UnGovr People

Joan Hartmann: meeting history

JH
Joan Hartmann
Supervisor
Nonpartisan officeElected
174meetings
170attended
96spoke in
4026speaking turns
2bodies
295votes
“phrase” · word OR word · -exclude · before:YYYY-MM-DD · after: · body:

Local Agency Formation Commission

How they voted 4
Aye
motion and a second. Is there anybody who wishes to speak on this? Hearing none, Madam Clerk would you please call the roll?Passed · 7–0
Aye
motion and a second. Would you please call the roll?Passed · 7–0
Aye
motion would Adam Clerk would you please call the roll?Passed · 6–0
Aye
motion and a second. Okay. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Please call the roll.Passed · 7–0
2026-05-07Regular Meetingabsentdid not speak
2026-04-02Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 4
Aye
motion and a second. Vote by roll call.Passed · 7–0
Aye
motion and a second for the balance of the cons for the consent calendar agenda. Aye.Passed · 6–0
Aye
motion and a second. Madam Clerk, please call the roll.Passed · 5–0
Aye
motion with that in mind. Are we good? I would suggest and now's the time for the clerk to call the rollPassed · 6–1
2026-03-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
Aye
Motion and a second. Any discussion on the minutes? That's a relief. Please call the roll.Passed · 7–0
Aye
Motion and a second. Is there any public comment? Chair Starkey, members of the Commission, there are no requests to speak on this item. AnyPassed · 6–0
—
Motion has been made and seconded Madam Clerk could you please call the rollVote recorded · 4–0
2026-02-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
Aye
motion and the second. Could we please have a roll callPassed · 7–0
—
motion and a second made madam clerk you please call the roll.Vote recorded · 2–0
Aye
motion and the second I'd asked the clerk to call the rollPassed · 7–0
Aye
MotionPassed · 7–0
Aye
motion? I don't hear any. I'll ask the clerk to call the roll.Passed · 7–0
Aye
motion we have a second. There's no public comment. I'm going to ask the clerk to call the roll.Passed · 7–0

Board of Supervisors

2026-08-25Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 26-00776 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Jeremy and Megan Raff Appeal of the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Transient Occupancy Tax Final Audit Determination, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) a) Consider an appeal of the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Transient Occupancy Tax final audit determination for Jeremy and Megan Raff. The appeal was filed by Jeremy and Megan Raff. b) Consider taking the following actions: i) Conduct a hearing to consider the appeal of the final determination of Transient Occupancy Tax, interest and penalties assessed by the Treasurer-Tax Collector on Jeremy and Megan Raff in the amount of $65,840.11; ii) Uphold the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s final determination and deny the appeal request for the waiver or meaningful reduction of Transient Occupancy Tax, penalties and interest totaling $65,840.11; iii) Deny the appeal request for a payment plan arrangement; iv) Adopt the findings proposed by the Treasurer-Tax Collector; and v) Determine that the above actions involve government funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activities and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2026-08-18Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
—
1) 26-00691 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding California Municipal Finance Authority Issuance of Qualified 501(c)(3) Bonds on Behalf of Step Up Housing, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.)a) Hold a public hearing in compliance with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 regarding the issuance by the California Municipal Finance Authority of qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, to finance or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement and equipping of a multifamily rental housing project located at 4036 Cedarhurst Drive, Santa Maria, California, and consider public comment;b) Adopt a Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara approving the issuance of the California Municipal Finance Authority qualified 501(c)(3) bonds in an aggregate principal amount not-to-exceed $60,000,000.00 for the purpose of financing or refinancing the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement, and equipping of Knollwood Meadows Apartments, and certain other matters relating thereto; andc) Determine that the above actions involve government funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activities and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 2–0
2026-05-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2026-04-27Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2026-04-23Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
Aye
A-17) 26-00316 Consider recommendations regarding the Professional Services Agreement with CJM Petroleum Consulting (CJMPC) to Conduct Amortization Study, as follows:a) Approve and authorize the Chair of the Board to execute a Professional Services Agreement with CJMPC ("Agreement") to conduct an amortization study of onshore oil and gas extraction operations, in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00; andb) Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 3–2
Aye
A-19) 26-00336 Consider recommendations regarding the Support for Assembly Bill (AB) 2257 - County Departments of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as follows:a) Adopt a position to support AB 2257, which would allow any County Board of Supervisors to create a Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and shift authority over county jails from the Sheriff to the Department, pursuant to the Legislative Program Committee recommendation; andb) Find that the proposed action is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a project under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 14 CCR 15378(b)(5).Passed · 3–2
No
3) 26-00350 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding options related to the implementation of an Office of Inspector General pursuant to Government Code Section 25303.7, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file a report on oversight options related to the Sheriff's Office, including implementation of an Office of Inspector General per Government Code Section 25303.7;b) Provide direction as appropriate; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5), the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative, or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
How they voted 1
No
1) 26-00294 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Richards Ranch Reorganization Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) File No. 24-08 Tax Exchange Arbitration, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) a) Receive and file a report on the outcome of the advisory arbitration regarding a property tax exchange between the County of Santa Barbara and the City of Santa Maria as required by the proposed Richards Ranch Reorganization Annexation to the City of Santa Maria LAFCO File No. 24-08; b) Reject the property tax exchange offer selected by the contracted arbitrator, based upon certain findings of fact; and c) Find that the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect changes to the environment and therefore are not a "project" as defined for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5). COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–1
2026-04-07Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
No
A-21) 26-00211 Consider recommendations regarding the 2026 Critical Projects for Legislative Funding, as follows: a) Approve the 2026 Critical Projects for Legislative Funding list as the County’s priorities for state and federal funding opportunities; b) Authorize County staff and legislative advocates to choose which projects from the list to submit for state and federal funding opportunities based on the specific criteria for each funding opportunity; and c) Determine that the above actions are organizational and administrative activities of government that are not projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.Passed · 4–1
Aye
8) 26-00192 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding time extension requests for the installation of multi-technology carbon filtration for cannabis odor control, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) CP1 Supply Systems Inc / 4505 Foothill Road, Case No. 25TEX-00026:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00026; b) Emmawood B1 LLC / 5888 Via Real, Case No. 25TEX-00027:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00027:c) Valley Crest Farms / 5980 Casitas Pass, Case No. 26TEX-00001:i) Make the required findings for denial;ii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270, determine that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves; iii) Deny the time extension request, Case No. 26TEX-00001:d) CKC Farms, Inc. and Life Remedy Farms, Inc. / 5138 Foothill Road, Case No. 26TEX-00002:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00002;e) Bosim 1628 Management Company LLC / 1628 Cravens Ln, Case No. 26TEX-00003:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00003;f) New Generation Farms, Inc. and Blue Whale Agriculture, Inc. / 5775 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00004:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00004;g) Primetime Farms, Inc. / 5554 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00005: i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00005; andh) G and K Produce / K and G Flowers / 3480 Via Real, Case No. 26TEX-00006:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00006.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
How they voted 4
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the February 3, 2026 MeetingPassed · 5–0
Aye
County Executive Officer’s ReportPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-10) 26-00116 Consider recommendations regarding the North Branch Jail Expansion Project - Award Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Construction Management (CM); Project No. 23040, Fifth District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with STV Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, to provide CM services during the design competition and selection, design-build entity design and construction, closeout, and post construction phases for the proposed new North Branch Jail Expansion project, located at 2301 Black Road, Santa Maria, CA 93455 (APN 113-210-022/024), in an amount not to exceed $5,072,320.00; b) Authorize the Director of General Services, or his Assistant Director or Capital Division Chief designee, to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5% or $253,616.00 as authorized under California Public Contract Code Section 20142(b); c) Authorize the Director of General Services to (i) amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement by up to six (6) additional months, and (ii) terminate the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement; d) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010960; ande) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 5–0
Aye
2) 26-00127 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Sheriff's Office Overtime Usage Report, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on Sheriff's Office overtime usage from FY 2024-2025;b) Request the Sheriff's Office to continue to explore and implement additional controls to manage and reduce overtime use and exercise appropriate management controls;c) Direct further review and/or audit of issues noted in the report by the Auditor-Controller's Office, as well as other findings as determined by the Auditor-Controller, as appropriate; d) Direct the Human Resources Director to explore available options to increase accountability and control over overtime and compensatory time use and costs through upcoming labor negotiations with the Deputy Sheriffs' Association (DSA) and Sheriff's Managers Association (SMA);e) Provide other direction, as appropriate; andf) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative, or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2026-02-03Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the January 13, 2026 MeetingPassed · 5–0
Aye
County Executive Officer’s ReportPassed · 5–0
Aye
A-20) 26-00057 Consider recommendations regarding the California Coastal Commission Conditional Certification of the Local Coastal Program Amendment for Rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, as follows:a) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's certification of the Coastal Land Use Plan amendment (Resolution No. 24-93) of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);b) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209), zoning map and zoning text, respectively, of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);c) Adopt a Resolution acknowledging receipt of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209) with suggested modifications, accepting and agreeing to the suggested modifications, agreeing to issue Coastal Development Permits for the total area included in the conditionally certified Local Coastal Program, and adopting the Local Coastal Program amendment with the suggested modifications; d) Determine that the Board of Supervisors' action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15265; ande) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted resolution to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission.Passed · 5–0
Aye
A-34) 26-00084 Consider recommendations regarding a Santa Barbara County Stand Down Update, as follows: a) Receive an oral report from Supervisor Lavagnino regarding the 2025 Santa Barbara County Stand Down event; and b) Determine that the above actions are organizational or administrative activities of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.Passed · 5–0
Aye
1) 26-00055 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Extra Help Service and Retirement Waiver for Sheriff’s Office, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.) a) In accordance with California Government Code Section 7522.56(f)(1), certify that the appointment of County Employee Jose Ayala, Communications Dispatch Supervisor, is necessary to fill a critical need in the Sheriff’s Office before 180 days have passed from his date of retirement; b) Approve and authorize the Sheriff’s Office to appoint retired employee, Jose Ayala, as an Extra Help employee to assist with critical technical projects within the dispatch center on a part-time basis not to exceed 960 hours or annual service with an appointment effective February 2, 2026; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because they consist of government administrative or discal activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
Aye
2) 26-00052 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Progress Update on the One Climate Initiative, 2030 Climate Action Plan and Energy Assurance Plan, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) a) Receive and file the One Climate Initiative 5-Year Review, the One Climate Initiative 2025 Progress Report, the 2023 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Memo, and the Summary of Policy Impacts on Local Climate Action; and b) Determine that the above recommended actions do not constitute a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5), as the actions are organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
2026-01-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
A-34) 25-01057 Consider recommendations regarding the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Fees for Planning and Development Services, as follows: a) Determine that the adoption of an Ordinance Amending Fees for Planning and Development Department Services is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15273(a)(1) and 15378(b)(5); andb) Adopt (Second Reading) "An Ordinance Amending Fees for Planning and Development Services".Passed · 4–1
—
6) 25-01067 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the appeals of the Planning Commission Approval of the Sable Offshore Corporation’s Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU), Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company (POPCO) Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System Final Development Plan (FDP) Permits, Third, Fourth, and First Districts, as flows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 15 MIN.) a) Approve the appeals, Case Nos. 24APL-00025 and 24APL-00026; b) Make the required findings for denial of the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits; c) Determine that denial of the requests is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a); and d) Deny the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 2–1
2025-11-18Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-13) 25-00993 Consider recommendations regarding an Agreement for Professional Legal Services with Outside Counsel Renne Public Law Group, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute an Agreement for Professional Legal Services between the County of Santa Barbara and Renne Public Law Group with a contract term ending June 30, 2027, and a not-to-exceed contract amount of $350,000.00; and b) Determine that the above action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of government administrative or fiscal activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–1
2025-11-04Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
3) 25-00942 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the appeals of the Planning Commission approval of the Sable Offshore Corporation’s Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU), Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company (POPCO) Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System Final Development Plan (FDP) Permits, First, Third, and Fourth, Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.) a) Deny the appeals, Case Nos. 24APL-00025 and 24APL-00026; b) Make the required findings for approval of the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine the requests are not a project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5); and d) Grant de novo approval of the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits, subject to the Conditions of Approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
3) 25-00942 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the appeals of the Planning Commission approval of the Sable Offshore Corporation’s Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU), Pacific Offshore Pipeline Company (POPCO) Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System Final Development Plan (FDP) Permits, First, Third, and Fourth, Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.) a) Deny the appeals, Case Nos. 24APL-00025 and 24APL-00026; b) Make the required findings for approval of the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine the requests are not a project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5); and d) Grant de novo approval of the Change of Owner, Operator, and Guarantor for the respective SYU, POPCO Gas Plant, and Las Flores Pipeline System FDP Permits, subject to the Conditions of Approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
2025-11-03Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
2025-10-21Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
3) 25-00921 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the framework, approach and budget to phaseout oil & gas operations, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.) a) Authorize staff to initiate work on developing an ordinance to prohibit drilling of new oil and gas wells and to initiate work on preparing a Request for Proposals to undertake an amortization study to determine an appropriate period to phase out existing oil and gas facilities/operations; b) Direct Planning & Development Department staff to add this project to the Long-Range Planning Annual Work Program for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and adjust work on other projects, as necessary; c) Provide additional direction to staff regarding the framework and/or approach; andd) Determine that the proposed actions are not a project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) because providing direction to staff is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that itself will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2025-10-07Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-15) 25-00851 Consider recommendations regarding appointment of Mobilehome Rent Control Arbitrators, Santa Barbara County Code of Ordinances Chapter 11A - Mobilehome Rent Control, as follows: a) Reappoint the following candidate to the County of Santa Barbara’s Panel of prospective Mobilehome Rent Control Arbitrators: i) Luis Esparza, Attorney at Law; b) Appoint the following four (4) candidates to the County of Santa Barbara’s Panel of prospective Mobilehome Rent Control Arbitrators: i) L. Donald Boden, Attorney at Law; ii) Janean Acevedo Daniels, Attorney at Law; iii) John Derrick, Attorney at Law; and iv) Janet K. McGinnis, Attorney at Law; c) Appoint the following additional candidate to the County of Santa Barbara’s Panel of prospective Mobilehome Rent Control Arbitrators, in the event that a resignation or other removal reduces the panel to less than five (5): i) Joan Vignocchi, Attorney at Law; and d) Determine that the Board’s appointment and reappointment of Mobilehome Rent Control Arbitrators is not a project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5), as it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 2
Aye
A-20) 25-00830 Consider recommendations regarding Management Classification and Compensation Refinement, as follows: a) Adopt an amendment to the Salary Resolution to revise the County of Santa Barbara’s Classification and Salary Plan Section 2 - to establish additional management classifications and salary ranges and delete unused management classifications; revise Section 3 - Salary Schedules effective October 13, 2025; and revise Section 4 - Department Position Allocation consistent with the June 24, 2024 implementation of the management classification changes that allowed certain employees with existing civil service status to retain that status until leaving their current position; b) Adopt the Resolution which amends the Compensation and Benefits Plan for Management, Appointed Executive, and Confidential Unrepresented Employees (Resolution No. 24-187) previously approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2024, and amended June 16, 2024, July 16, 2024, and August 27, 2024; c) Authorize the Human Resources Director to apply Management General Salary Increases in 2026 and subsequent years, up to a maximum of 1.5% annually, to employees who will be Y-rated as a result of their placement in the revised classification structure on October 13, 2025 (item (a) above), as an exception to general Y-rating rules; and d) Determine that the above actions are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) since the recommended actions are government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 4–1
Aye
A-22) 25-00829 Consider recommendations regarding Building and Safety Classification and Compensation Changes, as follows: a) Adopt an amendment to the Salary Resolution to revise the County of Santa Barbara’s Classification and Salary Plan Sections 2 and 3 to establish additional classifications and salary ranges; adjust the titles and salary ranges for other classifications in the Building and Safety Division of the Planning and Development Department; and establish a new allowance; and b) Determine that the above actions are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) since the recommended actions are government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 3–1
How they voted 1
Aye
2) 25-00801 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Amendment to the 2025 County Legislative Platform, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.) a) Amend the 2025 County Legislative Platform to advocate for improved immigration reform, to include requirements for law enforcement officer identification and civil rights protections; and b) Find that the proposed action is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 14 CCR 15378(b)(5). COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2025-09-09Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
Aye
A-7) 25-00763 Consider recommendations regarding a Funding Commitment Letter for Brisa Encina Affordable Apartments, Fourth District, as follows: a) Approve and authorize the Director of the Community Services Department (CSD), pursuant to the Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Action Plan approved by the Board on May 7, 2024, to execute a HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Funding Commitment Letter between the County and the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara (HASBARCO), in the amount of $1,500,000.00, for the Brisa Encina Affordable Supportive Housing Development (Project); and b) Determine that the above recommended actions are not the approval of projects that are subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), finding that the actions are not projects as they are the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.Passed · 4–1
—
A-10) 25-00768 Approve Budget Revision Request Nos. 0010781; 0010785; 0010794; 0010796; 0010797; and 0010798 (4/5 Vote Required).Vote recorded · 1–1
Aye
4) 25-00783 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Soutar Appeal of the County Planning Commission Approval of the Mission Isla Vista Partners LP Housing Development, Case No. 25APL-00010, Goleta Community Plan Area, Second District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 10 MIN.) a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 25APL-00010; b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case Nos. 24DVP-00005 and 24CDP-00021, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 21159.25; and d) Grant de novo approval of the project, Case Nos. 24DVP-00005 and 24CDP-00021, subject to the conditions of approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 3–2
How they voted 3
Aye
A-9) 25-00734 Consider recommendations regarding an Agreement with The Fund for Santa Barbara to administer a fifth cycle of the County of Santa Barbara Racial Equity Grant Program, as follows: a) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute the Regranting Agreement with The Fund for Santa Barbara administration of a Racial Equity Grant Program for a total maximum contract amount not to exceed $275,000.00 for the period of September 15, 2025, through June 30, 2027; and b) Determine that the above recommended action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), as the action involves the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Vote recorded · 2–0
Aye
1) 25-00749 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding County Support for State Legislation Senate Bills 627 and 805, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Adopt a position to support California State Senate Bill 627, which would prohibit federal, state, and local law enforcement officers from masking under most circumstances;b) Adopt a position to support California State Senate Bill 805, which would require federal, state, and local law enforcement officers to display identification; c) Receive and file an update on Board direction from the July 15, 2025 Board hearing; andd) Find that the proposed actions are organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a project under (California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 14 CCR 15378(b)(5).COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
4) 25-00746 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Resolution for Environmental Health Services (EHS) relating to Retail Food Facility Fees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for EHS relating to Retail Food Facilities;b) Approve, ratify, and authorize the County Health Director, or designee, to extend the term of and make certifications for the grant funding allocation award of $44,548.47 in Assembly Bill (AB) 178 Local Government Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operation Assistance Program funding through the California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health for the extended deadline period of May 31, 2025 through November 30, 2025 with no change to the total grant amount; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are not a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and are exempt pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378(b)(4), since the recommended actions are the creation of governmental funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2025-08-19Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2025-07-01Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-25) 25-00415 Consider recommendations regarding the adoption (Second Reading) of a proposed Fee Ordinance for Public Works Transportation Division’s Development Review and Plan Check Review services, as follows: a) Adopt the Ordinance (Second Reading) updating fees for the Santa Barbara County Public Works Department, pertaining to Transportation Division’s review of subdivision maps and other documents related to development review and plan check review; and b) Find that the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County approving charges that are for the purpose of meeting operating expenses, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and are therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(l) and not a "project" as defined for purposes of CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and (b)(5).Passed · 4–1
2025-06-24Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
Board Deliberation and Decision-MakingPassed · 4–2
Aye
Board Deliberation and Decision-MakingPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
Aye
A-30) 25-00504 Consider recommendations regarding the reaffirmation of County opposition to new offshore oil leasing in response to the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM’s) 11th National Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Leasing Program, as follows: a) Adopt a Resolution reaffirming the County of Santa Barbara’s opposition to new offshore oil leasing off the coast of California in response to BOEM’s request for information regarding preparation of the 2025-2030 National OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program, as published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2025 (Federal Register Doc. No. 2025-07479); and b) Determine that the recommended actions do not constitute a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), as they are administrative government activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 3–2
2025-06-03Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-19) 25-00382 Consider recommendations regarding Environmental Health Services Fees, as follows: a) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste; b) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Monitoring Wells and Borings; c) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Site Mitigation; d) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA); and e) Find that approval of the above recommended actions i-iv is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and (B) because the fees will be used for operating expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 because the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a "Project" as defined for purposes of CEQA, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 3–1
2025-05-20Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2025-05-13Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
5) 25-00382 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Environmental Health Services Fees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding Environmental Health Services' Fee Schedule Resolutions and Ordinances; b) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Public Swimming Pools;c) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, Pumping, Maintenance and Disposal Services, Sewage Violation Inspections, and Land Development Review Services; d) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Organized Camps and Housing Complaint Inspections;e) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Body Art;f) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Public Water Systems (California Safe Drinking Water Act);g) Adopt a Resolution amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Water Wells and Private Water Systems;h) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste;i) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Monitoring Wells and Borings;j) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Site Mitigation;k) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA);l) Read the titles of the above Ordinances amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste, Monitoring Wells and Borings, Site Mitigation, and Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) into the record and waive full reading of these Ordinances; m) Find that approval of the recommended actions a) - l) is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and (B) because the fees will be used for operating expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 because the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a "Project" as defined for purposes of CEQA, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis. n) Continue the hearing on Environmental Health Services' Fee Ordinances to the Administrative Agenda of June 3, 2025, to consider recommendations, as follows:i) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Solid Waste; ii) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Monitoring Wells and Borings; iii) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Site Mitigation;iv) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending fees for Environmental Health Services relating to Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA);v) Find that approval of the above recommended actions i-iv is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8)(A) and (B) because the fees will be used for operating expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273 because the proposed actions are administrative activities of the County, which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a "Project" as defined for purposes of CEQA, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
Aye
8) 25-00399 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding options to address emissions from Oil & Gas Operations, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Provide direction to staff regarding potential actions to address emissions from oil and gas operations, including:i) Preparation of ordinance amendments prohibiting new drilling, orii) Maintain status quo and allow acceptance of permits applications for new drilling; oriii) Provide other direction to staff, as appropriate;b) Direct staff to maintain status quo and exclude oil and gas operations from the 2030 Climate Action Plan; and c) Determine that the proposed actions are not a project pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15378(b)(5) because providing direction to staff is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that itself will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
How they voted 1
—
3) 25-00294 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Workforce Housing Study, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Receive a presentation on the Workforce Housing Study, which identifies implementation actions to increase the availability of affordable workforce housing in Santa Barbara County; b) Direct staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a lower- to moderate-income workforce affordable housing development at the current site of the Probation building (123 East Carrillo Street, in Santa Barbara), and return to the Board for authorization to issue the RFP; c) Provide direction to staff whether to focus on development of housing or installation of solar panels in the downtown campus parking lot; if housing is selected, direct staff to examine the feasibility of utilizing the current site of the Engineering building (123 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara), Human Resources building (1226 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara) and the Administrative building parking lot (105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara) for housing; and d) Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–1
2025-04-01Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
—
4) 25-00266 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on current renovations at the Main Jail and potential expansion of the Northern Branch Jail (NBJ), as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.) a) Receive an update on renovations at the Main Jail and options for new construction at the NBJ; b) Regarding the NBJ: i) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1 (new construction of one housing unit for a total jail system of 748 beds) and issue a Request for Quotation (RFQ) to select potential Design Build teams; or ii) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 housing units for a total jail system of 876 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; or iii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 housing units for a total jail system of 1,004 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; c) Approve and authorize staff to develop funding strategies to address the operational and debt service budgetary impacts for the selected option; d) Approve and authorize staff to negotiate an amendment to the existing ground lease boundary at the NBJ with the State of California; e) Approve and authorize the County Executive Office to work with the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office, County Counsel and Auditor-Controller’s Office to develop feasible debt issuance strategies; f) Provide other direction as appropriate; and g) Find that these actions are not a "project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because they consist of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and exempt from the provisions of the CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–2
2025-03-18Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
—
A-13) 25-00163 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 46A - Inclusionary Housing, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 46A to amend Sections 46A-2, 46A-3, 46A-4, 46A5, and 46A-6 and implement the specific actions described in Program 4 of the County of Santa Barbara 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (HEU); andb) Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 3–1
2025-03-14Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
2025-03-11Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
A-3) 25-00163 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 46A - Inclusionary Housing, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 46A to amend Sections 46A-2, 46A-3, 46A-4, 46A5, and 46A-6 and implement the specific actions described in Program 4 of the County of Santa Barbara 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (HEU); and b) Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the CEQA, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–1
No
A-13) 25-00185 Consider recommendations regarding a Community Forum on Cannabis Odor in Carpinteria, as follows: a) Authorize a special meeting to host a Community Forum on Cannabis Odor in Carpinteria to be held in Carpinteria City Hall Chambers on March 14, 2025. The purpose of this forum is to provide additional opportunity to hear from the community on the needs for improved cannabis odor control; b) Determine that these actions do not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5); and c) Provide any additional direction to staff, as appropriate.Passed · 3–2
2025-03-04Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
Aye
A-10) 25-00109 Consider amendments to the Compensation Ordinance and Resolution for Elected Officials, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance to index salaries of Members of the Board of Supervisors to seventy percent (70%) of the base salary for a California Superior Court Judge, effective May 12, 2025, resulting in a 48.8% salary increase, for an annual salary of approximately $171,309.00, with future salary adjustments to be effective annually in the pay period in which January 15th falls, and set the biweekly allowance for the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to 2% of salary; and b) Determine pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.Passed · 3–1
Aye
A-11) 25-00112 Consider recommendations regarding an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and American Medical Response West (AMR), as follows: a) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services; and b) Determine that the above recommended action is not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the action is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 3–2
Aye
5) 25-00163 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance to Amend County Code Chapter 46A - Inclusionary Housing, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 46A to amend Sections 46A-2, 46A-3, 46A-4, 46A5, and 46A-6 and implement the specific actions described in Program 4 of the County of Santa Barbara 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (HEU); andb) Determine that the proposed action does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the CEQA, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–1
2025-02-11Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
—
A-11) 25-00112 Consider recommendations regarding an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and American Medical Response West (AMR), as follows:a) Repeal Ordinance 5182 that rescinded and replaced Chapter 5 of the Santa Barbara County Code (Ambulances) on June 20, 2023, which will nullify the actions to approve the permit for the Fire District and deny the permit for AMR taken thereunder;b) Approve the introduction (first reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services;c) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Agreement with AMR to provide ambulance services for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area with an annual cost reimbursement to the County in the amount of up to $3,989,831.00 for performance period of February 11, 2025 through February 10, 2029. If the County or AMR does not provide written notice of withdrawal six (6) months before the end of the applicable term the Agreement will automatically renew for one (1) year terms not to exceed beyond February 10, 2033; e) Approve and authorize the Director of the Public Health Department and the Local Emergency Medical Services Authority to make immaterial changes such as correcting clerical errors and updating contact information, upon review and concurrence by the Offices of the County Executive, County Counsel, and Auditor-Controller, as may be applicable;f) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; and g) Continue the item to the Administrative Agenda of March 4, 2025 to consider adoption of the Ordinance, as follows:i) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services; and ii) Determine that the above recommended action is not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the action is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 0–1
Aye
3) 25-00089 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Montecito Land Use and Development Code (MLUDC), County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), Article II, Coastal Zoning Ordinance, and associated Comprehensive Plan amendments to adopt updated Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance amendments (Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, 24ORD-00003, 24GPA-00001, and 24GPA-00002), as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Case Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, and the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003;b) Determine that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003, and the design guidelines amendments are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15265;c) Approve the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments by taking the following actions:i) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the County LUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00001), Section 35-1 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;ii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the MLUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00002), Section 35-2 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; andiii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the Article II Coastal Zoning Ordinance (Case No. 24ORD-00003) of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;d) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00001, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-1.10, amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-3.1, and delete Attachment H, of the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan;ii) Amend Development Standard VIS-LA-1.2.3 of the Los Alamos Community Plan; andiii) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan;e) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00002, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Coastal Land Use Plan in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan; f) Adopt a Resolution revising the Old Town Orcutt Design Guidelines and the Los Alamos Bell Street Design Guidelines for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments; g) Adopt a Resolution revising the Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments;h) Adopt a Resolution authorizing Planning and Development to submit the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards amendments (Case No. 24ORD-00003, Case No. 24GPA-00002) to the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for review and certification as an amendment to the Santa Barbara County Local Coastal Program; andi) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted Resolution to the Executive Director of the CCC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2025-01-07Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
25-00032 9:00 A.M.WelcomeSupervisor Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPresentation of Colors and Pledge of AllegianceSanta Barbara County Fire Department Honor GuardInvocationAnthony RodriguezLady of Guadalupe ChurchIntroduction of Officials Elected in 2024Mona Miyasato, County Executive OfficerAdministration of the Oath of OfficeMona Miyasato, County Executive OfficerCall to Order and Election of Officers of the2025 Board of Supervisors,Board of Directors of the Flood Control & Water Conservation District,and Board of Directors of the Water AgencyJacquelyne Alexander, Chief Deputy Clerk of the BoardNomination of the 2025 Chair and Vice ChairSupervisor Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPresentation of GavelsRemarks, Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsRemarks, 2025 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPoetry ReadingMcKenna HeilLa Colina Junior High SchoolMusical PresentationLa Colina Jr. High School Jazz BandDirected by Mr. Stephen HughesKeynote AddressGwyn LurieCo-Founder of The Giving List/The Giving List Women and CEO of Montecito Media GroupRecessA reception will follow in the County Administration Building,Board of Supervisors Conference Room, Fourth FloorPassed · 5–0
Aye
25-00032 9:00 A.M.WelcomeSupervisor Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPresentation of Colors and Pledge of AllegianceSanta Barbara County Fire Department Honor GuardInvocationAnthony RodriguezLady of Guadalupe ChurchIntroduction of Officials Elected in 2024Mona Miyasato, County Executive OfficerAdministration of the Oath of OfficeMona Miyasato, County Executive OfficerCall to Order and Election of Officers of the2025 Board of Supervisors,Board of Directors of the Flood Control & Water Conservation District,and Board of Directors of the Water AgencyJacquelyne Alexander, Chief Deputy Clerk of the BoardNomination of the 2025 Chair and Vice ChairSupervisor Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPresentation of GavelsRemarks, Steve Lavagnino, 2024 Chair, Board of SupervisorsRemarks, 2025 Chair, Board of SupervisorsPoetry ReadingMcKenna HeilLa Colina Junior High SchoolMusical PresentationLa Colina Jr. High School Jazz BandDirected by Mr. Stephen HughesKeynote AddressGwyn LurieCo-Founder of The Giving List/The Giving List Women and CEO of Montecito Media GroupRecessA reception will follow in the County Administration Building,Board of Supervisors Conference Room, Fourth FloorPassed · 5–0
2024-12-17Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-18) 24-01282 Consider recommendation regarding the Fifth Amendment to the Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc. for climate action planning services, as follows:a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Fifth Amendment to the Agreement with Rincon Consultants, Inc., for climate action planning services to modify the scope of work, extend the term through December 31, 2025, and adjust contract amount by $53,270.00, for a total amount not to exceed $585,901.00; and b) Determine that the above recommended actions are government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and are therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.Vote recorded · 2–0
2024-10-01Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 9
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the September 17, 2024 MeetingPassed · 5–0
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
Aye
A-18) 24-00980 Consider recommendations regarding a Volunteer and Clinical Support Services Agreement with A.T. Still University of Health Sciences (ATSU), as follows: a) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute a Professional Services Agreement with ATSU (learning institution) for volunteer and clinical support services including income generation to the County of up to $31,500.00 per year with a period for performance from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2028; b) Approve and authorize the Director of Public Health, or designee, to make immaterial changes in accordance with Section 34 of the Agreement, subject to the Board’s ability to rescind this delegation at any time; and c) Determine that the recommended actions are not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is exempt pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the recommended actions are government fiscal activities that do not involve commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.Passed · 5–0
—
A-22) 24-00977 Consider recommendations regarding an Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Project, County Project No. 864052, Second District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. (not a local vendor), in an amount not to exceed $424,505.00, to provide professional design and engineering services for the Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Design; b) Approve and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to, in accordance with the Agreement: extend the period of performance for up to one additional year (Section 4.B); make immaterial amendments (Section 34); suspend performance (Section 46.); and to approve amendments to the Agreement in an amount not to exceed 10% of the initial contract amount, $42,450.00, for a total contract authorization of $466,955.00; c) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010054 to increase appropriations of $446,955.00 in Public Works Roads-Capital Infrastructure for Services and Supplies funded by a Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Measure A Grant and Public Works Roads Measure A Fund; and d) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 1–0
—
A-24) 24-00969 Consider recommendations regarding a Resolution in Support of Proposition 35: Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal Health Care Services Initiative, as follows: a) Adopt a Resolution in support of Statewide Ballot Proposition 35, the "Provides Permanent Funding For Medi-Cal Health Care Services Initiative" on the November 5, 2024 General Election ballot; and b) Determine that the above actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.Vote recorded · 0–0
Aye
A-25) 24-00985 Approve the reappointment of Steve Strachan to the Parks Commission, term ending June 30, 2027, Fourth District.Passed · 5–0
Aye
1) 24-00880 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC) Member Agency Strategic Plan Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Receive and file a member agency update presentation from the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC) on the RCRC Strategic Plan and ongoing efforts; andb) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines the actions consist of organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
Aye
2) 24-00986 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Countywide Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP), as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Receive and file an update from the Information Technology Department (ITD) regarding the Countywide ITSP; andb) Determine that the receipt and filing of an update on the ITSP is not the approval of a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), finding that the action is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in the direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
Aye
3) 24-00978 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Energy Assurance Plan (EAP), as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)a) Receive and file a report on the EAP for the County of Santa Barbara; b) Adopt the four goals of the EAP;c) Direct staff to pursue implementation of strategies in EAP as funding and resources permit; andd) Determine that the recommended actions do not constitute a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), as the actions do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION:Passed · 5–0
2024-09-10Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
A-12) 24-00889 Consider recommendations regarding a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Dominion Voting Systems, Inc., as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Second Amendment to the Voting System and Services Agreement with Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. for the purchase of an 821D HiPro InterScan ballot scanner and associated firmware and support and to upgrade existing hardware; to increase the not-to-exceed amount from $2,400,000.00 to $3,500,000.00; and to update the Pricing and Payment Schedule which includes additional annual firmware license fees and hardware warranty fees; b) Authorize the County Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, or designee, to approve and sign amendments to the components and services of the Agreement, with the concurrence of County Counsel, Auditor-Controller and Risk Management, if the total cost of the amendments does not exceed 10% of the Agreement’s not-to-exceed amount; c) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0009895 to increase equipment capital asset appropriations for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 by $287,560.00 in the Department of Clerk-Recorder-Assessor Fund 0001; and d) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378((b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–1
Aye
1) 24-00893 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara Issuance of Tax-Exempt Multifamily Housing Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Patterson Point Apartments, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.) a) Hold a public hearing in compliance with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) regarding the issuance by the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara of tax-exempt multifamily housing revenue obligations, for the benefit of Patterson Point, L.P., and consider public comment; b) Adopt a Resolution approving the issuance by the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara of its multifamily housing revenue obligations for the benefit of Patterson Point, L.P. in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,720,240.00, to finance the acquisition and construction of a 24-unit multifamily rental housing facility, to be located in the unincorporated area of the County located at 80 North Patterson Avenue, Goleta, California; and c) Determine that the above actions involve government funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activities and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
2024-08-20Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 7
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the July 16, 2024 MeetingPassed · 3–0
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-19) 24-00833 Consider recommendations regarding a Resolution of Support for AB 2236 and SB 1053, as follows: a) Adopt a Resolution of Support for AB 2236 and SB 1053 related to banning plastic bags; and b) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines the actions consist of organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 24-00836 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Extra Help Services and Retirement Waiver for Sheriff’s Office, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.) a) In accordance with California Government Code Section 7522.56(f)(1), certify that the appointment of former County employee Steven Akiyoshi, Building Maintenance Supervisor, is necessary to temporarily fill a critical need in the Sheriff’s Office before 180 days have passed from his date of retirement; b) Approve and authorize the Sheriff’s Office to temporarily appoint retired employee, Steven Akiyoshi, as an Extra Help employee to assist with critical ongoing maintenance of Main Jail Facility on a part-time basis not to exceed 960 hours of annual service with an appointment effective date of September 2, 2024; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because they consist of government administrative or fiscal activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
2) 24-00766 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance renewing Santa Barbara County Code Chapter 12A, County-Owned Property, Article II, Real Property Procedures, Sections 12A-10, 12A-10.1, 12A-11, and 12A-11.1 pertaining to the administration and procedures for managing County-owned property and renewing delegations of authority therein, as follows:a) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance renewing delegations of authority for Santa Barbara County Code Chapter 12A, County-Owned Property, Article II, Real Property Procedures, Sections 12A-10, 12A-10.1, 12A-11, and12A-11.1, pertaining to the administration and procedures for managing County-owned property therein; andb) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as they consist of "general policy and procedure making" and pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(5) as they consist of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and approve and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 4–0
Aye
3) 24-00838 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a response to the 2023-2024 Grand Jury Report: Santa Barbara County Coroner Facility and Equipment a Hazardous Environment, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider and adopt the responses as the Board of Supervisors' response to the 2023-2024 Grand Jury report entitled "Santa Barbara County Coroner Facility and Equipment a Hazardous Environment,";b) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the letter and forward the letter and responses to the Presiding Judge of Santa Barbara County Superior Court; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15378(b)(5) that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review, because they are government administrative activities that does not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
4) 24-00842 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Update on Deferred Implementation of Senate Bill 43, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation on the Deferred Implementation of Senate Bill 43 which modifies Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5008 by expanding the definition of "Gravely Disabled"; andb) Determine that the above actions are organizational or administrative activities of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and are therefore not projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
2024-07-30Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
Motion and vote to accept Supervisor Capps’ remote participation.Passed · 4–0
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
2024-07-16Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
—
Motion and vote to accept Chair Lavagnino’s remote participation; Motion and roll call vote for Admin Items A4, A11, A12, A19, A25Vote recorded · 0–0
Aye
Motion and vote to accept Chair Lavagnino’s remote participation; Motion and roll call vote for Admin Items A4, A11, A12, A19, A25Passed · 3–0
2024-07-09Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
2) 24-00759 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Second Reading of a Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Increase Ballot Measure for November 2024 General Election Ballot, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code to increase the TOT rate from the current level of twelve percent (12%) to fourteen percent (14%) of the rent charged in the unincorporated areas of the County; b) Adopt a Resolution submitting the proposed Ordinance and ballot language proposing to increase the TOT rate to fourteen percent (14%) to the electorate for approval, and requesting and ordering consolidation with the November 5, 2024 General Election; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
How they voted 2
Aye
5) 24-00713 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Seventh Amendment to the Agreement with California Forensic Medical Group (CFMG/Wellpath) for the provision of Medical and Mental Health Services, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Seventh Amendment to the Agreement for Services with CFMG/Wellpath for healthcare services (medical and mental health services) at the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office jail facilities and only for medical services for Probation’s juvenile facilities, to extend these services from July 1, 2024 to March 31, 2025, and increase the not to exceed amount by $13,232,153.75 for this nine-month contract extension period in a total amount not to exceed $88,767,268.35 for the contract term; and b) Determine that the above action is not a "Project" subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15378(b)(5), since the activity is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
—
2) 24-00659 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding KPMG's Operational Performance Review of the Child Support Services Department, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a report on KPMG's Operational and Performance Review of the Child Support Services Department;b) Provide direction as appropriate; andc) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as it consists of general policy and procedure making.COUNTY EXCUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–0
2024-06-18Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Abstain
7) 24-00639 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Tax on Cannabis Operations Ordinance, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County:i) Option 1 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed, as follows: Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at twenty-five cents ($0.25) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at two and a half cents ($0.025) per quarter, per square foot; orii) Option 2 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed as follows:Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at fifty cents ($0.50) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at ten cents ($0.10) per quarter, per square foot;b) Read the title, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 50A, Tax on Cannabis Operations, of the Santa Barbara County Code," and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Approve the appointment and authorize member(s) of the Board of Supervisors to author, sign, and submit on behalf of the Board an argument in favor of the Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" ballot measure and any rebuttal; d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Set a hearing on the Agenda of July 9, 2024 to consider the following actions: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County; ii) Adopt a Resolution submitting the proposed Ordinance and ballot language to change the tax on cannabis cultivation to the electorate for approval, and requesting and ordering consolidation with the November 5, 2024 General Election; and iii) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 24-00575 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Recommended Budget Hearings, as follows:Acting concurrently as the Board of Supervisors; the Board of Directors, Fire Protection District, Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District; Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District; Board of Directors, Water Agency; and other special districts under the supervision and control of the Board of Supervisors:a) Receive, consider, and file the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, which includes the County's General Operating Budget as well as budgets of special districts governed by the Board of Supervisors;b) Approve final budget adjustments to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;c) Adopt a Resolution entitled In the Matter of Adopting the Budget for FY 2024-2025; d) Approve budget adjustments, if any, as amended during Budget Hearings, to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;e) Delegate authority to the Chair of the Board to execute single-year renewals of grants and contracts previously approved by the Board and included in the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, where contract amounts are within 10% of previously contracted amounts;f) Receive the draft salary resolution, direct any specific changes made during the June 2024 budget hearings, and adopt that amended salary resolution to be effective June 24, 2024, which updates job classifications and department position allocations to include positions approved by the Board of Supervisors during the FY 2024-2025 Budget Hearings;g) Adopt position changes previously approved by the County Executive Officer during FY 2023-2024 under Board Resolution 99-486; andh) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above fiscal activities are not a project subject to CEQA.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
Aye
4) 24-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Proposed Increase of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Ballot Measure for November 2024 General Election Ballot, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.) a) Receive and consider a report from staff regarding placing a measure on the November 5, 2024 General Election ballot for a possible TOT increase from Twelve Percent (12%) to Fourteen Percent (14%) in the unincorporated areas of the County; b) Direct staff to return on June 25 18, 2024 with an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Section 32-12 of the Santa Barbara County Code "Tax-imposed on transients; rate; when payable" and ballot measure for an increase of the TOT before the voters on the November 2024 General Election ballot; c) Provide other direction to staff as appropriate; and d) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
2024-05-14Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
—
3) 24-00484 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Cannabis Cultivation Taxation Options, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Consider two alternative methods for cannabis taxation for cultivation:i) Option 1: Square foot tax rate with a minimum Base Tax Rate and Activity Tax Rate; or ii) Option 2: Hybrid structure of Gross Receipts Tax Rate with a minimum Base Tax Rate based on square footage; andiii) Direct staff to return on June 25, 2024 with a Taxation Ordinance and ballot measure for cannabis operations for the November 2024 General Election ballot; and iv) Direct staff to incorporate ballot language to allow for flexibility to adjust square footage tax rates at the Board's discretion without returning to the voters; ORb) Take no action and maintain the current gross receipts taxation method; andc) Determine that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review because they are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
3) 24-00484 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Cannabis Cultivation Taxation Options, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Consider two alternative methods for cannabis taxation for cultivation:i) Option 1: Square foot tax rate with a minimum Base Tax Rate and Activity Tax Rate; or ii) Option 2: Hybrid structure of Gross Receipts Tax Rate with a minimum Base Tax Rate based on square footage; andiii) Direct staff to return on June 25, 2024 with a Taxation Ordinance and ballot measure for cannabis operations for the November 2024 General Election ballot; and iv) Direct staff to incorporate ballot language to allow for flexibility to adjust square footage tax rates at the Board's discretion without returning to the voters; ORb) Take no action and maintain the current gross receipts taxation method; andc) Determine that pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review because they are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
2024-05-07Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2024-04-23Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
4) 24-00376 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Briefing on cannabis odor abatement plan compliance monitoring in Santa Barbara County, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on cannabis odor abatement plan compliance monitoring in Santa Barbara County;b) Determine that this report does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5); andc) Provide direction to staff, as appropriate.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–2
2024-03-19Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2024-03-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
motion from Supervisor Hartman and second from Supervisor Nelson. Let's take a roll callPassed · 4–0
2024-03-05Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
Roll CallPassed · 4–0
2024-02-27Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
4) 24-00180 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding authority to advertise for construction bids for the proposed Probation Headquarters (HQ) Building Project, Project No. 19014, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Authorize the Director of General Services to advertise for construction bids for the proposed Probation HQ Building Project; andb) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 2–1
2024-02-13Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2024-02-06Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-17) 23-01212 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 Animals and Fowl, Article I and Adding Article IX, Roosters, to regulate and to limit the number of roosters by parcel size that may be kept on a single premise in Santa Barbara County, as follows: a) Consider and approve the adoption of the Ordinance (Second Reading) to amend Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 7, titled Animals and Fowl, Article I (General), Sections 7-1 and 7-5 through 7-7, and to add Article IX (Roosters); and b) Determine that the recommended actions are not a Project within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 1
Aye
MotionPassed · 4–1
How they voted 1
Aye
3) 23-01212 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 Animals and Fowl, Article I and Adding Article IX, Roosters, to regulate and to limit the number of roosters by parcel size that may be kept on a single premise in Santa Barbara County, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance to amend Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 7, titled Animals and Fowl, Article I (General), Sections 7-1 and 7-5 through 7-7, and to add Article IX (Roosters); b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive full reading of the Ordinance; and c) Continue the hearing to the Administrative Agenda of January 23, 2024 to consider adoption of the Ordinance amendments, as follows: i) Consider and approve the adoption of the Ordinance (Second Reading) to amend Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 7, titled Animals and Fowl, Article I (General), Sections 7-1 and 7-5 through 7-7, and to add Article IX (Roosters); and ii) Determine that the recommended actions are not a Project within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
How they voted 1
Aye
A-16) 23-00856 Consider recommendations regarding the Countywide Community Workforce Agreement Implementation, as follows:a) Approve and ratify a side letter between the County of Santa Barbara and Tri-Counties Building and Construction Trades Council for the Countywide Community Workforce Agreement; and b) Find that the proposed activities do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378 (b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and 15061(b)(3), therefore no environmental document is required.Passed · 3–2
How they voted 1
Aye
A-13) 23-00842 Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows:a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andb) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:i) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; andii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 1
—
2) 23-00798 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant (Pacific Pipeline Company) appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment, Case Nos. 23APL-00022; 21AMD-00000-00009 & 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST TIME: 1 HR. 45 MIN.)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C-1, C-2, and D of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report (Included in Attachment 2 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) [Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 to the Board Letter).Or, alternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 (included as Attachment 3 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) including CEQA findings; and d) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–1
2023-07-19Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-1) 23-00742 Consider recommendations regarding the 2023 Homekey Program Application, First District, as follows: a) Approve a no-interest loan to The Turner Foundation - Since 1958 (The Turner Foundation) in the amount of $90,000.00 from the First District, 990 Fund 0001 (Loan) for use as an earnest money deposit for the acquisition of that certain real property located at 2011 Oak Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (Project) using Round 3 Homekey Program grant funding from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (Homekey Funding), which Loan is to be memorialized, and subject to terms and conditions set forth, in a Promissory Note (Promissory Note), and subject to immediate repayment in the event that (i) The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding is not granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, or (ii) The Turner Foundation fails to duly execute and record, as appropriate, loan documents approved by the Board of Supervisors memorializing a loan by the County to The Turner Foundation of Homekey matching funds, including a loan agreement, promissory note, deed of trust, and regulatory agreement (Homekey Matching Loan Documents) within 30 days of The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding being granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, and which Homekey Matching Loan Documents include the Loan as amended to be subject to the terms and conditions of such Homekey Matching Loan Documents; b) Find that the foregoing recommended action constitutes the financing or assisting in the financing of the acquisition of real property to be owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation to carry out a program deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to meet the social needs of the population of the County pursuant to Government Code Section 26227; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed Project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness, and that the Project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4.Alternatively, that the Board of Supervisors:d) Approve a no-interest loan to The Turner Foundation - Since 1958 (The Turner Foundation) in the amount of $90,000.00 from the First District, 990 Fund 0001 (Loan) for use as an earnest money deposit for the acquisition of that certain real property located at 2011 Oak Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (Project) using Round 3 Homekey Program grant funding from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (Homekey Funding), which Loan is to be memorialized, and subject to terms and conditions set forth, in a loan agreement and promissory note in forms approved by each of the Community Services Director, County Counsel, County Risk Management, and the County Auditor-Controller (Loan Documents). This Loan is subject to immediate repayment in the event that (i) The Turner Foundation's application for such Homekey Funding is not granted by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, or (ii) The Turner Foundation fails to duly execute such Loan Documents by August 18, 2023, and (iii) authorize the Community Services Director to execute such Loan Documents; e) Find that the foregoing recommended action constitutes the financing or assisting in the financing of the acquisition of real property to be owned and operated by a nonprofit corporation to carry out a program deemed by the Board of Supervisors to be necessary to meet the social needs of the population of the County pursuant to Government Code Section 26227; andf) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed Project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness, and that the Project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 10
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the July 11, 2023 MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
Aye
A-15) 23-00731 Consider recommendations regarding a Letter of Support Request for AB 779: Groundwater: Adjudication and AB 560: Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: Groundwater Adjudication, as follows:a) Approve a letter of support for AB 779 and authorize the Chair to sign the letter; b) Approve a letter of support for AB 560 and authorize the Chair to sign the letter; and c) Determine that the above action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended action consists of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical damages in the environment.Passed · 3–2
Aye
A-20) 23-00714 Consider recommendations regarding a Professional Services Agreement for facilities and infrastructure asset assessment and solar feasibility study for Gaviota Mariposa Reina Site, Project No. 20036, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $490,772.00 with Michael Baker International, Inc., to provide a facilities and infrastructure asset assessment and solar feasibility study for the property known as the Gaviota Mariposa Reina Site, located at 17100 Calle Mariposa Reina, in Gaviota, California (APN 081-130-070);b) Authorize the Director of General Services or designee to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed $37,038.60;c) Approve Budget Revision Request 0009062 for $527,810.60; andd) Find that the proposed actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines, because they consist of administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and direct staff to file of a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 4–0
—
A-37) 23-00700 Set a hearing to consider the Applicant appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment and Coastal Development Permit, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows:(Set a Hearing for August 22, 2023. Time estimate: 2 hours)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval; orAlternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project by taking the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the appeal and project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 including CEQA findings; andd) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 23-00592 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending the Ordinance 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee";b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 8/22/2023Passed · 5–0
—
2) 23-00661 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustment of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 Library Special Tax Rate for County Service Area (CSA) No. 3 (greater Goleta), as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Adopt the Resolution that confirms the Report and adjusts the FY 2023-2024 library special tax rate in CSA No. 3 by 7.40%; andb) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEVote recorded · 1–0
Aye
3) 23-00662 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing), as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file the Administration Reports summarizing the Proposed FY 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing); b) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan);c) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing);d) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list;e) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list; andf) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–1
Aye
4) 23-00722 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Status Report on Criminal Justice Partners Improvement Efforts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file a report on criminal justice improvement efforts;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; andc) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
Aye
5) 23-00726 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Santa Barbara County Behavioral Health Housing and Care Continuum Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation on housing and care continuum progress to serve individuals receiving specialty mental health and substance abuse recovery services within Santa Barbara County; andb) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA guidelines, as organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
Aye
A-9) 23-00642 Consider recommendations regarding the Mental Health Services Act Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2023-2026, as follows:a) Approve and adopt the Mental Health Services Act Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan for FYs 2023-2026; andb) Determine that the above action is a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) and (b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.Passed · 4–1
2023-06-20Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
—
Approval of Administrative AgendaVote recorded · 1–0
How they voted 2
No
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 1–3
Aye
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
How they voted 8
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-4) 23-00306 Consider recommendations regarding an amendment to the Ordinance setting compensation and benefits for members of the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance which amends Ordinance 5119 setting compensation and benefits for members of the Board of Supervisors, as follows:i) Effective sixty (60) days after Board approval, increase the cap on the available percentage for salary increases for members of the Board of Supervisors and Chair allowance from 3% to 5%;ii) Effective sixty (60) days after Board approval, move the timing of salary adjustments for members of the Board of Supervisors and Chair allowance from Pay Period 01 (typically in mid-December) to the pay period in which October 1 falls; andii) Effective Pay Period 2023-21 (September 18, 2023), increase the salaries for members of the Board of Supervisors and increase the Chair allowance by 5% based on the October 2022 CPI-U; andb) Determine that the above actions are government fiscal activities or funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in potential physical impacts on the environment, and are therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA guidelines.Passed · 4–1
Aye
1) 23-00303 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an extra help service and retirement waiver for the Public Health Department, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.)a) In accordance with California Government Code Section 7522.56(f)(1), certify that the appointment of retired County employee, Manuel Crisostomo, is necessary to fill a critical need in the Public Health Department before 180 days have passed from his date of retirement; b) Approve and authorize the Public Health Department Director to appoint retired employee Manuel Crisostomo as an Extra Help employee to assist with technical assistance for the incoming Public Health Lab Supervisor not to exceed 960 hours of annual service; andc) Determine that the above actions are organizational and administrative activities of government that are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–1
—
2) 23-00435 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Central Coast Community Energy (CCCE) Member Agency Annual Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file an annual member agency update presentation from Central Coast Community Energy; andb) Determine that the above recommended actions do not constitute a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5), as the actions are organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
3) 23-00436 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ad Hoc Library Committee update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file an update on the work of the Ad Hoc Library Committee;b) Appoint Zone 5 Library Administrator to the Ad Hoc Library Committee;c) Provide staff direction regarding Ad Hoc Library Committee recommendations and next steps; andd) Determine that the above recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), finding that the action involves government organizational or administrative activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
4) 23-00217 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District Ordinance relative to service charges, connection charges, and trunk sewer fees and a Resolution relative to the collection of service charges on the tax roll; Fourth and Fifth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District:a) Receive and file with the Clerk of the Board the fixed charge report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024;b) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon, and Bradley-Solomon trunk sewer fees;c) Read title: "An Ordinance of the Laguna County Sanitation District Amending Ordinance No. 3130 Adopted November 19, 1979, Which Established Service Charges, Connection Charges, and Other Rules and Regulations as Amended by Ordinance No. 4142 Adopted December 9, 1993 Establishing Trunk Sewer Fees. This Amending Ordinance Changes the Annual Service Charge and Connection Charge for Single Family and Duplex Dwelling Units, Apartments, Condominiums, Trailer Spaces, Mobile Homes and Non-residential Development; and also Changes the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley-Solomon Trunk Sewer Fees," and waive reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Direct the Clerk to count and report the number of written protests and if no majority protest:i) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for May 16, 2023 to consider recommendations, as follows:1) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley Solomon trunk sewer fees;2) Consider the adoption of a Resolution authorizing the collection of said charges on the tax roll; and3) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are modifications of service charges, connection charges, and trunk line fees for the purposes of meeting operating and capital expenses, as well as for meeting financial reserve needs required to maintain services within this existing service area, and the modifications in charges and fees are not for the construction of capital projects for the expansion of the service system and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis; ore) If majority protest, take no action and provide direction to staff.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
Aye
5) 23-00297 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding County Service Area 12 (Mission Canyon Sewer District), Resolution Relative to Collection of Sewer Service Charges and Sewer Connection Charges on the Tax Roll, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Governing Authority of County Service Area 12:a) Receive and file with the Clerk of the Board a report entitled County Service Area 12 Fixed Charges Fee Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024;b) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the collection of sewer service charges and sewer connection charges for County Service Area 12 on the tax roll in FY 2023-2024; andc) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are for the establishment of service charges for services provided with County Service Area 12, that no expansion of services or facilities will result, that the fees will be used for meeting operating expenses and financial reserve needs and requirements, and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
Aye
6) 23-00296 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding establishing benefit assessments for County Service Areas 3, 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Receive and file Benefit Assessment Reports for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for County Service Area 3, County Service Area 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District with the Clerk of the Board;b) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 3 for Fiscal Year 2023-2024;c) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 31 for Fiscal Year 2023-2024;d) Do not establish the benefit assessments (set to zero) in those portions of the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District authorized to do so for Fiscal Year 2023-2024; ande) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15273(a)(1),(2),(3) and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are for the establishment of benefit assessment rates for services provided by County Service Areas 3 and 31, that no expansion of services or facilities will result, that revenues will be used for meeting operating expenses and financial reserve needs and requirements, and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
—
1) 23-00364 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Urgency Ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 44 to add Article IV, Just Cause for Residential Evictions, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Pursuant to Government Code Sections 25123 and 25131, adopt an Urgency Ordinance to amend County Code Chapter 44 to add Article IV, Just Cause for Residential Evictions; b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Urgency Ordinance; and c) Determine that adoption of the Urgency Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5); Or, alternatively consider recommendations, as follows: (3/5 Vote Required)d) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara to amend County Code Chapter 44 to add Article IV, Just Cause for Residential Evictions;e) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andf) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda of April 18, 2023 to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara to amend County Code Chapter 44 to add Article IV, Just Cause for Residential Evictions; andii) Determine that adoption of the Urgency Ordinance is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5).Passed · 3–0
How they voted 3
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the March 7, 2023 MeetingPassed · 5–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
Aye
2) 23-00246 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Roads Fiscal Review and Long-term Funding Options, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a report on the fiscal status of Roads Operations Fund 0015;b) Approve three staff-recommended long-term funding measures, including establishing a budget policy related to Measure A funding, increasing general fund contribution in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 Recommended Budget to cover liability insurance rate increases, and returning to the Board for consideration of permit fee increases;c) Provide other direction as appropriate; andd) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 6
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the December 21, 2022 Special MeetingPassed · 5–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 5–0
Aye
A-10) 23-00020 Consider recommendations regarding the Circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency, as follows:a) Reconsider the circumstances of the existing state of emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 23-00016 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Board of Supervisors' 2023 appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Adult and Aging Network;b) Area Agency on Aging (Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens);c) Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment (BEACON);d) Behavioral Wellness Commission;e) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Representative;f) CenCal Health;g) Child Care Planning Council;h) CommUnify (formerly Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County);i) Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Representative;j) Debt Advisory Committee;k) Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions;l) First Five Children and Families Commission of Santa Barbara County;m) Golden State Connect Authority (GSCA);n) Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA);o) Juvenile Justice Coordination Council;p) KIDS Network Policy Council;q) Law Library Board of Trustees;r) Legislative Program Committee;s) Library Advisory Committee;t) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO);u) Multi-jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force;v) National Association of Counties (NACO) Representative;w) Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board;x) Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System;y) Rural County Representative of California (RCRC); andz) Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
Aye
2) 23-00041 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Thomas Fire and 1/9 Debris Flow Five Year Recovery Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a video presentation and report from staff on the Thomas Fire and 1/9 Debris Flow Five Year Recovery Update; and b) Determine that the proposed actions are administrative activities that do not involve commitment to any specific project, and are therefore not a project as defined by State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15378 (b)(5).COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
Aye
3) 23-00017 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Commission for Women Annual Report, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file the 2021-2022 County of Santa Barbara Commission for Women Annual Report (presentation); andb) Determine that the above recommended action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), finding that the action involves government organizational or administrative activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 5–0
2022-12-06Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 22-01088 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding proposed Countywide Fee Adjustments for Santa Barbara County Parks and Services, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Adopt a Resolution that adjusts County Parks' fees for special events, aquatic programs, camping fees, and establishes new fees; andb) Determine that the above-recommended actions are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15273(a)(1), (2), and (4) since CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of: (1) Meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, (2) Purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials, and (3) Obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
2022-12-02Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 22-01091 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement Resolution and Project Template, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)Acting as the Board of Supervisors; the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District; the Board of Directors, Water Agency; the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District; and the Board of Directors, Fire Protection District:a) Receive and file a report on the status of negotiations for the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement Resolution and Project Template;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Countywide Community Workforce Agreement with Tri-Counties Building and Construction Trades Council for a term of five years for County capital projects; c) Adopt a Resolution establishing a policy for the use of Countywide Community Workforce Agreement for five years for County capital projects greater than $10 million finding that said agreement furthers a legitimate governmental interest consistent with competitive bidding law by preventing costly project delays, assuring contractors access to skilled labor, and avoiding the potential for labor strife during the life of the County capital project; and d) Find that the proposed activities do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378 (b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and 15061(b)(3), therefore no environmental document is required.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
2022-11-29Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
A-32) 22-01049 Consider recommendations regarding a First Amendment to the Agreement with Fitch and Associates (FITCH) for the Ambulance Request for Proposal (RFP) Consulting Services, as follows:a) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with FITCH to add support services for protest and appeal of the LEMSA's ambulance service RFP, to increase the amount by $51,174.00 for a revised amount not to exceed $188,574.00, and to extend the period of performance for an additional year with a revised ending date of December 31, 2023; andb) Determine that the proposed action is an administrative activity that does not involve commitment to any specific project, and therefore is not a project as defined by State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).Vote recorded · 2–1
Aye
1) 22-01048 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Notice of Funding Availability for a Farmworker Resource Center Grant, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)a) Approve and authorize the Public Health Department (PHD) Director to apply for a grant award for a County Farmworker Resource Center through the State Department of Community Services and Development (CSD) and to complete any required documentation or make any required certifications in application of the grant. If awarded the grant will be for the period of February 15, 2023 to May 15, 2024 in the amount of $833,000.00 not including the local match;b) Approve and authorize the County Executive Officer as the county administrative officer to submit a Commitment Letter and supporting documentation to the CSD for the County Farmworker Resource Center grant in the amount of County's matching fund requirement of 25% ($208,250.00) as part of the application package; c) If awarded, direct the County Executive Office and PHD to establish the required budget appropriations in the amount of $208,250.00 from local general fund dollars or other federal funding available for the required local match funding to support the Farmworker Resource Center during the grant period; andd) Determine that the recommended actions are not a "Project" with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and are exempt per CEQA Guideline section 15378(b)(5), since the recommended actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–1
2022-11-22Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
A-2) 22-00996 Consider recommendations regarding the appointment of members to Special District Boards of Directors in lieu of election, as follows:a) Appoint in lieu of election qualified individuals to Special District Boards of Directors as specified on the list of qualified applicants pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10515(b) where no candidates filed a declaration of candidacy; andb) Determine that the above action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
2022-10-18Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-9) 22-00909 Consider recommendations regarding the Circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency, as follows:a) Reconsider the circumstances of the existing state of emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Passed · 3–1
How they voted 4
Aye
A-4) 22-00872 Consider recommendations regarding a Regional Climate Collaborative Grant Application, as follows:a) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to apply for and receive Regional Climate Collaborative Grant funds in an amount up to $1,750,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 from the California Strategic Growth Council;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Partnership Agreement with the City of Guadalupe, a city government; City of Lompoc, a city government; Los Amigos de Guadalupe, a nonprofit organization; Children and Family Resource Services in partnership with the Santa Barbara County Education Office, a regional public agency, on behalf of its Santa Barbara County Promotores Network Program; Santa Paula Latino Town Hall, Inc., a nonprofit organization, on behalf of the Central Coast Climate Justice Network; California Marine Sanctuary Foundation, a nonprofit organization, on behalf of the Central Coast Climate Collaborative; Cachuma Resource Conservation District, a special district, on behalf of the Wildfire Resilience Collaborative; Community Environmental Council, a nonprofit organization; Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Center, a nonprofit organization; and Fund for Santa Barbara, Inc., a philanthropic organization, to implement the Guadalupe-Lompoc Initiative under the Regional Climate Collaborative grant, for the period of January 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026; and c) Determine that the above recommended actions do not constitute a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(2), as this involves continuing administrative activities, and 15378(b)(4) for the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 3–0
Aye
A-14) 22-00875 Consider recommendations regarding a Third Amendment to the Stacy Miller Public Affairs Agreement for COVID-19 Response in Santa Barbara County, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor Stacy Miller Public Affairs to continue providing communications, community education and outreach for COVID-19 response in the County for an additional nine months through June 30, 2023 and to increase funding by $31,500.00 for the extended period from October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 for a revised total amount not to exceed $382,000.00;b) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0008550 to increase appropriations for the Public Health Department Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Budget to add $31,500.00 to be spent from October 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023; andc) Determine that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the actions consist of the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.Passed · 3–1
Abstain
1) 22-00884 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Valley Crest, LLC appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the 5980 Casitas Pass Mixed-Light Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 22APL-000000-00018 and 19CDP-00000-00016, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.) a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, subject to the conditions of approval; orAlternatively, in order to deny the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, including CEQA findings;c) Determine that the previously certified PEIR (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, subject to the conditions of approval, including Condition No. 35 (Odor Abatement Plan Revision), as conditioned by the Planning Commission.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
Aye
2) 22-00883 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Building Electrification Ordinance, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Direct staff to proceed with developing an Ordinance that regulates natural gas infrastructure in new construction, additions, and major alterations, based on health and safety concerns and climatic, geological, and topographical conditions (Option 4), or provide other direction to Staff; and b) Determine that the above recommended actions do not constitute a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(2), as this involves continuing administrative activities; when projects and programs proceed to implementation, they may be subject to environmental review under CEQA; and that the above recommended actions are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, which consists of actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local Ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
How they voted 1
Aye
A-13) 22-00851 Consider recommendations regarding a contract renewal for countywide security services with Triumph Protection Group, as follows:a) Find, in accordance with Government Code Section 31000, that the County of Santa Barbara does not have employee resources to provide the security services being performed by Triumph Protection Group and that the County's economic interests are best served by a contract;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute Amendment 1 to BC20-144 with Triumph Protection Group (a local vendor) increasing the total contract amount by $3,294,540.00 for a total contract amount not to exceed $6,651,700.00. This will be the first of two twenty-four (24) month extension periods, covering October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2024; andc) Find that the proposed action does not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378: Maintenance of existing facilities.Passed · 3–1
2022-09-13Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-10) 22-00829 Consider recommendations regarding the circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency, as follows:a) Reconsider the circumstances of the existing state of emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Passed · 3–1
2022-08-30Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
No
1) 22-00794 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Elected Department Head Salaries, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider options regarding Elected Department Head salaries as follows:1) Option 1: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide for future salary increases as a flat percentage rate increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); 2) Option 2: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide future increases as follows: i) Provide the District Attorney with a flat percentage wage increase equivalent to the percentage wage increase provided to County Counsel and the Public Defender Department Heads (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase);ii) Provide the Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, and Treasurer-Tax Collector a flat percentage increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); andiii) Provide the Sheriff a flat percentage increase equivalent to the general wage increase for the Sheriffs Managers Association plus an adjustment that aligns the total percentage increase with other Elected Department Heads;3) Option 3: Effective at the start of each new term in office, set salaries for Elected Department Heads at the median of the market and provide for future increases based on the Consumer Price Index - Urban (CPI-U) that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors; 4) Option 4: Provide annual salary increases for Elected Department Heads based on the same CPI-U that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors and effective in the same pay period;5) Option 5a: Provide a 2.5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;6) Option 5b: Provide a 5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;7) Option 6: Take no action at this time; and8) Option 7: Provide other direction;b) Consider options and provide direction to County Human Resources regarding parity between Attorney Department Head positions; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 0–3
Aye
1) 22-00794 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Elected Department Head Salaries, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider options regarding Elected Department Head salaries as follows:1) Option 1: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide for future salary increases as a flat percentage rate increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); 2) Option 2: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide future increases as follows: i) Provide the District Attorney with a flat percentage wage increase equivalent to the percentage wage increase provided to County Counsel and the Public Defender Department Heads (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase);ii) Provide the Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, and Treasurer-Tax Collector a flat percentage increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); andiii) Provide the Sheriff a flat percentage increase equivalent to the general wage increase for the Sheriffs Managers Association plus an adjustment that aligns the total percentage increase with other Elected Department Heads;3) Option 3: Effective at the start of each new term in office, set salaries for Elected Department Heads at the median of the market and provide for future increases based on the Consumer Price Index - Urban (CPI-U) that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors; 4) Option 4: Provide annual salary increases for Elected Department Heads based on the same CPI-U that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors and effective in the same pay period;5) Option 5a: Provide a 2.5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;6) Option 5b: Provide a 5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;7) Option 6: Take no action at this time; and8) Option 7: Provide other direction;b) Consider options and provide direction to County Human Resources regarding parity between Attorney Department Head positions; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
No
1) 22-00794 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Elected Department Head Salaries, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider options regarding Elected Department Head salaries as follows:1) Option 1: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide for future salary increases as a flat percentage rate increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); 2) Option 2: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide future increases as follows: i) Provide the District Attorney with a flat percentage wage increase equivalent to the percentage wage increase provided to County Counsel and the Public Defender Department Heads (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase);ii) Provide the Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, and Treasurer-Tax Collector a flat percentage increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); andiii) Provide the Sheriff a flat percentage increase equivalent to the general wage increase for the Sheriffs Managers Association plus an adjustment that aligns the total percentage increase with other Elected Department Heads;3) Option 3: Effective at the start of each new term in office, set salaries for Elected Department Heads at the median of the market and provide for future increases based on the Consumer Price Index - Urban (CPI-U) that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors; 4) Option 4: Provide annual salary increases for Elected Department Heads based on the same CPI-U that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors and effective in the same pay period;5) Option 5a: Provide a 2.5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;6) Option 5b: Provide a 5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;7) Option 6: Take no action at this time; and8) Option 7: Provide other direction;b) Consider options and provide direction to County Human Resources regarding parity between Attorney Department Head positions; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
1) TrailedPassed · 4–1
No
1) TrailedPassed · 4–1
No
3) 22-00791 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Matkins Parcel Map, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Zoning Map Amendment, Case Nos. 19TPM-00000-00004, 19GPA-00000-00001, and 19RZN-00000-00001, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Make the required findings for approval of the proposed project, Case Nos. 19TPM-00000-00004, 19GPA-00000-00001, and 19RZN-00000-00001, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;b) Determine that the previous environmental document prepared for the Montecito Community Plan (92-EIR-3) may be used to fulfill the environmental review requirements for this project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 [Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations];c) Adopt a Resolution to amend the Land Use Designation Map in the Montecito Community Plan to re-designate Assessor's Parcel Number 013-090-001 from Single Family Semi-Rural Residential, two-acre minimum lot size (SRR-0.5) to Single Family Semi-Rural Residential, one-acre minimum lot size (SRR-1.0) (Case No. 19GPA-00000-00001); andd) Adopt an Ordinance to amend the Zoning Map in the Montecito Community Plan for Assessor's Parcel Number 013-090-001 to change the zoning from Single Family Residential, two-acre minimum lot size (2-E-1) to Single Family Residential, one-acre minimum lot size (1-E-1) (Case No. 19RZN-00000-00001).COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
2022-08-23Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2022-08-16Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 5
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the July 12, 2022 MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
1) 22-00751 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Monkeypox Outbreak, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a brief update on the current Monkeypox outbreak and Santa Barbara County's response and operations;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
Aye
2) 22-00742 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding recommended Ordinance amendments to the County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), to implement new permit requirements regarding commercial cannabis cultivation and processing, and align existing Odor Abatement Plan (OAP) standards with the new Conditional Use Permit (CUP) requirements, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;b) After considering the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (Cannabis Program) (17EIR-00000-00003), determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent environmental document shall be prepared for this project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and adoption of the LUDC Amendment (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and the Final Program EIR adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (17EIR-00000-00003) adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2); andc) Adopt the Ordinance (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) to amend the LUDC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
Aye
3) 22-00741 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Sheriff's Office participation in the National Policing Institute Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Study and Operation of ALPR Technology, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding the proposed participation of the Sheriff's Office in the National Policing Institute's ALPR study and the operation of ALPR technology by the Sheriff's Office within Santa Barbara County;b) Consistent with the requirements of California Civil Code Section 1798.90.55(a), during a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, provide members of the public and the Board with an opportunity to comment upon and provide suggestions relating to the Sheriff's Office's: i) Participation in the National Policing Institute's study on the effectiveness of Automated License Plate Reader technology; andii) Operation of Automated License Plate Reader technology within Santa Barbara County, to include policies, procedures, privacy concerns and transparency toward concerned community members and policy makers; c) Approve, ratify and authorize the Sheriff or his designee to execute the Services Agreement and Amendment with Flock Group, Inc.; andd) Determine that under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) the above actions are not subject to CEQA review because they are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; determine that the proposed project is exempt under CEQA Guidelines pursuant to section 15301, Existing Facilities, and section 15303, New Construction, because the project will either result in a minor alteration to a public structure involving negligible or no expansion of existing structures or involve the construction and location of new, small facilities; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
How they voted 2
Aye
move approval of the minutes. And I will second. Is there any discussion? Madam Clerk would you call the roll?Passed · 3–0
Aye
moved. And I will second and Madam Clerk would you call the roll?Passed · 3–0
2022-06-28Regular Meetingabsentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
A-29) 22-00581 Consider recommendations regarding Further Analysis Related to the 2021 Grand Jury Report: Jail Diversion in Santa Barbara County, Recommendations 3 and 4, as follows: a) Consider and adopt the responses as the Board of Supervisors' response containing further analysis related to the 2021 Grand Jury report entitled "Jail Diversion in Santa Barbara County - Criminal Justice Partners Are Finding Common Ground," Recommendations 3 and 4; b) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the letter and forward the letter and response updating the Grand Jury on the further analysis to the Presiding Judge of Santa Barbara County Superior Court; and c) Determine, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5), that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review because they are government administrative activities that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.Passed · 3–1
How they voted 1
Aye
Board DeliberationPassed · 2–1
2022-05-31Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 22-00513 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ambulance Service Contract Policy Resolution and Ambulance Services Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.)a) Adopt a Resolution adopting a policy setting forth issues to be considered for inclusion in contracts for the provision of emergency ambulance services entered into or renewed on or after January 1, 2022; b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Fifth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with American Medical Response West (AMR) to update the Vehicle Maintenance Program, to update the "Lame Duck" Contract Termination provision, and to extend the termination date to March 1, 2024 to allow for completion of the Ambulance Services Request-For-Proposals (RFP) process; c) Approve and authorize the Public Health Department Director, or designee, to authorize AMR's requests in accordance with Agreement Section 11.1.G, upon review and approval from the County Executive Officer (CEO), Auditor-Controller, and County Counsel;d) With respect to the RFP for an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area:i) Approve and authorize issuance of the RFP; orii) Provide staff with other direction regarding further development of the RFP; ande) Determine that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal and administrative activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2022-05-24Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
No
5) 22-00465 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Ordinance amendments to the County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), to implement new permit requirements regarding commercial cannabis cultivation, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) LUDC Amendment (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001);i) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;ii) After considering the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (Cannabis Program) (17EIR-00000-00003), determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent environmental document shall be prepared for this project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and adoption of the LUDC Amendment (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (17EIR-00000-00003) adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2); andiii) Adopt the Ordinance (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) to amend the LUDC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
Aye
5) 22-00465 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Ordinance amendments to the County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), to implement new permit requirements regarding commercial cannabis cultivation, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) LUDC Amendment (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001);i) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;ii) After considering the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (Cannabis Program) (17EIR-00000-00003), determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent environmental document shall be prepared for this project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and adoption of the LUDC Amendment (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) is within the scope of the program approved earlier, and the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adopted for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program (17EIR-00000-00003) adequately describes the activity for the purposes of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2); andiii) Adopt the Ordinance (Case No. 22ORD-00000-00001) to amend the LUDC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
Aye
6) 22-00468 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Singer and Concerned Carpinterians Appeal, Case No. 22APL-000000-00004, of the Planning Commission's approval of the 4701 Foothill Road Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00004;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
No
6) 22-00468 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Singer and Concerned Carpinterians Appeal, Case No. 22APL-000000-00004, of the Planning Commission's approval of the 4701 Foothill Road Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00004;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
Aye
6) 22-00468 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Singer and Concerned Carpinterians Appeal, Case No. 22APL-000000-00004, of the Planning Commission's approval of the 4701 Foothill Road Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00004;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00016 and 19CDP-00000-00017, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
Aye
7) 22-00472 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Stassinos, Concerned Carpinterians, and Save Arroyo Paredon Appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00006, of the Planning Commission's approval of the 3508 Via Real Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00020, 22CUP-00000-00005, and 19CDP-00000-00027, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00006;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00020, 22CUP-00000-00005, and 19CDP-00000-00027, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19DVP-00000-00020, 22CUP-00000-00005, and 19CDP-00000-00027, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
2022-05-10Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
4) 22-00406 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ambulance Service Contract Policy Resolution and ambulance services update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.)a) Adopt a Resolution adopting a policy setting forth issues to be considered for inclusion in contracts for the provision of emergency ambulance services entered into or renewed on or after January 1, 2022; b) Approve and authorize issuance of the Request-For-Proposals (RFP) for an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area;c) Authorize the Public Health Department to negotiate and return to the Board for approval of a Fifth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with American Medical Response West (AMR) extending the termination date to allow for completion of the Ambulance Services RFP process; andd) Determine that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal and administrative activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
2022-05-03Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
2) 22-00369 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) discussion regarding child care sector survey results and recommendations, as follows: (EST TIME: 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file information and a presentation from First 5 Santa Barbara County Children and Families Commission (First 5 SBC) regarding data requested for child care sector relief and recovery;b) Provide comments and/or direction to staff regarding participation in the development of a countywide strategy as listed in Options 1 or 2 in the background section of the Board Letter to address such child care sector needs;c) Provide comments and direction regarding the development of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to allocate funding or provide other direction as appropriate; andd) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organization, administrative, or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect changes to the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2022-04-19Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2022-04-14Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
Public Comment - 1)Passed · 4–0
2022-04-12Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 7
Aye
A-12) 22-00262 Consider recommendations regarding Santa Barbara and Santa Maria Administration Buildings' Security Improvements, Project No. 21051, First and Fourth Districts, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve the Santa Barbara and Santa Maria Administration Building Security Upgrades Project; b) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0008138 in the amount of $450,000.00, to establish an appropriation from the General Fund General County Programs of $100,000.00 to provide a portion of the funds needed for physical security improvements at the Santa Barbara and Santa Maria Administration Buildings and to re-assign $350,000.00 of budgeted Capital Outlay funding available from completed or deferred projects for the balance needed; andc) Determine that the proposed actions are exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to sections 15301, subdivisions (a) and (f) of the CEQA Guidelines, because the project is a minor alteration to a public structure involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use and involves safety protection devices for use in conjunction with existing structures; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 3–1
Aye
2) 22-00296 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an appeal of the Treasurer-Tax Collector's Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) audit final determination for Timothy Gault, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Conduct a hearing on the appeal of the final determination of TOT, Tourism Business Improvement District assessment (TBID), interest and penalties assessed by the Treasurer-Tax Collector on Timothy Gault in the amount of $25,623.17;b) Uphold the Treasurer-Tax Collector's final determination and deny the appeal request for the reduction or waiver of TOT, TBID, interest and penalties;c) Adopt the findings proposed by the Treasurer-Tax Collector; andd) Determine that the above actions involve government funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activities and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
—
3) 22-00196 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an appeal filed by Jacqueline Abbud (Applicant) of the Planning Commission's denial of the Hacienda Amador Homestay, Case Nos. 21APL-00000-00033 and 21HOM-00005, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 15 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00033;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case No. 21HOM-00005 including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that denial of the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a); and d) Deny the project de novo, Case No. 21HOM-00005.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
3) 22-00196 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an appeal filed by Jacqueline Abbud (Applicant) of the Planning Commission's denial of the Hacienda Amador Homestay, Case Nos. 21APL-00000-00033 and 21HOM-00005, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 15 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00033;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case No. 21HOM-00005 including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that denial of the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a); and d) Deny the project de novo, Case No. 21HOM-00005.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
No
3) 22-00196 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an appeal filed by Jacqueline Abbud (Applicant) of the Planning Commission's denial of the Hacienda Amador Homestay, Case Nos. 21APL-00000-00033 and 21HOM-00005, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 15 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00033;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case No. 21HOM-00005 including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that denial of the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a); and d) Deny the project de novo, Case No. 21HOM-00005.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
3) TrailedPassed · 3–1
No
3) TrailedPassed · 3–1
2022-03-15Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
3) 22-00194 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the applicant's appeal of the Montecito Planning Commission deemed denial of the Hawker/Philippides lot line adjustment, Case No. 20APL-000000-00003, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 20 MIN.)a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 20APL-00000-00003; b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case No. 16LLA-00000-00003, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305(a); andd) Grant de novo approval of the project, reversing the action of the Montecito Planning Commission, Case No. 16LLA-00000-00003, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2022-03-08Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
Aye
A-3) 22-00175 Consider recommendations regarding the circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency, as follows:a) Reconsider the circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Failed · 2–2
Aye
A-8) 22-00190 Consider recommendations regarding a response to the 2021 Grand Jury Report: Idle Oil Wells in Santa Barbara County, as follows:a) Consider and adopt the responses as the Board of Supervisors' response to the 2021 Grand Jury report entitled "Idle Oil Wells in Santa Barbara County";b) Authorize the Chair to sign the letter and forward the letter and responses to the Presiding Judge of Santa Barbara County Superior Court; andc) Determine pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15378(b)(5) that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review, because they are is government administrative activities that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.Vote recorded · 2–2
No
A-8) 22-00190 Consider recommendations regarding a response to the 2021 Grand Jury Report: Idle Oil Wells in Santa Barbara County, as follows:a) Consider and adopt the responses as the Board of Supervisors' response to the 2021 Grand Jury report entitled "Idle Oil Wells in Santa Barbara County";b) Authorize the Chair to sign the letter and forward the letter and responses to the Presiding Judge of Santa Barbara County Superior Court; andc) Determine pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15378(b)(5) that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review, because they are is government administrative activities that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.Vote recorded · 2–2
2022-02-15Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
Aye
3) 22-00132 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an amendment to Chapter 50 of the County Code - Licensing of Cannabis Operations, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 of the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations in the unincorporated area of the County;b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for March 1, 2022 to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 to the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) [Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016] adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the following situations elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
No
3) 22-00132 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an amendment to Chapter 50 of the County Code - Licensing of Cannabis Operations, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 of the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations in the unincorporated area of the County;b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for March 1, 2022 to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 to the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) [Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016] adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the following situations elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
3) ContinuedPassed · 3–1
No
3) ContinuedPassed · 3–1
No
2) 22-00138 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Appeal, Case No. 21APL-000000-00028, of the Planning Commission's Approval of the Cadwell Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No.19LUP-00000-00480, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00480 including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00480, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
Aye
2) 22-00138 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Appeal, Case No. 21APL-000000-00028, of the Planning Commission's Approval of the Cadwell Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No.19LUP-00000-00480, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00480 including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00480, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
2022-02-08Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the February 1, 2022 MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-4) 22-00102 Reconsider the Circumstances of the Existing State of Emergency, as follows:a) Reconsider the circumstances of the existing state of emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Failed · 2–2
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
1) 22-00039 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the abolition of Improvement Zone No. 1 for Vintage Ranch Tract 14,556, Fourth District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District:a) Hear and pass upon all protests and objections regarding the proposed abolition of Improvement Zone No. 1 for Vintage Ranch Tract 14,556; b) Adopt a Resolution finding that Improvement Zone No. 1 for Vintage Ranch Tract 14,556 is no longer benefited by the maintenance and operation of facilities within the Zone and abolishing the Improvement Zone; and c) Find that the recommended actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378 (b)(5), in that it is a government administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
2) 22-00113 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a response to the 2021-2022 Grand Jury Report entitled "The Keys to Housing the Homeless", as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Consider and adopt the responses as the Board of Supervisors' response to the 2021-2022 Grand Jury report entitled "the Keys to Housing the Homeless";b) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the letter and forward the letter and responses to the Presiding Judge of Santa Barbara County Superior Court; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) and 15378(b)(4), finding that the recommended actions consist of administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–0
Aye
3) 22-00117 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the nomination to rename County owned El Colegio Property to Hedges House of Hope, as follows: (Unanimous Vote Required)(EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Approve the nomination form and renaming request of County owned El Colegio Property located at 6549 El Colegio Road to Hedges House of Hope in memory of Father Jon-Stephen Hedges; and b) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organization, administrative, or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
How they voted 3
Aye
A-1) 21-01146 Consider recommendations regarding a Santa Barbara County Hemp Ordinance, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 3, Agriculture, of the Santa Barbara County Code Regarding Hemp; b) Read the title, "An Ordinance Regulating Hemp" and waive reading the Ordinance in full; and c) Find that the proposed actions are exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on CEQA Guidelines 15307, 15308, 15060(c)(2), and 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these actions will have a significant effect on the environment, these actions will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and these actions will assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources and the environment.Passed · 3–1
Aye
A-25) 22-00109 Consider recommendations regarding conditional reservation of funding to the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara (Housing Authority) for the Homekey Program Application in Santa Maria, Fifth District, as follows:a) Approve a reservation of $3,486,400.00, in funds made available by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) and HOME American Rescue Plan Consortium funds that have been allocated to the County, which will serve as the capital matching funds required under the Homekey program for the acquisition and rehabilitation of 1007 Main St., Santa Maria by the Housing Authority, and ratify a Reservation Letter signed by the Community Services Director for inclusion in the Homekey application to the State submitted prior to the January 31, 2022 deadline for geographic set-asides and application bonus award; b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a letter of support for the Homekey project, which will be attached to the Notice of Exemption; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed "Homekey" project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness and who are impacted by COVID-19 and that the project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 4–0
Aye
3) 22-00035 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) Ordinance and Project Template, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a status report on negotiations for a CWA on public projects;b) Direct staff to pursue Option 1, continue negotiating with Tri-County Building and Construction Trades (TCBT), and return with documents for approval to utilize a CWA; orc) Direct staff to pursue other options (Table 3 of the Board of Supervisors Agenda Letter), continue negotiating with TCBT, and return with documents for approval to utilize a CWA; ord) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that the proposed activities do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378 (b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment), therefore no environmental document is required.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 4
Aye
2) 22-00036 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the appeal, Case No. 20APL-00000-00028, filed by Steve Decker, Applicant, of the County Planning Commission's denial of the Decker Greenhouse project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 20APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that based on the CEQA Consistency Analysis and Examination of Environmental Effects Document and previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as stated in the Notice of Exemption; and d) Approve the project de novo, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 1–3
No
2) 22-00036 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the appeal, Case No. 20APL-00000-00028, filed by Steve Decker, Applicant, of the County Planning Commission's denial of the Decker Greenhouse project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 20APL-00000-00028;b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that based on the CEQA Consistency Analysis and Examination of Environmental Effects Document and previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as stated in the Notice of Exemption; and d) Approve the project de novo, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00469, subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
Aye
3) 21-01146 Consider recommendations regarding a Santa Barbara County Hemp Ordinance, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 3, Agriculture, of the Santa Barbara County Code Regarding Hemp; b) Read title, "An Ordinance Regulating Hemp" and waive reading the Ordinance in full; and c) Find that the proposed actions are exempt under the CEQA based on CEQA Guidelines 15307, 15308, 15060(c)(2), and 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these actions will have a significant effect on the environment, these actions will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and these actions will assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources and the environment.Passed · 3–1
Aye
3) Hemp Ordinance TrailedPassed · 3–1
2022-01-11Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
Call to Order and Election of Chair and Vice Chair of the 2022 Board of Supervisors, Board of Directors of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and Board of Directors of the Water AgencyPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-12) 22-00012 Consider recommendations regarding the circumstances of the existing state of emergency, as follows: a) Reconsider the circumstances of the existing state of emergency; b) Consider whether state or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; c) Find that the Board of Supervisors has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency, and that State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing; andd) Direct staff to notice and hold hearings as remote hearings consistent with Government Code Section 54953(e)(3).Passed · 3–1
How they voted 8
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the October 14, 2021 Special MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00643 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Bien Nacido Vineyards, et al. Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Canna Rios, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-000000-00027, Fifth District, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00027;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, subject to conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 12/14/2021Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00643 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Bien Nacido Vineyards, et al. Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Canna Rios, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-000000-00027, Fifth District, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00027;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections Section 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, subject to conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 12/14/2021Passed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-4) 21-00939 Consider recommendations regarding a Goleta Beach Restaurant Concession Agreement, Second District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Concession Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara (County) and PRJKT SB, Inc. (Concessionaire), to allow Concessionaire to operate and manage the Restaurant, Snack Bar, and Venue space at Goleta Beach for a term of ten (10) years, with three options to extend the term for an additional five (5) years per each extension, with Concessionaire to pay County special use fees (Fee) of Ten Percent (10%) of Concessioner's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales, or Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000.00) per month for the Restaurant and Snack Bar, whichever is greater; Twelve and One-half Percent (12.5%) of Concessionaire's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales for catering of special events at Goleta Beach Park; and Ten Percent (10%) of Concessionaire's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales, or Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) per month for the Venue, whichever is greater;b) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to exercise any and all of the options to extend the term of the Concession Agreement for an additional five (5) years per extension provided that the Concessionaire is not in default under the terms of the Concession Agreement;c) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to extend any and all options for the Concession Agreement Initial Term for up to an additional thirty (30) days per extension provided that the Director determines that the Concessioner is making satisfactory progress toward completion of capital improvements in order to open the operation; andd) Find that the recommended actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines as the actions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities and/or equipment that involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former uses (Section 15301), replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced (Section 15302), construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure (Section 15303), minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees (Section 15304), and construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities (Section 15311), and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-9) 21-00951 Consider recommendations regarding a Letter of Support for the Deportation of Veteran's, restoration of the MAVNI Program and Justice for Military Sexual Assault Victims, as follows:a) Approve the letter of support and authorize the Chair to sign the letter; and b) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 153378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical damages in the environment.Passed · 3–0
Aye
A-11) 21-00952 Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows:a) Receive and file a brief update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Santa Barbara County's response and operations;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; andc) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00958 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 update and eligible funding opportunities, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 2 HR.)a) Receive and file a presentation on the ARPA funding update; b) Approve allocation of remaining ARPA Tranche 1 funds totalling $5,906,480.00 towards eligible restricted categories and direct staff to process necessary budgetary adjustments; c) Consider optional allocation prioritization of a portion of ARPA Tranche 2 funds towards eligible restricted categories for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023; d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative, or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2021-10-14Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
Aye
5) 21-00805 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a County of Santa Barbara Employee COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Policy, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Adopt a COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Policy for all County of Santa Barbara Employees; b) Authorize the Human Resources Director and the County Executive Officer to take any necessary administrative actions to execute the Board’s direction; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational or administrative fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–1
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 21-00771 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file a brief update on the COVID-19 and Santa Barbara County’s response and operations; b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
How they voted 2
—
motion and a second to approve the minutes Second, and could we have a roll callVote recorded · 0–0
—
motion to direct staff to negotiate a community workforce agreement. Using the city of Santa Barbara's templates to draft the county ordinanVote recorded · 0–1
How they voted 2
Aye
Public Comment PeriodTHE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS RESERVED FOR COMMENT ON MATTERS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. EACH PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE BOARD FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR, FOR A TOTAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF NO MORE THAN 15 MINUTES. (Resolution No. 09-368) (21-00002)WHEN TESTIFYING BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PERSONAL ATTACKS AND OTHER DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR ARE NOT APPROPRIATE.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00699 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the acquisition of 630 Randall Road, Santa Barbara, California, by The Santa Barbara Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Flood Control Purposes (APN 007-120-101) (RES File No. 003892), First District, as follows (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) Acting as the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District: a) Approve, adopt and authorize the Public Works Director, as the General Manager of The Santa Barbara Flood Control and Water Conservation District, to execute the Resolution of Necessity, for the acquisition in fee of real property located at 630 Randall Road, Santa Barbara (APN: 007-120-101), hereinafter referred to as the "Property", currently owned by Catherine W. Montgomery, Trustee of the Montgomery Living Trust, dated February 7, 2014; b) Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute any and all documents and to expend funds for deposit with the State Treasurer’s Office in a sum equal to the appraised market value for the Property, in the amount of $1,346,000.00 for APN 007-120-101, and any additional related costs and fees, in order to acquire fee interest; and c) After considering the Environmental Impact Report as well as the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report, for the Randall Road Debris Basin Project (SCH Number; 2019029104), find that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 17
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the June 22, 2021 MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-9) 21-00651 Consider recommendations regarding the Annual Coastal Permit Service Agreement with Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. for the Goleta Beach Project, Second District, as follows:a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the professional services agreement with Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Contractor) in the amount not to exceed $54,585.00 to allow the Contractor to provide required coastal permit reporting and grant application support services for the Goleta Beach Project; andb) Determine that the recommended actions are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21080.5 and the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA, 14 CCR Section 15002(l) and 15251(c) (certified regulatory plan in-lieu-of EIR).Failed · 2–2
Aye
A-11) 21-00657 Consider recommendations regarding the reallocation of Homeless Emergency Assistance Program (HEAP) Funds to Good Samaritan Shelter Inc. for the purchase and installation of a restroom/shower trailer to be located on the County-owned Bridgehouse Shelter site as part of the Pallet Shelter Project, Fourth District, as follows:a) Approve the reallocation and re-programing of $65,148.00 in prior unexpended State HEAP funds from various previously awarded subrecipients to Good Samaritan Shelter Inc. for the purchase of a restroom/shower trailer; b) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute the First Amendment to the Subrecipient Agreement between the County and Good Samaritan Shelter, dated April 2, 2019, in order to amend the scope of work, revise the budget, and add an additional $65,148.00 in additional HEAP funds for reimbursement of a restroom/shower trailer for the Pallet Shelter Project; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c), finding that the actions consist of specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency; Government Code Section 8698.4, finding that the County has declared a shelter crisis and the action includes leasing of County-owned land for a homeless shelter and financial assistance therefore; CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, finding that the actions consist of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, finding that the action consists of minor public alterations in the condition of land; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-26) 21-00666 Consider recommendations regarding a Request to Ratify the Execution of a License and Reimbursement Agreement with Allan Hancock College for COVID-19 Vaccinations, as follows:a) Approve and ratify a License and Reimbursement Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Allan Hancock College located at 800 South College Drive in Santa Maria for use of premises for COVID-19 community vaccinations which was executed under the December 15, 2020 temporary delegated authority of the General Services Director for the period from December 15, 2020 through June 30, 2021 in an amount not to exceed $300,000.00; andb) Determine that the recommended action is not a "Project" that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), because it is the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and that the action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15269(c) as it consists of specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-36) 21-00660 Consider recommendations regarding Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Public Demonstration Garden Project, Fourth District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) Acting as the Board of Directors, Water Agency: a) Approve the plans and specifications for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project (WC8550); b) Award the construction contract for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project, in the amount of $243,640.00 to the lowest responsible bidder JF Will Company, Inc. (a local vendor in Santa Maria), subject to the provisions of documents and certifications, as set forth in the plans and specifications applicable to the project and as required by law; c) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Construction Contract upon return of the contractor’s executed contract documents, and the review and approval of the County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their authorized representatives; d) Authorize the Public Works Director or designee to approve changes or additions to the work being performed under the Construction Contract, in an amount not to exceed $24,364.00 for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project; e) Approve the Budget Revision Request No. 0007702 to increase appropriations of $25,285.00 in Water Agency Fund for Capital Assets funded by the release of Restricted Purpose of Fund, Fund Balance and to transfer appropriations of $250,000.00 in Water Agency Fund from Services and Supplies to Capital Assets-Land Improvements to complete the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project; and f) Determine that the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 CCR 15301, which consists of repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing facilities that involve no expansion, and direct the Clerk of the Board to file the California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption.Passed · 3–1
Aye
Item A-57) is added to the Administrative Agenda, as follows:Passed · 4–0
Aye
Item A-58) is added to the Administrative Agenda, as follows:Passed · 4–0
—
1) 21-00680 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows: (EST. TIME 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a brief update on COVID-19 and Santa Barbara County's response and operations;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; andc) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
2) 21-00639 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding CPI Adjustment of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 library special tax rate for County Service Area (CSA) No. 3 (greater Goleta), Second and Third Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Adopt a Resolution that confirms the report and adjusts the FY 2021-2022 library special tax rate in CSA No. 3 by 1.6%; andb) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00637 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Orcutt and Providence Landing Community Facilities Districts Special Tax Levy, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file the Administration Reports summarizing the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing); b) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan);c) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing);d) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list;e) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list; andf) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
4) 21-00503 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Speed Limits Specified in County Code Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 15.7 and 23-15.8, First and Third Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)a) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits on Ortega Ridge Road in the Summerland area of the First District; and Burton Mesa Boulevard and St. Andrews Way in the Vandenberg Village area and Onstott Road and Rucker Road in the Mission Hills area of the Third District;b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Continue the item to the Administrative Agenda of August 17, 2021 to consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending speed limits on various roads, as follows:i) Adopt the Ordinance (Second Reading) amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits on Ortega Ridge Road in the Summerland area of the First District; and Burton Mesa Boulevard and St. Andrews Way in the Vandenberg Village area and Onstott Road and Rucker Road in the Mission Hills area of the Third District; andii) Determine that amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits, is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378(b)(2), since the recommended actions are administrative activities of the County that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is general policy and procedure making.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
5) 21-00677 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Status Report on Criminal Justice Improvement Efforts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on criminal justice improvement efforts;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; c) Direct staff to return in 60-90 days with another progress report; andd) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
6) 21-00695 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an agreement with EF Johnson Company for the Public Safety Radio System Replacement Project, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor (Agreement) with EF Johnson Company for System and Installation for the Public Safety Radio System Replacement Project (Project) in the amount not to exceed $30,239,809.00; b) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0007711; c) Direct staff to return to the Board by January 2022 for an update about the project phases and to consider further funding for the Project;d) Authorize the General Services Director, or designee, until otherwise ordered by the Board, to administer the Agreement on behalf of the County and to execute the Final Detailed Design Certificate for Phase 1, attached to the Agreement as Exhibit I; ande) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines sections: 15301 as the actions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use; 15302 as the actions consist or replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities located on the same site and with the same purpose and capacity; 15303 as the actions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
7) 21-00655 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the scope of work for the Utility-Scale Solar Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance Amendments, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Provide direction to staff regarding the scope of work for the Utility-Scale Solar Comprehensive Plan and Ordinance Amendments; andb) Determine that the Board's actions are not a project as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378(b)(5) and, therefore, are not subject to the requirements of CEQA.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
Aye
8) 21-00663 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Gaillard Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Suarez Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-00000-00018 and 19LUP-00000-00327, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00327, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00327 subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
8) 21-00663 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Gaillard Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Suarez Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-00000-00018 and 19LUP-00000-00327, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00327, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00327 subject to the conditions of approval.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 3
No
D5) ContinuedPassed · 4–1
Aye
D5) ContinuedPassed · 4–1
Aye
6) 21-00250 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Annual TRUTH Act Report and Community Forum, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file the annual TRUTH Act report regarding United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to individuals as required by Government Code section 7283.1(d); b) Hold the public hearing, as required by Government Code section 7283.1(d), regarding ICE’s access to individuals, and receive and consider public comment; and c) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15378(b)(5) that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review, because it is a government administrative activity that does not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
How they voted 1
Aye
2) 21-00475 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Inmate Population Management within the Sheriff’s Office Jail Facilities, as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.) a) Receive and file a brief update on Inmate Population Management within Sheriff’s Office Jail Facilities; and b) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15738(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEFailed · 2–2
How they voted 13
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the May 11, 2021 MeetingPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-2) 21-00454 Consider recommendations regarding the Release of Prior Years Impounded Property Tax Revenue, for the 2020-2021 Tax Year, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0006827 to increase fund balance components by $3,430,968.00 in multiple County funds and departments, funded by release of nonspendable fund balance due to the resolution of multiple assessment appeals cases; andb) Determine that the above action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it is a government fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical effect on the environment.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-9) 21-00441 Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Third Quarter Budget and Financial Status Report as of March 31, 2021, showing the status of appropriations and financing for departmental budgets adopted by the Board of Supervisors.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-29) 21-00436 Set a hearing to consider recommendations regarding the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) Ordinance and Project Template, as follows:(Set a hearing for June 22, 2021. Time estimate: 1 hour)a) Provide conceptual direction to staff on negotiations for a CWA on public projects, including to pursue one of the following options:i) Utilize the CWA the City of Santa Barbara recently negotiated with Tri-County Building and Construction Trades Council (TCBT); orii) Utilize the CWA the City of Santa Barbara recently negotiated with TCBT as the County's base agreement and negotiate certain terms within that document; oriii) Utilize your Board's 2014 conceptually approved Project Stabilization Agreement (PSA) as the County's CWA; oriv) Negotiate an entirely new CWA with TCBT; orv) Provide other direction as appropriate;b) Direct staff to proceed with the necessary coordination and negotiation, and to return to your Board for further direction as necessary during negotiations, and following negotiations, with a recommended Ordinance and findings to approve use of a CWA; andc) Find that the proposed activities do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378 (b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment), therefore no environmental document is required.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00444 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a brief update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Santa Barbara County's response and operations;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; andc) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
Aye
2) 21-00447 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) Financing of Tax-Exempt Private Activity Notes on Behalf of Westmont College, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.)a) Hold a public hearing in compliance with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) regarding the re-issuance by the CMFA of tax-exempt variable rate revenue notes, for the purpose of refinancing the acquisition, construction, improvement, renovation, upgrading and equipping of education facilities for Westmont College, and consider public comment;b) Adopt a Resolution of the County of Santa Barbara approving the reissuance, for federal income tax purposes, of the CMFA Variable Rate Revenue Notes, Series 2016A in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $60,000,000.00 for the purpose of refinancing the acquisition, construction, improvement, renovation, upgrading and equipping of certain educational facilities, for the benefit of Westmont College and certain other matters relating thereto; andc) Determine that the above actions involve government funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activities and are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00440 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the amendment of a Fee Ordinance relating to Published Charges for Inpatient and Outpatient Mental Health Services, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding amendments to the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services; b) Consider and approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services;c) Read the title of the Ordinance, "An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 5016 Santa Barbara County Psychiatric Health Facility and Outpatient Mental Health Services Fees," into the record and waive full reading of the Ordinance; andd) Continue the hearing to the Administrative Agenda of June 15, 2021 to consider recommendations regarding the adoption (Second Reading) of the Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services, as follows: i) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of the Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services, effective 30 days after adoption by the Board of Supervisors; andii) Determine that the above actions are government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and are therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
4) 21-00449 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Update and Policy Direction on Advancing Equity and Inclusion, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)a) Receive and file a status report on Human Resources Department and Community Services Department equity initiatives; b) Provide staff direction regarding options for disbursement of $270,800.00 remaining from Board appropriated equity funds, as follows:Option 1: Contract with the Fund for Santa Barbara to administer a County equity support program and distribute equity funds; Option 2: Develop an internal County process led by staff to distribute equity funds;Option 3: Hybrid process to distribute equity funds;c) Provide other direction to staff; andd) Determine that the recommended actions are not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b) (5), because they consist of administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change to the environment; and CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) because they consist of government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
5) 21-00443 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Juvenile Justice Planning and Realignment Implementation, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file the County of Santa Barbara Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 Juvenile Justice Realignment Plan (JJRP); b) Receive and file the County of Santa Barbara FY 2021-2022 Comprehensive Multi-Agency Juvenile Justice Plan (CMJJP); and c) Determine that the above recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), finding that the activities are covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing significant effects on the environment, and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activities in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activities are not subject to CEQA. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
6) 21-00451 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the adoption of amendments to the Coastal Zoning Ordinance (CZO), the County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), and the Montecito Land Use and Development Code (MLUDC) to revise existing and create new development standards and permit procedures to implement recent changes in State legislation regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) and consider the adoption of an amendment to the Santa Barbara County Uniform Rules for Agricultural Preserves and Farmland Security Zones (Uniform Rules) to revise the existing ADU definition, add a new JADU definition, and allow JADUs as a compatible use on agricultural preserve contracted lands, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Consider recommendations regarding the CZO amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00001), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of the Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15265 and 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00001) amending the CZO, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; b) Consider recommendations regarding LUDC amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00002), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including CEQA findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 35-1, the LUDC, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; c) Consider recommendations regarding MLUDC amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00003), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including CEQA findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 35-2, the MLUDC, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; and d) Consider recommendations regarding the Uniform Rules amendment, as follows: i) Determine that the Uniform Rules amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and ii) Adopt a Resolution amending the Uniform Rules to revise the existing ADU definition, add a new JADU definition, and allow JADUs as a compatible use on agricultural preserve contracted lands. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
7) 21-00442 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a New Vision for Animal Services and the Jurisdictional Contract Fee Options Presentation, as follows: (EST. TIME: 40 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation on a new vision for Animal Services and receive Board direction on proposed new model of service delivery undertaken during COVID-19 and proposed for future innovations;b) Approve a flat 2% jurisdictional contract increase for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 for one year for the six participating full-service cities (Buellton, Goleta, Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Maria and Solvang), one shelter-only city (Santa Barbara), and the other jurisdiction of the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians and direct staff to return to the Board in Open Session for approval of the service agreements; andc) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, since they consist of the creation of governmental funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-12) 21-00469 Consider recommendations regarding an Amendment and Transfer of Conservation Easements at the Scolari Ranch from the County to the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, Gerald E. Scolari and Sandra K. Scolari, and Rosebel V. Cameron, as trustees of the owners, on real property containing approximately 233 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-090-001;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, Gerald E. Scolari and Sandra K. Scolari, and Rosebel V. Cameron, as trustees of the owners, on real property containing approximately 271 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-090-002; c) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, as trustee of the owner, on real property containing approximately 467.87 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-080-004;d) Authorize and direct the Clerk to execute Certificates of Acceptance in a form substantially similar to those attached to the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements, thereby affirming the County's acceptance of the Conservation Easements as amended and restated, and direct staff to subsequently record the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements;e) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Amendment to Funding Agreement following execution by all the parties of the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements;f) Authorize the Director of General Services, or designee, following the termination of the Funding Agreement becoming effective, to execute any additional related documents required to release the financial security for the Funding Agreement;g) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Assignment and Assumption Agreements with The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County, effective upon recordation, following execution by all the parties of the Amendment to Funding Agreement;h) Authorize the Director of General Services, or designee, to execute any additional related documents required to facilitate the County's acceptance and assignment of the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements; andi) Find that the proposed actions are within the scope of the environmental document prepared and adopted for the Strauss Wind Energy Project (Certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 18EIR-00000-00001/SCH No. 2018071002), including the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) Revision Letter dated November 12, 2019, that no substantial changes are proposed, there are no substantial changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance regarding significant impacts or feasibility of mitigation measures and alternatives and, therefore, that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 13
Aye
Approval of Minutes of the April 12, 14 and 16, 2021 Budget WorkshopsPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-19) 21-00392 Consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation North Trunk Line Rehabilitation Phase 2, Fourth District, as follows:Acting as the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District:a) Approve plans and specifications for the North Trunk Line Rehabilitation Phase 2 Project, Project No. NRTUN2, on file in the Laguna County Sanitation District office; b) Reject the bid protest, and award the construction contract in the base amount of $958,070.00 to the lowest responsible bidder, Performance Pipeline Technologies, Incorporated, (not a local vendor), subject to the provision of documents and certifications as set forth in the plans and specifications applicable to the project, as required under California law; c) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Construction Contract with Performance Pipeline Technologies, Incorporated; d) Authorize the Public Works Director or designee to approve change orders for a contingency amount up to $48,000.00 for the construction of North Trunk Line Rehabilitation Phase 2, Project No. NRTUN2 for a total, not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,006,070.00; ande) Determine that the action is within the scope of the North Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation project included in the previously posted and filed Notice of Exemption prepared pursuant to Section 15301(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines).Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-22) 21-00382 Consider recommendations regarding the Adoption of a Resolution Expressing Interest in Participating in a Viability Study for a Central Coast Public Bank, as follows:a) Adopt a Resolution expressing interest in participating in a viability study for a Central Coast Public Bank with other Central Coast local agencies; b) Direct staff to return to the Board with next steps and approval of final allocation of funding toward the study if other local agencies express interest in participating in a viability study; andc) Determine that the recommended actions do not constitute a project subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA GuidelinesSection 15378(b)(5), finding that the project is an organizational or administrative activity of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 3–1
Aye
A-53) 21-00381 Adopt a Resolution proclaiming the Month of May 2021 as Wildfire Community Preparedness in Santa Barbara County.Passed · 4–0
—
A-55) 21-00394 Adopt a Resolution proclaiming May 6, 2021 as National Nurses Day and May 6 through May 12, 2021 as National Nurses Week in Santa Barbara County.Vote recorded · 0–0
Aye
1) 21-00363 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a brief update on COVID-19 and Santa Barbara County's response and operations;b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; andc) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
2) 21-00374 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Retirement Waiver and Extra Help Services for the Behavioral Wellness Department, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.)a) In accordance with California Government Code Section 7522.56(f)(1), certify that the appointment of retired County employee Kaylyn Thomas, Patients' Rights Advocate, is necessary to fill a critically needed position in the Compliance Division of the Behavioral Wellness Department before 180 days have passed from her date of retirement;b) Approve and authorize the Behavioral Wellness Department to appoint retired employee, Kaylyn Thomas, as an Extra Help employee to provide patient support and advocacy services on a part time basis not to exceed 960 hours of annual service with an appointment effective date of May 3, 2021; and c) Determine that the above actions are organizational or administrative activities of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and are therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00272 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding County Service Area 12 (Mission Canyon Sewer District), Resolution Relative to Collection of Sewer Service Charges and Sewer Connection Charges on the Tax Roll, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Governing Authority of County Service Area 12:a) Receive and file with the Clerk of the Board a report entitled "County Service Area 12 Fixed Charges Fee Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022";b) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the collection of sewer service charges and sewer connection charges for County Service Area 12 on the tax roll in Fiscal Year 2021-2022; andc) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are for the establishment of service charges for services provided with County Service Area 12, that no expansion of services or facilities will result, that the fees will be used for meeting operating expenses and financial reserve needs and requirements, and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
4) 21-00275 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Establishing Benefit Assessments for County Service Areas 3, 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Second, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.) Acting as the Governing Authority of County Service Area 3, County Service Area 31 and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District: a) Receive and file Benefit Assessment Reports for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for County Service Area 3, County Service Area 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District with the Clerk of the Board; b) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 3 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; c) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 31 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; d) Do not establish the benefit assessments (set to zero) in those portions of the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District authorized to do so for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; and e) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15273(a)(1),(2),(3) and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are for the establishment of benefit assessment rates for services provided by County Service Areas 3 and 31, that no expansion of services or facilities will result, that revenues will be used for meeting operating expenses and financial reserve needs and requirements, and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
5) 21-00378 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-2022 Public Safety Realignment Act Plan, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation on the FY 2021-2022 Public Safety Realignment Act Plan;b) Accept the Santa Barbara County FY 2021-2022 Public Safety Realignment Act Plan developed by the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) and approved by the Executive Committee of the CCP; andc) Determine that the acceptance of the FY 2021-2022 Public Safety Realignment Act Plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), finding that the activities are covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activities in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activities are not subject to CEQA.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
6) 21-00398 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-000000-00003, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.) a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00003; b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19CUP-00000-00005 and 19DVP-00000-00010, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); and d) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19CUP-00000-00005 and 19DVP-00000-00010 subject to the conditions of approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Abstain
6) 21-00398 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Coalition for Responsible Cannabis Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 21APL-000000-00003, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.) a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00003; b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19CUP-00000-00005 and 19DVP-00000-00010, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 (c)(2); and d) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 19CUP-00000-00005 and 19DVP-00000-00010 subject to the conditions of approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2021-04-29Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
2021-04-20Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 9
—
Approval of Minutes of the February 23, 2021 Special MeetingVote recorded · 0–0
—
Approval of Administrative AgendaVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
4) 21-00168 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Pulice Appeal of the Ellwood Quarry Revised Conditional Use Permit and Reclamation Plan, Case Nos. 19APL-00000-00026, 18RVP-00000-00016, and 17RVP-00000-00082, Third District, as follows: ( EST. TIME: 1HR.)a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00026;b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents (Addendum dated March 2, 2021 together with the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report 87-EIR-3), determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of Case Nos. 17RVP-00000-00082 and 18RVP-00000-00016 subject to the conditions.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00157 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Update on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.) a) Receive and file a brief update on COVID-19 and Santa Barbara County’s response and operations; b) Provide any direction, as appropriate; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:Passed · 4–0
Aye
2) 21-00166 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Extra-Help Services and Retirement Waiver for the District Attorney's Office, as follows: (EST. TIME: 5 MIN.)a) In accordance with California Government Code Section 7522.56(f)(1), certify that the appointment of retired County employee Julie Rotta, Restitution Specialist, is necessary to fill a critical need in the District Attorney's Office before 180 days have passed from her date of retirement;b) Approve and authorize the District Attorney's office to appoint retired employee, Julie Rotta, as an Extra Help employee to provide training on a part time basis not to exceed 960 hours of annual service; and c) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because they consist of government administrative or fiscal activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00126 Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code Chapter 16 to authorize Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations to be permitted countywide as a Food Facility, and a Resolution amending Food Facility Fees to include application plan review and annual permitting fees for Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations, as follows:a) Consider and approve the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance to amend Chapter 16, Article III, entitled "County Retail Food Code" in the Santa Barbara County Code; andb) Find that the Ordinance is exempt from CEQA review per CEQA Guideline Section 151061(b)(3), since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant impact on the environment, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption.Passed · 3–0
Aye
7) 21-00158 HEARING - Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Second Quarter Budget and Financial Status Report as of December 31, 2020, showing the status of appropriations and financing for departmental budgets adopted by the Board of Supervisors. (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.) COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:Passed · 4–0
Aye
5) 21-00156 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a State Water Project (SWP) Contract Amendments, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District:a) Consider the request of the Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) to approve Amendment 20 (Contact Extension Amendment) to the SWP Contract as follows;i) Approve and authorize the Public Works Director or his designee to execute Amendment 20 (Contract Extension) to the SWP Contract contingent upon CCWA's acknowledgement by an action of its Board that the Transfer of Financial Responsibility Agreement (TFRA) remains in full force;ii) Approve and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to sign the Agreement Confirming the Term of the TFRA; and iii) Certify that the Board, acting as a Responsible Agency, has reviewed and considered the information and environmental effects contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for Amendment 20 to the SWP Contract, and that the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as Lead Agency found no significant impacts and is the custodian of the records located at ;b) Consider the request of the CCWA to approve Amendment 21 (Water Management Amendment);i) Reject Amendment 21 at this time because CCWA has not addressed the concerns out of District transfers and the impacts on water supply for sales of water out of the County; and ii) Direct staff to continue to work with CCWA staff and return to your Board at a future date if mutually agreeable terms can be reached related to Amendment 21; andc) Determine that the proposed actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), organization or administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
Aye
6) 21-00171 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II and a Resolution establishing County Office Hours, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II, to provide textual clarity and modernization of the 1971 language; b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive full reading of the Ordinance;c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for March 9, 2021 to consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Article I and II, to provide textual clarity and modernization of the 1971 language; and d) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as it consists of general policy and procedure making;That the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 2021 consider recommendations, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II, to provide clarity and modernization of the 1971 language;b) Adopt the Resolution Regarding County Office Hours; andc) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as it consists of general policy and procedure making.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
2021-02-23Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
2021-02-09Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
2021-01-26Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 11
Aye
Installation CeremonyPassed · 4–0
Aye
Installation CeremonyPassed · 4–0
Aye
Approval of Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-5) 21-00034 Consider recommendations regarding Jalama Beach Park Grant Award and Grant Application Resolutions, Third District, as follows: a) Adopt a Resolution to approve and authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to execute the California Coastal Conservancy (Coastal Conservancy) Grant Awards for the: i) Jalama Beach Coastal Trail and Beach Access Planning Project; and ii) Jalama Beach Campground Expansion and Improvements Planning Project; b) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to execute the grant agreement, in a form substantially similar to the Coastal Conservancy draft agreement and upon review and concurrence of County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their designee; c) Adopt a Resolution to approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Approval of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Grant Application for the Jalama Beach Water Recycling Feasibility Study; d) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to apply for a Water Recycling Program grant from SWRCB, for the Jalama Beach Water Recycling Feasibility Study; e) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to execute and submit the grant contract, in a form substantially similar to the SWRCB contract terms and conditions and upon review and concurrence of County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their designee if the SWRCB grant is awarded; and f) Determine that the above recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, finding that project involves only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the board has not approved, adopted, or funded but does require consideration of environmental factors.Passed · 4–0
—
A-6) 21-00036 Consider recommendations regarding a Landscaping Service Contract with BrightView Landscaping Services, Inc for all County Parks, as follows: a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a service contract with BrightView Landscaping Services, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $321,786.00; this contract will provide landscape maintenance services to eighteen (18) Community Services Department parks and open spaces located throughout the County for a period of eighteen (18) months beginning January 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022; b) Approve and authorize the Director of Community Services Department to exercise the option for one additional two (2) year extension, at the County’s discretion, in the amount not to exceed $448,550.00, subject to annual budget appropriations and with the following annual breakdown: July 1, 2022 through June30, 2023 (Third Year) at $220,960.00. July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 (Fourth Year) at $227,590.00; and c) Determine that the above recommended action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 as the action involves the maintenance of existing public facilities that will result in no or negligible expansion of existing use.Vote recorded · 0–0
Aye
A-8) 21-00037 Consider recommendations regarding Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Round 2 Applications for the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County Continuum of Care (CoC) and the County of Santa Barbara, as follows: a) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to submit a funding application and all certifications, standard forms, and other related documents to the State of California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency (BCSHA) to obtain the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC funding allocation in an amount up to $1,004,973.00 from the 2020 State of California HHAP Round 2 funding; b) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to submit a funding application and all certifications, standard forms, and other related documents to the BCSHA to obtain the County of Santa Barbara allocation in an amount up to $899,512.00 from the 2020 HHAP Round 2 funding; c) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to execute all certifications, standard forms, and grant agreement in a form substantially similar to the 2019 State of California HHAP grant agreement, and other related documents required for the acceptance and administration of HHAP Round 2 funds allocated to the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC; d) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to execute all certifications, standard forms, and grant agreement in a form substantially similar to the 2019 State of California HHAP grant agreement and other related documents required for the acceptance and administration of HHAP Round 2 funds allocated to the County of Santa Barbara; e) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to sign a Letter of Support for the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC to be included in the 2020 State of California HHAP application for Round 2 funding; and f) Determine that the recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) and 15378(b)(4), finding that the recommended actions consist of administrative or fiscal activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-23) 21-00027 Consider recommendations regarding Adopting Parking Restrictions in the First District, as follows:a) Adopt a Resolution to establish new parking restrictions in the First District; andb) Find that the proposed actions are for the operation and maintenance of an existing public facility, involving negligible, or no expansion of use beyond that, which presently exists, that the proposed action is therefore exempt from California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 CCR 15301(c), and approve and direct staff to file the Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-47) 21-00056 Adopt a Resolution declaring the month of January 2021 as "Human Trafficking Awareness Month" in Santa Barbara County.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 21-00049 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file a brief update on the COVID-19 and Santa Barbara County’s response and operations; b) Receive and file a report from the Social Services Director regarding isolated seniors’ nutrition request related to the COVID emergency; c) Provide any direction, as appropriate; and d) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because pursuant to sections 153378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) the recommended actions consist of organizational, administrative or fiscal activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
3) 21-00047 HEARING - Consider appointments to the Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System, as follows: (EST TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Reappoint Ted Sten to serve on the Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System, to a three-year term ending December 31, 2023; andb) Reappoint Trent Benedetti to serve on the Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System to a three-year term ending December 31, 2023.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
—
2) 21-00048 HEARING - Consider Board of Supervisors’ 2021 appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.) a) Adult and Aging Network - one Chair of the Policy Council and one Co-Chair; b) Area Agency on Aging (Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens) - one regular member to Advisory Council; c) Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment (BEACON) - two regular members, one alternate member; d) Behavioral Wellness Commission - one regular member; e) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) - one regular member, one alternate member; f) CenCal Health - one regular member; g) Child Care Planning Council - one regular member; h) CommUnify (formerly Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County) - one regular member, one alternate member; i) Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Representative - one regular member; j) Debt Advisory Committee - one regular member, one alternate member; k) Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions - two regular members; l) First Five Children and Families Commission of Santa Barbara County - one regular member, one alternate member; m) Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee - two regular members; n) Juvenile Justice Coordination Council - two regular members, one North County, one South County; o) KIDS Network Policy Council - two members to serve as Chair and Vice-Chair; p) Law Library Board of Trustees - Chair as Ex-Officio Member; q) Legislative Program Committee - two regular members; r) Library Advisory Committee - one regular member; s) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) - two regular members and one alternate member; t) Multi-jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force - two regular members; u) National Association of Counties (NACO) - one regular member, one alternate member; v) Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board - one regular member, one alternate member; w) Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System - one regular member; x) The Funders Collaborative of Home for Good - two regular members; and y) Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board - one regular member. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–0