SL
Steve Lavagnino
Supervisor
Nonpartisan officeElected
170meetings
165attended
122spoke in
4523speaking turns
1bodies
251votes

Board of Supervisors

How they voted 1
Aye
A-27) 26-00380 Consider recommendations regarding a Public Works Director's Report on Emergency Response Actions from Impacts on Flooding and Storms and Continuation of Emergency Actions for the Transportation Division, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Receive and review a report from the Public Works Director regarding emergency actions taken pursuant to Resolution No. 19-327 and Public Contract Code section 22050 related to emergency operations responding to flooding, storms, debris removal and transportation projects following the recent late December 2025 and early January 2026 (25STM3) storm events and the necessity of the action and the reasons the emergency will not permit delay resulting from competitive solicitation of bids; b) Determine that there is a need to continue the emergency actions ordered by the Public Works Director; c) Direct staff to return to the Board at the next regular meeting, or every 14 days in the case of consecutive weekly regular meetings, to allow the Board to review the emergency action and determine whether there is a need to continue the emergency action, by a 4/5 vote, until the actions are terminated; andd) Determine that these emergency actions were found by the Board to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(d) and Section 15301(c) on January 13, 2026. A Notice of Exemption was filed on this basis on January 7, 2026, and the proposed action is within the scope of that Notice of Exemption.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 3
How they voted 2
No
8) 26-00192 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding time extension requests for the installation of multi-technology carbon filtration for cannabis odor control, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) CP1 Supply Systems Inc / 4505 Foothill Road, Case No. 25TEX-00026:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00026; b) Emmawood B1 LLC / 5888 Via Real, Case No. 25TEX-00027:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 2-month time extension to May 18, 2026, Case No. 25TEX-00027:c) Valley Crest Farms / 5980 Casitas Pass, Case No. 26TEX-00001:i) Make the required findings for denial;ii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270, determine that CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves; iii) Deny the time extension request, Case No. 26TEX-00001:d) CKC Farms, Inc. and Life Remedy Farms, Inc. / 5138 Foothill Road, Case No. 26TEX-00002:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00002;e) Bosim 1628 Management Company LLC / 1628 Cravens Ln, Case No. 26TEX-00003:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00003;f) New Generation Farms, Inc. and Blue Whale Agriculture, Inc. / 5775 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00004:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00004;g) Primetime Farms, Inc. / 5554 Casitas Pass Rd, Case No. 26TEX-00005: i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 6-month time extension to September 18, 2026, Case No. 26TEX-00005; andh) G and K Produce / K and G Flowers / 3480 Via Real, Case No. 26TEX-00006:i) Make the required findings for approval;ii) Determine that the activity is not a "Project" subject to CEQA review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), since it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; andiii) Approve a 12-month time extension to March 18, 2027, Case No. 26TEX-00006.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
2026-02-10Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 4
Aye
A-10) 26-00116 Consider recommendations regarding the North Branch Jail Expansion Project - Award Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Construction Management (CM); Project No. 23040, Fifth District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with STV Construction, Inc., a California Corporation, to provide CM services during the design competition and selection, design-build entity design and construction, closeout, and post construction phases for the proposed new North Branch Jail Expansion project, located at 2301 Black Road, Santa Maria, CA 93455 (APN 113-210-022/024), in an amount not to exceed $5,072,320.00; b) Authorize the Director of General Services, or his Assistant Director or Capital Division Chief designee, to approve change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed 5% or $253,616.00 as authorized under California Public Contract Code Section 20142(b); c) Authorize the Director of General Services to (i) amend the Agreement to extend the Term of the Agreement by up to six (6) additional months, and (ii) terminate the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement; d) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010960; ande) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 5–0
How they voted 6
Aye
A-20) 26-00057 Consider recommendations regarding the California Coastal Commission Conditional Certification of the Local Coastal Program Amendment for Rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update, as follows:a) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's certification of the Coastal Land Use Plan amendment (Resolution No. 24-93) of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);b) Receive notice of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209), zoning map and zoning text, respectively, of the County's Local Coastal Program amendment for rezones for the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update (Coastal Commission Case No. LCP-4-STB-24-0028-1-Part B);c) Adopt a Resolution acknowledging receipt of the California Coastal Commission's conditional certification of the Coastal Zoning Ordinance amendment (Ordinance No. 5208 and Ordinance No. 5209) with suggested modifications, accepting and agreeing to the suggested modifications, agreeing to issue Coastal Development Permits for the total area included in the conditionally certified Local Coastal Program, and adopting the Local Coastal Program amendment with the suggested modifications; d) Determine that the Board of Supervisors' action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15265; ande) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted resolution to the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission.Passed · 5–0
How they voted 2
How they voted 1
Aye
A-20) 25-00830 Consider recommendations regarding Management Classification and Compensation Refinement, as follows: a) Adopt an amendment to the Salary Resolution to revise the County of Santa Barbara’s Classification and Salary Plan Section 2 - to establish additional management classifications and salary ranges and delete unused management classifications; revise Section 3 - Salary Schedules effective October 13, 2025; and revise Section 4 - Department Position Allocation consistent with the June 24, 2024 implementation of the management classification changes that allowed certain employees with existing civil service status to retain that status until leaving their current position; b) Adopt the Resolution which amends the Compensation and Benefits Plan for Management, Appointed Executive, and Confidential Unrepresented Employees (Resolution No. 24-187) previously approved by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2024, and amended June 16, 2024, July 16, 2024, and August 27, 2024; c) Authorize the Human Resources Director to apply Management General Salary Increases in 2026 and subsequent years, up to a maximum of 1.5% annually, to employees who will be Y-rated as a result of their placement in the revised classification structure on October 13, 2025 (item (a) above), as an exception to general Y-rating rules; and d) Determine that the above actions are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) since the recommended actions are government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 3
How they voted 3
2025-04-08Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 1
How they voted 1
No
4) 25-00266 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an update on current renovations at the Main Jail and potential expansion of the Northern Branch Jail (NBJ), as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.) a) Receive an update on renovations at the Main Jail and options for new construction at the NBJ; b) Regarding the NBJ: i) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1 (new construction of one housing unit for a total jail system of 748 beds) and issue a Request for Quotation (RFQ) to select potential Design Build teams; or ii) Direct staff to proceed with finalizing design for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 housing units for a total jail system of 876 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; or iii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 housing units for a total jail system of 1,004 beds) and issue RFQ to select potential Design Build teams; c) Approve and authorize staff to develop funding strategies to address the operational and debt service budgetary impacts for the selected option; d) Approve and authorize staff to negotiate an amendment to the existing ground lease boundary at the NBJ with the State of California; e) Approve and authorize the County Executive Office to work with the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s office, County Counsel and Auditor-Controller’s Office to develop feasible debt issuance strategies; f) Provide other direction as appropriate; and g) Find that these actions are not a "project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because they consist of an organizational or administrative activity of government which will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and exempt from the provisions of the CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–2
2025-03-04Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 3
2025-02-11Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
A-11) 25-00112 Consider recommendations regarding an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and American Medical Response West (AMR), as follows:a) Repeal Ordinance 5182 that rescinded and replaced Chapter 5 of the Santa Barbara County Code (Ambulances) on June 20, 2023, which will nullify the actions to approve the permit for the Fire District and deny the permit for AMR taken thereunder;b) Approve the introduction (first reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services;c) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Agreement with AMR to provide ambulance services for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area with an annual cost reimbursement to the County in the amount of up to $3,989,831.00 for performance period of February 11, 2025 through February 10, 2029. If the County or AMR does not provide written notice of withdrawal six (6) months before the end of the applicable term the Agreement will automatically renew for one (1) year terms not to exceed beyond February 10, 2033; e) Approve and authorize the Director of the Public Health Department and the Local Emergency Medical Services Authority to make immaterial changes such as correcting clerical errors and updating contact information, upon review and concurrence by the Offices of the County Executive, County Counsel, and Auditor-Controller, as may be applicable;f) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the actions are organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; and g) Continue the item to the Administrative Agenda of March 4, 2025 to consider adoption of the Ordinance, as follows:i) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 5182, Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 5, titled Ambulances that established a non-exclusive system to regulate, set rates for, issue permits for, and contract with ambulance services; and ii) Determine that the above recommended action is not a "Project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per CEQA Guideline 15387(b)(5) because the action is an organizational or administrative activity of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 0–1
No
3) 25-00089 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Montecito Land Use and Development Code (MLUDC), County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), Article II, Coastal Zoning Ordinance, and associated Comprehensive Plan amendments to adopt updated Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance amendments (Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, 24ORD-00003, 24GPA-00001, and 24GPA-00002), as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, for the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Case Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, and the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003;b) Determine that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Nos. 24GPA-00001 and 24GPA-00002, the Ordinance Amendments, Case Nos. 24ORD-00001, 24ORD-00002, and 24ORD-00003, and the design guidelines amendments are exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15265;c) Approve the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments by taking the following actions:i) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the County LUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00001), Section 35-1 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;ii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the MLUDC (Case No. 24ORD-00002), Section 35-2 of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; andiii) Adopt an Ordinance amending the zoning regulations of the Article II Coastal Zoning Ordinance (Case No. 24ORD-00003) of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code;d) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00001, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-1.10, amend Development Standard VIS-SYV-3.1, and delete Attachment H, of the Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan;ii) Amend Development Standard VIS-LA-1.2.3 of the Los Alamos Community Plan; andiii) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan;e) Adopt a Resolution approving Case No. 24GPA-00002, amending the Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Coastal Land Use Plan in the following ways:i) Amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1I, amend Development Standard VIS-EGV-1M, and delete Development Standard VIS-EGV-1O, of the Eastern Goleta Valley Community Plan; f) Adopt a Resolution revising the Old Town Orcutt Design Guidelines and the Los Alamos Bell Street Design Guidelines for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments; g) Adopt a Resolution revising the Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards for consistency with the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance Amendments;h) Adopt a Resolution authorizing Planning and Development to submit the Outdoor Lighting, Signs, and Miscellaneous Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and Montecito Architectural Guidelines and Development Standards amendments (Case No. 24ORD-00003, Case No. 24GPA-00002) to the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for review and certification as an amendment to the Santa Barbara County Local Coastal Program; andi) Direct the Planning and Development Department to transmit the adopted Resolution to the Executive Director of the CCC.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
How they voted 2
How they voted 8
A-22) 24-00977 Consider recommendations regarding an Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor for Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Project, County Project No. 864052, Second District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. (not a local vendor), in an amount not to exceed $424,505.00, to provide professional design and engineering services for the Cathedral Oaks Complete Streets Design; b) Approve and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to, in accordance with the Agreement: extend the period of performance for up to one additional year (Section 4.B); make immaterial amendments (Section 34); suspend performance (Section 46.); and to approve amendments to the Agreement in an amount not to exceed 10% of the initial contract amount, $42,450.00, for a total contract authorization of $466,955.00; c) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0010054 to increase appropriations of $446,955.00 in Public Works Roads-Capital Infrastructure for Services and Supplies funded by a Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Measure A Grant and Public Works Roads Measure A Fund; and d) Determine the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) because it consists of organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Vote recorded · 1–0
2024-08-20Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 6
Aye
Administrative AgendaPassed · 4–0
How they voted 1
2024-06-25Regular Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
How they voted 1
7) 24-00639 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Tax on Cannabis Operations Ordinance, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County:i) Option 1 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed, as follows: Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at twenty-five cents ($0.25) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at two and a half cents ($0.025) per quarter, per square foot; orii) Option 2 proposes a tax on cannabis cultivation computed as follows:Cultivation: Four percent of gross receipts or based on square footage for licenses having taxable transfer activity in the reporting period, whichever is greater 1) The rate for non-outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at fifty cents ($0.50) per quarter, per square foot; 2) The rate for outdoor cultivation shall be a maximum of seventy-five cents ($0.75) per quarter, per square foot, with an initial rate set at ten cents ($0.10) per quarter, per square foot;b) Read the title, "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 50A, Tax on Cannabis Operations, of the Santa Barbara County Code," and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Approve the appointment and authorize member(s) of the Board of Supervisors to author, sign, and submit on behalf of the Board an argument in favor of the Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" ballot measure and any rebuttal; d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Set a hearing on the Agenda of July 9, 2024 to consider the following actions: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50A, "Tax on Cannabis Operations" of the Santa Barbara County Code to change the tax on cannabis cultivation in the unincorporated area of the County; ii) Adopt a Resolution submitting the proposed Ordinance and ballot language to change the tax on cannabis cultivation to the electorate for approval, and requesting and ordering consolidation with the November 5, 2024 General Election; and iii) Determine that the above actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines because they consist of the creation of government funding mechanisms which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 1–0
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 24-00575 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Recommended Budget Hearings, as follows:Acting concurrently as the Board of Supervisors; the Board of Directors, Fire Protection District, Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District; Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District; Board of Directors, Water Agency; and other special districts under the supervision and control of the Board of Supervisors:a) Receive, consider, and file the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, which includes the County's General Operating Budget as well as budgets of special districts governed by the Board of Supervisors;b) Approve final budget adjustments to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;c) Adopt a Resolution entitled In the Matter of Adopting the Budget for FY 2024-2025; d) Approve budget adjustments, if any, as amended during Budget Hearings, to the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget;e) Delegate authority to the Chair of the Board to execute single-year renewals of grants and contracts previously approved by the Board and included in the FY 2024-2025 Recommended Budget, where contract amounts are within 10% of previously contracted amounts;f) Receive the draft salary resolution, direct any specific changes made during the June 2024 budget hearings, and adopt that amended salary resolution to be effective June 24, 2024, which updates job classifications and department position allocations to include positions approved by the Board of Supervisors during the FY 2024-2025 Budget Hearings;g) Adopt position changes previously approved by the County Executive Officer during FY 2023-2024 under Board Resolution 99-486; andh) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above fiscal activities are not a project subject to CEQA.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 2
How they voted 1
Abstain
Roll CallPassed · 4–0
How they voted 1
How they voted 1
No
A-13) 23-00842 Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows:a) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andb) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:i) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; andii) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.Passed · 4–1
How they voted 2
2) 23-00798 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant (Pacific Pipeline Company) appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment, Case Nos. 23APL-00022; 21AMD-00000-00009 & 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST TIME: 1 HR. 45 MIN.)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C-1, C-2, and D of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report (Included in Attachment 2 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) [Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 to the Board Letter).Or, alternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 (included as Attachment 3 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) including CEQA findings; and d) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–1
No
2) 23-00798 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Applicant (Pacific Pipeline Company) appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment, Case Nos. 23APL-00022; 21AMD-00000-00009 & 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST TIME: 1 HR. 45 MIN.)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C-1, C-2, and D of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report (Included in Attachment 2 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) [Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval (Attachment 2 to the Board Letter).Or, alternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project, as follows: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 (included as Attachment 3 of the July 18, 2023 Set Hearing Letter) including CEQA findings; and d) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
How they voted 10
Aye
A-37) 23-00700 Set a hearing to consider the Applicant appeal of the Planning Commission's April 26, 2023 denial of the Existing Oil Lines 901/903 Valve Upgrade Project Amendment and Coastal Development Permit, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows:(Set a Hearing for August 22, 2023. Time estimate: 2 hours)a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) After considering the environmental review documents included as Attachment C of the February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report Addendum dated March 1, 2023 together with previously adopted EIR/EIS and the CEQA exemption Sections 15301(b) [Existing Facilities], 15303(d) [New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures], 15311 [Accessory Structures], and CEQA Statutes Section 15284 [Pipelines], determine that as reflected in the CEQA findings, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project; andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case Nos. 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048, subject to the conditions of approval; orAlternatively, the Board could deny the appeal and deny the project by taking the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00022;b) Make the required findings for denial of the appeal and project, Case Nos. 23APL-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048;c) Determine that denial of the appeal and project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15270(a), included as Attachment A of the Planning Commission Action Letter dated May 3, 2023 including CEQA findings; andd) Deny the Project, Case Nos. 23APL-00000-00022, 21AMD-00000-00009 and 22CDP-00000-00048.Passed · 4–0
Aye
1) 23-00592 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding amendments to the Cannabis Business Licensing Fee Ordinance, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending the Ordinance 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee";b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 5181, "An Ordinance Establishing the Cannabis Business License Fee"; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016) adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: CONTINUE TO 8/22/2023Passed · 5–0
Aye
3) 23-00662 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing), as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file the Administration Reports summarizing the Proposed FY 2023-2024 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing); b) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan);c) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing);d) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list;e) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for FY 2023-2024 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list; andf) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–1
How they voted 2
Aye
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 1–3
No
7) 23-00492 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding direction on design of renovations at the Santa Barbara Main Jail (Second District) and possible construction at the Northern Branch Jail (Fifth District), Project No. 20041, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a report on conceptual options for renovations at the Main Jail and new construction at the Northern Branch Jail;b) Regarding the Main Jail, direct staff to proceed with a minimized renovation plan that addresses the Inmate Reception Center, makes Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and eliminates use of other beds, as detailed in the report; c) Regarding the Northern Branch Jail:i) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1 (new construction of one pod for a total jail system of 728 beds) and prior to final design, return to the Board with targeted diversion strategies to addresses jail population management, sustainable jail staffing, and identified savings or other revenues to fund the strategies; orii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 1.5 (new construction of 1.5 pods for a total jail system of 859 beds); oriii) Direct staff to proceed with obtaining designs for Option 2 (new construction of 2 pods for a total jail system of 984 beds);d) Provide other direction as appropriate; ande) Find that these actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 as a feasibility and planning study for possible future actions that have not been approved, adopted, or funded, and direct staff to file a notice of exemption on that basis.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–2
How they voted 6
Aye
4) 23-00217 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Laguna County Sanitation District Ordinance relative to service charges, connection charges, and trunk sewer fees and a Resolution relative to the collection of service charges on the tax roll; Fourth and Fifth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District:a) Receive and file with the Clerk of the Board the fixed charge report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024;b) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon, and Bradley-Solomon trunk sewer fees;c) Read title: "An Ordinance of the Laguna County Sanitation District Amending Ordinance No. 3130 Adopted November 19, 1979, Which Established Service Charges, Connection Charges, and Other Rules and Regulations as Amended by Ordinance No. 4142 Adopted December 9, 1993 Establishing Trunk Sewer Fees. This Amending Ordinance Changes the Annual Service Charge and Connection Charge for Single Family and Duplex Dwelling Units, Apartments, Condominiums, Trailer Spaces, Mobile Homes and Non-residential Development; and also Changes the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley-Solomon Trunk Sewer Fees," and waive reading of the Ordinance in full; d) Direct the Clerk to count and report the number of written protests and if no majority protest:i) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for May 16, 2023 to consider recommendations, as follows:1) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Ordinance Nos. 3130 and 4142 to change the annual service charge, connection charge, and the Dutard-Solomon and Bradley Solomon trunk sewer fees;2) Consider the adoption of a Resolution authorizing the collection of said charges on the tax roll; and3) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15273(a)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are modifications of service charges, connection charges, and trunk line fees for the purposes of meeting operating and capital expenses, as well as for meeting financial reserve needs required to maintain services within this existing service area, and the modifications in charges and fees are not for the construction of capital projects for the expansion of the service system and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis; ore) If majority protest, take no action and provide direction to staff.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
How they voted 6
Aye
1) 23-00016 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Board of Supervisors' 2023 appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.)a) Adult and Aging Network;b) Area Agency on Aging (Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens);c) Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment (BEACON);d) Behavioral Wellness Commission;e) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Representative;f) CenCal Health;g) Child Care Planning Council;h) CommUnify (formerly Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County);i) Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Representative;j) Debt Advisory Committee;k) Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions;l) First Five Children and Families Commission of Santa Barbara County;m) Golden State Connect Authority (GSCA);n) Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA);o) Juvenile Justice Coordination Council;p) KIDS Network Policy Council;q) Law Library Board of Trustees;r) Legislative Program Committee;s) Library Advisory Committee;t) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO);u) Multi-jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force;v) National Association of Counties (NACO) Representative;w) Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board;x) Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System;y) Rural County Representative of California (RCRC); andz) Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 5–0
How they voted 1
No
1) 22-01091 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement Resolution and Project Template, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)Acting as the Board of Supervisors; the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District; the Board of Directors, Water Agency; the Board of Directors, Laguna County Sanitation District; and the Board of Directors, Fire Protection District:a) Receive and file a report on the status of negotiations for the development of a Countywide Community Workforce Agreement Resolution and Project Template;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to sign the Countywide Community Workforce Agreement with Tri-Counties Building and Construction Trades Council for a term of five years for County capital projects; c) Adopt a Resolution establishing a policy for the use of Countywide Community Workforce Agreement for five years for County capital projects greater than $10 million finding that said agreement furthers a legitimate governmental interest consistent with competitive bidding law by preventing costly project delays, assuring contractors access to skilled labor, and avoiding the potential for labor strife during the life of the County capital project; and d) Find that the proposed activities do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378 (b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment) and 15061(b)(3), therefore no environmental document is required.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 2–2
How they voted 2
No
1) 22-01048 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a Notice of Funding Availability for a Farmworker Resource Center Grant, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)a) Approve and authorize the Public Health Department (PHD) Director to apply for a grant award for a County Farmworker Resource Center through the State Department of Community Services and Development (CSD) and to complete any required documentation or make any required certifications in application of the grant. If awarded the grant will be for the period of February 15, 2023 to May 15, 2024 in the amount of $833,000.00 not including the local match;b) Approve and authorize the County Executive Officer as the county administrative officer to submit a Commitment Letter and supporting documentation to the CSD for the County Farmworker Resource Center grant in the amount of County's matching fund requirement of 25% ($208,250.00) as part of the application package; c) If awarded, direct the County Executive Office and PHD to establish the required budget appropriations in the amount of $208,250.00 from local general fund dollars or other federal funding available for the required local match funding to support the Farmworker Resource Center during the grant period; andd) Determine that the recommended actions are not a "Project" with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and are exempt per CEQA Guideline section 15378(b)(5), since the recommended actions are organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 3–1
How they voted 4
Aye
A-4) 22-00872 Consider recommendations regarding a Regional Climate Collaborative Grant Application, as follows:a) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to apply for and receive Regional Climate Collaborative Grant funds in an amount up to $1,750,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2025-2026 from the California Strategic Growth Council;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Partnership Agreement with the City of Guadalupe, a city government; City of Lompoc, a city government; Los Amigos de Guadalupe, a nonprofit organization; Children and Family Resource Services in partnership with the Santa Barbara County Education Office, a regional public agency, on behalf of its Santa Barbara County Promotores Network Program; Santa Paula Latino Town Hall, Inc., a nonprofit organization, on behalf of the Central Coast Climate Justice Network; California Marine Sanctuary Foundation, a nonprofit organization, on behalf of the Central Coast Climate Collaborative; Cachuma Resource Conservation District, a special district, on behalf of the Wildfire Resilience Collaborative; Community Environmental Council, a nonprofit organization; Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes Center, a nonprofit organization; and Fund for Santa Barbara, Inc., a philanthropic organization, to implement the Guadalupe-Lompoc Initiative under the Regional Climate Collaborative grant, for the period of January 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026; and c) Determine that the above recommended actions do not constitute a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(2), as this involves continuing administrative activities, and 15378(b)(4) for the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.Passed · 3–0
Aye
1) 22-00884 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Valley Crest, LLC appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the 5980 Casitas Pass Mixed-Light Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case Nos. 22APL-000000-00018 and 19CDP-00000-00016, First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.) a) Grant the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, subject to the conditions of approval; orAlternatively, in order to deny the appeal and approve the Project, take the following actions:a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 22APL-00000-00018;b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, including CEQA findings;c) Determine that the previously certified PEIR (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); andd) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 19CDP-00000-00016, subject to the conditions of approval, including Condition No. 35 (Odor Abatement Plan Revision), as conditioned by the Planning Commission.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–0
How they voted 4
1) 22-00794 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Elected Department Head Salaries, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider options regarding Elected Department Head salaries as follows:1) Option 1: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide for future salary increases as a flat percentage rate increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); 2) Option 2: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide future increases as follows: i) Provide the District Attorney with a flat percentage wage increase equivalent to the percentage wage increase provided to County Counsel and the Public Defender Department Heads (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase);ii) Provide the Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, and Treasurer-Tax Collector a flat percentage increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); andiii) Provide the Sheriff a flat percentage increase equivalent to the general wage increase for the Sheriffs Managers Association plus an adjustment that aligns the total percentage increase with other Elected Department Heads;3) Option 3: Effective at the start of each new term in office, set salaries for Elected Department Heads at the median of the market and provide for future increases based on the Consumer Price Index - Urban (CPI-U) that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors; 4) Option 4: Provide annual salary increases for Elected Department Heads based on the same CPI-U that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors and effective in the same pay period;5) Option 5a: Provide a 2.5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;6) Option 5b: Provide a 5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;7) Option 6: Take no action at this time; and8) Option 7: Provide other direction;b) Consider options and provide direction to County Human Resources regarding parity between Attorney Department Head positions; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYFailed · 0–3
Aye
1) 22-00794 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Elected Department Head Salaries, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider options regarding Elected Department Head salaries as follows:1) Option 1: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide for future salary increases as a flat percentage rate increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); 2) Option 2: Effective September 5, 2022, provide a 2.5% general wage increase plus 2.5% commensurate to the performance-based salary increase received by Appointed Department Heads and provide future increases as follows: i) Provide the District Attorney with a flat percentage wage increase equivalent to the percentage wage increase provided to County Counsel and the Public Defender Department Heads (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase);ii) Provide the Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder-Assessor, and Treasurer-Tax Collector a flat percentage increase equivalent to what Appointed Department Heads are eligible to receive (a combination of general wage increase plus performance-based increase); andiii) Provide the Sheriff a flat percentage increase equivalent to the general wage increase for the Sheriffs Managers Association plus an adjustment that aligns the total percentage increase with other Elected Department Heads;3) Option 3: Effective at the start of each new term in office, set salaries for Elected Department Heads at the median of the market and provide for future increases based on the Consumer Price Index - Urban (CPI-U) that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors; 4) Option 4: Provide annual salary increases for Elected Department Heads based on the same CPI-U that is the basis for salary increases for elected members of the Board of Supervisors and effective in the same pay period;5) Option 5a: Provide a 2.5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;6) Option 5b: Provide a 5% salary increase for Elected Department Heads effective September 5, 2022 and County Human Resources will return to the Board prior to the new term in office;7) Option 6: Take no action at this time; and8) Option 7: Provide other direction;b) Consider options and provide direction to County Human Resources regarding parity between Attorney Department Head positions; andc) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and are therefore not a project subject to environmental review.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
1) TrailedPassed · 4–1
How they voted 5
Aye
3) 22-00741 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the Sheriff's Office participation in the National Policing Institute Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Study and Operation of ALPR Technology, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding the proposed participation of the Sheriff's Office in the National Policing Institute's ALPR study and the operation of ALPR technology by the Sheriff's Office within Santa Barbara County;b) Consistent with the requirements of California Civil Code Section 1798.90.55(a), during a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, provide members of the public and the Board with an opportunity to comment upon and provide suggestions relating to the Sheriff's Office's: i) Participation in the National Policing Institute's study on the effectiveness of Automated License Plate Reader technology; andii) Operation of Automated License Plate Reader technology within Santa Barbara County, to include policies, procedures, privacy concerns and transparency toward concerned community members and policy makers; c) Approve, ratify and authorize the Sheriff or his designee to execute the Services Agreement and Amendment with Flock Group, Inc.; andd) Determine that under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) the above actions are not subject to CEQA review because they are administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; determine that the proposed project is exempt under CEQA Guidelines pursuant to section 15301, Existing Facilities, and section 15303, New Construction, because the project will either result in a minor alteration to a public structure involving negligible or no expansion of existing structures or involve the construction and location of new, small facilities; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
How they voted 1
Aye
Board DeliberationPassed · 2–1
How they voted 1
Aye
1) 22-00513 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ambulance Service Contract Policy Resolution and Ambulance Services Update, as follows: (EST. TIME: 2 HR.)a) Adopt a Resolution adopting a policy setting forth issues to be considered for inclusion in contracts for the provision of emergency ambulance services entered into or renewed on or after January 1, 2022; b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a Fifth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with American Medical Response West (AMR) to update the Vehicle Maintenance Program, to update the "Lame Duck" Contract Termination provision, and to extend the termination date to March 1, 2024 to allow for completion of the Ambulance Services Request-For-Proposals (RFP) process; c) Approve and authorize the Public Health Department Director, or designee, to authorize AMR's requests in accordance with Agreement Section 11.1.G, upon review and approval from the County Executive Officer (CEO), Auditor-Controller, and County Counsel;d) With respect to the RFP for an Exclusive Ambulance Services Provider for the Santa Barbara County Exclusive Operating Area:i) Approve and authorize issuance of the RFP; orii) Provide staff with other direction regarding further development of the RFP; ande) Determine that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15378(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it consists of the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal and administrative activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 3
How they voted 1
Aye
Public Comment - 1)Passed · 4–0
How they voted 5
3) TrailedPassed · 3–1
How they voted 3
Aye
3) 22-00132 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an amendment to Chapter 50 of the County Code - Licensing of Cannabis Operations, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 of the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations in the unincorporated area of the County;b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for March 1, 2022 to consider recommendations, as follows: i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending Chapter 50 to the Santa Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations; andii) Determine for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that:1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) these actions are within the scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) [Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003, State Clearinghouse No. 2017071016] adequately describes this activity for the purposes of CEQA; and2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial importance concerning the ordinance's significant effects or mitigation measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received that shows any of the following situations elements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(3) apply.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–1
Aye
3) ContinuedPassed · 3–1
How they voted 6
How they voted 3
Aye
A-25) 22-00109 Consider recommendations regarding conditional reservation of funding to the Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara (Housing Authority) for the Homekey Program Application in Santa Maria, Fifth District, as follows:a) Approve a reservation of $3,486,400.00, in funds made available by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) and HOME American Rescue Plan Consortium funds that have been allocated to the County, which will serve as the capital matching funds required under the Homekey program for the acquisition and rehabilitation of 1007 Main St., Santa Maria by the Housing Authority, and ratify a Reservation Letter signed by the Community Services Director for inclusion in the Homekey application to the State submitted prior to the January 31, 2022 deadline for geographic set-asides and application bonus award; b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute a letter of support for the Homekey project, which will be attached to the Notice of Exemption; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 50675.1.4, finding that the proposed "Homekey" project is to provide housing for individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness and who are impacted by COVID-19 and that the project satisfies the requirements described more fully in Section 50675.1.4, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on that basis.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 4
Aye
How they voted 8
Aye
A-4) 21-00939 Consider recommendations regarding a Goleta Beach Restaurant Concession Agreement, Second District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Concession Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara (County) and PRJKT SB, Inc. (Concessionaire), to allow Concessionaire to operate and manage the Restaurant, Snack Bar, and Venue space at Goleta Beach for a term of ten (10) years, with three options to extend the term for an additional five (5) years per each extension, with Concessionaire to pay County special use fees (Fee) of Ten Percent (10%) of Concessioner's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales, or Eight Thousand Dollars ($8,000.00) per month for the Restaurant and Snack Bar, whichever is greater; Twelve and One-half Percent (12.5%) of Concessionaire's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales for catering of special events at Goleta Beach Park; and Ten Percent (10%) of Concessionaire's gross sales and Fifteen Percent (15%) of gross alcohol sales, or Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) per month for the Venue, whichever is greater;b) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to exercise any and all of the options to extend the term of the Concession Agreement for an additional five (5) years per extension provided that the Concessionaire is not in default under the terms of the Concession Agreement;c) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to extend any and all options for the Concession Agreement Initial Term for up to an additional thirty (30) days per extension provided that the Director determines that the Concessioner is making satisfactory progress toward completion of capital improvements in order to open the operation; andd) Find that the recommended actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines as the actions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities and/or equipment that involves negligible or no expansion of existing or former uses (Section 15301), replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced (Section 15302), construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure (Section 15303), minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees (Section 15304), and construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities (Section 15311), and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.Passed · 4–0
2021-08-03Special Meetingpresentdid not speak
How they voted 2
Aye
1) 21-00699 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the acquisition of 630 Randall Road, Santa Barbara, California, by The Santa Barbara Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Flood Control Purposes (APN 007-120-101) (RES File No. 003892), First District, as follows (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) Acting as the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District: a) Approve, adopt and authorize the Public Works Director, as the General Manager of The Santa Barbara Flood Control and Water Conservation District, to execute the Resolution of Necessity, for the acquisition in fee of real property located at 630 Randall Road, Santa Barbara (APN: 007-120-101), hereinafter referred to as the "Property", currently owned by Catherine W. Montgomery, Trustee of the Montgomery Living Trust, dated February 7, 2014; b) Authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute any and all documents and to expend funds for deposit with the State Treasurer’s Office in a sum equal to the appraised market value for the Property, in the amount of $1,346,000.00 for APN 007-120-101, and any additional related costs and fees, in order to acquire fee interest; and c) After considering the Environmental Impact Report as well as the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report, for the Randall Road Debris Basin Project (SCH Number; 2019029104), find that pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be prepared for this project. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 16
Aye
A-11) 21-00657 Consider recommendations regarding the reallocation of Homeless Emergency Assistance Program (HEAP) Funds to Good Samaritan Shelter Inc. for the purchase and installation of a restroom/shower trailer to be located on the County-owned Bridgehouse Shelter site as part of the Pallet Shelter Project, Fourth District, as follows:a) Approve the reallocation and re-programing of $65,148.00 in prior unexpended State HEAP funds from various previously awarded subrecipients to Good Samaritan Shelter Inc. for the purchase of a restroom/shower trailer; b) Approve, ratify, and authorize the Chair to execute the First Amendment to the Subrecipient Agreement between the County and Good Samaritan Shelter, dated April 2, 2019, in order to amend the scope of work, revise the budget, and add an additional $65,148.00 in additional HEAP funds for reimbursement of a restroom/shower trailer for the Pallet Shelter Project; andc) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15269(c), finding that the actions consist of specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency; Government Code Section 8698.4, finding that the County has declared a shelter crisis and the action includes leasing of County-owned land for a homeless shelter and financial assistance therefore; CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, finding that the actions consist of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; and CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, finding that the action consists of minor public alterations in the condition of land; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-36) 21-00660 Consider recommendations regarding Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Public Demonstration Garden Project, Fourth District, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) Acting as the Board of Directors, Water Agency: a) Approve the plans and specifications for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project (WC8550); b) Award the construction contract for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project, in the amount of $243,640.00 to the lowest responsible bidder JF Will Company, Inc. (a local vendor in Santa Maria), subject to the provisions of documents and certifications, as set forth in the plans and specifications applicable to the project and as required by law; c) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Construction Contract upon return of the contractor’s executed contract documents, and the review and approval of the County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their authorized representatives; d) Authorize the Public Works Director or designee to approve changes or additions to the work being performed under the Construction Contract, in an amount not to exceed $24,364.00 for the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project; e) Approve the Budget Revision Request No. 0007702 to increase appropriations of $25,285.00 in Water Agency Fund for Capital Assets funded by the release of Restricted Purpose of Fund, Fund Balance and to transfer appropriations of $250,000.00 in Water Agency Fund from Services and Supplies to Capital Assets-Land Improvements to complete the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project; and f) Determine that the Santa Maria Valley Sustainable Garden Project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to 14 CCR 15301, which consists of repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing facilities that involve no expansion, and direct the Clerk of the Board to file the California Environmental Quality Act Notice of Exemption.Passed · 3–1
Aye
3) 21-00637 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Orcutt and Providence Landing Community Facilities Districts Special Tax Levy, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file the Administration Reports summarizing the Proposed Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Special Tax Levy for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) and for the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing); b) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan);c) Adopt a Resolution Levying Special Taxes within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing);d) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2002-1 (Orcutt Community Plan) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list;e) Certify the list of all parcels within the County of Santa Barbara Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 (Providence Landing) subject to the special tax levy including the amount of the tax to be levied on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 and direct the Clerk of the Board or other designated official to file with the County Auditor the certified list; andf) Determine that the above recommended actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5) because the actions consist of organizational or administrative actions that will have no direct physical impact on the environment and the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
4) 21-00503 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Speed Limits Specified in County Code Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 15.7 and 23-15.8, First and Third Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)a) Approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits on Ortega Ridge Road in the Summerland area of the First District; and Burton Mesa Boulevard and St. Andrews Way in the Vandenberg Village area and Onstott Road and Rucker Road in the Mission Hills area of the Third District;b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full; andc) Continue the item to the Administrative Agenda of August 17, 2021 to consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance amending speed limits on various roads, as follows:i) Adopt the Ordinance (Second Reading) amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits on Ortega Ridge Road in the Summerland area of the First District; and Burton Mesa Boulevard and St. Andrews Way in the Vandenberg Village area and Onstott Road and Rucker Road in the Mission Hills area of the Third District; andii) Determine that amending Santa Barbara County Code, Chapter 23, Sections 23-15.4, 23-15.5, 23-15.6, 23-15.7 and 23-15.8, pertaining to speed limits, is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15378(b)(2), since the recommended actions are administrative activities of the County that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is general policy and procedure making.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
6) 21-00695 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an agreement with EF Johnson Company for the Public Safety Radio System Replacement Project, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor (Agreement) with EF Johnson Company for System and Installation for the Public Safety Radio System Replacement Project (Project) in the amount not to exceed $30,239,809.00; b) Approve Budget Revision Request No. 0007711; c) Direct staff to return to the Board by January 2022 for an update about the project phases and to consider further funding for the Project;d) Authorize the General Services Director, or designee, until otherwise ordered by the Board, to administer the Agreement on behalf of the County and to execute the Final Detailed Design Certificate for Phase 1, attached to the Agreement as Exhibit I; ande) Determine that the recommended actions are exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the following CEQA guidelines sections: 15301 as the actions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public structures, facilities, mechanical equipment or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use; 15302 as the actions consist or replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities located on the same site and with the same purpose and capacity; 15303 as the actions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption on these bases.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: APPROVEPassed · 4–0
How they voted 13
Aye
3) 21-00440 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the amendment of a Fee Ordinance relating to Published Charges for Inpatient and Outpatient Mental Health Services, as follows: (EST. TIME: 10 MIN.)a) Receive and file a presentation regarding amendments to the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services; b) Consider and approve the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services;c) Read the title of the Ordinance, "An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 5016 Santa Barbara County Psychiatric Health Facility and Outpatient Mental Health Services Fees," into the record and waive full reading of the Ordinance; andd) Continue the hearing to the Administrative Agenda of June 15, 2021 to consider recommendations regarding the adoption (Second Reading) of the Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services, as follows: i) Consider the adoption (Second Reading) of the Ordinance amending the Santa Barbara County Department of Behavioral Wellness Published Charges for inpatient and outpatient mental health services, effective 30 days after adoption by the Board of Supervisors; andii) Determine that the above actions are government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and are therefore not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
6) 21-00451 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding the adoption of amendments to the Coastal Zoning Ordinance (CZO), the County Land Use and Development Code (LUDC), and the Montecito Land Use and Development Code (MLUDC) to revise existing and create new development standards and permit procedures to implement recent changes in State legislation regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) and consider the adoption of an amendment to the Santa Barbara County Uniform Rules for Agricultural Preserves and Farmland Security Zones (Uniform Rules) to revise the existing ADU definition, add a new JADU definition, and allow JADUs as a compatible use on agricultural preserve contracted lands, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Consider recommendations regarding the CZO amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00001), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of the Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15265 and 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00001) amending the CZO, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; b) Consider recommendations regarding LUDC amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00002), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including CEQA findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 35-1, the LUDC, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; c) Consider recommendations regarding MLUDC amendment (Case No. 20ORD-00000-00003), as follows: i) Make the required findings for approval, including CEQA findings; ii) Determine that the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h); and iii) Adopt an Ordinance amending Section 35-2, the MLUDC, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Santa Barbara County Code; and d) Consider recommendations regarding the Uniform Rules amendment, as follows: i) Determine that the Uniform Rules amendment is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and ii) Adopt a Resolution amending the Uniform Rules to revise the existing ADU definition, add a new JADU definition, and allow JADUs as a compatible use on agricultural preserve contracted lands. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-12) 21-00469 Consider recommendations regarding an Amendment and Transfer of Conservation Easements at the Scolari Ranch from the County to the Land Trust for Santa Barbara County, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, Gerald E. Scolari and Sandra K. Scolari, and Rosebel V. Cameron, as trustees of the owners, on real property containing approximately 233 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-090-001;b) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, Gerald E. Scolari and Sandra K. Scolari, and Rosebel V. Cameron, as trustees of the owners, on real property containing approximately 271 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-090-002; c) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Amended and Restated Conservation Easement subject to final approval by County Counsel and the Directors of Planning and Development and General Services, amending and restating a conservation easement previously accepted by the County on April 21, 2020, granted by LeRoy Scolari, as trustee of the owner, on real property containing approximately 467.87 acres of land, located in the County of Santa Barbara, on Assessor Parcel Number 083-080-004;d) Authorize and direct the Clerk to execute Certificates of Acceptance in a form substantially similar to those attached to the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements, thereby affirming the County's acceptance of the Conservation Easements as amended and restated, and direct staff to subsequently record the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements;e) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Amendment to Funding Agreement following execution by all the parties of the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements;f) Authorize the Director of General Services, or designee, following the termination of the Funding Agreement becoming effective, to execute any additional related documents required to release the financial security for the Funding Agreement;g) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Assignment and Assumption Agreements with The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County, effective upon recordation, following execution by all the parties of the Amendment to Funding Agreement;h) Authorize the Director of General Services, or designee, to execute any additional related documents required to facilitate the County's acceptance and assignment of the Amended and Restated Conservation Easements; andi) Find that the proposed actions are within the scope of the environmental document prepared and adopted for the Strauss Wind Energy Project (Certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 18EIR-00000-00001/SCH No. 2018071002), including the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) Revision Letter dated November 12, 2019, that no substantial changes are proposed, there are no substantial changes in circumstances or new information of substantial importance regarding significant impacts or feasibility of mitigation measures and alternatives and, therefore, that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.Passed · 4–0
How they voted 12
Aye
4) 21-00275 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Establishing Benefit Assessments for County Service Areas 3, 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Second, Third and Fourth Districts, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.) Acting as the Governing Authority of County Service Area 3, County Service Area 31 and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District: a) Receive and file Benefit Assessment Reports for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for County Service Area 3, County Service Area 31, and the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District with the Clerk of the Board; b) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 3 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; c) Adopt a Resolution establishing streetlighting charges (no changes proposed), for County Service Areas 31 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; d) Do not establish the benefit assessments (set to zero) in those portions of the Santa Barbara North County Lighting District authorized to do so for Fiscal Year 2021-2022; and e) Determine that the above actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 15273(a)(1),(2),(3) and (4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they are for the establishment of benefit assessment rates for services provided by County Service Areas 3 and 31, that no expansion of services or facilities will result, that revenues will be used for meeting operating expenses and financial reserve needs and requirements, and approve the filing of a Notice of Exemption on that basis. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 9
Approval of Administrative AgendaVote recorded · 0–0
Aye
5) 21-00156 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding a State Water Project (SWP) Contract Amendments, as follows: (EST. TIME: 20 MIN.)Acting as the Board of Directors, Flood Control and Water Conservation District:a) Consider the request of the Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) to approve Amendment 20 (Contact Extension Amendment) to the SWP Contract as follows;i) Approve and authorize the Public Works Director or his designee to execute Amendment 20 (Contract Extension) to the SWP Contract contingent upon CCWA's acknowledgement by an action of its Board that the Transfer of Financial Responsibility Agreement (TFRA) remains in full force;ii) Approve and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to sign the Agreement Confirming the Term of the TFRA; and iii) Certify that the Board, acting as a Responsible Agency, has reviewed and considered the information and environmental effects contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for Amendment 20 to the SWP Contract, and that the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as Lead Agency found no significant impacts and is the custodian of the records located at ;b) Consider the request of the CCWA to approve Amendment 21 (Water Management Amendment);i) Reject Amendment 21 at this time because CCWA has not addressed the concerns out of District transfers and the impacts on water supply for sales of water out of the County; and ii) Direct staff to continue to work with CCWA staff and return to your Board at a future date if mutually agreeable terms can be reached related to Amendment 21; andc) Determine that the proposed actions are not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), organization or administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 3–1
Aye
6) 21-00171 HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an Ordinance amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II and a Resolution establishing County Office Hours, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required) (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)a) Consider the introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II, to provide textual clarity and modernization of the 1971 language; b) Read the title of the Ordinance and waive full reading of the Ordinance;c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for March 9, 2021 to consider the adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Article I and II, to provide textual clarity and modernization of the 1971 language; and d) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as it consists of general policy and procedure making;That the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 2021 consider recommendations, as follows: (4/5 Vote Required)a) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27, Personnel, Articles I and II, to provide clarity and modernization of the 1971 language;b) Adopt the Resolution Regarding County Office Hours; andc) Find that the proposed actions do not constitute a "Project" within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15378(b)(2), as it consists of general policy and procedure making.COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYPassed · 4–0
How they voted 11
Aye
Installation CeremonyPassed · 4–0
Aye
Installation CeremonyPassed · 4–0
Aye
A-5) 21-00034 Consider recommendations regarding Jalama Beach Park Grant Award and Grant Application Resolutions, Third District, as follows: a) Adopt a Resolution to approve and authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to execute the California Coastal Conservancy (Coastal Conservancy) Grant Awards for the: i) Jalama Beach Coastal Trail and Beach Access Planning Project; and ii) Jalama Beach Campground Expansion and Improvements Planning Project; b) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to execute the grant agreement, in a form substantially similar to the Coastal Conservancy draft agreement and upon review and concurrence of County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their designee; c) Adopt a Resolution to approve and authorize the Chair to execute the Approval of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Grant Application for the Jalama Beach Water Recycling Feasibility Study; d) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to apply for a Water Recycling Program grant from SWRCB, for the Jalama Beach Water Recycling Feasibility Study; e) Authorize the Director of the Community Services Department, or designee, to execute and submit the grant contract, in a form substantially similar to the SWRCB contract terms and conditions and upon review and concurrence of County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, and Risk Manager or their designee if the SWRCB grant is awarded; and f) Determine that the above recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, finding that project involves only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the board has not approved, adopted, or funded but does require consideration of environmental factors.Passed · 4–0
Aye
A-8) 21-00037 Consider recommendations regarding Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Round 2 Applications for the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County Continuum of Care (CoC) and the County of Santa Barbara, as follows: a) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to submit a funding application and all certifications, standard forms, and other related documents to the State of California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency (BCSHA) to obtain the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC funding allocation in an amount up to $1,004,973.00 from the 2020 State of California HHAP Round 2 funding; b) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to submit a funding application and all certifications, standard forms, and other related documents to the BCSHA to obtain the County of Santa Barbara allocation in an amount up to $899,512.00 from the 2020 HHAP Round 2 funding; c) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to execute all certifications, standard forms, and grant agreement in a form substantially similar to the 2019 State of California HHAP grant agreement, and other related documents required for the acceptance and administration of HHAP Round 2 funds allocated to the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC; d) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to execute all certifications, standard forms, and grant agreement in a form substantially similar to the 2019 State of California HHAP grant agreement and other related documents required for the acceptance and administration of HHAP Round 2 funds allocated to the County of Santa Barbara; e) Authorize the Community Services Director, or designee, to sign a Letter of Support for the Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC to be included in the 2020 State of California HHAP application for Round 2 funding; and f) Determine that the recommended actions are not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5) and 15378(b)(4), finding that the recommended actions consist of administrative or fiscal activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.Passed · 4–0
2) 21-00048 HEARING - Consider Board of Supervisors’ 2021 appointments to Boards, Commissions and Committees, as follows: (EST. TIME: 15 MIN.) a) Adult and Aging Network - one Chair of the Policy Council and one Co-Chair; b) Area Agency on Aging (Central Coast Commission for Senior Citizens) - one regular member to Advisory Council; c) Beach Erosion Authority for Control Operations and Nourishment (BEACON) - two regular members, one alternate member; d) Behavioral Wellness Commission - one regular member; e) California State Association of Counties (CSAC) - one regular member, one alternate member; f) CenCal Health - one regular member; g) Child Care Planning Council - one regular member; h) CommUnify (formerly Community Action Commission of Santa Barbara County) - one regular member, one alternate member; i) Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Representative - one regular member; j) Debt Advisory Committee - one regular member, one alternate member; k) Elected Officials Committee on Regional Homelessness Solutions - two regular members; l) First Five Children and Families Commission of Santa Barbara County - one regular member, one alternate member; m) Indian Gaming Local Community Benefit Committee - two regular members; n) Juvenile Justice Coordination Council - two regular members, one North County, one South County; o) KIDS Network Policy Council - two members to serve as Chair and Vice-Chair; p) Law Library Board of Trustees - Chair as Ex-Officio Member; q) Legislative Program Committee - two regular members; r) Library Advisory Committee - one regular member; s) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) - two regular members and one alternate member; t) Multi-jurisdictional Solid Waste Task Force - two regular members; u) National Association of Counties (NACO) - one regular member, one alternate member; v) Psychiatric Health Facility Governing Board - one regular member, one alternate member; w) Retirement Board of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System - one regular member; x) The Funders Collaborative of Home for Good - two regular members; and y) Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act Board - one regular member. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICYVote recorded · 0–0