as a little community work on? I think maybe if we start in one little spot and kind of work our way around the entire valley, it would be helpful to all of us. I don't see them very much where I live but I see them other places and walking around and they're not scared of us anymore so that's kind of the problem but let's see if BCAS can help us out a little bit one-on-one on that and i think that's it for me except our city manager would like to speak.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:29:23

I just wanted to add that in order to bring awareness about the coyote issues A few months back, I had spoken with our Environmental Services Director to ensure that we're having regular updates at our Neighborhood Council meetings. To educate our Neighborhood Council members about the Coyote Management Plan and what they can and can't do. Unfortunately Fish & Game and BCAS does kind of limit us in terms of enforcement against coyotes but there is a plan to do more outreach to the Neighborhood Councils about coyotes

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:29:59

Yes, thank you for doing that. I appreciate that. All right if there are no other comments we can

move on to the next item. Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:30:07

Thank you. Madam Mayor and members of City Council next on the agenda is public hearings this is a time for testimony on public hearings on the consideration of matters as presented on this agenda let the record show that due notice was given as required by law an affidavit to this effect is on file in the office of city clerk All comments submitted by email have already been provided to the City Council and will be made part of the record. However, they will not be read by the City Clerk this evening. Speakers will be called on in the order in which their card was submitted to speak for this public testimony item 5 for a period of no more than five minutes each.

Persons addressing the City Council are requested to state their name and community residence for the record. If you are participating by phone and wish to provide public testimony, please raise your hand by pressing star nine. Once the clerk recognizes you, you will be prompted to press star six to unmute your phone. You will have up to five minutes to speak and the mayor will notify you when you have 30 seconds remaining. Comments shall be limited to matters relevant on the agenda and may be ruled out of order if the comments aren't related to the item. The reports of city staff relating to these matters shall be made part of the record at this meeting.

If you challenge in court any of the City Council decisions made here tonight, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at this public hearing. The time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6. Item 5A a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment GPA-2024-0003 Zone change Z-S-2025-0003, specific plan amendment SP-S 2025-0002. Plan development permit PDS-S 2025-0003 and tentative map TT-2025 0002 to modify the approved 364 lot 1770 Acre Lost Canyons Development Project located west of Tapo Canyon Road, east of Copperstone Lane north of Anderson Drive and Ditch Road and north of south of Lost Canyons Drive. An addendum to the previously approved environmental impact report and mitigation monitoring and reporting program introduction of an ordinance and adoption of a resolution.

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:32:26

Thank you. Before we begin are there any ex parte communications to

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:32:30

report?

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:32:31

I'm sorry, you

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:32:31

have to read the resolution. Sorry it wasn't on my paper. No worries. The readings are as follows. Ordinance number 1374 an ordinance of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley approving a change of zone Z-S-2025-003 and specific plan amendment SPS 2025-0002 for the Los Canyons development and in addendum to the previously approved environmental impact report and mitigation monitoring reporting program.

And resolution number 2026-39, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley approving a general plan amendment GPA-2024-0003. Plan development permit PD-S-2025-0003 and tentative map TT-2025-0002. To reconfigure the approved Los Canyons development project to relocate 178 approved lots from the south side of Los Canyons Drive to the north side, locate two lots on the south end as a site for an approved 364 lot residential subdivision On a 1770 acre site located west on Temple Canyon Road and Bennett Road, east of Copperstone Lane, north and south of Lask Canyons Drive and north of Anderson Drive and Ditch Road, Lost Canyons.

And an addendum to the previously approved environmental impact report and mitigation monitoring report program. And Deputy Environmental Services Director Shawn Gibson, Senior Planner Elizabeth Richardson are here to present this item.

1:34 – 1:479 turns

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:34:17

Thank you before we begin this item are there any ex parte communications to report?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed1:34:23

I've met with the developer and also received communications from community members regarding this.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:34:29

Thank you, I met with the developer on the 27th prior to that City Council meeting.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:34:36

I think we all met with the developer.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:34:38

Okay thank you so everyone met except for Mayor Pro Tem did not. All right thank you we can move forward now Madam Clerk and staff.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:34:48

Good evening Mayor Cavanaugh, Members of City Council, tonight's public hearing is to consider revisions to the previously approved Las Canyons Development Project. In a nutshell, the requested actions would relocate 178 to 180 of the 364 approved units from the southerly portion of the site to the former golf course site north of Las Canyons Drive which will result in elimination of the golf course, consolidation of infrastructure improvements and preservation of additional open space.

If approved tonight, further public hearings before the Planning Commission will occur to review proposed home styles, landscaping and architecture. Tonight's action focuses on the proposed land use changes, zoning changes and core site layout. On June 3rd, the Planning Commission recommended approval. With tonight's presentation is Senior Planner Elizabeth Richardson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:35:44

Hey, good evening. Tonight we are reviewing a modification to the Lost Canyon specific plan development. Lost Canyons is a 364 lot subdivision approved in 2013 and grading for phase one is approved and actively occurring on the site. The site is 1,770 acres located on the north side of Simi Valley bounded by Tapu Canyon Road to the west Copperstone Drive to the east, north and south of Lost Canyons Drive and north of Ditch Road and Anderson Drive.

The Big Sky subdivision is located to the west and county land is to the north and east and county islands are located to the south. Tonight's request is to modify the approved subdivision. The request consists of a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, plan development permit and a tentative map to move 180 approved single-family lots located on the south side of Lost Canyons Drive.

No new residential lots are proposed. If the modification is approved tonight, the builder will return to the Planning Commission with individual lot plotting and architectural designs. Before we consider tonight's request, I'm going to do a brief overview of the history of Lost Canyons. First, the Whiteface Specific Plan was first adopted in 1992 for a maximum of 364 lots.

A park and two golf courses were anticipated for the project site and the two golf courses were constructed and operated however both have since closed. In 2011, the Lost Canyon specific plan was adopted for 364 single family residences. Remove the golf course on the south side of Lost Canyons Drive and allow the golf course on the north side of Lost Canyons Drive to be a private golf course with an expanded clubhouse amenities.

The environmental impact report was certified in 2011 as well. In 2013, the City Council adopted the plan development permit and tentative map to subdivide the 1,770 acre site to create 364 single family residential lots, parks, golf courses and infrastructure. No architectural plans were approved. The Phase 1 final map has been recorded for 184 lots in site grading and improvements have begun. To reach this point in the project, the applicant team has had to comply with the EIR mitigation measures, secure permits from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and obtain a tree removal permit and relocation permit from the city.

In addition they've worked with the Public Works Division to obtain grading and site improvement construction permits. In 2020, the Planning Commission approved a cluster development permit for individual house site plans and architecture for 184 single-family residences located in the Phase 1 area north of Las Canyons Drive. Construction of these approved homes was not started.

In September 2023, the City Council had a general plan prescreening and authorized further processing of a general plan amendment which is part of tonight's request In July of 2024, the Planning Commission approved a plan development permit modification and tentative map to relocate 32 approved lots. The 32 lots were originally proved in the northeast corner of the project site shown in red and were relocated to just north of Lost Canyons Drive shown here in blue.

For tonight's project, the applicant requests approval of the following modifications to the approved Lost Canyons development. These include removal of the commercial recreation land use and zone to remove the golf course portion of the project. Reconfigure the open space residential estate, residential low and medium density land use and zoning to allow the relocation of the 180 single family lots.

Amendments to the Lost Canyon specific plan development and design standards and modifications to the Tapo Canyon Road alignment with are also to be considered as well. The general plan land-use map will be updated to reflect the development changes. The area around the golf course will be changed from recreation commercial land use designation to low-density residential and medium density residential for the relocation of 178 home sites.

The area south of Lost Canyons Drive where the homes were approved will be changed to open space plus two areas of low density residential for the two estate lots, the areas shown in the red rectangles are located or the location of the previous location of the 180 lots that are being proposed to be removed. The zone change will update the city's zoning map to correspond with the general plan land use map changes. The former golf course area will be rezoned from commercial recreation to residential low and medium density, and the areas south of Los Cangues Drive will be replaced with open space and residential estate zoning, and the two estate lots will be rezoned for residential low density.

As we have discussed, the following specific plan amendments are proposed and in conjunction with the general plan amendment and zone change are necessary to relocate the residential lots. One of the more significant amendments to the specific plan is reducing the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The side yard setbacks will be reduced from 10 feet minimum for two-story structures to five feet.

The reduced side yard setbacks will allow the future homes to fill the lots for an improved house frontages when viewed from the street The amendment also proposes to reduce the rear yard setback for one and two story structures. When the homes are located adjacent to HOA open space, the one-story homes can have a five foot setback and two story homes can have a 10 foot rear yard setback.

The specific plan amendment includes replacing references to estate, custom and semi-custom home types with product types A, B, C and D. And each of these product types are defined by the minimum lot dimension and lot sizes. This change will allow the future builder to present product types that meet their development needs but will not regulate the size of the individual homes.

The specific plan design guidelines establish the character of the overall development and provide guidance to maintain the desired design quality. In addition to regulating the common area construction, the design guidelines also regulate the architectural styles and details of the individual homes. There are currently five approved architectural styles, Mission, Spanish Colonial Revival, American Eclectic, Craftsman Bungalow and Mediterranean. Four of these are shown on the screen.

The amendment proposes two new architectural styles, the first being Modern Farmhouse and the second being Coastal Contemporary. The program book guides the overall site layout landscaping streetscape for a cohesive design. The amendment to the program book includes a conceptual site plan and landscape plan for the future recreation amenities, common area landscaping and entrance gate design.

The future common area designs and recreation amenities will be reviewed by the Planning Commission with the Plan Development Permit Modification. A new recreation amenity will be provided to replace the golf course and clubhouse being removed from the specific plan. At this time, the space has not been designed or programmed however it will be reviewed by the Planning Commission with a future modification to review the single family residential architecture.

The Phase 2 tentative map will relocate the 180 previously approved lots located on the south side of Lost Canyons Drive. 178 of those lots will be located to the north of Lost Canyons Drive on the area of the now closed golf course and two lots will be located at the southern edge of the site with access from Anderson Drive and Ditch Road. The 178 relocated lots will range in size between 6,485 square feet and 24,377 square feet with a minimum lot dimension ranging between 60 by 100 and 90 by 110. Lot 363 will be accessed from Anderson Drive and will be 1.10 acres and lot 364 will be accessed from Detroit and will be 4.6 acres.

Phase 2 will also have a total of 17 lettered lots used as HOA maintained areas for streets, slopes, landscaping and other amenities. The specific plan amendment includes changes to the Tapo Canyon Road right-of-way. The 2013 specific plan approved the right-of way to be 52 feet wide curb to curb With two lanes of traffic and a center median. However, due to geotechnical issues identified on Tapo Canyon Road between Presidio Drive and Las Canyons Drive it is now proposed to be reduced to 45 feet wide with one lane of traffic in each direction and no center median.

The six foot wide bike lanes will be maintained going both north and southbound along with a five foot wide sidewalk on the east side of Tapu Canyon Road. At the intersection of Lost Canyons Drive and Tapo Canyon Road, the street width is proposed to be 52 feet wide with a north bound left turn lane and a south bound merge lane. A tree removal permit was issued in January of 2026 with the grading permit approving the removal of 49 mature trees and the relocation of 61 trees to areas within Lost Canyons Drive.

The grading activities have occurred, and the trees have already been removed as part of the Phase 1 construction. Neighborhood Council 1 considered the project on March 5th, 2026 and recommended approval by a vote of 10 to 0. The audience vote was 3 to 0. An environmental impact report was previously certified in 2011 and since the original project will be modified, an addendum to the EIR was prepared to confirm that there were no new significant impacts and there are no substantial increases in the severity of any previously identified environmental impacts.

The associated impacts of the modified project were determined to be the same or less than described in the previously adopted EIR. And the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve the zone change and specific plan amendment, and resolution approving the general plan amendment plan development permit modification and tentative map, and adopt an addendum to the environmental impact report and mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

This concludes staff's presentation and we are available for questions.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:47:27

Thank you does anybody have any questions of staff? None just double-check okay thank you Councilmember Rhoads

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed1:47:46

And this is for staff. What were the geotechnical issues on the decision to narrow the roadway? What would prohibit it from being the original size?

1:48 – 1:5312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:48:02

We may want to defer that to the applicant, but Public Works staff is here if they'd like to elaborate, but I think they may have a better reasoning for that. That's kind of what I thought so I was...

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:48:12

As a tentative, okay, that's fine. Mayor Pro Tem Lutzer

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:48:16

And I'm not sure if my question is for staff or for the developer as well, but let me just ask a couple. On page 52 it talks about Las Canyons easterly terminus is actually Madera and so I was just curious, is there a road currently existing that, or is this connecting that makes that all happen? Or are they responsible for developing that or is that just saying that we're trying to get the entire project

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:48:49

context. One of the site plans, there's a Madera Road connection in our general plan which actually terminates at the westbound, it's already built. There's a westbound terminus of Lost Canyons Drive and actually I can refer to you. It's actually right... Here. Madera Road would come from this point here if I'm seeing it correctly in the Big Sky community, and it just terminated into Big Sky. The specific plan references that connection or circulation element to the existing built Big Sky community.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:49:44

Interesting. Okay, thank you. Again this might be a question for the developer but I will ask you. I noticed that plan shows a water feature that is used for retention pond, drainage et cetera but also for something that is an attractive feature. Is that something that is helpful for drainage purposes or is that clearly in your opinion aesthetics?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:50:29

There's definitely need for drainage purposes the applicant could also elaborate on Some of the issues that they're programming into their design to make it a more attractive water feature at the same time. To kind of coincide with the proposed recreational building rather than just a drainage basin that's sometimes not attractive.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:50:51

Got it. And maybe one final question, could you speak to obviously this has to go through approvals go through a host of different including Ventura County Fire? It's been my sense that could you speak to their approval of this process today I know that originally the initial plan had the canyons with As I look at it, this seems like this might be an improvement in terms of fire safety security etc Was there were there any concerns or was there was it?

It was approval granted more readily by Ventura County Fire. Was that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:51:30

Yes through the current phase which is the phase two where they're taking improvements on the golf course the Fire Department look closely at the street lengths to make sure there's secondary access required and there's proper Limits into size or were some modifications to the original draft design that came to us because the streets are too long so they made sure they made changes to ensure that the Secondary access was provided per Ventura County standards and That was a primary change, I don't know if the Fire Department is here if we want to go over that, but I think I Won't speak for them.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role1:52:15

Let's say if you would like to hear directly from Ventura County fire We have a representative here this evening.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed1:52:20

I see that um which if he would like to speak to it otherwise I'm comfortable, but it's Come on down man down chief This is an opportunity be part of the fun come on down

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed1:52:38

I can speak for obviously through our fire prevention bureau is that all the plans would have to be approved, you know per fire code emergency access piece will absolutely be verified prior to. groundbreaking and overall development, right? And then the water component. That too will be checked as far as pump standards where that is looking at the zoning itself from an urban interface standpoint just from the outside looking in it does seem like it's probably a little bit more safer now with that being said per fire code they're not going to sign off on anything that isn't meeting the standards Something to also remember is that now we're also going to be dealing with Zone Zero, right?

Regarding the development. But I'm sure all of that was in play even prior too so... I'm sure our Fire Prevention Bureau's heavily involved in this. So, that's all I can really speak about.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role1:53:35

Perfect! That's great. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Thank you Chief Fallett. Are there any other questions from Council? Okay, seeing none. At this time I would like to open up the public hearing. Does the applicant wish to be heard?

1:54 – 2:101 turns

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated1:54:31

It's working. Good evening, Mayor and City Council members. My name is Rick Nelson and I'm with Newport Pacific Land Company. Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal tonight to transfer The lots that are currently planned for Dry Canyon and Tapo Canyon South. Try not to be too repetitive with staff's presentation, they did a very thorough presentation but I will summarize some of the things that they mentioned there.

report. This exhibit here shows you what is currently approved for the project. As staff had mentioned, the area in magenta is the 184 lots that were approved and are currently being graded. The remaining portion of the development, and I should just also add that the 32 lots that staff had mentioned were up in this location here. And as they said it was located down in this area closer to Los Canyons Drive.

So now there's no development proposed up here. In fact all the residential lots that were up there have gone away and it's essentially two large parcels. As part of this proposal in front of you tonight, this will become open space also. The Dry Canyon area is shown here in the kind of mustard color and blue color. It's phase two and phase three, and the Dry Canyon, excuse me, Tappel Canyon South is here shown in phase four.

What our proposal is to eliminate all the housing here in Dry Canyon with exception that one lot that comes off of Anderson Drive and the other lot that comes off of Ditch Road and similarly eliminate all the housing here And to relocate them adjacent north of the phase one development. So with the proposal, the areas that we're going to have residential development here in Dry Canyon will be zoned open space.

Similarly, the area that was happening in Tapo Canyon Road South will be open space and again with exception these two lots at the very southern end of the property. Staff mentioned we had a Neighborhood Council meeting on the 5th of March, and then followed by a Planning Commission hearing on the 3rd. And both of those bodies gave unanimous approval to our proposal to relocate the lots to the north side of Lost Canyons Drive.

This illustrative site plan gives you a little more detail of what we're proposing, just to orient everybody. This is Lost Canyons Drive here and this is Tapo Canyon Road here. The main entrance into the project is where it was originally posed at this location here. There's another entrance on the east side. Both these will be gated. There is a third entrance but it's for EVA purposes down in this location here.

When you enter the site, you'll see this lake feature that was mentioned previously. And I can expound upon that a little bit more if the council likes but it's serving multiple purposes. The first is that the resource agencies even though they quote unquote didn't deem it jurisdictional, they did require that it be maintained because it's considered to be an aquatic feature. We could relocate it but it has to be a similar size as what the existing feature is.

In addition to that, it's serving as a storm drainage retention facility. We have three of them on the site. We have this one here, there's one over here to the east and there's one up here in this location here. Those are three primary stormwater detention facilities so that the project doesn't increase their historical flows offsite. As staff had mentioned, this is where the proposed clubhouse is and this location here In addition, we're proposing community trails over the former golf course paths that you see in the areas I'm describing here.

These will be access for the community at this location here and at this location here. We're also proposing to construct a public trailhead off of Bennett Road so the public can actually access these trails that go through the community here. In addition to that, we're gonna be dedicating in fee simple a trailhead to the Rancho Simi Park District that you see here.

As you probably know there's lots of cars that park adjacent to Tapakane Road which is really not a very safe condition And this will allow residents who want to enjoy the trails to the east, which I think are in the county, a safe place to park and enter into Tapo Canyon Road as opposed to parking on the side of the road now. And I'll show you in a blow up here but this is also another trail that we'll be dedicating to the Park District and it goes through the former area where the residential development was proposed in Dry Canyon.

This is a blow-up of what the property would look like with the approval in front of you tonight. As I mentioned, this is the trail that will go through Dry Canyon. Originally, the trail was proposed to go through here in this fashion. And it was a very difficult trail to construct for the district. It had a lot of topography, had some other things that they were going to have to deal with as far as coastal sage shrub and mitigation of those sorts of things.

So when we proposed the idea that we relocate it to where the former residential development was going to be in Dry Canyons, they were very excited about it. They said that's really where they wanted to be initially, but it was obviously in conflict with the residential development. They couldn't have it there and again they will be making usage of the cart trails that are through here too which will mean their improvements aren't going to be nearly as expensive as otherwise would be.

And just for reference again this is the trailhead that would be dedicated to Park District and the trailhead that we'll be constructing off of Bennett Road As you may be aware, Newport Pacific Land Company is in contract with Toll Brothers to purchase the property. If you're not aware of Toll Brothers, they are a national home builder and nationally recognized, won many awards throughout the country.

They are very well capitalized and one of the reasons that we chose them is because of their reputation And because of their capitalization, because this is a very expensive project and you need to have a home builder with a wherewithal to be able to develop a site like this. It's a very expensive site and they've got the wherewithal to do that. This is a picture of a development down the street, Porter Ranch.

And I think as you can see the homes they build are from a streetscape and very beautiful. If you ever had the opportunity to actually visit a Toll community, I think you'd be very impressed with their house designs when you go into some of their homes. They're magnificent and probably little biased because I used to work for Toll Brothers but just everybody knows but I still sing their praise.

On Tappel Canyon Road improvements, the general plan designates Tappel Canyon Road as a two-lane roadway with two bicycle lanes, a raised median and 118 foot right of way. The proposal tonight, as the design maintains a two 14-foot travel lanes as the prior plan did. In addition to that, the two six foot bicycle lanes provides a sidewalk on the north side and will still dedicate 118 foot right away however we're proposing to move the raised median. The raised median I think was 12 feet in width. It doesn't provide any additional traffic capacity And I'll explain to you a little bit more about the geotechnical question, I think that came up. But by removing that divided median, the roadway traffic capacity remains the same. It meets the city's traffic volume capacity and level of service criteria.

At the Planning Commission hearing, the City's Traffic Engineer Mr. Link described in great detail about the traffic volumes and we're well below the traffic volumes that this road can carry with the existing traffic plus the project in addition to projected future traffic demands and volumes. As I mentioned, there is an existing geotechnical issue that I'll elaborate in a minute here. In addition to that, there's some jurisdictional issues that we're having to deal with on the east or west side of the roadway.

So proposing a widened Tappel Canyon Road from a current pavement width which I think is about 28 feet. It varies. It gets a little wider and a little narrower but it's approximately 28 feet to a 40 foot wide street pavement section And once we get past this particular area with the geotechnical and jurisdictional issues, we will transition to a 64-foot wide pavement section at Lost Canyons Drive intersection.

And unfortunately, my computer's hiding the last point. But we're also going to be putting in a new traffic signal at the intersection of Lost Canyons Drive and Tappel Canyon Drive. I think that will be very, very helpful because I think anybody that's driven that road knows a lot of the traffic coming from the north goes at excessive speeds and that will help slow down the traffic.

So this is a plan view of what we're proposing in two cross sections. The south cross section is this point where we have some of these constraints on the west side of the roadway, or we have jurisdictional constraints, IE creeks and those sorts of things that we can't get into on the east side of this area Without getting too into the weeds, the geotechnical issue is an existing condition that's out there. And unfortunately once you touch it, you own it.

And right now there's a clay lens that's about five foot in depth, about 50 feet deep. And that's what's causing or creating this instability. If you were to look at the design criteria for both the static, i.e., current without any dynamic loading, meaning an earthquake, it barely meets the safety criteria but under a dynamic situation, i e. It would calculate to fail. Now I'm not saying it's going to fail, but if you had to bring it forward for approval, it would meet the factor of safety. So what the proposal is, and it's expensive, we're going to be installing what they call these shear pins. And I'll try to explain it such that hopefully you understand what I'm trying to say.

But as I mentioned, there's that clay layer. It's about five feet deep and it's about 50 feet below ground. There will be three-foot diameter borings that'll be drilled down. There'll be an array of them in different rows. There's probably 40 or so that'll be in rows that will transition up the hillside. Sorry. Got to watch my hands. The three foot diameter hole will have inserted into it I-beams.

And those I-beams will go down below the clay layer approximately five to six feet, go through the clay layer and above the clay layer about another five or six feet And that hole, three foot diameter hole will then be grouted with concrete. The purpose of those I-beams is to where that clay layer would want to slip in a dynamic or earthquake situation it will prevent that clay layer from moving because of the array of pins that will be put in in order to secure that site.

Technically, we could widen it even more if we wanted to. It would be even more expensive but the reality is the two lanes that we're opposing which is consistent with the current general plan plus the bike lanes and the sidewalk provides the capacity that's needed for this project both under existing plus project and future growth. Let me see if I can wake this guy up.

See ya. And I'll also mention that this is a little bit further to the south, but this is Presidio. So this 40-foot paved section will start at Presidio and continue up through approximately this area. And this is the area as soon as we got out of this referred to it as a pinch point because of the geotechnical and jurisdictional issues when the roadway starts to widen out. It gets to, I think, 64 feet wide which will allow a left hand turn lane coming off And I should also mention, As a result of this new alignment, we're going to be increasing the site distances because if you've ever driven that road it's a little bit curvy. And we're trying to make the site—and we're not trying—we are making the site distances better and with less pronounced curves.

The project benefits eliminates 235 acres of disturbance where housing was previously approved in both Dry Canyon and Tapo Canyon South. And I think it preserves over 1,500 acres of undeveloped land. The project footprint where the homes will now be located Approximately 200 acres and so out of the 1,764 or 1,700 acres only 200 acres is actually going to be developed with residential. The total unit count remains at 364 units it creates additional community and public trails and trailheads It's a more sustainable plan with efficient use of public resources, police fire water and etc. I'll just add one comment on the fire prevention that comes to mind in order for this project to be deemed complete for this proposal we had to do what they call a fire prevention plan It's a very extensive analysis, and I think it's about 136 pages.

And they look at fire direction or fire coming from different directions, different wind speeds, different types of fires, canopy fires, low-lying fires. And it all passed the analysis that was needed for us to be able to proceed with

not transcribed≈22s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

2:10 – 2:1729 turns

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:10:25

the bill. I'm sorry Mr. Nelson but the 15 minutes allowed is up. Would you like to extend it?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:10:31

I can wrap it up in two or I can quit.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:10:35

Want to wrap it or two more minutes? Fine. Two more minutes, thank you.

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:10:38

Thank you. I'll go quick. It's a more efficient and economically feasible plan that provide much needed housing. It eliminates the golf course and reduces the water usage tremendously from the previous golf course. Previous golf course probably used about 180 million gallons a year of water. Provides for completion of Lost Canyons Drive and Tappal Canyon Road wide widening improvements as I mentioned and preserves There was a lot of trees down there so we wouldn't be going down there anymore.

Our project request is to amend the White Space Pacific Plan design guidelines and general plan, modify the tentative track map and plan development permit, relocate 178 loss to the center of located area north of Los Canyons Drive. There's no change in the improvement improved unit count or density and reduce the disturbance environmental impact and some more efficient sustainable plan. And that concludes my presentation I'd be happy to answer any questions you have.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:11:36

Thank you, you didn't even use the full two minutes so we're good. At this point are there any questions of the applicant from City Council members? And we will start with Council Member Ayala.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:11:46

Thank you I just wanted to bring up some of the concerns that residents had during the planning meeting and Mr. McGill has sent me as well as that to kind of make up my question just so everyone has a clear understanding of what's going forward and everything is clear The first is that, and it's just a few of them. There are a lot of speakers who had concerns over Anderson Road and Ditch Road where they lived that the streets would be torn up because water pipes would be placed under there to feed the two homes that were going to be, the two estate lots.

So can you confirm that that is not the case?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:12:29

You say roads torn up, meaning for what reason? For the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:12:32

water.

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:12:33

The water, okay. We have an easement off of Ditch Road. There's actually an existing water line in Ditch Road that we'd be tapping into that water line and bringing it up Ditch Road on this easement. There could be a small amount of encroachment in a ditch road to do that, but I don't think it's a very major encroachment. The one off Anderson Drive already has water in that street so we'd just be extending that.

Did that answer your

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:00

question? And are those two going to be on septic tanks?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:13:03

Yes, they are. That came up in the Planning Commission hearings. I know there was a lot of concern with a lot of the owners south of our property boundary. Some want sewer service and some don't but the two estate lots will be on septic tanks and as opposed to the current approval that would actually Install sewer to surface those areas that would be eliminated now,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:29

right? And then also there was concerns about how many with just those two estate lots How many homes could actually be placed on there. Can you just confirm one just money?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:13:41

I think they would still be allowed a to use but there's one primary residence and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:13:45

And the other important thing is that we are re-designating that land as open space, which there was a big concern about the fear of more homes just being placed there. But in order for that to happen, that would have to come back through the channels to actually redesignate that as residential. Is that correct?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:14:06

That is correct. In addition to many other environmental constraints that somebody would have to deal with and I wouldn't wish that upon anybody

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:12

personally. And then if we cross the street to the north side, this will be my last question. The other concern was that there may be natural gas lines going to the homes which might be a dangerous thing to do. Can you respond to that?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:14:24

That is not the case. It's going to be an all electric development, as you probably were. California discourages gas now. The only gas that will be installed will be part of the clubhouse facility, but that's the only gas that will be installed

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:14:38

there. So those are my questions for now. Thank you.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:14:41

Thank you. Next up, Council Member Rhodes.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:14:44

Thank you, Madam Mayor. I want to talk about trails and that open space. I didn't think about this question when we've talked previously but the trailheads are going to be open to the public at least two of them in the community are behind gates will the public be able to access the trails from the community side or do they have to go around and access it and then would get up to the community they turn around and go back?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:15:07

The public, the residents would be able to access it from the development. The trailhead off of Bennett Road is a public trailhead so the public wouldn't be able to access the community trails that we're providing. The trailhead for Rancho Simi Valley Park District is a public trailhead at the intersection of Lost Canyons Drive and Tapo Canyon Road.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:15:36

The new reconfigured trail going through Sand Canyon. Did I hear correctly that that would be something turned over to the parks? Correct.

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:15:46

It's an easement and it will be a 25, 20 foot wide easement that they will have in that they will maintain that easement through the development and it'll go from Anderson Drive to Lost Canyons Road and then you can travel to the east along Lost Canyons Drive and then connect to the trailhead at set the intersection of Dry Canyon, excuse me, Tapalcane Road and Lost Canyons Drive.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:16:10

Does that easement stay if there's another future disposition of the property? Yes. Who is going to currently own the property after the houses are all built, the open space property?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:16:30

Well, there's a couple of different property owners. Hillwood owns a lot of the open space areas to the south side of Lost Canyons Drive and then that the former residential area is both in Tapal Canyon Road and Dry Canyon will be owned by NPLC with the easement for the park district. Perfect thank you all my questions

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:16:49

Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem Litzter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:16:52

Thank you and I would just start by saying I appreciate that this does create actually consolidates the homes and creates more open space ultimately can you speak to the comparison between how many acres of open space originally was proposed and how much this with a net difference is?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:17:10

I think the percentage, if I recall correctly and staff can step in if I got it wrong. But I think the original plan was about 43% open space and I think it's like 89% now? So substantially more. Well, I know the total acreage now is approximately 1,500 acres of open space with a development footprint of about 200 acres. I don't recall specifically an acreage for the previous development but if you just did the ratios that I mentioned between the 90% or 89% now versus 43%, it would give you an understanding.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:17:43

Appreciate that. And that kind of leads to my second question of ignorance obviously these beautiful homes would, there would be an HOA that is created that helps support improvements, etc.

2:17 – 2:2312 turns

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:17:59

Once you get into development, it's all HOA maintained. The roads, any of the landscaping within there and the area to the north where the community trails are opposing both for the public and for the community that would be also HOA maintained.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:16

And that's going to really what my question was, what responsibility the HOA has for the open space maintenance and et cetera. What I'm hearing you just now say is that to north of it where the trails are there would be responsibility?

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:18:30

Where the community trails will be available to both public and the community of this proposed development those trails will be maintained by the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:38

HOI. Interesting. Open space property, there's not a financial responsibility with the HOA to cover any of that. No

CommentRick NelsonProposedself-stated2:18:48

they're not purchasing that property. Got it

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:18:50

got it

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:18:51

okay thank you. Thank you any other questions from council? Okay at this time Madam Clerk are there any members of the public wishing to be heard on this matter?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:19:05

Yes Madam Mayor we do have six speaker cards. Michael Shaw.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed2:19:27

Madam Mayor, Council. I won't take five minutes, I promise. I want to speak in favor of the development. My biggest thought of it is all those wonderful new homes are going to be full of families and those families are going to come into town and spend money And we're going to see some nice tax revenue come from that. So I'm really in favor of it, plus I want to move up there.

Thanks a lot. That's

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:20:03

all. Thank you. James McGillis?

CommentJames McGillisProposedself-stated2:20:13

Madam Mayor, members of the City Council and staff, I'm James McGillis, resident of Simi Valley. Tonight the City Council will approve phase two of the Lost Hills Development Project. I will only touch on one subject regarding this program. The plans for 364 new homes also includes a stormwater retention pond sometimes possibly used for a helicopter dip if there is a fire and mainly for residents to take a look at. In 2007, the Board of Directors of Waterworks No. 8, the City Council approved a groundwater management plan for the Gillibrand Groundwater Basin. It provided for continued use by P.W. Gillibrand Company and a provision of water for other quote irrigation purposes.

Subsequently water was pumped to the pond At the Lost Canyon's golf course and then used to irrigate its greens. Groundwater management plan never mentioned that pond and did not sanction it as an ongoing ornamental body of water. Around that same time, 2007, the city built a Tapo Canyon Water Treatment Plant intended to treat groundwater to potable water standards.

In the documentation for the Lost Canyons Development Project, there is no mention of the well that will feed what I call its fake lake. According to city staff, the well that supplies that water feature is located on city land in the Gillibrand Groundwater Basin. A 2006 report by a company by the name of Geoscience estimated that the basin has a sustainable yield of up to 1,350 acre-feet per year. In 2025, WaterWorks No. 8 treated only 95 acre-feet at its Tapo Canyon Treatment Plant probably just enough to keep the plant running. According to the 2020 Ventura County Report on groundwater. The City of Simi Valley operated several wells in the basin intended for backup water supply. There was no mention of how much water was pumped by PW Gillibrand or the condition of the underlying aquifer.

There is no public information available that I could find on the status of the Gillibrand sub-basin. For all we know, it could be full or it could be empty. Water Works No. 8 currently provides 23,000 acre-feet per year to our city, almost all of it imported. If our supply of Sacramento Delta River water were ever to be severed, the Gillibrand Subbasin would—could be a reliable source for 1,100 acre-feet per year going through the Tapo Canyon Treatment Plant.

In other words, most of the city would then rely on less than 5% of normal flow. The Gillibrand Subbasin represents this city's emergency water supply reserve. It should not be used for a decorative amenity visible to only 364 privileged homeowners. Unless that water feature portion of this plan is amended to specifically prohibit use of city-owned water, either raw or treated, the project should be denied. If the developer or City staff can set the record straight I am willing to listen. Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:23:30

Thank you. Anthony Eason?

2:23 – 2:282 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed2:23:43

My name is Anthony Eason. I'm a 42-year resident of Simi Valley in District 1. I am here tonight to voice some concerns I have with the proposed changes to the Lost Canyons project. First, I have an objection to the idea that the relocation of 178 lots is not a significant change to the plan. I understand the reasoning of the developer. They claim it will centralize the project development in one area of the property for a more efficient, economical and sustainable plan.

I am quite sure that these changes will be more economical and efficient for the developer. I would like a more precise explanation as to how this change is more sustainable than the former plan however. The developer and city staff claim reduced environmental impacts without a new environmental impact study to back those claims. I believe this change of plan has more to do with the financial saving for the owners and developer than any additional benefit to the city.

The moving or relocation of 178 lots, a half mile or more, to a significantly different location, a former golf course is a significant change. Are you just playing a numbers game? There is no change in total number of lots, so there is not a significant change. My next concern involves the rezoning of Dry Canyon and South Tapo Canyon. The rezoning of these areas to open space sounds wonderful. My concern is for how long? Will this land be donated to the city? I would doubt that. Will the owners along with the city be rezoning these areas under the Williamson Act to achieve a tax benefit for the owners of this new open space?

What guarantee, if any, is proposed for how long this land will remain open space. Do the landowners or developers have a plan to have this land rezoned at a future date to build more homes? The city's position appears to be that will be decided in the future and shouldn't concern anyone now. That is just poor city planning and management, kicking it down the road if you will. The City Council as well as the Planning Commission should have needs to consider how this may affect any future development in this area.

The original plan called for 180 homes. Will another 180 or more homes now be built on this same land at a future date? What actually should and needs to be considered today? The city should set a minimum 25-year moratorium of any zoning change that would allow building and development to these new open spaces as a condition of approval for the change to this plan.

Next, what is the deal with lot 363 on Anderson Road and 364 on Ditch Road? Why do those need to remain? Are there prospective buyers for those lots? Are there already drawn up building plans for these lots that haven't been submitted, just waiting for approval of this change. Will those lots actually be built on or are they placeholders for future access after the open spaces are once again rezoned for development?

The city should put a condition on those lots that they have to be sold and built upon within a three to five year time frame or become additional open space. Neighborhood Council No. 1 approved this plan with the recommended condition that the road construction on Tapo Canyon and Lost Canyons Drive takes place during Phase I, not Phase II as shown in the original plan. Will those street improvements take place in Phase I as recommended?

All homes in this plan should include solar panels and storage batteries. I don't think the people who are likely to purchase these homes will blink at the added cost of solar power. These new homeowners should have the most energy efficient homes possible made available to them. That is what will actually add to the sustainability of this project. The addition of solar power on all these homes will put less stress on the existing power grid and the effect it may have on existing neighborhoods.

I believe the homes in this project will be on the Southern California Edison Tappo Canyon Circuit, which is subject to public safety power shutoffs. These homes should have power backup planned in their construction for the safety and convenience of the homeowners. These homes, at the very least should be built pre-wired for the addition of solar power panels and battery backup.

This revised plan will add open space but for how long? Is this just a ruse to have the city approve this change only to have another rezoning in 10 years? The continual rubber stamping of new developments on our city without intense formal review real scrutiny...

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:28:46

Mr. Eason your time is up. Thank you.

2:28 – 2:346 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:28:53

Glenn Becerra.

CommentGlenn BecerraProposedself-stated2:29:08

Madam Mayor, members of the Council, City Manager, City Attorney my name is Glenn Becerra and when this project first got started John had the same color hair I do This project has been under scrutiny and review for the last 20 years, and the one thing that stayed consistent is the amount of housing that's been part of this. It's always been in a 365 range. It hasn't changed at all.

I actually was in favor and voted in favor when I was on the City Council of the original project which included a golf course, homes, custom lots, a gated country club And a project being designed for a company called Discovery Homes, which builds in Kauai and has some of the most premier places down in Palm Springs and in Dubai. And other places in the world like that. This project took so long because of the scrutiny that all got walked away from. We're lucky to have a builder like Toll Brothers to come into Simi to do this project. Toll Brothers is a premier builder, they've never built in Simi Valley before if you drive down Santa Rosa they're building a beautiful project in Santa Rosa right now those houses are going for $3 million.

I remember when Lost Canyons or Long Canyons was approved and New Urban West, which was a premier builder built the first million dollar track home in Simi Valley. I believe these will be the first $2 million track homes in Simi Valley. I grew up playing in that area riding my dirt bike hunting. I lived at the bottom of Anderson Drive and yes, I do want sewer in that area. I still own the Anderson house. I don't live in it but I own it and would welcome the sewer to come through there, but that's not going to happen.

I do welcome the neighbor whoever is going to build the house at the top of that street it's i walked that area and I know the area well um and I really appreciate the improvements that are going to go in on Tappel Canyon. I'm a mountain biker. I ride my mountain bike from my development in Wild Horse Canyon where I come through Tapple Canyon and I ride down that road Yes, I do take my life in my own hands every time I come out of that canyon and ride down Tableau Canyon. So this will have dedicated bike lanes. It'll make it much safer.

And overall, I think the project is much needed for Simi Valley. These are the types of projects that will bring business owners and people who start businesses into Simi Valley. And when they do that, and live here, they'll relocate their businesses here. The report that was done earlier by the Community Foundation said that we lost farmers Bank of America. Yes, I think it would be fair to say that California lost them because Bank of America moved most of those jobs to Texas and I know Farmers Insurance merged with Century 21 and moved to a newer building over in the Warner Center area but those jobs will probably never come back because California's environment doesn't make it possible. So we have to have homegrown businesses here, people that live in this development will bring those homegrown businesses to Simi Valley.

So I hope you'll vote in favor of this project and get this moving. Thank you.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:32:31

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:32:37

Mayans Patcharelli?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed2:32:51

Oh, my beautiful view. I look over this whole entire project and it's been a long time coming. I hate to see my view change but I'm not opposing the project at all. Two areas of concern one is there's two quarries are up Tapal Canyon Road and a topsoil yard. The trucks are incredibly loud. I grew up around trucks so it doesn't bother me. I hear them every day but they also run through the night and when they're empty When they hit the bumps, they just make a lot of noise. And so maybe an idea to put on the title or CC&Rs that they are moving next to what would be equivalent to a train station, airport. They're moving next to quarries. They're going to hear the trucks. They echo through the whole canyon over there and you guys don't want to be bombarded with a bunch of people calling about the noise all the time because it pre-existed them.

Also, on Lost Canyons and Tappel Canyon Road that's the southern part of my property. My property is on the west side. It's also neighboring the hiking trail and on certain Saturdays that place is flooded with cars so I didn't notice like a parking entrance over there. Also, I'm working with the developers to get an easement onto my property. There's been an existing road that pre-existed in my time I use it, and Edison uses it. And we'll still need access to get to my southern part of the property. Maybe something can be done with the parking for that trailhead and then access for Edison. They have high-powered and low-powered poles right there on that corner.

And that's my talk.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:34:31

Thank you.

2:34 – 2:4111 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:34:37

The last speaker is John Friedman

CommentJohn FriedmanProposedself-stated2:34:52

Thank you, Madam Mayor and council members. My name is John Friedman. I reside in Thousand Oaks but my first project out of college in 1983 was the Marr Ranch which is now Silverstone and Wild Horse. My father and I worked on that project from about 83 and four till about 10 years ago. At one point went to the US Supreme Court on that project so it has a long history And my recollection is that this project tonight, or at least the overall white face was in the midst of discussions just like this in about 1990 when I kind of was knee deep into the Mar Ranch.

And it's a tough project so I commend them for sticking to it. I do as a developer and as someone who has lived in Ventura County for 26 years now, I think it's better layout Putting aside that the golf courses were really hard, I lost a lot of golf balls. Ultimately it always felt like those courses were too tough for the average golfer and we're destined to not work in the long run.

And here we are tonight, I think this really is the better plan staying out of those two other canyons consolidating. It's a lot less grading. Those canyons have lots of landslides So in conclusion, I wish them well. It's been a long time coming. I see I have three minutes and 30 seconds left if Glenn would like my extra time, I will give it to him.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:36:32

Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:36:39

Madam Mayor that was the last speaker and we have no speakers online.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:36:43

All right thank you does staff desire to respond any comments or issues raised?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:36:53

Yes, Mayor Cavanaugh if there's any specific follow-up regarding the retention basin public work staff is here we could try to answer any questions on that as needed. I won't try to elaborate on that this will be on my expertise. The couple of questions regarding environmental impacts or It is a significant change to the project, that's why we're here tonight for consideration of the specific plan and general plan amendments.

The comment on is it a significant impact refers to the environmental document. Staff prepared, reviewed the changes to the project and did find that it is not a significant change to environmental impacts. But it is a significant design change. That's why we're here tonight. Let's see, I'm just checking my comments. I'll reserve any further comments but I will be here for questions. Ms. Richardson, do you have anything else?

I don't. Okay thank you.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:38:18

All right thank you. Public Works would you like to come up and discuss the retention basin? Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:38:35

Thanks Madam Mayor, Council. Mr. McGillis is correct about the Gillibrand Groundwater Basin and its capacity and our treatment plant that is up at the top of Tapo Kenyan Road. The previous golf course lake that was being fed by groundwater is actually It was in fact supplied by CityWell, but in a different basin. So the impacts of what was going on at the time the golf course was active didn't affect The lake being proposed as part of this development is not going to be using groundwater, I understand. It's quite a distance from where the previous pond was which would require significant runoff pipeline and frankly the quality of that ground water wasn't that great anyway so using potable water The demands coming just from that lake, if you just consider evaporation are really not that significant.

I'm not sure how many acres the lake is. 3.74, so almost four acres. So we're talking about 20 acre feet of water just from evaporation but then that's offset by rain and drainage coming into it. So it's not a big draw on our water resources. I don't know if there's anything else that you might have questions

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:40:17

about? Not at this time, thank you. Does the applicant wish to desire any rebuttals? You don't have to, okay thank you. All right so are there any further comments or questions from city council members? Council Member Ayala

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:40:35

I just wanted to comment on two things. First, and you guys can nod your head, aren't all of these going to have solar panels on them? To address one of the concerns someone had. And then also, one of the selling points of this move was that we would have that extra open space on that south side so to Mr. Eason's concern Because that is one of the selling points, why this is a good thing.

I would just want to encourage future councils Remember that this, having that open space was one of the reasons of justifications for this move. And so we really should keep that as open space going forward for people to have with their trails. So I just wanted to mention that but solar panels, I wanted to make sure you knew that they were already gonna be standard on all of the homes

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:41:41

And I just want to add for the record, since the applicant didn't come to the podium. For the record there will be solar panels on all of the properties.

2:41 – 2:5632 turns

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:41:51

Thank you. I believe it's state law now isn't it? That's what I thought okay good thank you. Are there any other comments from any other council members? Okay seeing none this hearing is now closed. I will now entertain a motion. Mayor Pro Tem Litster

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:42:11

I'll first start by saying I appreciate the thought that has gone into this, and I think ultimately it is a better footprint and better use of the land. And I appreciate this has been a difficult journey but thank you for getting it to this point. So I move that we introduce ordinance number 1374 approving zone change ZS 2025. and adopt an addendum to Approving General Plan Amendment GPA 2024-0003, Plan Development Permit Modification PDS 2025-003 and Tentative Map TT 2025-002 and adopt an addendum to the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Second.

Thank you call for

not transcribed≈20s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:43:11

the vote

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:43:16

The motion passes unanimously. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:43:41

Madam Clerk, are we ready to move on?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:43:57

Yes, Madam Mayor.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:43:58

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:43:59

Next item, Item 5B, a public hearing to consider a proposed preferential parking zone fee and adoption of a resolution establishing a preferential parking zone fee. The reading of the resolution is as follows. Resolution number 2026-40, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley establishing a preferential parking zone fee and interim Public Works Director Jay Spurgeon And Deputy Public Works Director of Administration Lori Volmer are here to present this item.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:44:30

Thank you before we begin are there any ex parte communications to report? Seeing none, we may move forward thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:44:40

Good evening again and I'll be brief. September last year ordinance 1365 was adopted establishing a preferential parking program The first folks to come forward were from Brandon Avenue. They petitioned for a preferential parking permit zone in February, earlier this year and then a resolution was adopted establishing that zone and tonight we're here to set fees for the program.

So first out of the gate, Brandon Avenue Their street is on the right-hand side. They're adjacent to Hillside Middle School, which is off of Fitzgerald Road between Erringer and Sycamore. Because they are proximate to the middle school it's very convenient for parents to come and park and or stop along both sides of their street in the mornings for drop off and in the afternoons especially for pickup.

It really does adversely impact the residents' use of their street, and it's an example of a situation that this ordinance intends to address. So to set fees, we wanna start with full cost recovery of course. So a cost analysis was done by the city's fee consultants, the same consultant working on updating city-wide fees which I think is coming back in a couple months to you.

So they looked at staff time and material costs to set fees for an application, the application fee Sign installation and then a permit fee. Start with the signs, the placement of the signs for Brandon Avenue there will be seven signs installed Some of them will be installed on existing infrastructure such as poles already in place and streetlights and a block wall.

A couple of them will be on signs, on new poles. So this is important to note because going forward and in this case too the sign fee is set which I'll get to in a second but the actual conditions of the infrastructure on any particular street would likely decrease the cost of sign installation and that's true here as well. This is what the signs will be installing, restricting any stopping and parking as well between those hours on school days except by permit. These signs were ready to install tomorrow and school starts on Wednesday so in advance The school district has sent this notice out to all the parents at school, informing them that they will no longer be able to do their drop-off and pickup on Brandon Avenue.

And these are the permits. They're kind of cute, see? Hang in your car. The green are for residents. Each home is Able to get up to three of the green resident permits and up to two of the yellow visitor permits. So, to the costs again full cost recovery we've provided two options for council to consider to adopt the fees for this program. So full cost is application fee of $324.

Signs would cost $490 each, but again depending on the infrastructure the total costs may be less. For instance here seven signs at 490 is more like 3400. The actual cost for Brandon is 1900 because we can reuse poles and street lights. Permit fees, $37 for the first permit and then $10 for each additional that they might want of the green or the yellow. The second option is partial cost recovery, similar fees except that the one-time sign costs would be covered by the city.

This is actually very common in other agencies that have this program that they do not charge the residents for the one-time upfront sign installation costs. And then each year there'll be annual renewals, they will have to get a new expiration date sticker on their permits and that would be $27 per home cost. One of the residents, Mr. Betty is here he came down to see you and from Brandon Avenue and we're happy to answer any questions that concludes our present part.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:50:08

Thank you are there any questions of staff from council members? Council Member Ayala

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:50:15

I know we're talking about the cost but I also have questions about the implementation so the Brandon Avenue residents came Did they pay the fee at that time? Like the application fee.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:50:31

Good question, they did not. At that time we had not set fees and in fact I think it was anticipated there would only be a permit fee as part of the program again similar to other

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:50:43

agencies. So my question is for any other street that comes up they turn in the application what happens if no one pays even the application fee

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:50:54

Well it wouldn't move forward then. Should you adopt a fee schedule that includes an application fee, they would need to pay that at the time a petition is submitted so that it covers the cost for staff to put it all together and bring it to council.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:09

And you're dividing the fee amongst each of those dwellings?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:51:14

Well that's up to the applicants to come up with that amount of money In Brandon Avenue's case. There's 12 residents 11 petitioners, so they would have divided it up by So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:26

really so we leave it up to that community to somehow say okay We gathered up the money to give to you so it could just be me saying hey Hey I've just offered it up for my community and here's my check right and

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:51:39

You could. One residence could want it bad enough to pay the whole amount, sure.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed2:51:44

Okay. That really was the question was I did not want work to commence until at least the application fees were actually paid. Otherwise we eat 100% of the cost even if we decide not to charge them for the signs on the poles? Correct. You have your money.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:52:12

Are you done? Yeah, okay thank you. Mayor Pro Tem Litzter.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:52:17

So I first of all want to take a slight issue with one of your statements and maybe it's just my understanding. I disagree a little bit the background statement suggesting that this was the intention in this ordinance because my understanding at the intention the preferential parking zones was set specifically when residences were being impacted by overdeveloped apartments, residences next door and the parking was going to impede them overnight et cetera and take away their parking.

But that was my understanding of the ordinance originally we've now extrapolated it to parks and schools et cetera and maybe businesses and I just want to be sure that we're careful with our understanding of the purpose initially. That being said I know this passed and I am sure it's been implemented very well, and I've also shared previously that it's a safe place for students but that aside.

I was trying to understand better that application fee, and your question was actually very good because I assumed that meant each household had to pay an application fee of $326. You're saying the application fee for the entire group is one amount of $326? Is that correct? I

not transcribed≈5s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:53:48

misread,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:53:51

misunderstood that as I read initially the report so I appreciate that clarification. So that can be divided up however they want or in is it and do we assuming we and by the way I should say even though though I still take issue at the intention of this parking arts I don't want to impose undue hardship on a residence. So, I want to make that very clear. I'm not looking to gouge them but I guess I'm trying to understand for this instance if we approve the reduced amount that $326 amount do we decide it gets divided between the 12 or who just doesn't go forward until someone pays it?

I'm getting the nodding from the mayor and our legal staff, and our attorney. Okay so let me just here's a question then what happens if someone who signed the petition to give us a great idea suddenly decides you know I don't want to pay $36 or whatever we decide that annual I want to be sure that they no longer than can park in front of their house correct?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:55:02

If a homeowner does not have a permit, one of these, then during the restricted hours they can be cited just like anybody from outside of the neighborhood. They need to have this to park on the street.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:55:17

Okay and the restricted hours are exactly what? 630?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:55:23

Yeah for this circumstance...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:55:26

And did we set that? Did they set that? Did they ask for that time? How was that time set?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:55:32

So the ordinance doesn't set any particular times or restrictions. When someone comes in with a petition and then there's a following resolution which was passed on June 22nd for amendment, that's where the specifics of whether it's no parking, no stopping... I mean it could be a no parking restriction. In this case it's no stopping and these hours were I think requested by the residents but they could be different for each case.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:56:00

Okay, so that's where the time set was. Okay, thank you.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:56:05

Thank you any other questions from Council? If not at this time I would like to open the hearing for anyone in the City Council Chambers waiting to be heard on this matter and Madam Clerk do we have a speaker?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:56:16

Yes Madam Mayor we do have one speaker card here.

2:56 – 3:0219 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:56:31

Sorry. Regarding the application fee, we got the notice of it last week and we've already raised the 324. So...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed2:56:47

Do you have that in your hand right now? Yeah.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:56:51

So like we're kind of just want this over because it's been 10 years Parents use our street as a literal extension of the school. So yeah, we've had mailboxes broken. One of my residents even had a garage damaged so we're kind of sick and I just wanted to be over Oh, one more thing. We weren't told about the 324 beforehand so a couple of my neighbors were told me to ask if we can get the first year like waived for the permits because we all paid into this right now but I was told to ask.

Okay thank you.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:57:41

Thank you. Does staff desire to respond any comments or issues? So I'm sorry, you don't have any more. We don't have anyone on the phone. We have

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role2:57:51

no one

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:57:52

on call. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:57:53

Sorry. Yeah.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:57:53

Sorry, Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed2:57:54

Virginia. And and I'm impressed that the residents went ahead and raised their $324 application fee. He is correct we hadn't told him that up front when they circulated their petition so that's something to think about in terms of maybe if you want to waive that or not but we'll work with Mr. Betty and the other residents in terms of receiving that What we need to go forward in receiving it and then issuing their permits as they come in.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role2:58:24

All right, thank you. Are there any other further comments or questions from City Council? Council Member Rhoads

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:58:30

Thank you Madam Mayor. I actually have a question for the resident. It's being recommended by staff that we forego the cost of implementing the signs if we were to assign the burden of the $1,900 to the neighborhood would that make you want and not put in this parking ordinance?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:58:57

As in

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:58:59

So to install all the signs, it's going to cost $1,900. And that cost could go to the neighborhood or staff is recommending that we forego that cost. If it were a cost on the neighborhood do you think the neighborhood would not want to do the parking ordinance?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:59:17

Yeah because $2,000 just keep your property like from what's called To like basically make sure your property is not trampled on seems pretty steep. It seems kind of outrageous, so I don't think my neighbors would be OK with that. They took a while just to get them to get the 324.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed2:59:39

So then thank you for the honesty and being forthcoming with that. I would say to my peers that in the issue of fairness and any time that we have a moment where we're going to ask to put a burden on or to give do a benefit for a certain neighborhood and put that burden on the whole city, I'm fundamentally opposed to that action much like we have with the landscape districts and so on. We're not charging appropriate amount to the residents that are benefiting from it and it's being spread around the whole city in this particular case. It would be my recommendation that if this problem is so egregious that we need to have This parking permit set up for the neighborhood, which I agree.

cohorts to not take staff recommendation and actually pass that burden on. And then the neighborhood can get together and decide whether you want to move forward or not based on that. And those are all my comments.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:00:59

All right, thank you. Mayor Pro Tem Litster?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:01:07

Actually, I'm going to withdraw my question because now I'm thinking about your comments. And I forgot what my question was so I'm sorry. All

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:01:19

right thank you then. Council Member Aiella?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:01:25

This is a good discussion but I agree with Council Member Rhoads' general philosophy What I would say is that we did not publish these prices beforehand. So what I'm thinking possibly, is could we waive the signage fee for this project? Because now all of the public knows going forward if they were to do this it's gonna cost this much per sign. So would the council maybe say for this one will make because we didn't publish it before So they didn't know what the price was gonna be. That we will waive the fee for the signs, but going forward everyone's on notice that we now have published rates.

3:02 – 3:0723 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:02:15

If I may and staff might have this, might be wanting to say this if that was a question to staff is there is not a known cost to the signs based on the infrastructure that's available in the neighborhood so it couldn't be known ahead of time what that cost is going to be? Well we know how

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:02:30

much it is per sign

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:02:33

So we know what the maximum would be, 170 per sign. And they could say how many signs were needed but it could be less if there's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:02:40

infrastructure. I could go with your argument on the application fee since we hadn't figured that out yet this being the first one and waiving the application fee, I get that now that they know what it is and they had to scramble to get it together. But the signage, it's going to be unique and different for each neighborhood

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:03:04

I understand what you're saying, but we would be able to go out and do a preliminary and say okay this area is going to need 10 signs. I have seven poles so I can calculate the cost. Unfortunately we did not release any fee schedule to the residents but yet we approved it already. Well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:03:22

and I think we erred personally in bringing it And voting on Brandon, we should have done that initially.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:03:29

It's a learning

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:03:30

curve.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:03:32

This was a learning curve for us. So I do tend to agree with Councilmember Ayala in the fact that this particular census is the first time and we did not disclose the cost to them prior to them coming to us and approving it. I feel we should waive the 1900 but we could have it written in the application from now on, that the cost of the signs are very and you will be responsible for the fees on those also. That would be my recommendation.

Any other comments? Okay let me see where we are on our... Are there any further comments? Council Member City Manager?

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:04:20

I was just going to say that. I think, um, I just wanted to make sure that we brought up the point and it was already brought up that we could include the information on the application of how much the science tend to average right so if it's $490 for the sign depending upon a number of signs in your that are already existing in your neighborhood or polls. You know sign fees will vary. However, each sign is estimated to cost XYZ dollars And the neighborhood would be responsible for that, you know presuming that's what the council decides to do going forward and you know obviously even make an exception for this one this evening, but I think I Agree with what the council has said that obviously Not all of the information was brought forward at the time that Brandon came forward and all of the costs But I think now that we have that information, we know that is going to be the one variable.

The application fee is going to be the same each time because that's cost recovery for staff. The permit themselves are going to be the same cost. It's just going to

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:05:25

I was just going to share that the one thing we also haven't discussed is that this creates enforcement costs that are not factored in at all. And so, it's just an awareness of that. Just wanted to share that obviously as we're not passing that on as well and I don't know that we would or could or should but just an awareness.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:05:46

That would be very difficult to estimate. Are there any further questions or comments from City Council members? If not this hearing is now closed and I will now entertain a motion. All

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:06

right, I'll make the motion that we go with option two which is direct staff to implement option one for full recovery of costs for preferential parking zones in the future. For this instance we will waive the cost of the signs but the rest of the fees stay in place.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:06:26

Call for the vote.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:28

And can I make one clarification before you move on? Yes. Essentially it would be to adopt the resolution to establish it, which is number one and then would be number three out of the recommendations to implement option two for the partial recovery.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:06:45

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:46

So

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:47

moved. Oil recovery only partial recovery on this one

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:51

Correct on this, well every time we come back for another one you'll have to revisit this so it's a new resolution.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:06:58

That's right because we have to approve everyone of these

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:07:00

parking. That's correct. So it would only be partial, you're only dealing with this particular property if that makes any sense for this resolution?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:07:07

Yes but I think what I'm hearing Councilmember Judge state is that in the future the application will outline all the intended expenses that are attributed to what they're asking, which includes the signage. But

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:07:21

we can direct staff to please include that in the future so we can do that. So we do have a first and second is everyone clear? All right call for the vote

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

3:07 – 3:1721 turns

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:07:43

The motion passes unanimously.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:07:45

Thank you.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:07:48

Madam Mayor and members of the City Council, next on the agenda is item 7, the consent calendar and there are two resolutions for your consideration this evening. I apologize three. Consent, since item 6 resolution number 2026-41. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with OVIVO USA LLC and Coombs Service Group DBA Coombs Construction Engineers without the need for competitive bidding for the B&R East Basin aerator replacement project in the amount of $495,093.51.

Consent item 7 has two resolutions. Resolution number 2026-37, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Simi Valley approving an updated citywide publicly available pay schedule effective June 29th, 2026 in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 2 Section 570.5 And resolution number 2026-38, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley approving an updated citywide publicly available pay schedule effective July 13th, 2026 in accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 2 Section 570.5 and consent item 8 resolution number 2026-42, a resolution of the City Council of the city of Simi Valley confirming and renewing the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:09:19

Thank you, Madam Clerk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:09:21

I'll move consent. Second.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:09:25

Call for the vote.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:09:32

The motion passes unanimously.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:09:34

Thank

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:09:34

you. Madam Mayor and members of City Council next on the agenda is item 10A city council member reports.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:09:41

All right thank you Council Member Aiello you are up first.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed3:09:44

Thank you July 30th I attended the swearing in for two newest senior police officers, Jay King and Nicholas Ross. On July 31st, I attended the film Simi Valley Committee meeting also celebrated my 52nd birthday. On August 2nd, I attended the Peggy Sadler Memorial Scholarship Award Ceremony. So congratulations to those students. It was also the first year they awarded one to a male student and he was there.

On August 4th, I attended National Night Out. August 5th, just a general meeting with our city manager. I also went to the Park District meeting to welcome our new district manager Steve Wright August 6th, I attended the Ventura County Community Foundation Board meeting. Our speaker was actually Supervisor Kelly Long. She spoke on the importance of agriculture in Ventura County. It was really a great talk. On August 8th, i attended our Youth Council Orientation Day where all of the incoming youth council members had their orientation and learned all about what they're going to do for the next year.

And today, I attended a data center webinar focused on what different cities across the countries are facing and different legislation that is coming out in response to that. And that's my report.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:11:21

Thank you. Council Member Rhodes?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:11:22

Thank you Madam Mayor. On Tuesday July 28th, I attended a webinar on the I sat in mostly to listen and see what the input was. Also that day, I met with some staff at the senior center to talk about The pancake breakfast that was alluded to earlier, supporting the Meals on Wheels program which we know needs some subsidies. On October 10th we'll be having a pancake breakfast over at the Senior Center everyone is invited please come eat lots of pancakes We get lots of volunteers from like the ROTC to come and serve at the tables, and our seniors really enjoy that. But you don't have to be a senior to eat. All-you-can-eat pancakes, 10 bucks. Okay on Thursday July 30th I did a swing by the new swearing in ceremony for two officers, I think just promoting but I had to jump right out but it was important to go and shake hands On Tuesday, August 4th I attended the brief but poignant ceremony of the Officer Michael Clark Memorial Ceremony at the police station and it's been many years and we should never forget.

That evening I attended the national night out up at the town center. Fantastic job done by the crew that's putting that on and I think we get such great attendance because they moved it up to the mall, and I like that move. Wednesday, August 5th Mayor Pro Tem Lister and I had a couple of ad hoc committee meetings for the Hockey League coming to town First we met with staff and then we met with a member of the community that had some unique insights on that.

Oh And that evening I attended the Rancho Simi Recreation Park District Board of Directors Meeting where the new district manager was being introduced and we had a good showing there to congratulate that new district manager on Thursday, August 6th while this is not a council thing the evening Rotary Club led by Mike court and The rotary club in Simi Valley at the noon Club. We were able to do shoes for little souls where we assigned Shoppers to kids, and each got to spend about $300 in back-to-school and running around Kohl's trying to find deals. It was moving and super effective.

That afternoon, Mayor Parvin had a popsicle party here in the courtyard where I dressed up like a popsicle. Maybe that's a different story. On Friday August 7th, again this is not council related but we went to the Ventura County Fair. It was livestock auction day and I put this out into the world because Well, okay. So there's a bad combination of beer, credit card and an auction card.

And I have five pigs that I bought that day. And so if anybody would like to go in halves on a side of pig, I'll have extra but we did support a lot of kids and one was one that wouldn't make it to auction. So we bought it off the auction so they would still get their money for participating in the program. And then today I had a conversation with Komiya Jisei, the executive director of SCAG over some ideas for the upcoming first RENA subcommittee meeting this week. And that is the end of my report.

not transcribed≈15s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:15:32

Green Acres has great butcher service? Yes

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:15:35

they

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:15:36

do. They just

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:15:36

don't

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:15:36

do the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed3:15:36

kill.

ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:15:37

Oh sorry. All right thank you Councilmember Judge.

UnidentifiedCity ClerkProposed · by role3:15:42

Thank you Madam Mayor. On Thursday, July 20th I too attended the promotion swearing-in ceremony for the two training officers that were promoted. On Saturday August 1st I had the honor and privilege to judge the Miss Teen and Miss Moorpark in Simi Valley over in Moorpark at Moorpark High School and I want to congratulate from Simi Valley Aubrey Tuscawano, she was Miss Teen Simi Valley. And from Moorpark, Miss Teen Moorpark was Lan Nguyen.

Miss Moorpark is, and this is the more of the older girls, I think they're both over 18. Miss Moorpark is Raylene Sitchmiller. And Miss Simi Valley this year is Diana Lucy. On Sunday, August 2nd I too attended the Peggy Sadler Scholarship Fund Award and I was very impressed to have two people from Simi Valley get it. It's great. Tuesday, August 4th I attended the Michael Clark Memorial Ceremony down here at the police station.

That evening I also went to the National Night Out, stayed for a little while I got to hear a great rendition of the National Anthem and saw all the stuff out there and said hi to everybody that was there, helped set up with the Police Foundation. By the time I got there they were already set up so I got there just in time. And that's the end of my report. Thank you.

3:17 – 3:262 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed3:17:09

Thank you. Starting with Thursday, July 3rd I too attended the swearing in ceremony thank you Chief for all the good things happening there Sunday August 2nd I to attend the Piggy Sadler Memorial Scholarship piggy of course was instrumental in forming our city and being involved for many, many years. What I loved about the recipients or at least their requirement those who were chosen had to write an essay on the importance of voting and that was their topic and so appreciate our young people putting thought and effort into that.

And then I think the recipients one came from Simi Valley High School another from Murrow High School another from Monta Vista So, some good local talent. August 3 the mayor and I met with and see manager right met with the representative from the governor's office victory is more Alice who is here representing Our concerns and so I appreciated what the discussion was about several items. In the end, I suggested that he needs to work on fixing our PSPS events but I don't know that he had a specific answer but he heard our concerns and they were registered I just want you to know that we're out there.

On Tuesday, August the 4th again in the morning attended Michael Clark's memorial ceremony appreciate that it takes place annually thank you and also he was recognized at the National Night Out Thank you to all who participated. I went around and learned a few things from the Department of Alcohol, various things that I... It was informative, instructive and a lot of fun. I ran into a family who said what is this? And I had to explain what National Mid-Out was and its origins and how we are currently celebrating it. That was fun.

On Wednesday August 5th as Council Member Rocky Rhodes indicated, we had two ad hoc committee meetings and are taking our tasks serious. We want to be sure Things developed where they need to and correctly. Also met, I was also there to recognize our new RSRPD's Board Director, the new District Manager Stephen Wright on Thursday August 6th That morning I attended the State of the College Address at Moorpark College and I will tell you that was very worthwhile.

Great things happening there at Moorpark College, not a lot of new information proffered but We did, I did get to see their portable stage that they're going to be using for their outdoor temporary amphitheater. They also spoke again about their two bachelor's programs. Their cybersecurity program, I should mention begins in the spring of 2027 and so those who are interested are there now collecting or surveying interest? I think that they are going to start a cohort of about 40-50 students each semester one in the spring of 27 and then the fall of 28.

Also attended the popsicle party and had enjoyed a lovely strawberry popsicle for the record. Appreciated my bi-weekly meeting with Senior Manager Argerbright, and then that evening also attended the tri-agency meeting with the mayor. Topics discussed there were varied but they included more in depth eBike discussion about how we coordinate that Some things about homeless response.

And then after that I attended the goodbye gathering for Amy Curnow those who know her, I think all of us here know that she's contributed much to our community and will be missed as she heads off to Oklahoma. On Friday, August the seventh. This is not necessary see function by attended a kindergarten orientation at Hollow Hills. Yes it's time they're getting started back up and that was a fun experience.

Saturday is when I went to the Ventura County Fair. Somehow, I couldn't get my brood to get back to the animals and so I need to do better. I'm sorry Council Member Rhodes, I wasn't there representing the most important part of the fair. She could have split it with you. But appreciated that invitation from the fair for us to attend that and also I made a mental note the next time I'm going to investigate taking the train out there that really would be the way to see it Backtracking also into the Youth Council Orientation Day, I want to thank Brian for doing such a beautiful job with basically administering that with his group. And my takeaway is that one of the best ways to understand parliamentary procedure is to do it by putting trail mix together.

So I will tell you that he had some very innovative ways of teaching how government runs. Beautifully done. And then, actually I think that was it for my report. I do want to mention of course that school starts this Wednesday August the 12th. Be prepared for a little bit more drive time and be more careful as we're out there so that concludes my report thank you.

not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
not transcribed≈8s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedDee Dee CavanaughMayorProposed · by role3:22:27

Thank You Mayor Pro Tem My report on Wednesday, July 29th. I had the pleasure of meeting with Simi Youth Baseball's 16 and under all-star team on their way to the World Series for Pony Ball. So City Manager Argybright and I were here what a great group of young men coaches parents it was really a great sendoff They had such fun fighting over who got to be the mayor and who got to be a city council member, but it was good luck for them. And we will be honoring them in two weeks on the 24th they'll be coming here so that'll be very special for all of us to get to meet them. One of them is the son of a former city employee and the other one is the grandson of one of my co-workers so kind of put a little bit of a personal spin on it.

Unfortunately I missed Peggy Sadler's event, I had grandma duty pulled on me at the last minute. So August 3rd I attended the meeting with the governor's office Victor Reyes also with our city manager and Mayor Pro Tem And I will compliment our city manager was on top of it. She had her list of things to cover and what she wanted to say and got some answers out of him, so he did a great job.

On Tuesday, August 4th, I also attended National Night Out. That is such a fun event. It really, really is. It gets bigger and better every year. Thank you, Chief for your team that put that on. My favorite part was the pushups contest with the kids. So it was an officer against two or three little kids It was wonderful and then a, I don't know if anyone knew who she was. A lady came out with a $300 gift card to Larson's and said she wanted to see the officers all push up against each other so congrats to Senior Officer King he did a great job he won that so he was good he was really good On Wednesday, August 5th I also attended the Board of Directors meeting to welcome our new District Manager at Rancho Simi Steve Wright. They were all laughing at each other because they used the tagline you're the right man for the job!

I know everyone else they then they argued about who got to say it so but it was a great welcome. He was very pleased and honored to have City Council there and to have some school board members there, and then the next day he got to meet us at the Tri-Agency meeting so trial by fire. I think we had a great meeting we're accomplishing things in those again a lot of focus was on e-bikes as homeless cleanup in the Arroyo those type of things but It's easier when we all work together so that we're not each doing the same project. You know, we're combining efforts and so you get a lot more done that way.

And that is the actual... That's actually the end of my report for this month or excuse me this past two weeks. So on to item next item is 10B are there any requests for future agenda items? Seeing none, I would like to adjourn this meeting in memory of Richard L. Strayer otherwise known as Dick. Dick was a longtime Rotarian and the Simi Sunrise Club and a professor at Cal State Northridge and just a really funny guy he had a great sense of humor always laughing always smiling so we will adjourn in memory of Dick Strayer thank you