UnGovr Words

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

BOARD OF SUPERVISORSApril 19, 2011

Switch meeting
BodyBoard of Supervisors
MeetingRegular Meeting
Date📅 April 19, 2011

Click any transcript line to jump the video there.

Meeting Summary

  1. PendingQueued for transcription.
  2. AIYou are hereAuto-transcribed and summarized; not yet human-verified.
  3. VerifiedReviewed and corrected by a person.

This summary was AI-generated to save you time. It may miss or misstate details, so verify against the official recording and the transcript.

At a glance

Human Service Commission Funding

  • The Executive Director of the Family Service Agency testified that community-based programs prevent abuse and reduce county facility costs.
  • Data presented indicated that every dollar invested in these organizations generates eight to ten dollars in value.
  • The speaker requested the Board restore funding for the Human Service Commission in the upcoming budget year.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Animal Control and Adoption Policies

  • A speaker detailed recent difficulties with Santa Barbara and Lompoc Animal Control, including lost applications and denied adoption rights.
  • The speaker alleged discrimination and requested that charges be removed to restore local adoption rights.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Property Valuation and Informal Reviews

  • A County official reported receiving over 1,600 informal review requests in calendar year 2009.
  • The department adjusted over 20,000 properties downward based on its own valuation actions.
  • The official explained the goal to value property at the lower of market value or factored base value.
  • A motion was seconded, but no final vote outcome was recorded in this transcript segment.

Hollister Avenue Corridor Study

  • Public Works officials stated that federal funding was received to study the corridor for widening and circulation improvements.
  • A Project Study Report is being developed in conjunction with Long Range Planning and the Eastern Goleta Community Plan update.
  • The streetscape component will follow the Project Study Report, which is anticipated for completion by mid-spring 2012.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP)

  • Staff presented the CWPP process as a community-driven effort to address wildfire risks in the wildland-urban interface.
  • The Environmental Defense Center urged that CWPPs be subject to environmental review under CEQA prior to county sign-off.
  • The Board directed staff to develop a countywide process for the creation, review, and approval of CWPPs.
  • The Board voted to pass the item, directing the process be returned for adoption around June 21st.

Annual Work Plan and Brushing Ordinance

  • Staff presented the 2011-12 Annual Work Program, highlighting a 34% reduction in full-time equivalent staffing.
  • Public commenters urged the Board to prioritize narrow amendments to the brushing ordinance to trigger environmental review.
  • The Board engaged in a prioritization exercise, ranking the Winery Tiering Ordinance, Hollister streetscape, and Mission Hills/Vandenberg plan as high priorities.
  • The Board agreed to prioritize projects based on collective input, with the final order determined by staff tally.

Safe Haven Program / Safe Surrender Sites for Newborn Infants

  • The Fire Department proposed designating county fire stations as safe surrender sites for the Safe Start Newborn Infant Program.
  • Supervisors discussed the benefits of providing a safe alternative to abandoning infants and reducing public health risks.
  • The Board supported the program and directed staff to proceed with implementation, including public awareness efforts.
  • No specific vote count was recorded, but the Board supported the initiative.
No decision 0–0

Northern Lompoc Valley Comprehensive Plan

  • A homeowner criticized the current comprehensive plan as obsolete and argued that piecemeal planning reduces quality of life.
  • A resident expressed concern over piecemeal annexations and cumulative impacts on the Lompoc Uplands.
  • The speaker requested an updated comprehensive plan for the northern Lompoc Valley area.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Winery Ordinance

  • A speaker urged the Board to revise the winery ordinance, citing loopholes and ambiguity that cause friction between residents and the industry.
  • The speaker requested revisions to clarify allowed activities, improve enforcement, and increase penalties for violations.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Contract Mode

  • A representative for United Domestic Workers opposed the Department of Social Services’ proposal to not renew the contract mode for Addis Healthcare.
  • The speaker argued that eliminating the contract would result in higher long-term costs and job losses for caregivers.
  • The speaker requested a thorough cost analysis and urged the Board to consider the impact on vulnerable individuals.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Veterans Memorial Building Elevator Project

  • A speaker requested final approval for an elevator project at the Veterans Memorial Building to ensure ADA compliance.
  • Veterans groups raised $100,000 in matching funds for the project to improve accessibility for aging veterans.
  • The speaker argued the elevator is necessary for access to the ocean view room for meetings and functions.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Employees Giving Campaign

  • The CEO of United Way reported that 110 county employees served as volunteers for the campaign.
  • The pledge total exceeded $215,000 with nearly 800 employees participating financially.
  • The participation rate was 16%, an increase from 15% the previous year.
  • No motion, vote, or decision was recorded during this segment.

Goleta Revenue Neutrality / Loan Forgiveness

  • Public commenters requested the item be pulled for further review, citing concerns about the shift from a loan to full forgiveness.
  • Supervisors expressed uncertainty about the specific terms of the 2008 agreement and the current fiscal implications.
  • The Board decided to continue the item for three weeks to be heard in closed session.
  • The motion to continue the item passed.

General Services Appropriation ($836,000)

  • Public commenters requested the item be pulled to review the accounting of IT services consolidation and promised savings.
  • Staff explained that funds were transferred from a union concession account to fund positions retained due to union negotiations.
  • The item was discussed as part of the administrative agenda and approved.
  • The motion to approve the appropriation passed.

2011 Draft Annual Action Plan (HUD Grants)

  • Staff presented the 2011 Draft Annual Action Plan, representing the county’s formal federal grant application to HUD.
  • The plan covers Community Development Block Grant, Home Investment Partnerships Program, and Emergency Shelter Grant programs.
  • The Board approved the funding reservations included in the action plan and directed staff to finalize the plan for submission.
  • The motion to approve the plan passed.

Property Tax Appeal Fee

  • The Board discussed the fee for property tax appeals, with suggestions ranging from $50 to $65.
  • Staff noted that the assessor’s office provides free informal reviews and information.
  • The Board approved the fee, setting it at $65.
  • The motion to set the fee passed.

Administrative Agenda (General)

  • The Board reviewed the remaining items on the administrative agenda, including the approval of minutes from April 12, 2011.
  • The Board approved the administrative agenda as modified.
  • The motion to approve the agenda passed.

ESG Summary / Alamo Housing Community Development Awards

  • The Board discussed the ESG summary, noting that funding for the Alamo Housing Community Development Awards is contingent on a workout plan by September.
  • Questions were raised regarding the disposition of the $20,000 allocation if the workout plan is not completed by the deadline.
  • A motion was made to adopt the item with a modification to include the asterisk as stated on page 46 of the final plan.
  • The motion passed.

2011-2012 Annual Work Program and Midyear Report (Planning and Development)

  • Staff presented the Long Range Planning Division’s work program, noting consistency with county values and current budgetary constraints.
  • Staff reported a drop from 14.8 full-time equivalents to a submitted budget of 9.8 FTE for the next fiscal year.
  • The Board directed staff to continue work on current projects, required services, and operations management.
  • The Board directed staff to prioritize potential new projects based on available resources.

Resolutions and Recognitions

  • A resolution was presented to proclaim April as Autism Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County.
  • The board recognized the Santa Barbara County Courthouse Docents for their volunteer service.
  • A resolution was discussed to ensure all fire stations in the county participate in the Safety Surrendered Newborn Infant Program.
  • The resolutions were adopted.

Budget and Layoffs (Non-Agenda Item Comment)

  • A board member expressed concern that layoff notices were being sent without prior public workshops or board discussion.
  • The speaker criticized the timeline, noting that only three days in mid-June would remain for final budget discussions.
  • Other board members responded, noting that the budget process follows established procedures.
  • The discussion touched on the Brown Act limitations regarding debate on non-agendized items.

Resolution Honoring Kate School

  • A resolution was presented honoring Kate School for demonstrating exceptional environmental stewardship.
  • The resolution cited the school’s commitment to environmentally responsible education and low-impact development practices.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Resolution Proclaiming April 2011 as Autism Awareness Month

  • A resolution was presented proclaiming April 2011 as Autism Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County.
  • The resolution highlighted the prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders and the importance of early identification and treatment.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Resolution Proclaiming National Infant Immunization Week and Toddler Immunization Month

  • A resolution was presented proclaiming the week of April 23-30, 2011, as National Infant Immunization Week.
  • The resolution emphasized the cost-effectiveness of vaccines in preventing disease and the need for public awareness.
  • The resolution was passed and adopted.

Administrative Agenda Items

  • The Board considered budget revision requests from the County Executive Office.
  • The Board considered recommendations regarding the deleted Revenue Neutrality Agreement amendment.
  • The Board considered the adoption of a position designating county fire stations as safe surrender sites.
  • The Board received and filed summaries of 2010 annual health inspections of detention facilities.

Ordinance Amending Chapter 32 Article 4 (Assessment Appeals)

  • The Board considered an ordinance amending the County Code regarding assessment appeal fees.
  • Staff clarified that the fees are for the costs of the Clerk of the Board’s and CEO’s offices, not the Assessor’s Office.
  • The Board directed staff to amend the fee from $50 to $75 for applications with values less than $30 million.
  • The Board directed staff to provide statistics on assessment appeal cases.

CDBG Urban-County Partnership Draft 2011 Action Plan

  • The Board considered recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Home Consortium and CDBG Urban-County Partnership Draft 2011 Action Plan.
  • Public comments were received regarding funding for homeless outreach programs, specifically the St. Athanasius-St. Bridget’s program.
  • Requests were made to reevaluate funding levels for these programs.
  • No specific vote outcome was recorded in this segment.

Alcohol Beverage Control License Transfer

  • The Board considered the potential conditional withdrawal of the county’s protest regarding the transfer of an alcohol beverage license.
  • The license is held by the Santa Barbara Chumash Indians.
  • The Board directed staff to withdraw the matter at this time and reschedule it for a later date.
  • No specific vote outcome was recorded in this segment.

Closed Session

  • The Board decided to continue the Goleta Revenue Neutrality / Loan Forgiveness item for three weeks to be heard in closed session.
  • The motion to continue the item passed.

Full summary

Agenda Item: Human Service Commission Funding

  • Discussion: Bill Batty, Executive Director of the Family Service Agency, presented testimony regarding the partnership between the County of Santa Barbara and nonprofit community-based agencies. He noted that these programs prevent child and elder abuse, shelter the homeless, and reduce county jail and psychiatric facility costs. He cited data indicating that for every dollar invested, community-based organizations generate an average of eight to ten dollars in value. Batty requested that the Board restore Human Service Commission funding in the upcoming budget year, noting that the program was funded from reserve funds in the previous year but is not included in the current budget proposal.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Animal Control and Adoption Policies

  • Discussion: An unidentified speaker provided testimony regarding their experience with Santa Barbara and Lompoc Animal Control. The speaker described a positive adoption experience in the past but detailed recent difficulties, including lost applications, perceived rudeness from staff, and a denial of adoption rights by supervisor Michael Penna based on alleged rule violations. The speaker stated they complained to the Board of Supervisors and contacted Jan Glick, who provided contact information for out-of-county rescues. The speaker requested that the charges be removed and the right to adopt locally be restored, citing a broader countywide issue of discrimination.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Property Valuation and Informal Reviews

  • Discussion: A speaker (identified in the transcript as "Social Security," likely a mislabeling of a County Assessor or similar official) discussed the informal review process for property valuations. The speaker stated that over 1,600 informal requests were received in calendar year 2009, and over 20,000 properties were adjusted downward based on the department's own actions. The speaker explained the department's goal to value property at the lower of market value or factored base value and acknowledged that large neighborhoods may sometimes be missed.
  • Action: A motion was seconded. No vote outcome or final decision was recorded in this transcript segment.

Agenda Item: Hollister Avenue Corridor Study

  • Discussion: A speaker (identified in the transcript as "United Space Alliance," likely a mislabeling of a Public Works official) responded to Supervisor Wolf regarding the Hollister Avenue corridor. The speaker stated that Public Works received federal funding to study the corridor from Ahe to approximately 154 State Street for widening and circulation improvements. A Project Study Report (PSR) is being developed in conjunction with Long Range Planning and the Eastern Goleta Community Plan update. The speaker indicated that the streetscape component will follow the PSR, with the PSR anticipated for completion by the end of the calendar year or mid-spring 2012.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP)

  • Discussion:
  • Kevin Buckley, Fire Chief of the Painted Cave Fire Department, expressed support for the CWPP process, noting collaboration with County Fire and the Forest Service on clearing and community wildfire protection plans.
  • Ray Smith (identified in the transcript as "Ray Smith," but speaking as Brian Troutwine from the Environmental Defense Center) reviewed the staff report, CWPP handbook, and draft development process. Smith stated that CWPPs have the potential for significant environmental impacts, including vegetation removal, erosion, and sedimentation, and could affect over 40 special status species. Smith urged that CWPPs be subject to environmental review under CEQA prior to county sign-off and requested that the Environmental Defense Center be involved in the development process and the determination of the appropriate level of CEQA review.
  • Staff from the County Executive Office, Planning and Development, and Fire Department presented on the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans. They described CWPPs as community-driven efforts established under the Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 to address wildfire risks in the wildland-urban interface. The process involves convening stakeholders, mapping areas of concern, conducting risk assessments, and establishing priorities for fuel reduction and structural ignitability mitigation. Staff requested the Board to direct a working group to spend 60 days developing a countywide process for the creation, review, approval, and monitoring of CWPPs. Staff also requested a determination that this administrative process is exempt from CEQA requirements.
  • Staff presented the process for developing Community Wildfire Protection Plans, using the Mission Canyon CWPP as an example. Staff clarified that CWPPs serve two primary roles: surveying fire risks and summarizing best practices, and that they do not require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or establish ordinances such as buffers. Staff noted that the Mission Canyon plan is far along with minor changes needed. The board discussed the timeline for returning the process to the board, with staff recommending June 21st to ensure consistency with board direction.
  • Supervisors discussed the importance of uniform protocols with city fire departments and the need for minimal training for staff involved in child surrender programs (referenced in a separate context but discussed here regarding inter-agency cooperation). One Supervisor suggested sending a letter to city fire departments to encourage similar initiatives. Another Supervisor emphasized the need for consistency in decision-making and diplomacy with municipalities.
  • Motion: A motion was made to move forward with the item, incorporating Planning and Development into the core group and requesting the process be returned to the board no later than 60 days (sooner if possible).
  • Decision: The Board directed staff to develop the countywide CWPP process and return for adoption around June 21st.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed.

Agenda Item: Annual Work Plan and Brushing Ordinance

  • Discussion:
  • Ray Smith (speaking as Brian Troutwine from the Environmental Defense Center) addressed the annual work plan. Smith recommended dropping the "supplemental agricultural uses" program, stating that non-agricultural uses on ag land are inappropriate and that the Goleta and Gaviota plans are already addressing this issue.
  • Smith urged the Board to prioritize narrow amendments to the brushing ordinance to make permits discretionary, thereby triggering environmental review, while retaining exemptions for fire department directed clearing and agricultural clearing. Smith cited concerns about large-scale clear cuts causing erosion, flooding, and habitat loss, and noted that the county currently lacks tools to mitigate these impacts. Smith requested that the Board update the ordinance to better protect watersheds.
  • Staff presented the 2011-12 Annual Work Program, highlighting the prioritization of potential new projects due to budget constraints (14.8 current planners vs. 9.8 proposed). The board discussed specific projects, including the SB 375 pre-planning, the winery tiering ordinance, the Hollister Upper State Street streetscape improvement, the Mission Hills/Vandenberg Village plan, Montecito design guidelines, supplemental agricultural uses, San Inez Valley transportation, Los Alamos parking, and the brushing ordinance.
  • Winery Ordinance: Several board members and public speakers advocated for moving the winery tiering ordinance to the top priority due to community controversy and the need for clear rules.
  • Brushing Ordinance: Discussion centered on the scope of the project, with suggestions to narrow the scope to make permits discretionary and avoid a large stakeholder process. Staff confirmed an FTE calculation correction was needed.
  • Other Projects: The board discussed the status of the Hollister streetscape (already started), the Mission Hills/Vandenberg Village plan (long-standing request), and the Los Alamos parking plan.
  • Prioritization Exercise: The board engaged in a prioritization exercise, ranking the potential new projects from 1 to 8.
  • Supervisor Farr’s Ranking: 1. Winery Tiering Ordinance, 2. Hollister, 3. Ag, 4. Mission Hills/Vandenberg, 5. Montecito, 6. San Inez, 7. Brushing, 8. Los Alamos.
  • Supervisor Wolf’s Ranking: 1. Winery Ordinance, 2. Hollister, 3. Mission Hills/Vandenberg, 4. (Unspecified), 5. Montecito, 6. Brushing, 7. San Inez/Los Alamos, 8. Supplemental Ag.
  • Staff Tally: Staff reported the board’s collective priorities, noting that the top four items were generally agreed upon, with Montecito and Supplemental Ag being close in ranking.
  • Decision: The board agreed to prioritize the projects based on the collective input, with the Winery Tiering Ordinance, Hollister streetscape, and Mission Hills/Vandenberg plan receiving high priority. The specific final order was to be determined by the staff tally of the board's individual rankings.

Agenda Item: Safe Haven Program / Safe Surrender Sites for Newborn Infants

  • Discussion:
  • An unidentified speaker (likely a County Fire official) responded to Supervisor Carvajal’s questions regarding the Safe Haven program. The speaker confirmed that a program is in place with kits at fire stations containing information for site personnel and parents, including rights and health questionnaires. The speaker stated that all fire agencies in the county unanimously agreed to undertake the program.
  • The Fire Department presented a proposal to designate county fire stations as safe surrender sites for the Safe Start Newborn Infant Program. Supervisors discussed the program's benefits, including providing a safe alternative to abandoning infants and reducing public health risks associated with congregate housing for vulnerable populations. One Supervisor commended the Fire Department for its leadership in bringing the proposal forward. Another Supervisor suggested ensuring protocols are uniform with city fire departments and that staff receive minimal training on rights information and child transfer procedures to hospitals.
  • Decision: The Board supported the program and directed staff to proceed with implementation, including public awareness efforts.

Agenda Item: Northern Lompoc Valley Comprehensive Plan

  • Discussion:
  • John Pichuolo, a homeowner in Vandenberg Village, stated that the comprehensive plan for the northern Lompoc Valley is over 30 years old and obsolete. He criticized piecemeal and fragmented planning by the county and the City of Lompoc, arguing it reduces quality of life, creates traffic issues, and depletes groundwater. He requested an updated comprehensive plan for the area.
  • Carol Nash, a resident since 1961 and former member of the first GPAC, supported Pichuolo’s comments. She noted that residents of the Lompoc Uplands have never participated in a community plan update since the 1980 adoption. She expressed concern over piecemeal annexations, cumulative impacts, and the operation of a processing plant in the area, citing health and safety concerns.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Winery Ordinance

  • Discussion: Bob Field urged the Board to revise the winery ordinance, which he stated is seven years old and has loopholes that have been stretched. He argued that the current ambiguity causes friction between residents and the wine industry, consumes county staff time, and does not benefit the industry. Field requested revisions to clarify what is allowed, improve enforcement (particularly on weekends and evenings), and increase penalties for violations, which he described as trivial.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Contract Mode

  • Discussion: Yesenia DeCasaus, representing United Domestic Workers and AFSCME Local 3930, spoke on behalf of caregivers working for Addis Healthcare. She opposed the Department of Social Services’ proposal to not renew the contract mode for Addis Healthcare. She argued that eliminating the contract would result in higher long-term costs, job losses for caregivers who rely on steady schedules, and increased reliance on public services. She requested a thorough cost analysis and urged the Board to consider the impact on vulnerable elderly and disabled individuals.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Veterans Memorial Building Elevator Project

  • Discussion: An unidentified speaker (likely a DAV commander) requested final approval for an elevator project at the Veterans Memorial Building. The speaker stated that veterans groups raised $100,000 in matching funds for the project. The speaker argued that the elevator is necessary for ADA compliance, accessibility for aging veterans (Korean War and WWII veterans in their 70s and 80s), and to allow access to the ocean view room for meetings and functions.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Employees Giving Campaign

  • Discussion: Paul Didier, CEO of United Way of Santa Barbara County and campaign manager for the Employees Giving Campaign, reported on the campaign results. He stated that 110 county employees served as volunteers, and the pledge total exceeded $215,000 with nearly 800 employees participating financially. The participation rate was 16%, up from 15% the previous year. The Public Health Department had the highest total contribution. Additionally, 75 county employees contributed over 300 hours of volunteer time during United Way’s Day of Caring, and more than 40 employees volunteered for the Fund in the Sun Lunch Bunch program.
  • Action: No motion, vote, or decision was recorded.

Agenda Item: Goleta Revenue Neutrality / Loan Forgiveness

  • Discussion: Public commenters, including Andy Caldwell of COLAB, requested that the item be pulled for further review, citing concerns about the shift from a $1.5 million interest-free loan to a full forgiveness and questions regarding closed-session discussions. Supervisor Lavagnino expressed uncertainty about the specific terms of the 2008 agreement and the current fiscal implications, stating he would likely abstain or oppose without further clarification. Supervisor Carbajal expressed discomfort with the current board approving an agreement made by a previous board composition, suggesting the item be handled in closed session to recognize the prior agreement rather than simply approving a new expenditure.
  • Decision: The Board decided to continue the item.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed (Continued for three weeks to be heard in closed session).

Agenda Item: General Services Appropriation ($836,000)

  • Discussion: Public commenters, including Andy Caldwell of COLAB, requested the item be pulled to review the accounting of IT services consolidation and promised savings. Staff explained that the funds were transferred from a union concession account to General Services to fund positions that were retained due to union negotiations, preventing layoffs. Supervisor Lavagnino questioned the process, noting that the budget did not initially reflect these retained employees, leading to a shortfall. Staff confirmed this was a specific occurrence related to union concessions and not a standard annual practice.
  • Decision: The item was discussed as part of the administrative agenda.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed (Approved as part of the administrative agenda).

Agenda Item: 2011 Draft Annual Action Plan (HUD Grants)

  • Discussion: Staff presented the 2011 Draft Annual Action Plan, representing the county’s formal federal grant application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The plan covers three programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG). Staff detailed the funding availability, application processes, and committee recommendations for various projects, including affordable housing expansions and public services. Questions were raised regarding the contingency of funding for Lompoc shelters and the direct contractual relationship between HUD and certain agencies. Staff clarified that while the county submits the application, HUD contracts directly with some agencies, and funding expiration rules vary by program.
  • Decision: The Board approved the funding reservations included in the action plan and directed staff to finalize the plan for submission to HUD.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed.

Agenda Item: Property Tax Appeal Fee

  • Discussion: The Board discussed the fee for property tax appeals. Supervisor Lavagnino proposed setting the fee at $50, noting that $75 would place the county at the highest rate in the state. He suggested a middle ground of $55 or $60. Staff noted that the assessor’s office provides free informal reviews and information. A motion was made to set the fee at $65.
  • Decision: The Board approved the fee.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed (Fee set at $65).

Agenda Item: Administrative Agenda (General)

  • Discussion: The Board reviewed the remaining items on the administrative agenda, including the approval of minutes from April 12, 2011.
  • Decision: The Board approved the administrative agenda as modified.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed.

Board Member Reports

  • Supervisor Lavagnino: Reported on attending CSAC new supervisor training and meeting with Senator Tony Strickland.
  • Supervisor Carbajal: Reported on attending the CAC championship dinner and visiting with superintendents in the Santa Maria and Orcutt school districts regarding enrollment trends and school consolidation plans.
  • Supervisor Farr: Reported on informal community interactions at the market.
  • Supervisor Wolf: Reported on general activities.

Public Comment

  • Ray Smith (Mission Canyon Association): Spoke in support of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP), highlighting past grant successes in fuel reduction and requesting support for further grants to maintain defensible space.
  • Sandy Shobb (Autism Society of Santa Barbara): Spoke on behalf of the Autism Society, highlighting the increasing number of individuals with autism in California, the high lifetime cost of care, and the need for long-term planning for adult services, housing, and employment.
  • Rochelle Rose (People's Self-Help Housing): Thanked the Board for supporting funding recommendations for affordable housing projects in Carpinteria and Santa Maria.
  • Unidentified Speaker (Cate School): Accepted an award/recognition on behalf of Cate School, crediting a team effort involving county staff and contractors for environmental stewardship in facility construction.
  • Other Speakers: Various individuals provided comments on wildfire protection, budget priorities, and local issues.

Departmental Agenda

  • Discussion: The Board moved to the departmental agenda. A ten-minute break was taken. Upon return, the Board began reviewing Item 2, with staff providing clarifications on a memorandum related to the item.
  • Decision: The Board continued the discussion of Item 2 to allow for further review and public comment.
  • Vote Outcome: Passed (Continued).

Agenda Item: ESG Summary / Alamo Housing Community Development Awards

  • Discussion: The board discussed the ESG summary, specifically noting an asterisk on page 46 indicating that funding for the Alamo Housing Community Development Awards in the ESG category is contingent on a workout plan by September. Questions were raised regarding the disposition of the $20,000 allocation if the workout plan is not completed by the deadline, with options including reallocation, extension, or rollover. Additional questions addressed the county’s role in Continuum of Care Awards (Bridge House and Marks House) and whether those funds are also contingent on the workout plan.
  • Motion: A motion was made to adopt the item with a modification to include the asterisk as stated on page 46 of the final plan.
  • Vote: The motion passed.

Agenda Item: 2011-2012 Annual Work Program and Midyear Report (Planning and Development)

  • Discussion: Staff presented the Long Range Planning Division’s work program, noting consistency with county values and current budgetary constraints. The presentation detailed the transition from the 2010-2011 work program, which included 16 ongoing projects and four new projects added by the Board (Alcohol-Related Use Regulations, Santa Claus Lane Beach Access, Medical Marijuana Ordinance, and Mobile Home Park Conversion Ordinance). The Isla Vista Master Plan certification was noted as being transferred to the County Redevelopment Agency. Staff reported that the division completed nine major projects in the current fiscal year, including the Los Alamos Community Plan update.
  • Staff outlined staffing reductions, noting a drop from 14.8 full-time equivalents (FTE) to a submitted budget of 9.8 FTE for the next fiscal year, representing a 34% reduction. This includes the reallocation of one management position to the Redevelopment Agency and four FTE reductions in the submitted budget. Staff indicated that 10.08 FTE are required to maintain current projects and required services, leaving no capacity for new projects without additional funding. Staff requested Board guidance on prioritizing potential new projects, which were categorized into short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (3-5 years), and long-term (5-10 years) priorities. Short-term projects included economic development initiatives and implementation of adopted community plans. Mid-term projects included the 2015-2023 Housing Element and Circulation Element updates. Long-term projects included comprehensive updates to the Montecito, Orchid, and Toro Canyon community plans.
  • Supervisors discussed the staffing figures, with one Supervisor noting a discrepancy of 0.12 FTE between the required staffing for ongoing projects and the proposed budget. Another Supervisor requested clarification on the Mission Canyon Community Wildfire Protection Plan, noting it was listed in the mid-term section but is actually a benefit assessment process involving LAFCO and voter approval, separate from the standard planning process. Staff confirmed the Mission Canyon plan could be brought back as a separate item for adoption.
  • Decision: The Board directed staff to continue work on current projects, required services, and operations management, and to prioritize potential new projects based on available resources.

Agenda Item: Resolutions and Recognitions

  • Autism Awareness Month: A resolution was presented to proclaim April as Autism Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County. The resolution was adopted.
  • Immunization Month: A recognition was presented for Immunization Month.
  • Courthouse Docents: The board recognized the Santa Barbara County Courthouse Docents for their volunteer service, including providing walking tours and serving as county ambassadors.
  • Safety Surrendered Newborn Infant Program: A resolution was discussed to ensure all fire stations in the county participate in the Safety Surrendered Newborn Infant Program.
  • Revenue Neutrality Agreement: Discussion occurred regarding the revenue neutrality agreement with the City of Goleta. Board members expressed views on the agreement's resolution of past issues and the need for continued good faith cooperation. No new motion was recorded in this segment, but the topic was addressed in the context of ongoing intergovernmental relations.

Agenda Item: Budget and Layoffs (Non-Agenda Item Comment)

  • Discussion: A board member made a statement for the record regarding the 2011-12 budget adoption process. The statement expressed concern that layoff notices were being sent without prior public workshops or board discussion on service level reductions. The speaker criticized the timeline, noting that only three days in mid-June would remain for final budget discussions, which was described as insufficient for public input and creative problem-solving. Other board members responded, noting that the board had previously agreed to the revenue neutrality agreement and that the budget process follows established procedures. The discussion touched on the Brown Act limitations regarding debate on non-agendized items.

Adjournment

  • Decision: The meeting was adjourned.

Agenda Item: Resolution Honoring Kate School

  • Discussion: A resolution was presented honoring Kate School for demonstrating exceptional environmental stewardship. The resolution cited the school’s commitment to environmentally responsible education, low-impact development practices, and conservation of water, energy, and riparian habitats.
  • Decision: The resolution was passed and adopted.

Agenda Item: Resolution Proclaiming April 2011 as Autism Awareness Month

  • Discussion: A resolution was presented proclaiming April 2011 as Autism Awareness Month in Santa Barbara County. The resolution highlighted the prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders, the challenges faced by individuals and families, and the importance of early identification and treatment.
  • Decision: The resolution was passed and adopted.

Agenda Item: Resolution Proclaiming National Infant Immunization Week and Toddler Immunization Month

  • Discussion: A resolution was presented proclaiming the week of April 23-30, 2011, as National Infant Immunization Week and May 2011 as Toddler Immunization Month. The resolution emphasized the cost-effectiveness of vaccines in preventing disease and the need for public awareness.
  • Decision: The resolution was passed and adopted.

Agenda Item: Administrative Agenda Items

  • Item A-9 (Budget Revision Requests): The Board considered budget revision requests from the County Executive Office.
  • Item A-11 (Revenue Neutrality Agreement): The Board considered recommendations regarding the deleted Revenue Neutrality Agreement amendment.
  • Item A-13 (Safe Surrender Sites): The Board considered the adoption of a position designating county fire stations as safe surrender sites.
  • Item A-17 (Detention Facility Inspections): The Board received and filed summaries of 2010 annual health inspections of detention facilities. Public comments were received regarding compliance with state standards and public health risks.
  • Item A-18 (Preventive Maintenance): The Board continued the item regarding the 2010-11 countywide preventive maintenance application of scrub seal and microsurfacing to the May 17th meeting.

Agenda Item: Ordinance Amending Chapter 32 Article 4 (Assessment Appeals)

  • Discussion: The Board considered an ordinance amending the County Code regarding assessment appeal fees. Staff clarified that the fees are for the costs of the Clerk of the Board’s and CEO’s offices, not the Assessor’s Office.
  • Decision: The Board directed staff to amend the fee from $50 to $75 for applications with values less than $30 million and to provide statistics on assessment appeal cases.

Agenda Item: CDBG Urban-County Partnership Draft 2011 Action Plan

  • Discussion: The Board considered recommendations regarding the Santa Barbara County Home Consortium and CDBG Urban-County Partnership Draft 2011 Action Plan. Public comments were received regarding funding for homeless outreach programs, specifically the St. Athanasius-St. Bridget’s program, with requests to reevaluate funding levels.

Agenda Item: Alcohol Beverage Control License Transfer

  • Discussion: The Board considered the potential conditional withdrawal of the county’s protest regarding the transfer of an alcohol beverage license held by the Santa Barbara Chumash Indians.
  • Decision: The Board directed staff to withdraw the matter at this time and reschedule it for a later date.

Public Comment

  • Space Station Assembly: Bill Batty provided a comment referencing NASA Flight Engineer Ron Garan and Roscosmos Flight Engineer Alexander Samokutyaev. He described the experience of approaching the space station and noted the assembly by Canadarm2, stating that nations working together can achieve significant feats.
  • Assessor’s Office Fees: Bill Batty addressed the board regarding fees associated with corrections to issues created by the Assessor’s Office. He stated that he and others have been charged fees to correct errors originating from the office, describing this as a double charge. He reported being affected by such issues four times in the past ten years, citing arbitrary figures and a lack of satisfactory responses to inquiries. He requested that the board reconsider raising fees, arguing that the county should bear the cost of correcting problems it created, particularly given his status as a retiree on Social Security.