BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 May 19, 2026

UnGovr Transcript

iHow this transcript is madeUnGovr transcribes the official recording with automated speech-to-text, separates speakers by voice, and matches voices to the seated roster. Names and attributions are AI estimates and may contain errors.Verify any quote yourself: click anywhere in the transcript and the official video jumps to that exact moment, so you can check any quote against the recording.
  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

0:20 – 0:2713 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed20:58

Good morning everybody. We are going to get started here. I'm calling to order the Board of Supervisors meeting of May 19th, 2026. Madam Clerk please call the roll.

Roll call — called by Matt LaVere
Show transcript
Supervisor LaVere? Here. Supervisor Long? Here. Supervisor Parvin? Here Supervisor Lopez? Here Chair Garrell? I'm here
Pledge of Allegianceceremonial · click to expand · ≈18s recited, not transcribed
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed21:24

Please if you can stand, please do so remove your hats and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.

All right, thank you. This morning we have a moment of inspiration that is fantastic in Ventura County. We love our nurses and this week recognizes nurses with National Nurses Week and honors the incredible nurses who serve our community each and every day. I'd like to invite up right now to the microphone on the podium please Salita Dobrosky, Cynthia Fenton, Genevieve Zepeda Danielle Gable and Sherry Block.

And this year's theme, The Power of Nurses is a reminder of the extraordinary role nurses play in the lives of patients and families throughout Ventura County whether in hospitals clinics schools community settings home care nurses are often the people rely upon most during life's most difficult and vulnerable moments Nurses provide far more than medical care. They provide compassion, comfort, professionalism and hope to those they serve. Their dedication, resilience and humanity make an immeasurable difference in our community every single day.

We are so grateful to these outstanding nurses in our community especially those of the Ventura County Health Care Agency and to all nurses throughout our county. Thank you for all that you do for keeping our community healthy safe and cared for With that, I think do you want to start with a video? Okay. Let's start with the video and then we'll do some remarks if we could. All right, let's cue that up Brendan

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 3Proposed23:48

One way I make an impact every day as a nurse is by advocating for our patients and educating them on resources offered to the community. I like seeing them when they come back, and they'll be like, yay! You helped me last time. Thank you. And I just like being

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 4Proposed24:07

their help. I think nurses are powerful because we're problem solvers. That's how we get the job done.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 5Proposed24:17

It keeps me going and gets me up in the morning because I know I'm making a difference. The most important thing is that these patients are being treated with respect, giving them their dignity back that they often have lost during their lifespan. And they truly, truly appreciate it when they feel the compassion and kindness that I can give to them.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 6Proposed24:51

Hospital nursing is fantastic. It's one of the only places where you can make an extreme difference in somebody's health care and life in under 12 hours. There's nothing else in the world like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 7Proposed25:04

I had the Gold Coast Health Insurance, and the county took care of me when I wasn't making any money. And so I really wanted to work for the county to try and like pay it forward, help other people that were in my situation. That's what I love about my work.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 8Proposed25:23

It means every mother, every child, every father Every family, it doesn't matter where your story comes from is that there's always someone who has always got your corner and refuses to give up on

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 9Proposed25:40

you. I love being a nurse here at Employee Health. I love serving my community. The one way that I feel the most fulfilled here serving my community is definitely helping introduce new employees to our community

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 10Proposed25:59

to Ventura County. It's an honor to like help out nurses and to help out our own people, our own employees being like with Employee Health Services it's just kind of nice to give back to our own employees.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 11Proposed26:14

I used to work in the hospital before with the babies both jobs like in the hospital and over here at Employee Health Services I feel is both rewarding because You know, nursing is not just a profession for me. It's like a way of life and I'm practicing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 12Proposed26:38

I take care of a lot of pediatric patients and the moms and the dads are like we couldn't have done this without your help. And then I feel like I get to help people. I get to connect them when they have a hard time getting connected with physicians or anything like that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 13Proposed27:02

I chose to work in county when I was in nursing school, in 2000. I saw a resident helping a CNA with their chemistry homework. And I was like, this is the place for me because everyone was so approachable and they really are. Another reason is because I wanted to serve my community and take care of people.

0:28 – 0:3314 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:00

That's great. Please invite some comments.

PresenterSalida Dabrowski I'mpublic health nursing and we're going to do just quick introductions of our nursProposedself-stated28:09

Thank you so much Chair Garrell Board of Supervisors CEO Johnson my name is Salida Dabrowski I'm the director of public health nursing and we're going to do just quick introductions of our nursing leadership team

PresenterDanielle Gable I'mHospitalsProposedself-stated28:20

Good morning Supervisors, Dr. Johnson. We are so grateful to be here my name is Danielle Gable I'm a proud nurse and the new CEO of The Hospitals.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed28:33

Congratulations.

CommentCynthia FentonProposedself-stated28:34

Good morning Board, Dr. Johnson, I'm Cynthia Fenton the Chief Nursing Executive for Ambulatory Care.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed28:43

Good morning. It's a pleasure and honor to be here. Sherry Block, the interim chief nurse executive for VCMC in Santa Paula Hospitals.

CommentJennifer ZapataProposedself-stated28:53

Good morning everyone. I'm Jennifer Zapata, clinical nurse manager for Ventura County Behavioral Health.

PresenterDanielle Gable I'mHospitalsProposedself-stated29:00

And we know our time is very limited so we're each going to just share one aspect of nursing in our various departments that were proud of and thank you for having us.

PresenterSalida Dabrowski I'mpublic health nursing and we're going to do just quick introductions of our nursProposedself-stated29:11

I think we do have a PowerPoint ready to go.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed29:14

Okay, all right.

PresenterSalida Dabrowski I'mpublic health nursing and we're going to do just quick introductions of our nursProposedself-stated29:18

Today we are honored to recognize Nurses Week 2026 and to celebrate the extraordinary contributions of the nurses who serve our community each and every day. Nurses are the backbone of our health system, providing skilled care, compassion, and unwavering commitment in every setting from our hospitals and clinics to our public health programs and community services.

Over the past year, our nurses have continued to demonstrate resilience, innovation, and leadership in the face of evolving healthcare challenges. Their dedication ensures that individuals and families across our county receive safe, high quality patient-centered care. As we mark Nurses Week we extend our deep gratitude to these professionals who strengthen our community's well-being and embody the very best of public service. Today we ask the board to join us in honoring and celebrating our nurses for their outstanding contributions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 14Proposed30:10

All right, the one area that we've chosen to highlight for both VCMC and Santa Paula hospitals is shared governance. And the endeavor was led by Dr. Daniel Gable and Dr. Kelly Johnson who is here with us today as well. Shared Governance in Nursing is a participatory management model that empowers bedside nurses to have an active voice in clinical decision making practice standards in the work environment It shifts leadership from a top down hierarchy to a collaborative partnership and the benefits of this most importantly are improved patient outcomes, higher job satisfaction and it actually puts us on a path to receive magnet recognition as we move forward that celebrates excellence in nursing and patient quality of care.

Thank you.

CommentCynthia FentonProposedself-stated31:06

Across Ventura County, ambulatory care nursing teams have led important improvements in quality access to care and patient safety. This year our clinics have achieved 90 percentile in our QIPP performance in multiple areas through an evidence-based practice strong interdisciplinary collaboration One thing that we're super proud of is our launch of our HPV self swab program that extends cervical cancer screening for patients who may decline the traditional exams. Helping reduce barriers to care while supporting patient's dignity, comfort and early detection. Next slide.

Safe Harbor Program provides our trauma-informed forensic nursing services for victims of violence and abuse throughout Ventura County. We have five specialized forensic nurses and one amazing RN coordinator. Nurses are available 24 hours a day to provide compassion examinations, forensic evidence collection, advocacy, and supportive services. The program works closely with law enforcement district attorney offices And other community partners to support patient safety, healing and investigations.

Whole person care team provides a long support services through enhanced management. Enhanced care management is a patient centered approach designed to support high need managed care plan members by addressing both clinical and nonclinical needs the program provides coordinated physical behavioral and dental care through an interdisciplinary team and community based support Each enrolled member is assigned a dedicated care manager to help improve and coordinate access to services and overall health outcome.

PresenterSalida Dabrowski I'mpublic health nursing and we're going to do just quick introductions of our nursProposedself-stated32:56

The highlight for public health is very timely. California Department of Public Health Emergency Preparedness Training Workshop, our sheltering system was presented to the CDPH emergency preparedness workshop in Sacramento in June of 2025 The audience included hundreds of people from departments, agencies and municipalities from all over the state. Our very own Kyle Culkin, senior public health nurse received an award for innovative solutions with our alternate care site and medical shelter program. The sheltering presentation led to meetings and communications with several agencies and departments throughout California that are developing their sheltering system based on the VCPH model.

0:33 – 0:4919 turns

CommentJennifer ZapataProposedself-stated33:38

We would like to recognize the VCB nursing team for their leadership, service and continued commitment to our community. Our nurses play an important role in supporting safe high quality person centered behavioral health care for Ventura County residents. They strengthen care coordination by supporting communication among clients treatment teams programs and community partners They also contribute to system improvement by helping align nursing practice with CalAIM, CARE Act, FSP program, person-centered care priorities. Through training operational support and ongoing development of nursing standards of practice they help promote clinical excellence, stop support and safer care environments.

PresenterDanielle Gable I'mHospitalsProposedself-stated34:25

Okay, and last but definitely not least we want to recognize the nurses of the Ventura County Health Care Plan. They are undergoing a leadership transition in their area but they continue to provide really robust support and all of us who are recipients benefit from that. All right so thank you to all the nurses of Ventura County and thank you for your time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed34:47

Yeah thank you doctor. Madam clerk are there any public comments on this agenda item.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed34:58

Check girl during a request to speak for this item thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed35:01

Any comments from the board. We do have a proclamation that we'd love to come down and present to you and all of the nurses who are gathered here today. And I just want to say that we're so grateful for everything, and this PowerPoint was a reminder of just how influential nurses are across the entire spectrum. Everything from forensic health to behavioral health and seniors and youth and everything. So thank you very much for being our healers and our lifesavers. We're going to come down. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed35:48

Okay. Sorry.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed35:58

One, two, three. Hold it. One, two, three. Smiling.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
Presentermy name is BillCounty Executive Office Human Resources Division I am here today to present theProposedself-stated36:35

One,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 17Proposed36:36

two, three.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed37:42

We're going to take things a little bit out of order, but we are going to do. We are going to do I'm going to punt over to the CEO at this time and maybe have the fire chief come up. I think he's here so maybe this would be good opportunity as before I do though I'm footprint of the Sandy Fire yesterday and at the command post. And what I saw was amazing. It was just inspirational ballet of professionalism, precision and heroism all together. And I don't say that lightly.

I saw the airdrops, I saw the strike teams stopping the fire before they got to the homes. In one instance I looked up on a ridge line it was a razor-thin ridgeline and it looked like there was a tiny structure up on the top right where the flames were shooting up and I said what is that a structure up there? And an Oxnard firefighter one of our mutual I'm telling you it was out of a movie and some so impressed with our first responders led by the Ventura County Fire Department supported by the sheriff.

All of the agencies throughout the county that were there, I saw all of them and then our mutual aid responders from outside the county. So Chief thank you for leading the show and look forward to getting an update on the Sandy Fire.

not transcribed≈11s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
GuestDustin Gardner your countyFire ChiefProposedself-stated39:25

Chair Groh, thank you for kicking it off. You know we don't get a... We don't claim to be ballerinas very often so that was a nice start.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed39:32

Well I didn't think you looked like ballerinas personally. I was watching you guys out there too and it looked awesome but it wasn't a ballerina

GuestDustin Gardner your countyFire ChiefProposedself-stated39:42

So I'll kick it off. Chair Garrell, members of the board, Dr. Johnson, good morning for the record Dustin Gardner your county fire chief and with me is Assistant Fire Chief of Operations Dan Horton. I'll give a quick update on the Sandy Fire. It's currently sitting at 1385 acres with 5% containment Our crews took advantage of the increase in RH and the decrease in winds last night. They worked through the night, and I'm sure as you were all watching, you saw the three heavy helitankers flying all night long doing coordinated night dropping which again is such a cutting edge Advancing technology and ability, it truly remains a game changer that we can fly those things all night under direct supervision. We have more than 750 firefighters out on the incident last night and through today.

The fire is a long ways from being controlled right? We've got it pulled into the box and now we're getting the box built around it but you know that country. It's steep, it's rocky, its remote and we have north and northeast winds returning again today so They'll be in for a fight again today with single digit RHS and spotting up to a half a mile like we saw yesterday.

Our fire operations have moved away from a life-saving structure defense posture into a direct fire line attack posture which, again we saw last night with the hand crews and the bulldozers going direct you will see them out there for the next few days. You will see a lot of line construction going in primary lines secondary line containment lines to keep that thing boxed in You'll also see secondary lines and tertiary lines getting opened up because that fire sits in two main critical spot, one keeping out of Santa Susanna Field Lab and out of Bell Canyon. And the other keeping it out of Lang Ranch Sunset Hills Oak Park so you'll see a lot of containment lines going in And I'll ask that all of our folks watching this and all of our folks at home continue to monitor because the fire is only 5% contained.

So let's stay on our toes, continue, you know, continue watching VC alert, continue watching the situation awareness updates and be prepared to move if told to do so. And I would also, I think a May fire. It's only mid-May and we're seeing a fire that was spotting half a mile out in front of itself. We're seeing this fire that openly ate through retardant lines all day long is... I think it's an opportunity for us to acknowledge a couple things. And one, Chief Horton had command of the Fire Department yesterday and did an extraordinary job with it. He was able to deploy... We deployed 50% of all the resources in the county to that fire We were able to deploy 50% plus have all of our partners but with deploying 50% of the resources in the county, we have to backfill all those stations.

And we have a labor force and a labor group that dropped everything they were doing and came in and backfilled. We didn't have a single empty station. Right. And that doesn't just happen, we know that doesn't happen by accident that happens because we have a workforce that's committed they're committed to living here they're committed to protecting their neighbors they're committed to serving and I want to thank this board for that because you all help set that stage so your continued support matters the support of our workforce matters and the fact That we had such great recall matters and I want to say thank you for that.

I want to also acknowledge the relationships, we talk about relationships all the time but the relationships you all have with Cal Fire with Cal OES with the governor's office for us to be able to get an FMAG submitted it within two-and-a-half hours of an FMAG submitted reviewed by Cal OES and then approved by FEMA is extraordinary and the resources that will bring back to the county because this was a 95% LRA fire Meaning that 95% of all suppression costs were coming directly out of the fire department.

That FMAG is extraordinary and that happens because folks are prepared. Our partners, our mutual aid partners. We had resources coming from Los Angeles City, LA County, Santa Barbara, Oxnard, Kern. They were sending everything they could without asking. We had aircraft coming over that hadn't been everybody was sending because we all knew we needed to keep these fires small because we've seen what they can do. I was getting calls from our public works director last night who is letting me know the status of tanks being filled and where his folks were operating. That's never happened before. So just the teamwork and the preparedness.

And then a continual message, and I heard Chair Gorrell mention it several times in the community hall last week to our communities about being prepared right? We saw yesterday 100 foot clearance works we saw yesterday home hardening works we saw yesterday that folks being ready to leave and evacuate works right? We had 7800 homes in the footprint of that fire And we lost one and one is always too many. And my heart goes out to the homeowners that lost their home and some we had some scared homeowners in Simi Valley last night. We saw it then. We always want them to be ready. We always want them to be prepared. We always want to be paying attention.

And then I think just an overall reminder is the support that you all give that Dr. Johnson, that you give for pulling this county together because it was a county response. It was County Fire. It was County Sheriff. It's County OES. It was County Public Works. Our health care agency standing up and we had animal shelters stood up last night. We had human shelter stood up last night. We had rehab centers stood up last night.

Traveling the country and doing this for a living there are very few places that do it with this kind of precision. So, that comes from your support so thank you for continuing to support those teams and building those teams. It was days like yesterday where it matters so we appreciate you. We appreciate all the support and I'm open for questions and we have Chief Horton here if we have specific Sandy questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed45:33

Thank You chief there was some public discussion on the source origin cause of the fire. Do you want to say anything about that?

GuestDustin Gardner your countyFire ChiefProposedself-stated45:40

So I will acknowledge yes, there was a I won't say conflicting but there was information given out on the source. Our fire cause investigators and Cal Fire are working together we won't well I'm going to say this the sources are the causes under investigation until we have a firm and complete rock solid case right before we announce it. So some news did go out yesterday about a probable cause and it is highly likely that probable cause was accurate but our investigators are going to lock that down before we say anything. Yeah all

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed46:11

right thank you keep us posted. I will for sure. Supervisor Long?

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.8846:15

Thank you. You know, I really appreciate the updates to our board. Thank you to Chair Garrell and Parvin. I understand how hard this is on our communities in our districts and I just want to say the confidence that we have in all of you is just I want to share that it was odd not to be at a CP this morning but it's not my district. But it was just great to know the confidence. I think that's really it, to have the FMAG so quickly gotten to us to make sure that we are doing everything, the fixed wings to be out as quickly as it was and also the coordination with all the teams with LA County. I know no one wants these fires to get to our residents and to make sure that whole boundary is really secure with the winds. I just really appreciate the objective and to make sure that people are not hurt, homes are not lost but that we take care of everything so i wanted to say thank you very much.

I know resources is a key issue and I think what we've done as a board has really helped to get us where we were for this fire so we could get it out as quickly as we can so I really want to say thank you very much in our public All public safety, public works, our sheriffs, our fire, everybody. I just want to say thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed47:39

Supervisor Portman?

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed47:40

Thank you. I had the opportunity to spend a few hours with Mr. Horton there, the assistant chief relative to the fire was very active at the time fact he took one of those videos that he shared while I was with him so but I wanted to take a moment to say that the residents of Simi Valley are so confident in the work that you do That I kept hearing that yesterday about how they trust you, how they believe there that you're the best fire department in the entire country. These are things I'm hearing from our residents and I wanted to say that your leadership yesterday where it was an action the whole team.

I saw all of them. I can't tell you how satisfying it is to know that we attacked it Everybody had our back and it's just wonderful that work that you do. And I wonder if people truly appreciate it, but under duress like they were and still are trying to find a hotel room last night working on trying to find them a hotel room last night. Thank you for all the work you do And in public works and all the dozers and all of the activity. And thank you for Lake Bard being so handy, right?

Because we had a nice reservoir filled with water that we needed and it was there for us. So appreciate all the work that you do. And I just want to thank you on behalf of the residents Simi Valley.

0:49 – 0:5418 turns

GuestDustin Gardner your countyFire ChiefProposedself-stated49:09

Supervisor, thank you for bringing that up and Lake Bard. Yes to have all those rotoring aircraft in the sky which is a miracle and a blessing all on its own but the fact that they open up to us and let us dip out of their water source and give us a two minute turnaround. That's extraordinary so again it's a team effort by all of us and it pulls on all of us and takes all of

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed49:36

Be safe out there. Thank you for everything you're doing and keep us posted how we can help you. Thank you. Well done, Dr. Johnson. I saw you out there too, Supervisor Parvin and yourself and so

let's move on to agenda item number five back to you Dr. Johnson for a gender review in the Levine Act disclosures. I'm gonna say are there any Levine Act disclosures by the members of the board?

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed50:07

None.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:09

Any by the members of the board? You want to do first?

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed50:11

Yes I'm going to be recusing myself on item 17. I received more than $500 within the past 12 months from Fence Factory Rentals.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:22

And I too need to recuse myself from item number 17 on the consent agenda for donation over $500 from R.A. Atmore & Sons, one of the named contractees in that item so... What's that? Thank you for putting that into the record as well

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed50:46

so both

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed50:48

of those were. Conflict me out

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
CommentDavid ShowalterProposed · by introduction51:13

You can vote on the rest of agenda item 17.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed51:16

That's good to know, thank you. So I would make it clear for the record that I would intend to recuse myself for those particular contracts.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed51:29

Perfect. Thank you Mr. Chair Good morning Supervisors, staff and all in attendance today. The agenda review for May 19th 2026 is as follows. Item 4 a moment of inspiration proclaiming may 6 to 12 2026 as National Nurses Week in Ventura County at PowerPoint presentation has been submitted. Item 10 county executive office receive and file fiscal year 26-27 Department Budget Presentations. Seven PowerPoint presentations have been submitted. Item 31, Supervisor Garrell. Presentation proclaiming the week of May 17th to 23rd, 2026 as National Public Works Week. One public comment letter has been submitted. Item 34, County Executive Office. Public hearing regarding adoption of resolutions establishing and amending the service rates and fees for various services at the county.

Watershed Protection District and Fire Protection District for fiscal year 26-27. A board letter and attachments 1 through 19 have been submitted. Item 35, resource management agency planning De Novo hearing to consider approval of a project located at 4884 North Ventura Avenue. Additional exhibits 29, 29.1, 29.2 and 30 additional public comment letters and PowerPoint presentations from staff the applicant into appellants have been submitted. And finally item 44 closed session conference with legal counsel regarding Santa Paula Animal Rescue Center at all versus County of Ventura there will be no reportable action on this discussion Thank you, Mr. Chair. This concludes agenda review.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:02

Thank you. Are there any comments on the consent agenda item 6? Public comments? Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed53:10

Chair Garrell, there are no public comment for our agenda review item number 5 and we don't have any public comment for our consent items either. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:17

you. Supervisor Lopez did you have a comment?

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed53:20

Sorry I was gonna make a comment on item six but I think we're taking action on item five.

Roll-call vote Continued 5–0 · via vote board Moved by Vianey Lopez · Seconded by Kelly Long approve the agenda as modified has been
Show transcript
So item 5 motion to approve the agenda as modified has been moved by Supervisor Lopez seconded by Supervisor Long please vote that passes unanimously thank you
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed53:41

Thank you on the item number 6 a consent agenda. There's a comment. Supervisor Lopez?

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed53:46

Yes, thank you chair just wanted to call out item number 10 which was the pre-recorded budget presentations from the departments in Agriculture Weights and Measures Airports Animal Services CEO Child Support Services Harbor Library and the Medical Examiner's Office Just wanted to thank them for doing that. I know it's a very different way of doing the presentations, but I thought they were very informative, very convincing cases that were presented and just appreciate the work that everyone is doing. And as we go into the budget Thank you chair. Yeah, thank

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

0:54 – 1:007 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed54:46

But a board is can I just defer to the county council to help us frame a motion on this.

CommentDavid ShowalterProposed · by introduction54:54

Thank you, Chair. So the motion for the consent agenda would be approved consent agenda items 9 through 30 as recommended with Supervisor Parvin recusing herself on item 17 for the annual service agreement with farm fence factory rentals and Supervisor Garrell recusing on item 17 for the annual service agreements with RA Atmore & Sons and Sheet Metal Workers Local Union number 104

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.6455:23

Item 6 has been motioned to approve as stated by County Council by Supervisor Long, seconded by Supervisor Loehr. Please vote and that passes unanimously. Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:34

We are getting closer to public works week, I'm excited about that but I do want to do item number 7 for the minutes of the meeting is there a motion second related to the minutes of the meeting from May 12.

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.6455:45

Item 7 motion to approve by Supervisor Levier seconded by Supervisor Parvin please vote that passes unanimously thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed55:51

This is where we're going to take things out of order and I'm gonna call up our director Greg Strakoulos for National Public Works Week very excited about this I think we got some helmets and some vests up here ready for action. But the Ventura County Public Works is welcoming community groups and visitors to campus today, to our beautiful county campus here to celebrate all things public works and highlight the essential services that keep our communities safe connected and running smoothly every day.

And I just add here, Ventura County considers our public works team are first responders too. We just saw that plain and clear yesterday. So I'm going to turn this over. Thank you, Greg and thank you to the entire public works team for your continued continued dedication of public service and I'm turning it over to you to lead the presentation if you would.

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated56:43

Thank you Chair Gorel. Thank You Supervisors LaVere, Long, Lopez and Supervisor Parvin. Good morning Dr. Johnson and good morning ladies and gentlemen. I was gonna say good morning to the future Public Works leaders who are now returning. I thought they were going to become first responders for a second instead of Public Works but they're back So I'm Greg Strackalus, your Public Works Agency Director. And on behalf of every single member of our public works team, I want to thank you for the special proclamation recognizing National Public Works Week. It's an exciting week for us to share a little bit about how we serve the community and celebrate some incredible staff this year is American Public Works Association theme rooted in service powered by community is perfectly it perfectly captures not just what we do but why and how we do it When I think about being rooted, I think about sustainability, history and the solid foundation we all depend upon for our quality of life.

Much like the infrastructure your Public Works Agency manages, the most vital parts of public works are often literally right under our feet and many times out of sight. Our routes include the miles of flood control channels protecting our valleys and plains from stormwater They include the network of pipes, reservoirs, pumps delivering clean drinking water to our customers and the wastewater systems that protect our public health in our environment.

And of course they include the hundreds of miles of roadways and bridges that safely connect our families every single day. Our work is one cornerstone of Ventura County's exceptional quality of life. So for our team being rooted in service, that means this community is our why it's why we do it It means striving every day to be reliable, responsive and accountable for the responsibilities bestowed upon us.

We aren't just an organization of workers we're your neighbors. Every one of us takes immense pride in being the stewards of the land and systems that make Ventura County the greatest place in the world to live, work and thrive. While our roots provide that sustainability, the second half of this year's theme is truly what drives us forward. The energy momentum and power behind our agency come directly from the people of Ventura County.

We are powered by the feedback received at town halls, the cooperation we see during our construction projects and the shared vision that this board and our CEO champion so clearly. Every innovation we pursue is fueled by the evolving needs of our community designed to reflect deep-rooted values of the people we serve. So thank you board. Thank you for your vision, your support. Thank you Dr. Johnson for your mission and guiding principles by which we thank all of our community for being the true energy behind our efforts were profoundly honored to build protect and enhance Ventura County the place we also proudly call home so with that I'd like to transition to the awards component of to recognize some very special Public Works employees.

So we'll start with employee of the year So the candidates are Julie Taylor in Central Services, Najmeen Reema in Central Services, Kristen Selby in Central Services and April Hernandez in Engineering Services. And if you could all stand as candidates and the next slide will be... So Najmeem, if you would come down. If you'd come down.

1:00 – 1:188 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:00:37

All right next year I was going to give you a drumroll. You just jump right into it.

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated1:00:43

We can do that operations and maintenance employee of the year. So our nominees are Joseph Valdivia Aiden Armenta Ivan Gonzalez and Anthony Apricio and without Dremel it is Ivan Gonzalez All right, next. Moving on to Rookie of the Year. This is someone who's been with the organization for about a year now. So the candidates are Jill Sarick and Charles Bell from Water and Sanitation and Central Services. And the winner is Charles Bell.

All right. So moving on to manager there are five managers candidates Toby Mitchell Central Services Debbie now a model from engineering services Matt Hespin Hyde from roads and transportation David Lack watershed protection and Homer Aaron Dondo from water and sanitation and the winner is David Lack. Okay. So that concludes our presentation again, thank you board for the recognition and the proclamation for public works day. Thank you for everything you do Mr. Strakoulos and let's

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:02:33

give them all a round of applause We couldn't do it without Public Works. We're so grateful for everything you do and congratulations to the winners and all the nominees, and we've got signed proclamations resolutions for each one of those individuals up here as well that we'd like to present. And now we have a proclamation we'd like to bring down as well but before we walk down any other comments from the board members?

Okay Mr. LeVere

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:03:06

Thank you, Chair. I appreciate you mentioning the importance that our Public Works Department plays or agency plays In terms of being part of the first responder team that's sometimes forgotten, but you're a critical piece of that puzzle. But also I think so much of our job is dealing with constituent requests, constituent concerns and oftentimes they have to do with roads or parks or watersheds or so many of the calls that we get deal with public works and the entire agency is so responsive to me, to all of us. And I just wanted to say thank you for that is that whenever we have concerns in our district, you're always so quick to jump on it, to solve problems and having that problem solving mentality really sets you apart and I just so appreciate that.

So thank you. Supervisor Long?

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.881:03:54

I also would like to join in on that. It's just amazing what you can do and how quickly, I appreciate the preparedness and really looking at our locations and seeing where we need to do better and how do we clean things up so that we can be more prepared for the next storm, the next fire, There's always going to be a next time. I just don't know what it is, and I don't want to jinx it because you know here we are today with the Sandy fire and I just want to say thank you because our constituents might not understand what city jurisdiction is or county or state and they just need help They need something cleaned up. They need something cleared, we need water. There are so many things that our departments are doing for public works. I geeked out and just heard something about how welders were going to be lacking welders.

We're going to be lacking people that can do the engineering and to really highlight today what important work that our community, our people do that have those skill sets is really important And so I just wanted to say thank you very much and hopefully the little ones out there want to like dig in the dirt and play with water, and who knows who you'll become.

But thank you to the teachers for being here as well and thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:05:20

Yeah. Supervisor, Supervisor Harmon

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed1:05:26

just just quickly I just wanted to touch base on the fact that you're always there in the middle of the night when you needed sometimes feel like your department's taken for granted by the community because our water still runs our sewers still flow but you're going to hear from it if they don't so we don't really get a lot of calls regarding issues there And the fact that you were up all night working relative to the Sandy Fire, your whole team is much appreciated. So thank you. Thank you to your department and I'm glad I only have two miles of roadway in my district.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:06:04

Well with that we'd like to take a photograph would you like us to put on our vests and our hard hats? All right yeah okay I'm excited we're gonna do it Thank you. You know, I think we can get started. The other two are going to come out and just hear in a minute but we are going to go to agenda item number eight general public comments. Madam Clerk, are there any general public comments on items not on the agenda?

1:18 – 1:255 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:18:29

Thank you Chair Guerra. We currently have four speakers for this item and just as a reminder to members of the public who wish to address the board today with live public comment on any agenda item please visit VenturaCounty.gov forward slash BOS comment for participation information and instructions For in-person public comment, please check in with the deputy clerk at the entrance of the boardroom. If you wish to make comments, you must be in the boardroom or if you're participating remotely, you must be connected to the meeting via Zoom or telephone before the close of the public comment period for that agenda item. Requests to make public comment on an agenda item will be accepted until the public comment period for each agenda item is complete for our remote participants.

Please accept the prompt to be promoted and unmute your mic when it's your turn to speak. And for all public comments, the in-person speakers present in the boardroom will be called upon first followed by remote participants at the discretion of the chair general public comment regarding county related matters that are not listed on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the board may be moved to the end of the meeting and our first speaker today is going to be Nina Gluskiter followed by Winona Virgie Krantzoff and Stephen Blair.

Nina proceed to the podium and you'll have three minutes to give your comment.

CommentNina GlaskoterProposedself-stated1:19:38

Good morning, supervisors. My name is Nina Glaskoter and I'm here today about Bruce in the Ventura County Animal Shelter Services dangerous dog procedures. Bruce remains at risk temporary court protection has only paused the emergency has not resolved it. The county and the city have also agreed to request additional time from the court this creates a narrow window for transparency accountability and careful review I understand that the board may be limited in what they can discuss today because Bruce is not on the agenda. I am not asking the board to try Bruce's case, I'm asking that at least one supervisor request a staff report from VCAS and County Council The report should answer a basic question. What process does Ventura County use before it seeks the most extreme and irreversible outcome available, the destruction of a dog?

The public deserves to know whether VCAS has written standards for that decision. Does VCAS require independent behavioral assessment before seeking destruction? Does it evaluate whether a dog could become adoptable, manageable or safely placed with reasonable effort? Does it consider conditions short of death? such as rescue transfer, professional handling, containment training or restrictions? Does it evaluate the dog's full history including conduct before the incidents after the incidents in veterinary handling in shelter custody and with staff for volunteers.

Why is the document being rejected? These are public safety questions. A serious public safety process should not only rely on labels, it should examine the full facts, the content of the incidents, the dog's actual behavior, expert advice, management failures and available safeguards Bruce's case raises such serious questions about what happened. So, my request is narrow and appropriate. Please ask VCAS and County Council for a staff report explaining the standards used before VCAS seeks destruction of a dog including whether independent behavioral assessment is required, whether treatability or adoptability with reasonable effort evaluated and whether alternative short or death are considered and documented.

Public safety and saving Bruce are not on opposites a serious public safety process would look at the whole dog, the whole history, the available safeguards and expert evidence not simply rushing to kill thank you for your time today

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:22:30

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Winona Burgey-Kransoff, followed by Steve Blair and then we'll transition to Zoom and hear from James Frye.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 21Proposed1:22:43

I would really love for you all to have that in front of you during the closed session later. I don't think the VCAS has a CBCC on staff so what a wonderful resource to have available to us right? And Jeff, seeing that you didn't hear much of Nina's statement maybe you could listen to mine. My name is Winona and I want to be clear about one issue in Bruce's case.

Advocates have supported secure placement at West Coast Conecorso Rescue as one possible public safety option but secure placement was never the only possible option and it does not answer the legal or behavioral questions in Bruce's case. West Coast Cane Corso Rescue was proposed because they were willing to accept Bruce. Ventura County had recently trusted them with challenging dogs, and Dr. Crosby identified that placement was a credible safety option. That's what you have in front of you there.

That proposal was one responsible way to address the public safety concerns VCAS raised while preserving a non-lethal path for Bruce. It should not end the analysis. The real question is whether VCAS ever seriously evaluated the full range of possibilities before choosing death. Those possibilities include behavioral assessment, training, rescue transfer, structured placement, professional management, containment conditions, handling protocols or other safeguards. Bruce's broader history matters here.

People who knew him through local parks described him as friendly, social, affectionate, calm, gentle, loyal and good with people and other dogs. Several people described ordinary repeated interactions with Bruce in community settings without seeing aggression. VCAS's own records matter too. When Bruce entered VCAS custody intake notes stated that he was easy to leash and walk to intake allowed handling without issue and had his muzzle and leash removed without issue. Those observations are not the entire case But they are relevant facts. The county should not decide a dog's life based only on incident labels. A fair process should ask what happened, why did it happen? What role did human management play? What does the dogs full history show and what alternatives could address the public safety concerns?

VCAS raised without requiring Bruce's destruction. There is no public safety gain from killing a dog who can be safely managed under appropriate conditions. Bruce deserved that full assessment before death was pursued. I respectfully ask that at least one supervisor request to staff report from VCAS and County Council explaining how VCAS evaluates alternatives short of destruction, including whether a dog can be made adoptable manageable or safely placed with reasonable effort.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:25:28

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Stephen Blair, and then we're going to transition to Zoom and hear from James Frye.

1:25 – 1:3310 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed1:25:37

I do want to speak about Bruce and expert review Dr. Jim Crosby reviewed Bruce's case. Dr. Crosby is an expert in canine aggression and dog bite investigation He did not minimize the public safety he acknowledged Bruce's documented bite history and acknowledge that Ventura County was placed in a difficult position. But doctor Bruce also identified some critical Bruce difficulties like unaddressed and Human failures he especially identified inadequate and faulty training improper and unsafe management and failure to mitigate risk.

Dr. Crosby also reviewed the proposed West Coast Kane Corso rescue placement and concluded that he was Had no reservation recommending transfer to a lifetime care management under strict conditions. That was not an argument that death is justified, it's was expert evidence that an alternative to death exists even under conservative public safety approach. Even if the county insists on strict safety conditions, expert evidence shows an alternative to death. West Coast Cane Corso Rescue offers an alternative. Death is irreversible and should not be pursued until all facts, circumstances and non-lethal Alternatives have been considered. There is no public safety gain from killing a dog who has, who can be safely managed under appropriate conditions.

The public deserves to know whether VCAS obtained any comparable independent behavioral assessments Before seeking Bruce's destruction, did VCAS ask whether Bruce could be safely managed? Did it evaluate reasonable efforts? Did it consider rescue placement? Did it recommend any alternatives or why were any alternatives rejected and again We ask that any one of you supervisors that can speak up to this matter. I understand you're going into private session about this, but you will.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:28:42

Thank you for your comments, Steve.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 22Proposed1:28:43

Our hearts go out to this dog. We're really fighting for him.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:28:50

Thank you. We're gonna transition over to Zoom and hear from James Fry. James, I see that you've been promoted. Your mic is unmuted. Please proceed with your comment.

CommentJames FryeProposedself-stated1:29:00

Good morning, Chair and members of the Board of Supervisors. My name is James Frye. I've worked in the county Ventura in construction for over 20 years and I'm returning regarding the permitting and enforcement records associated with 8513 North Ventura Avenue. I submitted a packet to the clerk of board containing county enforcement records, severity hold records, approved plans, zoning documents and written responses from county officials.

At this point, I've exhausted nearly every internal county review process available to me. Your office informed me in writing that both RMA and the CEO's office conducted what was described as a thorough and independent review, and both concluded that nothing improper occurred. Dr Johnson, your assistant CEO Mike Pettit informed me that he reviewed more than 150 pages of documents before reaching the same conclusion.

However, despite all these reviews the central inconsistency with county records still has not been publicly explained. County records show a stop work notice was issued for non-permitted structural work involving framing roofing windows electrical and remodeling work. Building and safety later placed a severity hold stating that a new roof sheeting had been installed without inspection along with new framing of exterior and interior walls.

However, the later approved plans appear to show the same structural work as existing conditions. These are not complicated questions. County records should be able to show when the stop work notice was issued Who cleared the severity hold, what work was reviewed and how the approved plans later identified that work as existing conditions. As someone who spent over two decades working in Ventura County permitting process I believe the public deserves a clear explanation regarding how these records and approvals were determined to comply with county standards So today I am respectfully asking whether Supervisor LaVar, Dr. Johnson or any member of this board is willing to support an independent public review of these unresolved inconsistencies within county records?

Thank you for your time and in closing I would like to say we do appreciate our nurses. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:31:55

Thank you for your comment. Chair Corral that concludes the public comment for this item thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:31:59

Thank you Madam Clerk. I'm going to call upon the County Council to, a question has been raised in this format for the protocols and procedures that the county follows for dangerous animals. Can you comment on that?

CommentDavid ShowalterProposed · by introduction1:32:14

Thank you chair. Briefly, the county has followed our local ordinances in our municipal code regarding potentially dangerous and vicious dogs at section 4470 and the applicable state law in the Food and Agricultural Code. The documentation that was filed with the court as to the determination of animal services is a public record and available for anyone to review.

With regards given the federal lawsuit that has been filed recently I'm not going to comment further on this

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:32:45

Thank you. All right, thank you that concludes agenda item number eight general public comments and we're now going to go to an item they'll be presented out of order by Supervisor Laverde's item number 33 a presentation of a proclamation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:33:02

Thank You chair and I think we've all been able to go out to the county's Veterans Memorial and see the new Purple Heart Monument and What an amazing addition it made to an already special memorial site. But I wanted to take the opportunity today to proclaim and honor those who helped make that transition of that monument from the naval base To the county possible and I'd like to invite up to the podium Tom hunt who is the director of GSA if he's here.

Dylan Wheeler, who is the principal engineer from GSA Mr Tony D Raimondo, who was with the the order of the purple heart and then also a Jim McHugh who is our better county veteran services officer. So gentlemen, thank you for coming up. I'll give you the chance to maybe speak briefly and then I'd like to read some words from this proclamation but thank you all for being here.

1:34 – 1:4711 turns

CommentDylan Wheeler I'mProposedself-stated1:34:03

Good morning Mr. Chair members of the Board of Supervisors Dr. Johnson staff County Ventura my name is Dylan Wheeler I'm the principal engineer for the General Services Agency it's an honor to speak with you today about the installation of the Purple Heart Monument and what it means to the county of Ventura and GSA This project carries deep personal meaning for me. I joined the county in February of 2024 after serving more than 10 years on active duty in the United States Navy, and I continue to serve as a Lieutenant Commander in the Navy Reserves.

My last duty station before I left active duty was here at Naval Base Ventura County. So, I had actually seen the Purple Heart Monument a few times on the golf course golfing with my little ones. Our previous Chief Deputy Director and our director of GSA Craig Klutz and Dave Sassick and now our current director and deputy director Tom Hunt and Kenny Johnson had asked me to oversee this and I was honored to help coordinate efforts on this project and make it visible to the broader community.

This relocation was more than two years in the making. Your board accepted and approved the generous donation of the monument in September of 2025 from the military order, The Purple Heart as well as donations from local contractors to transport and install the monument. It required stamped engineering design permitting approvals from through RMA and extensive coordination and collaboration across agencies and partners culminating in the final installation on February 28th 2026 I was honored to work closely with the local chapter of the Military Order of the Purple Heart throughout this process and I especially want to thank you for your service, your sacrifices and your commitment to ensuring this monument found its home it deserves. I also wanted to recognize some key staff from GSA, GSA Maintenance Jill Sela, Steven Blair, Saul De La Rosa and security teams led by Dave Barley And Supervisor LeVere, your Senior Administrative Assistant Lourdes Solorzano.

I recently learned that she retired so that was a surprise but she was instrumental throughout this effort. Their coordination site preparation and communication helped move this project across the finish line and ensured a safe and seamless installation I want to take a moment to acknowledge the many veterans and reservists across GSA and throughout the county workforce. I tried to find full numbers for how many veterans serve in the county, I couldn't find that but on my team alone in GSA maintenance 12 individuals or nearly 20% of the team have served as in the United States military. Their continued commitment to public service strengthens our organization every day. For the county and for GSA this moment symbolizes our shared commitment to honoring service fostering connection And preserving stories of those who have sacrificed so much.

I'm grateful to have played a small part in bringing it to its new home. Thank you for your support and for recognizing the importance of this moment to our veterans and our community, thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 23Proposed1:36:53

Good morning, good morning Chair Garrell. Old Supervisor is CEO Johnson I think now you can see why I asked Dylan to come up and speak before me. I want to thank Dylan though for his leadership in bringing this project to completion as you just heard from him it took a great deal of coordination and support to make it happen from GSA's perspective our role was to support and steward this effort to ensure that the monument was installed on county grounds in a way that is going to reflect its significance and it will serve the community well From a personal perspective, I'm also a Navy veteran who was once stationed at Naval Base Ventura County in Port Wendy.

So this monument also carries additional special meaning for me. The purple heart itself represents sacrifice is given to those who were wounded or gave their lives and service to our country. And for many veterans like myself it represents the people that we serve alongside who paid a price that others did not. And the great thing about this monument being moved to the government center is that it is now much more visible and accessible to the community.

So we have created a place and an opportunity for people to pause, reflect, and remember those Purple Heart recipients. I'm proud of GSA's role in this effort, and I'm grateful for your board support in making it possible. Thank you.

CommentTony DiRimandoProposedself-stated1:38:14

Ladies and gentlemen, I'm Tony DiRimando. And my son's name is on this monument. First of all a little background on Michael. We moved to Ventura County specifically Simi Valley in 1985. Michael was four years old so for all intents and purposes he grew up here. As he grew He acquired a strong desire to become a firefighter paramedic. And it was pretty difficult back in the 2020 era, excuse me 2000 in there to get in.

So he said, dad I know you know people at the recruiting station in LA And he said, do you think you can get me into the Army and become a medic? I said, well, I don't think I can do that. But I think you can do that. But all I'll make the phone calls to see that you at least get the opportunity. And he did. He joined three weeks before 9-11. So it wasn't in response to 9- 11 but he was happy to be there.

And he went on to become a paramedic. When he was deployed to Iraq in March of whatever year it was, 20... He died in 22? 24. So in In 2023, he was deployed to Iraq where initially he was handing out aspirins and other things. And he went to his commander and he said this is not what I signed up for. I signed up to help people who are hurt. So he became a medic with the 3rd ACR, 3rd Air Cavalry Regiment And then had the opportunity to become a flight medic, which is kind of the highest level of medics. They're the ones that come in on the helicopters and treat people and save their lives and all that.

And he only had three things going against him according to the first sergeant of that company who told him You're too young, you're too inexperienced and you're too underranked. Besides that come back and see me in three years I'll be happy to talk to you." So Mike took the opportunity to thank the first sergeant he walked out of the building went around to the back entrance where the company commander was and he gave the company commander his story And it didn't go over real well with the first sergeant, especially when the company commander told the first sergeant I'm going to override your decision this one time because I see me in this kid.

And he was young. He was an underranked. He was only an E4 at the time and He said, but I want you to give him the opportunity to try. Put him through the whole training program and see what happens. Well that training program typically lasts about three months. Mike finished the program in 41 days. And the company commander months later said to me he said we've never seen a soldier picked us all up as quickly as Mike did.

And for that reason, and he said I had a world of respect for him. They went on a mission where a Chinook helicopter had gone down and there were some 35 soldiers on that helicopter And Mike kept running back into this burning helicopter, pick up a soldier, bring him out. Treat him, get him sent off to the hospital, back into the helicopter and for that he was nominated or put in for the Air Medal and the Air Medal with Valor which posthumously he was given along with the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Three or four others.

But he was just an incredible young man and at the time that this happened, he was the first Simi Valley fatality. And the community just raised up and supported us emotionally and spiritually and whatnot I couldn't say more about it. One of the things that happened on the day we found out he died, we were sitting around at night with all the TV people had come and gone and I'm thinking alright this is what happened now what are you going to do about it?

I said to my family, I said you know we're probably going to receive hundreds of dollars worth of flowers and other stuff that will be dead in a week. So what if I put the word out that in lieu of flowers please send a donation to the Michael A. DiRomando Foundation which didn't exist yet And I had no idea how to go about doing this, but with the help of my Congressman Elton Gallogly at the time he connected me with the Ventura County Community Foundation who now administers the scholarship which awards one person every year $11,000 and it will go on in perpetuity.

And I know I've gone over my time. I'm sorry, I get started on my son and I don't stop but I wanted you to know who this man is whose name is on that monument. He's not just anybody he's quite the human being and I'll answer any questions you might have about Mike or anything?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:13

Well sir, thank you for sharing your story with us. I've had the pleasure to meet you and your family before. Sergeant DiRamundo is a hero and a great American and this country owes him and your family a great unpayable debt of honor.

CommentTony DiRimandoProposedself-stated1:45:28

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:45:31

We were really proud of Supervisor LeVere and teaming up with the veterans and yourself to bring that out here to a more public place, to honor this Sergeant DiRamundo. And all of our Purple Heart recipients and those who have fallen in particular. So thank you for continuing to lead the charge on behalf of your son and on behalf of all fallen veterans in this community. Thank you.

CommentTony DiRimandoProposedself-stated1:45:56

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:45:59

And I think you sharing your son's story emphasizes why this move was important because it's important that the larger community is able to come and see those names and see those who made such incredible sacrifices In a more public setting, not on the golf course. Yeah. On the base but right here kind of at the heart of the veteran, the County Veterans Memorial where there's a lot of traffic and a lot of people can come pay their respects and see the sacrifice of our local residents serving in the military.

CommentTony DiRimandoProposedself-stated1:46:27

Personally I'm honored that the county wants to bring that monument here so that it can be seen by more people And not just to see Michael's name on it, but because of what that monument stands for. The men and women who have been wounded or killed in combat and my father had the got a purple heart I was in during Vietnam but was not deployed to Vietnam I'm not going to get into the details of that but. Mike did what he wanted to do.

So yeah, thank you thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:47:09

Many public speakers

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:47:11

yes any public or Mister McHugh.

1:47 – 1:549 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 24Proposed1:47:16

Thank chair members of board and as a kind of service officer is truly an honor to join The relocation of that Military Order Purple Hearts Memorial to the Ventura County Government Center ensures really greater public visibility, accessibility to all who live and work in this community. This memorial stands as a powerful symbol of sacrifice resilience and enduring commitment to service values embodied by men and women we honored today By placing this memorial at the center of our county civic life, we create a lasting reminder of the cost of freedom and the responsibility we all share to honor it.

It becomes not only a place of remembrance but also a place of education reflection for future generations. So thank you for making this a priority and for your continued support for Ventura County veterans so thank you. This is a great honor. Thank you. Yeah thank you Jim

CommentRaymond WetzelProposedself-stated1:48:30

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Raymond Wetzel. I'm the current past department commander for the state of California for the military or the Purple Heart. I want to thank Commander Antonio and the members of the Sergeant Michael DiRomando Chapter 750 of the Military Order of the Purple Heart for inviting me to this very special event today. I am honored and privileged to be present today Today marks the end of over two and a half years of struggles with logistics funds, red tapes and a lot of hard work on both sides.

I am very humbled to be in the presence of so many heroes today. There has been approximately 1.8 million Purple Hearts awarded to both men and women since the Purple Heart was established on August 7th 1782 by General George Washington known then as the Badge of Merit Currently there are approximately 300,000 members within the order. In California we have approximately 4500 and in Chapter 750 there's a total of 114 members.

These are known numbers. Events like this The Purple Heart is the last medal of valor that will Prestigious thing to be done, to be interned at Arlington. In closing I want to thank the board members of Ventura County, the Point Mugu Naval Air Station, Port Hueneme home of the Seabees and to the community. And in closing I want to say thank you and God bless.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:50:45

Thank you

CommentRaymond WetzelProposedself-stated1:50:46

sir. Is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:50:53

there any public comment, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed1:50:56

Chair Groh, there are no requests to speak for this item thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:51:00

I think a lot of the people who helped make this possible, you just heard from. But I also want to recognize Hugh who's here for all of the work you did. Lourdes, I don't think she's here. She's probably enjoying retirement somewhere but Lourdes was my team member who really took the lead on this and dealt with a lot of logistics and she put so much work into this and I'm glad to see this come to fruition. I'd just like to read a couple of the paragraphs in the proclamation we'll be presenting and then we can go down and present it to them.

But the Military Order of the Purple Heart is a congressionally chartered veterans organization whose membership is composed of men and women wounded in combat and awarded the Purple Heart, and whose mission includes honoring sacrifice, promoting patriotism, and serving veterans and their families. And we heard a little about this, but the Sergeant Michael A. DiRamondo, Chapter 750 of the Military Order of the Purple Heart serves the Ventura and Santa Barbara region and carries forward the legacy of Army Sergeant Michael A. DiRamondo, a Ventura County service member killed in action while serving his country in Iraq.

And this new prominent public space allows residents, county employees and visitors to pause, reflect and recognize the courage of Purple Heart recipients. Ensuring that their sacrifices remain a central part of our community's shared history and reflecting the county's ongoing commitment to honoring veterans while strengthening the bond between the naval base and the surrounding community.

And so now therefore be it resolved that the Board of Supervisors today hereby does proclaim its profound gratitude to the Sergeant Michael A. DiRamondo, Chapter 750 of the Military Order of the Purple Heart for the donation of this monument and further commence the chapter for ensuring that the sacrifice of America's fallen heroes will remain visible honored and remembered in Ventura County for generations to come. So thank you we'd love to come down and obviously have any other comments but I'd love to present this Supervisor Parven.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed1:53:02

Yeah, I just wanted to take a moment and just thank you for. And I know you didn't personally orchestrate every movement to get it here, but the fact that it's going to be shared now with the community is really special to me, especially having a father who fought in World War Two and was a bronze medal recipient. I'm really glad that he didn't win this award because I wouldn't be here today. So I just want to thank you for doing that, because it's really special Something for you to remember long into your future too. Thanks.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:53:37

I'll just add there's a few folks that didn't come up to the microphone that we hope will take a picture with us and I just want to recognize for your Service to the country, I know Dr. John Williams. I reckon I haven't seen him in a while but a good friend of 20 years, local podiatrist, doctor and an overachiever. I tease him for being an overachiever because you only need one Purple Heart to get into this order 750 and he's got three from Vietnam.

Thank all of you for your service and your sacrifice and for being here today to support this important agenda item.

1:58 – 2:064 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:58:48

And if I could just make a quick announcement, I know that a lot of those who are gathered for this item today are going out to the monument right now for a small ceremony as well. So if you were interested in attending that, I know they would love to have you as well.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed1:59:03

Thank you again supervisor liver for bringing that one forward. That was a big one we're now going to do agenda item number 32 receiving file presentation on first

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed1:59:13

5 enter county here thank you again chair and this is an item where we do it every year and we welcome first 5 to come to the board and to present their So I'm pleased to welcome Lauren our zoo, our executive director and as the board's representative on the first 5 commission. We do this and we give Lauren and the first 5 team a chance to come and submit the budget and to provide a transparent and accountable overview of the planned revenues and expenditures and to really emphasize our shared commitment both at first 5 and at this port as well to early childhood priorities so please join me in welcoming Lauren.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 15Proposed1:59:53

Thank you. Well, good morning Chair Gorel, Supervisors, Dr. Johnson as Supervisor Lavier mentioned we're here to present our budget today we brought to you in March our strategic plan and once that was approved that led us to our budget so that we can enact all of the goals that we had within the strategic plan. The budget has been thoroughly reviewed by both our administration and finance committee as well as the commission and we are here today to get your sign off as well So just as a quick reminder, we are First 5 in Tura County and we are here to invest in families with children prenatal to age five. We do that through tobacco tax funding that we leverage with other funding and our overall goal is to really strengthen the early childhood system.

Why are we investing in those first five years? We say a lot that it's because 90% of brain development happens in the first five years. But what we don't often point out is that after those first five years, that window has closed and there is no opportunity to make up for what you've lost if children aren't exposed to talking, reading, singing and a high quality early childhood environment. We know that parents are a child's first and best teacher, and we can support parents in supporting their children to reach all of their developmental milestones. So since 1998 we have invested more than $233 million dollars in Ventura County's early childhood system.

In our strategic plan, we went through our four main goal areas. So we're focusing on child health and development, making sure that kids grow up healthy and are meeting their developmental milestones. And if they aren't, that we're identifying them and getting them to additional services. We want to build strong and resilient families who can support their children. We're supporting quality early learning through our Neighborhoods for Learning as well as program and systems integration where we're really looking to improve the early childhood system as a whole.

So I broke out our budget for you in the percentages that we're investing it. Currently, we're investing about two-thirds of our budget into our Neighborhoods for Learning. Those are our family resource centers that we have countywide and what we're really known for is those free parent and child together classes where you can come in and you have a play group with your friends but you're also learning about how to support your child's development We also have the home visiting program, our Welcome Every Baby that's held in cooperation with the county.

As well as screening for any kind of concerns that could be maternal mental health or social determinants of health and then supporting families in receiving the extra services that they might need. And finally parent education is woven into all of our programs. The next quarter of our budget goes into programs and systems integration as well as Help Me Grow. So that's things like advocating here at the county level and at the state level, really developing strong partnerships and collaboration. We're really honored to be part of the Ventura County Wellness System and to be the first community pathway where we're supporting county workers to come into our neighborhoods for learning and support our families.

We do a lot of messaging and outreach. Hopefully you've seen some of our Help Me Grow social media campaign in your social media feeds. We also are really happy to announce that we are back to having the kit for new parents so those are distributed through the state down to the county, we have them at WIC, we have them at county clinics anywhere that a mom might be giving birth or finding out that she's having a baby so that they get some resources in their hands right away. They're in both English and Spanish and they're tailored to Ventura County families We also do a lot of capacity building and training. So we recently held a home visiting summit where we had over 150 attendees, and a lot were from public health who are current home visitors, and giving them a chance not just to learn and to gain some new tips but to really connect with each other in a job that can often be very isolating.

And finally, we have our Community Investment Loan Fund where we can offer below market rate loans to people who want to have a preschool to add new spices. Our most recent loan was November of last year. The Little Blue Crush opened up in Ventura and has 36 new spots from infants through toddlers. So the last 10% of our budget goes into evaluation and administration.

So I put in a few of our evaluation measures that we've had in our most recent annual report, they can see after parents attend our parent child together classes all of these measures more than double parental knowledge confidence and abilities their social support and their ability to get services So this is our overall budget. You can see that the majority of our revenue does come from proposition 10, which is the tobacco tax a $0.50 tax on every packet of tobacco that is sold in the county as well as some other grants that we're able to leverage and interest earnings and then we have more detailed breakdown of our expenditures as well broken out through those neighborhoods for learning programs But to make it a little more fun we just want to thank all of you for your support at our Take 5 and Read To Kids.

This is a great day. Did I skip one? Oh, am I going backwards now? All right. But we've got pictures of all of you out there reading this is what really brings the joy out when we have a chance to show you what's happening in our programs. When you have the chance to take five minutes and read to kids it can make all the difference or some of our county sorry Dr. Johnson and Sheriff Fryhoff had the opportunity to do head shoulders knees and toes in Spanish also So we have a lot of fun opportunities and we appreciate your support in getting those bilingual books out into the hands of kids and reminding parents to please take five minutes and read to your kids.

We had some great media coverage as well And we want to thank you because the smallest hands need the biggest champions. We know that today's toddlers are tomorrow's public works employees, tomorrow's county supervisors and tomorrow's veterans but they need to have the support in those first five years. So any questions?

2:06 – 2:1520 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed2:06:27

I just want to personally thank all of you and Dr. Johnson for taking part in the take five and read that's always so meaningful to the kids we reach, I'm sure we all had the same experience and just seeing their excitement in their eyes and reading those books it was so much fun. And I also want to recognize Lauren and the entire first five team. It's a small staff but they are incredible. They are so committed to the mission of early childhood development into supporting the youngest in our community and you all do just incredible work. So thank you.

I just want to add,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:06:58

I enjoyed it so much. I did it twice. I read the kids five and five. I did 10 and it was the first time was in at Somas School and it was with Ventura County Mobile Library and it was just like a twofer. The kids were great. The second time is the Camarillo Public Library And I love doing it. It really makes up for the first year where there was a little bit of a mix-up and they were expecting Sheriff Fryhoff to walk in, and they had a big banner that said welcome Sheriff Fryoff! And the kids wanted the uniform and the gun and the sheriff walking in. You cannot imagine how disappointed they were when I walked in there. The look on their faces... So I've been working really hard ever since then to build... That's why I'm doing two now.

But it's a great program. I just echo all the things that my colleague has said about First 5 and thank you for the presentation, everything you do Lauren. With that.

CommentDavid ShowalterProposed · by introduction2:07:52

All right well thank you We will need a motion on this item Oh

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:08:02

My goodness Well it's too

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.642:08:07

early for the 1030 times

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:08:09

certain.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 · via vote board Moved by Veer · Seconded by Vianey Lopez receive and file has been
Show transcript
So item 32 motion to receive and file has been moved by Supervisor Veer, seconded by Supervisor Lopez please vote. Perfect. Sorry that passes unanimously thanks to you.

Yeah I think we did 26 let's see what we got 36 receiving file County of Ventura single audit report presenting is Mr. McGuire All right.

Guestand Jason McGuire servicesAuditorProposedself-stated2:08:34

Thank you. Good morning, Chair Guerrero Supervisors CEO Dr. Johnson for the record and Jason McGuire services a deputy director for financial management reporting in the auditor's office. I'm here today for my annual appearance of to present the conclusion of the fiscal 25 single audit and conducting The board of Supervisors meeting was conducted in accordance with federal regulations at the 10th board meeting you receive and file the county's fiscal 25 annual comprehensive annual report which was Independent external auditors, I'd Bailey and issue with an unmodified clean opinion. Today, I'm requesting that you receive and file the remaining documents for this year's audit. It's the fiscal 25 single audit report, the county's corrective action plan, the summary schedule of prior year audit findings, and the auditor's communication letter.

For more details, I would like to introduce David Showalter, audit partner for I'd Bailey.

CommentDavid ShowalterProposedself-stated2:09:45

Good morning. Good morning, Mr. Chair and members of the board. Morning.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:09:50

My name is

CommentDavid ShowalterProposedself-stated2:09:50

David Showalter with Ida Bailey. And we are presenting to you the results of the 2025 single audit report.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:10:06

Thank you. We're queuing those up right now.

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.642:10:10

Just let us know when you'd like to

move to the next slide and we will advance that for you.

CommentDavid ShowalterProposedself-stated2:10:14

Go ahead and

move to the next slide. This is the audit team for the single audit for this year. My name is David Showalter and I'm the Audit Partner on the Audit Engagement. And we had Jennifer Lightfoot who was our Quality Control Reviewer and Erica Partita and Layla El-Samary were the Auditor Managers. Next slide. The scope This year was the audit of the county's annual comprehensive financial report and the single audit. Next slide.

Here's the scope and timing of the audit, and you can see that the audit begins all the way back in June 2025, and we concluded the audit in March 2026. Next slide. Our responsibility under generally accepted auditing standards is to express opinions about whether the financial statements that have been prepared by management are presented fairly in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

And for the single audit our requirement is to express an opinion on compliance applicable with each major federal program. Next slide. And also in your packet In Exhibit 4 we have a required communications letter and our professional standards require us to communicate certain items to you as it relates to ethics and independence qualitative aspects of accounting policies any difficulties we encountered corrected uncorrected misstatements. Any disagreements we had with management and management representations.

Next slide. So for the single audit we had a total of 12 major programs that were audited. Next slide and the summary of audit results for the financial statement audit, the county received an unmodified opinion which is the clean opinion which is the highest level assurance and for the single audit the county had an unmodified opinion for all the major programs except for the health center program which was qualified. Next slide.

And included in our single audit report we have nine findings that were reported related to the single audit and those nine findings are related to these five programs And the findings are related to various compliance requirements including procurement, allowable costs, reporting and special test provisions. And I believe that the staff report does provide a detail of each of these findings.

For the one program that had a qualified opinion Which was the Health Center Program Cluster. That finding was related to the sliding fee discounts and there's a compliance requirement that requires the county to follow its policies with respect to the sliding fee discounts. And in that particular program we had a number of findings as it related to that compliance requirement.

For this financial statement audit we had no findings reported with respect to the financial statement audit. There were no material weaknesses and there were no significant deficiencies reported. Next slide. And I would open it up for any questions that you may have with any of the reports, the findings, anything that I can answer. And I do want to thank the county for all of their effort and work with the audit. We appreciate the partnership and this particular year's audit where we had quite a few programs. We were appreciative of each department's assistance with helping us get the audit done before the March 31 deadline.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:00

Yeah, thank you for that presentation. Any questions by the board? Any public comment, Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:15:07

Chair Grohl, there are no requests to speak for this item. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:15:10

Okay, thank you. It's pretty straightforward. It is a receiving file so looking for a motion.

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 · via vote board Moved by Vianey Lopez · Seconded by Matt LaVere Receive and File
Show transcript
Item number 36, Motion to Receive and File. Moved by Supervisor Lopez, seconded by Supervisor Verveer. Please vote and that passes unanimously. Thank you.

Thank you very much, appreciate that. Item number 37 this is also receiving file and County Ventura's recruitment and retention efforts. Good morning still. Mr. Friedel

2:15 – 2:2612 turns

Presentermy name is BillCounty Executive Office Human Resources Division I am here today to present theProposedself-stated2:15:50

Good morning members of the board, Chair Gorel, CEO Dr. Johnson for the record my name is Bill Friedel with the County Executive Office Human Resources Division I am here today to present the annual workforce report in compliance with California Assembly Bill 2561 this report serves to fulfill the statutory requirement for all California public agencies to report on the status of job vacancies recruitment and retention efforts By way of background, AB2561 which became effective January 1st 2025 requires the county to hold an annual public hearing prior to adopting its final budget.

One core element of this requirement is identifying any policies procedures or recruitment practices that may create obstacles in our hiring process. The legislation also establishes a 20% vacancy benchmark. If any bargaining unit reaches or exceeds this level, we are required upon the union's request to provide additional information including data on the number of applicants and hiring timelines.

Finally AB2561 ensures that our labor partners have the opportunity to present during the same hearing. We value that partnership and welcome their participation. Today's objectives are to report on the current vacancy status, review ongoing recruitment and retention initiatives, and identify opportunities for continued improvement. As of April 30th, the county has 9,101 filled represented positions and 975 represented vacancies.

The countywide vacancy rate for represented positions is 10.7%. Individual bargaining groups maintain vacancy rates between 0 and 17% below the 20% vacancy threshold under AB2561 as shown on the current slide. In reviewing recruitment activity over the prior 12 months, our engagement volume has been significant with 22,312 applications received Over the same period, there were 719 represented hires and 1018 represented promotions demonstrating strong recruitment success and upward mobility countywide.

Our outreach and engagement efforts include completing 21 career fairs in 2025 with more than 18 already scheduled for 2026. We are in the planning stages for the annual countywide Career and Resource Expo, and we are launching a new Candidate Connect initiative to further enhance engagement. Our retention efforts remain top priority as part of the recent contract negotiations. The County has implemented general salary increases and market-based adjustments to remain competitive.

Current trend analysis indicates that county vacancy and turnover rates have stabilized and returned to pre-pandemic levels as shown on the current slide. Looking ahead, we see opportunities to expand candidate career workshops and find new ways to connect with both employees and candidates. Additionally updates to the countywide recruitment standard operating procedures will be completed this year And candidate communications within the recruiting process will be improved to enhance the candidates experience.

These initiatives keep us strategically aligned with the county's priority of attracting, hiring, developing and retaining a diverse workforce all while turnover rates return to historic averages and vacancy rates remain below the 20% threshold set by AB 2561. And that concludes my presentation and I'm available if you have any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:19:51

Thank you, any questions from the board? Any public comment? Madam Clerk?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:19:58

Chair Goran we do not have any members of the public who wish to speak on this item thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:20:03

Okay, thank you. So that again is another receiving file if there's no other questions or deliberations we would seek a motion but but

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:20:11

the sorry I think we do there's an invited guests from the CIU and the CNA who wish to present on this item.

PresenterNeil McGuireapplicantProposedself-stated2:20:21

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:20:24

so I think we have the California Nurses Association CNA Susana Macias Robles and Naomi Corpuz

PresenterSusana Macias Roblesnurses of California Nurses Association today day and night our union members arProposedself-stated2:20:40

Hello, my name is Susana Macias Robles. I'm a proud member union member representing nurses of California Nurses Association today day and night our union members are serving health care needs of the community we are deeply we care deeply of our patients and the future of our hospitals public health behavioral health and ambulatory care clinics While we pride ourselves in the contractual protections and benefits that we have negotiated in our contracts to protect our members, we are facing a major staffing obstacles. For example, nurses and healthcare professionals are facing higher patient acuities workloads and less resources coverages for meal breaks and breaks Major delays and logistical processing in our union members are still waiting for over 200 nurses and health care professionals to be paid back missing meal breaks and meal breaks for 17 pay periods in 2023.

The county is very easy to collect for overpayment or human errors input payroll processing. But when it comes to our overpayment or our pay, it cannot make it happen still we remain committed to our patients and community. communities and because we choose to stay as we are dedicated to life-saving in health care community professionals. We need more break relief nurses who will remain excluded from the racials We need resources nurses in all our units that nurses can properly care for our patients. We need break relief nurses for the emergency department, maternity units and ambulatory care specialty clinics. We are seeing nurses and healthcare professions are taking more and more roles when our staff or colleagues retire or resign instead of those vacancies getting filled.

I leave you with this, you have an obligation to support us in our everyday work to save lives we deserve the support of our local government leaders and agency department heads to strive for the filling vacancies, awarding transfers or promotions within our bargaining unit. To strive and to attain and retain their work of our work life balance. The county wants to invest $25 million in outside contract workers when we know that you should use that money to invest in our nurses, in our community. Our healthcare professionals to fill those vacancies that are unfilled or to create positions or to promote within our units and to better staff and safer patient care. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:24:11

Thank you. Thank you very

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:24:12

much. Noemi, you'll have less than two minutes for your presentation.

CommentNoemi CorpusProposedself-stated2:24:17

Hello my name is Noemi Corpus I am registered nurse in the County of Ventura and proud member of California Nurses Association. Recruitment and retention of CNA union position is critical to the filling and We continue to face prior to the hiring freeze several nursing staff applied and interviewed for promotional bargaining unit position and were informed that positions would not be impacted by the hiring freeze. Five months later, none of the candidates received formal communications regarding whether the position was finalized, delayed or canceled. Nurses have been left in limbo without any updates or closure to this day. All of this while management position and admin promotions have been awarded and publicized in the local news. Nurses who have worked for years in our county serving our vulnerable patients population with limited staffing have been ignored.

This has caused major frustration and uncertainty among staff waiting to hear back about filing feeling disposition this promotional vacancies and transfer. Frontline nurses wants to grow with the organization but when internal promotion and transfer processes remain unresolved for months without communication it affects morale and trust in the system. We would like the Board of Supervisors to review the hiring freeze is being applied across the departments and classifications in the CNA bargaining unit to encourage a clear communication and timely decision for internal candidates who have already applied for interview processes.

We deserve to be given the opportunity to fill the vacancy within the county healthcare system so that we may see improvement in patient care outcomes and give the continuity of care our community deserves.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:25:59

Thank you, Naomi, for your comment. Mr. Fridell would you like to introduce the next union members? If you would like to or if you'd like me to introduce them. Thank you. So then Service Employees International Union, Carson Acosta.

2:26 – 2:326 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:26:25

It doesn't look like Mr. Acosta is here I know him I don't recognize him being here but we can I guess move on with the and receive any information from SEIU in written testimony form. That'd be great. I think that concludes the information at this point, and there's no further public comment, I believe? Okay. Thank you for the presentations earlier from the Nurses Association, and call for a motion and second please.

Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Matt LaVere · Seconded by Kelly Long receive and file
Show transcript
Item number 37, motion to receive and file. Moved by Supervisor Lavier, seconded by Supervisor Long. Please vote. I'm not being cued so yes. All right that passes unanimously thank you yeah

maybe somebody could come look at the All right, thank you very much looks like agenda item number 38. Adoption of a resolution amending the job titles skis.

Commentand Daniel keys yourProposedself-stated2:27:31

Good morning chair corral members of the board CEO doctor Johnson for the record and Daniel keys your County human resources director and I'm here to present recommendations related to classifications covered by the management confidential clerical and other under unrepresented employee resolution referred CEO Human Resources performed a comprehensive analysis of several classifications to ascertain unintended consequences of implementing management and minimum wage requirements for health care workers pursuant to Senate Bill 525 or SB525.

This analysis identified pay compaction issues for several unrepresented classifications many of these belong to multi-level series which led to today's recommendations The recommendation is to restructure the classifications to reduce the number of levels and adjust salary ranges accordingly. Our first recommendation is for your board to adopt a proposed resolution amending the job titles of 9 classifications in the unrepresented administrative clerical and accounting financial series, all of which are itemized in the submitted board letter.

The amendments will result in the job titles of all current incumbents in the affected classifications being amended to match the new titles. By aligning these titles, the county ensures consistency and fairness across job roles that perform similar functions while also supporting clear pathways for advancement within the classification framework. Our second recommendation is to delete 9 classifications in the unrepresented administrative clerical and accounting financial series. The incumbents in the affected classification will be reclassified to the new proposed classification.

This process aims to simplify the classification framework ensuring it better aligns with organizational needs while complying with legislative mandates Our third recommendation is to adjust the salary ranges of 13 classifications in the aforementioned series. This recommendation will ensure that compensation levels remain consistent with the county's operational requirements while maintaining compliance with SB 525.

Proposed changes will result in adjusting the salary ranges for incumbents in the affected classifications to an amount equal to the percent increase of the range not to exceed 7.5% for clerical classifications and 15% for accounting and financial classifications by implementing these salary ranges, the county aims to better align its compensation structure support upward career progression for employees and enhance overall operational efficiency The proposed salary ranges take into account the 3.5% general salary increases approved by your board in December of 2025, which are scheduled to occur on December 20th of 2026.

Accordingly there is a recommendation to exclude these classifications from the upcoming general salary increases and resume them in December of 2027. The fiscal impact of the proposed changes are department specific. If additional appropriations related to this proposal are required, they will return to your board at a future time. Our next recommendation is the adoption of an amended management resolution reflecting an amended Exhibit 1 to the Management Resolution to reflect the proposed changes to both classifications and compensation as noted An update to the Supervisory Differential Pay in Section 311 and amendment to section 623 pay for performance adding the classification of hospital administrator and adding additional clarification clarifying language related to prorated application.

All of the recommended items align with the county's strategic priority to attract, hire, develop and retain a diverse workforce empowered to meet the needs of our customers. I want to take a moment to thank our CEO Dr. Johnson your board CFO Scott Powers CEO HR class and comp and labor staff for their dedicated efforts in bringing these recommendations forward today.

This concludes my presentation. I'm available to address any questions you may have.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:31:53

Thank you Miss Keyes. Any questions from the Board? Any public comment on this agenda item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:32:00

Chair Gerald, there are no requests to speak for this item. Thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:32:02

you Well the board letter and attachments were pretty straightforward. Thank you for this CEO recommends approval is there a motion

2:32 – 2:4814 turns

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.642:32:15

We'll have to do a verbally our system appears to be down the recommended action is to approve staff recommendations

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed2:32:22

Second

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.642:32:25

All in favor, please say aye. Aye any opposed or abstentions Hearing none that passes unanimously. Thank you.

Commentand Daniel keys yourProposedself-stated2:32:32

Thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:32:32

way to adapt that was Well done well done We're gonna go back now to agenda item number 34 34 is a public hearing regarding an adoption of resolutions establish establishing and amending the service rates and fees I Am opening the public hearing and asking for a presentation And that is mr. McCarter

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:32:54

Good

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:32:54

morning,

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:32:55

Mr. Chair board members Dr. Johnson Clay McCarter with the CEO's office our offices requesting your board adopt a variety of rates and fees today for various services of the county Watershed Protection District the Fire Protection District and the Harbor Department The counties FY 26 27 preliminary budget contains over 1.63 billion dollars in revenue from charges for services Which is a nearly 2% increase from the current budget The rates and fees before your board today achieve full cost recovery and are increasing slightly based on offsetting the increased costs of providing these services. Certain fees, however, are limited by law or policy and are not increasing.

And that concludes my presentation. Departments are in attendance. Do you have any follow-up questions? Thank you very much, Madam Clerk.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:33:41

Are there any other public comments on this agenda item?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:33:45

Thank you Chair Corral for asking. Currently, I don't see any in our queue. However, I would like just to ask if there are any members of the public who wish to address the board on this item? Please go ahead and proceed to the podium at this time. Seeing none, Chair Garrell, I believe we have any public comment for this item. Thank you.

Roll-call vote Passed Moved by Janice S. Parvin · Seconded by Kelly Long
Show transcript
Yeah, thank you. We're being flexible here a little bit because our computer system is lagging but with that, any questions from the members of the board? No? Okay, I'd entertain a verbal motion And a second? Moved by Supervisor Parvin. Seconded by Supervisor Long, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Any no's? Any abstentions? Okay motion carries and we're closing the public hearing on that thank you. That was easy All right, we're going to go back again to the regular agenda. It looks like
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:34:47

the next item is 38 another adoption. Is that no? We'd handle that 38. We're going on to 39 receiving file County CEO. We did 30.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.882:34:56

That's right

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:34:59

39 39 is correct. So 39 is correct. Yes, the Public Works is here. Great.

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated2:35:27

Good morning Chair Gorel. Good morning board members. CEO Dr. Johnson Greg Strackle is your public works agency director for the record as part of the overall budget presentations you're receiving as we close out the end of the fiscal year This is a presentation on capital improvement projects. You've recently received agency operating budgets, we're also scheduled for the budget hearing in June and then in August we'll come back with a water and sanitation update for budgets and rates to review more specifically some of those Water Works districts.

So one of the purposes for presenting the capital improvement program is, of course, to comply with state law. Capital improvement projects are a list of non-recurring investments with a very long useful life there. They tend to be projects that are above ten thousand dollars and they could range in the millions in terms of representing our infrastructure throughout the city. I'm sorry, the county We also do the capital projects presentation also for understanding what our infrastructure improvements look like over the course of the next 5 years so it's really applying strategic thinking to the projects were selecting planning for the future needs of our community and also operating in a very fiscally responsible manner.

This table identifies the public works operating budgets in the capital improvement programs that are not only Program for next fiscal year but the fiscal year after. The headers in the fiscal years a little bit off this should be fiscal year 2627 column, but those numbers underneath are correct and then the out years are 27 to 31. So this upcoming year there about 90 million dollars of projects capital improvement projects planned.

For the 3 operating divisions or departments of public works What I'd like to do now is go over a few of those projects for use beginning with roads and transportation. And beginning there, we start with bridges. The bridge program is primarily funded through the Highway Bridge Program, the road front and grants this upcoming fiscal year they're about $4.3 million worth of projects in terms of bridge deck rehabilitation at various bridges throughout the county And bridge road bridge replacement project that we've got identified for this upcoming fiscal year.

In the out years, we have bridge inspection programs that will result in additional work that will program into the CIP in the out years and we are always looking for grants and state and federal funding to help support our bridge program Staying with roads and transportation, there are transportation safety improvements countywide that we always look to. We acquire highway safety grants to fund many of these transportation safety improvements, active transportation grants. We work closely with Ventura County Transportation Commission trying to acquire these grants and of course the road fund.

In the five-year capital improvement program for next fiscal year, there are some general safety improvements that might include roadway markings signage and some other technology with radar feedback signs and such flashing beacons. We have Sata Koi pedestrian improvements that are in the design process. And also Piru side pedestrian improvements that are also in design for additional future work. Las Posas Road at East 5th Street intersection design is in process now so that'll be a project to improve that intersection.

And of course in the out years, looking for more pedestrian and bicycle facility projects which are consistent with our Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan. General safety improvements, Satakoi Piru construction work on those pedestrian improvements and then constructing Las Posas and East 5th. Pavement resurfacing, our annual pavement resurfacing program uses of course the state gas taxes and road maintenance and rehabilitation SB1 funds to facilitate our pavement management plan. And 26-27 we're looking towards about 12 million dollars worth of resurfacing primarily in the Oak View and Piru area East Oak Area Mupu Road and Pine Grove Road.

In the out years we have additional streets that are identified and your board approves through resolution a list of streets each year that we work on in terms of resurfacing. Then of course there's the Wainimi Road widening project, a very important project. It's a highway infrastructure trade corridor project with receiving currently $13.2 million worth of state funding.

We also do intend to use traffic impact mitigation fees on this particular project that is a growth project In the 5-year capital improvement program, we're looking at about $3.7 million to complete the design next fiscal year into the 27-28 fiscal year and then also with that using the $13.2 million for right of way acquisition and easements. In fiscal year 27 28 in the out years.

The construction projects going to range between 40 45 million dollars and we are still working with VCTC as well as the state CTC to try and identify future construction project funding for this thoughts are that if the CTC is granted 13 point 2 million dollars then we're in pretty good standing to get the balance or a good portion of Moving on to water and sanitation. Department we have multiple districts and I thought I'd break out the water and sewer components for this upcoming fiscal year and then the 5 years after that you'll you'll note that there are capital improvements that are planned in waterworks district one 1719 38 and in the next few slides will go over some of those but also ensure In the out years, you see the emphasis being in Waterworks District 19 primarily because many projects have shifted into an out year because there has been a lack of funding in that particular district.

But also if we look at Waterworks District 1, there's some catching up we need to do in the out years for infrastructure improvements. You have many old lines and we'll go into that in the next few slides. So the first thing, in Water Works District 1 there are reservoir refurbishment projects that we've got geared up. Peach Hill and Tierra Jada. Of course welding repairs, corroded surfaces need to be ground down and recoding the interior and exterior of those tanks.

Our milestone dates are to award construction around September 2026 and then complete in early September 2027. Water supply reliability program is one where we're treating our wastewater a little bit differently. We're disinfecting it differently, whereas currently we use chlorine and we're moving towards an ultraviolet light system. This project is currently under construction but the bulk of the expenditures will occur next fiscal year so that's why you're seeing that here.

The project includes constructing storage basins, installation of new pumps, the piping and of course the UV disinfection system. It's a 6.8 million dollar project which is mostly funded by grant funding Sewer pipe rehabilitation. Very, very important component of our program and all really the sewer districts. Many of our pipes are old they tend to corrode or clog.

Step one of course is jet packing those pipes and cleaning them out. And then of course sending a camera through many of those lines inspecting those lines from the inside identifying cracks and leaks. And then the next step would be lining those pipes and gaining an additional 50 years of life on those pipes. And this is a really unique, innovative way to add 50 years to a pipe other than excavating a trench and replacing the pipe itself or working through the pipe itself and working internally almost surgically.

So Water Works District 16 in Piru we have At the head works a screen that needs to be rebuilt there and we want to do the same thing with the pipe cleaning inspections and lining. Waterworks District 19, Balcombe Canyon Reservoir refurbishment has been deferred. We still have it programmed now and it's been deferred from last fiscal year to this upcoming fiscal year in hopes that we can achieve some grant funding to do this project so we've got that budgeted Also, part of this project is to increase reservoir pump capacity in zone 571.

So we do have a grant in queue on this. We still want to get a little bit more design to get it more shovel ready. Moving onto some of the water main replacements along State Road 118. We've had some breaks along this line and we really do need to replace this segment of water line particularly in four different locations. At a cost of about 3.6 million dollars and then of course iron manganese which treatment systems which are becoming important as the state regulates manganese as a constituent that we need to remove from our water our water system, which means an expensive filtration process so we've got this identified it was identified in past year were deferring its next fiscal year at a cost of 3. 6 million In Lake Sherwood, Waterworks District 38.

We've got funding set aside to replace booster pumps at Zone 2 Booster Station and of course look at an alternative water supply source connection for that system right now there's only one connection that feeds that system we want redundancy and sustainability in that system. Moving on to watershed protection Of course, we'll start with Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project. Multi-component project that continues to move along very well with our partners in the regulatory realm and the funding partners.

There are specific components of the project that are identified here many under design, many funded with grant funding already. There still is a significant need to construct many of these pieces of the puzzle in the future and we are continuing to work to secure that grant funding, whether it's through Prop 4 or some other appropriation through our funding partners. That is what we're seeking to do.

The Santa Clara River levee project is currently under construction. There's about four more months worth of work to do there. The project has been suspended because there are nesting birds in the area, so we've backed off until those nesting birds have left and will come back to finish this project again some expenditure will continue into next fiscal year.

And then an interesting project from the stormwater perspective. It's called the Kitty Beach Storm Water Quality Improvement Project where there are some water quality issues right now and they're receiving water over by the harbor, and staff has designed a way to improve the water quality by building in a pump station to redirect some of the flows to a different location.

a different outfall. So we're currently in the design and permitting stage, we don't have construction funding but will be searching for that through grants or other sources and that grant project cost is about 3.2 million dollars but it will help improve water quality at the discharge points So in conclusion, the CIP has been delivered to all 10 incorporated cities and we have received no responses so we take that as those cities having no concerns.

Ventura County Resource Management Agency particularly the Ventura County Cultural Heritage Board has commented and there are 16 projects that have been identified It's a great opportunity for us to look at potential historic impacts as we do those projects and will certainly do that will identify those projects. That concludes my presentation remain available. Thank you Mister struck

2:48 – 2:5517 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:48:47

loose any comments by the board.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.882:48:54

I did. As far as the Channel Islands Harbor, we have had water quality issues in there due to the turning off of the Peeker plant. Is there anything else that we're working with the City of Oxnard to rectify some of what has happened due to their lawsuit? All that. Is there anything else that's going to help with the water quality? I see this program for diverting the stormwater from the Kitty Beach, which I appreciate because that's where a lot of people are hanging out in the harbor.

So I just wanted to see if there was any other things that the city of Oxnard maybe be suggesting and so forth.

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated2:49:44

I'll ask Kaylee Lunitz to respond to that if I could.

PresenterHaley Lunawater resources for watershed protection districtProposedself-stated2:49:48

Thank you. Thank you. Good morning, board members my name is Haley Luna deputy director of water resources for watershed protection district. And we are there. We helped support particularly the county's Harbor Department with some of the coordination that they've had on those programs and I know they recently developed a comprehensive study looking at the different alternatives where they're in a support role.

This could be beach project is focusing on our storm drain inputs into channel islands harbor as part of the compliance with the kitty Beach bacteria TMD all Okay I appreciate that and so that will be grant funded. That's the hope we're keeping a close eye on grant funding for construction costs, the design costs are already encumbered we've been doing that through our stormwater budget so we plan to complete design hopefully by the end of this calendar year.

not transcribed≈9s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.882:50:47

And then on the grants are you looking for a state or federal are there particular grants that you're already looking at that we can apply for?

PresenterHaley Lunawater resources for watershed protection districtProposedself-stated2:50:54

So we're keeping a close eye on the prop 4 funding. There's about 100 million for urban stormwater projects from the state, so we're keeping a close eye on that and trying to make sure that our project is competitive for the grant funding and participating in any surveys they have for feedback on the grant application criteria as they're forming that program.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.882:51:13

Great thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:16

Thanks. Any other comments? Any public comments?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed2:51:26

I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:28

believe there's is. Mister

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:51:30

sorry, Mister chair of the board would like I can provide CEO comments on that because the

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:51:35

next

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 25Proposed2:51:36

one please so good morning again Board of Supervisors and doctor Johnson claim a Carter with the CEO capital projects team. Capital Improvement Program provides projects for every department except Public Works. So on our program we have nearly $930 million in ongoing projects and project requests, and like Public Works we also do a five-year outlook. And so today I would like to provide a quick highlight of some of our projects. We're doing a lot of great work in the East County for behavioral health. The newly named Bob Huber Crisis Stabilization Unit is under construction due to open next year with four chairs with expansion possible to eight chairs and this is a GSA managed project. The next door to the CSU will be the Psychiatric Health Facility which is a 16 bed lock facility managed by Public Works Agency and that will, is currently in design anticipated opening in 2029.

Out at Lewis Road, we continue to work on a lot of great projects to provide more of a wellness campus for our county's most vulnerable residents. We're in design for the 38-bed Mental Health Rehabilitation Center. Public Works is close to releasing bids to hire a contractor and they will come back to your board soon with that recommended contractor. And then across the street from that project, we have our Home Key Plus which is an 88 unit and one manager unit Total of 89 units of permanent supportive housing and that is a CEO community development project that's under construction.

Next, our project on Knoll Drive at 2323 Knoll Drive is a county-owned building. The first floor is a 55 bed homeless shelter. We are developing the third and fourth floors into 50 beds of recuperative care. That's a public works managed project. The bids have just come in so you can expect Public Works to report to your board soon on a recommended contractor for that project. And I would add that that project is funded in part by the Gold Coast Health Plan.

Fairly soon we'll have 3 family justice centers in the county. The GSA just completed the domestic violence shelter project at the Ventura Family Justice Center. The FJC and Oxnard common areas FTC is currently under construction and then we'll have another center in the East County which will be a leased space and more news on that shortly. Next our Nyland Acres project is a public works project. It's new construction of a youth and teen center, community center and recreational facilities at the John Zaragoza facility and it is currently in the design phase.

And that concludes our brief remarks on our CAO projects and I'm happy to take any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:54:32

Fantastic Supervisor Lopez

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed2:54:35

Thank you Chair, thank you Clay for the presentation and Greg also. I wanted to bring up one of the items related to the harbor that I've spoken with Dr. Johnson very briefly about and given Just the interest of the residents in the beach communities around the dredging. There's been discussions in the past with a harbor director, Mr. Michael Tripp about a shore power project to connect the dredge when it's idling in the harbor And so wanted to see if it might be possible for our CEO, Dr. Johnson, to work with Director Tripp to possibly add that project to the list either under the CEO's office or the Public Works Capital Improvement Project List. Very good.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:55:31

Thank you Mister chair supervisor Lopez, thank you. Yes I did talk to director trip and they do understand the estimate for that is about 5 million so we can definitely work with him to have that at it. Thank you

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed2:55:43

appreciate that I know the residents out there would really appreciate it just given that judging is a permanent. And I think that would be a great addition if it's possible to identify the sources to make it happen. Thank you very good. Thank you chair.

2:56 – 3:1216 turns

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.882:56:08

Yes, I just really am asking. I know we've been talking about the Nyland Acres Community Center has been in design phase for quite a few years and I appreciate the working it seems like a very easy project and I just want to say thank you to our staff because it is not easy Our community has been asking at every MAC meeting in regards to the status of it and we've had a lot of different We've had a number of. Updates and I feel just as frustrating. I think our staff sometimes is very frustrated about it too.

But I'm And starting it. It's just, I know that there's a lot of projects on our list and I can't say that health care and psych units in homeless is not as important. It is all important and I get it but just to stress my frustration for this being on the Waiting list for, I don't know. So what we started this before COVID? Just so you know. So I understand I've made these comments to everybody but I have to be very vocal about this at this point especially since yeah, I'll be here for about two more years and my frustration just the board I haven't been able to tell you all that is that my frustration is I won't see this done before I get out of this seat And it's a commitment I've made to our community to make sure that that disadvantaged community has the resources.

And we were given those funding and so we get that asked every time. So, I just want to push that off. I know that the hospital is another issue that people ask me about and that'll be a conversation for a different time. But this one, I just wanted to make sure since it was on the slide I'm not going to be able to answer all of those questions. But I do want to make sure that I bring it up so in case anyone out in public is asking we have been working diligently there are a man, a lot

not transcribed≈10s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed2:58:34

Thank you, Supervisor Long. As you know, our office is extremely committed to seeing this project through and it will happen. There have been multiple challenges with the property, with access to water, with having to get an ENA with a property owner to try to bring in water tankers. My last update as of last week still stands. Nothing has changed but our team has been working very diligently and are committed to seeing this through. Thank you for your comments.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed2:59:01

I have a question geared toward Mr. Strakoulis, I think It's about public engagement and I think that there's a general Unawareness maybe in some of our unincorporated communities about these capital projects What what's it? What is what is the strategy or the budget or the approach to public engagement for two reasons one so that the community is aware these these projects are coming up for purposes of I'm not aware of any inconveniences may come up whether it's bridge repair paving but also more generally about the public these public improvements are being made on a regular basis, but I'm not sure that our constituents are seeing these these improvements and are aware.

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated2:59:44

Thank you for the question. In the design process occasionally will integrate public involvement. Workshops and steps. And we'll share information will receive feedback on some of these more detailed projects and then of course at the time of construction or prior to construction, we'll do things like message boards social media posts and we have our 2 week advanced look ahead for mainly maintenance operations not so much capital but That's an option as well.

not transcribed≈18s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:00:33

Okay. Yeah, thank you. I just think sometimes that Public Works doesn't get credit for the really ongoing great work that's done on capital improvements and projects big and small. And I know that our offices can help with that individually but I would love to learn more in the future about maybe any kind of budget for community outreach. The first and foremost is to avoid impacts and for the public to be aware of that But it's also just broader so they can see that their investment and taxpayer investment back into their community. Thank

CommentGreg StrackalusProposedself-stated3:01:10

you. Great. Just one last point, you know two of the most incredible milestones from a public works employee perspective is the groundbreaking ceremonial groundbreaking and also the ribbon cutting At those two points really the community is brought in to be part of that ceremonial part and Thank you, and the board members for hosting those.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:01:33

Yeah, thank you all right I don't have any more questions any other questions from them and So seeking a motion

Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 · via vote board Moved by Levier · Seconded by Kelly Long receive and file
Show transcript
Item number 39, motion to receive and file. Moved by Supervisor Lopez, seconded by Supervisor Long. Please vote. That passes unanimously, thank you.

Our technology is back on track. Community should rest assured. So now we're gonna move to the correspondence agenda. We can do these together unless there's a protest and that would be agenda item 42 and 43. We'll take those up now. Is there a motion? Second?

ElectedMatt LaVereSupervisor, District 1Proposedvoiceprint 0.643:02:16

Correspondence agenda, motion to receive and file items 42 and 43 moved by Supervisor Levier seconded by Supervisor Parvin. Please vote that passes unanimously thank you. It looks like it's too early to do

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:02:28

our next time certains and I think it'd be good to hold off until later for board comments if that's okay? Would you like to do those now? I'd like to that's a democracy. Okay, then let's start with you Madam CEO Dr. Johnson.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 19Proposed3:02:47

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I already have my comments all I really have to say is thank you to everyone who's taken part in response to the Sandy fire the Ventura County Fire Protection District the Sheriff's OES Office of Emergency Services team PWA HSA set up a shelter, you know around 7 or 8 o'clock. They had 30 people there So that was amazing that they were able to do that so quickly Ventura County Animal Services Set up shelters for animals to go both in see me and Ventura And our state partners for the FMAG approval sold quickly I don't think I've ever seen it that quick That was amazing. So just wanna say thank you to everyone who has been involved continues to be involved as we keep our community safe Thank You. Mr. Chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:03:31

Thank you supervisor Lopez

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed3:03:34

Yes, thank you Chair. I want to start off by sharing yesterday the Gold Coast Health Plan Commission managed Medi-Cal Managed Care Commission met and approved a $30 million advance payment to the county to help with the health care agency cash flow and it will be due back in September. So just wanted to share that update with all of you earlier we part of our consent agenda included the presentations on the budget, but at our Airport Authority meeting last week with Supervisor long we at the authority. We also got the budget presentation which was moved forward so We'll be seeing that as well. And I just want to give a shout out to everyone involved with the home key, the Lewis Road Home Key Project. I think we all realized that it was I think the first time that all five supervisors were present at a groundbreaking and an event so I know sometimes schedules are really tough but it was a really meaningful event and look forward to seeing that project come to life.

So thank you chair for for opening up that groundbreaking. I also attended the House Farm Workers Development Roundtable, provided some comments about the status of farm workers and the work that the county is doing to support farm worker housing. There were three panels that included Karen Flock, Rashida Kadakia from our planning department and we heard from some of the local organizations including Limonera talking about the labor needs around farm worker capacity.

And on Saturday, I attended the 16th annual Channel Islands Harbor Safe Boating Expo. I presented a proclamation from our board for safe boating week and want to thank all the first responder agencies who were in attendance and especially those who work on a daily basis to ensure that our waterways are safe and accessible for the public including the harbor department Harbor Patrol The Ventura County Fire Department, Oxnard Fire Department, the Ventura County Sheriff's Office Marine Units, the Ventura Port District Harbor Patrol, local lifeguard agencies, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service, the U.S. Coast Guard and Tow Boat US Ventura who have been helping out with emergencies as well.

And on Saturday, Supervisor Long and I attended the Habitat for Humanity Heart & Hammers dinner and auction which was a really nice gathering to support again housing. And upcoming events that I want to share includes the Memorial Day events The City of Port Wainimi ceremony will be taking place at 8.30 a.m. on Monday at the Port Wainimi Pier. The keynote speaker is Chief Staff Officer Captain Andy Litterell from the Naval Base Ventura County and the City of Oxnard Memorial Day Ceremony will take place that same morning at 11 a. m.

And I have submitted a list of names that I request we adjourn in memory of, but want to give a specific call out for Richard Hodge who is known as the Hawk. He was a Silver Strand resident since 1965, a Navy veteran. He served in Vietnam and was a retired Oxnard Fire Captain with over 30 years of service And over the weekend, there was a special paddle out memorial service for him that was really well attended. I think all of Silverstrand was probably out there and while I was not there do wanna send my best to his family including Jason Hodge or one of our Harbor commissioners. Thank you chair.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:07:32

Thank you Supervisor Parvin.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed3:07:36

Yes it was a really great event when we attended the Lewis Road Homekey plus groundbreaking It was nice to see everybody there and it was a very nice crowd and very inspirational. I also participated in the monthly CoLab wheel meeting, attended the Department of Energy's Connect Community Update regarding the Santa Susana Field Lab cleanup Attended the quarterly economic vitality strategic plan to receive an update and focus on what was on the growing leadership in autonomous systems and advanced air mobility.

Attended the Simi Valley Samaritan Center's Second Chance Prom and Soaring Spirits Gala And we are wrapping up our animal donation, our animal adoption kits. I wanted to thank everyone for dropping off their items. I also want to thank our donors for making their locations available and we have a few events coming up which is the blood drive will be held on June 4th. And my third annual information firework, fire workshop is on Tuesday, June 30th.

More information can be found on my website And I'm happy to say that I have no one to adjourn in honor of, which is a good thing. So and wish everyone a wonderful holiday coming up. Thank you Supervisor Long.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.883:09:01

Thank you. I too, I really appreciate the home key break groundbreaking that was fabulous note to everyone going out and hikes that there are snakes around. I confirmed it on another hike there are some king snakes please leave them alone they actually eat rat rattlesnakes and other pests but just keep an eye out i just want to make sure wear your boots Keep your eyes out. That's all I have to say.

Also, it was my honor to speak at the 805 HIVE meeting that we had for autonomous innovation and represented the regional defense partnership also highlighted the fact that since I started with the economic vitality strategic plan In 2017, the launch of that plan has just grown so much and I really appreciate our Board of Supervisors continuing to support that with our team in our general plan. And and I believe that's why we are so successful And so I just wanted to say thank you for making sure we focus on that. The Habitat of Humanities of Ventura County, In 2018, and to see that program be their 40th year. And how many housing projects that they have done in provided a roof over people's house is just amazing. I think I will be competitive with Supervisor Parvin as I think the majority are in my district.

And how great it is also is at the Rebozo Festival wonderful gathering at the Camarillo House for our farm workers and supporting our Latina heritage has just been wonderful. Also, congratulations to all the awardees of the Best of the Heritage Valley Awards and the Santa Paula Chamber Commerce Awards. It's always wonderful to see businesses of every size recognized for their hard work along with the dedicated individuals who are carefully selected to the impact they make on their community.

And as memorial sales come through, please buy locally. We need our businesses here locally supported. And then I would like to highlight, I'd like to congratulate Mr. John Beck, an English teacher at Pacifica High School for being named the Ventura County Office of Education 2026 Ventura County Teacher of the Year. Mr. Beck has been teaching for 21 years and 13 at Pacific, his classroom is known for its welcoming and positive environment where students feel comfortable, confident and encouraged to participate in academic discussions. Teachers like Mr. Beck make a lasting difference in the lives of their students and we're grateful for the care dedication and support that educators bring to our schools and communities every day.

One of those Students is actually a staff member of mine, Arianna. And I just want to say that your our teachers works really do take us to the future. So thank you very much and I will adjourn with those that I have submitted to the clerk of the board. Thank you.

3:12 – 3:174 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:12:32

Thank you, Supervisor

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed3:12:32

Long. Supervisor LaVere? Thank you chair and yeah just kind of following up on what Supervisor Lopez's comments it was so great to have all five of us at that ribbon cutting because I think it really does send A message to the community that this entire board truly believes in affordable housing and building out a stock of that to meet the needs of our residents here in Ventura County. So it's great to see all of us there, and I appreciate it.

I also want to recognize Ben Fischetti and Sandy Harrison from Public Works for the past two weekends if you've driven on the 101 you've probably seen that mural going in place right by the auto center. The Moon Ditch, it's actually a county watershed drainage ditch. And through a grant program David Yoshitomi and the arts and culture manager we were able to select an artist Elisa Torres who is an Oxnard based muralist just an incredible, incredible artist. And she's been leading the efforts to paint that channel. And for the past two weekends we've brought the community into that project and into that process. And so under Elisa's guidance And through the direction of Ben and Sandy we've brought in. I think it's close to 100 members of the community, including youth to help paint that so I want to recognize all of them and I was able to attend it last Saturday and just so well attended and it's the murals turning out beautiful.

So great job, Lisa. I provided to the clerk, I'd like to recognize some of the veterans. And that's Gary Gerard who was a United States Air Force veteran and then went on to serve 28 years with Ventura County Fire Department as battalion chief and a training chief. Louis Morales who was an Air Force veteran and served during the Vietnam War. Herbert Wilkinson who was World War II veteran and also served at the United Nations Security Commission.

If you grew up in Ventura, you probably spent a lot of your childhood at Santino's Pizzeria after every little league game or a soccer game. And Chuck Rowland passed away recently he was one of the owner of Santino and so we're thinking about his family and the impact he had on countless youth in Ventura through the years. So thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed3:14:47

Thank you Supervisor LaVere. I think that leaves me, I just I also was at the groundbreaking small golf claps for Kimberly for Dr. Dennering for everybody. The biggest news of that were the testimonials given about the roadblocks that had been thrown in front of the team preventing the forward progress to that project that were just through innovation and determination brought down and steamrolled over eventually but those Those challenges, those roadblocks by the state of California and other sources were no match. So I'm grateful for the team that persevered and is keeping this project on track. So thank you very much.

Yes, all five of us were there. Do you think it was the first time? It was very cool. And Supervisor Long also mentioned a snake or snakes. There was also a giant snake there too. And so there was five supervisors in a snake. This is it's it's going to be it's it's destined for greatness. I'm sure, I'm sure but it was not a dangerous snake supervisor let me know as I was running away.

It was a gopher snake. I was able to host a town hall fire town hall with sheriff Excuse me, with the chief Gardner and with our director Strackel Roos of Public Works at Leisure Village. And assure them of some of the work going on in the red line channel behind them related to fire and related mitigation of Arundo and very well received. It was standing room only there was probably I don't know 300 400 people there it was a big turnout. I'm really grateful for the community getting involved and grateful for our county team for supporting that kind of engagement I'd like to adjourn in memory of the names submitted to the clerk, one of them in particular I'd like to talk about somebody I knew personally. Adam Rausch, he was the assistant superintendent of Oak Park Unified School District.

My condolences and prayers are with him his family and his loved ones right now, and the entire school community. Adam devoted his career to serving students, families and educators. And his impact on Oak Park schools and the broader community will be felt for very many years to come. I appreciated his collaboration, his approach to getting things done, and the time he spent working on solutions for items in Oak Park. He really made a difference and will be missed by me and by many other people.

And thank you with that, I'm gonna turn over to County Council to let us know what's next.

CommentDavid ShowalterProposed · by introduction3:17:25

Thank you, Chair. We will now go into closed session with on item 44 as listed on the agenda. As Dr. Johnson said previously there will be no reportable announcements at a closed session but your board will return at 130 for the time certain item. Thank you.

5:16 – 5:2110 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:16:09

All right, Madam Clerk we're going to come back in session. This is Board of Supervisors May 19th and we're gonna go right to item number 35 on the agenda that's brought forth by the Resource Management Agency de novo hearing to consider approval of a project located at 4884 North Ventura Avenue I'd like to start by asking County Council, if you would, to please make a brief statement on the applicable legal principles here that we're going to follow through this proceeding.

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed5:16:44

Okay, great. Yeah. Thank you chair girl Jeff Barnes chief assistant County Council as you mentioned this is a de novo hearing for your board to consider approving a farm worker housing project that has several constituent discretionary approvals including a tentative parcel map plan development permit discretionary tree permit and a few other approvals and it's basically to take one existing lot to subdivide it into three developable lots and one conservation lot. And staff will get into those details, and also to consider finding that the project qualifies for a statutory exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act.

There's often confusion over the appeal, the fact that this type of hearing, land use hearing is an appeal of a planning commission hearing. The planning commission heard the project and approved it by three to two votes. That was appealed by two separate appellants so each of the appellant will have the opportunity to present their appeal cases before your board. But that being said, under the county's land use rules, your board is hearing the project de novo which means anew and it means you're considering this project as though it's coming to your board in the first instance.

And so while your board should consider all of the points made by appellants and other public commenters, your boards ultimately ultimate decision should be based on the merits of the project itself. And so that's kind of how it fits together as stated in the board letter. County Staff Resource Management Agency Planning Division recommends that your board approve this project.

The board letter contains all of the findings that are needed in order to do that just by approving staff's recommended actions if your board is inclined to deny the project There are special requirements under the Housing Accountability Act, special findings that would need to be made in order to do so. In addition if your board has concerns or feels that the CEQA review is inadequate then your board would need to make findings in order to require additional or different CEQAs review and I'm happy to answer questions about that, cross that bridge when we get to it. But I just wanted to point that out for your board.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:30

Thank you Mr. Barnes on the very narrow topic of the legal principles are there any questions of board members of Mr. Barnes or the County Council?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 26Proposed5:19:39

Oh and I'm sorry one more basic thing I should have said your boards actions on the project requires three affirmative votes and that's a magic number

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:19:50

All right, thank you. If there are no questions then I'll move on to disclosures. Do any members of the Board of Supervisors have any relevant disclosures to make including any ex parte communications with either of the parties beforehand? Mr.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed5:20:04

Supervisor LaVere. Thank you Chair and this project has been going on for several years now and in that time I've spoken with several of the neighbors and also with the applicant None of what was discussed in any of those conversations is not already part of the record. I've read a lot of the, obviously the staff reports and their PowerPoints and nothing outside of the bounds of what's already in the public record.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:20:31

Thank you. Any other Supervisor Lopez?

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed5:20:33

Yes, thank you Chair. Likewise to Supervisor Levir I had at least one meeting with members of the project, the proposed project including Stacy Miller, Doug Spondello and Lisa Woodburn. And again none of the information shared was anything other than what has been presented. Thank you.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.885:20:53

Same same for me as Supervisor Lopez.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:20:56

Supervisor Parvin any disclosures to make and I don't have any myself? I'm gonna go ahead and open the public hearing at this time, and I'd like to ask staff to make the initial presentations Mr. Conger thank you

5:21 – 5:361 turns

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated5:21:14

Good afternoon, Chair Gorel and members of the board and CEO Dr. Johnson. My name is Michael Conger representing the Resource Management Agency's Planning Division. The item before your board this afternoon is the Ventura Ranch Farmworker Housing Project. It is a request for a tentative parcel map, plan development permit and discretionary tree permit. The file number is PL23-0051.

I'll start by orienting you to the project site. The project site is located at 4884 North Ventura Avenue, about 1.5 miles north of the city of Ventura off of Ventura Avenue in the southeast corner of Norway Drive. This is a land use map of the project site. The project site has split zoning and split general plan designations. The western portion of the site is designated agricultural and zoned agricultural exclusive, and the eastern portion of the site is designated and zoned open space.

This is an aerial image showing the full project site. It's an 83-acre parcel, and as you can see it is bounded on the north and the west by an existing residential neighborhood. This is a neighborhood we commonly refer to as the Valley Vista Tract. This is a zoom in on the aerial for the 19.6 acre portion of the project site that is proposed for development.

The project site is currently in crop production and has a single family dwelling and barn on the site. As we mentioned, there are three different entitlements involved with this project. There is a tentative parcel map, a plan development permit and a discretionary tree permit. The tentative parcel map is necessary to subdivide the 83 acre parcel into four parcels.

The first three parcels will be developed with the farmworker housing complex and the fourth parcel which is 63.34 acres would be preserved permanently as open space. The plan development permit is necessary to authorize the phase development of a farm worker housing complex. This is a 328 unit complex, it would involve 18 three-story buildings which would be just under 35 feet in height.

There would be 572 parking spaces, two community centers and a variety of recreational amenities including a basketball court, bocce ball court, garden and children's play areas. And finally, the discretionary tree permit is necessary to accommodate road improvements to North Ventura Avenue. The discretionary tree permit would involve the removal of seven protected trees five of which are non-native heritage trees and two or coast live oaks and those trees would be offset by either planting on site or payment of an in lieu fee.

This is the track map or excuse me parcel map for the proposed development And these are the four parcels that would result. As I'd mentioned, the first three parcels, Parcels 1 through 3 would be the farmworker housing complex and Parcel 4 would be open space. This is a site plan showing the layout of those three parcels that are proposed for development into the farmworker housing complex.

The pink lines indicate the parcel boundaries. And this is a landscape plan showing the same location. Something I'd like to point out are the two children's play areas, the central green recreational plaza with the basketball court and then the landscaping in general with a focus on the northern property boundary where trees and shrubs are being planted to help screen the development from view from the residents to the north.

This is an image showing the site plan superimposed on an aerial image to give you some perspective as to how the development would look in context. One of the things I'd like to point out is that the applicants have made an effort to move the buildings as far to the south as possible, to create a buffer zone to the north. The nearest buildings are 90 feet from the northern property boundary and those buildings have been oriented so that the two-story portion of the building is facing north to create a bit of a transition from the one story buildings along Bounds Road to the three story buildings in the interior of the site.

These arrows indicate the access locations to the project site. The two principal access locations are off of Ventura Avenue with a third location at Floral Drive. That Floral Drive access point is proposed to be gated and restricted to emergency egress only based on neighborhood input. Eventually, if Floral Drive ever does become a public road that gated access would be opened And I want to take a moment to talk a little bit about some of the state laws that apply to the project. The first is the Housing Accountability Act, which we heard a little bit about from Mr. Barnes.

Two of the key components of the Housing Accountability Act that we want to make sure your board is aware of are the fact that any policies and standards applied to a project must be objective and in effect at the time the application was deemed complete. In this case, this application was deemed complete in April of 2024. Additionally, as Mr. Barnes mentioned special findings are required if the board is to consider disapproval of the project or reduction of the project's density and specifically that finding must be that there is a specific adverse impact that cannot be feasibly mitigated through other means and that's based on the preponderance of evidence in the record.

Another law that applies to this project is the density bonus law. The density bonus law applies to affordable housing projects, and this is 100% affordable other than the four managers units. The density bonus law allows an applicant to seek up to five concessions or waivers. So these are slight deviations from zoning standards, and in this case the applicant is seeking two concessions.

One is to reduce the private open space for ground floor units to match the upper floor unit requirements, and the other is for a reduced interior side setback on one of the parcels Additionally, the density bonus law allows use of a reduced parking ratio and the applicants are requesting to use that reduced parking ratio as well. The last state law I'm going to mention is the California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA.

CEQAs the environmental reviews law that applies to discretionary projects and In this case, the project was reviewed for CEQA but we did find that it met streamlining provisions in section 15183 of the CEQAs guidelines. Essentially what the streamlining provisions allow us to do is when we have an environmental impact report that was certified for a general plan or a community plan and a project that is consistent with the development intensity standards in that plan Then we can limit our environmental review to issues that were not addressed in the environmental impact report. Things, for example, that are peculiar to the project or the project site or that were not known at the time the environmental impact report was released.

In this case, we found that we did have a certified environmental impact report from the 2040 general plan. And that analyzed development consistent with the general plan and non-coastal zoning ordinance. The project is consistent with the general plan and the non-coastal zoning ordinance standards. And it will incorporate mitigation measures from the General Plan Environmental Impact Report as well as standard conditions of approval which will reduce environmental impacts of the project.

Essentially, we found that there were no additional adverse impacts beyond what was already analyzed in the general plan environmental impact report and therefore no further CEQA analysis was necessary. The project was also reviewed for consistency with the general plan, the North Ventura Avenue area plan, the non-coastal zoning ordinance and the subdivision ordinance and found to be consistent with all of those documents Additionally, because the project site is in the sphere of influence for the city of Ventura.

The guidelines for orderly development require that we consider city policies and standards. And so we analyzed applicable City of Ventura policies and standards and found that the project is in compliance with those as well. That analysis is contained in Exhibit 6, 7, and 12 of the staff report packet. On February 19, 2026 the Planning Commission reviewed this project and approved the project on a 3-2 vote with some modifications to one of the conditions of approval regarding wildfire evacuation readiness planning.

Two appeals were filed and those appeals bring this item before your board today The appeal grounds raised by the appellants are numerous and they're addressed in detail in exhibits 25 and 30 to the staff report packet. But for the most part, they fall within one of these six categories on the screen. The first issue is concerning evacuations and safety of the evacuation routes.

This project was subject to extensive review of evacuations. There was a wildfire evacuation study prepared, a fire protection plan and a wildfire hazard memo which are all part of the record. The evacuation modeling showed that the project site and surrounding neighborhoods could be safely evacuated in under an hour. Additionally, I want to point out that there is no numeric or quantitative threshold for evacuation impacts. So there's not a way to say well a 30 minute delay is acceptable but a 60 minute delay is unacceptable. There's no standard like that what we have in CEQA is two thresholds that we look at one is whether the project would substantially impair or obstruct implementation of an emergency operations plan and the other is whether the project would substantially impair or obstruct evacuation routes.

And based on the information in the record, we've concluded that neither of those circumstances would arise. I also want to point out that the project site with the floral drive connection may actually enhance evacuation options for the Valley Vista tract which currently only has one way in and one way out Another topic that has been raised by the appellants is the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

When this application came in, the map on the left was being used and the project was not in a very high fire hazard severity zone though it was surrounded. That map was replaced with a map on the right which took effect on July 1st 2025 Now this comes into play because as we mentioned the Housing Accountability Act requires that we only apply those policies and standards as they existed at the time the application was deemed complete. This application was deemed complete on April 24, 2024 and therefore the Housing Accountability Act mandates that we use the map on the left for the purposes of determining whether this project is in a very high fire hazard severity zone And why that matters is that there is a standard in the non coastal zoning ordinance that prohibits farm worker housing complexes in the very high fire hazard disparities.

So for the purposes of the Housing Accountability Act this project is deemed to be in compliance. The next issue concerns the CEQA streamlining process. Appellants have raised a couple of concerns specifically that there are peculiar site conditions that needed analysis. Those include pesticide use and access constraints, and additionally the appellants have raised that the change in very high fire hazard severity zone is substantial new information that changes conclusions.

In reality we had soils tested as part of this project and under the phase 2 environmental site assessment, the conclusions were that the pesticide levels were well below residential screening standards. And in any case a history of pesticide use is not something that's peculiar for an agricultural property it's actually quite common Additionally, the access is not peculiar. The project site has direct access on the collector road and very close access to a freeway.

Finally development in very high fire hazard severity zones was analyzed in the general plan environmental impact report so that is not substantial new information. Concerns were raised about zoning and general plan consistency This project is consistent with all applicable standards from the non-coastal zoning ordinance in the general plan. One of the points that has been raised is regarding minimum parcel size this project benefits from a section in the non coastal zoning ordinance that allows reduced minimum parcel sizes for farmworker housing complexes on agricultural exclusive zoned land in a sphere of influence The requirement is that the non-farm worker housing parcel that's created from the subdivision be at least 10 acres and in this case we have a 63 acre parcel.

The final issue that's being raised is regarding the SOAR initiative. The appellants have argued that this project should be subject to a SOAR vote The development site is in a designated existing community, which is not subject to SOAR voting requirements. Additionally the project will not result in the change of a land use designation, which is usually what triggers the SOAR vote.

This site is in the agricultural land use designation and would remain in the agricultural land use designation. Farm worker housing complexes are considered at permissible use in that designation. Additionally, SOAR recognizes the need for farmworker housing in order to sustain an agricultural economy. And so there's no inherent conflict with SOAR. So staffs conclusions are that this project has been subject to extensive review as is evident in the record.

The project is consistent with all applicable objective standards and policies and therefore planning division staff recommends project approval. These are the recommended actions. I won't read all of them, but to summarize essentially planning staff is recommending that the board find that the project is exempt from CEQA and approve the tentative parcel map, the plan development permit and the discretionary tree permit subject to the conditions of approval.

This concludes staff's presentation, but we're available for any questions. I'm joined by Assistant Planning Director Susan Curtis and we also have from Rincon Consultants our CEQA consultant Danielle Griffith. We're also joined by representatives from the County Fire Department in the Public Works Roads and Transportation Department if there are any questions specific to those issue areas.

5:36 – 5:453 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:36:56

Thank you, Mr. Conger before my intention is to now allow the opportunity for the applicant to make a presentation but before that are there any questions for Mr. Conger we'd like to hold those okay all right thank you now I'd like to invite up Miss Woodburn for a 15-minute project applicant presentation

PresenterLisa Woodburnapplicant I'm going to give just a brief overview of the prProposedself-stated5:37:15

Hello. Good afternoon Chair Gorel, members of the board, Executive Johnson. My name is Lisa Woodburn and I'm with Sandbell and I'm here today with Doug Nichols and Neil McGuire we are representing the applicant I'm going to give just a brief overview of the project. Doug Nichols will be here to discuss the wildfire analysis that was done, including the evacuation study and then Neil McGuire is here to respond to appeal issues talk about CEQA and touch briefly on the Housing Accountability Act if we have time.

So I want to start by saying we submitted this application in May of 2023 about three years ago After it was released, we did have quite a bit of public input and concern about the project. So we had a community meeting up in the Oak View Community Center and this is a picture, a photo of the meeting you can tell it was well attended there were a lot of concerns raised people had issues expressed issues and so we did as Mr. Conger mentioned we made some changes to the project The first thing we did was we moved the apartment buildings away from the Valley Vista community. We moved them further back to address our concerns that people, the buildings were too close to the neighborhood.

The other thing we did was we changed the access. We originally had one direct access from this site on to Ventura Avenue and our second access was the extension of Floral Drive onto Bounds Road and out through the neighborhood The residents did not want the traffic through their neighborhood. So we changed the project and we added two direct accesses from our site onto Ventura Avenue, but we kept the floral drive access as an emergency only not only for us but also to provide a second access for the Valley Vista community because right now they only have one way in and one way out Also our project, I want to mention all structures will be built to meet the building and safety very high fire hazard area construction requirements. That includes fire sprinklers, all residential building exterior walls unit separation walls floors and roofs will have a one hour fire rating.

All floors and ceiling vents will be covered with flame and ember resistant material And all roof vents will have a mesh material to prevent the passage of embers. We'll also comply with the landscape requirements by the Ventura County Fire Department. They require the zone, I'm sure you're all very familiar with all the different zones that are required now and very high fire hazards and also what we're doing is adding additional brush clearance to the open space parcel it's shown in green on this slide and it's an additional brush clearance adjacent to the Valley Vista community Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you.

This is a picture of one of the playgrounds that is located at the Somos Ranch Farmworker Housing Project. So you can get an idea what the playground would look like. There will be two community centers, this is a picture of one of the community centers at Somos Ranch And here's one of the other community centers. And again, we'll have an activity room there. There's beautifully constructed kitchens and there's a lounge and laundry facilities.

And again, a lot of good amenities for the residents. And now I'd like to ask Doug Nichols to come up and he's going to talk to you about the wildfire analysis that's been done for the project. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 27Proposed5:41:37

Thank you Lisa good afternoon, Mister chair and members of the board. Doug Nichols senior fire protection specialist with do deck just want to highlight a couple of the fire protection issues. Obviously with the fire protection plan and the wildfire evacuation study we wanted to make sure we covered all of the necessary components. The fire protection plan is designed to review all of the required fire codes, building codes that would apply to a project and make sure they are adequately addressed and if there are any deficiencies to identify those and the types of additional fire protection measures to make sure those are incorporated We reviewed that, found that the project would certainly comply with the necessary requirements there.

And Lisa had already mentioned some of these things but again the construction, the fuel modification, the fire access, reliable water sources, emergency access all that was assessed as part of the Fire Protection Plan and found to be in compliance and anything that needed to be addressed we made some additional recommendations for example that additional fuel modification for the open space parcel In addition, for the wildfire evacuation study we also completed that study as well and found that the project was in fact consistent with the existing emergency response plans as well as the existing emergency evacuation plans that are published by the county.

And then we also make sure that we did have necessary egress, as was mentioned the two points of access and then additional emergency egress. As part of the evacuation study was identified some of it was comparing some of the stories in the past of evacuation. Some of our big fires that we've had Thomas fire, we've had some larger fires here in the county and some of the challenges with evacuation.

There have been some significant changes along the years, VC alert is part of that we also have a door-to-door county sheriff notification and a big part of the evacuation system this is implemented the county but really statewide and even nationwide is targeted evacuations. Now with everyone having pretty much having wireless access on their hip or in their pocket or in their purse, they can get notifications so those are broadcast targeted, not mass as we've seen often in the past where everybody gets to notice all at once and everybody packs and leaves and creates a massive evacuation challenge. Now it's targeted I think even for those of you following the Sandy Fire in Simi you've seen some of those notifications where it's one zone after another getting additional information to try and meter that out As a result, we did not see any mass evacuations on the 118 freeway.

It was a very regulated and targeted process. Also determined that the roadway capacity was sufficient that the modeling that was conducted determined that the project would contribute an evacuation time increase of approximately 15 minutes And I also just wanted to mention that while every minute counts with this targeted process, the county and those emergency coordinators have the advantage of being able to redirect or change notices as they need to.

But with the also the concern with making sure people are properly notified and educated, a welfare preparation program will be prepared would be a written document and approved by the county fire department. And that there will be annual residence meetings to make sure people are fully informed on emergency preparedness whether it be wildfire or otherwise. We'll also make sure we have onsite training for the property managers and the staff there as well, and make sure everyone's informed with the VC alert program.

Well I'm going to turn this over to Neil and be available for questions after that thank you.

5:45 – 5:545 turns

PresenterNeil McGuireapplicantProposedself-stated5:45:47

Good afternoon Chair Garrell, Vice-Chair Lopez and fellow supervisors. I'm Neil McGuire also here on behalf of the applicant. I'd like to elaborate a little bit on the CEQA process that was utilized for this project as Mr. Conger noted it is labeled as an exemption But that is a little bit of a misnomer, a mislabeling if you will. The process that was utilized here was really more of a streamlining process so unlike a typical CEQA exemption where you really get to skip the entire environmental review process entirely that is not what happened here we looked at The general plan. Yeah, I are and what was analyzed in that document including with regard to this project site an area County approved the Shiells battery storage project. We utilized a similar process here as the one used here, and I believe the county has utilized the 15183 exemption for affordable housing projects in the past as well.

So, as I mentioned it was a streamlining process. Ideally that's designed to shorten the CEQA review here we still had a very robust environmental review of this project so in your packet and exhibit 5 you have a 170 page document or so that is the sequel analysis for this project covers a lot of topics As does the dozen or so technical reports that have been prepared for this project and that are before you. So there are reports covering air quality impacts, potential traffic impacts, biological resources and so on.

And most importantly for today as Mr. Nichols mentioned, there were technical reports that analyzed the potential wildfire hazards associated with this project as well as the evacuation study that was done. So these are issues that have been raised in the appeals. You'll hear more about them this afternoon, but I think it's very important to note the technical work that was done on these issues done by experts Mr. Nichols and they were done in the same way that they would have been done had we prepared a full environmental impact report for this project These documents looked at what are the CEQA thresholds for wildfire risks and so on.

As was mentioned, there are not quantitative thresholds under CEQA or under the county's local CEQA rules dealing with these issues. There are qualitative standards and the analysis that was prepared looked at potential impacts of this project under those qualitative standards. But we did go above and beyond, and prepared the modeling work that Mr. Nichols mentioned that looked at evacuation times and so on to provide the county and ultimately this board with more information on these topics.

Now, Mr. Conger mentioned that the appeals raised some issues about whether the CEQA analysis that was performed here should have been done given special circumstances, alleged special circumstances associated with the project sites or area. The first being of course the fire hazard area. For better or worse in this county, that is not an unusual circumstance There are over 340,000 acres in the unincorporated county that are in the high fire area.

The large majority of the rural unincorporated county is in a very high fire area so this is a common designation and If we're going to say the development should not be allowed in such areas or that we are going to burden such development so greatly that it has a practical effect, it inhibits the development entirely. We are essentially saying that we are prohibiting development and the unincorporated county Now we've taken the issues, the wildfire risk issues seriously. As Mr. Nichols mentioned there was a study done on the evacuation issues as well.

Again this site is not a peculiar site in that regard. As was mentioned it is near the city of Ventura. It has direct access to a major collector street The freeway is right there. There are two ramps north and south of the project site at Kenyatta Lager and Shell that provide access as well, so I know there's going to be comments about access Probably trying to portray a perception that this is maybe a more isolated site.

Relative to the county, the access here is significantly better than what you would see and say not to pick on anybody but this is not Wheeler Canyon right? We have a freeway pretty much adjacent to this project site. Just briefly I'd like to touch on the Housing Accountability Act issues that Mr. Conger and Mr. Barnes alluded to as well The focus under that act is on objective standards.

Why? Because projects like this, affordable housing projects are often denied on pretextual grounds so the state has said it's very important when you're making decisions about these types of projects to look at objective criteria what does that mean a 40 foot high building height standard that's objective Criteria that says that you should look at whether a building height is compatible with surrounding buildings. That is not objective, that is subjective starts bringing in your personal feeling personal judgment.

So

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed5:52:27

checker L this applicant is out of time.

PresenterNeil McGuireapplicantProposedself-stated5:52:30

I see that thank you Thank you for consideration and will be available for any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed5:52:36

Yeah, we'll see well you have another opportunity so thank you very much It's my intention now to go to the appellants, but before that are there any questions specifically for the applicant by board members? Okay. With that I'd like to invite up to the microphone Appellant Number 1 Sarah Swidler and Jack Dempsey for a 15-minute presentation. We'll cue that up for you if you have slides.

Thank you. And I promise we won't start your time until they're

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated5:53:10

up. Thank you Good afternoon, chair and supervisors. My name is Sarah Swidler and I live at 5136 Floral Drive. I'll be playing several short clips from the Planning Commission hearings not to amplify neighbor concerns but because these issues were raised on the record by subject matter experts County officials and commissioners themselves. The request in action is narrow grant the appeal in part and remand for focus project level sequel review and corrected findings before approving 328 units in a constrained wildfire evacuation corridor The safety concern isn't new. It's already in the county's own modeling. Evacuation clearance time increases from 43 minutes to 58 minutes, a 15 minute almost 35% increase before accounting for human behavior.

What's missing is a reasoned explanation for why that impact is less insignificant with findings that connect the evidence to the conclusion. This is not theoretical. During the Thomas Fire, it took me 41 minutes to travel half a mile on the same corridor. These timestamp photos show what limited roadway capacity looks like under real conditions. A 15-minute model delay should not be treated as abstract on a road that has already experienced evacuation gridlock.

The first clip all plays from Patrick Maynard, Director of Emergency Services, on what happens operationally when density is added to constrained evacuation corridors and the reality of county resources. Brenda, I might need you to play it seems.

5:54 – 5:595 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 28Proposed5:54:44

Board of Supervisors meeting do our best to get resources out to an area like this, but there's no guarantee that those resources are available. And as you can imagine during the Thomas fire, law enforcement resources were tied up knocking on doors. So one of the mitigation suggestions that was provided in the traffic study was to have flaggers in place at intersections to ensure efficient moving of traffic and that just isn't practical. I wanna be absolutely realistic, that is not practical.

Not to say that evacuations won't be possible. Again, every scenario is different. Not every fire's a Thomas Fire but we need to be realistic that we're seeing these fires move faster. We have less notice and while we have great systems to notify people, that traffic study assumes that everyone knows which direction to go, that everyone drives in an orderly fashion, that everyone's packed up and ready to go. And I think the reality of the case is that's not what happens. So I think we can't be blind to the common sense view of there will be impacts to traffic and there is no sure way to ensure everyone's going to get out in an orderly, timely fashion. So you don't agree with the traffic study? I don't want to say I don't agree with it. There's a lot of detail in terms of Mathematical study portion of it that you know has a point, but I think the reality is what we saw in 2017 during the Thomas fire and I can tell you I was there.

I was on Ventura Avenue to witness it myself It's a challenge and adding you know 500 or so additional cars will exacerbate that. Is it going to exacerbate it to a high degree? It's hard to tell, but it will obviously exacerbate the situation. So I would never want to stand before the commission or before the Board of Supervisors and lie to anybody and say that there will be no impacts. This is additional vehicles in an area that is challenging plain and simple. So are you working on a plan to make it better?

You know, working on a plan specific to that area? No. I think you know what we do year-round is encourage residents to plan and prepare so when we say plan and prepare don't wait for us to tell you to leave if there's a fire leave especially if you're in an area that is difficult to get out of It's things like that that we look to as mitigation measures. Again, it's not practical for us to promise resources into an area to control traffic at intersections. Again I wish I had a lot of deputies to be able to do those types of things. The reality is we don't. We do not have those resources so there's no magic answer unfortunately. Again it boils down to individual preparedness staying very alert to potentially rapidly changing conditions and being prepared to evacuate far before we ever ask you to.

That's a big ask. It is, it's a challenge and again there's no magic answer as much as I like to say we could wave a wand in clear traffic you know as well as I do that there's traffic on the roadway every day under blue sky conditions. It will not be a good situation under gray sky conditions.

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated5:58:16

The key point, emergency services can educate residents but education does not change road geometry. It doesn't add lanes create redundant egress or reduce the modeled 15-minute increase a proper evacuation impact analysis has to happen before the county relies on streamlining not after. The next clip addresses the site's current very high fire hazard severity zone designation and why it previously did not have that designation.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed5:58:46

I understand that prior to re-designating the high fire zone, that this wasn't included. Do you have any idea? Was it not included because at the time

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 30Proposed5:58:57

it was an orchard? It was not a very high fire severity zone. But all around it... Right. ...was. Yeah so it was probably, it was not a very high fire severity zone, that parcel because it was a liminal. Because it was an orchard. Yeah.

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated5:59:18

This next exchange makes clear the very high fire hazard severity zone designation is not a technicality. It's a change safety condition and the Housing Accountability Act allows the county to address it. Someone press play? It's the next one.

5:59 – 6:0612 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed5:59:46

Yeah, but it's my understanding that when this project is deemed complete, it wasn't in the zone. But there can be new things that happen after the completeness letter that take it out so that you can consider them significant impacts. Is that correct? I'm sorry, I don't understand. Sorry, I think that's for planning

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated6:00:16

and then I

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed6:00:16

have one

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated6:00:17

more

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed6:00:17

for

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated6:00:17

you, sorry. So there's an exception under the Housing Accountability Act to allow you to apply newly adopted policies and standards? If they are significantly different than what was prior to... Well, there needs to be a specific adverse impact that you're looking to avoid by applying that new standard. Well it's putting housing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed6:00:37

within a high fire zone As opposed to having an orchard. And I don't know if you want to

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated6:00:47

Here's the practical picture. A known bottleneck at Ventura Avenue and Highway 33, 328 new units near that bottleneck and no roadway improvements proposed to address evacuation. This is not about opposing housing it's about applying the county's own safety standard. Ordinance 4596 signed by this board in 2022 explicitly prohibits farm worker housing complexes from being built in a very high fire hazard severity zone. That provision exists for exactly this reason wildfire exposure evacuation constraints and emergency access risk The county cannot rely on outdated assumptions when its own ordinance already recognizes this siting is unsafe.

This is a corridor-wide issue. Highway 33 and Ventura Ave serve the entire Ojai Valley in the west side. Planning acknowledged concerns at Shell Road and Stanley Avenue, and requested Caltrans follow up but those issues were never resolved before approval. And 328 units here sit on top of other already approved developments along the same constrained corridor.

Standard traffic analysis, LOS and VMT does not answer wildfire questions. What happens if access is blocked? What if queues fail? Can responders move while residents evacuate? The remand should require focused CEQA analysis of incident condition routing for Shell Road, Stanley Avenue and Canyada Larga including blocked access scenarios in cumulative growth from other approved projects on the same constrained system.

This next clip shows that unresolved safety concerns were also the basis for two commissioners voting no.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 18Proposed6:02:14

I'd like to be able to make a comment before we take a vote. I have been in property management and real estate development for 40 years. Developers do have a responsibility, and that is to make sure that you mitigate issues and you conform. Unfortunately because of the State Accountability Act we have stripped away that requirement except for the safety element.

I've done a lot of looking into this and unfortunately, I still do not see where the safety issue has been mitigated. There is more than likely going to be a gridlock issue that happens in the event of a fire or some other catastrophic situation. I've read through multiple people's declarations of what has happened in the past and we can rightly assume that it can happen in the future I personally live in an area that is affected by limited ingress and egress, and I had to fight with the county in order to get the issues mitigated to protect us to be able to get out of our property safely.

I don't believe the developer has come before us with something that mitigated those concerns. And I believe as a Planning Commissioner, I have a right to sit here and say, I cannot support a project that I seem that I have determined and it has not been mitigated to be safe for all people including the farm workers that would live there. I would hate to say yes to a project and then have to live with the circumstances should somebody die or be injured because of my decision to say yes. I wanted my comments on record for why I am going to have to say no to this development.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 31Proposed6:04:20

Thank you, Commissioner Kessler. Commissioner

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 29Proposed6:04:23

Boyston? 100% agree, Maggie. Common sense tells me that this is an unsafe place to put density housing. I understand we need farmworkers' housing and totally support it. Also, the situation that exists out there with limited what I think and you can call it subjective. But in my opinion, limited ways to get out especially in a panic situation. I agree and I've heard it over and over again that the ramp had shell road on and off.

Or at least on, is substandard. The ramp at Stanley is substandard. I think Caltrans would agree with that. I don't believe there's anything in the works to change that in the near future. So 100% agree. I think it's disappointing that we have a project that's really needed and in order to get it, we're going to use the housing state laws to bypass. I think good design strips away from us the ability that we typically have on a project where we can push for a better development. Here, we can't really do that And I find that disappointing. Those are my comments.

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated6:06:14

The 3-2 split means the record was not clean or settled. Two commissioners found the safety concerns sufficient to support denial, that alone confirms the findings package is not strong enough to support approval without further analysis. The final clip shows the legal uncertainty decision makers were operating under. A reluctant approval is not a substitute for defensible findings.

6:06 – 6:245 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 31Proposed6:06:37

Projects like this are tough. Our hands are really in one sense tied, we can say no and I totally agree with Maggie's comments and Commissioner Boyce and the problem is the state law and we can say no today to this and it just throws it legal spiral lawsuits, and ultimately I believe we would lose that as a county. And so it's tough decision today but I'm going to save the time and the money of the county by supporting this project.

CommentSarah SwidlerProposedself-stated6:07:28

The streamlining the county relied on is a conditional tool. To use it lawfully, the county still needs to identify where the prior general plan EIR actually analyzed this intensity at this site, explain why a 35% evacuation increase is less than significant and evaluate whether the sites changed fire hazard designation and access constraints triggered the streamlining exceptions. That bridge is missing from the record.

The remedy is focused, grant the appeal in part and remand for proper initial study. A reasoned explanation for why evacuation increase is less than significant incident condition routing analysis and corrected findings that treat streamlining and housing law as what they are conditional tools not exemptions. The record already documents quantifiable public safety impact nearly a 35% increase in evacuation clearance time before accounting for human behavior. The missing step is the analysis and findings the law requires before this approval can stand We respectfully ask the board to grant the appeal in part and remand for project level secret review and corrected findings safety first findings first then a lawful decision. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:08:27

Thank You, Mrs. Swidler I'd like to go on to the next appellant before we have open up for questions. I'd like to invite up to microphone Gemma Godina and Sabrina Venskas Is there another presentation? This also is a 15 minute time limit.

CommentHema GodinaProposedself-stated6:09:10

Members of the Board, my name is Hema Godina and I'll be presenting today alongside my attorney Sabrina Benskas. I'm a County of Ventura public servant. I am reserving my right to participate at this hearing as a private citizen and as the appellant. I currently work for the Assessor's Office. All the following statements in this slideshow presentation were created by me. They are not to be understood in any way shape or form as official policy or procedures of the Assessor office. The following content is information I gathered from primary government sources.

During the last two Planning Commission hearings, people who do not support this specific project have been maligned and slandered by commentators in the public comment period to be NIMBYs, xenophobes and farm worker haters. This is far from the truth. I myself come from a tradition of farm worker labor. In the 1940's my paternal grandfather participated in the Bracero program. In the 1980's my mother and her father picked strawberries in the Oxnard Plains.

Additionally, my father worked at the Lemon Packing House in La Colonia, Oxnard. Soon after, my father was hired by the Pig Sweet Mushroom Farm and worked there for 24 years. That agricultural job gave him the ability to purchase a home in Port Hueneme for his family. Here are photos of my family along with my siblings at our Hueneme home. Farm workers have a special place in my heart and I have a vested interest in improving the quality of life of all farm workers of today. That is why I oppose this project. I will demonstrate to you how the proposed project is inconsistent and violates the county's North Ventura Avenue Area Plan and the non-coastal zoning ordinances. Also, how and why this project places farm workers in harm's way and the project is not intended for them?

I'm going to refer a lot to the North Ventura Avenue Area Plan. The proposed project approximate location represented by the lemon icon throughout my presentation is within the North Ventura Avenue area plan boundary. The area is unincorporated under county jurisdiction and under the sphere of influence of the City of Ventura. The area plan recognizes the avenue area to have a unique character and development pattern which exists in no other part of Ventura Planning Area. The conservation land of the large Cañada Larga Ranch that is adjacent to the area, along with other open space create a rural atmosphere. Long-term oil field uses and oil field industry constitute the majority of existing urban development in the area.

This proposed project is specifically a farm worker housing complex and it is required to be in compliance with Ventura County non coastal zoning ordinance section 8107-41.3.3 standards for farm worker housing complexes that became effective and operative March 31st of 2022 I want to thank current supervisors Laverre and Long for voting to approve this ordinance Thank you for placing safety guards to protect those vulnerable in our communities Of that ordinance, Section A outlines that the applicant needs to have a minimum of 40 acres of agricultural-exclusive zone land. Section C states farmworker housing complex shall be prohibited in any location designated as very high fire severity zones. In the following slides I will demonstrate that the applicant does not meet the 40 acres of agriculture exclusive minimum and is in a very high fire severity zone.

Here's an aerial image of the zone designations of agriculture exclusive and open space land from the county viewer GIS. It shows that these designations encompass various parcels, and it gives the impression that they're all part of the applicant's application. For example, it groups agriculture-exclusive parcels as one that are not part of the project and is labeled altogether Agriculture Exclusive 40 Acres.

To be precise, the applicant's application includes four parcel numbers. The applicant is proposing to build farmworker housing on only one parcel zone agriculture exclusive of 18.24 acres labeled in pink not meeting the 40 acre requirement while the three parcels in green zoned open space of 58.9 acres will not be developed Here is the project plans for farmworker housing complexes on the parcel in question. Since I work for the Assessor's Office and work with World Plans, I recognize that the shape of the proposed parcel for development was incomplete so I went ahead and completed its outline with a red colored pencil. Recognizing its shape will help us understand its relationship to a fire severity zone map.

Per County Viewer GIS, it shows the proposed lot for development is in a very high fire severity zone as of 2023. The year the application was filed with the county. It also is noted in the general plan that was updated in 2020 and it shows the project in a very high fire severity zone. It was updated in 2020. So here's the aerial map that the applicant gave to the planning division to present and also today. And so, this is official record at the bottom of the screen you'll see that it shows 2023. This is a geographic information system and this is what was presented This is a current fire severity zone map updated in 2025 and the parcel is still in a very high fire severity zone. In summary, the applicant does not meet the 40 acre agriculture exclusive minimum and the proposed lot for development is in a very high fire severity zone.

Moving on to the county's guideline of orderly development per the RMAs planning division under general policies. It states and I quote urban development should occur whenever and wherever practical within incorporated cities, which exists to provide a full range of municipal services regarding policies within spheres of influence the city is primarily responsible for providing municipal services prior to receiving municipal services land should be annexed to this city end quote On the other hand, per the North Ventura Avenue Area Plan it states annexation will be hindered by the existing oilfield development adjacent to this city and current annexation law. The proposed land for development is unincorporated within the sphere of influence of the City of Ventura and land has not been annexed to this date therefore the project cannot receive municipal services.

For the North Ventura Avenue area plan, the application is incomplete under the Water Resources section and I quote water shall be provided by the city to the North Ventura Avenue community within a sphere of influence subject to the provisions of the city's water policy. Development proposals shall receive a preliminary will serve letter, water availability letter from the city prior to the filing of planning applications with the county. Applications which do not contain a preliminary will serve letter will be considered incomplete."

However, the applicant did not comply with this mandatory requirement Instead, per the RMA's Planning Division Section 15183 Consistency Analysis document, it states that obtaining the will serve letter was made a condition of approval of their deemed complete decision. In that manner, the applicant will not need to prove there's a permanent water supply for the project until after final project approval.

The application should not have been deemed complete by the Planning Commission until the applicant first received a preliminary will serve letter from the City of Ventura. Additionally, the area plan states and I quote under development standards section according to the City of Ventura's air quality management program AQMP all residential applications which do not comply with the city's AQMP implementation program will not be issued preliminary will serve letters by the city and therefore permit applications will be found incomplete by the county end quote. The applicant has not proven to comply with the City of Ventura's AQMP. As a result, the city has not issued the applicant preliminary willserv letters. Therefore, the applicant's permit application should have been deemed incomplete by the county.

I wanted to soften the language on this one, but due to time constraints here it is. It shows a 2017 Thomas fire evacuation boundaries. The proposed project is within that wildfire hazard area and it could potentially put new residents' lives and safety at risk. Now moving on to state laws, Senate Bill 167 allows a local agency to deny farmworker housing development projects. Section 1 and 1.265589.5 D4 states, A local agency shall not disapprove farmworker housing unless it makes written findings based on a preponderance of evidence on the record as to one of the following. D, the housing development is proposed on land zoned for agricultural and resource preservation that is surrounded on at least two sides by land being used for agricultural or resource preservation purposes or which does not have adequate water.

This condition of not having adequate water is already met by the applicant not already obtained a preliminary real survey letter by the City of Ventura prior to filing their planning applications with the county. Additionally, evidence in the record show that the farmworker housing development project is surrounded on more than two sides of land being used for agricultural and resource preservation.

Evidence in the record is the Assessor's Office Assessors Parcel Maps and the publicly available website. Here is a project overview showing the project consists of four parcel numbers. The parcel in red is the lot in which farmworker housing complexes are proposed to be built and is zoned agricultural exclusive. Parcels in blue, orange, and the green square are to remain zoned open space.

On the side of the proposed project that is zoned agricultural exclusive in red and open space in blue next to it is being used for agricultural as noted use description from the publicly available assessor's office website. On the side of the proposed project that is zoned open space in orange and in blue, next to it is being used for agricultural and resource preservation as noted as use description from the publicly available assessor office website.

Okay, go ahead. Can you give this to the Court of Report?

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated6:20:19

My name is Sabrina Venskas. I'm a CEQA land use attorney and I'm also housing rights attorney on behalf of tenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong place. I'm going to go through a couple legal issues that weren't raised by my client. I did submit a letter today and I'll just go through the points quickly because I don't have that much time and then I'm going to reserve, I guess rebuttal time for me to rebut anything with respect Planning is not exempt from CEQA even under the public resources code section 210383.3 and guidelines section 15183 planning makes no to basically 2 diametrically opposed findings on the one hand it emits the general plan concludes that putting residents in high-fire severity zones would result And then on the other hand, suggests that this project does not pose significant unavoidable impacts.

So those are contrary findings. The county must explain how it reached a contrary finding from that of the general plan EIR especially because the applicant's relying on the programmatic EIR for the general plan. Pointing to the project specific evacuation analysis and I put quotes around that does not help the applicant So, there's major problems with it. I really encourage you to look at it and encourage you to get your own expert who has a lot of experience in evacuation analyses. It appears to under-report the evacuation time and risks but even under reporting, it shows that there is a risk to life and safety of people.

The modeling uses the evacuation zones but has no basis in fact or evidence since it doesn't appear that the general plan has evacuation zone. I'll point out that the county's in non-compliance with AB 747, which is the law that was passed after the Paradise Fire. And maybe 747 and this is connected and that's why I'm bringing up right now. That local jurisdictions general plan safety element must identify evacuation routes and evaluate their, and this is important capacity, safety and viability under a range of emergency scenarios. IE if the county had complied with AB 747 you would have quantitative analyses and standards.

So that's pursuant to state law. The county is a clear mandatory duty to update its safety element with this required evacuation analysis and because it doesn't, this infects the entire safety analysis of the proposed project and it creates a general planning consistency problem and renders the project ineligible for the identified CEQA exemption. I will also point out that the project represents a violation of fair housing laws. By concentrating this vulnerable population in an area subject to severe wildfire and evacuation risks, it violates, falls to, fails to affirmatively further fair housing as required by government code section 65008 and 8899.50 Finally, the approval of this project results in a violation of a person's constitutional right to safety which has been overlooked really until now by us lawyers.

Article 1 section one affirmatively gives Persons not only the right to privacy as we're all familiar with that without right, but also the right to safety and by Affirmatively choosing to put farm workers in harm's way You are well. I'm not saying you are doing this but the county would Violate the constitutional right to safety Yeah,

6:24 – 6:3011 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:24:26

thank you for the presentation We're gonna go to public comments now unless there questions of the appellants Okay, Madam Clerk how many public speakers do we have signed up?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:24:38

I think you check around. We currently have 30 speakers. How much time would you like to give each speaker a

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed6:24:44

Minute and a half

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:24:45

a minute just the timer And then while we're adjusting the timer, as a reminder if you wish to make public comment on this agenda item. If you have not pre-registered please check in with the deputy clerk or if you're participating remotely please visit VenturaCounty.gov forward slash BOS comment for participation information and instructions. And for our public comment um we are going to go through the in person speakers first and then we'll transition over to Zoom So I do see that we have a few Zoom participants and so we'll get to you. I'm going to call your names in threes and then in person please proceed to the podium, and then you will have a minute and a half to give your comment there is a timer on the podium and then in a minute and a half we'll kindly ask you to yield your time thank you.

So our first speaker is going to be Robert Moon followed by Francine Smith and then Linda Braunschweiger. Robert Moon?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 32Proposed6:25:43

Good afternoon. I had an issue to the clerk, I gave all you including the attorney. I did a survey on Nextdoor this week and I asked how difficult was it for people in the Avenue Valley? I don't like that term then the Ventura River because that goes up and down. The Avenue Valley is the most narrow valley high density and it's getting worse in all of Ventura County there's nothing close. I'm fifth generation Ventura County. I might know a little bit So they all said 87 percent said it was very difficult, very, very difficult. And you're going to put a community that's going to be two to three thousand. You go, Robert, how can you do that? Well, the excuse me, I'm disabled at the camp in East Ventura. They have half of that and there's over a thousand residents in that.

And the most narrow part of Ventura Avenue is right there at Cate where the freeway jumped over. And where they're putting this development, there's an opening valley right there. At least with us mostly blew over and still burnt two houses in our neighborhood. There's a valley right there I believe it's the Martinez Valley so that goes straight all the way to 150 all that Santa Ana right there channeling through there.

I don't know, there's probably more. But you give me a minute and a half. Wasn't that good of presentation? Nothing beats like... So if you guys voted in, you give Ventura County 90% exposure. If the state does it, they have 90% exposure. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:27:17

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Francine Smith followed by Linda Braunschweiger and Patrick Trowbridge. Francine.

CommentFrancine SmithProposed6:27:25

I live in Valley Vista track for 15 years. Many of the neighbors have been there over 40 was starting 58 with 2 accesses that time until the flood of 69. I spoke with someone day before yesterday can't Can't get insurance at all. And this is happening more and more and more and more you just can't get insurance during Thomas fire we were able to get out people were backed up on the Avenue, the people in the north side of the Avenue and sick or village they were all coming up to Shell Road people Norton bill were coming up to Kenyatta larga then you've got other people from the West Side of Oakview on the other side of the river there are coming down Santa Ana road as the construction goes on Also, we've got a problem. Where is the farms? There's one little farm across the river with trees.

I have a next door neighbor that works in Santa Barbara County and avocado ranches where are the farms and 328 units when you're building and more park on That many acres, 700 units but you're building 300 and some on 18 units. And also it's a conflict of interest. Amcol is mainly stocks owned by pension funds for state workers and good for you but that's a conflict of interest that this is being built to make money and put us all at risk because we've got I've got a next door neighbor that has 10 adults living there with thank

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:29:03

you for your comment.

CommentFrancine SmithProposed6:29:03

Thank you. Okay, our next speaker is

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:29:05

going

PresenterLinda BraunschweigerHousing Trust Fund Ventura CountyProposedself-stated6:29:19

Good afternoon, thank you Supervisors and our CEO. I'm Linda Braunschweiger. I am the CEO of the Housing Trust Fund Ventura County, Housing Land Trust Ventura County as well as Vice Chair of House Farm Workers. I will keep this brief. We need our farm workers living in our community We are an AG community that has amazing agricultural companies and resources here. And the only way we're going to stay in a community is if we have housing for our farm workers. This is an essential economic issue for us.

We have farm workers coming from all over the place to work in this community, so it's causing traffic. It's causing stress of life. Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Patrick

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

6:30 – 6:3812 turns

PresenterPatrick TrowbridgeOperating Engineers Local 12 and I'm also a lifelong resident of Ventura CountyProposedself-stated6:30:32

Good afternoon, Mr. Chair and members of the board. My name is Patrick Trowbridge. I'm a business representative with the Operating Engineers Local 12 and I'm also a lifelong resident of Ventura County. I am here today in support of Ventura Ranch farmworker housing. The cost of living in this county has risen sharply over the past several years and last year especially.

Farmworkers are some of the hardest hit. Rents that were once manageable are now out of reach for many people, especially those earning farm wages. As a result, farm workers are commuting from hours away spending large portions of their wages on fuel to get to work or leaving the region altogether. We have a housing shortage and it's real and it's getting worse.

The workers who put food on our tables cannot afford to live in the communities they serve. Approving this farm worker housing is practical solution to a crisis that affects all of us. Please approve this project, thank you for your consideration.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:31:35

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Henry Kack followed by Daniel Mora and Linda Bellamy. Henry?

CommentHenry KackProposed6:31:44

Good afternoon since this has cut down to a minute and a half I'm just gonna say one thing I took the picture of the very high fire hazard severity map that was presented during the January 22nd, 2026 public hearing. Then I took it over to the CAL FIRE office on Wright Road and shared it with Deputy State Fire Marshal 3, Aaron Greer and told him this is what was presented as being a CAL FIRE very high fire severity zone map prior to 2025. And he immediately stated that isn't a CAL FIRE map where did this map come from?

Each and every one of you are going to have the opportunity to answer that question. I hope the board make a correct decision and deny this project. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:32:44

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Daniel Mora followed by Linda Bellamy and Steve Bostick. Daniel.

PresenterDaniel MoraLaborers Union Local 585Proposedself-stated6:32:56

Good afternoon, Chair Gorrell and the Board. My name is Daniel Mora. I'm a business representative with the Laborers Union Local 585. We are in support of item 35 just to kind of keep it tight. Our economy is built on the backs of farm workers. It's built on the backs of agricultural workers and Unfortunately, these members of our community have the least amount of options especially when we consider the economy and when we consider housing costs. And when we consider also just the community in general my family initially came over and lived in the projects and in the avenue We need some place for our core workers who are also at risk.

And we need it to be safe, and I think across the board they've proven that they'll have the highest safety standards. It will be built with the highest safety and construction standards by residents in Ventura County. And it's something that will help not only our city, but our community in general with our most important workers. So we support this item. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:34:24

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Linda Bellamy followed by Steve Bostick and let's see Ramos.

GuestLinda BellamyAgricultural CommissionerProposedself-stated6:34:35

Good afternoon, Lauren. My name is Linda Bellamy. I live in the Valley Vista track. I worked with the Agricultural Commissioner's Office for over 36 years. We do need safe farmworker housing. This is not a safe location for farmworker housing. You have a high fire severity zone with a hillside Oak Grove right next to this property and we have multiple fires in that area.

The non-coastal ordinance says farm worker housing should be prohibited And that means any location. Fire clearance as the applicants were talking about fire clearances behind the houses of floral drive will do absolutely nothing because mudslides believe me I've had to remove tons The freeway on-ramps are a substandard, which means everybody that is trying to exit the Ventura Ranch project will make a right hand turn and try to get out on Kanawla On-Ramp and will block everybody in the Valley Vista Track Inn. There would be absolutely no way to get out of there. And you're talking over 3,000 vehicles.

So we believe in farmworker housing. I support it but not in this location. Also, that's a wildlife corridor. We have wildlife that go through that area constantly all the time and I don't think that anybody wants to disturb.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:36:10

Thank you Linda

GuestLinda BellamyAgricultural CommissionerProposedself-stated6:36:10

for your comment. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:36:13

Our next speaker is going to be Steve Bostick followed by Letsie Ramos and Leslie Liebens.

CommentSteve BostickProposed6:36:19

Hello everybody good seeing you again thank you for being here today and doing the best job you can for all of us anyway I'm going to focus on one issue, baseline integrity. Because if the baseline isn't accurate and fully disclosed, the findings built on it cannot be relied upon. Here's what I documented on the ground myself personally looking from my house onto this property. The lemon orchard was bulldozed.

They did it at night after dark so nobody could see them doing it. The trees were torn out by their roots and the historic soil bed was ripped apart shredded Then the area was reworked and turned over again for sorghum, to grow sorghum. From September 21st through November 21st 2023, the site used over 7.7 million gallons of water, agricultural water, to water nothing but the dirt.

Okay, so there you go. That is a baseline altering activity that was not last minute on February 15th I submitted and I've also submitted many other public comments about it. A pre-hearing notice with photos and video and requested it to be entered in the public record And I hand deliver it to planning and the clerk of the board. So, the question is simple where is this bulldozing soil disturbance in irrigation history disclosed and analyzed in the CEQA streamlining record? And where is it tied to the soil analysis being relied on? Mr. Conger you know for a fact because you called me about this and we talked about it so he knows the stuff was submitted but nothing was done.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:37:54

Thank you our next speaker is going to be Leti Ramos followed by Leslie Levens and John Christ Let's see.

6:38 – 6:448 turns

CommentLetsie Ramos-AnselmoProposedself-stated6:38:09

Okay, so I am Letsie Ramos-Anselmo. I live in the Valley Vista Track. In 2017, the Tuomas Fire, two homes in the Valley Vista Track burned to the ground. The Planning Commission indicates that the property of the proposed Ventura Ranch cannot be considered a high fire hazard severity zone But the fact is that it is and the fire that occurred in Valley Vista.

You have to take into account the safety of future residents at Ventura Ranch, you have to consider it. CEQA indicates it will take 58 minutes to evacuate Valley Vista and future Ventura Ranch residents in an emergency. Well, there are 255 homes in Valley Vista. At two cars per home that's 510 cars. The proposed Ventura Ranch is 328 units at two cars per unit that 656 cars so potentially 1166 cars will be trying to exit all at the same time.

CEQA's estimate does not take into account the high volume of cars nor the confusion, the chaos or the gridlock that will occur trying to access Ventura Avenue. Emergency personnel and vehicles will be significantly impacted trying to access these areas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:39:43

Thank you for your comment. Let's see if we can use your time. Our next speaker is going to be Leslie Levens followed by John Christ and Brian Schumacher.

CommentLeslie LevensProposedself-stated6:39:53

Good afternoon, Chair Gorel and members of the Board of Supervisors and CEO Dr. Johnson. My name is Leslie Levens, and I'm a fourth-generation member of a family that's been farming in Ventura County for more than a century. I'm also on the Board of House Farm Workers, and urge you to approve the Ventura Ranch farm worker housing application. Our family farming company, Levin's Ranches grows lemons and avocados on nearly a thousand acres of farmland in the Santa Clara River Valley and the Las Posas Valley. We are fortunate enough to be able to provide housing ranch housing for our 17 year-round employees But it is not feasible for us to do that for the 60 to 75 seasonal workers needed for harvest and pruning. We don't hire seasonal workers directly but rather through farm labor contracts contractors who supply crews to AG operations all over the county.

That's why it's so exciting when an opportunity arises to create new beautiful farm worker housing. Proposals for large projects like Ventura Ranch are rare and they can play a key role in meeting the documented demand for affordable, high quality residential units. I urge you not to let this opportunity go to waste. Approving Ventura Ranch is the right thing to do for our county's essential agricultural workers. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:41:17

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be John Crist followed by Brian Schumacher and Laura Swenson.

CommentJohn CristProposedself-stated6:41:27

Good afternoon Chairman Gurrell, members of the board, Dr. Johnson. My name is John Crist and I'm a member of the Board of Directors of House Farm Workers And I'm here to speak in support of the Ventura Ranch Project. Before I retired in 2022, I served for 14 years as CEO of the Farm Bureau of Ventura County which taught me a few things about local agriculture. I want to focus on one of those things today.

In their public comments and appeal documents, the project opponents have repeatedly argued that the proposed Ventura Ranch site is unsuitable because it is far away from agricultural production sites and that farm worker housing should be built on or near the farms where those workers are employed. These comments reflect a basic misunderstanding of the nature of Ventura County agriculture and its workforce The implication that the term farmworkers refers solely to field workers directly employed on farms is false.

As the county non-coastal zoning ordinance properly defines it, a farmworker is anyone who derives more than half their income from quote activities associated with agriculture. This broader definition encompasses the thousands of agricultural workers in this county who are employed not on farms but in packing houses, greenhouses, nurseries and processing facilities or as equipment operators truck drivers pest control applicators and more.

Even if restricted to field and orchard crews, the argument that these workers should live on or near the farms where they work fails to recognize that about half of them are not hired by farms. They are hired by labor contractors whose crews are assigned to multiple operations all over the county at different times of the year.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:43:00

Thank you, John. Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Brian Schumacher followed by Laura Swinton and Gabrielle Mignone.

PresenterBrian Schumacherour advocacy committee to offer a strong suppoProposedself-stated6:43:10

Good afternoon Chair Gurrell, Supervisors, Dr. Johnson. My name is Brian Schumacher and I am Advocacy and Community Impact Manager for Autism Society of Ventura County. I'm here today representing our advocacy committee to offer a strong support for item 35 the Ventura Ranch Farmworker Housing Project. Farmworkers are the backbone of Ventura County's agricultural economy and supporting their dignity and well-being begins with safe stable housing, a place to call home.

Denying regulated housing does not eliminate risk, it pushes families into overcrowded and informal conditions. This project has undergone extensive review and planned housing with enforceable safety standards provides oversight mitigation and accountability. Like the individuals and families we serve each day, farm worker households include children and adults with disabilities as well as diverse support needs. Safe and consistent housing is foundational to meeting human needs including mental health, physical wellbeing, and full community involvement and integration.

Autism Society of Ventura County respectfully and proudly urges approval of item 35. Thank you for your service to Ventura County.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:44:13

And thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Laura Swinton followed by Gabrielle Vannoni and Adam Ashkenaz.

6:44 – 6:498 turns

CommentLaura SwensonProposedself-stated6:44:24

My name is Laura Swenson and I live in the Valley Vista tract. I have many concerns regarding the Ventura Ranch development, but these are the ones that concern me the most. This project would not be moving forward if it was presented in 2025 due to the very high fire hazard severity zone designation. The lives and safety of a thousand or more future The fire safety designation being used are so safety rest solely on a paperwork technicality. Well most of Ventura County may be considered to be in Two Valley Vista homes burned to the ground during the fire, Thomas Fire. The remaining 250 homes were threatened.

More homes would have burned without neighbors housing down their other neighbor's homes and extinguishing embers and fires. I can attest to the traffic congestion on Highway 33 in Ventura Avenue during the Thomas Fire. An additional 500 plus vehicles could bring the evacuation traffic on those already congested routes to a standstill. First responders may or may not be able to navigate this gridlock, endangering lives further.

The recent catastrophic fires in Los Angeles County and the current Simi fire are examples of the dangers of building in very high fire zones.

not transcribed≈21s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:45:59

Thank you, Laura for your comment. You've used your time. Thank you. Our next speaker is going to be Gabrielle Benoni followed by Adam Ashkenas and Osvaldo Godina

PresenterGabrielle VignoneHouse FarmworkersProposedself-stated6:46:13

Thank you, honorable members of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors for this time to speak to you about Ventura Ranch farmworker housing. My name is Gabrielle Vignone and I'm the Executive Director of House Farmworkers. We support Ventura Ranch. House Farmworkers in collaboration with the county of Ventura is currently working on the Ventura County Farmworker Housing Study and Action Plan.

I serve as the co-project manager of that and would like to share some data. Farm workers report spending 48% of their income on housing, 45% of farm workers reported sharing a dwelling meant for a single family which means they share bathrooms and kitchens with people outside of their families. 35.8% of farm workers reported six or more needed repairs in their households.

Our data also tells us that Ventura County is home to up to 36,500 farm workers who have lived in the county for a medium of 15 years and can decide where they want to live. House Farm Workers has had the honor of hearing from farm workers once they've moved into affordable housing and how life changing that experience was. We held an event last month, and we were proud to see a current farm worker who lives in affordable housing share with us that she brought her friends to the event so they, in her words, could also experience the benefit of having affordable housing.

There is an undeniable need for affordable housing for farm workers in Ventura County. And we believe that Ventura Ranch will play an important role of providing that and addressing the documented needs of these essential members of our community. We hope you reach

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:47:46

the same conclusion, thank you. Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Adam Ashkenas followed by Osvaldo Godina and Andy Conley.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:47:57

Supervisors, thank you all for being here. I am a lifelong well not lifelong but lifelong resident of the Santa Monica Mountains. I've lived in Ventura County 40 years almost now. I've lived through numerous fires evacuated numerous times and I am really concerned of the fire channeling down the canyons like we saw in Pacific Palisades and Altadena, who's lived through a fire knows there is no prediction. There is no timetable. Fire moves at its own pace.

You can be packed up and ready to go and have to run. It is not as clear cut as a lot of people like to say. I'd like to note my mother was fortunate enough to live in a CEDC building when she retired because in Ventura County, retirement does not cover rent. I support CEDD developments all over the county having seen what they do this project because Ventura Avenue is substandard and the amount of housing I do not agree with. I do agree and I will stand by any farm worker in Ventura County, they are the backbone of our county.

They deserve every right to good housing. I have the concern of if far enough farm workers don't rent these than their market value It should be low income. If you're not a farm worker...

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:49:32

Thank you, Adam for your comment.

UnidentifiedClerk of the BoardProposed · by role6:49:34

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:49:35

Our next speaker is going to be Osvaldo Godina followed by Andy Conley and Laura Schwab.

6:49 – 6:548 turns

CommentOsvaldo Godina I'mProposedself-stated6:49:48

Good afternoon Mr. Chair and members of the board, my name is Osvaldo Godina I'm a resident of Port Hueneme. I'm Hema's brother and initially when she told me about this project I was a little confused you know why wouldn't we want any housing for farmers as we do come from those families in that lineage but after looking at the facts and what's going on I do have concerns and I think my biggest one is accountability It hasn't been presented yet, but as far as I understand the developers are a private company and they don't need to report who exactly lives in those homes. And if those homes are not filled with farm workers then it could be opened to the public right? So it almost feels like this housing is being constructed as an avenue to open it to the public.

It's a private business so they could you know earn their money Number two, the thing I'm concerned about are the maps. I think my sister Hema did a great job presenting her maps and where she got the sources. Her maps with the fire severity zones from 2023 when they applied in 2023. She clearly is letting you guys know where she got that other map. We don't know where it's from or maybe it's been presented before. But as a resident here of the county, I'm confused. I'm concerned like why do we have that? Those two different maps. So the one from Hema came from the county. It's easy to find and I hope you guys come to the right conclusion accountability as far as the housing and fire severity zones.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:51:23

Thank you. Our next speaker is going to be Andy Conley followed by Laura Schwab and Dee Peterson

PresenterAndy Conley I'mWest Ventura County Business Alliance and I'm here on behalf of our Board of DirProposedself-stated6:51:36

Good afternoon chair girl members of the board, Dr. Johnson. My name is Andy Conley I'm the president CEO of the West Ventura County Business Alliance and I'm here on behalf of our Board of Directors and our members to urge you to vote yes and support this great project. This really is a great project and what it will do is we'll help create a lot of stable homes for the workforce that is so needed for agriculture. When workers can't find stable housing they leave, and when they leave farm struggle harvest suffer an entire supply chain feels that this is not hypothetical our members are living in Also, farmworker housing is not just a social services issue. It's a workforce infrastructure issue and the business community is here to say that we cannot afford to keep kicking this down the road.

Economically construction will put local contractors tradespeople and labor crews to work wages that stay here in Ventura County and strengthen our skilled workforce pipeline. The business case for this project is straightforward. A county that cannot house its workforce cannot sustain its economy. So in closing, the Ventura Ranch is well designed and responsibly sited and it's long overdue.

I respectfully urge you to vote yes on this item. Thank you very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:52:53

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Laura Schwab followed by Dee Peterson and then Peter Schwab.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 33Proposed6:53:11

Hi, my name is Laura and I'm pleading with you to please do not put this project through farm workers deserve safety. It's proven that it's a high extreme fire zone all of you probably don't know but on my drive here. I was 20 minutes delayed because there was a fire on the 126th Yeah, that happened just today and I was getting so frustrated. And am I going to get there in time?

We do not have control over fires over the wind and over climate change. We don't have control. And you know what? I experienced the Thomas fire. I wasn't informed. I was out of town for a week, I came home, I was exhausted and went to bed. I was not informed of it. I did not get the alerts on my phone. You know what? I was woken up in the morning. Emergency evacuation!

Flames are dangerously close to your home. I was like this. Oh my gosh! I was hysterical. I left, there were flames on either side of Ventura Avenue. The oil fields were there. I was terrified. It was the most scary experience that I've ever been through in my life and guess what? During it, I realized later I lost my wedding ring because I grabbed it and I lost it. My husband had to buy me a new one Anyways, the point is we do not realize how hysterical people get. I have PTSD right now from the fire today from the Sandy Fire.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:54:44

Thank you Laura for your comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 33Proposed6:54:46

Don't do it please!

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:54:48

Our next speaker is going to be Dee Peterson followed by Peter Schwab and Barbara Macri-Ortiz

6:55 – 7:0312 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 2Proposed6:55:00

Hello, hello. The proposed 328 unit 18 three-story project was approved without going through CEQA I feel there were several items that were not disclosed by Mr. Conger and others 40 plus years of pesticides that contaminated the soil millions of gallons of water poured over just like Steve Bostock said sorghum grass that could not be used because it was contaminated Who wants to buy that? I don't know.

No one could sell the sour grass, the pesticides are worse than the contaminants at Petrochem across the freeway. This property is and has been a high fire density zone. Many people in Valley Vista cannot get homeowners insurance. You just heard that unfortunately because of this high fire zone so someone's believing that it's a high fire zone we can't get insurance. So who is going to insure these buildings I'm just asking This area is already a high traffic zone. During the Thomas fire, my daughter was trapped in a rolling parking lot.

It took 45 minutes to go for one quarter of a mile on Highway 33. There was fire on both sides of the freeway. She left us a tearful message on her notes in her phone feeling that she may not survive I know you care, all the phones did not work. I want to add that in. Thank you for your comment. They did not work for anyone.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:56:39

Our next speaker is going to be Peter Schwab followed by Barbara Macri-Ortiz and Karen Flock

CommentPete SchwabProposedself-stated6:56:52

Good afternoon Board of Supervisors. My name is Pete Schwab, 37-year resident Valley Vista. When real estate developers and real estate agents are talking about projects and properties to sell they always mention three things location, location, location Well, this location that's proposed is the wrong location for farm workers housing because of the speakers today have talked about the high fire hazard. I want to appeal to your common sense Because it was designated in 25, a very high fire hazard area that should be considered. I don't care what the rating was when the project was approved. That's kind of irrelevant. That's kinda silly. That not using common sense.

We know now it's a very high fire hazard area besides all the other problems with the areas as far as evacuation if there is a fire And many other issues, those are things to consider. I'm asking you today and asking you to appeal to your common sense. The common sense tells you that it's too high of a fire hazard area to put people in and that many people, that many vehicles trying to get out in the event of a fire which are unpredictable. I am asking you, I appeal to your common sense do the right thing and deny this project.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:58:28

Thank

CommentPete SchwabProposedself-stated6:58:28

you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed6:58:30

Our next speaker is going to be Barbara Macri-Ortiz followed by Karen Flock and Juvenal Solano.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 34Proposed6:58:37

Good afternoon Chair Gorrell, Supervisors. You know agricultural housing, housing for farm workers is an ag related use This housing is just for AG. You know, this idea of oh yeah you're not going to be able to fill it so you're gonna bring in other people that is just cannot happen in our county under ordinance okay. So let's move that aside You know, I heard something. Farm workers deserve safe housing. That is exactly right. They deserve it today. I can tell you about one of my clients who lives in a garage in a two car garage.

The family lives on one side. The owner's car lives on the other every single night they're in danger of carbon monoxide poisoning. They are dying to be able to be in a place like this where the building is going to be with 2025 health standards This is going to be the safest. One of the safest places for farmworker housing for any housing because it could be built right, you know the attitude of this very high fire zone and that's why she eliminated well one thing I have a big problem with his discrimination because the farmer housing is the only housing in this county that even has Let's close down everything in the county because when we hear how many thousands of acres and very high fire zone. Thank you, Barbara for your comment. So you know it's like we have to get better build better and not throw away farm worker housing.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:00:21

Our next speaker is going to be Karen Flock followed by Juvenal Solano and John Newman.

CommentNeil McGuireProposed · by introduction7:00:27

Good afternoon chair growl and members of the board. My name is Karen flock and the real estate development director with venture housing we support this project be submitted a You've heard why, for legal reasons and planning reasons you should support this project. But I have some other reasons. I'm...I've worked with many farmworkers in several farmworker housing projects over the years.

Farmworkers will be excellent neighbors. They're hardworking and responsible. They're family-oriented. And they are of course essential workers. This project will have 55 year affordability restrictions. It will have lenders and investors who are closely monitoring compliance, we'll have on-site resident managers and its buildings and landscape will be built to current standards. On a personal note, I believe that this will be a great place for kids to grow up. It's close to nature it's next to a conservation easement and close to the site that was recently acquired by the Ventura Land Trust. I think this will enhance the curiosity and exploration and independence of the kids who live there and help keep them off their screens so I urge you to support this project thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:01:48

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Juvenal Solano, followed by John Newman and Sabrina Venskas. And then we're going to transition to Zoom and so ask our IT to get our Zoom participants ready.

CommentJuvenal SolanoProposedself-stated7:02:02

Good afternoon, Supervisors. My name is Juvenal Solano with MICOP, the Mixteco Indigenous Community Organizing Project. For more than 20 years, MICOP has served Ventura County's indigenous farm workers' families. I am here today because the people we serve are in crisis. The farm workers who harvest these country strawberries, lemons and avocados are living in garages. Many families of five and six people are sharing a single room. This is a reality for many of our neighbors right now in one of the wealthiest counties in California.

The Ventura Ranch project is direct response to that crisis, it means safe, stable, dignified housing for farm workers family who have internet. We saw during COVID that overcrowded housing cause us illness and In that, in trauma we cannot keep asking people to feed this county while offering them nothing to stand on. My call support this project fully. We urge the board to vote yes today for workers are not invisible their families and community are watching and we are here to say they deserve better and this project is a step in the right direction thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:03:16

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be John Newman followed by Sabrina Venskas and Helen McGrath.

7:03 – 7:1116 turns

CommentJohn NewmanProposedself-stated7:03:27

Good afternoon. My name is John Newman. I'm a fourth-generation Venturian. My great grandfather was Fred Hartman, who was also part of the supervisors back in the late 1800's and I lived in Casita Springs but now I live in the Valley Vista tract. All my property was burnt down except for the great job that the firefighters did in saving my house but everything else was burnt.

Coming here Three things I'd like to address. First is the safety of the area. It is a very high fire zone, the traffic would be horrible it's bad enough just trying to get to work Let alone if it was an emergency. The other thing I'd like to address is that it seems that when I first heard about this, I was like well where's the agriculture? I didn't really see any agriculture around there. I don't see any greenhouses. I don't see any packing houses. I don't see any fields. I dont' see anything like that.

And also the distance that it would take the workers to get to fields and places where they're gonna work. I mean, it's at least a half an hour to get to Oxnard, and it's gonna be in half an hour back. Now these people that are going to be doing this, they are disadvantaged and this is gonna be a burden. Look at the price of gas right now. So it's only gonna be worse.

There's better options. I'm all for farmworkers.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:05:02

Thank you

CommentJohn NewmanProposedself-stated7:05:05

very much.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:05:06

Our next speaker is going to be Sabrina Vinskas followed by Helen McGrath and George Atmore.

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated7:05:17

The 33 was shut down for a period of time, going south. The only way out was actually up the 33 through the mountains and I'm really glad I had enough gas in my tank because there was also fire all around in the mountains. The 150 going east-west was shut down at one point then after the 33 was opened it was so jammed you if you didn't have gas.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:05:40

Sabrina, I'm sorry just need to interrupt you for a moment

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated7:05:46

I'm speaking on behalf of myself as an individual that lives in Ojai and public comment.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:05:52

Thank you, we just had to make sure so that we're fair with everyone.

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated7:05:54

Okay yeah no problem.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:05:55

Please proceed.

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated7:05:56

No problem. So the fire was bad it was very scary and it was very hard to get out and if you wanted to get fuel in Ojai you had to wait about two blocks in line to get fuel so it was very nip-and-tuck The evacuation analysis that I looked at is faulty because it fails to look at cumulative impacts related to wildfire hazards, including evacuation impacts to all of the Ojai Valley. So you don't even have an analysis of significant or whether or not there's significant impacts with respect to this project individually but cumulatively with respect to the Ojai Valley. And again, the analysis cannot explain how an additional 15 minutes evacuation time that I believe is underreported based on my work with other evacuation experts in the field that I work in.

But even if you assume that 15 minutes is the right number it does not-that analysis does not explain how the evacuation time is not a significant impact life and safety.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:07:02

Thank you for your comment Okay, we are going to transition over to our Zoom participants. We have a few to get through and I see most of you have been promoted so I'm gonna call on your name and then I'll ask you to unmute your mic and proceed with your comment. Our first speaker is going to be Helen McGrath followed by George Atmore and then Jackson Piper.

Helen?

CommentHelen McGrathProposedself-stated7:07:22

Good afternoon Board of Supervisors. Supervisors, my name is Helen McGrath. I'm a fifth generation farmer in Ventura County and a resident of Ventura. I am here to support the Ventura Ranch Farmworker Housing Project. The groups involved have operated with very high integrity. They have an excellent record here in Ventura County of building safe, quality housing for a farmworker community. This is my third hearing on the project and it's frustrating to hear arguments being recycled that have clearly been addressed by the applicants and county staff. It's great to see the modifications that have been made to the design to incorporate Buffer zones that very few residential properties in the City of Ventura have, and a construction design that includes a one-hour exterior firewall throughout the complex.

That will keep residents safer than almost anybody else in this city of Ventura including the vocal opponents of the neighboring community. I find it disheartening to hear they are quote unquote concerned about the safety of farmworkers When this is clearly some of the safest housing that will exist along this corridor. Much of what I've heard today feels like it's okay for me to live in a high-fire zone, but not for you. Every single individual that has spoken today that claims to be concerned about fire likely lives in a wood framed housing in high-fire zones themselves. We're in dire need of housing for our farmworker community and I asked the board to approve this excellent and well vetted project. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:08:54

Thank you for your comment, Helen. Our next speaker is going to be George Atmore followed by Jackson Piper and then Joshua Medrano. Hi George I see you're ready please proceed.

CommentGeorge AtmoreProposedself-stated7:09:03

Good afternoon Chancellor Allen members of the board my name is George Atmore. I'm a second generation rancher in the hills of Ventura producing beef and avocados. I urge you to vote yes on item 35 and approve Ventura Ranch. Growing up on a ranch gave me a firsthand view of what the agricultural workforce looked like close-up When it comes to ranching and farming operations, our workers are not an afterthought. They're one of the most skilled and reliable components of our ranches.

When employees can't find decent housing nearby they're forced to leave and find work closer to home. For small farming operations losing these people can be crippling There can be a tendency for people who are not involved in agriculture to frame farm worker housing as just a social services question. But from where I stand, it's critical to the long term success of Ventura's agriculture.

A stable workforce requires stable housing. That is not a political statement, it is simply how farming works. You cannot build a stable agricultural operation on a workforce that is constantly shuffling because they cannot find a place to stay. Ventura Ranch is facing these issues by setting aside housing for people who work our lands versus where they work.

The design of the ranch shows a real understanding of new land with only 20 acres being developed and 63 acres staying in agriculture and open space, protected and managed. The Ventura County Council community has been facing this issue for a long time and we think this is one of the most responsible and well-considered proposals that has come before the county. Thank you George.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:10:41

Thank you for your comment. Okay our next speakers we're going to hear from is Jackson Piper, Joshua Madronel, Zuleth Lucero. If you are on Zoom and would like to make comment and didn't pre-register please use the raise hand button if you're calling in use star 9 to use the raise hand button I don't see Jackson Piper online, so we're going to go ahead and proceed with Joshua Medrano and then Zula Tocero.

7:11 – 7:197 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 35Proposed7:11:04

Well, thank you. Good afternoon honorable chair vice chair and board of supervisors. My name is Josh and I know I'm the executive secretary treasurer of the Tri-counties building. And I'm here in support of the Ventura Ranch Farmworker Housing Project. This project advances district objectives to benefit working families with a broader farming community while delivering strong public value by prioritizing affordable housing. This community will provide local farm worker housing for Ventura County, which in recent years affordable state farm worker housing has been increasingly difficult to find in the county. Enduring growth of the local agriculture industry and burdening local farmers and farm workers. We further support this project at its approach to inclusive community development aligns with our organization advocate for the rights of all underprivileged and unrepresented communities including pushing for anti-discrimination and civil rights legislation Furthermore, labor unions were created by workers to protect their rights.

However, labor's role in advancing civil liberty and social justice and economic equality for all Americans is not discussed often enough. I digress. This program allows the building trades to be able to stay lockstep with community-led organizations that continue to support the needs and betterment of our local communities. In closing, this project gives new chance opportunities for the hard-working farm workers who otherwise may lack access to education and employment necessary for creating healthy thriving lives. We encourage the Board of Supervisors to approve this project. Thank you for your time.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:12:32

Thank you for your comment. Our next speaker is going to be Zuleth Azero. Zuleth?

CommentZuleth AzeroProposed7:12:39

Hi, everyone. My name is Juliette and I'm here to speak on behalf of CALS. For more than two decades, CALS has organized a long-time farm worker and immigrant communities across Ventura County who are disruptionally impacted by housing instability. I have worked with and organized farm workers for more than 10 years. Today my work focus on connecting families to affordable housing.

Farm worker families constantly face some of the greatest barriers Right now, I'm working with a farmworker family who lost their housing after they can no longer afford at $3,000 a month in rent. They're not living in their car with a three-year-old child while both parents continue working in the fields every day. Sadly, their story is not unique. The Ventura Ranch Farm Worker Housing Project offers a real solution. Permanent housing means stability, safety and dignity for working families.

And that reduces the number of people forced into overcrowded housing and safe living situations. And when concerns are raised about traffic or evacuation during fire season, I ask that we center facts and lead experience. I worked as a responder during the Thomas Fire and like many Central County families, I was also personally impacted. I saw firsthand that housing insecure families are among the most vulnerable during emergencies because they have fewer safe and stable options to evacuate and recover.

Stable housing

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 16Proposed7:14:16

Thank you for your comment. You've used your time thank you. I did one final check for Jackson Piper who I don't see online, I don't see any raised hands on Zoom. Is there anybody here today in the boardroom that would like to give public comment on this item? Please proceed to the podium and state your name With that, Chair Guril, seeing none. That concludes the public comment for this item. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:14:37

Thank you, Madam Clerk. I'd like to now offer an opportunity for the appellant number one to have rebuttal of five minutes. We invite to the microphone Sarah Swidler if you'd like to take that opportunity. Looks like maybe Jack Dempsey.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 36Proposed7:14:52

Jack Dempsey, not serious. Thank you Board of Supervisors. Government Code Section 65913.4 the statute creating SB 35 itself streamlining does not eliminate your local authority. The law does not say that every project automatically receives streamlining simply because an application is filed or deemed complete. And importantly, the state's own SB 35 framework recognizes that local governments retain authority where necessary to address specific adverse impacts for public health or safety. That matters here as you watch today on video through Sarah Swindler's presentation testimony directly from planning commissioners and from our sheriff's emergency response leadership.

These concerns are not coming only from residents in this local area, but from your own county departments as well. We recognize the importance of farm worker housing in the seriousness of California's housing challenges, but urgency cannot replace due diligence where substantial public safety concerns remain unresolved This board has evidence in the record regarding wildfire evacuation concerns, emergency access limitations and increased evacuation timing in the very high-fired Severe Zone.

That's not a cliche by the way that's a literal term by CAL FIRE. The county is not required to abandon its independent judgment just because there may be broader housing state pressures, concern about potential litigation or pressure to move quickly. And when substantial evidence raises legitimate questions about whether a project qualifies for streamlining especially in a high fire risk environment affecting evacuation this board has the authority and responsibility to require a higher level of review and scrutiny.

That is not obstruction of housing law, that is lawful governance under local rule. This is a 100-year decision that you have to make for this community it's not just today you're making a 100 year decision once approved it cannot be undone This morning's briefing from the Ventura County Fire Department regarding the active fires impacting Simi Valley should serve as a reminder that our fire professionals are already protecting Ventura County communities under increasingly difficult conditions.

Much more acreage there, our 77 acres would just pop! Their work deserves not only our gratitude, but our respect in the decisions we make here today that will shape this community for decades to come. Respecting those professionals also means being careful to not knowingly add preventable strain and risk onto systems already operating under enormous pressure. We respectfully ask that you grant our appeal and require a full and thorough CEQA review So, your final decision is based on the complete scope of thoroughly researched evidence.

Ventura County and its constituents deserve your full support when it comes to safety infrastructure emergency response evacuation planning especially in documented burn zone areas like this and communities already facing serious wildfire risk This is not opposition to farm worker housing or farm workers. I don't know how many times I've had to say this over the past three years.

This is a request for the full lawful exercise of the county's review authority, a complete secret review. and responsible decision-making before anything approval is granted. We are counting on you to not put time and money before the health and safety of all residents of Ventura County, both existing residents and farm workers. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:18:58

Thank you and I'd like to offer Appellant number two, Hema Godina. Opportunity for a five minute rebuttal if you'd like.

7:19 – 7:244 turns

CommentHema GodinaProposedself-stated7:19:13

Is it possible to get my slideshow going?

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:19:16

I'm sorry what was that?

CommentHema GodinaProposedself-stated7:19:17

Is it possible to get my slideshow going? There we go yeah. It's right there. Oh okay perfect. So here is from the farm worker study. The majority of farm workers have a strong preference to live in a single family home versus other types of dwellings, that's 89%, followed by apartments 6 and 1 half percent and this project is studio apartments. The current and so this is also from the study on the map on the right hand side shows all those whites around our stickers. And this is where farm worker families live, and as you can tell there's no stickers placed on North Ventura Avenue.

And here I circled all the major agricultural fields and then up above where the lemon is, that's where the proposed project is. And it is approximately one hour round trip from where the major agricultural fields are and this is not even counting high traffic you know where there's a lot of traffic when people get out off at work Thank you. And here is a map from the city of Ventura with the unified school district, the red icon represents a high school there is no high school located near North Ventura Avenue everything's away from the proposed site.

PresenterSabrina Venskastenants and folks like farm workers This is the right project in the wrong placProposedself-stated7:21:05

By the way, the County of L.A. generally prohibits new subdivisions in very high fire severity zones and I heard somebody from the applicant say well are we going to just not build anywhere in the county of Ventura? And I just don't think that's sort of a hyperbole in my view but just look at what the County of L A is doing it takes some very high fire severity zones really seriously The state does not require you to approve this project if you find the project individually and or cumulatively poses a severe or significant life and safety risk. And all evidence that you've received today supports a finding that this project would pose a life and safety risk, a significant life and safety risk. Our recommended actions my clients are recommended action is You deem the application incomplete on three different bases.

One, applicant didn't receive a preliminary will serve letter as required by the county ordinance prior to filing their application. The applicant did not establish the project complies with the AQMP. And the applicant gave wrong information about the fire hazard zone for the proposed project location at the time that it applied for this project. The applicant did not disclose the true facts that the project is in a very high fire severity zone. If you wish to not deeming the application incomplete, I believe is within the board's jurisdiction and power If not, certainly the board is authorized and empowered to direct remand it back to the planning director to make determinations that are consistent with the evidence and also the findings of the general plan.

You can deny the project, you can deny the applicant's request for tentative subdivision parcel map, the tree permit, and the planned development permit on the grounds that have been stated previously. Finally, the staff suggests that it is too late for the appellant to challenge the planning staff's deemed complete determination. The staff report claims the appellate was required to challenge the deemed complete determination within the short statutory time period after planning action this is incorrect in fact the planning staff report states that It is likely the appellant wouldn't have been able to appeal that determination anyway because there is nothing in the code that allows that. So this is up to the board to determine that, you know I'll go and I don't want to go into exhaustion of administrative remedies exceptions.

I'll just state that there was nothing that the appellant could have done until this point to challenge the deemed complete determination by planning staff Finally, I would ask you to look at the Attorney General's guidance on analyzing risks associated with wildfire hazards. That has not been done. I don't see any, I don't see the county staff or the applicant following the AGs guidance and I have cited the AG's guidance with respect to this issue in my letter that you received today.

Thank you.

7:24 – 7:293 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:24:33

All right, thank you. Now I'd offer an opportunity for the applicant to provide rebuttal for five minutes if you...

PresenterNeil McGuireapplicantProposedself-stated7:24:43

Good afternoon again. We've heard a lot of the comments focus on the SQL analysis that was prepared for the project and a request essentially to go back and do a project level analysis or a complete analysis. That was done here, but before I get into that let me step back in terms of looking at what the county did a few years ago when the county went through and updated its general plan it also did a sequel analysis in connection with that document And that document looked at the impacts of allowing for by virtue of the general plan development in the unincorporated county including in.

High and very high fire hazard areas. And at that time, the general plan EIR concluded that impacts associated with development would in fact be significant but the county said we have countervailing considerations. We need housing. We need affordable housing. We need farm worker housing And we are going to allow those types of development in these areas. That was done as part of the CEQA review, again a number of years ago.

What this project then did is look at that programmatic level analysis and we did drill down and do a project level analysis, a complete analysis. We looked at this particular site, this particular project, the technical studies that you have in front of you including from Mr. Nichols look at The actual CEQA thresholds. for this project, looking at wildfire risks and so on and analyze the project under those actual thresholds. So we're hearing comments about well why didn't you analyze the 15 minutes? Why didn't you analyze the evacuation time under state? That's not the criteria as the experts have explained Mr. Nichols as well as fire staff at the planning commission.

The threshold for the evacuation is not time it is public safety And that is the analysis that was done for this project, was looking at the public safety thresholds and under that rubric. And so looking at that rubric with regard to the specific comments about the Thomas fire and the impacts of the Thomas fire, the congestion of the Thomas fire I think is somewhat helpful We heard comparisons, I think at least one to the Paradise campfire.

There was a significant loss of life associated with that fire. I believe 85 people. Let's look at public safety with regard to the Thomas Fire obviously a tragedy, the worst fire in the county's history at the time, the worst fire in California history. In this area we were very fortunate though no loss of life, no injuries So we did have congestion with the evacuation but with regard to the actual standard under CEQA that is being analyzed, the public safety standard. There was not an impact on the Thomas fire and this project is... The experts have said this project is not expected to have an impact on public safety.

And those reports are before you in the appendices to exhibit five. Very briefly, I want to follow up on Barbara had a comment about what is allowed and what is not allowed in the very high fire hazard area. And noted rightfully and was noted by County Fire Staff in front of the Planning Commission farmworker housing is the only type of development that is prohibited in the very high fire hazard zone. High density is allowed as long as it's not farm worker housing Residential development is allowed.

Commercial, industrial and so on obviously depending on zoning rules but farm worker housing is the only use that has been selected as being prohibited in the very high fire zone. One way to look at that is the farm worker housing in connection with SOAR. There was a window that was opened to allow more farm worker housing and areas where it was not previously allowed, and it's always possible that the prohibition was a way for some folks to maybe try to close that window back again.

But I do think it's an important point that is worth noting. There was a comment made by the appellants again about the water service and that would be some hook to render the project application incomplete. Again, the City of Ventura changed the way that they analyzed the water service for projects outside of the city itself but they did conduct a water review analysis in 2014 or excuse me 2024 And the city submitted a new letter to the county, a few months ago indicating that there's sufficient water supply available. So thank you very much and I'll be available for any questions.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:29:53

Thank you. Thank you very much Mr Conger. Any final closing statements by staff?

7:30 – 7:3412 turns

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:30:02

Good afternoon. Yes, I did have a couple clarifying remarks. First, I wanted to discuss the very high fire hazard severity maps. There was some confusion about which maps were in place in 2023. The information that Ms. Godina presented was from County View, which is our GIS online interactive map system. The slider for dates at the very bottom of that system changes only the aerial image. It does not bring up old data, it does not bring up the very high fire hazard severity maps from past years and so what she was seeing was a 2023 aerial image with the current very high fire hazard severity maps overlaid on that.

The correct very high fire hazard severity maps are included in your record as Exhibit 28. They were based on CAL FIRE maps that were produced in 2010. I also wanted to clarify that the subject parcel is one legal lot of record there was discussion of four separate parcels those are assessor parcels that are used for tax assessment purposes only, there's only one legal lot of record that's 83 acres in size So we're going to start with the general plan environmental impact report.

This project would be no worse than what was analyzed in the general plan EIR, which is what we consider when we're doing CEQA streamlining. I also wanted to mention someone had brought up that the project site is in a wildlife corridor it is not We also heard from Mr. Bostock regarding certain agricultural practices that occurred on the site, including irrigation and site work. These are all types of practices that are commonly associated with crop production and are part of the environmental baseline.

And I believe that is it but I'm available for any other questions.

not transcribed≈17s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:32:27

Thank you very much. Yeah, before we close the public hearing are there any questions by board members of staff or applicants or appellants? Supervisor

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:32:38

Long? In understanding the Somos fire or Somis farm worker housing so could you just reiterate where water and sewer hookups would be?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:32:51

The water is provided by the City of Ventura. After project approval, the applicants will need to get an out-of-agency service agreement approved through the Local Agency Formation Commission and through the City of Ventura to finalize their water connection. Sewer services are provided by the Ojai Valley Sanitary District

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:33:11

Okay, so different than what we had from the other one. That's great and then also could you just reiterate about the entrances?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:33:23

I'm sorry the...

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:33:24

The entrances into the property?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:33:27

The entrances will be off Ventura at North Ventura Avenue there will be two driveways off of North Ventura Avenue.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:33:32

Okay and then i think i saw a third one

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:33:35

There's a third access point at the northeast corner of the project site at Floral Drive, which based on the feedback that we'd received from the community. The condition of approval will require that that access be gated and restricted to emergency egress only there will be a Knox box type of system applied to that entrance so that the fire department could open that gate

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:33:58

Okay, great. And then the other question I had was it did pull up the fire map the exhibit 28 and then the reason why the fire maps were updated just recently could you just explain that a little bit?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:34:17

I believe they've been going through an update procedure for quite some time and it was in mid 2025 that the Cal Fire published the local responsibility area maps. There's some portions of the county that are local responsibility areas, some portion of their state responsibility area this is in a local responsibility area. And those maps were updated in yeah in mid-2025 and the board adopted its Thank you chair.

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

7:35 – 7:4028 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:35:07

Mr. McGuire just mentioned it, but with regards to the city's preliminary will serve letters Ventura water yeah it was my understanding that they don't offer those anymore that that goes back to some kind of antiquated city rules from I think 30 or 40 years ago can you talk about that what that process looks like now?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:35:24

That's correct. The North Ventura Avenue area plan was originally adopted, I believe by the city in 1982 and so the language is relatively old language it hasn't gone through a comprehensive update since then. So there's reference to a preliminary water will serve letter which the city no longer issues and the city's air quality management plan which the city no longer has. The city is covered under the Air Pollution Control District's air quality management plan And so the water, the way we work with the Water Department with the city is before an application even comes in. The applicant is directed to talk to the Water Department and they fill out a project referral form where they indicate if there are any concerns or what what requirements the applicant will have to meet in order to obtain water service and so we worked closely with Ventura Water throughout the initial application completeness review.

There is a water study that is completed, that's also part of the record and there's a letter from the city that also outlines those requirements.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:36:29

I think your follow-up comments address some of the questions I had about you know which map is applicable The will serve letter, you know there was the comment that this is just kind of a ruse to allow these units to in the future be sold market rate to non farm workers. Can you talk about the restrictions in place that are going to mandate these. Units will only be available to those working in the farm. Yeah,

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:36:57

these units are being permitted as farm worker housing units and so there are strict standards in section 8107-41 of the non coastal zoning ordinance that lay out what occupancy requirements are for those units. So there would not be an option to rent these at market rate to anybody if they were unsuccessful in housing farm workers for all of the units.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:37:20

And those are deed restrictions?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:37:22

It will be a deed restriction on on on the property there are conditions of approval that require that.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:37:29

Looking at emergency operations, I know that the general plan requires that the county have an emergency operations plan and a hazard mitigation plan. Correct?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:37:38

Yeah, the Office of Emergency Services has an all hazards evacuation plan that they maintain.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:37:45

And this was analyzed in determination was that this project would not substantially impair either of those plans?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:37:52

That's correct.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:37:54

And pesticides as another thing I brought up was the pesticide use that was studied as part of this, wasn't it?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:37:58

Yeah there was both a phase one and a phase two environmental site assessment that were done for the project. The phase 2 environmental site assessment included soil sampling and the soil sampling all showed results below residential screening levels.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:38:16

That's the only questions I have right now chair thank you

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:38:22

Yeah, thank you. Any other questions? Supervisor Lopez?

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed7:38:26

Thank you, Chair. I think most of my questions were covered already but there was a comment about the insurance impacts In the area, just whether you can answer Mr. Conger or the applicant if there have been any communications with the insurance commissioner's office about any insurance impacts to the area?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:38:54

There've been no communications from the planning division on insurance impacts I could defer to the applicant if they've been involved with anything like that.

PresenterLisa Woodburnapplicant I'm going to give just a brief overview of the prProposedself-stated7:39:16

Yes, we have not had any conversations with the state insurance company. But the fact that we're building to the very high fire hazard requirements in the Building and Safety Code and fire requirements I think that will be more favorable to this development than let's say existing residents and homes that were built 50 years ago or so.

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed7:39:44

Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:39:46

Thank you supervisor Parvin.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:39:49

When this went before the planning commission was floral drive included in the access as another access?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:01

No, it was the same arrangement where floral drive would be gated.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:04

Okay so that's not new.

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:06

That's not new.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:07

So when you go down floral drive Don't you actually meet up with the road that that they actually enter on.

CommentLaura SwensonProposedself-stated7:40:15

Yes, project

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:16

OK and the fire department is was signed off on that

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:21

yet the fire department did sign off on that

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:23

interesting.

7:40 – 7:4715 turns

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:28

I should point out that there are two other access points and that's why they signed up.

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:32

Don't they all end up in one place?

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:34

The two access points are, I believe less than a thousand feet apart from each other

ElectedJANICE S. PARVINSupervisor, District 4Proposed7:40:39

but on the same road.

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:40:40

On the same road Ventura Avenue and the mitigation for that is that the fire department recommended 200 foot instead of 100 foot fuel modification zones. Thank you.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:40:52

Supervisor Long

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:40:53

Thank you, I appreciate Supervisor Parvin asking about that. I definitely remember Thomas Fire. I was there CP 22 days understanding things have changed from our county as how we fight fires as we see today. I just want to make sure that's in the record of what we do differently and all the lessons we've learned. You know, we don't wanna lose anyone or any home or any animal.

And so this weighs very heavily on me but I also do appreciate our fire code compliance, our RMA to really look at these issues to ensure that The threats that are out there. How do we mitigate them as best as possible? I do understand, I was just going through watch duty a little bit earlier today about evacuations and I do appreciate you providing for us the evacuation information and that there's I think is there two off ramps or on ramps onto the freeway that is obtainable from this project

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:42:10

There's the Kenyatta Larga on-ramp which is north of the project site and then Shell Road south of the project site.

ElectedVianey LopezSupervisor, District 5Proposedvoiceprint 0.887:42:15

Okay, okay good I appreciate that because like having two roads in and out of the project I would also want to make sure that there's two on routes to the freeway so thank you appreciate that

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:42:33

Any other questions? If there are no other questions, I'm going to close the public hearing and open it up for deliberations or comments by board members.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 20Proposed7:42:47

Supervisor LaVere. I'll start. Thank you chair. And I just want to start by acknowledging Mr. Conger this was an incredibly thorough workup and I appreciate all of the work that went into this I'll say there's obviously very strong feelings about this project on both sides, for and against. But what the Housing Accountability Act tells us is we have to put those emotions aside and we have to look at this objectively.

And we have to look at very defined standards. Does it meet the policies and standards in place at the time of the projects deemed complete? And we have to make very, very specific findings. If there's an adverse impact the findings that we have to show that that impact cannot be feasibly mitigated or very strict and I spent hours going through this project, the workup by staff.

And I think if we look at this objectively the project has complied with all of the rules, the standards and the policies that the county had in place In 2024 when the project was deemed complete. And so even if this was a project that I didn't like, I would have to vote for today given what the H Housing Accountability Act requires of us as a county and the objectivity that were required to implement.

But with that said we are an ag community and there's over 40,000 workers in this community And if you look at the farm worker housing study that the county just did, the number one thing they want is dignified housing. And it's by and far their biggest wish. Ag workers are the backbone of our agricultural economy. They're among what I believe the most honorable members of our community, the work they perform for all of us.

And this is exactly the type of housing that they're asking for. And as someone who lives in a high fire zone myself, I think it'd be really disingenuous of me to say it's okay for me to live in this kind of zone but not them when they so desperately want and desire this type of dignified housing. And so I think this project will have generational benefits for the farm workers in our community. I think it gonna increase the stock which we desperately need and I'm going to be voting to deny the appeals and let the project move forward today.

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:45:17

Any other comments? Supervisor Lopez, please.

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed7:45:19

Thank you, Chair. And I do apologize there was a follow up question that I had that I realized I overlooked if Mr. Conger might be able to answer and this is regarding the deed restrictions on the property for farm worker housing. I mentioned earlier in my comments that I participated in a panel of sorry in an event last week talking about farm worker housing. And one of the questions that came up was about the possibility of farm worker designated housing, having the flexibility to allow temporary H-2A workers that could utilize that space should there be an opportunity or vacancy. So just wanted to bring that up if that's something that you might be able to address.

PresenterMichael CongerResource Management Agency's Planning DivisionProposedself-stated7:46:07

As long as they meet the definition of a farm worker in the ordinance, they would be able to occupy those units.

ElectedVIANEY LOPEZSupervisor, District 5Proposed7:46:13

Thank you for that. Thank you, Chair. And with that, thank you, Mr. Conger. I appreciate it. With that, I support as well my colleague Supervisor LaVere in moving this project forward and one of the things that really stands out to me as we talk about the need for housing And I understand the safety concerns, having seen the impacts of the Thomas fire from a distance working in the community.

The question that I ask myself is how can we make these projects safe? How can we make these developments safe not just for the incoming residents but for the current residents in that community and what is being done to ensure that everyone there is prepared for the next disaster, whether it's a wildfire or anything else. And that's what really stands out to me as we see the great need in our community with housing and especially the farm working community here. So I will also be supporting Supervisor Levere in moving this project forward and denying the appeal Thank you, Supervisor Lopez. Any other comments?

not transcribed≈12s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen

7:47 – 7:512 turns

UnidentifiedUnidentified speaker 1Proposed7:47:49

I'd like to just add a few before there's a motion. As I look at this, there's some long term it's raised some concerns, some challenges, some opportunities but definitely things that need to be focused on by this board and others that are very their long-term issues. The first is our traffic in general. It's not just the Avenue. And it's incumbent upon us as VCTC commissioners and also to work with Caltrans to focus on long-term infrastructure upgrades for our transportation system in general, even when there's not a horrific fire.

It's a challenge that we all need to focus on and fix. The other is continuing to look strategically at fuel modification particularly along the wild land and urban interfaces. And this is one of them. There's a number of them You know, so much of this comes up all the time. I'm on the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. We work through this. There's Prop 4 monies and you know there's very few places in Ventura County that are safe from these kind of wildfires. There really is not and you see like Camarillo hadn't had a fire in that area for over 100 years until the mountain fire And then the last thing is farmworker housing right it's and I know this is part of it.

The same applicant, the same proprietor has made the Somos farmworker housing project in Somos and it's there. And it's a wonderful place. It's nice place. It is not entirely affordable for all farmworkers. In fact they've not able to necessarily fill all those units and came to me some months ago asking if the unfilled units could be available generally We're going to have to think through that at a strategic level as well because some of these units are not affordable for all farm workers.

And I think that's a challenge we have to look at long term. So those are the three things that really, I think about have been raised as a result of this project coming forward and I will support my colleagues in supporting the recommendations brought forward in the board letter. Any other? If not, I'm entertaining a motion

not transcribed≈14s of audible speech the AI couldn’t make out▸ listen
Roll-call vote Passed 5–0 · via vote board Moved by Matt LaVere · Seconded by Vianey Lopez
Show transcript
All right, item number 35 has been moved by Supervisor LaVere to approve staff recommendations as stated in the board letter. Is that correct? Moved by second by Supervisor Lopez please vote and that passes unanimously thank you.

Thank you everyone and I believe the Board of Supervisors is adjourned